Module I
Module I
ii
a
This Study Material has been prepared by the faculty of the Board of Studies (Academic). The
objective of the Study Material is to provide teaching material to the students to enable them to
obtain knowledge in the subject. In case students need any clarification or have any suggestion for
further improvement of the material contained herein, they may write to the Director of Studies.
All care has been taken to provide interpretations and discussions in a manner useful for the
students. However, the Study Material has not been specifically discussed by the Council of the
Institute or any of its committees and the views expressed herein may not be taken to necessarily
represent the views of the Council or any of its Committees.
Permission of the Institute is essential for reproduction of any portion of this material.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or
otherwise, without prior permission, in writing, from the publisher.
E-mail : [email protected]
Website : www.icai.org
Printed by :
v
BEFORE WE BEGIN …
Concurrent Practical Training along with academic education: Key to achieving the
desired level of Professional Competence
Under the Revised Scheme of Education and Training, at the Final Level, you are ex pected to
apply the professional knowledge acquired through academic education and the practical
exposure gained during articleship training in addressing issues and solving practical problems.
The integrated process of learning through academic education and practical training should
also help you inculcate the requisite technical competence, professional skills and professional
values, ethics and attitudes necessary for achieving the desired level of professional
competence.
The Government of India in consultation with the ICAI decided to converge and not to adopt
IFRS issued by the IASB. The decision of convergence rather than adoption was taken after the
detailed analysis of IFRS requirements and extensive discussion with various stakeholders.
Accordingly, while formulating IFRS-converged Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS), efforts
have been made to keep these Standards, as far as possible, in line with the corresponding
IAS/IFRS and departures have been made where considered absolutely essential. These
changes have been made considering various factors, such as, various terminology related
changes have been made to make it consistent with the terminology used in law, e.g.,
‘statement of profit and loss’ in place of ‘statement of comprehensive income’ and ‘balance
sheet’ in place of ‘statement of financial position’. Certain changes have been made considering
the economic environment of the country, which is different as compared to the economic
environment presumed to be in existence by IFRS.
Thereafter, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) had notified IFRS-converged Indian
Accounting Standards (Ind AS) as Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 vide
Notification dated February 16, 2015 and also the roadmap for the applicability of Ind AS for
certain class of companies from financial year 2016-17. With the financial year 2016-17, the era
of implementation of Ind AS in India had begun for the listed and unlisted companies as per the
MCA roadmap for implementation of Ind AS. The MCA has also laid down roadmap for
implementation of Ind AS for NBFCs. These developments are a significant step in achieving
international benchmarks of financial reporting.
Ind AS, at the Final level, involves understanding, application and analysing of the concepts and
testing of the same. The nitty-gritties of this new standard coupled with its inherent dynamism,
makes the learning, understanding and application of the standards in problem solving very
interesting and challenging.
Accounts being the core competence areas of chartered accountants, at Final level, the syllabus
of Financial Reporting covers Indian Accounting Standards alongwith Ethics and Technology
integrated with the profession and accounting. However, for understanding the coverage of
syllabus, it is important to read the Study Material as the content therein has been developed
keeping in mind the extent of coverage of various topics in commensuration with 100 marks
allotted to the paper. Certain Ind AS / portion of Ind AS are excluded from the study material,
keeping in view the relevancy of the content in the Indian scenario and also to avoid the volume
of the study material.
v
For understanding the coverage of syllabus, it is important to read the Study Material along with
the reference to Study Guidelines. The Study Guidelines specify the topic-wise exclusions from
the syllabus.
Efforts have been made to present the multifaceted Ind AS in a lucid manner. The Study
Material carries 17 chapters. Care has been taken to present the chapters in a logical sequence
to facilitate easy understanding by the students. Ind AS have been grouped under various
categories to make you understand the areas of relevancy and application of Ind AS. The
chapters have been numbered based on those categories and Ind AS falling in the same
category are included in that chapter. Therefore, certain chapters on Ind AS, contain several
units each unit dedicated to one Ind AS. However, for bare text of Indian Accounting standards,
students are advised to refer the notified Indian Accounting Standards uploaded on the website
at the link https://www.icai.org/post.html?post_id=15365
The various chapters/units of this subject have been structured uniformly and comprise of the
following components:
2. Chapter / Unit As the name suggests, the flow chart/table/diagram given at the
Overview beginning of each chapter will give a broad outline of the contents
covered in the chapter.
These value additions will, thus, help you develop conceptual clarity
and get a good grasp of the topic.
5. Summary of The summary of each Ind AS has been linked through a QR Code in
Ind AS the respective chapter/unit dedicated to that Ind AS. The QR Code
has been given at the end of the chapter discussion i.e. before ‘Test
Your Knowledge’ section
Answers
After you work out the problems / questions given under the section
“Test Your Knowledge”, you can verify your answers with the
answers given under this section. This way you can self-assess
your level of understanding of the concepts of a chapter.
v
A new feature has been added at the end of each Module of Financial Reporting namely ‘Ind AS
Puzzlers: Test Your Accounting Acumen’. Under the title there is a crossword puzzle
Crossword After going through the chapters of a Module, you can test your Ind AS
Puzzle acumen by solving a crossword puzzle. The crossword puzzle has been
given at the end of every module with respect to the chapters dealt with in
that module. These crossword puzzles will be a fun for you to solve by
going through the clues, recall the concepts and review your understanding
and knowledge acquired. You are advised to solve the puzzle earnestly
after going through the chapters of the Module thoroughly.
Though all efforts have been taken in developing this Study Material, the possibilities of errors /
omissions cannot be ruled out. You may bring such errors / omissions, if any, to our notice so
that the necessary corrective action can be taken.
We hope that the student-friendly features in the Study Material makes your learning process
more enjoyable, enriches your knowledge and sharpens your application skills.
SYLLABUS
PAPER – 1: FINANCIAL REPORTING
(One paper – Three hours – 100 Marks)
Objectives:
(a) To acquire the ability to integrate and solve problems in practical scenarios on Indi an
Accounting Standards (Ind AS) for deciding the appropriate accounting treatment and
formulating suitable accounting policies.
(b) To gain the prowess to recognize and apply disclosure requirements specified in Indian
Accounting Standards (Ind AS) while preparing and presenting the financial statements.
(c) To develop the expertise to prepare financial statements of group entities which includes
subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements based on Indian Accounting Standards
(Ind AS).
Contents:
v
(v) Ind AS on Items impacting the Financial Statements
(viii) Ind AS on Financial Instruments (it includes Ind AS 32, Ind AS 109, Ind AS 107)
Notes:
2. If either a new Ind AS or Announcements and Limited Revisions to Ind AS are issued or
the earlier one is withdrawn or new Ind AS, Announcements and Limited Revisions to
Ind AS are issued in place of existing Ind AS, the syllabus will accordingly include /
exclude such new developments in the place of the existing ones with effect from the
date to be notified as decided by the Institute.
3. The specific inclusions / exclusions in any topic covered in the syllabus will be af fected
every year by way of Study Guidelines.
CONTENTS
MODULE – 1
Chapter 1: Introduction to Indian Accounting Standards
Chapter 2: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting under Indian Accounting
Standards (Ind AS)
Chapter 3: Ind AS on Presentation of Items in the Financial Statements
Unit 1: Ind AS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”
Unit 2: Ind AS 34 “Interim Financial Reporting”
Unit 3: Ind AS 7 “Statement of Cash Flows”
Chapter 4: Ind AS on Measurement based on Accounting Policies
Unit 1: Ind AS 8 “Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors ”
Unit 2: Ind AS 10 “Events after the Reporting Period”
Unit 3: Ind AS 113 “Fair Value Measurement”
Chapter 5: Ind AS 115 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”
Annexure: Division II of Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013
Ind AS Puzzlers: Test Your Accounting Acumen
MODULE – 2
Chapter 6: Ind AS on Assets of the Financial Statements
Unit 1: Ind AS 2 “Inventories”
Unit 2: Ind AS 16 “Property, Plant and Equipment”
Unit 3: Ind AS 23 “Borrowing Costs”
Unit 4: Ind AS 36 “Impairment of Assets”
Unit 5: Ind AS 38 “Intangible Assets”
Unit 6: Ind AS 40 “Investment Property”
Unit 7: Ind AS 105 “Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations”
Unit 8: Ind AS 116 “Leases”
MODULE – 4
Chapter 12: Ind AS 103 “Business Combinations”
Chapter 13: Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements of Group Entities
Unit 1 : Introduction to Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
Unit 2 : Important Definitions
Unit 3 : Consolidated Financial Statements
Unit 4 : Ind AS 110: Consolidation Procedure for Subsidiaries
Unit 5 : Ind AS 111: Joint Arrangements
Unit 6 : Ind AS 28: Investment in Associates & Joint Ventures
Unit 7 : Ind AS 27: Separate Financial Statements
Unit 8 : Disclosures
Chapter 14: Ind AS 101 “First-time Adoption of Indian Accounting Standards”
Chapter 15: Analysis of Financial Statements
Chapter 16: Professional and Ethical Duty of a Chartered Accountant
Chapter 17: Accounting and Technology
Ind AS Puzzlers: Test Your Accounting Acumen
ANNEXURE: DIVISION II OF SCHEDULE III TO THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 ............. A.1 – A.37
INTRODUCTION TO INDIAN
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this chapter, you will be able to:
❑ Appreciate the concept of Accounting Standards
❑ Grasp the Indian scenario prior to Ind AS and the need of time leading to emergence
of global accounting standards
❑ Acknowledge the benefits of global accounting standards
❑ Distinguish between convergence and adoption of global accounting standards
❑ Discuss about Ind AS transition in India and benefits thereof
❑ Recognise the process of development and finalisation of Ind AS (IASB to ICAI to
MCA)
❑ Describe India’s roadmap for applicability of Ind AS for listed and unlisted entities,
NBFCs, banking and insurance sector
❑ Illustrate the salient features of Ind AS like numbering, flow and structure
❑ Tabulate the important statutory provisions under the Companies Act and SEBI
regulations involving Ind AS
❑ Identify the format of balance sheet, statement of changes in equity, profit and loss
and significant notes related to them as given in Division II to Schedule III to the
Companies Act, 2013
❑ Analyse key takeaways from guidance note on Division II to Schedule III to the
Companies Act, 2013
UNIT OVERVIEW
Introduction
Limitations of AS
Emergence of Global Standards
Need for Global standard in India
Benefits of Global Accounting Standards
Convergence vs Adoption of IFRS
Introduction to Process of development and finalisation of Ind AS
Indian
Accounting
Standards Transition from AS to Ind AS About Indian Accounting Standards
How Ind AS has been numbered
How Ind AS has been structured
Roadmap for applicability of For listed entities
Ind AS
Ind AS Roadmap for Non -Banking
Financial Companies (NBFC)
Ind AS Roadmap for Banking and
Insurance Companies
Ind AS Roadmap for Mutual Funds
1. INTRODUCTION
A set of financial statements are a key tool of communication about the financial position,
performance and changes in financial position of an entity that is useful to a wide range of
stakeholders in making economic decisions. Accounting Standards is an essential building block
in the financial reporting world. These Accounting Standards provide principles and rules that
must be followed to ensure accuracy, consistency and comparability of financial statements.
These accounting guidelines also ensure that financial statements should be understandable,
relevant, reliable and comparable.
Accounting Standards are a set of documents that lay down the principles covering various
aspects, such as, recognition, measurement, presentation & disclosure of accoun ting transaction
in the financial statements. Objective of accounting standards is to standardize the diverse
accounting policies & practices with a view to eliminate the non-comparability of financial
statements to the extent possible and also to enhance the reliability to the financial statements.
Accounting standards play a very significant role in enabling the stakeholders to get the reliable
and comparable accounting data and investors to make more informed economic decisions.
The Accounting Standards Board (ASB) of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (The
ICAI), since its establishment way back in 1977, has been involved in the formulation of
Accounting Standards and standard setting process of the country. ASB has been relentlessly
working to ensure that the world’s fastest growing emerging economy of India is equipped with
high quality Accounting Standards (AS) comparable to the best in the world. The ICAI also issued
Accounting Standards which are applicable to the entities other than companies and are aligned
with Accounting Standards notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) with certain
differences.
ASB is an Accounting Standards-Setting arm of the ICAI, which formulates Accounting Standards
through a process that is robust, comprehensive, and inclusive with a view to assisting the Council
of the ICAI in evolving and establishing Accounting Standards to discharge its role of national
standard-setter. Once the ASB finalises the draft of AS post incorporating the public comments
on exposure draft, ASB recommends such approved draft of AS to National Financial Reporting
Authority (NFRA)1 and then Government of India, through MCA notifies AS or Ind-AS for corporate
entities under Companies Act and ICAI issues AS for non-corporate entities.
1 NFRA was constituted under the Companies Act, 2013 which replaced National A dvisory Committee On
Accounting Standards (NACAS) which was constituted under Companies Act, 1956 .
Government of India
4 Criteria for classification of Non-company Entities as decided by the Institute of Chartered Accountants
of India should be referred back from Appendix 1 to Compendium of Accounting Standards (as on
1 st February, 2022)
(Revised
2016)
5 Net Profit or Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Loss for the
Period, Prior
Period Items
and Changes
in Accounting
Policies
7 Construction Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Contracts
9 Revenue Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recognition
10 Property, Plant Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (with Yes (with
and Equipment disclosure disclosure
(Revised) exemption) exemption)
11 The Effects of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (with Yes (with
Changes in disclosure disclosure
Foreign exemption) exemption)
Exchange
Rates
12 Accounting for Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Government
Grants
13 Accounting for Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ) Yes (with
Investments disclosure
(Revised) exemption
14 Accounting for Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NA
Amalgamation
(Revised)
15 Employee No Applicable Yes Yes (With certain exemptions)
Benefits with some
exemptions
16 Borrowing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Costs
17 Segment No No Yes No No No
Reporting
18 Related Party Yes Yes Yes No No
Disclosure
19 Leases No Applicable Yes Yes (with disclosure exemption)
with some
exemptions
20 Earnings per No Applicable Yes No No No
share with some
exemptions
21 Consolidated Yes Yes Yes No No No
Financial
Statements
(Revised)
22 Accounting for Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (only
Taxes on related to
Income current tax
provisions)
23 Accounting for Yes Yes Yes No No No
Investments in
Associates in
Consolidated
Financial
Statements
24 Discontinuing Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Operations
25 Interim No Applicable Yes No No No
Financial with some
Reporting exemptions
26 Intangible Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (with
Assets disclosure
exemption)
27 Financial Yes Yes Yes No No No
Reporting of
Interests in
Joint Ventures
28 Impairment of No Applicable Yes Yes (with NA
Assets with some disclosure
exemptions exemption)
29 Provisions, No Applicable Yes Yes (with disclosure exemption)
Contingent with some
Liabilities and exemptions
Contingent
Assets
(Revised)
The joint convergence project was launched in 2002 by the International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB) and US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The objective of this project
is to eliminate a variety of differences between International Financial Reporting Standards and
US GAAP. The project, which is being done jointly by FASB and IASB, grew out of an agreement
reached by the two boards in October 2002 (the 'Norwalk Agreement'). The scope of the overall
IASB-FASB convergence project has evolved over time and is currently under progress .
So, IFRS is now, together with US GAAP, one of the two globally recognised finan cial reporting
frameworks. Although the goal of a single set of high–quality global accounting standards has not
been fulfilled, as per IASB research, presently, 167 jurisdictions require the use of IFRS
Accounting Standards for all or most publicly listed companies, whilst a furthe r 12 jurisdictions
permit its use.
IFRS” if it has adopted IFRS with some exceptions, and work with IASB towards those exceptions
to reach at a point wherein there are no differences left.
An entity is required to apply IFRS 1 First–time Adoption of International Financial Reporting
Standards – when it first asserts compliance with IFRS. The IASB has, therefore, established
unambiguously the principle that full application of its standards and related interpreta tions is
necessary for an entity to be able to assert that its financial statements comply with IFRS (as
issued by the IASB). Consequently, it is necessary for countries that align their national standards
with IFRS to require the application of IFRS 1 so that entities reporting under those standards can
assert compliance with IFRS. In addition, an entity that applies IFRS as amended by a local
authority cannot assert compliance with IFRS.
It is merely impossible for IASB to consider the individual factors of each country. Hence, such
countries decide to converge to IFRS with limited exceptions. These exceptions are regularly
looked upon and in order to meet at a point where no exceptions are left.
Countries like Canada, Bahrain, Cambodia etc have adopted IFRS while countries like India,
China, Hongkong etc have converged with IFRS.
• Finalisation of Exposure Draft of Ind AS and its issuance for inviting public comments
• Consideration of comments received on the Exposure Draft and finalisation of Ind AS by ASB
for submission to the Council of ICAI for its consideration and approval for issuance.
• Consideration of the final draft of proposed Ind AS by the Council of the ICAI, and if found
necessary, modification of the draft in consultation with the ASB
• Final draft Ind AS to be submitted to NFRA with ICAI recommendations for notification
• NFRAs reviews and provides inputs, if any, to ICAI before finalising. Post that, MCA notifies
the Ind AS under Companies Act for Companies to follow with announcement of applicability
date.
To summarise,
ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ
/^ŝƐƐƵĞƐŶĞǁ/&Z^ /ƐƐƵĞŽĨdžƉŽƐƵƌĞ ĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚ
ŽƌƵƉĚĂƚĞƐƚŚĞ ƌĂĨƚĨŽƌWƵďůŝĐ ŽŶƚŚĞdžƉŽƐƵƌĞƌĂĨƚ
ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŽŶĞ ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚĨŝŶĂůŝƐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ
ĨŝŶĂůĚƌĂĨƚ
ĞůŝďĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ /ŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ
&ŝŶĂůĚƌĂĨƚƐƵŵďŝƐƐŝŽŶ
ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĚƌĂĨƚ ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐĨƌŽŵ
ƚŽE&ZǁŝƚŚ
/ŶĚ^ŝŶůŝŶĞǁŝƚŚ/&Z^ ŽƵŶĐŝůĂŶĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞ
ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ
ďLJ^ ďŽĚŝĞƐ
ŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƌĂĨƚ DĞĞƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ
/ŶĚ^ƚŽƚŚĞŽƵŶĐŝů ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞŽĨƚŚĞ E&Z;DͿŶŽƚŝĨŝĞƐ
ŵĞŵďĞƌƐŽĨ//ĂŶĚ ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞ /ŶĚ^ƵŶĚĞƌ
ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞ ďŽĚŝĞƐƚŽĂƐĐĞƌƚĂŝŶ ŽŵƉĂŶŝĞƐĐƚ
ďŽĚŝĞƐ ƚŚĞŝƌǀŝĞǁƐ
Accordingly, it has notified 39 Ind AS and has laid down Ind AS transition roadmap for companies
and non-banking finance companies excluding banking companies and insurance companies.
The implementation of Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) converged with International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by Indian Companies is a monumental step in the
accounting history of India. It was possible due to the relentless and collective efforts of regulators
and accounting professionals of this large growing economy aspiring to be economic superpower
in the coming decades. ICAI believes that Ind AS implementation has provided better insights
into the financial affairs of the companies and Ind AS based financial statements reflect the
underlying economics of the transactions/events in a transparent and unbiased manner. It has
also improved the comparability and benchmarking of the financials of Indian Companies with
Global Peers, thereby improving the accessibility of Indian Companies to Global Capital Markets.
IFRS convergence is an ongoing initiative, and the process of issuing IFRS is dynamic. The IASB
issues new/revised IFRS on a regular basis. To avoid significant changes in Ind AS for a period
post its transition in India, it was decided to keep the applicability date of some of the IFRS earlier
than its applicability date announced by IASB.
Example 1
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers is effective for annual periods beginning on or
after 1st January 2017, while in India Ind AS 115 was applicable from 1 st April 2018. Hence, it
wasn’t implemented in advance of IFRS 15. Another example is that of IFRS 16 Leases, which
was issued in 2016 and made effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after
1 st January 2019, while in India Ind AS 116 was applicable from 1 st April 2019.
IND AS Description
Ind AS 105 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
Ind AS 2 Inventories
Ind AS 41 Agriculture
Further, IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) is the interpretative body of the IASB. Its main
work is to address application issues and suggest official IFRS Interpretations, which are
eventually approved by the IASB. These interpretations are titled ‘IFRIC’ and numbered as IFRIC
1,2 etc. Interpretations issued before 2003 were titled ‘SIC’ and some of them are still in force
today. IFRIC and SICs are included in Ind AS as part of Appendix in relevant Ind AS.
• Total reporting standards issued under IFRS are 41. Total reporting standards issued under
Ind AS are 39. IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts and IAS 26 Accounting and Reporting by
Retirement Benefit Plans are yet not notified in India as Ind AS.
• Total interpretations under IFRS (IFRIC + SIC) are 18. Total interpretation included under
Ind AS (Appendix to relevant standards) are 17. IFRIC 2 – Members’ Shares in Co-operative
Entities and Similar Instruments and SIC -7 Introduction of the Euro are neither included
under Ind AS nor notified. However, Appendix C to Ind AS 103 – Business Combinations
was developed and additionally included in India for which no corresponding IFRIC or SIC is
available.
9.3 How Ind AS have been structured?
Ind AS have followed the structure of IFRS and IAS and have not changed the same. Ind AS
retained the paragraph numbers of IFRS and IAS too to allow readers to refer back similar
guidance under IFRS and IAS while also appreciating the carve out and carve in. For ex. If
Ind AS do not contain corresponding paragraph of IFRS, the same number had been kept blank
with a note mentioned referring to Appendix – Comparison with IFRS.
Ind AS have following components and they are generally structured as follows:
1) Objective – What is the main purpose for which the Ind AS is formed is mentioned in this
heading. On a bird’s eye view, it mentions the issues dealt by it and what objective it seeks
to achieve from laying the principles in it.
Example 2
Following is Ind AS 2’s objective:
“The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the accounting treatment for inventories. A
primary issue in accounting for inventories is the amount of cost to be recognised as an asset
and carried forward until the related revenues are recognised. This Standard deals with the
determination of cost and its subsequent recognition as an expense, including any write -
down to net realisable value. It also provides guidance on the cost formulas that are used to
assign costs to inventories.”
2) Scope – What the standard intends to cover in its ambit is mentioned in the scope heading.
In many cases, it defines specifically what it intends not to cover. For e.g.: Para 2 of
Ind AS 2 states that it applies to all inventories except financial instruments and biologica l
assets related to agricultural activity and agricultural produce at the point of harvest .
3) Definitions – It includes definitions of various terms used in the standards. For standards
which are converged from International Accounting standards, definition is a part of structure
while for standards which are converged from International Financial Reporting standards
(Ind AS 101 onwards), the definitions are included in appendices.
4) Content of the Standard – This includes the main principles of the standard. It generally
contains principle of recognition, measurement, subsequent measurement along with any
other standard specific contents grouped in appropriate headings .
5) Disclosure – This section covers what qualitative / quantitative information required to be
disclosed in financial statements pertaining to the matter covered in the standard. Wherever
applicable, it also contains how a particular asset / liability / income / expense should be
presented in financial statements.
6) Transitional provisions and effective date –For any Ind AS notified, it mentions effective
date and transitional provisions from which it would be applicable. Under Ind AS, transitional
provisions are mentioned mainly at two places. Firstly, it is broadly mentioned in Ind AS 101
- First-time Adoption of Indian Accounting Standard and secondly in the individual Ind AS
wherever applicable. The transitional provisions mentioned in Ind AS 101 are applicable to
first time adopter of Ind AS. The transitional provisions mentioned in individual standards
are applicable to entities that have already applied Ind AS. In many standards, transitional
provisions and effective date are mentioned in Appendices
7) Appendices – As and where applicable, the Ind AS also has appendices which are integral
part of the standard. They mainly consist of:
a. Explanation on industry specific issues which require detailed guidance. For e.g.:
Appendix to Ind AS 16 contains treatment of stripping costs in the production phase of
a surface mine
b. Application Guidance – These are mainly in standards which are converged from
International Financial Reporting Standards (Ind AS 101 and onwards). It contains
detailed guidance in applying the principles mentioned in the standard
c. Defined terms – It mentions definition of terms mentioned in the standard
d. References to matters contained in other Ind AS - It lists the appendix which is a part of
another Indian Accounting Standard and makes reference to the particular standard.
e. Comparison with IFRS – Differences with IFRS are explained in this section
f. IFRIC and SIC applicable and relevant for the respective Ind AS
In each Ind AS, certain texts are highlighted in bold while certain are in plain. The text in
bold mentions the principle while the text in plain mentions its application guidance / other
explanation. Paragraphs set in bold type and plain type, have equal authority. In
Ind AS 101, principles are numbered in chronological order while detailed explanation or
guidance applicable to these principles are included in the respective Appendices, as
applicable.
Phase 1
2015 2016-17
Phase II
Following companies were covered under Phase II for accounting periods beginning on or after
1 st April 2017, with the comparatives for the periods ending on 31 st March 2017:
a) companies whose equity or debt securities are listed or are in the process of being listed on
any stock exchange in India or outside India and having net worth of less than rupee s five
hundred crore;
b) companies other than those covered in sub-clause (a) above i.e. unlisted companies having
net worth of rupees two hundred and fifty crore or more but less than rupees five hundred
crore.
The Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 clarifies that, the roadmap shall not
be applicable to companies whose securities are listed or are in the proc ess of being listed on
SME exchange as referred to in Chapter XB or on the Institutional Trading Platform without initial
public offering in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XC of the Securities and Exchange
Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009. For the
purpose, it clarifies SME Exchange to have the same meaning as assigned to it in Chapter XB of
the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements)
Regulations, 2009.
Phase 2
2016-17 2017-18
Ind AS would not be applicable to companies other than listed companies whose net worth is less
than ` 250 Crores and they will continue to follow AS as per its applicability discussed above.
However, they can voluntary adopt Ind AS.
It is notable that the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 gave an option to the
companies for early adoption of Ind AS for their financial statements for accounting periods
beginning on or after 1 st April 2015, with the comparatives for the periods ending on
31st March 2015 or any time thereafter.
10.1.1 Key Matters on Transition
1) Comparative Financial Information
All companies applying Ind AS are required to present comparative information as per Ind
AS for one year. To comply with this requirement, Ind AS will be applicable from the beginning
of the previous period.
Example 3
A company adopted Ind AS from 1 st April, 20X4 for its accounting period 20X4-20X5. Hence
it will be required to prepare its first Ind AS financial statements for financial year 20X4-20X5
with comparatives for financial year 20X3-20X4, and the date of transition to Ind AS will be
considered as 1 st April 20X3.
2) Ind AS applicability
As per clause 4 of the aforementioned MCA notification, companies to which Indian
Accounting Standards (Ind AS) are applicable as specified in th ose rules shall prepare their
first set of financial statements in accordance with the Ind AS effective at the end of its first
Ind AS reporting period.
Example 4
A company adopted Ind AS from 1 st April, 20X4 for its accounting period 20X4-20X5. Hence
it shall prepare Ind AS financial statements for financial year 20X4-20X5 by applying all
Ind AS duly effective as on 31st March 20X5.
3) Consistent Application of Ind AS
As per clause 9 of the notification, once a company starts following the Indian Accounting
Standards (Ind AS) either voluntarily or mandatorily on the basis of criteria specifie d, it shall
be required to follow the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) for all the subsequent
financial statements even if any of the criteria specified in the Rules does not subsequently
apply to it.
4) Ind AS Applicability for Indian Group Companies
As specified in the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 issued by MCA,
if Ind AS is applicable to a company, it would also be applicable to its holding company,
subsidiary company, associate company and joint venture.
5) Ind AS Applicability for Overseas Group Companies
As per clause 5 of the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 issued by
MCA, overseas subsidiary, associate, joint venture and other similar entities of an Indian
company may prepare its standalone financial statements in accordance with the
requirements of the specific jurisdiction, provided that such Indian company shall prepare its
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Indian Accounting Standards
(Ind AS) either voluntarily or mandatorily as per the criteria as specified in the Rules.
6) Ind AS Applicability for Standalone and Consolidated Financial Statements
As per clause 3 of the notification issued by MCA, Ind AS once required to be complied with
in accordance with these rules, shall apply to both stand-alone financial statements and
consolidated financial statements.
10.1.2 Calculation of Net Worth
For the purpose of determining the applicability of Ind AS as per the roadmap, net worth shall
have meaning as per clause 57 of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Following is the definition of net worth as per the section:
“Net worth means the aggregate value of the paid-up share capital and all reserves created out of
the profits and securities premium account, after deducting the aggregate value of the
accumulated losses, deferred expenditure and miscellaneous expenditure not written off, as per
the audited balance sheet, but does not include reserves created out of revaluation of assets,
write-back of depreciation and amalgamation;”
Solution
Calculation of Net Worth:
Particulars ` in crores
Equity Share Capital 160
Securities Premium 200
General Reserve 150
Profit and Loss A/c 75
Miscellaneous Expenditure not written off (80)
Net Worth as per Section 2(57) of The Companies Act, 2013 505
Note – Revaluation Reserve would not be included in the calculation of net worth as per definition
mentioned in section 2(57) of The Companies Act, 2013
The company is a listed company and it does meet the net worth threshold of ` 500 Crores. Hence
it would be covered under phase I. Hence Ind AS would be applicable to the company for
accounting periods beginning on or after 1 st April 2016.
Even if Company A is an unlisted company as company A’s net worth is more than 500 Crores, it
would be covered under Phase I of the road map and hence Ind AS would be applicable for the
accounting periods beginning on or after 1 st April 2016.
Illustration 2
Let’s say in Illustration 1, the balance of profit and loss account is negative ` 375 crores. When
Ind AS should be applicable to Company A? Will you answer change if Company A is an unlisted
company?
Solution
If the balance of Profit and Loss A/c is negative 375 Crores, the net worth as per section 2(57) of
The Companies Act, 2013 would be ` 55 Crores (Equity share capital ` 160 Cr + Securities
Premium ` 200 Cr + General Reserve ` 150 Cr – Debit balance of P&L `375 Cr – Miscellaneous
expenditure not written off ` 80 Cr). Hence, it does not meet the criteria as mentioned in Phase I
i.e. Listed company or Net worth of ` 500 Cr or more.
However, as Company A is a listed company, it will irrespective be covered under Phase II as the
first criteria of phase II states “companies whose equity or debt securities are listed or are in the
process of being listed on any stock exchange in India or outside India and having net worth of
less than rupees five hundred crore”. Hence, Ind AS would be applicable to Company A for the
accounting periods beginning on or after 1 st April 2017.
If Company A is an unlisted company, Ind AS would not be applicable until it breaches the net
worth criteria mentioned in the roadmap.
Illustration 3
The net worth of Company B (an unlisted company) was ` 600 crores as on 31 st March 2014.
However due to losses incurred in FY 14-15, the net worth of the company was ` 400 Crores as
on 31st March 2015. From when company B shall apply Ind AS?
Solution
Here the company’s net worth as on cut-off date was greater than ` 500 crores, which suggests
that it should be covered under phase I of the roadmap. A question may however arise in mind
that since, the net worth as on immediately preceding year-end was ` 400 crores, would the
company be covered under phase II of the roadmap?
“It may be noted that the net worth shall be calculated in accordance with the stand-alone financial
statements of the company as on 31 st March, 2014. Accordingly, if the net worth threshold criteria
for a company are once met, then it shall be required to comply with Ind AS, irrespective of the
fact that as on later date its net worth falls below the criteria specified.”
In view of the above, the Company B will be required to follow Ind AS for accounting periods
beginning on or after 1 st April 2016
Illustration 4
The net worth of Company C (an unlisted company) was ` 400 crores as on 31 st March 2014.
However, the net worth of the company was ` 600 Crores as on 31 st March 2015. From when
company B shall apply Ind AS?
Solution
Similar issue has been encountered in ITFG Bulletin 1, Issue 1 which gives reference to clause
2b of the notification wherein it is stated that:
“For companies which are not in existence on 31 st March, 2014 or an existing company falling
under any of thresholds specified in sub-rule (1) for the first time after 31 st March, 2014, the net
worth shall be calculated on the basis of the first audited financial statements ending after that
date in respect of which it meets the thresholds specified in sub -rule (1)”
Hence, any company that meets the thresholds as specified in the Companies (Indian Accounting
Standards) Rules, 2015 in a particular financial year, Ind AS will become applicable to such
company in immediately next financial year. Hence, in the present case, Company C is covered
by Phase I of the roadmap and accordingly, Ind AS will be applicable to Company C for accounting
periods beginning on or after 1 st April 2016
Illustration 5
Company D is the parent company of group A. Company A is an unlisted company having net
worth of 60 crores as on 31 st March 2014. Following are the other companies of the group.
ŽŵƉĂŶLJ
ŽŵƉĂŶLJ ŽŵƉĂŶLJ,
;^ƵďƐŝĚŝĂƌLJŽĨ
Ϳ ;^ƵďƐŝĚŝĂƌLJŽĨͿ
ŽŵƉĂŶLJ'
ŽŵƉĂŶLJ& ŽŵƉĂŶLJ/
;ƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞŽĨ
;^ƵďƐŝĚŝĂƌLJŽĨͿ ;^ƵďƐŝĚŝĂƌLJŽĨ,Ϳ
Ϳ
All the companies in above structure are unlisted companies and the net worth of company E is
` 300 Crores and net worth of all the other companies is below ` 250 crores. To which company
would Ind AS be applicable?
Solution
As mentioned in the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, if Ind AS is applicable
to a company, it would also be applicable to its Holding Company, subsidiary company, associate
company and Joint Venture.
As the turnover of company E is above ` 250 crores, it would be covered under Phase II of the
roadmap. Hence, its subsidiary (Company F), associate (Company G) and Holding (Company D)
would also be covered under Ind AS with effect from 1 st April 2017.
With respect to other companies of the group, following guidance is given in ITFG clarification
bulletin 15, Issue 10: “It may be noted that Ind AS applies to holding, subsidiary, joint venture and
associate companies of the companies which meet the net worth/listing criteria. This requirement
does not extend to another fellow subsidiary of a holding company which is required to adopt Ind
AS because of its holding company relationship with a subsidiary meeting the net worth/listing
criteria. Holding company will be required to prepare separate and consolidated financial
statements mandatorily under Ind AS, if one of its subsidiaries meets the specified criteria and
therefore, such subsidiaries may be required by the holding company to furnish financial
statements as per Ind AS for the purpose of preparing Holding company’s consolidated Ind AS
financial statements. Such fellow subsidiaries may, however, voluntarily opt to prepare their
financial statements as per Ind AS.”
Hence the other companies of the group i.e. Company H and Company I would not be covered
under Ind AS. However, as mentioned in ITFG, Company H and I would be required to prepare
its financial statements under Ind AS so as to facilitate Company D for preparation of its
consolidated financial statements. Hence, though statutorily Company H and I may continue to
prepare its financial statements under AS, but it will also have to converge to Ind AS. Moreover,
they may also opt to voluntarily adopt Ind AS and prepare its statutory accounts under Ind AS too.
Illustration 7
ABC Inc., incorporated in a foreign country has a net worth of ` 700 Crores. It has two subsidiaries
Company X whose net worth as on 31 st March 2014 is ` 600 Crores and Company Y whose net
worth is ` 150 Crores. Whether Company X and Y would be required to follow Ind AS from
accounting periods commencing on or after 1 st April 2016 on the basis of their own net worth or
on the basis of the net worth of ABC Inc.?
Solution
Similar issue has been dealt in ITFG Clarification Bulletin 2, Issue 2. ITFG noted that as per Rule
4(1)(ii)(a) of the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, Company X having net
worth of ` 600 crores at the end of the financial year 2015-16, would be required to prepare its
financial statements for the accounting periods commencing from 1st April, 2016, as per the
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015. While Company Y Ltd. having net worth
of ` 150 crores in the year 2015-16, would be required to prepare its financial statements as per
the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006.
Since, the foreign company ABC Inc., is not a company incorporated under the Companies Act,
2013 or the earlier Companies Act, 1956, it is not required to prepare its financial statements as
per the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015. As the foreign company is not
required to prepare financial statements based on Ind AS, the net worth of foreign company ABC
would not be the basis for deciding whether Indian Subsidiary Company X Ltd. and Company Y
Ltd. are required to prepare financial statements based on Ind AS.
10.2 Ind AS Roadmap for Non -Banking Financial Companies (NBFC)
For the purpose, NBFC is defined as a Non-Banking Financial Company as defined in clause (f)
of section 45-I of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and includes Housing Finance Companies,
Merchant Banking companies, Micro Finance Companies, Mutual Benefit Companies, Venture
Capital Fund Companies, Stock Broker or Sub-Broker Companies, Nidhi Companies, Chit
Companies, Securitisation and Reconstruction Companies, Mortgage Guarantee Companies,
Pension Fund Companies, Asset Management Companies and Core Investment Companies
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, in its circular dated 30 th March 2016, amended the Companies
(Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 to include its applicability to Non-Banking Finance
Companies. As per the circular, NBFCs to apply Ind AS in the following two phases :
Phase I
As per the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, following NBFCs were cov ered
under Phase I for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 st April 2018, with the comparatives
for the periods ending on 31 st March 2018.
a. NBFCs having net worth of ` 500 Crores or more
b. Holding, subsidiary, associate or Joint Venture of NBFCs already covered under sub clause
(a) above, other than companies already covered under Ind AS roadmap for Non -Financial
companies
Phase 1
2017-18 2018-19
Opening Balance Sheet Comparative for 31st March, Financial Statements for the
1st April, 2017 2018 year ended 31st March, 2019
Phase II
Following NBFCs were covered under Phase II for accounting periods beginning on or after
1 st April 2019, with the comparatives for the periods ending on 31 st March 2019
a. NBFCs whose equity or debt securities are listed or in the process of listing on any stock
exchange in India or outside India and having net worth less than rupees five hundred crore;
b. NBFCs, that are unlisted companies, having net worth of rupees two -hundred and fifty crore
or more but less than rupees five hundred crore; and
c. Holding, subsidiary, associate or Joint Venture of Companies already covered under sub
clause (a) and (b) above, other than companies already covered under Ind AS roadmap for
Non-financial companies
Phase 2
2018-19 2019-20
Opening Balance Sheet Comparative for 31st March, Financial Statements for the
1st April, 2018 2019 year ended 31st March, 2020
NBFCs having net worth below rupees two fifty crores and not covered above shall continue to
apply ASs. Further, where Ind AS is applicable to NBFCs, the same shall apply to both standalone
and consolidated financial statements.
It is notable that NBFC can apply Ind AS only if they fall in any of the above criteria. Voluntary
adoption of Ind AS by NBFCs are not allowed.
10.2.1 Clarification on calculation of Net Worth
For the purposes of calculation of net worth of NBFCs for determining the applicability of Ind AS,
the following principles shall apply, namely:-
a) the net worth shall be calculated in accordance with the stand-alone financial statements of
the NBFCs as on 31st March 2016 or the first audited financial statements for accounting
period which ends after that date;
b) for NBFCs which are not in existence on 31st March 2016 or an existing NBFC falling first
time, after 31st March 2016, the net worth shall be calculated on the basis of the first audited
stand-alone financial statements ending after that date, in respect of which it meets the
thresholds.
Explanation.- For the purposes of sub-clause (b), the NBFCs meeting the specified thresholds as
given in the roadmap for the first time at the end of an accounting year shall apply Ind AS from
the immediately next accounting year
For E.g. –
(i) The NBFCs meeting threshold for the first time as on 31st March, 2019 shall apply Ind AS
for the financial year 2019-20 onwards.
(ii) The NBFCs meeting threshold for the first time as on 31st March, 2020 shall apply Ind AS
for the financial year 2020-21 onwards and so on.
Application of Ind AS to non-finance companies whose parent / subsidiary or associate or
joint venture is a NBFC
The date for application of Ind AS to non-finance companies is not aligned with that of NBFCs.
Hence it has been clarified in the notification that the companies shall apply AS or Ind AS on the
basis of respective standard applicable to them. However, for the purpose of preparation of
Consolidated Financial Statements it is clarified that :
A) where an NBFC is a parent (at ultimate level or at intermediate level), and prepares
consolidated financial statements as per AS, and its subsidiaries, associates and joint
ventures are non-finance companies and are required to prepare financial statements as per
Ind AS as per the roadmap given in The Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rule s,
2015, such subsidiaries, associate and joint venture shall prepare its financials as per Ind
AS. However, such subsidiaries, associate and joint venture has to provide the relevant
financial statement data in accordance with the accounting policies foll owed by the parent
company for consolidation purposes (until the NBFC is covered under Ind AS.
B) Where a parent is a non-finance company covered under Ind AS as per the roadmap given
in The Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 and has a NBFC s ubsidiary,
associate or a joint venture, the parent has to prepare Ind AS-compliant consolidated
financial statements and the NBFC subsidiary, associate and a joint venture has to
provide the relevant financial statement data in accordance with the accoun ting policies
followed by the parent company for consolidation purposes (until the NBFC is covered under
Ind AS).
It implies that the NBFC subsidiary, associate or a joint venture, in such case shall continue to
prepare the financials under AS until Ind AS are applicable to it.
Illustration 8
As per the roadmap, Ind AS is applicable to Company X from the financial year 2017-18. Company
X (non-finance company) is a subsidiary of Company Y (NBFC). Company Y is an unlisted NBFC
company having net worth of ` 400 crores. What will be the date of applicability of Ind AS for
company X and company Y? If Ind AS applicability date for parent NBFC is different from the
applicability date of corporate subsidiary, then, how will the consolidated financial statements of
parent NBFC be prepared?
Solution
In accordance with the roadmap, it may be noted that NBFCs having net worth of less than 500
crore shall apply Ind AS from 1 April, 2019 onwards. Further, the holding, subsidiary, joint venture
or associate company of such an NBFC other than those covered by corporate roadmap shall also
apply Ind AS from 1 April, 2019.
Accordingly, in the given case, Company Y (NBFC) shall apply Ind AS for the financial year
beginning 1 April, 2019 with comparative for the period ended 31 March, 2019 . Company X shall
apply Ind AS in its statutory individual financial statements from financial year 2017-2018 (as per
the corporate roadmap). However, for the purpose of Consolidation by Company Y for financial
years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, Company X shall also prepare its individual financial statements
as per AS.
10.3 Ind AS Roadmap for Banking and Insurance Companies
As per the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) (Amendment) Rules, 2016, The Banking
Companies and Insurance Companies shall apply the Ind AS as notified by the Reserve Bank of
India (RBI) and Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (IRDA) respectively. As the same
are yet to be notified, Ind AS is not applicable to Banking and Insurance Companies presently.
It is notable that Banks and Insurance Companies shall not be allowed to voluntarily adopt
Ind AS. However, this does not preclude them from providing Ind AS compliant financial
statements for the purpose of preparation of consolidated financial statements by its
parent/investor, as required by the parent/investor to comply with the existing requirements of law.
10.4 Ind AS Roadmap for Mutual Funds
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 (the MF
Regulations) lay down the regulatory framework for operations and functioning of Mutual Funds
(MFs). The MF Regulations are amended by SEBI from time to time to enhance transparency and
disclosures, to address emerging issues, to protect the interests of investors, and to strengthen
the regulatory framework of MFs.
On 25 January 2022, SEBI vide a notification issued the SEBI (Mutual Funds) (Amendment)
Regulations, 2022. As per this notification, the financial statements and accounts of MF schemes
will be prepared in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS). Additionally, SEBI
vide a circular dated 4 February 2022 (the circular) provided certain guidelines on accounting with
respect to Ind AS for MFs. The circular also provides specific formats of the financial statements
to be prepared for the MF schemes under Ind AS. The requirements of the circular will become
applicable from 1 April 2023.
• Section 230 – Power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors and members and
Section 232 – Merger and amalgamation of Companies, the scheme of compromise or
arrangement is to be sanctioned by the tribunal only after obtaining a certificate from the
company’s auditor that the accounting treatment given proposed in the scheme of
compromise or arrangement is in conformity with the accounting standards mentioned in
Section 133.
• Section 66 – Reduction of Share Capital, which states that no application for reduction of
share capital shall be sanctioned by the Tribunal unless the accounting treatment, proposed
by the company for such reduction is in conformity with the accounting standards specified
in section 133 or any other provision of this Act and a certificate to that effect by the
company‘s auditor has been filed with the Tribunal.
11.2 Relevant SEBI Rules and Regulations
Formats for publishing financial results (Circular dated 30th November 2015)
SEBI via circular dated 30 th November, 2015 amended the format for publishing quarterly financial
statements. Point 5 of the circular clarified that Companies adopting the Ind AS in terms of
Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs
on 16 th February, 2015 while publishing quarterly / annual financial results under Regulation 33 of
the Listing Regulations, 2015, shall ensure that the comparatives filed along with such
quarterly/annual financial results are also Ind AS compliant.
Clarification regarding applicability of Indian Accounting Standards to disclosures in offer
documents under SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018
The applicability of Ind AS for financial information (last 3 years financials) to be disclosed in the
offer document as specified under SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018 and provided the year wise
applicability of Ind AS based on the period of filling offer document.
Example 6
For a company filling offer document between 1 st April 2021 to 31st March 2022, the financial
statements of latest financial year, second latest financial year and third latest financial year shall
be as per Ind AS.
Revised Formats for financial results and implementation of Ind AS by Listed Entities
For the period ending on or after 31st March, 2017, the formats for Unaudited / Audited quarterly
financial results i.e. Statement of Profit and Loss and the Unaudited / Audited Half-Yearly Balance
Sheet to be submitted by the Listed Entities, with the stock exchanges, shall be as pe r the formats
for Balance Sheet and Statement of Profit and Loss (excluding notes and detailed sub -
classification) as prescribed in Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013. However, Banking
Companies and Insurance Companies shall follow the formats as prescribed under the respective
Acts / Regulations as specified by their Regulators.
6 th April, 2016, Schedule III is amended to include a format of Financial Statements for a company
preparing Financial Statements in compliance with the Companies Ind AS Rules. Schedule III has
been further amended vide the Government Notification dated 24 th March, 2021 to include certain
additional presentation and disclosures requirements and changes some existing requirements.
These changes need to be applied in preparation of financial statements for the financial year
commencing on or after 1 st April, 2021. All companies that prepare, either voluntarily or
mandatorily, Financial Statements in compliance with the Companies Ind AS Rules, should
consider Ind AS Schedule III as well as ICAI’s Guidance Note on Division II to Schedule III to the
Companies Act, 2013. Additionally, preparers of financial statements should also consider
requirements of the Act as well as other Statutes, Notifications, Circulars issued by various
Regulators.
Division II to Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 has been annexed at the end of the
study material for reference.
A limited liability partnership is a body corporate and not a partnership firm as envisaged
under the Partnership Act, 1932. Hence, disclosures pertaining to Investments in partnership
firms will not extend to investments in limited liability partnerships. The investments in limited
liability partnerships will be disclosed separately under ‘other investment’.
Note: Any application money paid towards securities, where security has not been allotted
on the date of the Balance Sheet, shall be disclosed as a separate line item under ‘other
non-current financial assets’. In case the investment is of current investment in nature, such
share application money shall be accordingly, disclosed under other current financial assets.
3) Trade Receivables: A receivable shall be classified as 'trade receivable' if it is in respect of
the amount due on account of goods sold or services rendered in the normal course of
business and the company has a right to an amount of consideration that is unconditional
(i.e. if only the passage of time is required before payment of that consideration is due).
Hence, amounts due under contractual rights, other than arising out of sale of goods or
rendering of services, cannot be included within Trade Receivables. Such items may include
dues in respect of insurance claims, sale of Property, Plant and Equipment, contractually
reimbursable expenses, etc. Such receivables should be classified as "other financial assets"
and each such item should be disclosed nature-wise
The ageing of the trade receivables needs to be determined from the due date of the invoice.
Due date is generally considered to be the date on which the payment of an invoice falls due.
The due date of an invoice is determined based on terms agreed upon between the buyer
and supplier. In case if the due date is neither agreed in writing nor orally, then the ageing
related disclosure needs to be prepared from the transaction date.
Schedule III requires split of trade receivables between ‘disputed’ and ‘undisputed’. These
terms have not been defined in the Schedule III. A dispute is a matter of facts and
circumstances of the case; however, dispute means disagreement between two parties
demonstrated by some positive evidence which supports or corroborates the fact of
disagreement. In case there are any disputes such fact should also be considered while
assessing the credit risk associated with respective party while computing the impairment
loss. However, a dispute might not always be an indicator of counterparty’s credit risk and
vice-versa. Hence, both of these should be evaluated independently for the purpose of
making these disclosures.
4) Other Non-Current Financial Assets – Ind AS Schedule III does not specify about the
presentation of finance lease receivables. However, the guidance note clarifies that he non-
current portion of a finance lease receivable shall be presented under ‘Other non -current
financial assets’ while its current portion shall be presented under ‘Other current financial
assets’.
5) Current Assets - As per Ind AS Schedule III, all items of assets and liabilities are to be
bifurcated between current and non-current portions. In some cases, the items presented
under the “non-current” head of the Balance Sheet may not have a corresponding “current”
head under the format given in Ind AS Schedule III. Since Ind AS Schedule III permits the
use of additional line items, in such cases the current portion should be classified under the
“Current” category of the respective balance as a separate line item and ot her relevant
disclosures should be made.
6) Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents is not defined in Ind AS Schedule
III however, according to Ind AS 7 Statement of Cash Flows, Cash is defined to include cash
on hand and demand deposits with banks. Cash Equivalents are defined as short term,
highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash and which
are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
As per para 8 of Ind AS 7 “where bank overdrafts which are repayable on demand form an
integral part of an entity’s cash management, bank overdrafts are included as a component
of cash and cash equivalents. A characteristic of such banking arrangements is that the
bank balance often fluctuates from being positive to overdrawn.” Although Ind AS 7 permits
bank overdrafts to be included as cash and cash equivalent, however for the purpose of
presentation in the balance sheet, it is not appropriate to include bank overdraft as a
component of cash and cash equivalents unless the offset conditions as given in paragraph
42 of Ind AS 32 are complied with. Bank overdraft, in the balance sheet, should be included
as ‘borrowings’ under Financial Liabilities.
7) Current Tax Assets - If amount of tax already paid in respect of current and prior periods
exceeds the amount of tax due for those periods (assessment year -wise and not cumulative
unless tax laws allow for e.g., say tax laws in the country of overseas subsidiary permits),
then such excess tax shall be recognised as an asset. The excess tax paid (presented as
current tax assets) may not be expected to be recovered / realised within one year from the
balance sheet date and if so, the same shall be presented under non -current assets. An
entity should evaluate whether current tax assets meet the definition of current assets or not
and should accordingly present the same.
8) Equity Share Capital - The accounting definition of ‘Equity’ is principle based as compared
to the legal definition of ‘Equity’ or ‘Share’, such that any contract that evidences residual
interest in an entity’s net asset is termed as ‘Equity’ irrespective of whether it is legally
recognized as a ‘Share’ or not. Accordingly, all instruments (including convertible preference
shares and convertible debentures) that meet the definition of ‘Equity’ as per Ind AS 32 in its
entirety and when they do not have any component of liability, should be considered as
having the nature of ‘Equity’ for the purpose of Ind AS Schedule III. Such instruments shall
be termed as ‘Instruments entirely equity in nature’.
9) Borrowings- The phrase "term loan" has not been defined in the Schedule III. Term loans
normally have a fixed or pre-determined maturity period or a repayment schedule.
Terms of repayment of term loans and other loans shall be disclosed. The term ‘other loans’
is used in general sense and should be interpreted to mean all categories listed under the
heading ‘Non – Current borrowings’ as per Ind AS Schedule III. Disclosure of terms of
repayment should be made preferably for each loan unless the repayment terms of individual
loans within a category are similar, in which case, they may be aggregated.
Ind AS Schedule III requires presenting ‘current maturities of long-term debt’ under ‘current
borrowings’. Long-term debt is specified in Ind AS Schedule III as a borrowing having a
period of more than twelve months at the time of origination. The portion of non-current
borrowings, which is due for payments within twelve months of the reporting date is required
to be classified under “current borrowings” while the balance amount should be classified
under non-current borrowings.
10) Trade Payable - A payable shall be classified as 'trade payable' if it is in respect of the amount
due on account of goods purchased or services received in the normal course of business.
Hence, amounts due under contractual obligations or which are statutory payables should not
be included within Trade Payables. Such items may include dues payable in respect of
statutory obligations like contribution to provident fund or contractual obligations like
contractually reimbursable expenses, amounts due towards purchase of capital goods, etc .
Due date shall be the date by when a buyer should make payment to the supplier as per
terms agreed upon between the buyer and supplier. In case if the due date is neither agreed
in writing nor oral, then the disclosure needs to be prepared from the transa ction date.
Transaction date shall be the date on which the liability is recognised in the books of accounts
as per the requirement of applicable standards. A dispute is a matter of facts and
circumstances of the case. However, dispute means disagreement between two parties
demonstrated by some positive evidence which supports or corroborates the fact of
disagreement. Reference is given to the term “Dispute” as defined under the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
11) Current Borrowings - Loans payable on demand should be treated as part of current
borrowings. Current borrowings will include all loans payable within a period of 12 months
from the date of the loan. In the case of current borrowings, the period and the amount of
defaults existing as at the date of the Balance Sheet should be disclosed (item -wise).
To provide relevant information to the users of the financial statements regarding total
amount of liability under the respective category of noncurrent borrowings, Companies shall
provide the amount of non-current as well as current portion for each of the respective
category of non-current borrowings either by way of a note or a schedule or a cross -
reference, as appropriate. This shall be in addition to Ind AS Schedule III requirements for
presenting ‘current maturities of long-term borrowings’ under current borrowings.
12) Other Current Liabilities - Trade Deposits and Security Deposits, which do not meet the
definition of financial liabilities, should be classified as ‘Others’ grouped un der this head.
Others may also include liabilities in the nature of statutory dues such as Withholding taxes,
Service Tax, VAT, Excise Duty, Goods and Services Tax (GST), etc .
13) Contingent Liabilities and Commitments - A contingent liability in respect of guarantees
arises when a company issue guarantees to another person on behalf of a third party e.g.
when it undertakes to guarantee the loan given to a subsidiary or to another company or
gives a guarantee that another company will perform its contractual o bligations. However,
where a company undertakes to perform its own obligations, and for this purpose issues,
what is called a "guarantee", it does not represent a contingent liability and it is misleading
to show such items as contingent liabilities in the Balance Sheet. For various reasons, it is
customary for guarantees to be issued by Bankers e.g. for payment of insurance premium,
deferred payments to foreign suppliers, letters of credit, etc. For this purpose, the company
issues a "counter-guarantee" to its Bankers. Such "counter-guarantee" is not really a
guarantee at all, but is an undertaking to perform what is in any event the obligation of the
company, namely, to pay the insurance premium when demanded or to make deferred
payments when due. Hence, such performance guarantees and counter guarantees should
not be disclosed as contingent liabilities.
14) Revenue from Operations and other operating income- Indirect taxes such as Sales tax,
Goods and Services tax, etc. are generally collected from the customer on behalf of the
government in majority of the cases. However, this may not hold true in all cases and it is
possible that a company may be acting as principal rather than as an agent in collecting
these taxes. Whether revenue should be presented gross or net of taxes should depend on
whether the company is acting as a principal and hence, is responsible for paying tax on its
own account or, whether it is acting as an agent i.e. simply collecting and paying tax on
behalf of government authorities. If the entity is the principal, then revenue should also be
grossed up for the tax billed to the customer and the tax payable should be shown as an
expense. However, in cases, where a company collects such taxes only as an agent,
revenue should be presented net of taxes.
The term “other operating revenue” is not defined. This would include Revenue arising from
a company’s operating activities, i.e., either its principal or ancillary revenue -generating
activities, but which is not revenue arising from sale of products or rendering of services.
Whether a particular income constitutes “other operating revenue” or “other income” is to be
decided based on the facts of each case and detailed understanding of the company’s
activities.
15) Exceptional Items - The term ‘Exceptional items’ is neither defined in Ind AS Schedule III nor
in Ind AS. However, Ind AS 1 has reference to such items. Ind AS 1 states that disclosing
the components of financial performance assists users in understanding the financial
performance achieved and in making projections of future financial performance. An entity
considers factors including materiality and the nature and function of the items of income
and expense. It indicates circumstances that would give rise to the separate disclosures of
items of income and expenses and include:
(a) Write-downs of inventories to net realisable value or of property, plant and equipment
to recoverable amount, as well as reversals of such write-downs;
(b) restructurings of the activities of an entity and reversals of any provisions for the costs
of restructuring;
(c) disposals of items of property, plant and equipment;
(d) disposals of investments;
(e) discontinued operations;
(f) litigation settlements; and
(g) other reversals of provisions.
SUMMARY
• Accounting Standards is an essential building block in the economics financial reporting
world. These Accounting Standards provide principles and rules that must be followed to
ensure accuracy, consistency and comparability of financial statements
• Prior to introduction of Ind AS, ASB has issued various AS to deal with various reporting
matters which were known as AS and were applicable to companies and also non-corporate
entities.
• To enable free flow of capital across jurisdiction without increasing cost and complexity of
compliances along with need to provide comprehensive guidance to deal with rising
complexities of business and financial world, the need to have Global Accounting Standards
have strongly emerged, leading to rise of IFRS.
• In response to commitment to G20, MCA has notified IFRS converged Standards i.e. Ind AS
phase wise for India Corporates in 2015, which eventually got extended to NBFCs.
• MCA and ICAI had worked extensively together to align Statutory provisions not in cognisant
with Ind AS to ease the implementation challenges for the companies.
Schedule III revision, extensive guidance note dealing with practical application thereof,
amendment in listing regulations by SEBI, continuous guidance on key matters by ITFG are some
of the many initiatives which helped companies to transition to Ind AS smoothly.
Recognition
income and expenses
process
Recognition
and Recognition Relevance Faithful representation
derecognition criteria
Measurement
recognition and subsequent measurement
Measurement of equity
Concepts of
capital and Concepts of Concepts of capital Capital
capital capital maintenance and the maintenance
maintenance determination of profit adjustments
Ind AS or any requirement in an Ind AS overrides the Conceptual Framework under Ind AS. To
meet the objective of general-purpose financial reporting, the ICAI may sometimes specify
requirements that depart from aspects of the Conceptual Framework. If the ICAI does so, it will
explain the departure in the Appendix to the relevant Ind AS.
are not designed to show the value of a reporting entity; but they provide information to help
existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors to estimate the value of the
reporting entity; and
are not primarily directed to other parties, such as regulators and members of the public other
than investors, lenders and other creditors.
Financial Information
2.3.2.3 Changes in economic resources and claims not resulting from financial performance
A reporting entity’s economic resources and claims may also change for reasons other than
financial performance, such as issuing debt or equity instruments. Information about this type of
change is necessary to give users a complete understanding of why the reporting entity’s
economic resources and claims changed and the implications of those changes for its future
financial performance.
Financial information has predictive value if it can be used as an input to processes employed
by users to predict future outcomes. Financial information need not be a prediction or forecast to
have predictive value. Financial information with predictive value is employed by users in making
their own predictions.
Financial information has confirmatory value if it provides feedback about (confirms or changes)
previous evaluations.
The predictive value and confirmatory value of financial information are interrelated. Information
that has predictive value often also has confirmatory value.
Example 1
Revenue information for the current year, which can be used as the basis for predicting revenues
in future years, can also be compared with revenue predictions for the current year that were
made in past years. The results of those comparisons can help a user to correct and improve
the processes that were used to make those previous predictions.
The characteristic of ‘relevance’ also includes the concept of materiality. Information is material
if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could reasonably be expected to influence decisions that the
primary users of general purpose financial reports make on the basis of those reports, which
provide financial information about a specific reporting entity. In other words, materiality is an
entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature or magnitude, or both, of the items to
which the information relates in the context of an individual entity’s financial report. Consequently,
the ICAI cannot specify a uniform quantitative threshold for materiality or predetermine what could
be material in a particular situation.
3.1.2 Faithful representation
To be useful, financial information must also faithfully represent the substance of the phenomena
that it purports to represent. In many circumstances, the substance of an economic phenomenon
and its legal form are the same. If they are not the same, providing information only about the
legal form would not faithfully represent the economic phenomenon.
To be a perfectly faithful representation, a depiction would have following three characteristics:
Complete: A complete depiction includes all information necessary for a user to understand
the phenomenon being depicted, including all necessary descriptions and explanations.
Example 2
A complete depiction of a group of assets would include, at a minimum, a description of the
nature of the assets in the group, a numerical depiction of all of the assets in the group,
and a description of what the numerical depiction represents (for example, historical cost
or fair value). For some items, a complete depiction may also entail explanations of
significant facts about the quality and nature of the items, factors and circumstances that
might affect their quality and nature, and the process used to determine the numerical
depiction (e.g. facts such as encumbrance / hypothecation / mortgage of items of Property,
Plant and Equipment against secured borrowings, disclosure of fair value of Investment
Property etc.).
Example 3
The use of reasonable estimates is an essential part of the preparation of financial
statements. Examples of estimates could include useful life of an item of Property, Plant
and Equipment, net realizable value of inventories, fair value of investment in an unlisted
entity, expected credit losses etc. As long as the estimates are fair, the financial statements
will be concluded to be free from error, even though the actual outcome may be different
from the original estimate.
In some cases, a trade-off between the fundamental qualitative characteristics may need to be
made in order to meet the objective of financial reporting, which is to provide useful information
about economic phenomena. For example, the most relevant information about a phenomenon
may be a highly uncertain estimate. In some cases, the level of measurement uncertainty involved
in making that estimate may be so high that it may be questionable whether the estimate would
provide a sufficiently faithful representation of that phenomenon. In some such cases, the most
useful information may be the highly uncertain estimate, accompanied by a description of the
estimate and an explanation of the uncertainties that affect it. In other such cases, if that
information would not provide a sufficiently faithful representation of that phenomenon, the most
useful information may include an estimate of another type that is slightly less relevant but is
subject to lower measurement uncertainty. In limited circumstances, there may be no estimate
that provides useful information. In those limited circumstances, it may be necessary to provide
information that does not rely on an estimate.
3.1.4 Enhancing qualitative characteristics
As mentioned at the beginning of Unit 3, the usefulness of financial information is enhanced if it
is comparable, verifiable, timely and understandable. Having identified the fundamental
qualitative characteristics of useful financial information, let’s understand how to enhance the
usefulness by applying four enhancing qualitative characteristics.
Comparability: Users’ decisions involve choosing between alternatives, for example, selling
or holding an investment, or investing in one reporting entity or another. Consequently,
information about a reporting entity is more useful if it can be compared with similar
information about other entities and with similar information about the same entity for another
period or another date.
Comparability is neither same as consistency, nor as uniformity. Comparability is the goal;
consistency helps to achieve that goal. Comparability refers to the use of the same methods
for the same items, and uniformity implies that like things must look alike and different things
must look different.
Verifiability: Verifiability means that different knowledgeable and independent observers
could reach consensus, although not necessarily complete agreement, that a particular
depiction is a faithful representation.
Verification can be direct or indirect. Direct verification means verifying an amount or other
representation through direct observation, for example, by counting cash. Indirect verification
means checking the inputs to a model, formula or other technique and recalculating the
outputs using the same methodology. An example is verifying the carrying amount of
reporting particular information are likely to justify the costs incurred to provide and use that
information. When applying the cost constraint in formulating a proposed Ind AS, the ICAI seeks
information from providers of financial information, users, auditors, academics and others about
the expected nature and quantity of the benefits and costs of that Ind AS. In most situations,
assessments are based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative information.
Because of the inherent subjectivity, different individuals’ assessments of the costs and benefits
of reporting particular items of financial information will vary. Therefore, the ICAI seeks to
consider costs and benefits in relation to financial reporting generally, and not just in relation to
individual reporting entities.
Consolidated financial statements are not designed to provide separate information about the
assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses of any particular subsidiary. A subsidiary’s own
financial statements are designed to provide that information.
Unconsolidated financial statements are designed to provide information about the parent’s
assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses, and not about those of its subsidiaries. That
information can be useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors of the
parent because:
(a) a claim against the parent typically does not give the holder of that claim a claim against
subsidiaries; and
(b) in some jurisdictions, the amounts that can be legally distributed to holders of equity claims
against the parent depend on the distributable reserves of the parent.
Another way to provide information about some or all assets, liabilities, equity, income and
expenses of the parent alone in consolidated financial statements, is in the notes.
Information provided in unconsolidated financial statements is typically not sufficient to meet the
information needs of existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors of the parent.
Accordingly, when consolidated financial statements are required, unconsolidated financial
statements cannot serve as a substitute for consolidated financial statements. Nevertheless, a
parent may require, or choose, to prepare unconsolidated financial statements in addition to
consolidated financial statements.
(ii) if a reporting entity comprises more than one legal entity, debt instruments or equity
instruments issued by one of those legal entities and held by another of those legal
entities are not economic resources of the reporting entity.
In principle, each of an entity’s rights is a separate asset. However, for accounting purposes,
related rights are often treated as a single unit of account that is a single asset. For example,
legal ownership of a physical object may give rise to several rights, including:
(a) the right to use the object;
(b) the right to sell rights over the object;
(c) the right to pledge rights over the object; and
(d) other rights not listed in (a)–(c).
In many cases, the set of rights arising from legal ownership of a physical object is accounted for
as a single asset. Conceptually, the economic resource is the set of rights, not the physical object.
Nevertheless, describing the set of rights as the physical object will often provide a faithful
representation of those rights in the most concise and understandable way.
Example 4
Ownership of land gives the entity the right to use the land, the right to sell the land, the right to
give the land on lease, the right to pledge land to obtain a secured loan etc. However, these
rights are normally bundled up as a single asset ‘Land’ as such classification provides a faithful
representation of those rights in the most concise and understandable way.
Example 5
An entity and another party might dispute whether the entity has a right to receive an economic
resource from that other party. Until that existence uncertainty is resolved — for example, by a
court ruling — it is uncertain whether the entity has a right and, consequently, whether an asset
exists.
Example 6
Receivable from a bankrupt customer is a right, even if the measurement principle renders the net
carrying amount of such an asset as ‘nil’.
Role of timing
Although an economic resource derives its value from its present potential to produce future
economic benefits, the economic resource is the present right that contains that potential, not the
future economic benefits that the right may produce.
For example, a purchased option derives its value from its potential to produce economic benefits
through exercise of the option at a future date. However, the economic resource is the present
right—the right to exercise the option at a future date. The economic resource is not the future
economic benefits that the holder will receive if the option is exercised.
Role of expenditure
There is a close association between incurring expenditure and acquiring assets, but the two do
not necessarily coincide. Hence, when an entity incurs expenditure, this may provide evidence
that the entity has sought future economic benefits but does not provide conclusive proof that the
entity has obtained an asset. Similarly, the absence of related expenditure does not preclude an
item from meeting the definition of an asset. Assets can include, for example, rights that a
government has granted to the entity free of charge or that another party has donated to the entity.
5.2.3 Control
Control links an economic resource to an entity. Assessing whether control exists helps to identify
the economic resource for which the entity accounts. For example, an entity may control a
proportionate share in a property without controlling the rights arising from ownership of the entire
property. In such cases, the entity’s asset is the share in the property, which it controls, not the
rights arising from ownership of the entire property, which it does not control.
An entity controls an economic resource if:
(a) it has the present ability to direct the use of the economic resource i.e. it has the right to
deploy that economic resource in its activities, or to allow another party to deploy the
economic resource in that other party’s activities, and
(b) obtain the economic benefits that may flow from it. For an entity to control an economic
resource, the future economic benefits from that resource must flow to the entity either
directly or indirectly rather than to another party. This aspect of control does not imply that
the entity can ensure that the resource will produce economic benefits in all circumstances.
Instead, it means that if the resource produces economic benefits, the entity is the party that
will obtain them either directly or indirectly. Having exposure to significant variations in the
amount of the economic benefits produced by an economic resource may indicate that the
entity controls the resource. However, it is only one factor to consider in the overall
assessment of whether control exists.
An entity controls an economic resource if it has the present ability to direct the use of the
economic resource and obtain the economic benefits that may flow from it. Control includes the
present ability to prevent other parties from directing the use of the economic resource and from
obtaining the economic benefits that may flow from it. It follows that, if one party controls an
economic resource, no other party controls that resource.
Control of an economic resource usually arises from an ability to enforce legal rights. However,
control can also arise if an entity has other means of ensuring that it, and no other party, has the
present ability to direct the use of the economic resource and obtain the benefits that may flow
from it. For example, an entity could control a right to use know-how that is not in the public
domain if the entity has access to the know-how and the present ability to keep the know-how
secret, even if that know-how is not protected by a registered patent.
It must be remembered that if one party controls an economic resource, no other party controls
that resource.
Would control exist with the principal in a principal-agent relationship?
Sometimes one party (a principal) engages another party (an agent) to act on behalf of, and for
the benefit of, the principal. For example, a principal may engage an agent to arrange sales of
goods controlled by the principal. If an agent has custody of an economic resource controlled by
the principal, that economic resource is not an asset of the agent.
Furthermore, if the agent has an obligation to transfer to a third party an economic resource
controlled by the principal, that obligation is not a liability of the agent, because the economic
resource that would be transferred is the principal’s economic resource, not the agent’s.
Obligation Present
is to obligation
Entity has
transfer as a result Liability
obligation
economic of past
resource events
necessary that the obligation already exists and that, in at least one circumstance, it would require
the entity to transfer an economic resource.
An obligation can meet the definition of a liability even if the probability of a transfer of an economic
resource is low. Nevertheless, that low probability might affect decisions about what information
to provide about the liability and how to provide that information, including decisions about whether
the liability is recognised and how it is measured.
Obligations to transfer an economic resource include, for example:
(a) obligations to pay cash.
(b) obligations to deliver goods or provide services.
(c) obligations to exchange economic resources with another party on unfavourable terms. Such
obligations include, for example, a forward contract to sell an economic resource on terms
that are currently unfavourable or an option that entitles another party to buy an economic
resource from the entity.
(d) obligations to transfer an economic resource if a specified uncertain future event occurs.
(e) obligations to issue a financial instrument if that financial instrument will oblige the entity to
transfer an economic resource.
Instead of fulfilling an obligation to transfer an economic resource to the party that has a right to
receive that resource, entities sometimes decide to, for example:
(a) settle the obligation by negotiating a release from the obligation;
(b) transfer the obligation to a third party; or
(c) replace that obligation to transfer an economic resource with another obligation by entering
into a new transaction.
It is however important to note that in the situations described above, the entity has the obligation
to transfer an economic resource until it has settled, transferred or replaced that obligation.
5.3.3 Present obligation as a result of past events
A present obligation exists as a result of past events only if:
(a) the entity has already obtained economic benefits (for example, goods or services obtained
from a supplier) or taken an action (for example, operating a particular business or operating
in a particular market); and
(b) as a consequence, the entity will or may have to transfer an economic resource that it would
not otherwise have had to transfer.
Example 7
If an entity has entered into a contract to pay an employee a salary in exchange for receiving the
employee’s services, the entity does not have a present obligation to pay the salary until it has
received the employee’s services. Before then the contract is executory — the entity has a
combined right and obligation to exchange future salary for future employee services. We will
discuss more about ‘executory contracts’ in more detail later in this Chapter.
(b) the information provided about the asset or liability and about any related income and
expenses must faithfully represent the substance of the transaction or other event from which
they have arisen.
Sometimes, both rights and obligations arise from the same source. For example, some contracts
establish both rights and obligations for each of the parties. If those rights and obligations are
interdependent and cannot be separated, they constitute a single inseparable asset or liability and
hence form a single unit of account.
Conversely, if rights are separable from obligations, it may sometimes be appropriate to group the
rights separately from the obligations, resulting in the identification of one or more separate assets
and liabilities. In other cases, it may be more appropriate to group separable rights and
obligations in a single unit of account treating them as a single asset or a single liability.
5.4.2 Executory contracts
An executory contract is a contract, or a portion of a contract, that is equally unperformed —
neither party has fulfilled any of its obligations, or both parties have partially fulfilled their
obligations to an equal extent.
An executory contract establishes a combined right and obligation to exchange economic
resources. The right and obligation are interdependent and cannot be separated. Hence, the
combined right and obligation constitute a single asset or liability. The entity has an asset if the
terms of the exchange are currently favourable; it has a liability if the terms of the exchange are
currently unfavourable.
Whether such an asset or liability is included in the financial statements depends on both the
recognition criteria and the measurement basis selected for the asset or liability, including, if
applicable, any test for whether the contract is onerous.
5.4.3 Substance of contractual rights and contractual obligations
The terms of a contract create rights and obligations for an entity that is a party to that contract.
To represent those rights and obligations faithfully, financial statements report their substance. In
some cases, the substance of the rights and obligations is clear from the legal form of the contract.
In other cases, the terms of the contract or a group or series of contracts require analysis to
identify the substance of the rights and obligations.
All terms in a contract — whether explicit or implicit — are considered unless they have no
substance. Implicit terms could include, for example, obligations imposed by statute, such as
statutory warranty obligations imposed on entities that enter into contracts to sell goods to
customers.
position and its financial performance. Hence, although income and expenses are defined in
terms of changes in assets and liabilities, information about income and expenses is just as
important as information about assets and liabilities.
Different transactions and other events generate income and expenses with different
characteristics. Providing information separately about income and expenses with different
characteristics can help users of financial statements to understand the entity’s financial
performance.
Contributions
from holders of
Assets (-) equity claims Assets (-)
Income (-) minus
Liabilities = Liabilities =
Expenses distributions to
Equity Equity
holders of equity
claims
The balance sheet and statement of profit and loss are linked because the recognition of one item
(or a change in its carrying amount) requires the recognition or derecognition of one or more other
items (or changes in the carrying amount of one or more other items). This principle can be
explained in the form of a journal entry as below:
The initial recognition of assets or liabilities arising from transactions or other events may result
in the simultaneous recognition of both income and related expenses.
Example 8
The sale of goods for cash results in the recognition of both income (from the recognition of one
asset — the cash) and an expense (from the derecognition of another asset—the goods sold).
The simultaneous recognition of income and related expenses is sometimes referred to as the
matching of costs with income. It may be noted that matching of costs with income is not an
objective of the Conceptual Framework under Ind AS. The Conceptual Framework under Ind AS
does not allow the recognition in the balance sheet of items that do not meet the definition of an
asset, a liability or equity.
Liability
In some cases, it is uncertain whether an obligation exists. For example, if another party is
seeking compensation for an entity’s alleged act of wrongdoing, it might be uncertain whether
the act occurred, whether the entity committed it or how the law applies. Until that existence
uncertainty is resolved — for example, by a court ruling — it is uncertain whether the entity
has an obligation to the party seeking compensation and, consequently, whether a liability
exists.
In those cases, that uncertainty, possibly combined with a low probability of inflows or outflows of
economic benefits and an exceptionally wide range of possible outcomes, may mean that the
recognition of an asset or liability, necessarily measured at a single amount, would not provide
relevant information. Whether or not the asset or liability is recognised, explanatory information
about the uncertainties associated with it may need to be provided in the financial statements.
6.2.1.2 Low probability of an inflow or outflow of economic benefits
If the probability of an inflow or outflow of economic benefits is low, the most relevant information
about the asset or liability may be information about the magnitude of the possible inflows or
outflows, their possible timing and the factors affecting the probability of their occurrence. The
typical location for such information is in the notes.
However, in some cases, recognition of the asset or liability may provide relevant information
beyond the disclosure in the notes.
Even if the probability of an inflow or outflow of economic benefits is low, recognition of the asset
or liability may provide relevant information beyond the information described above. Whether
that is the case may depend on a variety of factors. For example:
(a) if an asset is acquired or a liability is incurred in an exchange transaction on market terms,
its cost generally reflects the probability of an inflow or outflow of economic benefits. Thus,
that cost may be relevant information, and is generally readily available. Furthermore, not
recognising the asset or liability would result in the recognition of expenses or income at the
time of the exchange, which might not be a faithful representation of the transaction.
(b) if an asset or liability arises from an event that is not an exchange transaction, recognition of
the asset or liability typically results in recognition of income or expenses. If there is only a
low probability that the asset or liability will result in an inflow or outflow of economic benefits,
users of financial statements might not regard the recognition of the asset and income, or
the liability and expenses, as providing relevant information.
In limited circumstances, all relevant measures of an asset or liability that are available (or can
be obtained) may be subject to such high measurement uncertainty that none would provide useful
information about the asset or liability (and any resulting income, expenses or changes in equity),
even if the measure were accompanied by a description of the estimates made in producing it and
an explanation of the uncertainties that affect those estimates. In those limited circumstances,
the asset or liability would not be recognised.
Whether or not an asset or liability is recognised, a faithful representation of the asset or liability
may need to include explanatory information about the uncertainties associated with the asset or
liability’s existence or measurement, or with its outcome — the amount or timing of any inflow or
outflow of economic benefits that will ultimately result from it.
It may be noted that the level of measurement uncertainty beyond which a measure does not
provide a faithful representation depends on facts and circumstances and so, the standard-setters
felt, that level can be determined only when developing Standards.
6.2.2.2 Other factors
Faithful representation of a recognised asset, liability, equity, income or expenses involves not
only recognition of that item, but also its measurement as well as presentation and disclosure of
information about it.
Hence, when assessing whether the recognition of an asset or liability can provide a faithful
representation of the asset or liability, it is necessary to consider not merely its description and
measurement in the balance sheet, but also:
the depiction of resulting income, expenses and changes in equity. For example, if an entity
acquires an asset for consideration, not recognising the asset would result in recognising
expenses, and that result could provide a misleading representation that the entity’s financial
position has deteriorated.
whether related assets and liabilities are recognised. If they are not recognised, recognition
may create a recognition inconsistency (accounting mismatch). That may not provide an
understandable or faithful representation of the overall effect of the transaction or other event
giving rise to the asset or liability, even if explanatory information is provided in the notes.
presentation and disclosure of information about the asset or liability, and resulting income,
expenses or changes in equity. A complete depiction includes all information necessary for
a user of financial statements to understand the economic phenomenon depicted, including
all necessary descriptions and explanations. Hence, presentation and disclosure of related
information can enable a recognised amount to form part of a faithful representation of an
asset, a liability, equity, income or expenses.
6.3 DERECOGNITION
Derecognition is the removal of all or part of a recognised asset or liability from an entity’s balance
sheet. Derecognition normally occurs when that item no longer meets the definition of an asset
or of a liability:
Asset When the entity loses control of all or part of the recognised asset
Liability When the entity no longer has a present obligation for all or part of the
recognised liability
if an entity has apparently transferred an asset but retains exposure to significant positive or
negative variations in the amount of economic benefits that may be produced by the asset,
this sometimes indicates that the entity might continue to control that asset
if an entity has transferred an asset to another party that holds the asset as an agent for the
entity, the transferor still controls the asset.
Measurement bases
Value in use (assets)
Current value Fulfilment value
(liabilities)
Current cost
A very broad comparison between the historical cost and current value measurement bases is
given below:
Monetary information Derived, at least in part, from Using information updated to reflect
about assets, liabilities the price of the transaction or conditions at the measurement date
and related income and other event that gave rise to
expenses them
Changes in values Not reflected except to the Reflect changes, since the previous
extent that those changes measurement date, in estimates of
relate to impairment of an cash flows and other factors
asset or a liability becoming reflected in those current values
onerous
effect of events that cause the effect of events that increase the
historical cost of the asset to be value of the obligation to transfer
no longer recoverable the economic resources needed
(impairment) to fulfil the liability to such an
extent that the liability becomes
onerous. A liability is onerous if
the historical cost is no longer
sufficient to depict the obligation
to fulfil the liability
When an asset is acquired or created (say, a loan is given by a parent to a subsidiary), or a liability
is incurred or taken on, as a result of an event that is not a transaction on market terms (say, at a
discounted interest rate), it may not be possible to identify a cost, or the cost may not provide
relevant information about the asset or liability. In some such cases, a current value of the asset
(say, fair value) or liability is used as a deemed cost on initial recognition and that deemed cost
is then used as a starting point for subsequent measurement at historical cost (say, amortised
cost in case of the loan - see next paragraph for discussion on this).
Current Value
7.1.2.1 Exit value – Fair value and Value in use / Fulfilment value
The following table summarises these concepts in a comparative form:
Transaction Netted off from Netted off from Not including Including present
costs above above transaction value of
costs that would transaction costs
be incurred on to be incurred in
transfer fulfilment or
transfer
Additionally, certain other factors must also be considered while selecting a measurement basis
for initial recognition and subsequent measurement and this section 7.3 focuses on the same.
Section 7.4 will focus on certain additional factors to be considered when selecting measurement
basis for initial measurement only.
In most cases, no single factor will determine which measurement basis should be selected. The
relative importance of each factor will depend on facts and circumstances. As discussed in Unit
3, the information provided by a measurement basis must be useful to users of financial
statements. To achieve this, the information must be relevant and it must faithfully represent what
it purports to represent. In addition, the information provided should be, as far as possible,
comparable, verifiable, timely and understandable.
The following chart lays down the overall scheme of factors relevant for selection of measurement
basis, besides the information provided by the same:
7.3.1 Relevance
7.3.1.1 Characteristics of the asset or liability
The relevance of information provided by a measurement basis depends partly on the
characteristics of the asset or liability, in particular, on:
Variability of cash flows, and
Sensitivity of the value of the asset or liability to market factors or other risks
Asset or liability carried at historical cost
If the value of an asset or liability is sensitive to market factors or other risks, its historical cost
might differ significantly from its current value and hence may not provide relevant information if
information about changes in value is important to users of financial statements.
As an example, amortised cost cannot provide relevant information about a financial asset or
financial liability that is a derivative.
Furthermore, if historical cost is used, changes in value are reported not when that value changes,
but when an event such as disposal, impairment or fulfilment occurs. This could be incorrectly
interpreted as implying that all the income and expenses recognised at the time of that event
arose then, rather than over the periods during which the asset or liability was held.
Moreover, because measurement at historical cost does not provide timely information about
changes in value, income and expenses reported on that basis may lack predictive value and
confirmatory value by not depicting the full effect of the entity’s exposure to risk arising from
holding the asset or liability during the reporting period.
Asset or liability carried at fair value
Changes in the fair value of an asset or liability reflect changes in expectations of market
participants and changes in their risk preferences. Depending on the characteristics of the asset
or liability being measured and on the nature of the entity’s business activities, information
reflecting those changes may not always provide predictive value or confirmatory value to users
of financial statements. This may be the case when the entity’s business activities do not involve
selling the asset or transferring the liability.
As an example, if the entity holds assets solely for use or solely for collecting contractual cash
flows or if the entity is to fulfil liabilities itself, information reflecting changes in the fair value of an
asset or liability may not always provide predictive value or confirmatory value to users of financial
statements.
cash flows from one asset or liability are directly linked to the cash flows from another asset or
liability.
7.3.2.2 Certainty
When a measure cannot be determined directly by observing prices in an active market and must
instead be estimated, measurement uncertainty arises. The level of measurement uncertainty
associated with a particular measurement basis may affect whether information provided by that
measurement basis provides a faithful representation of an entity’s financial position and financial
performance. A high level of measurement uncertainty does not necessarily prevent the use of a
measurement basis that provides relevant information. However, in some cases the level of
measurement uncertainty is so high that information provided by a measurement basis might not
provide a sufficiently faithful representation. In such cases, it is appropriate to consider selecting
a different measurement basis that would also result in relevant information.
Measurement uncertainty is different from both outcome uncertainty and existence uncertainty,
but their presence may sometimes contribute to measurement uncertainty.
(a) outcome uncertainty arises when there is uncertainty about the amount or timing of any inflow
or outflow of economic benefits that will result from an asset or liability.
(b) existence uncertainty arises when it is uncertain whether an asset or a liability exists.
The presence of outcome uncertainty or existence uncertainty may sometimes contribute to
measurement uncertainty. However, outcome uncertainty or existence uncertainty does not
necessarily result in measurement uncertainty. For example, if the fair value of an asset can be
determined directly by observing prices in an active market, no measurement uncertainty is
associated with the measurement of that fair value, even if it is uncertain how much cash the asset
will ultimately produce and hence there is outcome uncertainty.
Illustration 1: Derecognition vs. Faithful Representation
As at 31 st March 20X2, Natasha Ltd. carried trade receivables of 280 crores in its balance sheet.
At that date, Natasha Ltd. entered into a factoring agreement with Samantha Ltd., a financial
institution, according to which it transferred the trade receivables in exchange for an immediate
cash payment of 250 crores. As per the factoring agreement, any shortfall between the amount
collected and 250 crores will be reimbursed by Natasha Ltd. to Samantha Ltd. Once the trade
receivables have been collected, any amounts above 250 crores, less interest on this amount,
will be repaid to Natasha Ltd. The directors of Natasha Ltd. are of the opinion that the trade
receivables should be derecognized.
You are required to explain the appropriate accounting treatment of this transaction in the financial
statements for the year ending 31 st March 20X2, and also evaluate this transaction in the context
of the Conceptual Framework.
indicates that the entity might continue to control that asset, which appears to be the case in the
current scenario.
The accounting requirements for derecognition aim to faithfully represent both:
(a) any assets and liabilities retained after the transaction or other event that led to the
derecognition (including any asset or liability acquired, incurred or created as part of the
transaction or other event); and
(b) the change in the entity’s assets and liabilities as a result of that transaction or other event.
Meeting both the above requirements becomes difficult if there is only a part disposal of an asset,
or there is a retention of some exposure to that asset. It is difficult to faithfully represent the legal
form (which is, in this scenario, a decrease in trade receivables under the factoring arrangement)
with the substance of retaining the corresponding risks and rewards.
In view of the difficulties in practical scenarios in meeting the two aims, the Conceptual Framework
does not advocate the use of a control approach or a risk-and-rewards approach to derecognition
in every circumstance.
As such, the treatment as per Ind AS 109, as well as the principles laid down in the Conceptual
Framework do not appear to be in conflict with each other in this case.
Illustration 2:
Explain the criteria in the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting for the recognition of an
asset and discuss whether there are inconsistencies with the criteria in Ind AS 38, Intangible
Assets.
Solution:
The Conceptual Framework defines an asset as a present economic resource controlled by the
entity as a result of past events. An economic resource is a right that has the potential to produce
economic benefits. Assets should be recognized if they meet the Conceptual Framework definition
of an asset and such recognition provides users of financial statements with information that is
useful (i.e. it is relevant as well as results in faithful representation). However, the criteria of a
cost-benefit analysis always exists i.e. the benefits of the information must be sufficient to justify
the costs of providing such information. The recognition criteria outlined in the Conceptual
Framework allows for flexibility in the application in amending or developing the standards.
Para 8 of Ind AS 38, Intangible Assets defines an intangible asset as an identifiable non-monetary
asset without physical substance. Further, Ind AS 38 defines an asset as a resource:
(a) controlled by an entity as a result of past events; and
(b) from which future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity.
Solution:
Usage of Fair Value in Ind AS:
Treatment under Ind AS:
The statement of the directors regarding Ind AS implementing a fair value model is not entire
accurate. Although Ind AS do use fair value (and present value), it is not a complete fair value
system. Ind AS are often based on the business model of the entity and on the expectations of
realizing the asset- and liability-related cash flows through operations and transfers.
It is notable that what is preferred is a mixed measurement system, with some items being
measured at fair value while others measured at historical cost.
About Fair Value (Ind AS 113)
Ind AS 113 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This
price is an exit price.
Ind AS 113 has given consistency to the definition and application of fair value, and this
consistency is applied across other Ind AS, which are generally required to measure fair value in
accordance with Ind AS 113. However, it cannot be implied that Ind AS requires all assets and
liabilities to be measured at fair value. Rather, many entities measure most items at depreciated
historical costs, although the exception being in the case of business combinations, where assets
and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. In other cases, usage of fair
value is restricted.
Examples of use of fair value in Ind AS:
(a) Ind AS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment permits revaluation through other comprehensive
income, provided it is carried out regularly.
(b) Disclosure of fair value of Investment Property in Ind AS 40, while the companies account
for the same under the cost model.
(c) Ind AS 38 Intangible Assets allows measurement of intangible assets at fair value with
corresponding changes in equity, but only if the assets can be measured reliably by way of
existence of an active market for them.
(d) Ind AS 109 Financial Instruments requires some financial assets and liabilities to be
measured at amortized cost and others at fair value. The measurement basis is largely
determined by the business model for that financial instrument. Where the financial
instruments are carried at fair value, depending on the category and circumstances, the
Verifiability: Verifiability is enhanced by using measurement bases that result in measures that
can be independently corroborated either directly, for example, by observing prices, or indirectly,
for example, by checking inputs to a model. If a measure cannot be verified, users of financial
statements may need explanatory information to enable them to understand how the measure was
determined. In some such cases, it may be necessary to specify the use of a different
measurement basis.
related income and expenses in order to provide relevant information that faithfully represents
both the entity’s financial position and its financial performance.
In most cases, the most understandable way to provide that information is:
(a) to use a single measurement basis both for the asset or liability in the balance sheet and for
related income and expenses in the statement of profit and loss ; and
(b) to provide in the notes additional information applying a different measurement basis.
However, in some cases, that information is more relevant, or results in a more faithful
representation of both the entity’s financial position and its financial performance, through the use
of:
(a) a current value measurement basis for the asset or liability in the balance sheet; and
(b) a different measurement basis for the related income and expenses in the profit or loss
section of statement of profit and loss
Example 10
An entity may choose to measure an interest bearing financial asset at fair value through other
comprehensive income. In this case, the total fair value change is separated and classified so
that:
(a) the profit or loss section of statement of profit and loss includes the interest income applying
the amortised cost as the measurement basis; and
(b) other comprehensive income includes all the remaining fair value changes.
For more details on the principles used in this example, refer to chapter on financial instruments.
(b) other comprehensive income includes all the remaining income or expenses.
As a result, the accumulated other comprehensive income related to that asset or liability equals
the difference between:
(i) the carrying amount of the asset or liability in the balance sheet; and
UNIT 8
PRESENTATION AND DISCLOSURE
A reporting entity communicates information about its assets, liabilities, equity, income and
expenses by presenting and disclosing information in its financial statements.
8.2 CLASSIFICATION
Classification is the sorting of assets, liabilities, equity, income or expenses on the basis of shared
characteristics for presentation and disclosure purposes. Such characteristics include — but are
not limited to — the nature of the item, its role (or function) within the business activities conducted
by the entity, and how it is measured.
Classifying dissimilar assets, liabilities, equity, income or expenses together can obscure relevant
information, reduce understandability and comparability and may not provide a faithful
representation of what it purports to represent.
8.2.1 Classification of assets and liabilities
Classification is applied to the unit of account selected for an asset or liability. However, it may
sometimes be appropriate to separate an asset or liability into components that have different
Because the profit or loss section of statement of profit and loss is the primary source of
information about an entity’s financial performance for the period, all income and expenses are,
in principle, included in that statement. However, in formulating Ind AS, the ICAI may decide in
exceptional circumstances that income or expenses arising from a change in the current value of
an asset or liability are to be included in other comprehensive income when doing so would result
in the profit or loss section of statement of profit and loss providing more relevant information, or
providing a more faithful representation of the entity’s financial performance for that period.
In principle, income and expenses included in other comprehensive income in one period are
reclassified from other comprehensive income into the profit or loss section of statement of profit
and loss in a future period when doing so results in the profit or loss section of statement of profit
and loss providing more relevant information or providing a more faithful representation of the
entity’s financial performance for that future period. However, if, for example, there is no clear
basis for identifying the period in which reclassification would have that result, or the amount that
should be reclassified, the ICAI may, in formulating Ind AS, decide that income and expenses
included in other comprehensive income are not to be subsequently reclassified.
8.3 AGGREGATION
Aggregation is adding together of assets, liabilities, equity, income or expenses that have shared
characteristics and are included in the same classification.
Aggregation makes information more useful by summarising a large volume of detail. However,
aggregation conceals some of that detail. Hence, a balance needs to be found so that relevant
information is not obscured either by a large amount of insignificant detail or by excessive
aggregation.
Different levels of aggregation may be needed in different parts of the financial statements. For
example, typically, the balance sheet and the statement of profit and loss provide summarised
information and more detailed information is provided in the notes.
Illustration 4:
Everest Ltd. is a listed company having investments in various subsidiaries. In its annual financial
statements for the year ending 31 st March 20X2 as well as 31 st March 20X3, Everest Ltd. classified
Kanchenjunga Ltd. a subsidiary as ‘held-for-sale’ and presented it as a discontinued operation.
On 1 st November 20X1, the shareholders had authorized the management to sell all of its holding
in Kanchenjunga Ltd. within the year. In the year to 31 st March 20X2, the management made a
public announcement of its intention to sell the investment but did not actively try to sell the
subsidiary as it was still operational within the Everest group.
date. Additional information would be needed to confirm that the subsidiary was available for
immediate sale, and that it was being actively marketed at an appropriate price so as to satisfy
the criteria in the year to 31 st March 20X2.
Further, the organizational changes made by Everest Ltd. in the year 20X2-20X3 are a good
indicator that Kanchenjunga Ltd. was not available for immediate sale in its present condition at
the point of classification. The fact that additional activities have been given to Kanchenjunga
Ltd. indicate that the change wasn’t insignificant. The shareholders had authorized for a year
from 1 st November 20X1. There is no evidence that this authorization extended beyond
1 st November 20X2.
Conclusion:
Based on the information provided in the given case, it appears that Kanchenjunga Ltd. should
not be classified by Everest Ltd. as a subsidiary held for sale. Instead, the results of the subsidiary
should be reported as a continuing operation in the financial statements for the year ending
31 st March 20X2 and 31 st March 20X3.
Evaluation of treatment in context of the Conceptual Framework
The Conceptual Framework states that the users need information to allow them to assess the
amount, timing and uncertainty of the prospects for future net cash inflows. Highlighting the
results of discontinued operations separately equips users with the information that is relevant to
this assessment as the discontinued operation will not contribute to cash flows in the future.
If a company has made a firm decision to sell the subsidiary, it could be argued that the subsidiary
should be classified as discontinued operation, even if the criteria to classify it as ‘held for sale’
as per Ind AS 105 have not been met, because this information would be more useful to users.
However, Ind AS 105 criteria was developed with high degree of strictness on classification.
Accordingly, this decision could be argued to be in conflict with the Conceptual Framework.
*****
Concepts of capital
Financial concept
Physical concept
[Invested money / purchasing
power] [Operating capability]
Net assets or Equity Productive capacity
The selection of the appropriate concept of capital by an entity should be based on the needs of
the users of its financial statements. Thus, a financial concept of capital should be adopted if the
users of financial statements are primarily concerned with the maintenance of nominal invested
capital or the purchasing power of invested capital. If, however, the main concern of users is with
the operating capability of the entity, a physical concept of capital should be used. The concept
chosen indicates the goal to be attained in determining profit, even though there may be some
measurement difficulties in making the concept operational.
The negative retained profit indicates that the trader has failed to maintain his capital. The
available fund 9,000 is not sufficient to buy 6,000 units again at increased price 2.50 per
unit. There should not be any drawings in the year.
Had the trader withdrawn nothing during the year instead of 6,000, he would have left with
15,000, the fund required to buy 6,000 units at 2.50 per unit.
Capital maintenance can be computed under all three bases as shown below:
Financial Capital Maintenance at historical costs
those which the standard-setters believe provide the most relevant information and which
most faithfully represent the underlying transaction or event. Based on the reactions to the
convergence to Ind AS, it feels that most investors feel this approach is consistent with their
analysis of financial statements. Thus, the arguments against a mixed measurement are far
outweighed by the greater relevance achieved by such measurement bases.
Jayant Ltd. prepares its financial statements under Ind AS, and therefore applies the
measurement bases permitted in Ind AS. Ind AS adopt a mixed measurement basis, which
includes current value (fair value, value in use, fulfilment value and current cost) and
historical cost.
Where an Ind AS allows a choice of measurement basis, the directors of Jayant Ltd. must
exercise judgment as to which basis will provide the most useful information for its primary
users. Furthermore, when selecting a measurement basis, measurement uncertainty should
also be considered. The Conceptual Framework states that for some estimates, a high level
of measurement uncertainty may outweigh other factors to such an extent that the resulting
information may be of little relevance.
IND AS ON PRESENTATION
OF GENERAL PURPOSE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNIT 1 :
INDIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARD 1 :
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
List the scope and objective of Ind AS 1
Define the relevant terms used in Ind AS 1
Explain the purpose of financial statements
Illustrate the complete set of financial statements
Describe the general features of the financial statements
Follow the structure and content of the financial statements
Identify the various components of financial statements
Prepare the disclosures to be made in the financial statements
Discuss the significant differences in Ind AS 1 vis-à-vis AS 1
Reconcile the carve out in Ind AS 1 from IAS 1.
• Objective
• Scope
• Definitions
Ind AS 1
1.2 OBJECTIVE
This standard prescribes the basis for presentation of general-purpose financial statements to
ensure comparability:
a) with the entity’s financial statements of previous periods and
b) with the financial statements of other entities.
It sets out overall requirements for the presentation of financial statements, guidelines for their
structure and minimum requirements for their content.
1.3 SCOPE
This standard applies to all types of entities including those that present:
(a) consolidated financial statements in accordance with Ind AS 110 ‘Consolidated
Financial Statements’; and
(b) separate financial statements in accordance with Ind AS 27 ‘Separate Financial
Statements’.
This standard does not apply to structure and content of condensed interim financial
statements prepared in accordance with Ind AS 34 except for para 15 to 35 of Ind AS 1.
This Standard uses terminology that is suitable for profit-oriented entities, including public
sector business entities.
1.4 DEFINITIONS
1. Accounting policies are defined in paragraph 5 of Ind AS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes
in Accounting Estimates and Errors, and the term is used in this Standard with the same
meaning.
2. General purpose financial statements (referred to as ‘financial statements’) are those
intended to meet the needs of users who are not in a position to require an entity to prepare
reports tailored to their particular information needs.
3. Impracticable: Applying a requirement is impracticable when the entity cannot apply it after
making every reasonable effort to do so.
4. Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) are Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the
Companies Act, 2013.
5. Material
Information is material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could reasonably be expected to
influence decisions that the primary users of general-purpose financial statements make on
the basis of those financial statements, which provide financial information about a specific
reporting entity.
Materiality depends on the nature or magnitude of information, or both. An entity assesses
whether information, either individually or in combination with other information, is material
in the context of its financial statements taken as a whole.
Information is obscured if it is communicated in a way that would have a similar effect for
primary users of financial statements to omitting or misstating that information.
Examples of circumstances that may result in material information being obscured:
(a) information regarding a material item, transaction or other event is disclosed in the
financial statements but the language used is vague or unclear;
(b) information regarding a material item, transaction or other event is scattered throughout
the financial statements;
(c) dissimilar items, transactions or other events are inappropriately aggregated;
(d) similar items, transactions or other events are inappropriately disaggregated; and
(e) the understandability of the financial statements is reduced as a result of material
information being hidden by immaterial information to the extent that a primary user is
unable to determine what information is material.
Assessing whether information could reasonably be expected to influence decisions made
by the primary users of a specific reporting entity’s general purpose financial statements
requires an entity to consider the characteristics of those users while also considering the
entity’s own circumstances.
Many existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors cannot require reporting
entities to provide information directly to them and must rely on general purpose financial
statements for much of the financial information they need. Consequently, they are the
primary users to whom general purpose financial statements are directed. Financial
statements are prepared for users who have a reasonable knowledge of business and
economic activities and who review and analyse the information diligently. At times, even
well-informed and diligent users may need to seek the aid of an adviser to understand
information about complex economic phenomena.
6. Notes contain information in addition to that presented in the balance sheet, statement of
profit and loss, other comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement
of cash flows. Notes provide narrative descriptions or disaggregation of items presented in
those statements and information about items that do not qualify for recognition in those
statements.
7. Owners are holders of instruments classified as equity.
8. Profit or loss is the total of income less expenses, excluding the components of other
comprehensive income.
9. Reclassification adjustments are amounts reclassified to profit or loss in the current period
that were recognised in other comprehensive income in the current or previous periods.
10. Total comprehensive income is the change in equity during a period resulting from
transactions and other events, other than those changes resulting from transactions with
owners in their capacity as owners.
11. Other comprehensive income comprises items of income and expense (including
reclassification adjustments) that are not recognised in profit or loss as required or permitted
by other Ind AS.
The components of Other Comprehensive Income include the following:
includes
Note:
1. An entity shall present a single statement of profit and loss, with profit or loss and other
comprehensive income (OCI) presented in two sections. The sections shall be presented
together, with the profit or loss section presented first followed directly by the other
comprehensive income section.
2. Reports and statements presented outside financial statements are outside the scope of
Ind AS.
3. An entity is not required to present the related notes to the opening balance sheet as at
the beginning of the preceding period.
General Features
1.7.1 Presentation of True and Fair View and compliance with Ind AS
Financial statements shall present a true and fair view of the financial position, financial
performance and cash flows of an entity. Presentation of true and fair view requires the faithful
representation of the effects of transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the
definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the
Conceptual Framework. The application of Ind AS, with additional disclosure when necessary, is
presumed to result in financial statements that present a true and fair view.
1.7.1.1 An explicit and unreserved statement
An entity whose financial statements comply with Ind AS shall make an explicit and unreserved
statement of such compliance in the notes.
An entity shall not describe financial statements as complying with Ind AS unless they comply with
all the requirements of Ind AS. There may be disagreement between the Company and its auditor
on the applicability of any Ind AS or any particular requirement of any Ind AS and accordingly
auditor may qualify the audit report. Even in such a situation, the financial statements shall be
assumed to be Ind AS compliant.
In virtually all circumstances, presentation of a true and fair view is achieved by compliance with
applicable Ind AS. Presentation of a true and fair view also requires an entity:
(a) to select and apply accounting policies in accordance with Ind AS 8 ‘Accounting Policies,
Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors’. Ind AS 8 sets out a hierarchy of authoritative
guidance that management considers in the absence of an Ind AS that specifically applies
to an item.
(b) to present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant,
reliable, comparable and understandable information.
(c) to provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in Ind AS
is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other
events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
An extract from the annual report of Tata Consultancy Services Limited for the
year ended 31 st March, 2022:
Notes forming part of Standalone Financial Statements
2) Statement of compliance
These standalone financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
the Indian Accounting Standards (referred to as “Ind AS”) as prescribed under
section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Companies (Indian
Accounting Standards) Rules as amended from time to time.
Of the financial position Of the financial performance Of the cash flows of an entity
On the basis of Ind AS 1 and the facts and circumstances of this case, the following disclosure is
appropriate:
Extracts from the notes to entity XYZ’s 31 st March, 20X7 financial statements
Note 1: Basis of preparation
On the basis of management’s assessment at 31 st March 20X7, the financial statements have
been prepared on the going concern basis. However, management’s assessment assumes that
the government will reintroduce limited plastic import tariffs and that the currency exchange
rate will remain constant. On 15 th March 20X7, the government announced that limited import
tariffs will be imposed in 20X8. However, the government emphasised that the tariff would not
be as protective as the 40 percent tariff in effect before 20X7.
Provided that does not strengthen, management projects / forecasts that a 10 percent tariff
on all plastic products would result in entity XYZ returning to profitability. As at
31 st March, 20X7 entity XYZ had net assets of 1,000. If import tariffs are not imposed and
currency exchange rates remain unchanged, entity XYZ’s liabilities could exceed its assets by
the end of financial year 20X7-20X8. On the basis of their assessment of these factors,
management believes that entity XYZ is a going concern.
*****
1.7.3 Accrual basis of accounting
An entity shall prepare its financial statements, except for cash flow information, using the
accrual basis of accounting.
When the accrual basis of accounting is used, an entity recognises items as assets, liabilities,
equity, income and expenses (the elements of financial statements) when they satisfy the
definitions and recognition criteria for those elements in the Conceptual Framework.
1.7.4 Materiality and aggregation
An entity shall present separately each material class of similar items. An entity shall present
separately items of a dissimilar nature or function unless they are immaterial except when
required by law.
Financial statements result from processing large numbers of transactions or other events
that are aggregated into classes according to their nature or function. The final stage in the
process of aggregation and classification is the presentation of condensed and classified
data, which form line items in the financial statements. If a line item is not individually
material, it is aggregated with other items either in those statements or in the notes. An item
*****
1.7.5 Offsetting
An entity shall not offset assets and liabilities or income and expenses, unless required or
permitted by an Ind AS.
An entity reports separately both assets and liabilities, and income and expenses. Measuring
assets net of valuation allowances — for example, obsolescence allowances on inventories
and doubtful debts allowances on receivables—is not offsetting.
Ind AS 115, ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’, requires an entity to measure revenue
from contracts with customers at the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to
be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services. For example, the
amount of revenue recognized reflects any trade discounts and volume rebates the entity
allows. An entity undertakes, in the course of its ordinary activities, other transactions that
do not generate revenue but are incidental to the main revenue-generating activities. An
entity presents the results of such transactions, when this presentation reflects the substance
of the transaction or other event, by netting any income with related expenses arising on the
same transaction.
Examples 4 and 5
4. An entity presents gains and losses on the disposal of non-current assets, including
investments and operating assets, by deducting from the amount of consideration on
disposal the carrying amount of the asset and related selling expenses; and
5. An entity may net expenditure related to a provision that is recognised in accordance
with Ind AS 37, ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets’, and
reimbursed under a contractual arrangement with a third party (for example, a supplier’s
warranty agreement) against the related reimbursement.
In addition, an entity presents on a net basis gains and losses arising from a group of similar
transactions, for example, foreign exchange gains and losses or gains and losses arising on
financial instruments held for trading. However, an entity presents such gains and losses
separately if they are material.
Illustration 3
Is offsetting of revenue against expenses, permissible in case of a company acting as an agent
and having sub-agents, where commission is paid to sub-agents from the commission received
as an agent?
Solution
On the basis of the guidance regarding offsetting, net presentation in the given case would not be
appropriate, as it would not reflect substance of the transaction and would detract from the ability
of users to understand the transaction.
Accordingly, the commission received by the company as an agent is the gross revenue of the
company. The amount of commission paid by it to the sub-agent should be considered as an
expense and should not be offset against commission earned by it.
*****
1.7.6 Frequency of reporting
An entity shall present a complete set of financial statements (including comparative
information) at least annually.
When an entity changes the end of its reporting period and presents financial statements for
a period longer or shorter than one year, an entity shall disclose, in addition to the period
covered by the financial statements:
the reason for using a longer or shorter period, and
the fact that amounts presented in the financial statements are not entirely comparable.
For example, in the current period an entity discloses details of a legal dispute whose
outcome was uncertain at the end of the immediately preceding reporting period and that is
yet to be resolved.
Example 7
An entity may present a third statement of profit or loss (thereby presenting the current period,
the preceding period and one additional comparative period). However, the entity is not required
to present a third balance sheet, a third statement of cash flows or a third statement of changes
in equity (ie an additional financial statement comparative). The entity is required to present, in
the notes to the financial statements, the comparative information related to that additional
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
Illustration 4
A retail chain acquired a competitor in March, 20X1 and accounted for the business combination
under Ind AS 103 on a provisional basis in its 31 st March, 20X1 annual financial statements. The
business combination accounting was finalised in 20X1-20X2 and the provisional fair values were
updated. As a result, the 20X0-20X1 comparatives were adjusted in the 20X1-20X2 annual
financial statements. Does the restatement require an opening statement of financial position
(that is, an additional statement of financial position) as of 1 st April, 20X0?
Solution
An additional statement of financial position is not required, because the acquisition had no impact
on the entity’s financial position at 1 st April, 20X0.
*****
1.7.7.3 Change in accounting policy, retrospective restatement or reclassification
When an entity applies an accounting policy retrospectively or makes a retrospective
restatement of items in its financial statements or reclassifies items in its financial statements
and the retrospective application, retrospective restatement or the reclassification has a
material effect on the information in the balance sheet at the beginning of the preceding
period, it shall present, as a minimum, three balance sheets, two of each of the other
statements, and related notes. An entity presents balance sheets as at
the end of the current period,
Example 8
A significant acquisition or disposal, or a review of the presentation of the financial statements,
might suggest that the financial statements need to be presented differently. An entity changes
the presentation of its financial statements only if the changed presentation provides information
that is reliable and more relevant to users of the financial statements and the revised structure is
likely to continue, so that comparability is not impaired. When making such changes in
presentation, an entity reclassifies its comparative information.
As per Schedule III of the Companies Act 2013, depending upon the total income of the
company, the figures appearing in the financial statements shall be rounded off as
below:
b Investment property
c Intangible assets
f Biological assets
g Inventories
j The total of assets classified as held for sale and assets included in disposal groups
classified as held for sale in accordance with Ind AS 105 ‘Non-current Assets Held for Sale
and Discontinued Operations’
l Provisions
n Liabilities and assets for current tax, as defined in Ind AS 12 ‘Income Taxes’
p Liabilities included in disposal groups classified as held for sale in accordance with
Ind AS 105
Additional line items, headings and subtotals in the balance sheet should be presented when such
presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial position.
The descriptions of the line items, and the order in which they are shown, can be adapted
according to the entity's nature and its transactions.
Example 9
Financial institutions would amend the descriptions of line items to provide information that is
relevant to the operations of financial institutions.
Note:
1. Financial institutions may present assets and liabilities in increasing or decreasing order of
liquidity if the presentation is reliable and more relevant than a current / non-current
presentation. This is because such entity does not supply goods or services within a clearly
identifiable operating cycle.
2. An entity is permitted to present some of its assets and liabilities using a current / non-current
classification and others in order of liquidity. The need for a mixed basis of presentation
might arise when an entity has diverse operations.
1.8.2.2 Current Assets
An entity shall classify an asset as current when:
(a) it expects to realise the asset, or intends to sell or consume it, in its normal operating cycle;
(b) it holds the asset primarily for the purpose of trading;
(c) it expects to realise the asset within twelve months after the reporting period; or
(d) the asset is cash or a cash equivalent (as defined in Ind AS 7) unless the asset is restricted
from being exchanged or used to settle a liability for at least twelve months after the reporting
period.
An entity shall classify all other assets as non-current.
This Standard uses the term ‘non-current’ to include tangible, intangible and financial assets of a
long-term nature. It does not prohibit the use of alternative descriptions as long as the meaning
is clear.
An extract from the annual report of Reliance Industries Limited for the year ended
31 st March, 2022:
Notes to the Standalone Financial Statements for the year ended 31 st March, 2022
B.2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Current and Non-current Classification
The Company presents assets and liabilities in the Balance Sheet based on
Current/ Non-Current classification.
Examples 10 -13
10. An entity produces whisky from barley, water and yeast in a 24-month distillation
process. At the end of the reporting period the entity has one month’s supply of barley
and yeast raw materials, 800 barrels of partly distilled whisky and 200 barrels of
distilled whisky.
All raw materials (barley and yeast) work in process (partly distilled whisky) and finished
goods (distilled whisky) are inventories. The raw materials are expected to be realised (ie
turned into cash after being processed into whisky) in the entity’s normal operating cycle.
Therefore, even though the realisation is expected to take place more than twelve months
after the end of the reporting period, the raw materials, work in progress and finished goods
are current assets.
Illustration 5
X Ltd. provides you the following information:
Raw material stock holding period : 3 months
Work-in-progress holding period : 1 month
Finished goods holding period : 5 months
Debtors collection period : 5 months
You are requested to compute the operating cycle of X Ltd.
Solution
The operating cycle of X Ltd. will be computed as under:
Raw material stock holding period + Work-in-progress holding period + Finished goods holding
period + Debtors collection period = 3 + 1 + 5 + 5 = 14 months.
*****
Illustration 6
Inventory or trade receivables of X Ltd. are normally realised in 15 months. How should X Ltd.
classify such inventory / trade receivables: current or non-current if these are expected to be
realised within 15 months?
Solution
These should be classified as current.
*****
Illustration 7
B Ltd. produces aircrafts. The length of time between first purchasing raw materials to make the
aircrafts and the date the company completes the production and delivery is 9 months. The
company receives payment for the aircrafts 7 months after the delivery.
(a) What is the length of operating cycle?
(b) How should it treat its inventory and debtors?
Solution
(a) The length of the operating cycle will be 16 months.
(b) Assuming the inventory and debtors will be realised within normal operating cycle, i.e.,
16 months, both the inventory as well as debtors should be classified as current.
*****
An extract from the annual report of Reliance Industries Limited for the year
ended 31 st March, 2022:
Notes to the Standalone Financial Statements for the year ended
31 st March, 2022
B.2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Current and Non-Current Classification
The Company presents assets and liabilities in the Balance Sheet based on
Current/ Non-Current classification.
A liability is current when:
- It is expected to be settled in normal operating cycle;
- It is held primarily for the purpose of trading;
- It is due to be settled within twelve months after the reporting period,
or
- There is no unconditional right to defer the settlement of the liability
for at least twelve months after the reporting period.
The Company classifies all other liabilities as non-current.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as non-current assets and
liabilities.
Some current liabilities, such as trade payables and some accruals for employee and other
operating costs, are part of the working capital used in the entity’s normal operating cycle.
An entity classifies such operating items as current liabilities even if they are due to be settled
more than twelve months after the reporting period.
The same normal operating cycle applies to the classification of an entity’s assets and
liabilities.
When the entity’s normal operating cycle is not clearly identifiable, it is assumed to be twelve
months.
Other current liabilities which are not settled as part of the normal operating cycle, but are
due for settlement within twelve months after the reporting period or held primarily for the
purpose of trading.
Examples are some financial liabilities classified as held for trading in accordance with
Ind AS 109, bank overdrafts, and the current portion of non-current financial liabilities,
dividends payable, income taxes and other non-trade payables.
Financial liabilities that provide financing on a long-term basis (i.e. are not part of the working
capital used in the entity’s normal operating cycle) and are not due for settlement within
twelve months after the reporting period are non-current liabilities.
An entity classifies its financial liabilities as current when they are due to be settled within
twelve months after the reporting period, even if:
the original term was for a period longer than twelve months, and
an agreement to refinance, or to reschedule payments, on a long-term basis is
completed after the reporting period and before the financial statements are approved
for issue.
If an entity expects, and has the discretion, to refinance or roll over an obligation for at least
twelve months after the reporting period under an existing loan facility, it classifies the
obligation as non-current, even if it would otherwise be due within a shorter period. However,
when refinancing or rolling over the obligation is not at the discretion of the entity (for
example, there is no arrangement for refinancing), the entity does not consider the potential
to refinance the obligation and classifies the obligation as current.
When an entity breaches a provision of a long-term loan arrangement on or before the end
of the reporting period with the effect that the liability becomes payable on demand, the entity
does not classify the liability as current, even if the lender agreed, after the reporting period
Illustration 10
Entity A has two different businesses, real estate and manufacturing of passenger vehicles. With
respect to the real estate business, the entity constructs residential apartments for customers and
the normal operating cycle is three to four years. With respect to the business of manufacture of
passenger vehicles, normal operating cycle is 15 months. Under such circumstance where an
entity has different operating cycles for different types of businesses, how classification into
current and non-current be made?
Solution
As per paragraph 66(a) of Ind AS 1, an asset should be classified as current if an entity expects
to realise the same, or intends to sell or consume it in its normal operating cycle. Similarly, as
per paragraph 69(a) of Ind AS 1, a liability should be classified as current if an entity expects to
settle the liability in its normal operating cycle. In this situation, where businesses have different
operating cycles, classification of asset/liability as current/non- current would be in relation to the
normal operating cycle that is relevant to that particular asset / liability. It is advisable to disclose
the normal operating cycles relevant to different types of businesses for better understanding.
*****
Illustration 11
An entity has placed certain deposits with various parties. How the following deposits should be
classified, i.e., current or non-current?
(a) Electricity Deposit
(b) Tender Deposit/Earnest Money Deposit [EMD]
(c) GST Deposit paid under dispute or GST payment under dispute.
Solution
(a) Electricity Deposit - At all points of time, the deposit is recoverable on demand, when the
connection is not required. However, practically, such electric connection is required as long
as the entity exists. Hence, from a commercial reality perspective, an entity does not expect
to realise the asset within twelve months from the end of the reporting period. Hence,
electricity deposit should be classified as a non-current asset.
(b) Tender Deposit/Earnest Money Deposit [EMD] -Generally, tender deposit / EMD are paid
for participation in various bids. They normally become recoverable if the entity does not win
the bid. Bid dates are known at the time of tendering the deposit. But until the date of the
actual bid, one is not in a position to know if the entity is winning the bid or otherwise.
(c) Will the answer to (a) be different if the existing facility is from one bank and the new facility
is from another bank?
(d) Will the answer to (a) be different if the new facility is not yet tied up with the existing bank,
but the entity has the potential to refinance the obligation?
Solution
(a) The loan is not due for payment at the end of the reporting period. The entity and the bank
have agreed for the said roll over prior to the end of the reporting period for a period of 5
years. Since the entity has an unconditional right to defer the settlement of the liability for at
least twelve months after the reporting period, the loan should be classified as non-current.
(b) Yes, the answer will be different if the arrangement for roll over is agreed upon after the end
of the reporting period, since assessment is required to be made based on terms of the
existing loan facility. As at the end of the reporting period, the entity does not have an
unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least twelve months after the
reporting period. Hence the loan is to be classified as current.
(c) Yes, loan facility arranged with new bank cannot be treated as refinancing, as the loan with
the earlier bank would have to be settled which may coincide with loan facility arranged with
a new bank. In this case, loan has to be repaid within a period of 9 months from the end of
the reporting period, therefore, it will be classified as current liability.
(d) Yes, the answer will be different and the loan should be classified as current. This is
because, as per paragraph 73 of Ind AS 1, when refinancing or rolling over the obligation is
not at the discretion of the entity (for example, there is no arrangement for refinancing), the
entity does not consider the potential to refinance the obligation and classifies the obligation
as current.
*****
Illustration 14
In December 20X1 an entity entered into a loan agreement with a bank. The loan is repayable in
three equal annual instalments starting from December 20X5. One of the loan covenants is that
an amount equivalent to the loan amount should be contributed by promoters by 24 th March 20X2,
failing which the loan becomes payable on demand. As on 24 th March 20X2, the entity has not
been able to get the promoter’s contribution. On 25 th March, 20X2, the entity approached the
bank and obtained a grace period up to 30 th June, 20X2 to get the promoter’s contribution.
The bank cannot demand immediate repayment during the grace period. The annual reporting
period of the entity ends on 31 st March, 20X2.
(a) As on 31 st March, 20X2, how should the entity classify the loan?
The classification of the instrument could affect initial recognition and subsequent measurement.
This might require the entity’s management to exercise judgement, which could require disclosure
under judgements and estimates.
*****
1.8.2.5 Information to be provided in the Balance Sheet or in the notes
An entity shall disclose, either in the balance sheet or in the notes, further sub-classifications
of the line items presented, classified in a manner appropriate to the entity’s operations.
The detail provided in sub-classifications depends on the requirements of Ind AS and on the
size, nature and function of the amounts involved. The disclosures vary for each item, for
example:
(i) items of property, plant and equipment are disaggregated into classes in accordance
with Ind AS 16;
(ii) receivables are disaggregated into amounts receivable from trade customers,
receivables from related parties, prepayments and other amounts;
(iv) provisions are disaggregated into provisions for employee benefits and other items; and
(v) equity capital and reserves are disaggregated into various classes, such as paid-in
capital, share premium and reserves.
An entity shall disclose the following, either in the balance sheet or in the statement of
changes in equity which is part of the balance sheet, or in the notes:
(b) the number of shares issued and fully paid, and issued but not fully paid;
(c) par value per share, or that the shares have no par value;
(f) shares in the entity held by the entity or by its subsidiaries or associates; and
(g) shares reserved for issue under options and contracts for the sale of shares,
including terms and amounts; and
(ii) a description of the nature and purpose of each reserve within equity.
An entity whose capital is not limited by shares e.g., a company limited by guarantee, shall
disclose information, showing changes during the period in each category of equity interest,
and the rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each category of equity interest.
As at As at
31 st March 31 st March
20X6 20X5
Assets
Non-current Assets
Property, plant and equipment 1,37,048 97,023
Capital work in progress 17,450 3,100
Investment property 7,419 7,179
Goodwill 8,670 4,530
Other Intangible Assets 12,033 10,895
Intangible assets under development 2,365 1,965
Financial assets
Investments 38,576 32,416
Loans 1,033 850
Trade Receivables 3,238 2,376
Deferred tax assets (net) 4,598 2,774
Other non-current assets 21,586 10,565
Total Non-Current Assets (A) 2,54,016 1,73,673
Current Assets
Inventories 67,878 61,062
Financial assets
Loans 623 546
Trade receivables 30,712 30,078
Derivative instruments
Cash and cash equivalents 25,031 7,035
Investments 10,695 9,170
Other financial assets 2,856 2,093
Prepayments 459 543
1,38,254 1,10,527
Assets classified as held for sale 220 19,310
Total Current Assets (B) 1,38,474 1,29,837
Total Assets (A+B) 3,92,490 3,03,510
As at As at
31 st March 31 st March
20X6 20X5
Equity and liabilities
Equity
Equity share capital 22,400 12,600
Other equity
Equity component of compound financial instruments 372
Reserves and surplus 2,16,092 1,60,796
Other reserves 4,233 3,215
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent 2,43,097 1,76,611
Non-Controlling interest 24,742 16,248
Total equity (C) 2,67,839 1,92,859
31 st March 31 st March
20X6 20X5
'000 '000
Expenses
gains and losses arising from translating the financial statements of a foreign
gains and losses from investments in equity instruments designated at fair value through
OCI
gains and losses on financial assets measured at fair value through OCI
the effective portion of gains and losses on hedging instruments in a cash flow hedge and
the gains and losses on hedging instruments that hedge investments in equity instruments
measured at fair value through OCI
for particular liabilities designated as at FVTPL, the amount of the change in fair value that
is attributable to changes in the liability’s credit risk
changes in the value of the time value of options when separating the intrinsic value and
time value of an option contract and designating as the hedging instrument only the
changes in the intrinsic value
changes in the value of the forward elements of forward contracts when separating the
forward element and spot element of a forward contract and designating as the hedging
instrument only the changes in the spot element, and changes in the value of the foreign
currency basis spread of a financial instrument when excluding it from the designation of
that financial instrument as the hedging instrument
Example 14
Gains realised on the disposal of financial assets are included in profit or loss of the current
period. These amounts may have been recognised in other comprehensive income as
unrealised gains in the current or previous periods. Those unrealised gains must be
deducted from other comprehensive income in the period in which the realised gains are
reclassified to profit or loss to avoid including them in total comprehensive income twice.
Revaluation of land
and buildings 7,100 7,100
An entity may present reclassification adjustments in the statement of profit and loss or in
the notes. An entity presenting reclassification adjustments in the notes presents the items
of other comprehensive income after any related reclassification adjustments.
31.3.20X6 31.3.20X5
'000 '000
311 200
(590) (281)
(1229) 58
(79) 5
617 (655)
1420 0
(17)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 433 (673)
Circumstances that would give rise to the separate disclosure of items of income and
expense include:
(a) write-downs of inventories to net realisable value or of property, plant and equipment to
recoverable amount, as well as reversals of such write-downs;
(b) restructurings of the activities of an entity and reversals of any provisions for the costs
of restructuring;
(c) disposals of items of property, plant and equipment;
(d) disposals of investments;
(e) discontinued operations;
(f) litigation settlements; and
(g) other reversals of provisions.
An entity shall present an analysis of expenses recognised in profit or loss using a
classification based on the nature of expense method.
Revenue X
Other income X
Other expenses X
Format of Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 st March 20X6 *
Share capital
Translation
earnings
Retained
reserve
Total
Equity as at 31 st March 20X5 (A) 1,041 (47,382) 2,65,266 2,18,925
*For the purpose of convenience, the movement has been given only for one year. However as
per the requirement, the similar reconciliation is also required from 31 st March, 20X4 to
31 st March, 20X5 as comparatives in the Statement of changes in equity.
1.8.5 Statement of Cash Flows
Cash flow information provides users of financial statements with a basis to assess the ability
of the entity to generate cash and cash equivalents and the needs of the entity to utilise those
cash flows.
An entity should present a statement of cash flows in accordance with Ind AS 7, Statement
of Cash Flows.
(2) non-financial disclosures, eg the entity’s financial risk management objectives and
policies (see Ind AS 107).
An entity may present notes providing information about the basis of preparation of the financial
statements and specific accounting policies as a separate section of the financial statements.
1.8.6.2 Disclosure of accounting policies
An entity shall disclose material accounting policy information. Accounting policy information is
material if, when considered together with other information included in an entity’s financial
statements, it can reasonably be expected to influence decisions that the primary users of general
purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements.
Accounting policy information that relates to immaterial transactions, other events or conditions is
immaterial and need not be disclosed. Not all accounting policy information relating to material
transactions, other events or conditions is itself material.
An entity is likely to consider accounting policy information material to its financial statements if
that information relates to material transactions, other events or conditions and:
(a) the entity changed its accounting policy during the reporting period and this change resulted
in a material change to the information in the financial statements;
(b) the entity chose the accounting policy from one or more options permitted by Ind AS
(c) the accounting policy was developed in accordance with Ind AS 8 in the absence of an
Ind AS that specifically applies;
(d) the accounting policy relates to an area for which an entity is required to make significant
judgements or assumptions in applying an accounting policy, and the entity discloses those
judgements or assumptions; or
(e) the accounting required for them is complex and users of the entity’s financial statements
would otherwise not understand those material transactions, other events or conditions—
such a situation could arise if an entity applies more than one Ind AS to a class of material
transactions.
Accounting policy information that focuses on how an entity has applied the requirements of the
Ind AS to its own circumstances provides entity-specific information that is more useful to users
of financial statements than standardised information, or information that only duplicates or
summarises the requirements of the Ind AS.
If an entity discloses immaterial accounting policy information, such information shall not obscure
material accounting policy information.
31.3.20X6 31.3.20X5
Borrowings other than convertible preference shares 1,44,201 1,57,506
Gearing ratio 27 36
In order to achieve this overall objective, the Group’s capital management, amongst other things,
aims to ensure that it meets financial covenants attached to the interest-bearing loans and
borrowings that define capital structure requirements. Breaches in meeting the financial
covenants would permit the bank to immediately call loans and borrowings. There have been no
breaches in the financial covenants of any interest-bearing loans and borrowing in the current
period. No changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes for managing capital
during the years ended 31 st March 20X6 and 31 st March 20X5.
16. Capital Allocation Policy: The Board reviewed and approved a revised Capital Allocation
Policy of the Company after taking into consideration the strategic and operational cash
requirements of the Company in the medium term.
The key aspects of the Capital Allocation Policy are:
1. The Company’s current policy is to pay dividends of up to 50% of post-tax profits of the
Financial Year. Effective from Financial Year 20X1, the Company expects to payout up
to 70% of the free cash flow* of the corresponding Financial Year in such manner
(including by way of dividend and/or share buyback) as may be decided by the Board
from time to time, subject to applicable laws and requisite approvals, if any.
b. its objectives, policies and processes for managing its obligation to repurchase or redeem
the instruments when required to do so by the instrument holders, including any changes
from the previous period;
c. the expected cash outflow on redemption or repurchase of that class of financial instruments;
and
d. information about how the expected cash outflow on redemption or repurchase was
determined.
1.8.6.6 Other disclosures
An entity must disclose the amount of dividends proposed or declared before the financial
statements were approved for issue but not recognised as a distribution to owners during the
period, and the related amount per share and the amount of any cumulative preference dividends
not recognised.
Ind AS 1 requires certain other disclosures, if not disclosed elsewhere in information published
with the financial statements:
a) the domicile and legal form of the entity, its country of incorporation and the address of its
registered office (or principal place of business, if different from the registered office);
b) a description of the nature of the entity’s operations and its principal activities;
c) the name of the parent and the ultimate parent of the group; and
d) if it is a limited life entity, information regarding the length of its life.
(a) An extract from the annual report of Tata Consultancy Services Limited
for the year ended 31 st March, 2022:
Notes forming part of Standalone Financial Statements
1) Corporate information
Tata Consultancy Services Limited (referred to as “TCS Limited” or “the
Company”) provides IT services, consulting and business solutions and has been
partnering with many of the world’s largest businesses in their transformation
journeys. The Company offers a consulting-led, cognitive powered, integrated
portfolio of IT, business and engineering services and solutions. This is delivered
through its unique Location-Independent Agile delivery model, recognised as a
benchmark of excellence in software development.
Illustration 16
A Limited has prepared the following draft balance sheet as on 31 st March 20X1: ( in crores)
Particulars 31 st March, 31 st March,
20X1 20X0
ASSETS
Cash 250 170
Cash equivalents 70 30
Non-controlling interest’s share of profit for the year 160 150
Dividend declared and paid by A Limited 90 70
Accounts receivable 2,300 1,800
Inventory at cost 1,500 1,650
Inventory at fair value less cost to complete and sell 180 130
Investment property 3,100 3,100
Property, plant and equipment (PPE) at cost 5,200 4,700
Total 12,850 11,800
ASSETS
Non-current assets
(a) Property, plant and equipment 1 3,590 3,460
(b) Investment property 3,100 3,100
Total non-current assets 6,690 6,560
Current assets
(a) Inventory 2 1,680 1,780
(b) Financial assets
(i) Trade and other receivables 3 2,100 1,735
(ii) Cash and cash equivalents 4 320 200
Total current assets 4,100 3,715
LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities
(a) Financial Liabilities
Borrowings - Long-term debt 6 2,800 3,385
(b) Provisions
Long-term provisions (environmental
restoration) 765 640
Current liabilities
(a) Financial Liabilities
(i) Trade and other payables (Other than 7 895 820
micro enterprises and small
enterprises)
8 500 500
(ii) Current portion of long-term debt
260 290
(iii) Interest accrued on long-term debt
150 230
(iv) Dividend payable
(b) Provisions
600 445
(i) Warranty provision
35 25
(ii) Other short-term provisions
2,440 2,310
Total current liabilities
6,005 6,335
Total liabilities
Working Notes:
2. Purpose and Ind AS 1 lays down purpose of financial Not covered in any
General Features statements and general feature of AS
of Financial financial statements such as True and
Statements Fair view and compliance with Ind AS. An
enterprise shall make an explicit
statement in the financial statements of
compliance with all the Indian Accounting
Standards. Further, Ind AS 1 allows
deviation from a requirement of an
accounting standard in case the
management concludes that compliance
with Ind AS will be misleading and if the
regulatory framework requires or does
not prohibit such a departure.
3. Off-setting Ind AS 1 state that an entity shall not Not covered in any
offset assets and liabilities or income and AS
expenses, unless required or permitted
by an Ind AS.
7. Statement of profit Ind AS 1 requires that an entity shall Not covered in any
and loss present a single statement of profit AS
and loss, with profit or loss and other
comprehensive income presented in
two sections. The sections shall be
presented together, with the profit or
loss section presented first followed
10. Comparative As per Ind AS 1, an entity shall include Not covered in any
information certain comparative information for AS
understanding the current period’s
financial statements.
11. Classification of Ind AS 1 clarifies that long-term loan Not covered in any
long-term loan arrangement need not be classified as AS
arrangement current on account of breach of a material
provision, for which the lender has
agreed to waive before the approval of
financial statements for issue.
(Paragraph 74 of Ind AS 1)
payable on demand on the reporting date, the entity does not classify the liability as current, if the
lender agreed, after the reporting period and before the approval of the financial statements for
issue, not to demand payment as a consequence of the breach. Consequent to this, requirements
of paragraph 76 of IAS 1 to treat such events as non-adjusting events are also deleted.
Reason
Under Indian banking system, a long-term loan agreement generally contains a large number of
conditions. Some of these conditions are substantive, such as, recalling the loan in case interest
is not paid, and some conditions are procedural and not substantive, such as, submission of
insurance details where the entity has taken the insurance but not submitted the details to the
lender at the end of the reporting period. Generally, in case of any procedural breach, a loan is
generally not recalled. Also, in many cases, a breach is rectified after the balance sheet date and
before the approval of financial statements. Carve out has been made as it is felt that if the breach
is rectified after the balance sheet date but before the approval of the financial statements, it
would be appropriate that the users are informed about the true nature of liabilities being non-
current liabilities instead of current liabilities.
date extended upto 30 th June, 20X2 for getting promoter’s contribution. In this case will
the loan classification as on 31 st March, 20X2 be different from (a) above?
3. Company A has taken a long-term loan from Company B. In the month of December 20X1,
there was a breach of material provision of the arrangement. As a consequence of which
the loan becomes payable on demand on 31 st March, 20X2. In the month of May 20X2, the
company started negotiation with company B for not to demand payment as a consequence
of the breach. The financial statements were approved for the issue in the month of June
20X2. In the month of July 20X2, both the companies agreed that the payment will not be
demanded immediately as a consequence of breach of material provision.
Advise on the classification of the liability as current / non-current.
4. Entity A has undertaken various transactions in the financial year ended 31 st March, 20X1.
Identify and present the transactions in the financial statements as per Ind AS 1.
5. XYZ Limited (the ‘Company’) is into the manufacturing of tractor parts and mainly supplying
components to the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs). The Company does not have
any subsidiary, joint venture or associate company. During the preparation of financial
statements for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1, the accounts department is not sure about
the treatment / presentation of below mentioned matters. Accounts department approached
you to advice on the following matters.
S. No. Matters
(i) There are qualifications in the audit report of the Company with reference to two
Ind AS.
Evaluate the above matters with respect to preparation and presentation of a general-
purpose financial statement.
6. A Company presents financial results for three years (i.e., one for current year and two
comparative years) internally for the purpose of management information every year in
addition to the general-purpose financial statements. The aforesaid financial results are
presented without furnishing the related notes because these are not required by the
management for internal purposes. During the current year, management thought why not
they should present third year statement of profit and loss also in the general-purpose
financial statements. It will save time and will be available easily whenever management
needs this in future.
With reference to above background, answer the following:
(i) Can management present the third statement of profit and loss as an additional
comparative in the general-purpose financial statements?
(ii) If management present third statement of profit and loss in the general-purpose financial
statement as comparative, is it necessary that this statement should- be compliant of
Ind AS?
(iii) Can management present third statement of profit and loss only as additional
comparative in the general-purpose financial statements without furnishing other
components (like balance sheet, statement of cash flows, statement of change in equity)
of financial statements?
7. A company, while preparing the financial statements for financial year 20X1-20X2,
erroneously booked excess revenue of 10 crore. The total revenue reported in financial
year 20X1-20X2 was 80 crore. However, while preparing the financial statements for
20X2-20X3, it discovered that excess revenue was booked in financial year 20X1-20X2 which
it now wants to correct in the financial statements. However, the management of the
company is not sure whether it need to present the third balance sheet as additional
comparative.
With regard to the above background, answer the following:
(i) Is it necessary to provide the third balance sheet at the beginning of the preceding
period in this case?
(ii) The company wants to correct the errors during financial year 20X2-20X3 by giving
impact in the figures of current year only. Is the contention of the management, correct?
8. XYZ Limited (the ‘Company’) is into construction of turnkey projects and has assessed its
operating cycle to be 18 months. The Company has certain trade receivables and payables
which are receivable and payable within a period of twelve months from the reporting date,
i.e., 31 st March, 20X2.
In addition to above there are following items/transactions which took place during financial
year 20X1-20X2:
S. No. Items/transactions
(1) The company has some trade receivables which are due after 15 months from
the date of the balance sheet. So, the company expects that the payment will
be received within the period of operating cycle.
(2) The company has some trade payables which are due for payment after
14 months from the date of balance sheet. These payables fall due within the
period of operating cycle. Though the company does not expect that it will be
able to pay these payables within the operating cycle because the nature of
business is such that generally projects get delayed and payments from
customers also get delayed.
(3) The company was awarded a contract of 100 crore on 31 st March, 20X2. As
per the terms of the contract, the company made a security deposit of 5% of
the contract value with the customer, of 5 crore on 31 st March, 20X2. The
contract is expected to be completed in 18 months’ time. The aforesaid deposit
will be refunded back after 6 months from the date of the completion of the
contract.
(4) The company has also given certain contracts to third parties and have received
security deposits from them of 2 crore on 31 st March, 20X2 which are
repayable on completion of the contract but if contract is cancelled before the
(i) The company wants to present the trade receivable as current despite the fact that these
are receivables in 15 months’ time. Does the decision of presenting the same as current
is correct?
(ii) The company wants to present the trade payables as non-current despite the fact that
these are due within the operating cycle of the company. Does the decision of
presenting the same as non-current is correct?
(iii) Can the security deposit of 5 crore made by the company with the customers be
presented as current?
(iv) Can the security deposit of 2 crore taken by the company from contractors be
presented as non-current?
(b) Whether profit on sale of an asset against loss on sale of another asset can be offset?
(c) When services are rendered in a transaction with an entity and services are received
from the same entity in two different arrangements, can the receivable and payable be
offset?
Answers
1. Inventory and debtors need to be classified in accordance with the requirement of Ind AS 1,
which provides that an asset shall be classified as current if an entity expects to realise the
same or intends to sell or consume it in its normal operating cycle.
(a) In this case, time lag between the purchase of inventory and its realisation into cash is
19 months [11 months + 8 months]. Both inventory and the debtors would be classified
as current if the entity expects to realise these assets in its normal operating cycle.
(b) No, the answer will be the same as the classification of debtors and inventory depends
on the expectation of the entity to realise the same in the normal operating cycle. In
this case, time lag between the purchase of inventory and its realisation into cash is
28 months [15 months + 13 months]. Both inventory and debtors would be classified as
current if the entity expects to realise these assets in the normal operating cycle.
2. (a) Ind AS 1, inter alia, provides, “An entity classifies the liability as non-current if the lender
agreed by the end of the reporting period to provide a period of grace ending at least
twelve months after the reporting period, within which the entity can rectify the breach
and during which the lender cannot demand immediate repayment.” In the present
case, following the default, grace period within which an entity can rectify the breach is
less than twelve months after the reporting period. Hence as on 31 st March, 20X2, the
loan will be classified as current.
(b) Ind AS 1 deals with classification of liability as current or non-current in case of breach
of a loan covenant and does not deal with the classification in case of expectation of
breach. In this case, whether actual breach has taken place or not is to be assessed on
30 th June, 20X2, i.e., after the reporting date. Consequently, in the absence of actual
breach of the loan covenant as on 31 st March, 20X2, the loan will retain its classification
as non-current.
3. As per para 74 of Ind AS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”, where there is a breach
of a material provision of a long-term loan arrangement on or before the end of the reporting
period with the effect that the liability becomes payable on demand on the reporting date, the
entity does not classify the liability as current, if the lender agreed, after the reporting period
and before the approval of the financial statements for issue, not to demand payment as a
consequence of the breach.
An entity classifies the liability as non-current if the lender agreed by the end of the reporting
period to provide a period of grace ending at least twelve months after the reporting period,
within which the entity can rectify the breach and during which the lender cannot demand
immediate repayment.
In the given case, Company B (the lender) agreed for not to demand payment but only after
the reporting date and the financial statements were approved for issuance. The financial
statements were approved for issuance in the month of June 20X2 and both companies
agreed for not to demand payment in the month of July 20X2 although negotiation started in
the month of May 20X2 but could not agree before June 20X2 when financial statements
were approved for issuance.
Gains and losses arising from translating the monetary assets in foreign 75,000
currency
Items impacting the other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1 ( )
Gains and losses arising from translating the financial statements of a foreign
operation 65,000
5. (i) Yes, an entity whose financial statements comply with Ind AS shall make an explicit
and unreserved statement of such compliance in the notes. An entity shall not describe
financial statements as complying with Ind AS unless they comply with all the
requirements of Ind AS. (Refer Para 16 of Ind AS 1)
(ii) No, but need to disclose in the financial statement that these are individual financial
statements of the Company. (Refer Para 51(b) of Ind AS 1)
(iii) Yes, Para 51(d) of Ind AS 1 inter alia states that an entity shall display the presentation
currency, as defined in Ind AS 21 prominently, and repeat it when necessary for the
information presented to be understandable.
(iv) No, as per Para 38 of Ind AS 1, except when Ind AS permit or require otherwise, an
entity shall present comparative information in respect of the preceding period for all
amounts reported in the current period’s financial statements. An entity shall include
comparative information for narrative and descriptive information if it is relevant to
understanding the current period’s financial statements.
6. (i) Yes, as per Para 38C of Ind AS 1, an entity may present comparative information in
addition to the minimum comparative financial statements required by Ind AS, as long
as that information is prepared in accordance with Ind AS. This comparative
information may consist of one or more statements referred to in paragraph 10 but need
not comprise a complete set of financial statements. When this is the case, the entity
shall present related note information for those additional statements.
(ii) Yes, as per Para 38C of Ind AS 1, an entity may present comparative information in
addition to the minimum comparative financial statements required by Ind AS, as long
as that information is prepared in accordance with Ind AS.
(iii) Yes, as per Para 38C of Ind AS 1, an entity may present comparative information in
addition to the minimum comparative financial statements required by Ind AS, as long
as that information is prepared in accordance with Ind AS. This comparative
information may consist of one or more statements referred to in paragraph 10 but need
not comprise a complete set of financial statements. When this is the case, the entity
shall present related note information for those additional statements.
7. (i) No, as per Para 40A of Ind AS 1, an entity shall present a third balance sheet as at the
beginning of the preceding period in addition to the minimum comparative financial
statements required in paragraph 38A if:
(a) it applies an accounting policy retrospectively, makes a retrospective restatement
of items in its financial statements or reclassifies items in its financial statements;
and
(b) the retrospective application, retrospective restatement or the reclassification has
a material effect on the information in the balance sheet at the beginning of the
preceding period.
(ii) No, management need to correct the previous year figures to correct the error but need
not to furnish third balance sheet at the beginning of preceding period. (Refer Para 40A
of Ind AS 1)
8. (i) Yes, but additionally the Company also need to disclose amounts that are receivable
within a period of 12 months and after 12 months from the reporting date. (Refer Para
60 and 61 of Ind AS 1)
(ii) No, the Company cannot disclose these payables as non-current and the Company also
need to disclose amounts that are payable within a period of 12 months and after
12 months from the reporting date. (Refer Para 60 and 61 of Ind AS 1)
v
UNIT 2:
INDIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARD 34: INTERIM
FINANCIAL REPORTING
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
State the objective and scope of Ind AS 34
Define the relevant terms used in the standard
Elaborate the contents of interim financial report
Prescribe minimum content of Interim Financial Report
Account for the significant events and transactions while preparing the
interim financial report
Recommend principles of recognition and measurement in complete or
condensed financial statement for an interim period
Prepare the interim financial report of an entity
Differentiate between Ind AS 34 and AS 25.
UNIT OVERVIEW
Minimum
Components
of Interim
Recognition and Measurement
Financial
Report
Significant
Events and Same
Transactions Accounting
Policies as Restatement of Previously
Annual
Reported Interim Periods
Revenues
Received
Seasonally,
Other Cyclically, or
Disclosures Occasionally
Costs incurred
Unevenly during Interim Financial
Disclosure in Annual
the Financial Reporting and
Year Financial Statements
Impairment
v
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Interim Financial Reporting applies when an entity prepares an interim financial report. Ind AS
34 does not mandate an entity as when to prepare such a report. Timely and reliable interim
financial reporting improves the ability of investors, creditors, lenders and others to understand
an entity’s capacity to generate earnings and cash flows and its financial condition and liquidity.
Permitting less information to be reported than in annual financial statements (on the basis of
providing an update to those financial statements), the standard outlines the recognition,
measurement and disclosure requirements for interim reports.
2.2 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this Standard is to prescribe
a) the minimum content of an interim financial report
b) the principles for recognition and measurement in complete or condensed financial
statements for an interim period.
2.3 SCOPE
This Standard does not mandate which entities should be required to publish interim
financial reports, how frequently, or how soon after the end of an interim period.
This Standard applies if an entity is required or elects to publish an interim financial report
in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS).
Each financial report, annual or interim, is evaluated on its own for conformity to Ind AS.
The fact that an entity may not have provided interim financial reports during a particular
financial year or may have provided interim financial reports that do not comply with this
Standard does not prevent the entity’s annual financial statements from conforming to Ind
AS if they otherwise do so.
If an entity’s interim financial report is described as complying with Ind AS, it must comply
with all of the requirements of this Standard.
2.4 DEFINITIONS
1. Interim period is a financial reporting period shorter than a full financial year.
In the interest of timeliness and cost considerations and to avoid repetition of information
previously reported, an entity may be required to or may elect to provide less information at
interim dates as compared with its annual financial statements.
The interim financial report focuses on new activities, events, and circumstances and does
not duplicate information previously reported.
Nothing in this Standard is intended to prohibit or discourage an entity from publishing a
complete set of financial statements (as described in Ind AS 1) in its interim financial
report, rather than condensed financial statements and selected explanatory notes. Nor
does this Standard prohibit or discourage an entity from including in condensed interim
financial statements more than the minimum line items or selected explanatory notes asset
out in this Standard.
v
2.5.1 Form and Content of Interim financial report
The following is a list of events and transactions for which disclosures would be
required if they are significant: (The below list is not exhaustive)
1. the write-down of inventories to net realisable value and the reversal of such write-
down;
2. recognition of a loss from the impairment of financial assets, property, plant and
equipment, intangible assets, assets arising from contracts with customers, or other
assets, and the reversal of such an impairment loss;
6. litigation settlements;
8. changes in the business or economic circumstances that affect the fair value of the
entity’s financial assets and financial liabilities, whether those assets or liabilities are
recognised at fair value or amortised cost;
9. any loan default or breach of a loan agreement that has not been remedied on or
before the end of the reporting period;
11. transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy used in measuring the fair value
of financial instruments;
Individual Ind AS provide guidance regarding disclosure requirements for many of the
items listed above. When an event or transaction is significant to an understanding of the
changes in an entity’s financial position or performance since the last annual reporting
period, its interim financial report should provide an explanation of and an update to the
relevant information included in the financial statements of the last annual reporting period.
v
Significant events and transactions
a) a statement that the same accounting policies and methods of computation are followed
in the interim financial statements. If those recently used policies or methods have
been changed, a description of the nature and effect of the change should also be
given.
c) the nature and amount of items affecting assets, liabilities, equity, net income or cash
flows that are unusual because of their nature, size or incidence.
d) the nature and amount of changes in estimates of amounts reported in prior interim
periods of the current financial year or changes in estimates of amounts reported in
prior financial years.
f) dividends paid (aggregate or per share) separately for ordinary shares and other
shares.
h) events after the interim period that have not been reflected in the financial statements
v
for the interim period.
i) the effect of changes in the composition of the entity during the interim period, including
business combinations, obtaining or losing control of subsidiaries and long-term
investments, restructurings, and discontinued operations. In the case of business
combinations, the entity shall disclose the information required by Ind AS 103, Business
Combinations.
j) for financial instruments, the disclosures about fair value of Ind AS 113, Fair Value
Measurement, and Ind AS 107, Financial Instruments: Disclosures.
k) for entities becoming, or ceasing to be, investment entities, as defined in Ind AS 110,
Consolidated Financial Statements, the disclosures in Ind AS 112, Disclosure of
Interests in Other Entities.
l) the disaggregation of revenue from contracts with customers required by Ind AS 115,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Other Disclosures
Either Or
Statements should be available to users of the financial statements on the same terms as the
interim financial statements and at the same time otherwise the interim financial
statements shall be considered as incomplete
v
Periods for which interim financial statements are required to be presented
Note: For an entity whose business is highly seasonal, financial information for the twelve
months up to the end of the interim period and comparative information for the prior twelve-
month period may be useful.
Statement of profit and loss : 6 months ending 30 September 20X2 30 September 20X1
2.5.5 Materiality
In deciding how to recognise, measure, classify, or disclose an item for interim financial
v
reporting purposes, materiality shall be assessed in relation to the interim period financial
data.
In making assessments of materiality, it shall be recognised that interim measurements
may rely on estimates to a greater extent than measurements of annual financial data.
While judgement is always required in assessing materiality, this Standard bases the
recognition and disclosure decision on data for the interim period by itself for reasons of
understandability of the interim figures.
Unusual items, changes in accounting policies or estimates, and errors are recognised and
disclosed on the basis of materiality in relation to interim period data to avoid misleading
inferences that might result from non-disclosure.
1 Same accounting 1. An entity shall apply the same accounting policies in its
policies as annual interim financial statements as are applied in its annual
financial statements, except for accounting policy
changes made after the date of the most recent annual
financial statements that are to be reflected in the next
annual financial statements.
2. The frequency of an entity’s reporting (annual, half-
yearly, or quarterly) shall not affect the measurement of
3 Costs incurred Costs that are incurred unevenly during an entity’s financial
unevenly during the year shall be anticipated or deferred for interim reporting
financial year purposes if, and only if, it is also appropriate to anticipate or
defer that type of cost at the end of the financial year.
v
Employer payroll taxes and insurance contributions
If employer payroll taxes or contributions to government-sponsored insurance funds are
assessed on an annual basis, the employer’s related expense is recognised in interim periods
using an estimated average annual effective payroll tax or contribution rate, even though a large
portion of the payments may be made early in the financial year. A common example is an
employer payroll tax or insurance contribution that is imposed up to a certain maximum level of
earnings per employee. For higher income employees, the maximum income is reached before
the end of the financial year, and the employer makes no further payments through the end of
the year.
A provision is recognised when an entity has no realistic alternative but to make a transfer of
economic benefits as a result of an event that has created a legal or constructive obligation. The
amount of the obligation is adjusted upward or downward, with a corresponding loss or gain
recognised in profit or loss, if the entity’s best estimate of the amount of the obligation changes.
This Standard requires that an entity apply the same criteria for recognising and measuring a
provision at an interim date as it would at the end of its financial year. The existence or non-
existence of an obligation to transfer benefits is not a function of the length of the reporting
period. It is a question of fact.
Year-end bonuses
The nature of year-end bonuses varies widely. Some are earned simply by continued
employment during a time period. Some bonuses are earned based on a monthly, quarterly, or
annual measure of operating result. They may be purely discretionary, contractual, or based on
years of historical precedent.
A bonus is anticipated for interim reporting purposes if, and only if, (a) the bonus is a legal
obligation or past practice would make the bonus a constructive obligation for which the entity
has no realistic alternative but to make the payments, and (b) a reliable estimate of the
obligation can be made. Ind AS 19, Employee Benefits provides guidance.
v
recognition and measurement principles shall be applied in an interim financial report as are
applied in annual financial statements. Income taxes are assessed on an annual basis. Interim
period income tax expense is calculated by applying to an interim period’s pre-tax income the
tax rate that would be applicable to expected total annual earnings, that is, the estimated
average annual effective income tax rate. That estimated average annual rate would reflect a
blend of the progressive tax rate structure expected to be applicable to the full year’s earnings
including enacted or substantively enacted changes in the income tax rates scheduled to take
effect later in the financial year. Ind AS 12, Income Taxes provides guidance on substantively
enacted changes in tax rates. The estimated average annual income tax rate would be re-
estimated on a year-to-date basis, consistent with paragraph 28 of this Standard. The Standard
requires disclosure of a significant change in estimate.
To the extent practicable, a separate estimated average annual effective income tax rate is
determined for each taxing jurisdiction and applied individually to the interim period pre-tax
income of each jurisdiction. Similarly, if different income tax rates apply to different categories
of income (such as capital gains or income earned in particular industries), to the extent
practicable a separate rate is applied to each individual category of interim period pre-tax
income. While that degree of precision is desirable, it may not be achievable in all cases, and a
weighted average of rates across jurisdictions or across categories of income is used if it is a
reasonable approximation of the effect of using more specific rates.
Contractual or anticipated purchase price changes
Volume rebates or discounts and other contractual changes in the prices of raw materials,
labour, or other purchased goods and services are anticipated in interim periods, by both the
payer and the recipient, if it is probable that they have been earned or will take effect. Thus,
contractual rebates and discounts are anticipated but discretionary rebates and discounts are
not anticipated because the resulting asset or liability would not satisfy the conditions in the
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting that an asset must be a resource controlled by
the entity as a result of a past event and that a liability must be a present obligation whose
settlement is expected to result in an outflow of resources.
Depreciation and amortisation
Depreciation and amortisation for an interim period is based only on assets owned during that
interim period. It does not take into account asset acquisitions or dispositions planned for later
in the financial year.
Inventories
Inventories are measured for interim financial reporting by the same principles as at financial
year-end. Ind AS 2, Inventories establishes standards for recognising and measuring
v
Inventories
Full stock-taking and valuation procedures may not be required for inventories at interim dates,
although it may be done at financial year-end. It may be sufficient to make estimates at interim
dates based on sales margins.
Provisions
Determination of an appropriate amount of a provision (such as a provision for warranties,
environmental costs, and site restoration costs) may be complex and often costly and time-
consuming. Entities sometimes engage outside experts to assist in the annual calculations.
Making similar estimates at interim dates often entails updating of the prior annual provision
rather than the engaging of outside experts to do a new calculation.
Pensions
Ind AS 19, Employee Benefits requires that an entity determine the present value of defined
benefit obligations and the market value of plan assets at the end of each reporting period and
encourages an entity to involve a professionally qualified actuary in measurement of the
obligations. For interim reporting purposes, reliable measurement is often obtainable by
extrapolation of the latest actuarial valuation.
Contingencies
The measurement of contingencies may involve the opinions of legal experts or other advisers.
Formal reports from independent experts are sometimes obtained with respect to contingencies.
Such opinions about litigation, claims, assessments, and other contingencies and uncertainties
may or may not also be needed at interim dates.
Inter-company reconciliations
Some inter-company balances that are reconciled on a detailed level in preparing consolidated
financial statements at financial year-end might be reconciled at a less detailed level in
preparing consolidated financial statements at an interim date.
Illustration 1
Company A has reported 60,000 as pre tax profit in first quarter and expects a loss of
15,000 each in the subsequent quarters. It has a corporate tax slab of 20 percent on the first
20,000 of annual earnings and 40 per cent on all additional earnings. Calculate the amount of
tax to be shown in each quarter.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Profit / (Loss) before tax 60,000 (15,000) (15,000) (15,000)
Tax charge / (credit) 12,000 (3,000) (3,000) (3,000)
*****
Illustration 2
ABC Ltd. presents interim financial report quarterly. On 1.4.20X1, ABC Ltd. has carried forward
loss of 600 lakhs for income-tax purpose for which deferred tax asset has not been
recognized. ABC Ltd. earns 900 lakhs in each quarter ending on 30.6.20X1, 30.9.20X1,
31.12.20X1 and 31.3.20X2 excluding the carried forward loss. Income-tax rate is expected to be
40%. Calculate the amount of tax expense to be reported in each quarter.
Solution
Amount of income tax expense reported in each quarter would be as below:
The estimated payment of the annual tax on earnings for the current year:
*****
Illustration 3
Innovative Corporation Private Limited (or “ICPL”) is dealing in seasonal product and the sales
pattern of the product, quarter wise is as under during the financial year 20X1-20X2:
v
Qtr. I Qtr. II Qtr. III Qtr. IV
ending 30 June ending 30 September ending 31 December ending 31 March
10% 10% 60% 20%
For the first quarter ending on 30 June, 20X1, ICPL has provided the following information :
ICPL while preparing interim financial report for first quarter wants to defer 16 crores
expenditure to third quarter on the argument that third quarter is having more sales therefore
third quarter should be debited by more expenditure. Considering the seasonal nature of
business and that the expenditures are uniform throughout all quarte
Calculate the result of first quarter as per Ind AS 34 and comment on the company’s view.
Solution
Result of the first quarter ending 30 June
Sales 70
Profit (A-B) 29
Illustration 4
Fixed production overheads for the financial year is 10,000. Normal expected production for
the year, after considering planned maintenance and normal breakdown, also considering the
future demand of the product is 2,000 MT. It is considered that there are no quarterly /
seasonal variations. Therefore, the normal expected production for each quarter is 500 MT and
the fixed production overheads for the quarter are 2,500.
Total 1,900
Presuming that there are no quarterly / seasonal variation, calculate the allocation of fixed
production overheads for all the four quarters as per Ind AS 34 read with Ind AS 2. Will the
quarterly results affect the annual results?
Solution
If it is considered that there is no quarterly / seasonal variation, therefore normal expected
production for each quarter is 500 MT and fixed production overheads for the quarter are
2,500.
Fixed production overhead to be allocated per unit of production in every quarter will be 5
per MT (Fixed overheads / Normal production).
Quarters Allocations
First Quarter Actual fixed production overheads = 2,500
Fixed production overheads based on the allocation rate of 5 per
unit allocated to actual production = 5 x 400 = 2,000
v
Unallocated fixed production overheads to be charged as expense as
per Ind AS 2 and consequently as per Ind AS 34 = 500
Second Quarter Actual fixed production overheads on year-to-date basis = 5,000
Fixed production overheads to be absorbed on year-to-date basis =
1,000 x 5 = 5,000
Earlier, 500 was not allocated to production in the 1 st quarter. To
give effect to the entire 5,000 to be allocated in the second quarter,
as per Ind AS 34, 500 are reversed by way of a credit to the
statement of profit and loss of the 2 nd quarter.
Third Quarter Actual production overheads on year-to-date basis = 7,500
Fixed production overheads to be allocated on year-to-date basis =
1,500 x 5 = 7,500
There is no under or over recovery of allocated overheads. Hence,
no further action is required.
Fourth Quarter Actual fixed production overheads on year-to-date basis
= 10,000
Fixed production overheads to be allocated on year-to-date basis
1,900 x 5 = 9,500
500, i.e., [ 2,500 – ( 5 x 400)] unallocated fixed production
overheads in the 4 th quarter, are to be expensed off as per the
principles of Ind AS 2 and Ind AS 34 by way of a charge to the
statement of profit and loss.
Unallocated productions overheads for the year 500 (i.e 10,000 –
9,500) are expensed in the Statement of profit and loss as per
Ind AS 2.
The cumulative result of all the quarters would also result in unallocated overheads of 500,
thus, meeting the requirements of Ind AS 34 that the quarterly results should not affect the
measurement of the annual results.
*****
v
depreciation.
(iii) Exceptional loss of 28,000 incurred during the third quarter. 50% of exceptional loss have
been deferred to next quarter.
(iv) 5,00,000 expenditure on account of administrative expenses pertaining to the third
quarter is deferred on the argument that the fourth quarter will have more sales; therefore
fourth quarter should be debited by higher expenditure. The expenditures are uniform
throughout all quarters.
Ascertain the correct net profit to be shown in the Interim Financial Report of third quarter to be
presented to the Board of Directors.
Solution
In the instant case, the quarterly net profit has not been correctly stated. As per Ind AS 34,
Interim Financial Reporting, the quarterly net profit should be adjusted and restated as follows:
(i) The treatment of bad debts is not correct as the expenses incurred during an inter
imreporting period should be recognised in the same period. Accordingly, 50,000 should
be deducted from 20,00,000.
(ii) Recognising additional depreciation of 4,50,000 in the same quarter is correct and is in
tune with Ind AS 34.
(iii) Treatment of exceptional loss is not as per the principles of Ind AS 34, as the entire
amount of 28,000 incurred during the third quarter should be recognized in the same
quarter. Hence 14,000 which was deferred should be deducted from the profits of third
quarter only.
(iv) As per Ind AS 34 the income and expense should be recognised when they are earned and
incurred respectively. As per para 39 of Ind AS 34, the costs should be anticipated or
deferred only when:
(i) it is appropriate to anticipate or defer that type of cost at the end of the financial year,
and
(ii) costs are incurred unevenly during the financial year of an enterprise.
Therefore, the treatment done relating to deferment of 5,00,000 is not correct as
expenditures are uniform throughout all quarters.
Thus considering the above, the correct net profits to be shown in Interim Financial Report of
the third quarter shall be 14,36,000 ( 20,00,000 - 50,000 - 14,000 - 5,00,000).
*****
v
Statements inthe entity’s interim report if an statements in addition to the
and the entity’s annual financial report separate financial statements,
Consolidated included the parent’s separate the interim financial report
Financial financial statements in addition to should include both the
Statements consolidated financial statements. consolidated financial
in the Entity’s statements and separate
Interim financial statements, complete or
Report condensed.
7. Transitional Ind AS 34 does not have this Under AS 25, when an interim
provision transitional provision. financial report is presented for
the first time in accordance with
that Standard, an entity need not
present, in respect of all the
interim periods of the current
financial year, comparative
statements of profit and loss for
the comparable interim periods
(current and year-to-date) of the
immediately preceding financial
year and comparative cash flow
statement for the comparable
year-to-date period of the
immediately preceding financial
year.
v
FOR SHORTCUT TO IND AS WISDOM: SCAN ME!
v
comparable interim periods (current and year-to-date) of the immediately preceding
financial year.
c) statement of changes in equity cumulatively for the current financial year to date, with
a comparative statement for the comparable year-to-date period of the immediately
preceding financial year.
d) statement of cash flows cumulatively for the current financial year to date, with a
comparative statement for the comparable year-to-date period of the immediately
preceding financial year.
Accordingly, periods for which interim financial statements are required to be presented are
provided herein below:
(i) Entity publishes interim financial reports quarterly
The entity will present the following financial statements (condensed or complete) in
its interim financial report of 30 th September, 20X1:
2. As per para 30(c) of Ind AS 34 ‘Interim Financial Reporting’, income tax expense is
recognised in each interim period based on the best estimate of the weighted average
annual income tax rate expected for the full financial year.
If different income tax rates apply to different categories of income (such as capital gains or
income earned in particular industries) to the extent practicable, a separate rate is applied
to each individual category of interim period pre-tax income.
(B) 9,50,000
9,50,000
Weighted average annual income tax rate = B = 38%
A 25,00,000
10,46,000
v
3. As illustrated in para 30 (c) of Ind AS 34 ‘Interim financial reporting’, income tax expense is
recognised in each interim period based on the best estimate of the weighted average
annual income tax rate expected for the full financial year.
Accordingly, the management’s contention that since the net income for the year will be
zero no income tax expense shall be charged quarterly in the interim financial report, is not
correct. Since the effective tax rate or average annual income tax rate is already given in
the question as 30%, the income tax expense will be recognised in each interim quarter
based on this rate only. The following table shows the correct income tax expense to be
reported each quarter in accordance with Ind AS 34:
Since an entity’s accounting year is not same as the tax year, more than one tax rate might
apply during the accounting year. Accordingly, the entity should apply the effective tax rate
for each interim period to the pre-tax result for that period.
6. Paragraph 28 of Ind AS 34, Interim Financial Reporting states that an entity shall apply the
same accounting recognition and measurement principles in its interim financial statements
as are applied in its annual financial statements.
UNIT 3:
INDIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARD 7: STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
Understand the meaning of cash flow statement
Describe the objective and scope of issuance of Ind AS 7
Define the relevant terms used in the Ind AS
Classify the types of cash flows into operating, investing and financing
activities
Distinguish between direct and indirect method of presentation of cash
flows under the operating activity
Identify the provision applicable to various peculiar situations of cash
flows
Disclose the necessary information as required in the standard
Differentiate between Ind AS 7 and AS 3.
UNIT OVERVIEW
• Objectives
• Scope
• Benefits
Ind AS 7 • Definitions
• Direct Method
Method of • Indirect Method
Presentation
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The balance sheet is a snapshot of entity’s financial resources and obligations at a particular point
of time and the statement of profit and loss reflects the financial performance for the period.
These two components of financial statements are based on accrual basis of accounting. The
statement of cash flows includes only inflows and outflows of cash and cash equivalents; it
excludes transactions that do not affect cash receipts and payments.
The information on cash flows is useful in assessing sources of generating and deploying cash
and cash equivalents during the reporting period. The statement of cash flows can be used for
comparison with earlier reporting periods of the same entity as well as comparison with other
entities for the same reporting period.
Ind AS 7, Statement of Cash Flows, prescribes principles and guidance on preparation and
presentation of cash flows of an entity from operating activities, investing activities and financing
activities for a reporting period.
From Operating
Activities
Cash Flows
Particulars Amount ( )
Add: Cash and Cash Equivalents at the beginning of the year 13,000
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the end of the year (which will also tally with
the cash and cash equivalents given in the balance sheet) 17,000
Thus, one can see that at the beginning of the year, the opening balance of cash and cash
equivalent was 13,000. During the year, the business generated (inflow) cash from its main
operations 10,000. Thus, the entity had 23,000 at its disposal. Out of it, the entity has used
(outflow) 2,000 for additional investments and 4,000 for financing activities. Therefore, at the
end of the year, the entity is left with the balance of 17,000.
3.3 OBJECTIVE
Ind AS 7, has specified the following objectives of Statement of Cash Flows:
3.3.1 To provide information about historical changes in cash and
cash equivalents
Cash flow statement aims at providing the information about how the cash has been generated
during the year and for what purposes has it been utilised. The information will be provided for
current year and immediate previous year.
3.3.2 To assess the ability to generate cash and cash equivalents
Cash flow statement is intended to provide the stakeholders about the efficiency of the company in
generating cash and cash equivalents. Some companies may look profitable as per profit and loss
account but whether they have enough cash for payment of their debts and creditors has to be
assessed by using cash flow statement. It is useful in examining the relationship between
profitability and net cash flow and the impact of changing prices.
Objectives of Ind AS 7
To assess
To require
the provision of
the ability of the the needs of the the timing and information about the
entity to generate entity to utilise certainty of historical changes in
cash and cash those cash flows generation of cash and cash
equivalents cash flows equivalents of an entity
3.4.3 Assess and compare the present value of future cash flows
The past trends of cash flows will help the company to predict about future cash flows. Such
information is useful while evaluating the projects on capital budgeting or valuation of shares.
Thus, it forms the base for future projects and can be discounted using discounting techniques.
3.4.4 Compares the efficiency of different entities
Accounting profits of various entities may have different assumptions, policies and definitions.
However, cash flows will be calculated by using the same technique and finally all differing
assumptions across the companies will melt down and entity will reach to a common comparable
base of cash and cash equivalents.
3.5 SCOPE
An entity shall prepare a statement of cash flows in accordance with the requirements of this
Standard and shall present it as an integral part of its financial statements for each period for
which financial statements are presented.
The Standard requires all entities to present a statement of cash flows.
Every organisation, whether it is small or big in size, whether it’s a manufacturing organisation or
trading concern or service organisation, needs cash for running its business. The cash is also
needed for future investments. Cash would be needed for payment of dividends, repayment of
loans as well. Thus, any organisation is required to generate the cash and utilises cash
continuously.
Banks and Financial institutions are also not an exception to the same. Even if they deal with
financial products, accept deposits and give loans day in and day out, they need to generate the
cash profit for their own organisation. They need to make investments in terms of new branches,
set ups etc. Thus, statement of cash flow is equally important for Banking and Financial
Institutions as well.
3.6 DEFINITIONS
The following terms are used in this Standard with the meanings specified:
1. Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits.
2. Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to
known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
3. Cash flows are inflows and outflows of cash and cash equivalents.
4. Operating activities are the principal revenue-producing activities of the entity and other
activities that are not investing or financing activities.
5. Investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other
investment not included in cash equivalents.
6. Financing activities are activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the
contributed equity and borrowings of the entity.
Illustration 1
Company has provided the following information regarding the various assets held by company on
31 st March 20X1. Find out, which of the following items will be part of cash and cash equivalents
for the purpose of preparation of cash flow statement as per the guidance provided in Ind AS 7:
Sr.No. Name of the Security Additional Information
1. Fixed deposit with SBI 12%, 3 years maturity on 1 st January 20X4
2. Fixed deposit with HDFC 10%, original term was for 2 years, but due for
maturity on 30 th June 20X1
3. Redeemable Preference shares Acquired on 31 st January 20X1 and the
in ABC ltd redemption is due on 30 th April 20X1
4. Cash balances at various banks All branches of all banks in India
5. Cash balances at various banks All international branches of Indian banks
6. Cash balances at various banks Branches of foreign banks outside India
7. Bank overdraft of SBI Fort branch Temporary overdraft, which is payable on
demand
8. Treasury Bills 90 days maturity
Solution
Sr. No. Name of the Security Decision
1. Fixed deposit with SBI Not to be considered – long term
2. Fixed deposit with HDFC Exclude as original maturity is not less than 90
days from the date of acquisition
3. Redeemable Preference shares in Include as due within 90 days from the date of
ABC Ltd. acquisition
4. Cash balances at various banks Include
5. Cash balances at various banks Include
6. Cash balances at various banks Include
7. Bank overdraft of SBI Fort branch Include (Assumed as integral part of an entity's
cash management)
8. Treasury Bills Include
*****
Activities
Solution
*****
The amount of cash flows arising from operating activities is a key indicator of the extent to
which the operations of the entity have generated sufficient cash flows or not. If the cash
flow from operations is positive, it will be treated as positive indicator whereas negative cash
flow from operations will denote that company’s ability to generate the revenue from its main
operations is very weak. The companies in the initial stage of their business or the
companies which are facing economic problems will generally have the negative cash flow
from operations.
Cash flow from operations are used to maintain the operating capability of the entity, pay
dividends and make new investment without recourse to external sources of financing.
Therefore, it is necessary to assess how much cash is generated by the business from
operations? Are they sufficient to take care of their future investment plans? Can loans be
repaid in time without default from such cash flows? Is there sufficient amount for payment of
preference dividend? Is anything left for equity shareholders after making all these
payments? Answers to all these questions will depend on whether the entity has generated
enough cash or not.
3.8.1.1 Certain Specific Issues
1. Profit/ Loss on Sale of Assets : Some transactions, such as the sale of an item of plant,
may give rise to a gain or loss that is included in recognised profit or loss. The cash flows
relating to such transactions are cash flows from investing activities.
2. Properties built for let out : Cash payments to manufacture or acquire assets held for rental
to others and subsequently held for sale are cash flows from operating activities. The cash
receipts from rents and subsequent sales of such assets are also cash flows from operating
activities.
3.8.2 Investing Activities
Investment means sacrifice of current resource in a view to get more returns in future. All entities
need some amount of investment for their future survival.
Cash Inflow from Investing Activities Cash Outflow from Investing Activities
Cash receipts from sales of property, plant Cash payments to acquire property, plant and
and equipment, intangibles and other long- equipment, intangibles and other long-term
term assets assets. These payments include those
relating to capitalised development costs and
self-constructed property, plant and
equipment
Cash receipts from sales of equity or debt Cash payments to acquire equity or debt
instruments of other entities and interests in instruments of other entities and interests in
joint ventures (other than receipts for those joint ventures (other than payments for those
instruments considered to be cash instruments considered to be cash
equivalents and those held for dealing or equivalents or those held for dealing or
trading purposes) trading purposes);
Cash receipts from the repayment of Cash advances and loans made to other
advances and loans made to other parties parties (other than advances and loans made
(other than advances and loans of a financial by a financial institution)
institution)
Cash receipts from futures contracts, forward Cash payments for futures contracts, forward
contracts, option contracts and swap contracts, option contracts and swap
contracts except when the contracts are held contracts except when the contracts are held
for dealing or trading purposes, or the receipts for dealing or trading purposes, or the
are classified as financing activities payments are classified as financing activities
When a contract is accounted for as a hedge of an identifiable position the cash flows of the
contract are classified in the same manner as the cash flows of the position being hedged.
Illustration 3
From the following transactions taken from a private sector bank operating in India, identify
which transactions will be classified as operating and which would be classified as Investing
activity.
3 Deposits accepted
4 Loans given to customers
5 Loans repaid by the customers
6 Deposits repaid
7 Commission received
8 Lease rentals paid for various branches
9 Service tax paid
10 Furniture purchased for new branches
11 Implementation of upgraded banking software
12 Purchase of shares in 100% subsidiary for opening a branch in Abu Dhabi
13 New cars purchased from Honda dealer, in exchange of old cars and remaining
amount paid in cash
14 Provident fund paid for the employees
15 Issued employee stock options
Solution
Sr. No. Nature of transaction paid Operating / Investing / Not to be considered
1 Interest received on loans Operating – Main revenue generating activity
2 Interest paid on Deposits Operating – Main expenses of operations
3 Deposits accepted Operating – in case of financial institutes
4 Loans given to customers Operating – in case of financial institutes
5 Loans repaid by the customers Operating – in case of financial institutes
6 Deposits repaid Operating – in case of financial institutes
7 Commission received Operating – Main revenue generating activity
8 Lease rentals paid for various Operating – Main expenses of operations
branches
9 Service tax paid Operating – Main expenses of operations
10 Furniture for new branches Investing – Assets purchased
11 Implementation of upgraded Investing – Purchased for long term purpose
banking software
12 Purchase of shares in 100% Investing – strategic investment
*****
3.8.3 Financing Activities
During the life time of the entity, it needs money for long term investments as well as for working
capital purpose. Company can raise the capital by way of equity or loans. Thus, the cash flows
related to raising of funds and redemption of funds will be covered under Cash flows from
financing activities. The cost of capital is also generally covered under the Financing Activity.
Ind AS 7 states that the cash flows from Financing activity are useful in predicting claims on future
cash flows by providers of capital to the entity.
Cash Inflows from Financing Activity Cash Outflows from Financing Activity
Cash proceeds from issuing shares or other Cash payments to owners to acquire or redeem
equity instruments; the entity’s shares;
Cash proceeds from issuing debentures, loans, Cash repayments of amounts borrowed; and
notes, bonds, mortgages and other
Short-term or long-term borrowings; Cash payments by a lessee for the reduction of
the outstanding liability relating to a lease.
Illustration 4
From the following transactions taken from a parent company having multiple businesses and
multiple segments, identify which transactions will be classified as Operating, Investing and
Financing:
Sr. No. Nature of transaction
1 Issued preference shares
2 Purchased the shares of 100% subsidiary company
3 Dividend received from shares of subsidiaries
4 Dividend received from other companies
Solution
Sr. Nature of transaction Operating / Investing /
No. Financing / Not to be
considered
1 Issued preference shares Financing
2 Purchased the shares of 100% subsidiary company Investing
3 Dividend received from shares of subsidiaries Investing
4 Dividend received from other companies Investing
5 Bonus shares issued No cash flow
6 Purchased license for manufacturing of special drugs Investing
7 Royalty received from the goods patented by the company Operating
8 Rent received from the let out building (letting out is not main Investing
business)
9 Interest received from loans and advances given Investing
10 Dividend paid Financing
11 Interest paid on security deposits Financing
12 Purchased goodwill Investing
13 Acquired the assets of a company by issue of equity shares Not to be considered
(not parting any cash)
14 Interim dividends paid Financing
15 Dissolved the 100% subsidiary and received the amount in Investing
final settlement
*****
Solution
Under factoring arrangement, it needs to be assessed whether the arrangement is recourse or
non-recourse.
Recourse factoring:
The cash received is classified as a financing cash inflow as the entity continues to recognize the
receivables and the amount received from the factor is indeed a liability, The substance of the
arrangement is financing, as the entity retains substantially all of the risk and rewards of the
factored receivables.
When the cash is collected by the factor, the liability and the receivables are de-recognized. It is
acceptable for this to be disclosed as a non-cash transaction, because the settlement of the
liability and the factored receivables does not result in cash flows. The net impact of these
transactions on the cash flow statement is to present a cash inflow from financing, but there is no
operating cash flow from the original sale to the entity’s customers.
Non-recourse factoring:
Where an entity de-recognises the factored receivables and receives cash from the factor, the
cash receipt is classified as an operating cash inflow. This is because the entity has received cash
in exchange for receivables that arose from its operating activities.
*****
An entity shall report cash flows from operating activities using either:
(a) the direct method, whereby major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash
payments are disclosed; or
(b) the indirect method, whereby profit or loss is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a
non-cash nature, any deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or
payments, and items of income or expense associated with investing or financing cash
flows.
Entities are encouraged to report cash flows from operating activities using the direct method.
The direct method provides information which may be useful in estimating future cash flows
and which is not available under the indirect method. Under the direct method, information
about major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash payments may be obtained either:
(a) from the accounting records of the entity; or
(b) by adjusting sales, cost of sales (interest and similar income and interest expense and
similar charges for a financial institution) and other items in the statement of profit and
loss for:
(i) changes during the period in inventories and operating receivables and payables;
(ii) other non-cash items; and
(iii) other items for which the cash effects are investing or financing cash flows.
Analysis
Direct method starts with cash revenue / income / receipts of the company. All the cash
expenses will be deducted from such cash revenue. The cash profit will be adjusted for the
cash flows arising from investing and financing activities. Non-cash expenses / losses / gains
will not be considered. The payments to suppliers and receipts from customers are also
taken into consideration. The resultant figure would be cash flow from operating activity. The
exercise would be similar to converting the income and expenditure account (accrual system)
into receipt and payment (cash system), with certain adjustments. Thus, if we consider the
vertical operating statement, direct method will have (TOP down) approach of presentation.
Under the indirect method, the net cash flow from operating activities is determined by
adjusting profit or loss for the effects of:
(a) changes during the period in inventories and operating receivables and payables;
(b) non-cash items such as depreciation, provisions, deferred taxes, unrealised foreign
currency gains and losses, and undistributed profits of associates; and
(c) all other items for which the cash effects are investing or financing cash flows.
Illustration 6
Find out the cash from operations by direct method and indirect method from the following information:
Operating statement of ABC Ltd. for the year ended 31.3.20X2
Particulars
Sales 5,00,000.00
Less: Cost of goods sold 3,50,000.00
Administration & Selling Overheads 55,000.00
Depreciation 7,000.00
Interest Paid 3,000.00
Loss on sale of asset 2,000.00
Profit before tax 83,000.00
Tax (30,000.00)
Profit After tax 53,000.00
Balance Sheet as on 31 st March
20X2 20X1
Assets
Non-current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment 75,000.00 65,000.00
Investment 12,000.00 10,000.00
Current Assets
Inventories 12,000.00 13,000.00
Trade receivables 10,000.00 7,000.00
Cash and cash equivalents 6,000.00 5,000.00
Indirect Method
Profit After Tax 53,000.00
Add back/(Less): Depreciation 7,000.00
Loss on sale of asset 2,000.00
Interest paid 3,000.00
Decrease in Inventory 1,000.00
Increase in Trade Receivables (3,000.00)
Increase in Trade Payables 4,000.00
Increase in Payables for expenses 3,000.00
Net cash generated from operating activities 70,000.00
Note: Cash flow derived from operations 70,000 is same in both Direct Method and Indirect
Method.
*****
Example 3
Entity A (Indian Company) purchased goods for resale from France during January for EUR 10,000
(Exchange rate: 1 EUR = 70) on a credit period of 4 months. It accounted for the purchase of
inventory at 7,00,000 (10,000 x 70). On 31st March, the exchange rate has changed to
1 EUR = 65. This would mean an unrealised gain due to exchange fluctuation of 50,000 (since
the payables will be recorded at 6,50,000 (at closing exchange rate).
Assuming that the inventory is unsold at that date, the movement is reported as under:
Profit 50,000
Less: Increase in Inventory (7,00,000)
Add: Increase in Payables 6,50,000
Net Cash flows from operating activities 0
Note:
1. Cash flows denominated in a foreign currency are reported in a manner consistent with
Ind AS 21.
2. A weighted average exchange rate for a period may be used for recording foreign
currency transactions or the translation of the cash flows of a foreign subsidiary
3. Ind AS 21 does not permit use of the exchange rate at the end of the reporting period
when translating the cash flows of a foreign subsidiary
Illustration 7
A firm invests in a five-year bond of another company with a face value of 10,00,000 by paying
5,00,000. The effective rate is 15%. The firm recognises proportionate interest income in its
income statement throughout the period of bond.
Based on the above information answer the following question:
a) How the interest income will be treated in cash flow statement during the period of bond?
b) On maturity, whether the receipt of 10,00,000 should be split between interest income and
receipts from investment activity.
Solution
Interest income will be treated as income over the period of bond in the income statement.
However, there will be no cash flow in these years because no cash has been received. On
maturity, receipt of 10,00,000 will be classified as investment activity with a bifurcation of
interest income & money received on redemption of bond.
*****
Shall be separately
Cash flows When it is
disclosed Tax cash flow is
arising from practicable to
classified as an
taxes on identify
investing or financing
income activity as
When it is Shall be classified as
appropriate
impracticable cash flows from
to identify operating activities when
impracticable to identify
with financing and
investing activities
Note: When tax cash flows are allocated over more than one class of activity, the total amount of
taxes paid is disclosed.
Illustration 8
X Limited has paid an advance tax amounting to 5,30,000 during the current year. Out of the
above paid tax, 30,000 is paid for tax on long term capital gains.
Under which activity the above said tax be classified in the cash flow statements of X Limited?
Solution
Cash flows arising from taxes on income should be classified as cash flows from operating
activities unless they can be specifically identified with financing and investing activities. In the
case of X Limited, the tax amount of 30,000 is specifically related with investing activities.
5,00,000 to be shown under operating activities. 30,000 to be shown under investing activities.
*****
An entity that reports its interest in an associate or a joint venture using the equity method includes
in its statement of cash flows the cash flows in respect of its investments in the associate or joint
venture, and distributions and other payments or receipts between it and the associate or joint
venture.
(d) the amount of the assets and liabilities other than cash or cash equivalents in the
subsidiaries or other businesses over which control is obtained or lost, summarised by
each major category.
The separate presentation of the cash flow effects of obtaining or losing control of
subsidiaries or other businesses as single line items, together with the separate disclosure of
the amounts of assets and liabilities acquired or disposed of, helps to distinguish those cash
flows from the cash flows arising from the other operating, investing and financing activities.
The cash flow effects of losing control are not deducted from those of obtaining control.
The aggregate amount of the cash paid or received as consideration for obtaining or losing
control of subsidiaries or other businesses is reported in the statement of cash flows net of
cash and cash equivalents acquired or disposed of as part of such transactions, events or
changes in circumstances.
3.16.2 Classification of Cash Flows as Financing Activity
Cash flows arising from changes in ownership interests in a subsidiary that do not result in
a loss of control shall be classified as cash flows from financing activities, unless the
subsidiary is held by an investment entity and is required to be measured at fair value
through profit or loss.
Changes in ownership interests in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control, such
as the subsequent purchase or sale by a parent of a subsidiary’s equity instruments, are
accounted for as equity transactions (see Ind AS 110), unless the subsidiary is held by an
investment entity and is required to be measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Accordingly, the resulting cash flows are classified in the same way as other transactions
with owners.
The total The portion of the The amount of cash and The amount of the assets
consideration consideration cash equivalents in the and liabilities other than
paid or consisting of cash subsidiaries or other cash or cash equivalents
received and cash businesses over which in the subsidiaries or
equivalents control is obtained or lost other businesses over
which control is obtained
or lost, summarised by
Cash flows arising from changes in ownership interests in a each major category
subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control
Shall be classified as cash flows from Need not apply to an investment in a subsidiary
financing activities, unless the subsidiary measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)
is held by an investment entity
Such transactions shall be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements in a way that
provides all the relevant information about these investing and financing activities.
Many investing and financing activities do not have a direct impact on current cash flows
although they do affect the capital and asset structure of an entity. Such non-cash items will
not form part of the cash flow statement.
Examples of non-cash transactions are:
(a) the acquisition of assets either by assuming directly related liabilities or by means of a
lease;
(b) the acquisition of an entity by means of an equity issue; and
(c) the conversion of debt to equity
Illustration 9
X Limited acquires fixed asset of 10,00,000 from Y Limited by accepting the liabilities of
8,00,000 of Y Limited and balance amount it paid in cash. How X Limited will treat all those
items in its cash flow statements?
Solution
Investing and financing transactions that do not require the use of cash and cash equivalents shall
be excluded from a statement of cash flows. X Limited should classify cash payment of 2,00,000
under investing activities. The non-cash transactions –liabilities and asset should be disclosed in
the notes to the financial statements.
*****
3.17.1 Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
An entity shall provide disclosures that enable users of financial statements to evaluate
changes in liabilities arising from financing activities, including both changes arising from
cash flows and non-cash changes.
To the extent necessary to satisfy the above requirement, an entity shall disclose the
following changes in liabilities arising from financing activities:
(a) changes from financing cash flows;
(b) changes arising from obtaining or losing control of subsidiaries or other businesses;
(c) the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates;
(d) changes in fair values; and
(e) other changes.
gains or losses arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which are not
considered to be cash flows. The following illustration would explain the issue:
Illustration 10
An entity has bank balance in foreign currency aggregating to USD 100 (equivalent to 4,500) at
the beginning of the year. Presuming no other transaction taking place, the entity reported a profit
before tax of 100 on account of exchange gain on the bank balance in foreign currency at the
end of the year. What would be the closing cash and cash equivalents as per the balance sheet?
Solution
For the purpose of statement of cash flows, the entity shall present the following:
Amount (
Profit before tax 100
Less: Unrealised exchange gain (100)
Cash flow from operating activities Nil
Cash flow from investing activities Nil
Cash flow from financing activities Nil
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents during the year Nil
Add: Opening balance of cash and cash equivalents 4,500
Cash and cash equivalents as at the year-end 4,500
Illustration 11
Following is the balance sheet of Kuber Limited for the year ended 31 March, 20X2 ( in lacs)
20X2 20X1
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 13,000 12,500
Intangible assets 50 30
Other financial assets 145 170
Deferred Tax Asset (net) 855 750
Other non-current assets 800 770
Total non-current assets 14,850 14,220
Current assets
Financial assets
Investments 2,300 2,500
Cash and cash equivalents 220 460
Other current assets 195 85
Total current assets 2,715 3,045
Total assets 17,565 17,265
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Equity
Equity share capital 300 300
Other equity 12,000 8,000
Total equity 12,300 8,300
Liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Long-term borrowings 2,000 5,000
Other non-current liabilities 2,740 3,615
Total non-current liabilities 4,740 8,615
Current liabilities
Financial liabilities
Trade payables 150 90
Bank overdraft 75 60
Other current liabilities 300 200
Total current liabilities 525 350
Total liabilities 5,265 8,965
Total equity and liabilities 17,565 17,265
Solution
Statement of Cash Flows
in lacs
Cash flows from Operating Activities
Net Profit after Tax 4,450
Add: Tax Paid 105
4,555
Add: Depreciation & Amortisation (500 + 20) 520
Less: Gain on Sale of Machine (70-60) (10)
Less: Increase in Deferred Tax Asset (855-750) (105)
4,960
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Add: Decrease in financial asset (170 - 145) 25
Less: Increase in other non-current asset (800 - 770) (30)
Less: Increase in other current asset (195 - 85) (110)
Less: Decrease in other non-current liabilities (3,615 – 2,740) (875)
Add: Increase in other current liabilities (300 - 200) 100
Add: Increase in trade payables (150-90) 60
4,130
Less: Income Tax (105)
Illustration 12
The relevant extracts of consolidated financial statements of A Ltd. are provided below:
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended ( in Lac)
31 st March 20X2 31 st March 20X1
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment 4,750 4,650
Investment in Associate 800 -
Financial Assets 2,150 1,800
Current Assets
Inventories 1,550 1,900
Trade Receivables 1,250 1,800
Cash and Cash Equivalents 4,650 3,550
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Trade Payables 1,550 3,610
Property, plant and equipment was sold at 630 Lac. Gain on disposal is adjusted against
operating expenses.
4. A Ltd. purchased 30% interest in an Associate (G Ltd) for cash on 1 st April 20X1. The
associate reported profit after tax of 400 Lac and paid a dividend of 100 Lac for the
year.
5. Impairment test was conducted on 31 st March 20X2. The following were impaired as under:
Goodwill impairment loss: 265 Lac
Intangible Assets impairment loss 900 Lac
The goodwill impairment relates to 100% subsidiaries.
Assume that interest cost is all paid in cash.
You are required to determine cash generated from operations for group reporting purposes
for the year ended 31 st March 20X2.
Solution
Extracts of Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 31 st March 20X2
3. Examples of cash Ind AS 7 includes following examples These examples are not
flows arising from of cash flows arising from financing mentioned in AS 3
financing activities (paragraph 17 of Ind AS 7):
activities (a) cash payments to owners to
acquire or redeem the entity’s
shares;
(b) cash proceeds from mortgages;
(c) cash payments by a lessee for
the reduction of the outstanding
liability relating to a lease.
QUICK RECAP
Presentation of a statement of cash flows
Classified as
Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Cash and cash equivalents
These are the Investing activities Financing activities Cash Cash equivalents
principal revenue- are the acquisition are activities that
producing activities and disposal of result in changes in Are short-
of the entity other It term, highly
long-term assets the size and
than investing or comprises liquid
and other composition of the
financing activities cash on investments
investments not contributed equity
hand &
included in cash and borrowings of
demand Are readily
Reporting equivalents the entity
deposits convertible to
known
An entity shall report separately amounts of
Under direct Under indirect major classes of gross cash cash
method method receipts and gross cash
payments arising from investing Are subject to
and financing activities an
Whereby Whereby profit or loss is insignificant
major classes adjusted for risk of
of gross cash non-cash transactions changes in
receipts and value
any deferrals or accruals of
gross cash
past or future operating Are not for
payments are
cash receipts or payments investment
disclosed
items of income or expense purposes
associated with investing or
financing cash flows has a short
maturity of,
say, 3 months
or less from
Exception the date of
Entities are encouraged to follow the direct
acquisition
method. The direct method provides information
which may be useful in estimating future cash
flows and which is not available under the indirect
method. Equity investments are excluded from cash equivalents
20X2 20X1
Cash 4,000 14,000
Accounts Receivable 25,000 32,500
Prepaid Insurance 5,000 7,000
Inventory 37,000 34,000
Fixed Assets 3,16,000 2,70,000
Accumulated Depreciation (45,000) (30,000)
Total Assets 3,42,000 3,27,500
Accounts Payable 18,000 16,000
Wages Payable 4,000 7,000
Debentures 1,73,000 1,60,000
Equity Shares 88,000 84,000
Retained Earnings 59,000 60,500
Total Liabilities & Equity 3,42,000 3,27,500
20X2
Sales 2,00,000
Cost of Goods Sold (1,23,000)
Depreciation (15,000)
Insurance Expense (11,000)
Wages (50,000)
Net Profit 1,000
During the financial year 20X2 company ABC Ltd. declared and paid dividend of 2,500.
During 20X2, ABC Ltd. paid 46,000 in cash to acquire new fixed assets. The accounts
payable was used only for inventory. No debt was retired during 20X2.
2. From the following summary cash account of XYZ Ltd, prepare cash flow statement for the
year ended March 31, 20X1 in accordance with Ind AS 7 using direct method.
Summary of Bank Account for the year ended March 31, 20X1
’000 ’000
Balance on 1.4.20X0 50 Payment to creditors 2,000
Issue of Equity Shares 300 Purchase of Fixed Assets 200
Receipts from customers 2,800 Overhead Expenses 200
Sale of Fixed Assets 100 Payroll 100
Tax Payment 250
Dividend 50
Repayment of Bank loan 300
Balance on 31.3.20X1 150
3,250 3,250
3. Z Ltd. has no foreign currency cash flow for the year 20X1. It holds some deposit in a bank in
the USA. The balances as on 31.12.20X1 and 31.12.20X2 were US$ 100,000 and
US$ 102,000 respectively. The exchange rate on December 31, 20X1 was US$1 = 45. The
same on 31.12.20X2 was US$1 = 50. The increase in the balance was on account of
interest credited on 31.12.20X2. Thus, the deposit was reported at 45,00,000 in the
balance sheet as on December 31, 20X1. It was reported at 51,00,000 in the balance
sheet as on 31.12.20X2. How these transactions should be presented in cash flow for the
year ended 31.12.20X2 as per Ind AS 7?
4. Company A acquires 70% of the equity stake in Company B on July 20, 20X1. The
consideration paid for this transaction is as below:
(a) Cash consideration of 15,00,000
(b) 200,000 equity shares having face of 10 and fair value of 15 per share.
Amount ( )
Revenue 3,80,000
Cost of sales (2,20,000)
Gross profit 1,60,000
Depreciation (30,000)
Other operating expenses (56,000)
Interest cost (4,000)
Profit before taxation 70,000
Taxation (15,000)
Profit after taxation 55,000
20X2 20X1
Assets Amount Amount
( ) ( )
Cash and cash equivalents 8,000 5,000
Trade receivables 54,000 50,000
Inventories 30,000 35,000
Property, plant and equipment 1,60,000 80,000
Goodwill 18,000 —
Total assets 2,70,000 1,70,000
Liabilities
Trade payables 68,000 60,000
Other information
All of the shares of entity B were acquired for 74,000 in cash. The fair values of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed were:
Particulars Amount ( )
Inventories 4,000
Trade receivables 8,000
Cash 2,000
Property, plant and equipment 1,10,000
Trade payables (32,000)
Long term debt (36,000)
Goodwill 18,000
Cash consideration paid 74,000
Prepare the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year 20X2, as per Ind AS 7.
6. During the financial year 2019-2020, Akola Limited have paid various taxes & reproduced the
below mentioned records for your perusal:
- Capital gain tax of 20 crore on sale of office premises at a sale consideration of
100 crore.
- Income Tax of 3 crore on Business profits amounting 30 crore (assume entire
business profit as cash profit).
- Dividend Distribution Tax of 2 crore on payment of dividend amounting 20 crore to
its shareholders.
- Income tax Refund of 1.5 crore (Refund on taxes paid in earlier periods for business
profits).
You need to determine the net cash flow from operating activities, investing activities and
financing activities of Akola Limited as per relevant Ind AS.
7. From the following data of Galaxy Ltd., prepare statement of cash flows showing cash
generated from Operating Activities using direct method as per Ind AS 7:
other entities
4 Dividend paid on preference and equity shares, including tax on dividend paid on
preference and equity shares by other entities
5 Finance charges paid by lessee under finance lease
6 Payment towards reduction of outstanding finance lease liability
7 Interest paid to vendor for acquiring fixed asset under deferred payment basis
8 Principal sum payment under deferred payment basis for acquisition of fixed assets
9 Penal interest received from customers for late payments
10 Penal interest paid to suppliers for late payments
11 Interest paid on delayed tax payments
12 Interest received on tax refunds
Answers
1. A. DIRECT METHOD
Cash flows from operating activities 20X2
Cash received from customers 2,07,500
Cash paid for inventory (1,24,000)
Cash paid for insurance (9,000)
Cash paid for wages (53,000)
Net cash flow from operating activities 21,500
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of fixed assets (46,000)
Cash flows from financing activities
Dividend paid (2,500)
Proceeds from issuance of debentures 13,000
Proceeds from issue of equity 4,000
Net cash flows from financing activities 14,500
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (10,000)
Opening Cash Balance 14,000
Closing Cash Balance 4,000
B. INDIRECT METHOD
Cash flows from operating activities 20X2
Net Profit 1,000
Adjustments for Depreciation 15,000
Working Notes:
Fixed Assets Account
Particulars Amount Particulars Amount (
(
To Balance b/d 2,70,000 By Balance c/d 3,16,000
To Cash (Purchase of Fixed
Assets) 46,000
3,16,000 3,16,000
Inventory Account
Particulars Amount ( Particulars Amount (
To Balance b/d 34,000 By Cost of goods sold 1,23,000
To Creditors account (credit 2,000 By Balance c/d 37,000
purchase)
To Purchase (Bal. Figure) 1,24,000
1,60,000 1,60,000
2. XYZ Ltd.
Cash Flow Statement for the year ended March 31, 20X1 (Using the Direct Method)
Cash flows from operating activities ‘000 ‘000
Cash receipts from customers 2,800
Cash payments to suppliers (2,000)
Cash paid to employees (100)
Cash payments for overheads (200)
Cash generated from operations 500
Income tax paid (250)
Net cash from operating activities 250
Cash flow from investing activities
Payments for purchase of fixed assets (200)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets 100
Net cash used in investing activities (100)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares 300
Bank loan repaid (300)
3. The profit and loss account was credited by 1,00,000 (US $ 2,000 × 50) towards interest
income. It was credited by the exchange difference of US$ 1,00,000 × ( 50 - 45) that is,
500,000. In preparing the cash flow statement, 5,00,000, the exchange difference,
should be deducted from the ‘net profit before taxes’. However, in order to reconcile the
opening balance of the cash and cash equivalents with its closing balance, the exchange
difference 5,00,000, should be added to the opening balance in note to cash flow
statement.
Cash flows arising from transactions in a foreign currency shall be recorded in Z Ltd.’s
functional currency by applying to the foreign currency amount the exchange rate between
the functional currency and the foreign currency at the date of the cash flow.
4. As per para 39 of Ind AS 7, the aggregate cash flows arising from obtaining control of
subsidiary shall be presented separately and classified as investing activities.
As per para 42 of Ind AS 7, the aggregate amount of the cash paid or received as
consideration for obtaining subsidiaries is reported in the statement of cash flows net of cash
and cash equivalents acquired or disposed of as part of such transactions, events or changes
in circumstances.
Further, investing and financing transactions that do not require the use of cash or cash
equivalents shall be excluded from a statement of cash flows. Such transactions shall be
disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements in a way that provides all the relevant
information about these investing and financing activities.
As per para 42A of Ind AS 7, cash flows arising from changes in ownership interests in a
subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control shall be classified as cash flows from
financing activities, unless the subsidiary is held by an investment entity, as defined in
Ind AS 110, and is required to be measured at fair value through profit or loss. Such
transactions are accounted for as equity transactions and accordingly, the resulting cash
flows are classified in the same way as other transactions with owners.
Considering the above, for the financial year ended 31 st March, 20X2 total consideration of
15,00,000 less 250,000 will be shown under investing activities as “Acquisition of the
subsidiary (net of cash acquired)”.
There will not be any impact of issuance of equity shares as consideration in the cash flow
statement however a proper disclosure shall be given elsewhere in the financial statements in
a way that provides all the relevant information about the issuance of equity shares for non-
cash consideration.
Further, in the statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 st March, 20X3, cash
consideration paid for the acquisition of additional 10% stake in Company B will be shown
under financing activities.
5. This information will be incorporated into the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as
follows:
Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 20X2 (extract)
Amount ( ) Amount ( )
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before taxation 70,000
Adjustments for non-cash items:
Depreciation 30,000
Decrease in inventories (W.N. 1) 9,000
Decrease in trade receivables (W.N. 2) 4,000
Decrease in trade payables (W.N. 3) (24,000)
Interest paid to be included in financing activities 4,000
Taxation (11,000 + 15,000 – 12,000) (14,000)
Net cash generated from operating activities 79,000
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash paid to acquire subsidiary (74,000 – 2,000) (72,000)
Net cash outflow from investing activities (72,000)
Cash flows from financing activities
Interest paid (4,000)
Net cash outflow from financing activities (4,000)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents during the year 3,000
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the 5,000
year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 8,000
Working Notes:
6. Para 36 of Ind AS 7 inter alia states that when it is practicable to identify the tax cash flow
with an individual transaction that gives rise to cash flows that are classified as investing or
financing activities the tax cash flow is classified as an investing or financing activity as
appropriate. When tax cash flows are allocated over more than one class of activity, the total
amount of taxes paid is disclosed.
Accordingly, the transactions are analysed as follows:
Particulars Amount (in crore) Activity
Sale Consideration 100 Investing Activity
Capital Gain Tax (20) Investing Activity
Business profits 30 Operating Activity
Tax on Business profits (3) Operating Activity
Dividend Payment (20) Financing Activity
Dividend Distribution Tax (2) Financing Activity
Income Tax Refund 1.5 Operating Activity
Total Cash flow 86.5
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of total purchases
Cost of Sales = Opening stock + Purchases – Closing Stock
56,00,000 = 1,65,000 + Purchases – 1,20,000
Purchases = 55,55,000
2. Calculation of cash paid to Suppliers
Trade Payables
7 Interest paid to vendor for acquiring fixed Financing activities Financing activities
asset under deferred payment basis
8 Principal sum payment under deferred Investing activities Investing activities
payment basis for acquisition of fixed
assets
9 Penal interest received from customers for Operating Activities Operating Activities
late payments
10 Penal interest paid to suppliers for late Operating Activities Operating Activities
payments
11 Interest paid on delayed tax payments Operating Activities Operating Activities
12 Interest received on tax refunds Operating Activities Operating Activities
IND AS ON MEASUREMENT
BASED ON ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
UNIT 1:
INDIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARD 8 :
ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CHANGES IN
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ERRORS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
Apply the principles laid down for selection of accounting policies.
Explain the treatment of changes in accounting policies, changes in
accounting estimates and correction of prior period errors.
Distinguish between accounting policies, estimates, changes in them
and errors.
Assess the limitations of giving retrospective effect while accounting.
Judge the impracticability of a requirement for giving retrospective effect.
v
UNIT OVERVIEW
Changes in
Accounting
Accounting Errors
Policies
Estimates
• Selection and • Apply changes in • Limitations on
application of accounting retrospective
accounting estimates restatement
policies prospectively • Disclosure of prior
• Consistency of • Disclosure period errors
accounting
policies
• Changes in
accounting
policies
• Applying changes
in accounting
policies
• Retrospective
application
• Limitations on
retrospective
application
• Disclosure
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Ind AS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements, lays down the foundation for an entity regarding
how the financial statements need to be presented. Ind AS 1 gives equal importance to the
disclosure, in notes, of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information besides
balance sheet, statement of profit and loss, statement of changes in equity and statement of
cash flows.
Accounting policies, estimates and correction of errors play a major role in the presentation of
financial statements. That is why Ind AS 1 states that an entity cannot rectify inappropriate
accounting policies either by disclosure of the accounting policies used or by notes or
explanatory material. If there is any change in accounting policies, that needs to be dealt with
due diligence and not just by mere note or explanation.
Further, Ind AS 1 makes it mandatory for the entity to present a third balance sheet as at the
beginning of the preceding period, if it applies an accounting policy retrospectively, which has a
material effect on the information in the balance sheet at that date.
Further, Ind AS 1 provides detail guidance about the proper disclosure of accounting policies
and estimates.
Therefore, in the current chapter we are going to see, how to select the accounting policies, how
to make the changes in accounting policies if needed, how to deal with changes in the
estimates, how to rectify errors, etc., as all these elements will have impact on the true and fair
position of the financial statements.
1.2 OBJECTIVE
1.2.1 To prescribe the criteria for selecting and changing accounting
policies
As per Ind AS 1, an entity is required to disclose the significant accounting policies. However, it
does not specify which accounting policies are to be disclosed. Depending upon the nature of
business and types of transactions, the entity is supposed to decide whether an accounting
policy is to be disclosed. In this regard, Ind AS 1 lays emphasis on usefulness of the disclosure
in assisting the users in understanding financial statements, nature of an entity’s operations and
expectations of users. Ind AS 8 further provides some criteria / guidelines which will facilitate
the entity to take a decision on selection and application of accounting policies and also making
changes in them.
Is to prescribe
The criteria for selecting and The accounting treatment and disclosure of
changing accounting policies
1.3 SCOPE
This standard shall be applied in
selecting and applying accounting policies;
accounting for changes in accounting policies;
accounting for changes in accounting estimates; and
accounting for corrections of prior period errors.
However, tax effects of retrospective application of accounting policy changes and correction of
prior period errors are not dealt with in this standard. The tax effects of these items are dealt
with Ind AS 12, ‘Income Taxes’.
Note: Requirements of Ind AS 8 in respect of changes in accounting policies do not apply in
an entity’s first Ind AS financial statements.
1.4 DEFINITIONS
1. Accounting policies are the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices
applied by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements.
2. Accounting estimates are monetary amounts in financial statements that are subject to
measurement uncertainty.
The application of the concept of materiality is set out in two Standards. Ind AS 1
continues to specify its application to disclosures and Ind AS 8 specifies the application of
materiality in applying accounting policies and correcting errors (including errors in
measuring items).
5. Prior period errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, the entity’s financial
statements for one or more prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of, reliable
information that:
(a) was available when financial statements for those periods were approved for issue;
and
(b) could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the
preparation and presentation of those financial statements. Such errors include the
effects of mathematical mistakes, mistakes in applying accounting policies, oversights
or misinterpretations of facts, and fraud.
6. Retrospective application is applying a new accounting policy to transactions, other
events and conditions as if that policy had always been applied.
7. Retrospective restatement is correcting the recognition, measurement and disclosure of
amounts of elements of financial statements as if a prior period error had never occurred.
8. Impracticable: Applying a requirement is impracticable when the entity cannot apply it
after making every reasonable effort to do so. For a particular prior period, it is
impracticable to apply a change in an accounting policy retrospectively or to make a
retrospective restatement to correct an error if:
(a) the effects of the retrospective application or retrospective restatement are not
determinable;
(b) the retrospective application or retrospective restatement requires assumptions about
what management’s intent would have been in that period; or
(c) the retrospective application or retrospective restatement requires significant
estimates of amounts and it is impossible to distinguish objectively information about
those estimates that:
(i) provides evidence of circumstances that existed on the date(s)as at which those
amounts are to be recognised, measured or disclosed; and
(ii) would have been available when the financial statements for that prior period
were approved for issue from other information.
9. Prospective application of a change in accounting policy and of recognising the effect of
a change in an accounting estimate, respectively, are:
Analysis
There is a need to have some authentic base for selecting and applying the accounting
policy. Even if it is left to the judgement of the entity, there has to be some basis for
making the judgement. It cannot be left to the personal opinions/ understanding/ intuitions
of the people working for the entity. In view of this, Ind AS 8 requires that in absence of
specific Ind AS, the entity should refer to the following material, in their descending order.
Accordingly, Ind AS 8 provides the following list:
(i) Check if there are any other Ind AS available which are dealing with similar and
related issues
(ii) Check the basic Conceptual Framework of Ind AS, which provides the general
principles
(iii) Check the pronouncements of International Accounting Standard Board
(iv) Check the pronouncements of other standard setting bodies having a similar
conceptual framework
(v) Check the accounting literature and accepted industry practices.
1.5.4 Consistency of accounting policies
An entity shall select and apply its accounting policies consistently for similar transactions, other
events and conditions, unless an Ind AS specifically requires or permits categorisation of items
for which different policies may be appropriate. If an Ind AS requires or permits such
categorisation, an appropriate accounting policy shall be selected and applied consistently to
each category.
Analysis
Accounting policies are the bases or principles or conventions or rules which are followed by an
entity while preparing the financial statements. If the entity keeps on changing the base from
year to year, it will not reflect the true and fair financial position of the entity. Secondly the
results of earlier years cannot be compared with the latest year as the base of the measurement
is changed. Therefore, it is utmost necessity that the entity follows the accounting policies
consistently.
Examples 2 & 3
2. An entity has grouped its property, plant and equipment into four classes viz., land, factory
building, plant and machinery and furniture. The entity may propose to apply revaluation
model only to land. It need not apply this model to building or plant and machinery.
3. Ind AS 2 ‘Inventories’ requires that inventory be valued at lower of cost and net realizable
value. In identifying cost, it allows alternative cost formulas; FIFO and Weighted average.
show major discrepancies. Thus, changing the base will not only affect the true and fair
position of the financial statements but it will also affect the decision making of the
stakeholders.
In view of the above, Ind AS 8 allows the entity to change the accounting policy only in
following circumstances:
(a) when the change is required by an Ind AS; or
(b) when the change results in the financial statements providing reliable and more
relevant information about the effects of transactions, other events or conditions on
the entity’s financial position, financial performance or cash flows.
The following are not changes in accounting policies:
(a) the application of an accounting policy for transactions, other events or conditions that
differ in substance from those previously occurring; and
(b) the application of a new accounting policy for transactions, other events or conditions
that did not occur previously or were immaterial.
Analysis
Ind AS 8 clearly states that if the entity applies an accounting policy which is different from
the previous one to a transaction, other event or condition that differs in substance from a
previously occurring transaction, other event or condition, the application of the new policy
will not be considered as a change in accounting policy.
Example 5
A company owns several hotels and provides significant ancillary services to occupants of
rooms. These hotels are, therefore, treated as owner-occupied properties and classified as
property, plant and equipment in accordance with Ind AS 16. The company acquires a new
hotel but outsources entire management of the same to an outside agency and remains as
a passive investor. The selection and application of an accounting policy for this new hotel
in line with Ind AS 40 is not a change in accounting policy simply because the new hotel
rooms are also let out for rent. This is because the way in which the new hotel is managed
differs in substance from the way other existing hotels have been managed so far.
Similarly, if an entity is not applying the accounting policy currently and starts applying the
accounting policy newly, that will also not be treated as a change in accounting policy.
Whether a changed accounting policy results in reliable and more relevant financial information
is a matter of assessment in the particular facts and circumstances of each case. In order to
ensure that such an assessment is made judiciously (such that a voluntary change in an
accounting policy does not effectively become a matter of free choice), paragraph 29 of Ind AS 8
requires an entity making a voluntary change in an accounting policy to disclose, inter alia, “the
reasons why applying the new accounting policy provides reliable and more relevant
information.”
*****
Illustration 2
Entity ABC acquired a building for its administrative purposes and presented the same as
property, plant and equipment (PPE) in the financial year 20X1-20X2. During the financial year
20X2-20X3, it relocated the office to a new building and leased the said building to a third party.
Following the change in the usage of the building, Entity ABC reclassified it from PPE to
investment property in the financial year 20X2-20X3. Should Entity ABC account for the change
as a change in accounting policy?
Solution
Paragraph 16(a) of Ind AS 8 provides that the application of an accounting policy for
transactions, other events or conditions that differ in substance from those previously occurring
are not changes in accounting policies.
As per Ind AS 16, ‘property, plant and equipment’ are tangible items that:
(a) are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others, or for
administrative purposes; and
(b) are expected to be used during more than one period.”
As per Ind AS 40, ‘investment property’ is property (land or a building—or part of a building—or
both) held (by the owner or by the lessee as a right-of-use asset) to earn rentals or for capital
appreciation or both, rather than for:
(a) use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes; or
(b) sale in the ordinary course of business.”
As per the above definitions, whether a building is an item of property, plant and equipment
(PPE) or an investment property for an entity depends on the purpose for which it is held by the
entity. It is thus possible that due to a change in the purpose for which it is held, a building that
was previously classified as an item of property, plant and equipment may warrant
reclassification as an investment property, or vice versa. Whether a building is in the nature of
PPE or investment property is determined by applying the definitions of these terms from the
perspective of that entity. Thus, the classification of a building as an item of property, plant and
equipment or as an investment property is not a matter of an accounting policy choice.
If a change in accounting policy is due to a new Ind AS, then, generally the standard itself
provides the transitional provisions i.e., provisions applicable on initial application of the
standard, such as method of application (retrospective or prospective or modified
retrospective), availability of any transitional relief etc. In such cases, the entity needs to
follow the transitional provisions accordingly.
2. When an entity changes an accounting policy upon initial application of an Ind AS that does
not include specific transitional provisions applying to that change, or changes an
accounting policy voluntarily, it shall apply the change retrospectively.
If the change in accounting policy is made voluntarily or where the Ind AS is not containing
transitional provisions, then the accounting policy needs to be applied retrospectively.
Note: Early application of an Ind AS is not a voluntary change in accounting policy.
In the absence of an Ind AS that specifically applies to a transaction, other event or condition,
management may apply an accounting policy from the most recent pronouncements of IASB and
in absence thereof those of the other standard-setting bodies that use a similar conceptual
framework to develop accounting standards.
If, following an amendment of such a pronouncement, the entity chooses to change an
accounting policy, that change is accounted for and disclosed as a voluntary change in
accounting policy.
Suppose in absence of any specific Ind AS to a particular transaction, a company follows an
accounting policy as per the relevant IFRS which addresses that transaction and, subsequently
there is an amendment to that IFRS, then, the company may change its accounting policy as per
that amendment. In such cases, it will be considered as if the company is making the change
voluntarily and, accordingly, change in the accounting policy should be applied retrospectively.
Illustration 4
An entity developed one of its accounting policies by considering a pronouncement of an
overseas national standard-setting body in accordance with Ind AS 8. Would it be permissible
for the entity to change the said policy to reflect a subsequent amendment in that
pronouncement?
Solution
In the absence of an Ind AS that specifically applies to a transaction, other event or condition,
management may apply an accounting policy from the most recent pronouncements of
International Accounting Standards Board and in absence thereof those of the other standard-
setting bodies that use a similar conceptual framework to develop accounting standards. If,
following an amendment of such a pronouncement, the entity chooses to change an accounting
policy, that change is accounted for and disclosed as a voluntary change in accounting policy. As
such a change is a voluntary change in accounting policy, it can be made only if it results in
information that is reliable and more relevant (and does not conflict with the sources in Ind AS 8).
*****
value as on that date as above is the cumulative effect of change in accounting policy on the
opening balance sheet for the comparative year 20X7-20X8. The difference between previously
presented closing inventory value as at 31 st March, 20X8 and the recalculated value as on that
date as above is the cumulative effect of change in accounting policy on the closing balance
sheet for the comparative year 20X7-20X8. The difference between the cumulative effects on
the opening and closing balance sheets for the comparative year 20X7-20X8 as arrived at above
is the period-specific effect of change in the policy for that comparative year. Accordingly, while
preparing the financial statements for the year 20X8-20X9, the entity should adjust the opening
inventory as at 1 st April, 20X7 and adjust retained earnings on that date for the cumulative effect
of change in accounting policy and restate comparative amount in respect of increase/decrease
in inventories in the statement of profit and loss for the comparative year 20X7-20X8. This
results in consequential restatement of profit or loss, total comprehensive income, closing
balances of retained earnings and inventories for that comparative year. The said restated
closing balances of retained earnings and inventories become opening balances of these items
for the year 20X8-20X9, which is the year of change in accounting policy. Income tax effect due
to change in accounting policy will be accounted for in accordance with Ind AS 12.
1.5.5.3 Limitations on retrospective application
The intention of the standard is, as far as possible, that the companies should follow the
same accounting policies consistently year after year to ensure the relevance and reliability
of financial statements.
There are some advantages of making the process of change in accounting policy so
tedious as outlined below.
i. Companies will not make the frequent changes in their accounting policies just to do
the window dressing of their financial statements.
ii. The comparison of financial statements over time and with other entities will be
possible, in a reliable way.
Having said this, there can be practical difficulties in making the retrospective changes in
policies, when the company wants to change the policy.
Example 8
A company has been incorporated 25 years ago and since then doing the business on pan
India basis. Now, is it supposed to incorporate the changes in accounting policy for last
25 years? Will it be practicable? Will it be worth doing it? Will it be material? Such
questions arise when one wants to change the accounting policy, since voluntary change in
policy is required to be applied retrospectively.
When retrospective application is required, a change in accounting policy shall be applied
retrospectively except to the extent that it is impracticable to determine either the period-
specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change.
Example 9
In the example given in the section 1.5.5.2 above, if comparative information is presented
for two years i.e., 20X6-20X7 and 20X7-20X8 and if it is not practicable to apply the
changed policy retrospectively from 20X6-20X7, then, the entity can apply the changed
policy retrospectively from 20X7-20X8. This may happen if it is not practicable to compute
the inventory value in accordance with the changed policy as on 1 st April, 20X6, for
example, due to loss of latest purchase bills for the year 20X5-20X6 and computer records
of the same are also lost.
In the above example, if comparative information is presented for one year and if it is not
practicable to compute the opening inventory value as at 1 st April, 20X7, the entity can
apply the changed policy retrospectively from 20X8-20X9.
When an entity applies a new accounting policy retrospectively, it applies the new
accounting policy to comparative information for prior periods as far back as is practicable.
Retrospective application to a prior period is not practicable unless it is practicable to
determine the cumulative effect on the amounts in both the opening and closing balance
sheets for that period. The amount of the resulting adjustment relating to periods before
those presented in the financial statements is made to the opening balance of each
affected component of equity of the earliest prior period presented. Usually, the
adjustment is made to retained earnings. However, the adjustment may be made to another
component of equity (for example, to comply with an Ind AS). Any other information about
prior periods, such as historical summaries of financial data, is also adjusted as far back as
is practicable.
When it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect, at the beginning of the current
period, of applying a new accounting policy to all prior periods, the entity shall adjust the
comparative information to apply the new accounting policy prospectively from the earliest
date practicable. It therefore disregards the portion of the cumulative adjustment to assets,
liabilities and equity arising before that date. Changing an accounting policy is permitted
even if it is impracticable to apply the policy retrospectively for any prior period.
Example 10
In 20X6, an entity changes its accounting policy with respect to determination of cost of its
inventories from FIFO to weighted average cost formula. This change is made because
management believes that weighted average cost formula results in better matching of cost
with revenue. Further, weighted average cost formula is generally used by other entities
whose business is similar to that of the entity and, hence, provides reliable and more
relevant information to the users of the financial statements. This being a voluntary
change, it has to be applied retrospectively. The entity had commenced operations in
20X1. No records of earlier years are available as a virus attack on server in 20X6 had
wiped off all past records. It is not possible to recreate the records. It is therefore
- Results in financial
statements providing transactions that differ
reliable and more in substance from
relevant information those previously
policies
occurring
- Application of new
accounting policies for
new transactions
Illustration 5
Whether an entity can change its accounting policy of subsequent measurement of property,
plant and equipment (PPE) from revaluation model to cost model?
Solution
Paragraph 29 of Ind AS 16 provides that an entity shall choose either the cost model or the
revaluation model as its accounting policy for subsequent measurement of an entire class of
PPE.
A change from revaluation model to cost model for a class of PPE can be made only if it meets
the condition specified in Ind AS 8 paragraph 14(b) i.e. the change results in the financial
statements providing reliable and more relevant information to the users of financial statements.
For example, an unlisted entity planning IPO may change its accounting policy from revaluation
model to cost model for some or all classes of PPE to align the entity’s accounting policy with
that of listed markets participants within that industry so as to enhance the comparability of its
financial statements with those of other listed market participants within the industry. Such a
change – from revaluation model to cost model is not expected to be frequent.
Where the change in accounting policy from revaluation model to cost model is considered
permissible in accordance with Ind AS 8 paragraph 14(b), it shall be accounted for
retrospectively, in accordance with Ind AS 8.
*****
1.5.6 Disclosure regarding the changes in accounting policies
When initial application of an Ind AS has an effect on the current period or any prior period,
would have such an effect except that it is impracticable to determine the amount of the
adjustment, or might have an effect on future periods, an entity shall disclose:
(a) the title of the Ind AS;
(b) when applicable, that the change in accounting policy is made in accordance with its
transitional provisions;
(c) the nature of the change in accounting policy;
(d) when applicable, a description of the transitional provisions;
(e) when applicable, the transitional provisions that might have an effect on future
periods;
(f) for the current period and each prior period presented, to the extent practicable, the
amount of the adjustment:
(i) for each financial statement line item affected; and
(ii) if Ind AS 33, ‘Earnings per Share’, applies to the entity, for basic and diluted
earnings per share;
(g) the amount of the adjustment relating to periods before those presented, to the extent
practicable; and
(h) if retrospective application required by paragraph 19(a) or (b) of Ind AS 8 is
impracticable for a particular prior period, or for periods before those presented, the
circumstances that led to the existence of that condition and a description of how and
from when the change in accounting policy has been applied.
When a voluntary change in accounting policy has an effect on the current period or any
prior period, would have an effect on that period except that it is impracticable to determine
the amount of the adjustment, or might have an effect on future periods, an entity shall
disclose:
(a) the nature of the change in accounting policy;
Illustration 6
Whether an entity is required to disclose the impact of any new Ind AS which is issued but not
yet effective in its financial statements as per Ind AS 8?
Solution
Paragraph 30 of Ind AS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors,
states as follows:
“When an entity has not applied a new Ind AS that has been issued but is not yet effective, the
entity shall disclose:
(a) this fact; and
(b) known or reasonably estimable information relevant to assessing the possible impact that
application of the new Ind AS will have on the entity’s financial statements in the period of
initial application.”
Accordingly, it may be noted that an entity is required to disclose the impact of Ind AS which has
been issued but is not yet effective.
*****
paragraph 36(a) of Ind AS 2, ‘Inventories’, specifically requires disclosure of ‘cost formula used’
as a part of disclosure of accounting policies adopted in measurement of inventories.
Accordingly, a change in cost formula is a change in accounting policy.
*****
1.6.4 Accounting treatment for applying changes in accounting
estimates
The effect of change in an accounting estimate, except to the extent that the change results
in change in assets, liabilities or relates to an item of equity, shall be recognised
prospectively by including it in profit or loss in:
(a) the period of the change, if the change affects that period only; or
(b) the period of the change and future periods, if the change affects both.
A change in an accounting estimate may affect only the current period’s profit or loss, or
the profit or loss of both the current period and future periods.
To the extent that a change in an accounting estimate gives rise to changes in assets and
liabilities, or relates to an item of equity, it shall be recognised by adjusting the carrying
amount of the related asset, liability or equity item in the period of the change.
Prospective recognition of the effect of a change in an accounting estimate means that the
change is applied to transactions, other events and conditions from the date of that change.
A change in an accounting estimate may affect only the current period’s profit or loss, or the
profit or loss of both the current period and future periods. For example, a change in a loss
allowance for expected credit losses affects only the current period’s profit or loss and
therefore is recognised in the current period. However, a change in the estimated useful life
of, or the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in, a
depreciable asset affects depreciation expense for the current period and for each future
period during the asset’s remaining useful life. In both cases, the effect of the change
relating to the current period is recognised as income or expense in the current period. The
effect, if any, on future periods is recognised as income or expense in those future periods.
Examples 11 and 12
11. A change in the estimate of the amount of bad debts affects only the current period’s
profit or loss and therefore is recognised in the current period. However, a change in
the estimated useful life of, or the expected pattern of consumption of the future
economic benefits embodied in, a depreciable asset affects depreciation expense for
the current period and for each future period during the asset’s remaining useful life.
In both cases, the effect of the change relating to the current period is recognised as
income or expense in the current period. The effect, if any, on future periods is to be
recognised as income or expense in those future periods.
12. During the financial year ended 31 st March, 20X2, Entity ABC introduced a new range
of electric motors. It sold the motors with a standard warranty of two years. Warranty
provides assurance that a product will function as expected and in accordance with
certain specifications and it has been assessed that it is not a separate performance
obligation under Ind AS 115.
Based on results of testing of the motors during trials prior to commercial production,
Entity ABC made a provision for warranty costs amounting to 1,00,000 for motors
sold during the year ended 31 st March, 20X2.
During financial year 20X2-20X3, a defect was discovered in the motors that had not
come to light during the trials. The defect resulted in the entity incurring an amount of
2,00,000 during the financial year 20X2-20X3 on repairs of motors sold during the
financial year 20X1-20X2. Besides, the entity expects to incur 1,50,000 as costs
during the year 20X3-20X4 on meeting its warranty obligations in respect of motors
sold during the financial year 20X2-20X3.
In preparing its financial statements for the year ended 31 st March, 20X3, the entity
would carry forward a warranty provision of 1,50,000 in respect of motors sold
during the financial year 20X1-20X2. It would recognise an amount of 2,50,000
( 2,00,000 plus 1,50,000 minus 1,00,000) in respect of motors sold during the
financial year 20X1-20X2 as an expense in profit or loss for the financial year
20X2-20X3. The warranty provision included in the comparatives for financial year
ended 31 st March, 20X2 would not be adjusted.
The provision for warranty costs in respect of motors sold during the financial year
20X2-20X3 would be made by considering the information concerning the defect in
motors that came to light during the financial year 20X2-20X3.
1.7 ERRORS
1.7.1 Meaning
Ind AS 8 deals with the treatment of errors that have taken place in past but were not
discovered at that time. Subsequently, when they are discovered, it is necessary to correct
The abovementioned errors and any other error may happen while recognising the transaction,
or while measuring the transaction, or while presenting it in financial statements or it might be
possible that proper disclosure is not done.
Example 13
The following errors occurred in preparation of A Ltd.’s financial statements for the immediately
preceding financial year –
(a) Depreciation on plant and machinery understated by an amount equal to 0.30% of sales;
(b) Warranty provisions understated by an amount equal to 0.15% of sales;
(c) Allowance for bad debts understated by an amount of 0.25% of sales.
Individually none of these errors may be material but could collectively influence the economic
decision of the users of the financial statements. These are material prior period errors.
comply with Ind AS if they contain either material errors or immaterial errors made intentionally
to achieve a particular presentation of an entity’s financial position, financial performance or
cash flows. Potential current period errors discovered in that period are corrected before the
financial statements are approved for issue. However, material errors are sometimes not
discovered until a subsequent period, and these prior period errors are corrected in the
comparative information presented in the financial statements for that subsequent period.
In accordance with the above, the reclassification of liabilities from non-current to current would
be considered as correction of an error under Ind AS 8. Accordingly, in the financial statements
for the year ended 31 st March, 20X2, the comparative amounts as at 31 st March, 20X1 would be
restated to reflect the correct classification.
Ind AS 1 requires an entity to present a third balance sheet as at the beginning of the preceding
period in addition to the minimum comparative financial statements, if, inter alia, it makes a
retrospective restatement of items in its financial statements and the restatement has a material
effect on the information in the balance sheet at the beginning of the preceding period.
Accordingly, the entity should present a third balance sheet as at the beginning of the preceding
period, i.e., as at 1 st April, 20X0 in addition to the comparatives for the financial year
20X0-20X1.
*****
1.7.4 Limitations on retrospective restatement
We have already discussed in detail the treatment when there are the limitations on giving
retrospective effect to changes in accounting policies. Similar provisions are included in
Ind AS 8 to deal with limitations on retrospective restatement of prior period errors.
Step 1: A prior period error shall be corrected by retrospective restatement if it is practicable to
determine both the period specific effects and cumulative effect of the error.
The correction of a prior period error is excluded from profit or loss for the period in which the
error is discovered. Any information presented about prior periods, including any historical
summaries of financial data, is restated as far back as is practicable.
Step 2: If it is not practicable to determine the period-specific effects of an error on comparative
information for one or more prior periods presented, the entity shall first find out the earliest
period for which retrospective restatement is practicable and then restate the opening balances
of assets, liabilities and equity for that period. Ind AS 8 further states that such period can be
the current period also.
For meaning of ‘impracticable’ for the purposes of Ind AS 8, see section 1.5.5.3.
Step 3: If it is not practicable to determine the cumulative effect, at the beginning of the current
period, of an error on all prior periods, the entity shall restate the comparative information to
correct the error prospectively from the earliest date practicable.
because of the longer period of time that might have passed since the affected transaction,
other event or condition occurred. However, the objective of estimates related to prior periods
remains the same as for estimates made in the current period, namely, for the estimate to reflect
the circumstances that existed when the transaction, other event or condition occurred.
Therefore, retrospectively applying a new accounting policy or correcting a prior period error
requires distinguishing information that
(a) provides evidence of circumstances that existed on the date(s) as at which the transaction,
other event or condition occurred, and
(b) would have been available when the financial statements for that prior period were
approved for issue
from other information.
For some types of estimates (eg a fair value measurement that uses significant unobservable
inputs), it is impracticable to distinguish these types of information. When retrospective
application or retrospective restatement would require making a significant estimate for which it
is impossible to distinguish these two types of information, it is impracticable to apply the new
accounting policy or correct the prior period error retrospectively.
Hindsight should not be used when applying a new accounting policy to, or correcting amounts
for, a prior period, either in making assumptions about what management’s intentions would
have been in a prior period or estimating the amounts recognised, measured or disclosed in a
prior period. For example, when an entity corrects a prior period error in calculating its liability
for employees’ accumulated sick leave in accordance with Ind AS 19, ‘Employee Benefits’, it
disregards information about an unusually severe influenza season during the next period that
became available after the financial statements for the prior period were approved for issue.
The fact that significant estimates are frequently required when amending comparative
information presented for prior periods does not prevent reliable adjustment or correction of the
comparative information.
4. Accounting for Ind AS 8 requires that, subject While AS 5 does not clearly
changes in to limited exceptions, changes specify how changes in
accounting in accounting policies should accounting policies other than
policies be accounted for those dealt with by specific
retrospectively by restatement transitional provisions of an
of comparative information. In accounting standard should be
5. Prior period Ind AS refers to the term ‘prior AS 5 defines prior period items
items period errors’ which is wider in as incomes or expenses which
scope as compared to ‘prior arise in the current period as a
period items’ used in AS 5. result of errors or omissions in
the preparation of financial
Ind AS 8 definition of prior
statements of one or more prior
period errors include the
periods.
effects of misinterpretations of
facts and fraud as well.
the said year. Would this situation require retrospective restatement of comparatives
considering that the amount was material?
7. While preparing interim financial statements for the half-year ended 30 th September, 20X1,
an entity notes that there has been an under-accrual of certain expenses in the interim
financial statements for the first quarter ended 30 th June, 20X1. The amount of under
accrual is assessed to be material in the context of interim financial statements. However,
it is expected that the amount would be immaterial in the context of the annual financial
statements. The management is of the view that there is no need to correct the error in the
interim financial statements considering that the amount is expected to be immaterial from
the point of view of the annual financial statements. Whether the management’s view is
acceptable?
8. ABC Ltd has an investment property with an original cost of 1,00,000 which it
inadvertently omitted to depreciate in previous financial statements. The property was
acquired on 1 st April, 20X1. The property has a useful life of 10 years and is depreciated
using straight line method. Estimated residual value at the end of 10 year is Nil.
How should the error be corrected in the financial statements for the year ended
31 st March, 20X4, assuming the impact of the same is considered material? For simplicity,
ignore tax effects.
9. ABC Ltd. changed its method adopted for inventory valuation in the year 20X2-20X3. Prior
to the change, inventory was valued using the first in first out method (FIFO). However, it
was felt that in order to match current practice and to make the financial statements more
relevant and reliable, a weighted average valuation model would be more appropriate.
The effect of the change in the method of valuation of inventory was as follows:
31 st March, 20X1 - Increase of 10 million
31 st March, 20X2 - Increase of 15 million
31 st March, 20X3 - Increase of 20 million
Profit or loss under the FIFO valuation model are as follows:
20X2-20X3 20X1-20X2
Revenue 324 296
Cost of goods sold (173) (164)
Gross profit 151 132
Expenses (83) (74)
Profit 68 58
Sales 73,500
Cost of goods sold (53,500)
Profit before income taxes 20,000
Income taxes (6,000)
Profit 14,000
Basic and diluted EPS 2.8
The 20X3-20X4 opening retained earnings was 20,000 and closing retained earnings was
34,000. Cheery Limited’s income tax rate was 30% for 20X4-20X5 and 20X3-20X4. It had
no other income or expenses.
Cheery Limited had 50,000 (5,000 shares of 10 each) of share capital throughout, and
no other components of equity except for retained earnings.
State how the above will be treated /accounted in Cheery Limited’s Statement of profit and
loss, statement of changes in equity and in notes wherever required for current period and
earlier period(s) as per relevant Ind AS.
11. In 20X3-20X4, after the entity’s 31 st March 20X3 annual financial statements were
approved for issue, a latent defect in the composition of a new product manufactured by
the entity was discovered (that is, a defect that could not be discovered by reasonable or
customary inspection). As a result of the latent defect the entity incurred 1,00,000 of
unanticipated costs for fulfilling its warranty obligation in respect of sales made before
31 st March 20X3. An additional 20,000 was incurred to rectify the latent defect in
products sold during 20X3-20X4 before the defect was detected and the production
process rectified, 5,000 of which relates to items of inventory at 31 st March 20X3. The
defective inventory was reported at cost 15,000 in the 20X2-20X3 financial statements
when its selling price less costs to complete and sell was estimated at 18,000. The
accounting estimates made in preparing the 31 st March 20X3 financial statements were
appropriately made using all reliable information that the entity could reasonably be
expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the preparation and presentation
of those financial statements.
Analyse the above situation in accordance with relevant Ind AS.
Answers
1. This is not a change in accounting policy as the carpet retailer has changed the way that
the carpets are fitted.
Therefore, there would not be any need to retrospectively change the prior period figures
for revenue already recognized.
2. As per paragraph 40A of Ind AS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements, an entity shall
present a third balance sheet as at the beginning of the preceding period in addition to the
minimum comparative financial statements required by paragraph 38A of the standard if:
it applies an accounting policy retrospectively, makes a retrospective restatement of
items in its financial statements or reclassifies items in its financial statements; and
the retrospective application, retrospective restatement or the reclassification has a
material effect on the information in the balance sheet at the beginning of the
preceding period.
3. Extract from the notes
From the start of 20X2, Delta Ltd., changed its accounting policy for depreciating property,
plant and equipment, so as to apply much more fully a components approach, whilst at the
same time adopting the revaluation model. Management takes the view that this policy
provides reliable and more relevant information because it deals more accurately with the
components of property, plant and equipment and is based on up-to-date values. The
policy has been applied prospectively from the start of 20X2 because it was not practicable
to estimate the effects of applying the policy either retrospectively, or prospectively from
any earlier date. Accordingly, the adoption of the new policy has no effect on prior years.
The effect on the current year is to increase the carrying amount of property, plant and
equipment at the start of the year by 6,000; increase the opening deferred tax provision
by 1,800; create a revaluation surplus at the start of the year of 4,200; increase
depreciation expense by 500; and reduce tax expense by 150.
4. As per paragraphs 60 and 61 of Ind AS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, the
depreciation method used shall reflect the pattern in which the asset’s future economic
benefits are expected to be consumed by the entity. The depreciation method applied to
an asset shall be reviewed at least at each financial year-end and, if there has been a
significant change in the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits
embodied in the asset, the method shall be changed to reflect the changed pattern. Such a
change is accounted for as a change in an accounting estimate in accordance with
Ind AS 8.
As per the above, depreciation method for a depreciable asset has to reflect the expected
pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset. Determination
statements and the retrospective restatement has a material effect on the information in the
balance sheet at the beginning of the preceding period.
In the given case, expenses for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1 and liabilities as at
31 st March, 20X1 were understated because of non-recognition of bonus expense and
related provision. Expenses for the year ended 31 st March, 20X2, on the other hand, were
overstated to the same extent because of recognition of the aforesaid bonus as expense
for the year. To correct the above errors in the annual financial statements for the year
ended 31 st March, 20X3, the entity should:
(a) restate the comparative amounts (i.e., those for the year ended 31 st March, 20X2) in
the statement of profit and loss; and
(b) present a third balance sheet as at the beginning of the preceding period (i.e., as at
1 st April, 20X1) wherein it should recognise the provision for bonus and restate the
retained earnings.
7. Paragraph 41 of Ind AS 8, inter alia, states that financial statements do not comply with
Ind AS if they contain either material errors or immaterial errors made intentionally to
achieve a particular presentation of an entity’s financial position, financial performance or
cash flows.
As regards the assessment of materiality of an item in preparing interim financial
statements, paragraph 25 of Ind AS 34, Interim Financial Statements, states as follows:
“While judgement is always required in assessing materiality, this Standard bases the
recognition and disclosure decision on data for the interim period by itself for reasons of
understandability of the interim figures. Thus, for example, unusual items, changes in
accounting policies or estimates, and errors are recognised and disclosed on the basis of
materiality in relation to interim period data to avoid misleading inferences that might result
from non-disclosure. The overriding goal is to ensure that an interim financial report
includes all information that is relevant to understanding of an entity’s financial position and
performance during the interim period.”
As per the above, while materiality judgements always involve a degree of subjectivity, the
overriding goal is to ensure that an interim financial report includes all the information that
is relevant to an understanding of the financial position and performance of the entity
during the interim period. It is therefore not appropriate to base quantitative assessments
of materiality on projected annual figures when evaluating errors in interim financial
statements.
Accordingly, the management is required to correct the error in the interim financial
statements since it is assessed to be material in relation to interim period data.
Cheery Limited
Statement of Changes in Equity
Share Retained Total
capital earnings
Balance at 31 st March, 20X3 50,000 20,000 70,000
Profit for the year ended 31 st March, 20X4
as restated 9,450 9,450
Balance at 31 st March, 20X4 50,000 29,450 79,450
Profit for the year ended 31 st March, 20X5 16,800 16,800
Balance at 31 st March, 20X5 50,000 46,250 96,250
Extract from the Notes
Some products that had been sold in 20X3-20X4 were incorrectly included in inventory at
31 st March, 20X4 at 6,500. The financial statements of 20X3-20X4 have been restated to
correct this error. The effect of the restatement on those financial statements is
summarized below:
Effect on 20X3-20X4
(Increase) in cost of goods sold (6,500)
Decrease in income tax expenses 1,950
(Decrease) in profit (4,550)
(Decrease) in basic and diluted EPS (0.91)
(Decrease) in inventory (6,500)
Decrease in income tax payable 1,950
(Decrease) in equity (4,550)
There is no effect on the balance sheet at the beginning of the preceding period i.e.
1 st April, 20X3.
11. Ind AS 8 is applied in selecting and applying accounting policies, and accounting for
changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and corrections of prior
period errors.
A change in accounting estimate is an adjustment of the carrying amount of an asset or a
liability, or the amount of the periodic consumption of an asset. This change in accounting
estimate is an outcome of the assessment of the present status of, and expected future
benefits and obligations associated with, assets and liabilities. Changes in accounting
UNIT 2:
IND AS 10: EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Define the relevant terms like ‘events after the reporting period’, ‘date of
approval’, ‘adjusting events’ and ‘non-adjusting events’.
UNIT OVERVIEW
IND AS 10
• Of adjusting events • Long term loan
after the reporting arrangements
period • Going concern
• No recognition of non-
adjusting events after
the reporting period;
only disclosure is
required
Recognition Special
and Cases
measurement
Distribution of
Non-cash Disclosure
Assets to
Owners
• When to recognise a • Date of approval for
dividend payable issue
• Measurement of a • Non-adjusting events
dividend payable after the reporting
• Presentation and period
disclosures
2.1 INTRODUCTION
It is impossible for any company to present the information on the same day, as the day of
reporting. There would always be a gap between the end of the period for which financial
statements are presented and the date on which the same will actually be made available to the
public.
During this gap, there is a possibility of occurring of few events which will have far reaching
effects on the business / existence of the company. Now the question arises: what view the
company should take about such events? Should it leave it without any cognizance as they are
taking place after the reporting period, or should it take cognizance of such events as at the time
of preparation of the financial statement and making it available to the public? If the company is
aware of the facts and is still not disclosing the same, it may mislead the users.
Ind AS 10 deals with such events and provides guidance about its treatment in the financial
statements.
2.2 OBJECTIVE
The objective of this standard is to prescribe.
1. When an entity should adjust its financial statements for the events after the reporting
period.
2. The disclosures that an entity should give about the date when the financial statements
were approved for issue and about events after the reporting period.
The standard also requires that an entity should not prepare its financial statements on a going
concern basis if events after the reporting period indicate that the going concern assumption is
no longer appropriate.
Ind AS 10 prescribes
2.3 SCOPE
The Standard -shall be applied in:
1. Accounting for events after reporting period; and
2 . Disclosure of events after the reporting period.
Cut off
date
Financial Statements
Start of the End of the Approved by the
reporting reporting Management Shareholders’
period period Meeting
Example 1
The financial year of an entity ends on 31 st March, 20X2. If the board of directors approves the
financial statements on 15 th May, 20X2, ‘after the reporting period’ will be the period between
31 st March, 20X2 and 15 th May, 20X2 and the events occurring during this period should be
considered as ‘events after the reporting period’.
Example 2
The Board of Directors of ABC Ltd., in its meeting on 5 th May, 20X1, reviews and approves
the financial statements for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1 and issues them to the
shareholders. The financial statements are adopted by the shareholders in the annual
general meeting on 23 rd June, 20X1. The date of approval of financial statements for the is
5 th May, 20X1 in accordance with the standard.
Likewise, in some cases, the management of an entity is required to issue its financial
statements to a supervisory board (made up solely of non-executives) for approval. In
such cases, as per paragraph 6 of Ind AS 10, the financial statements are approved for
issue when the management approves them for issue to the supervisory board.
Example 3
On 18 th May, 20X2, the management of an entity approves financial statements for issue to
its supervisory board. The supervisory board is made up solely of non-executives and may
include representatives of employees and other outside interests. The supervisory board
approves the financial statements on 26 th May, 20X2. The financial statements are made
available to shareholders and others on 1 st June, 20X2. The shareholders approve the
financial statements at their annual meeting on 15 th July, 20X2 and the financial statements
are then filed with a regulatory body on 17 th July, 20X2.
The financial statements are approved for issue on 18 th May, 20X2 (date of management
approval for issue to the supervisory board).
What is the date of approval for issue of the financial statements prepared for the reporting
period from 1 st April, 20X1 to 31 st March, 20X2, in a situation where following dates are
available? Completion of preparation of financial statements 28 th May, 20X2 Board reviews and
approves it for issue 19 th June, 20X2.
Available to shareholders 1 st July, 20X2
Solution
As per Ind AS 10 the date of approval for issue of financial statements is the date on which the
financial statements are approved by the Board of Directors in case of a company, and, by the
corresponding approving authority in case of any other entity. Accordingly, in the instant case,
the date of approval is the date on which the financial statements are approved by the Board of
Directors of the company, i.e., 19 th June, 20X2.
If the entity is a partnership firm, the date of approval will be the date when the relevant
approving authority of such entity approves the financial statements for issue i.e. the date when
the partner(s) of the firm approve(s) the financial statements.
*****
Illustration 2
ABC Ltd. prepared interim financial report for the quarter ending 30 th June, 20X1. The interim
financial report was approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 15 th July, 20X1. Whether
events occurring between end of the interim financial report and date of approval by Board of
Directors, i.e., events between 1 st July, 20X1 and 15 th July, 20X1 that provide evidence of
conditions that existed at the end of the interim reporting period shall be adjusted in the interim
financial report ending 30 th June, 20X1?
Paragraph 2 of Ind AS 34, inter alia, provides that each financial report, annual or interim, is
evaluated on its own for conformity with Ind AS. Further, paragraph 19 of Ind AS 34, provides
that an interim financial report shall not be described as complying with Ind AS unless it
complies with all of the requirements of Ind AS.
In accordance with the above, an entity describing that its interim financial report is in
compliance with Ind AS, has to comply with all the provisions of Ind AS including Ind AS 10.
In order to comply with the requirements of Ind AS 10, each interim financial report should be
adjusted for the adjusting events occurring between end of the interim financial report and the
date of approval by Board of Directors. Therefore, in the instant case, events occurring between
1 st July, 20X1 and 15 th July, 20X1 that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the end of
the interim reporting period should be adjusted in the interim financial report ending
30 th June, 20X1.
*****
Illustration 3
The Board of Directors of ABC Ltd. approved the financial statements for the reporting period
20X1-20X2 for issue on 15 th June, 20X2. The management of ABC Ltd. discovered a major
fraud and decided to reopen the books of account. The financial statements were subsequently
approved by the Board of Directors on 30 th June, 20X2. What is the date of approval for issue
as per Ind AS 10 in the given case?
Solution
As per paragraph 3 of Ind AS 10, the – date of approval is the date on which the financial
statements are approved by the Board of Directors in case of a company, and by the
corresponding approving authority in case of any other entity for issue. In the given case, there
are two dates of approval by Board of Directors. The financial statements were reopened for
further adjustments subsequent to initial approval. The date of approval should be taken as the
date on which financial statements are finally approved by the Board of Directors. Therefore, in
the given case, the date of approval for issue as per Ind AS 10 should be considered as
30 th June, 20X2.
*****
2.4.4 Should the company report only unfavourable events?
The standard clearly states that events after reporting period can be favourable as well as
unfavourable. Accordingly, an entity should report both favourable as well as unfavourable
events after the reporting period.
Ind AS 10 Carve Out: Where there is a breach of a material provision of a long-term loan
arrangement on or before the end of the reporting period with the effect that the liability
becomes payable on demand on the reporting date, the agreement by lender before the
approval of the financial statements for issue, to not demand payment as a consequence of the
breach, shall be considered as an adjusting event.
(a) The settlement after the reporting period of a court case that confirms that the entity had a
present obligation at the end of the reporting period. The entity adjusts any previously
recognised provision related to this court case in accordance with Ind AS 37, ‘Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets’ or recognises a new provision.
The entity does not merely disclose a contingent liability because the settlement provides
additional evidence that would be considered in accordance with paragraph 16 of
Ind AS 37.
Illustration 4
A case is going on between ABC Ltd., and GST department on claiming some exemption
for the year 20X1-20X2. The court issued the order on 15 th April, 20X2 and rejected the
claim of the company. Accordingly, the company is liable to pay additional tax. The
financial statements of the company for the year 20X1-20X2 have been approved on
15 th May, 20X2. Should the company account for such tax in the year 20X1-20X2 or should
it account for the same in the year 20X2-20X3?
Solution
An event after the reporting period is an adjusting event, if it provides evidence of a
condition existing at the end of the reporting period. Here, this condition is satisfied.
Court order received after the reporting period (but before the financial statements are
approved) provides evidence of the liability existing at the end of the reporting period.
Therefore, the event will be considered as an adjusting event and, accordingly, the
amounts will be adjusted in financial statements for 20X1-20X2.
*****
(b) The receipt of information after the reporting period indicating that an asset was impaired at
the end of the reporting period, or that the amount of a previously recognised impairment
loss for that asset needs to be adjusted. For example:
(i) The bankruptcy of a customer that occurs after the reporting period usually confirms
that the customer was credit-impaired at the end of the reporting period;
Example 4
Loss allowance for expected credit loss in respect of the amount due from a customer
was recognised at the end of the reporting period in accordance with Ind AS 109,
‘Financial Instruments’. Subsequent liquidation order on the customer issued before
the date of approval of financial statements for the reporting period indicates that
nothing could be received from the customer. This confirms that the expected credit
loss at the end of the reporting period on this particular trade receivable is equal to its
Illustration 5
While preparing its financial statements for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1, XYZ Ltd.
made a general provision for bad debts @ 5% of its debtors. In the last week of
February, 20X1 a debtor for 2 lakhs had suffered heavy loss due to an earthquake;
the loss was not covered by any insurance policy. Considering the event of
earthquake, XYZ Ltd. made a provision @ 50% of the amount receivable from that
debtor apart from the general provision of 5% on remaining debtors. In April, 20X1
the debtor became bankrupt. Can XYZ Ltd. provide for the full loss arising out of
insolvency of the debtor in the financial statements for the year ended
31 st March, 20X1?
Would the answer be different if earthquake had taken place after 31 st March, 20X1,
and therefore, XYZ Ltd. did not make any specific provision in context that debtor and
made only general provision for bad debts @ 5% on total debtors?
Solution
As per the definition of ‘Events after the Reporting Period’ and paragraph 8 of
Ind AS 10, Events after the Reporting Period, financial statements should be adjusted
for events occurring after the reporting period that provide evidence of conditions that
existed at the end of the reporting period. In the instant case, the earthquake took
place in February 20X1 (i.e. before the end of the reporting period). Therefore, the
condition exists at the end of the reporting date though the debtor is declared
insolvent after the reporting period. Accordingly, full provision for bad debt amounting
to 2 lakhs should be made to cover the loss arising due to the bankruptcy of the
debtor in the financial statements for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1. In this case,
assuming that the financial statements are approved by the approving authority after
April, 20X1, XYZ Ltd should provide for the remaining amount as a consequence of
declaration of this debtor as bankrupt.
In case, the earthquake had taken place after the end of the reporting period, i.e.,
after 31 st March, 20X1, and XYZ Ltd. had not made any specific provision for the
debtor who was declared bankrupt later on, since the earthquake occurred after the
end of the reporting period no condition existed at the end of the reporting period.
The company had made only general provision for bad debts in the ordinary business
after reporting period, they provide proof about the circumstances that existed at the end of
reporting period. Therefore, the cost of installation and training will be considered for
capitalisation in the year 20X1-20X2.
*****
(d) The determination after the reporting period of the amount of profit-sharing or bonus
payments, if the entity had a present legal or constructive obligation at the end of the
reporting period to make such payments as a result of events before that date (see
Ind AS 19, Employee Benefits).
The careful reading of the above provision brings forth following two points:
(i) There is a legal or constructive obligation at the end of reporting period
(ii) The obligation is based on profit sharing or bonus payments.
Here one would understand that before the year end, one cannot determine the amount of
profit. Unless one determines the final amount of profit, one cannot finalise the amount of
profit sharing as the latter is related to the former. Therefore, such events must be
considered for the adjustments in financial statements, provided, the contract already
exists on the last day of reporting period.
(e) The discovery of fraud or errors that show that the financial statements are incorrect.
If any error or any fraud related to the reporting period is detected after the reporting
period (but before approval of the financial statements), then the entity must adjust the
financial statements appropriately by rectifying the same. This is because such fraud and
errors provide evidence that the financial statements are not correct as at the reporting
date. Discovery of such fraud and errors are adjusting events under Ind AS 10
Adjusting events after the reporting Non -adjusting events after the reporting period
period
Example 7
ABC Ltd., in order to raise funds, has privately placed debentures of 1 crore, on
st
1 January, 20X1, issued to PQR Ltd. As per the original terms of agreement, the debentures
are to be redeemed on 31 st March, 20X9. One of the conditions of the private placement of the
debentures was that debt-equity ratio at the end of any reporting year should not exceed 2:1. If
this condition is not fulfilled, then PQR Ltd., has a right to demand immediate redemption of the
debentures. On 31 st March, 20X6, debt-equity ratio of ABC Ltd., exceeds 2:1. Therefore,
PQR Ltd., decides to return the debentures.
Thus, on 31 st March, 20X6, the liability of the ABC Ltd., towards PQR Ltd., (which was originally
a long-term liability) becomes a current liability, since it is now a liability on demand. However,
ABC Ltd. enters into an agreement with PQR Ltd. on 15 th April, 20X6 that PQR Ltd., will not
demand the payment immediately. The financial statements are approved by the BOD on
30 th April, 20X6.
In this case, the agreement that PQR Ltd., will not demand the money immediately is a
subsequent event. Even though it is a subsequent event not affecting the condition existing at
the balance sheet date, yet because of the specific provisions of paragraph 3 of Ind AS 10, it
has to be given effect in the financial statements for the year 20X5-20X6. Accordingly, though
as per original terms the liability would have been otherwise reclassified as a current liability as
on 31 st March, 20X6, by giving effect to the event after the reporting period due to the specific
provisions of paragraph 3 of Ind AS 10, it would continue to be classified as a non-current
liability as on 31 st March, 20X6. In other words, the re-classification of debentures as current
liability as at 31 st March, 20X6 will be adjusted and once again classified as a non-current
liability as at that date.
assumption is no longer appropriate, the effect is so pervasive that this Standard requires a
fundamental change in the basis of accounting, rather than an adjustment to the amounts
recognised within the original basis of accounting.
In accordance with the above, an entity needs to change the basis of accounting if the effect of
deterioration in operating results and financial position is so pervasive that management
determines after the reporting period either that it intends to liquidate the entity or to cease
trading, or that it has no realistic alternative but to do so.
In the instant case, since contract is expiring on 31 st December 20X5 and it is confirmed on
23 rd April, 20X5, (i.e., after the end of the reporting period and before the approval of the
financial statements), that no further contact is secured, it implies that the entity’s operations are
expected to come to an end by 31 st December 20X5. Accordingly, if entity’s operations are
expected to come to an end, the entity needs to make a judgement as to whether it has any
realistic possibility to continue or not. In case, the entity determines that it has no realistic
alternative of continuing the business, preparation of financial statements for 20X4-20X5 and
thereafter going concern basis may not be appropriate.
*****
Illustration 9
In the plant of PQR Ltd., there was a fire on 10 th May, 20X1 in which the entire plant was
damaged and the loss of 40,00,000 is estimated. The claim with the insurance company has
been filed and a recovery of 27,00,000 is expected.
The financial statements for the year ending 31 st March, 20X1 were approved by the Board of
Directors on 12 th June, 20X1. Show how should it be disclosed?
Solution
In the instant case, since fire took place after the end of the reporting period, it is a non-
adjusting event. However, in accordance with paragraph 21 of Ind AS 10, disclosures regarding
material non-adjusting event should be made in the financial statements, i.e., the nature of the
event and the expected financial effect of the same.
With regard to going concern basis followed for preparation of financial statements, the company
needs to determine whether it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements on going
concern basis, since there is only one plant which has been damaged due to fire. If the effect of
deterioration in operating results and financial position is so pervasive that management
determines after the reporting period either that it intends to liquidate the entity or to cease
trading, or that it has no realistic alternative but to do so, preparation of financial statements for
the financial year 20X0-20X1 on going concern assumption may not be appropriate. In that
case, the financial statements may have to be prepared on a basis other than going concern.
2.9 DIVIDENDS
If an entity declares dividends to holders of equity instruments (as defined in Ind AS 32,
Financial Instruments: Presentation) after the reporting period, the entity shall not
recognise those dividends as a liability at the end of the reporting period.
If dividends are declared after the reporting period but before the financial statements are
approved for issue, the dividends are not recognised as a liability at the end of the
reporting period because no obligation exists at that time. Such dividends are disclosed in
the notes to accounts in Financial Statements.
The crux of difference between adjusting event and non-adjusting event depends on the
fact whether the event provides evidence for existence of a condition at the end of
reporting period or not.
Illustration 10
ABC Ltd. declares the dividend on 15 th July, 20X2 as the results of year 20X1-20X2 as well as
Q1 ending 30 th June, 20X2 are better than expected. The financial statements of the company
are approved on 20 th July, 20X2 for the financial year ending 31 st March, 20X2. Will the
dividend be accounted for in the financial year 20X2-20X3 or will it be accounted for in the year
20X1-20X2?
Solution
The dividend was declared in the year 20X2-20X3. Therefore, the obligation towards dividend
did not exist at the end date of reporting period i.e., on 31 st March, 20X2. Therefore, it will be
accounted for in the year 20X2-20X3 and not in 20X1-20X2, even if financial statements for
20X1-20X2 were approved after the declaration of dividend. It will, however, be disclosed in the
notes in the financial statements for the year 20X1-20X2 in accordance with Ind AS 1.
*****
Illustration 11
What would be the treatment for dividends declared to redeemable preference shareholders
after the reporting period but before the financial statements are approved for issue for the year
20X1-20X2. Whether Ind AS 10 prescribes any accounting treatment for such dividends?
Solution
Paragraph 12 of Ind AS 10 prescribes accounting treatment for dividends declared to holders of
equity instruments. If an entity declares dividends to holders of equity instruments (as defined
in Ind AS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentations) after the reporting period, the entity shall not
recognise those dividends as a liability at the end of the reporting period.
However, Ind AS 10 does not prescribe accounting treatment for dividends declared to
redeemable preference shareholders. As per the principles of Ind AS 32, Financial Instruments:
Presentation, a preference share that provides for mandatory redemption by the issuer for a
fixed or determinable amount at a fixed or determinable future date or gives the holder the right
to require the issuer to redeem the instrument at or after a particular date for a fixed or
determinable amount, is a financial liability. Thus, dividend payments to such preference shares
are recognised as expense in the same way as interest on a bond. Since interest will be
charged on time basis, the requirements of Ind AS 10 regarding date of declaration of dividend
is not relevant for its recognition.
*****
of such transactions, other than when such transactions involve capitalisation or bonus
issues, share splits or reverse share splits all of which are required to be adjusted under
Ind AS 33);
(g) abnormally large changes after the reporting period in asset prices or foreign exchange
rates;
(h) changes in tax rates or tax laws enacted or announced after the reporting period that have
a significant effect on current and deferred tax assets and liabilities (see Ind AS 12, Income
Taxes);
(i) entering into significant commitments or contingent liabilities, for example, by issuing
significant guarantees; and
(j) commencing major litigation arising solely out of events that occurred after the reporting
period.
Important points to remember
S.No. Item Timing Treatment Reason
1. Dividends Declared after the Do not recognise it No obligation exists at
reporting period as a liability at the that time
but before approval end of the reporting
of financial period.
statements Disclosed in the
notes to accounts
2. Going If management Do not prepare the The deterioration in
concern determines after financial statements operating results and
the reporting on a going concern financial position after
period either that it basis; or the reporting period
intends to liquidate Make necessary may be so pervasive
the entity or to disclosure of not that it may require a
cease trading following going fundamental change
concern basis or in the basis of
events or conditions accounting
that may cast
significant doubt
upon the entity’s
ability to continue
as a going concern
An extract from the annual report of JSW Steel Limited for the year ended
31 st March, 2021:
It may be recalled that paragraph 107 of Ind AS 1, inter alia, requires an entity to present the
amount of dividends recognised as distributions to owners either in the statement of changes in
equity or in the notes to the financial statements but does not prescribe how to measure it.
Appendix A to Ind AS 10, Distribution of Non-cash Assets to Owners is relevant in this regard.
2.11.1 Applicability
Appendix A to Ind AS 10 applies to the following types of non-reciprocal distributions of
assets by an entity to its owners acting in their capacity as owners:
(a) distributions of non-cash assets (e.g., items of property, plant and equipment,
businesses as defined in Ind AS 103, ownership interests in another entity or disposal
groups as defined in Ind AS 105); and
(b) distributions that give owners a choice of receiving either non-cash assets or a cash
alternative.
It applies only to distributions in which all owners of the same class of equity instruments
are treated equally.
2.11.2 Non-applicability
This Appendix does not apply to a distribution of a non-cash asset that is ultimately
controlled by the same party or parties before and after the distribution.
This exclusion applies to the separate, individual and consolidated financial statements of
an entity that makes the distribution.
For a distribution to be outside the scope of this Appendix on the basis that the same
parties control the asset both before and after the distribution, a group of individual
shareholders receiving the distribution must have, as a result of contractual arrangements,
such ultimate collective power over the entity making the distribution.
It does not apply when an entity distributes some of its ownership interests in a subsidiary
but retains control of the subsidiary. The entity making a distribution that results in the
entity recognising a non-controlling interest in its subsidiary accounts for the distribution in
accordance with Ind AS 110, Consolidated Financial Statements.
This Appendix addresses only the accounting by an entity that makes a non-cash asset
distribution. It does not address the accounting by shareholders who receive such a
distribution.
amount of the dividend payable recognised in equity as adjustments to the amount of the
distribution.
Accounting for any difference between the carrying amount of the assets distributed and
the carrying amount of the dividend payable when an entity settles the dividend payable.
When an entity settles the dividend payable, it shall recognise the difference, if any,
between (a) the carrying amount of the assets distributed and (b) the carrying amount of
the dividend payable - in profit or loss.
2.11.4.3 Presentation and disclosures
An entity shall present the difference between carrying amount of the assets distributed and the
carrying amount of the dividend payable at the time of settlement of the dividend payable as a
separate line item in profit or loss.
An entity shall disclose the following information, if applicable:
(a) the carrying amount of the dividend payable at the beginning and end of the period; and
(b) the increase or decrease in the carrying amount recognised in the period as result of a
change in the fair value of the assets to be distributed.
If after the end of a reporting period but before the financial statements are approved for issue,
an entity declares a dividend to distribute a non-cash asset, it shall disclose:
(a) the nature of the asset to be distributed;
(b) the carrying amount of the asset to be distributed as of the end of the reporting period; and
(c) the fair value of the asset to be distributed as of the end of the reporting period, if it is
different from its carrying amount, and the information about the method(s)used to measure
that fair value required to be disclosed by Ind AS 113, Fair Value Measurement.
less estimated costs necessary to make the sale as the event of reduction in selling price
took place after 31 st March, 20X2 and the reduced prices were not applicable as on
31 st March, 20X2. Comment on the company’s views.
4. XY Ltd took a large-sized civil construction contract, for a public sector undertaking, valued
at 200 crores. The execution of the project started during 20X1-20X2 and continued in
the next financial year also. During execution of the work on 29 th May, 20X2, the company
found while raising the foundation work that it had met a rocky surface and cost of contract
would go up by an extra 50 crores, which would not be recoverable from the contractee
as per the terms of the contract. The Company’s financial year ended on 31 st March, 20X2,
and the financial statements were considered and approved by the Board of Directors on
15 th June, 20X2. How will you treat the above in the financial statements for the year
ended 31 st March, 20X2?
5. A Ltd. was required to pay a penalty for a breach in the performance of a contract. A Ltd.
believed that the penalty was payable at a lower amount than the amount demanded by the
other party. A Ltd. created provision for the penalty but also approached the arbitrator with
a submission that the case may be dismissed with costs. A Ltd. prepared the financial
statements for the year 20X1-20X2, which were approved in May, 20X2. The arbitrator, in
April, 20X2, awarded the case in favour of A Ltd. As a result of the award of the arbitrator,
the provision earlier made by A Ltd. was required to be reduced. The arbitrator also
decided that cost of the case should be borne by the other party. Now, whether A Ltd. is
required to remeasure its provision and what would be the accounting treatment of the cost
that will be recovered by A Ltd., which has already been charged to the Statement of Profit
and Loss as an expense for the year 20X1-20X2?
6. A company manufacturing and supplying process control equipment is entitled to duty
drawback if it exceeds its turnover above a specified limit. To claim duty drawback, the
company needs to file an application within 15 days of meeting the specified turnover. If
the application is not filed within stipulated time, the Department has discretionary power of
giving duty draw back credit. For the year 20X1-20X2, the company has exceeded the
specified limit of turnover by the end of the reporting period but the application for duty
drawback is filed on 20 th April, 20X2, which is after the stipulated time of 15 days of
meeting the turnover condition.
Duty drawback has been credited by the Department on 28 th June, 20X2 and financial
statements have been approved by the Board of Directors of the company on
26 th July, 20X2. Whether duty drawback credit should be treated as an adjusting event?
7. XYZ Ltd. sells goods to its customer with a promise to give a discount of 5% on list price of
the goods provided that the payments are received from customer within 15 days. XYZ Ltd.
4. In the instant case, the execution of work started during the financial year 20X1-20X2 and
the rocky surface was there at the end of the reporting period, though the existence of
rocky surface is confirmed after the end of the reporting period as a result of which it
became evident that the cost may escalate by 50 crores. In accordance with the
definition of ‘Events after the Reporting Period’, since the rocky surface was there, the
condition was existing at the end of the reporting period, therefore, it is an adjusting event.
The cost of the project and profit should be accounted for accordingly.
5. In the instant case, A Ltd. approached the arbitrator before the end of the reporting period,
who decided the award after the end of the reporting period but before approval of the
financial statements for issue. Accordingly, the conditions were existing at the end of the
reporting date because A Ltd. had approached the arbitrator before the end of the reporting
period whose outcome has been confirmed by the award of the arbitrator. Therefore, it is
an adjusting event.
Accordingly, the measurement of the provision is required to be adjusted for the event
occurring after the reporting period. As far as the recovery of the cost by A Ltd. from the
other party is concerned, this right to recover was a contingent asset as at the end of the
reporting period.
As per para 35 of Ind AS 37, contingent assets are assessed continually to ensure that
developments are appropriately reflected in the financial statements. If it has become
virtually certain that an inflow of economic benefits will arise, the asset and the related
income are recognised in the financial statements of the period in which the change occurs.
If an inflow of economic benefits has become probable, an entity discloses the contingent
asset.
On the basis of the above, a contingent asset should be recognised in the financial
statements of the period in which the realisation of asset and the related income becomes
virtually certain. In the instant case, the recovery of cost became certain when the
arbitrator decided the award during financial year 20X2-20X3.
Accordingly, the recovery of cost should be recognised in the financial year 20X2-20X3.
6. In the instant case, the condition of exceeding the specified turnover was met at the end of
the reporting period and the company was entitled to the duty draw back but the application
for the same has been filed after the stipulated time. Therefore, credit of duty drawback is
discretionary in the hands of the Department. Accordingly, the duty drawback credit is a
contingent asset as at the end of the reporting period, which may be realized if the
Department credits the same.
between the end of the reporting period and the date when the financial statements are
approved by the Board of Directors in case of a company, and, by the corresponding
approving authority in case of any other entity for issue. Two types of events can be
identified:
(a) those that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting
period (adjusting events after the reporting period); and
(b) those that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting period (non-
adjusting events after the reporting period)
In the instant case, the demand notice has been received on 15 th June, 20X2, which is
between the end of the reporting period and the date of approval of financial statements.
Therefore, it is an event after the reporting period. This demand for an additional amount
has been raised because of higher rate of excise duty levied by the Excise Department in
respect of goods already manufactured during the reporting period. Accordingly, the
condition exists on 31 st March, 20X2, as the goods have been manufactured during the
reporting period on which additional excise duty has been levied and this event has been
confirmed by the receipt of demand notice. Therefore, it is an adjusting event.
In accordance with the principles of Ind AS 37, the company should make a provision in the
financial statements for the year 20X1-20X2, at best estimate of the expenditure to be
incurred, i.e., 15,00,000.
UNIT 3:
INDIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARD 113: FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENT
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this unit, you will be able to:
Understand the need for issuance of Ind AS 113
UNIT OVERVIEW
Ind AS 113
Establish Parameters
Identify the Item being Identify the Unit of Account Identify the Market Partcipants
Measured and Unit of Valuation and identify the market
3.2 OBJECTIVE
Sets out in a single Ind AS a framework for measuring fair value; and
When a price for an identical asset or liability is not observable, an entity measures fair value
using another valuation technique that:
Maximises the use of relevant observable inputs and
Minimises the use of unobservable inputs.
Because fair value is a market-based measurement, it is measured using the assumptions that
market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about
risk. As a result, an entity's intention to hold an asset or to settle or otherwise fulfil a liability is
not relevant when measuring fair value.
The definition of fair value focuses on assets and liabilities because they are a primary subject
of accounting measurement. In addition, this Ind AS shall be applied to an entity's own equity
instruments measured at fair value.
3.3 SCOPE
There are many Ind AS which require measuring assets / liabilities at
fair value and whenever it is required to be fair valued, one looks at Ind
AS 113. It means that this Standard will cover all such requirements
of another standard where fair value measurement and disclosure is
needed. However, there are some specific scope exclusions. It applies
to initial measurement and subsequent measurement as required by
respective Accounting Standard.
Required for
Applies to
3.4 DEFINITION
This Ind AS defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date.
Fair Value
The price that would In an orderly Between market At the measurement
be received to sell an transaction participants date
asset or paid to
transfer a liability
In order to understand the definition of the fair value, some of the major terms as used in the
definition need to be understood which are as follows:
a. The asset or liability
b. The transaction
c. Market participants
d. The price
Example 1 - Settlement vs Transfer
A bank holds a debt obligation with a face value of 1,00,000 and a market value of 95,000.
Assume that market interest rates are consistent with the amount in the note; however, there is
5,000 discount due to market concerns about the risk of non-performance by Counterparty I.
Settlement value
Counterparty I would be required to pay the face value of the note to settle the obligation, because
the bank might not be willing to discount the note by the market discount or the credit risk
adjustment. Therefore, the settlement value would equal the face value of the note.
Transfer value
In order to calculate the transfer value, Counterparty I must construct a hypothetical transaction
in which another counterparty (Counterparty II), with a similar credit profile, is seeking financing
on terms that are substantially the same as the note. Counterparty II could choose to enter into
a new note agreement with the bank or receive the existing note from Counterparty I in a transfer
transaction. In this hypothetical transaction, Counterparty II should be equally willing to obtain
financing through a new bank note or assumption of the existing note in return for a payment of
95,000. Therefore, the transfer value would be 95,000, and thus the fair value.
An Asset or a
Liability Is
For Recognition
aggregated or
disaggregated
Unit of Account
An Asset or a
Liability Is
For Measurement
aggregated or
disaggregated
Ind AS 113 describes how to measure fair value, not what is being measured at fair value. Other
Ind AS specify whether a fair value measurement considers an individual asset or liability or a
group of assets or liabilities (i.e. the unit of account).
Whether the asset or liability is a stand-alone asset or liability, a group of assets, a group of
liabilities or a group of assets and liabilities for recognition or disclosure purposes depends on its
unit of account.
The unit of account for the asset or liability shall be determined in accordance with the Ind AS that
requires or permits the fair value measurement, except as provided in this Ind AS.
This essentially defines the level of aggregation or disaggregation while calculating fair values of
the assets/ liabilities.
Examples 5 & 6
5. An entity having certain securities which are quoted at market and these are recognized at
fair value in the balance sheet. Quoted prices at individual level will be used in order to
find fair values of these investments.
6. In order to evaluate fair value of assets to identify impairment as per Ind AS 36, which
requires to measure such fair value at CGU (cash generating unit) level, group of assets will
be used to find fair values as per the requirement of such standard.
An entity shall measure the fair value of an asset or a liability using the assumptions that market
participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in
their economic best interest.
3.8.1 What are market participants?
The parties which eventually transact the assets/ liabilities either in principal market or the most
advantageous market in their best economic interest i.e.
They should be independent and not related parties. However, if related parties have done
similar transaction on arm’s length price, then it can be between related parties as well.
The parties should not be under any stress or force to enter into these transactions
All parties should have reasonable and sufficient information about the same.
Example 9
A land has legal restriction to use it for commercial purposes in next 10 years irrespective of its
holder. The fair value of the land will include this restriction about its usage because it is an asset
related restriction and any buyer will need to take over with similar restriction to use the land for
next 10 years. Now to evaluate its fair value, one has to consider the restriction based on the
assumptions which normally would be taking into account by its market participants, mentioned
as below
a) Whether the restriction is commonly imposed on each such type of land?
b) How useful it will be after the end of 10 years?
c) Whether there is any alternative use which may be considered normally by a participant for
similar kind of deals?
d) How liquid the sale of land will be with such restrictions?
e) Comparing the price with similar kind of land without restrictions to arrive at its fair values.
If location is a characteristic of the asset (as might be the case, for example, for a commodity),
the price in the principal (or most advantageous) market shall be adjusted for the costs, if any,
that would be incurred to transport the asset from its current location to that market.
It would be considered, if in case it is an inherent part of the Assets/ Liability so transacted e.g.
commodity.
Access on
measurement
Price in a different date Need not be able to
market is potentially sell on the
favourable measurement date
The financial assets do not have alternative uses because they have specific contractual terms
and can have a different use only if the characteristics of the financial assets (ie the contractual
terms) are changed.
Fair valuation in case of non-financial assets especially buildings and other property, plant and
equipment often require to look for the best and highest use by its market participants and that
will be the reference point to evaluate fair value of such non-financial assets.
3.10.1 Highest and best use
The highest and best use is a valuation concept used to value many non‑financial assets (eg real
estate). The highest and best use of a non‑financial asset must be physically possible, legally
permissible and financially feasible.
A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant's ability
to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to
another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.
The highest and the best use is determined from market participant perspective. It does not matter
whether the entity intends to use the asset differently.
To find out the best possible use, one has to identify its market participants and then to find
best legitimate use of this non- financial asset which one would normally do.
All restrictions specific to any market participant would not be considered while finding out
fair value of the non-financial asset.
It is imperative to understand the best use while evaluating such fair values, as there is no
need to exhaust all possible uses of such non-financial assets before concluding highest and
best use.
In the absence of potential best use which is not easily available, its current use would be
considered as best use.
Example 14
To find the fair value of customer relations where a right to receive all future technological updates/
researches is being provided as complementary (which is in a way another intangible asset) i.e.
other than customer relations. The customer relations would be valued together with the right to
receive all the future technological updates / researches, as it is likely to have less or no value for
the customer relations without considering such right to receive all future technological updates/
researches which is being provided free to them.
Physically Possible
Yes No
3.11.1 When liability and equity instruments are held by other parties as
assets
When directly quoted prices are not available for liabilities or equity instruments, then an entity
should use an identical price of similar liabilities or equity instruments which is held by market
participants as an asset. The quoted prices of such assets at the measurement date should be
used. However, if quoted prices are not available then observable inputs can be used. In the
absence of observable inputs, the valuation techniques such as income approach or market
approach etc. may be used.
3.11.2 When liability and equity instruments are not held by other parties
as assets
When these are not held by other parties then valuation techniques from the perspective of a
market participant that owes the liability or has issued the claim on equity would be used to
evaluate such fair values.
For example, certain contracts of derivatives which are being netted with all existing open
positions from same counterparty etc.
If the entity manages that group of financial assets and financial liabilities on the basis of its net
exposure to either market risks or credit risk, the entity is permitted to apply an exception to this
Ind AS for measuring fair value.
That exception permits an entity to measure the fair value of a group of financial assets and
financial liabilities on the basis of the price that would be received to sell a net long position (ie
an asset) for a particular risk exposure or paid to transfer a net short position (ie a liability) for a
particular risk exposure in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date under current market conditions. Accordingly, an entity shall measure the fair value of the
group of financial assets and financial liabilities consistently with how market participants would
price the net risk exposure at the measurement date.
Analysis of applying offsetting position in market or credit risk
This exception is allowed only in case the other market participants also manage the similar
risk on net basis.
There should ideally be same information and market practice available for making these
assets/ liabilities on net basis.
All open position for derivatives are being normally evaluated on net exposure basis from
each counterparty.
Once the exception to fair value certain assets/ liabilities on net basis is being used, then
unit of account to measure fair value would be considered as net.
Market risk should be same while combining any asset/ liability.
An interest rate risk can not be netted with a commodity price risk.
Duration of a market risk should be identical to use the exception for valuing assets/ liabilities
on net basis.
1. An interest rate swap of longer period will only be allowed to value at net basis upto the
duration of financial instrument of the same duration.
2. Certain Interest rate risk from counterparty Z is being managed on net basis considering
the changes in interest rate amount receivable and amounts payable to counterparty Z
from normal sale/ purchase basis. Hence such net exposure would be used to evaluate
fair values as required by this standard. The netting should normally be followed by
other market participants as well and should not be an entity specific.
An entity shall use valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which
sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable
inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
It is pertinent to note that the overall objective to use any valuation approach or technique is in
accordance with all relevant data available related to the Asset/ liability which could utilize all
directly observable inputs.
Note: It is worth to be noted that in case of availability of quoted prices which are being used in
an active market, there is no need to consider any valuation approach further.
The standard requires and allows using one or combination of more than one approach to measure
any fair value which corroborates all inputs available related to such asset/ liability. Selecting an
appropriate approach is matter of judgment and based on the available inputs related to the asset
/ liability.
Example 15
An unquoted investment can be fair valued either by taking similar entity’s quoted prices with
appropriate adjustments or a valuation of business using DCF or some other technique. This
would purely be dependent upon the available inputs and approach relevant for the asset/ liability.
Cost Approach
Valuation Techniques
1. MARKET APPROACH : The market approach uses prices and other relevant information
generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable (i.e. similar) assets, liabilities
or a group of assets and liabilities, such as a business.
For example, valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples
derived from a set of comparables. Multiples might be in ranges with a different multiple for each
comparable. The selection of the appropriate multiple within the range requires judgement,
considering qualitative and quantitative factors specific to the measurement.
Quoted prices are indicative values of any business if it exchanges in an active market. However,
in the absence of such quoted prices, it is relevant to value the business based on market values
and do some adjustment relevant to the assets/ liabilities. Standard specifies a valuation
technique called “Matrix pricing” which is normally used to value debt securities. This technique
relates the securities with some similar benchmarked securities including coupons, credit ratings
etc. to derive at fair value of the debt.
An entity does not have any security which is quoted in an active market, however, its price to
earnings ratio is being used to corroborate its enterprise value with certain adjustments relevant
to the business e.g. there are some specific restrictions to use certain assets for some specific
period being in a specialized industry.
2. INCOME APPROACH: The income approach converts future amounts (e.g. cash flows or income
and expenses) to a single current (i.e. discounted) amount. When the income approach is used, the
fair value measurement reflects current market expectations about those future amounts.
It is a present value of all future earnings from an entity whose fair values are being evaluated or
in other words all future cash flows to be discounted at current date to get fair value of the asset
/ liability.
Assumption to the future cash flows and an appropriate discount rate would be based on the other
market participant’s views. Related risks and uncertainty would require to be considered and
would be taken into either in cash flow or discount rate.
Illustration 2
Discount Rate assessment to measure present value:
Investment 1 is a contractual right to receive 800 in 1 year. There is an established market for
comparable assets, and information about those assets, including price information, is available.
Of those comparable assets:
a. Investment 2 is a contractual right to receive 1,200 in 1 year and has a market price of
1,083.
b. Investment 3 is a contractual right to receive 700 in 2 years and has a market price of
566.
All three assets are comparable with respect to risk (that is, dispersion of possible payoffs and
credit).
You are required to measure the fair value of Asset 1 basis above information.
Solution
On the basis of the timing of the contractual payments to be received for Investment 1 relative to
the timing for Investment 2 and Investment 3 (that is, one year for Investment 2 versus two years
for Investment 3), Investment 2 is deemed more comparable to Investment 1. Using the
contractual payment to be received for Investment 1 ( 800) and the 1-year market rate derived
from Investment 2, the fair value of Investment 1 is calculated as under:
Investment 2 Fair Value 1,083
Contractual Cash flows in 1 year 1,200
IRR = 1,083 x (1 + r) = 1,200
= (1 + r) = ( 1,200 / 1,083) = 1.108
r = 1.108 – 1 = 0.108 or 10.8%
Value of Investment 1 = 800 / 1.108 = 722
Alternatively, in the absence of available market information for Investment 2, the one-year market
rate could be derived from Investment 3 using the build-up approach. In that case, the 2-year
market rate indicated by Investment 3 would be adjusted to a 1-year market rate using the term
structure of the risk-free yield curve. Additional information and analysis might be required to
determine whether the risk premiums for one-year and two-year assets are the same. If it is
determined that the risk premiums for one-year and two-year assets are not the same, the two-
year market rate of return would be further adjusted for that effect.
*****
Standard defines the below techniques which may be considered while using Income approach
a) Present value techniques
Brokered Market Buy & Sell order matching, Broker knows better Yes
commercial and prices from both buy &
residential markets Sell side
Principal to principal Negotiated prices with no Little information Yes
Markets intermediary available in market
The inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the
asset or liability, including assumptions about risk.
In order to establish comparability and consistency in fair value measurement, Ind AS 113 has
made some hierarchy to define the level of inputs for fair value. The hierarchy is purely based on
the level of inputs available for the specific Asset / liability for which the fair value is to be
measured.
Some significant notes about the fair value hierarchy
The hierarchy has been categorized in 3 levels which are based on the level of inputs that
are being used to find out such fair values. There could be a situation where more than one
level of fair value is being used, hence standard provides a guidance which states that in
case of using more than one level of input, the entire class of asset / liability will be defined
by its level which has significance on overall basis.
Note: Significance has not been defined anywhere and could be a matter of judgement.
Standard defines the valuation techniques that could be used to evaluate fair values of
Assets/ liabilities and its level of hierarchy will be depending upon the level of inputs that
have been used while using such valuation techniques.
If an observable input requires an adjustment using an unobservable input and that
adjustment results in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement, the resulting
measurement would be categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Example 17
If a market participant would take into account the effect of a restriction on the sale of an asset
when estimating the price for the asset, an entity would adjust the quoted price to reflect the effect
of that restriction. If that quoted price is a Level 2 input and the adjustment is an unobservable
input that is significant to the entire measurement, the measurement would be categorised within
Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
A Level 1 input will be available for many financial assets and financial liabilities, some of which
might be exchanged in multiple active markets (e.g. on different exchanges). Therefore, the
emphasis within Level 1 is on determining both of the following:
The principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the
most advantageous market for the asset or liability
Whether the entity can enter into a transaction for the asset or liability at the price in that
market at the measurement date
Example 18
An entity is holding investment which is quoted in BSE, India and NYSE, USA. However,
significant activities are being done at BSE only. The fair value of the investment would be
referenced to the quoted price at BSE India (which is Level 1 fair value- Direct quoted price with
no adjustments).
3.15.1.1 Adjustment to Quoted Price when it does not reflect the fair price
In certain situations, a quoted price in an active market might not faithfully represent the fair value
of an asset or liability, such as when significant events occur on the measurement date but after
the close of trading. In these situations, companies should adjust the quoted price to incorporate
this new information into the fair value measurement. However, if the quoted price is adjusted,
the resulting fair value measurement would no longer be considered a Level 1 measurement. A
company’s valuation policies and procedures should address how these “after-hour” events will
be identified and assessed. Controls should be put in place to ensure that any adjustments made
to quoted prices are appropriate and are applied in a consistent manner.
Example 19
A Ltd., a large biotech company with shares traded publicly, has developed a new drug that is in
the final phase of clinical trials. B Ltd. has an equity investment in A Ltd.’s shares. B Ltd.
determines that the shares have a readily determinable fair value and accounts for the investment
at fair value through profit and loss. B Ltd. assesses the fair value as of the measurement date
of 31 st March 20X3. Consider the following:
(i) On 31 st March 20X3, the Drug Approval authority notifies A Ltd.’s management that the drug
was not approved. A Ltd.’s shares closed at 36.00 on 31 st March 20X3.
(ii) A Ltd. issued a press release after markets closed on 31 st March 20X3 announcing the failed
clinical trial.
Yes No
No Yes Yes No
Yes No
3.16 DISCLOSURES
An entity shall disclose information that helps users of its financial statements assess both of the
following:
(a) for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis
in the balance sheet after initial recognition, the valuation techniques and inputs used to
develop those measurements.
(b) for recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), the
effect of the measurements on profit or loss or other comprehensive income for the period.
The weightage average cost of capital of PT Ltd. is 11%. The total debt as on measurement
date is 1,465 crores and the surplus cash & cash equivalent is
106.14 crores.
The total numbers of shares of PT Ltd. as on the measurement date is 8,52,84,223 shares.
Determine value per share of PT Ltd. as per Income Approach.
5. You are a senior consultant of your firm and are in process of determining the valuation of
KK Ltd. You have determined the valuation of the company by two approaches i.e. Market
Approach and Income approach and selected the highest as the final value. However, based
upon the discussion with your partner you have been requested to assign equal weights to
both the approaches and determine a fair value of shares of KK Ltd. The details of the KK
Ltd. are as follows:
Particulars in crore
Valuation as per Market Approach 5268.2
Valuation as per Income Approach 3235.2
Debt obligation as on Measurement date 1465.9
Determine the Equity value of KK Ltd. as on the measurement date on the basis of above
details.
6. Comment on the following by quoting references from appropriate Ind AS.
(i) DS Limited holds some vacant land for which the use is not yet determined. The land
is situated in a prominent area of the city where lot of commercial complexes are coming
up and there is no legal restriction to convert the land into a commercial land.
The company is not interested in developing the land to a commercial complex as it is not
its business objective. Currently the land has been let out as a parking lot for the
commercial complexes around.
The Company has classified the above property as investment property. It has
approached you, an expert in valuation, to obtain fair value of the land for the purpose of
disclosure under Ind AS.
On what basis will the land be fair valued under Ind AS?
(ii) DS Limited holds equity shares of a private company. In order to determine the fair value'
of the shares, the company used discounted cash flow method as there were no similar
shares available in the market.
Under which level of fair value hierarchy will the above inputs be classified?
What will be your answer if the quoted price of similar companies were available and can
be used for fair valuation of the shares?
7. On 1 st January, 20X1, A Ltd assumes a decommissioning liability in a business combination.
The reporting entity is legally required to dismantle and remove an offshore oil platform at
the end of its useful life, which is estimated to be 10 years. The following information is
relevant:
If A Ltd was contractually allowed to transfer its decommissioning liability to a market
participant, it concludes that a market participant would use all of the following inputs,
probability weighted as appropriate, when estimating the price it would expect to receive:
a. Labour costs
Labour costs are developed based on current marketplace wages, adjusted for
expectations of future wage increases, required to hire contractors to dismantle and
remove offshore oil platforms. A Ltd. assigns probability to a range of cash flow
estimates as follows:
(ii) Based on the facts given in the aforementioned part (i), assume that, Entity A estimates
the fair value of the shares it owns in company XYZ using a net asset valuation
technique. The fair value of company XYZ’s net assets including those recognised in
its balance sheet and those that are not recognised is 8,50,000. Determine the fair
value of Entity A’s investment in XYZ’s shares.
Answers
1. (i) If Market A is the principal market
If Market A is the principal market for the asset (i.e., the market with the greatest volume
and level of activity for the asset), the fair value of the asset would be measured using
the price that would be received in that market, after taking into account transport costs.
Fair Value will be
Price receivable 26
Less: Transportation cost (2)
Fair value of the asset 24
Market A Market B
Price receivable 26 25
Less: Transaction cost (3) (1)
Less: Transportation cost (2) (2)
Fair value of the asset 21 22
Since the entity would maximise the net amount that would be received for the asset in
Market B i.e. 22, the fair value of the asset would be measured using the price in
Market B.
Price receivable 25
Less: Transportation cost (2)
Fair value of the asset 23
2. The highest and best use of the land is determined by comparing the following:
The value of the land as currently developed for industrial use (i.e., an assumption that
the land would be used in combination with other assets, such as the factory, or with
other assets and liabilities); and
The value of the land as a vacant site for residential use, taking into account the costs of
demolishing the factory and other costs necessary to convert the land to a vacant site.
The value under this use would take into account risks and uncertainties about whether
the entity would be able to convert the asset to the alternative use (i.e., an assumption
that the land would be used by market participants on a stand-alone basis).
The highest and best use of the land would be determined on the basis of the higher of these
values. In situations involving real estate appraisal, the determination of highest and best use
might take into account factors relating to the factory operations (e.g., the factory’s operating
cash flows) and its assets and liabilities (e.g., the factory’s working capital).
3. Determination of Enterprise Value of XYZ Ltd.
Particulars in crore
EBITDA as on the measurement date 40
EV/EBITDA multiple as on the date of valuation 8
Enterprise value of XYZ Ltd. 320
Particulars in crore
Enterprise Value of XYZ Ltd. 320
ABC Ltd.’s share based on percentage of holding (5% of 320) 16
Less: Liquidity discount & Non-controlling stake discount (5%+5%=10%) (1.6)
Fair value of ABC Ltd.’s investment in XYZ Ltd. 14.4
6. (i) As per Ind AS 113, a fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account
a market participant’s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its
highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the
asset in its highest and best use.
In the given case, DS Limited adopted discounted cash flow method, commonly used
technique to value shares, to fair value the shares of the private company as there were
no similar shares traded in the market. Hence, it falls under Level 3 of fair value hierarchy.
Level 2 inputs include the following:
(a) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets.
(b) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
(c) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.
If an entity can access quoted price in active markets for identical assets or liabilities of
similar companies which can be used for fair valuation of the shares without any
adjustment, at the measurement date, then it will be considered as observable input and
would be considered as Level 2 inputs.
7.
Amount
(In Crore)
Expected Labour Cost (Refer W.N.) 131.25
Allocated Overheads (80% x 131.25 Cr) 105.00
Profit markup on Cost (131.25 + 105) x 20% 47.25
Total Expected Cash Flows before inflation 283.50
Inflation factor for next 10 years (4%) (1.04) 10 =1.4802
Expected cash flows adjusted for inflation 283.50 x 1.4802 419.65
Risk adjustment - uncertainty relating to cash flows (5% x 419.64) 20.98
Total Expected Cash Flows (419.65+20.98) 440.63
Discount rate to be considered = risk-free rate +
entity’s non-performance risk 5% + 3.5% 8.5%
Expected present value at 8.5% for 10 years (440.63 / (1.085 10 )) 194.97
Working Note:
Expected labour cost:
Cash Flows Estimates Probability Expected Cash Flows
100 Cr 25% 25 Cr
125 Cr 50% 62.50 Cr
175 Cr 25% 43.75 Cr
Total 131.25 Cr
Particulars Unit
Entity XYZ’s after-tax maintainable profits (A) 70,000
Price/Earnings ratio (B) 15
Adjusted discount factor (C) (1- 0.20) 0.80
Value of Company XYZ (A) x (B) x (C) 8,40,000
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
v
Incremental costs
Five step model
v/s Fulfilment costs
Non-
refundable
upfront fees
This standard establishes principles to report useful information about the nature, amount,
timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a contract with a customer.
The core principle is that an entity shall recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised
goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
The standard specifies the accounting for an individual contract with a customer. However, as a
practical expedient, an entity may apply this Standard to a portfolio of contracts (or performance
obligations) with similar characteristics if the entity reasonably expects that the effects of
applying the Standard to the portfolio would not differ materially from applying this Standard to
the individual contracts (or performance obligations) within that portfolio.
1. SCOPE
Ind AS 115 applies to all contracts with customers to provide goods or services that are outputs
of the entity’s ordinary course of business in exchange for consideration, unless specifically
excluded from the scope of the new guidance, as described below.
An entity shall apply this Standard to all contracts with customers, except the following:
(a) lease contracts within the scope of Ind AS 116, Leases;
(b) insurance contracts within the scope of Ind AS 104, Insurance Contracts
(c) financial instruments and other contractual rights or obligations within the scope of
Ind AS 109, Financial Instruments, Ind AS 110, Consolidated Financial Statements,
Ind AS 111, Joint Arrangements, Ind AS 27, Separate Financial Statements and Ind AS 28,
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures; and
(d) non-monetary exchanges between entities in the same line of business to facilitate sales to
customers or potential customers. For example, this Standard would not apply to a
contract between two oil companies that agree to an exchange of oil to fulfil demand from
their customers in different specified locations on a timely basis.
This standard is applicable only if the counterparty to the contract is a customer. A
customer is a party that has contracted with an entity to obtain goods or services that are
an output of the entity’s ordinary activities in exchange for a consideration.
A counterparty to the contract would not be a customer if, for example, the counterparty
has contracted with the entity to participate in an activity or process in which the parties to
the contract share in the risks and benefits that result from the activity or process (such as
2. DEFINITIONS
Contract An agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights
and obligations.
Contract asset An entity’s right to consideration in exchange for goods or services that the
entity has transferred to a customer when that right is conditioned on
something other than the passage of time (for example, the entity’s future
performance).
Contract liability An entity’s obligation to transfer goods or services to a customer for which
the entity has received consideration (or the amount is due) from the
customer.
Customer A party that has contracted with an entity to obtain goods or services that
are an output of the entity’s ordinary activities in exchange for a
consideration.
Income Increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of
inflows or enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in
3. OVERVIEW
After more than a decade of work, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) had published their largely converged standards
on revenue recognition in May, 2014. The IASB issued IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with
Customers and FASB issued ASU 2014-09 with the same name.
In convergence with IFRS, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) issued Ind AS 115, Revenue
from Contracts with Customers vide its notification dated 28 th March, 2018.
Ind AS 115 supersedes and replaces Ind AS 11 and Ind AS 18.
Ind AS 115 is based on a core principle that requires an entity to recognize revenue:
(a) In a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or services to customers
(b) At an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange
for those goods or services.
To achieve the core principle, an entity should apply the following five-step model:
Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer.
Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3: Determine the transaction price.
Each of these steps, and some other related guidance, is discussed in details below.
Entities will need to exercise judgement when considering the terms of the contract(s) and all of
the facts and circumstances, including implied contract terms. Entities will also have to apply
the requirements of the standard consistently to contracts with similar characteristics and in
similar circumstances.
4. TRANSITION
Ind AS 115 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 st April, 2018.
Entities are required to apply the new revenue standard using either of the following two
approaches:
(a) Full retrospective approach: apply retrospectively to each prior period presented in
accordance with Ind AS 8, subject to some practical expedients mentioned in the standard
or
(b) Modified retrospective approach: apply retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initial
application recognized at the date of initial application
When applying the full retrospective method, an entity shall restate all prior periods presented in
accordance with Ind AS 8. This results in comparative statements in which all periods are
presented as if Ind AS 115 had been in effect since the beginning of the earliest period
presented.
When applying modified retrospective approach, an entity does not restate prior periods
presented and the cumulative effect of initial application is recognized in the opening retained
earnings of the first year of application of Ind AS 115.
Consider if the contract meets each of the five criteria to Continue to assess the
pass Step 1: contract to determine if the
Step 1 criteria are met.
Have the parties approved the contract? No
Each of the criteria mentioned above are discussed in more detail below:
5.1.1 Criteria 1: The parties have approved the contract and are committed to
perform
To pass Step 1, the parties must approve the contract. This approval may be written, oral, or
implied, as long as the parties intend to be bound by the terms and conditions of the contract.
The form of the contract (i.e. oral, written or implied) is not determinative, in assessing whether
the parties have approved the contract. Instead, an entity must consider all relevant facts and
circumstances when assessing whether the parties intend to be bound by the terms and
conditions of the contract. In some cases, the parties to an oral or implied contract may have
the intent to fulfil their respective obligations. However, in other cases, a written contract may
be required before an entity can conclude that the parties have approved the arrangement.
In addition to approving the contract, the entity must also be able to conclude that both parties
5.1.5. Criteria 5: It is probable the entity will collect substantially all of the
consideration
To pass Step 1, an entity must determine that it is probable that it will collect substantially all of
the consideration to which it will be entitled under the contract in exchange for goods or services
that it will transfer to the customer. This criterion is also referred to as the ‘collectability
assessment’. In determining whether collection is probable, the entity considers the customer’s
ability and intention to pay considering all relevant facts and circumstances, including past
experiences with that customer or customer class. In making the determination of customer’s
ability to pay, the credit risk was an important thing to determine if the contract is valid.
However, customer’s credit risk should not affect the measurement or presentation of revenue.
The standard requires an entity to evaluate at contract inception (and when significant facts and
circumstances change) whether it is probable that it will collect the consideration to which it will
be entitled in exchange for the goods or services that will be transferred to a customer. For
purposes of this analysis, the meaning of the term ‘probable’ means ‘more likely than not’. If it is
not probable that the entity will collect amounts to which it is entitled, the model in Ind AS 115 is
not applied to the contract until the concerns about collectability have been resolved.
Illustration 1
New Way Ltd. decides to enter a new market that is currently experiencing economic difficulty
and expects that in future the economy will improve. New Way Ltd. enters into an arrangement
with a customer in the new region for networking products for promised consideration of
1,250,000. At contract inception, New Way Ltd. expects that it may not be able to collect the
full amount from the customer.
Determine how New Way Ltd. will recognize this transaction?
Solution
Assuming the contract meets the other criteria covered within the scope of the model in
Ind AS 115, New Way Ltd. need to assess whether collection is probable.
In making this assessment, New Way Ltd. considers whether the customer has the ability and
intent to pay the estimated transaction price, which may be an amount less than the contract
price.
*****
5.2 Contracts that do not pass Step 1: Reassessing the Step 1
criteria
When an entity determines that a contract passes Step 1, it should not reassess contract
existence unless there is an indication of a significant change in facts and circumstances.
Illustration 2
A gymnasium enters into a contract with a new member to provide access to its gym for a
12-month period at 4,500 per month. The member can cancel his or her membership without
penalty after three months. Specify the contract term.
Solution
The enforceable rights and obligations of this contract are for three months, and therefore the
contract term is three months.
*****
Illustration 3
Contractor P enters into a manufacturing contract to produce 100 specialised CCTV cameras for
Customer Q for a fixed price of 1,000 per sensor. Customer Q can cancel the contract without
a penalty after receiving 10 CCTV cameras. Specify the contract units.
Solution
P determines that because there is no substantive compensation amount payable by Q on
termination of the contract – i.e. no termination penalty in the contract – it is akin to a contract to
produce 10 CCTV cameras that gives Customer Q an option to purchase additional 90 CCTV
cameras. Hence, contract is for 10 units.
*****
5.4 Combining contracts
An entity should combine two or more contracts and account for them as a single contract in
certain circumstances because the substance of the individual contracts cannot be understood
without considering the entire arrangement. This evaluation takes place at contract inception.
Two or more contracts may need to be accounted for as a single contract if they are entered into
at or near the same time with the same customer (or with related parties of the customer), and if
one of the following conditions exists:
(a) The contracts are negotiated as a package with a single commercial objective;
(b) The amount of consideration paid in one contract depends on the price or performance in
the other contract; or
(c) The goods or services promised in the contract are a single performance obligation.
Note: Entities will need to apply judgement to determine whether contracts are entered into at or
near the same time because the standard does not provide a bright line for making this
assessment.
No
Treat as separate contracts
Illustration 4
Manufacturer of airplanes for the air force negotiates a contract to design and manufacture new
fighter planes for a Kashmir air base. At the same meeting, the manufacturer enters into a
separate contract to supply parts for existing planes at other bases.
Would these contracts be combined?
Solution
Contracts were negotiated at the same time, but they appear to have separate commercial
objectives. Manufacturing and supply contracts are not dependent on one another, and the planes
and the parts are not a single performance obligation. Therefore, contracts for supply of fighter
planes and supply of parts shall not be combined and instead, they shall be accounted separately.
*****
Illustration 5
Software Company S enters into a contract to license its customer relationship management
software to Customer B. Three days later, in a separate contract, S agrees to provide
consulting services to significantly customise the licensed software to function in B’s IT
environment. B is unable to use the software until the customisation services are complete.
Would these contracts be combined?
Solution
S determines that the two contracts should be combined because they were entered into at
nearly the same time with the same customer, and the goods or services in the contracts are a
single performance obligation.
Illustration 6
Manufacturer M enters into a contract to manufacture and sell a cyber security system to
Government-related Entity P. One week later, in a separate contract, M enters into a contract to
sell the same system to Government-related Entity Q. Both entities are controlled by the same
government. During the negotiations, M agrees to sell the systems at a deep discount if both P
and Q purchases the security system.
Should these contracts be combined or separately accounted?
Solution
M concludes that the said two contracts should be combined because, among other things, P is
a related party of Q, the contracts were entered into at nearly the same time and the contracts
were negotiated as a single commercial package, which is clearly evident from the fact that
discount is being offered if both the parties purchase the security system, thereby also making
the consideration in one contract dependent on the other contract.
*****
5.5 Contract Modifications
Modifications that change the terms of a contract are common in many industries, including
manufacturing, telecommunications, defence, and construction. Depending upon the industry or
jurisdiction, the modification may be better known as a change order, a variation, or an
amendment.
The modification guidance under Ind AS 115 requires an entity to
(a) Identify if a contract has been modified.
(b) Determine if the modification results in a separate contract, a termination of the existing
contract and the creation of a new contract, or a continuation of the existing contract.
(c) Account for the contract modification accordingly.
5.5.1 Identifying a modification
A contract modification exists if three conditions are met:
(a) There is a change in the scope, price, or both in a contract.
(b) That change is approved by both the entity and the customer.
(c) The change is enforceable.
Similar to the criterion discussed above, the approval of a contract modification may be written,
oral, or implied by customary business practice.
No Yes
Follow the guidance above for distinct and
Are some of the remaining goods or services distinct
non-distinct remaining goods or services
and others not distinct?
● The consideration promised by the customer (including amounts already received from
the customer) that was included in the estimate of the transaction price and had not
yet been recognized as revenue. This amount is zero.
● The consideration promised as part of the contract modification i.e. 270,000.
*****
(b) Second, when the remaining goods or services are not distinct and are part of a single
performance obligation that is partially satisfied, the entity recognizes the effect of the
modification on a cumulative catch-up basis. This is the case in many construction
contracts where a modification does not result in the transfer of additional distinct goods or
services.
Illustration 9
Growth Ltd enters into an arrangement with a customer for infrastructure outsourcing deal.
Based on its experience, Growth Ltd determines that customising the infrastructure will
take approximately 200 hours in total to complete the project and charges 150 per hour.
After incurring 100 hours of time, Growth Ltd and the customer agree to change an aspect
of the project and increase the estimate of labour hours by 50 hours at the rate of 100
per hour.
Determine how contract modification will be accounted for as per Ind AS 115?
Solution
Considering that the remaining goods or services are not distinct, the modification will be
accounted for on a cumulative catch up basis, as given below:
Promises under the contract can be explicit or implicit if the same creates a valid expectation by
the customer that the entity will provide those goods or service based on the customary
business practices, published policies, or specific statements. Some of the examples of
promised goods or services include:
Promise Example
Sale of manufactured goods A manufacturing entity sells inventory
Resale of goods purchased A retail entity sells purchased merchandise
Resale of rights to goods or A hospitality entity that purchased a concert ticket
services purchased by an entity resells the ticket, acting as principal
Performing tasks A professional services entity provides consulting
services
Providing goods or services to A manufacturing entity provides maintenance
customers on stand-by basis i.e. as services on machines sold to a customer when the
and when required customer decides it wants the services performed
Construction of an asset for the A contractor builds a hospital
customers
Use or access to intellectual An entity grants a license to use its trade name
property rights of the entity
Right to purchase additional goods A retailer grants a customer an option to buy three
or services to the customer in the items and to receive 60 percent off of a fourth
future item at a later date
An entity, a manufacturer, sells a product to a distributor (i.e. its customer) who will then resell it
to an end customer.
I Explicit promise of service
● The entity promises to the distributor to provide maintenance services for no
additional consideration or free of cost to any party that purchases the product from
the distributor. The entity in turn appoints the distributor and pays the distributor to
provide the maintenance services on company’s behalf to the customer for an agreed
payment. In case no one avails those services, the company is not required to pay
anything to the distributor.
● Under this contract promise to provide maintenance services in the future will be
considered as a performance obligation. The entity has promised to provide
Each of the criteria mentioned above are discussed in more detail below:
6.1.1 Customer can benefit either on a stand-alone basis or with other readily
available resources
The customer can benefit from the goods or service either on its own or with other resources
readily available to them. A readily available resource is a goods or service that is sold
separately (by the entity or by another entity) or that the customer has already obtained from the
entity or from other transactions or events.
A customer can benefit from a goods or service if the goods or service could be used,
consumed, sold for an amount that is greater than its scrap value or otherwise held in a way that
generates economic benefits.
Sometimes, a customer can benefit from a goods or service only with other readily available
resources. A readily available resource is a goods or service that is sold separately (by the
entity or another entity) or a resource that the customer has already obtained from the entity
(including goods or services that the entity will have already transferred to the customer under
the contract) or from other transactions or events. Various factors may provide evidence that
the customer can benefit from a goods or service either on its own or in conjunction with other
readily available resources.
For e.g, the fact that the entity regularly sells a goods or service on its own is an indicator that
the goods or service is capable of being distinct.
6.1.2 Separately identifiable from other promises in the contract
Factors that indicate that an entity's promise to transfer a goods or service to a customer is
separately identifiable include, but are not limited to, the following:
Example 1
An entity promises to provide a customer with software that it will significantly customise to
make the software function with the customer’s existing infrastructure. Based on its facts and
circumstances, the entity determines that it is providing the customer with a fully integrated
system and that the customisation service requires it to significantly modify the software in such
a way that the risks of providing it and the customisation service are inseparable (i.e. the
software and customisation service are not separately identifiable).
Illustration 12
An entity enters into a contract to build a power plant for a customer. The entity will be
responsible for the overall management of the project including services to be provided like
engineering, site clearance, foundation, procurement, construction of the structure, piping and
wiring, installation of equipment and finishing.
Determine how many performance obligations does the entity have?
Solution
Based on the discussion above it needs to be determined that the promised goods and services
are capable of being distinct as per the principles of Ind AS 115. That is, whether the customer
can benefit from the goods and services either on their own or together with other readily
available resources. This is evidenced by the fact that the entity, or competitors of the entity,
regularly sells many of these goods and services separately to other customers. In addition, the
customer could generate economic benefit from the individual goods and services by using,
consuming, selling or holding those goods or services.
However, the goods and services are not distinct within the context of the contract. That is, the
entity's promise to transfer individual goods and services in the contract are not separately
identifiable from other promises in the contract. This is evidenced by the fact that the entity
provides a significant service of putting together the various inputs or goods and services into
the power plant or the output for which the customer has contracted.
Since both the criteria have not met, the goods and services are not distinct. The entity accounts
for all of the goods and services in the contract as a single performance obligation.
*****
B. Promise to transfer a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the
same and have the same pattern of transfer:
There might be cases, where distinct goods or services are provided continuously over a period
of time. For e.g. security services, or bookkeeping services. This will be considered as single
performance obligation if the consumption of those services by the customers is symmetrical.
A series of distinct goods or services has the same pattern of transfer to the customer if both of
the following criteria are met:
(a) each distinct goods or service in the series that the entity promises to transfer to the
customer would meet the criteria to be a performance obligation satisfied over time; and
(b) the same method would be used to measure the entity’s progress towards complete
satisfaction of the performance obligation to transfer each distinct goods or service in the
series to the customer.
Example 2
A vendor enters into a 5-year contract with a customer to provide continuous access to its
system and to process all transactions on behalf of the customer. The customer is obligated to
use the vendor’s system, but the ultimate quantity of transactions is unknown. The vendor
concludes that the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits as it performs.
If the vendor concludes that the nature of its promise is to provide continuous access to its
system, rather than process a particular quantity of transactions, it might conclude that there is a
single performance obligation to stand ready to process as many transactions as the customer
requires. If that is the case, it would be reasonable to conclude that there are multiple distinct
time increments of the service. Each day of access to the service provided to the customer
could be considered substantially the same since the customer is deriving a consistent benefit
from the access each day, even if a different number of transactions are processed each day.
If the vendor concludes that the nature of the promise is the processing of each transaction,
then each transaction processed could be considered substantially the same even if there are
multiple types of transactions that generate different payments. Furthermore, each transaction
processed could be a distinct service because the customer could benefit from each transaction
on its own and each transaction could be separately identifiable. Accordingly, it would be
reasonable for an entity to conclude that this contract meets the series’ requirement.
Illustration 13
Could the series requirement apply to hotel management services where day to day activities
vary, involve employee management, procurement, accounting, etc?
Solution
The series guidance requires each distinct goods or service to be “substantially the same.”
Management should evaluate this requirement based on the nature of its promise to customer.
For example, a promise to provide hotel management services for a specified contract term may
meet the series criteria. This is because the entity is providing the same service of “hotel
management” each period, even though some on underlying activities may vary each day. The
underlying activities for e.g. reservation services, property maintenance services are activities to
fulfil the hotel management service rather than separate promises. The distinct service within
the series is each time increment of performing the service.
*****
6.2 Multiple Element Arrangements/ Goods and services that are not
distinct
Once an entity determines whether the goods and services would be distinct based on their
individual characteristics, the entity then has to consider if the manner in which the goods and
services have been bundled in an arrangement would require the entity to account for two or
more goods or services as one performance obligation. This determination would be required
regardless of whether or not those goods and services were determined to be distinct on their
own.
If the goods or services are not considered as distinct, those goods or services are combined
with other goods or services under the contract till the time the entity identifies a bundle of
distinct goods or services.
This combination would result in accounting of multiple goods or services in the contract as a
single performance obligation. This could also result in an entity combining a goods or service
that is not considered distinct with another goods or service that, on its own, would have met the
criteria to be considered distinct. An entity may end up accounting for all the goods or services
promised in a contract as a single performance obligation if the entire bundle of promised goods
and services is the only distinct performance obligation identified.
It is important to note that the assessment of whether a goods or service is distinct must
consider the specific contract with a customer. That is, an entity cannot assume that a particular
goods or service is distinct (or not distinct) in all instances. The manner in which promised
goods and services are bundled within a contract can affect the conclusion of whether a goods
or service is distinct. Entities may treat the same goods and services differently, depending on
how those goods and services are bundled within a contract.
Illustration 14
Entity A, a specialty construction firm, enters into a contract with Entity B to design and
construct a multi-level shopping centre with a customer car parking facility located in sub-levels
underneath the shopping centre. Entity B solicited bids from multiple firms on both phases of
the project — design and construction.
The design and construction of the shopping centre and parking facility involves multiple goods
and services from architectural consultation and engineering through procurement and
The entity also considers the factors of Ind AS 115 and determines that the promise to transfer
each goods and service to the customer is separately identifiable from each of the other
promises. In particular, the entity observes that the installation service does not significantly
modify or customise the software itself and, as such, the software and the installation service
are separate outputs promised by the entity instead of inputs used to produce a combined
output.
On the basis of this assessment, the entity identifies four performance obligations in the contract
for the following goods or services:
The software license
An installation service
Software updates
Technical support
*****
Illustration 16 : Significant customisation
The promised goods and services are the same as in the above Illustration, except that the
contract specifies that, as part of the installation service, the software is to be substantially
customised to add significant new functionality to enable the software to interface with other
customised software applications used by the customer. The customised installation service
can be provided by other entities.
Determine how many performance obligations does the entity have?
Solution
The entity assesses the goods and services promised to the customer to determine which goods
and services are distinct. The entity observes that the terms of the contract result in a promise
to provide a significant service of integrating the licensed software into the existing software
system by performing a customised installation service as specified in the contract. In other
words, the entity is using the license and the customised installation service as inputs to
produce the combined output (i.e. a functional and integrated software system) specified in the
contract. In addition, the software is significantly modified and customised by the service.
Although the customised installation service can be provided by other entities, the entity
determines that within the context of the contract, the promise to transfer the license is not
separately identifiable from the customised installation service and, therefore, the criterion on
the basis of the factors is not met. Thus, the software license and the customised installation
service are not distinct.
C could benefit from the internet services using routers and modems that are not sold by T
Ltd. Therefore, the modem, router and internet services are not highly dependent on or
highly inter-related with each other.
*****
Illustration 18
V Ltd. grants Customer C a three-year licence for anti-virus software. Under the contract, V Ltd.
promises to provide C with when-and-if-available updates to that software during the licence
period. The updates are critical to the continued use of the anti-virus software.
Determine how many performance obligations does the entity have?
Solution
V Ltd. concludes that the licence and the updates are capable of being distinct because the anti-
virus software can still deliver its original functionality during the licence period without the
updates. C can also benefit from the updates together with the licence transferred when the
contract is signed.
However, V Ltd. concludes that the licence and the updates are not separately identifiable
because the software and the service are inputs into a combined item in the contract − i.e. the
nature of V Ltd.’s promise is to provide continuous anti-virus protection for the term of the
contract. Therefore, V Ltd. accounts for the licence and the updates as a single performance
obligation.
*****
Illustration 19
Media Company P Ltd. offers magazine subscriptions to customers. When customers subscribe,
they receive a printed copy of the magazine each month and access to the magazine’s online
content.
Determine how many performance obligations does the entity have?
Solution
P evaluates whether the promises to provide printed copies and online access are separate
performance obligations. P determines that the arrangement includes two performance
obligations for the following reasons:
The printed copies and online access are both capable of being distinct because the
customer could use them on their own.
(e.g., coupons with a limited distribution, competitor price matching programs aimed at only
some customers, gift cards issued by a retailer as a promotion) and customer award credits
(e.g., loyalty or reward programs).
The standard states that when an entity grants a customer the option to acquire additional goods
or services, that option is only a separate performance obligation if it provides a material right to
the customer. The right is material if it results in a discount that the customer would not receive
without entering into the contract (e.g., a discount that exceeds the range of discounts typically
given for those goods or services to that class of customer in that geographical area or market).
If the option provides a material right to the customer, the customer in effect pays the entity in
advance for future goods or services and the entity recognizes revenue when those future goods
or services are transferred or when the option expires.
If the discounted price in the option reflects the stand-alone selling price (separate from any
existing relationship or contract), the entity is deemed to have made a marketing offer rather
than having granted a material right.
In such cases, the entity has made a marketing offer that it shall account for in accordance with
this Standard only when the customer exercises the option to purchase the additional goods or
services.
This standard requires an entity to allocate the transaction price to performance obligations on a
relative stand-alone selling price basis. If the stand-alone selling price for a customer’s option
to acquire additional goods or services is not directly observable, an entity shall estimate it.
That estimate shall reflect the discount that the customer would obtain when exercising the
option, adjusted for both of the following:
(a) any discount that the customer could receive without exercising the option; and
(b) the likelihood that the option will be exercised.
v
Does the option provide a material right to the customers that it would not receive without
entering into the contract?
Does the contract grant the customer the option to acquire additional goods or services?
No Yes
Illustration 22
Entity sells gym memberships for 7,500 per year to 100 customers, with an option to renew at
a discount in 2 nd and 3 rd years at 6,000 per year. Entity estimates an annual attrition rate of
50% each year.
Determine the amount of revenue to be recognized in the first year and the amount of contract
liability against the option given to the customer for renewing the membership at discount.
Solution
Allocated price per unit (year) is calculated as follows:
Total estimated memberships is 175 members (Year 1 = 100; Year 2 = 50; Year 3 = 25) = 175
Total consideration is 12,00,000 {(100 x 7,500) + (50 x 6,000) + (25 x 6,000)}
Allocated price per membership is 6,857 approx. (12,00,000 / 175)
Based on above, it is to be noted that although entity has collected 7,500 but revenue can be
recognized at 6,857 approx. per membership and remaining 643 should be recorded as
contract liability against option given to customer for renewing their membership at discount.
*****
Illustration 23
An entity enters into a contract for the sale of Product A for 1,000. As part of the contract, the
entity gives the customer a 40% discount voucher for any future purchases up to 1,000 in the
next 30 days. The entity intends to offer a 10% discount on all sales during the next 30 days as
part of a seasonal promotion. The 10% discount cannot be used in addition to the 40% discount
voucher.
The entity believes there is 80% likelihood that a customer will redeem the voucher and, on an
average, a customer will purchase 500 of additional products.
Determine how many performance obligations does the entity have and their stand-alone selling
price and allocated transaction price?
Solution
Since all customers will receive a 10% discount on purchases during the next 30 days, the only
additional discount that provides the customer with a material right is the incremental discount of
30% on the products purchased. The entity accounts for the promise to provide the incremental
discount as a separate performance obligation in the contract for the sale of Product A.
The entity believes there is 80% likelihood that a customer will redeem the voucher and, on an
average, a customer will purchase 500 worth of additional products. Consequently, the
entity’s estimated stand-alone selling price of the discount voucher is 120 ( 500 average
purchase price of additional products x 30% incremental discount x 80% likelihood of exercising
the option). The stand-alone selling prices of Product A and the discount voucher and the
resulting allocation of the 1,000 transaction price are as follows:
The entity allocates 890 to Product A and recognizes revenue for Product A when control
transfers. The entity allocates 110 to the discount voucher and recognizes revenue for the
voucher when the customer redeems it for goods or services or when it expires.
*****
and would recognize revenue in the gross amount to which it is entitled. An entity that obtains
legal title of a product only momentarily before legal title is transferred to the customer is not
necessarily acting as a principal. In contrast, an agent facilitates the sale of goods or services
to the customer in exchange for a fee or commission and generally does not control the goods
or services for any length of time. Therefore, the agent’s performance obligation is to arrange
for another party to provide the goods or services to the customer. Since the identification of
the principal in a contract is not always clear, Ind AS 115 provides indicators that a performance
obligation involves an agency relationship.
Indicators that an entity is a principal (and therefore controls the goods or service before it is
provided to a customer) include the following:
(a) the entity is primarily responsible for fulfilling the contract. This typically includes
responsibility for the acceptability of the specified goods or service;
(b) the entity has inventory risk before the specified good or service has been transferred to a
customer or after transfer of control to the customer (for example, if the customer has a
right of return).
(c) the entity has discretion in establishing prices for the goods or services.
After an entity identifies its promise and determines whether it is the principal or the agent, the
entity recognizes revenue when it satisfies that performance obligation. In some contracts in
which the entity is the agent, control of the goods or services promised by the agent might
transfer before the customer receives the goods or services from the principal.
For example, an entity might satisfy its promise to provide customers with loyalty points when
those points are transferred to the customer if:
(a) The entity’s promise is to provide loyalty points to customers when the customer purchases
goods or services from the entity
(b) The points entitle the customers to future discounted purchases with another party (i.e., the
points represent a material right to a future discount)
(c) The entity determines that it is an agent (i.e., its promise is to arrange for the customers to
be provided with points) and the entity does not control those points before they are
transferred to the customer.
In contrast, if the points entitle the customers to future goods or services to be provided by the
entity, the entity may conclude it is not an agent. This is because the entity’s promise is to
provide those future goods or services.
(a) the entity is primarily responsible for fulfilling the contract, which provides the right to fly.
However, the entity is not responsible for providing the flight itself, which will be provided
by the airline.
(b) the entity has inventory risk for the tickets because they are purchased before, they are
sold to the entity’s customers and the entity is exposed to any loss as a result of not being
able to sell the tickets for more than the entity’s cost.
(c) the entity has discretion in setting the sales prices for tickets to its customers.
The entity concludes that its promise is to provide a ticket (i.e. a right to fly) to the customer. On
the basis of the indicators, the entity concludes that it controls the ticket before it is transferred
to the customer. Thus, the entity concludes that it is a principal in the transaction and
recognizes revenue in the gross amount of consideration to which it is entitled in exchange for
the tickets transferred.
*****
Illustration 27
Company D Ltd. provides advertising services to customers. D Ltd. enters into a sub-contract
with a multinational online video sharing company, F Ltd. Under the sub-contract, F Ltd. places
all of D Ltd.’s customers’ adverts.
D Ltd. notes the following:
– D Ltd. works directly with customers to understand their advertising needs before placing
adverts.
– D Ltd. is responsible for ensuring that the advert meets the customer’s needs after the
advert is placed.
– D Ltd. directs F Ltd. over which advert to place and when to place it.
– D Ltd. does not bear inventory risk because there is no minimum purchase requirement
with F Ltd.
– D Ltd. does not have discretion in setting the price because fees are charged based on
F Ltd.’s scheduled rates.
D is Principal or an agent?
Solution
D Ltd. is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide advertising services. Although
F Ltd. delivers the placement service, D Ltd. works directly with customers to ensure that the
services are performed to their requirements. Even though D Ltd. does not bear inventory risk
Yes No
Account for as an advanced
Account for as a promised good payment for future goods or
or service services
Illustration 28
A customer buy a new data connection from the telecom entity. It pays one-time registration
and activation fees at the time of purchase of new connection. The customer will be charged
based on the usage of the data services of the connection on monthly basis.
Are the performance obligations under the contract distinct?
Solution
By selling a new connection, the entity promises to supply data services to customer. Customer
will not be able to benefit from just buying a data card and data services from third party. The
activity of registering and activating connection is not a service to customer and therefore does
not represent satisfaction of performance obligation.
Entity’s obligation is to provide data service and hence activation is not a separate performance
obligation.
*****
After identifying the contract in Step 1 and the performance obligations in Step 2, an entity next
applies Step 3 to determine the transaction price of the contract. The objective of Step 3 is to
predict the total amount of consideration to which the entity will be entitled from the contract.
The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable
amounts, or both. Further, an entity shall consider the terms of the contract and its customary
business practices to determine the transaction price.
Price
Non-cash consideration Consideration payable to a
customer
Non-cash consideration is measured at fair
value, if that can be reasonably estimated. An entity needs to determine whether
If not, then an entity uses the stand-alone consideration payable to a customer
selling price of the goods or service that represents a reduction of the transaction
was promised in exchange for non-cash price, a payment for a distinct good or
consideration service, or a combination of the two.
Variable consideration may be fixed in amount, but the entity’s right to receive that consideration
is contingent on a future outcome. For example, the amount of a performance bonus might be
fixed, but because the entity is not entitled to that bonus until a performance target is met, the
outcome is uncertain and therefore the amount is considered variable. Items such as discounts,
rebates, refunds, rights of return, early settlement discounts, credits, price concessions,
incentives, performance bonuses, penalties or similar items may result in variable consideration.
The variability relating to the consideration promised by a customer may be explicitly stated in
the contract. In addition to the terms of the contract, the promised consideration is variable if
either of the following circumstances exists:
(a) the customer has a valid expectation arising from an entity’s customary business
practices, published policies or specific statements that the entity will accept an amount of
consideration that is less than the price stated in the contract. That is, it is expected that
the entity will offer a price concession. Depending on the jurisdiction, industry or customer
this offer may be referred to as a discount, rebate, refund or credit.
(b) other facts and circumstances indicate that the entity’s intention, when entering into the
contract with the customer, is to offer a price concession to the customer.
Variable Fixed
Estimate the amount using the expected value or the most likely amount
Apply the constraint – i.e. determine the portion of the amount, if any, for which
it is highly probable that a significant revenue reversal will not subsequently
occur
7.1.1 Penalties
Penalties shall be accounted for as per the substance of the contract. Where the penalty is
inherent in determination of transaction price, it shall form part of variable consideration.
Example 3
Where an entity agrees to transfer control of a goods or service in a contract with customer at
the end of 30 days for 100,000 and if it exceeds 30 days, the entity is entitled to receive only
95,000, the reduction of 5,000 shall be regarded as variable consideration. In other cases,
the transaction price shall be considered as fixed at 95,000.
The most likely amount may be an appropriate estimate of the amount of variable
consideration if the contract has only two possible outcomes (for example, an entity either
achieves a performance bonus or does not).
An entity is required to choose between the expected value method and the most likely
amount method. The choice is based on the method which better predicts the amount of
consideration to be entitled. That is, the method selected is not meant to be a ‘free
choice’. Rather, an entity selects the method that is best suited, based on the specific
facts and circumstances of the contract.
An entity shall apply one method consistently throughout the contract when estimating the
effect of an uncertainty on an amount of variable consideration to which the entity will be
entitled. An entity shall consider all the information that is reasonably available to the
entity and shall identify a reasonable number of possible consideration amounts.
A contract may contain different types of variable consideration. It may be appropriate for
an entity to use different methods (i.e. expected value or most likely amount) for estimating
different types of variable consideration within a single contract.
Illustration 29 : Estimating variable consideration
XYZ Limited enters into a contract with a customer to build sophisticated machinery. The
promise to transfer the asset is a performance obligation that is satisfied over time. The
promised consideration is 2.5 crore, but that amount will be reduced or increased depending
on the timing of completion of the asset. Specifically, for each day after 31 st March, 20X1 that
the asset is incomplete, the promised consideration is reduced by 1 lakh. For each day before
31 st March, 20X1 that the asset is complete, the promised consideration increases by 1 lakh.
In addition, upon completion of the asset, a third party will inspect the asset and assign a rating
based on metrics that are defined in the contract. If the asset receives a specified rating, the
entity will be entitled to an incentive bonus of 15 lakh.
Determine the transaction price.
Solution
In determining the transaction price, the entity prepares a separate estimate for each element of
variable consideration to which the entity will be entitled using the estimation methods described
in paragraph 53 of Ind AS 115:
a) the entity decides to use the expected value method to estimate the variable consideration
associated with the daily penalty or incentive (i.e. 2.5 crore, plus or minus 1 lakh per
day). This is because it is the method that the entity expects to better predict the amount
of consideration to which it will be entitled.
AST Limited decides to use the most likely amount to estimate the variable consideration
associated with the potential quality bonus because there are only two possible outcomes
( 2 crore or Nil) and this method would best predict the amount of consideration associated
with the quality bonus. AST Limited believes the most likely amount of the quality bonus is
2 crore.
*****
As per para 54 of Ind AS 115, an entity shall apply one method consistently throughout the
contract when estimating the effect of an uncertainty on an amount of variable consideration to
which the entity will be entitled. In addition, an entity shall consider all the information
(historical, current and forecast) that is reasonably available to the entity and shall identify a
reasonable number of possible consideration amounts. The information that an entity uses to
estimate the amount of variable consideration would typically be similar to the information that
the entity’s management uses during the bid-and-proposal process and in establishing prices for
promised goods or services.
7.1.3 Refund liabilities
An entity shall recognize a refund liability if the entity receives consideration from a customer
and expects to refund some or all of that consideration to the customer. A refund liability is
measured at the amount of consideration received (or receivable) for which the entity does not
expect to be entitled (i.e. amounts not included in the transaction price). The refund liability
(and corresponding change in the transaction price and, therefore, the contract liability) shall be
updated at the end of each reporting period for changes in circumstances.
While the most common form of refund liabilities may be related to sales with a right of return,
the refund liability requirements also apply when an entity expects that it will need to refund
consideration received due to poor customer satisfaction with a service provided (i.e. there was
no goods delivered or returned) and/or if an entity expects to have to provide retrospective price
reductions to a customer (e.g. if a customer reaches a certain threshold of purchases, the unit
price will be retrospectively adjusted).
contract specifies that the price per unit is retrospectively reduced to 900 per unit.
Consequently, the consideration in the contract is variable.
For the first quarter ended 30 th June, 20X1, the entity sells 10 units of Product A to the
customer. The entity estimates that the customer's purchases will not exceed the 100 unit
threshold required for the volume discount in the financial year. HT Limited determines that it
has significant experience with this product and with the purchasing pattern of the customer.
Thus, HT Limited concludes that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the cumulative
amount of revenue recognized (i.e. 1,000 per unit) will not occur when the uncertainty is
resolved (i.e. when the total amount of purchases is known).
Further, in May, 20X1, the customer acquires another company and in the second quarter ended
30 th September, 20X1 the entity sells an additional 50 units of Product A to the customer. In the
light of the new fact, the entity estimates that the customer's purchases will exceed the 100-unit
threshold for the financial year and therefore it will be required to retrospectively reduce the
price per unit to 900.
Determine the amount of revenue to be recognize by HT Ltd. for the quarter ended
30 th June, 20X1 and 30 th September, 20X1.
Solution
The entity recognizes revenue of 10,000 (10 units × 1,000 per unit) for the quarter ended
30 th June, 20X1.
HT Limited recognizes revenue of 44,000 for the quarter ended 30 th September, 20X1. That
amount is calculated from 45,000 for the sale of 50 units (50 units x 900 per unit) less the
change in transaction price of 1,000 (10 units x 100 price reduction) for the reduction of
revenue relating to units sold for the quarter ended 30 th June, 20X1.
*****
The entity has extensive experience creating products that meet the specific performance
criteria. Based on its experience, the entity has identified five engineering alternatives that will
achieve the 10 percent incentive and two that will achieve the 25 percent incentive. In this case,
the entity determined that it has 95 percent confidence that it will achieve the 10 percent
incentive and 20 percent confidence that it will achieve the 25 percent incentive.
Based on this analysis, the entity believes 10 percent to be the most likely amount when
estimating the transaction price. Therefore, the entity includes only the 10 percent award in the
transaction price when calculating revenue because the entity has concluded it is probable that
a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the
uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved due to its
95 percent confidence in achieving the 10 percent award.
The entity reassesses its production status quarterly to determine whether it is on the track to
meet the criteria for the incentive award. At the end of the year four, it becomes apparent that
this contract will fully achieve the weight-based criterion. Therefore, the entity revises its
estimate of variable consideration to include the entire 25 percent incentive fee in the year four
because, at this point, it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative
revenue recognized will not occur when including the entire variable consideration in the
transaction price.
Evaluate the impact of changes in variable consideration when cost incurred is as follows:
Year
1 50,000
2 1,75,000
3 4,00,000
4 2,75,000
5 50,000
Solution
Note: For simplification purposes, the table calculates revenue for the year independently based
on costs incurred during the year divided by total expected costs, with the assumption that total
expected costs do not change.
Fixed A 1,000,000
consideration
Estimated costs B 950,000
to complete*
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Total estimated C 100,000 100,000 100,000 250,000 250,000
variable amount
Fixed revenue D=A x H/B 52,632 184,211 421,053 289,474 52,632
Variable revenue E=C x H/B 5,263 18,421 42,105 72,368 13,158
Cumulative F (see below) — — — 99,370 —
revenue
adjustment
Total revenue G=D+E+F 57,895 202,632 463,158 461,212 65,790
Costs H 50,000 175,000 400,000 275,000 50,000
Operating profit I=G–H 7,895 27,632 63,158 186,212 15,790
Margin (rounded J=I/G 14% 14% 14% 40% 24%
off)
*****
efforts to transfer the services for that quarter, which are distinct from the services provided in
other quarters.
Consequently, the entity recognizes 2 crore as revenue for the quarter ended
31 st March, 20X2.
*****
7.1.6 Sale with a right of return
In some contracts, an entity transfers control of a product to a customer (refer Step 5) and also
grants the customer the right to return the product for various reasons (such as dissatisfaction
with the product) and receive any combination of the following:
(a) a full or partial refund of any consideration paid;
(b) a credit that can be applied against amounts owed, or that will be owed, to the entity; and
(c) another product in exchange.
In some contracts, an entity transfers control of a product to a customer with an unconditional
right of return. In such cases, the recognition of revenue shall be as per the substance of the
arrangement. Where the substance is that of a consignment sale, the entity shall account for
such a contract as per the provisions of Ind AS 115’s application guidance related to
consignment sales (refer paragraph B77 and B78 of Application Guidance to Ind AS 115). In
other cases, the accounting for contracts with customers shall be as per provisions laid out
below.
To account for the transfer of products with a right of return (and for some services that are
provided subject to a refund), an entity shall recognize all of the following:
(a) revenue for the transferred products in the amount of consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled (therefore, revenue would not be recognized for the products
expected to be returned);
(b) a refund liability; and
(c) an asset (and corresponding adjustment to cost of sales) for its right to recover products
from customers on settling the refund liability.
An entity’s promise to stand ready to accept a returned product during the return period shall not
be accounted for as a performance obligation in addition to the obligation to provide a refund.
An entity shall apply the requirements in paragraphs 47 – 72 (including the requirements for
constraining estimates of variable consideration in paragraphs 56 – 58) to determine the amount
of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled (i.e. excluding the products expected
Example 4
An entity enters into a contract with a customer to sell 10 units of a product for 100 per unit.
The customer has the right to return the product, but if it does so, it will be charged a 3%
restocking fee (or 3 per returned unit). The entity estimates that 10% of the sold units will be
returned. Upon transfer of control of the 10 units, the entity will recognize revenue of 903
[(9 units not expected to be returned x 100 selling price) + (1 unit expected to be returned x
3 restocking fee per unit)]. A refund liability of 97 will also be recorded [1 unit expected to
be returned x ( 100 selling price – 3 restocking fee)].
Contracts in which a customer may return a defective product in exchange for a functioning
product shall be evaluated in accordance with the guidance on warranties given below.
Illustration 34 : Right of return
An entity enters into contracts with 1,000 customers. Each contract includes the sale of one
product for 50 (1,000 total products × 50 = 50,000 total consideration). Cash is received
when control of a product transfers. The entity's customary business practice is to allow a
customer to return any unused product within 30 days and receive a full refund. The entity's
cost of each product is 30.
The entity applies the requirements in Ind AS 115 to the portfolio of 1,000 contracts because it
reasonably expects that, in accordance with paragraph 4, the effects on the financial statements
from applying these requirements to the portfolio would not differ materially from applying the
requirements to the individual contracts within the portfolio. Since the contract allows a
customer to return the products, the consideration received from the customer is variable. To
estimate the variable consideration to which the entity will be entitled, the entity decides to use
the expected value method (see paragraph 53(a) of Ind AS 115) because it is the method that
the entity expects to better predict the amount of consideration to which it will be entitled. Using
the expected value method, the entity estimates that 970 products will not be returned.
The entity estimates that the costs of recovering the products will be immaterial and expects that
the returned products can be resold at a profit.
Determine the amount of revenue, refund liability and the asset to be recognized by the entity
for the said contracts.
Solution
The entity considers the requirements in paragraphs 56 – 58 of Ind AS 115 on constraining
estimates of variable consideration to determine whether the estimated amount of variable
consideration of 48,500 ( 50 × 970 products not expected to be returned) can be included in
the transaction price. The entity considers the factors in paragraph 57 of Ind AS 115 and
determines that although the returns are outside the entity's influence, it has significant
experience in estimating returns for this product and customer class. In addition, the uncertainty
will be resolved within a short time frame (ie the 30-day return period). Thus, the entity
concludes that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the cumulative amount of
revenue recognized (i.e. 48,500) will not occur as the uncertainty is resolved (i.e. over the
return period).
The entity estimates that the costs of recovering the products will be immaterial and expects that
the returned products can be resold at a profit.
Distinct service, as the entity promises to provide Warranty provides an assurance that the
service in addition to the product’s described product complies with agreed-upon
functionality specifications
Account for the promised warranty as a Account for the warranty in accordance
performance obligation and allocate a portion of the with Ind AS 37
transaction price to that performance obligation
In assessing whether a warranty provides a customer with a service in addition to the assurance
that the product complies with agreed-upon specifications, an entity shall consider factors such
as:
(a) Whether the warranty is required by law — if the entity is required by law to provide a
warranty, the existence of that law indicates that the promised warranty is not a
performance obligation because such requirements typically exist to protect customers
from the risk of purchasing defective products.
(b) The length of the warranty coverage period — the longer the coverage period, the more
likely it is that the promised warranty is a performance obligation because it is more likely
to provide a service in addition to the assurance that the product complies with agreed-
upon specifications.
(c) The nature of the tasks that the entity promises to perform — if it is necessary for an entity
to perform specified tasks to provide the assurance that a product complies with agreed-
upon specifications (for example, a return shipping service for a defective product), then
those tasks likely do not give rise to a performance obligation.
If an entity promises both an assurance-type warranty and a service-type warranty but cannot
reasonably account for them separately, the entity shall account for both of the warranties
together as a single performance obligation.
A law that requires an entity to pay compensation if its products cause harm or damage does not
give rise to a performance obligation. For example, a manufacturer might sell products in a
jurisdiction in which the law holds the manufacturer liable for any damages (for example, to
personal property) that might be caused by a consumer using a product for its intended purpose.
Similarly, an entity’s promise to indemnify the customer for liabilities and damages arising from
claims of patent, copyright, trademark or other infringement by the entity’s products does not
give rise to a performance obligation. The entity shall account for such obligations in
accordance with Ind AS 37.
Comparison with AS 7 and AS 9
Ind AS 115 deals with warrantees in two specific ways as discussed above. However, as per
AS 9 only a general provision for warrantees is sufficient without revenue reversal or recognition
of a contractual liability.
Illustration 35 : Warranty
An entity manufactures and sells computers that include an assurance-type warranty for the first
90 days. The entity offers an optional ‘extended coverage’ plan under which it will repair or
replace any defective part for three years from the expiration of the assurance-type warranty.
Since the optional ‘extended coverage’ plan is sold separately, the entity determines that the
three years of extended coverage represent a separate performance obligation (i.e. a service-
type warranty). The total transaction price for the sale of a computer and the extended warranty
is 36,000. The entity determines that the stand-alone selling prices of the computer and the
The entity derecognizes the accrued warranty liability associated with the assurance-type
warranty as actual warranty costs are incurred during the first 90 days after the customer
receives the computer. The entity recognizes the contract liability associated with the service-
type warranty as revenue during the contract warranty period and recognizes the costs
associated with providing the service-type warranty as they are incurred. The entity had to
determine whether the repair costs incurred are applied against the warranty reserve already
established for claims that occur during the first 90 days or recognized as an expense as
incurred.
*****
In the above illustration, the net effect of the accounting treatment can be seen as follows:
Accounting treatment Total cash inflow 36,000 Total cash inflow 36,000
Warranty expense 2000 Provision for warranty (at 5% of
transaction price) 1800
Accrued warranty cost 2,000
Contract liability – None
Contract liability (for future
service cost) 4000 Actual revenue 34,200
Actual revenue 32,000
Illustration 36 : Warranty
Entity sells 100 ultra-life batteries for 2,000 each and provides the customer with a five-year
guarantee that the batteries will withstand the elements and continue to perform to
specifications. The entity, which normally provides a one-year guarantee to customer
purchasing ultra-life batteries, determines that from the years 2 to 5 represent a separate
performance obligation. The entity determines that 1,70,000 of the 2,00,000 transaction
price should be allocated to the batteries and 30,000 to the service warranty (based on
estimated stand-alone selling prices and a relative selling price allocation). The entity’s normal
one-year warranty cost is 100 per battery.
Pass required journal entries.
Solution
The entity will record the following journal entries:
Upon delivery of the batteries, the entity records the following entry:
The contract liability is recognized as revenue over the service warranty period (years 2 - 5).
The costs of providing the service warranty are recognized as incurred. The assurance warranty
obligation is used / derecognized as defective units are replaced / repaired during the initial year
of the warranty. Upon expiration of the assurance warranty period, any remaining assurance
warranty obligation is reversed.
customer would have paid for the promised goods or services if the customer had paid cash for
those goods or services when (or as) they transfer to the customer (ie the cash selling price).
An entity shall consider all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether a contract
contains a financing component and whether that financing component is significant to the
contract, including both of the following:
(a) the difference, if any, between the amount of promised consideration and the cash selling
price of the promised goods or services; and
(b) the combined effect of both of the following:
(i) the expected length of time between when the entity transfers the promised goods or
services to the customer and when the customer pays for those goods or services;
and
(ii) the prevailing interest rates in the relevant market.
To meet the objective stated above, when adjusting the promised amount of consideration for a
significant financing component, an entity shall use the discount rate that would be reflected in a
separate financing transaction between the entity and its customer at contract inception. That
rate would reflect the credit characteristics of the party receiving financing in the contract, as
well as any collateral or security provided by the customer or the entity, including assets
transferred in the contract.
An entity may be able to determine that rate by identifying the rate that discounts the nominal
amount of the promised consideration to the price that the customer would pay in cash for the
goods or services when (or as) they transfer to the customer. After contract inception, an entity
shall not update the discount rate for changes in interest rates or other circumstances (such as
a change in the assessment of the customer’s credit risk).
An entity considers the significance of a financing component only at a contract level and not
whether the financing is material at a portfolio level. In other words, if the combined effects for a
portfolio of similar contracts were material to the entity as a whole, but if the effects of the
financing component were not material to the individual contract, such financing component
shall not be considered significant and shall not be separately accounted for.
As mentioned above, when a significant financing component exists in a contract, the
transaction price is adjusted so that the amount recognized as revenue is the ‘cash selling price’
of the underlying goods or services at the time of transfer. Essentially, a contract with a
customer that has a significant financing component would be separated into a revenue
component (for the notional cash sales price) and a loan component (for the effect of the
deferred or advance payment terms). Consequently, the accounting for accounts receivable
9,131,346 (60 monthly payments of 212,470 discounted at 14%). The entity recognizes
revenue and a loan receivable for that amount. The entity accounts for the loan receivable in
accordance with Ind AS 109.
*****
Illustration 40 : Advance payment and assessment of discount rate
ST Limited enters into a contract with a customer to sell an asset. Control of the asset will
transfer to the customer in two years (i.e. the performance obligation will be satisfied at a point
in time). The contract includes two alternative payment options:
1) Payment of 5,000 in two years when the customer obtains control of the asset or
2) Payment of 4,000 when the contract is signed. The customer elects to pay 4,000 when
the contract is signed.
ST Limited concludes that the contract contains a significant financing component because of
the length of time between when the customer pays for the asset and when the entity transfers
the asset to the customer, as well as the prevailing interest rates in the market.
The interest rate implicit in the transaction is 11.8 per cent, which is the interest rate necessary
to make the two alternative payment options economically equivalent. However, the entity
determines that, the rate that should be used in adjusting the promised consideration is 6%,
which is the entity's incremental borrowing rate.
Pass journal entries showing how the entity would account for the significant financing
component.
Solution
Journal Entries showing accounting for the significant financing component:
(a) Recognize a contract liability for the 4,000 payment received at contract inception:
Cash Dr. 4,000
To Contract liability 4,000
(b) During the two years from contract inception until the transfer of the asset, the entity
adjusts the promised amount of consideration and accretes the contract liability by
recognizing interest on 4,000 at 6% for two years:
Interest expense Dr. 494*
To Contract liability 494
* 494 = 4,000 contract liability × (6% interest per year
for two years).
*****
Ind AS 115.62 contains an overriding provision, which specifies that, a contract with a customer
would not have a significant financing component if any of the following factors exist:
(a) the customer paid for the goods or services in advance and the timing of the transfer of
those goods or services is at the discretion of the customer. For example, consider a
prepaid card for mobile phone services, wherein the customer has the discretion to avail
mobile services within a certain band of time.
(b) a substantial amount of the consideration promised by the customer is variable and
the amount or timing of that consideration varies on the basis of the occurrence or non-
occurrence of a future event that is not substantially within the control of the customer
or the entity (for example, if the consideration is a sales-based royalty).
(c) the difference between the promised consideration and the cash selling price of the goods
or service arises for reasons other than the provision of finance to either the customer
or the entity, and the difference between those amounts is proportional to the reason for
the difference. For example, the payment terms might provide the entity or the customer
with protection from the other party failing to adequately complete some or all of its
obligations under the contract.
Illustration 41 : Withheld payments on a long-term contract
ABC Limited enters into a contract for the construction of a power plant that includes scheduled
milestone payments for the performance by ABC Limited throughout the contract term of three
years. The performance obligation will be satisfied over time and the milestone payments are
scheduled to coincide with the expected performance by ABC Limited. The contract provides
that a specified percentage of each milestone payment is to be withheld as retention money by
the customer throughout the arrangement and paid to the entity only when the building is
complete.
Analyse whether the contract contains any financing component.
Solution
ABC Limited concludes that the contract does not include a significant financing component
since the milestone payments coincide with its performance and the contract requires amounts
to be retained for reasons other than the provision of finance. The withholding of a specified
percentage of each milestone payment is intended to protect the customer from the contractor
failing to adequately complete its obligations under the contract.
*****
Illustration 42 : Advance payment
XYZ Limited, a personal computer (PC) manufacturer, enters into a contract with a customer to
provide global PC support and repair coverage for three years along with its PC. The customer
purchases this support service at the time of buying the product. Consideration for the service
is an additional 3,000. Customers electing to buy this service must pay for it upfront (i.e. a
monthly payment option is not available).
Analyse whether there is any significant financing component in the contract or not.
Solution
To determine whether there is a significant financing component in the contract, the entity
considers the nature of the service being offered and the purpose of the payment terms. The
entity charges a single upfront amount, not with the primary purpose of obtaining financing from
the customer but, instead, to maximise profitability, taking into consideration the risks
associated with providing the service. Specifically, if customers could pay monthly, they would
be less likely to renew and the population of customers that continue to use the support service
in the later years may become smaller and less diverse over time (i.e. customers that choose to
renew historically are those that make greater use of the service, thereby increasing the entity's
costs). In addition, customers tend to use services more if they pay monthly rather than making
an upfront payment. Finally, the entity would incur higher administration costs such as the costs
related to administering renewals and collection of monthly payments.
In assessing whether or not the contract contains a significant financing component, XYZ
Limited determines that the payment terms were structured primarily for reasons other than the
provision of finance to the entity. XYZ Limited charges a single upfront amount for the services
because other payment terms (such as a monthly payment plan) would affect the nature of the
risks it assumes to provide the service and may make it uneconomical to provide the service.
As a result of its analysis, XYZ Limited concludes that there is not a significant financing
component.
*****
Illustration 43 : Advance payment
A computer hardware vendor enters into a three-year arrangement with a customer to provide
support services. For customers with low credit ratings, the vendor requires the customer to pay
Analyse whether there is any significant financing component in the contract or not.
Solution
Due to this customer’s credit rating, the customer pays in advance for the three-year term.
Because there is no difference between the amount of promised consideration and the cash
selling price (that is, the customer does not receive a discount for paying in advance), the
vendor requires payment in advance only to protect against customer non-payment, and no
other factors exist to suggest the arrangement contains a financing, the vendor concludes this
contract does not provide the customer or the entity with a significant benefit of financing.
*****
Illustration 44 : Sales based royalty
A software vendor enters into a contract with a customer to provide a license solely in exchange
for a sales-based royalty.
Analyse whether there is any significant financing component in the contract or not.
Solution
Although the payment will be made in arrears, because the total consideration varies based on
the occurrence or non-occurrence of a future event that is not within the control of the customer
or the entity, the software vendor concludes the contract does not provide the customer or the
entity with a significant benefit of financing.
*****
Illustration 45 : Payment in arrears
An EPC contractor enters into a two-year contract to develop customized machine for a
customer. The contractor concludes that the goods and services in this contract constitute a
single performance obligation.
Based on the terms of the contract, the contractor determines that it transfers control over time,
and recognizes revenue based on an input method best reflecting the transfer of control to the
customer. The customer agrees to provide the contractor monthly progress payments, with the
final 25 percent payment (holdback payment) due upon contract completion. As a result of the
holdback payment, there is a gap between when control transfers and when consideration is
received, creating a financing component.
Analyse whether there is any significant financing component in the contract or not.
Solution
There is no difference between the amount of promised consideration and the cash selling price
(that is, the customer did not pay a premium for paying a portion of the consideration in arrears).
The payment terms included a holdback payment only to ensure successful completion of the
project, and no other factors exist to suggest the arrangement contains a financing. Hence, the
contractor concludes this contract does not provide the customer or the contractor with a
significant benefit of financing.
*****
Illustration 46 : Payment in arrears
Company Z is a developer and manufacturer of defence systems that is primarily a Tier-II
supplier of parts and integrated systems to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in the
commercial markets. Company Z enters into a contract with Company X for the development
and delivery of 5,000 highly technical, specialized missiles for use in one of Company X’s
platforms.
As a part of the contract, Company X has agreed to pay Company Z for their cost plus an award
fee up to 100 crore. The consideration will be paid by the customer related to costs incurred
near the time Company Z incurs such costs. However, the 100 crore award fee is awarded
upon successful completion of the development and test fire of a missile to occur in 16 months
from the time the contract is executed.
The contract specifies Company Z will earn up to 100 crore based on Company X’s
assessment of Company Z’s ability to develop and manufacture a missile that achieves multiple
factors, including final weight, velocity, and accuracy.
Partial award fees may be awarded based on a pre-determined scale based on their success.
Assume Company Z has assessed the contract under Ind AS 115 and determined the award fee
represents variable consideration. Based on their assessment, Company Z has estimated a
total of 80 crore in the transaction price related to the variable consideration pursuant to
guidance within Ind AS 115. Further, the entity has concluded it should recognize revenue over
time for a single performance obligation using a cost-to-cost input method.
Analyse whether there is any significant financing component in the contract or not.
Solution
Company Z will transfer control over time beginning shortly after the contract is executed but will
not receive the cash consideration related to the award fee component from Company X for
more than one year in the future. Hence, Company Z should assess whether the award fee
represents a significant financing component.
Yes
If the consideration payable to a customer includes a variable amount, an entity shall estimate
the transaction price (including assessing whether the estimate of variable consideration is
constrained) in accordance with accounting guidance on “variable consideration” discussed
earlier.
As per Ind AS 115.72, if consideration payable to a customer is accounted for as a reduction of
the transaction price, an entity shall recognize the reduction of revenue when (or as) the later of
either of the following events occurs:
(a) the entity recognizes revenue for the transfer of the related goods or services to the
customer; and
(b) the entity pays or promises to pay the consideration (even if the payment is conditional on
a future event). That promise might be implied by the entity’s customary business
practices.
Consideration paid or payable to a customer can take many different forms. Therefore, entities
will have to carefully evaluate each transaction to determine the appropriate treatment of such
amounts. Some common examples of consideration paid to a customer are given below:
1. Slotting fees – Manufacturers of consumer products commonly pay retailers fees to have
their goods displayed prominently on store shelves. Those shelves can be physical (i.e. in
Example 5
A producer entity sells energy drinks to a retailer, a convenience store. Producer also pays
Retailer a fee to ensure that its products receive prominent placement on store shelves, to
attract the customer’s eyeballs so that chances of sales of its products are higher. The fee
is negotiated as part of the contract for sale of the energy drinks. In this case, Producer
should reduce the transaction price for the sale of the energy drinks by the amount of
slotting fees paid to Retailer. Producer does not receive a goods or service that is distinct
in exchange for the payment to Retailer.
Example 6
Mobile-Co sells 1,000 phones to Retailer for 10,00,000. The contract includes an
advertising arrangement that requires Mobile-Co to pay 1,00,000 toward a specific
advertising promotion that Retailer will provide. The retailer will provide the advertising on
strategically located billboards and in local advertisements. Mobile-Co could have elected
to engage a third party to provide similar advertising services at a cost of 1,00,000. In
this case, Mobile-Co should account for the payment to Retailer consistent with other
purchases of advertising services. The payment from Mobile-Co to the Retailer is
consideration for a distinct service provided by Retailer and reflects fair value. The
advertising is distinct because Mobile-Co could have engaged a third party who is not its
customer to perform similar services. The transaction price is 10,00,000 and is not
affected by the payment made by Retailer for the sale of the phones. However, it is to be
noted here that, if price paid to retailer for this service is not the fair value of such
advertising services, then any excess paid to retailer over the fair value of said services
should be reduced from transaction price.
3. Price protection – A vendor may agree to reimburse a retailer up to a specified amount for
shortfalls in the sales price received by the retailer for the vendor’s products over a
specified period of time. Normally such fees do not provide a distinct goods or service to
the manufacturer and are treated as a reduction of the transaction price.
price in proportion to those stand-alone selling prices, to allocate the transaction price to each
performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. Stand-alone selling prices
are determined at contract inception and are not updated to reflect changes between contract
inception and when performance is complete. Furthermore, if the contract is modified and that
modification is treated as a termination of the existing contract and the creation of a new
contract (see 5.5.2 above), the entity would update its estimate of the stand-alone selling price
at the time of the modification. If the contract is modified and the modification is treated as a
separate contract (see 5.5.2.1 above), the accounting for the original contact would not be
affected (and the stand-alone selling prices of the underlying goods and services would not be
updated), but the stand-alone selling prices of the distinct goods or services of the new,
separate contract would have to be determined at the time of the modification.
A contractually stated price or a list price for a goods or service may be (but shall not be
presumed to be) the stand-alone selling price of that goods or service.
If a stand-alone selling price is not directly observable, for example, the entity does not sell the
goods or service separately, an entity shall estimate the stand-alone selling price at an amount
that would result in the allocation of the transaction price meeting the allocation objective in
paragraph 73 above. When estimating a stand-alone selling price, an entity shall consider all
information (including market conditions, entity-specific factors and information about the
customer or class of customer) that is reasonably available to the entity. In doing so, an entity
shall maximise the use of observable inputs and apply estimation methods consistently in similar
circumstances.
Evaluating the evidence related to estimating a stand-alone selling price may require significant
judgment.
An entity should establish policies and procedures for estimating stand-alone selling price and
apply those policies and procedures consistently to similar performance obligations. As a best
practice, an entity should document its evaluation of the market conditions and entity-specific
factors considered in estimating each stand-alone selling price, including factors that it
considers to be irrelevant and the reasons why.
Suitable methods for estimating the stand-alone selling price of a goods or service include, but
are not limited to, the following:
(a) Adjusted market assessment approach—an entity could evaluate the market in which it
sells goods or services and estimate the price that a customer in that market would be
willing to pay for those goods or services. That approach might also include referring to
prices from the entity’s competitors for similar goods or services and adjusting those prices
as necessary to reflect the entity’s costs and margins. Applying this approach will likely be
convenient when an entity has sold the goods or service for a period of time (such that it
method to estimate the stand-alone selling prices of the individual goods or services relative to
that estimated aggregate stand-alone selling price determined by the residual approach. When
an entity uses a combination of methods to estimate the stand-alone selling price of each
promised goods or service in the contract, the entity shall evaluate whether allocating the
transaction price at those estimated stand-alone selling prices would be consistent with the
allocation objective in paragraph 73 and the requirements for estimating stand-alone selling
prices.
Below chart summarises the above concept:
(c) the discount attributable to each bundle of goods or services described in (b) above is
substantially the same as the discount in the contract and an analysis of the goods or
services in each bundle provides observable evidence of the performance obligation (or
performance obligations) to which the entire discount in the contract belongs.
Note: As a first step, always allocate the discount entirely to one or more performance
obligations in the contract (if applicable), and then as a second step, use the residual
approach to estimate the stand-alone selling price of a goods or service.
*****
Product X 50,000
Product Y 25,000
Product Z 45,000
Total 1,20,000
In addition, the entity regularly sells Products Y and Z together for 50,000.
Case A—Allocating a discount to one or more performance obligations
The entity enters into a contract with a customer to sell Products X, Y and Z in exchange for
100,000. The entity will satisfy the performance obligations for each of the products at
different points in time; or Product Y and Z at same point of time. Determine the allocation of
Solution
Case A—Allocating a discount to one or more performance obligations
The contract includes a discount of 20,000 on the overall transaction, which would be
allocated proportionately to all three performance obligations when allocating the transaction
price using the relative stand-alone selling price method.
However, because the entity regularly sells Products Y and Z together for 50,000 and Product
X for 50,000, it has evidence that the entire discount of 20,000 should be allocated to the
promises to transfer Products Y and Z in accordance with paragraph 82 of Ind AS 115.
If the entity transfers control of Products Y and Z at the same point in time, then the entity
could, as a practical matter, account for the transfer of those products as a single performance
obligation. That is, the entity could allocate 50,000 of the transaction price to the single
performance obligation of Product X and recognize revenue of 50,000 when Products Y and Z
simultaneously transfer to the customer.
If the contract requires the entity to transfer control of Products Y and Z at different
points in time, then the allocated amount of 50,000 is individually allocated to the promises to
transfer Product Y (stand-alone selling price of 25,000) and Product Z (stand-alone selling
price of 45,000) as follows:
The entity observes that the resulting 30,000 allocated to Product Alpha is within the range of
its observable selling prices ( 15,000 – 45,000).
Case C—Residual approach is inappropriate
The same facts as in Case B apply to Case C except the transaction price is 1,05,000 instead
of 1,30,000. Consequently, the application of the residual approach would result in a stand-
alone selling price of 5,000 for Product Alpha ( 105,000 transaction price less 1,00,000
allocated to Products X, Y and Z).
The entity concludes that 5,000 would not faithfully depict the amount of consideration to
which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for satisfying its performance obligation to
transfer Product Alpha, because 5,000 does not approximate the stand-alone selling price of
Product Alpha, which ranges from 15,000 – 45,000.
Consequently, the entity reviews its observable data, including sales and margin reports, to
estimate the stand-alone selling price of Product Alpha using another suitable method. The
entity allocates the transaction price of 1,05,000 to Products X, Y, Z and Alpha using the
relative stand-alone selling prices of those products in accordance with paragraphs 73–80 of
Ind AS 115.
*****
For purposes of allocation, the entity estimates its sales-based royalties (ie the variable
consideration) to be 20,00,000. Allocate the transaction price.
Case B — Variable consideration allocated on the basis of stand-alone selling prices
The price stated in the contract for Licence A is a fixed amount of 6,00,000 and for Licence B
the consideration is five per cent of the customer's future sales of products that use Licence B.
The entity's estimate of the sales-based royalties (ie the variable consideration) is 30,00,000.
Here, Licence A is transferred 3 months later. The royalty due from the customer’s first month
of sale is 4,00,000.
Allocate the transaction price and determine the revenue to be recognized for each licence and
the contract liability, if any.
Solution
Case A—Variable consideration allocated entirely to one performance obligation
To allocate the transaction price, the entity considers the criteria in paragraph 85 and concludes
that the variable consideration (ie the sales-based royalties) should be allocated entirely to
Licence B. The entity concludes that the criteria are met for the following reasons:
(a) the variable payment relates specifically to an outcome from the performance obligation to
transfer Licence B (ie the customer's subsequent sales of products that use Licence B).
(b) allocating the expected royalty amounts of 20,00,000 entirely to Licence B is consistent
with the allocation objective in paragraph 73 of Ind AS 115. This is because the entity's
estimate of the amount of sales-based royalties ( 20,00,000) approximates the stand-
alone selling price of Licence B and the fixed amount of 16,00,000 approximates the
stand-alone selling price of Licence A. The entity allocates 16,00,000 to Licence A. This
is because, based on an assessment of the facts and circumstances relating to both
licences, allocating to Licence B some of the fixed consideration in addition to all of the
variable consideration would not meet the allocation objective in paragraph 73 of
Ind AS 115.
The entity transfers Licence B at inception of the contract and transfers Licence A one month
later. Upon the transfer of Licence B, the entity does not recognize revenue because the
consideration allocated to Licence B is in the form of a sales-based royalty. Therefore, the
entity recognizes revenue for the sales-based royalty when those subsequent sales occur.
When Licence A is transferred, the entity recognizes as revenue the 16,00,000 allocated to
Licence A.
resolution of uncertain events or other changes in circumstances that change the amount of
consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for the promised goods or
services.
The following principles should be noted:
An entity shall allocate to the performance obligations in the contract any subsequent
changes in the transaction price on the same basis as at contract inception.
Consequently, an entity shall not reallocate the transaction price to reflect changes
in stand-alone selling prices after contract inception.
Amounts allocated to a satisfied performance obligation shall be recognized as revenue, or
as a reduction of revenue, in the period in which the transaction price changes.
When reallocating consideration because of a change in the transaction price, the entity
continues to allocate the variable amount entirely to a performance obligation or to a distinct
goods or service that forms part of a single performance obligation if the criteria in
Ind AS 115.85 (as discussed above) continue to be met.
If the change in transaction price is the result of a contract modification, the entity should follow
the contract modification guidance.
However, when the transaction price changes after a modification, the entity should allocate the
change in transaction price to the performance obligations identified before the modification if
both:
The change in the transaction price is attributable to variable consideration promised prior
to the modification.
The modification is accounted for as a termination of the old contract and the creation of a
new contract.
An entity allocates all other changes in the transaction price to performance obligations under
the modified contract (i.e. the performance obligations that were unsatisfied or partially satisfied
immediately after the modification) as long as the modification was not accounted for as a
separate contract.
Changes in the transaction price should be allocated entirely to one or more, but not all, distinct
goods or services promised in a series that forms part of a single performance obligation if the
criteria for allocating variable consideration are met.
Comparison with AS 7 and AS 9
Subsequent changes in transaction price are not specifically dealt with either AS 7 or AS 9 unlike
in Ind AS 115.
Therefore, the key questions that need to be answered at contract inception to determine if the
seller has satisfied its performance obligation are –
Establish what does transfer of control mean in the context of the arrangement between
the parties?
Identify an appropriate method (i.e. Input Recognize revenue at the point in time
Method or Output Method) to measure progress at which control of the good or service is
and apply that method to recognize revenue transferred
over time
Control is…
the ability – The customer has a present right
and obtain – The right also enables it to obtain potential cash flows directly or
the indirectly – e.g. through:
remaining - use of the asset
benefits
- consumption of the asset
from
- sale or exchange of the asset
- pledging the asset
- holding the asset
… an asset
The benefits of an asset are the potential cash flows (inflows or savings in outflows) that
can be obtained directly or indirectly in many ways, such as by:
(a) using the asset to produce goods or provide services (including public services);
(b) using the asset to enhance the value of other assets;
(c) using the asset to settle liabilities or reduce expenses;
(d) selling or exchanging the asset;
(e) pledging the asset to secure a loan; and
(f) holding the asset.
In addition, an entity shall consider indicators of the transfer of control, which include, but
are not limited to, the following:
(a) The entity has a present right to payment for the asset;
(b) The customer has legal title to the asset;
(c) The entity has transferred physical possession of the asset;
(d) The customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset;
(e) The customer has accepted the asset.
The standard indicates that an entity must determine, at contract inception, whether it will
transfer control of a promised goods or service over time. If an entity does not satisfy a
performance obligation over time, the performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time.
To help entities determine whether control transfers over time (rather than at a point in time), the
standard states below guidance:
9.2 Does the customer acquire control over a period of time or at a
point in time?
9.2.1 Transfer of control over a period of time:
Per para 35 of Ind AS 115, an entity transfers control of a goods or service over time and,
therefore, satisfies a performance obligation and recognizes revenue over time, if any of the
following criteria is met:
Criteria (a) – The customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the
entity's performance as the entity performs;
Or
Criteria (b) – the entity's performance creates or enhances an asset (for example, work in
progress) that the customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced; or
No
Does customer receive and consume
the benefits as the entity performs? Yes
No Does entity have
the enforceable
right to receive Yes
Does asset have an alternative use
to the entity? payment for work to
No date?
Yes
No
Control is transferred at a Control is transferred
point in time over time
In this regard, it is important to understand how each of the above criteria are evaluated –
Criteria (a) – Customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by
the entity's performance as the entity performs
This criterion is ordinarily applied in situations in which the benefits of seller’s performance are
immediately consumed by the customer, for eg.: routine or recurring services in which the
consumer consumes the benefits immediately as the services are performed, which means that
the customer obtains control of seller entity’s output as soon as the entity performs.
Hence, in such situations, entity’s performance is said to be performed over a period of time.
Illustration 59
Minitek Ltd. is a payroll processing company. Minitek Ltd. enters into a contract to provide
monthly payroll processing services to ABC limited for one year. Determine how entity will
recognize the revenue?
Solution
Payroll processing is a single performance obligation. On a monthly basis, as Minitek Ltd carries
out the payroll processing –
The customer, ie, ABC Limited simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of the
entity’s performance in processing each payroll transaction.
Further, once the services have been performed for a particular month, in case of
termination of the agreement before maturity and contract is transferred to another entity,
then such new entity will not need to re-perform the services for expired months.
Therefore, it satisfies the first criterion, ie, services completed on a monthly basis are consumed
by the entity at the same time and hence, revenue shall be recognized over the period of time.
*****
For certain performance obligations, an entity may not be able to readily identify whether a
customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits from the entity's performance as
the entity performs. In such cases, a performance obligation is satisfied over time if an entity
determines that another entity would not need to substantially re-perform the work that the entity
has completed to date if that other entity were to fulfil the remaining performance obligation to
the customer.
In making such determination, an entity shall make both of the following assumptions:
(a) disregard potential contractual restrictions or practical limitations that otherwise would
prevent the entity from transferring the remaining performance obligation to another entity;
and
(b) presume that another entity fulfilling the remainder of the performance obligation would not
have the benefit of any work in progress.
Illustration 60
T&L Limited (‘T&L’) is a logistics company that provides inland and sea transportation services.
A customer – Horizon Limited (‘Horizon’) enters into a contract with T&L for transportation of its
goods from India to Sri Lanka through sea. The voyage is expected to take 20 days from
Mumbai to Colombo. T&L is responsible for shipping the goods from Mumbai port to Colombo
port.
Whether T&L’s performance obligation is met over period of time?
Solution
T&L has a single performance to ship the goods from one port to another. The following factors
are critical for assessing how services performed by T&L are consumed by the customer –
And
Illustration 61
AFS Ltd. is a risk advisory firm and enters into a contract with a company – WBC Ltd to provide
audit services that results in AFS issuing an audit opinion to the Company. The professional
opinion relates to facts and circumstances that are specific to the company. If the Company was
to terminate the consulting contract for reasons other than the entity's failure to perform as
promised, the contract requires the Company to compensate the risk advisory firm for its costs
incurred plus a 15 per cent margin. The 15 per cent margin approximates the profit margin that
the entity earns from similar contracts.
Whether risk advisory firm’s performance obligation is met over period of time?
Solution
AFS has a single performance to provide an opinion on the professional audit services proposed
to be provided under the contract with the customer. Evaluating the criterion for recognizing
revenue over a period of time or at a point in time, Ind AS 115 requires one of the following
criteria to be met –
Criterion (a) – whether the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits
from services provided by AFS: Company shall benefit only when the audit opinion is
provided upon completion. Further, in case the contract was to be terminated, any other
firm engaged to perform similar services will have to substantially re-perform.
Hence, this criterion is not met.
Criterion (b) – An asset created that customer controls: This is service contract and no
asset created, over which customer acquires control.
Criterion (c) – no alternate use to entity and right to seek payment:
The services provided by AFS are specific to the company – WBC and do not have
any alternate use to AFS
Further, AFS has a right to enforce payment if the contract was early terminated, for
reasons other than AFS’s failure to perform. And the profit margin approximates what
the entity otherwise earns.
Therefore, criterion (c) is met, and such performance obligation is said to be met over a period
of time.
*****
Solution
The Company shall evaluate conditions laid in para 35 of Ind AS 115 as follows:
Criterion (a) – whether the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits:
Customer can benefit only when the asset is fully constructed and no benefits are
consumed as its constructed. Hence, this criterion is not met.
Criterion (b) – An asset created that customer controls: As per provided facts, the customer
does not acquire control of the asset as it is created.
Criterion (c) – no alternate use to entity and right to seek payment:
The customer has specific right over the asset and company does not have right to
divert it for any alternate use. In other words, there is contractual restriction to use
the asset for any alternate purpose.
In the event of early termination, Company has a right to retain any payments made
by the customer. However, such payments need not necessarily compensate the
selling price of the partially constructed asset, if the customer was to stop making
payments.
Therefore, Company does not have a legally enforceable right to payment for work
completed to date and the criterion under para 35 is not satisfied. Thus, revenue cannot be
recognized over a period of time.
*****
All above discussed three criteria can be summarized in below diagram:
Criterion Example
1. The customer simultaneously receives and Routine or recurring services – e.g.
consumes the benefits provided by the entity’s cleaning services, Routine
performance as the entity performs transaction processing services,
Hotel management services.
2. The entity’s performance creates or enhances Building an asset on a customer’s
an asset that the customer controls as the asset site
is created or enhanced
3. The entity’s performance does not create an Building a specialized/highly
asset with an alternative use to the entity and customized asset that only the
the entity has an enforceable right to payment customer can use or building an
for performance completed to date asset according to a customer’s
specifications
A. Output methods:
Output methods recognize revenue on the basis of direct measurements of the value,
to the customer, of the goods or services transferred to date relative to the remaining
goods or services promised under the contract. Output methods include methods
such as surveys of performance completed to date, appraisals of results achieved,
milestones reached, time elapsed and units produced or units delivered. Output
method is selected if it would faithfully depict the entity's performance towards
complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. It may not be useful in depicting
the entity's performance if it would fail to measure some of the goods or services for
which control has transferred to the customer. For example, output methods based on
units produced or units delivered would not faithfully depict an entity's performance in
satisfying a performance obligation if, at the end of the reporting period, the entity's
performance has produced work in progress or finished goods controlled by the
customer that are not included in the measurement of the output.
As a practical expedient – if a company has a right to consideration from a customer
in an amount which corresponds directly with the value billed to the customer of the
entity’s performance completed to date, then company may recognize revenue for the
amount to which the entity has a right to invoice. For eg.: a service contract in which
entity bills a fixed amount for each hour of service provided, etc.
B. Input methods:
Input methods recognize revenue on the basis of the entity’s efforts or inputs to the
satisfaction of a performance obligation (e.g. resources consumed, labour hours
expended, costs incurred, time elapsed or machine hours used) relative to the total
expected inputs to the satisfaction of that performance obligation. If the entity's efforts
or inputs are expended evenly throughout the performance period, it may be
appropriate for the entity to recognize revenue on a straight-line basis.
While applying input method, a careful consideration should be given for events that
do not depict a direct relationship between entity’s inputs and transfer of control of
goods or services. For example, when cost-based input method is used, an
adjustment may be required in the following cases –
(a) When any cost incurred does not contribute to an entity’s progress in satisfying
performance obligation – any excess costs incurred owing to entity’s
inefficiencies that were not reflected in the price of the contract must be ignored
for measuring progress of work. For eg: cost of wasted materials, labour or other
resources, etc.
(b) When cost incurred is not proportionate to entity’s progress in satisfying its
performance obligation. In such cases, the best reflection is to adjust the input
method to recognize revenue only to the extent of costs incurred. Such
recognition of revenue to the extent of costs incurred is appropriate, if at contract
inception, all the following conditions exist:
(i) The goods do not represent a distinct performance obligation;
(ii) Customer is expected to obtain control of the goods significantly before
receiving the services;
(iii) Cost of such goods is significant relative to the total expected costs to
complete the performance obligation; and
(iv) The entity procures the goods from a third party and does not significantly
involve in designing / manufacturing the goods (even if the entity is a
principal in the arrangement between the entity and end customer).
An entity shall apply a single method of measuring progress for each performance obligation
satisfied over time, and the entity shall apply that method consistently to similar performance
obligations and in similar circumstances. At the end of each reporting period, an entity shall
remeasure its progress towards complete satisfaction of a performance obligation satisfied over
time.
Particulars Amount ( )
Transaction price 5,000,000
Expected costs:
(a) Elevators 1,500,000
(b) Other costs 2,500,000
Total 4,000,000
The entity purchases the elevators, and they are delivered to the site six months before they will
be installed. The entity uses an input method based on cost to measure progress towards
completion. The entity has incurred actual other costs of 500,000 by 31 st March, 20X1.
How will the Company recognize revenue, if performance obligation is met over a period of
time?
Solution
Costs to be incurred comprise two major components – elevators and cost of construction
service.
(a) The elevators are part of the overall construction project and are not a distinct performance
obligation
(b) The cost of elevators is substantial to the overall project and are incurred well in advance.
(c) Upon delivery at site, the customer acquires control of such elevators.
(d) And there is no modification made to the elevators, which the company only procures and
delivers at site. Nevertheless, as part of materials used in overall construction project, the
company is a principal in the transaction with the customer for such elevators also.
Therefore, applying the guidance on Input method –
- The measure of progress should be made based on the percentage of costs incurred
relative to the total budgeted costs.
- The cost of elevators should be excluded when measuring such progress and revenue
for such elevators should be recognized to the extent of costs incurred.
Therefore, for the year ended 31 st March, 20X1, the Company shall recognize revenue of
2,200,000 on the project.
*****
Other considerations in measuring progress of work:
Stand-Ready Obligations
When the nature of an entity’s performance obligation is to stand ready to provide goods or
services, it may be appropriate to utilize a time-based measure of progress.
- When the pattern of benefit and the entity’s efforts to fulfill the contract are not even
throughout the contract period, a time-based method of measuring progress may not be
appropriate.
- On the other hand, when an entity expects the customer will receive and consume the
benefits of the entity’s promise equally throughout the contract period, or if the entity does
not know and cannot reasonably estimate how and when the customer will request
performance, then a straight-line revenue attribution resulting from a time-based measure of
progress may be appropriate.
9.2.2 Transfer of control at a point in time:
Where a company does not meet any of the aforementioned criteria for recognizing revenue
over a period of time, then revenue shall be recognized at a point in time.
The following is an indicative list of indicators which may exist, to imply the point of time at
which control of goods has been passed to the customer. This is not an exhaustive list and there
may be more factors that may be considered to determine the point in time at which revenue
shall be recognized:
Indicator Evaluation
The entity has a If a customer is presently obliged to pay for an asset, then that may
present right to indicate that the customer has obtained the ability to direct the use of,
payment and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset in
exchange.
The customer has a - Legal title may indicate which party to a contract has the ability to
legal title to the asset direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining
benefits from, an asset or to restrict the access of other entities to
those benefits.
If an entity retains legal title solely as protection against the customer's
failure to pay, those rights of the entity would not preclude the
customer from obtaining control of an asset.
The customer has The customer's physical possession of an asset may indicate that the
physical possession of customer has the ability to direct the use of the asset.
the asset - However, physical possession may not coincide with control of an
asset. For example, in some repurchase agreements and in some
consignment arrangements, a customer or consignee may have
physical possession of an asset that the entity controls.
The customer has - Transfer of risks & rewards for an asset may indicate that the
assumed significant customer has the ability to direct the use of and obtain
risks & rewards of substantially all of the benefits from the asset.
owning the asset When evaluating the risks and rewards of ownership of a promised
asset, an entity shall exclude any risks that give rise to a separate
performance obligation in addition to the performance obligation to
transfer the asset. For example, an entity may have transferred control
Put option:
Forward: Call option: An entity's
An entity's obligation to
An entity's right to repurchase the
obligation to repurchase the
repurchase the asset at the
asset customer's
asset
request
B. Put option
If an entity has an obligation to repurchase the asset at the customer's request (a put
option) at a price that is lower than the original selling price of the asset, the entity shall
consider at contract inception whether the customer has a significant economic incentive to
exercise that right. The customer's exercising of that right results in the customer
effectively paying the entity consideration for the right to use a specified asset for a period
of time. Therefore, the entity shall account for the agreement as a lease in accordance
with Ind AS 116, unless the contract is part of a sale and leaseback transaction. If the
contract is part of a sale and leaseback transaction, the entity shall continue to recognize
the asset and shall recognize a financial liability for any consideration received from the
customer. The entity shall account for the financial liability in accordance with Ind AS 109.
To determine whether a customer has a significant economic incentive to exercise its right,
an entity shall consider various factors, including the relationship of the repurchase price to
the expected market value of the asset at the date of the repurchase and the amount of
time until the right expires. For example, if the repurchase price is expected to significantly
exceed the market value of the asset, this may indicate that the customer has a significant
economic incentive to exercise the put option and hence the customer is expected to
ultimately return the asset to the entity.
If the repurchase price is equal to or greater than original selling price and more than the
expected market value of the asset, the contract is in effect a financing arrangement.
If the repurchase price of the asset is equal to or greater than the original selling price and
is less than or equal to the expected market value of the asset, and the customer does not
have a significant economic incentive to exercise its right, then the entity shall account for
the agreement as if it were the sale of a product with a right of return.
If the customer does not have a significant economic incentive to exercise its right at a
price that is lower than the original selling price of the asset, the entity shall account for the
agreement as if it were the sale of a product with a right of return.
The following decision tree may be useful to account for the arrangement –
No
Is the repurchase price < Original
Is the repurchase price => Original Selling No Selling Price and Significant
Price and; economic
Repurchase price <= to expected market incentive to exercise?
price
Yes No
Yes
When comparing the repurchase price with the selling price, an entity shall consider the
time value of money.
If the option lapses unexercised, an entity shall derecognize the liability and recognize
revenue.
Illustration 66
An entity enters into a contract with a customer for the sale of a tangible asset on
1 st January, 20X1 for 1 million. The contract includes a call option that gives the entity the
right to repurchase the asset for 1.1 million on or before 31 st December, 20X1.
How would the entity account for this transaction?
9.4 Bill-and-hold
A bill-and-hold arrangement is a contract under which an entity bills a customer for a
product but the entity retains physical possession of the product until it is transferred to the
customer at a point in time in the future. For example, a customer may request an entity to
enter into such a contract because of the customer's lack of available space for the product
or because of delays in the customer's production schedules.
In such arrangements, the entity shall determine at which point does control transfer to the
customer.
In some cases, control is transferred either when the product is delivered to the customer’s
site or when the product is shipped, depending on the terms of the contract (including
delivery and shipping terms). While in other cases, a customer may obtain control of a
product even though that product remains in an entity’s physical possession. In that case,
the customer has the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the
remaining benefits from, the product even though it has decided not to exercise its right to
take physical possession of that product. Consequently, the entity does not control the
product. Instead, the entity provides custodial services to the customer over the
customer’s asset
In addition, the indicators defined earlier in this chapter for establishing transfer of control,
all the following criteria must be met:
(a) the reason for the bill-and-hold arrangement must be substantive (for example, the
customer has requested the arrangement);
(b) the product must be identified separately as belonging to the customer;
(c) the product currently must be ready for physical transfer to the customer; and
(d) the entity cannot have the ability to use the product or to direct it to another customer.
Where an entity recognizes revenue on bill & hold basis, the entity shall determine if it has
any additional performance obligations forming part of the transaction price, which would
need to be segregated and accounted separately, when such performance obligations are
met. (for eg.: custodial services for goods held, extended warranty, etc.) For identification
of performance obligations, refer step 2 – identifying performance obligations.
Illustration 68
An entity enters into a contract with a customer on 1 st April, 20X1 for the sale of a machine and
spare parts. The manufacturing lead time for the machine and spare parts is two years.
Upon completion of manufacturing, the entity demonstrates that the machine and spare parts
(a) the reason for the bill-and-hold The customer has specifically requested
arrangement must be substantive (for for entity to store goods in their
example, the customer has requested warehouse, owing to close proximity to
the arrangement); customer’s factory.
(b) the product must be identified The spare parts have been specifically
separately as belonging to the identified and inspected by the customer.
customer;
(c) the product currently must be ready The spares are identified and
for physical transfer to the customer; segregated, therefore, ready for delivery.
and
(d) the entity cannot have the ability to Spares have been segregated and
use the product or to direct it to cannot be redirected to any other
another customer customer.
Therefore, all conditions of bill-and-hold are met and hence, company can recognize
revenue for sale of spare parts on 31 st March, 20X3.
- Custodial services: Such services shall be given for a period of 2 to 4 years from
31 st March, 20X3. Where services are given uniformly and customer receives & consumes
benefits simultaneously, revenue for such service shall be recognized on a straight-line
basis over a period of time.
*****
9.5 Licences of intellectual property
Ind AS 115 provides application guidance specific to the recognition of revenue for licences of
intellectual property, which differs from the recognition model for other promised goods and
services.
Considering the fact that licences include a wide range of features and economic characteristics,
an entity will need to evaluate the nature of its promise to grant a licence of intellectual property
in order to determine whether the promise is satisfied (and revenue is recognized) over time or
at a point in time.
A licence will either provide:
a right to access the entity’s intellectual property throughout the licence period, which
results in revenue that is recognized over time; or
a right to use the entity’s intellectual property as it exists at the point in time in which the
licence is granted, which results in revenue that is recognized at a point in time.
The standard states that licences of intellectual property establish a customer’s rights to the
intellectual property of an entity and may include licences for any of the following: software and
Solution
The entity assesses the goods and services promised to the customer to determine which goods
and services are distinct in accordance with paragraph 27 of Ind AS 115. The entity concludes
that its only performance obligation is to grant the licence. The entity does not have any
contractual or implied obligations to change the licensed recording. The licensed recording has
significant stand-alone functionality (i.e. the ability to be played) and, therefore, the ability of the
customer to obtain the benefits of the recording is not substantially derived from the entity’s
ongoing activities. The entity therefore determines that the contract does not require, and the
customer does not reasonably expect, the entity to undertake activities that significantly affect
the licensed recording. Consequently, the entity concludes that the nature of its promise in
transferring the licence is to provide the customer with a right to use the entity’s intellectual
property as it exists at the point in time that it is granted. Therefore, the promise to grant the
licence is a performance obligation satisfied at a point in time. The entity recognizes all of the
revenue at the point in time when the customer can direct the use of, and obtain substantially all
of the remaining benefits from, the licensed intellectual property.
*****
Access to the IP (over time) Right to use the IP (at a point in time)
license the IP, or obtain settlements from entities that use the IP without permission,
without undertaking any ongoing activities to promote or support the IP
Would the answer be different in this situation?
Solution
(i) The nature of D’s promise in this contract is to provide M with the right to access the sports
team’s IP and, accordingly, revenue from the licence will be recognized over time. In
reaching this conclusion, D considers all of the following facts:
– M reasonably expects D to continue to undertake activities that support and maintain
the value of the team name and logo by continuing to play games and field a
competitive team throughout the licence period. These activities significantly affect
the IP’s ability to provide benefit to M because the value of the team name and logo is
substantially derived from, or dependent on, those ongoing activities.
– The activities directly expose M to positive or negative effects (i.e. whether D plays
games and fields a competitive team will have a direct effect on how successful M is
in selling its products featuring the team’s name and logo).
– D’s ongoing activities do not result in the transfer of a goods or a service to M as they
occur (i.e. the team playing games does not transfer a goods or service to M).
(ii) Based on B’s customary business practices, Apparel Maker M probably does not
reasonably expect B to undertake any activities to change the form of the IP or to support
or maintain the IP. Therefore, B would probably conclude that the nature of its promise is
to provide M with a right to use its IP as it exists at the point in time at which the licence is
granted.
*****
Expect to be recovered
Once an entity has determined that costs incurred relate to a specific contract with a customer, it
should then determine if the costs meet the conditions for capitalisation. Incremental costs to
obtain a contract that an entity expects to recover should be capitalised, while costs to obtain a
contract that do not qualify for capitalisation should be expensed as incurred.
The test to determine if a cost is incremental is to ask whether the entity would have incurred
the cost had one or both of the parties decided to walk away just before signing the
arrangement. In this context, any legal costs (for example, to draft or negotiate the contract) or
salaries for salespeople would be incurred regardless of whether the contract is finalized.
Therefore, these costs are not incremental. On the other hand, a commission paid only upon the
successful signing of the contract would be incremental and should be capitalized.
As a practical expedient, Ind AS 115 allows an entity to expense the incremental costs of
obtaining a contract as incurred if the amortisation period of the asset that the entity would have
otherwise recognized is one year or less.
Cost Capitalize Reason
or expense
Commission paid only Capitalize Assuming the entity expects to recover the cost,
upon successful signing of the commission is incremental since it would not
a contract have been paid if the parties decided not to enter
into the arrangement just before signing.
Travel expenses for sales Expense Because the costs are incurred regardless of
person pitching a new whether the new contract is won or lost, the entity
client contract incurs the costs, unless they are expressly
reimbursable.
Legal fees for drafting Expense If the parties walk away during negotiations, the
terms of arrangement for costs would still be incurred and therefore are not
parties to approve and incremental costs of obtaining the contract.
sign
Salaries for sales people Expense Salaries are incurred regardless of whether
working exclusively on contracts are won or lost and therefore are not
obtaining new clients incremental costs to obtain the contract.
Bonus based on quarterly Capitalize Bonuses based solely on sales are incremental
sales target costs to obtain a contract.
Commission paid to sales Capitalize The commissions are incremental costs that
manager based on would not have been incurred had the entity not
contracts obtained by the obtained the contract. Ind AS 115 does not
sales manager’s local differentiate costs based on the function or title of
employees the employee that receives the commission.
(iii) allocations that relate directly to the contract or contract activities (for example,
contract management and supervision costs and depreciation of tools and equipment
and right-of-use assets used in fulfilling the contract)
(iv) costs that are explicitly chargeable to the customer
(v) other costs that the entity incurs only because it entered into the contract (e.g.
payments to subcontractors)
(b) the costs generate or enhance resources of the entity that will be used to satisfy
performance obligations in the future
(c) the entity expects to recover the costs, for e.g. through the expected margin
The following costs should be expensed as incurred:
(a) general and administrative costs that are not explicitly chargeable to the customer
(b) costs of wasted materials, labour, or other resources that were not reflected in the contract
price
(c) costs that relate to satisfied performance obligations
(d) costs related to remaining performance obligations that cannot be distinguished from costs
related to satisfied performance obligations.
Costs incurred in fulfilling a contract with a customer that are within the scope of another
Standard, an entity shall account for those costs in accordance with those other Standards.
Illustration 73
Customer outsources its information technology data centre
Term = 5 years plus two 1-yr renewal options
Average customer relationship is 7 years
Entity spends 4,00,000 designing and building the technology platform needed to
accommodate out-sourcing contract:
Design services 50,000
Hardware 140,000
Software 100,000
Migration and testing of data centre 110,000
TOTAL 400,000
*****
10.3 Amortisation and impairment
Under Ind AS 115, an entity amortises capitalised contract costs on a systematic basis
consistent with the pattern of transferring the goods or services related to those costs. If an
entity identifies a significant change to the expected pattern of transfer, it updates its
amortisation to reflect that change in estimate in accordance with Ind AS 8.
An entity recognizes an impairment loss in earnings if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds
the remaining amount of consideration that the entity expects to receive in connection with the
related goods or services less any directly related contract costs yet to be recognized. When
determining the amount of consideration, it expects to receive, an entity ignores the constraint
on variable consideration previously discussed, and adjusts for the effects of the customer's
credit risk.
Before recognizing an impairment loss under the revenue recognition guidance, an entity
recognizes impairment losses associated with assets related to the contract that are accounted
in accordance with another Standard (for example, Ind AS 2, Ind AS 16 and Ind AS 38).
An entity would reverse a previously recognized impairment loss when the impairment
conditions no longer exist or have improved. The increased carrying amount of the asset shall
not exceed the amount that would have been determined (net of amortisation) if no impairment
loss had been recognized previously.
Illustration 74 : Amortisation
An entity enters into a service contract with a customer and incurs incremental costs to obtain
the contract and costs to fulfil the contract. These costs are capitalised as assets in accordance
with Ind AS 115. The initial term of the contract is five years but it can be renewed for
subsequent one-year periods up to a maximum of 10 years. The average contract term for
similar contracts entered into by entity is seven years.
Determine appropriate method of amortisation?
Solution
The most appropriate amortisation period is likely to be seven years (i.e. the initial term of five
years plus two anticipated one year renewals) because that is the period over which the entity
expects to provide services under the contract to which the capitalised costs relate.
*****
A feature of these service arrangements is the public service nature of the obligation
undertaken by the operator.
Public policy is for the services related to the infrastructure to be provided to the public,
irrespective of the identity of the party that operates the services. The service arrangement
contractually obliges the operator to provide the services to the public on behalf of the
public sector entity. Other common features are:
(a) the party that grants the service arrangement (the grantor) is a public sector entity,
including a governmental body, or a private sector entity to which the responsibility for
the service has been devolved.
(b) the operator is responsible for at least some of the management of the infrastructure
and related services and does not merely act as an agent on behalf of the grantor.
(c) the contract sets the initial prices to be levied by the operator and regulates price
revisions over the period of the service arrangement.
(d) the operator is obliged to hand over the infrastructure to the grantor in a specified
condition at the end of the period of the arrangement, for little or no incremental
consideration, irrespective of which party initially financed it.
12.2 Accounting Principles
12.2.1 Treatment of the operator’s rights over the infrastructure
Infrastructure shall not be recognized as property, plant and equipment of the operator
because the contractual service arrangement does not convey the right to control the use
of the public service infrastructure to the operator.
The operator has access to operate the infrastructure to provide the public service on
behalf of the grantor in accordance with the terms specified in the contract.
12.2.2 Recognition and measurement
Since the operator acts as a service provider, he shall recognize and measure revenue in
accordance with Ind AS 115 for the services it performs. The operator constructs or
upgrades infrastructure (construction or upgrade services) used to provide a public service
and operates and maintains that infrastructure (operation services) for a specified period of
time.
If the operator performs more than one service (ie construction or upgrade services and
operation services) under a single contract or arrangement, consideration received or
receivable shall be allocated by reference to the relative fair values of the services
delivered, when the amounts are separately identifiable.
The nature of the consideration i.e. whether financial asset or intangible asset determines
its subsequent accounting treatment.
The operator shall account for revenue and costs relating to construction or upgrade
services.
The operator shall account for revenue and costs relating to operation services in
accordance with Ind AS 115.
12.2.3 Consideration given by the grantor to the operator
If the operator provides construction or upgrade services, the consideration received or
receivable by the operator shall be recognized at its fair value. The consideration may be
rights to:
(a) a financial asset, or
(b) an intangible asset.
The operator shall recognize a financial asset to the extent that
it has an unconditional contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset from
or at the direction of the grantor for the construction services; the grantor has little, if
any, discretion to avoid payment, usually because the agreement is enforceable by
law.
it has an unconditional right to receive cash if the grantor contractually guarantees to
pay the operator (a) specified or determinable amounts or (b) the shortfall, if any,
between amounts received from users of the public service and specified or
determinable amounts, even if payment is contingent on the operator ensuring that the
infrastructure meets specified quality or efficiency requirements.
The operator shall recognize an intangible asset to the extent that it receives a right (a
licence) to charge users of the public service. A right to charge users of the public service
is not an unconditional right to receive cash because the amounts are contingent on the
extent that the public uses the service.
If the operator is paid for the construction services partly by a financial asset and partly by
an intangible asset it is necessary to account separately for each component of the
operator’s consideration. The consideration received or receivable for both components
shall be recognized initially at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.
The operator may have contractual obligations it must fulfil as a condition of its licence, like to
maintain or restore infrastructure, except for any upgrade element, which shall be recognized
and measured in accordance with Ind AS 37, ie at the best estimate of the expenditure that
would be required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period.
12.2.5 Borrowing costs incurred by the operator
Borrowing costs attributable to the arrangement shall be recognized as an expense in the
period in which they are incurred unless the operator has a contractual right to receive an
intangible asset (a right to charge users of the public service).
If the operator does not have a contractual right to receive an intangible asset, borrowing
costs attributable to the arrangement shall be capitalised during the construction phase of
the arrangement.
12.2.6 Financial asset
For recognition of financial asset, Ind AS 32, Ind AS 107 and Ind AS 109 shall be applied.
The amount due from or at the direction of the grantor is accounted at:
(a) amortised cost;
(b) fair value through other comprehensive income; or
(c) fair value through profit or loss.
If the amount due from the grantor is measured at amortised cost or fair value through
other comprehensive income, Ind AS 109 requires interest calculated using the effective
interest method to be recognized in profit or loss.
12.2.7 Intangible asset
For recognition and measurement of intangible asset, one has to apply Ind AS 38 for guidance
on measuring intangible assets acquired in exchange for a non-monetary asset or assets or a
combination of monetary and non-monetary assets.
(b) significant terms of the arrangement that may affect the amount, timing and certainty
of future cash flows (eg the period of the concession, re-pricing dates and the basis
upon which re-pricing or re-negotiation is determined);
(c) the nature and extent (eg quantity, time period or amount as appropriate) of:
(i) rights to use specified assets;
(ii) obligations to provide or rights to expect provision of services;
(iii) obligations to acquire or build items of property, plant and equipment;
(iv) obligations to deliver or rights to receive specified assets at the end of the
concession period;
(v) renewal and termination options; and
(vi) other rights and obligations (eg major overhauls);
(d) changes in the arrangement occurring during the period; and
(e) how the service arrangement has been classified.
An operator shall disclose the amount of revenue and profits or losses recognized in the
period on exchanging construction services for a financial asset or an intangible asset.
The disclosures required in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Appendix shall be provided
individually for each service concession arrangement or in aggregate for each class of
service concession arrangements. A class is a grouping of service concession
arrangements involving services of a similar nature (eg toll collections, telecommunications
and water treatment services).
Illustration 75
A Ltd. is in the business of infrastructure and has two divisions; (I) Toll Roads and (II) Wind
Power. The brief details of these business and underlying project details are as follows:
I. Bhilwara-Jabalpur Toll Project - The Company has commenced the construction of the
project in the current year and has incurred total expenses aggregating to 50 crore as on
31 st December, 20X1. Under IGAAP, the Company has 'recorded such expenses as
Intangible Assets in the books of account. The brief details of the Concession Agreement
are as follows:
Total Expenses estimated to be incurred on the project 100 crore;
Fair Value of the construction services is 110 crore;
Total Cash Flow guaranteed by the Government under the concession agreement is
200 crore;
Solution
(i) Here the operator has a contractual right to receive cash from the grantor. The grantor has
little, if any, discretion to avoid payment, usually because the agreement is enforceable by
law. The operator has an unconditional right to receive cash if the grantor contractually
guarantees to pay the operator. Hence, the operator recognizes a financial asset to the
extent it has a contractual right to receive cash.
(ii) Here the operator has a contractual right to charge users of the public services. A right to
charge users of the public service is not an unconditional right to receive cash because the
amounts are contingent on the extent that the public uses the service. Therefore, the
operator shall recognize an intangible asset to the extent it receives the right (a licence) to
charge users of the public service.
Note: Amount in entry 4 is kept blank as no information in this regard is given in the question.
*****
9. Adjustment for time As per Ind AS 115, transaction As per AS 9, revenue is not
value of money price is adjusted for the effect of adjusted for time value of
time value of money when a money.
significant financing component
exists.
10. Guidance on Service Ind AS 115 gives guidance on AS does not provide such
Concession service concession arrangements guidance.
Arrangements and disclosures thereof.
As at 31 st March, 20X1, other costs incurred excluding the air conditioners are 6,00,000.
Whether Company X should include cost of the air conditioners in measure of its progress
of performance obligation? How should revenue be recognized for the year ended
March 20X1?
4. An entity G Ltd. enters into a contract with a customer P Ltd. for the sale of a machinery for
20,00,000. P Ltd. intends to use the said machinery to start a food processing unit. The
food processing industry is highly competitive and P Ltd. has very little experience in the
said industry.
P Ltd. pays a non-refundable deposit of 1,00,000 at inception of the contract and enters
into a long-term financing agreement with G Ltd. for the remaining 95 per cent of the
agreed consideration which it intends to pay primarily from income derived from its food
processing unit as it lacks any other major source of income. The financing arrangement is
provided on a non-recourse basis, which means that if P Ltd. defaults then G Ltd. can
repossess the machinery but cannot seek further compensation from P Ltd., even if the full
value of the amount owed is not recovered from the machinery. The cost of the machinery
for G Ltd. is 12,00,000. P Ltd. obtains control of the machinery at contract inception.
When should G Ltd. recognize revenue from sale of machinery to P Ltd. in accordance with
Ind AS 115?
5. Entity I sells a piece of machinery to the customer for 2 million, payable in 90 days.
Entity I is aware at contract inception that the customer might not pay the full contract
price. Entity I estimates that the customer will pay atleast 1.75 million, which is sufficient
to cover entity I's cost of sales ( 1.5 million) and which entity I is willing to accept because
it wants to grow its presence in this market. Entity I has granted similar price concessions
in comparable contracts.
Entity I concludes that it is highly probable that it will collect 1.75 million, and such
amount is not constrained under the variable consideration guidance.
What is the transaction price in this arrangement?
6. On 1 st January 20X8, entity J enters into a one-year contract with a customer to deliver
water treatment chemicals. The contract stipulates that the price per container will be
adjusted retroactively once the customer reaches certain sales volume, defined, as follows:
500 20%
1,000 10%
Determine the transaction price.
10. Construction Company C enters into a contract with Customer E to build an asset.
Depending on when the asset is completed, C will receive either 1,10,000 or 1,30,000.
As per paragraph 47 of Ind AS 115, “An entity shall consider the terms of the contract and
progress in paragraph 39, do not depict the entity’s performance in transferring control of
goods or services to the customer”.
In accordance with the above, Company X assesses whether the costs incurred to procure
the air conditioners are proportionate to the entity’s progress in satisfying the performance
obligation. The costs incurred to procure the air conditioners ( 10,00,000) are significant
relative to the total costs to completely satisfy the performance obligation ( 40,00,000).
Also, Company X is not involved in manufacturing or designing the air conditioners.
Company X concludes that including the costs to procure the air conditioners in the
measure of progress would overstate the extent of the entity’s performance. Consequently,
in accordance with paragraph B19 of Ind AS 115, the entity adjusts its measure of progress
to exclude the costs to procure the air conditioners from the measure of costs incurred and
from the transaction price. The entity recognizes revenue for the transfer of the air
conditioners at an amount equal to the costs to procure the air conditioners (i.e., at a zero
margin).
Company X assesses that as at March, 20X1, the performance is 20 per cent complete
(i.e., 6,00,000 / 30,00,000). Consequently, Company X recognizes the following-
As at 31 st March, 20X1
Amount in
Revenue 18,00,000
Cost of goods sold 16,00,000
Profit 2,00,000
are subsequently met. Depending on the facts and circumstances relating to the contract,
the liability recognized represents the entity’s obligation to either transfer goods or services
in the future or refund the consideration received. In either case, the liability shall be
measured at the amount of consideration received from the customer.
In accordance with the above, in the given case G Ltd. should account for the non-
refundable deposit of 1,00,000 payment as a deposit liability as none of the events
described in paragraph 15 have occurred—that is, neither the entity has received
substantially all of the consideration, nor it has terminated the contract. Consequently, in
accordance with paragraph 16, G Ltd. will continue to account for the initial deposit as well
as any future payments of principal and interest as a deposit liability until the criteria in
paragraph 9 are met (i.e. the entity is able to conclude that it is probable that the entity will
collect the consideration) or one of the events in paragraph 15 has occurred. Further,
G Ltd. will continue to assess the contract in accordance with paragraph 14 to determine
whether the criteria in paragraph 9 are subsequently met or whether the events in
paragraph 15 of Ind AS 115 have occurred.
5. Entity I is likely to provide a price concession and accept an amount less than 2 million in
exchange for the machinery. The consideration is therefore variable. The transaction price
in this arrangement is 1.75 million, as this is the amount which entity I expects to receive
after providing the concession and it is not constrained under the variable consideration
guidance. Entity I can also conclude that the collectability threshold is met for 1.75
million and therefore contract exists.
6. The transaction price is 90 per container based on entity J's estimate of total sales
volume for the year, since the estimated cumulative sales volume of 2.8 million containers
would result in a price per container of 90. Entity J concludes that based on a
transaction price of 90 per container, it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the
amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty is resolved.
Revenue is therefore recognized at a selling price of 90 per container as each container
is sold. Entity J will recognize a liability for cash received in excess of the transaction price
for the first 1 million containers sold at 100 per container (that is, 10 per container) until
the cumulative sales volume is reached for the next pricing tier and the price is
retroactively reduced.
For the quarter ended 31 st March, 20X8, entity J recognizes revenue of 63 million
(700,000 containers x 90) and a liability of 7 million [700,000 containers x ( 100 -
90)].
Entity J will update its estimate of the total sales volume at each reporting date until the
uncertainty is resolved.
7. Entity K records sales to the retailer at a transaction price of 47.50 ( 50 less 25% of
10). The difference between the per unit cash selling price to the retailers and the
A.6
Share Equity Reserves and Surplus Debt Equity Effective Revaluat Exchange Other items Money Total
application component Capital Securities Other Retained Instruments Instruments portion of ion differences of Other received
on money of Reserve Premium Reserve Earnings through other through Other Cash Flow Surplus on Comprehen against
pending compound s Comprehensive Comprehensiv Hedges translating sive Income share
allotment financial (specify Income e Income the financial (specify capital
instrument nature) statements nature)
s of a foreign
operation
Balance at the
FINANCIAL REPORTING
A.6
beginning of the
current
reporting period
Changes in
accounting
policy or prior
period errors
Restated
balance at the
beginning of the
current
reporting period
Total
comprehensive
Income for the
current year
Dividends
Transfer to
retained
earnings
Any other
change (to be
specified)
Balance at the
end of the
current
reporting period
A.7
shall be recognised as a part of retained earnings with separate disclosure of such items alongwith the relevant amounts in the Notes or shall be shown as a separate
column under Reserves and Surplus.
* similar information shall be given where no due date of payment is specified in that
case disclosure shall be from the date of the transaction.
Unbilled dues shall be disclosed separately
VIII. Loans
(i) Loans shall be classified as-
(a) Loans to related parties (giving details thereof); and
(b) Other loans (specify nature).
(ii) Loans Receivables shall be sub-classified as:
(a) Loans Receivables considered good - Secured;
(b) Loans Receivables considered good - Unsecured;
(c) Loans Receivables which have significant increase in Credit Risk; and
(d) Loans Receivables - credit impaired;
The above shall also be separately sub-classified as-
(a) Secured, considered good;
(b) Unsecured, considered good; and
(c) Doubtful.
(iii) Allowance for bad and doubtful loans shall be disclosed under the relevant heads
separately.
(iv) Loans due by directors or other officers of the company or any of them either
severally or jointly with any other persons or amounts due by firms or private
companies respectively in which any director is a partner or a director or a member
should be separately stated.
(d) Others- (specify the nature and purpose of each reserve and the amount in
respect thereof);
(Additions and deductions since last balance sheet to be shown under each of the
specified heads)
(ii) Retained Earnings represents surplus i.e. balance of the relevant column in the
Statement of Changes in Equity;
(iii) A reserve specifically represented by earmarked investments shall disclose the fact
that it is so represented;
(iv) Debit balance of Statement of Profit and Loss shall be shown as a negative figure
under the head 'retained earnings'. Similarly, the balance of 'Other Equity', after
adjusting negative balance of retained earnings, if any, shall be shown under the
head 'Other Equity' even if the resulting figure is in the negative; and
(v) Under the sub-head 'Other Equity', disclosure shall be made for the nature and
amount of each item.
E. Non-Current Liabilities
I. Borrowings
(i) borrowings shall be classified as-
(a) Bonds or debentures
(b) Term loans
(I) from banks
(lI) from other Parties
(c) Deferred payment liabilities
(d) Deposits
(e) Loans from related parties
(f) Liability component of compound financial instruments
(g) Other loans (specify nature);
(ii) borrowings shall further be sub-classified as secured and unsecured. Nature of
security shall be specified separately in each case.
(iii) where loans have been guaranteed by directors or others, the aggregate amount of
such loans under each head shall be disclosed;
(iv) bonds or debentures (along with the rate of interest, and particulars of redemption
or conversion, as the case may be) shall be stated in descending order of maturity
(a) estimated amount of contracts remaining to be executed on capital account and not
provided for;
(b) uncalled liability on shares and other investments partly paid; and
(c) other commitments (specify nature).
I. The amount of dividends proposed to be distributed to equity and preference shareholders for
the period and title related amount per share shall be disclosed separately. Arrears of fixed
cumulative dividends on irredeemable preference shares shall also be disclosed separately.
J. Where in respect of an issue of securities made for a specific purpose the whole or part of
amount has not been used for the specific purpose at the Balance sheet date, there shall be
indicated by way of note how such unutilised amounts have been used or invested.
JA. Where the company has not used the borrowings from banks and financial institutions for the
specific purpose for which it was taken at the balance sheet date, the company shall disclose
the details of where they have been used.
L. Additional Regulatory Information
(i) Title deeds of Immovable Properties not held in name of the Company
The company shall provide the details of all the immovable properties (other than properties
where the Company is the lessee and the lease agreements are duly executed in favour
of the lessee) whose title deeds are not held in the name of the company in following
format and where such immovable property is jointly held with others, details are required
to be given to the extent of the company‘s share.
(II) date and amount of fund further advanced or loaned or invested by such
Intermediaries to other intermediaries or Ultimate Beneficiaries alongwith
complete details of the ultimate beneficiaries.
(III) date and amount of guarantee, security or the like provided to or on behalf of
the Ultimate Beneficiaries
(IV) declaration that relevant provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management
Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and Companies Act has been complied with for such
transactions and the transactions are not violative of the Prevention of Money-
Laundering act, 2002 (15 of 2003).
(B) Where a company has received any fund from any person(s) or entity(ies),
including foreign entities (Funding Party) with the understanding (whether
recorded in writing or otherwise) that the company shall
(i) directly or indirectly lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any
manner whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or
(ii) provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries,
the company shall disclose the following:
(I) date and amount of fund received from Funding parties with complete details
of each Funding party.
(II) date and amount of fund further advanced or loaned or invested other
intermediaries or Ultimate Beneficiaries alongwith complete details of the
other intermediaries or ultimate beneficiaries.
(III) date and amount of guarantee, security or the like provided to or on behalf of
the Ultimate Beneficiaries
(IV) declaration that relevant provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management
Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and Companies Act has been complied with for such
transactions and the transactions are not violative of the Prevention of Money-
Laundering act, 2002 (15 of 2003).]
7. When a company applies an accounting policy retrospectively or makes a restatement of items
in the financial statements or when it reclassifies items in its financial statements, the company
shall attach to the Balance Sheet, a "Balance Sheet" as at the beginning of the earliest
comparative period presented.
8. Share application money pending allotment shall be classified into equity or liability in
accordance with relevant Indian Accounting Standards. share application money to the extent
not refundable shall be shown under the head Equity and share application money to the extent
refundable shall be separately shown under 'Other financial liabilities'.
9. Preference shares including premium received on issue, shall be classified and presented as
'Equity' or 'Liability' in accordance with the requirements of the relevant Indian Accounting
Standards. Accordingly, the disclosure and presentation requirements in that regard applicable
the Income Tax Act, 1961 (such as, search or survey or any other relevant provisions of the
Income Tax Act, 1961), unless there is immunity for disclosure under any scheme and shall
also state whether the previously unrecorded income and related assets have been properly
recorded in the books of account during the year.
(m) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Where the company covered under section 135 of the Companies Act, the following shall be
disclosed with regard to CSR activities:-
(i) amount required to be spent by the company during the year,
(ii) amount of expenditure incurred,
(iii) shortfall at the end of the year,
(iv) total of previous years shortfall,
(v) reason for shortfall,
(vi) nature of CSR activities,
(vii) details of related party transactions, e.g.,contribution to a trust controlled by the company
in relation to CSR expenditure as per relevant Accounting Standard,
(viii) where a provision is made with respect to a liability incurred by entering into a contractual
obligation, the movements in the provision during the year shall be shown separately.
(n) Details of Crypto Currency or Virtual Currency
Where the Company has traded or invested in Crypto currency or Virtual Currency during the
financial year, the following shall be disclosed:-
(i) profit or loss on transactions involving Crypto currency or Virtual Currency,
(ii) amount of currency held as at the reporting date,
(iii) deposits or advances from any person for the purpose of trading or investing in Crypto
Currency or virtual currency.
8. Changes in Regulatory Deferral Account Balances shall be presented in the Statement of Profit
and Loss in accordance with the relevant Indian Accounting Standards
1.
2.
3.
Non-
Controlling
Interest in all
subsidiaries
Associates
(Investment as
per the equity
method)
Indian
1.
2.
3.
Foreign
1.
2.
3.
Joint Venture
(Investment as
per the equity
method)
Indian
1.
2.
3.
Foreign
1.
2.
3.
Total
3. All subsidiaries, associates and joint venture (whether Indian or Foreign) will be covered under
consolidated financial statement.
4. An entity shall disclose the list of subsidiaries or associates or joint venture which have been
consolidated in the consolidated financial statement along with the reason of not consolidating.
2 3
5 6 7
9 10
11
13
14 12
15
16
17 18
19 20
21
22
23 24
25 26 27
28
29
30
ACROSS:
2 3
5 6 7
9 10
11
13
14 12
15
16
17 18
19 20
21
22
23 24
25 26 27
28
29
30
ACROSS:
10. Prior period errors include the effects of mathematical mistakes, mistakes in
applying accounting policies, oversights, or misinterpretations of facts, and
_________. (5)
13. Negative cash flow from _________ denotes that company is unable to
generate cash from its main business activity. (10)
27. Cash flows arising from _________ paid or received in the case of a financial
institution should be classified as cash flows from operating activities. ( 8)
28. Cash flows arising from taxes on income shall be ________ disclosed under
cash flows from operating activities unless they can be specifically identified
with financing and investing activities. (10)
29. The entity shall not recognise _________ when it transfers products to
customers but shall recognise those amounts received (or receivable) as a
refund liability. (7)
30. ________ is the present economic resource controlled by the entity as a result
of past events. (5)
DOWN:
4. Ind AS 113 provides guidance on how to determine fair _______ for financial
reporting purposes. (5)
12. The asset held primarily for the purpose of trading is known as _________. (7,5)
16. Ind AS 113 establishes a fair value _________ that categorizes inputs into three
levels based on their reliability and observability. (9)
17. As per conceptual framework, _________ are present obligations of the entity
to transfer economic resources. (11)
19. Ind AS are accompanied by mandatory _________ that is integral part of Ind AS
to assist entities in applying their requirements. (8)
20. An entity whose financial statements comply with Ind AS shall make an
__________ and unreserved statement of such compliance in the notes. (8)
21. Even if the ___________ is declared after the reporting period but before the
financial statements are approved for issue, it is disclosed in the notes to
financial statements. (8)
24. The exercise of prudence means that assets and income are not overstated,
and liabilities and _________ are not understated. (8)
26. _______ two are observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets.
(5)
To know the answer of the above Ind AS Puzzle, scan the QR Code