1 s2.0 S0167577X06006550 Main
1 s2.0 S0167577X06006550 Main
www.elsevier.com/locate/matlet
Influence of crystallite size on the hardness and fatigue life of steel samples
coated with electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni–W alloys
K.R. Sriraman 1 , S. Ganesh Sundara Raman ⁎, S.K. Seshadri
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai-600 036, India
Received 6 July 2005; accepted 23 May 2006
Available online 14 June 2006
Abstract
The present work deals with the effect of crystallite size on the hardness and fatigue life of steel samples coated with electrodeposited
nanocrystalline Ni–W alloys. The Ni–W alloys were electrodeposited on steel samples at four different current densities (0.05, 0.10. 0.15 and 0.20 A/
cm2) and at a temperature of 75 °C. The crystallite size of the deposit reduced (from 40 to 13 nm) with an increase in current density (from 0.05 to
0.20 A/cm2) due to an increase in the tungsten content (from 0.72 to 9.33 at.%). Ni–W alloy containing 9.33 at.% W and having a crystallite size of
13 nm exhibited the maximum hardness of 638 HV. The alloys, with the crystallite size in the range 40–13 nm, followed the direct Hall–Petch
relation, i.e. hardness increased with a reduction in the crystallite size. The coated samples exhibited inferior fatigue lives compared to uncoated
samples. This may be attributed to the presence of tensile residual stresses and inherent microcracks in the coatings. Among the specimens coated
with Ni–W alloys, as the crystallite size decreased, the fatigue life of the specimen increased owing to the increase in hardness values.
© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Table 1
Plating bath formulation and for Ni–W alloy
Chemicals mol/l Purpose
Nickel sulfate (NiSO4·7H2O) 0.06 Ni source
Sodium tungstate (Na2WO4·2H2O) 0.15 W source
Trisodium citrate dihydrate 0.30 Complexer for Ni and W
(Na3C6H5O7·2H2O)
Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) 0.50 To increase current
efficiency
Boric acid (HBO3) 1.00 Buffer
Sodium bromide (NaBr) 0.15 Conductivity
Sodium saccharin 0.08 Stress reliever
(COC6H4SO2NNa·2H2O)
Sodium laurel sulfate (CH3)(CH2) 0.0867 Surfactant
10CH2OSO3Na
4. Conclusions
1. An increase in current density resulted in an increase in the [7] H. Iwasaki, K. Higashi, T.G. Nieh, Scripta Materialia 50 (2004) 395.
tungsten content of the coating leading to a reduction in [8] H. Somekawa, T.G. Nieh, K. Higashi, Scripta Materialia 50 (2004) 1361.
[9] M. Ma, V.S. Donepudi, G. Sandi, Y.K. Sun, J. Prakash, Electrochimica
crystallite size. Acta 49 (2004) 4411.
2. Ni–W alloy containing 9.33 at.% W and having a crystallite [10] O. Younes, L. Zhu, Y. Rosenberg, Y.S. Diamand, E. Gileadi, Langmuir 17
size of 13 nm exhibited the maximum hardness of 638 HV. (2001) 8270.
All Ni–W alloys followed the direct Hall–Petch relation, i.e. [11] T. Yamasaki, Scripta Materialia 44 (2001) 1497.
[12] D. Clark, D. Wood, U. Erb, Nanostructured Materials 9 (1997) 755.
the hardness of the alloys increased with a reduction in the
[13] A.M. El-Sherik, U. Erb, G. Palumbo, K.T. Aust, Scripta Metallurgica et
crystallite size. Materialia 27 (1992) 1185.
3. The coated samples exhibited inferior fatigue lives compared [14] D.G. Morris, Mechanical Behavior of Nanostructured Materials, . Mater.
to uncoated samples. This may be attributed to the presence Sci. Foundations, vol. 2, Trans Tech Publ., Aedermannsdarf, 1998, p. 1.
of tensile residual stresses and inherent microcracks in the [15] K.S. Kumar, H. Van Swygenhoven, S. Suresh, Acta Materialia 51 (2003)
coatings. Among the specimens coated with Ni–W alloys, as 5743.
[16] T. Hanlon, Y.N. Kwon, S. Suresh, Scripta Materialia 49 (2003) 675.
the crystallite size decreased, the fatigue life of the specimen [17] K.R. Sriraman, S. Ganesh Sundara Raman, S.K. Seshadri, Materials
increased owing to the increase in hardness values. Science & Engineering. A, Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructure
and Processing 418 (2006) 303.
References [18] L. Zhu, O. Younes, N. Ashkensey, Y.S. Diamand, E. Gileadi, Applied
Surface Science 200 (2002) 1.
[1] T. Yamasaki, R. Tomohira, Y. Ogino, P. Schlossmacher, K. Ehrlich, Plating [19] A. Brenner, Electrodeposition of Alloys: Principles and Practice, vol. I,
and Surface Finishing 87 (2000) 148. Academic Press, New York, 1963.
[20] A. Pertuz, J.A. Berrios, E.S.P. Cabrera, Surface and Coatings Technology
[2] Y. Shacham-Diamond, Y. Svendlov, Journal of Microelectronics Engi-
neering 50 (2000) 525. 133–134 (2000) 572.
[3] T. Yamasaki, P. Schlossmacher, K. Ehrlich, Y. Ogino, Nanostructured [21] G. Contreras, C. Fajardo, J.A. Berrios, A. Pertuz, J. Chitty, H. Hintermann,
Materials 10 (1998) 375. E.S. Puchi, Thin Solid Films 355–356 (1999) 480.
[22] J.A. Diaz, M. Passarelli, J.A. Berrios, E.S. Puchi, Surface and Coatings
[4] T. Nasu, M. Sakurai, T. Kamiyama, T. Usuki, O. Uemura, T. Yamasaki,
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 312–314 (2002) 319. Technology 149 (2002) 45.
[5] C.A. Schuh, T.G. Nieh, H. Iwasaki, Acta Materialia 51 (2003) 431. [23] C. Guzman, N. Diaz, J.A. Berrios, A. Pertuz, E.S. Puchi, Surface and
[6] D.B. Lee, J.H. Ko, S.C. Kwon, Material Science & Engineering. A, Structural Coatings Technology 133–134 (2000) 561.
Materials: Properties, Microstructure and Processing 380 (2004) 73.