100% found this document useful (1 vote)
86 views43 pages

Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reportin

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
86 views43 pages

Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reportin

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 43

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/325176917

Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting

Book · July 2018


DOI: 10.4324/9781351243957

CITATIONS READS

38 14,953

2 authors:

Marco Bellucci Giacomo Manetti


University of Florence University of Florence
55 PUBLICATIONS 1,785 CITATIONS 44 PUBLICATIONS 2,503 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Marco Bellucci on 03 September 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Finance, Governance and Sustainability

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
AND SUSTAINABILITY
REPORTING
Marco Bellucci and Giacomo Manetti
Stakeholder Engagement and
Sustainability Reporting

In a context of growing social and environmental concerns, the role of large enterprises and
corporations in encouraging sustainability has drawn increasing attention in recent years.
Both academic debates and public-opinion research have called into question the extended
responsibilities of firms in our increasingly inter-connected world. By studying issues asso-
ciated with the greatest challenges mankind is currently facing – from climate change to
social exclusion – the scientific community is aware of the need to account for the actions
and agendas of companies, especially large ones. They are becoming important global polit-
ical actors with great power, but also unprecedented responsibilities. With this in mind, the
authors believe that it is more important than ever that large enterprises, on the one hand,
take into account the opinion of their stakeholder while defining their strategies and, on the
other hand, disclose material and relevant information on their ability to contribute to sus-
tainability while delivering value for all of their stakeholders. A consensus is being reached
on the responsibility of large enterprises to report in a triple bottom perspective – not only on
their financial performances, but also on their social and environmental outcomes. Conse-
quently, it is important to understand what elements organizations need to report on in order
to provide stakeholders with relevant and comprehensive sustainability reports. Against this
background, this book presents a significant and original contribution, both empirically and
theoretically, to the social and environmental accounting literature by studying the various
features of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting.

Marco Bellucci is a postdoctoral research fellow in accounting at the University of


Florence. He holds a PhD with distinction in business administration and management
from the University of Pisa. His research interests include corporate social responsibil-
ity, sustainability reporting, social enterprises and third sector organizations. He is social
economy unit coordinator at ARCO Action Research for CO-development and project
manager of the Yunus Social Business Centre of the University of Florence under the
patronage of Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus. Additionally, he was a visiting scholar at
the Schulich School of Business at York University in Toronto and is the author of many
articles in various respected scholarly journals.

Giacomo Manetti is associate professor of accounting at the Department of Economics


and Management of the University of Florence. He holds a PhD in planning and control
from the University of Florence. He teaches financial accounting and business administra-
tion at the School of Economics and Management. His research interests include stake-
holder theory, corporate social responsibility, sustainability reporting and assurance, the
third sector and accounting history. Additionally, he is the author of many scholarly arti-
cles and four books and was a visiting scholar at the Schulich School of Business at York
University in Toronto in 2012.
Finance, Governance and Sustainability: Challenges to
Theory and Practice Series
Series Editor: Professor Güler Aras
Yildiz Technical University, Turkey;
Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA

Focusing on the studies of academicians, researchers, entrepreneurs, policy makers


and government officers, this international series aims to contribute to the progress in
matters of finance, good governance and sustainability. These multidisciplinary books
combine strong conceptual analysis with a wide range of empirical data and a wealth
of case materials. They will be of interest to those working in a multitude of fields,
across finance, governance, corporate behaviour, regulations, ethics and sustainability.

Strategy, Structure and Corporate Governance


Nabyla Daidj

Corporate Behavior and Sustainability


Doing Well by Being Good
Edited by Güler Aras and Coral Ingley

Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development


Social Capital and Corporate Development in Developing Economies
Risa Bhinekawati

Cosmopolitan Business Ethics


Towards a Global Ethos of Management
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Sustainability Accounting and Integrated Reporting


Edited by Charl de Villiers and Warren Maroun

Women on Corporate Boards


An International Perspective
Edited by Maria Aluchna and Güler Aras

Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting


Marco Bellucci and Giacomo Manetti

For more information about this series, please visit www.routledge.com/Finance-


Governance-and-Sustainability/book-series/FINGOVSUST
Stakeholder Engagement and
Sustainability Reporting

Marco Bellucci and Giacomo Manetti


with a foreword by Linda Thorne
First published 2019
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
 2019 Marco Bellucci and Giacomo Manetti
The right of Marco Bellucci and Giacomo Manetti to be identified as authors
of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with sections 77 and
78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or
utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now
known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in
any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing
from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation
without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Bellucci, Marco, author. | Manetti, Giacomo, author.
Title: Stakeholder engagement and sustainability reporting / Marco Bellucci
and Giacomo Manetti.
Description: Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2018. | Series:
Finance, governance and sustainability: challenges to theory and practice
series ; 10
Identifiers: LCCN 2018009736| ISBN 9780815373155 (hardback) |
ISBN 9781351243957 (ebook) | ISBN 9781351243926 (mobipocket)
Subjects: LCSH: Sustainable development reporting. | Corporations—
Investor relations. | Sustainable development.
Classification: LCC HD60.3 .B45 2018 | DDC 338.9/27—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018009736

ISBN: 978-0-8153-7315-5 (hbk)


ISBN: 978-1-351-24395-7 (ebk)

Typeset in Times New Roman


by Swales & Willis Ltd, Exeter, Devon, UK
To our wives
Contents

List of figures viii


List of tables ix
Foreword by Linda Thorne x
Acknowledgements xiv

1 Introduction 1

2 Business and sustainability 6


2.1 Enterprises’ extended role in society 6
2.2 The path to integrated reporting 12
2.3 The concept of sustainability 19

3 Materiality in sustainability reporting 37


3.1 Social and environmental sustainability reporting 37
3.2 The topic of materiality and its relevance for
sustainability reporting 48

4 A theory of stakeholder engagement 66


4.1 Stakeholder theory 66
4.2 The process of stakeholder engagement 76
4.3 Stakeholder engagement for sustainability reporting 88
4.4 A review of stakeholder engagement tools 100

5 An empirical overview of stakeholder engagement in


sustainability reports 121
5.1 Research context and objectives 121
5.2 Research design 123
5.3 Discussion of results 134

6 Conclusions 150

Index 156
Figures

4.1 From an input-output model to the stakeholder model 68


4.2 Three aspects of stakeholder theory 71
4.3 The components of stakeholder engagement 78
4.4 Stakeholder identification in Mitchell et al. (1997) 80
4.5 A 12-rung ladder of stakeholder management and engagement 89
5.1 Providers of external assurance 125
Tables

2.1 Guiding principles for an integrated report 17


2.2 Content elements of an integrated report 18
2.3 Strong and weak forms of sustainability 22
3.1 Main theories used to explain why organizations publish
sustainability reports 42
3.2 Motivations for the assurance of SR 57
4.1 Clarkson principles for stakeholder engagement 84
4.2 Aspects of the GRI G4 guidelines directly concerned with
stakeholder engagement 96
4.3 Process for defining reporting content using the principles
of materiality and stakeholder inclusiveness in the
GRI G4 guidelines 97
4.4 Levels of stakeholder engagement and supporting
methodologies 103
5.1 Organizations per sector 124
5.2 Organization types and stock exchange listing 124
5.3 Region and size 124
5.4 Adherence level and integrated reports 125
5.5 List and description of data collected from the GRI
sustainability database 129
5.6 List and description of data collected from the
content analysis 130
5.7 Research questions, categories and results of the
content analysis 134
Foreword
Linda Thorne

In the context of growing social and environmental concerns, the role of large
enterprises and corporations in encouraging sustainability has drawn increasing
attention in recent years. Both academic debates and public opinion research
have called into question firms’ extended responsibilities in our increasingly
inter-connected world. By studying issues associated with the greatest chal-
lenges mankind currently faces – from climate change to social exclusion – the
scientific community is aware of the need to account for companies’ actions and
agendas (Crane & Matten, 2016).
This volume examines and emphasizes the need for stakeholder engagement
in promoting corporate social responsibility (CSR). By so doing, it stands in
direct contrast to Milton Friedman’s perspective on the responsibility of business
as focusing solely on owners’ and shareholders’ economic interests (Friedman,
2007; 1970). Many agree that Friedman’s perspective is becoming progres-
sively untenable as corporations are increasingly willing, for various reasons, to
address the needs and expectations of their stakeholders (not just shareholders)
and to create shared value (not just shareholder value). For example, statements
pertaining to expanded corporate commitment – even though some may be rhe-
torical in nature – can be found in companies’ sustainability reports or integrated
annual reports, particularly in high-impact sectors and sectors with high legiti-
macy concerns. Organizations operating in these fields must deal with social and
environmental issues every day and are very sensitive to the interests of sev-
eral stakeholder groups. More specifically, the analysis presented in this volume
focuses on these sectors and includes the chemical, energy, food and beverage,
forest and paper products, mining, textile and apparel, tobacco and waste man-
agement sectors.
Friedman offers an excellent starting definition of CSR. According to
Friedman, CSR is when a company – or managers acting on its behalf – has
a “social conscience and take[s] seriously its responsibilities for providing
employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution” (1970) and vol-
untarily addresses objectives beyond shareholders’ economic interests. In other
words, CSR implies that companies adopt expanded responsibilities beyond
the narrow economic interests of shareholders, consider the interests of a wide
collection of firm stakeholders (McGuire, 1963; Carroll, 1999), and undertake
Foreword xi
courses of action that are “desirable in terms of the values and objectives of
society” (Bowen, 1953).
Given the evolving expectations of both consumers and investors, corporations
are increasingly communicating to an expanded stakeholder audience regarding
how corporate sustainability strategies are integrated into their business models.
Over the past 40 years, companies have begun to pay greater attention to environ-
mental and social issues (Cho, 2009; De Villiers, Rinaldi, & Unerman, 2014; Buhr,
Gray, & Milne, 2014; Guthrie & Parker, 1989). At the same time, there has been
substantial growth in research that tackles social and environmental accounting top-
ics (Deegan, 2002). This growing interest has raised new questions regarding the
underlying objectives of corporations and the best ways to account for (and report
on) CSR and the extent to which the objectives of various stakeholder communities
have been addressed (Gray, 2016; Adams & McNicholas, 2007). The development
of the reporting of social and environmental information has resulted in various
narratives that articulate – with varying degrees of thoroughness and misdirection –
organizations’ relationships with their stakeholders and with the environment
(Gray, 2010; Brown & Dillard, 2014; Kolk, 2004.
Guided by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), stakeholder engagement has
increasingly played a key role in dictating the information to be included in sustain-
ability reports (Brown & Dillard, 2014; Manetti & Bellucci, 2016; Manetti, 2011).
Stakeholder engagement is the process by which companies interactively engage
with their stakeholders to understand their key corporate objectives and priorities.
Stakeholder engagement can act as a powerful tool for dialogic communication and
accounting (Bebbington, Brown, Frame, & Thomson, 2007; Brown & Dillard, 2014)
and a channel for interactive mutual learning while also promoting transformative
action and social change (Bebbington et al., 2007; Dillard & Brown, 2012). By
definition, stakeholder engagement is a re-iterative process that fosters an open and
evolving relationship between a corporation and its stakeholders and thus ensures that
stakeholders’ evolving expectations can be addressed (Manetti & Bellucci, 2016).
By studying the various features of stakeholder engagement in sustainability
reporting, this volume makes a significant and original contribution – both empir-
ically and theoretically – to the social and environmental accounting literature.
CSR research has evolved from a specialty area of interest and research to one that
is pervasive and crosses national boundaries and corporate cultures.
To advance our understanding of the extent to which corporations value,
engage and address the needs of various corporate stakeholders, this volume pre-
sents research that bridges the divide between traditional sociological research
and archival studies by providing insight into the properties of information on
which sustainability activities are reported, and in so doing, provides insight on
stakeholder engagement’s importance for and impact on social and environmental
accounting. This volume aims to provide insight for both experienced and emerg-
ing researchers on the complexities of the information on which CSR research is
based. As a result, I believe that this volume is an invaluable resource for graduate
students and established scholars regarding the current state of CSR research and
corporate accountability.
xii Foreword
References
Adams, C. A., & McNicholas, P. (2007). Making a difference: Sustainability reporting,
accountability and organisational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal, 20(3), 382–402.
Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., & Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement:
The potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal, 20(3), 356–381.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman (No. 3). New York:
Harper.
Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and
opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156. http://
doi.org/doi:10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1313
Buhr, N., Gray, R., & Milne, M. J. (2014). Histories, rationales, voluntary standards
and future prospects for sustainability reporting. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, &
B. O’Dwyer (Eds), Sustainability accounting and accountability. London: Routledge.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct.
Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.
Cho, C. H. (2009). Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster:
A French case study of Total SA’s Erika and AZF incidents. European Accounting
Review, 18(1), 33–62.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Engagement required: The changing role of the corpora-
tion in society. In D. Barton, D. Horvath, & M. Kipping (Eds), Re-imagining capitalism:
Building a responsible, long-term model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental
disclosures-a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
15(3), 282–311.
De Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and
an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7),
1042–1067. http://doi.org/doi:10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736
Dillard, J., & Brown, J. (2012). Agonistic pluralism and imagining CSEAR into the future.
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 32(1), 3–16.
Friedman, M. (2007) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In W. C.
Zimmerli, M. Holzinger, and K. Richter (Eds), Corporate ethics and corporate govern-
ance. Berlin: Springer.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The
New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970. The New York Times Company.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability
. . . and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the
planet. Accounting Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aos.2009.04.006
Gray, R. (2016). Reading for displeasure: Why bother with social accounting at all? Social
and Environmental Accountability Journal, 36(2), 153–161. http://doi.org/10.1080/09
69160X.2016.1197625
Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy
theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343–352.
Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance.
International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 51–64.
http://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2004.004688
Foreword xiii
Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolu-
tionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1),
53–73.
Manetti, G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability report-
ing: Empirical evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 18(2), 110–122.
Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sus-
tainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985–1011.
http://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1797
McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Acknowledgements

We are sincerely and deeply grateful to Linda Thorne, Luca Bagnoli, Kristina
Abbotts, Andrew Crane and all others who supported this project and provided
academic guidance and human inspiration. We also wish to thank Sofia Biagini,
Dania Cantatori, Gabriele Citrolo, Joseph Mazziotti and Vanessa Pezzetta.
Finally, we are grateful to our families for their lasting encouragement and love.
Although this monograph is the result of a team effort, Marco Bellucci can be
considered the author of sections 2.1, 3.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 5, 6 and Giacomo Manetti
the author of section 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 4.1. Section 1 has been written by both authors.
1 Introduction

Currently, many of the largest economies in the world are corporations, not
nations. Many multinationals’ revenues surpass the budgets of entire countries.
For example, Apple’s turnover exceeds Austria’s revenues by a few billion dol-
lars, while the revenues of British Petroleum easily compete with the federal
budget of Mexico1 (CIA, 2016; Fortune, 2016). Although we acknowledge that
dollar-value company revenues are not equivalent to governments’ dollar-value
budgets, this illustrative comparison nevertheless reveals the vast power held by
corporations and raises important questions regarding large firms’ accountability
and responsibility to civil society.
Particularly in the context of growing environmental concerns, the role of large
enterprises in promoting sustainability is increasingly highlighted. Both academic
conversations and public opinion debates increasingly question firms’ extended
responsibilities in the frame of contemporary and inter-connected societies. In
studying issues associated with the greatest challenges mankind currently faces –
from climate change to social exclusion – the current scientific community is
fully aware of the need to account for companies’ actions and agendas, especially
those of large companies (Aras & Crowther, 2008; Crane & Matten, 2016). Large
firms are becoming global political actors – but with great power comes greater
responsibility.
As shown later in this volume, many authors agree that the historically prevailing
thesis that a firm’s first and only responsibility is to maximize value for sharehold-
ers (cf. Friedman, 1970) is becoming progressively untenable (cf. Freeman, 1984).
Enterprises themselves are increasingly willing – for different reasons – to show
their commitment to the needs and expectations of their stakeholders (not just those
of their shareholders), their aspiration to create shared value (not only value for
shareholders) and to make every element of their business sustainable. Although
they vary case by case from genuine to be completely rhetoric, statements on this
commitment are commonly found in the sustainability reports and integrated annual
reports of companies operating in various sectors, even and especially in the most
impactful ones, such mining and oil and gas (Bini, Bellucci, & Giunta, 2018).
Given consumers’ and investors’ evolving expectations, corporations currently
face the need to communicate to internal and external stakeholders how their
2 Introduction
business model is integrated with aspects of sustainability. In the last 40 years,
companies have exhibited increasing interest in environmental and social issues
(Aras & Crowther, 2016; Bagnoli, 2004); at the same time, the research attention
devoted to social and environmental accounting topics has grown substantially
(Bini et al., 2018; Deegan, 2002). This growing interest has raised new questions
on the real objectives of large corporations and the best ways to account for and
report on the degree to which these objectives have been achieved. The develop-
ment of social and environmental accounting and reporting in recent decades has
resulted in a wide range of actual and potential accounts of extended organiza-
tional interactions with society and with the natural environment: such accounts
can be understood as narratives of events that articulate, with varying degrees of
thoroughness and misdirection, the relationships between the organization and its
stakeholders and the environment (Gray, 2010).
With that in mind, we believe it is now more important than ever that large
enterprises take into account their stakeholders’ opinions when defining their
strategies on the one hand and, on the other, disclose material and relevant infor-
mation regarding their ability to contribute to sustainability while delivering value
to all their stakeholders. An increasing consensus is being reached on large enter-
prises’ responsibility to report not only on their financial performance but also
on their social and environmental outcomes. Consequently, in practical terms, it
is important to understand the elements on which organizations need to report to
provide stakeholders with relevant and comprehensive sustainability reports.
In the past two decades, stakeholder dialogue and engagement have played
an increasingly important role in defining the contents of integrated and sustain-
ability reporting (Fasan & Mio, 2017; Manetti, 2011) in accordance with the
principle of materiality and relevance of information disclosed (Global Reporting
Initiative, 2013; Unerman & Bennett, 2004). According to the materiality princi-
ple, material aspects are those that reflect the organization’s significant economic,
environmental and social impacts or that substantively influence stakeholders’
assessments and decisions (Global Reporting Initiative, 2013). Stakeholder engage-
ment can represent a powerful tool for dialogic communication and accounting
(Bebbington, Brown, Frame, & Thomson, 2007; Brown & Dillard, 2014) and a
channel for interactive mutual learning that is capable of promoting transforma-
tive action and social change (Bebbington et al., 2007; Bellucci & Manetti, 2017;
Passetti, Bianchi, Battaglia, & Frey, 2017). Moreover, stakeholder engagement
is a milestone policy in social and environmental accounting because it allows
an organization to interact with its stakeholders in a two-way dialogue in which
the engager and the engaged mutually learn from this cooperation and potentially
revise their expectations, strategies and behaviors (Manetti & Bellucci, 2016;
Manetti, Bellucci, & Bagnoli, 2016; Owen, Swift, & Hunt, 2001).
Against this background, this volume aims to contribute to the social and envi-
ronmental accounting literature by studying the role and features of stakeholder
engagement in sustainability reporting.
This contribution is structured as follows. The next chapter introduces and
discusses corporations’ extended responsibilities in contemporary societies and
Introduction 3
considers the opposition between shareholder and stakeholder theories. Alongside
the evolution of enterprises’ objectives lies the evolution of reporting and the
need to account for an integrated and broader set of information. Consequently,
the concept of sustainability and the role of enterprises and accounting in sustain-
ability are framed in light of social and environmental accounting.
The third chapter provides a literature review on sustainability reporting,
materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement. Many local and global fac-
tors currently advocate for social and environmental reporting: the increasing
relevance of beneficial relations with stakeholders, the growing concern about
business ethics and CSR and the mounting importance of ethical investment have
all increased the need for new accounting methods that organizations and their
stakeholders can use to mutually address these issues. After analyzing the main
motivations underlying sustainability reporting, we discuss the topic of material-
ity and the salience of information in social and environmental reports through the
lens of the materiality principle and the main sustainability reporting guidelines.
We then discuss how the involvement of every relevant group of stakeholders can
represent the most straightforward way to produce comprehensive, relevant and
material sustainability reports.
The fourth chapter provides a theoretical framework based on stakeholder
theory and the involvement of stakeholders in decision making and sustainabil-
ity reporting. We introduce a review of the different definitions of stakeholders
and the diverse approaches to stakeholder theory. Consequently, the process of
stakeholder engagement is theoretically divided into three phases: 1) stakeholder
identification and analysis; 2) interaction with stakeholders; and 3) evaluation and
reporting. Each phase is analyzed by considering the contributions of the most
relevant authors and our own elaboration. Then, we discuss the theory underlying
the possible achievement of materiality among the information in sustainability
reports through stakeholder engagement. The last section of the fourth chapter is
dedicated to a review of stakeholder engagement tools in practice and to a focus
on social media as a tool that supports dialogic accounting.
Many theoretical tools introduced in the fourth chapter are then used to support
our empirical analysis. The fifth chapter adopts a deep empirical focus on how
sustainability reports address the topic of stakeholder engagement, the distinctive
features of this involvement process and the role of stakeholder engagement in
assessing materiality and defining the contents of such a disclosure. To pursue this
objective, we opted for a mixed methodology built on content analysis – a research
technique based on the objective, systematic and quantitative description of the
manifest content of communications (Berelson, 1952). We analyze 211 sustaina-
bility reports that were published in 2016 in compliance with the Global Reporting
Initiative (GRI) G4 guidelines from organizations operating in eight sectors with
high social and environmental impact (Chemicals, Energy, Food and Beverage
Products, Forest and Paper Products, Mining, Textiles and Apparel, Tobacco and
Waste Management). We focus on these sectors because of the legitimate concerns
they raise: organizations operating in these sectors must wrestle various societal,
organizational and environmental issues linked to sustainability and legitimacy
4 Introduction
and are very sensitive to the interests of several stakeholder groups. The results of
this content analysis are discussed in detail in the last section of the fifth chapter.
Through this empirical analysis, we aim to contribute to the stakeholder theory
literature and sustainability reporting literature original insights on the properties
of information regarding stakeholder engagement policies and practices stated in
sustainability reports.
Finally, we draw conclusions that summarize our contribution, offer supple-
mentary comments on our main results and practical implications, and provide
several ideas for further research on stakeholder engagement in social and envi-
ronmental accounting.

Note
1 Considering the 2010 spillage of the BP-operated Deepwater Horizon oil platform in the
Gulf of Mexico, this association is not completely casual.

References
Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). The social obligation of corporations. Journal of
Knowledge Globalization, 1(1). www.journal.kglobal.org/index.php/jkg/article/view/22
Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2016). The durable corporation: Strategies for sustainable
development. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bagnoli, L. (2004). Quale responsabilità sociale per l’impresa? (Vol. 21). Milano: Franco
Angeli.
Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., & Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement:
The potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability
Journal, 20(3), 356–381.
Bellucci, M., & Manetti, G. (2017). Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic account-
ing? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 874–905. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2122
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York: Free Press.
Bini, L., Bellucci, M., & Giunta, F. (2018). Integrating sustainability in business model
disclosure: Evidence from the UK mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production,
171(Supplement C), 1161–1170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.282
Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out
and opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156.
doi:doi:10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1313
CIA. (2016). The World Factbook. Retrieved September 2016, www.cia.gov/library/pub
lications/the-world-factbook/fields/2056.html
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Engagement required: The changing role of the corpora-
tion in society. In D. Barton, D. Horvath, & M. Kipping (Eds), Re-imagining capitalism:
Building a responsible, long-term model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental
disclosures-a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
15(3), 282–311.
Fasan, M., & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of material-
ity disclosure in Integrated Reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3),
288–305.
Introduction 5
Fortune. (2016). Global 500. Retrieved September 2016, http://beta.fortune.com/global500
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New
York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, 122–126.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). Reporting principles and standard disclosure.
Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability . . .
and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet.
Accounting Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Manetti, G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability report-
ing: Empirical evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 18(2), 110–122.
Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders
in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6),
985–1011. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1797
Manetti, G., Bellucci, M., & Bagnoli, L. (2016). Stakeholder engagement and public
information through social media: A study of Canadian and American public trans-
portation agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(8), 991–1009.
doi:10.1177/0275074016649260
Owen, D. L., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engage-
ment in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Paper presented at the
Accounting Forum. http://lists.exeter.ac.uk/items/BDDBDFDB-0CBB-F6C5-00CC-
60A158A4435A.html
Passetti, E., Bianchi, L., Battaglia, M., & Frey, M. (2017). When democratic principles are
not enough: Tensions and temporalities of dialogic stakeholder engagement. Journal of
Business Ethics, online.
Unerman, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards
greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 29(7), 685–707.
Introduction
Aras, G. , & Crowther, D. (2008). The social obligation of corporations. Journal of Knowledge
Globalization, 1(1). www.journal.kglobal.org/index.php/jkg/article/view/22
Aras, G. , & Crowther, D. (2016). The durable corporation: Strategies for sustainable
development. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bagnoli, L. (2004). Quale responsabilit sociale per limpresa? (Vol. 21). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Bebbington, J. , Brown, J. , Frame, B. , & Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement: The
potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3),
356381.
Bellucci, M. , & Manetti, G. (2017). Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting?
Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 30(4), 874905. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2122
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York: Free Press.
Bini, L. , Bellucci, M. , & Giunta, F. (2018). Integrating sustainability in business model
disclosure: Evidence from the UK mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production,
171(Supplement C), 11611170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.282
Brown, J. , & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and
opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 11201156.
doi:doi:10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1313
CIA . (2016). The World Factbook. Retrieved September 2016,
www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2056.html
Crane, A. , & Matten, D. (2016). Engagement required: The changing role of the corporation in
society. In D. Barton , D. Horvath , & M. Kipping (Eds), Re-imagining capitalism: Building a
responsible, long-term model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-
a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282311.
Fasan, M. , & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality
disclosure in Integrated Reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288305.
Fortune . (2016). Global 500. Retrieved September 2016, http://beta.fortune.com/global500 5
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York
Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, 122126.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013). Reporting principles and standard disclosure. Amsterdam:
Global Reporting Initiative.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability . . . and
how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting
Organizations and Society, 35(1), 4762. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Manetti, G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Empirical
evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,
18(2), 110122.
Manetti, G. , & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in
sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 9851011.
doi:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1797
Manetti, G. , Bellucci, M. , & Bagnoli, L. (2016). Stakeholder engagement and public information
through social media: A study of Canadian and American public transportation agencies. The
American Review of Public Administration, 47(8), 9911009. doi:10.1177/0275074016649260
Owen, D. L. , Swift, T. , & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in
social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Paper presented at the Accounting Forum.
http://lists.exeter.ac.uk/items/BDDBDFDB-0CBB-F6C5-00CC-60A158A4435A.html
Passetti, E. , Bianchi, L. , Battaglia, M. , & Frey, M. (2017). When democratic principles are not
enough: Tensions and temporalities of dialogic stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business
Ethics, online.
Unerman, J. , & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards
greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations
and Society, 29(7), 685707.
Business and sustainability
Abdifatah, A. H. , & Mutalib, A. (2016). The trend of integrated reporting practice in South Africa:
ceremonial or substantive? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2),
190224.
Adams, S. , & Simnett, R. (2011). Integrated reporting: An opportunity for Australias not-for-
profit sector. Australian Accounting Review, 21(3), 292301.
Adams, W. (1995). Green development: Environment and sustainability in a developing world.
London: Routledge.
Amit, R. , & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal,
22(67), 493520.
Andr, R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray
sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1),
133150.
AngloAmerican . (2013). Annual report 2013. Retrieved from
www.angloamerican.com/investors/annual-reporting
Aras, G. , & Crowther, D. (2008a). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the
relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision,
46(3), 433448.
Aras, G. , & Crowther, D. (2008b). The social obligation of corporations. Journal of Knowledge
Globalization, 1(1). www.journal.kglobal.org/index.php/jkg/article/view/22
Aras, G. , & Crowther, D. (2016). The durable corporation: Strategies for sustainable
development. London: Taylor & Francis.29
Aras, G. , Aybars, A. , & Kutlu, O. (2010). Managing corporate performance: Investigating the
relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging
markets. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(3), 229254.
Ariansen, P. (1999). Sustainability, morality and future generations. In W. M. Lafferty & O.
Langhelle (Eds), Towards sustainable development: On the goals of development and the
conditions of sustainability (pp. 8496). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Alnder, M. S. , & Curbach, J. (2017). Corporate or governmental duties? Corporate citizenship
from a governmental perspective. Business & society, 56(4), 617645.
Atkinson, G. (2000). Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and
Management, 43(2), 235252. doi:10.1080/09640560010694
Backman, C. A. , Verbeke, A. , & Schulz, R. A. (2017). The drivers of corporate climate change
strategies and public policy: A new resource-based view perspective. Business & society, 56(4),
545575.
Bagnoli, L. (2004). Quale responsabilit sociale per limpresa? (Vol. 21). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Barnett, M. L. , & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape
of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,
33(11), 13041320.
Barth, R. , & Wolff, F. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in Europe: Rhetoric and realities.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Beattie, V. , & Smith, S. J. (2013). Value creation and business models: Refocusing the
intellectual capital debate. The British Accounting Review, 45(4), 243254.
Bebbington, J. (2001). Sustainable development: A review of the international development,
business and accounting literature. Univ of Aberdeen Acct, Finance & Mgmt Working Paper,
0017. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.257434
Bebbington, J. , & Gray, R. (1996). Sustainable development and accounting: Incentives and
disincentives for the adoption of sustainability by transnational corporations. In H. Blokdijk (Ed.),
Environmental and sustainable development (pp. 107151). Amsterdam: Limperg Instituut.
Bebbington, J. , & Gray, R. (2001). An account of sustainability: Failure, success and a
reconceptualization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(5), 557587.
Bebbington, J. , & Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C. (2008). Carbon trading: Accounting and reporting
issues. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 697717.
Bellucci, M. , Bagnoli, L. , Biggeri, M. , & Rinaldi, V. (2012). Performance measurement in
solidarity economy organizations: The case of fair trade shops in Italy. Annals of Public and
Cooperative Economics, 83(1), 2559. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00453.x
Biggeri, M. , & Ferrannini, A. (2014). Sustainable human development: A new territorial and
people-centred perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Biggeri, M. , Ballet, J. , & Comim, F. (2011). Children and the capability approach. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Bini, L. , Dainelli, F. , & Giunta, F. (2016). Business model disclosure in the Strategic Report:
Entangling intellectual capital in value creation process. Journal of intellectual capital, 17(1),
83102. doi:10.1108/JIC-09-2015-0076
Blomqvist, L. , Brook, B. W. , Ellis, E. C. , Kareiva, P. M. , Nordhaus, T. , & Shellenberger, M.
(2013). Does the shoe fit? Real versus imagined ecological footprints. PLoS Biol, 11(11),
e1001700.
Bonacchi, M. (2007). Sustainable development performance and sustainability: Are
stakeholders the missing link? Paper presented at the Seminar at Darden School of Business,
USA.30
Bonacchi, M. , & Rinaldi, L. (2006). A performance measurement system for sustainability. In M.
Epstein & J. Manzoni (Eds), Studies in managerial and financial accounting (Vol. 16, pp. 4977).
Oxford: Elsevier.
Borzaga, C. , Depedri, S. , & Tortia, E. (2009). The role of cooperative and social enterprises: A
multifaceted approach for an economic pluralism. European Search Institute on Cooperative
and Social Enterprises. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1622143
Boulding, K. E. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In H. Jarrett (Ed.),
Environmental quality issues in a growing economy (pp. 314). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Brown, J. , & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and
opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 11201156. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-
04-2013-1313
Buhr, N. , & Reiter, S. (2006). Ideology, the environment and one worldview: A discourse
analysis of Norandas environmental and sustainable development reports. Advances in
Environmental Accounting and Management, 3, 148.
Busco, C. , Frigo, M. L. , Quattrone, P. , & Riccaboni, A. (2014). Integrated reporting. Dordrecht:
Springer.
Cho, C. H. (2009). Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster: A French
case study of Total SAs Erika and AZF incidents. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 3362.
Ciepley, D. (2013). Beyond public and private: Toward a political theory of the corporation.
American Political Science Review, 107(01), 139158.
Crane, A. , & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: A European perspective: managing corporate
citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: University Press Oxford.
Crane, A. , & Matten, D. (2016). Engagement required: The changing role of the corporation in
society. In D. Barton , D. Horvath , & M. Kipping (Eds), Re-imagining capitalism: Building a
responsible, long-term model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crane, A. , Matten, D. , & Spence, L. J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and
cases in a global context. London: Routledge.
Crowther, D. (1996). Corporate performance operates in three dimensions. Managerial Auditing
Journal, 11(8), 413.
Crowther, D. (2012). A social critique of corporate reporting. In D. Crowther , Semiotics and
web-based integrated reporting. Edition 2 reprint, London: Routledge.
Crowther, D. , & Aras, G. (2007). Is the global economy sustainable? In S. Barber (Ed.), The
geopolitics of the city (pp. 165194). London: Forum Press.
Daily, C. M. , Dalton, D. R. , & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of
dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371382.
Daly, H. E. (1996). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Boston:
Beacon Press.
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities.
Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312322.
De Villiers, C. , & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). Where firms choose to disclose voluntary
environmental information. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(6), 504525.
De Villiers, C. , Rinaldi, L. , & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an
agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 10421067.
doi:10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736 31
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-
a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282311.
Deegan, C. , Rankin, M. , & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and
environmental disclosures of BHP from 19831997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312343.
Defourny, J. , & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and
developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202228.
Defourny, J. , & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social
entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of
social entrepreneurship, 1(1), 3253.
Dey, C. , Burns, J. , Hopwood, A. , Unerman, J. , & Fries, J. (2010). Integrated reporting at Novo
Nordisk. In A. Hopwood , J. Unerman , & J. Fries (Eds) Accounting for sustainability: Practical
insights (pp. 215232). London: Earthscan.
Dierkes, M. , & Antal, A. B. (1986). Whither corporate social reporting: Is it time to legislate?
California Management Review, 28(3), 106121.
Dobson, A. (2000). Green political thought. Hove: Psychology Press.
Dresner, S. (2008). The principles of sustainability. London: Earthscan.
Eccles, R. G. , & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable
strategy. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Eccles, R. G. , & Krzus, M. P. (2014). The integrated reporting movement: Meaning,
momentum, motives, and materiality. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Ekins, P. (1993). Making development sustainable. In W. Sachs (Ed.), Global ecology: A new
arena of political conflict (pp. 91). London: Zed Books.
Ekins, P. , Simon, S. , Deutsch, L. , Folke, C. , & De Groot, R. (2003). A framework for the
practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability.
Ecological Economics, 44(2), 165185.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century. Oxford:
Capstone publishing.
Elkington, J. (1999). The link between accountability and sustainability: Theory put into practice.
Paper presented at the Conference on the Practice of Social Reporting for Business, ISEA,
January 19 , Commonwealth Conference Centre, London.
Evans, T. L. (2012). Occupy education: Living and learning sustainability (Vol. 22). New York:
Peter Lang.
Fasan, M. , & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality
disclosure in Integrated Reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288305.
Fiala, N. (2008). Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and
bad environmental science. Ecological economics, 67(4), 519525.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. , Harrison, J. S. , & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival,
reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. E. , Wicks, A. C. , & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate
objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364369.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York
Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, 122126.
Fritsch, B. , Schmidheiny, S. , & Seifritz, W. (2012). Towards an ecologically sustainable growth
society: Physical foundations, economic transitions, and political constraints. Dordrecht:
Springer Science & Business Media.32
Fuller, R. B. (1968). Operating manual for spaceship earth. New York: Dutton.
Galera, G. , & Borzaga, C. (2009). Social enterprise: An international overview of its conceptual
evolution and legal implementation. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 210228.
Garca-Snchez, I. M. , & Noguera-Gmez, L. (2017). Integrated reporting and stakeholder
engagement: The effect on information asymmetry. Corporate social responsibility and
environmental management. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/csr.1415
Garriga, E. , & Mel, D. (2013). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. In
Michalos, Alex C. , Poff CM , & Deborah C (Eds)Citation classics from the Journal of Business
Ethics (pp. 6996). Dordrecht: Springer.
Giovannoni, E. , & Pia Maraghini, M. (2013). The challenges of integrated performance
measurement systems: Integrating mechanisms for integrated measures. Accounting, Auditing
& Accountability Journal, 26(6), 9781008.
Gladwin, T. N. , Krause, T. S. , & Kennelly, J. J. (1995). Beyond eco-efficiency: Towards socially
sustainable business. Sustainable Development, 3(1), 3543.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013). Reporting principles and standard disclosure. Amsterdam:
Global Reporting Initiative.
Gray, R. (1992). Accounting and environmentalism: An exploration of the challenge of gently
accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and
Society, 17(5), 399425.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability. . . and how
would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting
Organizations and Society, 35(1), 4762. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Gray, R. , & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting for the environment. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gray, R. , & Milne, M. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Whos kidding whom? Chartered
Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), 6670.
Gray, R. H. , Milne, M. , & Buhr, N. (2014). Histories, rationales, voluntary standards and future
prospects or sustainability reporting: CSR, GRI, IIRC and Beyond. In J. Bebbington , J.
Unerman , & B. ODwyer (Eds), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 5171). London:
Routledge.
Gray, R. , Owen, D. , & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: Changes and
challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Guthrie, J. , & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory.
Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343352.
Haigh, N. , Walker, J. , Bacq, S. , & Kickul, J. (2015). Hybrid organizations: Origins, strategies,
impacts, and implications. California Management Review, 57(3), 512.
Hiller, J. S. (2013). The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of
Business Ethics, 118(2), 287301.
Hines, R. D. (1988). Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3), 251261.
Hopwood, A. G. , Unerman, J. , & Fries, J. (2010). Accounting for sustainability: Practical
insights. London: Earthscan.
International Integrated Reporting Committee . (2011). Towards integrated reporting:
Communicating value in the 21st century. London: International Integrated Reporting
Committee.
IIRC . (2013a). Business modelbackground paper for <IR>. Retrieved from
http://integratedreporting.org//wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Business_Model.pdf
IIRC . (2013b). The international <IR> framework. London: IIRC.33
Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective
function. Journal of applied corporate finance, 14(3), 821.
Jones, M. J. (1996). Accounting for biodiversity: A pilot study. The British Accounting Review,
28(4), 281303.
Jones, M. J. (2003). Accounting for biodiversity: Operationalising environmental accounting.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(5), 762789.
Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring
multinationals reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 115.
Kolk, A. , Levy, D. , & Pinkse, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime:
The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting
Review, 17(4), 719745.
KPMG . (2015). Currents of change: The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting
2015. Netherlands: KPMG.
Laine, M. (2010). Towards sustaining the status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish
corporate disclosures 19872005. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 247274.
doi:10.1080/09638180903136258
Lamberton, G. (2000). Accounting for sustainable development: Case study of city farm. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, 11(5), 583605.
Lele, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6),
607621.
Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social
performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Conference, New York.
Livesey, S. M. , & Kearins, K. (2002). Transparent and caring corporations? A study of
sustainability reports by the Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell. Organization & Environment,
15(3), 233258.
Lohmann, L. (2009). Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of
carbon and costbenefit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3), 499534.
Lopatta, K. , Jaeschke, R. , & Chen, C. (2017). Stakeholder engagement and corporate social
responsibility (CSR) performance: International evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 24(3), 199209.
Luke, T. W. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: An uneasy merger of sustainability and
development. Sustainable Development, 21(2), 8391. doi:10.1002/sd.1558
Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 8692.
Manetti, G. (2006). Il triple bottom line reporting: Dal coinvolgimento degli stakeholder alle
verifiche esterne (Vol. 30). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Manetti, G. , Bellucci, M. , Como, E. , & Bagnoli, L. (2015). Investing in volunteering: Measuring
social returns of volunteer recruitment, training and management. VOLUNTAS: International
Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 21042129. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-
9497-3
Matten, D. , & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical
conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166179.
Matten, D. , Crane, A. , & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of
corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 109120. doi:10.1023/a:1024128730308
Meadowcroft, J. (2000). Sustainable development: A new (ish) idea for a new century? Political
Studies, 48(2), 370387.
Meadows, D. , Randers, J. , & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update.
White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Miles, S. (2017). Stakeholder theory classification: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of
definitions. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 437459.34
Milne, M. J. (2013). Phantasmagoria, sustain-a-babbling and the communication of corporate
social and environmental accountability. In L. Davison , & R. Craig (Eds), The Routledge
companion to accounting communication (pp. 135153). London: Routledge.
Milne, M. J. , & Gray, R. (2012). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the Global Reporting
Initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 1329.
doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
Milne, M. J. , Kearins, K. , & Walton, S. (2006). Creating adventures in wonderland: The journey
metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13(6), 801839.
Mitchell, R. K. , Agle, B. R. , & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification
and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management
Review, 22(4), 853886. doi:10.2307/259247
Mook, L. , Chan, A. , & Kershaw, D. (2015). Measuring social enterprise value creation.
Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(2), 189207.
Moratis, L. , & Brandt, S. (2017). Corporate stakeholder responsiveness? Exploring the state
and quality of GRI-based stakeholder engagement disclosures of European firms. Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 312325..
Morris, L. (2013). Business model warfare: The strategy of business breakthroughs. Journal of
Business Models, 1(1), 1337.
Nron, P.-Y. , & Norman, W. (2008). Citizenship, Inc. Do we really want businesses to be good
corporate citizens? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(01), 126.
Neu, D. , Warsame, H. , & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: environmental
disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265282.
Nidumolu, R. , Prahalad, C. K. , & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key
driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 5664.
Nielsen, C. (2010). Conceptualizing, analyzing and communicating the business model.
Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University, WP, 2, 124.
Nixon, B. , & Burns, J. (2012). The paradox of strategic management accounting. Management
Accounting Research, 23(4), 229244.
Padilla, E. (2002). Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Ecological Economics, 41(1),
6983.
Pallot, J. (1997). Infrastructure accounting for local authorities: Technical management and
political context. Financial Accountability & Management, 13(3), 225242.
Parker, L. D. (2012). Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and
relevance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(1), 5470.
Perkmann, M. , & Spicer, A. (2010). What are business models? Developing a theory of
performative representations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 29, 265275.
Phillips, N. , & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social
construction (Vol. 50). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Pulejo, L. (2012). La gender equality nelleconomia dellazienda. Strategie e strumenti di
mainstreaming di genere per lo sviluppo sostenibile (Vol. 1). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Ranganathan, J. (1998). Sustainability rulers: Measuring corporate environmental and social
performance. World Resources Institute, Sustainable Enterprise Initiative. Retrieved from
www.wri.org/publication/sustainability-rulersmeasuring-corporate-environmental-social-
performance
Redclift, M. (2002). Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions. London: Routledge.
Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (19872005): An oxymoron comes of age.
Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212227.
Rees, W. E. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban
economics leaves out. Environment and urbanization, 4(2), 121130.35
Reid, D. (2013). Sustainable development: An introductory guide. London: Routledge.
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application
of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595612.
Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable
development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369384.
Safire, W. (2008). Footprint. The New York Times.
www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/magazine/17wwln-safire-t.html
Salazar, J. , Husted, B. W. , & Biehl, M. (2012). Thoughts on the evaluation of corporate social
performance through projects. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 175186.
Scherer, A. G. , Palazzo, G. , & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a
new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly,
16(04), 505532.
Scruton, R. (2012). How to think seriously about the planet: The case for an environmental
conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Setia, N. , Abhayawansa, S. , Joshi, M. , & Huynh, A. V. (2015). Integrated reporting in South
Africa: Some initial evidence. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(3),
397424. doi:10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2014-0018
Shleifer, A. , & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of
Finance, 52(2), 737783.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy
of Management Review, 20(4), 936960. doi:10.2307/258961
Solomon, J. , & Maroun, W. (2012). Integrated reporting: The influence of King III on social,
ethical and environmental reporting. London: The Association of Chartered Certified
Accountants.
Solow, R. M. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. The Review of
Economic Studies, 41, 2945.
Sombart, W. (1915). The quintessence of capitalism: A study of the history and psychology of
the modern business man. New York: EP Dutton.
Steiner, G. A. (1972). Social policies for business. California Management Review, 15(2), 1724.
Stout, L. A. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors,
corporations, and the public. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy
of Management Review, 20(3), 571610.
Sundaram, A. K. , & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization
Science, 15(3), 350363.
Taplin, J. R. , Bent, D. , & Aeron-Thomas, D. (2006). Developing a sustainability accounting
framework to inform strategic business decisions: A case study from the chemicals industry.
Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 347360.
Terzani, S. (1989). Introduzione al bilancio di esercizio. (Quinta edizione. ed.). Padova: Cedam.
Thomas, A. (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of
Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(3), 243263.
Wackernagel, M. , & Rees, W. (1998). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the
earth. Gabriola: New Society Publishers.
Wang, P. C. , Halim, I. , Adhitya, A. , & Srinivasan, R. (2010). Evaluating triple bottom line
sustainability of global supply chains using dynamic simulation. Paper presented at the 2010
AIChE Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City.
Ward, B. (1966). Spaceship earth. New York: Columbia University Press.
Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment. Journal of
Corporate Citizenship, 1(1), 5773.36
Whelan, G. , Moon, J. , & Grant, B. (2013). Corporations and citizenship arenas in the age of
social media. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 777790.
Wild, S. , & van Staden, C. (2013). Integrated reporting: Initial analysis of early reportersan
institutional theory approach. Paper presented at the 7th Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary
Accounting Research Conference, Kobe.
World Commission for Environment and Development . (1987). Our common future. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Yunus, M. (2007). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of
capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.
Yunus, M. , Moingeon, B. , & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models:
Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 308325.
Zappa, G. (1957). Le produzioni nelleconomia delle imprese. Milano: Giuffr editore.
Materiality in sustainability reporting
AccountAbility . (2008a). AA1000 AccountAbility principles standard 2008. New York:
AccountAbility.
AccountAbility . (2008b). AA1000 assurance standard 2008. New York: AccountAbility.
AccountAbility . (2015). AA1000 stakeholder engagement standard 2015. New York:
AccountAbility.
Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical
reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2),
223250.
Adams, C. A. , Larrinaga-Gonzlez, C. , Adams, C. A. , & McNicholas, P. (2007). Making a
difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 382402.
Arevalo, J. A. , Castello, I. , de Colle, S. , Lenssen, G. , Neumann, K. , Zollo, M. , . . . Lenssen,
G. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Integrating sustainability in business models.
Journal of Management Development, 30(10), 941954.
Bagnoli, L. (2004). Quale responsabilit sociale per limpresa? (Vol. 21). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Bagnoli, L. , & Megali, C. (2009). Measuring performance in social enterprises. Nonprofit and
Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 149165.
Balmer, J. M. , Blombck, A. , & Scandelius, C. (2013). Corporate heritage in CSR
communication: A means to responsible brand image? Corporate Communications: An
International Journal, 18(3), 362382.
Bandettini, A. (1981). Responsabilit sociale dellimpresa. AA. VV., Bilancio desercizio e
amministrazione delle imprese. Studi in onore di Pietro Onida. Milano: Giuffr.
Barth, R. , & Wolff, F. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in Europe: Rhetoric and realities.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bebbington, J. (2001). Sustainable development: a review of the international development,
business and accounting literature. Univ of Aberdeen Acct, Finance & Mgmt Working Paper, 00-
17. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.257434
Bebbington, J. (2007). Changing organizational attitudes and culture through sustainability
accounting. In J. Unerman , J. Bebbington , & B. ODwyer (Eds), Sustainability Accounting and
Accountability (pp. 226242). London: Routledge.
Beder, S. (2002). Global spin: The corporate assault on environmentalism. Totnes: Green
Books.
Bellucci, M. , Bagnoli, L. , Biggeri, M. , & Rinaldi, V. (2012). Performance measurement in
solidarity economy organizations: The case of fair trade shops in Italy. Annals of Public and
Cooperative Economics, 83(1), 2559. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00453.x
Berthelot, S. , Cormier, D. , & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental disclosure research: Review
and synthesis. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1.
Brammer, S. , & Pavelin, S. (2004). Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies.
Business Ethics A European Review, 13(2-3), 8699.60
Brennan, N. M. , & Gray, S. J. (2005). The impact of materiality: Accountings best kept secret.
Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1, 131.
Busco, C. , Frigo, M. L. , Quattrone, P. , & Riccaboni, A. (2014). Integrated reporting. Dordrecht:
Springer.
Cafferata, R. (2009). Il cantiere aperto della responsabilit sociale dellimpresa. Impresa Progetto-
Electronic Journal of Management, 1.
https://www.impresaprogetto.it/sites/impresaprogetto.it/files/articles/ip_1-
09_saggio_cafferata.pdf
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral
management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 3948.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct.
Business & society, 38(3), 268295.
Castello, I. , & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate
responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 1129. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0770-
8
Catturi, G. (2002). Sviluppo sostenibile e nuove attivit del professionista economico-contabile.
Universit di Siena, Facolt di economia.
Catturi, G. (2006). Lazienda universale: Piste di riflessione. Padova: Cedam.
Ciappei, C. , & Ninci, D. (2006). Etica di impresa: Considerazioni teoriche ed evidenze cliniche.
Firenze: Firenze University Press.
Clarke, J. , & Gibson-Sweet, M. (1999). The use of corporate social disclosures in the
management of reputation and legitimacy: A cross sectoral analysis of UK Top 100 Companies.
Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(1), 513.
Clarkson, P. M. , Li, Y. , Richardson, G. D. , & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be
green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of
Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122144.
Clarkson, P. M. , Overell, M. B. , & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation
to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 2760.
Coda, V. (1985). Valori imprenditoriali e successo dellimpresa. Finanza, Marketing e
Produzione, 2, 2356.
Corporate Register . (2008). The CSR assurance statement report. London: Corporate Register.
Crane, A. , & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: A European perspective: Managing corporate
citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crane, A. , & Matten, D. (2016). Engagement required: The changing role of the corporation in
society. In D. Barton , D. Horvath , & M. Kipping (Eds), Re-imagining capitalism: Building a
responsible, long-term model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Villiers, C. , Rinaldi, L. , & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an
agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 10421067.
doi:10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-
a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282311.
Deegan, C. , Rankin, M. , & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and
environmental disclosures of BHP from 19831997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312343.
Donaldson, T. , & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts,
evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 6591.61
Dowling, J. , & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational
behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122136.
Durden, C. (2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671694.
Eccles, R. G. , Krzus, M. P. , Rogers, J. , & Serafeim, G. (2012). The need for sector-specific
materiality and sustainability reporting standards. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24(2),
6571.
Edgley, C. , Jones, M. J. , & Atkins, J. (2015). The adoption of the materiality concept in social
and environmental reporting assurance: A field study approach. The British Accounting Review,
47(1), 118.
Elkington, J. (1999). The link between accountability and sustainability: Theory put into practice.
Paper presented at the Conference on the Practice of Social Reporting for Business, ISEA,
January, 19, Commonwealth Conference Centre, London.
Epstein, E. M. (2007). The good company: Rhetoric or reality? Corporate social responsibility
and business ethics redux. American Business Law Journal, 44(2), 207222. doi:10.1111/j.1744-
1714.2007.00035.x
Evans, T. L. (2012). Occupy education: Living and learning sustainability (Vol. 22). New York:
Peter Lang.
Fasan, M. , & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality
disclosure in integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288305.
Ferrero, G. (1968). Istituzioni di economia dazienda. Milano: Giuffr.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. , Wicks, A. C. , & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate
objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364369.
Frishkoff, P. (1970). An empirical investigation of the concept of materiality in accounting.
Journal of Accounting Research, 8, 116129.
Giunta, F. (2008). Economia aziendale. Padova: Cedam.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2002). Sustainability reporting guidelines 2002. Amsterdam: Global
Reporting Initiative.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013a). The external assurance of sustainability reporting.
Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013b). Implementation manual. Amsterdam: Global Reporting
Initiative.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013c). Reporting principles and standard disclosure. Amsterdam:
Global Reporting Initiative.
Gbbels, M. (2002). Reframing corporate social responsibility: The contemporary conception of a
fuzzy notion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95105.
Goertz, G. , & Mahoney, J. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Qualitative and quantitative research
in the social sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gond, J. P. , Grubnic, S. , Herzig, C. , & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control
systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting
Research, 23(3), 205223. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003
Gray, R. (2000). Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing,
reporting and attestation: A review and comment. International Journal of Auditing, 4(3),
247268.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability . . . and
how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting
Organizations and Society, 35(1), 4762. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006 62
Gray, R. , & Milne, M. (2002). Sustainability reporting: whos kidding whom? Chartered
Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), 6670.
Gray, R. , Kouhy, R. , & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A
review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 8(2), 4777.
Gray, R. , Owen, D. , & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: Changes and
challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Guthrie, J. , & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory.
Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343352.
Guthrie, J. , & Parker, L. D. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative
international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159175.
Hedberg, C. J. , & Von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate
sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 10(3), 153164.
Hopwood, A. G. (2009). Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and
Society, 34(3), 433439.
Ihlen, . (2009). The oxymoron of sustainable oil production: The case of the Norwegian oil
industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(1), 5363.
Ihlen, . , & Roper, J. (2014). Corporate reports on sustainability and sustainable development:
We have arrived. Sustainable Development, 22(1), 4251.
IIRC . (2013a). Business modelbackground paper for < IR>. Retrieved from
http://integratedreporting.org//wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Business_Model.pdf
IIRC . (2013b). The international <IR> framework. London: IIRC.
IIRC . (2013c). Materialitybackground paper for < IR>. Retrieved from
http://integratedreporting.org//wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IR-Background-Paper-Materiality.pdf
International Accounting Standards Board . (2010). The conceptual framework for financial
reporting 2010. London: IFRS.
Ioannou, I. , & Serafeim, G. (2014). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability
reporting: Evidence from four countries. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper,
11100. Harvard: Harvard Business School.
Khandker, S. R. , Koolwal, G. B. , & Samad, H. A. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation:
Quantitative methods and practices. Washington: World Bank Publications.
Kiron, D. , Kruschwitz, N. , Haanaes, K. , & Velken, I. V. S. (2012). Sustainability nears a tipping
point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 69.
Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance.
International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 5164.
doi:10.1504/IJESD.2004.004688
Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring
multinationals reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 115.
Kolk, A. , & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance
statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3),
182198.
KPMG . (2013). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013. Amsterdam:
KPMG.
KPMG . (2015). Currents of change: The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting
2015. Amsterdam: KPMG.
Laine, M. (2010). Towards sustaining the status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish
corporate disclosures 19872005. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 247274.
doi:10.1080/09638180903136258 63
Lamberton, G. (2005). Sustainability accounting: A brief history and conceptual framework.
Accounting Forum, 29(1), 726. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2004.11.001
Larrinaga, C. (2007). Sustainability reporting: Insights from neo-institutional theory. In J.
Unerman , J. Bebbington , & B. ODwyer (Eds), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp.
150167). London: Routledge.
Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C. , & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting change or institutional
appropriation? A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3), 269292.
Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business
Ethics, 43(3), 253261.
Lee, T. A. (1984). Materiality: A review and analysis of its reporting significance and auditing
implications. London: Auditing Practices Committee of the Consultative Committee of
Accounting Bodies.
Lehman, G. (1999). Disclosing new worlds: A role for social and environmental accounting and
auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(3), 217241.
Liberatore, G. (2001). Pianificazione e controllo delle aziende di trasporto pubblico locale:
problematiche di misurazione della performance. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Lo, K. (2010). Materiality and voluntary disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
49(1), 133135.
Lopatta, K. , Jaeschke, R. , & Chen, C. (2017). Stakeholder engagement and corporate social
responsibility (CSR) performance: International evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 24(3), 199209.
Luke, T. W. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: An uneasy merger of sustainability and
development. Sustainable Development, 21(2), 8391. doi:10.1002/sd.1558
Manetti, G. (2006). Il triple bottom line reporting: Dal coinvolgimento degli stakeholder alle
verifiche esterne (Vol. 30). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Manetti, G. , & Toccafondi, S. (2011). The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting
assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 363377. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1044-1
Masini, C. (1960). Lorganizzazione del lavoro nellimpresa (Vol. 1). Milano: Giuffr.
Masini, C. (1964). La struttura dellimpresa. Milano: Giuffr.
Matacena, A. (1984). Impresa e ambiente: Il bilancio sociale. Bologna: Clueb.
Matacena, A. (2008). Responsabilit sociale delle imprese e accountability: Alcune glosse.
Milano: Diapason.
Matten, D. , Crane, A. , & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of
corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 109120. doi:10.1023/a:1024128730308
Messier Jr, W. F. , Martinov-Bennie, N. , & Eilifsen, A. (2005). A review and integration of
empirical research on materiality: Two decades later. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,
24(2), 153187.
Milne, M. J. (2013). Phantasmagoria, sustain-a-babbling and the communication of corporate
social and environmental accountability. In J. L. Davison , & R. Craig (Eds), The Routledge
companion to accounting communication (pp. 135153). London: Routledge.
Milne, M. J. , Kearins, K. , & Walton, S. (2006). Creating adventures in wonderland: The journey
metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13(6), 801839.
Mio, C. (2013). Materiality and assurance: Building the link. In C. Busco , M. L. Frigo , A.
Riccaboni , & P. Quattrone (Eds), Integrated reporting (pp. 7994). Dordrecht: Springer.
Mitchell, R. K. , Agle, B. R. , & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification
and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management
Review, 22(4), 853886. doi:10.2307/259247 64
Morris, R. D. (1987). Signalling, agency theory and accounting policy choice. Accounting and
Business Research, 18(69), 4756.
Newton, T. , & Harte, G. (1997). Green business: Technicist kitsch? Journal of Management
Studies, 34(1), 7598.
Nielsen, C. (2010). Conceptualizing, analyzing and communicating the business model.
Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University, Working Paper, 2, 124. Aalborg: Aalbord
University.
ODwyer, B. , & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and
sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205229.
Onida, P. (1954). Lazienda: primi principi di gestione e di organizzazione. Milano: Giuffr.
Onida, P. (1965). Economia dazienda. Torino: Unione tipografico-editrice torinese.
Owen, D. L. , Swift, T. , & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in
social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Paper presented at the Accounting Forum.
http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/5326647/questioning-role-stakeholder-engagement-
social-ethical-accounting-auditing-reporting
Passetti, E. , Cinquini, L. , Marelli, A. , & Tenucci, A. (2014). Sustainability accounting in action:
Lights and shadows in the Italian context. The British Accounting Review, 46(3), 295308.
Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil
spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471475.
Phillips, R. , Freeman, R. E. , & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business
Ethics Quarterly, 13(04), 479502.
Rebora, G. (1981). Comportamento dimpresa e controllo sociale. Milano: Etas Libri.
Ruisi, M. (2014). La dimensione etico-valoriale nel governo delle aziende.
http://riviste.paviauniversitypress.it/index.php/ea/article/viewFile/1719/1796
Rusconi, G. (1988). Il bilancio sociale dimpresa: Problemi e pospettive. Milano: Giuffr.
Rusconi, G. , & Signori, S. (2007). Responsabilit sociale e azienda non profit: Quale
declinazione. Impresa sociale, 76(1), 3958.
Sherman, W. R. , Steingard, D. S. , & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (2002). Sustainable stakeholder
accounting beyond complementarity and towards integration in environmental accounting.
Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the
natural environment.
https://books.google.it/books?hl=it&lr=&id=KEYUy7pxiFMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA257&dq=Sustainabl
e+stakeholder+accounting+beyond+complementarity+and+towards+integration+in+environmen
tal+accounting&ots=v4V6EeCg55&sig=9JsMjcIONnFa0GigbxHK3pW2oeM#v=onepage&q=Sus
tainable%20stakeholder%20accounting%20beyond%20complementarity%20and%20towards%
20integration%20in%20environmental%20accounting&f=false
Signori, S. , & Rusconi, G. (2009). Ethical thinking in traditional Italian Economia Aziendale and
the stakeholder management theory: The search for possible interactions. Journal of Business
Ethics, 89(3), 303318.
Simnett, R. , Vanstraelen, A. , & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An
international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937967.
Slack, K. (2012). Mission impossible? Adopting a CSR-based business model for extractive
industries in developing countries. Resources Policy, 37(2), 179184.
Sorci, C. (1986). I valori imprenditoriali nei rapporti con i proprietari del capitale. In AA. VV.
(Ed.), Valori imprenditoriali e successo aziendale (pp. 3958). Milano: Giuffr.65
Tate, W. L. , Ellram, L. M. , & Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility reports: A
thematic analysis related to supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management,
46(1), 1944.
Terzani, S. (1984). Responsabilit sociale dellazienda. Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di
Economia aziendale, 8, 286299.
Terzani, S. (1989). Introduzione al bilancio di esercizio (Quinta edizione. ed.). Padova: Cedam.
Thomson, I. , & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A
pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(5), 507533.
Thorne, L. , Mahoney, L. S. , & Manetti, G. (2014). Motivations for issuing standalone CSR
reports: A survey of Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(4),
686714.
Tregidga, H. , Kearins, K. , & Milne, M. (2013). The politics of knowing organizational
sustainable development. Organization & Environment.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1086026612474957
Tuttle, B. , Coller, M. , & Plumlee, R. D. (2002). The effect of misstatements on decisions of
financial statement users: An experimental investigation of auditor materiality thresholds.
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 1127.
UNEP . (1998). The non-reporting report. London: UNEP.
Unerman, J. , & Zappettini, F. (2014). Incorporating materiality considerations into analyses of
absence from sustainability reporting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 34(3),
172186.
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability:
Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), 95105.
doi:10.1023/a:1023331212247
Vermiglio, F. (1984). Il bilancio sociale nel quadro evolutivo del sistema dimpresa. Brescia:
Grafo Editore.
Whetten, D. A. , Rands, G. , & Godfrey, P. (2002). What are the responsibilities of business to
society. Handbook of strategy and management.
http://marriottschool.net/emp/daw4/Responsibilities%20of%20Business%20to%20Society%202
002.pdf
World Commission for Environment and Development . (1987). Our common future. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Zappa, G. (1927). Tendenze nuove negli studi di ragioneria. Milano: Istituto Editoriale
Scientifico.
Zappa, G. (1957). Le produzioni nelleconomia delle imprese. Milano; Giuffr.
A theory of stakeholder engagement
ACCA . (2005). Improving stakeholder engagement reporting: An ACCA and the Environment
Council workshop. London: ACCA.
AccountAbility . (2008a). AA1000 AccountAbility principles standard 2008. New York:
AccountAbility
AccountAbility . (2008b). AA1000 assurance standard 2008. New York: AccountAbility
AccountAbility . (2015). AA1000 stakeholder engagement standard 2015. New York:
AccountAbility
Agle, B. R. , Mitchell, R. K. , & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An
investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values.
Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507525.
Agostino, D. , & Arnaboldi, M. (2015). A measurement framework for assessing the contribution
of social media to public engagement: An empirical analysis on Facebook. Public Management
Review, 119.
Andriof, J. , & Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In J. Andriof , S.
Waddock , B. Husted , & S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds),Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory,
responsibility and engagement (Vol. 17, pp. 1742). Greenleaf Publishing in association with
GSE Research. www.ingentaconnect.com/content/glbj/ust;jsessionid=6nm5sef1glp61.x-ic-live-
01#expand/collapse
Argenti, J. (1993). Your organization: What is it for? Challenging traditional organizational aims.
New York: McGraw Hill Book.
Argenti, J. (1997). Stakeholders: The case against. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 442445.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of
Planners, 35(4), 216224.
Barnett, M. L. , & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape
of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,
33(11), 13041320.
Bebbington, J. , & Gray, R. (2001). An account of sustainability: failure, success and a
reconceptualization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(5), 557587.
Bebbington, J. , Brown, J. , & Frame, B. (2007). Accounting technologies and sustainability
assessment models. Ecological Economics, 61(2), 224236.
Bebbington, J. , Brown, J. , Frame, B. , & Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement: The
potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3),
356381.
Bellucci, M. , & Manetti, G. (2017). Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting?
Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 30(4), 874905. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2122
Bendheim, C. L. , Waddock, S. A. , & Graves, S. B. (1998). Determining best practice in
corporate-stakeholder relations using data envelopment analysis: An industry-level study.
Business & Society, 37(3), 306338.
Berman, S. L. , Wicks, A. C. , Kotha, S. , & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation
matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial
performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488506.
Boatright, J. R. (1994). Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or, whats so
special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(04), 393407.
Bond, R. M. , Fariss, C. J. , Jones, J. J. , Kramer, A. D. , Marlow, C. , Settle, J. E. , & Fowler, J.
H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature,
489(7415), 295298.
Bowie, N. (1988). The moral obligations of multinational corporations. Problems of International
Justice, 97, 113.113
Boyce, G. (2000). Public discourse and decision making: Exploring possibilities for financial,
social and environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1),
2764.
Brainard, L. , & Edlins, M. (2015). Top 10 US municipal police departments and their social
media usage. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), 728745.
Brenner, S. N. , & Molander, E. A. (1977). Is ethics of business changing. Harvard Business
Review, 55(1), 5771.
Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking
pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(3), 313342.
Brown, J. , & Dillard, J. (2013). Critical accounting and communicative action: On the limits of
consensual deliberation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(3), 176190.
Brown, J. , & Dillard, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and
opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 11201156. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-
04-2013-1313
Brown, J. , & Dillard, J. (2015). Dialogic accountings for stakeholders: On opening up and
closing down participatory governance. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 961985.
doi:10.1111/joms.12153
Bryman, A. , & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and
analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 2153.
Bryson, J. M. , & Bromiley, P. (1993). Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation
of major projects. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 319337.
Bryson, J. M. , Bromiley, P. , & Jung, Y. S. (1990). Influences of context and process on project
planning success. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 9(3), 183195.
Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action.
Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 3349.
Busco, C. , Frigo, M. L. , Quattrone, P. , & Riccaboni, A. (2014). Integrated reporting. Dordrecht:
Springer.
Campbell, D. (2003). Intra-and intersectoral effects in environmental disclosures: Evidence for
legitimacy theory? Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(6), 357371.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An
institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3),
946967.
Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy
of Management Review, 4, 497505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral
management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 3948.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000768139190005G
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct.
Business & society, 38(3), 268295.
Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics . (1999). Principles of stakeholder management. Clarkson
Centre for Business Ethics, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
Clarkson, M. B. (1991). Defining, evaluating, and managing corporate social performance: The
stakeholder management model. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12(1),
331358.
Clarkson, M. B. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social
performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92117.114
Cooper, S. M. , & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability:
The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7), 649667.
Crane, A. , & Matten, D. (2016). Engagement required: The changing role of the corporation in
society. In D. Barton , D. Horvath , & M. Kipping (Eds), Re-imagining capitalism: Building a
responsible, long-term model (Chapter 9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cummings, J. (2001). Engaging stakeholders in corporate accountability programmes: A cross-
sectoral analysis of UK and transnational experience. Business Ethics: A European Review,
10(1), 4552.
Dahlberg, L. (2005). The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously? Theory and
Society, 34(2), 111136.
Darnall, N. , & Jolley, G. J. (2004). Involving the public: When are surveys and stakeholder
interviews effective? 1. Review of Policy Research, 21(4), 581593.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-
a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282311.
Deegan, C. (2006). Legitimacy theory. In Z. Hoque (Ed.), Methodological issues in accounting
research: Theories and methods (pp. 161182). Spiramus.
Dey, C. (2003). Corporate silentand shadowsocial accounting. Social and Environmental
Accountability Journal, 23(2), 69.
Dillard, J. , & Brown, J. (2012). Agonistic pluralism and imagining CSEAR into the future. Social
and Environmental Accountability Journal, 32(1), 316.
Dillard, J. , & Roslender, R. (2011). Taking pluralism seriously: Embedded moralities in
management accounting and control systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(2),
135147.
Dillard, J. , & Yuthas, K. (2013). Critical dialogics, agonistic pluralism, and accounting
information systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(2), 113119.
Donaldson, T. , & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts,
evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 6591.
Downey, P. R. (2002). The essential stakeholder dialogue. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 9(1), 3745.
Edward Freeman, R. , Rusconi, G. , Signori, S. , & Strudler, A. (2012). Stakeholder theory (ies):
Ethical ideas and managerial action. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 12.
Emshoff, J. R. , & Freeman, R. E. (1978). Stakeholder management. Pennsylvania: Wharton
Applied Research Center.
Evan, W. M. , & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation:
Kantian capitalism. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Frame, B. , & Brown, J. (2008). Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability.
Ecological Economics, 65(2), 225241.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2),
233236.
Freeman, R. E. (2000). Business ethics at the millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(01),
169180.
Freeman, R. E. (2004). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. In T. L. Beauchamp
and N. E. Bowie (Eds), Ethical theory and business, 7th edn (pp. 5564). Upper Saddle River:
Pearson/Prentice-Hall.
Freeman, R. E. , & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management.
www.researchgate.net/publication/228320877_A_Stakeholder_Approach_to_Strategic_Manage
ment 115
Freeman, R. E. , & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on
corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88106.
Freeman, R. E. , Wicks, A. C. , & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate
objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364369.
Friedman, A. L. , & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford
University Press on Demand.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York
Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, 122126.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2),
191205.
Fuchs, C. (2009). Information and communication technologies and society: A contribution to
the critique of the political economy of the internet. European Journal of Communication, 24(1),
6987.
Garriga, E. , & Mel, D. (2013). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. In
Michalos, A. C. , Poff C. M. , & Deborah, C , (Eds) Citation classics from the Journal of
Business Ethics (pp. 6996). Dordrecht: Springer.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2002). Sustainability reporting guidelines 2002. Amsterdam: Global
Reporting Initiative.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013a). Implementation manual. Amsterdam: Global Reporting
Initiative.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013b). Reporting principles and standard disclosure. Amsterdam:
Global Reporting Initiative.
Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly,
1(01), 5373.
Gray, R. (1997). The silent practice of social and environmental accounting and corporate social
reporting in companies. In S. Zadek , R. Evans , & P. Pruzan (Eds), Building corporate
accountability: Emerging practices in social and ethical accounting auditing and reporting (pp.
201217). London: Earthscan.
Gray, R. (2000). Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing,
reporting and attestation: a review and comment. International Journal of Auditing, 4(3),
247268.
Gray, R. , & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting for the environment. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gray, R. , & Milne, M. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Whos kidding whom? Chartered
Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), 6670.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action 1, reason and the rationalization of
society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action 2: Lifeworld and system-A critique of
functionalist reason (trans. Thomas McCarthy ). Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a
category of bourgeois society. Boston: MIT press.
Halal, W. E. (1990). The new management: Business and social institutions for the information
age. Business in the Contemporary World, 2(2), 4154.
IIRC . (2013). Materiality background paper for < IR>. Retrieved from
http://integratedreporting.org//wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IR-Background-Paper-Materiality.pdf
Inauen, S. , & Schoeneborn, D. (2014) Twitter and its usage for dialogic stakeholder
communication by MNCs and NGOs. In R. Tench , W. Sun , & B. Jones (Eds) Communicating
corporate social responsibility: Perspectives and practice (Critical studies on corporate
responsibility, governance and sustainability, Volume 6) (pp. 283310). Emerald Group
Publishing Limited.116
Jackson, C. , & Bundgard, T. (2002). Achieving quality in social reporting: The role of surveys in
stakeholder consultation. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(3), 253259.
Jawahar, I. , & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An
organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397414.
Jeacle, I. , & Carter, C. (2014). Creative spaces in interdisciplinary accounting research.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(8), 12331240.
Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective
function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 821.
Jensen, M. C. , & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency
costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305360.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics.
Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404437.
Jones, T. M. , & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management
Review, 24(2), 206221.
Jones, T. M. , Wicks, A. C. , & Freeman, R. E. (2002). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art.
In N. E. Bowie (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to business ethics (pp. 1937). London: Blackwell.
Jonker, J. , & Foster, D. (2002). Stakeholder excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity
of a stakeholder perspective of the firm. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 9(4), 187195.
Kent, M. L. (2013). Using social media dialogically: Public relations role in reviving democracy.
Public Relations Review, 39(4), 337345.
Kent, M. L. , Taylor, M. , & White, W. J. (2003). The relationship between web site design and
organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Public Relations Review, 29(1), 6377.
Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance.
International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 5164.
doi:10.1504/IJESD.2004.004688
Kreiner, P. , & Bhambri, A. (1988). Influence and information in organization-stakeholder
relationships. In Academy of management proceedings, no. 1 (pp. 319323). Briarcliff Manor:
Academy of Management.
Laplume, A. O. , Sonpar, K. , & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that
moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 11521189.
Laughlin, R. C. (1987). Accounting systems in organisational contexts: A case for critical theory.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(5), 479502.
Laughlin, R. C. (2007). Critical reflections on research approaches, accounting regulation and
the regulation of accounting. The British Accounting Review, 39(4), 271289.
Lee, K. , Oh, W.-Y. , & Kim, N. (2013). Social media for socially responsible firms: Analysis of
fortune 500s twitter profiles and their CSR/CSIR ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4),
791806.
Lombardi, L. (2016). Disempowerment and empowerment of accounting: An indigenous
accounting context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(8), 13201341.
doi:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2015-2167
Lopatta, K. , Jaeschke, R. , & Chen, C. (2017). Stakeholder engagement and corporate social
responsibility (CSR) performance: International evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 24(3), 199209.117
Lovejoy, K. , Waters, R. D. , & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter:
How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations
Review, 38(2), 313318.
MacRae Jr , D., & Whittington, D. (1997). Expert advice for policy choice: Analysis and
discourse. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Manetti, G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical
evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,
18(2), 110122.
Manetti, G. , & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in
sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 9851011.
doi:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1797
Manetti, G. , & Toccafondi, S. (2011). The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting
assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 363377. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1044-1
Manetti, G. , Bellucci, M. , & Bagnoli, L. (2017). Stakeholder engagement and public information
through social media: A study of Canadian and American public transportation agencies. The
American Review of Public Administration, 47(8). doi:10.1177/0275074016649260
Marcoux, A. (2000). Business ethics gone wrong. Emmitsburg: National Emergency Training
Center.
Marcoux, A. M. (2003). A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory. Business Ethics
Quarterly, 13(01), 124.
Margerum, R. D. (2002). Collaborative planning building consensus and building a distinct
model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 237253.
Margolis, J. D. , & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by
business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268305.
Medawar, C. (1976). The social audit: A political view. Accounting, Organizations and Society,
1(4), 389394.
Merton, R. K. , Fiske, M. , & Kendall, P. (1956). The focused interview. Glencoe: Ballachulish.
Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused? Journal of Business
Ethics, 108, 285298.
Mitchell, R. K. , Agle, B. R. , & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification
and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management
Review, 22(4), 853886. doi:10.2307/259247
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard:
Harvard university press.
Moratis, L. , & Brandt, S. (2017). Corporate stakeholder responsiveness? Exploring the state
and quality of GRI-based stakeholder engagement disclosures of European firms. Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 312325
Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: Towards a new epistemology for
accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5), 477485.
Murphy, D. F. , & Bendell, J. (1997). In the company of partners: Business, environmental
groups and sustainable development post-Rio. Bristol: Policy Press.
Nsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm.
Understanding Stakeholder Thinking, 19, 31.118
Neligan, C. (2003). Increasing accountability through external stakeholder engagement.
London: One World Trust, Houses of Parliament.
Nutt, P. C. (2002). Why decisions fail. San Francisco: Barrett-Kohler Publishers.
ODwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story.
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406436.
ODwyer, B. (2005). The construction of a social account: A case study in an overseas aid
agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 279296.
ODwyer, B. , & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and
sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205229.
Ogden, S. , & Watson, R. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management:
Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the UK privatized water industry. Academy of
Management Journal, 42(5), 526538.
Owen, D. L. , Swift, T. , & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in
social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Paper presented at the Accounting Forum.
http://lists.exeter.ac.uk/items/BDDBDFDB-0CBB-F6C5-00CC-60A158A4435A.html
Park, H. , & Reber, B. H. (2008). Relationship building and the use of web sites: How Fortune
500 corporations use their web sites to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 34(4),
409411.
Passetti, E. , Bianchi, L. , Battaglia, M. , & Frey, M. (2017). When democratic principles are not
enough: Tensions and temporalities of dialogic stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business
Ethics. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10551-017-3500-z
Perrin, A. (2015). Social media usage. Washington: Pew Research Center.
Pfeffer, J. , & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource
dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Phillips, R. A. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly,
7(1), 5166.
Phillips, R. A. , & Reichart, J. (2000). The environment as a stakeholder? A fairness-based
approach. Journal of Business E thics, 23(2), 185197.
Polonsky, M. J. , Giraud Voss, Z. , Voss, G. B. , & Moorman, C. (2005). An empirical
examination of the complex relationships between entrepreneurial orientation and stakeholder
support. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 11321150.
Ramanadhan, S. , Mendez, S. R. , Rao, M. , & Viswanath, K. (2013). Social media use by
community-based organizations conducting health promotion: A content analysis. BMC Public
Health, 13(1), 110.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard: Harvard university press.
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application
of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595612.
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences.
Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887910.
Rybalko, S. , & Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How
Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36(4),
336341.
Salancik, G. R. , & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision
making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 453473.
Scherer, A. G. , Palazzo, G. , & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a
new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly,
16(04), 505532.119
Sharma, S. , & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the
Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159180.
Starik, M. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-
human nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(3), 207217.
Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance: An
International Review, 5(1), 310.
Sternberg, E. (2000). Just business: Business ethics in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steurer, R. , Langer, M. E. , Konrad, A. , & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders
and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of businesssociety relations. Journal of
Business Ethics, 61(3), 263281.
Stieb, J. A. (2009). Assessing Freemans stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3),
401414.
Strong, K. C. , Ringer, R. C. , & Taylor, S. A. (2001). THE* rules of stakeholder satisfaction (*
timeliness, honesty, empathy). Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 219230.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy
of Management Review, 20(3), 571610.
Sundaram, A. K. , & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization
science, 15(3), 350363.
Svendsen, A. (1998). The stakeholder strategy: Profiting from collaborative business
relationships. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Swift, T. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics:
A European Review, 10(1), 1626.
Thomson, I. , & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A
pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(5), 507533.
Thorne, L. , Mahoney, L. S. , & Manetti, G. (2014). Motivations for issuing standalone CSR
reports: A survey of Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(4),
686714.
Tuchman, B. W. (2009). The march of folly. Ashland: Blackstone Audio, Incorporated.
UNEP . (1998). The non-reporting report. London: UNEP.
Unerman, J. , & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards
greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations
and Society, 29(7), 685707.
Villa, D. R. (1992). Postmodernism and the public sphere. American Political Science Review,
86(03), 712721.
Vinnari, E. , & Dillard, J. (2016). (ANT) agonistics: Pluralistic politicization of, and by, accounting
and its technologies. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 39, 2544.
Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. The
Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87108.
Wang, J. , & Dewhirst, H. D. (1992). Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of
Business Ethics, 11(2), 115123.
Waters, R. D. , & Jamal, J. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit
organizations Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321324.
Weick, K. E. (1999). Thats moving: Theories that matter. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(2),
134.
Weiss, J. W. (2014). Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach.
Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.120
Wood, D. J. (1991a). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review,
16(4), 691718.
Wood, D. J. (1991b). Social issues in management: Theory and research in corporate social
performance. Journal of Management, 17(2), 383406.
Xifra, J. , & Grau, F. (2010). Nanoblogging PR: The discourse on public relations in Twitter.
Public Relations Review, 36(2), 171174.
Zadek, S. , & Raynard, P. (2002). Stakeholder engagement: Measuring and communicating
quality. Accountability Quarterly, 19(2), 817.
Zller, K. (1999). Growing credibility through dialogue: Experiences in Germany and the USA. In
Zller, K. , Greener Marketing: A Global Perspective on Greening Marketing Practice (Vol. 196,
pp. 196206). Greenleaf Publishing in association with GSE Research.

An empirical overview of stakeholder engagement in sustainability


reports
Abdifatah, A. H. , & Mutalib, A. (2016). The trend of integrated reporting practice in South Africa:
Ceremonial or substantive? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2),
190224.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of
planners, 35(4), 216224.
Azapagic, A. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the
mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 639662.
Barcus, F. E. (1959). Communications content: Analysis of the research, 19001958 (a content
analysis of content analysis). University of Illinois, Univ. Microfilms [reprod.].
Bellucci, M. (2017). The role of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting. (PhD),
University of Pisa.
Bellucci, M. , & Manetti, G. (2017). Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting?
Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 30(4), 874905. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2122
Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Free Press.
Bini, L. , Bellucci, M. , & Giunta, F. (2018). Integrating sustainability in business model
disclosure: Evidence from the UK mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production,
171(Supplement C), 11611170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.282
Brown, J. , & Dillard, J. (2015). Dialogic accountings for stakeholders: On opening up and
closing down participatory governance. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 961985.
doi:10.1111/joms.12153
Brummer, H. , Badenhorst, J. , & Neuland, E. (2006). Competitive analysis and strategic
decision-making in global mining firms. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 2(2), 26.
Bryman, A. , & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse
Education Today, 11(6), 461466.
Castello, I. , & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate
responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 1129. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0770-
8
Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse
Researcher, 4(3), 513.
Chinn, P. L. , & Kramer, M. K. (1983). Theory and nursing: A systematic approach.Please
complete ref. ST Louis: Mosby.
Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics . (1999). Principles of stakeholder management. Clarkson
Centre for Business Ethics, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
Clarkson, P. M. , Li, Y. , Richardson, G. D. , & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be
green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of
Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122144.
Clarkson, P. M. , Overell, M. B. , & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation
to corporate environmental performance. Abacus, 47(1), 2760.
Cooper, S. M. , & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability:
The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7), 649667.
Cowell, S. J. , Wehrmeyer, W. , Argust, P. W. , & Robertson, J. G. S. (1999). Sustainability and
the primary extraction industries: Theories and practice. Resources Policy, 25(4), 277286.
Crane, A. , & Matten, D. (2016). Engagement required: The changing role of the corporation in
society. In D. Barton , D. Horvath , & M. Kipping (Eds), Re-imagining capitalism: Building a
responsible, long-term model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.147
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-
a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282311.
Deegan, C. , Rankin, M. , & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and
environmental disclosures of BHP from 19831997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312343.
Dey, I. (2003). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social scientists. London:
Routledge.
Dobele, A. R. , Westberg, K. , Steel, M. , & Flowers, K. (2014). An examination of corporate
social responsibility implementation and stakeholder engagement: A case study in the
Australian mining industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(3), 145159.
Dowling, J. , & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational
behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122136.
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care
for Women International, 13(3), 313321.
Elo, S. , & Kyngs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 62(1), 107115.
Fasan, M. , & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality
disclosure in integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288305.
Friedman, A. L. , & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford
University Press on Demand.
General Accounting Office . (1996). Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and
analyzing written material. Washington: US General Accounting Office.Please give city.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013). Reporting principles and standard disclosure. Amsterdam:
Global Reporting Initiative.
Graneheim, U. H. , & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research:
Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2),
105112.
Gray, R. , Kouhy, R. , & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A
review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 8(2), 4777.
Gray, R. , & Milne, M. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Whos kidding whom? Chartered
Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), 6670.
Grove, S. , & Burns, N. (2005). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, & utilization.
St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders.
Guthrie, J. , & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory.
Accounting and Business Research, 19(76), 343352.
Guthrie, J. , Petty, R. , Yongvanich, K. , & Ricceri, F. (2004). Using content analysis as a
research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2),
282293.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley.
Hsieh, H.-F. , & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 12771288.
Jenkins, H. , & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry:
Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3),
271284.148
Kolk, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance.
International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 5164.
doi:10.1504/IJESD.2004.004688
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
Kyngas, H. , & Vanhanen, L. (1999). Content analysis. Hoitotiede, 11(312).
Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business
Ethics, 43(3), 253261.
Lederman, R. P. (1991). Content analysis of word texts. MCN: The American Journal of
Maternal/Child Nursing, 16(3), 169.
Manetti, G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical
evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,
18(2), 110122.
Manetti, G. , & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in
sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 9851011.
doi:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1797
Manetti, G. , Bellucci, M. , & Bagnoli, L. (2016). Stakeholder engagement and public information
through social media: A study of Canadian and American public transportation agencies. The
American Review of Public Administration, 47(8). doi:10.1177/0275074016649260
Marshall, C. , & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage
publications.
Miles, S. (2017). Stakeholder theory classification: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of
definitions. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 437459.
Milne, M. J. , & Adler, R. W. (1999). Exploring the reliability of social and environmental
disclosures content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(2), 237256.
Moratis, L. , & Brandt, S. (2017). Corporate stakeholder responsiveness? Exploring the state
and quality of GRI-based stakeholder engagement disclosures of European firms. Corporate
Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, online.
Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: Towards a new epistemology for
accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5), 477485.
Mouan, L. C. (2010). Exploring the potential benefits of Asian participation in the extractive
industries transparency initiative: The case of China. Business Strategy and the Environment,
19(6), 367376.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. London: Sage.
Owen, D. L. , Swift, T. , & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in
social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Paper presented at the Accounting Forum.
London.
Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil
spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471475.
Peck, P. , & Sinding, K. (2003). Environmental and social disclosure and data richness in the
mining industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(3), 131146.
Rosengren, K. E. (1981). Advances in content analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage
Sandelowski, M. (1993). Theory unmasked: The uses and guises of theory in qualitative
research. Research in Nursing & Health, 16(3), 213218.149
Tate, W. L. , Ellram, L. M. , & Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility reports: A
thematic analysis related to supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management,
46(1), 1944.
Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment. Journal of
Corporate Citizenship, 1(1), 5773.
Waters, R. D. , & Jamal, J. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit
organizations Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321324.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. London: Sage.
Xifra, J. , & Grau, F. (2010). Nanoblogging PR: The discourse on public relations in Twitter.
Public Relations Review, 36(2), 171174.

Conclusions
Abdifatah, A. H. , & Mutalib, A. (2016). The trend of integrated reporting practice in South Africa:
Ceremonial or substantive? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2),
190224.
AccountAbility . (2008). AA1000 AccountAbility principles standard 2008. New York:
AccountAbility.
AccountAbility . (2015). AA1000 Stakeholder engagement standard 2015. New York:
AccountAbility.
Aras, G. , & Crowther, D. (2016). The durable corporation: Strategies for sustainable
development. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Bellucci, M. , & Manetti, G. (2017). Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting?
Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, 30(4), 874905. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2122
Brown, J. , & Dillard, J. (2015). Dialogic accountings for stakeholders: On opening up and
closing down participatory governance. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 961985.
doi:10.1111/joms.12153
Cooper, S. M. , & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability:
The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7), 649667.
Cowell, S. J. , Wehrmeyer, W. , Argust, P. W. , & Robertson, J. G. S. (1999). Sustainability and
the primary extraction industries: Theories and practice. Resources Policy, 25(4), 277286.
Crane, A. , & Matten, D. (2016). Engagement required: The changing role of the corporation in
society. In D. Barton , D. Horvath , & M. Kipping (Eds), Re-imagining capitalism: Building a
responsible, long-term model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-
a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282311.
Dobele, A. R. , Westberg, K. , Steel, M. , & Flowers, K. (2014). An examination of corporate
social responsibility implementation and stakeholder engagement: A case study in the
Australian mining industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(3), 145159.
Fasan, M. , & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality
disclosure in Integrated Reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288305.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013a). Implementation manual. Amsterdam: Global Reporting
Initiative.
Global Reporting Initiative . (2013b). Reporting principles and standard disclosure. Amsterdam:
Global Reporting Initiative.155
Gray, R. (2016). Reading for displeasure: Why bother with social accounting at all? Social and
Environmental Accountability Journal, 36(2), 153161. doi:10.1080/0969160X.2016.1197625
Manetti, G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Empirical
evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,
18(2), 110122.
Manetti, G. , & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in
sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 9851011.
doi:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1797
Manetti, G. , Bellucci, M. , & Bagnoli, L. (2017). Stakeholder engagement and public information
through social media: A study of Canadian and American public transportation agencies. The
American Review of Public Administration, 47(8). doi:10.1177/0275074016649260
Neu, D. , Cooper, D. J. , & Everett, J. (2001). Critical accounting interventions. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, 12(6), 735762.
Owen, D. L. , Swift, T. , & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in
social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Paper presented at the Accounting Forum,
London.
Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment. Journal of
corporate citizenship, 1(1), 5773.

View publication stats

You might also like