MOJICA Lab Report 3 Series Parallel Pumps
MOJICA Lab Report 3 Series Parallel Pumps
Experiment No. 3
ME152L-2 / C2
Group 2
GRADE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OBJECTIVES………………………………………………………………….…………………..….…..1
LIST APPARATUS…………………………………………………………………..…………....……...5
PROCEDURE………………………………………………………………………………………..……6
SET UP OF APPARATUS……………………………………………………..……….…………..…...7
DISCUSSION………….………………………………………………………......………...………….12
CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………..………………14
REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………..……………...…15
i
OBJECTIVES
1
THEORY AND PRINCIPLE
Pumps can be arranged and connected in serial or parallel to provide additional head or flow
rate capacity.
A. Discharge Flow, Q
B. Manometric Head, Hm
C. Brake Power, BP in
2
Pumps in Serial - Head Added
When two (or more) pumps are arranged in serial their resulting pump performance curve is
obtained by adding their heads at the same flow rate as indicated in the figure below.
Centrifugal pumps in series are used to overcome larger system head loss than one pump can
handle alone.
for two identical pumps in series the head will be twice the head of a single pump at the
same flow rate - as indicated with point 2.
With a constant flowrate the combined head moves from 1 to 2 - BUT in practice the combined
head and flow rate moves along the system curve to point 3.
Note that for two pumps with equal performance curves running in series
the head for each pump equals half the head at point 3
the flow for each pump equals the flow at point 3
Operation of single stage pumps in series are seldom encountered - more often multistage
centrifugal pumps are used.
3
Pumps in Parallel - Flow Rate Added
When two or more pumps are arranged in parallel their resulting performance curve is obtained
by adding the pumps flow rates at the same head as indicated in the figure below. Centrifugal
pumps in parallel are used to overcome larger volume flows than one pump can handle alone.
for two identical pumps in parallel and the head kept constant - the flow rate doubles
compared to a single pump as indicated with point 2
Note! In practice the combined head and volume flow moves along the system curve as
indicated from 1 to 3.
In practice, if one of the pumps in parallel or series stops, the operation point moves along the
system resistance curve from point 3 to point 1 - the head and flow rate are decreased.
Note that for two pumps with equal performance curves running in parallel
zero flow or “shut valve” heads must match for the pumps
unstable pump curves must be avoided
steeper pump curves are preferred
4
LIST OF APPARATUS
3. Weight Sets
4. Steel Tanks
5
PROCEDURE
6
SETUP OF APPARATUS
A. Full Set-Up
7
Name: Mojica, Neil Daniel B. Seat Number: 16
Student Number: 2021100407 Date: 12-14-2023
Group No.: 2
Pump A:
N hv Q HS(A) HD(A) HM(A) MT Pin Pout PA
(rpm) (mm) (m3/s) (m) (m) (m) (gm) (W) (W) (%)
1.3598 435.575
1600 62 -1.8 1.8 3.8163 1060 50.9081 11.69
x10-3 5
Pump B:
N hv Q HS(B) HD(B) HM(B) MT Pin Pout PB
(rpm) (mm) (m3/s) (m) (m) (m) (gm) (W) (W) (%)
1.5279 452.012
1600 65 -2.5 0.5 3.2731 1100 49.0595 10.85
x10-3 4
SERIES:
N Q HS(A) HD(A) HM(A) HS(B) HD(B) HM(B)
S (%)
(rpm) (m3/s) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1.3598
1600 -2.25 0.8 3.2663 -1.5 1 2.7163 11.29
x10-3
PARALLEL:
N hv QT QA QB
P (%)
(rpm) (mm) (m3/s) (m3/s) (m3/s)
1600 69 1.7706x10-3 1.3598x10-3 1.5279x10-3 6.89
8
Sample Computations:
Pump A
√( )
3
m −3 m
Q=0.31 ( ho )2.5 √ 2 g=( 0.31 ) ( 0.06285 )2.5 2 9.81 =1.3598 x 10
s2 s
Manometric head
−3 2
H M =H D−H S + ( 1.17 x 10 ) ( Q ) =1.8 m−(−1.8 m ) + ( 1.17 x 10 ) ( 1.3598 x 10 ) =3.8163 m
5 2 5
Brake power
Water power
Pump efficiency
W Pout 50.9081W
η P= × 100 %= ×100 %=11.69 %
B P¿ 435.5755W
Pump B
9
h o=h v + 0.00085=( 65 mm ) ( 10001 mmm )+0.00085=0.06585 m
Discharge flow
√( )
3
m −3 m
Q=0.31 ( ho ) 2.5
√ 2 g=( 0.31 ) ( 0.06585 ) 2.5
2 9.81 2 =1.5279 x 10
s s
Manometric head
−3 2
H M =H D−H S + ( 1.17 x 10 ) ( Q ) =0.5 m−(−2.5 m ) + ( 1.17 x 10 )( 1.5279 x 10 ) =3.2731m
5 2 5
Brake power
Water power
Pump efficiency
W Pout 49.0595 W
η P= × 100 %= × 100 %=10.85 %
B P¿ 452.0124 W
Series configuration
−3 2
H M ( A )=H D ( A )−H S ( A ) + ( 1.17 x 10 ) ( Q A ) =0.8 m−(−2.25 m ) + ( 1.17 x 10 )( 1.3598 x 10 ) =3.2663 m
5 2 5
H M (B )=H D ( B)−H S ( B) + ( 1.17 x 105 ) ( Q2B )=1 m−(−1.5 m ) + ( 1.17 x 10 5 )( 1.3598 x 10−3 ) =2.7163 m
2
Pump efficiency
10
H M ( A) + H M( B) 3.2663 m+2.7163 m
η series = ×100 %= ×100 %=11.29 %
H M ( A ) H M ( B) 3.2663 m 2.7163 m
+ +
η P (A ) η P(B ) 0.1169 0.1085
Parallel configuration
√( )
3
m −3 m
Q T =0.31 ( ho ) 2.5
√2 g=( 0.31 ) ( 0.06985 ) 2.5
2 9.81 2 =1.7706 x 10
s s
Pump efficiency
3
−3 m
1.7706 x 10
QT s
η¿ = × 100 %= 3 3
×100 %=6.89 %
Q A QB −3 m −3 m
+ 1.3598 x 10 1.5279 x 10
η A ηB s s
+
0.1169 0.1085
11
DISCUSSION
The experiment aimed to investigate the performance of centrifugal pumps in varying
setups, including single operation, series, and parallel configurations. The collected data and
computations offer valuable insights into the efficiency and characteristics of the pumps under
these different arrangements.
Series Configuration:
In the series configuration, where the pumps were connected linearly, the manometric
heads for Pump A and Pump B were computed separately, considering the cumulative effect.
The series operation resulted in an efficiency of 11.29%, indicating that when working in series,
the pumps contributed to an increased overall head, effectively overcoming higher resistance or
lift requirements.
Parallel Configuration:
In the parallel configuration, where the pumps operated simultaneously, drawing fluid
independently from the same source, the total discharge flow and efficiency for the parallel
setup were calculated. The parallel configuration exhibited an efficiency of 6.89%, highlighting
that parallel operation achieved a higher flow rate but with lower efficiency compared to the
series configuration.
12
These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting pump configurations based on
specific application requirements.
1. Question: What is the fundamental difference between series and parallel pumping
in fluid systems?
Answer: Series pumping involves the sequential connection of multiple pumps, where the output
of one pump becomes the input for the next. In contrast, parallel pumping involves the
simultaneous operation of multiple pumps, with each pump handling a portion of the total flow.
2. Question: How do series and parallel pumping configurations affect the total head
and flow rate in a pumping system?
Answer: In series pumping, the total head increases, while the flow rate remains constant. In
parallel pumping, the flow rate increases, and the total head remains constant. These
configurations offer different performance characteristics to meet specific system requirements.
3. Question: What are the advantages and disadvantages of series pumping in terms
of system efficiency and redundancy?
Answer: Series pumping provides increased system efficiency by allowing pumps to operate
near their best efficiency points. However, it lacks redundancy, as a failure in one pump can
disrupt the entire system. Redundancy can be achieved by adding standby pumps.
4. Question: Explain the concept of pump affinity laws and how they apply to parallel
pumping.
Answer: Pump affinity laws describe the relationship between pump speed, impeller diameter,
head, and flow rate. In parallel pumping, the flow rate is directly proportional to the number of
pumps running, assuming constant pump speed. Affinity laws help predict the system's
performance when multiple pumps are operating simultaneously.
13
head, while parallel pumps help achieve the desired flow rate. This hybrid approach offers a
balance between energy efficiency and system reliability.
CONCLUSION
This study investigated the performance of centrifugal pumps in various setups,
including individual operation, series, and parallel configurations. The primary goals were to
acquaint participants with pump setups, grasp operational principles, and collect performance
data for thorough analysis. The outcomes and discussions provided insights into pump
efficiency and characteristics under diverse conditions. Performance of Individual Pumps: Pump
consistent performance within the experimental parameters. Series Setup: The series
configuration exhibited a higher overall efficiency of 11.29%, consistent with the principle that
cumulative increase in total head. Parallel Setup: Despite achieving a higher flow rate, the
parallel configuration displayed a lower efficiency of 6.89%. This highlights the robustness of the
parallel setup in scenarios requiring greater fluid transport volume, as suggested by the
professor. It is important to note that the parallel arrangement would require larger piping to
in different setups, and enhanced their understanding of fluid transport systems. The learning
knowledge into practical insights. Through hands-on engagement, students developed skills in
optimizing pump systems based on factors such as flow rate, head requirements, and efficiency.
Practical skills in fluid dynamics experiments, including valve manipulation and parameter
recording, were refined. In summary, the experiment successfully achieved its objectives by
thoroughly investigating pump configurations in series and parallel. Students gained valuable
14
data, refined practical skills, and deepened their understanding of pump performance principles.
This knowledge is crucial for future engineers and practitioners engaged in industries where
REFERENCES
15