0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views1 page

Ang LADLAD LGBT Party vs. COMELEC

Uploaded by

Isang Ay-en
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views1 page

Ang LADLAD LGBT Party vs. COMELEC

Uploaded by

Isang Ay-en
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Ang LADLAD LGBT Party Vs.

COMELEC
G.R. No. 190582 April 8, 2010

FACTS: This case involves petitioner Ang Ladlad LGBT Party. The case has its roots in the
COMELEC’s refusal to accredit Ang Ladlad as a party-list organization under Republic Act (RA)
No. 7941, otherwise known as the Party-List System Act.4 Ang Ladlad is an organization
composed of men and women who identify themselves as lesbians, gays, bisexuals, or trans-
gendered individuals (LGBTs).The petitioner argued that the LGBT community is a marginalized
and under-represented sector that is particularly disadvantaged because of their sexual
orientation and gender identity; that LGBTs are victims of exclusion, discrimination, and
violence; that because of negative societal attitudes, LGBTs are constrained to hide their sexual
orientation; and that Ang Ladlad complied with the 8-point guidelines enunciated by this Court in
Ang Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor Party v. Commission on Elections. This Petition is dismissible
on moral grounds. Petitioner defines the Filipino Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender
(LGBT) Community, thus a marginalized and under-represented sector that is particularly
disadvantaged because of their sexual orientation and gender identity and proceeded to define
sexual orientation.

ISSUE:
 Whether or not the COMELEC violate Ang Ladlad's constitutional rights by denying their
petition for registration on moral and religious grounds.
 Whether or not the LGBT community a marginalized and underrepresented sector
eligible for party-list accreditation under the Philippine Constitution and Republic Act No.
7941.

RULING:
 The COMELEC violated Ang Ladlad's constitutional rights by denying their petition for
registration on moral and religious grounds
 The LGBT community a marginalized and underrepresented sector eligible for party-list
accreditation under the Philippine Constitution and Republic Act No. 7941.

You might also like