Scribd
Upload
388 views3 pages

Draft of Reply To Your Notice Under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - BareLaw - in

NI Legal draft

Uploaded by

Ram V
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
388 views3 pages

Draft of Reply To Your Notice Under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - BareLaw - in

NI Legal draft

Uploaded by

Ram V
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
SUB: REPLY TO YOUR LEGAL NOTICE U/S 138 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT. 1881 Dear Sir, Your legal notice dated 09.06.2015 has been placed before me by my client Sh. .+.at Connaught Place, New Delhi -110001 and I, the undersigned, have been instructed to reply to your SaigiRotice by my client on his behalf as ly deserves to be withdrawn, with an tional by nt {Bkofihse the claim made by you is witho is and 1 GAsed u | as no claim is made out against my client and it ‘or of yol B. That. in fact, my client did not place an order for the supply of any machines whatsoever, as alleged by you. But, with a view to disposing of your old stock of outdated machines, you requested my client to place them at his shop for sale. Keeping in view old relations my client agreed to your client’s proposal, which was subject to the condition that payment would be made only after those machines were sold out. However. those machines were not only outdated but were also mechanically faulty, because of which till date they are lying with my client, which your client is at liberty to take back with two days prior notice. It is pertinent to mention here that the cheque in question was handed over by my client blank and the same was to be used only upon instructions of my client after he could sold out all those machines. C. That, however, your client has cheated my client by misusing that cheque which is not in the handwriting of my ction MD racer of fact, your client has 1o your client nee _ Rather, One as misused that blank cheque with ulter ives, REPLY ON MERITS» 1. That the contents of para 1 oh legal n¢ MAF one and denied and whatsoever is stated above is reiterated. It is denied that my client purchased from you client any machines whatsoever. Rather, my client helped your client to keep your machines in his godown/shop for disposal. Therefore, it is denied that the cheque in question was issued in discharge of any liability towards my client, as alleged in this para. 2. That the contents of Para 2 are denied for want of knowledge. However, it is reiterated that my client ever issued any cheque, in the manner as alleged by you. 3. That, in reply to para 3 of your legal notice, what is stated above is reiterated. It is submitted that your client was not entitled to use that cheque for encashment and deposit the same in his bank. 4. That the contents of para’s 4 &5 are denied for want of knowledge. However. it is reiterated that any cheque Was issued in discharge of any liability towards my client to your client. 5. That the contents it is denied that my said notice une: nt in any frivolous litigation, whicl lent sl longiiaidied to contest the same, besides proceedi tO tun sions of law, at the costs, risks, and consesweige ur W.. Yours Sincerely. Advocate The copy is kept in my office for future reference and use.

You might also like