Grading Analysis For GSB

Morth 5th Revision

Project NCR BIG BOX Format No.

Client ISPL Date of Rev .

Contractor PISL Page

GSB

SAMPLE NO : DATE OF TESTING : 11.06.2024

MATERIAL SOURCE : CHARKHI DADRI SAMPLE LOCATION : From Truck

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

15000GM
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: SAMPLED BY : BITTU KUMAR SINGH

S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM)

Weight % weight Cumulative % Cumulative % Morth 5th Revision
Retained retained Retained Passing Table No-400-1 & 2

1 75 0 0 0 100 100

2 53 251 5.02 5.02 94.98 80-100

3 26.5 4018 26.79 31.81 68.19 55-90

4 9.5 2272 15.15 41.93 58.07 35-65

5 4.75 2284 15.23 57.16 42.84 25-55

6 2.36 2108 14.05 71.21 28.79 20-40

7 0.425 2251 15.01 86.22 13.78 10-.15

8 0.075 1501 10.01 96.23 3.77 0-5

9 Pan 315 2.10 -

REMARKS :-

Singnature PISL Signature ISPL

 Grading Analysis For WMM

Morth 5th Revision

Project NCR BIG BOX Format No.
Client ISPL Date of Rev .
Contractor PISL Page

WMM

SAMPLE NO : 01 DATE OF TESTING : 14.09.2023

MATERIAL SOURCE : Charkhi Dadri SAMPLE LOCATION : Site

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: 5000 GM SAMPLED BY : ROHIT YADAV

Cumulative
S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM) Weight Retained
% weight Cumulative % Morth 5th Revision
% Passing
retained Retained Table No-400-1 & 2

1 53 0 0 0 100 100

2 45 0 0 0 100 95-100

3 22.4 1377 27.54 27.54 72.46 60-80

4 11.2 1020 20.4 47.94 52.06 40-60

5 4.75 802 16.04 63.98 36.02 25-40

6 2.36 695 13.9 77.88 22.12 15-30
7 0.6 628 12.56 90.44 9.56 8-022
8 0.075 344 6.88 97.32 2.68 0-5

9 Pan 134

REMARKS :-

Singnature PISL Signature ISPL

 Grading Analysis For Coarse Aggregates

IS:383

Project Format No.

Contract Rev.No. 0

Date of
Client
Rev .

Contractor Page 1 Of 1

AGGREGATE TYPE: 40 MM

SAMPLE NO : DATE OF TESTING :

MATERIAL SOURCE : SAMPLE LOCATION :

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: SAMPLED BY :

Cumulative
Weight % weight Cumulative %
S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM)
Retained retained
% Retained
Passing Limits as per IS 383

1 63 100

2 40 95-100

3 20 30-70

4 10 10-35

5 4.75 0-5

6 Pan -

REMARKS :-

Singnature of Contractor Signature of Client PDIL Signature of Client IOCL

 V
i
l
l
a
s
Grading Analysis For Coarse Aggregates
a
t

S
e IS:383
c
Project tNCR BIG BOX PATLI Format No.
o
r
Contract Rev.No.
1
1
Client ISPL Date 17.10.2024
&
Contractor :PISL
Skyline Engineering Contracts (India) Pvt. Ltd. Page
1
4
,
V
i
l
l AGGREGATE TYPE: 20 MM
a
g
e

SAMPLE NO : 1 R DATE OF TESTING : 17.10.2024

a
i
p
u
r
MATERIAL SOURCE : DULHEDA
, (Narnol) SAMPLE LOCATION :TRUCK
S
o
h
n
DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: a INTENDED USE :

,
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: D 3000 SAMPLED BY : BITTU KUMAR SINGH
i
s
t
t
.
Weight % weight Cumulative % Cumulative %
S.No G I.S Sieve Size (MM)
Retained retained Retained Passing Limits as per IS 383
u
r
g
1 a 40 Err:522 0 0 100 100
o
n
2 20 286 9.53 9.53 90.47 85-100
(
H
3 a 10 2456 81.87 91.40 8.60 0-20
r
y
4 4.75 224 7.47 98.87 1.13 0-5
a
n
5 a Pan 34 1.13 100.00 -
)

REMARKS :-

Singnature of PISL Signature of ISPL

 Grading Analysis For Coarse Aggregates
IS:383
Project NCR BIG BOX PATLI

: Civil and Rough Finishes Work for

Villas at Sector 11 & 14,Village
Contract
Raipur,Sohna ,Distt.Gurgaon
(Haryana)

Client ISPL

Contractor: Skyline Engineering Contracts (India)PISL

AGGREGATE TYPE: 20 MM

SAMPLE NO : 1 DATE OF T

MATERIAL SOURCE : DULHEDA (Narnol) SAMPLE LO

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: 3000 SAMPLED B
Cumulati
Weight % weight ve %
S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM)
Retained retained Retained
1 40 Err:522 0 0
2 20 132 4.40 4.40
3 10 2732 91.07 95.47
4 4.75 118 3.93 99.40
5 Pan 18 0.60 100.00
REMARKS :-

Singnature of PISL Signatur

e Aggregates

Format No.

Rev.No.

Date 12.10.2023

Page

: 20 MM

12.10.2023

FROM TRUCK

INTENDED USE :
ROHIT YADAV

Cumulative %
Passing Limits as per IS 383
100 100
95.60 85-100
4.53 0-20
0.60 0-5
-

Signature of ISPL
 NCR BIG BOX PATLI

CHECK LIST FOR MATERIAL INSPECTION

VENDOR NAME: DATE OF
INSPECTI
: ON

Name of the
:
project
Package :
Material
:
Description
Quantity as per DC :
D.C No & date :
Date of receipt at
:
Site
Batch No :

S.NO. ACTION Result REMARKS

Y N NA
1 Check for specifications as per Tender
2 Manufacturer certificate attached
3 Warranty certificate attached
4 Check for quality as per challan (in the
remarks specify the check conducted
and the result and whether it is
5 accepted)
Check for dimensional stability
6 Check for colour
7 Check for breakages
8 Check for packing
9 Check for any defects
10 Make
11 Check for quantity as per challan

COMMENTS

PISL SIGNATURE ISPL SIGNATURE

 Grading Analysis For Coarse Aggregates

IS:383
Project NCR BIG BOX PATLI Format No.

Contract Rev.No.

Client ISPL Date 17.10.2024

Contractor PISL Page

AGGREGATE TYPE: Agg.10 MM

17.10.2024
SAMPLE NO : DATE OF TESTING :

MATERIAL SOURCE : DULHEDA (Narnol) SAMPLE LOCATION : FROM TRUCK

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

3000 BITTU KUMAR SINGH

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: SAMPLED BY :

Cumulative % Cumulative
Weight
S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM) % weight retained Retained % Passing Limits as per IS 383
Retained

1 12.5 0 0 0.00 100.00 100

2 10 242 8.07 8.07 91.93 85-100

3 4.75 2501 83.37 91.43 8.57 0-20

4 2.36 205 6.83 98.27 1.73 0-5

5 Pan 52 1.73 100.00 0.00 0

REMARKS :-

Singnature PISL Signature of Client ISPL

 Grading Analysis For Stone Dust

IS:383

Format
Project NCR BIG BOX PATLI No.

Contract Rev.No.

Date of
Client ISPL Rev .

Contractor PISL Page

Stone Dust

SAMPLE NO : DATE OF TESTING :

MATERIAL SOURCE : SAMPLE LOCATION :

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: SAMPLED BY :

Cumulative
Weight % weight Cumulative %
S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM)
Retained retained
% Retained
Passing Limits as per IS 383

1 10 100

2 4.75 95-100

3 2.36 80-100

4 1.18 50-85

5 0.6 25-60

6 0.3 5-30

7 0.15 0-10

8 Pan -

REMARKS :-

Singnature PISL Signature ISPL

 Average Grading Analysis For Fine Aggregates

IS:383

Project NCR BIG BOX PATLI Format No.

Contract Rev.No. 0

Date of Rev
Client ISPL
.

Contractor PISL Page 1 Of 1

SAMPLE NO : 01 DATE OF TEST17.10.2024

SAMPLE LOCATION : SAMPLED BY: BITTU KUMAR SINGH

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE : M/Sand INTENDED USE :

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN 1000

: GMS MATERIAL SOURCE : Charkhi Dadri

Weight %Weight Limits as per IS 383

Cumulative % Cumulative
S.No I.S Sieve Size Retained Retained
Retained % Passing Fine sand
(gm) (gm) ZONE - I ZONE-II ZONE-III
IS 1542

1 10 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100

2 4.75 0 0 0 100 90-100 90-100 90-100 95-100

3 2.36 196 19.6 19.6 80.4 60-95 75-100 85-100 95-100

4 1.18 192 19.2 38.8 61.2 30-70 55-90 75-100 90-100

5 0.600 184 18.40 57.2 42.8 15-34 35-59 60-79 80-100

6 0.300 175 17.50 74.7 25.3 5-20 8-30 12-40 20-65

7 0.150 211 21.10 95.8 4.2 0-10 0-20 0-10 0-15

8 PAN 42 FM 2.86 0 0 0 0

REMARKS :-

ZONE : 2ND

F.M. 2.86

SILT BY VOLUME 5.00%

Singnature of PISL Signature of ISPL

 Average Grading Analysis For Fine Aggregates

IS:383

Project NCR BIG BOX PATLI

Contract

Client ISPL

Contractor PISL

SAMPLE NO : 01 DATE OF TESTING:

SAMPLE LOCATION : SAMPLED BY:

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE : M/Sand INTENDED USE :

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN : 1000 GMS MATERIAL SOURCE :

Weight %Weight
I.S Sieve Cumulative Cumulative %
S.No Retained Retained
Size % Retained Passing
(gm) (gm)

1 10 0 0 0 100

2 4.75 0 0 0 100

3 2.36 226 22.6 22.6 77.4

4 1.18 198 19.8 42.4 57.6

5 0.600 179 17.90 60.3 39.7

6 0.300 157 15.70 76 24

7 0.150 218 21.80 97.8 2.2

8 PAN 22 FM 2.99
REMARKS :-

ZONE : 2ND
F.M. 2.99
SILT BY VOLUME 4.50%

Singnature of PISL Signature of ISPL

Aggregates

Format
No.
Rev.No. 0
Date of
Rev .
Page 1 Of 1

E OF TESTING: 04.09.2023

PLED BY: ROHIT YADAV

NDED USE :
ERIAL SOURCE :

Limits as per IS 383

Fine
ZONE - I ZONE-II ZONE-III sand IS
1542

100 100 100 100

90-100 90-100 90-100 95-100

60-95 75-100 85-100 95-100

30-70 55-90 75-100 90-100

15-34 35-59 60-79 80-100

5-20 8-30 12-40 20-65

0-10 0-20 0-10 0-15

0 0 0 0

Signature of ISPL
 BRICK REGISTER-B (COMP.STRENGTH)
SI.NO DATE OF TESTING I.D MARK DIMENSIONS AREA LOAD IN KN STRENGTH IN AVERAGE
L B N/MM2 N/MM2
TRENGTH)
TESTED IN PRESENCE REMARKS
 Compaction Test for GSB
Sand Replacement Method [As Per 2720, (Part-28)]

Sources of Material Max Dry Density (YMDD) gm/cc

Location Optimum Moisture Content %

Date :

STEP :- 1

1 Wt of Pouring Cylinder + Sand W1

7000 7000 6400 6400

2 Volume of Callibration Container VS

3 Wt of Sand Required to Fill the Cone W2

309 309 309 309

4 Wt of Callirated Container W3

5 Wt of Callirated Container + Sand W4

6 Wt of Sand W5 = W4-W3-W2

7 Density of Sand Ds = W5/Vs

1.505 1.505 1.505 1.505

STEP :- 2

1 Wt of Excavated GSB M
2703 1860 2462 2442

2 Wt of Pouring Cylinder after Pour M1

5012 5489 4528 4508

3 Wt of Sand in the Hole M2 = W1-W2-M1

1679 1202 1563 1583

4 Volume of Snad Vp = M2/Ds

1115.614618 798.6710963 1038.538 1051.827

5 Bulk Density Yb = M/Vp

2.42287969 2.328868552 2.37064 2.321674

6 Moisture Content, w

Results

1 Field Dry Density Yd = 100 x {Yb/(100+w)}

2 % age of Compaction obtained = (100 x Yd / YMDD )

3 Average Compaction obtained

4 % Compaction required as per specification

Remarks

Signature Signature Signature

Shankar Enterprises PDIL IOCL
SHANKAR ENTERPRISES PROJECT :- LPG BOTTLING PLANT AT MANDLA, JABALPUR Quality Management System

Compaction Test for WMM

Sand Replacement Method [As Per 2720, (Part-28)]

Sources of Material Max Dry Density (YMDD) gm/cc

Location Optimum Moisture Content %

Date :

STEP :- 1

1 Wt of Pouring Cylinder + Sand W1

2 Volume of Callibration Container VS

3 Wt of Sand Required to Fill the Cone W2

4 Wt of Callirated Container W3

5 Wt of Callirated Container + Sand W4

6 Wt of Sand W5 = W4-W3-W2

7 Density of Sand Ds = W5/Vs

STEP :- 2

1 Wt of Excavated WMM M

2 Wt of Pouring Cylinder after Pour M1

3 Wt of Sand in the Hole M2 = W1-W2-M1

4 Volume of Snad Vp = M2/Ds

5 Bulk Density Yb = M/Vp

6 Moisture Content, w

Results

1 Field Dry Density Yd = 100 x {Yb/(100+w)}

2 % age of Compaction obtained = (100 x Yd / YMDD )

3 Average Compaction obtained

4 % Compaction required as per specification

Remarks

Signature Signature Signature

Shankar Enterprises PDIL IOCL
 Grading Analysis For WMM

Morth 5th Revision

Project NCR BIG BOX Format No.
Client ISPL Date of Rev .
Contractor PISL Page

WMM

SAMPLE NO : 01 DATE OF TESTING : 26.09.2023

MATERIAL SOURCE : Charkhi Dadri SAMPLE LOCATION : Site

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: 5000 GM SAMPLED BY : ROHIT YADAV

Cumulative
S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM) Weight Retained
% weight Cumulative % Morth 5th Revision
% Passing
retained Retained Table No-400-13

1 53 0 0 0 100 100

2 45 0 0 0 100 95-100

3 22.4 1302 26.04 26.04 73.96 60-80

4 11.2 850 17 43.04 56.96 40-60

5 4.75 1086 21.72 64.76 35.24 25-40

6 2.36 505 10.1 74.86 25.14 15-30
7 0.6 646 12.92 87.78 12.22 8,- 22
8 0.075 492 9.84 97.62 2.38 0-5

9 Pan 119

REMARKS :-

Singnature PISL Signature ISPL

 Flakiness & Elongation Index

AS PER IS . 2386 PART 1

Project NCR BIG BOX Format No.
Client ISPL Date of Rev .
Contractor PISL Page

SAMPLE NO : 01 DATE OF TESTING : 10.09.2024

MATERIAL
SOURCE : Charkhi Dadri SAMPLE LOCATION : Site

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

10000 GM
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: SAMPLED BY : BITTU KUMAR SINGH

Passing weight of Non-

weight of the weight aggregate in weight of aggregate in
through I.S Retained on flaky aggregate
S.No aggregatedtaken each fraction passing each fraction not passing
Sieve Size IS Sieve mm taken in each
in fraction (gm) thickness gauge (gm) the length guage (gm)
(MM) fraction (gm)

A B C=A-B D
1 63 50 0 0 0 0
2 50 40 0 0 0 0
3 40 31.5 0 0 0 0
4 31.5 25 0 0 0 0
5 25 20 3742 684 3058 424
6 20 16 3482 537 2945 233
7 16 12.5 2177 314 1863 181
8 12.5 10 599 154 445 110
9 10 6.3
W w W1 w1

10000 1689 8311 948

Flakiness index of coarse aggregates = w /W * 100 = 16.89

Elongation index of aggregate = w1/W1 *100 = 11.41

COMBINED F.I.+E.I. = 28.30

Remarks : Acceptance Criteria:F.I.+E.I. Combined limit 40% (IS 383:2016 Clause 5.2.1)

Singnature PISL Signature ISPL

.
 AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE COARSE AGGREGATE

AS PER IS . 2386
Project NCR BIG BOX

Client ISPL

Contractor PISL

SAMPLE NO : 01 DATE OF TESTING : 10.09.2024

MATERIAL
SOURCE : NARNOL(MAHENDRAGAGH) SAMPLE LOCATION :

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: aggregate INTENDED USE :

WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: 10000 GM SAMPLED BY : BITTU KUMAR SINGH

Wt. of fraction Wt. of fraction retained

Wt.of oven dry Impact value B/A
S.No passing 2.36 IS on 2.36 IS Sieve(C) Remarks
sample (A) gms *100 (%)
Sieve(B) gms gms

1 322 78 244 24.22

Acceptance Criteria:
2 320 62 258 19.38 Non Wearing Surface
45% OR Wearing
3 Surface 30%
(IS:383:2016 Clause
4 5.4.2)
5

Aggregate average Impact value ,=B*100/A 21.80

Singnature PISL Signature ISPL

.
 Grading Analysis For Coarse Aggregates

IS:383
Project NCR BIG BOX PATLI Format No.

Contract Rev.No.

Client ISPL Date 11.10.2024

Contractor PISL Page

AGGREGATE TYPE: Agg.10 MM

SAMPLE NO : DATE OF TESTING : 11.10.2024

MATERIAL SOURCE : DULHEDA (Narnol) SAMPLE LOCATION : FROM TRUCK

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

3000 BITTU
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: SAMPLED BY :

Cumulative % Cumulative
Weight
S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM) % weight retained Retained % Passing Limits as per IS 383
Retained

1 12.5 0 0 0.00 100.00 100

2 10 242 8.07 8.07 91.93 85-100

3 4.75 2485 82.83 90.90 9.10 0-20

4 2.36 221 7.37 98.27 1.73 0-5

5 Pan 52 1.73 100.00 0.00 0

REMARKS :-

Singnature PISL Signature of Client ISPL

 V
i
l
l
a
s
Grading Analysis For Coarse Aggregates
a
t

S
e IS:383
c
Project tNCR BIG BOX PATLI Format No.
o
r
Contract Rev.No.
1
1
Client ISPL Date 25.09.2024
&
Contractor :PISL
Skyline Engineering Contracts (India) Pvt. Ltd. Page
1
4
,
V
i
l
l AGGREGATE TYPE: 20 MM
a
g
e

SAMPLE NO : 1 R DATE OF TESTIN

25.09.2024
a
i
p
u
r
MATERIAL SOURCE : DULHEDA
, (Narnol) SAMPLE LOCATI FROM TRUC
S
o
h
n
a INFRATECH
DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: OM INTENDED USE :

,
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: D 3000 SAMPLED BY : BITTU
i
s
t
t
. Cumulative %
Weight % weight Cumulative %
S.No G I.S Sieve Size (MM)
Retained retained Retained
Passing Limits as per IS 383
u
r
g
1 a 40 Err:522 0 0 100 100
o
n
2 20 255 8.50 8.50 91.50 85-100
(
H
3 a 10 2496 83.20 91.70 8.30 0-20
r
y
4 4.75 211 7.03 98.73 1.27 0-5
a
n
5 a Pan 38 1.27 100.00 -
)

REMARKS :- REJECTED

Singnature of PISL Signature of ISPL

 V
i
l
l
a
s
Grading Analysis For Coarse Aggregates
a
t

S
e IS:383
c
Project tNCR BIG BOX PATLI Format No.
o
r
Contract Rev.No.
1
1
Client ISPL Date 01.02.2024
&
Contractor :PISL
Skyline Engineering Contracts (India) Pvt. Ltd. Page
1
4
,
V
i
l
l AGGREGATE TYPE: 20 MM
a
g
e

SAMPLE NO : 1 R DATE OF TESTIN 01.10.2023

a
i
p
u
r
MATERIAL SOURCE : DULHEDA
, (Narnol) SAMPLE LOCATI FROM TRUC
S
o
h
n
a INFRATECH
DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: OM INTENDED USE :

,
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: D 3000 SAMPLED BY : INDRAJEET SINGH
i
s
t
t
. Cumulative %
Weight % weight Cumulative %
S.No G I.S Sieve Size (MM)
Retained retained Retained
Passing Limits as per IS 383
u
r
g
1 a 40 Err:522 0 0 100 100
o
n
2 20 106 3.53 3.53 96.47 85-100
(
H
3 a 10 2120 70.67 74.20 25.80 0-20
r
y
4 4.75 328 10.93 85.13 14.87 0-5
a
n
5 a Pan 446 14.87 100.00 -
)

REMARKS :- REJECTED

Singnature of PISL Signature of ISPL

 Grading Analysis For GSB

Morth 5th Revision

Project NCR BIG BOX

Client ISPL

Contractor PISL

GSB

SAMPLE NO : DATE OF TESTING : 11.10.2024

MATERIAL SOURCE : Charkhi Dadri SAMPLE LOCATION : From Truck

DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE: INTENDED USE :

15000 GM
WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TAKEN: SAMPLED BY : BITTU KR SINGH

Weight % weight Cumulative % Cumulative %

S.No I.S Sieve Size (MM)
Retained retained Retained Passing

1 75 0 0 0 100

2 53 331 6.62 6.62 93.38

3 26.5 5145 34.30 40.92 59.08

4 9.5 2345 15.63 49.93 50.07

5 4.75 2296 15.31 65.24 34.76

6 2.36 1678 11.19 76.43 23.57

7 0.425 1378 9.19 85.61 14.39

8 0.075 1541 10.27 95.89 4.11

9 Pan 286

REMARKS :-

Singnature PISL Signature ISPL

 Format No.

Date of Rev .

Page

Morth 5th Revision

Table No-400-1 & 2

100

80-100

55-90

35-65

25-55

20-40

10-.15

0-5

PL