HISTORY & CULTURE OF

PAKISTAN
Section One

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD

World Distinction Pak Studies CAIE 2022
Pakistan Studies (GCE 2059/IGCSE 0448)
MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

History and Culture of Pakistan

Section One
Chapter Number Chapter Name Page Number
One Decline of the Mughal 02-07
Empire

The East India Company 08-21

Two
The Religious Reformers 22-34

Three The War of

Independence 1857 35-47

Four Sir Syed Ahmed Khan 48-59

Five Languages 60-66

Teacher
MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD
World Distinction Pak Studies CAIE 2022
O- Level Pakistan Studies (GCE 2059/IGCSE 0448)
Contact: 03336610587

1|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Chapter One: Causes of the Mughal Decline

What was practice of Sutti or Satti? [4]
Suttee, Sanskrit sati (“good woman” or “chaste wife”), the Indian custom of a wife
immolating herself either on the funeral pyre of her dead husband. It was the ideal
of womanly devotion held by certain Brahman and royal castes. It is sometimes
linked to the myth of the Hindu goddess Sati, who burned herself to death in a fire.
Suttee became a central issue under the British Raj it was legalized by legislating
conditions under which it could be done, it was banned in 1829.
Who was Ahmed Shah Abdali? [4]
Ahmed Shah Abdali, also known as Ahmad Shah Durrani, was the founder of the
Durrani Empire and is considered the father of modern Afghanistan. Born in 1722,
he became a powerful leader and established his empire in 1747. Abdali is famous
for his military campaigns in India, particularly the Battle of Panipat in 1761, where
he defeated the Marathas. His leadership and conquests helped shape the political
landscape of South Asia during the 18th century. Despite his military focus, he also
worked to develop his empire and is remembered as a significant figure in Afghan
history.
Who was Nadir Shah Durrani? [4]
Nadir Shah Durrani, also known as Nadir Shah Afshar, was a Persian ruler and
founder of the Afsharid dynasty. Born in 1688, he rose to power by overthrowing
the Safavid dynasty in Iran. Nadir Shah is best known for his military conquests,
including his invasion of India in 1739, where he captured Delhi and took immense
wealth, including the famous Peacock Throne and the Koh-i-Noor diamond. His
reign was marked by significant military achievements but also by cruelty and heavy
taxation, which eventually led to his assassination in 1747.
What was Jizya? [4]
It was an Islamic Tax charged from non-Muslim for their protection by Muslim
rulers, Mughals also charged it in their Empire later abolished by Emperor Akbar
but Aurangzeb introduced it again in India, Mughals lost loyalty of non-Muslim
population due to Jizya collection, later abandoned by Shah Alam 1. The Hindus
refused to pay the taxes because they thought it would be used against them in wars
due to Aurangzeb’s policy of expansion.
2|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

What was Mansabdari system? [4]

Mughal emperor Akbar introduced a new system officially called mansabdars who
were responsible for civil and military administration. As they were appointed by
the King himself so they were directly answerable to him. Akbar ensured that they
were not local land lords who had power in their own right. Instead they owned their
position simply because they were appointed by him. They would easily be
dismissed or lose power so it was in their power to remain loyal. To stop them
building up too much power in one area, he often transfers them to jobs in other
areas. When they die their wealth and property goes to the emperor.
Who was Shivaji? [4]
Shivaji established his own independent kingdom from the declining Adilshahi
sultanate of Bijapur which formed the start of the Maratha Empire. He was engaged
in both alliances and hostilities with the Mughal Empire, the Sultanate of Golkonda,
Sultanate of Bijapur and the European colonial powers. His military forces expanded
the Maratha sphere of influence, capturing and building forts, and forming a Maratha
navy. Shivaji established a competent and progressive civil rule with well-structured
administrative organizations. He revived ancient Hindu political traditions, court
conventions and promoted the usage of the Marathi and Sanskrit languages,
replacing Persian in court and administration.
Who were Zamindars? [4]
They were Landlords or tax collectors of the areas. They were Wealthy and
influential and some of them had private armies. After death of Aurangzeb they were
increasingly unwilling to accept rule of any new emperor or to make payments to
government in Delhi. Some Hindu Zamindars imposed beard tax which annoyed
Muslims in Bengal. Muslims were oppressed by zamindars from the 1800’s
onwards, especially in East Bengal.
Why was imposition of Jizya tax opposed by the Hindus? [7]
The imposition of the Jizya tax by Emperor Aurangzeb was strongly opposed by
Hindus for several reasons. To begin with, the amount of Jizya was often higher than
the Zakat, a tax paid by Muslims. This disparity made the tax burden on Hindus
particularly heavy, causing financial strain and resentment. Many felt it was an
unjust and discriminatory policy, as it placed a higher financial obligation on them
compared to their Muslim counterparts.
3|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Similarly, there was widespread concern that the revenue generated from the Jizya
tax would be used to fund Aurangzeb's military campaigns against non-Muslim
regions. Hindus feared that their money would be utilized to suppress and conquer
territories that were predominantly non-Muslim, furthering the emperor's agenda of
expanding Islamic rule. This created a sense of betrayal and anger, as they did not
want to contribute to their own subjugation and the expansion of policies that
discriminated against them.
Last but not the least, the Jizya tax was seen by many Hindus as a form of coercion
to convert to Islam. Paying the tax was a financial burden that some believed was
designed to encourage conversion to avoid the extra cost. This perceived bribe to
change religion was deeply resented, as it undermined their religious freedom and
cultural identity. The imposition of Jizya thus not only had economic implications
but also posed a threat to their religious and social integrity, making it a deeply
unpopular measure among Hindus.
Explain why Aurangzeb was blamed for the Mughal decline? [7]
Aurangzeb Alamgir, the sixth Mughal emperor, is often blamed for contributing
significantly to the decline of the Mughal Empire due to several key factors. To bigin
with, his strict and intolerant attitude towards other religions, particularly his policies
against Hindus and Sikhs, created social and religious unrest across the empire.
Unlike his predecessors who adopted a policy of religious tolerance and
inclusiveness, Aurangzeb sought to impose Islamic orthodoxy and enforce Sharia
law, leading to the destruction of temples, imposition of discriminatory taxes like
the Jizya, and bans on religious practices. This alienated large section of the
population and undermined the social harmony that was crucial for the empire's
stability.
Furthermore, Aurangzeb's prolonged military campaigns in the Deccan region,
known as the Deccan Wars, drained the empire's resources and manpower. These
wars, aimed at expanding Mughal territory and asserting control over the Deccan
sultanates, were costly both in terms of finances and human lives. The continuous
warfare diverted attention and resources away from governance and administration
in the heartland of the empire, weakening central authority and diminishing the
Mughal's ability to maintain control over their vast territories.

4|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Last but not the least, Aurangzeb's decision to reimpose the Jizya tax on non-
Muslims further exacerbated tensions within the empire. The reimposition of this
tax, which had been abolished by his predecessors Akbar and Jahangir as a gesture
of religious tolerance, sparked widespread resentment and economic hardship
among Hindus and other non-Muslim communities. This discriminatory policy not
only strained relations between the ruling administration and the populace but also
alienated potential allies and contributors to the empire's economic stability.
Explain why the Mughal Empire declined following the reign of Aurangzeb. [7]
The decline of the Mughal Empire following Aurangzeb's reign can be attributed to
several interconnected factors. The War of Successions, which followed
Aurangzeb's death in 1707, had a profound impact on the decline of the Mughal
Empire. This conflict erupted among Aurangzeb's sons and other claimants to the
throne, each vying for power and control over the empire. The prolonged and bloody
struggle destabilized the Mughal government and weakened central authority. The
war drained the empire's resources, both financial and military, and diverted
attention from external threats and effective governance. Ultimately, the War of
Successions accelerated the decline of the Mughal Empire by weakening its political
unity and fostering internal divisions.
Moreover, The Mughal Empire's decline was significantly hastened by a series of
incompetent rulers who succeeded Aurangzeb. These emperors lacked the
administrative skills, political foresight, and military prowess needed to govern
effectively and maintain the empire's vast territories. Many of them were more
interested in personal luxury and pleasure than in the affairs of state, leading to
neglect of governance and the weakening of central authority. Their weak leadership
allowed powerful regional governors and nobles to assert greater autonomy, further
fragmenting the empire. The inability of these rulers to manage internal factions and
external threats, such as invasions and rebellions, weakened the Mughal state's
ability to defend its borders and maintain stability. This era of weak and ineffective
leadership played a crucial role in the gradual disintegration of the once-mighty
Mughal Empire.
Last but not the least, the corrupt Mansabdari system in the Mughal Empire allowed
officials to gain positions based on connections rather than abilities. This led to many
incompetent people holding important roles. These officials often used their power
for personal gain, taking bribes and misusing funds meant for the state. This
5|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

corruption weakened the empire's finances and governance, making it harder to

manage the vast territories effectively. The system also caused instability by
frequently changing officials and their assignments, disrupting local administration
and hindering long-term planning. Overall, the corrupt Mansabdari system played a
significant role in the decline of the Mughal Empire, eroding trust in the government
and contributing to its eventual fragmentation.
The spread of Marathan power was the main reason for the decline of the
Mughal Empire.’ Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer. [14]
The spread of the Maratha Empire significantly contributed to the decline of the
Mughal Empire. During the 17th and 18th centuries, the Marathas, a regional power
in western India, expanded their influence and territory at the expense of the
weakening Mughal authority. Led by capable leaders like Shivaji and later Peshwas,
the Marathas successfully resisted Mughal attempts to control their territories and
launched campaigns to expand their own domains. Their military prowess, effective
administration, and ability to forge alliances with other regional powers challenged
the Mughal hegemony over India. The constant conflict between the Marathas and
the Mughals drained the empire's resources, diverted attention from governance, and
further weakened central authority. Ultimately, the Maratha expansion played a
pivotal role in the gradual disintegration of the Mughal Empire, paving the way for
the emergence of regional powers and European colonial domination in India.
Similarly, The War of Successions, which followed Aurangzeb's death in 1707, had
a profound impact on the decline of the Mughal Empire. This conflict erupted among
Aurangzeb's sons and other claimants to the throne, each vying for power and control
over the empire. The prolonged and bloody struggle destabilized the Mughal
government and weakened central authority. The war drained the empire's resources,
both financial and military, and diverted attention from external threats and effective
governance. Ultimately, the War of Successions accelerated the decline of the
Mughal Empire by weakening its political unity and fostering internal divisions.
Furthermore, The Mughal Empire's decline was significantly hastened by a series of
incompetent rulers who succeeded Aurangzeb. These emperors lacked the
administrative skills, political foresight, and military prowess needed to govern
effectively and maintain the empire's vast territories. Many of them were more
interested in personal luxury and pleasure than in the affairs of state, leading to
neglect of governance and the weakening of central authority. Their weak leadership
6|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

allowed powerful regional governors and nobles to assert greater autonomy, further
fragmenting the empire. The inability of these rulers to manage internal factions and
external threats, such as invasions and rebellions, weakened the Mughal state's
ability to defend its borders and maintain stability. This era of weak and ineffective
leadership played a crucial role in the gradual disintegration of the once-mighty
Mughal Empire.
By the same token, External invasions were another crucial factor contributing to
the decline of the Mughal Empire. Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, various
external powers and invaders targeted Mughal territories, weakening the empire's
control and draining its resources. Invasions by Persian forces under Nadir Shah in
1739 and Afghan forces led by Ahmad Shah Durrani in the mid-18th century were
particularly devastating. These invasions resulted in the plunder of wealth,
destruction of cities, and loss of territory for the Mughal Empire. The military defeats
inflicted a blow to Mughal prestige and authority, while the economic repercussions
strained the empire's finances and undermined its ability to maintain stability and
defend its borders. These external pressures, combined with internal conflicts and
administrative weaknesses, hastened the decline of the once-powerful Mughal
Empire, paving the way for regional fragmentation and European colonial
dominance in India.
Last but not the least, the arrival and expansion of the British East India Company
in India from the early 17th century onwards dealt a severe blow to the Mughal
Empire. Initially arriving as traders, the British gradually expanded their influence
through alliances with local rulers and military conquests. Their superior military
technology, economic dominance, and astute diplomacy allowed them to gradually
undermine and supplant Mughal authority, culminating in the establishment of
British colonial rule in India by the mid-19th century.
In conclusion, the decline of the Mughal Empire was a complex process influenced
by internal strife, incompetent leadership, systemic corruption, external invasions,
and the rise of European colonial powers. These factors collectively weakened the
empire's foundations and eventually led to its fragmentation and loss of sovereignty
over vast parts of the Indian subcontinent.

7|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

The East India Company

What was East India company? [4]
The East India Company was a British trading corporation established in the early
17th century to facilitate trade between Britain and Asia, particularly India and
Southeast Asia. Initially formed for trade in spices, textiles, and other goods, it
eventually became a powerful political and military force in India. The company
gained control over large parts of India through alliances with local rulers and
military conquests. Over time, it established its own administrative and judicial
systems, effectively governing territories on behalf of the British Crown. The East
India Company played a significant role in British expansion in India and laid the
foundation for British colonial rule, which lasted until India gained independence in
1947.
Who was Roberet Clive? [4]
Robert Clive was a British military officer and administrator who played a important
role in the establishment of British rule in India during the 18th century. Born in
1725, Clive first gained prominence for his leadership in the Battle of Plassey in
1757, where he decisively defeated the Nawab of Bengal and his French allies. This
victory marked a turning point in British fortunes in India, leading to the East India
Company's dominance in Bengal and setting the stage for further British expansion
across the subcontinent. Clive also served as the Governor of Bengal on multiple
occasions, where he implemented administrative reforms and consolidated British
control. His actions laid the foundation for British colonial rule in India and
established him as one of the key figures in British imperial history.
Why was Robert Clive appointed as Governor of Bengal? [7]
Robert Clive was appointed as the Governor of Bengal for several key reasons that
underscored his strategic importance and the British East India Company's
objectives in India. Clive's military successes, notably his pivotal victory at the
Battle of Plassey in 1757, solidified his reputation as a capable and effective leader.
The Battle of Plassey marked a turning point in British fortunes in Bengal, where
Clive, with the support of local allies, defeated the Nawab of Bengal and his French
allies, effectively establishing British dominance in the region. This victory boosted
Clive's standing within the East India Company and positioned him as a prominent
figure capable of managing the company's interests in Bengal.
8|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Similarly, Clive's political understanding of Indian affairs made him a suitable

candidate for the role of Governor. He demonstrated skill in solving complex
political matters and forging alliances with local rulers. Clive's ability to negotiate
favorable terms and agreements with Indian allies and adversaries alike contributed
to the East India Company's expansion and influence in Bengal. His appointment as
Governor was seen as a means to consolidate British control and manage the
administration of Bengal in alignment with the company's commercial interests.
Last but not the last, Clive's appointment as Governor of Bengal was also influenced
by the East India Company's need for a strong and decisive leader to stabilize and
govern the region. Bengal was a lucrative center of trade and commerce, and
effective governance was essential to maximize profits and manage administrative
challenges. Clive's previous experience in Bengal, coupled with his leadership
qualities and familiarity with local dynamics, made him a pragmatic choice to
oversee the company's operations and ensure stability in a region vital to British
commercial interests.
Who was Mir Qasim? [4]
Mir Qasim was a prominent figure during the 18th century in Bengal. He initially
allied with the British but later turned against them due to disagreements over trade
policies and British interference in Bengal's administration. Mir Qasim formed
alliances with the Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II and the Nawab of Awadh to
challenge British authority. Despite initial successes, including defeating British
forces in battles, Mir Qasim was ultimately defeated by the combined British forces
in 1764. After his defeat, he sought refuge in various places, ultimately settling in
Awadh, where he died in 1777.
Who was Hyder Ali? [4]
Hyder Ali was a formidable military leader and ruler of the Kingdom of Mysore in
18th-century southern India. He expanded his influence through alliances and
military campaigns, becoming the de facto ruler of Mysore. His forces were known
for their advanced tactics and modernized weaponry, which posed a significant
challenge to regional powers, including the British East India Company. He engaged
in several conflicts with the British, notably during the First Anglo-Mysore War,
where he demonstrated his ability to resist and confront British expansion in the
region.

9|Page

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Who was Tipu Sulatan? [4]

Tipu Sultan (1751-1799) was the ruler of the Kingdom of Mysore in southern India,
succeeding his father Hyder Ali. Born as Sultan Fateh Ali Sahab Tipu, he is often
referred to as the "Tiger of Mysore" due to his fierce resistance against British
colonial rule. He continued his father's policies of modernization and military
innovation, expanding Mysore's territories and strengthening its defenses. He
formed alliances with other regional powers to resist British dominance and
employed advanced military tactics and technologies. Despite his efforts, Tipu
Sultan was ultimately defeated in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War and died fighting
British forces in 1799.
Why was Tipu Sultan called Tiger of Mysore? [7]
Tipu Sultan earned the title "Tiger of Mysore" due to several notable reasons that
highlighted his leadership and bravery. He was known for his fierce resistance
against British colonial expansion in India. He waged multiple wars against the
British East India Company, notably during the Anglo-Mysore Wars, where he
demonstrated his determination to defend Mysorean sovereignty and independence.
His military campaigns and strategic maneuvers often caught the British off guard,
earning him a reputation as a formidable adversary.
furthermore, his military prowess and innovation in warfare contributed to his
nickname. He modernized the Mysorean army, introducing advanced artillery,
rockets, and infantry tactics. The use of Mysorean rockets, known as "Mysorean
rockets" was particularly innovative and effective, influencing military technology
in the region. These technological advancements showcased Tipu Sultan's
commitment to strengthening Mysore's defenses and his ability to adapt to changing
military strategies.
Last but not the least Tipu Sultan's personal courage and leadership on the battlefield
solidified his reputation as the "Tiger of Mysore." He led his troops from the front
lines, inspiring loyalty and dedication among his soldiers. his bravery was evident
in his final moments during the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War, where he fought
valiantly against British forces until his death in the siege of Seringapatam in 1799.
His steadfast determination and military acumen continue to be remembered in
Indian history, symbolizing resistance against colonial oppression and a
commitment to defending his homeland against foreign aggression.

10 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Who was Titu Mir? [4]

Titu Mir, Syed Mir Nisar Ali emerged as a notable Islamic religious leader and
freedom fighter in Bengal during the 19th century. He led the Faraizi Movement,
which sought to address socio-economic injustices faced by Muslim peasants and
resist British colonial oppression. Titu Mir's movement stimulated widespread
support among the local Muslim population, advocating for religious revivalism and
economic reforms while challenging the authority of British administrators and local
landlords who collaborated with them. In 1831, he led several uprisings against
British and feudal rule, marking a significant challenge to British dominance in
Bengal.
Why did Syed Mir Nisar Ali [Titu Mir] oppose Hindu landlords? [7]
Muslim peasants in Bengal during the 19th century faced significant socio-economic
injustices that fueled unrest and resistance movements like the one led by Syed Mir
Nisar Ali, also known as Titu Mir. These injustices stemmed from several factors.
The oppressive land tenure system imposed by Hindu landlords and British colonial
administrators often exploited Muslim peasants through exorbitant rents, arbitrary
taxes, and forced labor obligations. This economic exploitation contributed to
widespread poverty and indebtedness among Muslim farming communities, limiting
their economic mobility and perpetuating cycles of poverty.
Meanwhile, discrimination and unequal treatment in legal and social spheres further
marginalized Muslim peasants. Landlords, who were predominantly Hindu,
exercised considerable authority over land disputes, often favoring Hindu tenants
over their Muslim counterparts. This bias in the judicial system exacerbated
grievances and reinforced social inequalities based on religion and caste.
Last but not the least, limited access to education and economic opportunities
hindered the socio-economic advancement of Muslim peasants. Educational
institutions and government positions were often dominated by Hindus or British
officials, restricting Muslim participation and empowerment. This lack of access to
education and economic resources perpetuated socio-economic disparities,
reinforcing the cycle of poverty and dependency among Muslim communities.

11 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Who was Lord Wellesley? [4]

Lord Wellesley was a British politician and colonial administrator who served as the
Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805. He was appointed by the British
government to oversee the East India Company's affairs in India during a critical
period of expansion and consolidation. Lord Wellesley implemented aggressive
policies aimed at extending British influence across the Indian subcontinent,
including the Subsidiary Alliance System. This system allowed the British to
maintain control over Indian princely states by stationing British troops in their
territories.
Describe Subsidiary Alliances. [4]
Subsidiary Alliances were a system introduced by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-
General of India, in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Under this system,
princely states in India were required to accept British troops (subsidiary forces)
stationed within their borders. In return, the British East India Company guaranteed
protection against external threats and internal rebellions. The princely states also
agreed not to form alliances with other powers without British consent. Additionally,
they had to pay for the maintenance of the British troops stationed in their territories.
The Subsidiary Alliance System effectively allowed the British to extend their
control over Indian states without absolute annexations.
What was Black Hole incident of Calcutta? [4]
The Black Hole incident of Calcutta refers to a tragic event that took place on the
night of June 20, 1756, in Calcutta. Following the capture of Calcutta by the forces
of Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah of Bengal, a large number of British prisoners, both
soldiers and civilians, were reportedly confined in a small, poorly ventilated
dungeon known as the "Black Hole" in the old Fort William. The dungeon was
significantly overcrowded and lacked adequate ventilation, leading to extreme heat
and suffocation. Many of the prisoners perished due to suffocation, heat exhaustion,
and overcrowding.
Who was Nawab Siraj-ud-Daula? [4]
Nawab Siraj-ud-Daula was a ruler of Bengal during the mid-18th century. He
ascended to the throne in 1756 at a young age. He was best known for his conflict
with the British East India Company, particularly the capture of Calcutta and the
Black Hole incident in 1756. His reign was marked by efforts to assert Bengal's
12 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

independence and resist British encroachment on political and economic affairs.

However, his confrontational stance towards the British led to the Battle of Plassey
in 1757, where he was decisively defeated by Robert Clive and his allies.
What was battle of Plassey 1757? [4]
The Battle of Plassey in 1757 was a significant military encounter between the forces
of the British East India Company and the Nawab of Bengal, Siraj-ud-Daula. It took
place near the village of Plassey in Bengal. The battle was a decisive victory for the
British East India Company, led by Robert Clive, over the much larger army of Siraj-
ud-Daula. The British victory was achieved through a combination of military
strategy, political alliances with local Indian rulers, and diplomatic maneuvering.
The aftermath of the Battle of Plassey allowed the British East India Company to
gain control over Bengal and marked the beginning of British dominance in India.
Who was Mir Jaffer? [4]
Mir Jafar was a key figure in the history of Bengal during the 18th century. He is
known for his role in the Battle of Plassey in 1757, where he allied with the British
East India Company against Nawab Siraj-ud-Daula. His betrayal of Siraj-ud-Daula
during the battle was instrumental in the British victory, allowing Robert Clive and
his forces to defeat the Nawab's army. As a result, Mir Jafar was installed as the
puppet Nawab by the British, marking the beginning of British influence and control
over Bengal. His reign as Nawab, however, was marked by internal dissent and
instability, and he was eventually replaced by other rulers.
Describe Battle of Buxer 1764. [4]
The Battle of Buxar, fought in 1764 near the town of Buxar in Bihar, was a decisive
engagement that cemented British control over northern India. The British East India
Company, led by Major Hector Munro, faced off against a coalition comprising the
Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II, the Nawab of Awadh Shuja-ud-Daula, and the
ousted Nawab of Bengal, Mir Qasim. Despite being outnumbered, the British forces
prevailed due to their disciplined troops, superior artillery, and effective tactics. The
defeat of the Mughal-led alliance solidified British authority in the region and led to
the signing of the Treaty of Allahabad in 1765. This treaty granted the East India
Company extensive territorial and political privileges, marking a pivotal moment in
the establishment of British supremacy and the eventual colonial rule over India.

13 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

What was Doctrine of Lapse? [4]

The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie, the Governor-
General of India from 1848 to 1856. According to this doctrine, if a ruler of an Indian
princely state died without a natural heir, the state would "lapse" or revert to direct
British control instead of passing on to an adopted heir or another family member.
The Doctrine of Lapse was controversial and faced opposition from Indian princes
and local elites, who saw it as an encroachment on their sovereignty and a threat to
their traditional rights. Despite criticisms, the doctrine was enforced in several
instances, leading to the annexation of several princely states like, Satara, Jhansi and
Cawnpur by the British East India Company.
Who were Thugees? [4]
The Thuggees, or Thugs, were a group of criminals in India during the 17th to 19th
centuries. They were organized into secret gangs that roamed across the country,
especially on highways, targeting travelers for robbery and murder. Thugees
operated as part of a cult-like group with rituals and a hierarchy, and they often
worshipped the Hindu goddess Kali. Their criminal activities spread fear among
travelers and posed a challenge to law enforcement in British India. The British
authorities launched concerted efforts to suppress the Thugee menace, resulting in
the eradication of the Thugee cult by the mid-19th century through large-scale arrests
and trials.
Who was Mahraja Ranjeet Singh? [4]
Maharaja Ranjit Singh was a prominent ruler in the early 19th century known for
founding the Sikh Empire in the Punjab. He unified various Sikh factions and
established himself as the Maharaja of Punjab in 1801. He was known for his
military shrewdness and leadership, expanding his empire through strategic alliances
and conquests. Ranjit Singh's reign was marked by administrative reforms and
patronage of the arts and culture. He modernized his army with European techniques
and weaponry, creating a formidable force that successfully resisted British
expansion into his territories for much of his rule. Ranjit Singh's death in 1839
marked the decline of the Sikh Empire.

14 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

What was the India Pitts Act 1784? [4]

The India Pitts Act of 1784 was enacted by the British Parliament to regulate the
governance and administration of British territories in India under the East India
Company. The Act aimed to address concerns over the East India Company's
unchecked power and corruption by establishing greater parliamentary oversight.
Key provisions included the appointment of a Board of Control in London to
supervise and direct the Company's affairs, ensuring that decisions affecting India
were subject to scrutiny by the British government. The Act also sought to improve
governance standards and accountability within the Company, marking a significant
step towards increased British state intervention in Indian affairs.
What was annexation of Sindh? [4]
The annexation of Sindh refers to the British East India Company's takeover of the
region of Sindh. It occurred in 1843 following military conflicts between the British
forces under Sir Charles Napier and the ruling Talpur Mirs of Sindh. The British,
aiming to expand their control over strategic territories in South Asia, perceived
Sindh as a valuable region due to its location along major trade routes and its
economic potential. The British victory in the Battle of Miani and the subsequent
Battle of Dubbo in 1843 led to the annexation of Sindh into British India.
Why was annexation of Sindh a shameful act by the British? [7]
The annexation of Sindh by the British East India Company in 1843 served as a
powerful message to Indians of British superiority and strength. By asserting control
over Sindh, the British aimed to demonstrate their military prowess and dominance
in the Indian subcontinent. This move was not only about expanding territorial
control but also about sending a clear signal to local rulers and populations across
India that resistance to British authority would be met with forceful consequences.
The annexation of Sindh thus became a symbolic act of imperial assertion,
reinforcing British colonial power and instilling a sense of fear and submission
among Indian communities.
The annexation has been widely interpreted as a retaliatory measure following their
defeats and setbacks at the Afghan border. The First Anglo-Afghan War (1839-
1842) had exposed vulnerabilities in British military strategy and led to a humiliating
retreat from Kabul. In response, British officials sought to restore their prestige and
assert their dominance in the region. Sindh, strategically positioned near British
15 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

territories in India, became a target for British military action. The annexation of
Sindh served not only to expand British territorial control but also to send a clear
message of British power and resolve to local rulers and neighboring powers.
The annexation involved the deliberate breaking of previously established treaties
of friendship and cooperation with the local rulers, known as the Amirs. These
treaties, often forged for mutual benefit and to maintain peace, were seen by the
British as tools to secure their economic and strategic interests in the region.
However, as British ambitions expanded and the geopolitical landscape evolved,
these treaties became increasingly viewed as constraints on British authority and
influence. This deliberate breach of trust and diplomatic agreements undermined
local sovereignty and contributed to a sense of betrayal among the Sindhi leadership
and population.
Why were the British able to replace the Mughals as the dominant force in the
Sub-Continent by 1850? [7]
One of the primary reasons for British ascendency over the Mughals in the Indian
subcontinent was their military superiority and advanced technology. The British
East India Company possessed well-disciplined armies equipped with modern
weaponry such as rifles, cannons, and superior naval fleets. This technological edge
allowed them to win decisive battles against Indian rulers and European rivals alike.
The use of innovative military tactics and strategic alliances with local Indian rulers
further enhanced their military effectiveness, enabling them to consolidate their
territorial gains.
By the 19th century, the Indian subcontinent had experienced a decline in centralized
political authority. The Mughal Empire, once a formidable force, had weakened
significantly due to internal strife, succession disputes, and administrative
inefficiencies. Regional powers, such as the Marathas and various princely states,
engaged in frequent conflicts that further fragmented political authority across the
subcontinent. This fragmentation created opportunities for the British East India
Company to exploit divisions and establish hegemony through a policy of divide and
rule. They leveraged local rivalries and alliances to expand their influence, gradually
replacing indigenous powers as the dominant force in India.
British economic policies, characterized by exploitation of India's resources and
markets, played a crucial role in their dominance. The British East India Company
initially focused on trade, establishing monopolies and extracting wealth through
16 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

taxation and commercial monopolies. Later, after assuming direct control following
the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the British Crown implemented policies that further
entrenched their economic dominance. They imposed land reforms, taxation
systems, and infrastructure projects that primarily benefited British interests, thereby
consolidating their economic control over India. This economic exploitation fueled
resentment and resistance but also solidified British authority over the subcontinent.
Explain why the East India Company got involved in the sub-continent during
the seventeenth century. [7]
The East India Company's involvement in the Indian subcontinent during the
seventeenth century was largely driven by economic motives tied to England's
emerging Industrial Revolution. As England underwent rapid industrialization, there
was a growing demand for raw materials such as cotton, silk, spices, and indigo,
which were abundant in India. By establishing trading posts and securing trading
rights from local rulers, the Company aimed to monopolize the lucrative trade routes.
The wealth generated from Indian trade not only fueled England's economic growth
but also provided the financial resources necessary for the Company to expand its
influence and eventually establish political control over parts of India.
The Indian subcontinent during the seventeenth century was primarily driven by the
pursuit of profitable trade. India was rich in valuable commodities such as spices,
textiles, silk, and indigo, which were in high demand in Europe. The Company
established trading posts and factories along the Indian coastline, where they could
purchase these goods from local producers and traders. They then transported these
goods back to Europe, where they were sold at significant markups, yielding
substantial profits for the Company and its shareholders. The Company's ability to
monopolize trade routes and secure favorable trade agreements with Indian rulers
enabled them to dominate the lucrative trade networks in the region. This profitable
trade not only enriched the Company but also played a pivotal role in England's
economy, contributing to its economic growth and establishing the foundations for
British colonial rule in India in the following centuries.
India's strategic location has been a cornerstone of its historical importance,
positioned at the crossroads of major trade routes linking Europe, the Middle East,
Southeast Asia, and East Asia. This geographic advantage made India a vital hub for
international commerce and cultural exchange. Its extensive coastline facilitated
maritime trade, while its diverse geography provided abundant resources ranging
17 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

from fertile plains to mineral-rich mountains. The control of Indian ports and coastal
areas offered access to lucrative trade networks, enhancing the influence and wealth.
India Pitts Act 1784 was the most important event of British expansion in India
till 1857. Do you agree? Discuss. [14]
The India Pitts Act of 1784 was enacted by the British Parliament to regulate the
governance and administration of British territories in India under the East India
Company. The Act aimed to address concerns over the East India Company's
unchecked power and corruption by establishing greater parliamentary oversight.
Key provisions included the appointment of a Board of Control in London to
supervise and direct the Company's affairs, ensuring that decisions affecting India
were subject to scrutiny by the British government. The Act also sought to improve
governance standards and accountability within the Company, marking a significant
step towards increased British state intervention in Indian affairs.
The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie, the Governor-
General of India from 1848 to 1856. According to this doctrine, if a ruler of an Indian
princely state died without a natural heir, the state would "lapse" or revert to direct
British control instead of passing on to an adopted heir or another family member.
The Doctrine of Lapse was controversial and faced opposition from Indian princes
and local elites, who saw it as an encroachment on their sovereignty and a threat to
their traditional rights. Despite criticisms, the doctrine was enforced in several
instances, leading to the annexation of several princely states like, Satara, Jhansi and
Cawnpur by the British East India Company.
The Battle of Buxar, fought in 1764 near the town of Buxar in Bihar, was a decisive
engagement that cemented British control over northern India. The British East India
Company, led by Major Hector Munro, faced off against a coalition comprising the
Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II, the Nawab of Awadh Shuja-ud-Daula, and the
ousted Nawab of Bengal, Mir Qasim. Despite being outnumbered, the British forces
prevailed due to their disciplined troops, superior artillery, and effective tactics. The
defeat of the Mughal-led alliance solidified British authority in the region and led to
the signing of the Treaty of Allahabad in 1765. This treaty granted the East India
Company extensive territorial and political privileges, marking a pivotal moment in
the establishment of British supremacy and the eventual colonial rule over India.
The Battle of Plassey in 1757 was a significant military encounter between the forces
of the British East India Company and the Nawab of Bengal, Siraj-ud-Daula. It took
18 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

place near the village of Plassey in Bengal. The battle was a decisive victory for the
British East India Company, led by Robert Clive, over the much larger army of Siraj-
ud-Daula. The British victory was achieved through a combination of military
strategy, political alliances with local Indian rulers, and diplomatic maneuvering.
The aftermath of the Battle of Plassey allowed the British East India Company to
gain control over Bengal and marked the beginning of British dominance in India.
The annexation of Sindh refers to the British East India Company's takeover of the
region of Sindh. It occurred in 1843 following military conflicts between the British
forces under Sir Charles Napier and the ruling Talpur Mirs of Sindh. The British,
aiming to expand their control over strategic territories in South Asia, perceived
Sindh as a valuable region due to its location along major trade routes and its
economic potential. The British victory in the Battle of Miani and the subsequent
Battle of Dubbo in 1843 led to the annexation of Sindh into British India.
Subsidiary Alliances were a system introduced by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-
General of India, in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Under this system,
princely states in India were required to accept British troops (subsidiary forces)
stationed within their borders. In return, the British East India Company guaranteed
protection against external threats and internal rebellions. The princely states also
agreed not to form alliances with other powers without British consent. Additionally,
they had to pay for the maintenance of the British troops stationed in their territories.
The Subsidiary Alliance System effectively allowed the British to extend their
control over Indian states without absolute annexations.
How successful were the British attempts to take control of lands in the sub-
continent between 1750 and 1856? [14]
Subsidiary Alliances were a system introduced by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-
General of India, in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Under this system,
princely states in India were required to accept British troops (subsidiary forces)
stationed within their borders. In return, the British East India Company guaranteed
protection against external threats and internal rebellions. The princely states also
agreed not to form alliances with other powers without British consent. Additionally,
they had to pay for the maintenance of the British troops stationed in their territories.
The Subsidiary Alliance System effectively allowed the British to extend their
control over Indian states without absolute annexations.

19 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

The Battle of Buxar, fought in 1764 near the town of Buxar in Bihar, was a decisive
engagement that cemented British control over northern India. The British East India
Company, led by Major Hector Munro, faced off against a coalition comprising the
Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II, the Nawab of Awadh Shuja-ud-Daula, and the
ousted Nawab of Bengal, Mir Qasim. Despite being outnumbered, the British forces
prevailed due to their disciplined troops, superior artillery, and effective tactics. The
defeat of the Mughal-led alliance solidified British authority in the region and led to
the signing of the Treaty of Allahabad in 1765. This treaty granted the East India
Company extensive territorial and political privileges, marking a pivotal moment in
the establishment of British supremacy and the eventual colonial rule over India.
The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie, the Governor-
General of India from 1848 to 1856. According to this doctrine, if a ruler of an Indian
princely state died without a natural heir, the state would "lapse" or revert to direct
British control instead of passing on to an adopted heir or another family member.
The Doctrine of Lapse was controversial and faced opposition from Indian princes
and local elites, who saw it as an encroachment on their sovereignty and a threat to
their traditional rights. Despite criticisms, the doctrine was enforced in several
instances, leading to the annexation of several princely states like, Satara, Jhansi and
Cawnpur by the British East India Company.
However, the British had to face resistance by the Indians as well.
Tipu Sultan, also known as the Tiger of Mysore, fiercely resisted British expansion
in South India during the late 18th century. As the ruler of the Kingdom of Mysore
from 1782 until his death in 1799, Tipu Sultan was known for his military prowess
and determination to defend his kingdom against colonial encroachment. He
modernized his army, equipped it with advanced weaponry, and implemented
innovative military tactics. Tipu Sultan formed alliances with regional powers and
sought to unite other Indian rulers against British expansionism. His resistance
culminated in the four Anglo-Mysore Wars, where he inflicted notable defeats on
British forces and negotiated treaties that temporarily checked British ambitions.
Maharaja Ranjit Singh, the founder and ruler of the Sikh Empire in the early 19th
century, displayed notable resistance against British expansionism in his region.
Despite the British East India Company's growing influence and territorial
ambitions, Ranjit Singh managed to maintain the sovereignty of the Sikh Empire in
the Punjab region. His resistance was characterized by a combination of military
20 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

prowess, strategic alliances, and diplomatic maneuvering. Ranjit Singh modernized

his army with European military techniques and artillery, making it a formidable
force that deterred direct British aggression. He also forged alliances with
neighboring powers and maintained a balance of power in the region, which helped
him safeguard Punjab from British encroachments for much of his reign.

21 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Chapter Two
Religious Reformers
Shah Waliullah (1703-1762)
Who was Shah Walliullah? [4]
He was a Muslim religious scholar who worked for revival of Islam in India after
death of Aurangzeb. He believed that most of the problems of Muslims were due to
their incomplete Knowledge and understanding of the Holy Quran. He tried to stop
the Muslims dividing into sects. He Studied the differences between Sunni and Shia
sects objectively and wrote an account of the first four caliphs in a way acceptable
to both groups. He tried to revive Islam in the prevalent economic system by
stressing on social justice for peasants and the labour class.
Why were there attempts to revive Islam in the sub-continent during the
eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries? [7]
Several reasons compelled reformers to advocate for the religious and social
reformation of Indian Muslim society. Many believed that the issues facing Muslims
stemmed from their insufficient knowledge and understanding of the Holy Quran.
Since the Holy Quran is in Arabic, and most common Muslims had limited
knowledge of Arabic, relying on Persian instead, Shah Waliullah sought to make
Quranic teachings accessible to the general population so they could follow them
more closely.
Another significant reason was that the Muslim community was divided into sects,
such as Sunni and Shia. This division made them vulnerable to attacks on their
religion, resulting in disunity among Indian Muslims. There was a pressing need for
unity to protect Muslims from other communities. Reformers, therefore, wanted
Muslims to put aside their differences to create a more united and strong community.
This noble cause of Muslim unity inspired the reformers to work towards societal
reform.
Last but not the least, another crucial reason to reform Indian Muslim society was
the prevalence of many un-Islamic practices among Muslims due to constant
interaction with Hindus and other non-Muslim communities. This led to Muslims
forgetting the moral and spiritual principles of Islam, blurring the lines between
Islamic and un-Islamic culture. Many Muslims were following practices from both
22 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

religions. Therefore, it became necessary to take steps to reform the Muslims of

India. Reformers aimed to revive Islam and purify the Islamic society, addressing
the need of the time.
Why did Shah Waliullah wish to revive Islam in the sub-continent? [7]
There were several reasons that compelled Shah Waliullah to advocate for the
religious and social reformation of Indian Muslim society. He strongly believed that
the problems Muslims faced were due to their incomplete knowledge and poor
understanding of the Holy Quran. Since the Quran is in Arabic and common
Muslims had little understanding of Arabic, relying on Persian instead, Shah
Waliullah wanted to make Quranic teachings accessible to everyone so they could
follow them properly.
Another significant reason was the division of the Muslim community into sects,
such as Sunni and Shia. These divisions made Muslims vulnerable to attacks on their
religion, creating disunity among Indian Muslims. There was a pressing need for
unity to protect Muslims from other communities. Reformers wanted Muslims to put
aside their differences to build a stronger, more united community. This noble cause
of Muslim unity inspired Shah Waliullah to work towards societal reform.
Lastly, many un-Islamic practices had crept into the Muslim community due to
constant interaction with Hindus and other non-Muslim communities. Muslims had
forgotten the moral and spiritual principles of Islam, leading to a blurred distinction
between Islamic and un-Islamic culture. Many were following practices from both
religions. It was necessary to take steps to reform the Muslims of India. Shah
Waliullah wished to revive Islam and purify Islamic society, addressing this critical
need.
Why did Haji Shah Walliullah have such a major influence on the revival of
Islam in the subcontinent? [7]
Shah Waliullah had a major influence on the revival of Islam in the subcontinent
through his many valuable services for the Muslim community. To begin with, his
most notable service was translating the Holy Quran into Persian. This translation
into the local language greatly improved the understanding of the true teachings of
the Holy Quran, despite severe opposition from the Ulemas. As a result, it became
easier for common Muslims to follow Islamic teachings, leading to a revival of Islam

23 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

among the local population. This effort also paved the way for his sons to translate
the Quran into Urdu, making it accessible to even more people.
Another valuable service of Shah Waliullah was his effort to prevent the division of
Muslims into sects. He thoroughly studied the differences between Sunni and Shia
sects objectively and wrote about the first four caliphs in a manner acceptable to
both groups. Shah Waliullah authored 51 books on various aspects of Islam,
including Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) and Hadith (sayings of the Prophet).
Significant among these were "Hujjatullah ul Baligha" and "Izalat ul Akhfa." His
writings helped Muslims understand Islamic principles better and encouraged them
to act upon these teachings, fostering greater unity and knowledge within the
community.
Moreover, Shah Waliullah worked to unite Muslims against the Marathas and Sikhs
to protect and revive Islam. The Marathas had become a significant threat to
Muslims. Shah Waliullah wrote letters inviting Ahmad Shah Durrani from Persia
and strong independent Muslim nobles of India to form a military alliance against
the Marathas. This alliance successfully defeated the Marathas, saving the Muslim
empire from their tyranny and allowing it to survive for about another 100 years.
Through his efforts, Shah Waliullah played a crucial role in preserving the Muslim
empire and promoting unity among Muslims.
Creation of peaceful co-existence between Muslim sects was more important
service of Shah Waliullah than any other. Do you agree? Discuss. [14]
A valuable service of Shah Waliullah was his effort to stop Muslims from dividing
into sects. He deeply studied the differences between Sunni and Shia objectively and
wrote an account of the first four caliphs in a way that was acceptable to both groups.
He authored 51 books on various aspects of Islam, including Fiqh (Islamic
jurisprudence) and Hadith (sayings of the Prophet). Significant among these works
were "Hujjatullah ul Baligha" and "Izalat ul Akhfa." These writings helped Muslims
understand Islamic principles better and encouraged them to act upon these
teachings, promoting greater unity and knowledge within the community.
Shah Waliullah had a major influence on the revival of Islam in the subcontinent
through his many valuable services to the Muslim community. His translation of the
Holy Quran into Persian was his most notable service for Indian Muslims. This
translation into the local language greatly improved understanding of the true
teachings of the Holy Quran, despite severe opposition from the Ulemas. It made it
24 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

easier for common Muslims to follow Islamic teachings, leading to a revival of Islam
among the locals. This effort also paved the way for his sons to translate the Quran
into Urdu, making it accessible to even more people.
Similarly, Shah Waliullah taught at the Madrassa Rahimiya for many years, which
was crucial because it provided the youth with a deep understanding of the
fundamental principles of Islam and the glorious past of Muslim civilization. His
teachings instilled solidarity and pride in their religion. Shah Waliullah became a
beacon of hope for many future leaders; notable figures like Haji Shariatullah and
Syed Ahmed studied at the same Madrassa, drawing inspiration from his teachings
and continuing his mission of reform and revival.
Moreover, Shah Waliullah endeavored to unite Muslims against the Marathas and
Sikhs to protect and revive Islam. The Marathas had become a significant threat to
Muslims. Shah Waliullah took the initiative by writing letters to invite Ahmad Shah
Durrani from Persia and strong independent Muslim nobles in India to form a
military alliance against the Marathas. This alliance successfully defeated the
Marathas, saving the Muslim empire from their tyranny and ensuring its survival for
approximately another 100 years. Shah Waliullah's efforts played a pivotal role in
preserving the Muslim empire and promoting unity among Muslims during a critical
period of history.
Last but not the least, one of Shah Waliullah's notable contributions to Islam was his
correction of the prevailing economic system. He emphasized social justice and
equal treatment for peasants and laborers. Shah Waliullah advocated for fair wages
and better treatment of laborers and craftsmen, urging businesses to adopt just
Islamic trading practices. He encouraged Muslim traders to adhere to Islamic
economic principles, promoting fairness and integrity in business transactions and
discouraging corruption. Shah Waliullah's efforts aimed to align economic practices
with Islamic teachings, fostering a more just and equitable society within the Muslim
community.

25 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Syed Ahmed Shaheed Barailvi (1786-1831)

Who was Syed Ahmed Barailvi Shaheed? [4]
Syed Ahmed Barelvi, a prominent figure in the history of India's Islamic revival and
resistance against Sikh rule. He was a Muslim religious reformer and activist who
initiated the Jihad Movement aimed at liberating Muslim-majority areas of Punjab
and the North-Western Frontier Province (NWFP) from Sikh rule under Raja Ranjit
Singh. His movement sought to revive Muslim power and influence in India. Syed
Ahmed Barelvi joined a Pathan military force led by Amir Khan, where he gained
knowledge of European weaponry and artillery tactics. He traveled extensively
across Rajasthan, NWFP, Sindh, Balochistan, and Afghanistan to mobilize
Mujahideen forces for his movement against the Sikhs. However, he met his end
tragically at the Battle of Balakot in 1831.
What was the Jihad Movement? [4]
Syed Ahmed Barelvi founded the Jihad Movement, advocating armed struggle to
overthrow non-Muslim oppression and restore Muslim power. The main objective
of the movement was to liberate Muslim-majority areas of Punjab and NWFP from
Sikh rule under Raja Ranjeet Singh, aiming to rejuvenate Islam's influence in India.
He believed that once achieved, Islam could be revived and safeguarded from beliefs
and customs contrary to Islamic teachings that had infiltrated everyday life. Syed
Ahmed Barelvi traveled extensively across Rajasthan, NWFP, Sindh, Balochistan,
and Afghanistan to mobilize Mujahideen forces for the movement.
Why did Syed Ahmed Barailvi Shaheed wish to revive Islam in the
subcontinent? [7]
Syed Ahmed Barelvi Shaheed aimed to revive Islam in the Indian subcontinent for
several compelling reasons. He observed that Islamic teachings and practices were
being compromised and weak under the rule of non-Muslim powers, particularly the
Sikh Empire led by Raja Ranjeet Singh. Syed Ahmed believed that reviving Islam
was crucial to restoring the true faith and removal of beliefs and customs contrary to
Islamic principles that had crept into daily life. He saw this as essential for preserving
the spiritual integrity and identity of Indian Muslims amidst external cultural
influences.

26 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Similarly, Syed Ahmed Barelvi Shaheed perceived a decline in Muslim political

power and influence in the subcontinent. He viewed the liberation of Muslim-
majority regions such as Punjab and NWFP from Sikh rule as a means to revive
Muslim governance and authority. By advocating armed struggle through the Jihad
Movement, he aimed to reclaim these regions under Muslim leadership, believing
that political resurgence was essential for the protection and promotion of Islam's
interests and values in the region.
Last but not the least, Syed Ahmed Barelvi Shaheed was driven by a deep sense of
religious duty and responsibility towards his fellow Muslims. He believed that
reviving Islam would not only safeguard the spiritual well-being of the Muslim
community but also uplift their social and moral standards. He envisioned a society
where Islamic principle guided every aspect of life, from personal conduct to
governance, fostering unity, justice, and prosperity among Muslims. His mission to
revive Islam in the subcontinent was thus fueled by a desire to empower Muslims
spiritually, politically, and socially, ensuring their rightful place in the cultural and
political landscape of India.
How successful was Jihad Movement in achieving its objectives? [14]
One of the significant successes of the Jihad Movement was its bold challenge to
Sikh rule under Raja Ranjeet Singh, who was renowned as the most powerful ruler
of the time. Singh's strength was such that even the British opted to sign a friendship
treaty with him. Despite this formidable power, Syed Ahmed dared to confront Sikh
oppressions and attempted to protect fellow Muslims from their cruelties. The Jihad
Movement not only provided a platform for Muslims to resist Sikh hostilities but
also inspired courage among the oppressed to confront these challenges bravely.
Thus, the movement's proactive stance against Sikh rule stands out as a notable
achievement, demonstrating its commitment to defending Muslim interests in the
face of adversity.
Another success of the movement was its ability to foster unity among Indian
Muslims during a period marked by deep divisions and personal interests. Syed
Ahmed's noble character, piety, and profound knowledge of the Quran and Sunnah
served as significant motivating factors for Muslims to rally behind him. His
exemplary character inspired Muslims across the region, leading to a rapid influx of
supporters. Within a short span, the Mujahideen army swelled to approximately
27 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

80,000 soldiers, showcasing the movement's success in mobilizing a large Muslim

force united under a common cause. This achievement underscored the movement's
capacity to unite Muslims against external threats and injustices, demonstrating Syed
Ahmed's influential leadership and the movement's broader impact on Indian
Muslim solidarity.
One final success of the movement was its role in inspiring hope, courage, and
determination among future movements aimed at safeguarding the rights of Indian
Muslims. The steadfast devotion and resolve demonstrated by the Mujahideen under
Syed Ahmed's leadership served as a powerful inspiration. This spirit of dedication
continued to resonate among Indian Muslims, particularly evident in 1947 when they
united to advocate for an independent Muslim state based on Islamic principles. This
resolution ultimately paved the way for the Pakistan Movement.
However, The Jihad Movement faced several significant failures, but its most critical
was its inability to achieve its primary goal of securing independence for Muslim-
majority areas like Punjab, NWFP, and Kashmir from Sikh rule. Despite their
efforts, Muslims continued to endure oppressive Sikh governance, which restricted
their religious freedoms. Following the defeat of Syed Ahmed Shaheed in the Battle
of Balakot in 1831, the Sikhs grew stronger, further solidifying their control over the
region. Consequently, the Jihad Movement fell short of its primary objective to free
Muslim territories from Sikh dominance.
Similarly, the Jihad Movement also failed to establish an independent Muslim state
based on Islamic principles. The movement encountered betrayal, even from fellow
Muslims who were swayed by worldly benefits. Raja Ranjeet Singh utilized his
agents to sow discord and misunderstandings between the Mujahideen fighters and
local supporters of the movement from Pathan tribes. Additionally, Ranjeet Singh
obtained a religious decree from scholars opposed to the teachings of Shah
Waliullah, declaring the Jihad movement un-Islamic because it was founded on Shah
Waliullah's teachings. This decree was disseminated through Singh's agents,
undermining the legitimacy of the movement and preventing the creation of an
independent Muslim state.
Furthermore, the Mujahideen managed to capture several areas including Peshawar
and Attock. Early victories at Hazroth and Okara boosted their morale. However,
they struggled to maintain control over these areas, and one by one, Sikh armies
recaptured them. Syed Ahmed Shaheed's attempt to enforce strict Sharia laws also
28 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

alienated local Pathan tribes, who turned against the Mujahideen. This conflict
turned these regions into battlegrounds, forcing Syed Ahmed Shaheed to withdraw.
This highlighted Syed Ahmed's weak administrative capabilities, which contributed
significantly to the movement's failure.
Another critical failure of the movement was the inability of the Mujahideen to
maintain unity among themselves. The army consisted of individuals from diverse
cultures, races, and backgrounds, with religion being the only common bond under
Syed Ahmed's leadership. These differences often escalated into serious
disagreements, undermining cohesion within the army. This lack of unity proved
detrimental during battles against the Sikh armies, as internal conflicts hampered
effective war strategy and command decisions. Consequently, the Mujahideen
suffered significant defeats, weakening the overall effectiveness and credibility of
the Jihad Movement.
Disunity between Mujahideens was the most important reason for failure of
Jihad Movement. Do you agree? Discuss. [14]
The primary factor contributing to the failure of the Jihad Movement was the
disunity among the Mujahideen fighters. These fighters were a diverse group, hailing
from various cultural, ethnic, and regional backgrounds. While they shared a
common goal of challenging Sikh rule and defending Muslim interests, internal
divisions and disagreements frequently emerged. Differences in strategy, leadership
disputes, and varying interpretations of religious principles often led to significant
conflicts within the movement. These internal rifts undermined their ability to
coordinate effectively during battles against the Sikh armies. Thus, the inability to
overcome internal divisions proved to be the decisive factor in the Jihad Movement's
failure to achieve its goals.
The Mujahideen camp faced disruption from agents who spread rumors that Syed
Ahmed's reforms were against Islamic teachings. These agents, possibly working for
opponents like Raja Ranjeet Singh, aimed to create division and distrust among the
fighters. Their actions made it harder for the Mujahideen to stay united and focused
on their goal of resisting Sikh rule and protecting Muslim interests. This internal
strife weakened their efforts and contributed to the challenges they faced during the
Jihad Movement.
The dissatisfaction of tribal chiefs also played a significant role in the Jihad
Movement's challenges. These chiefs, influential leaders within their communities,
29 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

often had differing priorities, strategies, and loyalties compared to Syed Ahmed and
his Mujahideen forces. Their discontent and occasional opposition hindered
cohesive action and unity among the fighters. This dissatisfaction among tribal
chiefs further complicated efforts to effectively confront Sikh rule and achieve the
movement's objectives, contributing to its ultimate setbacks and failures.
The lack of proper military training among the Mujahideen fighters was a critical
factor in the challenges faced by the Jihad Movement. Many of these fighters were
volunteers from diverse backgrounds, often with limited or no formal military
experience. This lack of training affected their ability to effectively coordinate
tactics, handle advanced weaponry, and execute strategic maneuvers during battles
against the well-trained Sikh armies. Without adequate military preparation, the
Mujahideen struggled to maintain discipline and respond effectively to the
complexities of warfare, ultimately contributing to their difficulties in achieving
significant victories and sustaining momentum in their campaign against Sikh rule.
Syed Ahmed Shahid Baralvi imposed high taxes on locals to fund military expenses
and maintain a large army. The local population, however, had expected tax relief
under Muslim rule and was dismayed by the new taxes, leading to resentment and
widespread refusal to pay. In response, Syed Ahmed began punishing those who
resisted, further alienating the local population. This loss of support eroded the
strength of his forces and significantly undermined the Jihad Movement,
contributing to its ultimate failure.
The attitude of some Mujahideen fighters also contributed to the challenges faced
by the Jihad Movement. While many were dedicated to the cause, some exhibited
behaviors that undermined unity and effectiveness. Issues such as lack of discipline,
personal rivalries, and differing interpretations of strategy and leadership often
surfaced within the ranks. These internal conflicts and varying attitudes among
fighters made it difficult to maintain cohesive action and focus during critical
moments of the movement. As a result, the overall strength and coordination of the
Mujahideen forces were compromised, impacting their ability to effectively
challenge Sikh rule and achieve their objectives.

30 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Haji Shariatullah (1781-1840)

Who was Haji Shariatullah? [4]
Haji Shariatullah was born in 1781 in Faridpur district of Bengal. At a young age,
he traveled to Mecca and spent a long time there. His stay in Hejaz gave him the
chance to deeply understand true Islam. When he returned, he aimed to improve the
lives of poor Muslims by revitalizing the core values of Islam. He called upon
Bengali Muslims to follow basic Islamic teachings and give up practices that weren't
in line with Islam. His followers were known as Faraizi because he emphasized
fulfilling religious duties (Faraiz). Haji Shariatullah strongly opposed the
relationship between mystics (Pirs) and their followers (Murids), promoting instead
a teacher-student relationship among Muslims.
Who was Mohsin-ud-Din or Dodhu Mian? [4]
He was the son of Haji Shariatullah, who assumed leadership of the Faraizi
movement and organized it more systematically. He divided East Bengal into
administrative units known as circles, each placed under a Khalifa responsible for
the well-being of people in their area, both socially and spiritually. He also supported
peasants in resisting high taxes levied by Hindu and British landlords. During times
of unrest in Bengal, he even threatened to declare Jihad against the British
government. However, he was arrested and later died in prison.
What was the Faraizi Movement? [4]
It was a religious reformation movement started by Haji Shariat Ullah to reform
Muslim society of Bengal. It Emphasized on performing of only Faraiz of Islam. It
asked Muslims to give up all un-Islamic practices which had crept in them. The
followers of the movement came to be known as Faraizi’. The movement rejected
the expressions of Pir (Master) and Murid (Disciple) and advised Muslims to be
replaced with the title of Ustad (Teacher) & Shagird (Student). It also encouraged
the Muslims tyo adopt ‘Tauba’ as a manifestation of repentance for all the past sins
and a pledge to lead a righteous and God-fearing life in future.
Why did Haji Shariatullah wish to revive Islam in the sub-continent? [7]
There were many reasons which motivated Haji Shariat Ullah to reform Muslims of
Bengal. Early eighteenth century was a miserable period for the Bengali Muslims.
They were economically, socially and educationally crippled under the British rule.
31 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

They were also oppressed and tortured by Hindu landlords. These landlords had
imposed heavy taxes on poor Muslim peasants. The Muslins even had to pay many
unfair religious taxes like beard tax and marriage tax. He wanted to save poor
Muslim peasants from these cruel taxes.
Another important reason which motivated him was that religious belief had gone
weak as Islam was badly influenced by Hinduism. There was no clear distinction
between Islamic and un-Islamic practices. Majority of the Muslims were performing
both practices at a same time. These Muslims had become superstitious and were far
from the true ideal of Islam. This was very disturbing for him and he decided to
reform Muslim society of Bengal.
He was belonged to prominent religious family of Bengal. He left for Mecca at an
early age and stayed there for a very long period. His stay in Hejaz was an
opportunity for him to learn the true ideal of Islam. He decided to improve the
conditions of poor Muslims by reviving the true spirit of Islam. On his return, he
called upon Bengali Muslims to follow the basics of Islam. His first message was to
give up un-Islamic practices and to stick to duties towards religion. So, he started
Faraizi Movement.
Why did Haji Shariatullah have such an important influence on the revival of
Islam in the sub-continent? [7]
He was a religious reformer who had great influence on the Indian Muslims. By the
start of 19th century the Muslims of Bengal had also gone away from Islam by living
with the non-Muslims. They had accepted their rituals and practices and had lost
inclusive identity of Islam. He was highly grieved and disturbed by seeing the
Muslims. He laid foundation of Faraizi movement, which put stress in the
performance of duties and a pious life after Tauba. He advised the Muslims to avoid
all the superstitions and un-Islamic customs and practice. His efforts brought visible
change and many Muslims shaped their lives according to Islam.
Similarly, during the days the peasants were living a miserable life in Bengal. Most
of the property owners in the Bengal were Hindus who had terrible treatment with
the Muslims. They had usurped the rights of Muslim peasants. The Muslims were
denied equal share in the production. He awoke the Muslims and advised them not
to be silent for their rights. He played a vital role in creating awaking and awareness
among the poor Muslim peasants for the protection of their rights.

32 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Last but not the least Faraizi Movement in the nineteenth century was major attempt
aimed at the revival of Islam. A great many people were influenced by the teachings
of both Haji Shariat Ullah and his son Mohsin-ud-Din Ahmad. They very
successfully helped Bengali Muslims set their religious belief right. It was surely
through this movement that Islam returned to its original form. It made them
conscious of their religious identity and created a spirit in them for the fighting of
holy war (Jihad).
Did Syed Ahmed Shaheed contribute more to the spread of Islam than anyone
else in the sub-continent before 1850? Explain your answer. [14]
One of the significant successes of the Jihad Movement was its bold challenge to
Sikh rule under Raja Ranjeet Singh, who was renowned as the most powerful ruler
of the time. Singh's strength was such that even the British opted to sign a friendship
treaty with him. Despite this formidable power, Syed Ahmed dared to confront Sikh
oppressions and attempted to protect fellow Muslims from their cruelties. The Jihad
Movement not only provided a platform for Muslims to resist Sikh hostilities but
also inspired courage among the oppressed to confront these challenges bravely.
Thus, the movement's proactive stance against Sikh rule stands out as a notable
achievement, demonstrating its commitment to defending Muslim interests in the
face of adversity.
Another success of the movement was its ability to foster unity among Indian
Muslims during a period marked by deep divisions and personal interests. Syed
Ahmed's noble character, piety, and profound knowledge of the Quran and Sunnah
served as significant motivating factors for Muslims to rally behind him. His
exemplary character inspired Muslims across the region, leading to a rapid influx of
supporters. Within a short span, the Mujahideen army swelled to approximately
80,000 soldiers, showcasing the movement's success in mobilizing a large Muslim
force united under a common cause. This achievement underscored the movement's
capacity to unite Muslims against external threats and injustices, demonstrating Syed
Ahmed's influential leadership and the movement's broader impact on Indian
Muslim solidarity.
Moreover, Shah Waliullah endeavored to unite Muslims against the Marathas and
Sikhs to protect and revive Islam. The Marathas had become a significant threat to
Muslims. Shah Waliullah took the initiative by writing letters to invite Ahmad Shah
Durrani from Persia and strong independent Muslim nobles in India to form a
33 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

military alliance against the Marathas. This alliance successfully defeated the
Marathas, saving the Muslim empire from their tyranny and ensuring its survival for
approximately another 100 years. Shah Waliullah's efforts played a pivotal role in
preserving the Muslim empire and promoting unity among Muslims during a critical
period of history.
Last but not the least, one of Shah Waliullah's notable contributions to Islam was his
correction of the prevailing economic system. He emphasized social justice and
equal treatment for peasants and laborers. Shah Waliullah advocated for fair wages
and better treatment of laborers and craftsmen, urging businesses to adopt just
Islamic trading practices. He encouraged Muslim traders to adhere to Islamic
economic principles, promoting fairness and integrity in business transactions and
discouraging corruption. Shah Waliullah's efforts aimed to align economic practices
with Islamic teachings, fostering a more just and equitable society within the Muslim
community.
Haji Shariatullah was a religious reformer who had great influence on the Indian
Muslims. By the start of 19th century the Muslims of Bengal had also gone away
from Islam by living with the non-Muslims. They had accepted their rituals and
practices and had lost inclusive identity of Islam. He was highly grieved and
disturbed by seeing the Muslims. He laid foundation of Faraizi movement, which
put stress in the performance of duties and a pious life after Tauba. He advised the
Muslims to avoid all the superstitions and un-Islamic customs and practice. His
efforts brought visible change and many Muslims shaped their lives according to
Islam.
Similarly, during the days the peasants were living a miserable life in Bengal. Most
of the property owners in the Bengal were Hindus who had terrible treatment with
the Muslims. They had usurped the rights of Muslim peasants. The Muslims were
denied equal share in the production. He awoke the Muslims and advised them not
to be silent for their rights. He played a vital role in creating awaking and awareness
among the poor Muslim peasants for the protection of their rights.

34 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

The War of Independence 1857

Describe the War of Independence 1857. [4]
The War of Independence in 1857 was a major uprising against British rule in India.
It began with a revolt by Indian soldiers, or sepoys, in the British East India
Company's army, who were unhappy with issues such as the use of rifle cartridges
rumored to be greased with animal fat, which was offensive to both Hindu and
Muslim soldiers. The rebellion quickly spread to other regions, involving various
Indian rulers and common people who were frustrated by British policies and
economic exploitation. The conflict saw significant battles and widespread violence
but was eventually suppressed by the British.
What happened at the battle of Kanpur? [4]
The Battle of Kanpur, also known as the Siege of Kanpur, was a significant and
brutal conflict during the War of 1857. It began in June 1857 when the forces, led
by Nana Sahib, besieged the British garrison in Kanpur, now in Uttar Pradesh. The
British and their loyal Indian troops, including women and children, were trapped in
a makeshift fort. After initial fighting and a failed attempt to relieve the siege, the
rebels offered terms of surrender. However, a massacre occurred when the British
attempted to evacuate, leading to the killing of many British civilians. The British
eventually recaptured Kanpur in July after a fierce counterattack, resulting in severe
reprisals against the rebels.
What was greased cartridge issue? [4]
The greased cartridge issue was a major cause of the War of Independence 1857.
Indian soldiers, known as sepoys, were given new rifle cartridges that were rumored
to be coated with animal fat, specifically from pigs and cows. This was deeply
offensive to both Hindu and Muslim sepoys because cows are sacred to Hindus and
pigs are considered unclean by Muslims. The soldiers believed that using these
cartridges would go against their religious beliefs, causing widespread anger and
distrust towards the British. This controversy was one of the key factors that sparked
the rebellion against British rule.

35 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Who was Lakshmi Bai? [4]

Lakshmi Bai, also known as Rani of Jhansi, was a courageous queen and a key figure
in the war of 1857. She became the queen of Jhansi after marrying the Maharaja.
When the British annexed Jhansi under the Doctrine of Lapse, Lakshmi Bai led a
strong resistance against them. She became famous for her bravery and leadership
in defending her kingdom, fighting fiercely in battle and inspiring many with her
determination. Despite her efforts, Jhansi fell to the British, and Lakshmi Bai
eventually died in battle. She is remembered as a symbol of resistance and heroism
in India's struggle for independence.
Who was Mangel Pandey? [4]
Mangal Pandey was a prominent figure in the Indian Rebellion of 1857, often
regarded as one of its early leaders. He was a sepoy (soldier) in the British East India
Company's army. In March 1857, he rebelled against British officers due to the issue
of the greased cartridges, which he believed were offensive to his religious beliefs.
His actions, including attacking British officers, were among the initial sparks that
ignited the broader uprising. Pandey was arrested, tried, and executed by the British,
but his courage and resistance made him a symbol of the fight against colonial rule
and a martyr in India's struggle for independence.
Who was Nana Sahib? [4]
Nana Sahib, born as Dhondu Pant in 1824, was an important leader in the Indian
War of Independence of 1857 against British rule. He was adopted by the last
Peshwa of the Maratha Empire, Baji Rao II, and was denied his father's pension by
the British, which fueled his anger. Nana Sahib is best known for leading the siege
of Kanpur, where his forces captured the city and fought against the British. After
the rebellion was suppressed, he disappeared, and his fate remains a mystery. Nana
Sahib is remembered as a key figure in India's struggle for independence.
Who was Tatya Tope? [4]
Tatya Tope, also known as Tantia Tope, was a key leader in the Indian War of
Independence of 1857 against British rule. He played a significant role in several
key battles, including the capture of Gwalior and the defense of Kanpur. He was
famous for his clever guerrilla warfare tactics, which caused trouble for the British.
Even though he didn't have formal military training, he led many successful battles.

36 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

He was eventually betrayed, captured, and executed by the British in 1859,

becoming a hero in India's fight for independence.
Describe the Proclamation of 1858. [4]
The British were expected to adhere to several important principles to address Indian
grievances. Firstly, they were to avoid interfering in the religious beliefs of the
people, showing respect for local customs and traditions. They were also required to
honor ancient property rights and customs, ensuring that traditional practices and
rights were preserved. Additionally, the British needed to abide by all treaty
obligations, maintaining the agreements made with Indian rulers and communities.
There was also a commitment to refrain from further territorial acquisitions,
avoiding the expansion of British control over additional lands. Lastly, it was crucial
to guarantee the right of Indians to appointments in public service, ensuring fair and
equitable opportunities for all, regardless of nationality.
How did the British Political Reforms cause anger among Indians by 1875? [7]
The British political reforms, such as the Doctrine of Lapse, caused anger among
Indians by 1875. The Doctrine of Lapse allowed the British to annex Indian states
that did not have a direct male heir, disregarding traditional succession laws. This
policy led to the annexation of several princely states, including Jhansi and Satara,
creating resentment among Indian rulers and their subjects. Additionally, the British
introduced laws and policies that favored their interests over those of the Indians,
marginalized local governance, and imposed heavy taxes. These actions disrupted
existing social and economic structures, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and
anger among Indians.
The mistreatment of the Mughal Emperor by the British caused significant anger
among Indians by 1875. The British systematically undermined the authority and
dignity of the Mughal Emperor, reducing his status to that of a mere pensioner with
no real power. In 1857, the British exiled the last Mughal Emperor, Bahadur Shah
Zafar, to Burma, effectively ending the Mughal dynasty. This act deeply offended
many Indians who revered the Mughal Emperor as a symbolic and cultural
figurehead. The disrespect and harsh treatment of the Mughal Emperor contributed
to the growing resentment and anger towards British rule.
The lack of representation in the civil service was another significant factor that
caused anger among Indians by 1875. The British colonial administration largely
37 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

excluded Indians from high-ranking positions within the civil service, reserving
these roles for British officials. Despite the introduction of competitive exams for
the Indian Civil Service in 1853, the exams were conducted in England and were
inaccessible to most Indians due to geographic, educational, and financial barriers.
This exclusion from the administrative machinery of their own country created
feelings of injustice and discrimination, fueling widespread resentment and anger
among educated Indians and the broader population.
How did the British Religious Reforms cause anger among Indians by 1875? [7]
The propagation of Christianity by the British also stirred anger among Indians by
1875. British missionaries actively promoted Christianity, establishing schools,
churches, and missions throughout India. This proselytizing effort often clashed with
the deeply rooted Hindu and Muslim traditions of the Indian population. Many
Indians viewed the British promotion of Christianity as a form of cultural and
religious imposition, which threatened their traditional beliefs and practices. The
perceived attempt to undermine and replace local religions with Christianity
contributed to growing resentment and resistance against British rule.
Anti-religious laws introduced by the British further fueled anger among Indians by
1875. These laws often conflicted with traditional religious practices and beliefs,
leading to widespread dissatisfaction. For example, British regulations that
interfered with Hindu and Muslim customs, such as laws related to marriage,
inheritance, and religious ceremonies, were seen as intrusive and disrespectful. The
imposition of these laws not only disrupted long-standing religious traditions but
also provoked fears of cultural erosion. This antagonistic approach towards local
religious practices contributed significantly to growing resentment against British
colonial rule.
The banning of religious symbols by Indian soldiers was a significant source of
anger among Indians by 1875. The British authorities prohibited the wearing of
religious symbols, such as sacred threads or turbans, by soldiers in the British Indian
Army. This ban was perceived as a direct attack on the soldiers' religious and cultural
identities, undermining their deeply held beliefs. Many Indian soldiers saw this
restriction as an attempt to erode their traditional practices and disrespect their faith,
leading to widespread resentment and contributing to the broader discontent with
British rule.

38 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

How did the British Economic Reforms cause anger among Indians by 1875?
[7]
The British agrarian policy also contributed to widespread anger among Indians by
1875. The British implemented policies that prioritized revenue collection over the
welfare of farmers, leading to severe economic hardship. The introduction of high
land taxes and a rigid revenue system often forced farmers into debt and sometimes
even led to the loss of their land. Additionally, the British system favored landlords
and intermediaries, which further exploited the peasants. These policies disrupted
traditional agricultural practices and contributed to widespread poverty and unrest
in rural areas, exacerbating resentment towards British rule.
Unemployment became a growing issue under British rule, contributing to anger
among Indians by 1875. The British economic policies and the focus on exporting
raw materials to Britain led to the decline of traditional industries, such as textiles,
which were vital to many local economies. The influx of British goods and the
establishment of British-controlled industries created job losses and economic
instability for Indian workers and artisans. This disruption, coupled with the limited
opportunities for employment in the British administration or other sectors, led to
widespread unemployment and economic frustration among Indians, further fueling
discontent with British rule.
The destruction of local industries was a major cause of anger among Indians by
1875. British policies prioritized the import of British-made goods, which severely
undermined traditional Indian industries, such as textiles and handicrafts. Local
artisans and small-scale producers struggled to compete with the influx of cheaper
British goods, leading to widespread closures of Indian workshops and factories.
This economic disruption not only resulted in significant job losses but also harmed
local economies that had relied on these industries for centuries. The decline of these
industries contributed to growing frustration and resentment towards British
economic policies and their negative impact on Indian livelihoods.
How did the British Social Reforms cause anger among Indians by 1875? [7]
The role of modern education in causing anger among Indians by 1875 was
significant. The British introduced a Western-style education system that prioritized
English language and literature, science, and British history over traditional Indian
education. This shift not only marginalized local languages, cultures, and knowledge
systems but also created a disconnect between educated Indians and their traditional
39 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

roots. The new educational policies led to a feeling of alienation among those who
were educated in Western institutions but found themselves excluded from higher
positions in the British administration, which were often reserved for British
nationals. Additionally, the focus on Western education created a class divide, as
only a small, often elite, segment of the population had access to these educational
opportunities, deepening social inequalities and fueling resentment towards British
rule.
The construction of railways by the British in India also contributed to growing
anger among Indians by 1875. While railways were instrumental in modernizing
infrastructure and boosting economic growth, their implementation often prioritized
British interests over Indian needs. The primary focus of the railways was to
facilitate the efficient transport of goods and resources for British economic benefit,
rather than addressing local transportation needs. This led to the exploitation of
Indian resources and labor, with little regard for the social or economic impact on
local communities. Additionally, the displacement of communities and changes in
land use caused by railway construction disrupted traditional livelihoods and
contributed to growing resentment towards British rule.
The threat to Indian culture posed by British policies was a significant factor in the
growing anger among Indians by 1875. The British colonial administration often
disregarded or undermined traditional cultural practices and institutions. Policies
promoting Western education and legal systems were seen as eroding Indian cultural
heritage and values. The imposition of Western customs and ideas, along with the
suppression of local traditions and religions, led many Indians to feel that their
cultural identity was being systematically dismantled. This cultural disruption,
combined with the British disregard for traditional Indian practices, fostered a sense
of cultural invasion and alienation, contributing to widespread discontent and
resistance against British rule.
How did the British Military Reforms cause anger among Indians by 1875? [7]
The British military reforms, including the disbandment of Indian armies, caused
significant anger among Indians by 1875. The British reduced the size of the Indian
armies and disbanded several regiments as part of their strategy to control and limit
the power of local rulers and potential rebels. This move not only led to widespread
unemployment among soldiers and their support staff but also disrupted the social
and economic fabric of many communities dependent on the military for their
40 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

livelihood. This policy was perceived as a deliberate attempt to undermine Indian

military capabilities and reduce their autonomy, fueling widespread resentment and
contributing to the broader discontent with British rule.
The resentment of Indian soldiers being deployed outside India was a significant
factor causing anger among Indians by 1875. Many Indian soldiers, or sepoys, were
unhappy about being sent to fight in distant territories, such as Burma or China, far
from their homes and families. This deployment was often seen as an exploitation
of their services for British imperial interests. Additionally, Hindu soldiers were
uncomfortable to leave Mother India and the Muslim soldiers were not ready to fight
against their fellow Muslims. This sense of being used and mistreated contributed to
growing discontent among Indian soldiers and further fueled the broader resistance
against British rule.
The lack of officer ranks for Indian soldiers was another source of resentment by
1875. Despite their significant contributions to the British Indian Army, Indian
soldiers were rarely promoted to officer positions, which were exclusively held by
British nationals. This policy not only limited their career advancement but also
reinforced a sense of racial discrimination and inequality. Indian soldiers felt
excluded from leadership roles and decision-making processes, which contributed
to their frustration and disillusionment with British rule. The perceived lack of
respect and opportunity further fueled their anger and resistance against the colonial
administration.
Why did the Indians not achieve Independence in 1857? [7]
One of the key reasons why Indians did not achieve independence in 1857 was the
lack of unity among the diverse Indian communities. The rebellion was marked by
significant regional and cultural differences, with various local leaders and factions
having different goals and priorities. While some groups fought against the British,
others were more focused on preserving their own local interests or settling old
scores with rival factions. This disunity weakened the overall strength of the
rebellion, as there was no unified command or common objective. The absence of a
coordinated effort among various Indian states and communities made it difficult to
mount a sustained and effective resistance against the British forces.

41 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

The rebellion of 1857 also failed to achieve independence due to its ill-organized
and uncoordinated nature. The uprising lacked a cohesive and strategic plan, with
different regions and leaders pursuing their own agendas without effective
communication or collaboration. The initial revolt was spontaneous and driven by
immediate grievances, but there was no overarching strategy to consolidate gains or
plan for the long term. The British, on the other hand, had a well-organized military
and administrative apparatus that was able to respond effectively to the scattered and
disjointed efforts of the rebels. This lack of organization and coordination among
the Indian forces significantly undermined their ability to challenge British rule
successfully.
The British strength during the Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a decisive factor in
preventing Indian independence at that time. Their military forces were well-
organized and technologically advanced, equipped with superior weaponry and
artillery that outmatched the less well-equipped rebels. The British had a highly
disciplined army, supported by an efficient administrative and logistical network that
facilitated rapid reinforcement and supply. Additionally, they skillfully used divide-
and-conquer tactics to exploit existing regional and cultural divisions among Indian
communities, weakening the overall resistance. The ability to maintain control over
strategic locations and key transport routes further enhanced their capacity to
suppress the rebellion and retain dominance over India.
A lack of unity and coordination was the main reason for the failure of the War
of Independence by 1858.' Do you agree? [14]
One of the key reasons why Indians did not achieve independence in 1857 was the
lack of unity among the diverse Indian communities. The rebellion was marked by
significant regional and cultural differences, with various local leaders and factions
having different goals and priorities. While some groups fought against the British,
others were more focused on preserving their own local interests or settling old
scores with rival factions. This disunity weakened the overall strength of the
rebellion, as there was no unified command or common objective. The absence of a
coordinated effort among various Indian states and communities made it difficult to
mount a sustained and effective resistance against the British forces.
The rebellion of 1857 also failed to achieve independence due to its ill-organized
and uncoordinated nature. The uprising lacked a cohesive and strategic plan, with
different regions and leaders pursuing their own agendas without effective
42 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

communication or collaboration. The initial revolt was spontaneous and driven by

immediate grievances, but there was no overarching strategy to consolidate gains or
plan for the long term. The British, on the other hand, had a well-organized military
and administrative apparatus that was able to respond effectively to the scattered and
disjointed efforts of the rebels. This lack of organization and coordination among
the Indian forces significantly undermined their ability to challenge British rule
successfully.
The British strength during the Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a decisive factor in
preventing Indian independence at that time. Their military forces were well-
organized and technologically advanced, equipped with superior weaponry and
artillery that outmatched the less well-equipped rebels. The British had a highly
disciplined army, supported by an efficient administrative and logistical network that
facilitated rapid reinforcement and supply. Additionally, they skillfully used divide-
and-conquer tactics to exploit existing regional and cultural divisions among Indian
communities, weakening the overall resistance. The ability to maintain control over
strategic locations and key transport routes further enhanced their capacity to
suppress the rebellion and retain dominance over India.
Many rulers of princely states supported the British during the Indian Rebellion of
1857, which significantly undermined the overall effort for independence. These
rulers, often motivated by their own political and economic interests, chose to align
with the British in exchange for maintaining their own positions of power and
privileges. Their support provided the British with valuable resources, such as troops
and logistical assistance, and helped to isolate the rebels by weakening the unity of
the anti-colonial forces. The allegiance of these princely states also allowed the
British to strategically secure important regions and suppress the rebellion more
effectively, ultimately contributing to the failure of the uprising.
The absence of experienced leadership was a significant factor in the failure of the
Indian Rebellion of 1857. The uprising lacked a unified command and strategic
vision, resulting in fragmented and often poorly coordinated efforts. Many of the
local leaders who rose to prominence during the rebellion, such as Nana Sahib and
Lakshmi Bai, were courageous but lacked the military training and strategic acumen
needed to effectively challenge the well-organized British forces. The rebellion was
driven more by immediate grievances and spontaneous uprisings rather than a
coherent, long-term strategy. This lack of experienced and centralized leadership

43 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

hindered the ability of the Indian forces to mount a sustained and effective resistance,
contributing to the eventual suppression of the rebellion by the British.
The outdated communication system of the Indians made it hard for them to
coordinate effectively during the Indian Rebellion of 1857. Unlike the British, who
had fast and reliable ways to send messages and information, such as telegraphs, the
Indians used slower methods. This meant that important orders and updates took a
long time to reach different leaders and regions. As a result, their efforts were often
uncoordinated and poorly organized. This slow communication made it easier for
the British to manage and defeat the rebels.
The Introduction of Social Reforms by the British, such as Education, caused
the War of Independence in 1857.' Do you agree? [14]
The role of modern education in causing anger among Indians by 1875 was
significant. The British introduced a Western-style education system that prioritized
English language and literature, science, and British history over traditional Indian
education. This shift not only marginalized local languages, cultures, and knowledge
systems but also created a disconnect between educated Indians and their traditional
roots. The new educational policies led to a feeling of alienation among those who
were educated in Western institutions but found themselves excluded from higher
positions in the British administration, which were often reserved for British
nationals. Additionally, the focus on Western education created a class divide, as
only a small, often elite, segment of the population had access to these educational
opportunities, deepening social inequalities and fueling resentment towards British
rule.
The threat to Indian culture posed by British policies was a significant factor in the
growing anger among Indians by 1875. The British colonial administration often
disregarded or undermined traditional cultural practices and institutions. Policies
promoting Western education and legal systems were seen as eroding Indian cultural
heritage and values. The imposition of Western customs and ideas, along with the
suppression of local traditions and religions, led many Indians to feel that their
cultural identity was being systematically dismantled. This cultural disruption,
combined with the British disregard for traditional Indian practices, fostered a sense
of cultural invasion and alienation, contributing to widespread discontent and
resistance against British rule.

44 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

The lack of officer ranks for Indian soldiers was another source of resentment by
1875. Despite their significant contributions to the British Indian Army, Indian
soldiers were rarely promoted to officer positions, which were exclusively held by
British nationals. This policy not only limited their career advancement but also
reinforced a sense of racial discrimination and inequality. Indian soldiers felt
excluded from leadership roles and decision-making processes, which contributed
to their frustration and disillusionment with British rule. The perceived lack of
respect and opportunity further fueled their anger and resistance against the colonial
administration.
Unemployment became a growing issue under British rule, contributing to anger
among Indians by 1875. The British economic policies and the focus on exporting
raw materials to Britain led to the decline of traditional industries, such as textiles,
which were vital to many local economies. The influx of British goods and the
establishment of British-controlled industries created job losses and economic
instability for Indian workers and artisans. This disruption, coupled with the limited
opportunities for employment in the British administration or other sectors, led to
widespread unemployment and economic frustration among Indians, further fueling
discontent with British rule.
The propagation of Christianity by the British also stirred anger among Indians by
1875. British missionaries actively promoted Christianity, establishing schools,
churches, and missions throughout India. This proselytizing effort often clashed with
the deeply rooted Hindu and Muslim traditions of the Indian population. Many
Indians viewed the British promotion of Christianity as a form of cultural and
religious imposition, which threatened their traditional beliefs and practices. The
perceived attempt to undermine and replace local religions with Christianity
contributed to growing resentment and resistance against British rule.
The British political reforms, such as the Doctrine of Lapse, caused anger among
Indians by 1875. The Doctrine of Lapse allowed the British to annex Indian states
that did not have a direct male heir, disregarding traditional succession laws. This
policy led to the annexation of several princely states, including Jhansi and Satara,
creating resentment among Indian rulers and their subjects. Additionally, the British
introduced laws and policies that favored their interests over those of the Indians,
marginalized local governance, and imposed heavy taxes. These actions disrupted

45 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

existing social and economic structures, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and

anger among Indians.
The War of Independence of 1857 achieved nothing'. Give reasons why you
might agree and disagree with this statement. [14]
After the Indian Rebellion of 1857 was suppressed, the British response was
extremely harsh. They carried out severe repression and retribution against those
involved in the uprising. This included widespread executions, public floggings, and
the burning of villages suspected of supporting the rebels. Many rebels and their
families suffered brutal punishments, which was meant to deter any future
resistance. This harsh crackdown not only punished the immediate participants but
also created a climate of fear and suffering, making it difficult for organized
resistance to continue in the short term.
The War of Independence in 1857 did not achieve immediate independence for
India, as the British were able to suppress the rebellion and maintain their control
over the country. The uprising failed to remove British rule, and instead, the British
government took direct control from the East India Company. Additionally, the
rebellion marked the end of Mughal rule in India. The last Mughal Emperor, Bahadur
Shah Zafar, was captured and exiled, and the Mughal Empire, which had been a
symbol of Indian authority for centuries, came to an end.
However, after the War of Independence in 1857, there were some positive impacts
on India’s constitutional development. The British realized that they needed to make
changes to their administration to prevent future uprisings. As a result, they
introduced several reforms aimed at improving governance. For example, the British
began to include Indians in the administration and made efforts to address some of
their grievances. The British also started to create new laws and policies to manage
the country more effectively. These changes laid the groundwork for future
constitutional developments and set the stage for more gradual political participation
by Indians in the years to come.
After the War of Independence in 1857, the East India Company (EIC) was
abolished, and its policies were largely discarded. The British government decided
to end the rule of the EIC due to its inability to effectively manage and control the
vast and diverse territories of India, especially in the wake of the rebellion. In 1874,
the British Parliament passed the Government of India Act, which transferred control
from the EIC to the British Crown. This change meant that the direct administration
46 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

of India was taken over by the British government, leading to the establishment of
the British Raj. The policies and practices of the EIC, which had been a major cause
of discontent, were largely replaced by new administrative reforms aimed at
stabilizing British rule.
The modernization of India during British rule involved significant changes in
infrastructure, education, and governance. The British introduced railways,
telegraphs, and roads, which transformed transportation and communication across
the vast subcontinent. They established a Western-style education system,
promoting English and Western sciences, which played a key role in shaping India's
modern intellectual and professional classes. Additionally, British administration
implemented legal and administrative reforms, including new laws and a more
structured bureaucracy, that influenced governance and civil service. While these
changes helped in the development of India's infrastructure and administrative
systems, they also often prioritized British interests and had mixed impacts on Indian
society, contributing to both progress and ongoing challenges.

47 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Chapter 04
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan 1817-1898
Who was Sir Syed Ahmed Khan? [4]
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan (1817-1898) was a prominent Indian Muslim reformer,
educator, and politician during the 19th century. He played a crucial role in the social
and educational upliftment of Muslims in British India. Sir Syed founded the
Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College in 1875, which later became Aligarh Muslim
University. He advocated for modern education, scientific thinking, and rationalism
among Muslims, and worked towards fostering Hindu-Muslim unity. His efforts
significantly contributed to the intellectual and cultural renaissance of Indian
Muslims.
What was Aligarh Movement? [4]
The Aligarh Movement, led by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan in the late 19th century, aimed
at the socio-economic and educational upliftment of Muslims in British India. It
emphasized modern education, promoting scientific and rational thought alongside
traditional Islamic teachings. The movement's cornerstone was the establishment of
the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College in 1875, which later became Aligarh
Muslim University. Through this institution and his writings, Sir Syed sought to
reconcile Western knowledge with Islamic values, fostering a progressive Muslim
identity and encouraging greater participation in the colonial administration.
What was book The Causes of Indian Revolt? [4]
In his essays on the causes of the Indian Revolt, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan highlighted
several key factors. One major cause was the lack of representation for Indians in
the government, which led to widespread dissatisfaction and a feeling of alienation
among the native population. Additionally, there was significant resentment over the
forcible conversion of Muslims to Christianity, which created religious tensions and
mistrust. Lastly, the poor management of the Indian army, including issues such as
inadequate pay and harsh treatment of soldiers, further fueled discontent and unrest,
contributing to the outbreak of the revolt.

48 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

What was the Scientific Society? [4]

The Scientific Society was founded by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan in 1864 in Aligarh,
India, with the aim of promoting scientific knowledge and modern education among
Indian Muslims. It served as a forum for translating contemporary scientific works
from English and other European languages into Urdu, making them accessible to a
broader audience. The society also published a journal to spread scientific and
literary knowledge. Through these efforts, the Scientific Society sought to foster a
spirit of inquiry and intellectual development, helping bridge the gap between
traditional learning and modern scientific thought.
What was Tehzib-ul-Akhlaq? [4]
Tehzib-ul-Akhlaq founded by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan in 1870, was a pioneering
journal aimed at social and educational reform among Indian Muslims. The journal,
also known as "The Social Reformer," published articles on a wide range of topics,
including education, social customs, and religious practices, advocating for
modernity, rational thinking, and progressive values. It played a crucial role in the
intellectual awakening of the Muslim community, encouraging critical thinking and
a departure from superstitious and outdated traditions. Through it, Sir Syed sought
to inspire a cultural and moral renaissance, promoting the overall development and
modernization of Muslim society.
What was Tabyin-ul-Kalam? [4]
Tabyin-ul-Kalam was a significant work by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan aimed at
fostering understanding and dialogue between Muslims and Christians. Written
between 1862 and 1865, it was an attempt to compare the Bible and the Quran,
highlighting similarities and shared values between the two scriptures. Sir Syed's
goal was to promote religious harmony and mutual respect by showing common
ground between Islam and Christianity. This work was part of his broader efforts to
encourage rationalism, tolerance, and interfaith dialogue during a period of
heightened religious tensions in British India.
What was the Mohammaden Educational Conference? [4]
The Muhammadan Educational Conference, established by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan
in 1886, was an organization dedicated to the educational and social upliftment of
Muslims in British India. It served as a platform for discussing and promoting
modern education, fostering intellectual development, and addressing various issues
49 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

affecting the Muslim community. The conference organized annual meetings, where
educators, scholars, and community leaders gathered to share ideas, propose
reforms, and coordinate efforts to improve educational facilities and curricula. The
conference played a pivotal role in the establishment of Aligarh Muslim University
and significantly contributed to the progress and modernization of Muslim society
in India.
What was the Loyal Mohammadens of India? [4]
The Loyal Mohammedans of India, written by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan in 1860, was
a book aimed at countering British misconceptions about Indian Muslims following
the War of 1857. The book highlighted the loyalty and contributions of Muslims to
the British administration, providing detailed accounts of Muslim leaders and
communities who had remained loyal during the revolt. Sir Syed's intention was to
alleviate British mistrust of Muslims, improve their political and social standing, and
secure better opportunities for them under British rule. This work was part of his
broader effort to foster cooperation and mutual understanding between the British
authorities and Indian Muslims.
What was the Urdu-Hindi Controversy 1867? [4]
The Urdu-Hindi Controversy, which arose in the late 19th century in North India,
was a linguistic and cultural conflict between the proponents of Urdu and Hindi.
Urdu, written in the Persian script, was favored by Muslims, while Hindi, written in
the Devanagari script, was preferred by Hindus. The controversy intensified when
Hindi supporters demanded official recognition and use of Hindi in place of Urdu.
This linguistic divide reflected deeper communal tensions and contributed to the
growing Hindu-Muslim polarization. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan supported Urdu,
viewing it as a symbol of Muslim identity and cultural heritage, and advocated for
its preservation and promotion.
Describe importance of Educational services of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. [4]
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's educational services were crucial in transforming the socio-
economic and intellectual landscape of Indian Muslims in the 19th century. His
founding of the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College in 1875, which later became
Aligarh Muslim University, provided a model for modern education that integrated
Western scientific knowledge with Islamic values. Through institutions like the
Scientific Society and the Muhammadan Educational Conference, he promoted
50 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

modern, rational thinking and scientific inquiry. His efforts in education helped
bridge the gap between traditional Islamic learning and contemporary Western
education, fostering a progressive Muslim identity and empowering the community
to participate more effectively in the socio-political life of British India.
Describe importance of Political services of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. [4]
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's political services were pivotal in shaping the political
landscape of British India. He advocated for increased representation and rights for
Muslims within the British colonial framework, aiming to secure their place in the
political and administrative spheres. By promoting loyalty to the British Crown and
working to build bridges between Muslims and the colonial government, he sought
to improve the community's socio-political status. His efforts included the
establishment of the United Provinces’ (now Uttar Pradesh) Muslim Educational
Conference and the formation of the All India Muslim League, which played a
significant role in the political mobilization of Muslims. Sir Syed's work laid the
groundwork for future political movements and the eventual creation of Pakistan,
highlighting his impact on Indian Muslim political consciousness and unity.
Describe importance of Social services of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. [4]
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's social services were crucial in fostering a progressive and
reformed Muslim society in 19th-century India. He advocated for social reforms that
included the promotion of modern education, rationalism, and scientific thinking
while respecting Islamic values. Through his writings and public speeches, he
addressed issues such as social injustices, outdated customs, and the need for
educational advancement. His efforts in establishing the Scientific Society and the
journal Tehzib-ul-Akhlaq played a key role in encouraging intellectual growth and
social reform. By emphasizing the importance of social and educational upliftment,
Sir Syed helped lay the foundation for a more enlightened and forward-thinking
Muslim community, ultimately contributing to the broader social progress of India.
Describe importance of Religious services of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. [4]
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's religious services were significant in reconciling Islamic
teachings with modernity and promoting a rational interpretation of Islam. He
emphasized the importance of understanding the Quran and Hadith in the context of
contemporary knowledge and science. His works, such as Tabyin-ul-Kalam, aimed
at fostering interfaith dialogue by drawing parallels between Islamic and Christian
51 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

scriptures, thereby promoting mutual respect and understanding. Sir Syed also
advocated for the reform of traditional practices and superstitions that he believed
were inconsistent with Islamic principles. By encouraging a rational approach to
religion and emphasizing the need for reform within the framework of Islamic
teachings, Sir Syed sought to modernize Muslim thought and practice, ensuring that
the faith could coexist harmoniously with the advancements of the modern world.
Why did Sir Syed oppose All India National Congress? [7]
The All India National Congress advocated for the allocation of seats in legislative
bodies based on the principle of majority rule, which meant that seats would be
distributed according to the population proportions of different communities. This
approach favored the Hindu majority, as they constituted a larger portion of the
population compared to Muslims. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and other Muslim leaders
opposed this demand because they feared it would result in the marginalization of
Muslims, who would be underrepresented in legislative assemblies despite their
significant contributions and needs. They believed that such a system would not
provide adequate protection for minority rights or ensure fair representation for all
communities, thereby jeopardizing the interests of Muslims within the political
framework.
The All India National Congress's agitational politics involved a confrontational
approach to challenging British colonial rule, using mass protests, demonstrations,
and civil disobedience to demand political rights and self-governance. Sir Syed
Ahmed Khan opposed this strategy, fearing it was too radical and could provoke
severe backlash from the British authorities. He believed that such aggressive tactics
might undermine the progress Muslims were making through cooperation and
negotiation. Sir Syed preferred a more cautious and gradual approach, focusing on
securing reforms and improving conditions for Muslims within the existing colonial
framework rather than risking disruptions and potential setbacks from
confrontational politics.
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan viewed the All India National Congress as predominantly a
Hindu political party, reflecting the concerns of its largely Hindu leadership and
base. He believed that the Congress, while claiming to represent all Indians,
primarily served Hindu interests and did not adequately address or represent the
concerns of Muslims. This perception led him to worry that the Congress's policies
and actions would marginalize Muslims and fail to consider their unique needs
52 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

within the broader nationalist movement. Sir Syed's critique was based on the belief
that a political party led and influenced mainly by one community could not
effectively advocate for the diverse and distinct needs of all groups, particularly
minorities like Muslims.
Why did Sir Syed Ahmed Khan develop his Two Nation Theory? [7]
Urdu had long been the official language of the subcontinent, representing a
significant part of the Muslim heritage. However, during the 1867 Urdu-Hindi
Controversy, Hindus advocated for replacing Urdu with Hindi, which was strongly
opposed by Muslims. For Muslims, Urdu was not just a language but a symbol of
their history, culture, and glorious past. The desire to maintain Urdu as the official
language was deeply rooted in their sense of identity and pride. This controversy had
a profound impact on Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, who realized that the growing discord
between Hindus and Muslims made it clear that the two communities had
fundamentally different views and could not easily reconcile. This realization led Sir
Syed to formulate the Two Nation Theory, acknowledging that Hindus and Muslims
were distinct nations with separate identities and interests.
Similarly, the proposal for Hindus to be integrated into the parliamentary system
was rejected by Muslims, who were concerned that their minority status would lead
to Hindu dominance and marginalization. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan observed that
Hindus primarily focused on their own interests, and he feared that under a
parliamentary system, Muslims would continually be sidelined and treated unfairly.
He recognized that if such a system were implemented, Muslims would remain a
minority and could be exploited or oppressed. To address this issue and protect
Muslim interests, Sir Syed introduced the Two Nation Theory, emphasizing that
Muslims were not merely a minority but a distinct nation with their own unique
identity and needs.
Finally, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan believed that Muslims were a separate community
with their own unique identity. He saw that Muslims had different cultural and
religious practices compared to Hindus, and this separation was important for their
progress. By recognizing Muslims as a distinct group, Sir Syed aimed to help them
build their own institutions and preserve their heritage while engaging effectively
with the British colonial government.

53 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Why did Sir Syed try to improve the British-Muslim relationship? [7]
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan understood that the British were not just in India for a short
time—they were going to stay and rule for a long time. He realized that for Muslims
to get what they wanted from the British, they needed to have a good relationship
with them. Sir Syed wanted to see Muslims succeed and have their needs met in all
areas. He believed this could only happen if Muslims worked well with the British.
So, he made efforts to improve the relationship between Muslims and the British to
help achieve these goals.
After the War of 1857, the British held Muslims responsible and treated them very
harshly, while favoring Hindus. Hindus were given many high-ranking jobs and
significant economic opportunities, whereas Muslims were largely ignored. For
example, in the Indian Civil Services, there were 70 Hindus and only 1 Muslim until
1870. Hindus enjoyed rapid economic growth, while Muslims faced severe financial
hardships with no support from the British. To address this imbalance, Sir Syed
Ahmed Khan worked to improve relations between Muslims and the British, hoping
to reduce British hostility and ensure that Muslims could also benefit from the
opportunities that Hindus were receiving.
Lastly, Muslims saw the British as foreign invaders who had taken control of India
from them, leading to a loss of their former prestige. As a result, many Muslims were
reluctant to embrace Western education. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, however, wanted to
make sure that Muslims could benefit from the British rule, particularly in areas like
education, science, and technology. To achieve this, he worked diligently to improve
the relationship between the British and the Muslim community, aiming to help
Muslims access the advantages that British rule could offer.
Why was Sir Syed accused as pro-British? [7]
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan was often accused of being pro-British for several reasons.
Firstly, he actively sought to improve relations between Muslims and the British
authorities. Following the Indian Revolt of 1857, Sir Syed recognized that Muslims
faced significant hostility from the British. To address this, he encouraged Muslims
to align themselves with the British government, believing that a positive
relationship would help secure better opportunities and protections for the Muslim
community. His efforts to build bridges with the British led many to view him as
overly supportive of their rule.

54 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Similarly, Sir Syed's emphasis on modern education, particularly in institutions like

the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College (later Aligarh Muslim University), was
seen as aligning with British interests. He advocated for adopting Western scientific
knowledge and rational thinking while maintaining Islamic values. This approach
was perceived by some as promoting British educational standards and institutions,
which contributed to the perception that he was pro-British. His focus on
modernizing the Muslim community in ways that aligned with British expectations
further fueled these accusations.
Last but not the least Sir Syed’s political strategies, including his support for the
British administration and his efforts to ensure Muslim representation in colonial
institutions, were interpreted as signs of his pro-British stance. By encouraging
Muslims to work within the British system and advocate for their rights through
existing colonial structures, Sir Syed was seen as endorsing British rule rather than
challenging it. This pragmatic approach, aimed at improving the Muslim
community's position under British rule, led to accusations that he was too
accommodating to British interests.
Was the attempt to achieve a better understanding with the British the most
important contribution that Sir Syed Ahmad Khan made to the Muslim cause
during the nineteenth century? Explain your answer. [14]
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's efforts to achieve a better understanding with the British
were indeed a crucial aspect of his contributions to the Muslim community in the
19th century. Following the Indian Revolt of 1857, Muslims faced significant
hostility and marginalization from the British authorities. Sir Syed recognized that
for Muslims to improve their position and secure their rights, they needed to build a
constructive relationship with the British government. He advocated for Muslims to
align themselves with British rule, believing that this approach would help mitigate
British hostility and open up opportunities for Muslims in areas such as education,
employment, and political representation.
One of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's key contributions to fostering a better understanding
with the British was his work The Loyal Mohammedans of India, published in 1860.
In this book, Sir Syed aimed to counter the widespread perception that Muslims were
disloyal and responsible for the Indian Revolt of 1857. By documenting the loyalty
of various Muslim leaders and communities during the revolt, he sought to
demonstrate that Muslims had supported the British Crown and were not inherently
55 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

rebellious. This work was an attempt to improve relations between Muslims and the
British authorities, showcasing Muslims in a positive light to secure better treatment
and opportunities under British rule.
In his analysis of the causes of the Indian Revolt, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan identified
several factors contributing to the unrest. He highlighted the lack of representation
for Indians in the British government, the forcible conversion of Muslims to
Christianity, and the poor management of the Indian army. By addressing these
grievances, Sir Syed aimed to provide a clearer understanding of the discontent that
led to the revolt. His goal was to use this insight to advocate for reforms that could
prevent future conflicts and improve the relationship between the British and the
Indian populace, particularly the Muslim community.
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan suggested that the British should make an effort to better
understand Muslims. He believed that improving the position of Muslims in the
subcontinent depended on enhancing relations with the British. To achieve this, Sir
Syed took a two-pronged approach to bridge the gap between Muslims and the
British. On one hand, he advised Muslims against armed resistance, recognizing that
the British were too powerful. On the other hand, Sir Syed was aware that the British
had limited knowledge about Islam. During a visit to England, he was so disturbed
by inaccuracies in an English book about the life of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) that
he immediately wrote his own work to correct these errors.
However, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's educational services were crucial in transforming
the socio-economic and intellectual landscape of Indian Muslims in the 19th century.
His founding of the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College in 1875, which later
became Aligarh Muslim University, provided a model for modern education that
integrated Western scientific knowledge with Islamic values. Through institutions
like the Scientific Society and the Muhammadan Educational Conference, he
promoted modern, rational thinking and scientific inquiry. His efforts in education
helped bridge the gap between traditional Islamic learning and contemporary
Western education, fostering a progressive Muslim identity and empowering the
community to participate more effectively in the socio-political life of British India.
Similarly, Advocacy for separate political rights was crucial for Sir Syed Ahmed
Khan’s efforts to uplift the Muslim community in British India. By pushing for
separate political representation, Sir Syed aimed to ensure that Muslims had their
own distinct voice in the colonial administration, allowing them to safeguard their
56 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

cultural, religious, and social identity. This advocacy was essential for addressing
historical grievances, protecting Muslim interests, and promoting political
engagement. It also helped foster community solidarity and secure a degree of
autonomy, empowering Muslims to influence British policies and achieve
meaningful reforms that would benefit their community.
Last but not the least, the opposition to the Indian National Congress by Sir Syed
Ahmed Khan was rooted in his concerns about the party's approach to Indian politics
and its implications for Muslims. Sir Syed was wary of the Congress's predominantly
Hindu leadership and its focus on a broad, nationalist agenda that he believed did
not adequately address or represent the interests of Muslims. He felt that the
Congress's policies might marginalize Muslim concerns and lead to the dominance
of Hindu perspectives in the political sphere. Instead, Sir Syed advocated for a more
cautious and pragmatic approach, emphasizing the importance of building a positive
relationship with the British authorities to secure political and educational benefits
for Muslims. His opposition was based on a desire to protect Muslim interests and
ensure that their unique needs and rights were not overshadowed by the broader
nationalist movement.
Were the Religious views of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan his most important
contribution in developing the cause of Muslims during the nineteenth century?
Explain your answer. [14]
The religious views of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan were profoundly important for
Muslims as they offered a modern interpretation of Islam that aligned with
contemporary advancements while preserving core Islamic principles. Sir Syed
emphasized the need for rationality and scientific inquiry within the framework of
Islamic teachings, advocating for a progressive approach to religion that embraced
modernity without compromising faith. His efforts, such as writing Tabyin-ul-
Kalam to correct misconceptions about Islam and promoting a rational
understanding of religious texts, helped Muslims navigate the challenges of colonial
rule and modernity. This approach not only fostered a more enlightened and
informed Muslim community but also facilitated their integration into the broader
socio-political landscape of British India, ensuring that religious identity and modern
development went hand in hand.
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's political views were pivotal in shaping the approach of
Muslims towards British rule and their political engagement in British India. He
57 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

advocated for a pragmatic and cooperative relationship with the British authorities,
recognizing the need to align with them to secure political and social benefits for
Muslims. Sir Syed was cautious about direct confrontation and armed resistance,
believing instead in working within the existing colonial framework to achieve
reforms and representation. He emphasized the importance of Muslims acquiring
modern education and increasing their political awareness to effectively negotiate
with the British. His political stance aimed to ensure that Muslims could secure their
rights and improve their status by adapting to the colonial system rather than
opposing it. This approach laid the groundwork for future political strategies and
helped Muslims gain significant concessions and opportunities under British rule.
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's educational views were transformative for the Muslim
community in British India. He championed modern, Western-style education as
essential for the progress and empowerment of Muslims. Recognizing the need to
adapt to the changing socio-political landscape, Sir Syed established the
Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College in 1875, which later became Aligarh Muslim
University. This institution combined Western scientific knowledge with Islamic
teachings, aiming to provide a comprehensive education that would enable Muslims
to compete in the modern world. Sir Syed believed that education was the key to
social and economic advancement and that by embracing modern subjects and
rational thinking, Muslims could overcome the disadvantages imposed by colonial
rule. His emphasis on education not only sought to uplift the Muslim community but
also to integrate them into the broader fabric of British Indian society, ensuring their
active participation in various fields and improving their overall status.
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's social views were focused on reforming and modernizing
the Muslim community in British India. He recognized that social practices and
customs needed to evolve to align with contemporary realities and improve the
community's overall well-being. Sir Syed advocated for rational thinking and
progressive attitudes, urging Muslims to abandon outdated traditions that hindered
their social and economic advancement. His efforts included promoting social
reforms such as improving the status of women, encouraging educational
opportunities for all, and fostering a more rational and scientific approach to life. By
challenging conservative practices and emphasizing the need for social progress, Sir
Syed aimed to uplift the Muslim community, enhance their integration into modern
society, and enable them to better navigate the challenges of colonial rule. His social

58 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

reforms were integral to his broader vision of revitalizing the Muslim community
and ensuring its success in a rapidly changing world.

59 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Chapter five
Languages
How has the Pakistan Government Promoted the development of Urdu since
1947? [4]
The government has taken various measures to promote the growth of Urdu. It is
used as the medium of instruction in many educational institutions across Pakistan.
A dictionary of office terms in Urdu has been published, and efforts are being made
to reduce the reliance on English in administration. Urdu is also the primary
language for radio and television programs, and Urdu plays and films are very
popular. Urdu novels, poetry, magazines, and newspapers are widely read. The
language is taught up to MA, MPhil, and PhD levels in institutions like the Urdu
University, where scholars research and modernize its poetry and prose.
Additionally, Urdu is a mandatory subject for passing grades 10 and 12 in schools,
ensuring that students become well-versed in its literature and grammar.
How has the Pakistan Government Promoted the development of Balochi since
1947? [4]
To promote the Balochi language, broadcasts in Balochi were started on Radio
Pakistan Karachi. Quetta Television also played a key role by featuring Balochi
news and entertainment programs. The establishment of the Balochi Literary
Association further supported the language by publishing weekly and monthly
magazines. This association has promoted Balochi by encouraging various writers
and providing additional resources. Notable poets and writers, such as Ishaq
Shamim, have contributed to making Balochi more accessible to interested
audiences through their works, thus further advancing the language.
How has the Pakistan Government Promoted the development of Punjabi since
1947? [4]
Since 1947, the Pakistani government has promoted the development of Punjabi by
incorporating it into education and administration in Punjab. Punjabi is used as a
medium of instruction in schools and colleges, supported by the publication of
textbooks and dictionaries. Institutions such as the Punjab Institute of Language, Art,
and Culture work to preserve and advance Punjabi literature and culture. The
University of the Punjab offers advanced degree programs in Punjabi language and
literature. The Holy Quran was translated into Punjabi by Muhammad Ali Faiq.
60 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Additionally, Punjabi is widely represented in media through newspapers, television

channels, and radio programs. The government also supports cultural events and
festivals celebrating Punjabi heritage, further encouraging its use and appreciation
in daily life.
How has the Pakistan Government Promoted the development of Sindhi since
1947? [4]
The establishment of the Sindhi Literary Board was a significant step in promoting
the Sindhi language, as it published a variety of books and magazines in Sindhi. This
initiative helped elevate the profile of Sindhi literary figures like Fakir Nabi Baksh
and G. Allama. The Bazm-e-Talibul Mawla organization was also founded to
publish Sindhi books, further contributing to the recognition and development of
Sindhi literature. The Sarmast Academy, set up to honor Sindhi poets, promotes the
language by printing their works and making them accessible to the public.
Additionally, the Sindhiology department at Jamshoro University offers Sindhi
literature courses up to the MA level, providing students with a deeper understanding
of the language and its literary heritage.
How has the Pakistan Government Promoted the development of Pashto since
1947? [4]
The establishment of Peshawar University and the introduction of postgraduate
Pashto literature classes have significantly promoted the Pashto language and its
literature, making it more widely recognized. In 1954, the Academy for the
Promotion of Pashto Literature was founded, which produced a widely accepted
Pashto dictionary that helped develop the vocabulary and enhance understanding of
the language among the people. Additionally, the introduction of Pashto television
channels, newspapers, magazines, songs, and movies has played a crucial role in
further promoting the language and making it more accessible to the masses.
Why is it important for individuals to learn and use language? [7]
Language is a strong symbol of culture because it carries the traditions, values, and
identity of a community. It reflects a group’s history and beliefs and helps share their
way of life. Through language, people pass down stories, customs, and knowledge
to future generations, keeping their cultural practices alive. The language a
community speaks shows its unique experiences and perspectives, making it an
important part of understanding and valuing different cultures.
61 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Language plays a crucial role in identification as it helps individuals connect with

their cultural, social, and personal identities. It reflects where someone is from, their
family background, and their community. By speaking a particular language, people
show their connection to a specific culture and heritage, which helps them feel a
sense of belonging and unity with others who share the same language. This sense
of identification is important for building personal and collective identity and
maintaining cultural traditions.
Language acts as a unifying force by bringing people together and creating a sense
of shared identity. When individuals speak the same language, they can
communicate more easily, fostering stronger connections and mutual understanding.
This shared linguistic bond helps to bridge gaps between different regions,
communities, and social groups, promoting collaboration and harmony. In diverse
societies, a common language can serve as a foundation for unity, allowing people
from various backgrounds to work together, share ideas, and build a cohesive social
fabric.
Language is essential for the development of a state as it facilitates communication,
governance, and national unity. A common language helps streamline administrative
processes and ensure that government policies and services are accessible to the
entire population. It enables effective dialogue between citizens and officials, which
is crucial for implementing laws, regulations, and public programs. Additionally,
promoting a shared language can foster national identity and cohesion, helping to
integrate diverse communities into a unified state. By supporting the development
and standardization of a language, a state can enhance educational opportunities,
drive economic growth, and strengthen social stability.
Why did Pakistan choose Urdu as its National Language? [7]
Urdu was often referred to as the "language of the Muslims" because of its historical
and cultural association with the Muslim community in South Asia. Originating in
the Indian subcontinent during the Mughal era, Urdu developed as a language
incorporating elements from Arabic, Persian, Turkish, and local Indian languages. It
was widely used by Muslim poets, scholars, and leaders, and became a prominent
medium for Islamic literature and religious scholarship. During the struggle for
independence and the formation of Pakistan, Urdu was chosen as a symbol of unity
and identity for Muslims across the region, reflecting their shared cultural and

62 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

historical heritage. Its role in expressing Muslim culture, values, and experiences has
cemented its status as a national language of Pakistan.
Urdu serves as a uniting force by providing a common language that bridges diverse
linguistic and cultural groups. In Pakistan, where multiple languages and dialects are
spoken, Urdu acts as a lingua franca, enabling effective communication and
fostering a sense of national cohesion. Its widespread use across different regions
and communities helps to integrate various ethnic and linguistic groups into a unified
national identity. By offering a shared medium for education, media, and
government, Urdu helps reduce regional and ethnic divides, promotes mutual
understanding, and strengthens the social fabric of the country. This unifying role of
Urdu is crucial in maintaining harmony and facilitating collaboration among
Pakistan's diverse population.
During the independence movement Urdu played a crucial role in uniting Muslims
and advancing their political goals. It served as a powerful medium for expressing
nationalist ideas, rallying support, and communicating the vision for a separate
Muslim state. Prominent leaders like Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and Muhammad Ali
Jinnah used Urdu to mobilize the Muslim community, spread political messages
through newspapers and speeches, and foster a sense of unity and identity. This
widespread use of Urdu in the movement not only helped articulate the demands for
independence but also solidified its status as a symbol of Muslim solidarity and
national aspiration, ultimately contributing to the creation of Pakistan.
Urdu played a pivotal role in the Two Nation Theory, which was the foundation for
the creation of Pakistan. As a common language spoken by Muslims across British
India, Urdu became a crucial tool for articulating the idea that Muslims and Hindus
were distinct nations with separate cultural, religious, and political identities.
Leaders like Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Sir Syed Ahmed Khan used Urdu to
promote the concept of a separate Muslim nation, effectively communicating their
vision to a broad audience. Urdu's prominence in political discourse, newspapers,
and public speeches helped to unify Muslims around the idea of a distinct national
identity, reinforcing the argument for the establishment of Pakistan as a separate
state for Muslims.

63 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

Why have Regional Languages been Promoted by the Pakistan Government

since 1947? [7]
Since 1947, the Pakistan government has promoted regional languages for several
important reasons. Like, promoting regional languages helps preserve and celebrate
the diverse cultural heritage of Pakistan's various ethnic communities. With a rich
tapestry of linguistic traditions across the country, recognizing and supporting
regional languages ensures that the cultural identities and historical narratives of
different groups are maintained. By fostering regional languages, the government
helps safeguard local traditions, folklore, and literature, contributing to a richer and
more inclusive national culture.
Similarly, the promotion of regional languages enhances educational and
administrative accessibility. In regions where local languages are spoken, using
these languages in schools and government offices improves communication and
understanding. This approach helps ensure that education and public services are
more effectively tailored to the needs of local populations, leading to better
engagement and outcomes. It also helps bridge gaps between central authorities and
regional communities, facilitating more inclusive governance.
Lastly, supporting regional languages promotes social cohesion and reduces regional
disparities. By recognizing and valuing the linguistic diversity of the country, the
government can address feelings of marginalization among different ethnic groups.
This inclusivity fosters a sense of belonging and unity within the broader national
framework, helping to integrate diverse communities and promote national
solidarity. Ultimately, the promotion of regional languages contributes to a more
balanced and equitable development across all regions of Pakistan.
Urdu language has been promoted more than any regional language in Pakistan
between 1947 and 1999.' Give reasons why you might agree and disagree with
this statement. [14]
The government has taken various measures to promote the growth of Urdu. It is
used as the medium of instruction in many educational institutions across Pakistan.
A dictionary of office terms in Urdu has been published, and efforts are being made
to reduce the reliance on English in administration. Urdu is also the primary
language for radio and television programs, and Urdu plays and films are very
popular. Urdu novels, poetry, magazines, and newspapers are widely read. The
64 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

language is taught up to MA, MPhil, and PhD levels in institutions like the Urdu
University, where scholars research and modernize its poetry and prose.
Additionally, Urdu is a mandatory subject for passing grades 10 and 12 in schools,
ensuring that students become well-versed in its literature and grammar.
To promote the Balochi language, broadcasts in Balochi were started on Radio
Pakistan Karachi. Quetta Television also played a key role by featuring Balochi
news and entertainment programs. The establishment of the Balochi Literary
Association further supported the language by publishing weekly and monthly
magazines. This association has promoted Balochi by encouraging various writers
and providing additional resources. Notable poets and writers, such as Ishaq
Shamim, have contributed to making Balochi more accessible to interested
audiences through their works, thus further advancing the language.
Since 1947, the Pakistani government has promoted the development of Punjabi by
incorporating it into education and administration in Punjab. Punjabi is used as a
medium of instruction in schools and colleges, supported by the publication of
textbooks and dictionaries. Institutions such as the Punjab Institute of Language, Art,
and Culture work to preserve and advance Punjabi literature and culture. The
University of the Punjab offers advanced degree programs in Punjabi language and
literature. The Holy Quran was translated into Punjabi by Muhammad Ali Faiq.
Additionally, Punjabi is widely represented in media through newspapers, television
channels, and radio programs. The government also supports cultural events and
festivals celebrating Punjabi heritage, further encouraging its use and appreciation
in daily life.
The establishment of the Sindhi Literary Board was a significant step in promoting
the Sindhi language, as it published a variety of books and magazines in Sindhi. This
initiative helped elevate the profile of Sindhi literary figures like Fakir Nabi Baksh
and G. Allama. The Bazm-e-Talibul Mawla organization was also founded to
publish Sindhi books, further contributing to the recognition and development of
Sindhi literature. The Sarmast Academy, set up to honor Sindhi poets, promotes the
language by printing their works and making them accessible to the public.
Additionally, the Sindhiology department at Jamshoro University offers Sindhi
literature courses up to the MA level, providing students with a deeper understanding
of the language and its literary heritage.

65 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587

The establishment of Peshawar University and the introduction of postgraduate

Pashto literature classes have significantly promoted the Pashto language and its
literature, making it more widely recognized. In 1954, the Academy for the
Promotion of Pashto Literature was founded, which produced a widely accepted
Pashto dictionary that helped develop the vocabulary and enhance understanding of
the language among the people. Additionally, the introduction of Pashto television
channels, newspapers, magazines, songs, and movies has played a crucial role in
further promoting the language and making it more accessible to the masses.

66 | P a g e

MIAN SHAHID MAHMOOD TEACHER O LEVEL PAKISTAN STUDIES (2059/0448) 03336610587