Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Some people believe that it is wrong to test new
medicines on animals. Do you think the advantages of
testing new medicines on animals outweigh the disadvantages? Due to various biological similarities to human, mammals such as monkeys and rats have been used in scientific research, especially in medicine testing. However, people are still debating about whether or not animals should be used as experimental subjects. This essay will compares both pros and cons of this argument. The major reason explaining why people should not use animals for medical research is how cruel it is. They usually have to live in harsh condition and normally would be killed at the end of the experiment, giving them no choices but death. Not only issues about humanity, but these tests also show unreliable results. Animals used for testing only have similar, not perfectly match, genes to humans, so the medicines that is safe for creatures may not work well on human bodies, which may affect negatively to our health. Though mentioned reasons prove that animal should not be used for medical studies, it is still popular due to several advantages. One of the reasons to use animal to test new medicines is that they have short life-cycles and rapid breeding. This means that it allow scientist to observe the effect of the medicine throughout the creature life as well as in the next generations, which other methods may not provide. Moreover, the animal studies give medical researchers a better idea about the effects they are likely to see on human. From complications on animals, scientists would have more data to develop their medicines, being more effective on human health. Although animal testing has a lot of benefits, which make it become a popular way to research new medicine, I personally argue that it should not be used due to its inhumanity and unreliability.