Project Planning
Project Planning
Some of the concepts that we will examine closely include Project Quality Management and Value
Engineering, Project Management Information System and the Work Breakdown Structure. We will
also understand the Deliverables of Project Management, the different types of Organisational
Structures and the processes involved in Estimating Activity Duration and Costs and the importance
of Identifying Critical Activities and Reviews in a project.
Objectives
Upon completion of this unit, you will be able to:
Describe the various functions performed in the Project Planning and Execution Phases
Identify the various types of organisational structures
Explain the process of estimating activity duration and costs
Describe the two popular estimation techniques—PERT and CPM
Explain Project Quality Management and Value Engineering
Describe the Project Management Information System
Create a Work Breakdown Structure
Identify the different types of reviews in a project
Organisational Structure
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Project-based Organisations
3. Organisational Forms
4. Organisational Forms and the Role of the Project Managers
5. The Project Management Office (PMO)
6. The Project Management Maturity Model (PMMM)
7. Summary
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Describe the different types of organisational systems and the rationale for them
Identify the various types of organisational structures
Explain the roles and responsibilities of a Project Manager in each of the different types of
organisational structures
Apply the principles of a project management office (PMO)
Rank the degree of project management maturity—of an organisation—using PMMM
Introduction
In the previous segment, we learned about the concept of portfolio management. In this segment,
we will focus on understanding the different types of organisational structures and their influence on
the project life cycle.
One of the emerging trends for carrying out business today is for us to focus our efforts around
projects in their various forms. Management scholars are of the view that much of the work of the
future will centre on knowledge generation. This will be performed in semi-permanent networks by
small, project-oriented teams.
In this segment, we will examine the different types of project-based organisations and what their
influence has been on the practicing project manager. We will look more closely at the role the
Project Manager plays in each organisation form (pure project organisation, functional organisation
and matrix organisation). Taking the concept of ‘organisational structures’ a little further, we will also
discuss the concept of the project management office (PMO). Additionally, we will touch on a
concept that is gaining widespread popularity, the project management maturity model (PMMM).
Project-based Organisations
Project-based organisations are firms whose primary means of doing business is by projects.
Typically, these organisations are further classified into one of the following two organisational
forms:
Non-project driven
These are organisations that earn revenue by performing projects. It is apparent that many
organisations that earn revenue by performing projects often do not themselves have strong project
management methodologies in place. With the lack of sufficient systems to assist with tracking and
reporting, executing project management successfully proves to be quite difficult in these
organisations.
Project driven
These are organisations that earn revenue by adopting management by projects. Organisations that
are project driven have more refined management structures in place and they benefit from the
management aspect of project management. Typically, these organisations gather information from
various departments regularly and track and report on multiple concurrent projects simultaneously.
Organisational Forms
Project-driven organisations have a tremendous impact on the projects that they undertake. The
nature of the organisation too impacts the project output and the Project Manager’s approach. Now,
let us look more closely at the role the Project Manager plays in each of these organisation forms.
Functional organisation
Matrix organisation
In a matrix organization structure, there is a fine blend of, both, the pure and functional organisation
structures. Here, the employees have a dual reporting structure, wherein the authority of the
functional manager flows vertically downwards and that of the Project Manager flows sideways.
In a projectised organisation structure, the project manager has all the power and authority and
everybody directly report to the project manager. Here, either no functional manager exists, or if one
exists, he/she will have a very limited role.
According to the Project Management Institute (PMI), the responsibilities of the project manager
increase as a firm goes from a functional, to a matrix, to a pure, or projectised, organisational form.
Functional organisation
Matrix organisation
In a matrix organisation, the role of the Project Manager can be that of a coordinator or of a Project
Manager, depending on the maturity of the matrix structure.
In a weak matrix form, the Project Manager will, most likely, serve in the capacity of a coordinator,
having limited:
In a balanced matrix form, the Project Manager will have increasingly more influence on the project.
In a strong matrix form, a Project Manager will more likely be a full-time Project Manager with a high
level of authority and responsibility over the project personnel and each of the decisions that are
made.
Definition
A project management office (PMO) is a group formed within an organisation for the express
purpose of supporting project management efforts.
Establishment
Composition
Project managers
Project administrators
Project schedulers
Planners
Project management software experts
Project management support personnel (archivists, clericals, secretaries, etc.)
Most PMOs are led by a Project Director who reports to the Vice-President, or the President of a
company. Under the leadership of the Project Director, subordinates may be comprised of Senior
Project Managers, Project Managers, Project Administrators and Project Schedulers or Planners.
Benefits
The PMO:
Using the lessons learned through project meetings and project archives, a PMO will mature,
improving its methodologies and increasing the group's effectiveness.
Responsibilities of a PMO
PMOs function as independent departments just like any other line organisation such as marketing
or accounting. On the other hand, depending on the level of maturity relating to project management
in the organisation, the PMO may exist within another group.
Regardless of where the PMO resides, at the conclusion of a project, most project managers
operating within a PMO will feel safe going back ‘home’, or into their PMO, until the next project
assignment comes their way.
In most cases, the PMO is partly or fully responsible for managing the project portfolio. If a PMO
exists, the project managers will most likely have the appropriate level of knowledge to analyse the
portfolio of projects and determine the appropriate amount of resource usage across all active and
planned projects.
Additionally, using the information from the portfolio, the PMO will be able to work with the higher
management to ensure that all efforts being pursued are part of the organisation’s overall strategic
goals.
Pros of a PMO
Templates
An example of using consistent methodologies by the PMO can be illustrated by the use of
templates. When the same template(s) is used consistently from project to project, others in the
organisation who have a stake in the project(s) will immediately know what to expect when
reviewing reports, responsibility matrices or meeting agendas.
The use of consistent methodologies and ‘boilerplates’ across an organisation, coordinated by the
efforts of a PMO, is particularly important when resources are shared across multiple projects as
often as they are. Imagine having to learn new meeting formalities, the manner in which
responsibilities on a project are documented or even rating a meeting's effectiveness in a different
way every time you work on a different project.
Earned value
Another example of where consistent methodologies may come into play is in the use of earned
value. The PMO may also establish the manner in which risk is analysed and mitigated, as well as
the manner in which metrics or indices are used to determine a project's performance across all
projects in the organisation. These metrics or indices can be unique to the firm as they fulfil its
strategic vision.
Cons of a PMO
While a PMO can help to support the consistent use of a standard set of project management best
practices, there can be a few disadvantages if one is not careful in setting up such an office.
Resources
Establishing a PMO requires additional resources and efforts by project managers in order to
maintain consistent policies and procedures. These additional efforts, if taken to the extreme, could
side-track project managers from focusing on their specific project goals.
Focus
In essence, the Project Manager might tend to focus on meeting strict reporting requirements in lieu
of actually getting the work done.
Additional time and money will need to be budgeted in order to keep the PMO running, and these
funds and time have to come from some place—usually from project efforts. Furthermore, with a
PMO in place, additional layers of hierarchy sometimes need to be navigated by project
management personnel as well as other members of the organisation.
Experience
If the PMO is not well established or respected in the organisation, members of the group may be
subjected to negative experiences. Their association with the PMO may compromise functional
career paths (‘we’ versus ‘them’). Others may view the PMO as a territorial group that tries to
impose too much control over the company's projects—a lack of freedom to get the actual work
done, especially when deviations from planned effort (work) are essential.
Despite some of these caveats, a successfully established and run PMO can set one organisation
or one division in an organisation apart from any other in consistently achieving successful results in
the areas of project scope, time, cost, and quality.
Similar to other quality initiatives such as International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and
Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute’s Capabilities Maturity Model (CMM),
which analyses an organisation’s maturity of software processes, the project management maturity
model (PMMM) assists organisations in implementing and ‘growing’ best project management
procedures.
The PMMM operates on the assumption that, as an organisation grows in maturity and moves from
one level to the next, efficiencies are gained resulting in higher profit margins and more projects
being completed on time. Ultimately, the notion is that by implementing PMMM and striving to reach
level 5, an organisation will achieve a competitive advantage. Although there is little empirical
evidence to support this claim, many organisations are looking for ways to reduce the risk of project
failure by implementing maturity models.
A study published by the Standish Group in their CHAOS report for 2004 indicates that project
success rates have increased by 34 percent. Unfortunately, the study also found that the total dollar
waste in the U.S. alone was USD 55 billion with USD 17 billion resulting in cost overruns. On top of
these astonishing results, these findings were only representative of the IT industry. Given these
figures, it is not surprising why many organisations are implementing PMMM.
PMMM closely resembles the CMM in that it ranks an organisation based on five different levels of
maturity. Each level, as it ascends from 1 to 5, represents a greater degree of project management
maturity.
You can think of the five levels as building blocks or steps. As an organisation progresses in the
field of project management, it builds on the cumulative knowledge of the lower level it previously
attained. Typically, organisations do not skip levels. Rather, they incrementally build one level at a
time.
Initial
This is the default level for all organisations. Policies and procedures are not well defined. Each
person or project operates according to his or her own standards. Success is not achieved by
implementation of best practices.
Repeatable
Basic processes are established to track cost, schedule and performance data. Project
management methodologies are established to the point where cost, schedule and performance can
be tracked. Projects tracking on similar tasks to predecessor projects can be implemented in a
repeatable fashion.
Defined
Processes are documented and standardised across all projects. Project management best practice
processes are well documented and are implemented in a consistent manner throughout the
organisation.
Managed
Processes and products use quantifiable metrics. Details of the processes and quality from project
to project are measurable and quantifiable.
Optimised
Continuous improvement is implemented using metrics established and re-established from level 4.
Data collected are analysed to determine where efficiencies can be gained. Continuous process
improvement policies are implemented consistently and thoroughly in the organisation.
In conjunction with ranking an organisation on one of the five levels, PMMM also takes into account
the level reached by an organisation in each of PMI’s knowledge areas listed in the Project
Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK).
Project integration
Scope
Time
Cost
Quality
Human resource
Communications
Risk
Procurement management
Each of the knowledge areas is further broken down into smaller and more refined sub-areas for
additional evaluation. For instance, risk is classified into the following sub-areas:
Risk identification
Risk quantification
Risk response development
Risk control
Risk documentation
Some of the benefits of maturity models are based on the fact that they focus on incremental
improvements based on quality initiatives. Being incremental is the key factor, which allows
organisations to reach levels of maturity bit by bit. Assessments are generally easy to conduct via
paper or electronic surveys. The repeatable processes that PMMM emphasises allow organisations
to measure progress over a period of time.
However, there has been some criticism regarding these models. Some observers feel that the
models are not robust enough to handle change. These models help the companies to identify the
problems, but not necessarily to implement plans for resolution. Perhaps too much emphasis is
placed on processes without respect for people or the organisational aspects.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
project-based organisations are firms whose primary means of doing business is by projects;
the three types of organisational forms are matrix organisation, functional organisation and
pure (projectised) organisation;
the responsibilities of the project manager increase as a firm goes from a functional, to a
matrix, to a pure, or projectised, organisational form;
project management office (PMO) is a group formed within an organisation for the express
purpose of supporting project management efforts; and
PPPM operates on the assumption that if it is implemented in an organisation and it strives
to reach level 5 then the organisation will gain a competitive advantage.
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment, we learned about the different organisational structures. In this segment,
we will examine some of the contemporary issues that are common to most organisations.
As project management practices expand around the globe, project managers need to become
more sensitive to a variety of factors that impact the manner in which projects are executed. These
factors involve issues such as company culture (the spoken and unspoken rules under which
businesses operate), nationality (the myriad customs and traditions followed by various ethnic
groups around the world) and time zone changes from region to region.
Corporate Culture
Just as the many projects that organisations undertake are unique, so too is the 'corporate culture'
under which project management is implemented.
It is important for project managers to understand the culture of an organisation before trying to
embark on the execution of a project. This holds true for both the organisations which formally 'own'
the project as well as the organisation(s) that will contribute to the project (contractors, suppliers and
even clients).
Before a Project Manager establishes the set of procedures that the project will follow, it is
imperative that the PM makes sure that these rules are in synch with the corporate climate. A simple
example of corporate culture can be understood by looking at the operating hours of employees.
While an organisation may post that normal operating hours are from 8.00 am – 5.00 pm with an
hour’s break for lunch, corporate culture may dictate that acceptable hours are from 7.30 am to 6.00
pm with leeway for employees to take an hour and a half break over lunch. Further, corporate policy
may dictate that business casual is appropriate attire, but corporate culture may dictate that wearing
denims on all week days is acceptable.
Additionally, meetings—that are scheduled to begin promptly at the time for which they are set—
may be dictated by a more casual corporate culture that indicates strolling into a meeting 10
minutes late is acceptable behaviour.
Another factor that may influence a Project Manager's success rate has to do with understanding
the role of the PM. Before embarking on the project, PMs should grasp a very clear picture of their
responsibilities, authority and corporate politics. If the PM is considered a coordinator of sorts, it is
important to understand to what extent their authority carries.
Without taking the time to understand these 'unspoken' nuances of the corporate culture, project
managers may find themselves frustrated by lack of respect for policies and in turn may frustrate the
project team.
Most often, these pressures are not fully understood by/or clearly communicated to the Project
Manager. It takes a special breed to navigate the political framework of organisations to fully
comprehend the constraints under which a project is managed. Project managers are sometimes
forced to delicately tip toe around these constraints in order to balance the needs of the organisation
as well as the end client.
Global Issues
While the limitation of multinational teams is being reduced by technology, project managers have
new challenges to face when managing teams around the world. Such factors such as time zone
issues can make coordinating deliverables an organisational challenge. Scheduling meetings with
respect to multiple time zones may pose a test in creativity.
Further, allowing teams to communicate with each other in order to build team cohesiveness is yet
another issue. While email has allowed teams to communicate at any time of the day, it is not
always the most effective means to send instructions or status. It is sometimes necessary to
communicate in real-time.
Therefore, while one team may need to get up at the crack of dawn, another may need to stay up till
the wee hours of the night in order to hold a conversation via telephone or on-line chatting.
Further, not all regions of the world are on the same playing field when it comes to technology.
Consideration needs to be given to internet connections and other limitations of technological
advancements.
Working with international teams may necessitate face-to-face meetings, which means that travel
costs will need to be built into the project's budget. Additionally, cost estimates may be influenced by
currency conversion. Variability in exchange rates and tracking budget costs will require a project
manager who has meticulous attention to detail. Additionally, government regulations of various
countries may dictate minimum payment practices.
Even further, the maximum number of hours an employee can work per week may also be limited
by government laws and or local associations such as unions. Respect to recognised holidays and
vacation time is another factor that will impact a project's success. Quality standards can be a
difficult issue to communicate. Expectations in one country can be vastly different from those in
another.
Additionally, governments may require that certain quality standard tests be performed before an
item can be released to the end users. As is the case with time being a driving factor, quality may be
of utmost importance in one culture, yet a low priority in another.
Further, language barriers can also create communication difficulties. A project manager who works
with teams that span the globe needs to be an extremely effective communicator. Certain deadline
driven vernacular (for example, immediately, as soon as possible and so on) can have different
meanings in different cultures. Time is not always a driving force in every culture. In some cultures,
the overall goal of the project is more important than getting the project completed as scheduled.
In summary, some of the global issues that project managers need to consider are:
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
it is important for project managers to understand the culture of an organisation before trying
to embark on the execution of a project;
projects operate under various internal and external pressures, mostly from stakeholders
with vested interests;
in the era of globalisation, many projects have a global reach and accordingly give rise to
many global issues which need to be managed with sensitivity.
Organising a Project
Table of Contents
1. Objectives
2. Introduction
3. Recruiting the Project Manager
4. Recruiting the Project Team
5. Organising the Project Team
6. Assigning Work Packages
7. Computer Software Applications
6. Summary
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment, we learned about some of the contemporary organisational issues faced
by most organisations. In this segment, we will focus on understanding the organising phase of a
project. We will learn the strategies for selecting the Project Manager followed by those for selecting
the Project Team. Once the Project Team is in place, we will see how to determine a strategy for
organising the team. We will see the impact of cultural dimensions in organising our work activity.
Just like breaking the project down into smaller, more manageable pieces, we need to assign the
various pieces or work packages to responsible individuals, sometimes known as project or
technical leads. What are the work packages and how will the assignments be made to them? We
will understand this as we discuss the process of assigning work packages.
Finally, when discussing computer software packages, we will practice assigning different resources
to project activities and evaluating the consequences of making these assignments. We will also
learn how to identify if a resource is overloaded and how to manage such resource usage.
Ideally, recruitment of the Project Manager should begin during planning, or very early in the
defining phase of the project, or alternatively, as soon as possible. The earlier a Project Manager is
identified, the greater the advantage he or she will have in getting up-to-speed in managing the
project. If a Project Manager is identified during the planning phase, he or she will be able to
participate in development of the project proposal and become more intimately familiar with project
budgets, resource requirements, negotiation of the project scope and the type of contractors and
other external resources that will be used.
Additionally, he or she will most likely have access to internal project contacts and fully understand
the constraints that must be considered in planning the project, and throughout the project’s
duration. Further, if the project manager is recruited early on in the project development phase, he
or she may be able to begin forming relationships with key stakeholders (for example, the various
clients and the executive management). Having a solid relationship with the client will help the
project run more smoothly throughout, especially when adjustments have to be made.
Unfortunately, not all projects run according to our ‘ideal world’. Frequently, project managers are
afterthoughts. Management may not even begin to think about the Project Manager until after a
project has begun or a deliverable has been promised to a client. The focus has been on what must
be done rather than who is going to do it.
As we have already seen, many projects are selected when the executive management asks an
individual to ‘look into something’, also known as the ‘sacred cow’ (a type of project selection
model). Management may be thinking of one person to plan the project, but yet another to lead or
direct it. Or, they might not even have thought ahead sufficiently for this phase or who will direct the
effort.
Instructions must always be clear, but especially when an individual sets off to accomplish a project
without initially identifying a Project Manager to lead it. A more favourable situation almost always
exists when the individual asked to ‘look into’ a project is also the Project Manager. In other cases, it
might be difficult to assign a leader before work begins on a project, due to the difficulty in finding a
suitable Project Manager.
Additionally, due to turnover or reassignment, project managers may come onto, or be removed
from, a project at various phases or milestones throughout its life. The textbook, Meredith, J. R. and
S. J. Mantel, Project Management: A Managerial Approach. 6th ed. John Wiley and Sons, 2006,
discusses a situation where a chemist on a project serves as the Project Manager during the
beginning phases, and then a marketer assumes the Project Manager role during the later stages of
the project lifecycle. The organisational structure and processes that are established within the
organisation will ultimately dictate recruitment of the Project Manager.
Learning curve
One obvious disadvantage of assigning a project manager at a later stage in the project lifecycle is
the learning curve the Project Manager will face. He or she will have to spend significant time
gaining familiarity with the project (that is, reading through contracts, understanding the project
scope, deciphering the project culture and establishing himself or herself as the leader and gaining
respect from team members).
Relationship management
The Project Manager will have to build a relationship with the client. If a Project Manager is
assigned to a project to replace another who has left, the relationship management may be even
more difficult due to previous, established processes with which the client is familiar. Those
assuming the later leadership role must be aware of the sensitivity of the situation, and the
requirement for early communication with everyone involved early in the management or leadership
of the project.
Ideally, in this situation—which is not the most favourable—the departing Project Manager can
introduce (through a variety of mechanisms) the replacing individual to all the important
stakeholders including, obviously, the Project Team. As much overlap as possible between
incoming and outgoing project managers is always advisable.
When recruiting the Project Manager, several criteria regarding skills-set must be considered.
Depending on the perceived level of project difficulty, management must analyse the level of
industry and technical expertise required for the project.
Managing a space shuttle launch for the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA) of
the US requires a Project Manager with a different skillset than someone charged with the duty of
constructing a new highway or developing an entire complement of microwave oven products for a
home appliance manufacturer. Conversely, someone who understands the nuances of organising a
conference may be well suited to manage a company’s 100th year celebration.
appropriate level of expertise to anticipate problems and identify contingency plans before
problems become fully developed;
appropriate level of industry knowledge for the project;
ability to switch from being a specialist to being a generalist in order to look at the project
from a bird’s eye view and integrate all of the pieces of the puzzle to form one cohesive and
successful effort; and
passionate about the project assigned to them, enthusiastic almost to a fault—and become
the champion or the main spokesperson for it.
Leadership skills
Management must also consider if the candidate is capable of leading a team of 50, 100 or possibly
even 1,000 team members. Will the Project Manager have the appropriate level of interpersonal
skills to manage the various personalities that will comprise a team? Management must be sure that
the team will accept and recognise the assigned person as their leader. Furthermore, he or she
must have excellent communication skills to ensure that all team members understand and commit
to the project objectives.
The Project Manager must be able to ‘rally the troops’ when things get tough. They must promote
team spirit and assist others in navigating complex issues. They must be able to identify which tasks
are best delegated to others and which tasks must be managed single-handedly.
If the project requires the use of outside contractors, management will need to consider if the
Project Manager has the appropriate level of leadership skills to assimilate the contracted resources
with other internal team members and co-ordinate the efforts between them.
Part of the leadership skill is the ability to make sound decisions. The Project Manager must be able
to obtain data from converging areas and filter the appropriate information to formulate a solution
approach.
Communication skills
A Project Manager must possess effective communication skills, or he or she is unlikely to get the
job done. Without sufficient communication, tasks cannot be completed, unless through luck. And
luck is never a substitute for effective management or organisation in a project (although sometimes
it helps). The Project Manager is responsible to the organisation, the client, his/her team
members and other important stakeholders. He/she must ensure that the appropriate project details
are communicated to each stakeholder group.
Presentation skills
Organisational skills
The Project Manager should also have excellent organisational skills. He or she should put project
standards and methodologies into place, and should clearly articulate project expectations so that
all team members and stakeholders understand their various roles and responsibilities.
The Project Manager may even consider developing a responsibility matrix to assist in
communicating these expectations. With the matrix in place, key project players can clearly see who
to go to for what and identify for which items they are accountable.
Further, the Project Manager should think big enough to plan the project effort at a high level, as
well as be detail oriented enough to not miss important project requirements. The Project Manager
should ensure that his or her project goals are in line with the company objectives without
compromising client expectations.
Administrative skills
The Project Manager should also be able to implement various administrative functions required in
successful project completion. Whether the Project Manager is responsible for carrying these out
single-handedly or has support staff such as a project administrator, they should be able to control
such tasks.
For all these to happen, the Project Manager should possess excellent communication skills.
Other skills
Apart from the above skills, a Project Manager is also expected to:
Not only will the project and its team have a culture of its own, cultural influences exist within the
organisation and between the organisation and its various stakeholders. Some of the cultural issues
are:
The dictionary defines culture as ‘the total pattern of human behaviour and its products embodied in
thought, speech, action and artefacts.’ Culture is dependent on the capacity for learning and
transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations using tools, language and systems of abstract
thought. Culture involves the body of customary beliefs, social norms and material traits constituting
a distinct, complex tradition for its members.
No matter how much we understand about another’s culture, especially when participation involves
team members across international boundaries, our general understanding is just the tip of the
cultural iceberg.
As seen in the cultural iceberg below, no matter what we think we understand about working with a
different person and the influence of his or her culture, we have only scratched the surface in
understanding all we need to know about the person and how culture influences so much of the
their behaviour. A well-grounded understanding of culture goes a long way towards developing an
understanding of a person’s behaviour and why it differs from ours.
Characteristics – in a nutshell
The following list identifies some of the characteristics, which should be considered when recruiting
a Project Manager, to ensure that he or she will be a good fit for the project.
Last, but not least, management should consider the cost of the individual assigned to direct the
effort. The following questions should be addressed:
Further, management must look at their overall strategic goals to determine if hiring a full-time
Project Manager is in line with their organisation’s growth model or if recruiting internally makes the
most strategic sense.
One of the first items to consider when assigning the team to a project is the quantity and type of
resources required in order to meet the project objectives and schedule. In conjunction with
determining the quantity of resources required, the Project Manager also has to take into
consideration the project budget.
If the number of resources required to meet the schedule objectives exceeds the project budget, the
Project Manager has to reassess the current plan. He or she may attempt to renegotiate the project
terms and conditions with the client, implement creative planning techniques, such as project
crashing and project fast tracking, or see if alternative resources, with a more advanced level of
expertise, can be obtained to expedite the schedule or meet the costs or other objectives.
In reference to creative planning techniques, team skill sets will first need to be analysed.
1. If the project to be undertaken is similar to projects that have been executed in the past, it is
likely that the same or similar resources can be used on the current project.
2. If the project is a new undertaking or attempts to use a new technology, alternative
resources may have to be sought.
3. Should a company be fortunate enough to have the appropriate level of expertise within the
organisation, the project manager (or decision-making body) will need to determine if the
resource(s) are available.
When identifying resources to work on a project, the team skills set has to be analysed and
considerations have to be made to match these with the requirements of the project. Then, we need
to go out and recruit the right individuals for the project.
Some of the characteristics of an individual that a Project Manager would consider when recruiting
team members are as follows:
For example, if a Project Manager is recruiting a team leader, he or she is likely to look for someone
with leadership qualities and prior experience of managing teams. On the other hand, if a Project
Manager is looking for say a designer, he or she may look for someone who is able to add creative
flare to the project.
If you were the Project Manager, how would you recruit a project team? How would you source for
the team and from where would you procure your resources?
As in recruiting a Project Manager, consideration will also have to be given to the appropriate fit of
resources assigned with the rest of the Project Team. Additionally, the Project Manager may need
to negotiate with functional managers for the resources necessary to work on the project. The
Project Manager or the decision-making body may need to make concessions regarding personnel
recruitment policy depending on project constraints, or constraints imposed by other on-going, and
possibly higher-priority projects.
The time required to recruit a suitable project team should be considered when planning the project
schedule and estimating project completion time. In some cases, interviewing may be required.
Candidates recruited from outside may have relocation issues to consider (selling or buying a home,
logistics of moving, etc.)
In some cases, depending on the mix of resources already assigned, it may be necessary to start
on the project while the remaining project members are being recruited. If the Project Manager feels
that external contractors will benefit the team, he or she may need to convince the Project
Stakeholders of the merits of this approach in order to gain their approval. Once the use of external
resources is approved, the Project Manager has to negotiate with the outside individuals regarding
their terms and conditions.
Working with sub-contractors usually adds another layer of administrative duties for the Project
Manager, though the difficulty of these duties depends once again on the organisational structure in
the firm. Does a separate office in the organisation exist to assist the Project Manager with writing
and advertising contract specifications and with subsequent contract negotiations, for example?
It is possible that a firm can be organised by several of these methods, at different levels in the
organisation, at the same time. For example, the firm might be organised functionally at the highest
levels of the organisation, and be arranged by the project to accomplish the current projects
undergoing completion at the middle and lower levels of the hierarchy.
In order to get the project off the ground, a team of resources must also be assigned. The group of
individuals who take part in determining who will comprise the team may range from executive
board members to functional managers or, sometimes, just the Project Manager working alone. As
with recruitment of the Project Manager, the selection process of the team will most likely be
influenced by the company’s existing organisational structure and policies.
communications plan,
risk-management plan,
change-management plan,
scope-management plan,
cost-management plan,
quality-management plan,
procurement-management plan, and
staffing-management plan.
The final step in this process is to hold a project kick-off meeting to discuss the contents of the
project plan. It needs to be ensured that this meeting, and all subsequent meetings, are facilitated
with respect to:
creating an open and friendly atmosphere,
publishing an agenda prior to the meeting,
starting on time and ending on time,
keeping the team focused on the meeting's objectives,
assigning action items to named team members and ensuring they accept the task being
assigned, and
assessing the effectiveness of the meeting in achieving the project goals.
Organisational structures
This section explains the three organisational forms—pure project, functional and matrix—and how
the nature of these structures affects the way a project is handled internally. We will also identify the
advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
Functional organisation
At the other end of the spectrum is a functional organisation structure where we have functional
projects housed within the various functional divisions in the firm.
Matrix organisation
The matrix organisation attempts to blend properties of the pure project and the functional
organisational form. We often find, both, weak matrix and strong matrix forms in practice, depending
upon a firm's strategic priorities, among other things to consider when adopting this structure.
Each project in this organisational form involves people from various functional areas. Most often,
the Project Manager decides which tasks to perform and when, and the functional managers
determine which people and which other functional resources will be used.
In this organisational form, it is especially important that the Project Manager be a skilled negotiator
and an excellent communicator, who can that proper resources and the proper mix of people
(individuals) are available for the project work, when needed.
Tom Peters predicts that most of the world's future work will be ‘brainwork’, done in semi-permanent
networks of small, project-oriented teams. Each team is an autonomous, entrepreneurial centre of
opportunity, where the necessity for speed and flexibility renders obsolete the hierarchical
management structures of the past. The pure project organisation affords us the opportunity to
respond rapidly to changing market conditions in order to take advantage of an opportunity, or to
rapidly solve a problem. Team members are focused more on solving a problem at hand, rather
than participating in a function.
Often, many of the functional obstacles are removed in a pure project organisation, and effort
concentrates instead on meeting deadlines or rapidly solving problems. The pure project method of
organising is often called ‘skunk works’. This term is used a great deal in the automotive industry in
developing new automobiles and prototypes.
The Project Manager has full authority over all aspects of the project.
Team members report to one boss—there is no question of loyalty.
Decisions are made quickly—communications are simpler than with other organisation
forms.
Team members have more of a problem-solving approach, rather than a functional
orientation.
Often ‘teams’ of integrated expertise develop, which is necessary for solving certain
problems because any one area cannot do it alone.
Team pride, motivation and commitment are high.
There is often a duplication of resources, especially staff. Resources are often not
adequately shared among projects. Project managers have a tendency to stockpile or
‘squirrel away’ key resources, even when not in use.
Organisation (management) leadership may feel less in control.
The organisation may fall behind in knowledge and technology, as there are fewer members
of pure functional divisions with which to work and share information.
‘Life after project’ anxieties can be highest among team members.
Despite these disadvantages, the pure project method of organising is often felt to be the preferred
approach when speed and flexibility are the key issues. In addition, this form also enhances the
entrepreneurial spirit of the team members.
Team members are easily shared among projects. This contributes a great deal of flexibility
in the use of functional expertise.
Team members report to one functional boss—there is no question of loyalty.
Technical expertise is maintained within a functional unit. There is usually a strong,
discipline-oriented knowledge base available. True experts can be shared among projects.
The functional area is ‘home’ after the project is completed. End of project life anxieties are
generally lower in this organisation form.
A critical mass of specialised functional area expertise is maintained.
There are two bosses, and team members (especially in a time of conflict) may support their
ultimate boss, the functional unit head.
Political infighting among projects might kill an individual project.
The project may be doomed to failure if the Project Manager is not a skilled negotiator.
The opportunity for conflict is much greater than with other organisation forms.
Regardless of which organisation structure is ultimately adopted, it is important to keep in mind that
the Project Manager is still pivotal in successful project completion, and is the primary contact point
for the client and other important stakeholders. Flexibility and responsiveness are enhanced
because one person is in charge and is ultimately responsible for successful project completion.
Conflict Resolution
Certain organisational structures potentially give rise to more conflict than do other forms, when
managing a project. When conflict arises, the Project Manager must be very skilled not only at
negotiations, but also at conflict resolution. One of the ways in which conflict among team members
can be resolved is through the use of an escalation process.
First, allow members who have a conflict to attempt to sort out the issue amongst
themselves.
If the attempt produces nothing but frustration, the next step is to involve the Project
Manager.
If the Project Manager cannot facilitate a resolution, then the next step is to involve the
relevant functional managers of the team members involved in the conflict, along with the
Project Manager. The hope here is that someone with more authority will be able to make
the appropriate decisions to resolve the conflict to everyone's satisfaction.
If the attempt for resolution is again a failure, the issue is then elevated to the next
authoritative rung on the ladder.
The issue is ‘escalated’ through each rank of authority (all the way up to the CEO, if
necessary) until the issue is either resolved or a decision is made by a ranking official. It
should be noted that an issue should only be escalated after those involved have seriously
tried to resolve the problem at the lower level.
Suzy and Hans have been working on a software development project that is responsible for
building their company's Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. The organisational makeup
for this project is that of a matrix structure. Suzy and Hans are both software developers working on
the same phase of the project, but report to different functional managers.
Suzy has suggested a particular design for a component of the project, but Hans does not like it. He
has suggested an alternative design for the same component. Suzy feels that her design is superior
to Hans' and, similarly, Hans feels his plan is superior to Suzy's.
The Project Manager gets involved to help them resolve this issue. After discussion turns to
arguments, the Project Manager wraps up the meeting by suggesting that the issue be escalated to
Suzy's and Hans' supervisors, Joe and Kathy, respectively. Unfortunately, even with Joe and
Kathy's involvement, the conflict does not get resolved.
The problem gets escalated to the highest level of impartial authority. The Vice President of
technology, Joe and Kathy's boss, is called in to review the issue. Having taken the time to go
through and understand the details of the issue, he reviews the designs, and decides that Hans'
design should be used. The decision is communicated to all involved parties and the plan is
implemented.
When escalating an issue through the various ranks of authority, it is important to note that as the
issue gets routed to higher and higher ranks, executive management availability becomes less and
less. Should the issue be escalated to someone at an executive level, the Project Manager and
other involved parties should feel comfortable that the issue was important enough to be reviewed
by someone who has very little time.
Not only does the Project Manager need to be concerned with the resource that will be responsible
for executing each activity, but he/she should also consider assigning a lead person responsible for
each work package. The larger a project, the more difficulty the Project Manager will have in
managing each activity. The assignment of a lead person for each work package will allow the
Project Manager to interact with fewer people when gauging the overall status of the project.
If the Project Manager is working in a matrix type organisation, the functional manager for a
particular resource may be assigned as the lead person responsible for his or her department’s set
of work packages. Whatever method is applied, for assigning ‘work package leads,’ needs to fit in
with the company’s overall structure and methodology.
Once each team member has been assigned to the various project tasks and work packages, the
Project Manager should ensure that everyone’s roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and
accepted by each team member. Without buy-in by each team member on his or her accountability,
the Project Manager will most likely have to fight an up-hill battle, throughout the project, regarding
team expectations. Sign-offs on a project charter and at the work package level are particularly
helpful in this regard.
Another item that the Project Manager needs to consider when assigning personnel to each activity
or work package element is the amount of time they can dedicate to the project. This becomes a
particularly important issue when working in a functional or matrix type organisation. Resources may
be expected to work on multiple projects simultaneously.
Functional organisation
Consider an organisation that has decided to implement a new accounting system. The organisation
has adopted the functional organisational approach. The accounting department has been assigned
this project. While various team members from the accounting department have been assigned to
this new project, they still have their day-to-day responsibilities that need to be carried out.
In this scenario, each team member has been told that they are to split their time 50/50 between the
new project and their current responsibilities. Therefore, the maximum hours per day that any one
team-member can spend on this project will be four hours per day (assuming that a normal work
day is made up of eight hours).
Matrix organisation
While manual-tracking techniques can be put into place, the more projects and resources involved,
the more difficult implementing a shared resource pool becomes. Using a scheduling software
package such as P3E/c application that allows for ‘enterprise’ resource planning can eliminate a lot
of the effort involved in using shared resources across multiple projects.
Other Issues
Other issues to consider, when making personnel assignments, have to do with company
schedules. The following questions should be asked:
2. Do employees work a five-day work week, or do they work four 10-hour days, for instance?
3. Which holidays are observed by the organisation?
4. Are all members of the team full-time employees, or are some team members part-time
employees?
5. How much productivity is expected from each team member?
6. Is anyone on the team new to the organisation, and still ‘ramping-up’ so to speak, and,
therefore, will have to be allowed extra time to complete the work which has been assigned?
7. Is there a new skill set that needs to be obtained before being able to contribute to the
project?
Calendars introduced in the next topic facilitate scheduling resources across a variety of conditions.
As you can see, making appropriate personnel assignments is no easy task. However, with
thorough planning and careful consideration of the numerous project variables, successful
designation of resource assignments can be accomplished.
Now that you have a good idea of what must be considered when recruiting the project manager
and the project team, as well as the points to consider when making personnel assignments, we will
now learn how to implement planning software such as P3E/c when organising a project and
making individual personnel assignments to work packages.
Although in this topic we refer to Primavera P3E/c as an example of a project management tool, you
should understand how these objectives relate to the specific project management tool you have
chosen to use.
Using P3E/c
P3E/c clearly delineates the distinction between enterprise data and individual project data, as seen
in the following diagram.
Enterprise data includes project collections, firm or enterprise resources, reports and the various
tracking mechanisms.
Project data includes the work breakdown structure (WBS), activities and reference documents (for
example, blueprints and drawings, as well as other reports.)
This distinction between firm ‘matters’ and project ‘matters’ goes a long way in helping us decide
how the project should be organised in the firm and—once organised—how it should be staffed and
managed in the enterprise.
For this topic, we will be entering information for establishing a project management office (PMO)
that has just been created. The new PMO has been tasked with creating a project management
handbook so that everyone in the group, as well as any new members that are added in the future,
will consistently implement the developed project management methodologies throughout the
organisation.
1. Open P3E/c
2. Click Create New… to create a new project
3. The Create a New Project wizard opens
4. Click the … button to select the Enterprise Project Structure (EPS)
5. Click the ‘cross’ icon on the right of the ‘Select EPS to add into’ window, to select the EPS
6. Click Next to continue
7. Leave the default as Project ID
8. Enter the project name
9. Click Next to continue
10. Click … from the Planned Start selection field to open the calendar
11. Navigate the calendar to the month January, 2005
12. Click Select to set 10 January 2005 as the project start date
13. Click … from the Must Finish By selection field to open the calendar
14. Navigate the calendar to the month February, 2005
15. Click Select to set 19 January 2005 as the project end date
16. Click Next to continue
17. Leave the default option for the Responsible Manager field and click Next to continue
18. Click Finish to close the wizard
19. The project activity sheet appears to indicate that the new project has been created
Entering resources
In this simulation, we will enter new resource data into the P3E/c application.
5. Click Resources
6. The Resources screen appears with the existing resources
7. Move to the far right corner of the screen
8. Click the first icon on the far right of the screen to add a new resource
9. The New Resource Wizard opens
10. Enter Resource ID
11. Enter Resource Name
12. Click Next to continue
13. In the next seven steps, leave the default option and go on clicking Next till you reach the
Progress Reporter Setup screen
14. Select the ‘No, I will not set up the Progress Reporter at this time’ radio button
15. Click Next to continue
16. Click Finish to exit the wizard
17. Repeat steps 7 to 16 to add every resource listed in the table. Once all of the resources are
added, the application produces a resource group for the PMO, as shown in the next screen.
Creating a Calendar
Now that we have entered the new resources, we will need to consider the type of calendar that is
used by the organisation. We need to determine if the organisation follows a typical five-day work
week or if it follows something a little different such as four 10-hour days.
P3E/c application comes with a variety of work calendars that can be used. It is also possible to
modify or create an entirely new calendar to suit the project or organisation’s needs.
Personnel Assignments
With the resources for the PMO set up and the new ‘summer schedule’ created, appropriate
resource assignments can be made.
Table 2 presents the activities, durations and the predecessor/successor relationships for the
example project. Be sure you set up the appropriate WBS elements before you begin entering
activity information.
Assigning Personnel
The following simulation shows how the information from the above table is used to assign
resources for this project.
selecting ‘Resources’ from the list of available options. You will also want to make sure that the
‘Activity Detail’ is displayed in the lower portion of the screen. To do this, go to the menu bar,
click ‘View’ and then ‘Bottom View’. Select ‘Activity Detail’.
12. Click Resources tab
13. Click Add Resource button
14. Click to select the first resource
15. For more names, hold shift key and click to select
16. Click the select button (the second button on the right of the Assign Resources window) to
assign the selected resources
17. Click Close to close the Assign Resources window
18. Follow steps 12 to 17 to assign resources to each activity.
Having come to an end of this segment, you have seen, via the simulations, how to make use of
computer software to organise your project and assign resources. You have learnt how to add
resources to the ‘enterprise library,’ make use of the various calendars such as global, project
and resource-specific calendars, as well as how to assign resources to various activities.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
a Project Manager must have a set of key traits that are necessary for the success of a
project;
recruiting and organising the Project Team are important steps in the project organising
phase;
the various organisational structures have advantages and disadvantages which have a
bearing on how a project is organised;
there are many factors that affect the work package assignment, such as the organisational
structure; and
Primavera P3E/c is an example of a project management tool, which is used for organising a
project and making individual personnel assignments to work packages.
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment, we understood the organising phase of the project management life cycle
with special emphasis on recruitment of the Project Manager, recruitment and organisation of the
Project Team, assignment of work packages and understanding how computer software
applications are used in project management.
In this segment, we will understand the need for, and the process of, estimating activity durations.
We will also touch upon the two estimation techniques: Program Evaluation Review Technique
(PERT) and Critical Path Method (CPM).
Determining Estimates
Before we discuss time and cost estimation procedures, it is important to understand how an
organisation’s structure can affect the manner in which time and cost estimates are made. The two
main strategies used to determine estimates are the:
top-down approach
bottom-up approach
Top-down approach
The top-down approach (also referred to as analogous estimating) engages the expertise of middle
and upper management to determine overall project estimates. When this strategy is used, the
project team is challenged to fit their activity and cost estimates into the overall project budget or
project scope. When various teams begin estimating work for which they are responsible, they may
have to ‘back into’ the estimates, starting at the overall budget or scope and using the number of the
provided hours or dollars that have been allocated to their part of the work.
The entire team may be asked to think creatively when planning and executing the work in order to
meet the overall project requirements. The top-down approach is best used when similar work has
been done before. Additionally, top-down estimates are more accurate if those preparing the
estimates have the appropriate level of expertise for which they are estimating.
The main disadvantage of using the top-down approach is that lower-level categories may be
inaccurately estimated, and often underestimated by upper-management due to their bias on
attempting to keep costs or time to completion unrealistically down.
An example of the top-down approach would be the instance of a bride who is enlisting the help of a
wedding planner (as her Project Manager). The bride has limited funds (USD10,000) and has
constraints as to when she wants the wedding to take place (the month of May). The wedding
planner must determine the various options that can be pursued based on the available funds, as
well as the time constraints indicated (the number of weekends in May).
Bottom-up approach
On the other side of the spectrum is the bottom-up approach (also referred to as expert judgement).
With this strategy, those responsible for executing or actually performing the work are charged with
determining the appropriate estimates.
Individuals (or team leaders) start with the WBS, assigning time estimates to each task and then
using these estimates to determine the associated required completion times and the budget. Some
of the advantages of using the bottom-up approach are:
The individuals who are performing the work are better equipped to provide estimates than
those who are far removed from the project effort (that is, upper management).
Buy-in to the project budget and schedule. Because the team plays an integral role in
developing the time estimates and budget, they will be more committed to adhering to their
‘promise’, so to speak.
Consider the example of the bride and wedding planner again. If the bride were to use the bottom-
up approach, she would simply go to the wedding planner, indicate some of her requirements and
let the planner run with her ideas (regardless of time constraints or costs).
As you can see with the scenario of the bride and wedding planner, many managers are reluctant to
deploy a pure bottom-up approach for fear that the teams will inflate time and cost estimates in
order to:
ensure total success (and perhaps beyond) with their portion of the project; and
ensure that there are sufficient funds left over to accomplish work other than that required for
this project, for example, 'padding' the estimate for various reasons.
If everyone who is estimating does this, the overall project budget could become inflated to the point
that the project will not be funded at all for fear of too high an expense or time of completion in doing
so.
Therefore, many organisations use a combination of both strategies. The upper management may
ask teams to develop bottom-up estimates and later challenge those estimates by imposing a
‘target’ budget.
The difficulty in predicting estimates stems from all types of variability such as:
level of expertise,
familiarity with technology,
familiarity with process,
familiarity with products used (possibly for the first time),
unpredictable circumstances (for example, key staff members going on medical leave),
resource productivity,
type of resources used (skill level and mix) on projects, and
availability and type of materials used.
There are others variances, to be sure. However, before we discuss the details of the techniques
that can be used to effectively develop time estimates, let us try the following exercise to see just
how difficult estimating can be.
The purpose of this activity is to demonstrate the difficulties the teams face when developing
estimates.
This exercise presents you with a 12-piece jigsaw puzzle and challenges you to estimate the time
you would need to put the puzzle together.
After trying it the first time, see what the variance is between the time you estimated and the time
you actually took, then, re-estimate the time you would need to do it again.
Variances demonstrate that team members often ‘shoot from the hip’, so to speak, when estimating.
Additionally, the level of expertise also affects one's estimates.
As you become more familiar with the puzzle and based on the knowledge of how long you took at
your first attempt, your estimates should become more accurate. This improvement in estimation
emphasises how working on similar activities and becoming an ‘expert’ in a particular field can
improve estimating accuracy (expert judgment).
Estimation Techniques
Now let us briefly discuss two of the most popular estimating techniques practised in the industry:
The two techniques are quite similar in nature. Note that PERT is rarely used in activity sequencing
today; although, it is used extensively in assessing risk in a project.
According to the Project Management Institute's definition, PERT uses a weighted average to
estimate expected activity duration (completion time). To calculate the estimate, PERT takes into
consideration three estimates:
1. Optimistic
2. Most Likely
3. Pessimistic
PERT deals with uncertainty. There are three time estimates provided for each activity because we
are not sure exactly how long it will take us to complete it. CPM does not deal with uncertainty, so
there is only one time estimate provided for each activity, that is, we presume to know how long it
will take to complete each activity in this implementation (CPM).
Thus, with CPM, there is no formula for computing a weighted average for the duration of an activity
as there is with PERT (PERT Weighted Average), as the estimated duration is a single number.
We will discuss CPM and PERT in greater detail in the next segment.
the WBS,
activity duration time estimates, and
resource assignments.
Once all project activities for each WBS element have been identified and the time estimates
(durations) have been made for each activity, it is possible to begin developing the project budget.
Resource requirements need to be evaluated for each activity in the project schedule in order to
derive the budget estimate. The following questions need to be addressed:
It is important to note that not all resources are people. Resources can also be material (for
example, sheet metal required to build the body of a new piece of equipment) or equipment (for
example, powder-coating machine used to paint and plate the required components in a project for
developing a new piece of equipment).
While making the budget estimate, you will have to calculate the costs that contribute to project
expenses and the ensuing project budget. Table 3 lists different cost categories:
Cost Example
Labour cost Resources
Whether top-down or bottom-up estimating (or a combination of these two) is applied, the process of
calculating project costs is the same. Once labour, material, equipment, and other direct and indirect
costs have been considered, the cost for each activity is calculated considering the time estimate
provided for it.
Wedding Example:
Consider the example of the bride and wedding planner once again. Let us say that the bride
provides the following list of items (or activities) as requirements for her wedding:
a string quartet to play before, during and after the wedding ceremony;
a church for four hours to hold approximately 150 guests;
a soloist to sing during the ceremony; and
two limousines to transport the wedding party from the church to the reception hall.
The wedding planner sets out to find the necessary resources to complete each of the activities
listed above. The wedding planner then multiplies the time estimate for each activity against the per-
unit resource dollar rate (when required) in order to estimate the total cost of completing the activity.
USD 1,000
A church for 4 hours (Contracted
to hold approximately Flat rate 4 hours expense for
150 guests facility
rental)
USD 800
Two limousines to
USD (Contracted
transport the wedding
200/limousine 2 hours expense for
party from the church
per hour equipment
to the reception hall
rental)
Similar to the way the wedding planner developed her budget for this portion of the project, a Project
Manager will consider the costs of each project activity, and, where appropriate to do so, will
multiply the usage rate against the estimated time and add these to determine the overall project
budget.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
once the following have been determined, the cost for each activity can be calculated
against the time estimate provided for it:
o labour
o material
o equipment
o other direct, and
o indirect costs;
many organisations use a combination of both a top-down approach and a bottom-up
approach to estimate time and budget for a project; and
time or activity duration is estimated using PERT (when we have uncertainty about the time
required to complete and activity) or CPM (when the time required to complete an activity is
felt to be known).
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment, we understood the need for, and the process of, estimating activity
durations and the two fundamental network techniques, namely PERT or Program Evaluation
Review Technique and CPM or Critical Path Method. In this segment, we will understand PERT and
CPM in detail.
PERT was originally developed to facilitate the planning and scheduling of the Polaris Fleet Ballistic
Missile Project of the US government. Designed to handle risk and uncertainty, PERT is quite
suitable for research and development programmes, aerospace projects and other projects related
to new technology. In such projects, there exists variability in the time requirement for completing
different jobs or activities. Therefore, the orientation of PERT is 'probabilistic'.
CPM is similar to PERT. It was developed in the US by the DuPont Company in 1956-57 for solving
scheduling problems of industries. CPM is principally concerned with the matters pertaining to cost
and time. Its application is mainly to projects that use a fairly stable technology and are quite risk
free. Therefore, its orientation is 'deterministic'.
Extensively diverse projects are open to analysis by PERT and CPM. For example, launching a
spaceship, research and development programmes, constructing a plant, building a river valley
project, overhauling an organisation, training manpower, starting a new venture and adult literacy
programme are all examples of such projects. This segment focusses on the basics of PERT and
CPM.
Figure 1
Activities and events are used to construct a network diagram. An activity is a specific task, job or
function to be carried out in a project. For example, 'prepare dinner' (see Figure 1) is an activity. An
activity is symbolised by an arrow. The head of the arrow depicts the completion of the activity and
the tail of the arrow depicts its beginning. (There is no significance of length and 'compass' direction
of the arrow.) The event is a specific point in time representing the beginning or end of one or more
activities. It stands for a milestone and does not consume time or resources.
It is essential to detail all the activities of the project because activities are the basic building blocks
of a network diagram. For this reason, it is useful to break the project into some steps. The number
of steps in a project depends upon its magnitude and complexity. For industrial projects, usually, a
two-step procedure is sufficient. In the primary step, the major parts of the project are identified and
in the next step, the activities of each major part are defined. Activities must be so defined that they
are distinct, logically uniform tasks for which time and resource requirement can be estimated.
After specification of activities, it is essential to define for each activity, the activities which precede
it, the activities which succeed it and the activities which can take place simultaneously. After getting
this information, the network diagram is developed through forward method or backward method,
showing the logical relationship among activities and events.
The forward method starts with the initial event, showing the beginning of the project, and proceeds
forward till the end event is accomplished. The backward method starts with the end event and
works backwards till the beginning event is reached.
PERT
For using the PERT model, we need to consider the variability of project duration.
Measures of variability
Variability in PERT analysis is measured by variance or its square root, that is, standard deviation.
Variance of a set of numbers is the average squared difference of the numbers in the set from their
arithmetic average. A simple example may be given to illustrate the calculation of variance. Let us
take a series that consist of numbers 4, 6 and 8. The average of this series is 6.
The differences of various numbers in the series from this average are -2, 0 and 2. Squaring them
we get 4, 0 and 4. Hence, the variance—the average of squared difference—is 8/3 and standard
deviation is √8/3. The steps involved in calculating the standard deviation of the duration of
critical path are as follows:
Step 1: Determine the standard deviation of the duration of each activity on the critical path.
Step 2: Determine the standard deviation of the total duration of the critical path on the basis of
information obtained in step 1.
In order to determine the standard deviation of the duration of an activity, we require the complete
probability distribution of the activity distribution. We, though, have just three values from this
distribution: tp, tm, and to. In PERT analysis, a simplification is used for calculating standard
deviation. It is calculated by the following formula:
The standard deviation and variance of the activities on the critical path of our illustrative project are
shown in the Table 4:
(1-2) 21 9 2 5.00
(2.5) 24 10 2.33 5.43
Assuming that the probability distribution of various activities on the critical path is independent, the
variance of the critical path duration is obtained by adding the variance of activities on the critical
path.
In real life projects which have a large number of activities on the critical path, we can sensibly
presume that the critical path duration is normally distributed, with mean and standard deviation
attained.
A normal distribution looks like a bell shaped curve as shown in Figure 2. It is symmetric and single
peaked and is fully described by its mean and standard deviation. The probability of values lying
within certain ranges is as follows:
Range Probability
Armed with information about mean (T) and standard deviation (a) for critical path duration, which is
normally distributed, we can compute the probability of completion by a specified date (D) as
follows:
Find Z = (D – T)/S.D, where Z is known as standard normal variate with mean and variance.
Obtain cumulative probability up to Z by looking at the probability distribution of the standard
normal variate.
Z Cumulative Probability
-3.0 0.001
-2.8 0.003
-2.6 0.005
-2.4 0.008
-2.2 0.014
-2.0 0.023
-1.8 0.036
-1.6 0.055
-1.4 0.081
-1.2 0.115
-1.0 0.159
-0.8 0.212
-0.6 0.274
-0.4 0.345
-0.2 0.421
0.0 0.500
0.2 0.579
0.4 0.655
0.6 0.726
0.8 0.788
1.0 0.841
1.2 0.885
1.4 0.919
1.6 0.945
1.8 0.964
2.0 0.977
2.2 0.986
2.4 0.992
2.6 0.995
2.8 0.997
3.0 0.999
The above procedure may be illustrated for our project which has T = 28 and SD = 3.07. Table 3
depicts the probability of completing this project by certain specified dates.
CPM
The PERT model was developed for projects, which are considered uncertain; the CPM model was
developed for projects, which are comparatively risk-free. Both the approaches start with the
development of the network and a focal point on the critical path. The PERT approach is
'probabilistic' while the CPM approach is 'deterministic'.
This does not, however, mean that in CPM analysis we work with single time estimates. Actually the
main focus of CPM analysis is on variations in activity times as a consequence of changes in
resource assignments.
These variations are planned plus related to resource assignments and are not caused by random
factors outside the control of management as in the case of PERT analysis. The major focus of
CPM analysis is on time-cost relationships and it seeks a project schedule that minimises total cost.
Assumptions
1. The costs associated with a project can be divided into two components: direct costs and
indirect costs. Direct costs are incurred on direct material and direct labour. Indirect costs
consist of overhead items like indirect supplies, rent, insurance, managerial services, etc.
2. Activities of the project can be expedited by crashing which involves employing more
resources.
3. Crashing reduces time but enhances direct costs because of factors such as overtime
payments, extra payments and wastage. The relationship between time and direct activity
cost can be reasonably approximated by a downward sloping straight line. Figure 5.12
depicts a typical cost-time line.
4. Indirect costs associated with the project increase linearly with project duration. Figure 4
depicts a typical line for indirect costs.
Procedure
Given the above assumptions, the CPM analysis seeks to examine the consequences of crashing
on total cost (direct cost plus indirect cost). Since the behaviour of indirect project cost is well
defined, the bulk of CPM analysis is concerned with the relationship between total direct cost and
project duration. The procedure used in this respect is generally as follows:
Step 1: Obtain the critical path in the normal network. Determine the project duration and direct
cost.
Step 2: Examine the cost-time slope of activities on the critical path obtained and crash the activity,
which has the least slope.
Step 3: Construct the new critical path after crashing as per step 2. Determine project duration and
cost.
Step 4: Repeat steps 2 and 3 till activities on the critical path (which may change every time) are
crashed.
Example: The above procedure may be illustrated with an example. Table 7 depicts the activities,
durations and direct activity costs of a project. The indirect cost is Rs. 2,000 per week.
The critical path in the all normal network is (1-2-4-6-7). The project duration is 30 weeks and the
total direct cost is Rs. 45,200. Examining the time cost slope of activities on the critical path, we find
that activity (2-4) has the lowest slope; in other words, the cost to expedite per week is the lowest
for activity (2-4). Hence, activity (2-4) is crashed. Figure 6 depicts the project network after such a
crashing.
As per Figure 6, the critical path is (1-2-5-6-7), with a length of 29 weeks, and the total direct cost is
Rs. 46,700. Looking at the time-cost slope of the activities on the new critical path (1-2-5-6-7), we
find that the activity (5-6) has the lowest slope. Hence, this activity is crashed. Figure 6 depicts the
project network after such crashing, the critical path is (1-2-4-6-7) with a length of 27 weeks and the
total direct cost is Rs. 49,500.
Comparing the time-cost slope of the non-crashed activities on the new critical path (1-2-4-6-7), we
find that the activity which costs the least to crash is (1-2). Hence, this is crashed. Figure 8 depicts
the project network after such a crashing. As per Figure 8, the critical path is (1-3-5-6-7) with a
length of 24 weeks and the total direct cost is Rs. 52,500.
Looking at the time cost slope of the non-crashed activities on the new critical path, (1-3-6-7), we
find that activity (6-7) has the lowest slope. Hence, it is crashed. Figure 9 depicts the project
network after such a crashing. As per Figure 9, there are two critical paths (1-3-5-6-7) and
(1-3-5-7), both with a length of 21 weeks, and the total direct cost is Rs. 55,200.
Considering the time-cost slope of non-crashed activities on critical paths (1-3-5-6-7) and (1-3-5-7),
we find that activity (3-5), which is common to both the critical paths is the least costly to crash.
Hence, it is crashed. Figure 10 depicts the project network after this crashing. As per Figure 10, the
critical path is (1-2-4-6-7) with a duration of 201/4 weeks and the total direct cost is Rs. 56,400.
Looking at the new critical path (1-2-4-6-7), we find that the only non-crashed activity is (4-6). Figure
11 depicts the project network given by crashing this. As per Figure 11, the critical path again is (1-
2-4-6-7) with a duration of 191/2 weeks and the total direct cost is Rs. 57,600.
Since all the activities on the critical path (1-2-4-6-7) are crashed, there is no possibility of further
time reduction. Hence, let us now look at the time-cost relationship. This is shown in Figure 11.
From table 8, we find that the total cost is minimised for the project schedule represented by the
activities crashed, which are (1-2), (2-4), (3-5), (5-6), (6-7). The information provided in table 8 is
useful for decision-making. Table 8 depicts the project duration and total cost.
Project Total
Total Direct Total
Figure no. Activities Crashed Duration in Indirect
Cost Cost
Weeks Cost
5.14 None 30 45,200 60,000 105,200
5.15 (2-4) 29 46,700 58,000 104,700
If the objective is to minimise the total cost of the project, the pattern of crashing suggested by
Figure 10 is optimal. If the objective is to minimise the project duration, then the pattern of crashing
suggested by Figure 11 is optimal. In real-life situations, however, both the factors may be
important. In addition, factors such as strain on resources and degree of manageability are also
important. The final decision would involve a careful weighing and balancing of these diverse
factors, some quantitative and some qualitative.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment, we learned about PERT and CPM in detail. In this segment, we will focus
on identifying the critical activities in a project.
It is possible to sequence project activities using precedence diagramming and arrow diagramming
methods, and display activity relationships using graphical depictions such as Gantt charts and
Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) charts. In this segment, we will combine these
methods and charting procedures to determine a project’s critical path and compute the critical path
statistics for a project.
Critical Path
According to the Project Management Institute (PMI), critical path is defined as ‘the series of
activities that determine the duration of a project.’ In a deterministic model, the critical path is usually
defined as ‘those activities that possess float which is less than or equal to a specified value, often
zero. It is the longest path through the project.’ In other words, when the durations of each of the
activities on this path are added, or summed, it is the longest path through the project or the one
with the maximum possible duration.
Float can be described as the amount of time an activity can be delayed, from its earliest start time,
before its delay causes a delay in the entire project. It is important to recognise that a delay in any of
the activities on the critical path will cause an overall delay in the project beyond the earliest
possible completion time.
Network diagrams
Network diagrams and charts can help determine a project’s critical path length as well as identify
which activities are on the critical path. Network diagrams are also useful for identifying activities
that have abundant float. Identifying these types of activities can be useful in the project when the
delay of an activity on the critical path occurs.
It might be possible to reassign resources to the activities without float (time-critical activities) to
bring the project back on track for a successful timely completion. This type of technique is often
known as project crashing or resource reallocation.
When using network diagrams to determine a project's critical path length, you must consider the
start and finish times for each activity.
Both start and finish should be considered in terms of early start (ES)/late start (LS) and early finish
(EF)/late finish (LF) times. These four quantities plus activity float comprise the critical path statistics
of a project.
When discussing critical path calculations for this subject, please note the following assumptions:
We will use the earliest start and finish dates to calculate the critical path. Using this
assumption, all activities on the critical path will have zero float.
It will be assumed that our projects will start on time and that no activities will have a
negative float, causing us to plan them to be late from the start.
Typically, the critical path calculation for a project will analyse every project activity. For our
demonstration purposes, we may only use a subset of the project activities to simplify the manual
calculations. Scheduling software such as P3E/c can easily calculate the critical path for a project
containing several thousands of activities, with a click of a button.
The early start of an activity is the earliest time period or date that the activity can begin after all of
its predecessor activities have finished. The early finish of an activity is the earliest possible point in
time when the activity can conclude. It can be calculated by considering the activity's early start time
and adding its estimated completion time (duration).
The late start of an activity is the latest possible point in time the activity can begin without delaying
the overall schedule beyond the critical path length. Likewise, the late finish of an activity is the
latest possible point in time an activity can finish without delaying the overall project schedule.
Activity A has an early start (ES) of 0 and a late start (LS) of 2. Its early finish (EF) is 2 while its late
finish (LF) is 4. Because there is a precedence relationship between activity A and B (Activity A
must finish before Activity B can start), activity B's early and late start are dependent upon activity
A's early and late finish.
Because the early and late starts (and early and late finishes) for these activities is different, there is
slack present in scheduling them. For example, Activity A can start immediately (ES = 0), but need
not absolutely start for 2 periods (LS = 2) and the overall completion period of the project (LF of
Activity ‘Finish’) will not be affected.
Thus, we say that Activity A has two units of slack in it (LF - EF = 4 - 2 = 2).
Start->C->D->E->F->G->Finish
This is the only other path in this network, and we have already established activities on the first
path we identified or the upper path, which have positive amounts of slack in them (both Activities A
and B). If Activities A and B are not on the critical path by virtue of possessing positive amounts of
slack or total float, then Activities C, D, and E must be the remaining activities in this network
required to make a continuous path through it, that is, activities Start, F, G, and Finish.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
The longest path through a network, or the critical path, gives the minimum time in which the
project can be completed. It might require more time to complete in actuality, but it cannot
require any less.
Network diagrams can be useful in determining a project’s critical path length, as well as to
identify which activities are on the critical path.
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment, we learned how to determine a project’s critical path and compute the
critical path statistics for a project. In this segment, we will understand the concepts of quality and
value engineering.
Good projects ensure quality processes for a standard output. Quality management principles are
used in conjunction with the project management tools to ensure that the project deliverables are in
tune with customers’ expectations. It is important to monitor the project activities continuously to
maintain quality standards and avoid mishaps.
‘Quality’ refers to the ability of a process or product to satisfy both stated and implied goals as
defined by the stakeholders.
Quality has become a key economic factor in terms of staying competitive on a global basis. The
quality management of a project means that the project should meet the needs that it was originally
meant to meet.
This segment also covers the concept of value engineering. Value engineering (VE) is an effective
productivity improvement tool. It originated during World War II in General Electric Company (GEC).
Over the years, its usage spread to the whole world. Now, it is being practised almost in every
sector of the economy in different countries in varying degrees. However, its full potential is yet to
be realised by organisations.
Quality
Quality begins with designing a product as per customer specifications. Further, it covers the
application of standard measuring units, the suitable raw material, selecting appropriate
manufacturing process, etc. Quality is a relative term and it can be better understood by a
comparison with the utility of the product.
Characteristics of quality
Quality characteristics such as performance, functionality, suitability, reliability and consistency are
commonly used to measure project deliverables. These quality characteristics are not only
applicable to the deliverable itself, but also to the processes or methods used to deliver the final
product, such as equipment or computers. Therefore, the required quality characteristics must be
fully stated and understood before procurement of any services, materials or equipment used in the
project.
Companies that offer a powerful combination of low prices and high quality are capturing the hearts
and wallets of consumers. Today, as companies are becoming more value driven, there is a shift in
competitive terrain from ‘price orientation’ to ‘quality and convenience’ orientation.
As these value-driven companies gain share, at varying speeds, across economies, they change
the nature of competition by transforming consumer attitudes about trade-offs between price and
quality. Today, quality is considered an 'order qualifying' rather than an 'order winning' attribute of
the product or service.
One approach that customers use to evaluate quality is to mention attributes of the product or its
product delivery process. For example, if someone were to ask you to assess the quality of a
notebook computer, you might reply by referring to things such as: the way it looks, aesthetic
appeal, system configuration—how long it took to set up, hard disk capacity and other software
installed—how long it takes to boot up and whether or not it has an Intel Chip Inside.
In the case of services, such as a meal at a restaurant, the determinants of quality might include:
the meal itself, its presentation, aroma of the food, the manner in which it was served, behaviour of
the waiter, behaviour of the other diners at the neighbouring tables and the overall ambience of the
place.
In effect, you are citing attributes of quality, that is, the traits associated with quality that can be
identified and, more importantly, measured. However, attributes are not the same as quality.
Identifying every attribute of quality for a product would not describe that product's quality level.
Freshness
Some products are perishable, that is, their quality declines over time. For example, vegetables fall
under this category. Fashion items also are subject to obsolescence. At the other extreme, the value
associated with some products increases with age, as is the case with antiques and red wine.
Reliability
The quality associated with a product often increases with the dependability of the product and
customer experience. For example, the patients expect the hospitals to have competent staff, and
the customers expect telephones to work.
Durability
The quality attribute that implies product performance under adverse conditions. For example,
Timberland’s commercials are designed to convey the durability of its outdoor footwear.
Safety
This is an attribute of quality that measures the likelihood of harm from goods or service. What is
safe can be a controversial issue. For instance: is a gun with a safety clip safe? Is the packaging of
a product tamper proof?
Environmental friendliness
As is the case with safety, this quality attribute has both societal aspects and is individual specific.
The requirements for being considered an environmentally friendly product are becoming more
stringent. For example, firms must now also focus on how a product is disposed of after its useful
life.
Serviceability
This attribute relates to the ease and cost associated with servicing a product after the sale has
been made. Products are now being increasingly designed so that they do not need service; for
example, car batteries. But many others do require service and this capability must be both
designed into the product and the post-sale service system. This is especially important for
consumer durables.
.
Attribute consistency
The attributes associated with a product should be internally consistent. It would make little sense to
build a car with air-foils or a biodegradable cigarette filter. Products with inconsistent combinations
of features are not likely to match the needs of their buyers.
To a certain degree, the functionality and the quality overlap. Products with excellent designs will
excel in attributes that matter. These, in turn, increase the functionality of the product.
From the above meaning and definitions of quality, we can conclude that quality plays an important
role in the overall project performance. The absence of quality will result in:
Concepts of Quality
New dimensions to the concept of quality have emerged in addition to the folklore philosophy.
Conventional definitions are aimed at conformance to standards while the modern thinkers focus on
deriving ‘value for money’.
Quality can be referred to as a state in which value entitlement is realised for the customer and
supplier in every aspect of the business relationship. 'Value' represents the economic worth,
practical utility and availability for customer and the company that creates the product or service.
This definition acknowledges the fact that the quality of products or services rarely comprises a
single element.
For the customer: a fair level of expectation to buy high-quality products at the lowest possible
cost.
For the provider: a fair level of expectation to create quality products at the highest possible profits.
The philosophical leaders of the quality movement, notably Phillip Crosby, W. Edward Deming and
Joseph S. Juran provide different perceptions to the concept of quality. It is because they use
different frameworks for defining quality.
Plan
Establish the objectives and processes essential to deliver results in agreement with the expected
output (the target or goals). With the establishment of output expectations, the completeness and
correctness of the specification also becomes a part of the targeted improvement. When possible,
start on a small scale to test likely effects.
Do
Execute the plan, implement the process, and make the product. Collect data to be used in the
charting and analysis in the following ‘Check’ and ‘Act’ steps.
Check
Study the results achieved (measured and collected in the above step) and compare against the
expected results (targets or goals from the ‘Plan’) to find out any mismatch between the two. Look
for deviation in implementation from the plan and also look for the appropriateness/completeness of
the plan to allow the execution, that is, 'Do'. Charting data can make it much easier to see trends
over several PDCA cycles and to convert the collected data into meaningful information, which is
what we need for the next step ‘Act’.
Act
Request corrective action on considerable differences between actual and expected results.
Analyse the differences to find out their root cause. Determine the areas where changes could be
applied to improve the process or product. If completion of these four steps does not show any need
for improvement, then the scope to which PDCA is applied may be fine-tuned to plan and improve
with more detail in the subsequent iteration of the cycle, or attention needs to be put in a different
stage of the process.
Project quality management begins by defining the quality standards to be used for the project. This
definition will come from the stakeholders, beneficiaries and often from the overall standards for the
organisation. Careful identification of the quality standards will help to ensure a successful project
outcome that will be accepted by the stakeholders.
In addition to quality standards for the end result of the project, there may also be organisational
quality standards that must be met for the actual management of the project, such as certain types
of reporting or project tracking methods.
It describes the processes required to ensure that the project will satisfy the needs for which it was
undertaken. The knowledge area of project quality management includes the organisational
processes that determine the quality policies, objectives and responsibilities. It consists of quality
planning, quality assurance and quality control. Figure 12 depicts the project quality management
process.
Inspection
Benefit/cost analysis Control charts
Quality planning tools
Tools and Benchmarking Pareto diagrams
and techniques
Techniques Flow-charting Statistical sampling
Quality audits
Design of experiments Flow-charting
Trend analysis
Quality improvement
Quality management plan
Acceptance decisions
Operational definitions
Output Quality improvement Rework
Checklists
Completed checklists
Inputs to other processes
Process adjustments
Quality planning is the process of identifying the quality standards that are related to the project and
determining how these standards can be achieved. It is one of the significant processes of project
planning and should be performed on a continuous basis and in parallel with the other project
planning processes.
A good quality planning process starts with a clear definition of the goals of the project. What is the
product or deliverable likely to achieve? What does the product look like? What functions will it
perform? How do you evaluate customer satisfaction? What determines the success of a project?
Answering these questions will help you in identifying and defining quality goals. It will also allow
you to discuss the approach and plans required to accomplish those goals. This includes measuring
the risks to success, setting high standards, documenting everything, and defining the methods
and tests to attain, control, forecast and validate success. You should make sure that you include
quality management tasks in the project plan and delegate the tasks to work groups and/or
individuals who will report and track quality metrics.
For example, the desired management quality may need cost or schedule adjustments, or the
desired product quality may need a detailed risk analysis of an identified problem. Before the ISO
9000 Series was developed, the activities mentioned here as quality planning were broadly
considered as part of quality assurance.
Scope statement: The scope statement comprises the key objectives of the project that are
needed by different stakeholders.
Product description: It includes the details of technical issues and other concerns which may
influence quality planning.
Standards and regulations: The project management team must acknowledge all the relevant
standards or regulations that may influence the project.
Benchmarking: As per this process, we compare actual or planned project practices with the
practices of other projects to produce ideas for improvement and to find a suitable standard to
measure performance.
Flowcharting: It is a diagram that depicts how different elements of a system relate to each other.
Design of experiments: It is an analytical technique that helps in identifying which variables affect
the overall income the most.
Quality management plans: They provide input to the overall project plan and must deal with
quality control, quality assurance and quality improvement for the project.
Operational definitions: It particularly explains what something is, and how it is measured by the
quality control process.
Checklists: It is a structured tool that helps in verifying if a set of required steps has been
performed.
Inputs to other processes: The quality planning process may discover a need for further activity in
some other area.
Quality assurance means all the systematic and planned activities executed within the quality
system give confidence that the project will meet the applicable quality standards. It also comprises
the examination of data at stations and centres to validate that the data are in line with the quality
system goals, and to identify errors so that required action can be taken in time.
A quality system should incorporate procedures that allow feedback into the measurement and
quality control process to avoid the errors from recurring. We can apply quality assurance in real-
time post measurement, and can also feed into the quality control process for the subsequent
process of a quality system. However, it usually tends to operate in non-real time.
Quality assurance tests make use of a system of metrics to decide whether or not the quality plan is
progressing in an acceptable manner. We can measure project quality with customer satisfaction
effectively by using both qualitative and quantitative metrics. These tests or quality audits assist us
in forecasting and verifying the accomplishment of goals and identifying need for corrective action.
Additionally, quality assurance tests also help us in mapping quality metrics to quality goals, thereby
allowing us to report—on the status of quality—at periodic project review meetings.
In most cases, quality assurance is provided by a quality assurance department or similarly titled
organisational unit, but it is not mandatory that only these departments perform this function. Quality
assurance may be provided to the team managing the project. It may also be provided to the
management of the performing organisation (internal quality assurance) or it may be provided to the
customer and others not actively involved in the work of the project (external quality assurance).
Apart from the quality management plans and operational definitions discussed under inputs to
quality planning, the inputs to quality assurance include the following:
Results of quality control measurements: These are the records of quality control testing and
measurement for comparison and analysis.
Quality audit: It is a structured review of other quality management activities. Quality audit may be
carried out by properly trained in-house auditors or by third parties such as quality system
registration agencies.
Quality improvement: It includes all the actions taken for increasing the effectiveness and
efficiency of the project to provide added benefits to the project stakeholders.
Quality control involves scrutinising particular project results to determine if they abide by relevant
quality standards and identifying ways to remove causes of unsatisfactory results. Quality Control
(QC) refers to a system of routine technical activities that assist in measuring and controlling the
quality of the project as it is being developed. This includes identifying, analysing and correcting
problems.
While quality assurance is provided prior to problem identification, quality control is reactionary and
occurs after the identification of a problem. Quality control examines specific project results and
determines conformity with relevant standards. In addition to this, it also identifies risk factors in a
project, their mitigation and looks for ways to avoid and eliminate unsatisfactory performance.
provides routine and consistent checks to make sure that data is reliable, correct and
complete;
identifies and deals with errors and omissions; and
documents and collects inventory material, and records all quality control activities.
Quality control activities comprise general methods such as accuracy tests on data acquisition and
calculations and the use of accepted standardised procedures for emission calculations,
measurements, estimating uncertainties, recording information and reporting. Higher-tier quality
control activities comprise technical reviews of source categories, activities and emission factor data
and methods.
Quality control implies working to a set standard of quality which is achievable and which has a
ready market. Hence, quality control means adherence to a standard or prevention of a change from
the set standard. In general, this is essential because when there is an acceptable quality, a
manager must ensure that there is no deterioration from the standard.
However, in a changing world, one is often faced with the fact that the quality which is acceptable
today by the customer may not be acceptable to him a year later. Therefore, there is need for a
breakthrough, (creation of change) for improving the existing standards. Thus, preventing change
(control) and creating change (breakthrough) are two important functions of quality management.
Unfortunately, a large number of managers simply have no time for breakthrough because they are
obsessed with day-to-day problems of keeping controls at the existing levels.
The project management team should have practical knowledge of statistical quality control,
specifically sampling and probability, to help them assess quality control outputs.
The inputs to quality control include the work results, quality management plans, operational
definitions and checklists. Apart from work results, the explanation of other inputs is discussed
above.
Work results: It includes, both, process results and product results. In order to get the work results,
information about the planned and actual results should be available.
Inspection: It includes activities such as measuring, examining and testing undertaken to determine
whether the results conform to the requirements.
Control charts: Control charts are a graphic display of the results, over time, of a process. These
are prepared to determine the variation between actual and planned outputs.
Pareto diagrams: A Pareto diagram is a histogram, ordered by frequency of occurrence that shows
how many results were generated by the type or category of identified cause.
Statistical sampling: It determines the number of items to sample. For example, selecting 10
paintings at random out of a list of 100.
Trend analysis: It involves using mathematical techniques to forecast the future outcomes based
on historical results.
Apart from the quality improvements, the following are the key outputs from quality control:
Rework: Rework is action taken to bring a defective or non-conforming item into compliance with
requirements or specifications.
Process adjustments: It includes the key preventive and corrective actions taken as a project
control measure.
Value Engineering
Value engineering is the systematic application of recognised techniques that identify the function of
a product, process or services, accomplishes a monetary value of that function, brings out areas of
avoidable costs and provides the essential functions consistently at the lowest overall cost. In
short, it tries to improve function or reduce cost or achieve both without compensating quality,
reliability and safety.
The ‘avoidable costs’ depict that cost which does not provide desirable function, or quality, or life or
appearance to the product.
Cost is the amount that we generally pay. It is the total sum of money spent on materials, labour,
overheads, profit, etc., to manufacture a product.
Value is something that a customer believes the product is worth to meet his minimum specific
requirements. It refers to the lowest price that a customer must pay to get a function or service.
A prime feature of value engineering (VE) is that a design or initial solution is usually in place before
undertaking the process. This initial design is used right through the value engineering process to
create optional approaches. The process of actually performing value engineering occurs in various
circumstances.
In the US, in a 40-hour workshop, a design that is prepared by the client’s design team is re-
engineered by some other independent team. This team spends a week just looking at the original
design in a workshop environment and makes its suggestions about alternative solutions.
There is usually only one 40-hour workshop on any particular project. In Europe, this 40-hour
workshop has been modified into a two-day session with the original design team. The members of
the design team meet to specifically challenge the team’s own design and seek viable options.
This workshop is typically repeated during different phases of the design process and can extend
onto the construction phase, in which the capability of the contractor can be exploited to pursue
substitutes to be used in the particular design solution.
Similar to the value management process described above, we can also implement value
engineering through a five-stage plan, in which each stage is aligned to a generic problem-solving
procedure.
Information: An information gathering process in which the prime focus is on the client’s business
drivers for the project. Special relevance is given to the use of facilitated workshops.
Speculation: Creative-thinking techniques are put into use to generate alternative ways to provide
the business drivers identified in stage 1.
Evaluation: The solutions generated are evaluated for their viability and cost. Ideas are combined
and consolidated to generate a list of some five or six ideas that are worthy of further consideration.
Development: The ideas generated and shortlisted in the previous stage are developed in detail,
ensuring that all the interfaces with the client’s business are considered.
Projects aim to produce some product, process, services or others. A good number of these are
concerned with building plants to produce goods and services to satisfy the human wants and
needs. The typical life cycle of such projects includes project selection, planning, execution and
closure.
VE may be applied in all the phases of project life cycle. However, the saving potential of a phase
decreases as we move down the phases of a project. When the saving potential decreases, the cost
to implement the changes to reap the benefit increases over the phases. As a result, the net saving
decreases over the phases. This is why one should embark on VE as early as possible in a project.
Some important areas of VE application in various phases of a project include the following:
Procurement of material and equipment accounts for over 50% of project cost. VE can play a useful
role in cutting the cost and lead time.
Analyse the function performed by a part, particle or specification. If any of these contributes
little or nothing, the designer should reconsider.
Aesthetic function may be performed by various alternatives. Select the alternative
performing the desired aesthetic at the least cost.
Avoid extra cost needed to make the material ready to use.
Analyse the different products performing the needed functions. Choose the product that
costs the least.
Compare the function provided by the buyer’s process with the desired function. Select the
process offering the closest fit.
Identify the parts performing the needed function and the parts supporting the primary parts.
Cut down the cost of supporting parts.
Benefits of VE in projects
Value engineering is a systematic process that aims to achieve the required functions at the least
cost. Unlike value management, it tries to provide an optimal answer to a design problem. Value
engineering advances from an initial solution to offer function-oriented alternatives created in an
unconstrained, creative environment. There are also some other benefits of application of VE in
projects as it:
reduces the complexity of the product,
achieves standardisation of components,
ensures improvement in functional aspects of the product,
ensures improvement in job design and safety,
ensures improved maintainability (serviceability), and
provides a robust design.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
quality is a state in which value entitlement is realised for the customer and the provider in
every aspect of the business relationship;
the basic processes of project quality management include quality planning, quality
assurance and quality control; and
value engineering is a cost effective approach which improves the performance without
disturbing the function(s) and without compromising on quality, reliability, etc.
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment we learned about the concept of quality management and value
engineering. In this segment, we will learn about the deliverables of a project, which conform to the
quality requirements and offer a value proposition to the end customer
This is a common term heard in the project management sphere. It is any tangible or intangible
object—produced as a result of a project—that is intended to be delivered upon the completion of
that project.
For a Web application project, the final product—Website up and running—is the deliverable. There
may also be other deliverables associated with it such as the source code of the project, help
documents, training materials and so on.
In our real-world example of a typical wedding, the wedding planner’s catering arrangement is one
of the project deliverables. Completion of the wedding ceremonies without any problems or issues
may be a key deliverable for an event manager.
In a practical scenario, often times, people who are working do not know what they are producing.
Whether the produced item will be useful or not could also be a question. The project’s goals, initial
scope, project stakeholders and end users are all determined during the initial stage of the project,
either by the Sponsor or by his team or the Project Manager. The Project Manager has to define the
deliverables that the project will produce. Even this is expected from the Project Sponsor.
To identify the project management deliverables, the Project Manager must try to understand the
following:
During the project initiation meetings, the expected deliverable from the task completion should be
made clear, based on the plan when the tasks are assigned to the resources. Sometimes,
completion of multiple tasks leads to one deliverable. Therefore, it must be carefully planned.
The project deliverables again can be classified as those that require specific clients for approval
and acceptance and those that are required by the organisation.
In the project life cycle phases, it is important to complete deliverables within that phase and get the
approval of the stakeholders to move forward. Project management plan, scope plan and risk plan
are also deliverables, which have to be created by the Project Manager either by himself or through
his supporting team.
At this point, it is important to understand the checks and balances that facilitate high quality project
deliverables.
Ensuring that a project is completed on time and within budget is a challenge. With the competing
demands for resources and capital, projects have many internal and external forces that can
contribute to their failure.
It takes a strong sense of direction, efficiency and leadership to keep the project on track. It is the
responsibility of the Sponsor and the Project Manager to ensure that certain checks are in place to
avoid such failures.
The Sponsor has to spend extra time upfront to ensure that the business case is adequately
defined and clear.
It is possible that certain decisions about the project might have been taken up in haste. The
Project Manager might be blamed later for an incomplete project or the failure of project. He
should do a proper analysis before the commencement of the project and bring up issues
and challenges upfront to the Sponsor.
To complete project on time, the project team might overlook completion of certain
functionalities. The Project Manager needs to clearly set guidelines and processes in place
and ensure that such mistakes do not happen without his and the key stakeholders’
(especially business sponsor) approval. This is done with the help of regular meetings and
by adopting the ‘always inform before judging’ process.
The Project Manager has to build contingency (buffer) in the schedule and the budget. Doing
this gives more flexibility to the project in case certain risk-response plans have to be worked
out. Even having certain backup resources would help in critical projects.
It must be ensured that proper reporting capabilities such as generation of automatic reports,
a process to receive status reports, etc. exists in the project. Automating many of these
activities helps the Project Manager save time and focus on important issues.
For better quality project deliverables, it must be ensured that the support of the right quality
team exists. If the quality team is not present, other quality management techniques must be
used.
The most important aspect of having checks and balances in a project is to have forethought on
what areas one would like to focus upon. It can be thought from a risk angle, quality angle and a
scope-schedule-budget angle.
Based on this, checks and balances must be prepared to ensure that there is minimal deviation from
the terms agreed upon with the client.
Before moving from one phase of a project to the next, exit and entry criteria has to be adhered to.
Team/Group leads should be made aware of such criteria. For instance, in a software project life
cycle, the ‘build’ phase will not be started until the ‘design’ phase is complete.
The ‘design’ team leads verify that their deliverables meet all the above criteria and ‘build’ team
leads take up build activity after verification and receiving confirmation.
Similarly, there may be many checks and balances placed in the project by the Project Manager to
ensure that the project smoothly transitions from one phase to the next. The Project Manager may
even place checks for approving expenses by team members.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
it is important to complete deliverables within a particular phase of a project and get the
approval of the stakeholders before moving forward to the next phase; and
checks and balances are necessary to ensure that the deliverables are produced within time
and budget.
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment, we learned about the deliverables of project management and the various
checks and balances necessary to ensure that the deliverables are produced within time and
budget.
In this segment, we will focus on the concept of PMIS, its planning and design.
The success of timely implementation of projects depends on the availability of essential information
at the appropriate time. The information is needed for taking various decisions during selection,
planning, execution and closure of a project. Project Management Information System (PMIS) aims
to provide relevant information on time, resulting in improved performance.
Traditionally, this system was manual, paper based and labour intensive. It was slow to respond and
update. The advancement of computer and telecommunication technology have revolutionised this
system.
PMIS
PMIS refers to the system tools and techniques used in project management to deliver information.
Project managers use the techniques and tools to collect, combine and distribute information
through electronic and manual means. PMIS is used by the upper and lower management to
communicate with each other.
PMIS helps in planning, executing and closing the project management goals. Project managers
use PMIS for the budget framework such as estimating costs at the time of planning the process.
Furthermore, the PMIS is employed to build a specific schedule and classify the scope baseline.
The project management team collects information into one database while executing the project
management goals. It is used to compare the baseline with the actual achievement of each activity,
manage materials, collect financial data and keep a record for reporting purposes.
To understand this concept better, we should first understand the distinction between data and
information.
Data
Data are values of qualitative or quantitative variables belonging to a set of items. They represent
something in the real world, expressed as a number or a statement or a picture and act as an input
to MIS.
Information
Information may be defined as (i) data within a context, (ii) data in a relationship or (iii) processed
data. It does not convey much. But, when we say it denotes an age of a student of a class, it gets
some meaning. Log of daily production figures in a year do not convey much. But when we
calculate their average, standard deviation, range and trend, we get much more meaning out of
them.
System
As shown in Figure 13, the data processing system has four stages.
Input
In the input stage, data are collected and entered into the computer.
Data processing
Output
Finally, in the storage stage, data and information are maintained for later use.
Planning of PMIS
The success of a PMIS depends on its effective planning. The PMIS is used for many purposes by a
Project Manager, which include budget estimation of costs, creating a schedule, defining the scope,
etc. Hence, these should be considered while planning for PMIS.
Identifying the information needed is necessary for improving the decision making and the structure
of the PMIS. Information requirements of project stakeholders include the recipients of information,
the type of information needed, which includes format, contents and level of details, the time the
information is required and how (by what media) will it be communicated to them.
The recipients of the information may include any stakeholder of a project. They are individuals or
groups that have a claim or ownership rights or interests in a project and its activities that may have
occurred in the past, the present, or which may occur in the future.
Let us find how a project management information system is used by different stakeholders.
Competitors
Tourists
Professional institutions
Recipients of information may be decided on a ‘need to know’ basis. The list needs to be reviewed
periodically to weed out obsolete entries and to add new ones.
The information need of various stakeholders differs in content and with respect to the time of need.
A survey may be conducted to identify the specific information requirements of stakeholders related
to the various decision areas in a project.
scope,
time,
cost,
quality,
resource utilisation,
procurements, and
risk.
A comprehensive list of information needed during the various phases of a project is as follows:
project scope;
project cost;
details of activities, which include descriptions, time, cost, resource needs and precedence
relationships;
project schedule and budget;
drawing and documents including specifications, civil and structural drawings and layouts
and schematics; and
communication, including correspondences, minutes of the meetings, reports and the
communication scheduled.
Following are the components of the execution and the control phase:
Project organization: The project organisation structure includes the various functions and
responsible agencies for the project and the coordination between the same.
This includes:
list of stakeholders;
disciplines, departments and specialties involved in the project;
procedure for project execution, critical execution steps, deliverables and checks;
safety and environment, training and inspection, cost and disaster management;
issue logs, which include various issues that arise during a project; and
change logs, where changes in scope, cost and time schedule are to be logged and
reported.
Project reporting: Project reporting comprises three phases, namely project scope, resource
requirement and the closure phase.
Project scope
Project schedule and cost: Two methods (variance analysis and earned value methods) are used
to provide information on cost and schedule. Performance information generated by the two
methods includes cost variance, schedule variance, cost performance index, schedule performance
index, months behind schedule and cost overrun.
Quality records: A project sets up a quality system to ensure that incoming items (materials, parts
and equipment), construction work, erection of equipment, etc., conform to the design
specifications. The quality system generates a list of items which are below par for taking
appropriate actions by the Project Manager.
Project risk assessment: It should be carried out at the start of the project as well as during the
execution of the project; covering anything noticed or identified that may affect the future project
schedule/cost. It is important to draw plans to implement measures to deal with any potential risks.
These plans are to be implemented along with the project plan and monitored to identity any
deviations so that corrective action can be taken.
Resource requirement
Materials, parts and equipment: A project needs a large number of materials, parts and
equipment. Requirement of such materials, at different points of time, can be determined based on
the network. With this input, material requirement planning is carried out for making these materials
available on time.
Many a times, proper linkage of requirements and availability are not ensured, resulting in time and
cost over-run. At times, it affects the quality of work, as procurement of materials is hurried or
substitute materials—not up to par—are procured.
Followup of the procurement process provides a list of materials, which need to be expedited (when
materials are likely to arrive late) or de-expedite (when usage of materials is delayed due to
any reasons).
Contracts: Besides other things, this function should include the sources of
inputs/materials/services. This may prove a major source of advantage for the execution of the
project and is kept at many organisations with secrecy. Many of the successful project managers
can be seen to have such information.
Closure Phase
Time of need of each stakeholder may be different. Some may need it on a daily, weekly or monthly
basis.
Capturing data
The term ‘capturing data’ is used to state a process of preparing and collecting data. The function of
data collection is to attain information to maintain a record, to make decisions for vital issues and to
pass information on to others.
Data can come from actual observation or from records. Data collected from records is known as
secondary data. Data collected from direct observation is known as primary data.
It should be ensured that all relevant groups are represented in the data. A formal data collection
process is essential as it makes certain that the gathered data are both defined and precise and that
subsequent decisions based on opinion embodied in the findings are valid. Data can possibly be
arranged in a tabular form, data array or frequency distribution.
An organisation—to achieve its aims—needs to process the data collected into meaningful
information. It should be presented in its most useful formats. Data must be processed in a context
to give it meaning. Data is transformed into information using mathematical, statistical, or other tools
including computer software. Information can be stored in electronic form or hard copies
represented in the most useful form.
Peter Drucker states that the ability to communicate, heads the list of criteria for success.
Harvard Business Review reports that the ability to communicate was at the top among the
22 personnel attributes considered for promotions.
A Project Manager uses communication more than any other force to manage the project.
Channels of communication
The three most important means through which people generally communicate are:
by actual physical touch, such as a pat on the shoulder, a pat on the back or the ritualistic
expression of the handshake;
by visible movement of some portion of their bodies such as the pointing of a finger, the wink
of an eye, a smile, a nod or a grimace; and
with the use of symbols, spoken or portrayed, which encompass some meaning based on
experience.
The first two are referred to as non-verbal and the last one is referred to as the verbal channel of
communication.
Some examples of means and channels of communication include plans, policies, procedures,
objectives, goals, strategies, organisation structure, linear responsibility chart, meetings, letters,
telephone calls, e-mails and project meetings.
There are a number of traditional as well as emerging methods of communicating information. The
project manager may choose any combination of these. Some of the popular means of
communication are discussed below.
Even with the arrival of modern methods of communication, some traditional methods are still more
prevalent for the purpose of communication. Let us discuss a few of them.
Written reports: Written reports are age old methods to communicate project information in many
organisations. These reports are generated at various levels of details and use tables, charts and
graphs.
It should be borne in mind that written reports cost money in preparing, distributing, using and
archiving. Longer is the report, more is the cost. A report should normally not exceed 5-10 pages.
To minimize cost, standard report formats may be defined that focus on key metrics by which
projects should ideally be tracked and measured. Usually, distribution of these reports is displayed
in a matrix. Column in a matrix shows the authorised recipients and a row shows each category of
the report. Entry in the square at each intersection shows the recipient of a particular document at a
particular frequency. If reports are made available over a network, appropriate security measures
should be taken.
Face-to-face meeting: In face-to-face meetings, all participants sit in a room and participate in the
agenda. The opinions about this form of communication are aptly described as, ‘this is the most
active form of communication and decision making’ or ‘this is the most ineffective use of time; an
occasion, where the minutes are kept but hours are lost’. The difference is made by the way the
meetings are conducted.
E-Mail: E-mail has the advantage of reaching quickly to many people at dispersed locations.
However, it should be used carefully and thoughtfully. Project report can be distributed as an
attachment to an e-mail.
Internet site: Internet site or a Website is related to the web pages that restrain content (media),
that is, text, video, music, audio, images, etc. A Website is hosted on no less than one Web server,
which is accessible via a network.
For instance, the Internet or a private local area network through an Internet address known as a
Uniform Resource Locator (URL). All publicly available websites together constitute the World Wide
Web (WWW). An organization can design an internet site to retrace and view project information by
authorised persons.
Chat room: Chat room is the online meeting of participants on project issues. Under this method,
opinions are exchanged by typing messages and viewing responses on the computer’s screen. The
session can be archived for future use. In this case, the party has to obtain lease connection from
an authorised body such as Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., India.
It has also been called 'visual collaboration' and is a type of groupware. Here, two parties exchange
their visual/audio data simultaneously. Infrastructure needed includes a computer, high speed
LAN/wan, Internet connection and video conferencing software.
Blog: A Blog is a white board or web space over the Internet. It is a portion of the national Web
space, acquired through purchase. Only blog owner or writer is authorised to write his views on the
blog and edit it. The blog can be read by the interested audience. They can write their comments on
it. However; they cannot edit it. The blog writer can accept or reject the comments. Blog writing is
similar to delivering a lecture. A blog can be a part of the internet (connecting to the outside world),
intranet (covering the organisation) and extranet (covering the organisation and a business partner).
Every country has its own Web space. Organizations/individuals can purchase a part of the space.
A Project Manager may use a blog to communicate his views on project-related issues such as
safety, motivational package, resource usages, unforeseen situations and the likes.
Wiki: A Wiki consists of Web space over Internet/intranet/extranet, shared by an authorised group
of users to discuss their common objective. Every user has the right to read, write, and edit others’
opinion or view expressed on the Wiki.
A Wiki uses a technology that assists a user in reading, writing, and editing. Besides, it assists in
keeping a complete record of history of the process and retrieving any record. It is similar to case
study discussion in a class.
Any member can write his view on any subject on a Wiki. Other members can edit the writing and
add their opinions. This process continues till a verified, true and accepted view emerges. Objective:
This is used to arrive at a consensus on an issue or to create knowledge through a collaborative
process.
A wiki user does not need to have any computing or web-related expertise to add, edit or
delete a page.
It creates an effective library of knowledge.
An employee can share, edit and access work-related information/knowledge such as
reports, best practices and documents.
A Project Manager may use this method to build consensus on an issue or find an approach
for doing a thing.
Design of PMIS
The following elements should be kept in view in the design, development and operation of a PMIS:
The PMIS should support the full range of life cycle including project analysis and post
project review.
Enterprise guidance and project background information must be a part of PMIS.
PMIS includes all information coming from various sources, including formal reports, informal
sources, observations, project review meetings and questioning.
The PMIS must interface with the larger organisational information system to permit smooth,
well-organised interchange of information in support of organisational and project goals.
Only relevant information should be a part of PMIS.
.
Design of the PMIS consists of four sub-systems:
Hardware: A computer and its peripheral: Input, output, and storage device. It also includes
communication equipment that facilitates fast transmission and reception of text, pictures, sound
and animation in the form of electronic data.
Software: Sets of instructions that tell the computer how to take data in, how to process it, how to
display information and how to store data and information.
People: It includes IT professionals and users, who analyse information needs, design and
construct information system, write computer program and operate and maintain the system.
Procedure: Procedures include priorities in running different applications and the security measures
to achieve optimal and secure operations of the system.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
PMIS is a MIS comprising system tools and techniques that are used in project management
to deliver information.
A good PMIS must provide appropriate information about the key factors critical to the
success of the project.
There are some key elements that must be ensured in the design, development and
operation of a PMIS.
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the previous segment, we learned about the project management information software. In this
segment, we will learn how to create a work breakdown structure.
A work breakdown structure is needed because the scope of work in the project has to be broken
down into smaller pieces so that they can be managed better.
WBS
Breaking down of work into smaller pieces in project management is termed as Work Breakdown
Structure, in short—WBS. It is one of most common term used during the early phases of a project
such as initiation, planning and assignment of work.
Why do we need to breakdown tasks? What happens if they are not broken down?
There are multiple reasons for using a WBS in projects—some of these are listed below:
Breaking down work ensures more accuracy and specifically helps to define and organise
the scope of the total project. Each level of the structure breaks the project deliverables or
objectives down to more specific and measurable chunks.
It allows double checking of all the deliverable specifics with the stakeholders and making
sure that nothing is missing/overlapping.
Last but not least, WBS illustrates the project scope so that stakeholders can have a better
understanding of the same.
The first step in creating a WBS is to get a team and, possibly, also the key stakeholders, together
in one room. The team possesses all the expertise, experience and creative thinking that will be
needed to get down to the specifics of each deliverable. If the team does not have the expertise
then subject matter experts—or the people who have worked on similar projects in the
organization—would be required for help.
There is nothing written in stone about how to break down the scope of work. It varies from project
to project and manager to manager.
Generally, the first level comprises the project title and the second level comprises the deliverables
for the project. Once we have the first two levels in place, it is time to break down work
(decomposition).
‘Decomposition’ is the act of breaking down deliverables into successively smaller chunks of work to
be completed in order to achieve a level of work that can be both realistically managed by the
Project Manager and completed within the given time frame by one or more team members. This
level of breakdown and detail is called the ‘work package’.
Work packages are the lowest level of the WBS and are pieces of work that are specifically
assigned to one person or a team of people. It is also the level at which the Project Manager has to
monitor all project work.
Now, the biggest question is how specific and small can this work package be. It can be done by
applying certain rules such as 8/80 or 8/40, that is, no work package should be less than 8 hours
and more than 80 hours or less than 8 hours and more than 40 hours.
As a general observation, it is found that managing/tracking work less than 8 hours is tedious and
time consuming for the Project Manager. However, in certain cases, it becomes important to
measure work of even 30 minutes or less.
Most of this work is performed by either machines or automated tools and the Project Manager or
the team member only observes the result at regular intervals.
The efficient breaking down of work helps the Project Manager to manage properly. It is one more
step to a successful project.
If all the above requirements have been followed, the Project Manager will be able to use the work
breakdown structure to arrive at the project work plan.
In this way, WBS plays an important role in the project life cycle and sets the tone for the execution
phase of project management.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
breaking down of work into smaller pieces in project management is termed as Work
Breakdown structure;
WBS serves multiple purposes and is, therefore, an important aspect of the project life cycle;
and
creating a WBS is not a static process, rather it is dynamic in nature and can accommodate
the particular needs of a given project.
Executing a Project
Table of Contents
1. Objectives
2. Introduction
3. Project Execution
4. The Project Control Process
5. The Purpose of Project Execution and Control
6. Summary
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the last segment, we learned about WBS and its importance in the project management life cycle.
In this segment, we will focus on project execution and the project control process.
An inexperienced person may interpret the term 'execution' to mean the personal consequence (or
at least it feels that way) if their project fails.
To a Project Manager or a leader it signifies the ‘Who, What, When and How’ that guides all project
activities. Sound project execution is a skill and also a knowledge area.
Technical skills and good people alone are not sufficient. Good project execution is possible when a
project team fully understands its roles, responsibilities, deliverables and due dates and works
together to complete the required work within the scheduled time.
Project teams show a collective morale and cohesion (or not) that is significantly influenced by how
well their work processes, communication and interactions work together. All these are execution
elements.
If confusion reigns, then productivity, quality and morale decline and schedules are missed. If this
occurs, it is time to stop, step back and understand what is happening. Where is the problem? Is
there a problem in the plan, or in the working? These are some of the important questions that must
be asked.
During project execution, the Project Manager as to act like a manager, coordinator, well-wisher,
motivator, coach and takes on other roles that are relevant to make the project successful.
Performance measurement and evaluation are important aspects in any project management
process. Performance measurement is the ongoing, regular collection of information for monitoring
how a project, policy or strategy is doing.
On the other hand, evaluation involves comparisons of performance with the objectives of the
information organisation in order to determine the change in performance over a given period or to
see whether the change is in the right direction or not and if so then to what extent.
Project execution (or implementation) is the phase in which the plan designed in the prior phases is
put into action. The purpose of project execution is to deliver the project’s expected results
(deliverable and other direct outputs). Typically, this is the longest phase of the project management
lifecycle where most resources are applied.
During project execution, the execution team utilises all the schedules, procedures and templates
that were prepared and anticipated during the previous phases. The completion of start-up activities
ensures that all elements are in place and project is ready to take-off. Project execution converts the
plan into a tangible asset, fulfilling a set of objectives. However, in real life, this transition from a plan
to a tangible asset is not smooth.
In the standard division of project management discipline, this phase is known as ‘project execution
and control’; the term ‘control’ is included here because execution is not a blind implementation of
what was written in advance but is a watchful process where doing things goes along with
understanding what is being done, and re-doing it or doing it differently when the action does not
fully respond to what it was meant for. This ‘control’ is an integral part of project management and is
a necessary task of the Project Manager.
The task of a Project Manager is to periodically monitor the performance, calculate the deviations,
and make adjustment in input, process, or plan so as to resolve the deviation and bring back the
project to the desired state.
Project Execution
At the time a project moves into the execution phase, the project team and the necessary resources
to carry out the project should be in place and ready to perform project activities. The project plan
should also have been completed and base-lined by this time. The project team and, specifically,
the Project Manager’s focus now shifts from planning the project efforts to participating, observing
and analysing the work being done.
Once all essentials are in place, the Project Manager plans to commence the project. He/she
organises a meeting called the 'kick-off meeting or event' of all concerned, chiefly, to announce the
start of the project. He/she takes the opportunity to present the main features of the project, project
objectives, organisation and so on. The purpose of the meeting is to ensure that:
A Project Manager’s responsibilities do not stop once the planning of the project is done. Because a
project manager is responsible to the internal and external Stakeholders, the Project Team,
vendors, executive management and so on, the visibility of the position is intensified. Many of these
people will now expect to see and discuss the resulting deliverables that were so meticulously
detailed in the planning phase.
As a Project Manager, keeping oneself from getting ‘down in the weeds,’ especially on large
projects, will be important during project execution. This will allow the Project Manager to
focus his/her attention on enabling the project plans, processes and managing the expectations of
the customers as well as the Stakeholders.
During project execution, particular attention needs to be paid to keeping interested parties up to
date with project status, dealing with procurement and contract administration issues, helping
manage quality control and monitoring project risk.
While the processes to control many of these elements are discussed within the project control
phase, it is, nevertheless, still important that the Project Manager be cognisant of the issues as the
project is being performed. Daily interaction and feedback from team members, therefore, prove to
be vital for project success.
The Project Team Members are expected to assist in the management of the project as well; albeit,
at a more functional level. The critical project management elements where the Project Team can
provide assistance, include:
Performance monitoring: This includes implementing an execution plan to measure the actual
performance as compared to planned performance. For example, the actual project schedules need
to be reviewed periodically and compared to baseline schedules in order to discern if the project is
performing according to the plan.
If the project is not performing according to baseline, steps need to be taken to get the project back
on track. The same monitoring and analysing should take place on budgets, quality, risks, scope
and so on.
Providing project status: While the Project Manager is responsible for relaying the project status
to parties outside the Project Team, the latter is expected to report the status to the Project
Manager. This includes communicating information, both, on a formal as well as an informal basis.
For execution of a large project, many a times, three types of network are prepared. These include:
Critical path network: Critical path networks highlight which tasks are critical for a project to stay
on schedule and which can slide without affecting the completion date of the project. This allows
efficient prioritisation of tasks. This shows only critical path activities and may be used by senior
level executives.
Detailed network: This is the final network which is arrived at after the resource rescheduling
process. It satisfies resource constraints and shows all activities including activities of the critical
path.
Agency wise network: This network only shows the activities to be executed by a particular
agency. It provides easy accounting for the executing agency.
Work-to List: Work-to list is a list prepared separately for each agency, after the resource
scheduling process. It is a recommendation to the concerned managers of the sequence and timing
of work to be done—a list to be worked upon. A work-to list is usually prepared to cover only a few
weeks ahead. However, it may cover the details of longer periods as per need.
There are three basic performance objectives/standards for a project which a manager is expected
to control. These include time schedule (project duration), project cost and conformance to design
specifications, which ensure quality.
Two of the commonly used methods to evaluate these objectives are variance analysis and the
earned value method.
Performance monitoring for schedule and cost tells who is to monitor the information and at what
frequency. Normally, for a moderate size project, a separate project monitoring cell is created for
collecting, analysing and reporting information to all concerned for the purpose of information and
controlling the project. The task of the group may include:
monitoring progress,
calculating variance/earned value,
preparing variance/earned value report and other reports and sending them to all concerned,
presenting the report in the review meeting,
compiling the measures arrived at in the meeting to deal with variances, and
following up the implementation of suggested measures.
The frequency of monitoring depends on the nature, duration and importance of projects and the
Stakeholders’ need. The time between monitoring may vary from continuous to several days.
The Earned Value Method (EVM) is a useful tool that allows the calculations of cost and schedule
performance measures including cost variance, schedule variance and cost and time over-runs for a
project. EVM uses the following parameters to calculate these measures:
Budgeted Cost of Work Schedule (BCWS): This is the budgeted cost of work scheduled up to the
status date and is calculated as:
BCWS = (Budgeted cost of work/day × Scheduled days of work up to status date for each activity)
Budgeted Cost of Work Actually Performed (BCWP) or Earned Value (EV): This is the
budgeted cost of work actually accomplished up to the status date and is calculated as:
Where,
Proportion of an activity = (work completed in physical units)/(Total work planned in physical units)
Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP): This is the cumulative actual cost of work performed up
to the status date and is calculated as:
ACWP = (Actual cost of work performed for each activity up to status date)
A negative cost variance means that the project is spending more than it should.
CPI less than one, indicates that the project is spending more than the schedule and is
unfavourable.
SPI less than one suggests that the work performed is less than the schedule and is naturally
unfavourable.
Figure 15 depicts the plot of BCWS versus time. This curve shows the cumulative spending planned
for a project and is referred to as the baseline plan and is also referred to as the S-curve.
Figure 16 depicts the plots of three spending BCWS, ACWP and BCWP for a typical project. It helps
to calculate the cost as well as schedule variances, and hence, is quite useful in controlling the
project.
The vertical distance between point R2 and R3 (that is, ACWP – BCWP) give the cost variance (in
this case overrun).
Point R3 falls below point R1, indicating that the project is behind schedule. Schedule variance in
monetary unit is given by vertical distance R1R3 (that is, BCWS – BCWP) and months behind is
given by the horizontal distance from point R3 on the BCWP curve to R4 on the BCWS curve, which
is equal to (t2 – t1).
The above analysis of various spending (BCWS, BCWP and ACWP) variances and their plots is
carried out on an aggregate basis. Aggregate analysis simply shows whether a project is under
control or not with respect to cost and time objective.
However, it does not pinpoint the specific actionable areas for bringing the project on track. For this
reason, variance analysis needs to be conducted on an activity-to-activity basis, besides aggregate
analysis.
Variance is the deviation of actual value from the planned value of a parameter. Variance analysis is
used to calculate the variances of parameters. Schedule Variance (time) is used to measure
schedule performance of an activity in terms of time and is calculated as:
The variance report may be presented in a tabular form or a graphical form. The data can be
provided for the current period as well as on a cumulative basis for an activity. A graphical report
may include GANTT chart, a milestone chart and a network diagram.
Here, the progress of any activity may be depicted by drawing another line or bar (usually in
different colour) over the line or the bar indicating the activity in plan. Difference in the length of
these two lines shows whether the activity is lagging, leading or on schedule.
Forecast: Once the current status of the project in terms of variances is known, the next task is to
make a forecast about the project at completion. The forecast is an estimate of the future based on
current progress and other factors (risks, resource availability and so on.)
The findings about variance and forecast are compiled in the form of a report. The report is
circulated to all concerned and is discussed in a review meeting. Various options including re-
planning, reallocating resources or changing the way the project is managed and so on are
discussed to resolve the variances.
Of these, a set of options are chosen. Plans to implement these options are drawn and executing
agencies are identified. The progress of such plans are monitored in the review meeting.
Project execution and control utilises all the plans, schedules, procedures, and templates that were
prepared and anticipated during prior phases. Unanticipated events and situations will inevitably be
encountered, and the Project Manager and the Project Team will be taxed to capacity to deal with
them while minimising the impact on the project’s CSSQ (Cost, Scope, Schedule and Quality).
The conclusion of the phase arrives when the product of the project is fully developed, tested,
accepted, implemented and transitioned to the performing organisation. Accurate records need to
be kept throughout this phase. They serve as input to the final phase—project closeout or project
closure.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that:
project execution (or implementation) is the phase in which the plan designed in the prior
phases is put into action;
control—corrective measures to resolve deviation between the planned and the actual—is
an integral part of project management and is, therefore, included in the execution phase;
two of the commonly used methods to evaluate variances of cost and schedule are variance
analysis and the earned value method.
Reviews in a Project
Table of Contents
1. Objectives
2. Introduction
3. Review and its Types
5. Summary
Objectives
Upon completion of this segment, you will be able to:
Introduction
In the last segment, we learned about project execution and the project control process. In this
segment, we will focus on the importance of review and its various types.
Review of deliverables in a project is done either formally or informally. Formal reviews are
performed as per the process defined and accepted by all. Informal reviews are those wherein
formal documentation can be skipped.
During preparation of a work plan, the Project Manager must allocate some time in the project
schedule for project reviews. The Project Manager has to schedule some time to ask the following
questions:
The Project Manager has to get all deliverables of the project reviewed properly. The main
deliverables of the project such as project plan, risk plan, issue plan, quality plan, scope plan and
work plan, all have to be reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure that they support the goal,
approach and feasibility of the project on ground. Post review, these plans have to be taken up with
the Stakeholders for their approval.
Peer reviews
Peer reviews are conducted by colleagues or co-workers working in the same project. The Project
Manager must ensure that proper templates, checklists, samples and trainings are provided for
everyone to perform the peer review efficiently. It is possible that peers may not be well versed with
the function of an item. In such cases the peer review is likely to be ineffective. Therefore, it is
important to plan in advance.
This type of a review is performed by a person outside the project and sometimes outside the
working group but by one who has knowledge or expertise in that particular field of work. When peer
review fails or are found to be ineffective, external project reviews help.
It does not, however, mean that when peer review is performed, an external review is not
necessary. It could still be required. External reviews also bring in a different perspective to the
review process as they are not directly influenced by the Project Stakeholders.
Although the peer and external reviews are also quality reviews, a specific quality review is done by
trained quality team members. The quality team brings in expertise and works outside the influence
of the project or the Project Manager.
The review plan has to be prepared properly and shared with everyone. Stakeholders will be more
interested to know the results of the quality review done by an external team.
Stakeholder review
As the name suggests, a Stakeholder review is done by any other stakeholders than those
mentioned above. It could be the Client, Project Manager, client representative, Sponsor and so on.
The Project Manager has to decide which review is suitable for a given project and in which phase.
These review schedules have to be documented in the work plan and the reviewer’s time has to be
blocked beforehand.
A generic review cycle involves creating the review plan, performing the review, recording the
review and acting on the outcome of the review.
Even the project plan prepared by the project Manager or his team has to be reviewed to ensure its
feasibility. If the Project Manager has prepared the plan himself, he/she has to find a peer Project
Manager or a quality assurance team member to ensure the effectiveness of the review.
At times, the project plan may have some gaps which can be found earlier than later—by following
the above process—thereby preventing cost implications to the project. The comments provided by
such reviews need to be documented and action must be taken to ensure that they are satisfactorily
closed.
In certain type of projects—where documentation is very critical and people who create these have
to be assessed for their productivity and quality of work—data points such as the number of review
comments, criticality of comments and size of the document, all could help.
Ideally, the Project Manager has to cap-in at least 10-15% of effort towards such reviews. Proper
reviews done in initial stage can be very helpful. It is observed that the cost of fixing issues later in
the project is very high compared to their identification and fixing in the early stages. The famous
proverb, ‘A stitch in time saves nine’ is relevant here.
Let us take the example of making a bolt with a head of six sides and the length of 2 cm. If the
person is not experienced on the job and has set his machine improperly, whereby it produces a
length of 2.1 cm instead of 2 cm and is running for ½ hour, we can imagine what would be the loss.
If the Project Manager understands the skill of the resource and—in the plan—makes sure that
before making the bolts, the machine is verified by another expert or his peer, it can reduce the loss
of effort and wastage.
Similarly, in the software industry, if the code written by one of the developers is reviewed properly
by peers or leads, it reduces the defects on moving to the final stage of the project. The cost of
fixing a defect—when found at the last minute—is high. Such defects reduce the confidence of the
client—if found by them.
Hence, reviews serve an important purpose in the project life cycle and go a long way in ensuring
that a fresh pair of eyes—whether it is that of a peer or any of the other entities discussed so far—
are able to detect any potential flaws in the project at an early stage where corrective measures can
be taken as against finding them at a later stage when it is much too late.
Summary
In this segment, you learned that: