1.

If the offended party dies before he is able to file a complaint, can his heirs
file it in his behalf? Explain (5 pts)

Yes, heirs can file a complaint on behalf of the deceased offended party in the
Philippines. Here are the legal bases:

1. Civil Code of the Philippines:

Article 262 of the Civil Code states that heirs can exercise the rights of the
deceased regarding torts or delicts. It indicates that wrongful acts that cause
injury can be pursued by the heirs after the death of the offended party.

2. Criminal Procedure:
Under Article 29 of the Revised Penal Code, if the offended party dies before
the filing of the criminal complaint, their legal heirs may file the complaint. This
allows for the continuation of criminal actions even after the death of the
person directly harmed.

3. Civil Remedies:
The heirs can claim damages under the principle of "actio personae" where
the rights to claim damages as a result of the wrongful act or omission survive
the death of the person injured (Article 29 and Article 2206 of the Civil Code).

In summary, heirs have the standing to file complaints for both civil and criminal
cases if the offended party cannot do so due to death, as provided by Philippine law.

2. What is a prejudicial question? Give its elements (10 pts)

In Philippine law, a prejudicial question is a legal issue that must be resolved before
a court can proceed with another case. It is primarily important in the context of
criminal and civil cases. Here are the key elements of a prejudicial question:

1. Existence of a Question of Law or Fact:

There must be a separate question of law or fact that needs to be resolved
before the main case can proceed.

2. Relationality:
The prejudicial question must be directly related to the case being suspended
and must affect the ultimate outcome of that case.

3. Final Resolution Required:

The resolution of the prejudicial question must be necessary for the resolution
of the main case.

4. Pending Action:
There is typically a pending action that raises the prejudicial question, and it
would require resolution in a court.

Page 1 of 9
 Legal Bases:

1. Article 36 of the Civil Code:

This addresses the effects of the filing of a prejudicial question affecting the
civil action.

2. Section 6, Rule 111 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure:

This section specifies the procedure when a prejudicial question arises in a
criminal case and how it must be resolved before proceeding with the case.

3. Case Law:
Precedents set by the Supreme Court also elaborate on the application and
significance of prejudicial questions in various cases.

3. Can a prosecutor be compelled to file a particular complaint or

information? Is this rule absolute? Discuss (10 pts)

Discretion of Prosecutors: Prosecutors have the discretion to determine whether

there is enough evidence to file a complaint or information. This is anchored in
their role as representatives of the State, which requires them to assess the merit
of cases.

 Legal Basis:

1. Section 16, Rule 112 of the Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure grants
prosecutors the discretion to file a complaint if evidence warrants it.

2. People v. Esguerra (G.R. No. 183310, July 5, 2010) establishes that

prosecutors are given discretion and are not compelled to file cases based
solely on the request of a complainant.

 Limits to Discretion:

1. While prosecutors have discretion, this does not mean their decision is
absolute.

2. There can be grounds for review or complaint if the prosecutor's decision

appears arbitrary or capricious.

3. Administrative remedies exist, wherein a complainant can seek remedy

from the Department of Justice (DOJ) if they believe the prosecutor has
failed to perform their duty.

 Public Interest:

Page 2 of 9
 Ultimately, the decision to file charges should align with the promotion of
public interest and justice.

4. When is a complaint or information deemed sufficient? (10 pts)

In the Philippines, a complaint or information is deemed sufficient when it meets

certain requirements outlined in the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure. Here are
the key points:

 Essential Elements: According to Section 6, Rule 110 of the Revised Rules of

Criminal Procedure, a complaint or information must contain:

1. The title of the action.

2. The name of the accused.
3. The designation of the offense.
4. The acts or omissions constituting the offense.
5. The name of the offended party (if applicable).
6. The place of the commission of the offense.
7. The date of the commission of the offense.

 Jurisdiction and Specificity:

The information must state the ultimate facts constituting the offense, providing
enough information for the accused to understand the charge.

 Legal Basis:
Revised Penal Code and Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure govern the
sufficiency of a complaint or information in the Philippines.

5. What is the effect of the failure of the accused to object to a duplicitous

information? (5 pts)

In the context of Philippine law, the failure of an accused to object to a duplicitous

information (which contains two or more distinct charges in one count) can have the
following effects:

1. Waiver of Objection:
If the accused fails to raise an objection to the duplicity before entering a plea,
they may be considered to have waived their right to contest it. This means
the accused cannot later argue that the information was defective due to its
duplicitous nature.

2. Proceeding with Trial:

The trial will generally proceed on the basis of the information as it was filed.
The court may continue with the case without addressing the issue of duplicity
if no objection was made.

Page 3 of 9
 3. Potential for Confusion:
While it's not grounds for dismissal, a duplicitous information can lead to
confusion in the proceedings and may affect the understanding of the specific
charges against the accused.

Legal Basis:
1. Rule 117 (Motions to Quash)
2. Rule 113 (Prosecution of Offenses).

6. Give at least 2 differences between amendment and substitution of

Information (5 pts)

Amendment:
Involves correcting or modifying parts of the information without changing the
essence of the charge. This can include changes in date, time, or other details that
do not alter the nature of the offense.

Substitution:
Involves replacing the entire charge or information with a new one, which may
change the nature of the offense being charged. This generally occurs when there is
a significant change in facts that warrants a different charge.

Legal Basis:

 Amendment: Governed by Section 14 of Rule 110 of the Revised Rules of

Criminal Procedure, which allows for amendments to the information before or
during the trial.

 Substitution: Governed by Section 14(b) of the same rule, which allows for
substitution of information when there’s a substantial change in the facts
constituting the offense after the information was filed.

7. When should reservation to file a separate civil action be made (5 pts)

In Philippine law, a reservation to file a separate civil action should be made at the
time of filing a responsive pleading to a complaint. This is to ensure that the party
retains the right to pursue a separate case while addressing the current matter in
court.

Legal Basis

1. Rule 6, Section 5 of the Rules of Court: A party may reserve the right to file a
separate civil action at the time of filing its responsive pleading.

Page 4 of 9
 2. Provisions on Joinder of Causes of Action: The rules allow a party to separate
claims when it is not convenient or possible to join them due to various
reasons, including legal strategy or procedural considerations.

8. What is the effect of an acquittal on the civil action (10 pts)

In the Philippines, an acquittal in a criminal case has specific implications for any
related civil action. Here are the key effects:

1. Separate Proceedings:
The acquittal does not necessarily extinguish the civil liability that may arise
from the same act. Civil and criminal cases are treated separately under
Philippine law.

2. No Ongoing Criminal Liability:

If acquitted, the accused cannot be punished for the same offense; however,
this does not prevent filing a civil suit for damages.

3. Article 29 of the Civil Code:

The law states that an acquittal in a criminal case shall not bar the filing of civil
action for damages.

4. Presumption of Innocence:
An acquittal reinforces the presumption of innocence, meaning the accused is
not legally considered liable for damages simply because they were acquitted.

5. Civil Action Outcome:

The outcome of the civil suit may still rely on different standards of proof as
civil cases require a preponderance of evidence as opposed to the higher
"beyond reasonable doubt" standard in criminal cases.

Legal Basis
:
1. Rule 111, Section 1 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure states that
criminal prosecutions are separate from civil actions arising from the same
act.

2. Article 29 of the Civil Code provides that an acquittal in a criminal case does
not bar civil action for damages.

9. When is warrantless arrest lawful? (10 pts)

Warrantless arrests in the Philippines are lawful under certain conditions, as

stipulated in the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure and jurisprudence. Here are
the key points:

Page 5 of 9
Context of Arrest: According to Rule 113, Section 5 of the Revised Rules of Criminal
Procedure, a warrantless arrest is justified under the following circumstances:

1. In Flagrante Delicto: When the person to be arrested is caught in the act of

committing a crime.

2. Under Standing Warrant: If the crime has just been committed and the person
to be arrested is about to escape or has just escaped.

3. Preventing Escapes: When the arresting officer has probable cause to believe
that the person has committed an offense and is likely to escape.

Legal References:

1. Constitution: Article 3, Section 2 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution provides

that no person shall be arrested except upon a warrant issued by a judge.

2. Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure: Rule 113, Section 5 outlines the

specific scenarios where warrantless arrests are permissible.

10. When should any question on the legality/illegality of a person's arrest be

raised? Discuss (5 pts)

Questions regarding the legality or illegality of a person’s arrest should typically be

raised immediately, preferably at the time of the arrest or shortly thereafter. Here are
the key points:

Timing of Raising Questions:

1. At the Time of Arrest: An individual has the right to question the legality of their
arrest as soon as it occurs. This can be done verbally, by requesting to see a
warrant if applicable.

2. During Arrest Proceedings: If detained without a warrant, a person should raise

these questions during initial proceedings, such as arraignment or preliminary
investigations.

Legal Basis:

1. Constitutional Rights: Article 3, Section 2 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution

guarantees that no person shall be arrested except upon a warrant issued by a
judge, thereby allowing individuals to contest any unlawful arrest.

2. Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure:

Page 6 of 9
 a) Rule 113, Sec. 4 states that an arrest may only be made under lawful
circumstances, allowing individuals to challenge the legality if those
circumstances are not met.

b) Rule 116, Section 1 provides that a motion to quash (challenge the legality of
the arrest) can be raised in the court.

Consequences of a Delay:
Delaying the challenge to legality may affect the admissibility of evidence or the
ability to seek remedy for unlawful arrest, reinforcing the need for prompt action.

11. You are charged with homicide; you put up bail, then you escaped; you are
then later re-arrested. All these before conviction. Can you set up bail?
Discuss (5 pts)

 Escaping After Bail:

In the Philippines, escaping from custody while on bail creates serious legal
consequences. Under Article 222 of the Revised Penal Code, a person who
escapes after having been admitted to bail commits a crime and can be charged
as a fugitive.

 Bail and Re-Arrest:

If you were re-arrested after escaping, your ability to secure bail again may be
affected. According to Rule 114 of the Rules of Court, one of the grounds for
denial of bail is that the accused is a flight risk.

1. Conditions for Bail: The court typically evaluates:

2. The nature of the offense (in this case, homicide).
3. The strength of the evidence against you.
4. Your ties to the community.
5. The likelihood of you fleeing again.

 Legal Basis:

1. Rule 114, Section 7 of the Rules of Court states that if you escape, it can be a
basis for the denial of your application for bail.

2. Additionally, under Article 29 of the Revised Penal Code, the penalty is

increased for fugitives from justice.

In summary, while it's technically possible to file for bail again after re-arrest, it is
very likely that the court will deny it based on your prior escape. It’s advisable to
seek legal counsel to navigate this complex situation.

12. When is a bail hearing necessary? (10 pts)

Page 7 of 9
A bail hearing in the Philippines is necessary in the following situations:

1. Initial Arrest:
When a person is arrested, they may request a bail hearing to secure
temporary release until trial or further proceedings.

2. Charges Involving Non-Bailable Offenses:

If you are charged with a non-bailable offense (e.g., certain serious crimes like
treason, murder), a bail hearing is essential to assess whether bail should still
be granted.

3. Motion for Bail:

If a defendant has already been charged and wishes to challenge the decision
regarding bail or if conditions have changed (e.g., new evidence), a formal
hearing may be required.

4. When Bail Is Denied Initially:

If bail is denied at the outset, the accused can file a motion for reconsideration
and request a bail hearing to present reasons why bail should be granted.

5. Within the Prisoner's Right to Bail:

Pursuant to Section 1, Article III of the Philippine Constitution, all persons
have the right to bail, implying that a hearing should be scheduled unless
specified otherwise by law.

In most cases, the court sets the hearing to evaluate the circumstances surrounding
the case, the nature of the charges, and any risk involved in releasing the accused
from custody.

13. Under Rule 114, where should bail be filed? Discuss (10 pts)

Under Rule 114 of the Rules of Court in the Philippines, the following outlines where
bail should be filed:

1. Court Where the Case is Pending:

Bail must be filed in the court where the criminal case is pending against the
accused. This is specified in Rule 114, Section 3, which states:
"Bail shall be filed with the court in which the criminal case is pending."

2. Regional Trial Court (RTC):

If the case is filed in a Regional Trial Court, the bail must be lodged in that
specific RTC.

3. Municipal Trial Court (MTC):

Similarly, if the case is pending in a Municipal Trial Court, the bail application
should be filed in that court.

Page 8 of 9
 4. Bail for Offenses Under Local Government Ordinances:
If the charge is under a local ordinance, the appropriate Local or Municipal
Trial Court should be the venue for filing the bail.

5. Filing of Bail for Non-Bailable Offenses:

Even in cases considered non-bailable, the bail application should be initiated
in the same court as defined in Rule 114, Section 1, indicating the necessity
of following proper procedure even when facing severe charges.

In summary, the correct venue for filing bail is the court that has jurisdiction over the
case. This ensures that the bail proceedings are handled in accordance with the
local laws and regulations governing the specific jurisdiction.

Page 9 of 9