Marketing. Reading Lectures
Marketing. Reading Lectures
Marketing strategy is the heart of a business plan. It has many elements but can be
grouped in the 4 Ps that make up a marketing mix:
a) Product: Total package of attributes a customer obtains from a purchase; the benefit
and risk. Consumers place value on products:
-Perceived value: Customer existing perception of the product
-Unrealized or potential value: The unrealized area where the perceived value
can grow. Achieved through communication channels
b) Market: Pocket of latent demand that affect and are affected by societal needs and
changes.
Market segmentation: Delimitation of the market into smaller, similar groups to find
potential customers. Like in the way they perceive, value, buy and use a product. Gives
framework and always changing. Can be demographic, geographic, psychographic and
behavioural.
The selection of the segment that should be target (attractive) can be evaluated in
-Product value: Enter market that value product the highest, where it makes most
contribution and covers the most needs
-Long run growth potential: Growing market and longevity
-Competitive positioning: Some markets have more accessible competition. Still,
always better to have a differentiated product
-Company - Market fit: Assessment of market opportunities in context of
business operations; are resources available, do we have existing manufacturing
capacities, will it overshadow other products.
2. PRICING
Where and how products are made available. Leading firms tend to have strong
distribution, with local market coverage, storing product lines, innovation and a large
installed base. Companies need to make a key decision:
-Sell directly through sales force (employees that sell products). Traditionally
placed closed to key locations but due to online commerce have more freedom
-Make use of intermediaries, indirect. What kind? intensively or selectively, etc?
-Or use both
Low income and older generations have lesser access though. Use of systems such as
EDI.
Channel support: Distributors often try to support or meddle in the channels their
products go through to increase their sales: For example, suppliers make sure that
-Their products are fully stocked and available
-Their products are displayed, advertised and promoted by retail to end-
consumers
-Price and margins do not destabilize. Prevent double marginalization
Commitments and uncertainty make distribution channels hard to build and change,
sometimes though, change is essential.
There are many communication channels (print media, tv, influences, etc). To make use
of them though, marketers need to understand buying behaviour:
Decision making units (DMU): Participants of the DMP: Can be a complex set of
players (a family). Sellers target each DMU in the DMP, as they respond to different
stimuli
-Pull: To pull in end-consumers by creating demand via communication
channels which, although costlier, get justified by a large potential market
-Pull: To push the product via intermediaries towards the end-user. Retail and
resellers get incentives to promote (push) the product. With balance, both could
be applied.
2.“There is no competitive substitute for the industry major product”. Firms lose
incentives to innovate and identify changing needs when there are no substitutes or
competitors. Focus on specific, limited products rather than the benefit it should offer.
New products whose benefit satisfies needs better will appear eventually
3. “Too much faith in mass production”. Mass production and declining unit costs drives
businesses to produce all they can, forgetting about valuable goods that consumers
actually want. Production should be a consequence of marketing, not vice versa.
4. “Focus on improving the technicalities of their product. Focus on improving
product via R&D optimization, product instead of customer oriented.
Consumers' needs become secondary to making a superior product that won't even sell.
From a marketing standpoint, companies should work backwards; first thinking about
customers and then production
Places in diagram:
A: Our points in difference (PD): What we have, that competitors don't, and consumers
want:
-How big is our advantage? What is it based on?
-Companies value ‘’A’’ the most, but to the eyes of consumer, A is miniscule
B: Points in parity (PP): What both we and competitors have that consumers want
-Are we delivering better than competition in the area of parity?
A&B: How well our offering fulfils consumers’ needs
C: Their points in difference: What competition offers, that we don't, and consumers
want
-How can we counter the competitor's advantage?
D,F,G: What value does our company (and competitors) offer that consumers don't even
want.
E: White space: Room for growth; unfulfilled needs
The coherent company concept states that the best companies are those focused on what
they do best. Simple, but not everyone does it.
-Aligns differential capabilities with operating decisions and market position
Pressure from top-line to grow quick and follow current trends makes them chase
businesses where they don't have the capabilities for success
Companies should not follow market signals blindly or ignore them, instead, they must
first understand what they can do well, develop those capabilities and interlock them
(mutually reinforcement). Those capabilities then should be aligned with the right market
opportunities
-Coherence premium: Market reward from a coherent company
Capabilities: Something that you do well, that adds customer value and competition
cannot beat. Component of core competency (the “why” they do well). It's a tool used
to enable companies to out-execute their rivals on important measures. Coherency comes
from answering
❖How are we going to face the market? Need a clear understanding of how they create
value for customers. Flexible yet capable of focus strategy and decision making.
❖What capabilities do we need? The engine of value creation. The article recommends
3-6 mutually reinforcing capabilities that give a competitive advantage.
❖What and to whom are we going to sell? Coherent companies build their product
around their capabilities. The external market is scanned for new opportunities that
align with them.
Trend-riding, if done correctly, can be beneficial for companies. Obvious trends are easy
to use for companies, however, the real value lies in less obvious, more complex trends
in consumer aspirations, attitudes and behaviours. Basic innovation strategies for
tackling trends
1. Infuse and augment: Aspects of the trend are infused into an existing product category
augmenting the new product while maintaining coherency. Basically, new product
retains most of its traditional functions, but new ones are added that address needs
unleashed by trend
-Still maintains product category
2. Combine and transcend: Combines existing features with new ones arising from a
trend to create a novel (new and unique) experience that transcends existing product
category. More radical approach. Ex: Nike getting into digital market
3. Counteract and reaffirm: Develops products with attributes that counteract negative
views about it, arising from new trends. Reaffirms the product as still relevant. Ex; video
games that promote physical activity.
Addressing trends:
1. Identify trends that matter: Not all trends are enough to change consumer aspirations,
attitudes and behaviours. Find trends that:
-Ripple effect: Does it affect multiple areas of consumers' lives?
-Impact: Does it profoundly impact consumer priorities?
-Scope: Does it encompass a large number of consumers?
-Endurance: Are there indications that the trend will last?
2.Conduct separate explorations
-First: How does the subtle effect of the trend affects consumers goals, beliefs
and perceptions, etc
-Second: Consumers' existing perception of your product. Use research
techniques
Then compare results between trend and product perception, find key links
3. Isolate potential strategies: Based on the key links.
-Infuse / augment: Product connects with trends
-Combine / transcend: Somewhat disconnection between product and trend
-Counteract / Affirm: Product and trend clash → reaffirm core values.
What should not do: Superficial response, waiting too long, failure to recognize trends
that are actually from outside the product market.
Low-cost businesses are becoming direct rivals to traditional businesses, who are only
experienced in competing against equals. To ignore or treat low-cost businesses as normal
rivals is a huge mistake and leads to market-segment losses.
How are low-cost sustainable? Despite generating small gross profit margins (cost-
price), their operating expenses are very low, resulting in HIGHER operating margins.
That is, smart use of energy, spending less in non-crucial benefits → structure saves
expenses
-Consumer behaviour also works in their favour, as most will choose better
prices over small benefits.
WHAT TO DO?
1. ASK: Will the low-cost competitor take away current or future customers?
Yes: Look for options that don't involve a price war. Low-cost businesses experience,
machinery, cc and structure are better suited for a price war. Better low-cost interaction
No: The new low-cost may serve a different segment. It's better to wait but still observe
how the situation develops. Example: luxury brands whose status cannot be matched by
low cost
Future customers: Need to know that low-cost changes future customers' buying
behaviour. Once cheap → chance for always cheap
2. ASK: Are a sufficient number of consumers willing to pay more for extra benefits?
No: May need to learn to coexist with low-cost. Due to losing market segments,
companies
may need to merge or acquire rivals. Still room for other tactics though.
Yes: A dual strategy refers to setting up your own low-cost venture. Example of vertical
differentiation. May compete with the parent company for sale but, in the end, more
market share is covered, May need a different name and / or become independent
No: Switching to conquer: If there's no synergy options and coexisting is not an option:
-Switching to solutions: Low cost only offer basic needs, so they can’t sell
solutions. Attract customers by solving their problems and offering products /
services as an integrated package. Need understanding of consumer
-Switching to a low cost: Rarely succeed though, different capabilities are needed.
Hard to change the whole company structure.
The internet has changed how consumers engage with brands; many traditional ways of
marketing are no longer sustainable. An example is seen in buying behaviour:
Funnel metaphor:
Traditional way of viewing the DMP. Consumers start at a wide disposal of options
and narrow them down to a final choice. Marketers use push strategies via paid media
to build brand awareness and inspire purchase. Outdated: Too rational and does not
capture consumer engagement
Post choice evaluation: “Enjoy, advocate and bond’’. After a purchase, a deeper
connection between the product and consumer begins as they use it. When consumers are
pleased, they advocate it word of mouth or online → shifting others evaluation
towards said product.
May produce a loyalty loop: Consumers skip early stages and directly buy that product.
The consumer decision journey also highlights the importance: (added to traditional paid
media)
-Owned media: Channels that the brand controls
-Earned media: Consumer created channels (review sites)
Dimensions are subjective, other authors place history under consumer behaviour and
lifestyle as a psychographic factor. Companies should also address attractiveness:
-Homogenous, identifiable, reachable and large-enough
The base of the economical pyramid represents a market opportunity, due to its size,
but also a risk; profit-focused companies tend to face resistance by base population
To be successful at the base, companies should address their social (civic) responsibility.
This benefits both the population and your company → building private (directly) and
public value (indirectly). Therefore, communities should benefit from your product,
usually in terms of better living conditions and opportunities. The base is divided in 3
segments:
1. Low income (3–5$ day): Most have some secondary education and basic skills to enter
the job market. Able to make some purchases and cover some needs
-Value-Creation role: Consumers: Companies should offer affordable / low-cost
products to cover their needs. Have ability to buy
2. Sustenance (1-3$ day): Poor education and skills → unstable earnings. Present in
informal markets and rural areas.
-Value-creation role: Co-producers: With training and job conditions, they can
be integrated into the workforce. Have some, but lower, consumer value
3. Extreme poverty (>1$ day) Extreme lack of basic necessities and living conditions.
Almost non-existent education and skills. Present in even more informal markets.
Reliant on help from non-profit organizations
-Value-creation role: Clients: Companies can work in partnerships with NGOs
and government. Public relation marketing channel
This term is used to oppose the traditional segmentation, which is solely focused on
geographic and demographic segmentations. When consumers started being less
predictable, psychographic segmentation started to be used; still wasn't enough (too
focused on identities that forgot useful product features). Smart segmentation started
relying in behaviour domain and also looked for certain criteria:
a. Reflect the company strategy: What are we trying to do? Segmentation should
follow the company strategy.
b. Reveal sources of revenue: Which consumers drive profit? Potential
consumers should be ranked by profitability. Efforts should be concentrated in
those that drive profits → use characteristics of best customers to find similar
profiles.
c. Pinpoint consumer value, attitudes and beliefs. Attitudes matter in buying
decisions? People's lifestyle, attitudes, self-image and aspiration should be related
to product → so target them. They change over time
d. Focus on actual consumer behaviour. What are consumers actually doing?
Focus on consumer behaviour and perform lab simulations
e. Make sense to top executives: Does it make sense? Segmentation should be
clearly stated; top-brass needs to know what is happening and goals
f. Anticipate changes. Can our segmentation register change? Segmentation
should be an ongoing search for answers. Dynamic in consumer needs, attitudes
behaviour and market conditions (fluctuation, new tech)
Levels of importance in consumer expectations:
-The shallow end: Just want products that will save them time, money and
effort.
-In the middle: Concern about quality, design, complexity and potential status
-The deep end: Concerned about core values and emotional investment
(football shirt)
Value propositions are statements that describe the value a product offers to the
consumer: Types:
1. All benefits: Why should you buy our product? Lists all the benefits a product offers,
the more the better. Easiest, cheapest and most common, as it requires little knowledge
about consumer and competitor
-Drawback: Benefit assertion: Advertise features that actually provide no
benefit or value to targeted consumers.
-Also, heavily illustrated points in parity with competition. It's better to focus
on Points in Difference, what stands out about you.
First, companies must collect data about their users. Many ways, surveys, questionnaires,
etc; usually rating attributes in a quantitative scale. Note difference between:
-Perception data: How consumers see the product. Ex: Volvo is safe.
Homogenous
-Preference data: What consumers like. Ex: I like Volvo. Heterogenous
Using the acquired data, profile analysis of consumers can be built. Can display
information in different forms, such as an average or by using a graph. Also known as
‘’snake pot’’ given that the more brands involved, the messier the results → may need
more powerful techniques:
2. PERCEPTUAL MAPPING
One such better technique is perceptual mapping; a map that locates brands based on the
perceived value consumers have on certain attributes. Two types
❖Overall similarity method: Rates overall similarity between brands. Uses attributes
that cannot really be verbalized and rated in similar context between users
(subjective). MDS graph (2D)
There are 3 major ways in which perceptual maps are used in marketing:
-Understanding of current positioning: Of you and competitors. Also show
unfulfilled niches.
-Test perception on new product: Helps see if new product will be well received.
Should it be introduced or not
-Provide direction for R&D: Helps find ideal combination of product
attributes in market
Within saturated markets, it is common to see commoditized users; people that treat
shopping goods as commodities and, therefore, only focus on price. The natural response
of companies is to cut prices, which reduces brand equity, profit margins, develops low
consumer expectations and cannot even always be done (low-cost fighting). This article
focuses on how to make consumers care again about quality, differentiation and personal
relevance using, ironically, price as its main lever.
Because the sole focus on price, marketing and innovation alone won't catch their
attention, therefore, it's better to change what they care more about → price. 4 key
strategies
1. Price structure to clarify advantage
Use pricing to draw attention to the value and benefit your product delivers. This is
done by aligning the pricing structure (the basis in which you price products) with the
main benefit
Makes consumers actually think about the need for the extra benefit, rather than just
price
-Example: Price on miles driven → frequent drivers get interested
This article highlights that profit focused firms that look for highest margins in each
transaction are outdated and don’t work with modern customers.
It states that “charging max” makes companies lose customers (feel abused) and also
fail to create new value - short term results only. Of course, financial management is still
important as
companies need profit. Instead, they should treat the market as a win-win situation for
them and consumers, a collaborative process where both gain value (shared value:
long term).
The pricing strategy should engage customers in value creation and in customer
perception about what they want. Share value strategies:
1. Focus on relationships, not transactions: Firms should strive to identify consumers
with the brand, building a loyal base and not consumers that just come and go. Not
treated as just wallets.
5. Manage the market standards for fairness. Pricing should be fair in the market and
meet consumer expectations, ensuring a shared value. In summary, to be able to create
shared value, companies aim to build relationships with the consumer and be proactive,
flexible, transparent and fair in their pricing.
A product line is a group of similar products sold by the same company (ex; coca cola
light and normal). A product mix refers to all the product lines a company has.
Productions can be analysed in terms of length (# items) and depth (# of versions).
Brand valuation: Process of calculating the brand´s financial value. Essential for
offering a competitive advantage. Management usually relies on marketers for this
information, but the reality is that it is computed - and used for - by many departments.
An example can be seen in accountants, traditionally focused on history rather than
future, and normally lacking an external market perspective. On the contrary marketers
focus on future sales and use of external information. This has led many to believe that
there’s no connection between the two, which is totally false. Examples are seen in:
-Lifecycle costing: Compilation of asset costs during lifetime
-Target costing: Estimate of production costs based on forecast
-Customer costing; Determines profitability by consumer segment
Moreover, a disconnection between marketing and accounting leads to the creation of
surplus information channels that even overlap with each other; wasting resources and
creating miscommunication between branches.
→2. Shifts in the balance of channel power. When intermediaries gain a lot of power
of control, it affects suppliers negatively. Elements that contributed to buyer’s power:
-Enhanced bargaining power
-More knowledgeable buyers
-Threat of backwards integration
The retail business has experienced many descriptive changes during the years, the newest
one arising from the development of digital technology. Traditional retailers must adapt
to the new context, and that means adopting an omnichannel retailing strategy that
includes a mix of digital and traditional communication channels → they need to
facilitate the customer experience.
Customer needs: According to the article, customers are now looking for both the
advantages of digital (broad selection, information access, etc) and physical shopping
(personal service, direct interaction with products, instant gratification). Omnichannel
strategy for traditional retailers allows this, giving them an edge over digital competition.
Some other benefits:
-Product can be more easily customized
-Information is easier to get
-Advertisements and coupons are easier to offer, etc
“Certain experiences are impossible to get in digital-only retailers”
Building an omnichannel organization: Not easy; needs innovation, creativity,
technologically skilled employers, consumer research and taking risks. Benefits
outweigh though. Mainly:
-Innovation needs to be adopted early, frequently and broadly
-Skills need to be up to date to leading edge
ARTICLE 19: THE ONE THING YOU MUST GET RIGHT WHEN BUILDING
A BRAND
Social media has now become a key factor in marketing and consumer engagement. Many
view it as a replacement for traditional marketing, however, the article concludes
differently
New brands (or start-ups) should exploit the advantages of social media while staying
true to their basics, that is, developing and delivering an effective brand promise.
-Many views social media as a replacement for traditional marketing, which is
not, it is a tool for delivering the basics even more effectively.
-Losing sight of the fundamental always hurt companies
-Marketing playbook should be revised, not rewritten
They use social media as a tool for engagement and collaboration: Boosting brand
awareness, sales and, most importantly, gaining a (better and faster) understanding of
consumer insights → how they fit into consumers' lives. Capitalize on social media
Customers want engaging, authentic and trustworthy brands; this can only be done by
actually delivering the product / experience promised; that's why fundamentals
shouldn’t be abandoned.
-Fast propagation: Undelivered and dissatisfying customers is now more
dangerous than ever: backlash prophages online and gains traction faster and
wider.
Consumers spend a lot of time on their phones, and companies look to take advantage of
it. A common marketing tactic in this context is mobile advertisements. They are
straightforward, mass targetable and easy to make; they may not be the best option:
-People dislike mobile ads because they are too pushy and intrusive
-Take a lot of space and are hard to close (small x). This is why phone ads are
disliked more than computer ads, smaller and easier to close
Instead, the article states the idea that building an app might be a better marketing
communicator, as they not only promote the brand better (more engaging) but add value
to customers. Might even become a new revenue stream. Strategies for apps:
-Add convenience: Apps that give consumers a more seamless experience Ex:
airplane apps for check-in and flight monitoring. They strengthen consumer
relationships but don't really attract new customers (also hard to differentiate)
-Offer unique value: Apps use phone-advantages to offer unique values not in
store or computer. Ex: Nike + live tracking. Also promote customers to buy
products for better experience (trackable shoes)
-Provide social value: Apps that promote themselves via social interaction →
strengthening communities. Ex: Facebook users sending others Starbucks gift
cards
-Offer incentives: Apps that offer incentives for customers to get a product.
Specific promotions for app-users. Ex: H&M app offers discounts
-Entertain: Games are one of the most engaging marketing channels. Brands can
create associated games to promote themselves indirectly. Ex: Red bull sports
game or fate grand order.
This article explores 5 concrete ways in which neuroscience methods can be applied to
marketing, to better understand decision making and related processes. Many businesses
have neuromarketing tools and divisions.
Neuromarketing challenges:
-Provide little casual evidence on their own. The understanding of brain
behaviour, on its own, is useless. Traditional marketing and behavioural studies
must complement neuroscience research.
-Backward inference: Infer behaviour from brain / psychological signals. Contrary
to traditional, forward inference (infer psychological signals from behaviour).
Both need to work together
-Much smaller sample → less reliability.