Harvesting Value From Closed Blocks
Harvesting Value From Closed Blocks
Abstract ............................................................................................................ 1
Premise............................................................................................................ 2
Condition.......................................................................................................... 2
Carrier Challenges........................................................................................... 4
Alternatives........................................................................................................ 5
Outsourcing Concerns.................................................................................... 9
This white paper provides closed block insights and discusses optimization tactics to help the
Life and Annuity company maximize its return on closed blocks. It specifically defines the
best solution to manage the most vexing closed block portfolios – effectively and efficiently.
In short, the optimal solution for closed blocks maximizes margin, unlocks latent value,
and delivers capital to fuel strategic initiatives. The successful solution is rooted in
preservation of the policyholder-carrier relationship, while leveraging technological
efficiency offered by a modern solution.
Allowing the insurance company to maintain intimate customer contact and employ
the power of a low-cost technical platform is the ideal mix of insurance company and
outsourcing vendor capabilities. As such, the SaaS/ASP model is the most powerful solution
for closed blocks – especially the portfolio of complicated, benefit-rich, high-maintenance
policies and contracts.
Condition
Many Life and Annuity companies have a number of closed blocks. A closed block is loosely
defined as a group of policies that are no longer actively sold and positioned for run out.
A closed block is loosely Improving margins on in-force blocks (especially on non-core portfolios not actively sold) has
defined as a group of a positive impact on top and bottom line performance.
policies that are no A number of drivers are responsible for the propagation of closed blocks. These include:
longer actively sold and Ceased sales due to performance, such as:
positioned for run out. • Poor pricing
• Lack of scale
• Capital constraints
• Lapse rates
• Mortality/morbidity
Regulatory changes
Market shifts
Closed blocks come Large blocks of traditional products (sometimes referred to as “ordinary business”)
in all shapes and sizes, Often these are relatively simple term, whole life or universal life product designs.
The volume of these blocks may range from hundreds of thousands of policies to millions
including large blocks
of policies. In addition, these blocks often carry massive reserves and account for
of traditional products significant recurring premiums.
and small blocks of
For those portfolios of larger scale, the insurer has viable operational and financial alternatives.
niche products.
The carrier may maintain the block in-house. For this to be viable, the block must
have sufficient scale to warrant ongoing investment.
The carrier may outsource the block. Most outsourced vendors willingly assume large
homogeneous blocks because they can leverage similar competencies across multiple
carriers and realize economies of scale.
For small closed blocks, the insurer has the following characteristics to consider:
Due to regulatory changes, market shifts and product obsolescence, small closed
blocks are an ever-increasing portion of a Life and Annuity company’s portfolio.
There are two basic
As mentioned previously, carriers must contend with non-core, non-strategic blocks
challenges with which of business. This creates two basic challenges:
carriers must contend Focus: Diversion of a carrier’s focus from product development and
when dealing with strategic initiatives.
non-core, non-strategic Cost: The carrier battles a cost structure that continues to increase over time, even
though the block of business typically diminishes as time progresses. A number of
blocks of business: factors contribute to this, including:
focus and cost. • Maintenance of Service Standards
The carrier must continue routine spending to maintain service standards to
retain customers and safeguard its reputation.
• Proliferation of Manual Processes
Most system initiatives focus on expeditiously getting a product on the street
for new business (open portfolio). Many “Day 2” system enhancements for
closed blocks are delayed or canceled. Therefore, the business introduces
spreadsheets and manual processes to compensate and offset the Day 2 backlog.
• Antiquation of Systems
Systems used to maintain these blocks of business often become obsolete
and more costly to maintain as time progresses. In addition, the cost of
maintaining the systems are not directly proportional to the number of polices
on the system. It costs as much to maintain a system for 1,000 policies
as it does for 50,000 policies.
• Increasing Costs of Technical Resources
Since the risks of losing institutional knowledge on these systems is significant,
a carrier often pays more to retain these “technical experts” who are constantly
lured by the attraction of newer and “more interesting” technologies.
The following two alternatives are suggested: optimizing value or outsourcing the business.
Optimizing Value
Life and Annuity companies have various options to optimize the value of closed blocks.
OR
How Underlying hardware Underlying hardware Either party may host Either party may host
and software and software underlying hardware underlying hardware
platform supported platform supported and software and software
by outsourcer in by outsourcer in There is no
Software ownership
secure data center secure data center ownership
may reside with
Proprietary third party Proprietary third party either party consideration
of software
software; software;
Professional services
right to use granted right to use granted
conducted by third
by third party by third party
party; may require
licensed personnel
Employing the SaaS/ASP model to support closed blocks requires a conversion to the
outsourcer’s business platform. The business case for migrating policy data from a legacy
A holistic view of system to a new platform historically has been problematic: The potential for exorbitant cost,
conversion — one that daunting scope, and projected timelines are often deemed untenable.
contemplates various As such, the perceived risks associated with conversions have induced insurance companies
hard and soft benefits to maintain the status quo and abandon strategic platform initiatives that involve data
— can often build a migration. Nevertheless, times have changed, and the benefits of closed block conversion
are too great to dismiss.
compelling and viable
business case. Moreover, a holistic view of conversion — one that contemplates various hard and soft
benefits — can often build a compelling and viable business case. Such a conversion may
include: risk mitigation for incumbent platform, reapplying highly skilled resources to
strategic business initiatives, strategic consolidation platform and adding new products to
the new technology platform.
A key aspect to the SaaS/ASP model is that the insurance company maintains complete
control of the business processing functions and preserves day-to-day interaction with
the client and producer. The benefits of this method have been shown through market
research performed by Celent (the leader in research and consulting for IT in the financial
services industry). Their study, summarized on the following page, included 10 areas of
outsourcing concern.
Celent report indicates A summary of the Celent findings indicate that the most desirable outsourcing solution
that many insurance should have the following attributes:
carriers prefer to keep Maintaining (and guaranteeing) service levels, possibly through binding Service
Level Agreements
their customer service
Giving the insurance company control of critical functions (e.g., client facing
staff in direct contact processes like underwriting, call center and claims adjudication)
with their constituents Providing audited data security (SAS70, SSAE16), disaster recovery (redundant data
when outsourcing centers) and business continuity (periodic joint testing)
core services. Allowing the insurance company to tailor its outsourced services to meet the needs
of its customers; letting the outsourced vendor provide the IT commodity and
augment services on request
Allowing the insurance company to keep its customer service staff in direct contact
with their constituents
Partnering with an outsourcing firm with a strong marketplace reputation that also
works behind the scenes using the insurance company branding
Choosing an outsourcing firm with a proven delivery track record that is financially
fit and provides an array of clients that are available for reference
Embracing an outsourcing model that insulates the end-customer from the
outsourcer so the insurance company can manage the ongoing client contact
Structuring an outsourcing relationship that minimizes the displacement of insurance
company personnel, while it provides for powerful cost savings
Engaging with an outsourcer that provides services and solutions that meet or exceed
state and federal regulations
It is clear that the overall, best solution for closed blocks is one that maximizes margin,
unlocks latent value and delivers capital to fuel strategic initiatives. The success of such a
solution is often rooted in preserving the policyholder/carrier relationship while leveraging
technological efficiency. Many insurance companies prefer to maintain intimate customer
contact while employing the power of a low-cost, modern technical platform. Though BPO
arrangements can be beneficial, the SaaS/ASP model is often the most powerful solution
for tapping the unrealized value inherent to closed blocks.
Getting Started
To overcome the “do-nothing” inertia, and capitalize on the abundant benefits of closed
block conversion, insurance companies should look to an outsourcing partner with the
Insurance companies
following attributes:
should take care when
Portfolio rationalization experience
looking for a SaaS/ASP An assessment of business product portfolios establishes a business-centric
partner to help them modernization strategy and roadmap.
Andesa began as a pioneer in the field of COLI/BOLI policy administration. Today, more
than 30 years later, we partner with seven of the top 13 life and annuity carriers and several
top brokers. We offer a suite of SaaS and ASP services, all backed by decades of proven,
practical expertise in the industry.