Classical Free Electron Theory
Classical Free Electron Theory
UNIT – 1
ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
CONTENTS
1.5. Classical Free Electron theory
The average distance travelled by a free electron in any two successive collisions
is known as mean free path.
𝜆 = 𝑉𝑑 𝜏𝑐
Collision time
The average time taken by a free electron in any two successive collisions is
called collision time.
𝜏𝑐 = 𝜆⁄𝑉
𝑑
Relaxation time
Average time taken by a free electron to reach its equilibrium state from
disturbed state due to the application of an electrical field is known relaxation time.It is
approximately equal to 10-14 s.
Mobility
The drift velocity acquired by the electron per unit applied electrical field to it.
𝑉𝑑
𝜇= 𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑆 −1 )
𝐸
1.5.2. Electrical Conductivity
The amount of electrical charges conducted per unit time across unit area per unit
applied electrical field is known as electrical conductivity.
𝑄
𝜎=
𝑡𝐴𝐸
𝐼
𝜎= (∵ 𝑄⁄𝑡 = 𝐼)
𝐴𝐸
𝐽
𝜎= (∵ 𝐼 ⁄𝐴 = 𝐽)
𝐸
𝐽 = 𝜎𝐸
Derivation of Electrical Conductivity of metals
Consider a metal conductor of ‘XY’ and ‘E’ is the applied electric field to it. The
electron moves in opposite directions to the applied field with a velocity𝑉𝑑 .
Let ‘n’ be the number of free electrons per unit volume.
𝑉𝑑 = 𝑎𝜏 … … … … . (3)
From the Newton’s second law of motion, the force on the electron,
𝐹 = 𝑚𝑎 … … … … … . (4)
Equate equations (2) and (4) we have,
−𝑒𝐸 = 𝑚𝑎
−𝑒𝐸
𝑎= … … … … … (5)
𝑚
Substitute Eqn. (5) in Eqn. (3) we get,
−𝑒𝐸𝜏
𝑉𝑑 = … … … … … . . (6)
𝑚
𝑛𝐸𝑒 2 𝜏
𝐽=
𝑚
𝐽 𝑛𝑒 2 𝜏
=
𝐸 𝑚
𝑛𝑒 2 𝜏
𝜎= … … … … . (7) (∵ 𝜎 = 𝐽⁄𝐸 )
𝑚
We find that with increase of electron concentration ‘n’, the conductivity ‘σ’ is
increases. As ‘m’ increases the motion of the electron becomes slow and hence the
conductivity ‘σ’ decreases.
Co-efficient of electrical conductivity
The quantity of electricity flowing per unit area per unit time maintained at unit
potential gradient.
𝐽 = 𝜎𝐸
𝐼
= 𝜎𝐸
𝐴
If A=1; E=1, then,
𝐼=𝜎
1.5.3. Thermal Conductivity
The amount of heat conducted by the conductor is
𝑑𝑇
𝑄 = 𝐾𝐴 𝑡
𝑑𝑥
𝑄
𝐾= 𝑑𝑇
… … … … … (1)
𝐴 (𝑑𝑥 ) 𝑡
Where,
K → is the thermal conductivity
A → is the area of cross section
t → is the time of flow of heat
𝑑𝑇
→ Temperature gradient
𝑑𝑥
The amount of heat conducted per unit time per unit area of cross section per unit
temperature gradient.
If A = 1; t = 1, then eqn. (1) becomes
𝑄
𝐾= 𝑑𝑇
𝑑𝑥
𝑑𝑇
𝑄=𝐾 … … … … … . . (2)
𝑑𝑥
Let us assume that, there is an equal probability for the electrons to move in all
six directions shown in given figure.
Each electrons travels with thermal velocity ‘v’ and ‘n’ is the free electrons per
unit volume. Then 1/6 nv electrons travel in any one of the directions per unit area per
unit time.
Number of electrons crossing per unit area per unit time A to B is
1
= 𝑛𝑣
6
The excess of energy carried from A to B per unit area in unit time is
1 3
= 𝑛𝑣 × 𝐾𝐵 𝑑𝑇
6 2
1
= 𝑛𝑣𝐾𝐵 𝑑𝑇 … … … … . . (6)
4
Similarly, the deficient of energy carried from B to A per unit area per unit time
1
= − 𝑛𝑣𝐾𝐵 𝑑𝑇 … … … … … . (7)
4
Hence, the net amount of energy transferred from A to B per unit area per unit
time.
1 1
𝑄 = 𝑛𝑣𝐾𝐵 𝑑𝑇 − (− 𝑛𝑣𝐾𝐵 𝑑𝑇)
4 4
1
𝑄 = 𝑛𝑣𝐾𝐵 𝑑𝑇 … … … … … . (8)
2
We know that for the metals, the collision time is equal to the relaxation time.
𝜆 = 𝑣𝜏 … … … … … . (10)
Substitute eqn. (10) in eqn. (9) we have,
1
𝐾 = 𝑛𝑣𝐾𝐵 𝑣𝜏
2
1
𝐾 = 𝑛𝑣 2 𝐾𝐵 𝜏 … … … … … (11)
2
𝐾 3 𝐾𝐵 2
= 𝐿𝑇 … … … … … … (5) (∵ 𝐿 = ( ) )
𝜎 2 𝑒
PH 8252- PHYSICS FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE
ROHINI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
𝐾
𝐿= … … … … … … . . (1)
𝜎𝑇
3 𝐾𝐵 2
𝐿= ( ) … … … … … … … . (2)
2 𝑒
2
3 1.38 × 10−23
𝐿= ( )
2 1.602 × 10−19
Hence, it was found that the classical value of Lorentz number is only half of the
experimental value, i.e., L = 2.44×10-8 WΩK-2. This discrepancy in the experimental
and theoretical value of Lorentz number is the failure of classical theory. This was
rectified by quantum theory.
According to the quantum theory, electrons near the Fermi level alone contribute
towards thermal and noble conductions. Using quantum free electron theory model, the
electronic specific heat value is given by
𝑛𝜋 2 𝐾𝐵2 𝑇
𝐶𝑣 = … … … … … . (4)
𝑚𝑣 2
Thermal conductivity is
1
𝐾 = 𝐶𝑣 𝑣 2 𝜏 … … … … … … (5)
3
Substitute equation (4) in (5) we get,
𝑛𝜋 2 𝐾𝐵2 𝑇𝑣 2 𝜏
𝐾=
3𝑚𝑣 2
𝑛𝜋 2 𝐾𝐵2 𝑇𝜏
𝐾= … … … … . (6)
3𝑚
The electrical conductivity is
𝑛𝑒 2 𝜏
𝜎= … … … … … … . . (7)
𝑚
From equations (6) and (7) we get,
2
𝑛𝜋2 𝐾𝐵 𝑇𝜏
𝐾 3𝑚
= 𝑛𝑒 2 𝜏
𝜎
𝑚
𝐾 𝑚𝑛𝜋 2 𝐾𝐵2 𝑇𝜏
=
𝜎 3𝑚𝑛𝑒 2 𝜏
𝐾 𝜋 2 𝐾𝐵 2
= ( ) 𝑇
𝜎 3 𝑒
𝐾 𝜋 2 𝐾𝐵 2
= ( )
𝜎𝑇 3 𝑒
𝐾
=𝐿 … … … … … … . (8)
𝜎𝑇
𝜋 2 𝐾𝐵 2
𝐿= ( )
3 𝑒
Substitute the values of KB = 1.38 × 10-23 JK-1and e = 1.602 × 10-19 C in equation
(2), we have,
2
(3.14)2 1.38 × 10−23
𝐿= ( )
3 1.602 × 10−19
This value is in good agreement with the experimental value. The Widemann Franz
law is not appreciable at very low temperature.