TNA Master Report
TNA Master Report
Workshop
Key Findings Report
PRMP was launched by Government of the Punjab with the assistance of Asian Development
Bank to improve financial management, institutional development and private sector
participation in the GoPb initiatives. Training & capacity building of officers of the
provincial government departments and agencies is a major component of PRMP. To ensure
sustainability of the reforms, it is imperative that training & capacity building of officers is
conducted on an ongoing basis. Training Need Assessment needs to be conducted effectively
to identify the gaps in knowledge, skills and attitudes of officers and government
departments.
Government of the Punjab would like her employees to be dynamic, progressive individuals
at the career and personal levels and would like to equip them with the ability and confidence
to deal within the constantly metamorphosing global environment. Keeping this in mind, they
have felt the need to conduct this Training Needs Assessment exercise, in order to make their
employees the Transformational Leaders of tomorrow!
Under the existing devolution plan, a whole new set of technical and technically based
positions have been identified, but due to a lack of purposefully trained personnel, service
delivery gaps, especially among senior and middle tier employees in the public sector, have
been identified. This proposed exercise aims to investigate the nature and scope of Training
Needs within the context of departmental considerations, keeping in mind best utilization of
the resources made available through these interventions and the impact of TNA and the
ensuing training, on organisational performance falling under the purview of the PRMP.
The proposed series of workshops was to serve the purpose of acting as an indicative
exercise. This was done by implementing the methodology proposed by the consultant
through the use of Focus Group Discussions and the Questionnaire tool to gauge the
perceptual mapping of attendees’ vis-à-vis various dimensions and to broadly categorize the
general management and functional training needs of all the departments represented, while
readying the employees for a change management experience/institutional reform program in
the future.
2.1 The workshops were to identify, at the macro level, the training gaps and needs of the
government departments and to map their perception with regard to financial and institutional
reforms. The workshops helped provide answers to the following broad questions:
a. What are the gaps in knowledge, skills and attitudes required for efficient
running of the respective departments?
b. What training is needed to fill those gaps?
c. Who needs to be trained and in which disciplines?
d. Why is the training important?
e. How will the training be utilized?
f. Which are the priority areas which need to be focussed first?
2.2 The workshops were scheduled for May 29th and June 4th, 2009 at the MPDD training
institute, Lahore. Robust attendance by representatives of 32 departments was witnessed. In
spite of the varied departmental mix, the groups bonded well together and the FGD
component lasted for 1.5 hours. The attendees ranged from the Director General to Research
Officer Level with service experience ranging from 1 year to 38 years.
3.1.1 The significance and value of training has long been recognized as an integral
part of any organization’s smooth running machinery. Consider the popular and often
repeated quotation, “Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a person
to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.” This simple but profound saying is attributed
to the wisdom of Confucius who lived in the 5th century BC. Given today’s changing
requirements and the exponential growth in technology with its effect on the economy
and society at large, the need for constant training and re-training is more pronounced
than ever.
3.1.2 ‘With the new emerging organizational reality where change, competition,
workforce demographic changes and business upheavals are eminent, training and
development is becoming an important facet that equips the various functioning
departments and departmental organizations with the flexibility, adaptability and
durability required for survival’ (Al Khayyat, R. Elgamal, M. 1997). For optimal
functioning, the Human Resource of any governing entity needs to be equipped with
the necessary level of professional qualification, whether it is training them on how to
use a new piece of software or technology, complete a form, give good customer
service or write a professional letter, training becomes a basic strategy of every
organisations management.
3.2.3 “Limited capacity continues to impact on government’s performance and its ability to
realise its developmental objectives. Addressing the capacity challenge in the Public Service
requires dedicated leadership from the Executive and Senior Management levels and the
executive and senior managerial capacity required for this must have the ability to build on
existing legislative, normative and regulatory frameworks”1. While the government is trying
to make an effort to invest in training and capacity development, there is still a major gap that
needs to be bridged with regard to the qualification and experience that the employees have
and the competencies that are required of them to successfully improve and implement
service delivery quality. In other words, what is their training and capacity development
needs and can they be addressed through training?
3.2.4 The purpose of this TNA exercise is to try to identify, at the broad level, the gaps that
exist in general management skills and in technical skills in the public sector.
4.2 For this TNA exercise we have sought to employ a two-pronged methodology,
whereby information will be solicited in the form of a Focus Group Discussion
and then through a Questionnaire Tool
4.3.1 The main working principle of the chosen methodology is “loosely” grounded in
the concept of “Triangulation”, whereby all three methods (Focus Group discussions
FGDs, Survey questionnaires and a mix of structured/unstructured interviews) are
conducted simultaneously using convenience sampling techniques of the selected
population size. To account for the interviews part in the ‘triangulation’ concept,
“unstructured”, informal interviews were conducted on the side lines of the FDG
sessions, based primarily on the queries in the survey questionnaires and FDG session
discussion points. The responses from the unstructured, informal interviews have been
incorporated as some of the “FDG Respondent quotes” in the body of this report to
cater for the privacy requirement of the respondents.
4.3.2 Focus Group Discussions with respondents are essential tools used in order to
capture complex causal relationships and contextual information against which
backdrop survey questionnaire results can be properly understood and quantified.
4.3.3The scarcity of time and resources, amount of logistics involved and the massive
number of researchable participants present for each of the 31 selected department
and their uncertain availability made it impractical to follow “Probability sampling”
techniques, hence a mix of “Non-probability” sampling techniques such as
“Convenience sampling” and “Purposive sampling” techniques were undertaken,
whereby, at least two “representative persons” from each tier, from all departments
were invited to participate.
4.4.2 Based on the preliminary discussions held and the TORs shared with the
Consultant by the PRMP team, it was agreed that a mixed-methodology approach
of Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) as well as administering a specific
questionnaire designed to extract relevant responses be followed. The main idea
was to get relevant and quality responses that will allow the team to identify the
existing training needs as well as gaps both at the macro and the departmental
level in a focused manner in order to form a holistic picture of the entire TNA
spectrum.
4.5.1 To get a better grasp on the dynamics of these sessions, it was proposed to
first initially undertake a “Pilot group” workshop comprising two departments i.e.
the “Livestock and Dairy Development (L&DD)” and “Excise and Taxation
(E&T)” departments. The participants from these departments as well as for later
departments were mainly from the “Technical cadre”. The idea was to elicit
responses from the actual functional tiers of these departments and to extract their
exact capacity building needs in order to have a holistic picture for the whole
TNA canvass. The findings of this Pilot workshop were collated and formalized
(refer to Appendix C) and upon compilation and fine tuning, remaining
departments were then covered in two subsequent sessions, on similar lines, and
their data consolidated
4.5.2 For all three sessions, the invitees were divided into groups of manageable
number of people, such that each group represented a mix of all tiers/cadres from
4.6.1A clear cut “Object oriented Questionnaire” was enacted. The structure of
the questionnaire was “pluralistic”, containing both structured and unstructured
questions to get a deeper understanding of the topic. Questionnaires generally
allow for a large amount of data to be collected for rigorous analysis to be
conducted for the identification of trends and finding out causal relationship
4.7.1 Once the FGD, based on broad based questions, was over, the participants
were then asked to fill the TNA questionnaire in a supervised environment. The
Facilitator explained the questionnaire to the participants. The Facilitator tried to
ensure that all questions were understood and answered completely.
4.8.1A Manual data file was first checked for errors by scrutinizing the missing
and/or irrelevant values that were falling out of range in the questionnaire tool.
After the authenticity of the data was established, SPSS software was used for
analysing and exploring various dimensions and constructs. Descriptive statistics
were used to extract salient features of the data as elaborated below. Graphical
representation of some of the more salient dimensions can be seen in Appendix-D
4.10.1 As expected, at the end of each session a comprehensive data regarding the
training needs of each department was collected and at the same time, this gave us
5.2 Majority of the respondents (62.5%) identified themselves as from the ‘Technical
Cadre’ where as 37.5% were from the General Cadre.
5.3 Majority of the respondents (62.5%) identified themselves to have been inducted
through the PPSC stream, whereas only 2.8% identified themselves as from the
CSS Stream. The rest (34.7%) specified themselves as ‘Promotee or Direct
Inductees.
SITUATIONAL PERCEPTION
5.5 All respondents felt that TNA is a very useful and necessary exercise but if no
implementation is done with regards to the findings or recommendations provided
by this exercise, the purpose of this exercise will become redundant. One
respondent commented:
5.6 Respondents from both FGD sessions unanimously opined that people still have a
lot of enthusiasm and zeal for the public sector, they feel they are just not
provided with the right environment which leads to de-motivation, complacency
and apathy. One respondent commented:
5.7 Majority of the participants also commented that Political interference or ‘Elite
Capture’2 hampers the actual and effective working of the departments. Vertical
job movement of Generalists (usually of CSS background) between management
functions and departments, at the top tiers (usually at the director or Secretary or
above levels), hinders performance as each new Generalist appointee has their
own agenda, which does not include the betterment of the department or its
workings. One respondent commented:
Participant.
5.8 The ‘Elite Capture’ element also gives rise to discontentment, especially with
regards to misappropriation of funds for capacity development needs.
2 Using the ‘political economy’ approach, economists have explored the trade-off between
vulnerability of local agencies to the risk of ‘Elite Capture’, on the one hand, and their
informational advantages (assumed to have a better knowledge of the prevailing local
conditions and a better ability to enforce rules, monitor behaviour, and verify actions related
to interventions), on the other hand. This is with a view to identifying important determinants
of the relative desirability of decentralised versus centralised systems of service provision and
delivery (Bardhan and Mookherjee, 1999, 2000a, 2000b; Foster and Rosenzweig, 2002;
Ravallion and Galasso)
5.9 Respondents from both FGD sessions agreed that there is procedural stagnation
and decay. There is a lack of a centralized, internal general management system
and any procedures that exist, especially with regards to training, are so
cumbersome; they should be simplified.
5.10 Some respondents raised the issue of lack of information sharing at every
level, which leads to procedural bottlenecks, lost opportunities, frustration and
resentment. Possible causes for this were cited as insecurity and threat of job
security. One respondent commented:
Participant.
5.11 All the participants had a strong sense of the core functions of their respective
departments. Their perceptions regarding their core functions should not,
however, be confused with the mandate for each department.
5.12 On the other hand, most FGD respondents commented that the Mandate,
Vision and Mission of each department should be communicated to the employees
of the department and awareness should be created. One respondent commented:
5.13 Policy level problems and incorrect funds allocation was also identified as a
major hurdle in skills development within the public sector. One respondent
commented:
5.14 A few respondents made a valid point by stating that no inquiry is initiated
about the lost training opportunities. No one inquires about why it was not
utilized, what caused the opportunity to lapse, was it relevant training, if so why
was nobody nominated. No one accounts for the missed opportunities or inquires
about the gaps which caused the opportunity to lapse. This major gap in follow-up
of any capacity development initiative shows lack of ownership regarding the
progression of the department.
5.16 This lack of focus or far sightedness regarding capacity development goes
hand in hand with mis-delegation of authority, whereby untrained, inexperienced
generalist candidates are placed in highly technical roles and vice versa. This also
feeds into the gap whereby line departments are not trained and capacity
development initiatives remain limited to sub-classification which is linked to
‘self-projection’. Self-projection was explained by the participants as the
individual in a position of authority using his or her powers for personal
advancement or betterment and not for the department.
5.18 Another opinion that was shared was that there is a huge pool of ‘Generalists’
but not that many specialists, especially at the management level, within
departments. One respondent commented:
FGD Participant.
5.19 Respondents also commented that other than procedural gaps, no facilitation
to avail trainings is provided in the form of logistical support which can include
TA/DA, boarding lodging facilitation, workload sharing, etc.
5.20 Majority of the respondents (63.9%) were of the opinion that their department
was partially capable of performing its duties with the existing skill set of its
employees whereas 19.4% said it was not capable, which points towards existing
potential gaps in the skill sets of employees in the present setup.
5.21 This was further reinforced when 63.9% said their department does not
conduct sufficient (at least 3 trainings of any type) ‘In House Trainings’3 and 57%
concurred that the same is true of ‘Out Sourced Trainings’4.
5.22 Participants also opined that very few ‘corporate type’ trainings are available
for them, especially with regards to general management capacity development
which are being employed by modern efficient organization
5.24 Generally, training needs or gaps are seen to be identified through ‘Self-
reflection’. Whilst such self-awareness is to be encouraged, it might not hold any
strategic or organizational importance as it allows for a greater bias towards
individual needs as opposed to departmental needs. This mis-alignment in training
needs identification also reflects that decisions pertaining to resource allocation or
resource availability do not generally have a scientific base.
5.25 Most respondents observed that any job related learning that they did was
through Habituation or Phase Specific Learning, which is on the job learning,
as most employees are not taken through any orientation program within their
departments. All of this points to the fact that there is lack of awareness regarding
their job descriptions and role responsibilities and no formal procedure for
orientation exists.
5.26 Most of the respondents opined that there is a general lack of employee’s
career planning at the departmental level. The absence of which creates a lot of
uncertainty about future career growth and sense of achievement that an employee
derives. One respondent commented:
5.27 Majority of the respondents opined that there is no basis for promotion,
leading to limited promotion opportunity at every level.
5.28 In the discussion it was repeatedly commented that a lot of employees forego
promotions due to complacency and long intervals between promotions. Lack of
training at every level does not help the matter of efficiency and competence (a
person can be serving in his department for over 30 years without even one
training opportunity).
5.29 A few respondents shared the fact that major gaps exist for capacity
development initiatives and performance benefits, especially for Contractual
employees. This lack of motivation and absence of any career progression results
in induction of low quality personnel at all functional levels resulting in a general
decline in effectiveness of the overall service delivery at the departmental level.
As for benefits, logistical support should be offered for training opportunities
(TA/DA, workload sharing, etc)
5.30 A point that came out strongly was the absence of any central training data
repository maintained either by PRMP or MPDD. Whereby, a complete record of
all the trainings held in the past and a schedule for the future is maintained. One
respondent commented:
5.31 Another point that was highlighted pertained to people being sent on irrelevant
trainings most of the time. A general lack of training accountability and benefits
related to trainings is cited as the cause. This results in a lack of understanding of
5.33 Capacity development gaps were identified within three general categories
which included:
a. Interpersonal and communication skills (Annexure D i)
b. General Management and HR skills (Annexure D ii)
c. Core Business Competency Skills (Annexure D iii)
85%
Urgently
11%
Long term 4% Not
Applicable
15%
15% Degree Seminars &
Courses Workshops
2% Not
Applicable
5.35 The 7 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the Interpersonal
and Communication skills dimension and the urgency of skill development in
each sub-category are detailed in Annexure D-i.
5.36 For the dimension of General Management and HR skills, the Urgency of
getting trainings done and the way to fulfil those training needs was identified as:
22%
Long Term
4% Not
Applicable
19% Degree
Courses
6% Seminars
& Workshops
1% Not
Applicable
5.37 The 7 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the General
Management and HR skills dimension and the urgency of skill development in
each sub-category are detailed in Annexure D-ii.
5.38 For the dimension of Core Business Competency skills, the Urgency of
getting trainings done and the way to fulfil those training needs was identified as:
78%
Urgently
15% Long
Term 7% Not
Applicable
26% Long
Course
18% Degree
Course
9% Seminars
& Workshops
3% Not
Applicable
5.39 The 7 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the Core Business
Competency skills dimension and the urgency of skill development in each sub-
category are detailed in Annexure D-iii.
5.40 From the above graphs it is evident that the participants overwhelmingly
pointed out the need for “Urgent up-gradation” of skills in all these three broad
categories pertaining to general skills required for their work environment, (85%,
74% & 78% respectively). As we can see, these three categories comprise of cross
cutting skills and are common across all departments. So, while the technical skill
upgradation requirements may vary from department to department, these skills
remain common. Similarly “Short courses” were deemed to be the most favoured
way to upgrade these skills. Understandably so, as they require less time off job,
which, by many respondents, was identified as one of the major reasons why
people avoid going to attend trainings. Long courses, thus take a lower priority
ranking as the vehicle for capacity building and up-gradation needs.
5.41 Trainings, especially foreign trainings are considered as a ‘big deal’ and
mostly the horizontally moving generalist officers’ end up availing these
opportunities by getting nominated through a ‘short-termist’5 mutually conducive
mechanism, spearheaded by the ‘elite capture’ hindrance factor.
5Thinking of personal gain in the short term, as opposed to a long term benefit. A financial
term, as used in Short term speculation and ‘Short termist behaviour’; ‘Executive
5.43 Respondents were of the opinion that trainings by foreign trainers should only
be utilized in specialized fields, and even then, further dissemination should be
done through ‘Training of Trainer’ model. Respondents felt that foreign trainers
exhibited cultural insensitivity, lack of awareness about local cultural norms and
practices and the foreign accent is hard to understand and identify with.
5.44 Respondents pointed out that we have a sizeable pool of trained resources, but
we do not utilize them, as no follow up is conducted after they have returned from
a training course. Consequently the knowledge they have acquired does not get
disseminated and no knowledge or experience sharing is done.
A brief descriptive analysis of the sample revealed initial facts about the composition and
various characteristics of the respondents present at the time.
6.1.1It was revealed that 56.9% of the respondents present had total years of public
service of 20 years or more (up to 38 years) and hence belonged to senior executive
class and 36.1% of those were with their present departments for 20 years or more as
well. Only 5.6% of the respondents belonged to the category having service life of 6
months to 2 years.
6.1.2As for the academic qualifications, 59.7% had at least a Masters degree, 33.3%
had Bachelors and the remaining had a doctorate.
6.1.3As for the ability of their respective departments to perform the duties using the
existing skill set once again, 63.9% of the attendees replied in a “Partial Yes” while
19.4% gave a “Firm No”. This points out towards existing potential gaps in the skill
sets of employees in the present setup and/or lack of clear cut information regarding
their departmental obligations. Only 12.5% replied with a “Firm Yes”.
6.1.4This fact was reinforced when almost 63.9% of all respondents informed that
their department does not conduct enough “in-house staff trainings”, conducted by
officials of same departments trying to build capacity of colleagues as a result of a
recent training they attended. Almost 57% of them informed that there are NO
“outsourced” staff trainings as well. This all, despite the fact that 72.2% people
discussed their training needs with their immediate “supervisors”. Also, according to
31% of respondents the frequency of these discussions in these departments is done
on a quarterly basis or more in a year. All this points out to the fact that there is
considerable pro-activeness on part of the employees regarding their existing skill
and their desire to upgrade them, but complacency on part of the overall department
heads to address those needs through conducting in-house and/or outsourced
programs despite the fact that the frequency of identifying those needs is done quite
regularly. Another dimension that needs attention here is the fact that 52% of the
6.1.5 28% of the respondents were “not sure” if their respective departments
understood their training and capacity development needs while 21% gave a “Firm
No”. As a result 57% believe that enough resources are NOT being allocated to
address these needs. Both these facts reinforce the arguments mentioned above.
6.2.2 If the value of r= +/- 0.10 to +/- 0.29, relation is considered to be small
If the value of r = +/- 0.30 to +/- 0.49, the relation is considered to be medium
6.3 COMMENTARY:
As we can see, there are mild correlations that exist between various constructs across the
matrix table. We shall comment briefly on them one by one.
6.3.1For the first dimension of “Total years of Public service”, we see a very weak,
negative correlation
(r = -0.1)” with only one construct, i.e. aggregate scores for upgrading interpersonal
& communication skills. This negative relationship can be explained as when the
person got senior in his post and accumulated more years of service, he considered the
urgency for upgradation in this category less important.
(r = 0.17). Hence, as the departments understand the training needs for capacity
building, they tend to allocate more resources towards achieving this goal as well as
people from these departments are also encouraged to seek higher/additional
qualifications for future tasks. However, if we co-relate it to the first dimension, we
will see a negative construct emerging, that as employees move up hierarchically,
the need for additional trainings and skill up-gradation diminishes, irrespective of
whether the department understands the need or allocates resources to fulfil the
need.
6.3.3 For the construct “Enough resource allocation”, the findings point out towards a
somewhat similar trend of findings. It again shares medium, positive relationship with
the “Department’s understanding of the training needs”, but also shares weak, positive
relationships with two “urgency” constructs i.e. for interpersonal skills improvement
(r = 0.1) and for improvement of core business skills construct (r = 0.12). It also
shares a weakish, positive relationship with the desire for additional qualification at (r
= 0.26). It shows an overall positive and direct trend between the constructs, whereby
increase in one tends to encourage the other in the same direction.
6.3.4 All the aggregate scores show positive direct correlations with similar
constructs. For example, for “urgency” construct regarding Interpersonal skills, a
positive relationship exists between it and urgency score for upgrading core business
skills. People wanting one also wanted the other. (r = 0.41). Other r-scores are also in
the medium to low category but all in a positive direction pointing out the fact that all
these constructs are complimentary in nature and reinforce each other.
6.3.6 This points out towards the fact that the employees in almost all departments
researched have the will and desire to upgrade themselves to fill in for the upcoming
roles that they envisage and they dovetail this upgradation with their future role
6.4.1 Three of the strongest opinions voiced by participants pertain to the ‘lack of
implementation’ of training strategies (if any), need for job specific trainings and
linking promotion to training and/or performance- all point towards a lack of
“systematic implementation and follow up”. A striking 22.22% of the respondents
chose not to identify anything that points towards the fact that they were either de-
motivated and/or they didn’t perceive any positive training related outcome so they
became disinterested as shown by the self explanatory graph below.
25
20
15
Percent
25
22.22
10
15.28
13.89
5
11.11
6.94
5.56
0
Promotion be Dept wise Improvement in Job specific None identified Preference for Implementation
linked with frequency of management trainings foreign training of training
training based TNAs be skills strategies
performance increased
40
30
Percent
20
37.5
10
6.4.3 Similarly, when asked about the specialized areas that need emphasis over the
next few years to streamline the functioning over the cross section of various
departments, a healthy 44.4% pointed out toward need for role based technical
trainings that will enhance the efficiency of each individual employee’s working
within the department.
Areas to be emphsized the most for next 2 years to make dept functions
efficient
50
40
30
Percent
44.4
20
33.3
10
16.7
5.6
0
7.2 Capacity development gaps at the departmental levels should be identified at that
level, instead of at a macro level. They should be assessed and validated through
a combination of scientific means and performance management system reviews
(such as skills audits and TNA). This will help overcome any ambiguity in the
system, especially with regards to job descriptions, role descriptions, succession
planning and an individual’s career path within public sector service.
7.3 For departments where the proposed 6 month pilot programs (please see appendix
C) will be run, they should be evaluated according to a pre and post impact
assessment.
7.4 Findings should be shared with all the departments and PRMP can assist the
individual departments in developing plans on how to address these gaps.
PRMP should provide support for improvement of Human Resource Development
and Training policy framework.
7.6 As a service delivery gap analysis exercise, we need to focus on some of the
larger departments and conduct a detailed TNA to address the lapse in service
delivery quality. Once the results are received, we can pick and chose the cross
cutting ones and replicate in other departments. This way a list of best practices
will emerge which can be used as local benchmarks for the rest of the system.
7.7 As global practices are moving towards a paper-less environment, on-line, web-
base virtual systems are the need of the hour. A centralized Human Resource
Development System should be explored and instituted. A centralized HRDS will
assist in a paradigm shift from ‘reactive’ towards ‘proactive’ in its approach
towards training, capacity development and HR perceptions.
7.8 Most of the respondents opined that there is a general lack of employee’s career
planning at the departmental level absence of which creates a lot of uncertainty
about future career growth and lack of sense of achievement for employees. It is
suggested that a formal departmental mechanism for each department be
devised that would ensure capacity building of employees keeping in mind the
specific training needs for that department and the career planning done
accordingly.
7.9 Within the Public Sector, in order to inculcate a learning-oriented work culture, as
part of a line manager’s performance review, there should be a review of the
training commitments undertaken in a Personal Development Plan (which
should be developed or incorporated into the existing performance review
mechanism). Then it should be evaluated whether these training commitments are
followed through or not, and an assessment against the agreed indicators for
7.11 Skills and roles mapping for each department should be done. This was
deemed to be an important precursor for all exercises to follow regarding
interventions in the reform and capacity development initiatives being carried out.
Unless and until these are carried out the focus and direction will be lost and will
result in misappropriation of time and resources.
7.14 It was clearly highlighted that there is a lack of In-house training and skill
development initiatives being carried out, as well as a lack of capacity
development needs that need to be explored, especially for departments which
already have institutes for imparting trainings programs, for example Agriculture
University, Mines and Minerals institutes, the Tourism department institute etc.
can be utilized for their facilities and can be extremely helpful in imparting
“Specialized” trainings to the employees of their respective departments. The
frequency of these trainings should be at least three trainings per year; once
every four months. This should also cater for the Major issue identified as
‘generalism’.
7.15 PRMP along with the MPDD should look to nurture a management
development institute’s network. Through this proposed initiative, the above
departments should develop the capacity of capacity developers like institutes of
public administration and management along with the assistance of the higher
education department and the existing departmental institutes where available (see
7.11).
7.16 Regional centres of learning should be established, similar to the MPDD so
an efficient learning environment can be provided even in out of reach places. But
it is suggested that we can go a step forward and establish “Regional” centres that
are centrally linked to the Head office. This regional linking of these centres
would ensure that synergies be created, parallel efforts can be eliminated
standards be maintained and recorded. It will also ensure in cost cutting as need
based courses run in one centre can be easily replicated in other regions. This
concept links with the central repository concept mentioned above.
MISCELLANEOUS
7.20 General Management training gaps should be fulfilled through short courses or
seminars. The suggestion of short courses or seminars and workshops (refer
to Annexure D-i, ii and iii) is based on participant input that due to logistical
concerns and the job insecurity potential of their positions, longer term trainings
cannot be availed effectively. Furthermore, from a trainer’s perspective, shorter
courses assist with better retention.
7.21 Budgetary allocation should then be made according to the needs of each
department within its operating budget, through which future interventions and
implementation of the training strategy can be institutionalized.
7.22 A comprehensive, but not conclusive, list of required and wanted technical
trainings has emerged. A departmental list of Technical Training Needs is
attached as Appendix F.
Given the macro nature of this indicative perception mapping exercise it is a fact that it has
created a high level of awareness in the target intervention areas. However some gaps in
knowledge as well as application and implementation still remain, which should be addressed
in future interventions. These have been discussed in detailed in the section on key findings,
as well as the section on recommendations.
The significance of the capacity to maximize human potential through sound Human
Resource management and career development practices for enhancing service delivery
cannot be over-emphasized. It is highly recommended that PRMP should continue working
with the same progressive outlook, and if and where possible, pull in assistance from the
departments where implementation is concerned; a Participatory Approach towards reform
with transparency of decision making and accountability is key. It is also strongly urged that
the suggested Pilot Training initiative be launched in collaboration with assistance in
implementation and ownership of the target departments, so tangible results of this exercise
can become best practice benchmarks for all departments and the Institutional Reform
initiative can become a success.
LIST OF DEPARTMENTS
1. Excise & Taxation department
2. Livestock and Dairy Development department
3. Zakat and Ushr
4. Local Government Community Development department
5. Punjab Tourism Development Corporation Department
6. Mines and Minerals department
7. Social Welfare, Women Development and Bait-ul-Maal department
8. Health Department
9. Special Education department
10. Transport department
11. Population Welfare department
12. Housing and Urban Development department
13. Agriculture department
14. Labour & Human Resource department
15. Cooperatives department
16. Food Department
17. TEVTA (Technical Education and Vocational Training Authority)
18. Industries department
19. Higher Education department
20. Communication and Works department
21. Planning and Development department
22. Irrigation and Power department
23. Finance department
24. Public Prosecution department
25. Information Technology department
26. Home department
27. Civil Defence department
28. Education department
29. Anti-Corruption department
30. Government Engineering department
31. Child Protection and Welfare department
32. Information, Culture and Youth department
33. Lahore Museum
,{,ffi'
{J-"t
Annexure-B
GOVERNMENT
OF THE PUNJAB
,isli'l88,igih"^"iffi1,'?i?RTtili"
PROGRAMMANAGEMENT
UNIT
'l'rb'---^ * ""
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 29thMay, 2OO9at MPDD
z w4/t,*
bt"l; Qc*S
rt+^oq^( mv^.1Oc/t
o t?9-ho9>
332 .
t7
a,
S<dE;*trf".^, Ptuts
3 fwe,!,,bt
olat -
L)r- D"?fr Qc"13.t Bs- l-l
.To*, lwilg^ -"a lleo-I+nabn o 3."l-
t7
LT uJ+ lP*Jea^ q3r'6 gg
\ 99^hbn-1,r
zz
ft*f L(s*
7lq4lA f4;4
's4{-. olnr - P9t-
hJ
T'-
1 Tvab D Qy>kft) /t
()J a
lo T*r"-re& ? *eosaz /7 Y.,,
I
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 29thMay, 2OO9at MPDD
Cadre/
Sr. Designation&
Name ContactNo. Seruice Signature
No. Depaftment (Grade)
s-t h osrg\Etghg9- t tl
Assisfcfr,-B
9"y
4t
lz lpvrrrt D"bfi*lYD"t lilolt S 6 I .
t5
wv S"vJnrt
; I4/r,//4*r
eo4/)
b "{rq-OlnAJG o3"1-L2rltt
o\rllnu )r lgl: ,,L I I
'((
Lc--.qowl
/8 ^kW
4. ,'du,f-eq:u, c)31h{.tAflA
,-g'"itt
q,t^rPetarA-l^
t1 i;'.trht
H.l. t14. t-4/J o3974tqrz b'tQ
k+*"nt* P-t.c LJ,^, sv r4-
tllul"annazL
Zo hth**lAsni efSla+
'
Drifelel')afuC
Zba. kk
t;qi
4a-656-
q7/7 6s-ry e'8!7"
4lt4,hxa^ Dv,gi Q-<)/ o}\f.
LI
DC
YA-cfi.c
c?r S
Mrl'en&J
r4 /r1 t' 5f Vt
r,J-J.
o 3 2t - t t ? 3 3
B)- t I
!+,
>L Ml. I\:l *s fr.(cl -(.
LH-*-
GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PUNJABRESOURCEMANAGEMEf{T PROGRAM
PROGRAMMANAGEMENT UNIT
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 29thMay, 2OO9at MPDD
Designation&
Depaftment
DZO ogoo -
SA\NA ZaxA{ tt<l'rv tr617>1
Bnba< V
Q^.Wto.
7
ln
()'
cjr
Ur_lg.
ehrJt Tio,-",(h"r
[*,ow hon":Q.nhDt0b,
Bs-tq
Agout- socl/H) o3Ll-160q Bs^l7
rtllxlN P//E
HUO<
q4.tL(t
M.A.f.a. Ahl\ o)tt,,\h tb911
9o,rt^4";
XEN L6?cD o31t hfr gg
t\SrN I.t^tt, Iil.u
Ntfnyflca{.r,Uft,
ALoun 6s-r7
5.6 - G4,6.,
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 29thMay, 2OOgat MPDD
Designation&
Depaftment
PuMrratA,W gfs- t7
ryrbZnl,ruol
AtqrfrrNf httAcTa& oleo-qJ(121
1742 iln|A iluh*t 0.,r.rr*( S?{4J
1Lt33tf
L.q I <.D. '92,)/ta9ltc
'.'
{,g'x. Uh.<'fi
TE-N Qhep "n3$
L\\R. Grr,r S s-\\
LQ€ e-D
obtf -?? B--r-1r6a
D.q.D-+{.
?fua*cr;tre-ory oggT4qfqyl
y'aa'n-ea$oAH 9ts9hc
- Qo
ftt.Sor ^& D.i(s). o1L\
D7, &il'eth"-
{. o333- qztqtorB>-lK
M
v ojoo \2
tJfl tsa; P.tn>to
GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
PTANNING& DEVETOPMET{TDEPARTMENT
PUNJABRESOURCEMANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PROGRAMMANAGEIIENTUNIT
SHEET
ATTENDANCE
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 29thMay, 2OO9at MPDD
Cadre/
Sr. Designation& ContactNo. Seruice Signature
Name
No. Department (Grade)
)
/4r*rR Mhsez-^ Vce ?pt*rpat qr$tL7T
56 t
4t
4z
e3
6q
et
L6
rT-r GOVERI{MENT OF THE PUNJAB
't*ffit d'b t.
PLANNII{G& DEVETOP}IENT
PUNJABRESOURCE
PROGRAMMANAGEMENT
DEPARTMEl{T
MANAGEMEI{TPROGRAM
UNIT
-- J*
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
a.
QE
"lrl,n/uu-,-.-A
W u.-
qq@
rbQ
(>sr45 Qt:,ffi.
&s't1 w
Qa iR*,.\.s.€\oe-dJs=\
\ \ q.-s
\
M
E7
9s
q?
{o
f,/
S>
d3
q'
.rr
GOVERNMENT OF THEPUNJAB
Annexure-B PTANNING& DEVETOPMENTDEPARTMENT
PUNJABRESOURCEMANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PROGMM MANAGEMENT UNIT
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 4thJune, 2OO9at MPDD
Designation& Cadre/
Depaftment Seruice
(Grade)
-Y Nra^"J."{dCud,^ Auy
Qunoo, H o*
hD-9*Mt o3o2_Qgqg
*bra1r,4 €rs
D,'l-O o 3Ll
Mwry! sa;k 'ft6es4Y
a33g^r/ t ,3U
ft*t,T P,-
6.e,a zfz
2/R' aF Sraa o3N - E{
S'.QAsilAh'
S*nrt
!.r/'fu o2o1tF :,Q;^
w a
SoCA)
.DpD
LPLM?)
o797-5(3qo
Pefiruott l.lrat^?1,
_rt.Etsu_
S.hrtr S'i'd"..'(
'
l(,halrfNoo-( \ .^, o\ o) \6o4oSl tk
Q1$"b S^[ e*
ip++'/) 9rr \r9r IB
{...\ /4,y'4.
-
?.R.d '
I iN/LDob*
&4.0"^-
GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
PLANNING& DEVELOPMEl{TDEPARTMEl{T
PUNJABRESOURCEMANAGEMENTPROGRAM
PROGRAMI.IANAGEMEf{TUNIT
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 4thJune, 2OO9at MPDD
Designation&
Depaftment
otabBoa
Huus.Rn I Btt*
lh-
'ot+y-u t- ^
'Ilztlzzlt'
t ,
8#o t7o
YlaLt.Ar -
oottr k .It?DlAtg
vq--t
I t
lZ-'t ttZZ.tzcz Q'
att
t.,-
Ep",t_q"E
[r1u{1q,",".rt- EF y Vtr '/q'u''s
N"6"qA[t<t^tt 'dt'0ro @ MNU
4ost t @
\ .oT.
RNilE
NlNPD
q2-l o 1tr\
L
cq . fvt AqSog
h"-
mFnsl
sD
At-{{vt
D .s(P P)
MD
P.Pa gMw,
11"> 1(? r8 t-\*,
(<
Bl+X'-r (IRMP l>roCuf
Mcrt-u1and.
.
il.l - l+oe*".,rn 1615.atfon
\
+Pcl"tut
J'a-F*'
aAgftrn:.ttto @)
'(l-svwrl,.
L s.(-1v+'> o3ll - ft3:
J+G,A,D.
Lo r__t{
a,r.
t+
M- ka-; (-r-,-.n fl<,i,)
(3an-*gr 1we>tt8 t8 :)-
kl-lKlrm a( c^'dI
--+{e-- JQ Jl-
GOVERNMET{T
OF THE PUI{JAB
,l$lx'1s3"?T,=t"^"il'"1#i?11'J
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UNIT
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 4thJune, 2OO9at MPDD
Designation&
Depaftment
ASntd utorat
D1.Du%* ob \t ht qp
fuw
PD,ilM P
F^Akn V
,trp)iltt^L q- [,QA"t k
4oj I>S0t*4
L/7V4N,7-
NryE?
.
L:7.D.,ffr 42-.SC-1 %
S{els@ o(ss*;r
Ps_D\Rph B,teblqT
/\ uR UqIl
44qo6(
-
a337
(* {l^'L f\lgf tto
t7
4yl
A+^5A.D
c\l , ;-iif ur?- il,;**'> \q
GOVERNMENT
OF THE PUNJAB
,l$li'J,:5,??,'h"^'^i:="H?i?1TJ
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UNIT
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 4thJune, 2009 at MPDD
Designation&
Depaftme-nt
o53J -
,f6
g^^//;/
1r,g,rl,
D.t-
?LTTT\
o 3 3 3-
laM Bo(. 6gtt la >4
t7
4
tifro"P
lftt
'lrlh w?w6jg3-szPt,
''6ujb-
:w|17
(g
%aPq
A st{drlau!
%
L1
?Lt6 \ 6
'Wluvt Pvu
'Yftgrv
&ual 7zl
Y,tr
vl Pal;I
5o(F,.,qer1
T
T
eA \R..rX 6b3!-
..1)SSS O..\
\cst\>-[)'
"/u
GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
PTANNING& DEVETOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PUNJABRESOURCEMAI{AGEMEt{TPROGRAM
PROGRAMMANAGEMENT UNIT
ATTENDANCE
SHEET
TRAINING NEEDSASSESSMENT WORKSHOP
Held on 4thJune, 2OO9at MPDD
hu Zr^b;l.^.r^, t.D(9?rt
ozlt/
9-trq1trI It fu-
Training Needs Assessment
Workshop
Pilot Key Findings Report
The Training Needs Assessment workshop was undertaken by the Punjab Resource
Management Program (PRMP) to try to identify, at the macro level, the training needs of all
the departments of Government of the Punjab (GoPb).
PRMP was launched by Government of the Punjab with the assistance of Asian Development
Bank to improve financial management, institutional development and private sector
participation in the GoPb initiatives. Training & capacity building of officers of the
provincial government departments and agencies is a major component of PRMP. To ensure
sustainability of the reforms, it is imperative that training & capacity building of officers is
conducted on an ongoing basis. Training Need Assessment needs to be conducted effectively
to identify the gaps in knowledge, skills and attitudes of officers and government
departments.
The pilot workshop was to serve the purpose of implementing the methodology proposed by
the consultant, identify the changes required, if any, in the methodology and, based on the
findings of the Focus Group Discussion and the Questionnaire tool used during the workshop,
identify the general as well as the functional and specific technical trainings required by the
Livestock and Dairy Development and Excise and Taxation departments.
The broad purpose of this TNA workshop was to act as an indicative exercise to gauge the
perceptual mapping of attendees’ vis-à-vis various dimensions and to broadly categorize the
general management and functional training needs of the above departments while readying
them for a change management experience/program in the future.
This workshop focussed specifically on the L&DD and the E&T departments as these two
departments are undergoing major financial and institutional reforms. The workshop helped
provide answers to the following broad questions:
a. What are the gaps in knowledge, skills and attitudes required for efficient
running of the respective departments?
b. What training is needed to fill those gaps?
c. Who needs to be trained and in which disciplines?
d. Why is the training important?
e. How will the training be utilized?
f. Which are the priority areas which need to be focussed first?
The pilot workshop was scheduled for May 21st, 2009. However sparse attendance was noted.
A total of 20 participants were invited from both departments (10 each), but only 7 attended.
Out of this, 4 were from the L&DD and 3 from the E&T department. In spite of the low
attendance, the group bonded well together and the FGD lasted for 1.5 hours. The attendees
ranged from the Director General to Farm manager/Section Officer Level and service ranging
from 1 year to 33 years.
As an alternate to the appendance issue, it was decided that the consultant would visit these
departments to get participants involved. For this a field visit was arranged by the PRMP to
the L&DD and E&T departments’ offices. Even during this visit, it was noted that the L&DD
department showed more initiative and pro-activeness (in spite of the bomb blast on May
27th!) for the exercise than the E&T department. An FGD ensued during the field visit as
well.
List of attendees for both the pilot workshop and the auxiliary pilot is attached as Annexure
A.
During both the TNA sessions, a targeted FGD ensued followed by a supervised filling out of
the Questionnaire tool. The detailed findings from both the FGD and the Questionnaire are
included below according to department, as it will help provide a clear picture for each
department ear-marked to undergo the financial and institutional reforms.
3.2 The majority of the respondents (90%) identified themselves as from the ‘General
Cadre’ where as only 10% were from the Technical Cadre.
3.3 The majority of the respondents had a general Bachelor level education.
3.4 All the attendees had a strong sense of the core functions of their respective
departments and were able to provide an overview of the promotion structure
working within their departments.
The above were identified as perceptions of the ‘Core Functions’ of the department,
as opposed to the actual mandate of the Department.
3.5 The majority of the respondents identified their department as a ‘Cash Cow’
department, as their core function had been identified as recovery of various taxes,
yet they were of the opinion that their job-related reward structure needed a major
re-vamp.
3.6 They said there is no basis for promotion, leading to limited promotion
opportunity at every level.
3.8 The majority of the respondents (60%) were of the opinion that their department
was capable of performing its duties with the existing skill set of its employees
where as 30% said it was Not capable, which points out towards existing potential
gaps in the skill sets of employees in the present setup.
3.9 This fact was further reinforced when 90% of the E&T department respondents
said that NOT enough In-house trainings1 are conducted and all 100% said NO
outsourced staff trainings2 are conducted. This demonstrates that even though the
respondents agree that there their department is not highly technically aligned;
they are still showing pro-activeness regarding a desire for the up-gradation of
their skill sets.
100
80
60
Percent
90
40
20
10
0
No Yes
100
80
60
100
Percent
40
20
No
3.10 The majority of the participants agreed that there is provision to initiate/attend
training programs, but due to lengthy procedure for registration/nomination, the
opportunity usually lapses. However 90% have taken the initiative to discuss their
training needs with their supervisors, but due to complacency these needs are not
addressed, despite the fact that the frequency of identifying those needs is done
quite regularly at the supervisor as well as sub-ordinate levels.
3.11 90% of the respondents declared that the department does not allocate enough
resources towards the fulfilment of training and capacity development needs.
3.12 Only 2 respondents out of the sample (and these being relatively recent
inductions with a combined tenure of less than 5 years) had undergone the 6
month post-induction training program is instituted by the MPDD. Both these
respondents had a PCS background. One respondent commented:
3.14 When asked to list down, priority-wise, the major gap areas within the E&T
department, the response was tabulated as:
30
25
20
Percent
15 30 30 30
10
5 10
HR Customer IT None
Relations Identified
3.16 The 30% which responded as ‘None Identified’ are the ones which are
demonstrating a high level of de-motivation and apathy. These are the ones which
can be cultivated by showing them some positive implementation strategies
coming out of this exercise.
3.17 Within the HR and General Management dimension, The Urgency in need
for the Skills Gap came out as:
30%
10%
Long Course,
20%
Short Course,
10%,
3.18 The 7 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the HR and
General Management dimension and the urgency of skill development in each
sub-category are detailed in Annexure B-i.
3.19 Out of the sub-categories identified in Annexure B-I, the following need to be
prioritized:
3.20 For the dimension of Interpersonal and Communication skills, the Urgency
of getting trainings done and the way to fulfil those training needs was identified
as:
20%
10%
Not Applicable
Long Course 30%
20%
Short Course
10%
3.21 The 6 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the Interpersonal
and Communication Skills dimension and the urgency of skill development in
each sub-category are detailed in Annexure B-ii.
3.22 Out of the sub-categories identified in Annexure B-ii, the following need to
be prioritized:
3.24 This gap has become more profound especially after the deployment of the
new in-house MIS system. Currently the IT department, which has set up the MIS
system, is handling all operations, but soon it will have to be weaned off and
functioning handed over to the department, but department will not be able to
handle it due to lack of IT skills.
3.25 For the dimension of Core Business Competency skills, the Urgency of
getting trainings done and the way to fulfil those training needs was identified as:
30%
20%
Long Course
30% Not Applicable
Short Course 10%
10%
3.26 The 6 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the Core Business
Competency Skills dimension and the urgency of skill development in each sub-
category are detailed in Annexure B-iii
3.29 Most trainings which are ever offered are taken up by senior DMG appointed
personnel, who end up being delegated to other departments after undergoing
trainings, thereby making the training provision redundant.
3.31 The majority of the respondents agreed that there was no need for any
Qualification Up-gradation, which is true, as the functioning of this department is
service delivery oriented. However, major up-gradation in soft skills is identified
as a major gap area.
4.3 Some exam/evaluation system should be instituted before promotion (eg. Like in
the forestry department)
6.2 As a 6 month pilot initiative, officers from all cadres should be sent on 1 day
courses/seminars. Through this methodology at least 500 (or more) officers should
be trained in a period of 6 months. The participation of the employees will also
provide an indication towards their readiness for a change management initiative.
By making such short training programs a regular feature, a culture of constant
learning will be inculcated and a positive message will be conveyed to the
employees.
6.3 The 6 month pilot initiative should be taken forward according to a mix of the
following suggestions:
Component 1: 1 day
Communication
Skills
Basic Training for E&T
Component 2: 1 or 2 days
Customer
Module
Component 4: IT 2 or 3 days
Skills
6.4 Special emphasis should be made to include employees from all cadres, especially
from the lower cadres, whereby the majority of the collection duties are done.
These are also the officers whose major role includes public dealing.
6.5 Orientation/ New Induction programs should be inculcated and made a part of the
employment process. This does not necessarily have to be a long (6 month or
more) training, as conducted by the MPDD, but can be a departmental level
initiative, whereby all new inductees have to go through it, irrespective of how
their induction was done (direct hiree/promote or through PCS/PMS stream).
Keeping the above methodology in mind, the New Hire Orientation should be an
in-house, 2-3 day program where an overview of departmental functions and
expected role/performance measures are explained.
6.7 Due to the recent deployment of the MIS systems, a lot of the lower cadre
employees are feeling threatened. In order to help them overcome this feeling and
to bring them at par with the new system, intensive IT training in basic IT skills
should be provided. Because these employees do not know how to use the new IT
System, they are offering resistance for change as they feel their roles are
becoming redundant within the present scenario.
7.2 The majority of the respondents (90%) identified themselves as from the
‘Technical Cadre’ where as only 10% were from the General Cadre, making this a
highly, technically functional department.
7.3 The minimum level of educational attainment for the majority of the respondents
(60%) was a Masters degree, with 30% at the PhD and 10% at the Post Doctorate
Levels with over 80% having Animal Nutrition and Veterinary Medicine as their
areas of specialization.
7.4 The attendees had a strong sense of the core functions of their respective
departments and were able to provide an overview of the promotion structure
working within their departments.
The above were identified as perceptions of the ‘Core Functions’ of the department,
as opposed to the actual mandate of the Department.
7.6 The majority of the respondents (80%) were of the opinion that their department
was partially capable of performing its duties with the existing skill set of its
employees where as 20% said it was Not capable. They further added that major
delegation issues are faced, due to lack of training and empowerment, especially
at the DDO level.
7.7 This fact was further reinforced when 90% of the L&DD department respondents
said that NOT enough In-house trainings are conducted and 70% said No
outsourced staff trainings are conducted, whereas 30% said some out-sourced
trainings ARE conducted. As this is a highly technical department, most of their
training technical training needs can be fulfilled by outsourced trainings. Also, as
the L&DD has their own University and training center, they have still identified
internal as well as external training needs, pointing to the fact that these facilities
are not utilized to their full potential.
100
80
60
Percent
90
40
20
10
0
No Yes
70
60
50
40
70
Percent
30
20
30
10
No Yes
7.8 Even though a training institute exists, there is still no provision to initiate any
training programs. Also due to lengthy procedure for registration/nomination, any
training opportunity that arises, usually lapses. However 80% have taken the
initiative to discuss their training needs with their supervisors, but due to
complacency these needs are not addressed, despite the fact that the frequency of
identifying those needs is done quite regularly at the supervisor as well as sub-
ordinate levels. Furthermore, 80% of the respondents also discuss training needs
and gaps with their subordinates on a quarterly basis.
7.9 40% of the respondents feel that the department understands their training and
capacity development needs, where as 30% each feel the department does NOT
understand, or are not sure.
7.10 As most of the L&DD employees are earning people (veterinarians, etc) so the
opportunity cost is very high for them to take time out for trainings. If they take
out a few days or weeks at a time for trainings they lose out on earning potential.
If they take time out for longer trainings, for example specialized degrees, the
chances are that they will be deployed where their newly earned knowledge and
skill will not be effectively used and they might have to start off at a lower cadre
than before they left for the training.
7.11 The FGD respondents also commented that if they are sent abroad or
internally, for specialized courses or degrees they will be benefitting from it
greatly at a personal level, however the efficacy of that training might not prove to
be beneficial for the department, as such.
7.12 However, 70% of the respondents declared that the department does not
allocate enough resources towards the fulfilment of training and capacity
development needs.
7.14 Within the HR and General Management dimension, The Urgency in need
for the Skills Gap came out as:
30%
Degree
Course
30%
Short
Course
20%
7.15 The 7 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the HR and
General Management dimension and the urgency of skill development in each
sub-category are detailed in Annexure C-i.
7.16 Out of the sub-categories identified in Annexure C-i, the following need to be
prioritized:
7.17 For the dimension of Interpersonal and Communication skills, the Urgency
of getting trainings done and the way to fulfil those training needs was identified
as:
10%
Degree Course
Short Course 22%
22%
7.18 The 6 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the Interpersonal
and Communication Skills dimension and the urgency of skill development in
each sub-category are detailed in Annexure C-ii.
7.19 Out of the sub-categories identified in Annexure C-ii, the following need to
be prioritized:
Long Course
40%
7.21 The 6 sub categories identified in the Questionnaire tool for the Core Business
Competency Skills dimension and the urgency of skill development in each sub-
category are detailed in Annexure C-iii
7.22 Out of the sub-categories identified in Annexure C-iii, the following need to
be prioritized:
7.24 A gap identified in IT and IT related skills was identified as a long term goal
for the department as currently NO IT related infrastructure exists for the L&DD
7.25 The group also opined that due to horizontal movement at the top level, most
training opportunities that arise are taken up by irrelevant employees. Thereby
wasting resources while not addressing any gaps.
8.2 Veterinary assistants are a critical level, and should be provided formal training,
starting with generalization and leading up to specialization
8.3 It was suggested that the facilities at the existing training institutes and University
should be upgraded for optimal usage of resources, especially in regards to
training and development.
8.5 It was suggested by the Secretary L&DD (Jehanzeb Khan) that performance and
evaluation should be outsourced.
8.7 Suggestions were made about skill development of the livestock sector using the
inclusion of the private sector.
8.8 Value chains and cottage industries should be identified and promoted.
Epidemiology Degree
10.2 The Secretary L&DD, Mr. Jehanzeb Khan, has identified many progressive
initiatives and has initiated a positive internal debate about the ensuing change
management reforms incumbent upon the department. He is leading the
department in a positive manner and to further capitalize on this momentum, a
pilot initiative should be undertaken whereby the Public-Private-Partnership
model should be utilized at the grassroots level.
10.5 General Management training gaps should be fulfilled through short courses or
seminars. The suggestion of short courses or seminars and workshops (refer to
Annexure C-i, ii and iii) is based on participant input that due to logistical
concerns and the ‘earning’ potential of their positions, longer term trainings
cannot be availed effectively. Furthermore, from a trainer’s perspective, shorter
courses assist with better retention.
10.6 As a 6 month pilot initiative, officers from all cadres (with special emphasis
on Grade 9 and below) should be sent on 1 day courses/seminars. Through this
methodology at least 500 (or more) officers should be trained in a period of 6
months. The participation of the employees will also provide an indication
towards their readiness for a change management initiative. By making such short
training programs a regular feature, a culture of constant learning will be
inculcated and a positive message will be conveyed to the employees.
10.7 The 6 month pilot initiative should be taken forward according to a mix of the
following suggestions:
Component 1: 2 day
Communication
Component 4: IT 2 or 3 days
Skills
10.8 The departmental culture of the L&DD is very education and skill
development oriented, as one of its core functions is R&D. By identifying the
L&DD a ‘model department’ for soft skills trainings, we will be able to record the
perceptions regarding change management and their readiness for institutional
reforms at various levels.
The Focus Group Discussion was supplemented by a broad based questionnaire tool
incorporating both closed and open ended questions.
11.1.1 A brief descriptive analysis of the sample revealed initial facts about the composition
and various characteristics of the respondents present at the time.
11.1.2 It was revealed that 70% of the respondents present had total years of public service of
20 years or more and hence belonged to senior executive class. The remaining 28% were split
evenly between persons having service life of 5-10 years and those having service range of 6
months to 2 years. Similarly 60% consisted of those who were having 20 years and above of
service lives with their respective departments.
11.1.3 As for the academic qualifications, 50% had at least a Masters degree, 25% had
Bachelors and the remaining had a doctorate. Similarly the areas of specialization had a more
varied representation with 30% as generalists, 25% people were animal nutritionists while
15% were having Economics as their major specialization.
Is Your Dept Capable of performing its duties with existing skill set
As for the ability of their
70
respective departments to
60
perform the duties using the
existing skill set once again, 70%
50
40
of the attendees replied in a
70
30
20
“Firm No”. This points out towards
25
10 existing potential gaps in the skill
5
0 sets of employees in the present
Partially YES No Comment Firm No
setup and/or lack of clear cut
100 100
80
80
60
60
Percent
40 90 Percent
40
85
20
20
10 15
0
0
No Yes No Yes
30 60
20 40 40 80
Percent
35 Percent
25
10 20
10 10
0 0
No Yes Not Sure No Yes Not Sure
10% 10%
NA
Short Course 20%
Urgently NA Long Term 20%
URGENCY
60% WAY
Degree
Long Course Course
40% 20%
35%
5%
Semianr &
Workshop
20%
Short Course
Long Term Urgently NA 20%
URGENCY
50%
40%
WAY Degree
Long
Courses
Courses
10%
35%
10%
Seminar &
Workshop
20%
Short
NA
Courses
Long Term Urgently NA 5%
30%
40
30
20 40
Percent
10 20
15
10 10
5
0
Promotion be Dept-wise Improvement in Job specific Preference for
None identified
linked with frequency of management Trainings Foreign
Training Based TNA Be Skills Trainings
performance increased
The success of the project in such a short span of time shows that demand exists for
this nature of intervention. For future interventions, the same approach should be used
when taking this initiative to the departmental level, whereby a Questionnaire Tool,
along with a Targeted FGD is employed to gauge perceptions and map needs of
departments.
12.2 The PRMP should work along with the MPDD and inter-departmental Capacity
development focal points to take the findings of this intervention forward, so tangible
implementational outcomes can be seen.
12.3 The General Skills gap areas fall in the purview of the PRMPs initiatives,
whereas the technical trainings findings should be shared with all the departments and
PRMP can assist the individual departments in developing plans on how to address
these gaps.
12.4 The PRMP should initiate a pilot training program for 6 months, based on the
urgency of general HR skills identified above through a structured, tiered program.
The Consultant recommends Fast-tracking the L&DD department for this pilot
initiative, as the perceptions and pro-activity of that department with regards to
trainings is more enthusiastic as compared to the E&T department.
12.5 The recommended Pilot can serve as a foundation for the change management
Institutional Reform initiative aimed at bettering the service delivery mechanism and
12.6 Concurrently, the E&T department should also undergo a similar pilot training
initiative. By taking both these departments through a Pilot training program together,
the progress can be charted to see the willingness for Change and reform within each
department. Also, the progress level with each department will highlight the same.
12.7 Both these departments, even though at different levels of perceptual and
progressive maturity, have shown a positive inclination towards the training initiative
being undertaken by the PRMP. However, if NO program is initiated after this, as has
been the case after many similar exercises, it will lead to further de-motivation,
complacency and resistance towards future initiatives aimed at Change Management
and Institutional Reform.
12.9 The perceptions mapped, especially during the FGD and further corroborated by
the Questionnaire (findings above 11.1.5.D) is that foreign trainings are a ‘Big Deal’
and usually all the seniors, who are usually not related to the technical functionings of
the departments, end up availing these opportunities, so thereby the training resources
end up being wasted. Also, especially true of the E&T department, is the opinion that
foreign trainings are usually ‘all expense paid vacations’ and the only way to get
‘Trained’! This opinion also holds true in the L&DD department, however the slight
change in perception is due to the fact that some people within the department have
gone on to relevant trainings abroad and the department has benefitted as a result, so
there have been some success stories. Whereas for the E&T department, there have
been no departmental benefits and success stories.
12.10 Both the departments feel that there is a major gap where trainings, especially
soft skills trainings are concerned, in the lower cadres of the respective departments.
For the E&T departments an overwhelming gap exists for Grades 17 and below and
for the L&DD department for Grades 14 and below, especially for Grade 9. For this, a
series of trainings at the grass-roots level should be organized, along with a partner
institute, preferable in the private sector, whereby officers numbering in hundreds
should be trained. This can be done through short courses or seminars. Detailed
suggestions are provided above for each department respectively (refer to 6.2, 6.3,
10.6 and 10.7 above)
12.11. The private sector is being recommended for the soft skills trainings because,
as suggested by the respondents, the entire environment of training which is not
limited to the course being taught, but to the experience of interacting with private
sector leaders and benchmarkers and the private sector ‘training ambience’ cannot be
reproduced in the public sector. They would like exposure to that ambience to be a
part of their training experience. In spite of the fact that everyone cannot be sent
12.13 A differential salary system structure should be explored which can be linked
with a Performance Management System (PMS) so employees appreciate the
competitivity of their roles and functions and the sense of complacency and apathy
that has developed can be addressed at its roots. Overwhelmingly, the respondents
have also suggested the same (refer to Annexure B-v and Annexure C-Vi). By
developing a PMS and linking it to a differential salary structure, the horizontal
movement of Generalists and bureaucratic leadership, especially for technical
departments will be addressed and the ‘right’ talent will emerge.
12.14. It was noted that the departmental culture of both departments varied greatly.
Even though both departments are technically oriented, the departmental functionings
have given rise to very distinct departmental cultures. The root cause of this can be
perceived to be at the induction or new-hire intake level, whereby educational
disparities are seen to exist (See Annexure B-vi and C-vii).
Conclusion:
Given the macro nature of this indicative perception mapping exercise it is a fact that it has
created a high level of awareness in the target intervention areas. However some gaps in
knowledge as well as application and implementation still remain, which should be addressed
in future interventions. These have been discussed in detailed in the section on key findings,
as well as the section on recommendations.
It is highly recommended that PRMP should continue working with the same progressive
outlook, and if and where possible, pull in assistance from the departments where
implementation is concerned. It is also strongly urged that the suggested Pilot Training
initiative be launched in collaboration with assistance in implementation and ownership of
the target departments, so tangible results of this exercise can be yielded and the Institutional
Reform initiative can become a success.
ATTENDANCE SHEET
TNA WORKSHOP
Sr. No. Name Designation & Department Grade
E&T DEPARTMENT
1. Mr. Ahmad Ali Kambo Director, E&T (Hqrs) Punjab 18
L&DD DEPARTMENT
1. Makhdoom A. Jabbar Food & Mutrition UVAS, Lahore 21
B-i
70%
60% 60%
10%
70%
60%
50% 50%
20% 20%
20% 20% 20%
10%
10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Short Course Long Course Degree Course Seminars & Workshops Not Applicable
30%
30% 30% 30% 30%
10%
10% 10%
B-iii
10% 10%
10%
Short Course Long Course Degree Course Seminars & Workshops Not Applicable
B-iv
Area to be emphsized the most for next 2 years to
make dept functions efficient
60
50
40
Percent
30 60
20
10
10 10 10 10
0
Collaborative IT Skills HR Not Identified Role based
Police & E&T Managment refresher
Dept training techniques courses
B-v
50
40
30
Percent
50
20
10 20 20
10
0
Promotion be Dept wise None identified Preference for
linked with frequency of foreign training
training based TNAs be
performance increased
Academic Qualification
50
40
30
50
Percent
20
40
10
10
0
C-i
60% 60%
50%
40% 40%
20%
30%
30% 30% 30% 30%
10%
50% 50%
10% 10%
10% 10%
10%
Short Course Long Course Degree Course Seminars & Workshops Not Applicable
C-iv
40
30
Percent
20 40
30
10
10 10 10
0
Embryo Lifestock IT Skills HR Role based
transfer development Managment refresher
technology & techniques courses
Management
C-v
80
60
Percent
40 80
20
20
C-vi
30
25
20
Percent
15 30 30
10 20 20
0
Promotion be Improvement in Job specific None identified
linked with management trainings
training based skills
performance
Academic Qualification
60
50
40
30 60
Percent
20
30
10
10
0
60
50
40
Percent
30
52.8
20
36.1
10
11.1
0
Long Term Urgently Not applicable
Short
Course
Long
Course
11.1 Degree
Course
Seminar &
15.3 Workshops
Not
Applicable
48.6
6.9
18.1
b) Presentation Skills
70
60
50
Percent
40
69.4
30
20
10 22.2
8.3
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
8.3
Degree
Course
13.9 Seminar &
Workshops
Not
1.4 Applicable
5.6
70.8
c) Report Writing Skills
70
60
50
Percent
40
63.9
30
20
27.8
10
8.3
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
8.3
Degree
8.3 Course
Seminar &
1.4 Workshops
Not
Applicable
13.9
68.1
d) Team Working Skills
60
50
40
Percent
30
54.2
20 38.9
10
6.9
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
6.9
Seminar &
Workshops
16.7 Not
Applicable
58.3
18.1
e) Negotiation Skills
50
40
30
Percent
45.8
20
33.3
10 20.8
Short
Course
Long
Course
Degree
22.2 Course
Seminar &
Workshops
Not
Applicable
48.6
18.1
1.4
9.7
f) Conflict management Skills
60
50
40
Percent
30
54.2
20
29.2
10
16.7
Short
Course
Long
Course
16.7 Degree
Course
Seminar &
Workshops
Not
12.5 Applicable
51.4
4.2
15.3
ANNEXURE – Dii
a) Conducting Appraisals
60
50
40
Percent
30
52.8
20
34.7
10
12.5
Short
Course
Long
Course
11.1 Degree
Course
Seminar &
Workshops
16.7
Not
Applicable
55.6
1.4
15.3
b) Giving & receiving Feedback
60
50
40
Percent
30
56.9
20
33.3
10
9.7
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
11.1 Degree
Course
Seminar &
Workshops
19.4 Not
Applicable
62.5
1.4
5.6
c) Performance Management
70
60
50
Percent
40
69.4
30
20
29.2
10
0 1.4
Long Term Urgently Not applicable
Short
Course
Long
1.4 Course
12.5 Degree
Course
1.4 Seminar &
Workshops
Not
Applicable
26.4 58.3
d) Discipline & Grievance Procedures
70
60
50
Percent
40
69.4
30
20
25
10
5.6
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
5.6
Seminar &
Workshops
16.7 Not
Applicable
61.1
16.7
e) Current HR Policy Awareness
70
60
50
Percent
40
65.3
30
20
26.4
10
8.3
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
8.3
Seminar &
Workshops
12.5 Not
Applicable
13.9 65.3
f) Capacity Building of Employees
60
50
40
Percent
30
58.3
20
34.7
10
6.9
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
5.6
Degree
9.7 Course
Seminar &
2.8
Workshops
Not
Applicable
51.4
30.6
g) General HR
50
40
30
Percent
43.1 43.1
20
10
13.9
Short
Course
Long
Course
15.3 Degree
Course
Seminar &
6.9 Workshops
Not
2.8 Applicable
61.1
13.9
ANNEXURE – Diii
80
60
Percent
40
75
20
15.3
9.7
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
9.7 Seminar &
Workshops
6.9
Not
Applicable
13.9
69.4
b) Time Management Skills
60
50
40
Percent
30 59.7
20
30.6
10
9.7
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
9.7 Seminar &
Workshops
Not
13.9 Applicable
11.1 65.3
c) Resource Planning Skills
60
50
40
Percent
30
55.6
20
34.7
10
9.7
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
11.1 Degree
Course
Seminar &
11.1 Workshops
Not
1.4 Applicable
52.8
23.6
d) Change Management Skills
50
40
30
Percent
48.6
20
37.5
10
13.9
Short
Course
Long
Course
15.3 Seminar &
Workshops
Not
Applicable
8.3
61.1
15.3
e) Stress Management Skills
60
50
40
Percent
30
54.2
20
27.8
10
18.1
Short
Course
Long
Course
Seminar &
18.1 Workshops
Not
Applicable
13.9
65.3
2.8
f) Relationship Management Skills
60
50
40
Percent
30
54.2
20
34.7
10
11.1
0
Short
Course
Long
Course
12.5 Seminar &
Workshops
Not
Applicable
16.7
58.3
12.5
g) Work Value Addition
50
40
30
Percent
44.4
20
36.1
10 19.4
Short
Course
Long
Course
Degree
19.4 Course
Seminar &
Workshops
Not
Applicable
54.2
16.7
1.4
8.3
D-iv Additional Sample Characteristics through Descriptive Statistics
Designation
25
20
Percent
15
22.2
10
15.3
13.9
5
11.1
8.3
6.9 6.9
5.6
2.8 2.8
1.4 1.4 1.4
0
.N
y
ry
tor
er
er
tor
y
er
er
or
r
ter
tar
tar
ne
a
X.E
fic
ffic
ag
fic
r
ec
ec
t
t
as
cre
cre
ec
cre
lan
Of
Of
an
tO
Dir
Dir
dM
Dir
Se
Se
rt P
Se
tM
on
arh
tric
pt.
st
l/H
cti
pt.
ss
po
al
se
Dis
De
As
Se
ion
ipa
A
De
ns
Re
dit
Tra
inc
Ad
Pr
ief
or/
Ch
ss
ofe
Pr
60
50
40
Percent
30
56.9
20
10
Service Cadre
70
60
50
Percent
40
30 62.5
20
37.5
10
50
40
30
Percent
48.6
20
36.1
10
12.5
0
2.8
CSS Technocrat
PCS Promotee/Inductee
Academic Qualification
60
50
40
Percent
30 59.7
20
33.3
10
40
30
Percent
20
36.1
10 20.8
13.9 12.5
6.9 8.3
0 1.4
6 months 6 months 2yrs to 5 5yrs to 10 10 yrs to 15yrs to 20 yrs
and less to 2 years yrs Yrs 15 yrs 20 yrs and
above
Is Your Dept Capable of performing its duties with
existing skill set ?
70
60
50
Percent
40
30
63.9
20
10 19.4
12.5
0 1.4 2.8
Firm Yes Partially No Firm No Firm
YES Comment Response
70
60
50
Percent
40
30
63.9
20
36.1
10
No Yes
Does your Dept conduct enough outsourced staff
trainings ?
60
50
40
Percent
30
56.94
20
43.06
10
No Yes
60
50
40
Percent
30
51.4
20
34.7
10
13.9
80
60
Percent
40
72.2
20
15.3 12.5
0
80
60
Percent 40
72.2
20
12.5 15.3
0
30
Percent
20
30.56
27.78
22.22
10 19.44
0
Quarterly Bi-Annually Annually Not Applicable
50
40
30
Percent
20 41.7
27.8
10
15.3 15.3
0
Quarterly Bi-Annually Annually Not Applicable
Your Dept understands your training/capacity
building needs ?
60
50
40
Percent 30
51.4
20
27.8
10 20.8
60
50
40
Percent
30
56.9
20
10 22.2 20.8