Tutorial 1 Solutions
Tutorial 1 Solutions
𝑣 00
50 = 17355, 𝑣 11
50 = 553,
01
𝑑50 = 293, 02
𝑑50 = 18, 03
𝑑50 = 196,
10 12
𝑑50 = 166, 𝑑50 = 17.
The subscripts of the above quantities indicate the age of the insured.
01 , 𝜇 02 , 𝜇 03 , 𝜇 10 , 𝜇 12 .
(a) Estimate 𝜇50 50 50 50 50
(b) Provide a 95% confidence interval for each of the quantities in part (a).
(c) It is of interest to analyze whether the force of mortality for disabled persons
is equal to 25 times that for healthy persons. Determine the answer based on
a 95% confidence interval for the quantity 𝜇5012 − 25𝜇 02 .
50
Solution:
(b) The upper 0.025-quantile of the standard normal distribution is 1.96. Hence,
the CI’s are:
01
𝜇ˆ 50
01 01
𝜇50 : 𝜇ˆ 50 ± 1.96 × √︃ = [0.01495, 0.01882];
01
𝑑50
𝜇ˆ 02
02
𝜇50 : 02
𝜇ˆ 50 ± 1.96 × √︃ 50 = [0.000558, 0.001516];
02
𝑑50
03
𝜇ˆ 50
03 03
𝜇50 : 𝜇ˆ 50 ± 1.96 × √︃ = [0.09715, 0.1288];
03
𝑑50
and variance
2. Information on the exposure, force of mortality extracted from a standard table, and
observed deaths for 10 years of age is available below:
Age 𝑥 30 35 40 45 50
𝐸 𝑥𝑐 726 1,224 1,472 1,369 985
𝜇𝑥𝑠 0.0008 0.0011 0.0016 0.0037 0.0065
𝑑𝑥 0 2 2 1 5
Age 𝑥 55 60 65 70 75
𝐸 𝑥𝑐 776 643 390 311 223
𝜇𝑥𝑠 0.0093 0.0112 0.0186 0.0335 0.0875
𝑑𝑥 10 9 6 15 16
(a) Calculate the standardized deviations (𝑧𝑥 ’s) and conduct a chi-squared test at
the 5% significance level to check whether the observed mortality follows that
of the standard table.
(b) Explain why it may not be desirable to conduct a standardized deviations test
based on five intervals on the real line, like the one in the example in the lecture
notes.
(c) Conduct a standardized deviations test at the 5% significance level based on
the interval (−2/3, 2/3), to check whether the deviations are roughly normally
distributed.
(d) Can you find any other abnormalities by inspecting the values of the 𝑧𝑥 ’s?
Solution:
√︁
(a) Using the formula 𝑧𝑥 = (𝑑𝑥 − 𝐸 𝑥𝑐 𝜇𝑥𝑠 )/ 𝐸 𝑥𝑐 𝜇𝑥𝑠 , we calculate the values as
follows:
This is much larger than 0.05; we do not have enough evidence to reject the
null hypothesis, and we conclude that it is consistent with the Bin(10, 0.5)
distribution.
(d) There are 4 positive and 6 negative deviations, and thus they are not biased
in one direction. There is one value above 1.645 in absolute value; this is
consistent with the 10% probability for a standard normal random variable to
be below −1.645 or above 1.645.
𝑖 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Growing Time, 𝑡𝑖 9 14 21 28 42 57 63 70 79
Pasture Yield, 𝑋𝑖 8.93 10.80 18.59 22.33 39.35 56.11 61.73 64.62 67.08
Two different choices are proposed for the regression function 𝑢 𝛽1 ,𝛽2 (𝑡) as follows:
(A) 𝑢 𝛽1 ,𝛽2 (𝑡) = 𝛽1 + 𝛽2 𝑡
(B) 𝑢 𝛽1 ,𝛽2 (𝑡) = 𝛽1 /(1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡 )
Answer the following questions for each of the above regression functions (A) and
(B).
(i) Calculate the maximum likelihood estimates ( 𝛽ˆ1 , 𝛽ˆ2 , ν̂) of (𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , ν)
(ii) Let 𝐼 (𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , ν) denote the Fisher information matrix. Calculate 𝐼 (𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , ν) −1
Solution:
𝑋𝑖 = 𝛽1 + 𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 + 𝜖𝑖
For function B
𝑛 2
𝑛 ∑︁ 1 𝛽1
𝑆(𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , ν) = − ln ν − 𝑋𝑖 −
2
𝑖=1
2ν 1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖
𝑛 2
𝜕 𝑛 ∑︁ 1 𝛽1
𝑆(𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , ν) = − + 𝑋𝑖 − =0
𝜕 𝛽1 2ν
𝑖=1
2ν 2 1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖
𝑛
𝜕 ∑︁
−𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 −1 𝛽1
𝑆(𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , ν) = (1 + 14𝑒 ) 𝑋𝑖 − =0
𝜕 𝛽2
𝑖=1
1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖
14𝛽1 𝑡𝑖 𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖
𝜕 1 𝛽1
𝑆(𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , ν) = − 𝑋𝑖 − =0
𝜕ν ν 1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 (1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 ) 2
Solving the above equation numerically, we have 𝛽ˆ1 = 72.28575, 𝛽ˆ2 = 0.0680184, ν̂ =
0.903530
(ii) Let β = (𝛽1 , 𝛽2 )
𝑛
𝜕 −1
∑︁ 𝜕𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 )
ln 𝑓 (X |β, ν) = ν (𝑋𝑖 − 𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 )
𝜕β 𝜕β
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝜕 𝑛 1 ∑︁
ln 𝑓 (X |β, ν) = − + 2 (𝑋𝑖 − 𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 ) 2
𝜕ν 2ν 2ν
" 𝑖=1 #
2 𝑛
𝜕𝜇 (𝑡 ) 𝜕𝜇 (𝑡 ) 𝜕 2 𝜇 (𝑡 )
𝜕 ∑︁ β 𝑖 β 𝑖 β 𝑖
ln 𝑓 (X |β, ν) = ν −1 − + (𝑋𝑖 − 𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 ))
𝜕β𝜕β ⊤ 𝜕β 𝜕β ⊤ 𝜕β𝜕β ⊤
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝜕2 1 ∑︁ 𝜕𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 )
ln 𝑓 (X |β, ν) = − (𝑋𝑖 − 𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 ))
𝜕β𝜕ν ν2 𝜕β
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝜕2 𝑛 1 ∑︁
ln 𝑓 (X |β, ν) = 2 − 3 (𝑋𝑖 − 𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 )) 2
𝜕ν 2 2ν ν 𝑖=1
Hence the Fisher information matrix is
ν −1 P𝑛 𝜕𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 ) 𝜕𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 )
0
I (β, ν) =
𝑖=1
𝜕β 𝜕β ⊤
𝑛
0 2
2ν
and its inverse is
P 𝜕𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 ) 𝜕𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 ) −1
ν 𝑛
𝑖=1 ⊤
0
I (β, ν) −1 =
𝜕β 𝜕β
2ν 2
0
𝑛
For function A 𝜇β (𝑡) = 𝛽1 + 𝛽2 𝑡,
𝜕𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 ) 𝜕𝜇β (𝑡𝑖 )
1 𝑡𝑖
=
𝜕β 𝜕β ⊤ 𝑡𝑖 𝑡𝑖2
We have the
P𝑛 −1
𝑖=1 𝑡𝑖
© 𝑛 ª
P ν P𝑛ν 2 ®®
𝑛 0 3.79 −0.06718 0
I (β, ν) −1
= 𝑖=1 𝑡𝑖 𝑖=1 𝑡𝑖 ® = −0.06718 0.000158 0
« ν ν ¬ 0 0 15.65
2
2ν
0
𝑛
14𝛽1 𝑡𝑖 𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖
(1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 ) −2 (1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 ) −1 ·
𝜕2 𝜇
© ª
β (𝑡𝑖 ) (1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 ) 2 ®®
= 2
𝜕β𝜕β ⊤ 14𝛽1 𝑡𝑖 𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 14𝛽1 𝑡𝑖 𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖
®
(1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽 2 𝑡 𝑖 ) −1 ®
« (1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽2 𝑡𝑖 ) 2 (1 + 14𝑒 −𝛽 2 𝑡 𝑖 ) 2
¬
Hence the inverse of
1.5428 −0.001817 0
−1
I (β, ν) = −0.001817 2.573 0 ,
0 0 0.1814
(v) Let 𝑇𝐴 = 𝜇ˆ 𝐴 (𝑎) be the unbiased estimator of 𝜇β𝐴 (𝑎) and 𝑇𝐵 = 𝜇ˆ 𝐵 (𝑏) be the
β̂ β̂
unbiased estimator of 𝜇β𝐵 (𝑏). Then,
𝜕𝜇 𝐴
𝜕𝛽
1
𝜕𝜇 𝐴 𝜕𝜇 𝐴 𝜕𝜇 𝐴 𝐴 𝐴
−1 𝜕𝜇
Var(𝑇𝐴 )| 𝑎=0 = Var(𝜇β𝐴 (0)) ≈ I (β, ν)
𝜕 𝛽1 𝜕 𝛽2 𝜕ν 𝜕 𝛽2
𝜕𝜇 𝐴
𝜕ν
1
−1 ª
© 𝐴
= 1 𝑎 0 I (β, ν) 𝑎 ®
0
« ¬𝑎=0
= 3.8529