How Is The Introduction Section Structured?: Biology, Chemistry, and Physics
How Is The Introduction Section Structured?: Biology, Chemistry, and Physics
Research papers in these disciplines demand objectivity and impartiality. The introduction should
include background information on related experiments, data sets, explanations of technical
terms, and a statement about the significance of your study.
Social Sciences
The social sciences rely heavily on existing literature and are often founded on primary and
secondary research. Most social sciences also require extensive qualitative data analysis, as well
as accuracy and honesty in presenting information. Most social science introductions follow the
same structure outlined in this resource.
A good tip is to write the introduction of your research paper last so that
you have a clear idea of what you are introducing. When thinking about
the overall structure of the introduction section, it is helpful to visualize
the introduction as an upside-down triangle.
Start by broadly introducing the topic, then provide general background information, narrowing
to specific background research, and finally a focused research question, hypothesis, or thesis
statement (general to specific). Perhaps the best way to achieve this is by following the CARS
Model outlined below.
[Broad Introduction to Topic] There are an estimated 1.2–5.5 million snakebites annually
around the world, with approximately 20,000–94,000 attributed annual deaths [1]. [Broad
Background Context] The annual cost burden of snakebites is significant, and worldwide
morbidity and mortality represent a neglected global public health problem [1,2]. [Narrowing
the Topic] In the United States, there are approximately 7,000–10,000 annual emergency
department visits from snakebites [3], with 32–60% from venomous species, the majority
being pit vipers [3,4], and 5–7 annual fatalities per year [3–5]. [Indicating Importance of
Research] Individual expenses from antivenom and intensive care unit stays can cost upwards
of $153,000 for a single patient [6].
[Specific Background Context] Snakes are poikilothermic animals whose activities, life
cycle, and geographic distribution are closely tied to ambient temperature [7,8], and vary as a
result of climate change [9]. [Review of Recent Studies on Focused Topic] Global climate
change’s effect on flora and fauna has been scientifically documented [10]. There is at
minimum a 99% chance that average global temperatures have significantly increased since
1950 to present times [11], and this global warming or “climate energizing” frequently results
in increased extreme weather patterns [12,13].
[Step 1: Establishing a Territory] These fluctuations of extreme weather (both drought and
high precipitation) impact human health through an increase of natural disasters such as
[Further Specifying the Niche] There is some evidence for increased incidence of snakebites
with warming temperatures, however interpretation is limited to Central American
meteorological patterns [9], and the current literature on snakebites in the United States
provide limited insight into this relationship [3,18]. [Step 3: Occupying the Niche] With the
recent most severe drought and precipitation seasons ever recorded in California [19], we
sought to correlate the relationship of climate trends with snakebite incidence in California
over 20 years. [Stating Research Hypothesis] The study’s primary hypothesis was that the
severity of drought would correlate with increased incidence of snakebites and could be
predicted by weather patterns.
Source: Phillips C., Lipman G., Gugelmann H, Doering K., & Lung D., “Snakebites and climate
change in California, 1997-2017,” Clinical Toxicology, 2019.
Notice the author’s use of general to specific as they guided the reader to their focused research
hypothesis. This article uses quantitative data and statistics to provide background information
and context, but it also ties in the human experience by mentioning the health impacts and cost of
snakebites. Compare this quantitative approach to the qualitative example below, observing any
similarities and differences.
[Introducing Secondary Case Study] Anishnaabe of Shoal Lake in Northwestern Ontario use
succession management via landscape burning and timber harvest to promote biodiversity and
support local livelihoods (Berkes and Davidson-Hunt 2006). Indigenous forestry outside
North America includes managing sacred forest groves that promote bird diversity in Tibet
(Brandt et al. 2013) and agri-forestry practices by Yoruba in Nigeria that integrate cash crops
and trees, limiting soil erosion and increasing soil fertility (Warren and Pinkston 1998).
Indigenous Nations and nonindigenous forest and wildlife managers generally profess similar
goals typically centered around sustaining resource values and yields, biological diversity, and
ecosystem productivity despite some differences. [Occupying the Niche] Do these shared
goals lead to similar outcomes on the lands managed by these two groups? Here, we explore
that question within the specific context of northern Wisconsin where a mix of private
industrial, private nonindustrial, and county, state, and national public forestlands surround
four major “Indian reservations,” i.e., lands under jurisdiction of Indigenous Nations in the
U.S. (Fig. 1A).
[Stating Research Focus and Objectives] This study thus fits within existing literature
concerning the foundations and outcomes of indigenous forest and wildlife management. Our
focus here, however, is to quantify the ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife management
and links between the two. [Stating Research Question] That is, have the land-based values
and practices of indigenous peoples in Wisconsin led to significantly different ecological
Source: Waller, D., and Reo, N., “First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife
stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA,” Ecology and Society, 2018.
How did this example differ from the previous one? What writing tools did the author use, and
were they effective? Rather than an inverted triangle structure, which moves from general to
specific, this author opted for an hourglass structure, moving from broad, to specific, then back
to broad. While this introduction still follows the CARS Model, Step 3 is separated from Steps 1
and 2 with case studies and background information.
Examine the introductions, noting the similarities and differences. How are the introductions
organized, and what information do they convey? Are the introductions long or short?
Next, find one more reputable journal within your discipline, repeating the same process to find
three more articles. Do they follow the same structure as the previous journal? If not, what is
different? These observations will further guide you in writing strong introductions that adhere to
the standards of your academic discipline.
To take it a step further, find author guidelines for your selected journals to ensure that your
research paper will have what it takes to get published should you choose.
References
Ferguson, Jason. “Writing Across the Disciplines (for Students and Writing Assistants).”
Learning Commons.
https://www.up.edu/learningcommons/files/overview-of-writing-across-the-disciplines.pd
f. Accessed 7 January 2023.
Germanna. “Writing a Formal Research Paper in the Social Sciences.” Academic Center for
Excellence.