2017-Empleo Decente Con Enfoque de Derechos
2017-Empleo Decente Con Enfoque de Derechos
An Evidence Base
Health Employment and Economic Growth
Powerful demographic and economic forces are shaping health The 17 chapters
workforce needs and demands worldwide. in this book, are
The contents of this book give direction and detail to a richer • Economic value Edited by
and more holistic understanding of the health workforce and investment
James Buchan
through the presentation of new evidence and solutions-
focused analysis. It sets out, under one cover, a series of • Education and Ibadat S. Dhillon
research studies and papers that were commissioned to production
provide evidence for the High-Level Commission on Health James Campbell
Employment and Economic Growth. • Addressing
inefficiencies
‘’An essential read that rightfully places investments in health workforce at the heart
of the SDG Agenda.”
— Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief
The Lancet
Campbell
Dhillon
Buchan
work in health.”
— H.R.H. Princess Muna al-Hussein,
Princess of Jordan
Health Employment
and Economic Growth
An Evidence Base
Edited by
James Buchan
Ibadat S. Dhillon
James Campbell
i
Health Employment and Economic Growth: An Evidence Base
ISBN 978-92-4-151240-4
Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial
purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there
should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of
the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or
equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following
disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health
Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original
English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.
Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the
mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Suggested citation. Buchan J, Dhillon IS, Campbell J, editors. Health Employment and Economic Growth:
An Evidence Base. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit
requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.
Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such
as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that
reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of
any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.
General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication
do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status
of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or
boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not
yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are
endorsed or recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication.
However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or
implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event
shall WHO be liable for damages arising from its use.
The named authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication.
Printed in USA
17-004 WHO Health Employment and Economic Growth TEXT LowColor 9.indd 2 10/27/17 16:04
Contents
List of Tables, Boxes and Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
List of Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Introduction to Health Employment and Economic Growth:
An Evidence Base, by James Buchan, Ibadat S. Dhillon, James Campbell . . . . xv
CHAPTER 4
Table 1 Practising doctors by place of birth in 30 OECD countries,
2000/2001 and 2010/2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
Table 2 Practising nurses by place of birth in 30 OECD countries,
2000/2001 and 2010/2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
Table 3 Foreign-trained doctors working in 26 OECD countries,
2000, 2006 and 2012–2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Table 4 Foreign-trained nurses working in 25 OECD countries,
2000, 2006 and 2012–2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Table 5 Trends in the expatriation rates of doctors and nurses
to OECD countries, 2000/2001 and 2010/2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Table 6 Estimated critical shortages of doctors, nurses and
midwives, by WHO region, 2000/2001 and 2010/2011 . . . . . . . . . . . 103
CHAPTER 5
Table 1 Projections for health care personnel demand in Norway
in 2060 (in thousand FTEs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
CHAPTER 6
Table 1 Conceptual framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Table 2 Median ratio of NHO workers to HO workers in 52
ILOSTAT countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
Table 3 WHO database categories and their ISCO code equivalents . . . . . . . . 165
Table 4 Median number of workers per 1000 population in
low-vulnerability countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
CHAPTER 9
Table 1 Wage indexes for health workers by cadre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
CHAPTER 11
Table 1 Search terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
Table 2 MeSH terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
CONTENTS v
CHAPTER 17
Table 1 Dependent and independent variables at district level (n = 412) . . . . . . 425
Table 2 Results of the three zero-truncated, negative binomial GLMs
for GP density, specialist density and ratio of GPs–specialists . . . . . . . 427
FIGURES
CHAPTER 1
Figure 1 SDG composite index: percentage of 12 SDG tracer indicators
achieved as a function of aggregate density of doctors, nurses
and midwives per 1000 population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
CHAPTER 2
Figure 1 Women’s share of employment in the health and social sector
versus total employment (%), by WHO region, average values
for the period 2005–2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Figure 2 Unadjusted gender wage gaps in mean monthly earnings
among health professionals and health associate professionals, 2005–
2014 (latest year for which data are available) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Figure 3 Women’s share of senior positions over their share
of employment, by sector and by country, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
CHAPTER 3
Figure 1 Percentage of population aged 60 years and over: 2015 and 2050 . . . 55
Figure 2 Young children and older people as a percentage of global population,
1950 to 2050 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Figure 3 People-centred integrated health services delivery:
the example of Alzheimer’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
CHAPTER 4
Figure 1 Number of foreign-born doctors and nurses in 30 OECD
countries by main region of origin, 2000/2001 and 2010/2011 . . . . . . . . 96
Figure 2 Number of foreign-born doctors and nurses in OECD
countries by 25 main countries of origin, 2000/2001
and 2010/2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Figure 3 Changes in the number of domestic graduates and inflow
of foreign-trained health workers, United States, 2001–2014 . . . . . . 106
Figure 4 Changes in the numbers of domestic graduates and inflow of
foreign-trained health workers, United Kingdom, 2000–2014 . . . . . . 107
Figure 5 Changes in numbers of new registrations of doctors
trained in Poland in three OECD countries, 2001–2012 . . . . . . . . . . . 109
Figure 6 Changes in numbers of new registrations in Italy and France
of nurses trained in Romania, 2000–2012 and 2006–2012 . . . . . . . . 110
CHAPTER 6
Figure 1 Composition of workers in the global health economy
(thousands), 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Figure 2 Ratio of NHO workers to HO workers, by income group, 2015 . . . . 148
Figure 3 Numbers of formal HO workers and NHO workers
currently available and missing, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Figure 4 Numbers of formal HO workers and NHO workers missing
in public and private employment, by region, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
Figure 5 Additional HO and NHO jobs to be created by 2030 in
public and private employment, by income group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
CHAPTER 7
Figure 1 Pathways to economic growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
Figure 2 Knock-on effects: some virtuous cycles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
CHAPTER 8
Figure 1 Gross hourly earning by age and health status in 21 European
OECD countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
Figure 2 Incidence of absenteeism and presenteeism (%) and
average absence duration (days) by mental health status,
average over 21 European OECD countries in 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
Figure 3 Employment in health and social work as a share of total employment,
OECD countries, 2000 and 2014 (or latest year available) . . . . . . . . . 205
Figure 4 Employment growth by sector, 2000–2014 (or latest year),
OECD average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
CHAPTER 9
Figure 1 Fiscal and financial space, domains and interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Figure 2 Comparison of average health worker wage indexes estimated
from ILOSTAT and from the GHED, displayed by World Bank
income group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
Figure 3 Sample statistics (mean, median, percentiles) for wage bills expressed
as a proportion of general government expenditure
on health, estimated from unpublished data in the GHED
(n = 136), displayed by World Bank income group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
CONTENTS vii
Figure 4 Number of countries where the wage bills of meeting normative health
worker targets would amount to more than 60% of
projected public spending on health in 2030 (n = 183) . . . . . . . . . . . 229
Figure 5 Number of countries where the wage bills of meeting normative health
worker targets would amount to more than 90% of projected public
spending on health in 2030 (n = 183) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
Figure 6 Projected financing gap for wages, and % of GDP and total
health expenditure required to pay additional wage bills, in
low-income countries over the period 2016–2030, assuming
an average health worker wage index (for all cadres) of
3 times GDP per capita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
Figure 7. Projected financing gap for wages, and % of GDP and total
health expenditure required to pay additional wage bills, in
lower middle-income countries over the period 2016–2030, assuming an
average health worker wage index (for all
cadres) of 3 times GDP per capita . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
CHAPTER 11
Figure 1 Interaction between education and labour markets, and
health systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
Figure 2 Hours-adjusted internal rate of return on additional training
for five surgical specialties and primary care medicine . . . . . . . . . . . 268
Figure 3 Growth in the remuneration of GPs and specialists, 2005–2013
(or nearest year) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
Figure 4 Founding dates of medical schools in sub-Saharan Africa
by sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
CHAPTER 13
Figure 1 THEnet social accountability framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
Figure 2 Building blocks for socially accountable health workforce
education institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331
CHAPTER 14
Figure 1 Reported overskilling by physicians, nurses and other
occupations, PIAAC survey, 2011/2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344
Figure 2 Reported underskilling by physicians, nurses and other
occupations, PIAAC survey, 2011/2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
Figure 3 Recommendations for reforms and enabling actions . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
Figure 4 Generalists as a share of all physicians, selected OECD
countries, 1995–2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350
Figure 5 Share of students admitted in general medicine versus other
specializations, selected OECD countries, 2013 (or nearest year) . . . . . . 351
Figure 6 Graduates from nurse practitioners programmes,
United States, 2001–2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352
CHAPTER 15
Figure 1 Subcontracting of ancillary services in all public hospitals
in South Africa, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
Figure 2 Yearly change of health workers’ remuneration compared
to total health expenditure and GDP by country income
level, 2000–2010 (%) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376
Figure 3 Female share of employment in the health and social
services sector by region, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
CHAPTER 17
Figure 1 Physician–population ratio as physicians per 100 000
inhabitants at district level in Germany, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412
BOXES
CHAPTER 1
Box 1 What is the health workforce? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Box 2 Operational definitions of health workforce needs, supply
and demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Box 3. Prior thresholds for health worker needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
CHAPTER 3
Box 1 Examples of health system and health workforce reforms . . . . . . . . . 60
Box 2. Multidisciplinary competencies in the care of older adults at
the completion of the entry-level health professional degree . . . . . . . . 64
Box 3. Examples of educational reform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
CHAPTER 4
Box 1 Highlights from the WHO Global Code of Practice on the
International Recruitment of Health Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Box 2 Learning from new models of global governance in the area
of climate change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
CHAPTER 6
Box 2 The forgotten workforce: female family members filling
in for shortages of long-term care workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
CHAPTER 8
Box 1 Labour force impact of HIV/AIDS in low- and middle-income
countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
CONTENTS ix
CHAPTER 12
Box 1 Transforming the health workforce in India . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
Box 2 Clinical associates in South Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
Box 3 People-centred and integrated health services in the Philippines . . . 294
Box 4 Apprenticeships in Benin, Malawi and the United States
of America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
Box 5 Measuring the return on investment in TVET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
CHAPTER 13
Box 1 Social accountability within health workforce education . . . . . . . . . . 311
Box 2 Interprofessional education and collaborative practice . . . . . . . . . . . 315
Box 3 Participatory planning to integrate education and health
services in Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
Box 4 Building a career in rural and remote areas: the stepladder
programme in the Philippines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
Box 5 Right-touch regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326
CHAPTER 14
Box 1 Recommendations to improve health workforce planning
in OECD countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
CHAPTER 15
Box 1 What is decent work? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
Box 2 ILO Conventions and standards relevant to the health sector . . . . . . 369
Box 3 Examples of improving conditions of work and organizing
care work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
Box 4 Raising awareness on labour rights for prospective migrant
nurses in the Philippines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380
Box 5 Brazil: Decent Work Agenda in the health sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382
CHAPTER 16
Box 1 Irrational posting and transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388
CHAPTER 17
Box 1 Regulatory planning system in Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411
Box 2 District factors possibly affecting physicians’ choice of
practice location in Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413
Box 3 Factors showing a significant association with physician density . . . 419
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS xi
Lynn Freedman, Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program, Columbia
University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, United States
Megan Gerecke, Independent Researcher, Geneva, Switzerland
John H.V. Gilbert, University of British Columbia, Canada, and Dalhousie
University, Nova Scotia, Canada
Yevgeniy Goryakin, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia,
United Kingdom
Wolfgang Greiner, Department of Health Economics and Health Management,
Faculty of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
Keith Holmes, Division for Policies and Lifelong Learning Systems, UNESCO,
Paris, France
David Hunter, Department of Statistics, International Labour Office,
Geneva, Switzerland
Chris James, Health Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development, Paris, France
Arielle Juberg, Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program, Columbia
University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, United States
Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen, University of Oslo, Oslo Economics, Oslo, Norway
Gaétan Lafortune, Health Division, Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD), Paris, France
Jeremy A. Lauer, Economic Analysis and Evaluation, Health Systems Governance
and Financing Department, Geneva, Switzerland
Gillian Lê, Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne,
Carlton, Australia
Jenny Liu, Institute for Health and Aging, Department of Social and Behavioral
Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Akiko Maeda, Health, Nutrition and Population Global Practice, World Bank,
Washington DC, United States
Veronica Magar, Gender, Equity, and Human Rights, World Health Organization,
Geneva, Switzerland
Barbara McPake, Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne,
Carlton, Australia
Tyra Merker, Oslo Economics, Oslo, Norway
The Global Strategy, adopted at the Sixty-ninth World Health Assembly in May
2016, challenges the erroneous narrative of health workers as a unit of cost in
the production of health. The evidence instead presents an intersectoral agenda
on the pre-condition of equitable access to health workers in the attainment of
universal health coverage, along with a dynamic labour market understanding of
the substantive impact on education, employment, jobs and innovation in the health
and social care economy. The Global Strategy, therefore, enables governments and
other relevant stakeholders to adopt a holistic, rather than fragmented, approach
to ensuring that the health workforce contributes both to improved health and to
broader socioeconomic development.
INTRODUCTION xv
At its core, the Global Strategy puts forward an integrated set of policy responses
necessary to take account of and respond to the dynamic and changing nature of
HRH, including the internal and international migration of health workers. The
Global Strategy highlights the importance of and need for intersectoral linkages
(between the education, health, labour and finance sectors), wider stakeholder
engagement, and effective analytical underpinning and alignment of policies across
sectors and stakeholders.
What is equally important, and is now receiving increasing recognition, is that there
can be no viable national or global economy without effective investment in the
health workforce. This reflects the overall paradigm shift from a model that frames
health system delivery and health employment as a “cost disease” to one in which the
contribution of health to economic and societal well-being is more fully recognized.
In this more complete perspective, the assessment of the contribution of the health
workforce broadens out to include its impact both as a leading source of employment
and as a socioeconomic multiplier, with particular benefits for women and youths. In
short, support for HRH is an investment in health, security and prosperity, not a cost.
The contents of this book give direction and detail to this important perspective by
presenting new evidence and analysis. It summarizes and sets out, under one cover, a
series of research studies and papers that were commissioned to provide evidence for
the High-Level Commission on Health Employment and Economic Growth.
The chapters, which were rapidly developed to retain a contemporary currency, are
evidence based and “next steps” oriented. They summarize the facts related to the
specific focus of review, but then assess them with a policy analysis lens, and provide
Each chapter of the book provides new analysis and fresh perspectives on aspects
of employment in health. The chapters stand alone and can be read in isolation, but
when read in combination, the reader will benefit from additional insights. These
derive from the linkages and connections between the issues covered in each chapter,
which means that the findings and recommendations are supportive and mutually
interdependent. A gender lens, as provided at the front of the book, in particular
helps the reader better see and understand the contribution of investments in the
health workforce, as well as the reforms required.
The ordering of the chapters in the book is linked to the same health labour market
framework that informs the Global Strategy. The book begins with chapters that
speak to overall health workforce dynamics, including existing and future estimates
of the health workforce, the gendered nature of the health workforce, and patterns
of international migration. Chapters identifying the socioeconomic value of and
opportunities for investment follow. The next set of chapters point to the potential to
transform the manner in which health workers are educated and formed. The book
concludes with a set of chapters outlining options to address existing inefficiencies in
the health workforce.
Each reader will develop their own conclusions about what are the main overall
messages and priorities that emerge, but the section below sets out five key messages
worthy of consideration.
INTRODUCTION xvii
B. What is important: five key messages
In combination, the evidence in the papers underpins five key messages that emerged
both from the analysis and from the work of the High-Level Commission. Overall, it
presents a strong argument in favour of investment in the health workforce (delivering
benefits across the SDGs), and a strong case for reform in how we invest in the health
workforce.
The analysis on HRH need and demand points to a growing staffing and skills
shortage in many countries, even in some high-income countries. The shortage is both
demographically driven, with population growth and ageing important factors, and
linked to the ambition of service delivery in the context of the SDG era. The analysis
additionally points to an escalating mismatch between supply, need (SDG-based)
and demand (ability to employ), with the international migration of health workers
also increasing. The analysis for the High-Level Commission further indicates that,
within a future scenario where continued fiscal and economic growth is accompanied
by an increase in priority to the health sector and the health workforce, there may
be sufficient financing in most countries to meet the wage bill for the additional
health workers required to address identified shortages. In some other, low-income,
countries, sustained development assistance from philanthropic, private and public
sources, investing in education, health, gender and labour, will be required to develop
and support the health workforce needed to deliver on the ambition of the SDGs.
The new analysis undertaken for the High-Level Commission helps broaden out the
assessment of HRH to include its impact both as a leading source of current and future
employment, notably for women and youths, and as a socioeconomic multiplier. The
analysis speaks to the fact that while globally the costs of HRH have been well recognized,
In part, this will be achieved by ensuring decent work; fulfilling labour rights;
addressing identified “market failures”, notably in current mismatches between
education, employment and population needs; appropriately recognizing and
rewarding women’s contribution; and establishing new “non-traditional” career entry
INTRODUCTION xix
points and routes that will have a payback in terms of both increased participation
and distributed growth. This will in turn require additional efforts to build the
evidence base and effective governance.
That process must also be driven by an assessment of the optimal skills mix to
achieve the SDGs and a primary care-led health system, with a strong focus on
expanding socially accountable TVET. Continuous development of the workforce,
particularly in underserved areas, must also be a priority; evidence suggests that
investment in the skills and motivations of the current workforce will be one major
factor in improving HRH distribution and impact.
Countries must not lose sight of the need to have the basic constructs for an effective
health workforce to be in place. These include policy, planning, management and
governance, supported by analysis based on accurate and complete HRH data.
Health workforce information is an obvious area for improvement in most countries;
without it, policy-makers and managers are “working blind”.
An effective health workforce is about more than just getting the staffing numbers
right. It is about recognizing that health workforce motivation, distribution and
C. Summary
The analysis and policy options set out in the chapters of this book highlight
that the global health workforce challenge cannot be solved by supply-side solutions
alone. The findings reported here support one of the main thrusts of the Global
Strategy – namely, that the policies that must be implemented cannot be “more of
the same”, but rather must emanate from a policy-led alignment of supply, demand
and need. This in turn must be informed by improved evidence and consistent
application of processes and tools, national policy coherence (better aligning across
the education, employment, health, labour, migration, and finance sectors), and
international cooperation.
The adoption of the Global Strategy and the publication of the High-Level
Commission’s report mark a watershed, and provide the foundation for a new,
transformative direction for health workforce policy and planning. This book gives
detail to this foundation. It is now for States and all relevant stakeholders to harness
the evidence and take the lead in shaping and implementing this new direction.
The focus of our efforts must now be on accountability for change, intersectoral
action, and finding new ways of working together. It will not be sufficient for
a handful of well-intentioned actors to attempt to “do the right thing” through
uncoordinated actions; what is now required is a critical mass of reform on
employment in health that is locally focused, country led, and globally connected.
INTRODUCTION xxi
xxii Health Employment and Economic Growth: An Evidence Base
PART I
Health Workforce
Dynamics
1
CHAPTER 1
Abstract
This chapter is based on analyses conducted by WHO and the World Bank
using the best available evidence. Variability in completeness and quality of
data required the use of assumptions, imputation and modelling techniques.
Modelled estimates identified that the growing demand for health workers
is projected to add an estimated 40 million health sector jobs to the global
economy by 2030. Most of these jobs will reside in upper middle- and
high-income countries. At the same time, modelled estimates point to the
need for over 18 million additional health workers by 2030 to meet the health
workforce requirements of the Sustainable Development Goals and universal
health coverage targets, with gaps in the supply of and demand for health
workers concentrated in low- and lower middle-income countries.
Indeed, many analyses point to the health economy – and those products, services
and activities related to health care and care for the dependent, disabled and elderly
(4) – as a driver of economic growth (5). There is also evidence that health sector
employment remains stable or even grows during economic downturns, contributing
to the resilience of national economies (6). In determining the potential for the health
economy to contribute to job creation and economic growth, it is, however, important
to have a more precise understanding of what constitutes “the health workforce”.
The International Labour Organization (ILO) adopts a model of the health workforce
(7) that (a) recognizes all workers in or contributing to the health sector based on
the concept of economic activity; (b) separately identifies specialized workers in
The available information is most complete for salaried and trained health workers
employed in the public sector; data can be more limited for health workers employed
in the private, not-for-profit or defence sectors, the self-employed, and health workers
with public health, health management, administrative or support roles. Despite
the existence of international measurement frameworks and classification systems,
the quality and quantity of information on the health workforce remains limited for
many countries, and particularly for those facing the most severe health workforce
challenges. In these contexts, there is a pressing need to improve statistical and
administrative data capacities, and infrastructure for improved health workforce
evidence.
Box 1
The 2006 World health report (8) defined health workers as “all people engaged in
actions whose primary intent is to enhance health”. For the purposes of health work-
force planning, it is necessary to understand the types of jobs needed to provide
health care, and the requisite skills and training for those jobs. This necessitates a
focus on occupations that require specific skills in the provision of health care and
that are in severe shortage in many countries. To understand the full impact of
investment in the health sector on employment and economic growth, however,
we also need to take into consideration the wider group of workers employed in
the health sector and in those industries that support it, as well as those providing
unpaid or informal care.
(continued on page 6)
b. those with training in a non-health field (or with no formal training) and
working in the health industry;
Categories (a) and (c) together form the trained (skilled) health workforce
(active or inactive) available in a given country or region, while (a) and (b)
represent the workforce employed in the health industry. The sum of the three
elements – (a), (b) and (c) – provides the total potential health workforce
available. A fourth category, (d), encapsulates all others, that is, those workers
without training for a health occupation and not working in the health
industry.
A limitation, however, is that the strong focus and better data availability on
trained workers in formal employment tends to overlook and underestimate the
role of many of those who contribute to the health sector as informal workers,
regardless of training or remuneration. In addition, it does not fully take into
consideration workers in non-health sectors that contribute to the health sector,
such as those involved in the pharmaceutical sector, in transportation services
or in the construction of medical facilities. These groups, included under the
ISCO groupings in categories other than health workers, would also need to be
quantified and monitored to assess the overall employment impact of the
health sector.
Most of the existing data available on the health workforce, however, are
restricted to workers in paid employment and in many cases only to those
formally employed in health services. Data are also more frequently complete
for health professionals than for other groups.
Source: ILO.
Box 2
Need: the number of health workers required to attain the objectives of the health
system. There are various approaches to calculating this number – for example,
it is sometimes estimated based on a threshold of minimum availability of health
workers to address priority population health issues, or in relation to the specific
service delivery profile and requirements of a health system.
Supply: the number of health workers who are available in a country. Future
supply can be estimated taking into account a variety of parameters, including
education capacity, attrition and retention.
Demand: the number of health workers that the health system (both public
and private) can support in terms of funded positions or economic demand
for services. Demand correlates with the economic capacity of a country, with
higher levels of resource availability resulting in greater demand for health
services and thus for health workers to provide them.
2. Methods
The methodological approach used to estimate and forecast needs-based
shortages of health workers was guided by the overarching goal of addressing
population health needs to make progress towards universal health coverage.
Policy actions and investment decisions should focus on redressing failures in
health labour markets, including easing supply constraints, to equitably meet
population health care needs. To this end, three main analyses were conducted:
(a) estimation of the projected supply, needs and needs-based shortages of health
workers to 2030, with a special emphasis on countries falling below a minimum
threshold of health worker availability; (b) projection of labour market demand
for health workers to 2030, taking into account economic growth trends and
other relevant parameters; and (c) simulation of trends in the supply of health
workers vis-à-vis requirements in high-income countries in the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In high-income countries,
the demand for health workers by far exceeds any needs-based thresholds, which
may attract health workers from other countries and has important implications
for global health workforce mobility patterns.
This SDG index threshold advances previous methods by empirically linking health
worker density to coverage of a broader range of health services based on universal
health coverage and SDGs. However, similarly to its predecessors, it should not be
used as a benchmark for planning at national levels as it does not account for the
high degree of heterogeneity across countries (with regard to baseline conditions,
epidemiology, demography, finances, health system needs, optimal workforce
composition and skills mix), which should be examined on an individual basis
when planning the workforce needed to meet the SDGs by 2030. Further, it is also
important that the use of the SDG index threshold does not result in an exclusive
The 2006 World health report (8 ) identified a minimum health worker density
of 2.3 skilled health workers (physicians and nurses/midwives) per 1000
population, which was considered generally necessary to attain high coverage
(80%) of skilled birth attendance. For nearly 10 years, the 2.3 workers
per 1000 threshold has galvanized support and enabled policy-makers
and advocates to push for goals and countries to measure their progress.
However, this threshold has its limitations in the SDG era: it is based on a
single health service (assisted deliveries) that is provided episodically, and its
focus is on maternal and newborn health, whereas the SDG agenda refers to
a broader range of services, including noncommunicable diseases.
To reflect the broader nature of universal health coverage, the ILO has
developed an alternative method to identify a minimum threshold of health
worker availability, rooted in an approach that identifies vulnerable countries
in terms of their social protection systems and outcomes. Based on this
approach, reflected in the 2010/2011 World social security report (14), the
threshold, termed as a “staff access deficit indicator”, identified a minimum
workforce availability of 3.4 skilled health workers per 1000 population. This
value has subsequently been updated to 4.1 per 1000 (15). The ILO approach,
while linked more explicitly to the policy ambition of universal health
coverage in the context of broader social protection, does not have a direct
empirical link with health service coverage.
Other similar thresholds exist. For instance, a value of 5.9 skilled health
professionals (midwives, nurses and physicians) per 1000 population was
identified as the workforce requirements for the Ending Preventable Maternal
Deaths initiative, which entails reducing global maternal deaths to 50 per
100 000 live births by 2035 (16).
Figure 1
30
25
Percentage of SDG tracer indicators achieved
20
15
10
0.05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The demand for health workers (physicians, nurses/midwives, and other health
workers) was estimated based on a model using per capita gross domestic product
(GDP), per capita out-of-pocket health expenditures, and population aged 65 years
and older. In this approach, demand is therefore more a function of economic
capacity than population needs. Demand for nurses/midwives was calculated
assuming a ratio of 2.5 to one physician (the average value in OECD countries).
Estimates could only be developed for 165 countries and territories with sufficient
data on the economic variables required to model demand.
3. Findings
Table 1 displays the forecasted numbers and percentage growth of health workers
by income group and WHO region in 2013 and 2030, assuming that recent trends
in training and employing health workers will stay the same. According to the latest
available data in 2013, the global health workforce was over 43 million, including 9.8
million physicians, 20.7 million nurses/midwives, and approximately 13 million other
health workers. The global nurse/midwife to physician ratio was 2.1 : 1. Based on current
trends and under the assumptions made in the model, the supply of health workers is
estimated to grow substantially (55%), leading to an aggregate of 67.3 million health
workers by 2030, comprising approximately 13.8 million physicians, 32.3 million nurses/
midwives and 21.2 million other health workers (18).
Table 2 shows the needs-based shortages of health workers in 2013 and 2030 in
countries below the SDG index threshold. Globally, there are more than enough
health workers to meet the SDG index threshold, but due to the uneven distribution
of health workers, there are countries in all income groups with needs-based
shortages, including the majority of low- and lower middle-income countries.
“Surpluses” in countries above the threshold were not computed towards the
Note: Absolute values are expressed in millions, rounded to the nearest 100 000. Totals may not precisely add up due
to rounding.
a. Refers to the seven other broad categories of the health workforce as defined by the WHO Global Health
Workforce Statistics database, that is, dentistry personnel, pharmaceutical personnel, laboratory health workers,
environment and public health workers, community and traditional health workers, health management and support
workers, and other health workers. A multiplier for “all other cadres” was developed based on the values of countries
with available data.
Note: All values are expressed in millions, rounded to the nearest 100 000. Totals may not precisely add up due to
rounding.
production and employment will not have sufficient impact on reducing the needs-
based shortage of health care workers by 2030, particularly in the African Region,
where the needs-based shortage is actually forecasted to worsen, while it will remain
broadly stable in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (18).
Table 3 shows that, by 2030, there will be a global aggregate demand for some 80
million health workers (in the 165 countries and territories with sufficient data to
produce demand estimates), with the potential for the creation of approximately 40
2013 2030
(165 countries) (165 countries)
WORLD BANK INCOME GROUP Demand Demand
Low 0.6 1.4
Lower middle 10.9 21.7
Upper middle 19.0 33.3
High 17.7 23.8
WHO REGION
Africa 1.1 2.4
Americas 8.8 15.3
Eastern Mediterranean 3.1 6.2
Europe 14.2 18.2
South-East Asia 6.0 12.2
Western Pacific 15.1 25.9
World 48.3 80.2
4. Discussion
The estimates described in the preceding sections were developed on the basis of
the best evidence and data available to WHO, which was nevertheless characterized
by variability in both completeness and quality. Assumptions had to be made to
overcome challenges relating to missing data; extensive use was made of modelling
and imputation techniques, which are described in greater detail in the full analyses.
Caution is therefore warranted in interpreting the findings: the results of these
simulations should not be interpreted as predictions of what will happen; instead they
are meant to show the directions in which the HRH situation is projected to be heading
if current trends continue, and to identify the policy levers to influence these trends.
Globally, 20–40% of all health spending is wasted (21), with health workforce
inefficiencies responsible for a substantial proportion. For example, service
organization models that place excessive reliance on specialists delivering curative
care in tertiary settings are neither cost-effective nor responsive to population
needs. In addition, weaknesses in transparency and accountability can lead to
inappropriate use of resources, such as ghost workers artificially inflating health
sector wage bills (22).
Policy reforms towards a more efficient and equitable allocation of resources are often
challenged by special interests, such as protecting overrestrictive access to health
professional education, or by well intentioned but misguided macroeconomic policies
that, while aiming at promoting economic stability, can result in underinvestment in
health systems (23) and in lost opportunities for job creation, economic growth and
improved health outcomes.
Market forces in the health sector do not necessarily and automatically lead towards
desirable health outcomes; health labour markets are an example of the potential
for market failure in the pursuit of social goals. Based on current trends, by 2030
the world would face a substantial and widening mismatch between the need for,
supply of and demand for health workers (see Tables 1 to 3). Evidence also indicates
that private sector investment in health worker education and employment tends
to cluster around the most remunerative professions and those marketable at the
global level, rather than the primary health care workforce, which is most needed
and effective in improving equity in access to essential health care services (28). It is
therefore critical that public sector policies and investments directly address health
labour market failures, better aligning supply of and demand for health workers to
population health needs, and prioritize investment in the cadres that have the skills
and competencies to meet the identified needs.
Past efforts for increasing the health workforce have also revealed the limitations
of approaches simplistically focused on scaling up the supply of health workers
without taking into account health labour market realities. For instance, several
low-income countries experience underemployment of doctors and nurses, yet
they simultaneously invest substantial public funds in producing more, worsening
underemployment and reducing the efficiency of government expenditures
(29). Conversely, effective strategies need to be targeted to the specific realities
and conditions of the health labour market and to improving the productivity
of the existing health workforce. These strategies should be accompanied by the
establishment of social protection schemes to make health care affordable to the
population, which can boost health system demand for health workers.
In low-income and some lower middle-income countries, on the other hand, both
demand and supply will continue to fall short of population needs. In these contexts
much-needed investments – from both the public and private sectors – in health
worker education should be accompanied by an expansion of the fiscal space to
create and fill funded positions in the health sector. Most funding should come from
domestic resources. However, several low-income countries and other settings affected
by complex humanitarian emergencies will still require international development
assistance for a few more decades.
Health workforce strategies should ensure that the expanded health resources envelope
leads to cost-effective resource allocation. An important strategy to inform resource
allocation will be to fully understand the health needs of populations in order to
design care delivery models that are both effective and efficient. Specifically, deploying
interprofessional primary care teams of health workers with broad-based skills should be
prioritized to avoid the pitfalls and cost escalation of overreliance on specialist and tertiary
care. This requires adopting a diverse and sustainable skills mix, and harnessing the
potential of community-based and mid-level health workers to extend service provision to
poor and marginalized populations (30, 31). In many settings, developing a national policy
to integrate community-based health workers in the health system can enable these cadres
to benefit from adequate system support and to operate more effectively within integrated
primary care teams (32, 33).
Technical and management capacities are needed to translate political will and
decisions into effective implementation; just as capable clinicians and health
professionals are needed, so are capable professional health managers, planners and
policy-makers. All countries should have an HRH unit or department, reporting
to a senior level within the ministry of health, with the capacity, responsibility and
accountability for a standard set of core functions of HRH policy, advocacy, analysis,
planning, governance, data management and reporting (34). Crucially, this capacity
needs to be available at the appropriate administrative level: in federal countries, or
those with a decentralized health workforce administration, competency, human
capital and institutional mechanisms for the core functions described above should be
built at the subnational and local levels.
Better HRH data and evidence are required as a critical enabler to enhance advocacy,
planning, policy-making, governance and accountability at subnational, national and
global levels. All countries should invest in analytical capacity for HRH and health
system data. This should be based on policies and guidelines for standardization and
interoperability of available and appropriate HRH data, such as those given in the
WHO minimum data set for health workforce registry (35), to establish and implement
national health workforce accounts.
In parallel with country actions, there are also opportunities to strengthen and streamline
global HRH governance. For example, global health initiatives should establish
mechanisms to ensure that all grants and loans include an assessment of health workforce
implications. Their programmes should contribute to HRH capacity-building efforts at
institutional, organizational and individual levels. The recruitment of general service staff
by disease-specific programmes weakens health systems, and should be avoided through
integration of disease-specific programmes into primary health care strategies and
pre-service education. Emphasis should be given to increasing sustainable investment
and support for HRH, including both capital and recurrent costs. The implementation of
global normative and policy instruments, such as the WHO Global Code of Practice on
the International Recruitment of Health Personnel (36), and of the WHO Global Strategy
on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030, should be reinforced and accelerated.
The chapter incorporates four components that have been developed separately in collaboration with
other partners and institutions.
1. Health workforce requirements for universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development
Goals: background paper no. 1 to the Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health:
Workforce 2030 (commissioned and coordinated by WHO):
Authors: Richard Scheffler (University of California, USA), Giorgio Cometto (WHO) (co-first
authors), Kate Tulenko (IntraHealth International, USA), Tim Bruckner (University of California,
USA), Jenny Liu (University of California, USA), Julia Brasileiro (IntraHealth International, USA),
James Campbell (WHO).
Acknowledgements: Eric Keuffel (Temple University, USA), Alexander Preker (Health Investment and
Financing Corporation, USA), Barbara Stilwell (IntraHealth International, USA) and Rebecca Bailey
(IntraHealth International, USA) contributed to some components of the analysis of needs-based
shortages.
David Evans (University of Basel, Switzerland), Akiko Maeda (World Bank), Tomoko Ono (JICA),
Octavian Bivol (UNICEF), Gabriele Fontana (UNICEF), Gilles Dussault (IHMT, Portugal), Remco
Van de Pas (ITM, Belgium), Angelica Sousa (WHO), Amani Siyam (WHO), Karin Stenberg
(WHO), Tessa Edejer (WHO) and Xenia Scheil-Adlung (ILO) were part of the advisory group that
provided strategic direction and peer review to the analysis of needs-based shortages.
Melanie Cowan (WHO), Leanne Riley (WHO), Gretchen Stevens (WHO) and Daniel Hogan
(WHO) availed health service coverage used in the analysis.
2. Global health workforce labour market projections for 2030 (commissioned and coordinated by
the World Bank):
Authors: Jenny Liu (University of California, USA), Yevgeniy Goryakin (University of East Anglia,
United Kingdom), Akiko Maeda (World Bank), Tim Bruckner (University of California, USA), and
Richard Scheffler (University of California, USA).
3. Future human resources for health supply and requirements in high-income OECD countries
(commissioned and coordinated by WHO):
Authors: Gail Tomblin Murphy (Dalhousie University, Canada), Stephen Birch (University of
Manchester, United Kingdom), Adrian MacKenzie (Dalhousie University, Canada).
Acknowledgements: Janet Rigby (Dalhousie University, Canada) and Annette Elliott Rose
(Dalhousie University, Canada) helped obtain necessary data for analyses in high-income countries.
The chapter incorporates four components that have been developed separately in collaboration with
other partners and institutions.
1. Health workforce requirements for universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development
Goals: background paper no. 1 to the Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health:
Workforce 2030 (commissioned and coordinated by WHO):
Authors: Richard Scheffler (University of California, USA), Giorgio Cometto (WHO) (co-first
authors), Kate Tulenko (IntraHealth International, USA), Tim Bruckner (University of California,
USA), Jenny Liu (University of California, USA), Julia Brasileiro (IntraHealth International, USA),
James Campbell (WHO).
Acknowledgements: Eric Keuffel (Temple University, USA), Alexander Preker (Health Investment and
Financing Corporation, USA), Barbara Stilwell (IntraHealth International, USA) and Rebecca Bailey
(IntraHealth International, USA) contributed to some components of the analysis of needs-based
shortages.
David Evans (University of Basel, Switzerland), Akiko Maeda (World Bank), Tomoko Ono (JICA),
Octavian Bivol (UNICEF), Gabriele Fontana (UNICEF), Gilles Dussault (IHMT, Portugal), Remco
Van de Pas (ITM, Belgium), Angelica Sousa (WHO), Amani Siyam (WHO), Karin Stenberg
(WHO), Tessa Edejer (WHO) and Xenia Scheil-Adlung (ILO) were part of the advisory group that
provided strategic direction and peer review to the analysis of needs-based shortages.
Melanie Cowan (WHO), Leanne Riley (WHO), Gretchen Stevens (WHO) and Daniel Hogan
(WHO) availed health service coverage used in the analysis.
2. Global health workforce labour market projections for 2030 (commissioned and coordinated by
the World Bank):
Authors: Jenny Liu (University of California, USA), Yevgeniy Goryakin (University of East Anglia,
United Kingdom), Akiko Maeda (World Bank), Tim Bruckner (University of California, USA), and
Richard Scheffler (University of California, USA).
3. Future human resources for health supply and requirements in high-income OECD countries
(commissioned and coordinated by WHO):
Authors: Gail Tomblin Murphy (Dalhousie University, Canada), Stephen Birch (University of
Manchester, United Kingdom), Adrian MacKenzie (Dalhousie University, Canada).
Acknowledgements: Janet Rigby (Dalhousie University, Canada) and Annette Elliott Rose
(Dalhousie University, Canada) helped obtain necessary data for analyses in high-income countries.
General acknowledgement
James Buchan provided valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this policy chapter.
1. Campbell J, Dussault G, Buchan J, Pozo-Martin F, 11. Investing in the future of jobs and skills: scenarios,
Guerra Arias M, Leone C et al. A universal truth: implications and options in anticipation of future
no health without a workforce. Forum report, Third skills and knowledge needs. Brussels: European
Global Forum on Human Resources for Health, Commission; 2009 (http://www.eurofound.europa.
Recife, Brazil. Geneva: Global Health Workforce eu/sites/default/files/ef_files/pubdocs/2009/82/en/1/
Alliance and World Health Organization; 2014 EF0982EN.pdf, accessed 23 October 2016).
(http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/
resources/hrhreport2013/en/, accessed 23 October 12. Scheil-Adlung X, Nove A. Global estimates of the size
2016). of the health workforce contributing to the health
economy: the potential for creating decent work in
2. The state of the world’s midwifery 2014. New York: achieving coverage. In: Buchan J, Dhillon I, Campbell
United Nations Population Fund; 2014 (http://www. J, editors. Health employment and economic
unfpa.org/sowmy, accessed 23 October 2016). growth: an evidence base. Geneva: World Health
Organization; [forthcoming].
3. Jamison DT, Summers LH, Alleyne G, Arrow KJ,
Berkley S, Binagwaho A et al. 13. World Health Organization, World Bank. Tracking
Global health 2035: a world converging within universal health coverage; first global monitoring
a generation. Lancet. 2013;382(9908):1898– report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015
955. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62105-4. (http://www.who.int/healthinfo/universal_health_
PMID:24309475. coverage/report/2015/en/, accessed 23 October
2016).
4. Fostering resilient economies: demographic
transitions in local labour markets. Paris: Organisation 14. World social security report 2010/11: providing
for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2014 coverage in times of crisis and beyond. Geneva:
(http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Fostering-Resilient- International Labour Office; 2010 (http://www.ilo.org/
Economies_final_opt.pdf, accessed 23 October 2016). wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/
documents/publication/wcms_146566.pdf, accessed
5. Arcand, JL, Araujo EC, Menkulasic G, Weber M. 23 October 2016).
Health sector employment, health care expenditure
and economic growth: what are the associations? 15. World social protection report 2014/2015: building
Washington (DC): World Bank; [forthcoming]. economic recovery, inclusive development and
social justice. Geneva: International Labour
6. Employment polarisation and job quality in the Organization; 2014 (http://ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/
crisis: European Jobs Monitor 2013. Dublin: public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/
Eurofound; 2013 (http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ wcms_245201.pdf, accessed 23 October 2016).
pubdocs/2013/04/en/1/EF1304EN.pdf, accessed 23
October 2016). 16. Bustreo F, Say L, Koblinsky M, Pullum TW,
Temmerman M, Pablos-Méndez A. Ending
7. ISCO: International Standard Classification of preventable maternal deaths: the time is now. Lancet
Occupations [Internet]. Geneva: International Labour Global Health. 2013;1(4):e176–7. doi:10.1016/S2214-
Organization; 2010 (http://www.ilo.org/public/english/ 109X(13)70059-7. PMID:25104339.
bureau/stat/isco/, accessed 23 October 2016).
17. Tomblin-Murphy G, Birch S, MacKenzie A, Bradish
8. The world health report 2006: working together for S, Elliott Rose A. A synthesis of recent analyses of
health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006 human resources for health requirements and labour
(http://www.who.int/whr/2006/en/, accessed 23 market dynamics in high-income OECD countries.
October 2016). Human Resources for Health. 2016;29;14(1):59.
doi:10.1186/s12960-016-0155-2. PMID:27687611.
9. Dal Poz MR, Gupta N, Quain E, Soucat AL, editors.
Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human 18. Health workforce requirements for universal
resources for health: with special applications for health coverage and the Sustainable Development
low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Goals. Background Paper No. 1 to the Global
Health Organization; 2009 (http://apps.who.int/iris/ Strategy on Human Resources for Health:
bitstream/10665/44097/1/9789241547703_eng.pdf, Workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health
accessed 23 October 2016). Organization; 2016 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstre
am/10665/250330/1/9789241511407-eng.pdf?ua=1,
10. ISIC Rev.4. United Nations Statistics Division; 2008 accessed 23 October 2016).
(http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/isic-4.asp,
accessed 23 October 2016). 19. Liu JX, Goryakin Y, Maeda A, Bruckner TA, Scheffler
RM. Global health workforce labor market projections
for 2030. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2016.
22. Dominican Republic’s health sector reinvests savings 31. Lassi Z, Cometto G, Huicho L, Bhutta ZA. Quality of
from ghost workers to improve care. IntraHealth care provided by mid-level health workers: systematic
International, 7 January 2015 (http://www.intrahealth. review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health
org/page/dominican-republics-health-sector-reinvests- Organization. 2013;91(11):824–33. doi:10.2471/
savings-from-ghost-workers-to-improve-care, BLT.13.118786. PMID:24347706.
accessed 23 October 2016).
32. McCord GC, Liu A, Singh P. Deployment of
23. Stuckler D, Basu S, Gilmore A, Batniji R, Ooms community health workers across rural sub-Saharan
G, Marphatia AA et al. An evaluation of the Africa: financial considerations and operational
International Monetary Fund’s claims about public assumptions. Bulletin of the World Health
health. International Journal of Health Services. Organization. 2013;91(4):244–53B. doi:10.2471/
2010;40(2):327–32. doi:10.2190/HS.40.2.m. BLT.12.109660. PMID:23599547.
PMID:20440976.
33. Tulenko K, Møgedal S, Afzal MM, Frymus D, Oshin
24. Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, David B, Dussault A, Pate M et al. Community health workers for
G, Fogstad H et al. Human resources for health universal health-care coverage: from fragmentation
and universal health coverage: fostering equity and to synergy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
effective coverage. Bulletin of the World Health 2013;91(11):847–52. doi:10.2471/BLT.13.118745.
Organization. 2013;91(11):853–63. doi:10.2471/ PMID:24347709.
BLT.13.118729. PMID:24347710.
34. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health:
25. Van Lerberghe W, Matthews Z, Achadi E, Ancona C, Workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization;
Campbell J, Channon A et al. Country experience with 2016 (http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/pub_
strengthening of health systems and deployment of globstrathrh-2030/en/, accessed 24 October 2016).
midwives in countries with high maternal mortality.
Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1215–25. doi:10.1016/S0140- 35. Human resources for health information system:
6736(14)60919-3. PMID:24965819. minimum data set for health workforce registry.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (http://
26. DeLuca MA, Soucat A, editors. Transforming the www.who.int/hrh/statistics/minimun_data_set/en/,
global health workforce. New York: New York accessed 23 October 2016).
University College of Nursing; 2013.
36. Resolution WHA63.16. WHO Global Code of Practice
27. Cometto G, Boerma T, Campbell J, Dare L, Evans T. on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel.
The Third Global Forum: framing the health workforce In: Sixty-third World Health Assembly, Geneva, 21
agenda for universal health coverage. Lancet Global May 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010
Health. 2013;1(6):e324–5. doi:10.1016/S2214- (http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63/
109X(13)70082-2. PMID:25104590. A63_R16-en.pdf), accessed 23 October 2016).
The full methods and results of this analysis were published in a background paper to
the Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. The following is
a chapter overview of the methods adopted.
To estimate each country’s current stock of health workers, we retrieved health workforce
figures from the WHO Global Health Observatory, which was updated in 2014 and
therefore reflects to a large extent data referring to 2013. Yearly workforce density (that is,
per 1000 population) data were obtained for 210 countries and territories. For each country,
we calculated the population density of physicians and nurses/midwives for the most
recent year (since 2008) for which there were data and adjusted the number to the 2013
populations of these countries. For countries with missing data on health workers (that is,
no values since 2008), we imputed numbers of physicians and nurses/midwives based on
the median density of physicians and nurses/midwives for each of the four World Bank-
designated income groups.
Data points that represented obvious outliers due to misreporting were removed and
replaced with missing data. Missing data points for physicians and nurses/midwives
per 1000 population between any two real data points were linearly interpolated.
The following equations were then estimated for each country from time
t = {1990, … 2013}:
where et is the random disturbance term and a0, b0, a1 and b1 are unknown parameters,
with the last two parameters representing the linear growth rates to be estimated from
the model.
• Where at least two data points were available, the estimated linear trend was
extended into the future until 2030 using the estimated coefficients for a and b.
• If the estimated linear growth was found to be too large or too small, the country’s
growth rate was replaced with aggregate medians, and then the median growth
rate was applied to the last available observation for that country (that is, most
recent year).
• For physicians: If a given country’s linear growth rate was larger or smaller than
1 standard deviation from the mean growth rate for all countries, the median
growth rate of a comparable group of countries was substituted.
• For nurses/midwives: For nurses, there was large overdispersion of the linear
growth rate distribution. Consequently, if a country’s linear growth rate was larger
than 80% or smaller than 20% of the growth rate distribution, then the median
growth rate of a comparable group of countries was substituted.
• For both physicians and nurse/midwives: If the predicted density in 2030 resulted
in a negative number, that country’s growth rate was also replaced with the
corresponding median aggregate value in a comparable group of countries.
• If there was just one point for a country (and thus linear growth rate could not be
estimated), the same median substitution for the growth rate as described above
was applied.
• When no observations were available before 2013 (that is, no empirical data at all
for both physicians and nurses/midwives), neither the supply of physicians nor
the supply of nurse/midwives was projected. Instead, the mean 2030 predicted
supply density across a comparable group of countries was substituted.
Abstract
This chapter explores trends in women’s work in health as related to the
achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), focusing on SDG
3, SDG 5 and SDG 8.1 It outlines challenges arising from gaps in the knowledge
base, gender biases in health systems, and gender biases in the institutions that
surround health systems. A qualitative literature review was supplemented with
sex-disaggregated data from several international organizations.
The health and social sector is a leading employer of women. However, significant
occupational segregation occurs by sex and institutionalized hierarchies are
prevalent within and across occupations, particularly in terms of pay rates, career
pathways and decision-making power. Gender biases create systemic inefficiencies
in health systems by limiting the productivity, distribution, motivation and
retention of female health workers.
While the health sector plays a positive role in drawing women into employment,
it could make a larger contribution to sustainable development by addressing
persistent gender biases and recognizing and valuing women’s unpaid and informal
work. The chapter calls on policy-makers to build the evidence base on women in
the health workforce; to work across sectors to recognize and reform unequal gender
laws and institutions; and to address gender biases in health systems.
1. On good health and well-being, gender equality, and decent work and economic growth, respectively.
The health workforce, as the backbone of health systems and a key employment
sector (1), is essential to sustainable development. However, it is not a gender-neutral
terrain. Significant occupational segregation occurs by sex and institutionalized
hierarchies are prevalent within and across occupations, particularly in terms of
pay rates, career pathways and decision-making power. Many of these inequalities
stem from gender biases in health systems and in the societies and institutions that
support and surround them.
Despite the importance of gender dynamics in the health workforce, gender issues
are rarely given heed in health systems design (4). This chapter draws on relational
and structural theories of gender to cast light on unaddressed issues within health
systems and the institutions that support them. While recognizing that gender is
a social process affecting both men and women, the chapter focuses primarily on
female health workers.
Gender inequalities in the health workforce are neither static nor universal (3).
They are embedded in particular contexts and shaped by health system design, the
national political economy and culture. Relational theories of gender recognize
that gender is a social process that is inextricable from “economic relations,
power relations, affective relations and symbolic relations; and [that it operates]
simultaneously at intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional and society-wide levels”
In this chapter, for a gender and human rights framing we look to the 2030 Agenda
for Sustainable Development, as adopted by 193 countries at the United Nations
General Assembly in September 2015 (7). As such, the chapter explores trends in
women’s work in health as they relate to the achievement of the SDGs, focusing on
SDG 3 (good health and well-being), SDG 5 (gender equality), and SDG 8 (decent
work and economic growth) in particular. Ending discrimination (SDG 5.1) is a
major cross-cutting theme of the chapter.
The chapter outlines challenges that arise from gaps in the knowledge base on gender,
gender biases in workforce policies and practices in health systems, and gender biases
in the institutions that support and surround health systems. After summarizing
current and previous efforts, it presents policy options for progress in these three
areas and explores challenges related to their implementation.
Significant gaps exist in the evidence base. Gender dynamics in the health
workforce are underexplored (4). Much of women’s work in health is unpaid
or in the informal sector and, as such, is poorly covered by official statistics.
However, a review of the existing evidence does reveal important findings, as
summarized in the following subsections.
SDG target 5.4 calls on countries to value unpaid care and domestic work through
the provision of public services, infrastructure and social protection policies and
the promotion of shared responsibility within the household and the family.
Health systems rely heavily on unpaid or informal work but fail to recognize or
value it. For example, in Spain, 88% of all health work is unpaid (9). A study of
volunteer caregivers in six African countries found that women made up the
majority of such workers (81%) and that only 7% of volunteers received a
stipend (10).
Informal and unpaid care work reproduces hierarchies not only across gender
but also across class and race, with low-income, minority and immigrant women
doing the bulk of unpaid and informal care work (11). Women’s informal care
work buffers weaknesses in the health care system and may hide the extent to
which these systems are inefficient and are creating medical poverty traps (3).
Eastern M
Morocco
(E
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syrian Arab Republic
Albania
Figure 1 Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belgium
Women’s share of employment in the health and social sector versus
Bulgaria
total employment (%), by WHO region, average values for the period
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Switzerland
2005–2014 Cyprus
Czech Republic
Germany
Denmark
Women’s share of employment in the Spain economy Women’s share of employment in the health and social sector
Estonia
Finland
Europe (EURO)
Benin
France
Burkina
United Faso
Kingdom
Botswana
Georgia
Ethiopia
Greece
Ghana
Croatia
Guinea
Hungary
Africa (AFRO)
Gambia
Ireland
Liberia
Iceland
Madagascar
Israel
Mauritius
Italy
Namibia
Kazakhstan
Nigeria
Kyrgyzstan
Rwanda
Lithuania
Senegal
Luxembourg
Sao Tome and Principe
Latvia
Republic ofSeychelles
Moldova
United Republic of Tanzania
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Uganda
Malta
South Africa
Montenegro
Zimbabwe
Netherlands
Argentina
Norway
Antigua and Barbuda
Poland
Belize
Portugal
Bolivia (Plurinational Romania
State of)
Brazil
Russian Federation
Barbados
Serbia
Chile
Slovakia
Colombia
Slovenia
Costa Rica
Americas (AMRO)
Sweden
Cuba
Tajikistan
Dominican Republic
Turkey
Ecuador
Ukraine
Guatemala
Bangladesh
Jamaica
Bhutan
theAsia
Mexico
Indonesia
(SEARO)
Nicaragua
Sri Lanka
South-East
Panama
Maldives
Peru
Nepal
Paraguay
Thailand
El Salvador
Timor-Leste
Suriname
Brunei Darussalam
Uruguay
China
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic Japan of)
United ArabCambodia
Emirates
Bahrain
Kiribati
Mediterranean
Pacific
Egypt
Republic of Korea
(WPRO)
MalaysiaIraq
Kuwait
New Zealand
Morocco
Philippines
Oman
Singapore
VietQatar
Nam
Saudi Arabia
Vanuatu
Syrian Arab Republic
Samoa
Albania 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Armenia
Austria
Source: ILOStat series: Female share of employment by economic activity (EMP_XFEM_ECO_RT)
Azerbaijan
Belgium
Bulgaria
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Switzerland
Cyprus
Czech Republic
32 Health Employment andGermany Economic Growth: An Evidence Base
Denmark
Spain
Estonia
)
Egypt
Eastern Mediterran
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
(EMRO)
Iraq
Kuwait
Morocco
Oman
Qatar
Women’s share of employment in the economy Women’s share of employment in the health and social sector
Saudi Arabia
Syrian Arab Republic
Albania
Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belgium
Bulgaria
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Switzerland
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Germany
Denmark
Spain
Estonia
Finland
Europe (EURO)
France
United Kingdom
Georgia
Greece
Croatia
Hungary
Ireland
Iceland
Israel
Italy
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Latvia
Republic of Moldova
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Malta
Montenegro
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Sweden
Tajikistan
Turkey
Ukraine
Bangladesh
Bhutan
South-East Asia
Indonesia
(SEARO)
Sri Lanka
Maldives
Nepal
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Brunei Darussalam
China
Japan
Cambodia
Kiribati
Western Pacific
Republic of Korea
(WPRO)
Mongolia
Malaysia
New Zealand
Philippines
Singapore
Viet Nam
Vanuatu
Samoa
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Structural and relational factors shape women’s engagement in the labour market
in general and in the health sector in particular. A variety of factors operate at
multiple levels:
The degree to which these factors affect individual women will depend on their
resources and capacities. The distribution of resources and capacities are in turn
shaped by where women fall on a variety of axes of inequality, such as race, ethnicity,
caste, socioeconomic status and geographical location. For example, much of unpaid
home care is concentrated among low-income women, who have fewer resources to
purchase paid care.
Equal pay for work of equal value means eliminating pay gaps between individuals
holding jobs that are the same or of comparable worth in terms of qualifications,
effort, responsibility and working conditions (14).
In most countries, pay for jobs in health care is lower than pay for jobs with similar
qualifications in other sectors. In fact, a pay penalty exists in general for care-related
work (including, for example, health care and child care), which remains even
after controlling for the sex composition of the workforce (15, 16). As women are
overrepresented in caring professions such as health care, they are disproportionately
affected by this pay penalty.
Looking within the health sector, gender wage gaps are common. ILO data on 33
WHO Member States show that female health professionals tend to earn less than
their male counterparts (Figure 2). Gaps among associate professionals also exist in
most cases. However, as shown in Figure 2, women earn the same or more in seven
of 33 Member States for which data exist. The data do not adjust for individual and
contextual factors that affect wages, such as seniority, education, working hours,
contract type, establishment type and size, region, and unionization.
Argentina
Austria
Belgium
Belarus
Costa Rica
Germany
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Spain
Ethiopia
Finland
United Kingdom
Greece
Guatemala
Indonesia
India
Israel
Sri Lanka
Madagascar
Maldives
Macedonia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Russian Federation
Slovakia
Thailand
Turkey
South Africa
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Notes: The gender wage gap is calculated as the difference between average earnings of men and
average earnings of women expressed as a percentage of average earnings of men (using nominal
monthly earnings).
Due to concerns about the quality of data, the 2012 instead of the 2013 observation has been used for
Guatemala.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on ILOSTAT: Mean nominal monthly earnings of employees by sex
and occupation – selected International Standard Classification of Occupation (ISCO) level 2.
Unequal division of care and domestic work within the household may lead
women to reduce their paid working hours and take career breaks. Biases in human
resourcing policies mean these choices are unfairly penalized with, for example,
unequal pay for part-time work or reduced eligibility and access to pensions and
other social benefits. Time taken off work for child care and other responsibilities
may also derail career paths, particularly if women returning to the labour market
lack opportunities to upgrade skills and access positions of power. Women from
minority and vulnerable groups may face structural obstacles on multiple levels,
exacerbating disadvantages. For example, migrants with foreign credentials have
been shown to suffer pay penalties (26).
A large share of the wage gaps described above reflects women’s underrepresentation
in positions of power in the health sector. In terms of political representation across
191 countries, only 51 countries had a female minister of health (27).
Data on a selection of high-income countries for 2007 show that in many countries,
women make up the majority of managers in the health and social sector but
are almost always underrepresented if one takes into account their share of total
employment in the sector (Figure 3). Underrepresentation seems to be more
prominent in countries with welfare regimes that attach social benefits to earnings
Figure 3
50
50
Female share of senior positions
50
0 0
50
0
0 50 100 0 50 100 0 50 100 0 50 100
Source: Authors’ calculations based on ILO’s Labour Statistics database (LABORSTAT): Economically
active population, by industry and by occupation (thousands).
2 Examining the institutional logic of welfare states (that is, how the responsibility for welfare is divided between the
state, the market and the family), Esping-Andersen categorized countries as “social democratic” (largely Nordic),
“liberal” (largely Anglo-Saxon) and “conservative” (continental European) (28). This categorization has been critiqued
and expanded upon by several authors, but in general, revisions have produced similar country groupings.
3 That said, countries’ choice of social policies is embedded in their particular sociocultural context and political
economy.
Health workers, particularly nurses and community health workers, are often at risk
of violence and harassment, as understood in SDG target 5.2 (29, 30). In addition to
being problems in their own right, violence and harassment increase absenteeism
and reduce workforce retention, motivation and the quality of services provided (29).
In some countries, problems of violence and harassment are particularly rampant
in rural and remote areas, which may exacerbate uneven distribution of health
workers. Disturbingly, targeted attacks against health workers have also increased in
recent years, leading to the adoption of a United Nations Security Council resolution
strongly condemning attacks against medical personnel (31).
In addition, stress, fatigue and a high workload are common complaints in the
sector (32). Unequal division of care work within the household can exacerbate these
problems, with female health workers having the double duty of caring for patients
at work and family members at home. This contributes to the health care worker’s
poor mental and physical health. Lack of appropriate work–life balance policies and
conflicts between work and family demands have been shown to increase workers’
stress levels (33).
4 The ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work recognizes three other fundamental principles and
rights at work: the elimination of (a) discrimination, (b) forced or compulsory labour and (c) child labour.
3. Discussion
3.1 Challenges
While the health sector plays a positive role in drawing women into employment,
it could make a larger contribution to sustainable development by addressing
persistent gender biases and recognizing and valuing women’s unpaid and informal
work. To achieve the targets under SDG 3, SDG 5 and SDG 8, a robust gender
(and equity) analysis and compelling response is called for. Obtaining data and
conducting analyses in underexplored areas is challenging – especially given the
likely implications for overarching policies on accountability, non-discrimination and
equality – but a gender-responsive and equity-enhancing approach is indispensable.
The challenges outlined in this chapter are not new – they are recognized by the
193 countries that endorsed and adopted the SDGs. For instance, SDG target 17.18
calls on countries to build the evidence base on inequalities with disaggregated
data, and SDG targets 5.c, 10.3 and 16.b call on countries to address gender bias
and other forms of discrimination at large through laws and policies that are
non-discriminatory and gender equal. Finally, SDG targets 3.c and 5.4 recognize
deficiencies in health care and the care economy, calling for increased financing of
health systems, valuation of unpaid care work, and better recruitment, development,
training and retention of the health workforce in developing countries.
What are sometimes seen as individual choices in how men and women engage
in health work (for example, the decision of women to work fewer hours, and
different rates of volunteer work) are structured by larger social processes and biases
in institutions and laws. A 2016 survey of laws in 173 countries found that while
support for equality is written into the constitutions of most countries (91%), less
than half of the countries explicitly mandate equal pay for work of equal value (41%)
or non-discriminatory hiring based on gender (40%) (42). Progress in these areas will
assist greatly in improving equity in the health workforce.
Labour, wage and social protection policies can help narrow inequalities by gender.
For example, policies and legislation on “equal pay for work of equal value” can
address wage gaps across sectors, by sex and along other axes of inequality, such
as migrant status. They can also address less favourable treatment of part-time
workers in terms of (pro rata) pay and benefits. Such policies usually examine gaps
employer by employer. This makes them powerful tools when the health workforce
is concentrated under one large employer (for example, when health services
are publicly provided), but less effective when it is scattered across many private
employers. Other wage policies, such as minimum wages, can also help reduce
Social protection policies such as cash transfers can help channel resources to women
in unpaid care work. Many countries compensate time dedicated to child care in
their social security systems, for example by increasing caregivers’ eligibility for and
entitlement to pensions (44). In addition, labour laws that challenge the gendered
division of care work within the household could foster women’s integration in and
return to the labour market; for example, non-transferable parental leave for fathers
challenges the idea that women are the natural caregivers of children.
Policies that improve basic infrastructure and services can also narrow gender
inequalities. Those that improve mobility (for example, transportation services and
roads) can reduce the risks and costs associated with travel, thus increasing female
employment and educational attendance (45). Investments in housing and public
safety could also improve the retention and distribution of female health workers;
for example, one study highlights that women’s reluctance to work in rural areas has
more to do with concerns about security and inadequate housing than pay (46).
Improving women’s outcomes in the health workforce can also be supported through
designing inclusive education systems that provide, recognize, subsidize and reward
investments in vocational training and in-work training.
Efforts have also been made to address problems of retention and recognition
through inclusive high-quality education and lifelong learning (SDG 4). For example,
a four-month chronic care expert training programme was established for nurses
in Thailand. This helped nurses upgrade their skills and gain recognition; after
the programme, “patients [grew] to view their nurses as their primary health-care
providers rather than doctors” (4).
It should be noted that much more could be done to address gender biases in the
health system. For example, work–life balance measures remain rare, even among
developed countries (32), and policies to remunerate unpaid health care work are few
and far between.
All health care, including unpaid health care, should be formalized in the health
workforce. Outside the paid labour force, countries should take steps to recognize
and compensate women for unpaid or informal health care work. This could involve
moving women into formal work and ensuring that career pathways exist.
In addressing gender issues in the health workforce, policy-makers will face a broad
range of implementation challenges. This chapter focuses particularly on difficulties
in ensuring that enacted law is reflected in practice. As is well documented in the
growing field of leximetrics,5 this is not always the case; there are often significant
differences between de jure and de facto practice.
To ensure that laws and policies are put into practice, particular attention should
be given to process and participation, including with regard to the private sector.
Clear enforcement provisions, backed by appropriately resourced and well governed
agencies (for example, labour inspectorates, human rights commissions and
countercorruption commissions), can make a forceful contribution to ensuring
implementation.
5 A field that produces quantitative measurements of laws and subsequently analyses them against objective
outcomes.
Finally, the bargaining power of women and workers can be reinforced by efforts
to guarantee substantive freedom of choice. Female health workers accept unfair
working conditions because their choice of alternatives is constrained. Thus it is
important to evaluate the range of alternatives and resources available to individuals
in order to enable them to widen their range of choices (51). Upgrading women’s
labour market opportunities and their access to resources will improve their situation
in the health sector and serve as an engine for economic growth.
1. Health workforce policies in OECD countries: 11. Crompton R, Lyonette C. Work-life “balance” in
right jobs, right skills, right places. OECD Health Europe. Acta Sociologica. 2006;49(4):379–93.
Policy Studies. Paris: Organisation for Economic doi:10.1177/0001699306071680.
Co-operation and Development; 2016 (http://www.
oecd.org/publications/health-workforce-policies-in- 12. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris:
oecd-countries-9789264239517-en.htm, accessed 23 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
October 2016). Development; 2015. doi:10.1787/health_glance-
2015-en.
2. Newman C. Time to address gender discrimination
and inequality in the health workforce. Human 13. Chen M. A matter of survival: women’s right
Resources for Health. 2014;12:25. doi:10.1186/1478- to employment in India and Bangladesh. In:
4491-12-25. PMID:24885565. Nussbaum M, Glover J, editors. Women, culture and
development: a study of human capabilities. Oxford,
3. George A. Human resources for health: a gender United Kingdom: Clarendon Press; 1995:37–57.
analysis. Background paper prepared for the Women
and Gender Equity Knowledge Network and the 14. Chicha M-T. Promoting equity – gender-neutral
Health Systems Knowledge Network of the WHO job evaluation for equal pay: a step-by-step guide.
Commission on Social Determinants on Health. Kochi Geneva: International Labour Office; 2008 (http://
(India); 2007. www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---
declaration/documents/publication/wcms_101325.pdf,
4. Langer A, Meleis A, Knaul FM, Atun R, Aran accessed 23 October 2016).
M, Arreola-Ornelas H et al. Women and health:
the key for sustainable development. Lancet. 15. Razavi S, Staab S. Underpaid and overworked:
2015;386(9999):1165–210. doi.org/10.1016/S0140- a cross-national perspective on care workers.
6736(15)60497-4. PMID:26051370. International Labour Review. 2010;149(4):407–22.
5. Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing 16. England P, Budig M, Folbre N. Wages of virtue:
the issue, in local and world perspective. Social the relative pay of care work. Social Problems.
Science and Medicine. 2012;74(11):1675–83. 2002;49(4):455–73. doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.4.455.
doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006.
PMID:21764489. 17. Russo G, Gonçalves L, Craveiro I, Dussault G.
Feminization of the medical workforce in low-income
6. Hammarstrom A, Johansson K, Annandale E, Ahlgren settings; findings from surveys in three African capital
C, Aléx L, Christianson M et al. Central gender cities. Human Resources for Health. 2015;13:64.
theoretical concepts in health research: the state doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0064-9. PMID:26228911.
of the art. Journal of Epidemiology and Community
Health. 2014;68(2):185–190. doi:10.1136/jech-2013- 18. Gravelle H, Hole AR, Santos R. Measuring and
202572. PMID:24265394. testing for gender discrimination in physician
pay: English family doctors. Journal of Health
7. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Economics. 2011;30(4):660–74. doi:10.1016/j.
Sustainable Development. United Nations General jhealeco.2011.05.005. PMID:21680033.
Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/L.1. New York: United
Nations; 2015 (http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_ 19. Vecchio N, Scuffham PA, Hilton MF, Whiteford HA.
doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E, accessed 23 Differences in wage rates for males and females in
October 2016). the health sector: a consideration of unpaid overtime
to decompose the gender wage gap. Human
8. Gerecke M. A policy mix for gender equality? Lessons Resources for Health. 2013;11:9. PMID:23433245.
from high-income countries. IILS discussion paper.
Geneva: International Labour Office; 2013 (http:// 20. Weeks WB, Paraponaris A, Ventelou B. Sex-based
www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/- differences in income and response to proposed
--inst/documents/publication/wcms_206235.pdf, financial incentives among general practitioners
accessed 23 October 2016). in France. Health Policy. 2013;113(1–2):199–205.
doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.016. PMID:24176289.
9. Gender, women and primary health care renewal: a
discussion paper. Geneva: World Health Organization; 21. Weeks WB, Wallace TA, Wallace AE. How do
2010. race and sex affect the earnings of primary care
physicians? Health Affairs (Millwood). 2009;28(2):557–
10. Budlender D. Compensation for contributions: 66. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.557. PMID:19276016.
report on interviews with volunteer care-givers in six
countries. New York: Huairou Commission; 2009.
Abstract
Chronic illnesses increase with age, while intrinsic capability decreases. Globally,
the population aged 60 years and over is projected to grow from 901 million, 11%
of the world’s population, in 2015, to 2.1 billion, 22% of the world’s population,
by 2050. Such rapid growth of this high-need population will drive an increased
need for more and more complex services.
As the World Health Organization (WHO) noted in its 2015 report on ageing and
health (1), both the proportion and absolute number of older people around the
world are increasing dramatically and will continue to do so for many years to come,
leading to the increased need for health services adapted to the needs of older people.
There is a strong rationale for believing that responding to this increased need
requires more than simply increasing the capacity of the existing health systems.
Health systems around the world are largely designed around disease-driven episodic
care using a biomedical approach that emphasizes finding a medical problem and
fixing it (1). However, the health needs of ageing populations are interlinked with
their social needs. Furthermore, these needs are typically complex and long term,
span a range of areas of functioning, wax and wane over time, and require a goal of
maintaining functional ability rather than curing disease. In addition, older people
face many barriers that limit their access to health services, particularly in low- and
middle-income countries and among disadvantaged people in higher-income
countries (1). The complex organizational and professional structures and skills
required to address these concerns suggests the need to rethink health system design.
Achieving our workforce goals for ageing and health requires a strategy that
includes five interconnected steps: assessment of existing workforce needs and gaps;
developing the right numbers of workers; giving them the right knowledge and skills;
deploying them in the right organizations and geographical locations; and using
them in the right roles to deliver care in a cost-effective manner that meets the needs
of a growing older population. There is not a single blueprint: how these strategies
This chapter on workforce strategies for ageing and health synthesizes material
from peer-reviewed research and WHO reports in three areas: demand and need
projections; workforce issues relating to supply, utilization and organization; and
tested or proposed policy solutions. The chapter draws on prior work of WHO,
including:
• Multisectoral action for a life course approach to healthy ageing: draft global strategy
and plan of action on ageing and health (4)
• Scaling up, saving lives (Task Force for Scaling Up Education and Training for
Health Workers) (6)
• The world health report 2008 – primary health care: now more than ever (7)
• The world health report 2010 – health systems financing: the path to universal
coverage (8)
Two trends are driving the “demographic transition”: longer lifespans, and falling
fertility rates. First, the population aged over 60 years is growing rapidly across the
globe. As of 2015, life expectancy exceeded 80 years in 24 countries (11).
In 2015, there were 106 countries where less than 10% of the population was aged 60
years and over, mostly in Africa and parts of Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean;
by 2050 only 41 countries will have less than 10% of their population aged 60 years
and over. Further, while only one country had more than 30% of its population aged
over 60 years in 2015, this will grow to 57 countries in 2050 (Figure 1).
2015
Percentage aged
60 years or older:
30% or more
10 to <30%
<10%
2050
Percentage aged
60 years or older:
30% or more
10 to <30%
<10%
Figure 2
25%
Under 5
Over 60
20%
15%
10%
5%
1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050
Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (12).
Older people not only have higher medical care needs than younger populations,
they also experience decreasing intrinsic capacity and decreasing functional ability,
increasing the need for the support and social services that enable people to live
meaningful lives and have a good quality of life. All countries face a substantial
challenge in reorienting their health care services from pervasive yet relatively
inexpensive treatment for short-term conditions to the far more costly treatment of
chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes (13).
Many of the chronic conditions of old age can be prevented or delayed by healthy
behaviours. Indeed, even in very advanced years, physical activity and good
nutrition can have powerful benefits for health and well-being. Other health
problems and declines in capacity can be effectively managed, particularly if
detected early enough. And even for people with declines in capacity, supportive
environments can allow them to live lives of dignity and continued personal growth.
Yet the world is very far from this ideal, particularly for older people who are poor
and those from disadvantaged social groups. Comprehensive public health action is
urgently needed (4).
But even as countries are successful in improving care and the quality of life of older
people, the fact that there will be an increasing number of older people also means
that planning for and delivering end-of-life care will be needed.
The implications for the workforce are enormous, especially if the goal is healthy
ageing with empowered and engaged seniors. Specifically, there is a need for:
• More clinical providers with relevant skills and qualifications and in the right
locations providing the needed range of services: promotion, prevention,
diagnosis, treatment, disease management, rehabilitation and palliative care. A
precondition in low-income and middle-income countries will be to increase the
general supply of health providers.
• More social service providers, assistants and other individuals to provide support
services, such as assistance with the activities of daily living and transportation.
• greater coordination among health workers and between health and social
service sectors;
The reforms also reveal the benefits of having a steady source of funds to support
services to older people (Box 1).
1 See Annex 1 for a description of the literature search process used in locating these examples.
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Since 2008, the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region Government has taken forward various payment initiatives
to promote primary care and encourage more use of private service. Nevertheless,
a study found that the willingness of older people in the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region to pay for specific primary care and preventive services in the
Pakistan. Pakistan established its first day centre for people at all stages of dementia
with technical collaboration from Alzheimer’s Australia in Western Australia. Care
workers provide education, support groups and counselling for families as well as
a broad package of services, including door-to-door transportation to and from the
centre, activities such as painting, cooking, gardening, reading the newspaper and daily
exercise, and help with personal care (1).
Sweden. The Swedish Government implemented the Adel reform in the care of
older citizens in 1992, by which the communities where older people live became
responsible for their care and housing. An important component in the reform was
an expanded need for community nurses to refer patients for emergency treatment.
Nurses were appointed to make sure that older people were given appropriate care
and to act as supervisors for nurses’ aides (20).
United States. The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) serves
individuals who are aged 55 years or older, certified by their state as needing nursing
home care, and able to live safely in the community at the time of enrolment and to
live in a PACE service area. Programmes under PACE deliver all needed medical and
supportive services, providing the entire continuum of care and services to seniors
with chronic care needs while maintaining their independence at home for as long as
possible. The programmes provide care and services in the home, in the community
and at PACE centres. There are now 116 programmes in the United States serving
several thousand enrollees. Comprehensiveness and coordination are key aspects of
the programme. Costs of care are covered by Medicare and Medicaid. There is some
evidence that the model reduces hospital use and reduces mortality, though it is still
unclear whether it reduces overall expenses (21–23).
United States. Although the acute hospital is the standard venue for treating acute
serious illness, it is often a difficult environment for older adults, who are highly
susceptible to functional decline and other iatrogenic consequences of hospital care.
Hospital care is also expensive. Providing acute hospital-level care at home, in lieu
of usual institutional care, is viable. As an emerging service model, the definition of
hospital at home (HaH) remains unsettled. Data favour HaH models that provide
substantial physician inputs and are geared towards substituting for hospital care,
provide services that are highly satisfying to patients and their caregivers, are
associated with less iatrogenic complications, and are less expensive. Dissemination
of HaH in integrated delivery systems is feasible. Widespread dissemination of HaH
in the United States will require payment reform that acknowledges the role of HaH
in the health care system (24).
United States. A significant rebalancing of the long-term care system away from
nursing homes towards home- and community-based services (HCBS) has occurred
over the past two decades. In the Commonwealth Fund Long-Term Care Opinion
Leader Survey on issues related to supporting HCBS, respondents expressed strong
enthusiasm for rebalancing the long-term care system towards HCBS. In particular,
respondents supported system-based approaches for this expansion, with the
majority indicating that greater care coordination was the single most preferred
approach for rebalancing the system, helping consumers make informed long-term
care choices and supporting caregivers (27).
Zambia. In 2010, the Ministry of Health in Zambia developed the National Community
Health Assistant Strategy, aiming to integrate community health workers into national
health plans to address the human resources for health shortage and the challenges facing
the community-based health workforce in Zambia (28).
Box 2
3. Assess specific risks and barriers to older adult safety, including falls, elder
mistreatment, and other risks in community, home, and care environments.
5. Apply knowledge of the indications and contraindications for, risks of, and
alternatives to the use of physical and pharmacological restraints with
older adults.
Domain #3: Care planning and coordination across the care spectrum
(including end-of-life care)
3. Develop advanced care plans based on older adults’ preferences and treatment/
care goals, and their physical, psychological, social, and spiritual needs.
4. Recognize the need for continuity of treatment and communication across the
spectrum of services and during transitions between care settings, utilizing
information technology where appropriate and available.
1. Distinguish among, refer to, and/or consult with any of the multiple health
care professionals who work with older adults, to achieve positive outcomes.
1. Serve as an advocate for older adults and caregivers within various health
care systems and settings.
2. Know how to access, and share with older adults and their caregivers,
information about the healthcare benefits of programs such as Medicare,
Medicaid, Veterans’ Services, Social Security, and other public programs.
There are also examples of educational reforms designed either to scale up provision
for or to better serve high-need populations that can serve as models to better
educate health workers on the needs of older people (Box 3). Education must
address the needs both of specialists in care of older people and of generalists who
are needed to implement service reforms – such as community-based care – that
respond to the rise in the number of older people.
Brazil. The Pró Saúde programme provides training institutions with financial
support, through a competitive bidding process, for projects aimed at reorienting
the health system to meet the needs of communities. In 2007, 90 medical, nursing
and dental schools received funding for curricular changes that promoted
interaction between the professions, primary care and action learning. As a
result of this training, the programme aims to expand to 40 000 the number of
community-based family health teams providing primary care (6).
3.1 Challenges
There are three major challenges to ensuring an effective workforce for achieving the
healthy ageing goals of maximizing quality of life in old age and giving older people
a say in how that is achieved through action to combat ageism in policy-making and
service delivery.
The first component is the deployment of the workforce needed to support healthy
ageing. The lack of effective links between professions and sectors – despite the fact all
may be essential for healthy ageing for many seniors – includes major gaps between
health professions within the health sector and gaps between the health and social
services workforce. These gaps have led to an increased need for care coordination.
However, the reality is that, given the complexity of illnesses of older people and
the number of clinical and non-clinical services needed, care coordination can be
extremely challenging, involving use of IT, multiple referrals, self-care by the patient
and a role for volunteers and relatives. Figure 3, for example, shows some of the
workers typically involved in the care of an Alzheimer’s patient.
Equipment service
Alzheimer’s social Oxygen Wheelchair
outreach worker service service Physiotherapist
Source: Adapted from WHO Global Strategy on People-Centred and Integrated Health Services (3).
There is great variation in the reported number of long-term care workers per 1000
population aged over 65 years, ranging from 16 in France to 213 in the Netherlands
(40). While some of this variation may reflect differences in job categorization and in
the prevalence of part-time arrangements – which can have an impact on the difference
between numbers of long-term care workers (measured as headcounts) and full-time
equivalent workers – the variation is still significant.
“Healthy ageing is the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability
that enables well-being in older age”(1). Health and social care workers work in health
systems and structures that operate within the values and beliefs of the community at
large. There are four environmental and structural changes that are needed to support
the policy options related to human resources for health of an ageing population.
These changes will greatly magnify the impact and effectiveness of a well prepared
workforce.
• Reframing sickness care to health care. The health care system, in collaboration
with the social services sector, needs to reframe its role from care of the sick to
preservation of health and the quality of life.
• Assuring a robust primary health care system. The health care system and its
workers will be more effective and productive if they can work in a health care
system with a well designed system for primary health care.
• Modifying health care financing systems. The workforce needed for healthy and
meaningful ageing extends across many services and also includes caregivers not
usually considered as part of health care delivery and not provided for in health
services funding. Health organizations and funders must recognize the contribution
of social and community-based services, supports, and workers, such as social
workers and community health workers, to the health and well-being of older people,
along with the very real difficulties associated with coordinating those services in
practice. Without expanded financing and reimbursement, these needed services are
not likely to be covered or provided.
The following policy options are proposed to assist the health workforce in supporting
healthy ageing:
A. Organize and deploy the workforce to make effective and efficient use
of health and social service workers to meet the needs of older people:
• Promote the widespread adoption of teams with a wide range of skills and
competencies to meet the needs of old people. The teams should include both
• Expand the use of technology across the continuum of care for older people
and extend team membership to isolated, rural workers.
• Promote the development and expanded use of workers such as community health
workers, care coordinators, case managers, registered nurses and others who
can be part of teams, function as connectors between health and social services,
and promote steps to improve the quality of life of older people. There are many
examples of the effective use of community health workers (41).
B. Ensure that health and social care workers have the skills and competencies
needed to provide high-quality and effective care to older people:
• Assess at the country level the supply of, demand for, need for and distribution
of health and social care workers who serve older people.
• Countries should give priority to workers who can be educated and trained
quickly and at a modest cost but can provide a wide range of services needed
by an ageing population. This includes medical assistants, health officers,
dental assistants, community health workers, nurse assistants and others. In
addition, priority should also be given to non-physician clinicians and other
advanced practitioners such as nurses, advanced practice registered nurses
(nurse practitioners, nurse midwives and clinical nurse specialists), physician
assistants, pharmacists and social workers.
1. World report on ageing and health. Geneva: World 12. World population prospects: the 2015 revision. New
Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps.who.int/iris/ York: United Nations, Department of Economic and
bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng. Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015 (https://esa.
pdf?ua=1, accessed 23 October 2016). un.org/unpd/wpp/DataQuery/ , accessed 4 November
2016).
2. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health:
Workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 13. Frenk J. Healthcare strategies for an ageing
2016 (http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/ society. Fourth report in a series of four. The
globstrathrh-2030/en/, accessed 23 October 2016). Economist Intelligence Unit, The Economist.
2009 (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=-
3. WHO Global Strategy on People-Centred and j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0a-
Integrated Health Services. Geneva: World Health hUKEwjB7tCBhZnMAhUJLB4KHTVcDMMQF-
Organization; 2016 (http://apps.who.int/iris/ ggdMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fptop.only.wip.la%3A443%2Fhttp%2Fgraphics.eiu.
bitstream/10665/155002/1/WHO_HIS_SDS_2015.6_ com%2Fupload%2Feb%2FPhilips_Healthcare_
eng.pdf, accessed 23 October 2016). ageing_3011WEB.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHxLCytvL-
4CUGL3ztMDRQSsQVQdxg&cad=rja, accessed
4. Multisectoral action for a life course approach to 23 October 2016).
healthy ageing: draft global strategy and plan of
action on ageing and health. Report by the Secretariat 14. Stuart M, Hansen EB. Danish home care policy and
(A69/17). In: Sixty-ninth World Health Assembly, 22 the family: implications for the United States. Journal
April 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 of Aging and Social Policy. 2006;18(3–4):27–42.
(http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/ doi:10.1300/J031v18n03_03. PMID:17135093.
A69_17-en.pdf?ua=1, accessed 23 October 2016).
15. Rostgaard T. Quality reforms in Danish home
5. Health workforce: update. Report by the Secretariat care: balancing between standardisation and
(EB138/34). In: Executive Board, 138th session, 4 individualisation. Health and Social Care in the
December 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; Community. 2012;20(3):247–54. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2015 (http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB138/ 2524.2012.01066.x. PMID:22512317.
B138_34-en.pdf, accessed 23 October 2016).
16. Liu S, Yam CHK, Huang OHY, Griffiths SM.
6. Task Force for Scaling Up Education and Training for Willingness to pay for private primary care services in
Health Workers, Global Health Workforce Alliance. Hong Kong: are elderly ready to move from the public
Scaling up, saving lives. Geneva: World Health sector? Health Policy and Planning. 2013;28(7):717–
Organization, Global Health Workforce Alliance; 2008 29. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs112. PMID:23161587.
(http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/
resources/scalingup/en/, accessed 23 October 2016). 17. Yam CH, Liu S, Huang OH, Yeoh EK, Griffiths SM.
Can vouchers make a difference to the use of private
7. The world health report 2008 – primary health primary care services by older people? Experience
care: now more than ever. Geneva: World Health from the healthcare reform programme in Hong Kong.
Organization; 2008 (http://www.who.int/whr/2008/en/, BMC Health Services Research. 2011;11(1):255.
accessed 23 October 2016). doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-255. PMID:21978140.
8. The world health report 2010 – health systems 18. Morikawa M. Towards community-based integrated
financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: care: trends and issues in Japan’s long-term
World Health Organization: 2010 (http://www.who.int/ care policy. International Journal of Integrated
whr/2010/en/, accessed 23 October 2016). Care. 2014;14(1):e005. doi:10.5334/ijic.1066.
PMID:24605073.
9. Imison C, Castle-Clarke S, Watson R. Reshaping the
workforce to deliver the care patients need. Research 19. Barriball L, Bremner J, Buchan J, Craveiro I, Dieleman
Report. London: Nuffield Trust; 2016 (http://www. M, Dix O et al. Recruitment and retention of the
nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/files/nuffield/publication/ health workforce in Europe. Final Report. Brussels:
reshaping_the_workforce_web_0.pdf, accessed European Commission; 2015 (http://ec.europa.
23 October 2016). eu/health/workforce/docs/2015_healthworkforce_
recruitment_retention_frep_en.pdf, accessed
10. Universal health coverage [Internet]. Washington 23 October 2016).
(DC): World Bank; 2016 (http://www.worldbank.org/
en/topic/universalhealthcoverage, accessed 20. Kihlgren AL, Fagerberg I, Skovdahl K, Kihlgren M.
23 October 2016). Referrals from home care to emergency hospital
care: basis for decisions. Journal of Clinical
11. He W, Goodkind D, Kowal P. An aging world: 2015. Nursing. 2003;12(1):28–36. doi:10.1046/j.1365-
United States Census Bureau, International Population 2702.2003.00682.x. PMID:12519247.
Reports, P95/16–1. Washington (DC): United States
Government Publishing Office; 2016
‘reform’
Filters
English language
2006 or later
Databases searched
Ovid: Global Health and all available Medline databases
Search results
The search was run in May 2016 and yielded 184 results. Removal of duplicates,
non-English language articles that had not been filtered out, and articles that
were clearly not relevant left 127 articles which were reviewed and classified for
subject relevance.
Abstract
This chapter examines trends in the international migration of health workers to
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries
since 2000. In total, the number of migrant doctors and nurses working in
OECD countries increased by 60% between 2000 and 2010. This rate is higher
for those who migrated to OECD countries from countries with severe health
workforce shortages, with an 84% increase during this time period. Immigrant
doctors and nurses account for growing shares of health professionals working
in OECD countries. Foreign-born doctors accounted for 22% of active doctors
in OECD countries in 2010/2011 (up from 20% in 2000/2001), whereas foreign-
born nurses represented 14% of all nurses (up from 11% in 2000/2001).
The chapter calls for movement towards greater self-sufficiency in OECD countries
through increased domestic education and training capacity, as required to
respond to current and future projected demand; implementation of retention
measures (for example, better working conditions and pay rates) in lower-income
countries, which itself will require good governance of the health systems and
may require international support as called for by the World Health Organization
(WHO) Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health
Personnel; and better management of health workforce migration through
negotiation of mutually beneficial agreements, as well as consideration of more
ambitious approaches to global governance.
The international migration of doctors, nurses and other health workers is not a new
phenomenon, but it has drawn a lot of attention in recent years because of concerns that
it exacerbates shortages of skilled health workers in some countries, particularly in those
that are already experiencing critical shortages. The WHO Global Code of Practice on
the International Recruitment of Health Personnel was adopted by the World Health
Assembly in 2010 to support improved management of international health personnel
migration according to globally accepted ethical norms and standards. It encourages
greater international cooperation and support in the area and encourages countries to
achieve greater “self-sufficiency” in the training of health workers, while also recognizing
the workers’ basic human right of freedom of movement (Box 1).
The 2007 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) study
on “Immigrant health workers in OECD countries in the broader context of highly
skilled migration”, published in International migration outlook, presented for the first
time a complete picture of the migration flows of health personnel to OECD countries
by country of origin and destination (3). This work was recently updated in a chapter on
“Changing patterns in international migration of doctors and nurses to OECD countries”,
published in the 2015 edition of International migration outlook (4). This policy chapter
presents some of the main results from these chapters and additional information on
health workforce policies from the 2016 publication Health workforce policies in OECD
countries: right jobs, right skills, right places (5), and the 2008 publication The looming crisis
in the health workforce: how can OECD countries respond? (6). This chapter addresses the
following questions:
• What is the scale of the international migration of doctors and nurses to OECD
countries, and who heads where?
• How much do immigration and health policies affect migration growth and
what is the scope of bilateral agreements and new possible global governance
arrangements to better manage health workforce migration?
International cooperation
The Code encourages collaboration between health workers’ countries of origin
and countries of destination, so that both benefit from the migration of health
professionals.
Data gathering
Member States are encouraged to strengthen or establish health personnel
information systems, including information on health personnel migration, in
order to collect, analyse and translate data into effective health workforce policies
and plans.
Sources: WHO Global Code of Practice, and user’s guide to the Code (1, 2).
This section uses two different data sets to monitor trends in the number of foreign-
born doctors and nurses working in OECD countries (based mainly on population
census data available in many countries at 10-year intervals) and the number of
foreign-trained doctors and nurses working in OECD countries (based mainly on
data from professional registries available each year). It focuses only on the migration
of doctors and nurses, given the preeminent role that these have traditionally played
in health service delivery in OECD countries.
Although the United States of America receives the highest number of migrant
doctors and nurses in absolute terms, the steepest rises in foreign-born doctors
between 2000/2001 and 2010/2011 were in Germany and the United Kingdom.
There were also significant increases in Australia, Ireland, New Zealand and
Switzerland, while the shares continued at their relatively high levels in Canada
and the United States.
There were important variations across OECD countries in the proportion of health
personnel born abroad in 2010/2011. For doctors, the share ranges from less than
3% in Poland and Turkey to over 50% in Australia and New Zealand. The share of
foreign-born nurses is insignificant in Poland and the Slovak Republic, but over
30% in Australia, Israel, Luxembourg, New Zealand and Switzerland. In almost all
countries, with the exception of Estonia, Israel, Italy and Turkey, immigrants make
up a higher proportion of doctors than of nurses. This is particularly the case in
Australia, Ireland and New Zealand.
Not surprisingly, the proportions of foreign-born doctors and nurses are highest
in the main settlement countries (for example, Australia, Canada, Israel and New
Zealand) and European countries such as Luxembourg and Switzerland. Other
countries, including Belgium and the United Kingdom, are also near the top of the
list in terms of the share of foreign-born health professionals, as are some Nordic
countries when it comes to doctors and Ireland in regard to both doctors and nurses
(Tables 1 and 2).
1 Other sources indicate a slightly higher increase in the number of doctors in Belgium during this period.
2 Some doctors undergoing specialty training may not be counted in 2011.
3 In 2001, doctors are only partially covered.
4 Other sources indicate a slightly lower increase in the number of doctors in Sweden during this period.
5 Some doctors undergoing specialty training may not be counted in 2000.
Sources: OECD, 2007 (3) for 2000/2001 data; database on immigrants in OECD countries1 2010/2011
and labour force surveys 2009–2012 for 2010/2011 data.
1 http://www.oecd.org/els/mig/databaseonimmigrantsinoecdcountriesdioc.htm.
Doctors
2010/11
Country of residence Year Total Foreign born % foreign born
Australia (2011) 68 795 36 076 52.8
Austria (2011/12) 40 559 6 844 16.9
Belgium1 (2011/12) 40 148 10 202 25.4
Canada (2011) 79 585 27 780 34.9
Czech Republic* 3 468 8.8 (2011)
Denmark2 (2011) 15 403 2 935 19.1
Estonia* (2011) 4 145 747 18.0
Finland (2011) 18 937 1 454 7.7
France (2011) 224 998 43 955 19.5
Germany (2011/12) 366 700 57 210 15.7
Greece3 (2011/12) 49 577 3 624 7.3
Hungary (2011) 28 522 3 790 13.3
Ireland (2011/12) 12 832 5 973 46.6
Israel* (2011) 23 398 11 519 49.2
Italy* (2011/12) 234 323 11 822 5.0
Luxembourg 536 40.0 (2011)
Mexico* … … …
Netherlands (2011) 57 976 8 429 14.6
New Zealand (2011) 12 708 6 897 54.3
Norway (2011) 19 624 4 460 22.7
Poland (2011) 109 652 2 935 2.7
Portugal (2011) 36 831 6 040 16.4
Slovak Republic* 823 3.8 (2011)
Slovenia* 2011) 5 556 1 006 18.1
Spain (2011) 210 500 21 005 10.3
Sweden4 (2011/12) 47 778 14 173 29.8
Switzerland5 (2011/12) 43 416 18 082 41.6
Turkey (2011/12) 104 950 3 003 2.9
United Kingdom (2011/12) 236 862 83 951 35.4
United States (2007-11) 838 933 221 393 26.4
OECD Total (23 countries) 2 666 632 590 748
Notes: Countries for which data for 2000/2001 are derived from a census: Australia, Austria, Canada, Finland,
France, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, United
Kingdom, United States; countries for which data for 2000/2001 are derived from labour force surveys:
Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Norway. Countries for which data for 2010/2011 are derived from a
census: Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Hungary, Israel, Luxembourg,
Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, United States; countries
for which data for 2010/2011 are derived from labour force surveys: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom. Foreign-born doctors
whose place of birth is unknown are excluded from the calculation of the percentage of foreign-born doctors.
Countries marked with an asterisk (*) are not counted in the total (OECD 23) due to data gaps for at least
one year.
Nurses
2000/01
Country of residence Year Total Foreign born % foreign born
Australia (2001) 191 105 46 750 24.8
Austria (2001) 56 797 8 217 14.5
Belgium (1998-02) 127 384 8 409 6.6
Canada (2001) 284 945 48 880 17.2
Czech Republic* … … …
Denmark1 (2002) 57 047 2 320 4.1
Estonia* … … …
Finland (2000) 56 365 470 0.8
France (1999) 421 602 23 308 5.5
Germany (1998-02) 781 300 74 990 10.4
Greece (2001) 39 952 3 883 9.7
Hungary (2001) 49 738 1 538 3.1
Ireland 2002) 43 320 6 204 14.3
Israel* … … …
Italy* … … …
Luxembourg (2001) 2 551 658 25.8
Mexico* (2000) 267 537 550 0.2
Netherlands (1998-02) 259 569 17 780 6.9
New Zealand (2001) 33 261 7 698 23.2
Norway (1998-02) 70 698 4 281 6.1
Poland (2002) 243 225 1 074 0.4
Portugal (2001) 36 595 5 077 13.9
Slovak Republic* … … … 52 773
Slovenia* … … … 17 124
Spain (2001) 167 498 5 638 3.4
Sweden (2003) 98 505 8 710 8.9
Switzerland2 (2000) 62 194 17 636 28.6
Turkey* (2000) … … …
United Kingdom (2001) 538 647 81 623 15.2
United States (2000) 2 818 735 336 183 11.9
OECD Total (22 countries) 6 441 033 711 327 11.0
1 Other sources indicate that the number of nurses in Denmark may be about 25% higher in 2002 and in 2012.
Some associate professional nurses may not be counted.
2 Other sources indicate that the number of nurses in Switzerland may be about 50% higher in 2000 and 20%
higher in 2010.
Sources: OECD, 2007 (3) for 2000/2001 data; database on immigrants in OECD countries2 2010/2011 and
labour force surveys 2009–2012 for 2010/2011 data.
Notes: Countries for which data for 2000/2001 are derived from a census: Australia, Austria, Canada, Finland,
France, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey,
2 http://www.oecd.org/els/mig/databaseonimmigrantsinoecdcountriesdioc.htm.
Nurses
2010/11
Year Total Foreign born % foreign born
Australia (2011) 238 935 78 508 33.2
Austria (2009-10) 70 147 10 265 14.6
Belgium (2011-12) 140 054 23 575 16.8
Canada (2011) 326 700 73 425 22.5
Czech Republic* (2011-12) 89 301 1 462 1.6
Denmark1 (2011-12) 61 082 6 301 10.3
Estonia* (2011-12) 8 302 2 162 26.0
Finland (2011-12) 72 836 1 732 2.4
France (2009-10) 550 163 32 345 5.9
Germany (2009-12) 1 074 523 150 060 14.0
Greece (2011-12) 55 364 1 919 3.5
Hungary (2011-12) 59 300 1 218 2.1
Ireland (2011-12) 58 092 15 606 26.9
Israel* (2011) 31 708 16 043 50.6
Italy* (2011-12) 399 777 39 231 9.8
Luxembourg (2011-12 4 372) 1 347 30.8
Mexico* … … …
Netherlands (2009-10) 323 420 30 909 9.6
New Zealand (2011) 40 002 13 884 35.0
Norway (2009-10) 97 725 8 795 9.0
Poland (2009-10) 245 667 595 0.2
Portugal (2011-12) 53 491 4 643 8.7
Slovak Republic* (2011-12) 303 0.6
Slovenia* (2011-12) 1 483 8.7
Spain (2011-12) 252 804 14 400 5.7
Sweden (2011-12) 113 956 15 834 13.9
Switzerland2 (2011-12) 110 069 36 531 33.3
Turkey* (2009-10) 147 611 4 484 3.1
United Kingdom (2011-12) 618 659 134 075 21.7
United States (2007-11) 3 847 068 561 232 14.6
OECD Total (22 countries) 8 414 429 1 217 200 14.5
United Kingdom, United States; countries for which data for 2000/2001 are derived from labour force surveys:
Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Norway; country for which data for 2000/2001 are derived from a register:
Denmark. Countries for which data for 2010/2011 are derived from a census: Australia, Canada, Israel, New
Zealand, United States; countries for which data for 2010/2011 are derived from labour force surveys: Austria,
Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy,
Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey, United Kingdom. Foreign-born nurses whose place of birth is unknown are excluded from the
calculation of the percentage of foreign-born nurses. Countries marked with an asterisk (*) are not counted in
the total (OECD 23) due to data gaps for at least one year.
Australia, Ireland, New Zealand and Norway have the highest share of foreign-
trained doctors, with more than 30% of doctors trained abroad. Following these
countries are Canada, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United
States, with rates between 24% and 30%. The very high proportion of foreign-
trained doctors in Israel reflects not only the importance of immigration in this
country, but also the fact that an increasing number of new licences are issued to
people born in Israel but trained abroad (about one third in 2014). Similarly, in
the case of Norway, large numbers of Norwegians study medicine abroad, with
most of them returning to practise in Norway.
In absolute numbers, the United States has by far the highest number
of foreign-trained health workers, with more than 200 000 doctors and
almost 250 000 nurses trained abroad in 2013. Following the United States
are the United Kingdom (with more than 48 000 foreign-trained doctors
and 86 000 foreign-trained nurses in 2014) and Germany (with nearly
29 000 foreign-trained doctors in 2014 and 70 000 foreign-trained nurses
in 2010, the latest year available).
Most OECD countries have stepped up their education and training efforts for
doctors and nurses since 2000 in response to expected shortages arising from
general population ageing (which is expected to increase the demand for health
services) and the ageing of the medical and nursing workforce (which is expected
to reduce their supply). These efforts have partly slowed down the increase in
international recruitment (see section 4.1 on the impact of domestic education
and training policies on international migration flows) (Tables 3 and 4).
Doctors
2006 2012–2014
Foreign- Foreign-
Year Total trained % of total Year Total trained % of total
2005 ... ... 25.0% 2013 82 498 25 153 30.5%
2006 30 236 888 2.9% 2014 35 844 1 640 4.6%
2006 49 695 2 636 5.3% 2014 59 070 6 732 11.4%
2006 70 870 15 237 21.5% 2013 90 205 21 225 23.5%
2006 ... ... ... 2014 36 013 5 489 15.2%
2006 44 064 1 744 4.0% 2014 41 671 1 135 2.7%
2006 18 403 1 145 6.2% 2012 20 250 1 127 5.6%
2006 5 336 30 0.6% 2014 6 294 166 2.6%
2005 ... ... ... 2012 20 866 4 154 19.9%
2006 212 711 12 261 5.8% 2013 219 833 20 275 9.2%
2006 284 427 14 703 5.2% 2013 326 945 28 901 8.8%
2006 37 908 2 917 7.7% 2013 32 668 2 470 7.6%
2006 15 512e 4 663 30.1% 2014 19 066 6 877 36.1%
2006 23 890 14 746 61.7% 2014 25 570 14 839 58.0%
2006 45 051 941 2.1% 2011 51 939 1 352 2.6%
2006 11 889 4 833 40.7% 2014 14 786 6 298 42.6%
2008 18 557 5 996 32.3% 2014 22 659 8 447 37.3%
2008 119 604 2 529 2.1% 2012 125 073 2 203 1.8%
2004 17 375e 139 0.8% 2011 16 899 506 3.0%
2006 ... ... ... 2013 5 416 781 14.4%
2006 ... ... ... 2011 207 042 19 462 9.4%
2006 32 802 6 321 19.3% 2012 38 144 9 283 24.3%
2008 29 653 6 479 21.8% 2012 31 858 8 617 27.0%
2006 104 475 240 0.2% 2013 133 775 261 0.2%
2008 146 834 43 885 29.9% 2014 172 561 48 766 28.3%
2006 664 814 166 810 25.1% 2013 859 470 214 438 25.0%
OECD Total (26 countries) 2 696 415 460 597 17.1%
Note: Doctors whose place of training is unknown have been excluded from the calculation of the percentage
of foreign-trained doctors (Netherlands, Slovak Republic, Slovenia and United Kingdom).
Source: Annex 4.A1 in chapter 4 of OECD, Health workforce policies in OECD countries: right jobs, right skills,
right places (5).
Nurses
2000
Foreign-
Country of residence Year Total trained % of total
Australia 2000 ... ... ...
Belgium 2000 130 560 679 0.5%
Canada 2000 232 566 14 187 6.1%
Chile 2000 ... ... ...
Denmark1 2000 49 694 889 1.8%
Estonia 2000 ... ... ...
Finland2 2000 ... ... 0.2%
France 2000 404 564 7 016 1.7%
Germany3 2000 ... ... ...
Hungary 2000 ... ... ...
Ireland 2000 … ... ...
Israel 2000 39 064 7 277 18.6%
Italy 2000 304 159 1 825 0.6%
Netherlands 2001 169 580 1 495 0.9%
New Zealand 2002 33 027 4 860 14.7%
Norway 2000 ... ... ...
Poland 2000 ... ... ...
Portugal 2002 41 902 1 954 4.7%
Slovenia 2000 ... ... ...
Spain 2000 ... ... ...
Sweden 2000 88 302 2 358 2.7%
Switzerland 2000 ... ... ...
Turkey 2000 69 550 11 0.0%
United Kingdom4 2001 632 050e 50 564 8.0%
United States 5
2000 ... ... ...
OECD Total (25 countries)
1 The data only include professional nurses (and exclude associate professional nurses).
2 The data refer only to general nurses.
3 The data refer to citizens born abroad, not German by birth (except ethnic German repatriates),
and the highest degree in nursing acquired in a foreign country.
4 Different source in 2001 (8).
5 Data refer to all nurses registered to practise.
Nurses
2006 2012–2014
Foreign- Foreign-
Year Total trained % of total Year Total trained % of total
2007 263 332 38 108 14.5% 2013 296 029 47 507 16.0%
2006 150 817 1 290 0.9% 2014 186 278 5 411 2.9%
2006 326 170 21 445 6.6% 2013 375 768 28 330 7.5%
2006 ... ... ... 2014 34 674 702 2.0%
2006 51 840 818 1.6% 2012 55 037 724 1.3%
2006 10 264 ... ... 2014 12 519 4 0.0%
2005 ... ... 0.3% 2012 72 471 1 293 1.8%
2006 493 503 11 712 2.4% 2014 622 052 17 692 2.8%
2006 ... ... ... 2010 1 211 000 70 000 5.8%
2006 ... ... ... 2013 53 323 650 1.2%
2004 60 819e 8 758 14.4% 2013 ... ... ...
2006 43 481 6 077 14.0% 2014 45 982 4 528 9.8%
2006 358 746 15 108 4.2% 2014 424 813 20 072 4.7%
2006 186 990 2 149 1.1% 2011 198 694 1 358 0.7%
2008 39 247 8 931 22.8% 2014 45 572 11 170 24.5%
2008 70 575 5 022 7.1% 2014 83 647 7 640 9.1%
2008 268 015 5 0.0% 2012 278 496 7 0.0%
2006 51 095 2 285 4.5% 2013 65 868 1 947 3.0%
2006 ... ... ... 2013 4 797 20 0.4%
2006 ... ... . .. 2011 250 277 5 247 2.1%
2006 98 905 2 789 2.8% 2012 106 176 2 882 2.7%
2006 ... ... ... 2012 61 609 11 536 18.7%
2006 82 626 79 0.1% 2013 139 544 239 0.2%
2006 659 470 88 609 13.4% 2014 683 625 86 668 12.7%
2006 ... ... ... 2012 4 104 854e 246 291e 6.0%
9 413 105 571 918 6.1%
e: estimation.
Note: Nurses whose place of training is unknown are excluded from the calculation of the percentage of
foreign-trained nurses (for example, Switzerland).
Source: Annex 4.A1 in chapter 4 of OECD, Health workforce policies in OECD countries: right jobs, right skills,
right places (5).
The emigration of health workers from their country of origin can be reconstructed
through the use of data collected in OECD destination countries.3 Figure 1 presents
the distribution by region of origin of foreign-born doctors and nurses who were
working in OECD countries in 2000/2001 and 2010/2011.
Figure 2 shows the top 25 countries of origin of foreign-born doctors and nurses
working in OECD countries in 2010/2011 and the increase since 2000/2001. In
the South-East Asia Region, the increase came mainly from doctors born in India.
Germany and the United Kingdom were the main countries of origin among OECD
countries. In non-OECD European countries, Romania also stands out for its high
volume of emigration. In the Eastern Mediterranean and Western Pacific Regions,
Pakistan and China accounted for the highest shares of foreign-born doctors
working in OECD countries, while the Philippines sent the largest proportion of
nurses. In the African Region, immigrant doctors in OECD countries came primarily
from Nigeria and South Africa, and in the Region of the Americas, from Colombia
and Peru, while the Caribbean supplied the most nurses.
India and the Philippines account for the largest shares of migrant doctors and
nurses in OECD countries. They were already the two main sending countries in
3 These data provide a lower-bound estimate, as they do not include migration to other non-OECD countries.
0
OECD South-East Eastern Western Africa Americas Europe
Asia Mediterranean Pacific
Note: The regional groupings correspond to the six WHO regions (for country details, see http://www.who.int/
about/regions), except the OECD countries.
Source: OECD, Changing patterns in the international migration of doctors and nurses to OECD countries,
Figure 3.15, p. 129 (4).
India
China
Germany
United Kingdom
Pakistan
Philippines
Iran
Algeria
Romania
Canada
South Africa
Viet Nam
Korea
Egypt
Poland
Nigeria
Malaysia
Colombia
Syria
United States
Morocco
Lebanon
Russian Federation
Cuba
Italy
Source: OECD, Changing patterns in the international migration of doctors and nurses to OECD countries,
Figure 3.16, p. 129 (4).
Philippines
India
United Kingdom
Germany
Jamaica
Canada
Nigeria
Haiti
China
Mexico
Korea
Poland
Ireland
France
Zimbabwe
Vietnam
Ghana
South Africa
Romania
New Zealand
Guyana
Trinidad and Tobago
Cuba
Kenya
Iran
In Africa, the expatriation rate for nurses in South Africa rose from 12.6% in
2000/2001 to 16.5% in 2010/2011, in Nigeria from 10% to 17%, and in Zimbabwe
from 28% to 43%. For the two main origin countries of doctors in Africa
Table 5
Doctors Nurses
2000/01 2010/11 2000/01 2010/11
Overall expatriation rate 5.3 5.9 4.5 5.7
Average expatriation rate 19.5 21.8 16.6 21.8
Median expatriation rate 13.0 13.6 6.4 10.4
Notes: The average expatriation rate corresponds to the unweighted average of each country’s expatriation
rate (and therefore does not take into account the demographic weight of each country), whereas the
overall expatriation rate indicates the share of expatriates in OECD countries in the total number of doctors
and nurses of the countries examined. The average expatriation rate is higher than the global rate, because
countries with the lowest populations and those that are islands show the highest rates of emigration.
Countries for which expatriation rates are under 10 for nurses (5 for doctors) or resident rates in the origin
country are below 50 for nurses (10 for doctors) are not included in the calculations. Expatriation rates are
only calculated for countries for which data back to 2005 at the latest are available. Therefore, 149 countries
of origin are included for doctors and 141 for nurses. Data on the expatriation rates in 2000/2001 of nurses
born in Brazil, India and South Africa have been updated on the basis of new data on the number of nurses
working in these countries in 2000/2001. The revised expatriation rates in 2000/2001 are: Brazil 1.5%; India
2.9%; and South Africa 12.6%.
Sources: OECD (3); database on immigrants in OECD countries 2010/2011;5 labour force surveys 2009–2012;
Global Health Observatory (WHO).
4 Table 3.A1.1 in the International migration outlook 2015 (4) presents expatriation rates by country of origin.
5 http://www.oecd.org/els/mig/databaseonimmigrantsinoecdcountriesdioc.htm.
Despite the sharp increase in the number of health professionals emigrating from
India and the Philippines, their expatriation rates remained relatively constant. For
example, the number of expatriate Indian doctors jumped from 56 000 in 2000/2001
to around 87 000 in 2010/2011, but the corresponding expatriation rates rose only
by one half of a percentage point to 8.6%. In China, the number of expatriate nurses
doubled in 10 years (from around 12 200 to 24 400), but the expatriation rate
remained at only 1%.
In its 2006 World health report, WHO estimated that 2.4 million health workers
were needed in the 57 countries considered to have critical shortages (9).6 In
2010/2011, WHO estimated that 54 countries were still facing critical shortages
of about 2 million health workers. Most of these countries (31 countries) were in
Africa. Progress made in India to close the gap between health worker supply and
demand accounted for much of the reduced shortage in 2010/2011. In Africa and
6 Countries with critical shortages were defined in the 2006 World health report as those with less than 22.8 health
professionals (doctors, nurses and midwives) per 10 000 people and where less than 80% of childbirths were deliv-
ered by skilled birth attendants.
The slightly smaller group of countries having critical shortages saw their health
workers continue to emigrate in growing numbers between 2000/2001 and
2010/2011. Emigration therefore appears to have contributed to these critical
shortages over the decade. It accounted for 20% of estimated critical shortages in
2010/2011, compared with 9% in 2000/2001. In the decade preceding the adoption
of the WHO Global Code, the number of doctors and nurses originating from
countries with severe shortages who migrated to OECD countries grew by 84%,
while the total number of migrant health workers increased by 60%.
In the Americas, the high share of the estimated shortage attributed to migrant
health personnel is due mainly to the high emigration of nurses from the Caribbean.
In absolute terms, the greatest shortage is in the South-East Asia Region. Shortages
are particularly acute in Bangladesh and Indonesia, with health worker shortfalls
estimated at 260 000 and 240 000 respectively. In the Eastern Mediterranean Region,
the increase in emigration – particularly of Pakistan-born doctors – to the OECD
area accounted for 17% of the region’s estimated critical shortage in 2010/2011, up
from 10% in 2000/2001. Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Papua
New Guinea were the countries where the shortfalls in health personnel were the
greatest in the Western Pacific Region. In this region, migration also accounted
for a higher share of the shortage in 2010/2011 compared with 2000/2001. Table 6
assesses the relative contribution of emigration for those countries where the density
Table 6
Sources: OECD (3); database on immigrants in OECD countries 2010/2011;7 labour force surveys
2009–2012; Global Health Observatory (WHO).
7 http://www.oecd.org/els/mig/databaseonimmigrantsinoecdcountriesdioc.htm.
Policies relating to the education and training of doctors, nurses and other health
professionals are among the most powerful tools that countries can use to adjust the
supply to projected needs. Training sufficiently large numbers of health workers to
curb any dependence on immigration is in fact one of the key principles of the WHO
Global Code of Practice. Most OECD countries control in some ways the number of
students admitted to medical and nursing schools, mainly through numerus clausus
policies, and several countries have raised admission levels in these programmes
since 2000, either to meet expected growing needs for health services or to reduce
their dependence on foreign-trained doctors or nurses.
In the United Kingdom, the steady rise in the number of domestic medical graduates
since 2002 has also reduced the need to recruit abroad (Figure 4), although the annual
inflow of foreign-trained doctors seems to have stabilized in recent years. But the
countries of origin of foreign-trained doctors in the United Kingdom have changed
considerably over the past decade, with a growing proportion of doctors trained in
other European Union countries. Regarding nurses, the inflow of foreign-trained
nurses fell sharply between 2004 and 2009, but it has gone up since then, driven
mainly by the migration of nurses trained in other European Union countries (for
example, Portugal and Spain), to meet growing demands for nurses that are not fully
met by the growing supply of domestically trained nurses. It is important to keep in
mind that there are also large outflows of nurses trained in the United Kingdom who
are emigrating to other English-speaking countries, such as Australia, Canada, New
Zealand and the United States (16).
8 See, for example, Figures 3.18 and 3.19 in the International migration outlook 2015 (4) and Figures 5.7 and 5.16
in Health at a glance 2015 (15).
20 000
16 000
12 000
NEED DATA
8 000
4 000
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
140 000
120 000
100 000
80 000
60 000
40 000
20 000
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: OECD, Health workforce policies in OECD countries: right jobs, right skills,
right places, Figure 8, p. 7 (5).
14 000
12 000
10 000
8 000
6 000
4 000
2 000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
25 000
20 000
15 000
10 000
5 000
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Note: Between 2005 and 2008, data on staff trained abroad correspond to the administrative period ending
31 March of the year indicated. There is a break in 2008 for the graduate series. Data from 2008 onwards
are estimated.
Source: OECD, Health workforce policies in OECD countries: right jobs, right skills, right places, Figure 9, p. 7 (5).
The free movement of people and workers has been a cornerstone of efforts to
build the European Union since the Treaty of Rome was signed in 1957. Prior to
the accession of the 10 new member countries in 2004, there were concerns about a
possible massive inflow of health workers from these countries. These concerns were
based primarily on the results of surveys of health workers’ intentions to migrate,
conducted before 2004. For example, more than a third of Polish health workers and
more than half of Estonian health workers expressed their intention to emigrate to
find work (17). Yet migration flows have been more modest, all things considered.
The available information indicates that there was no sudden inflow of Polish nurses
in western European countries in 2004. In Ireland and the United Kingdom, the
flows appear to have been affected more by labour market demand, which grew up to
2007 before falling from 2008 onwards.
Figure 5
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2 000
1 500
1 000
500
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
The economic crisis, which started in 2008 in many OECD countries, had varying
effects on international flows of migrant health workers. Some countries recruited
fewer international health professionals as they cut health expenditure growth,
and some domestic-born health workers came back on the job market. Some
countries hardest hit by the crisis, mainly in southern, central and eastern Europe,
experienced considerable outflows of health workers after 2008, with most of them
going to Germany and the United Kingdom. In some European Union countries,
this international mobility helped to achieve a better balance on labour markets and
reduced the risks of unemployment and underemployment among health workers.
Greece and Italy, two countries particularly hard hit by the crisis, have since 2008 seen
a significant increase in the numbers of doctors moving to other European countries,
notably Germany and the United Kingdom.
In recent years, Germany seems to be the favoured country of destination for doctors
born in Greece and Italy. The number of doctors of Greek nationality in Germany
As for nurses, there has been a steep rise in emigration from Italy, Portugal, Romania
and Spain, with the United Kingdom being the main destination country. Since 2009,
nurses trained in these four countries have represented most of new internationally
registered nurses in the United Kingdom.
The WHO Global Code of Practice encourages Member States to put in place bilateral,
regional or multilateral arrangements to promote cooperation and coordination
in the area of international recruitment (1). The Code specifies, in particular, that
these arrangements should take into account the needs of developing countries and
countries with economies in transition. In recent years, several OECD countries
have implemented such bilateral agreements for the international recruitment of
health personnel.
For example, Germany concluded a bilateral agreement with Viet Nam in 2012,
covering pilot projects for the training and recruitment of geriatric care nurses in
Vietnam, a country identified on the basis of its strategy of training nurses for the
global market. The project was commissioned by the German Federal Ministry
for Economics and Technology (BMWi) and is being implemented by German
Development Cooperation (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit,
GIZ), in collaboration with the Vietnamese Ministry of Labour, Invalids and Social
Affairs. Some 100 Vietnamese nursing graduates were selected initially to take six
months of training in the German language and culture. Participants then travelled to
Germany at the end of 2013 to begin two years of professional training, accompanied
by a programme of integration and language courses. This pilot project seeks to
establish a baseline for future recruitment of skilled foreign personnel to provide care
The German authorities have also sought to ensure that, consistent with the principles
of the WHO Global Code of Practice, its international recruitment activities do not
come at the expense of countries of origin. During the July 2013 review of the list of
professions in short supply in Germany, the government prohibited the recruitment
of health workers in the 57 countries identified by WHO in 2006 as facing a critical
shortage. This decision was subsequently reconsidered, as it not only banned active
recruitment by an employer or private agency but also prevented health workers
from seeking employment in Germany at their own initiative (so-called passive
recruitment). This provision was finally eliminated with the revision in October 2013
of the Employment Ordinance, which prohibits active recruitment and the private
placement of health workers from the 57 countries mentioned.
In Finland, the Mediko programme (which stands for Recruitment of Foreign Health
and Social Care Professionals to Finland) was launched in 2008 and is still in place.
Initially coordinated by the municipality of Kotka, the Mediko project was then
expanded to cover all of Finland. Since its creation, Mediko has provided counselling
to some 80 doctors, mainly Russian, wishing to practise in Finland. Mediko has also
begun to recruit nurses in Spain. Following an exploratory visit in 2012 by Mediko to
Spain, 2000 Spanish nurses expressed an interest in moving to Finland. Finnish language
courses have been organized in various Spanish cities, and since 2012, nearly 150 persons
have been recruited via this programme. With a view to longer-term recruitment,
intensive language courses before departure are planned as a way of bolstering the
motivation to move. Mediko also promotes cooperation between Finnish training
institutions and Estonian, Russian and Spanish institutions.
Another feature of several of the recruitment initiatives discussed here is the absence
of historical, colonial and linguistic ties that previously prevailed between countries
of origin and countries of destination. Countries are being increasingly targeted for
recruitment in light of their strategy of training health workers for the international
market. Learning the language of the destination country then becomes a central
condition of success of such recruitment programmes.
There may also be a need to think about more ambitious approaches to bilateral and
multilateral agreements building on the recent example of the Paris Agreement on
Climate Change (Box 2).
5. Conclusions
Migrant health workers represent a significant share of doctors and nurses working
in OECD countries. The share of foreign-born doctors and nurses increased in most
OECD countries between 2000/2001 and 2010/2011, as did the share of foreign-
trained doctors and nurses between 2000 and 2012–2014, although it is worth noting
that the share of foreign-trained doctors in the two main destination countries – the
United Kingdom and the United States – has decreased slightly in recent years, which
is also probably the case for foreign-trained nurses, mainly due to greater domestic
education and training efforts.
The Paris Agreement has been hailed by many as the new model for global
governance (20, 21). It aims to address an issue of global concern, with
clear recognition of countries that are most vulnerable. It also identifies
ethical principles and standards associated with national, international
and global efforts. The Paris Agreement does not strictly represent binding
international law with strict obligations. Instead, it substitutes a strong focus
on “compliance”, determination of legality or illegality, with an “enhanced
transparency framework”.
The Paris Agreement might provide some useful lessons for formalizing
similar dialogue structures through bilateral agreement between key source
and destination countries for migrant health personnel.
By adopting the WHO Global Code of Practice in 2010, all countries have committed
to improving their health workforce planning and to responding to their future
needs without relying unduly on the training efforts of other countries, in particular
those already having critical workforce shortages. The goal must not necessarily be to
achieve self-sufficiency, but to reduce the magnitude of reliance on other countries to
fill domestic needs.
Three possible areas for action in both destination and origin countries are proposed:
• OECD countries should adjust their domestic education and training capacity
to respond to current and future projected demand where necessary, based on
more robust health workforce planning, and promote greater retention rates of
currently active health professionals, to reduce their demand for foreign-trained
doctors and nurses.
• Lower-income countries that are losing many of their skilled health workers need
to address some of the “push” factors by increasing their efforts to retain these
scarce resources through improving their working conditions and pay rates.
These retention measures will require good governance of the health system and
long-term financial commitment, which in many cases may require the support of
the international community (22–24), as called for by the WHO Global Code of
Practice.
• As called for by the WHO Global Code of Practice, both destination and origin
countries should also seek to better manage health workforce migration by
negotiating mutually beneficial bilateral agreements, including by possibly
The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are solely those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor James Buchan (School of Health Sciences,
Queen Margaret University) and Ibadat S. Dhillon (Department for Health
Workforce, World Health Organization) for their useful comments and suggestions
on a draft version.
The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the
relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice
to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West
Bank under the terms of international law.
1. WHO Global Code of Practice on the International 12. Wismar M, Maier CB, Glinos IA, Dussault G, Figueras
Recruitment of Health Personnel. Geneva: World J, editors. Health professional mobility and health
Health Organization; 2010 (www.who.int/hrh/ systems: evidence from 17 European countries.
migration/code/code_en.pdf, accessed 27 October Observatory Studies Series 23. Copenhagen: WHO
2016). Regional Office for Europe, on behalf of the European
Observatory on Health Systems and Policies;
2. User’s guide to the WHO Global Code of Practice on 2011 (http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_
the International Recruitment of Health Personnel. file/0017/152324/Health-Professional-Mobility-Health-
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010 (http://apps. Systems.pdf?ua=1, accessed 27 October 2016).
who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70525/1/WHO_HSS_
HRH_HMR_2010.2_eng.pdf, accessed 27 October 13. Eke E, Girasek E, Szocska M. From melting pot to
2016). laboratory of change in central Europe: Hungary and
health workforce migration. In: Wismar M, Maier
3. Immigrant health workers in OECD countries in CB, Glinos IA, Dussault G, Figueras J, editors. Health
the broader context of highly skilled migration. professional mobility and health systems: evidence
In: International migration outlook, Part III. Paris: from 17 European countries. Observatory Studies
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Series 23. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for
Development; 2007. Europe, on behalf of the European Observatory on
Health Systems and Policies; 2011 (http://www.euro.
4. Changing patterns in the international migration who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/152324/Health-
of doctors and nurses to OECD countries. In: Professional-Mobility-Health-Systems.pdf?ua=1,
International migration outlook 2015. Paris: accessed 27 October 2016).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development; 2015. 14. Galan A, Olsavszky V, Vladescu C. Emergent
challenge of health professional emigration:
5. Health workforce policies in OECD countries: Romania’s accession to the EU. In: Wismar M, Maier
right jobs, right skills, right places. OECD Health CB, Glinos IA, Dussault G, Figueras J, editors. Health
Policy Studies. Paris: Organisation for Economic professional mobility and health systems: evidence
Co-operation and Development; 2016. from 17 European countries. Observatory Studies
Series 23. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for
6. The looming crisis in the health workforce: how
Europe, on behalf of the European Observatory on
can OECD countries respond? OECD Health
Health Systems and Policies; 2011 (http://www.euro.
Policy Studies. Paris: Organisation for Economic
who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/152324/Health-
Co-operation and Development; 2008.
Professional-Mobility-Health-Systems.pdf?ua=1,
7. Dumont JC, Lafortune G, Zurn P. Monitoring trends in accessed 27 October 2016).
international migration of health personnel: a critical
15. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris:
review of existing data sources. In: Siyam A, dal Poz
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
MR, editors. Migration of health workers: the WHO
Development; 2015.
Code of Practice and the global economic crisis.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. 16. Buchan J, Succombe I. Overstretched, under-
resourced: the UK nursing labour market review 2012.
8. Aiken L, Buchan J, Sochalski J, Nichols B, Powel M.
Royal College of Nursing; 2012.
Trends in international nurse migration. Health Affairs.
2004;23(3):69–77. PMID:15160804. 17. Vörk A, Kallaste E, Priinits M. Migration intentions
of health care professionals: the case of Estonia.
9. The world health report 2006: working together for
PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies; 2004.
health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
18. Training nurses from Viet Nam to become geriatric
10. Campbell J, Dussault G, Buchan J, Pozo-Martin F,
nurses in Germany: project description. Deutsche
Guerra Arias M, Leone C et al. A universal truth: no
Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
health without a workforce. Forum report, third Global
(GIZ); 2014.
Forum on Human Resources for Health, Recife,
Brazil. Geneva: Global Health Workforce Alliance 19. Slaughter A-M. The Paris approach to global
and World Health Organization; 2013 (http://www. governance [Internet]. Project Syndicate, 28
who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/resources/ December 2015 (https://www.project-syndicate.
hrhreport2013/en/, accessed 27 October 2016). org/commentary/paris-agreement-model-for-global-
governance-by-anne-marie-slaughter-2015-12,
11. Buchan J, Aiken L. Solving nursing shortages:
accessed 28 October 2016).
a common priority. Journal of Clinical Nursing.
2008;17(24):3262–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2702.2008.02636.x. PMID:19146584.
Abstract
The Nordic countries are “welfare superstars” with high-income economies, no
extreme inequality, high life expectancies and well functioning care services.
Their health care model is characterized by high proportions of public funding
through taxes, providers that are mostly publicly owned and modest co-
payments with universal access to care. This chapter presents forecasts that
evidence the need to reform these successful health care sectors, even in the
wealthiest of Nordic countries, in order to achieve their sustainability.
In Norway, due to income from the country’s pension fund, the current health
care model appears to be financially viable towards 2030. But extending the
projections makes clear that the current model is financially unsustainable.
Projections estimate a shortage of 76 200 FTEs (full-time equivalents) in the
Norwegian health care sector, including 28 200 FTE nurses and 1400 FTE
doctors by 2035. The numbers are expected to increase further towards
060. Estimates by Statistics Norway suggest that a staggering 38% of
Norway’s workforce will need to work within the health sector if the
system is not reformed.
This chapter calls for increasing efficiency and patient focus in the sector;
introduction of mechanisms to curb demand and reduce the tax burden; and
leadership to create a more optimal personnel mix, respecting the WHO Global
Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel.
The so-called Nordic model aims at equal and universal access to health care.
Given that it delivers high-quality services while limiting the financial burden on
individuals, the model can be considered a success (1).
In this chapter, we provide a short introduction to the essential aspects of the Nordic
model. Subsequently, we discuss the potential of the model, focusing on its sustainability
and replicability in oil-rich Norway. We assert that the model is dependent on the
financial, demographic and cultural context. We present forecasts of demographic
developments, the prevalence of diseases and the extent of care episodes for Norway.
Together, these factors will largely influence future demand for health care. Based on the
publications of Statistics Norway, we assert that an increase in supply of health care, if it
is to keep up with increasing demand from demographic changes and new technologies,
will not be financially sustainable – even in a wealthy country such as Norway.
The estimation entails assumptions about future demand for health care services and
the quality thereof. By relaxing some of the simplifying assumptions of the model, we
are able to determine the effects that different factors, such as delayed morbidity and
informal care, have on demand.
The four largest Nordic countries – Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden –
are welfare “superstars” with high-income economies, high life expectancies and
well functioning care services. The Nordic model refers to the economic and social
policies common to the Nordic countries. This includes a combination of free market
capitalism with a comprehensive welfare state. The Nordic countries have a universal,
tax-funded, single-payer health care system. All citizens and residents are insured,
and the level of co-payment has been relatively low. As a supplement, an increasing
share of the population pays out of pocket for private care.
Although there are significant differences among the Nordic countries, they all share
some common traits. These include support for a “universalist” welfare state, aimed
specifically at enhancing individual autonomy and promoting social mobility. There
is a commitment to widespread private ownership, free markets and free trade (2, 3).
Key premises for the Nordic model are transparent societies, democracy, high
social capital and low acceptance of corruption. The political model evolved in
similar countries with small and at the time homogeneous populations. There is
a check and balance between the key stakeholders within a corporatist system
involving a tripartite arrangement. The representatives of the labour force and
employers negotiate wages, and labour market policy is mediated and supported by
the government. The model has been adapted with the globalization of the Nordic
countries, but its financial sustainability is threatened by the ageing population,
through a relative reduction in the labour force, an increase in the share of recipients
and a costly public service production.
The journal The Economist (4) discusses the Nordic model with a practical approach
focusing on what works and what changes and adaptations have been implemented
thus far, dubbing the new, leaner Nordic model “the next supermodel”. The article
asserts that “A Swede pays tax more willingly than a Californian because he gets
decent schools and free health care.” Despite the model being in need of changes, the
1 In markets in general, customers’ preferences have a large impact on the products and services that are delivered.
However, when health care is paid for by a third party, the views and needs of patients can be neglected. In this
article, the term “patient focus” therefore refers to a political shift towards attention on patients’ needs, for example,
through valuing patients’ time when considering queues for treatments. A recent Norwegian reform is termed
“patient first”.
The Nordic governments introduced a common labour market in the 1950s and a
common accreditation for health personnel in 1982. The flow of health personnel
between the Nordic countries has varied with the relative attractiveness of the national
labour markets. The countries are also members of the joint European labour market,
as members of the European Union or the European Economic Area. The high wages
in Norway have resulted in a net influx of nurses and physicians from the other Nordic
and northern European countries.
2 It is noteworthy that the share of workers with part-time positions in the Norwegian health care sector is relatively
low. This may reflect good pay rates combined with a backward-bending supply curve, reducing demand for labour
as wages increase past a certain threshold.
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
1995 2000 2005 2010 2013
12
0
1995 2000 2005 2010 2013
Note: The figure for physicians has a smaller scale, in order to better display the differences between countries.
However, the difference between the Nordic countries and OECD average is much larger for nurses.
Source: OECD health statistics (http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm).
Among all factors that influence health care demand, health itself is critical.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer and respiratory disease are the three main
killers in Norway. Cancer, CVD, mental disease and diseases of the musculoskeletal
system are the diseases with the highest health care costs in Norway.
In 2013, 16 482 males and 13 919 females in Norway were diagnosed with cancer (9).
NORDCAN, a project that collects incidence, mortality, prevalence and survival
statistics from 50 major cancers in the Nordic countries, predicts that by 2033 the
crude rate of cancer will have increased by 39.5% among men and 17.1% among
women (10). The increase in crude rates is likely to be greater during the period
2034–2060, due to the rapid growth in the number of elderly people during this
period. Because innovative cancer therapies will be available over the coming
decades, patients will live longer with their disease, and the prevalence of cancer
will increase more than the increasing incidence would predict.
As life expectancy rises, the demographic age profile of Norway is changing. The
increase in the share of retirees and the reduction in the share of the tax-paying
labour force will cause the dependency ratio to rise, despite an expected decline
in the share of the population aged 0–19 years. Figure 2 depicts the expected
demographic development for Norway.
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1950 1970 1990 2010 2030 2050
Source: Figure 2 is based on two tables from Statistics Norway: Table 10211 (demography until 2015)
(https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/selectvarval/Define.asp?subjectcode=&ProductId=&MainTable=Folkem
EttAarig&nvl=&PLanguage=1&nyTmpVar=true&CMSSubjectArea=befolkning&KortNavnWeb=folkemengde&
StatVariant=&checked=true, accessed 6 November 2016); and Table 10212. The latter is no longer available
on the Statistics Norway website, and the demographic projections from 2016 onwards have been replaced
by Table 11167 (https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/selectvarval/Define.asp?subjectcode=&ProductId=&Main
Table=Framskr2016T1&nvl=&PLanguage=0&nyTmpVar=true&CMSSubjectArea=&KortNavnWeb=folkfram&
StatVariant=&checked=true, accessed 6 November 2016). The projections may differ from those in Table 10212.
The number of health personnel that countries will need in order to satisfy the
population’s future demand for health care is dependent on several factors, especially
demographic development and changes in morbidity and mortality.
We can forecast how large the supply of health care personnel would have to be
to satisfy future demand by dividing the population into subgroups, each group
The data are then combined with demographic projections to estimate future
personnel needs. Figure 3 illustrates this forecasting process for one subgroup.
Figure 3
Demographic projection
Number of individuals
in subgroup X
Age= y
Gender= z
As illustrated in Figure 3, such estimation assumes that the ratio of users per
individual in each subgroup remains unchanged. For example, we assume that
informal care (family members taking care of sick or disabled relatives) will increase
at the same rate as the expansion of the health care system. However, if informal
care should remain at today’s level, the number of users per individual for older age
groups would increase. Consequently, the supply of health care personnel would have
to increase even further.
Some of the factors that can affect the ratio of users per subgroup are:
• Delayed morbidity. A recent study indicates that mortality among older people
will continue to decline. This will probably delay morbidity to later stages in life,
but it is still uncertain whether this means a shorter morbidity period before death
(“compression of disease” and lower costs), or the opposite (15).
• Increase in standard or “quality of care”. The quality of health care has been
increasing with economic growth. If quality continues to increase over time, more
personnel will be needed in the future. This can be modelled as a proportional
increase in the number of users per individual in each subgroup or, perhaps
preferably, as a proportional increase in FTEs per user.
Thus, the model for estimating future health care demand is able to relax basic
assumptions and include several factors that may influence demand in the future.
By testing different sets (or combinations) of these assumptions we are able to
estimate different trajectories for future health care personnel demand.
Table 1 shows the results of the forecast of demand in 2060 for health care
personnel in Norway. The table provides an overview of the differing results for
several combinations of assumptions. For example, the reference case assumes no
growth in the quality of health care and no delayed morbidity. These assumptions
entail that 17% of all Norwegian FTEs would have to be in health care in order to
satisfy the 2060 demand. In comparison, there were 246 000 FTEs in health care
in 2010, constituting 11% of total FTEs in Norway (16).
The extent of informal care will also have a large impact on the demand for
health care. The bottom rows of Table 1 show the predicted demand given
that informal care stagnates at a level of approximately 100 000 FTEs per year.
This scenario will occur if, for example, the number of people caring for their
parents at home would remain constant, despite the increasing number of
elderly persons. Given the ageing demographic composition, a constant share
of informal care implies that informal care per dependent has to increase.
Furthermore, it is reasonable to assume that there is a connection between
Table 1
7. Educational capacity:
possibilities for health care supply
In order to meet future demand for health care services, it is imperative to train
sufficient and correct types of health care personnel. Forecasts for Norway indicate
that there already will be a deficit of approximately 76 000 health care workers in
2035 (17).
While there will be an expected surplus of psychologists and general high school-
educated personnel, there is a large deficit of nurses and specialized high school-
educated health care personnel, such as nurses’ aides.
Figure 4
SUM university-educated
Psychologists
Doctors
SUM college-educated
Nurses
Physiotherapists
SUM high school-educated
Other high school health/social education
Nurses aides, carers, health workers
-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
3 In a macro context, labour taxes from public sector employees equal a transfer from one public institution to another.
However, labour taxes from private sector employees constitute an income for the government, alongside direct
business taxes (16).
-5
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
9. A sustainable model?
The main challenge concerning the Nordic model is the difficulty of meeting
future health care demand, due to a changing epidemiological, technological and
demographic context. Thus, adapting the model is essential to ensure sustainable and
equitable health care in the future.
The Norwegian health care system is relatively well funded, and most new
pharmaceuticals, devices and other technologies are adopted early. Still, there are
challenges such as unmet needs, queuing, and not least discontent among health
personnel because of “too small budgets”. One current challenge in the health
services lies in funding the great number of cancer treatments.
With reduced oil prices and the economic downturn, health care budgets in the Nordic
countries could grow more slowly or even experience cuts. In the years towards 2030,
the situation seems manageable from a financial standpoint. However, the long-term
(2030–2060) projections indicate an increasing gap between supply of and demand
for health care personnel in terms of funding. This gap is so large that relatively drastic
measures need to be taken, unless some unexpected innovation in technology or
productivity is developed.
The example of Finland shows that the situation may become dramatic even in the
short run. The current economic recession has forced the Finnish parliament to agree
on a 1.9% real reduction in public expenditure on health care and social benefits during
the period 2016–2019 (20). While private financing currently lies at 25%, it is expected
that this share will increase and that private providers (a range of clinics and smaller
hospitals) will expand their capacity. The Finnish Government is now developing a
package of basic, necessary health care that all citizens will have access to, while other
services will be left to private providers and private funding. The content of the package
has not yet been agreed upon.
The projections presented earlier indicate that health services require production
with less use of resources per unit output. Furthermore, a greater share of the
funding needs to be from private sources, in order to reduce demand and limit the
strain on public finances.
Even though it is difficult to see how it will be possible to keep future supply
of health care at a level that is financially sustainable, we see three areas of
possible action.
Increasing the efficiency and customer service of health care production represents
one policy avenue. Lessons from the airline industry show that increased competition
has improved efficiency such that the costs have greatly diminished, the service level is
only moderately lower and safety is maintained. The key to higher efficiency in health
care may be through education of personnel, technology (including information and
communication technology), economic incentives, evidence-based medicine that
avoids ineffective care, and competition. Perhaps an increased use of privately owned
providers with public funding may create more competition and improve efficiency,
but there is still a need for better empirical evidence. It should be noted that hospital
efficiency has been a research area for decades, while we know even less about
efficiency in primary care, not least in the nursing services. Even though there has been
a more than 60% increase in registered nurses per 1000 population over the past 20
years, the discontent among nurses about the “staff shortage” is palpable. This may in
part be due to a change in health care services, characterized by shorter patient lengths
of stay in hospital, causing increased dependency and a higher workload.
Mechanisms to curb demand and reduce the tax burden, such as gatekeeping, cost
sharing and removing services from today’s high-cost universal health care coverage,
are another policy option. A greater share of funding needs to be private and some
co-payments for almost all types of care will be necessary, with few exemptions.
Some types of health care will also need to be left completely for private funding.
Surgery for varicose veins and screening procedures are examples of care that could
be excluded from the public health care package. Cost-effectiveness analysis is a
good tool, for example, to decide which services should fall outside public funding.
The third policy option is to focus on leadership in order to create a more optimal
and cost-efficient personnel mix; combining staff with different education and
educational levels; allowing for a wider range of tasks per educational group;
and increasing retention by limiting shifts towards administrative positions and
increasing the share of workers with full-time positions. The Nordic countries should
A leaner Nordic model will be more able to provide sustainable universal coverage of
critical health services as well as long-term job security for those considering a career
in the health services.
The main implication of our findings is that the context is crucial in order for a
health care model to function well. Even with a well-functioning model such as
the Nordic model, the circumstances and socioeconomic context are imperative
for its success.
Nevertheless, the policy options presented in this chapter may be part of the solution,
allowing the Nordic model to set an example for good health care in the future as
well. Perhaps it can even become more valuable, hopefully by demonstrating its
adaptability to changing and differing circumstances.
1. European Observatory for Health Systems and 11. Callahan D. Health care costs and medical technology.
Policies. Health systems in transition (HiT) profile The Hastings Center; 2008.
of Norway. 8. Conclusions. The Health Systems
and Policy Monitor [Internet]; 2016 (http://www. 12. Buffery D. The 2015 oncology drug pipeline:
hspm.org/countries/norway08012014/livinghit. innovation drives the race to cure cancer. American
aspx?Section=8.%20Conclusions&Type=Section, Health and Drug Benefits. 2015;8(4):216–22.
accessed 30 October 2016). PMID:26157543.
2. McWhinney JE. The Nordic model: pros and cons. 13. Regional health authorities in Norway: cost predictions
Investopedia, 7 October 2014 [Internet] (http://www. for pharmaceuticals financed by the regional health
investopedia.com/articles/investing/100714/nordic- authorities. Helse Vest RHF. Input to the budget
model-pros-and-cons.asp, accessed process at the Norwegian Ministry of Health; 2015.
30 October 2016).
14. Productivity Commission. Impacts of advances
3. Hicks A. Social democracy and welfare capitalism: in medical technology in Australia. Productivity
a century of income security politics. Ithaca (NY): Commission Research Report; 2005.
Cornell University Press; 2000.
15. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW.
4. The Economist. The Nordic countries: the next Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet.
supermodel. 2 February 2013 (http://www.economist. 2009;374(9696):1196–208. doi:10.1016/S0140-
com/news/leaders/21571136-politicians-both-right- 6736(09)61460-4. PMID:19801098.
and-left-could-learn-nordic-countries-next-supermodel,
accessed 31 October 2016). 16. Holmøy E, Kjelvik J, Strøm B. [Long projections of
the demand for health services and long-term care in
5. Focus on health spending: OECD health statistics Norway]. Reports 2014/14. Statistics Norway (SSB);
2015. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation 2014 (in Norwegian).
and Development; 2015 (http://www.oecd.org/health/
health-systems/Focus-Health-Spending-2015.pdf, 17. Roksvaag K, Texmon I. Arbeidsmarkedet for helse-
accessed 31 October 2016). og sosialpersonell fram mot år 2035 [The labour
market for health care personnel until the year 2035].
6. Nomesco. 2015 health statistics for the Nordic Report 14/2012. Statistics Norway (SSB); 2012 (in
countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Medico-Statistical Norwegian).
Committee 103:2015 (http://norden.diva-portal.org/
smash/get/diva2:874109/FULLTEXT01.pdf, accessed 18. Long-term perspectives on the Norwegian economy.
31 October 2016). White paper Meld. St. 12. Norwegian Ministry of
Finance; 2013.
7. European Observatory on Health Systems and
Policies; 2016 (http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/ 19. Holmøy E. Norsk helsesektor i tid og rom
partners/observatory/publications/health-system- [Norwegian health sector in time and space].
reviews-hits/full-list-of-country-hits). Presentation at Conference for Health Economics
(Helseøkonomikonferansen), 2014.
8. Helse- og sosialpersonell, 2014, 4. kvartal. Statistics
Norway (SSB); 2014 (http://ssb.no/hesospers, 20. Economic Policy Council report 2015. Helsinki: VATT
accessed 31 October 2016) (in Norwegian). Institute for Economic Research; 2016 (https://www.
eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/JulkaisuMetatieto/Documents/
9. Cancer in Norway 2013: cancer incidence, mortality, EDK-2016-AK-39122.pdf, accessed 31 October 2016).
survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo: Cancer
Registry of Norway; 2015.
Abstract
Acknowledging the fact that the health sector is strongly linked to the wider
economy, this chapter takes a broad health economy perspective and presents
new exploratory evidence on the size and scope of the workforce working
towards the achievement of health objectives such as universal health coverage.
These findings highlight that policies for strengthening the health economy
workforce must take into account both HO and NHO workers. The chapter
specifically calls on policy-makers to address shortages of decent jobs for health
economy workers through enabling macroeconomic and labour market policies;
to invest in new and better jobs to enhance economic growth by extending
health protection towards universal health coverage; and to transform unpaid
work into decent paid jobs in order to create inclusive and sustainable growth.
The health economy requires workers with a broad range of skills, including workers
in health occupations (HO workers), such as doctors and nurses, but also those in
non-health occupations (NHO workers), who provide necessary goods and services
to support the work of HO workers. Achieving health objectives and realizing the
related potential for economic growth is not possible without the contribution of
NHO workers: their work is essential, for example in administration to register
patients, the provision of social and long-term care services (including from family
members as outlined in Box 1), ensuring clean and sanitized laboratory coats,
producing and packaging medicines, operating computers, delivering financial
and legal advice, moving goods such as food in the production line, and producing
finished products for use in the health sector.1 Without diminishing the importance
of health occupations, the roles of other workers contributing to the health economy
seem to be equally crucial for achieving health objectives. Thus, for this study we take
a broad approach to identifying workers in the health economy, including workers
providing unpaid long-term care, and we thereby cover a larger group than is usually
included in the health sector alone.
1 A detailed definition of NHO workers is provided in the next section of this paper.
Shortages of skilled long-term care workers often result from the assumption
that “family care” is a “free” service without a cost to the economy. The
situation is worsened by age and gender discrimination, which manifests
itself in neglect of the need for paid long-term care workers and the
perception of such work as a financial burden.
Finally, accepting the lack of formal long-term care workers as normal fails to
recognize the potential for physical and mental improvements made possible
by the services of skilled workers and foregoes the potential for economic
growth through creating a sufficient number of long-term care jobs.
Source: Scheil-Adlung (4).
This lack of data has a strong impact on countries’ ability to allocate resources
efficiently and devise evidence-based employment policies. Against this background,
this paper assesses the employment and multiplier effects of investments in health
economy employment, focusing on the following questions:
a. Globally, how many NHO workers are supporting HO workers to achieve health
objectives?
b. How many decent jobs for NHO workers should be created by 2030 to achieve
universal health coverage in the context of SDGs 1, 3 and 8?
2. Methodology
Few data at global and national level are available on the number of NHO workers,
and current data do not permit country-level comparisons to be made, due to
differing definitions and categories of workers. We have therefore developed a new
methodology to estimate the current ratio of HO workers to NHO workers. From
this we can extrapolate the number of NHO workers and the number of NHO jobs
that would need to be created in the health economy to achieve universal health
coverage by 2030, assuming that the current ratio does not change. The methodology
• NHO workers as paid or unpaid workers not in heath occupations within the
health sector or in other sectors contributing through the delivery of goods and
services to the work of HO workers. They include long-term care workers such as
family members, friends or neighbours who provide unpaid services informally to
persons needing long-term care.
We estimate the number of workers in each of these categories for 185 countries
using the ILOSTAT database (6), World Health Organization (WHO) Global Health
Observatory database (7) and national databases, with data taken for the most
recent available year for each country. First, we calculate the number of HO workers
based on ISCO codes2 and the WHO Global Health Observatory data and apply
an upward adjustment to balance the data of countries where the WHO Global
Health Observatory data are likely to undercount certain professional categories,
such as associate health professionals.3 Then we calculate the number of workers in
all service industries4 and estimate the proportion of these who are formal NHO
workers based on a proxy: total health expenditure as a percentage of GDP.
2 This refers to ISCO codes 22 (health professionals), 32 (health associate professionals) and 532
(personal care workers).
3 Further details are available in the methodological annex (Annex 1).
4 The calculations are based on ISIC Rev.4 categories G–U. For details see Annex 1.
Using the total number of HO workers and both formal and informal NHO workers
working across all sectors we compute the current global ratio of NHO workers to
HO workers based on workforce-weighted data for each country.
For estimates of the number of HO workers and NHO workers needed to achieve
universal health coverage in the context of the SDGs by 2030 we follow earlier
methodologies (9) applied to estimate health workforce deficits by setting a threshold
based on workforce–population ratios in low-vulnerability countries and comparing
the situation in each individual country against this threshold.
The global estimates provide information on the number of NHO workers working
inside or outside the health sector in activities including (but not
limited to):
• administration
• insurance
• finance
• information technology
• transportation
• education.
Our analyses indicate that, globally, NHO workers account for 60% of all health
economy employment and 70% of all paid and unpaid workers, including informal
long-term care workers in the health economy (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Composition of workers in
the global health economy
(thousands), 2015
Unpaid NHO HOs:
workers: 70 631
56 665
Paid NHO
workers:
106 042
Source: ILO calculations, 2016 (10).
• 71 million HO workers;5
• 57 million unpaid, mostly female, NHO workers, providing care to older relatives.
The global ratio of NHO workers to HO workers is 2.3, with each HO worker
supported by 2.3 (paid or unpaid, formal or informal) NHO workers to achieve
overall health objectives. Excluding unpaid NHO workers (mostly female family
members), and the necessary transformation of the work into paid employment in
formal jobs for long-term care workers, brings the ratio to 1.5, meaning that each
HO worker is supported by 1.5 paid NHO workers.
Figure 2 shows how the ratio of NHO workers to HO workers varies by income
group. If we consider just paid NHO workers, high-income countries have an NHO–
HO ratio of 1.7, compared with 1.4 for middle-income countries and
1.3 for low-income countries.
Taking paid and unpaid, formal and informal workers into account, however, we
see a much higher ratio in low-income countries, because these countries tend to
have smaller numbers of HO workers relative to the size of their populations. The
relatively high ratio in high-income countries, on the other hand, is probably a
reflection of the higher proportion of older persons among the populations and
therefore greater numbers of long-term care workers.
5 Our estimates of 70.6 million HO workers are different from and larger than earlier estimates from WHO as a result
of different approaches, definitions, and data sources, for example including or excluding private health sector em-
ployment. Global estimation of HO workers is also a challenging task, as data from various sources differ in terms of
the definitions used, and the scope and completeness of the data. The differences show the range of the size of the
total health workforce depending on choices about which groups to include.
4.0
3.4
NHO workers per HO workers
3.5
3.0
2.5 2.3 2.4 2.3
(current)
2.1
2.0 1.7
1.5 1.4 1.4
1.5 1.3
1.0
0.5
0.0
All High Upper Lower Low
(n=185) (n=57) middle middle (n=27)
(n=50) (n=49)
Income group
Figure 3 provides estimates that suggest the world is currently short of about 18 million
HO workers and 32 million NHO workers to achieve universal health coverage.
However, the shortages of workers are not equitably distributed. While some countries
have a surplus of HO workers and NHO workers – particularly high-income countries
– others show gaps: 89 countries are observed with a shortage of HO workers and 95
countries with a shortage of formal NHO workers.
Adding unpaid workers to the calculations, we find that currently 123 countries have a
shortage of 38 million formal and informal NHO workers.
Figure 4 shows that the shortages of HO workers and NHO workers predominantly
affect Asia and the Pacific, which reflects the fact that this region contains the most
populous countries in the world, with Africa the next most affected. Relative to the
population size, however, Africa has the most severe shortages.
120
106 042
100
Number of workers
80 70 631
(thousands)
60
40 31 761
18 340
20
0
HO workers Paid NHO workers
Available Missing
Figure 4
20 18 575
18
16
Number of workers
14
(thousands)
12
10 347 10 494
10
8
6 368
6
4
2 966 1 510
499 829 353
160
0
HO workers Paid NHO workers
Asia & Pacific Africa Americas
Arab States Europe & Central Asia
Figure 5
45
40 38 144
Number of additional workers
required by 2013 (thousands)
35
30 856
30
25
20 17 982
15 12 921
9 945
10
6 173 4 971
5 3 917
2 201
437 784 1 099
0
HO jobs Paid NHO jobs Paid and unpaid
NHO workers
High Upper middle Lower middle Low
income income income income
This also holds true for the provision of decent working conditions for NHO
workers, who often work for low wages. Working conditions that do not respect
human rights, including labour rights, social protection coverage, occupational safety
and participatory processes through social dialogue, will not address challenges to
economic growth such as poverty and inequality. Based on this analysis, investments
in decent jobs for NHO workers should be considered alongside investments in
HO workers.
The data suggest that the economic return on investments in HO workers – or more
generally in universal health coverage – has a positive impact on job creation for
NHO workers. Globally, the ratio of NHO workers to HO workers is estimated at
2.3. If this ratio were to be maintained, the creation of one HO job has the potential
to result in 2.3 jobs for NHO workers. If only paid NHO work is considered the ratio
is still 1.5, meaning that each HO job could result in the creation of 1.5 NHO jobs.
Thus, a direct effect of additional HO jobs is the generation of NHO employment,
from which the resultant incomes are used and reused to contribute to the broader
economy, leading to further employment and economic growth.
Despite their importance, evidence suggests that the world is short of 32 million
NHO workers, with larger shortages in lower middle-income and low-income
countries. The demand for NHO workers will grow significantly by 2030, when
170 million NHO workers are likely to be required to provide goods and services
to achieve universal health coverage.
These results suggest that much potential economic growth is foregone due to the
gaps in employment. Further, NHO shortages reduce the accessibility of health
services, thus creating (a) negative health and economic impacts as the unserved
population cannot fully contribute to economic growth due to absenteeism,
disability and reduced life expectancy; and (b) increased public expenditure due to
higher morbidity.
• The creation of NHO jobs can benefit workers with all levels of qualifications
and in areas with limited employment opportunities and thus has the potential
to reduce un(der)employment and poverty.
The many occupations included in NHO work provide a wide range of job
opportunities for workers at all skill levels. Thus, the creation of decent jobs
in non-health occupations can play an important role in areas with high
unemployment of low-skilled workers. It can also provide learning and career
development opportunities to workers who have missed out on primary or
secondary education.
Further, NHO employment effects are likely to occur not only in affluent areas
but also in poor and rural areas if investments in decent jobs are made in the
context of universal health coverage policies based on equitable access to services,
as implied in SDGs 1, 3 and 8. Thus, the multiplier effects of investments in
health economy employment might include poverty alleviation and reduced
unemployment in such areas.
Shortages of formal jobs for health workers result in informal work, particularly for
the provision of long-term care services. These estimates indicate that, globally, there
are nearly as many unpaid NHO workers providing informal care as HO workers.
Often, these unpaid services are provided without decent working conditions,
defined working hours, rights to breaks, holidays, or social protection coverage for
sickness, unemployment and old age. This may result in negative health impacts such
as burnout and old age poverty among care workers.
Closing the gaps requires a rethinking of current health employment policies, which
often focus on HO workers in the health sector only rather than considering the
macroeconomic dimension of employment effects for all workers contributing to the
health economy. Thus, it is important to evaluate where investments are best placed
to achieve optimal health, social and economic returns on investment. Evidence
from prior studies (11) indicates that investments in medically underserved rural
Policies should not be limited to solely achieving higher numbers of HO jobs, but
should also consider decent work for NHO workers as an integral part of health
employment. Only if decent working conditions for the entire health economy
workforce are considered can sustainable progress be achieved (12).
• ensuring that sufficient funds for attaining universal health coverage are made
available for the workforce, requiring fair social protection financing mechanisms
aimed at financial, fiscal and economic sustainability with due regard to social justice
and equity, as highlighted in ILO Recommendation No. 202;
An essential foundation for policies to ensure that the health economy contributes fully
to and benefits from progress towards decent work for all is improved national data on
the size and composition of NHO workers.
Against this background, it is important to unlock the positive effects of health economy
employment and realize inclusive and sustainable growth based on investments in
decent jobs for NHO workers. Labour market and employment policies should be
closely linked to employment-friendly macroeconomic policies. Such enabling policies
reverse the prioritization of fiscal policies aimed at reducing debts and financial deficits
only. By using macroeconomic frameworks allowing for higher budget deficits and
inflation, policies have the potential to reduce unemployment, provide for education,
training, and skills development, alleviate poverty, and promote investments in social
protection in health (13). This can be achieved without jeopardizing macroeconomic
stability as the policies are thereby linked to employment-generating growth.
Policy option 2
Invest in new and better jobs to enhance economic growth by extending
health protection towards universal health coverage
It will be important to ensure sufficient investments for increasing the quality and
quantity of health employment for workers in health and other occupations in both
the public and private sectors. The generation of public funds requires fiscal space
that needs to be created based on fair financing mechanisms, including taxes and
shared contributions to health protection systems providing for universal health
coverage. Resultant funds should be equitably distributed in terms of geography, age
and gender, to avoid access deficits. Thus, increased health economy employment
will be linked to the needs and demands of the population, who can then access
affordable services and will in return be enabled to contribute to economic growth.
Some prerequisites and principles should be met to enable the population to utilize
services. These include the establishment of rights and legislation guaranteeing
access to health care for the whole population, rather than an approach based on
charity. Such legislation should be based on the principles of universality, equity,
social inclusion and non-discrimination. Further, it is essential to ensure that quality
services are affordable and financially protected, for example by minimizing out-of-
pocket payments.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank ILO colleagues for their contributions: Amber
Barth, Thorsten Behrendt, Ekkehard Ernst, David Hunter, Stephen Pursey, Dorothea
Schmidt-Klau and Christiane Wiskow.
1. James C. Health and inclusive growth: changing 8. State of Caring 2015. Carers UK [Internet]. London:
the dialogue. In: Buchan J, Dhillon I, Campbell J, Carers UK; 2014 (https://www.carersuk.org/for-
editors. Health employment and economic growth: an professionals/policy/policy-library/state-of-caring-2015,
evidence base. Geneva: World Health Organization; accessed 7 November 2016).
2016 [forthcoming].
9. Scheil-Adlung X. Health workforce benchmarks
2. Scheil-Adlung X. What are the impacts of health for universal health coverage and sustainable
workforce shortages and employment conditions development. Bulletin of the World Health
on the population and economic growth? Policy Organization. 2013;91:888–9. doi:10.2471/
Brief No. 10, United Nations Commission on Health BLT.13.126953.
Employment and Economic Growth. Geneva:
International Labour Office; 2016 [unpublished: 10. Scheil-Adlung X. Health workforce: a global supply
available upon request from the author]. chain approach – new data on the employment
effects of health economies in 185 countries. Geneva:
3. R202 – Social Protection Floors Recommendation, International Labour Office; 2016.
2012 (No. 202) [Internet]. Geneva: International
Labour Office; 2012 (http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/ 11. Scheil-Adlung X. Global evidence on inequities in rural
en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ health protection: new data on rural deficits in health
INSTRUMENT_ID:3065524, accessed coverage for 174 countries. Geneva: International
6 November 2016). Labour Office; 2015 (http://www.social-protection.
org/gimi/gess/ShowRessource.action?ressource.
4. Scheil-Adlung X. Long-term care (LTC) protection ressourceId=51297, accessed
for older persons: a review of coverage deficits in 7 November 2016).
46 countries. Geneva: International Labour Office;
2015 (http://www.ilo.org/secsoc/information- 12. Wiskow C. The role of decent work in the health
resources/publications-and-tools/Workingpapers/ sector. In: Buchan J, Dhillon I, Campbell J, editors.
WCMS_407620/lang--en/index.htm, accessed Health employment and economic growth: an
7 November 2016). evidence base. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2016 [forthcoming].
5. ISCO: International Standard Classification of
Occupations [Internet]. Geneva: International Labour 13. World social protection report 2014–15: building
Office; 2010 (http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/ economic recovery, inclusive development and social
stat/isco/, accessed 7 November 2016). justice. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2014
(http://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/
6. ILOSTAT database [Internet]. Geneva: International world-social-security-report/2014/WCMS_245201/
Labour Office; 2016 (http://www.ilo.org/global/ lang--en/index.htm, accessed
statistics-and-databases/lang--en/index.htm, accessed 16 November 2016).
7 November 2016).
14. R204 – Transition from the Informal to the Formal
7. Global Health Observatory data repository: 2014 Economy Recommendation, 2015 (No. 204)
update, Global Health Workforce Statistics [Internet]. [Internet]. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2015
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http:// (http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLE
apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main?showonly=HWF, XPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_
accessed 7 November 2016). ID:3243110:NO, accessed 7 November 2016).
The analyses are based on the conceptual framework illustrated in Table A1.1.
Within the framework, the workers of interest fall into five groups.
Table 1
Conceptual framework
At present, there is no global data source that will allow the number of NHO
workers outside the health sector (group D) to be counted. Only NHO workers
within the health sector (group C) usually appear in global estimates, which is a
major limitation because NHO workers can and do work in non-health sectors,
For the 68 countries in the ILOSTAT database, the number of workers in service
industries (ISIC Rev.4 categories G–U or ISIC Rev.3 G–Q) was extracted for the
most recent available year. This number includes most types of formal HO workers
and NHO workers (groups A–D), as well as people working in other service
industries. Five countries were excluded at this stage because their ILOSTAT data
were not disaggregated by industry sector (Algeria, Japan, Madagascar, Maldives
and Ukraine).
For the remaining 63 countries, workers in ISIC Rev.4 category Q (or ISIC Rev.3
category N) were assumed to represent workers employed in the health sector
(groups A + C). Five countries were excluded at this stage because their data
showed zero employees in the health sector (Albania, Belarus, Dominican Republic,
Indonesia and South Africa).
For the remaining 58 countries, to estimate the number of workers in ISIC Rev.4
categories G–P and R–U (or ISIC Rev.3 categories G–M and O–Q) who are health
workers outside the health sector (groups B + D), we used “total health expenditure
(THE) as a % of gross domestic product (GDP) 2014” (1) as a proxy variable. Thus,
the % of service workers in non-health sectors who provide health services was
assumed to be the same as the % of GDP that is the total health expenditure.
Limitations
• It was assumed that the numbers of workers recorded in the most recent year in
ILOSTAT still applied. Although the data were fairly recent for most countries (49
out of 63 countries had data for 2014, four for 2013, three for 2012), the data for a
few countries were slightly out of date (2009 or 2010).
• The lack of empirical data means that the assumption that THE/GDP is equal to
NHO workers/all service workers cannot be verified and it should therefore be
treated with an appropriate degree of caution.
• It is highly unlikely that the percentage of service industry workers who provide
services to the health sector is constant across all service industry sectors G–P
and R–U. The proxy variable assumes that, on average, the percentage who do is
equal to the percentage of GDP that is THE.
For the 58 remaining ILOSTAT countries, the number of workers with ISCO-08
code 22 or 32 (or ISCO-88 222, 223, 322, 323 or 324) was extracted for the most
recent available year. However, these ISCO codes do not include personal care
workers (ISCO-08 code 532). ILOSTAT does not disaggregate ISCO codes to the
three-digit level, so it was not possible to identify numbers of personal care workers.
Because personal care workers are HO workers as defined in this study, and in many
countries represent a significant proportion of HO workers, it was necessary to
estimate their numbers. This was done using OECD data (2), which showed that,
for the 17 OECD countries with data from 2012, 2013 or 2014 about both total
employment in health and social care and the number of personal care workers,
Four countries (Azerbaijan, Bhutan, Botswana and Brazil) were excluded at the stage
because they had no data for the relevant ISCO codes, and two more (the Russian
Federation and Sri Lanka) were excluded because the number of workers with these
ISCO codes was larger than the number of service industry workers counted in step
1. These two situations were taken as indicators of poor-quality data.
This left a total of 52 countries with sufficient data in ILOSTAT to estimate the size of
both the total number of health economy workers (groups A–D in Table A1.1) and
the number of HO workers (Groups A + B).
Limitations
• The proportion of workers employed in the health sector who are personal care
workers varies even within OECD countries, so the estimate of 10% on average
may not be representative of all countries.6
6 We tried to work out a method of adjusting for this by referring to the WHO Global Health Observatory database,
which includes personal care workers within its counts of “other health workers”, but also provides separate counts
of personal care workers as well as other health workers. However, only 15 countries had disaggregated data on
personal care workers for a comparable year to the data on “other health workers”, of which five recorded more
personal care workers than “other health workers”, which caused us to doubt the quality of the data.
The ratio of HO workers to NHO workers in each country was calculated by dividing
the number of NHO workers (see step 3) by the number of HO workers (see step 2).
Across all 52 countries, the median ratio was 1.62, that is, for every HO worker
in these countries, on average there were 1.62 NHO workers. The ratio was
disaggregated by World Bank income group, as shown in Table A1.2.
Table 2
a The low- and middle-income categories were combined because there were very few low-income countries
in ILOSTAT, and the medians for the low-income, lower middle-income and upper middle-income countries
were very similar.
Table 3
Physician 221 HO
Nursing & midwifery 222, 322 HO
Dentistry 226 HO
Pharmaceutical 226 HO
Laboratory 321 HO
Environmental & public health 226 HO
Community & traditional health 223 HO
Other health workers (which 532 + 226 not mentioned above HO
includes personal care workers)
Management & support various NHO
As with ILOSTAT, data were taken from the WHO database for the most recent
available year. For one of the WHO database countries (United Republic of
Tanzania), the data showed zero physicians, which was taken as an indicator of poor-
quality data. An alternative data source was therefore used for the United Republic
of Tanzania (3), which used the same health worker categories as the WHO database
(see Table A1.3).
Thus, estimates of the number of HO workers were made for 185 countries
(52 from ILOSTAT, 132 from WHO and one from a national data source).
Limitations
This was almost certainly an overestimate of the number of unpaid workers according
to our definition, because not all unpaid work can or should be transformed into
formal jobs. To estimate the numbers who fit our definition of unpaid workers, we
first assumed that most were family members, then used data from a 2015 United
Kingdom survey of family members providing care (7) to estimate the proportion
of unpaid work that could be converted to formal jobs. That survey found that 51%
of carers had given up work to provide long-term care for a family or household
member, 12% had taken early retirement and 21% had reduced their working hours.
Of those who gave up work, retired early or took reduced working hours, 30% said
it was because there were no suitable care services and 22% because they could not
afford to pay for the available services. This indicates that 44% of all informal unpaid
workers should be counted as part of the NHO workforce because the work that they
do should be transformed into formal jobs ((51 + 12 + 21) * (0.3 + 0.22) = 44)).
Limitations
• Most of the 21 countries in the ILO paper are in Europe and all are high-income
countries, so the applicability of their data to other countries is questionable. It
seems likely that the number of informal long-term carers is strongly negatively
correlated with the number of paid long-term carers, but very few data were
available on the number of paid long-term carers either. It is plausible that
in low- and middle-income countries with less developed health and social
care systems, a higher proportion of the population is performing long-term
care roles, in which case our estimates will be conservative rather than an
overexaggeration.
7 Estimates of the population aged over 65 years for 2015 were taken from United Nations Population Division
(http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/).
For all 185 countries, the number of HO workers (A + B) and formal NHO workers
(C + D) were summed to give a global total. The ratio of the global number of formal
NHO workers to the global number of HO workers was 1.5. In other words, for every
HO worker in the world, we estimate that there are 1.5 paid NHO workers.
Effectively, these global ratios give the weighted mean of the individual country
ratios (weighted by workforce size). We can also calculate the unweighted means: 1.5
excluding informal workers and 3.0 including informal workers. In other words, in
the average country, there are 1.5 paid NHO workers for every HO worker, and there
are 3 formal + informal NHO workers for every HO worker.
Estimated numbers of HO workers and NHO workers were summed for all countries
in each ILO region and each income group. Within each region and each income
group, the total number of NHO workers was divided by the total number of HO
workers to yield a weighted average ratio for that region or income group.
Table 4
The above numbers were applied to the 2015 population in each of the 185 countries to
estimate the number of each type of worker currently missing, and also applied to the
United Nations Population Division’s medium variant population projections for 2030
to estimate the related level of missing workers in 2030.
The gap for informal NHO workers was estimated by subtracting the gap of paid
NHO workers from the gap of paid + unpaid NHO workers.
For each country, the shortage of workers of each type was estimated by
subtracting the number currently in the workforce from the number needed. If
the result was a negative number (that is, availability was higher than need), the
shortage was set at zero.
The individual country shortages were then summed to give global and
regional totals.
Annex references
1. Health expenditure, total (% of GSP) [Internet]. 6. Scheil-Adlung X. Long-term care (LTC) protection
Washington (DC): World Bank; 2016 (http://data. for older persons: a review of coverage deficits in
worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.TOTL.ZS, accessed 46 countries. Geneva: International Labour Office;
7 November 2016). 2015 (http://www.ilo.org/secsoc/information-
resources/publications-and-tools/Workingpapers/
2. ECD health statistics 2016 [Internet]. Paris: OECD; WCMS_407620/lang--en/index.htm, accessed
2016 (http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/ 7 November 2016).
health-data.htm, accessed 7 November 2016).
7. State of Caring 2015. Carers UK [Internet]. London:
3. Tanzania: HRH fact sheet [Internet]. Brazzaville Carers UK; 2014 (https://www.carersuk.org/for-
(Republic of Congo): African Health Workforce professionals/policy/policy-library/state-of-caring-2015,
Observatory; 2010 (http://www.hrh-observatory. accessed 7 November 2016).
afro.who.int/en/country-monitoring/89-tanzania.html,
accessed 7 November 2016). 8. Scheil-Adlung X. Health workforce benchmarks
for universal health coverage and sustainable
4. Technical notes: global health workforce statistics development. Bulletin of the World Health
database [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2013;91:888–9. doi:10.2471/
Organization; n.d. (http://www.who.int/hrh/statistics/ BLT.13.126953.
TechnicalNotes.pdf, accessed 7 November 2016).
171
CHAPTER 7
Abstract
The principal purpose of a health system is to provide health care. However,
viewed as an economic sector, the health system contributes to growth.
Moreover, the health system offers additional benefits that contribute both to
economic growth and to health, as well as to non-health welfare. We do not
present a complete causal account of the interactions between the health system
and the economy, but focus in our discussion here on the pathways that involve
the employment of health workers and promote economic growth. The six
main pathways of interest are (a) the health pathway, addressing the intrinsic
(non-market-valued) health benefits of the health system; (b) the economic
output pathway, addressing the intrinsic (market-valued) economic benefits
of the health system; (c) the social protection pathway, addressing sickness,
disability, unemployment and old age benefits, as well as financial protection
against loss of income and catastrophic health payments; (d) the social cohesion
pathway, addressing the role of a health system in promoting equity and fostering
redistribution and growth; (e) the innovation and diversification pathway,
addressing the role of the health system in driving technological development
and in offering protection against macroeconomic shocks; and (f) the health
security pathway, addressing the role of the health system in protecting against
epidemic outbreaks and potential pandemics.
The principal purpose of a country’s health system is to provide health care to its
population; this is its defining objective. However, when viewed as an economic
sector, the health system also contributes to economic growth. Furthermore, the
health system generates a number of additional spillover benefits at no extra cost
(that is, positive externalities) that contribute both to health and to economic
growth, as well as to broader non-health welfare. All these benefits are realized
through distinct pathways of cause and effect. The purpose of this chapter is to
enumerate and classify the main pathways that are relevant to the work of the High-
Level Commission on Health Employment and Economic Growth. The need for an
analysis of these causal pathways was identified during the work of the Expert Group
that served as one of the main advisory bodies to the Commission.
The economic concept of “efficiency” and the plain-language term “growth” are
in fact interlinked: when an economy produces more with a given quantity of
resources, in economic terms it is more efficient. In the following, we occasionally
refer to “efficiency” but more usually we employ the term “growth”, with its implicit
connotation of efficiency. In the perspective adopted here, “efficiency” refers, first of
all, to the objective of producing more benefits, in terms of income, consumption,
investment, production, and other forms of (mainly) market-valued benefits. From
the perspective of public economics, however, the concept of efficiency is often used
as an argument for public sector intervention. The main rationales for public (that
is, government) action are to correct market failures, such as negative externalities,
but also to provide public goods, such as education and health care, that would not
otherwise be produced (at least not optimally) by the market. We therefore adopt
a dual perspective: principally that of the economy as a whole, with a focus on
the operation of market forces and the outcome of economic growth, but also, as
appropriate, that of identifying rationales for correcting inefficiencies, whether in the
public1 or private sector.
1 Inefficiencies in the public sector are sometimes termed “government failure”, that is, government interventions in
the market that reduce social or economic welfare.
full-income growth
1. health
improved labour supply
and productivity
services
2. economic output
health good and capital assets
economic
system
growth
3. social protection reduced inequality
In the following, we consider each pathway in turn, identifying and discussing along
the way relevant sub-pathways and briefly elucidating how the pathways involve
health employment and contribute to economic growth. The pathways identified here
are not intended to be exhaustive, or to represent a full causal account of the relation
of the health system to the broader economy.
As previously noted, the starting point is the health system. The “health system”
is understood here to include all activities whose primary intention is to improve
health. Of course not all health benefits are attributable to the health system, even
broadly defined. For example, health benefits also accrue as a result of education, or
through general social and economic development, although for reasons of scope we
do not consider those aspects here.
The health pathway comprises two sub-pathways, one of which we refer to as the
“full-income” pathway. The full-income pathway is perhaps the pathway most
Despite the use of monetary units for the valuation of health, it is important to note
that in this pathway health is conceived of as an intrinsic benefit (something good
for its own sake), and not as an instrumental benefit (something good for the sake
of something else, such as monetary income). In terms of economic theory, this
means that health is considered in this pathway as a direct argument in the preference
function of individuals (1). This role of health, as a direct consumption good, justifies
the central importance of this pathway in most health-related analyses: health is a
fundamental part of what people value as a good life; it plays an integral part in theories
of human well-being; and it features prominently in discussions of social welfare.
Most of the uncertainty, therefore, in accounting for health benefits in full income
involves not the importance of health per se but rather how to estimate its value.
At least in the health policy literature focused on full income (2), health benefits
are considered as a flow realized over an individual’s lifetime (that is, as a form
of income, measured in units of health per time). In the sustainable development
and economics literature, however, health benefits are usually viewed as a stock,
or endowment (that is, as a capital good, measured in units of health) (1, 3). Both
approaches, however, require an estimate of the shadow price of a unit of health.
Although individuals in principle will have different shadow prices for health (1),
both the full-income and the health capital literature rely on an average of estimates
of individual shadow prices as a proxy for the social value of a unit of health.
However the shadow price (p) of health is estimated, when it is multiplied by a
quantity (q) of health, the product (p × q) represents in these analyses an estimate of
the social value of a given improvement in health. This value is, strictly speaking, an
economic benefit, although it is not a market-valued one.
Both the full-income and the health capital literature refer, however, to a further,
instrumental value of improved health. Here, we identify this instrumental value
of improved health with the second health-related sub-pathway, one that figures
prominently in the literature on the “health investment case” (4) 2. This pathway is
important because improved health implies that individuals can engage in increased
levels of activity (that is, in addition to enjoying increased longevity and improved
health-related quality of life, individuals can also do more of all the things they
want to do). In economic terms, this means that health also enters indirectly as an
argument in the preference function of individuals: that is, in this pathway health is
considered as an element in individuals’ production functions, one that they use to
produce other goods that they value, such as wage income, which is a market-valued
benefit. Evidently, health is also instrumental for the transformation of leisure time
into non-market-valued benefits such as visits with family, recreational activities with
friends, as well as other forms of social participation.
In any case, if the activity resulting from an improvement in health takes place in
the labour market, it constitutes a market-valued benefit and will be recorded in the
national income as an increased level of economic productivity. In general, part of
this increased economic productivity is attributable to an augmented quantity of
2 There is a growing literature on the so-called investment case for health that seeks to measure benefits realized
through increased activity, as measured in terms of gross domestic product (GDP). The reference (4) is only intended
to be indicative.
If the activity resulting from a given improvement in health takes place in a non-
market context, it still constitutes an important benefit (for example, improved
performance in family and social roles); however, such activity does not have a
market value so a shadow price would need to be estimated for it. As for the intrinsic
value of health, instrumental benefits resulting from increased activities that are not
market valued inevitably present conceptual and measurement difficulties when it
comes to estimating a shadow price.
Presumably for these reasons, at least prior to the introduction of the full-income
terminology (2), there has been a noticeable reluctance within the sphere of health
policy to “put a price on” intrinsic health benefits such as longevity. Conversely, and
for presumably similar reasons, there has been resistance outside the domain of
health policy to consider non-market-valued benefits (even such important ones as
longevity) as having the same policy relevance to decision-makers as market-valued
benefits such as increases in GDP.3 From a purely economic perspective, neither of
these positions is particularly helpful.
3 The “Beyond GDP” movement proposes to give more emphasis to the policy relevance of non-market-valued
benefits; however, for the reasons of scope previously noted, we do not consider this in further detail here.
Although we do not pretend to resolve these debates, they are important: if the
health sector is not an efficient investment, then its growth should be curtailed and
its costs contained (to allow other, more productive, uses of resources); however,
if the health sector is an efficient investment, then its growth promotes broader
economic growth. The reflexive view of the health system as an unproductive
sector suffering from a cost disease is now being revisited, particularly with
respect to the situation in low-income and lower middle-income countries, where
the health system is much less developed than in richer countries and where
improvements in the health system potentially have much higher impact, both in
full-income and in market-valued terms. Moreover, the weight of evidence for the
productive role of the health sector in developed economies is also changing: for
example, recent work suggests that each dollar spent in the health sector results in
an additional US$ 0.77 contribution to economic output as a result of indirect and
induced effects (10).
According to our definition of the health system, these latter outputs should
be included under the umbrella of the broader health system; but according to
conventional health sector expenditure accounts, they are excluded. From an
employment perspective, the situation is analogous. Health employment, narrowly
construed, might logically be limited to personnel directly involved in the delivery of
medical services (including therefore many clinical laboratory staff but excluding, for
example, those required for cleaning, laundry, maintenance and catering services in a
health facility) (11). However, broader classifications of the health workforce include
both members of non-health occupations and many informal and unpaid workers
that are required by the health workforce, in its more limited sense, to perform its
functions (12). The wages of some of these non-health workers will be captured in
health expenditure statistics as constituting part of the cost of inputs; however, due to
limitations of data, and measurement problems tied to classifications of both health
expenditure and health occupations, not all of them are.
In brief, the health sector that we know from expenditure statistics is not identical to
the health system; a better term here for the broader concept we have in mind would be
the “health economy”. While, for the reasons mentioned, there are no global statistics
corresponding to this broader definition of the health economy, we know that it is
far bigger than the health sector per se (as measured by expenditure accounts). So
determining how large the world’s health sector is in economic terms can serve as a
starting point – and an approximate lower bound – for understanding the size of the
broader health economy.
As noted, expenditure-based figures for the health sector do not include goods
and services related to the nutritional, sports and fitness industries, receipts from
over-the-counter medicines or expenditures on home care services, all of which
are important constituents of the broader health economy. Nor do expenditure
statistics include indirect and induced effects. For example, based merely on
a reclassification of existing national accounts, the expanded health economy
in Germany is estimated to contribute 11% of gross value added in terms of
production, but to contribute an additional 8% in terms of indirect and induced
effects on the value of final consumption (10). If these same estimates are applied
to the health expenditure data published by the OECD, the size of the health
economy in 34 OECD countries would be estimated at US$ ~10.3 trillion. The
global health economy, therefore, is quite possibly the second-largest economy in
the world, after that of only the United States.
Moreover, the health sector is a growing part of the economy worldwide (13, 15).4
Growth in the health sector is believed to be driven in part by rising incomes that
create increased demand for health-related services and products, as well as by the
demand for new technologies that create new opportunities to improve health;
population ageing, and the associated increase in age-related health problems,
is another recognized source of increased demand for health-related goods and
services. As a result of these factors, the health sector has generally been growing
faster than overall growth in GDP in most economies, and has certainly done so in
high-income countries (16).
Finally, it is worth noting that, like the health pathway, the economic output
pathway comprises two sub-pathways: the services pathway, and the goods and
capital assets pathway. Given the labour-intensive nature of health care, the services
pathway usually receives more attention. The contribution of services to output
can be measured either through the wages of health workers (through income
accounting) or through the value of their billings to consumers of health services
(through expenditure accounting). However, the health economy also produces
a range of manufactured goods, such as pharmaceuticals and medical devices
and equipment, which form part of the second sub-pathway identified under
economic output. Manufactured goods contribute to the output of the broader
health economy, whether they are included in the cost of health services, are billed
separately, or are simply produced for export. Moreover, with the multiplication of
medical technologies such as new drugs and therapies, manufactured goods make
up an increasing share of expenditure in the health sector (16). Finally, the cost of
4. The importance of the health sector in the economy is the subject of a substantial literature, and institutional
investment in systems of health accounts (e.g. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-expenditure.htm,
http://www.who.int/health-accounts/methodology/en/) designed to measure and track its growth have
been significant (13, 15).
In summary, the economic output of the health sector is large but that of the
health economy is even larger. Debates about the efficiency of health expenditure
are evolving with an awareness of the magnitude of the contribution of the health
system to, and the ramifications of health employment in particular for, the broader
economy. Assumptions about the health system as a source of costs, rather than of
benefits, are being revised, and the traditional focus on the intrinsic value of health
improvements to broader social welfare (“full income”) is being supplemented
by new arguments and evidence about the economic contribution of health, and
of health employment, to economic growth as measured in conventional income
statistics such as GDP.
The health system offers social protection benefits that are external to its defining
purpose of improving health, which do not directly contribute to market-valued
economic output, and which are spillover effects of health employment in particular.
At base, health employment means jobs, and decent jobs (17) offer a range of social
protection benefits: for example, “child and family benefits, sickness and health-care
benefits, maternity benefits, disability benefits, old-age benefits, survivors’ benefits,
unemployment benefits and employment guarantees, and employment injury
benefits as well as any other social benefits in cash or in kind” (18). Social protection
benefits more generally are intended to “provide income or consumption transfers to
the poor, protect the vulnerable against livelihood risks and enhance the social status
and rights of the marginalised; with the overall objective of reducing the economic
and social vulnerability of poor, vulnerable and marginalised groups” (19). As a
result of reducing impoverishment and economic vulnerability, social protection
benefits offer opportunities for enhanced economic activity and growth.
One important social protection benefit the health system can provide is
direct insurance against the financial risk of catastrophic health expenditures.
Catastrophic and impoverishing spending on health is the most unambiguous
There is a strong case to be made for public sector action in health that is
redistributive (thereby reducing various forms of inequality). For example,
income equality per se is increasingly recognized as an important drag on
economic growth. In the words of a recent International Monetary Fund
(IMF) report, “inequality … tends to reduce the pace and durability of growth”
(27). This emerging consensus, based on decades of research performed in
multiple countries, effectively refutes the view popularized in the 1975 book
by Arthur Okun, Equality and efficiency: the big tradeoff (28), to the effect that
policy-makers face a stark choice between enhancing growth or promoting
equality. Recent evidence, amounting to a conclusive rejection of “trickle down”
Exceptionally, it seems, the second half of the 20th century showed a sustained
trend towards more equal shares of incomes across social groups (that is,
between labour and capital) in many countries (32). In recent years, however,
the trend has reversed towards one of greater concentration of wealth in the
hands of a few. In this light, and also in view of persistent slow growth as a
consequence of problems such as secular stagnation (due to a high savings
rate coupled with low investment) (33), the role of fiscal policy in promoting
equality, and thereby economic growth, has become more prominent (34). In
addition to the reasons noted in the preceding section, more equal societies are
more economically productive in part simply because they have a higher level of
political and social stability.
In other words, fiscal policies to promote health employment are not only good
for population health, for the economy, and for the social protection of vulnerable
individuals, but they also offer an important guarantor of basic social cohesion.
Novel genetic and biological medicines are important areas of innovation, and
such technologies are capable of providing substantial health benefits (16).
Often, but not exclusively, it is the private sector that responds to the demands
for better health through innovation in equipment, devices and drugs. Health
sector development as such can also be an important factor for economic
diversification.
As an example, the Ebola epidemic is estimated by the World Bank to have reduced
output in the three hardest hit countries by US$ 3–4 billion (out of a prior total
output of approximately US$ 50 billion) (44, 45) as a result of the disruptions in
trade, commerce and movement of populations, causing the IMF to reduce its
growth projections for all of sub-Saharan Africa by 10% (from 5.5% to 5%) (46, 47).
Tourism and travel bookings in African countries far removed from the epidemic
were also affected. Food production fell, and the United Nations Population
Fund (UNFPA) estimated that food security was adversely affected for upwards
of 1 million people (48). Human capital and other assets were in some cases
directly affected (for example through the death of health workers), but essential
refurbishments to or investments in manufactured capital were also postponed or
cancelled as a result of the generalized social disruptions caused by the epidemic.
A recent report from the National Academy of Medicine of the United States
commented that “framed as a health problem, building better defenses against the
threat of potential pandemics often gets crowded out by more visible and immediate
priorities…. Yet framed as an issue of human security, the current level of investment
in countering this threat … looks even more inadequate”. The report notes that
“the annualized expected loss from potential pandemics is more than $60 billion”,
whereas the costs of preparedness amount only to around US$ 4.5 billion per year
(49). Human resources, including the associated training and salary costs, are an
integral part of resilient health systems capable of responding to emerging pandemic
threats (50, 51).
So far we have identified six main pathways leading from the health system to
economic growth. Most, though not all, of these pathways explicitly involve health
employment. All of them result in economic growth. The economic growth caused
by health employment in turn has a number of knock-on (or feedback) effects
whose net result is to promote further economic growth (and increased health
employment). We refer to these effects as “virtuous cycles”. In this section we identify
briefly a number of virtuous cycles.
All these virtuous cycles operate through what we term the income pathway (Figure
2). We have in mind primarily household income, but analogous arguments apply
to other forms of income. For clarity, we focus on household income. Increased
household income has three main effects:
1. increased savings
3. increased consumption.
Figure 2
capital
savings investment
formation
goods and
consumption demand
services
Increased health employment results in more jobs and higher wages, which in
turn increases government tax revenues, increasing the fiscal space for necessary
government action in the public sector (for example to correct market failures and
provide public goods).
Increased health employment results in more jobs and higher household incomes.
Higher incomes means improved opportunities for consumption, which increases
aggregate demand for goods and services and enhances economic growth.
1. Grossman M. On the concept of health capital and 12. Scheil-Adlung X, Nove A. Global estimates of the size
the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy. of the health workforce contributing to the health
1972:80(2):223–55. doi:10.1086/259880. economy: the potential for creating decent work in
achieving universal health coverage. In: Buchan J,
2. Jamison DT, Summers LH, Alleyne G, Arrow KJ, Dhillon I, Campbell J, editors. Health employment and
Berkley S, Binagwaho A et al. Global health 2035: economic growth: an evidence base. Geneva: World
a world converging within a generation. Lancet. Health Organization; 2017 [forthcoming].
2013;382(9908):1898–955. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(13)62105-4. PMID:24309475. 13. Health expenditure [Internet]. Paris: Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2016
3. Arrow KJ, Dasgupta P, Goulder LH, Mumford KJ, (http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-
Oleson K. Sustainability and the measurement expenditure.htm, accessed 9 November 2016).
of wealth. Environment and Development
Economics. 2012;17(3):317–53. doi:10.1017/ 14. GDP ranking [Internet]. Washington (DC): World Bank;
S1355770X12000137. 2016 (http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/GDP-
ranking-table, accessed 9 November 2016).
4. Stenberg K, Axelson H, Sheehan P, Anderson
I, Gülmezoglu AM, Temmerman M et al. 15. Health Accounts methodology [Internet]. Geneva;
Advancing social and economic development World Health Organization; 2016 (http://www.who.int/
by investing in women’s and children’s health: health-accounts/methodology/en/, accessed
a new Global Investment Framework. Lancet. 9 November 2016).
2014;383(9925):1333–54. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(13)62231-X. 16. Fiscal sustainability of health systems: bridging
health and finance perspectives. Paris: Organisation
5. Baumol W. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2015
the anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic (http://www.oecd.org/publications/fiscal-sustainability-
Review. 1967;57(3):415–26. of-health-systems-9789264233386-en.htm, accessed
9 November 2016).
6. Hartwig J. 2008. What drives health care
expenditure? Baumol’s model of “unbalanced 17. ILO Declaration of Social Justice for a Fair
growth” revisited. Journal of Health Economics. Globalization, adopted by the International Labour
27(3):603–23. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.05.006. Conference at its Ninety-seventh Session, Geneva,
10 June 2008. Geneva: International Labour Office;
7. Hartwig J. 2011. Can Baumol’s model of 2008 (http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---
unbalanced growth contribute to explaining dgreports/---cabinet/documents/genericdocument/
the secular rise in health care expenditure? An wcms_371208.pdf, accessed 9 November 2016).
alternative test. Applied Economics. 43(2):173–84.
doi:10.1080/00036840802400470. 18. R202 – Social Protection Floors Recommendation,
2012 (No. 202). Geneva: International Labour Office;
8. Arcand JL, Araujo EC, Menkulasic G, Weber M. 2012 (http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NOR
Health sector employment, health care expenditure MLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_
and economic growth: what are the associations? ID:3065524, accessed 9 November 2016).
Washington (DC): World Bank; [forthcoming].
19. Devereux S, Sabates-Wheeler R. Transformative
9. Rajan RG, Zingales L. 1998. Financial dependence and social protection. IDS Working Paper 232. Brighton,
growth. American Economic Review. 88(3):559–86. United Kingdom: Institute of Development Studies;
2004 (https://www.unicef.org/socialpolicy/files/
10. Henke K-D. The economic and the health dividend of Transformative_Social_Protection.pdf, accessed
the health care system. Presentation at Health Forum, 9 November 2016).
Vilnius, Lithuania, 19–20 November 2013.
20. Xu K, Saksena P, Jowett M, Indikadahena C, Kutzin
11. Cometto G, Scheffler R, Liu J, Maeda A, Tomblin- J, Evans DB. Exploring the thresholds of health
Murphy G, Hunter D et al. Health workforce needs, expenditure for protection against financial risk.
demand and shortages to 2030: an overview of Background Paper 19 for World health report 2010.
forecasted trends in the global health labour market. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010 (http://
In: Buchan J, Dhillon I, Campbell J, editors. Health www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/
employment and economic growth: an evidence healthreport/19THE-thresv2.pdf, accessed
base. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 9 November 2016).
[forthcoming].
28. Okun A. Equality and efficiency: the big tradeoff. 40. Gender, women and primary health care renewal:
Washington (DC): Brookings Institution Press; 1975. a discussion paper. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2010 (http://apps.who.int/iris/
29. Sharing the growth dividend: analysis of inequality bitstream/10665/44430/1/9789241564038_eng.pdf,
in Asia. IMF Working Paper WP/16/48. Washington accessed 9 November 2016).
(DC): International Monetary Fund; 2016 (https://
www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/wp1648.pdf, 41. Turner A, Hughes-Cromwick P, Miller G, Daly M.
accessed 9 November 2016). Health sector job growth flat for the first time in a
decade. Labor Brief No. 13-08. Altarum Institute;
30. Dabla-Norris E, Kochhar K, Suphaphiphat N, Ricka 2013.
F, Tsounta E. Causes and consequences of income
inequality: a global perspective. IMF Staff Discussion 42. Wood CA. Employment in health care: crutch for
Note No. 15/13. Washington (DC): International the ailing economy during the 2007–09 recession.
Monetary Fund; 2015 (https://www.imf.org/external/ Monthly Labor Review, April 2011. Office of
pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1513.pdf, accessed 9 November Employment and Unemployment Statistics, Bureau
2016). of Labor Statistics; 2011 (http://www.bls.gov/opub/
mlr/2011/04/art2full.pdf, accessed 9 November 2016).
45. World Bank Group Ebola response fact sheet. 50. Kruk ME, Myers M, Varpilah ST, Dahn BT. What
Washington (DC): World Bank; 2016 (http://www. is a resilient health system? Lessons from Ebola.
worldbank.org/en/topic/health/brief/world-bank-group- Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1910–2. doi:10.1016/S0140-
ebola-fact-sheet, accessed 9 November 2016). 6736(15)60755-3.
46. Regional economic outlook, sub-Saharan Africa: 51. Kieny M-P, Evans DB, Schmets G, Kadandale S.
dealing with the gathering clouds. World Economic Health-system resilience: reflections on the Ebola
and Financial Surveys. Washington (DC): International crisis in western Africa. Bulletin of the World
Monetary Fund; 2015 (https://www.imf.org/external/ Health Organization. 2014;92:850. doi:http://dx.doi.
pubs/ft/reo/2015/afr/eng/pdf/sreo1015.pdf, accessed org/10.2471/BLT.14.149278.
9 November 2016).
Abstract
This chapter demonstrates how the health care sector and better health outcomes
contribute to inclusive economic growth and how this contribution can be
further enhanced. The chapter is largely, though not exclusively, based on
experiences from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) countries.
Health systems around the world not only treat the sick and prevent future illness, they
are also central to the effective functioning of a country’s economy. People in good
health are likely to be more productive than those who are sick or in poor health. In
turn, a healthier, more productive population can help strengthen its country’s economic
performance, and ensure that its economic growth is more sustainable and inclusive.
The health care sector is also an important source of employment, particularly for young
adults and women, and is likely to provide more jobs in the future.
Health professionals play a fundamental role in delivering the health services that
help achieve improvements in health outcomes and population well-being. High-
quality health services that are available for the entire population help reduce health
inequalities. While there is a growing demand for quality health services across
the globe, many countries – particularly low- and middle-income countries – face
significant labour shortages in the health sector.
Nevertheless, increased health spending and a growing health workforce should not
be seen as ends in themselves. This is because not all health spending provides added
value in terms of better-quality and more accessible care. More employment in the
health sector should be focused on achieving better health outcomes and increasing
the overall productivity of the health care sector.
This chapter demonstrates how the health care sector and better health outcomes
contribute to the economy and encourage inclusive growth, and suggests how
In high-income countries, sleep disorders and mental health problems are common
health conditions that impact future developmental outcomes for children and
adolescents (9). For example, shortened sleep duration, especially among young
infants, is associated with hyperactivity-impulsivity and poor test results in
cognitive performance (10). Studies focusing on mental health problems show that
anxiety and depression are significantly and negatively associated with short- and
long-term educational outcomes (11, 12).
Adults in ill health are more likely to be unemployed than healthier people. When
unhealthy people have jobs, they are more likely to be absent from work and less
productive at work than healthier people. Older adults with chronic diseases and
other health conditions are at risk of quitting the workforce prematurely.
Being in ill health adversely affects one’s employment prospects. For example,
unemployed people in Great Britain are almost twice as likely as employed people
to have a long-standing illness or disability (13). Moreover, being unemployed
is likely to worsen an individual’s health status, largely because unemployment
worsens mental health (14). The psychosocial literature suggests this results
from reduced social contact, a less defined social identity and loss of an ordered
structure to daily living (15). Such insights are supported by data. For example, in
Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, evidence from time series data shows
The number of employed individuals who experience absence from work due to
illness can be substantial. Across 15 OECD countries, an average of 11 days per
employed person were lost from work in 2013. Absentee rates were particularly high
in Germany (18 days per person) and Norway (16 days per person), equivalent to
approximately 7.2 million working days lost in Germany and 0.42 million working
days lost in Norway in 2013.1 In addition, many workers are less productive on the
job than they could be because of poor health – a phenomenon that is commonly
referred to as presenteeism. Presenteeism at work was estimated to have cost the
United States of America’s economy US$ 150 billion a year in the early 2000s (17).
Individuals with poor health status have lower wages than healthier workers at
all ages, with the wage gap widening as age increases. For example, in 24 OECD
countries there was a noticeable wages rise less steeply with age for workers with
health problems as compared with their healthy peers, leading to a growing gap in
hourly earnings over the life course (Figure 1) (18).
Figure 1
80
80
60
40 60
20
0 40
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Age Age
Data suggest that in over 21 European OECD countries the sickness absence
incidence is roughly double for workers with severe mental health problems and 50%
higher for those with moderate problems, compared to those with no mental health
problems. Sickness absence duration is also longer for those with mental health
problems. Many people with mental health problems who do not take sick leave
accomplish less than they would like at work due to their health problems (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Chronic diseases and poor lifestyles can also lower productivity and harm
employment prospects and wages. For example, in France the cost of overall
productivity losses related to alcohol use and smoking has been estimated at 9
billion and 8.6 billion euros respectively (20). In Germany, sickness absence and
forced early retirement due to smoking cost an estimated €4.9 billion and €3.5
billion respectively (21). In the United Kingdom, nearly 11 million working days
were lost by alcohol-dependent workers in 2001, and the total cost of absenteeism
due to alcohol was estimated to be £1.2 billion (13). In the European Union,
alcohol accounted for an estimated €59 billion worth of lost production through
absenteeism, unemployment and lost working years through premature death in
2003 (22).
Obesity and diabetes also affect labour market outcomes. For instance, diabetes was
significantly associated with a 30% increase in the rate of workforce exit across
16 countries studied (23). The total cost for sick leave and disability pension related
to obesity in Swedish women was estimated at 10.5 billion Swedish kronor
(US$ 1.2 billion) per year (24).
The HIV/AIDS epidemic has a large impact on labour markets in many low-
and middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
HIV/AIDS limits African countries’ productive capacity by damaging human
capital development and decreasing the possibility for people to find jobs.
Studies from South Africa found that being HIV positive increases the
likelihood of unemployment by 6–7%, with the poor and less educated more
likely to be HIV positive (25).
The biggest challenge for health systems in addressing mental health problems is the
very large treatment gap resulting from considerable unawareness of such problems
and the social and self-imposed stigma experienced by people living with mental
health conditions. Many of those people receive no or only insufficient treatment, and
Good health has benefits that extend beyond the individual, particularly in
developing country contexts. Better population health can encourage greater
domestic savings and foreign investment, and improve social stability. In countries
with high fertility rates, a reduced likelihood of premature maternal mortality
(deriving from fewer pregnancies) can positively influence household decisions
on family planning. This contributes to a faster demographic transition and its
associated economic benefits.
In all countries, poor health affects the ability and motivation to save money.
However, the impact is larger in low- and middle-income countries that are
still transitioning to universal health coverage. In such countries, incomplete
prepayment systems mean households will often have to pay out of pocket
for needed health services. This can lead to severe financial hardship and
impoverishment (28).
Better population health can also raise per capita income by changing individuals’
decisions about expenditure, saving and investment. With increased longevity
and the associated greater prospect of retirement, new generations have more
incentive to save. At the same time, companies tend to invest in economies where
the workforce is healthy and move away from environments with high burdens of
disease (2).
The prospect of better health outcomes will also impact family planning and
consequently fertility rates. This can create a “demographic dividend” in terms of a
lower dependency ratio. That is, as fertility begins to slow, the number of children
In summary, better individual and population health can have substantial impacts on
economic growth and development. For instance, Bloom, Canning and Sevilla found
that one extra year of life expectancy raised steady-state GDP per capita by about 4%,
based on a cross-country econometric analysis using data from 1960 to 1990 (30).
3.1 Health and social care: a large and rapidly growing source of
employment
People employed in health care and social work represent a large and growing share
of the labour force in many OECD countries. On average, health care and social work
activities constituted around 11% of total employment for OECD countries in 2014
(Figure 3). The employment share is particularly pronounced in Denmark, Finland,
the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden, where people with jobs in health and social
work represent 15–20% of the workforce.
The percentage of workers employed in health and social work has steadily risen
in 31 of 34 OECD countries over time. For the OECD overall, there was an average
increase of 1.8 percentage points from 2000 to 2014. Some of the greatest increases
have taken place in Ireland (5.3 percentage points), Chile (4.9 percentage points),
Republic of Korea (4.0 percentage points), Luxembourg (3.8 percentage points),
Japan (3.7 percentage points) and Portugal (3.5 percentage points). Three countries
have experienced a decrease in share of employment in health and social work:
Iceland (-1.7 percentage points), Sweden (-0.8 percentage points) and Poland
(-0.6 percentage points).
20 20
19 2014 2000
18
16 15
16 16
14 14
14 13
13 13 13
13 13 12
12 12 11
11 11 11
10 10 10
9 8 8
8 7 7
7 7 6 6 6
6 6
5
4 4
3
2
0
Norway
Denmark
Finland
Netherlands
Sweden
Belgium
France
United Kingdom
USA
Ireland
Switzerland
Canada
Germany
Australia
Japan
Iceland
New Zealand
Israel
OECD average
Luxembourg
Austria
Portugal
Spain
Italy
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Republic of Korea
Hungary
Slovenia
Estonia
Greece
Poland
Chile
Turkey
Mexico
Note: 2014 data follow ISIC Rev.4, except for Australia, Canada, Chile and Ireland (ISIC Rev.3); 2000 data follow ISIC
Rev.3, except for Republic of Korea (ISIC rev.4). Annual Labour Force Statistics data are given for all countries except
France, Switzerland and the United States (System of National Accounts data). Data for Sweden and Republic of Korea
start respectively in 2003 and 2004 (rather than 2000) due to a break in the series. 2012 data are given for Australia
instead of 2014. Information on data for Israel: http://oe.cd/israel-disclaimer.
Sources: OECD.Stat, Annual Labour Force Statistics (ALFS), employment by activities and status; and National
Accounts, detailed tables and simplified accounts, Table 7A: Labour input by activity, ISIC Rev.4.
The rapid growth of employment in health and social care contrasts markedly with
the situation in other sectors (Figure 4). Across the OECD, employment in health
and social work grew on average by 48% (with a median value of 37%) during the
period 2000–2014. Over the same period, there was a decline in the number of jobs
in agriculture and industry in most OECD countries. Employment growth in health
and social work was also noticeably higher than employment growth in the service
sector and in total employment.
Looking forward, employment opportunities in health and social work are likely
to increase as a result of several factors. Ageing populations will change the pattern
of demand for health and social services. This could include greater demand for
50% 48
OECD mean OECD median
Change in employment since 2000
40% 37
30% 27
23
20% 14
12
10%
0%
-5
-10% -8
-20%
-23
-26
-30%
Total Agriculture Industry Services Health & social
work
Note: Average of 30 OECD countries for which data are available in both time periods (excludes Chile, France,
Japan and the United States). Health and social work is classified as a subcomponent of the service sector.
Source: OECD employment database, http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm.
long-term care services, which are particularly labour intensive (31). Over time,
rising incomes and new technologies will increase consumers’ expectations related to
the quality and scope of care (32), with consequent impacts on staffing requirements
in the health sector.
It is not only the number of jobs provided by the health care sector that matters for
the economy, but also the range and scope of opportunities that these jobs offer.
The health care sector offers employment across all localities in a country, rather
than primarily in capital cities or commercial centres. Indeed, the health sector
can be an important employer in rural and remote locations, where other jobs
are scarcer. In addition, the health care sector offers employment for people with
a wide variety of skill sets, including low-skilled workers such as care assistants
(where much of the training is on the job), as well as those educated in specialized
Despite ongoing technological advances, health and social care remain labour
intensive. This characteristic implies that productivity growth may lag. That is,
output gains in health and social care are constrained because labour cannot easily
be replaced by capital inputs (a phenomenon commonly referred to as Baumol’s
cost disease). While the nature of outputs in health care makes productivity hard to
measure, some studies have suggested that wage increases over time have been in
excess of productivity growth (34, 35). Although evidence on Baumol’s cost disease
model remains inconclusive, studies nevertheless point to the need to carefully
evaluate whether increased health spending is contributing sufficiently to better
health outcomes. Studies also suggest the importance of innovative health
workforce policies.
To boost the productivity of health care, some countries are re-examining the
traditional functions of health professionals. For example, between 2007 and
2012 about half of OECD member countries expanded the scope of practice for
non-physician providers, such as nurse practitioners and pharmacists. In Canada,
the Netherlands and the United States, student intakes in advanced education
programmes for nurse practitioners are increasing the supply of these mid-level
providers (36). Policies supporting the use of mid-level providers can be part of
broader efforts to enhance primary health care in countries. The introduction or
expansion of such non-physician roles is often met with initial opposition from
medical professionals, which needs to be overcome; integration of mid-level
providers into health care delivery may depend in part on the future supply of
physicians. It also requires an enabling funding environment, as well as legislative
and regulatory support.
Digital technology has made the collection, processing and transfer of information
efficient and powerful, transforming a range of industries in the public and private
sector to improve services. Application of digital technology in the knowledge- and
information-intense endeavour of health care holds great potential. For example,
an integrated and interoperable electronic health record allows real-time access
to the same clinical information by a team of practitioners involved in a patient’s
management. Web-enabled portable devices can improve patient self-management
and facilitate more accurate diagnosis and monitoring, triggering timely
intervention as clinically appropriate. Reliable high-speed Internet and modern
telecommunications hardware (for example, the smartphone) have made remote
consultations more feasible. Powerful computer processing, analytical techniques and
machine-learning algorithms can analyse masses of big data to generate information,
enabling better diagnoses while improving the timeliness and accuracy of clinical
decision-making (40).
Applied sensibly and with due regard for privacy and security of personal
information, digital technology can reduce duplication and errors, improve
Provider payment reform (at both the individual and health facility level) can be an
important policy lever to drive health system performance. All modes of payment
contain financial incentives that affect provider behaviour, and some modes of
payment can stimulate the efficient use of inputs. Within OECD countries, payment
reforms are being introduced to improve coordination, quality and efficiency of the
health care system. Reforms include population-based payments that bundle a wide
range of services involving several providers, as well as pay-for-performance add-on
payments affecting individual providers. For example, England recently introduced a
bundled payment for cataract surgery based on best-practice tariffs that incentivize
a shift from performing the surgery in inpatient settings to using outpatient or
day surgery facilities. Similarly, the Netherlands introduced bundled payments
for diabetes care. Such reforms reward care coordination and better integration of
different health services, and consequently have the potential to generate quality or
efficiency gains (42). Financial incentives can also be used to redress geographical
imbalances in availability of health workers. For example, basic income guarantees
are used in Denmark and France, and in the Canadian province of British Columbia
physicians working in isolated areas receive annual bonuses (36).
Therefore, health care should not be viewed solely as a cost driver; it is also an
investment that offers valuable returns to society. Reassessing health care in terms
of its broader economic impacts is a more useful perspective than focusing only on
its cost. However, more spending on health is not automatically worthwhile. Critical
assessment of the investment case for different types of health spending is required,
so that spending can be clearly focused on services that provide the best value in
terms of improved health outcomes.
The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Acknowledgements
1. Nyaradi A, Li J, Hickling S, Foster J, Oddy WH. The role 12. Spernak SM, Schottenbauer MA, Ramey SL, Ramey
of nutrition in children’s neurocognitive development, CT. Child health and academic achievement among
from pregnancy through childhood. Frontiers in former Head Start children. Children and Youth
Human Neuroscience. 2013;7:97. doi:10.3389/ Services Review. 2006;28(10):1251–61. doi:10.1016/j.
fnhum.2013.00097. PMID:23532379. childyouth.2006.01.006.
2. López-Casasnovas G, Rivera B, Currais L, editors. Health 13. Alcohol misuse: how much does it cost? UK Cabinet
and economic growth: findings and policy implications. Office, Strategy Unit; 2003 (http://alcoholresearchuk.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005. org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/strategy-unit-alcohol-
costs-2003.pdf, accessed 16 November 2016).
3. Bougma K, Aboud FE, Harding KB, Marquis GS.
Iodine and mental development of children 5 years 14. James C, Devaux M, Marechal C, Sassi F. Inclusive
old and under: a systematic review and meta-analysis. growth and health. OECD ELS/HEA Committee
Nutrients. 2013;5(4):1384–416. doi:10.3390/nu5041384. Paper 2015/14. Paris: Organisation for Economic
PMID:23609774. Co-operation and Development; 2015.
4. Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe 15. Clark AE. Unemployment as a social norm:
P, Richter L, Strupp B. Developmental potential in psychological evidence from panel data. Journal
the first 5 years for children in developing countries. of Labor Economics. 2003;21(2):323–51.
Lancet. 2007;369(9555):60–70. doi:10.1016/S0140- doi:10.1086/345560.
6736(07)60032-4. PMID:17208643.
16. Llena-Nozal A. The effect of work status and working
5. Alderman H, Behrman J, Hoddinott J. Nutrition, conditions on mental health in four OECD countries.
malnutrition and economic growth. In: López- National Institute Economic Review. 2009;209(1):72–87.
Casasnovas G, Rivera B, Currais L, editors. Health and doi:10.1177/0027950109345234.
economic growth: findings and policy implications.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005. 17. Hemp P. Presenteeism: at work – but out of it.
Harvard Business Review. 2004;82(10):49–58, 155.
6. Clarke SE, Jukes MC, Njagi JK, Khasakhala L, Cundill B, PMID:15559575.
Otido J et al. Effect of intermittent preventive treatment
of malaria on health and education in schoolchildren: 18. Boulhol H, Scarpetta S. Generation next: how to prevent
a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled ageing unequally. OECD ELS/SA Committee Paper
trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9633):127–38. doi:10.1016/ 2015/25. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation
S0140-6736(08)61034-X. PMID:18620950. and Development; 2015.
7. Miguel E, Kremer M. Worms: identifying impacts on 19. Sick on the job? Myths and realities about mental
education and health in the presence of treatment health and work. Paris: Organisation for Economic
externalities. Econometrica. 2004;72(1):159–217. Co-operation and Development; 2012 (http://www.oecd.
doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00481.x. org/els/mental-health-and-work-9789264124523-en.htm,
accessed 28 November 2016).
8. Aiken AM, Davey C, Hargreaves JR, Hayes RJ. Re-
analysis of health and educational impacts of a school- 20. Kopp P. Le coût social des drogues en France: note de
based deworming programme in western Kenya: a synthèse [The social cost of drugs in France: executive
pure replication. International Journal of Epidemiology. summary]. Observatoire français des drogues et des
2015;44(5):1572–80. doi:10.1093/ije/dyv127. toxicomanies; 2015 (in French) (http://www.ofdt.
PMID:26203169. fr/publications/collections/notes/le-cout-social-des-
drogues-en-france/, accessed 16 November 2016).
9. Suhrcke M, de Paz Nieves C. The impact of health
and health behaviours on educational outcomes in 21. Welte R, Kӧnig H-H, Leidl R. The costs of health damage
high-income countries: a review of the evidence. and productivity losses attributable to cigarette smoking
Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; in Germany. European Journal of Public Health.
2011 (http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_ 2000;10(1):31–8. doi:10.1093/eurpub/10.1.31.
file/0004/134671/e94805.pdf, accessed 28 November
2016). 22. Anderson P, Baumberg B. Alcohol in Europe: a public
health perspective. European Commission, Health and
10. Touchette E, Petit D, Séguin JR, Boivin M, Tremblay RE, Consumer Protection Directorate-General; 2006 (http://
Montplaisir JY. Associations between sleep duration www.ias.org.uk/uploads/alcohol_europe.pdf, accessed
patterns and behavioral/cognitive functioning at school 16 November 2016).
entry. Sleep. 2007;30(9):1213–9. PMID:17910393.
23. Rumball-Smith J, Barthold D, Nandi A, Heymann J.
11. Mazzone L, Ducci F, Scoto MC, Passaniti E, D’Arrigo Diabetes associated with early labor-force exit: a
VG, Vitiello B. The role of anxiety symptoms in school comparison of sixteen high-income countries. Health
performance in a community sample of children and Affairs (Millwood). 2014;33(1):110–5. doi:10.1377/
adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(1):347. hlthaff.2013.0518. PMID:24395942.
doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-347. PMID:18053257.
Abstract
In spite of the projected creation of millions of new health worker jobs in the
coming years, achieving the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030 implies
a still greater need for health workers of all types. This chapter addresses two
questions: Can governments worldwide meet the wage bills of their needed
health workers from public revenues (“Is there enough fiscal space”)? and, Can
low-income and lower middle-income countries meet the additional wage bills
from both public and private financing sources (“Is there enough financial
space”)? To investigate these questions, we used estimates of the number of
current and projected health workers (“supply”) and of the number of needed
health workers (“needs”), and we multiplied these figures by the wages of
health workers as estimated from International Labour Organization data on
earnings. The resulting wage bills were then compared with different public
revenue and health expenditure scenarios. Conditional on current trends
in economic development and population growth, sustainable financing for
health workers, mostly domestic, can be secured in most low-income and lower
middle-income countries. Progressive fiscal policies and the reprioritization of
government expenditure can also mobilize additional private financing. With
the necessary conditions in place, all but a small number of countries worldwide
should be able to meet the recurrent cost of their health workforce. Finally,
targeted international assistance can be used to support catalytic investments in
developing human capital and skills.
The objective of this chapter is to assess to what extent governments and other actors
can meet – in a sustainable manner and under plausible scenarios – the financing
needs implied by the growth in the health workforce required to meet the SDGs. To
do so, we examine two related questions:
• Can increased public financing be relied upon to finance health worker wage
bills? In other words, is there sufficient fiscal space to finance the projected total
wage bills for health workers by 2030?
• Can increased public and private financing be relied upon to finance the health
worker wage gap? In other words, is there sufficient financial space to meet the
additional projected wage bills for health workers by 2030?
1 A “shortage” is a condition of excess demand (that is, when supply is too low). A “deficiency”, on the other hand,
is a gap between needs and supply, and suggests demand is too low. Globally, there are both deficiencies and
shortages in the numbers of needed health workers, according to setting. In this brief - given the concentration of
the need for additional health workers in low-income and lower middle-income countries (which are subject to the
substantial emigration of health workers) - we prefer the term “shortage”, while acknowledging that the technical
denotation may not in every case strictly apply.
e. monetary expansion;
The domains are not mutually exclusive – for example, earmarked taxes (c) are a
form of taxation (a). Moreover, many of the domains are interacting – for example,
monetary (e) and tax (a) policies are determinants of economic development (b).
However, with the exception of the fiscal impacts of economic development and
population growth (b), the items in the above list are directly associated with public
policy levers, that is, they result from actions that a government can in principle
undertake. The fiscal impacts of economic development and population growth
(b), on the other hand, are sometimes referred to as “conducive macroeconomic
conditions” (4), presumably to indicate their (partial) exogeneity from the sphere
of government action, at least in the health sector. Note also that all the policy-
relevant domains, with the exception of monetary policies (e) and efficiency (f),
While Heller’s conception (2, 3) focused on four classical policy levers of public
financial management, Tandon and Cashin (4) broadened the scope to include
the fiscal impacts of “conducive macroeconomic conditions”; they also added
“earmarking” as a means of generating fiscal space specifically for health. Barroy,
Sparkes and Dale (5), however, focus on expenditure management and in particular
identify means for improving technical efficiency to create fiscal space. The
concept of “fiscal space” has both broadened and deepened since Heller’s initial
use of the term.
To investigate the availability of fiscal space for health workforce expansion, we look
at scenarios for taxation (a), economic development and population growth (b)
and allocative efficiency (f). However, since economic development and population
growth (b) and effective public policies on tax (a) and spending (f) can in addition
catalyse investments by the private sector, and since external investments such as
(d) and (g) – which can include both private and philanthropic financing – can be
instrumental in supporting public policy, we further extend the concept of fiscal
space to include the availability of financing from private sources, both domestic
and external. We refer to this broader concept as “financial space”. Figure 1 presents
a (partial) depiction of the domains and interactions of fiscal and financial space.
To show coherence with the categories employed in its historical development, our
diagram expands outwards from the original policy-oriented conception of fiscal
space to include first the fiscal impacts of the broader economic context, and then
the interactions of these domains with non-public actors.
Financial space has nearly the same determinants (and restrictions) as fiscal space,
except it is not limited to the public sphere. One might object that monetary policy
(e) is the exclusive domain of government action; however, private entities such as
banks and investors nevertheless play a role in monetary expansion, not of course
through the government prerogative of seigniorage but rather as a result of their
FINANCIAL SPACE
taxation
social investment
MONETARY
CONTROLS borrowing
public-
social
private
businesses central bank
partnerships earmarking
operations
fiscal impacts
of economic
and population external grants
private private not-
for-profit for-profit growth
entities entities
EXPENDITURE
MANAGEMENT
out of
pocket
co-payments technical efficiency
willingness to lend and to invest. On the other hand, since (lawful) private actors
do not raise funds through taxation (a), not only the specific lever of seigniorage –
which is a part of (e) – but also any form of “private taxation” – that is, the whole
of (a) – should be understood to be explicitly excluded from the scope of action of
private actors.
“Financial space” then refers to a situation in which governments and private actors
have the flexibility to direct resources to a specific purpose without jeopardizing
their financial position or long-term financial prospects; financial space can be said
to include fiscal space as a subset. A particular advantage of the broader concept of
financial space is that it brings into scope actions that increase the capacity of both
public and private actors to spend — and to manage effectively their expenditure
of — financial resources. Effective expenditure management for private actors is
not limited (as for government actors) mainly to concerns about technical and
We analyse the implications of the wage bills of additional needed health workers
from both a fiscal space (public sector) perspective and a financial space (public and
private sector) perspective. The period analysed is 2016–2030, corresponding to the
time horizon of the SDGs; however, to harmonize with the estimates of projected
health worker supply and health worker needs taken from Cometto et al. (1), the base
year (that is, the starting point) used for projections (except as noted below) is 2013.
“Additional needed health workers” are defined as “the projected needed health
workers minus the projected supply of health workers” (1). The wage bills
corresponding to additional needed health workers are termed “the financing gap”.
The fiscal space scenarios examined here rely on assumptions about taxation
(a), economic development and population growth (b) and the reprioritization
of expenditure (f). The scenarios are described in more detail below (section 3).
Given the focus of these scenarios on public budgets, they can be said to represent
a traditional, public sector-driven, view of development. As such, fiscal space
scenarios represent an upper bound on the scale of demands that could be made on
public budgets; that is, even if additional, socially beneficial private financing should
become available, the stewardship function of public governance nevertheless makes
it interesting to examine the potential implications for specifically public budgets.
Therefore, in light of the discussion in the previous section – and specifically because
the different domains are interacting and not mutually exclusive – the financial space
scenarios should be interpreted as relying not only on explicit assumptions about
economic and population growth but also on a set of implicit assumptions about the
effects of effective public tax and expenditure policies on the other domains of both
financial and fiscal space (see Figure 1).
i. estimates of the needs for and the supply of health workers projected to 2030;
Estimates of (i) were obtained from the analysis performed by Cometto et al. (1);
estimates of (ii) were derived from wage indexes estimated from country-specific
earnings data for health workers and other relevant occupational groups published
by the International Labour Organization (ILO) (as described in more detail below);
estimates of (iii) are taken from work done at the World Health Organization
(WHO) based on figures published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in
the World Economic Outlook database (and are described in more detail below);
finally, estimates of (iv) come from the United Nations Population Division
(medium variant). All these estimates are subject to uncertainty; however, as this
policy chapter presents a fiscal and financial analysis in which we take externally
determined2 data as given, we focus our discussion of uncertainty exclusively on (ii),
by investigating a plausible range of health worker wages.
Estimates of health worker wages were derived from an econometric model based
on available earnings3 data, as described more fully in Bertram et al. (6). Earnings
data were retrieved from the ILOSTAT database of reported earnings estimates (7)
for a variety of job titles, then classified into occupational levels according to the
four ISCO-08 major groups. Data for medical professions were selected wherever
available and relevant: for level 4, data extraction focused on earnings for general
2 “Externally determined data” are data obtained from sources external to this analysis, and whose assumptions,
strengths, and weaknesses are discussed in the original publications.
3 Here we use “earnings”, “wages”, and “salaries” as (more or less) interchangeable terms expressing the value of
the (gross) remuneration (in cash and in kind) received by employees for their work (but excluding social security and
pension benefits). The “cost of employment” to employers will generally be higher than their employees’ earnings.
The health worker wage estimation model employed a Heckman two-stage procedure
to model missing country-specific earnings data: that is, a probit model was used
to model the probability of observing earnings data, and an ordinary least squares
model was used for wage estimation. In the former case, mortality statistics were
used to predict the probability of observing earnings, since higher levels of mortality
are plausibly associated with lower levels of development, specifically within the
health system, and would thus lead to poor data collection.
In this analysis, we assume that the predicted mean of category 4 (equivalent to the
second stage of tertiary education) provides an estimate of the average wages of
doctors. For the wage estimates for nurses and midwives, we use an average of the
predicted means of category 4 and category 3 (the latter being equivalent to the first
stage of tertiary education). Although professional nurses are classified by ILO at level
4, auxiliary nurses are classified at level 3, which still demands some tertiary-level
training. For “other health workers”, we use an average of the predicted means of
categories 3, 2 and 1. While other classification strategies for health worker wages are
possible and would potentially be reasonable, we adopted the described strategy as
being in our view both plausibly consistent with the actual situation in most low-
income and lower middle-income countries and in addition the one most consistent
with the available data and therefore requiring the fewest number of auxiliary
assumptions.
The resulting monthly earnings estimates for the three cadres of health workers were
converted to annual earnings figures and then expressed in terms of GDP per capita
indexes (that is, as multiples of GDP per capita). Expression of annual earnings in
Table 1
Estimated wage indexes, by cadre (Table 1) or averaged across all cadres (Figure
2), show an inverse gradient with income, in the sense that higher-income regions
show lower estimated health worker wage indexes. In other words, the wages of
health workers are higher as a multiple of GDP per capita in low-income and lower
middle-income countries than in upper middle-income and high-income countries.
This said, wages in absolute terms are clearly higher in the higher income groups,
since GDP per capita is higher in those groups. Figure 2 further shows, however, that
when aggregate figures on health expenditure from the GHED are used for top-down
analysis of health worker wages based on available aggregate wage bill data, the
aggregate data imply systematically higher wage indexes than our econometric
analysis of wage levels using data published in ILOSTAT.
4 Wage bill data are not reported in the publicly available GHED and were estimated internally at WHO.
GHED ILOSTAT
10
9
8
GDP per capita index
6 5.5
5
0
high upper lower low global
middle middle
Both the data published by the ILO and those obtained from the GHED are subject
to measurement error, and they also both have numerous missing observations. Yet
these two sources of estimates of health worker earnings agree in important respects,
and in our view they therefore can be used to establish a “plausibility range” for
GDP per capita wage indexes for health workers. In our subsequent calculations
we employ such “plausible ranges”, relying on our (subjective) interpretation of the
strength of the evidence contained in both data sources (ILOSTAT and GHED).
As health worker wages are a key parameter affecting the analysis, we return to this
point when discussing our results for fiscal and financial space.
We used GDP growth projections for 2022 to 2030 prepared at WHO using the
IMF’s published GDP projections5 to 2021 and each country’s historical data (8). As
5 April 2016.
3.1.1 Baseline
3.1.4 Wages
In line with the findings reported above (see section 2.1), we assume that
average health worker wages for all cadres in 2014 are either 3 times GDP
per capita (plausible lower bound) or 6 times GDP per capita (plausible
upper bound).
There are no accepted international benchmarks for the ratio of wage bills
to total public spending on health. Nevertheless, raw calculations (that is,
uncorrected for on-budget development assistance) from unpublished data
in the GHED reveal that, for 136 countries with available data, the global
unweighted average wage bill, expressed as a proportion of public spending
on health, is 57%. In high-income countries that are not recipients of
development assistance, the figure is also 57%. We therefore take 60% as
a (slightly ambitious) “feasible lower bound” for the magnitude of wage
bills expressed as a proportion of total public spending on health. For the
sake of defining an “upper bound” that might nevertheless be at the extreme
limit of feasibility, we assume 90%, noting that approximately one quarter
of lower middle-income countries currently show wage bills above this
level (Figure 3).
100
80
60
Percentage
40
20
0
High Upper middle Lower Middle Low
The 60-90% range adopted here for the purposes of this analysis should not be
interpreted as a norm or policy recommendation, but merely represents values
we are using to draw conclusions about the limits of the modelled fiscal scenario.
Indeed, when health worker wages are above 60%, expressed as a proportion of total
government expenditure on health, and almost certainly when they are above 90%,
there will generally be concerns about the implications for efficiency in the mix of
inputs required for service delivery, as well as about the financial burden that a lack
of public resources to fund other inputs (such as medicines and supplies) is liable to
place on patients who could have to pay for these inputs out of their own pockets.
More particularly, the allocation of 60-90% of government health spending to health
worker wages should by no means be interpreted as a target. Such high levels of
spending on wages might be sustainable only in contexts in which external funding
can finance a substantial proportion of non-salary inputs.
Figure 4
140
124
120
102
100 93
80 69
60
42
40 29
20 11
4
0
Baseline Fiscal growth Priority increase Fiscal and priority
Under the more extreme assumption that health worker salaries can rise to 90%,
expressed as a proportion of public expenditure on health, and thus that very high
levels of external funding are available to fund the recurrent costs of non-staff inputs,
Figure 5
80
71
60 55
37
40
20 17 16
8
3 0
0
Baseline Fiscal growth Priority increase Fiscal and priority
Our analysis of fiscal space suggests that, if wage bills are expressed as a proportion
of projected public spending on health under our fiscal scenarios, and conditional
on estimates of a plausible range of health worker wage indexes of 3–6 times GDP
per capita, only a small number of countries (4–16 countries; see Figures 4 and
5) are projected to show wage bills outside the upper range of the distribution of
some currently observed wage bills (that is, above the range 60–90%). Therefore,
We claim that there is sufficient financial space for the necessary expansion of
health employment in low-income and lower middle-income countries if the
following conditions can be (jointly) met:
• the projected annual financing gap for the wages of needed health workers
is a “small” proportion of total annual economic output (i.e. GDP) in those
countries;
• the projected annual financing gap for the wages of needed health workers is a
“reasonable” proportion of total health expenditure in those countries.
If, on the other hand, an average health worker wage index (for all cadres) of 6 times
GDP per capita is assumed, the financing gap for needed health worker salaries in 29
low-income countries is projected to start at US$ 18.9 billion (in constant 2013 US
dollars) per year in 2016, rising to US$ 33.8 billion per year in 2030. As a proportion
of projected GDP, the projected financing gap in this less optimistic scenario averages
approximately 4% of GDP over this period (implying approximately a tripling of
the share of GDP going to health worker wages). As a percentage of projected total
health expenditure, the projected financing gap averages approximately 65%, again
implying approximately a tripling in the share of overall health expenditure going to
health worker wages.
Projected financing gap for wages, and % of GDP and total health
expenditure required to pay additional wage bills, in low-income
countries over the period 2016–2030, assuming an average health
worker wage index (for all cadres) of 3 times GDP per capita
THE GDP
40% 2.5%
38%
36% 2.0%
34%
32% 1.5%
30%
28% 1.0%
26%
24% 0.5%
22%
20% 0.0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
% GDP 2.23% 2.20% 2.17% 2.12% 2.09% 2.06% 2.02% 1.99% 1.96% 1.92% 1.89% 1.85% 1.82% 1.79% 1.75%
% THE 38% 36% 34% 33% 32% 31% 31% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30%
(low-income countries)
Figure 7
Projected financing gap for wages, and % of GDP and total health expenditure
required to pay additional wage bills, in lower middle-income countries over
the period 2016–2030, assuming an average health worker wage index (for all
cadres) of 3 times GDP per capita
THE GDP
25% 0.9%
0.8%
20% 0.7%
0.6%
15%
0.5%
0.4%
10%
0.3%
5% 0.2%
0.1%
0% 0.0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
% GDP 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3%
% THE 19% 14% 12% 11% 11% 10% 10% 9% 9% 9% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
(LMICs)
If, on the other hand, an average health worker wage index (for all cadres) of
6 times GDP per capita is assumed, the financing gap for needed health worker
salaries in 46 lower middle-income countries is found to start at US$ 104 billion
(in constant 2013 US dollars) per year in 2016, falling to US$ 97 billion per year
in 2030. As a proportion of projected GDP, the projected financing gap averages
approximately 1% of GDP over this period. As a percentage of projected total health
expenditure, however, the projected financing gap averages approximately 20%
The fiscal space analysis focuses on the role of governments, under a scenario
composed of assumptions about projected economic and population growth,
projected growth in public funds, and the potential for the reprioritization of
health in government expenditure; however, on the assumption that effective public
policies will have broader effects on the private economy, the financial space analysis
examines projected economic development, population growth and growth in overall
health spending (in other words, it includes the full scope of available public and
private resources that could potentially be mobilized by effective public policies and
broad-based health financing reform).
There is the potential for public funds to meet the recurrent costs of needed
health workers in many countries. Countries that are projected not to meet their
wage bills in 2030 from public finances display the common feature of low levels
of general government expenditure on health. For example, the 69 countries
reported as potentially not meeting their wage bills in 2030 (Figure 4), even in
the optimistic scenario of fiscal growth and increased prioritization of health
spending, show an average share of general government expenditure on health
of only 2% of GDP in data from the GHED (whereas a target of 5% has been
recommended by some) (9).
At lower wage levels, the implications for financial space of paying additional required
health workers appear challenging but potentially manageable, that is, feasible under
assumptions of appropriate public policy (including broad-based health financing
reform) and international engagement (including targeted aid, where necessary).
Low-income countries face a fairly steady demand on available sources of financing, such
as growth in output (GDP) and total health expenditure, over the horizon of the SDGs.
Lower middle-income countries face falling demands on available sources of financing
over the horizon of the SDGs, although both groups of countries face dramatic initial
projected financing needs at higher wage levels.
If average wage levels are as high as 6 times GDP, the financial implications of
funding the wage gap begin to appear unrealistic in low-income countries (since the
additional resources required amount to as much as 4.5% of projected GDP and 75%
of projected total health expenditure, at least initially). At such higher wage levels,
the implications for total health expenditure are also quite challenging in lower
middle-income countries, again, at least initially.
The average level of health worker wages is accordingly a major determinant of the
availability of both fiscal and financial space. According to available data, average
health worker wage indexes may lie anywhere in the range of 1.3 to 9 times GDP per
capita, depending on income region and data source.
An even higher estimate for average health worker wages than 6 times GDP per capita
would not be incompatible with existing data, especially in low-income countries.
In economic terms, health workers are “tradable goods”, in the sense that they cross
international boundaries in search of better employment conditions, including notably
higher (absolute) wage levels (10). There are thus economic reasons to suspect that
lower-income countries may have to offer higher (relative to the rest of their workforce)
wages in order to retain health workers. In higher-income countries, (relative) health
worker wages appear to be much lower, at least in available data. Thus, if the barriers,
both fiscal and institutional, to creating the necessary supply of health workers in all
countries can be addressed, such that the demand for health workers in rich countries
does not result in shortages of health workers in poor countries, it is possible that
relative health worker wages may stabilize towards the currently observed global mean
of 3.3 times GDP per capita (or even lower), especially over a medium-term horizon
showing sufficient economic growth in lower-income countries to allow absolute
health worker wages in such countries to rise appropriately.
In any case, it is clear that average health worker wages higher than 6 times GDP
per capita would pose serious challenges to both fiscal and financial space, in both
low-income and lower middle-income countries. Therefore, an implicit background
assumption to the scenarios examined here involves the effective management of
wage bill growth, not through arbitrary caps, but rather through addressing the
shortages of health workers – as well as the persistent mismatches in skills mix and in
modes of service delivery as compared with population health needs (11, 12) – that
have been affecting low-income and lower middle-income countries, and that will
continue to affect these countries in the absence of bold new measures to increase the
supply of (and, where appropriate, the demand for) health workers.
1. Cometto G, Scheffler R, Liu J, Maeda A, Tomblin- 7. ILOSTAT summary tables. International Labour
Murphy G, Hunter D et al. Health workforce needs, Organization (http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/, accessed
demand and shortages to 2030: an overview of 21 January 2017).
forecasted trends in the global health labour market.
In: Buchan J, Dhillon I, Campbell J, editors. Health 8. Brindley C, Meshreky A. Health expenditure
employment and economic growth: an evidence projections: technical report. Geneva: World Health
base. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 Organization; 2016 [internal working paper].
[forthcoming].
9. Shared responsibilities for health: a coherent global
2. Heller PS. Understanding fiscal space. IMF framework for health financing. In: Final report
Policy Discussion Paper PDP/05/4. Washington of the Centre on Global Health Security Working
(DC): International Monetary Fund; 2005 (http:// Group on Health Financing. London, United
mulkiye.byethost13.com/web_documents/ Kingdom: Chatham House; 2014 (https://www.
imfpaperfiscalspace.pdf?i=1, accessed 21 January chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/
2017). field_document/20140521HealthFinancing.pdf,
accessed 21 January 2017).
3. Heller PS. The prospects of creating “fiscal space”
for the health sector. Health Policy and Planning. 10. Dumont J-C, Lafortune G. International migration
2006;21(2):75–9. doi:10.1093/heapol/czj013. of doctors and nurses to OECD countries: recent
trends and policy implications. In: Buchan J, Dhillon
4. Tandon A, Cashin C. Assessing public expenditure I, Campbell J, editors. Health employment and
on health from a fiscal space perspective. HNP economic growth: an evidence base. Geneva: World
Discussion Paper. Washington (DC): World Health Organization; 2017 [forthcoming].
Bank; 2010 (http://siteresources.worldbank.
org/HEALTHNUTRITIONANDPOPULATION/ 11. McPake B, Correia EA, Lê G. The economics of health
Resources/281627-1095698140167/ professional education and careers: a health labour
AssesingPublicExpenditureFiscalSpace.pdf, market perspective. In: Buchan J, Dhillon I, Campbell
accessed 21 January 2017). J, editors. Health employment and economic
growth: an evidence base. Geneva: World Health
5. Barroy H, Sparkes S, Dale E. Assessing fiscal Organization; 2017 [forthcoming].
space for health in low-and-middle income
countries: a review of the evidence. Health 12. Moreira L, Lafortune G. Equipping health workers
Financing Working Paper No. 3. Geneva: World with the right skills, in the right mix and in the right
Health Organization; 2016 (http://apps.who.int/ numbers, in OECD countries. In: Buchan J, Dhillon
iris/bitstream/10665/251904/1/WHO-HIS-HGF- I, Campbell J, editors. Health employment and
HFWorkingPaper-16.3-eng.pdf, accessed 21 economic growth: an evidence base. Geneva: World
January 2017). Health Organization; 2017 [forthcoming].
Abstract
This rapid review considers evidence of (a) effectiveness of nursing and
midwifery-related interventions, including studies on the role of nursing and
midwifery as determinants of health; and (b) cost-effectiveness of nursing
and midwifery-related interventions. In light of what remains a still scarce,
underdeveloped cost-effectiveness evidence base, it is especially important to
consider evidence on effectiveness. We have focused in particular on two types
of policy questions: (a) increasing the number of nurses and midwives; and
(b) shifting the skills mix away from more expensive medical staff (especially
doctors) to nurses and midwives. The good news is that there is certainly selected
evidence to support the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness case for nursing and
midwifery. However, we need to acknowledge that the evidence base as a whole
appears fairly limited and mixed, if less so in terms of effectiveness than cost-
effectiveness. Many of the systematic reviews discussed in this chapter concluded
that the evidence base was “inconclusive”. More often than not this was attributed
to the several methodological challenges involved in the assessment of (cost)
effectiveness of nursing and midwifery policies. What evidence exists is also –
not surprisingly – biased towards high-income countries.
This chapter seeks to provide a rapid review of the evidence on the effectiveness
and cost-effectiveness of nursing and midwifery-related interventions or policies.
We note the challenge involved in adhering to common definitions of the
professions “nurse” and “midwife”. Definitions often vary between countries and
between different organizations, but usually include some formal qualification
and registration in most countries. According to the Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD), nurses are defined as “all the ‘practising’
nurses providing direct health services to patients, including self-employed nurses”
(1).1 Midwifery – according to the recent Lancet series on the subject – involves
“skilled, knowledgeable and compassionate care for childbearing women, newborn
infants and families across the continuum throughout pre-pregnancy, pregnancy,
birth, post-partum and the early weeks of life” (2).
1 Note that definitions used across the studies reviewed in this chapter may also differ, thereby potentially compromis-
ing the comparability of the results.
A further, much less frequently used approach to assessing value for money in health
care is cost–benefit analysis. Unlike cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis,
in this case all consequences of an intervention are converted to a monetary metric,
allowing for the expression of the return on investment in purely monetary terms.
In this chapter we shall use the more common term “cost-effectiveness analysis” as
the overall umbrella concept to include cost-utility analysis and narrowly defined
cost-effectiveness analysis. For a brief summary of a broader set of economic
evaluations as applied in health care see Annex 1.
There is a small body of evidence that uses country-level data on (highly aggregate)
nursing and midwifery indicators (especially density of nurses and midwives)
within a cross-country regression framework to assess its impact on (or at least
association with) a range of mortality outcomes. While this evidence contains no
economic assessment at all, it is potentially informative for an assessment of the
cost-effectiveness of increasing the density of nurses and midwives, in that it can tell
us something about the potential effectiveness (in terms of health) resulting from
changes in that density.
4 A relevant caveat to most if not all cross-country econometric studies is in the potentially varying definition of what
is included in the category “nurses and midwives”, potentially introducing bias in any resulting impact estimate.
5 The authors justified combining nurses and midwives in the sample by arguing that in countries where they exist as
separate health worker categories they are trained similarly and undertake similar tasks.
While the economic evaluation evidence on nurse staffing is thin, one cost–benefit
study evaluated a programme in Massachusetts, United States, where full-time
registered nurses provided care for the Massachusetts Essential School Health
Services programme, with 477 163 students from 933 schools participating during
2009/2010 (15). While the authors concluded that the programme appeared to
provide good value for money, generating a seemingly impressive US$ 98 million
net benefit to society, this finding needs to be treated with caution, as it relied on
Likewise, Dall et al. (16) concluded that adding 133 000 registered nurses to the
hospital workforce in the United States would lead to medical savings of US$ 6.1
billion, or an average of US$ 46 000 per additional registered nurse per year. Again,
while such numbers might sound impressive, once we investigate the underlying
distinct assumptions, it remains persistently difficult to make a meaningful
judgement as to how “large” or “small” they really are.
In one notable study (18), the economic value of alternative nurse staffing levels was
determined using more traditional incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimation.
The authors found that investing in nurse staffing was cost-effective, comparable to
commonly accepted medical interventions such as thrombolytic therapy for acute
myocardial infarction and routine cervical cancer screening. On the other hand, in
a study from Australia, Twigg et al. (19) concluded in a recent review (focusing on
full economic evaluations only, where both costs and outcomes where considered)
that the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of different nurse staffing levels was
inconclusive, due to the “small number of studies, the mixed results and the inability
to compare results across studies”. This conclusion coincides with that of an earlier
review of a very small number of cost-effectiveness studies (20).
6 A caveat is in order here, in that while it might seem reasonable to assume that nurses are cheaper to employ than
doctors (while noting that the relative cost of employing a nurse versus a doctor varies significantly in different
countries), the impact of nurse–physician substitution on overall resource utilization is still unclear. Laurant et al.
(22), for instance, noted that increasing the ratio of nurses and midwives to physicians may lead not only to cost
savings attributable to cheaper costs of employing nurses and midwives, but also to cost increases due to potentially
lower productivity of nurses and midwives compared to physicians (22). (It may though be that part of the “lower
productivity” of nurses and midwives is a reflection of their traditionally narrower range of permissible clinical
interventions compared to physicians.) Similarly, Delamaire and Lafortune (23) concluded that savings from employing
the cheaper nurse workforce may be offset by longer consultations times and higher rates of patient referrals. A
modelling study (24) based on two randomized controlled trials conducted in the United Kingdom corroborated this
further by showing that there was little difference in costs of employing a nurse practitioner compared to a salaried
GP. In addition, a recent systematic review concluded that the available evidence on the impact of nurse-led care on
costs was insufficient (25).
Another review article (26) cited evidence that a higher proportion of registered
nurses in the health workforce was associated with better health outcomes, and
also noted the evidence that registered nurses might provide more cost-effective
care than less costly licensed practical nurses, as the former will save both time
and money compared to the latter. In another study, Aiken et al. (27) found that
a greater proportion of nurses with International Baccalaureate degrees in the
hospital staff was inversely related to mortality. However, this does not necessarily
prove that investing in the education of nurses is cost-effective from a health care
system perspective, as one also needs to consider the cost of education and of
higher salaries.
In one example of a high-quality RCT study conducted in the United States (28),
patients randomly assigned to primary care by nurse practitioners or physicians
after emergency department and urgent care visits were found to have no significant
differences in most measured outcomes, which included patient satisfaction, health
status, psychological test results after six months of follow-up, and service utilization
for one year after initial appointment. The only exceptions were average satisfaction
ratings, which were slightly higher for those assigned to physicians (4.2 versus
4.1 on a 5-point scale); and diastolic blood pressure, which was lower for nursing
practitioner patients (82 versus 85 mm Hg).
One of the most important issues common to all studies is the difficulty of
establishing causality, as assignment of people to care by doctors or nurses/
midwives is typically non-random, and usually depends on the severity of
the underlying illness. Thus, nurses are more likely to treat healthier patients
(compared to doctors), and midwives tend to focus more (compared to
obstetricians) on women who are less likely to have serious complications (34).
In their recent systematic review, Twigg et al. (19) could not identify a single RCT
that considered both nurse staffing levels and health outcomes simultaneously. In
Estimating the effect of nursing and midwifery on resource utilization (and hence
costs) alone is also challenging. This is because these costs may be offset as a result
of various events (related to changes in staffing scenarios for nurses and midwives)
that are difficult to capture empirically, such as reduced length of stay due to better
patient care, fewer readmissions, less sickness absence, less use of emergency
7 For example, one review found that increased nurse staffing levels led to reduced length of stay by 24% in inten-
sive care units and by 31% in surgical patients (13, 37).
On the whole, the good news is that there are certainly selected primary studies
that can support both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness case for nursing and
midwifery interventions. However, we need to acknowledge that the evidence
base as a whole appears decidedly mixed, if less so in terms of effectiveness
than cost-effectiveness (where there is much more limited evidence to start
with). Many of the systematic reviews discussed in this chapter concluded that
the evidence base was “inconclusive”. More often than not this was attributed
to the several methodological challenges involved in the assessment of (cost)
effectiveness of nursing and midwifery policies. What evidence exists is also – not
surprisingly – biased towards high-income countries. Most of the evidence on
the impact of nurse staffing levels was collected in acute care settings, and hence
may not be generalizable to health care more broadly (40). The evidence on the
impact of the skills mix has been limited mostly to primary care settings in – yet
Looking ahead, there is great scope for more work in this area, especially for
low- and middle-income countries. As there remain uncertainties in the precise
contribution of nursing and midwifery to health outcomes, we recommend as a
priority more work on the sheer effectiveness of related policies, possibly trying
to exploit natural experiments in this area, along the lines of Daysal et al. (35) or
Miller (34).
1. OECD data: nurses [Internet]. Paris: Organisation 12. Bruyneel L, Li B, Ausserhofer D, Lesaffre E,
for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2016 Dumitrescu I, Smith HL et al. Organization of
(https://data.oecd.org/healthres/nurses.htm, accessed hospital nursing, provision of nursing care, and
17 November 2016). patient experiences with care in Europe. Medical
Care Research and Review. 2015;72(6):643–64.
2. ten Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Campbell J, doi:10.1177/1077558715589188.
Downe S, Fauveau V, Fogstad H et al. Improvement
of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. 13. Kane RL, Shamliyan TA, Mueller C, Duval S, Wilt
Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1226–35. doi:10.1016/S0140- TJ. The association of registered nurse staffing
6736(14)60930-2. levels and patient outcomes: systematic review and
meta-analysis. Medical Care. 2007;45(12):1195–204.
3. Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, Rice N, Spackman doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815ccaaf.
E, Hinde S et al. Methods for the estimation of the
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 14. Griffiths P, Ball J, Drennan J, Dall’Ora C, Jones J,
cost-effectiveness threshold. Health Technology Maruotti A et al. Nurse staffing and patient outcomes:
Assessment. 2015;19(4):1–503, v–vi. doi:10.3310/ strengths and limitations of the evidence to inform
hta19140. policy and practice. A review and discussion paper
based on evidence reviewed for the National
4. Revill P, Sculpher M. Cost effectiveness of Institute for Health and Care Excellence Safe Staffing
interventions to tackle non-communicable diseases. guideline development. International Journal of
British Medical Journal. 2012;344:d7883. doi:10.1136/ Nursing Studies. 2016;63:213–25. doi:10.1016/j.
bmj.d7883. PMID:22389332. ijnurstu.2016.03.012.
5. Goryakin Y, Griffiths P, Maben J. Economic evaluation 15. Wang LY, Vernon-Smiley M, Gapinski MA, Desisto M,
of nurse staffing and nurse substitution in health Maughan E, Sheetz A. Cost-benefit study of school
care: a scoping review. International Journal of nursing services. JAMA Pediatrics. 2014;168(7):642–
Nursing Studies. 2011;48(4):501–12. doi:10.1016/j. 8. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5441.
ijnurstu.2010.07.018.
16. Dall TM, Chen YJ, Seifert RF, Maddox PJ, Hogan
6. Anand S, Bärnighausen T. Human resources and PF. The economic value of professional nursing.
health outcomes: cross-country econometric study. Medical Care. 2009;47(1):97–104. doi:10.1097/
Lancet. 2004;364(9445):1603–9. doi:10.1016/ MLR.0b013e3181844da8.
S01406736(04)17313-3.
17. Sandall J, Murrells T, Dodwell M, Gibson R, Bewley
7. Speybroeck N, Kinfu Y, Dal Poz MR, Evans DB. S, Coxon K et al. The efficient use of the maternity
Reassessing the relationship between human workforce and the implications for safety and quality
resources for health, intervention coverage and health in maternity care: a population-based, cross-sectional
outcomes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. study. Southampton, United Kingdom: NIHR Journals
Library; 2014.
8. Carr-Hill R, Currie E. What explains the distribution of
doctors and nurses in different countries, and does 18. Rothberg MB, Abraham I, Lindenauer PK, Rose
it matter for health outcomes? Journal of Advanced DN. Improving nurse-to-patient staffing ratios as
Nursing. 2013;69(11):2525–37. doi:10.1111/jan.12138. a cost-effective safety intervention. Medical Care.
2005;43(8):785–91.
9. Castillo-Laborde C. Human resources for
health and burden of disease: an econometric 19. Twigg DE, Myers H, Duffield C, Giles M, Evans G. Is
approach. Human Resources for Health. 2011;9:4. there an economic case for investing in nursing care:
doi:10.1186/14784491-9-4. what does the literature tell us? Journal of Advanced
Nursing. 2015;71(5):975–90. doi:10.1111/jan.12577.
10. Kruk ME, Prescott MR, de Pinho H, Galea S. Are
doctors and nurses associated with coverage of 20. Caird J, Rees R, Kavanagh J, Sutcliffe K, Oliver K,
essential health services in developing countries? A Dickson K et al. The socioeconomic value of nursing
cross-sectional study. Human Resources for Health. and midwifery: a rapid systematic review of reviews.
2009;7:27. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-7-27. EPPI-Centre Report No. 1801. London, United
Kingdom: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit,
11. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede Institute of Education, University of London; 2010.
K, Griffiths P, Busse R et al. Nurse staffing and
education and hospital mortality in nine European 21. Dierick-van Daele AT, Steuten LM, Metsemakers
countries: a retrospective observational study. JF, Derckx EW, Spreeuwenberg C, Vrijhoef HJ.
Lancet. 2014;383(9931):1824–30. doi:10.1016/S0140- Economic evaluation of nurse practitioners versus
6736(13)62631-8. GPs in treating common conditions. British Journal of
General Practice. 2010;60(570):e28–35. doi:10.3399/
bjgp10X482077.
26. Aiken LH. Economics of nursing. Policy, 36. Parahoo K. Review: Ways of assessing the economic
Politics and Nursing Practice. 2008;9(2):73–9. value or impact of research: is it a step too far for
doi:10.1177/1527154408318253. nursing research? Journal of Research in Nursing.
2011;16(2):167–8. doi:10.1177/1744987110393236.
27. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, Sloane DM, Silber
JH. Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical 37. Shamian J, Ellen ME. The role of nurses and
patient mortality. Journal of the American Medical nurse leaders on realizing the clinical, social, and
Association. 2003;290(12):1617–23. doi:10.1001/ economic return on investment of nursing care.
jama.290.12.1617. Healthcare Management Forum. 2016;29(3):99–103.
doi:10.1177/0840470416629163.
28. Mundinger MO, Kane RL, Lenz ER, Totten AM,
Tsai W-Y, Cleary PD et al. Primary care outcomes in 38. Hanney S, Griffiths P. Ways of assessing the
patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: economic value or impact of research: is it
a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical a step too far for nursing research? Journal
Association. 2000;283(1):59–68. PMID:10632281. of Research in Nursing. 2011;16(2):151–66.
doi:10.1177/1744987110393427.
29. Fairall L, Bachmann MO, Lombard C, Timmerman
V, Uebel K, Zwarenstein M et al. Task shifting 39. Newbold D. The production economics of nursing:
of antiretroviral treatment from doctors to a discussion paper. International Journal of
primary-care nurses in South Africa (STRETCH): a Nursing Studies. 2008;45(1):120–8. doi:10.1016/j.
pragmatic, parallel, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. ijnurstu.2007.01.007.
2012;380(9845):889–98. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(12)60730-2. 40. Griffiths P. RN + RN = better care? What do we
know about the association between the number of
30. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane nurses and patient outcomes? International Journal of
D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other Nursing Studies. 2009;46(10):1289–90. doi:10.1016/j.
models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane ijnurstu.2009.07.007.
Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;4:CD004667.
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.
1. Cost-consequences analysis
All benefits of an intervention are listed, no matter in which area or in what
kind of unit they occur. The same is done with costs. No surrogate benefit unit
is built and no ratio is calculated. Therefore it is not considered a full economic
evaluation.
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis
The health benefits in this type of evaluation are measured in a single natural unit
(e.g. life-years gained, weight loss, increase in condom use). All alternatives have
to use the same natural unit in order to be comparable.
Weaknesses: Focus on one benefit only (hard to choose the most relevant one);
comparability of different interventions might be difficult.
3. Cost-utility analysis
Health outcomes are measured in a comprehensive unit representing quantity
and quality of life (for example QALYs, DALYs). This surrogate unit is derived
from an algorithm using life-years multiplied with utility scores for the respective
health states, which represent the quality of life during the time frame under
analysis.
4. Cost–benefit analysis
All consequences of an intervention are converted to their monetary equivalent using
methods such as “willingness to pay”. Money units become the common currency to
compare across alternatives.
259
CHAPTER 11
Abstract
Taking a labour market perspective, this chapter investigates current obstacles
to and potential policy solutions for the transformation of health professional
education that is required to reorientate the health workforce over the next
15 years towards Sustainable Development Goals for health.
At the core of the Sustainable Development Goal for Health is universal health
coverage. Universal health coverage is not possible without an adequate volume
of educated and trained professionals to deliver quality health care services. The
processes by which health professionals are educated, trained and supported
throughout their careers are therefore critical. The health care profession
is currently facing a triple challenge of changing population health needs,
professional preference for specialization and the variable quality of education.
An integrative review of 206 academic papers was undertaken to consider
these issues.
This chapter argues that the evolution of professional clinical education and
health labour markets reflects underlying market failures by which the social
return to those health professions most important for responding to population
need is undervalued. It calls for policy-makers to recognize the importance of
market forces in professional education, training and labour policies; to redirect
1. Introduction
Sustainable Development Goal 3, under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development, aims to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages”
(1). The goal identifies 13 targets that have universal health coverage at their heart.
Universal health coverage is not possible without an adequate number of educated
and trained professionals to deliver high-quality health care services. The processes
by which professionals are selected for training, educated and deployed are therefore
critical. Most governments recognize the importance of these processes and heavily
subsidize the education and ongoing training of health professionals, while seeking
to regulate the numbers and types of jobs as well as the quality of health workers’
training (2).
However, market forces are often more influential than government policies on
professional career choices. The interaction between two markets – the education
system and the health system – is mediated by a third, namely the labour market for
health workers. Ideally, these intersecting markets produce a balance between the
health needs of the population; the numbers and types of health workers required
to meet those needs; and the supply of these health workers from educational
institutions. But the market for health professional training and its outcomes is
skewed by market failures inherent to health care that result in two significant
mismatches (Figure 1).
HEALTH LABOUR
MARKET
HEALTH
POPULATION PROFESSIONALS
HEALTH NEEDS DEMAND SUPPLY
TRAINING &
Illness that can Perceived need Availability CAREER CHOICES
be changed for care of staff to fill
Demand & supply
through health positions
+ of training places
promotion, Willingness to for generalists/
prevention willingness accept pay &
to pay for it specialists.
or curative conditions
interventions Public subsidy
levels
MISMATCH MISMATCH
Results in neglect of poor, Results in labour shortage,
rural, remote populations underemployment or
& promotive/preventative unemployment
interventions
Professional wage rates do not reflect the contribution of the work of health
professionals to public health (that is, its social return). This is because individuals
purchasing health care do not always know what they need to promote their own
health, while individuals with high need for primary care tend to have low ability
to pay, thereby reducing demand. Government efforts to replace patient ability to
pay with public subsidy are hampered by weak fiscal capacity, weak governance or
weak political will. Taken together, these conditions contribute to the undervaluing
in the marketplace of the social return to the types of health professional work that
are most responsive to population need. Trends in the development of the health
professions and in health professional training reflect these market failures. This
briefing will consider:
• evolution of health labour and care markets and their interaction with health
professional education;
• policies to better align education, employment and health labour market forces
to meet population health needs.
A growing body of evidence has demonstrated the value of all these low-
and mid-level providers to improve patient outcomes in primary care and
other settings (7, 8, 13, 14). The shorter training time for these providers has
helped health systems respond more rapidly to local demands for preventive
and primary care services. The HIV/AIDS epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa
illustrates how mid-level provider roles have emerged and enabled primary
care and obstetric services to expand (15, 16).
There is little longitudinal evidence that follows graduates through their training
and into employment to understand career progression. This is important, because
it is known that students in a clinical or primary care phase of their study are
more likely to report that phase as a career preference. In Lao People’s Democratic
Republic, nurse students demonstrated significant differences in their respective
Figure 2.
60 General surgery
Otolaryngology
50
Internal rate of return, %
Orthopedics
Urology
40
Ophthalmology
30 Primary care
20
10
0
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Year
Source: Reprinted from The Economics of Health Professional Education and Careers:
Insight from a Literature Review, World Bank (2015).
GPs Specialists
7
6.2 6.3
6
Average annual growth rate
5.5
(%, in nominal terms)
5 4.8 4.8
4.6
4.1 4.1 4.2
4 3.7
3.4
3 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.9
2.4 2.6
2.3
2
1.5
1.2
1
0.3
0
ria
da
ce
ry
el
s
nd
an
an
ur
ic
ra
ga
iu
st
na
an
ex
bo
nl
el
Is
rla
lg
Au
un
Ca
Fr
M
Fi
Ic
Be
he
H
xe
et
Lu
Note: Growth rate for the Netherlands and Luxembourg is for self-employed GPs and specialists. N
Source: OECD (37).
Studies of financial returns to specialist nurse training show more mixed results, with
some types of advanced training evaluated showing negative returns (38). Differences
in economic return influence the status and prestige attached to different clinical
professions. This includes the influence of technology, in which certain specialist
roles are associated with increasing productivity, and the greater role of specialists
in institutionalized price-setting processes, such as setting reimbursement levels of
major insurers. Training schools reflect those dual pressures, with organizational
and cultural influences reinforcing trends towards ever greater specialization and
movement away from primary care, particularly for the clinical professions but also
for other health professionals.
Few studies have either evaluated separately, or included in any evaluation, the social
rates of return to health professional training and specialization. However, changes
The market failure by which the health needs of the population are not reflected in
relative pay means that clinical professionals are directed away from where they are
most needed for universal health coverage. However, it should be recognized that
the factors shaping higher returns to specialization are not entirely driven by market
forces. Where prices and pay are in some part determined by regulatory systems,
such systems are often captured by specialists who clearly face conflicts of interest in
that role.
Private clinical and medical education of doctors has been a relatively new
phenomenon in Africa (Figure 4), emerging in the 1990s and strengthening since
2000 (43). In Asia, India has more private medical schools than any other country
in the world; more than half of the schools in Bangladesh, China, Japan, Nepal,
Pakistan, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China) are private; the Islamic Republic
of Iran and Mongolia have far fewer private medical training institutions, while the
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Israel, Kuwait, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and
Thailand have none. In the Middle East, private medical and clinical training is
wholly dominant (44).
40
Public
33
Number of medical schools
India, Kenya, South Africa and Thailand are experiencing increased private sector
provision of nurses. South African nurses graduating from private institutions
increased from 45% in 2001 to 66% in 2004, while in Thailand this proportion
grew from 20% in 2001 to 24% in 2010. In Kenya, 35 out of 68 nursing institutions
Practically, if the cost of education borne by any one student is deemed too
expensive, low student numbers will result, as will student expectations of overall
lower lifetime earnings for a career in primary care. This could be offset by
redirecting public investments in health professional education.
Policy option 2
Redirect public investments in education to primary care and to
low- and mid-level providers
Primary care education should receive higher public subsidy than specialist
education on the rationale that public subsidy should be focused where public
returns are highest. Students of clinical specializations could fund their own
education on the basis that returns on specialization are mostly private. Most
countries generally do not distinguish between specialist and generalist training
in allocating educational subsidy. The allocation of subsidy should also reflect
recognition that students from rural backgrounds are more likely to take up rural
general practice, and students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more
willing to take up community-based practice. This has been established in several
contexts. Institutions in such settings should be prioritized for public investment
over urban and higher socioeconomic contexts.
Policy option 3
Balance professional with public representation in key policy and regulatory
bodies that influence the rate of return within all clinical professions
Policy option 4
Mobilize private international investment in systems for regulating private
training providers
Policy option 5
Prioritize research that includes evaluation of the social rate of return
in economic analyses
Over the midterm, research to ensure that social returns are appropriately evaluated
in economic analyses will assist decision-makers in government and influential
regulatory bodies to reduce the impact of market failure.
Acknowledgements
This paper draws significantly on Barbara McPake, Allison Squires, Agya Mahat,
Edson Araujo (2015): The economics of health professional education and careers:
insights from a literature review, unpublished literature review prepared for the
World Bank.
The Economics of Health Professional Education and Careers: Insights from a Literature
Review. World Bank Studies. Washington,
DC: World Bank. doi:lO.1596/978-1-4648-0616-2.
License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO
© by International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank
22. Competition ratios and application ratios [Internet]. GP 32. González-Robledo LM, González-Robledo
National Recruitment Office (https://gprecruitment. MC, Nigenda G. Dentist education and labour
hee.nhs.uk/Recruitment/Competition-Ratios, market in Mexico: elements for policy definition.
accessed 18 November 2016). Human Resources for Health. 2012;10(1):31.
doi:10.1186/1478-4491-10-31. PMID:22974344.
23. Kiolbassa K, Miksch A, Hermann K, Loh A, Szecsenyi
J, Joos S et al. Becoming a general practitioner: 33. dos Santos BF, Nicolau B, Muller K, Bedos C,
which factors have most impact on career choice Zuanon AC. Brazilian dental students’ intentions
of medical students? BMC Family Practice. and motivations towards their professional career.
2011;12(25):25. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-25. Journal of Dental Education. 2013;77(3):337–44.
PMID:21549017. PMID:23486898.
24. Harvey A, DesCôteaux JG, Banner S. Trends in 34. Rockers PC, Jaskiewicz W, Kruk ME,
disciplines selected by applicants in the Canadian Phathammavong O, Vangkonevilay P, Paphassarang C
resident matches, 1994–2004. Canadian Medical et al. Differences in preferences for rural job postings
Association Journal. 2005;172(6):737. doi:10.1503/ between nursing students and practicing nurses:
cmaj.1040146. PMID:15767603. evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Lao
People’s Democratic Republic. Human Resources for
25. Burch VC, McKinley D, van Wyk J, Kiguli-Walube Health. 2013;11(1):22. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-11-22.
S, Cameron D, Cilliers FJ et al. Career intentions PMID:23705805.
of medical students trained in six sub-Saharan
African countries. Education for Health (Abingdon). 35. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Abel T, Buddeberg
2011;24(3):614. PMID:22267357. C. Swiss residents’ speciality choices: impact of
gender, personality traits, career motivation and life
26. Hayes BW, Shakya R. Career choices and what goals. BMC Health Services Research. 2006;6(1):137.
influences Nepali medical students and young doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-137. PMID:17054803.
doctors: a cross-sectional study. Human Resources
for Health. 2013;11(1):5. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-11-5. 36. Review of the Queensland health rural generalist
PMID:23394308. pathway (RGP) model to examine whether there is
the potential to expand the model nationally: final
27. Nair M, Webster P. Education for health professionals report. Canberra, Australia: Nova Public Policy Pty Ltd;
in the emerging market economies: a literature 2010 (https://www.health.qld.gov.au/ruralgeneralist/
review. Medical Education. 2010;44(9):856–63. docs/NOVA_RGP_EVL_Jun2010.pdf, accessed 18
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03747.x. November 2016).
PMID:20716095.
37. Remuneration of doctors (general practitioners
28. Atchison KA, Mito RS, Rosenberg DJ, Lefever KH, and specialists). In: Health at a glance 2015: OECD
Lin S, Engelhardt R. PGD training and its impact on indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-
general dentist practice patterns. Journal of Dental operation and Development; 2015:88–9 [Internet]
Education. 2002;66(12):1348–57. PMID:12521061. (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-
health/health-at-a-glance-2015/remuneration-of-
29. Al-Dlaigan YH, Al-Sadhan R, Al-Ghamdi M, Al-Shahrani doctors-general-practitioners-and-specialists_health_
A, Al-Shahrani M. Postgraduate specialties interest, glance-2015-25-en, accessed
career choices and qualifications earned by male 18 November 2016).
dentists graduated from King Saud University. Saudi
Dental Journal. 2011;23(2):81–6. doi:10.1016/j. 38. Graf CM. ADN to BSN: lessons from human capital
sdentj.2010.11.004. PMID:23960503. theory. Nursing Economics. 2006;24(3):135–41, 123,
quiz 142. PMID:16786828.
45. Ananthakrishnan N. The entrance examination fiasco 54. Adhikari R. From aspirations to “dream trap”: nurse
in Tamil Nadu. National Medical Journal of India. education in Nepal and Nepali nurse migration to
2007;20(3):160. PMID:17867627. the UK. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh; 2010
(https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6199,
46. Ananthakrishnan N. Medical education in India: is it accessed 18 November 2016).
still possible to reverse the downhill trend? National
Medical Journal of India. 2010;23(3):
156–60. PMID:20949720.
Table 1
Search terms
Rate Of Return
Regulation
Education Quality
Education Impact
Curricul
Note: Items in the same column were searched using the Boolean term “OR” or its equivalent and those in
other columns using the Boolean term “AND”. MeSH terms were searched in PubMed only.
MeSH terms
Abstract
This chapter argues that special attention should be given to education and
training for the achievement of universal health coverage. An intersectoral
approach to Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 4 would help to unleash the
potential of technical and vocational education and training (TVET) for health
workforce employment, economic growth and social equity, supporting the
implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as a whole.
Education and training should be a strategic priority for universal health coverage,
employment and decent work, and inclusive economic growth. Stakeholders in
health and social care, in their actions towards Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)
3 (Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages) should give focused
attention to SDG 4 (Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote
lifelong learning opportunities for all) and the associated Education 2030 Framework
for Action (1), including target 4.3 (By 2030, ensure equal access for all women
and men to affordable and quality technical, vocational and tertiary education,
including university). SDG 4 recognizes that education has a unique enabling role
across, between and within the SDGs. As the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development (2) gets under way, it will be critical to maximize synergies
to ensure that efforts towards meeting the SDGs are convergent, coordinated
and mutually reinforcing.
It is important to recognize the broad scope and aims of technical and vocational
education and training (TVET). According to the 2015 Recommendation concerning
Technical and Vocational Education and Training, adopted by the General
Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization (UNESCO),
TVET is a well established policy area and increasingly prominent subsector within
education. It is attracting increased interest from various sectors, but has been
largely overlooked for the health workforce until now. An intersectoral approach
to health and education could help to connect TVET systems with strategies on
This chapter focuses on the health workforce – those workers with expertise in
health and social care. However, it also has relevance for the wider group of workers
in health and social sectors and supporting industries (6, 7). It argues that a shift
towards intersectoral SDG 3–SDG 4 planning for health workforce education and
training is needed to respond effectively to evolving health needs and changes in
health labour market demands, health services and local communities, including
those resulting from public health emergencies. Such an approach could catalyse
and drive new thinking and enhance collaboration and cooperation between
ministries of education, health, labour and finance, and other ministries,
professional organizations and stakeholders.
The next section of this chapter elaborates on the shortcomings of the conventional
model of health workforce education and training and on why focused attention
should now be given to education and training systems. The chapter then shows how
TVET within a lifelong learning framework could make a powerful contribution
towards expanding and transforming the health workforce.
The final section proposes four related domains of policy action to unleash
the potential of TVET through intersectoral collaboration: governance and
programming; data, knowledge and research; innovation and resources; and
funding and investment.
Globally, the demand and need for workers with expertise in health and social care is
growing. Projections developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the
World Bank identify the need to train and deploy at least 18 million additional health
workers, primarily in low-resource settings, by 2030 (8).
The shortcomings of the conventional narrowing pipeline model are most serious
in low-income countries. Significant bottlenecks are the proportion of the student
cohort attaining upper secondary education – projected to be only 26% in low-
income countries by 2030 (10) – and shortages of qualified teachers. Projections
for sub-Saharan Africa have indicated that an extra 2.5 million teachers for lower
secondary education are needed by 2030 (11, 12). Teacher supply for upper
The privatization of health workforce education and training in low- and middle-
income countries is rapid and insufficiently regulated. Faculty recruitment,
retention and increased mobility are also acute challenges
for low-income countries. For example, in the Eastern Mediterranean
Region, countries are experiencing serious shortages due to out-migration
to high-income countries (19).
The critical shortage of health workers is only part of the problem. WHO
guidelines include quality and relevance as core issues that must be addressed
TVET can take place at different levels and sites, and as such might play a role in
helping to connect education subsystems, including health workforce education and
training. Schools, colleges, universities and other tertiary education institutions,
community-based learning facilities, and health workplaces could gradually become
integrated learning centres, which together – as learning networks – would become
TVET within a lifelong learning framework could help to establish diverse learning
pathways with multiple entry and exit points, supporting learning and career
progression. Learning pathways could enable learners to navigate between different
sites or levels and to gain recognized skills and qualifications throughout the life
course. Together, such learning networks and learning pathways could form more
flexible and responsive lifelong learning systems.
The development of national education plans for health workers aligned with
national health plans should take into account the strategic potential of TVET. A
better choice of courses and other learning opportunities linked to health sector
employment should foster the expansion and continuous transformation of health
and social care services in support of universal health coverage (25).
Such education plans for health workers would help to promote the role of teachers
and students in developing creative and critical thinking in interaction with other
actors. This would advance understanding of the synergies between learning
pathways and health pathways. Extending the concept of lifelong learning, including
the provision of global citizenship education (26), to include early childhood can
help harmonize home, family, health and educational environments over time. This
Other sectors are already benefiting from TVET in terms of the quality and relevance
of their workforces, youth employment and decent work, equity and gender equality,
and inclusive and sustainable economic growth (27, 28). Multistakeholder education
and health systems would need to be increasingly networked to support learning
and complex interactions between their subsystems, as described by the Lancet
Commission (29).
Health and education systems are highly contextualized. The shape and form of
TVET within a lifelong learning framework should be responsive to domestic
circumstances and the evolving global, regional and national health workforce
education and training environment. By drawing attention to issues around the
development relevance of education, TVET can also promote learning about
environmental sustainability as a citizenship and values education issue as well as
an important workplace issue.
To unleash the potential of TVET for the health workforce, intersectoral policy
action could be taken in the following interrelated domains: governance and
programming; data, knowledge and research; innovation and technology; and
funding and investment.
The following subsections elaborate upon the four interrelated domains and
policy options.
A joint intersectoral SDG 3–SDG 4 approach can build and strengthen cooperation
within, between and across education and training systems, enabled through
multistakeholder governance arrangements, joint planning and accountability
mechanisms. TVET could facilitate such an approach and should be prioritized
as a modality characterized by diverse programmes, proximity to the world of
work, interconnecting learning pathways and career guidance for social mobility.
Social accountability mechanisms can ensure that TVET within a lifelong learning
framework is responsive to the evolving health needs of communities and attuned to
national and local contexts. The skills and skills mix of the future health workforce,
and the teachers and trainers required, should be taken into account.
Joint intersectoral SDG 3–SDG 4 planning could catalyse and foster the
implementation of TVET for the health workforce within a framework of lifelong
learning. This will necessitate a change in approaches to policy and strategy, shifting
from prioritizing investment in the rigid, selective and specialized pre-service
education and training pipeline towards the development of more flexible lifelong
learning systems. Such changes could include intersectoral approaches to the design
of learning and career pathways for all levels, and mechanisms for developing
learning pathways and school-to-work transition programmes for unemployed
youths into the health sector. Policy-makers should examine and reflect upon the
processes by which health and education sectors can best cooperate to support the
implementation of the 2030 Agenda.
Sector skills councils or similar apex bodies could develop plans to admit, educate,
train, deploy, develop and retain health workers, according to health and social care
needs, the absorptive capacity of labour markets and development contexts. This
could include the development of national education plans for health workers – with
an emphasis on youth employment and part-time work – that are aligned with
national health plans.
The case of India, a country taking significant actions towards transforming the
health workforce, is informative here (Box 1).
Box 1
In India, the National Human Resources for Health Cell in the Ministry of
Health and Family Welfare seeks to ensure coordinated and collaborative
efforts towards generating a skilled and qualified health care workforce. The
cell provides constant policy and technical support on overall issues related
to human resources for health (HRH), including and going beyond existing
cadres in the health system. It assists in quantifying and forecasting the need
for various health care professionals and in generating evidence for effective
policy formulation in close coordination with the states. The cell advocates
and is working towards the scale-up of innovative models on HRH issues,
including transforming health workforce education in support of universal
health coverage and liaising with stakeholders to build strategic intelligence
and strengthen capacity in the relevant departments of the ministry. It aims
to facilitate the creation and maintenance of a national health workforce
registry. The cell currently works closely with and provides technical
Job and career mobility across national boundaries and new patterns of knowledge
and skills transfer call for policies and mechanisms that recognize, validate and
accredit formal, non-formal and informal learning (35). Forecasts of the skills and
skills mix needed in the future health workforce, and the teachers and trainers
required, should be conducted, taking account of relevant factors, including an
understanding of outward and return migration. Transforming education and
training for the achievement of universal health coverage will require institutional
and instructional reforms (25). At an institutional level, selection and admission
policies for health workforce education and training programmes should seek to
broaden the socioeconomic, cultural and geographical diversity of students, in line
with recommendation 7 of the WHO guidelines on transforming and scaling up
health professionals’ education and training (41). TVET could build and strengthen
capacity to empower and enable the recruitment and training of local students
from underserved areas (42, 43). Similar approaches should be introduced for the
expansion of institutional teaching staff through the recruitment of community-
based clinicians and health workers as educators, as suggested by recommendation 3
of the WHO transformative education guidelines (41). This should be accompanied
by reward systems and merit-based career development opportunities with
appropriate levels of flexibility and autonomy.
The two notions underlying the approach – that health is produced socially
and that health care should include both treating illness and addressing
the social determinants of health – have major implications for the
training needs of doctors. As doctors have considerable influence in health
programmes, any paradigm shift must start with redesigning doctors’
training. Ateneo de Zamboanga University School of Medicine is pioneering
innovative use of social media to connect, communicate and empower
community-based and community-engaged learning.
Health workers should be educated on the social determinants of health and use
this knowledge in their practice. Education that enables health workers to address
and take action on the social determinants of health, including the Health in All
Policies approach (46), should be integrated into the assessed health workforce
education curricula.
It will be important to recognize the tensions involved in the politics of health and
education policy change. Mechanisms for inclusive and transparent dialogue should
be an integral part of intersectoral SDG 3–SDG 4 planning and partnerships.
Education data collection and analysis within a lifelong learning framework would
enable a better understanding of how learning outcomes from early childhood,
Data are also needed on entry into and participation in health workforce
education and training. For many countries, some data are available on
graduations from tertiary health and welfare programmes at International
Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) level 5 and above (48). However,
more data are needed on ISCED levels 2, 3 and 4, which will be crucial for SDG 3
and SDG 4.
WHO national health workforce accounts (49) and health workforce registries are
first steps toward standardizing the health workforce information architecture.
Efforts have been made to support the lifelong learning approach, including
the use of disaggregated data for national and subnational decision-making.
The inclusion of TVET and adult learning and education in data collection and
analysis for national health workforce accounts would enhance data sharing for
the 2030 Agenda as a whole. An example is the Health Data Collaborative, a new
initiative working on a common agenda in health measurement and accountability
and tracking progress towards SDG 3 and the broader 2030 Agenda (50).
Apprenticeship (54) is a social institution with a long history, having ensured, over
centuries, the transmission of work skills from one generation to the next. Around
the world apprenticeship takes different forms, including traditional apprenticeships,
which are self-organized. Many countries are exploring the option of introducing
or improving apprenticeship schemes as a way to better address youth employment
and skills mismatches. Efforts are under way to modernize and formalize informal
and traditional apprenticeships as a way to expand quality TVET (Box 4). UNESCO
notes that promoting learning for the world of work has led to one of the most
significant trends in vocational education in recent years: a rediscovery of the value
of apprenticeships (55).
ICT is a major driving force for change and innovation in the health and education
sectors but its relative absence in low-income countries is a significant constraint.
Health workforce education and training must take advantage of rapid technological
advances, while acting proactively to ensure wider development benefits and
equitable learning opportunities. The potential of ICT for education and training,
including distance learning and massive open online courses (MOOCs), should be
explored for driving learning and innovation by individuals and organizations.
ICT can help to build lifelong learning systems that can enable all actors and
providers to be responsive to changing workplace needs and demands (60). However,
The International Labour Organization (ILO) analysed case studies that used
cost–benefit calculations to assess returns on investment in apprenticeship. The
findings underscored the “overall consensus on the fact that apprenticeships
bring value to the companies across different trades, sectors and regions”. The
report highlights that such surveys also assess additional qualitative benefits,
such as retention and the contribution of apprenticeships to overall work culture,
aiding understanding of the hiring motivations of enterprises. It finds that hiring
apprentices yields both monetary and qualitative advantages, which are highly
relevant to health workforce employment and economic growth (68).
Joint SDG 3–SDG 4 planning should identify and coordinate domestic public
investment, with public subsidy considered where there is good evidence of high
social returns (70), for example in cadres such as nurses and midwives. These efforts
could promote health equity and gender equality to ensure that efforts towards the
SDGs are convergent, coordinated and mutually reinforcing.
Agenda 2030-wide scoping exercises for financing health workforce education and
training could include assessing the merits of innovative funding mechanisms that
could deliver a triple win for health, employment and education. While the various
options need to be carefully assessed and explored, one option might be measures to
reclaim costs from, or to introduce a levy on, the private cross-border recruitment
of health workers that have completed publicly funded education and training. The
funds generated could be reinvested directly into future health workforce education
and training.
Disclaimer
The ideas and opinions expressed here are those of the authors; they are not necessarily
those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
1. Incheon Declaration – Education 2030: towards 10. Pricing the right to education: the cost of reaching
inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong new targets by 2030. Education for All global
learning for all. In: World Education Forum 2015, monitoring report, Policy Paper 18. Paris: United
19–22 May 2015, Incheon, Republic of Korea. Paris: Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2015 [Internet] (http://unesdoc.unesco.
Organization; 2015 (http://en.unesco.org/world- org/images/0023/002321/232197E.pdf, accessed
education-forum-2015/incheon-declaration, accessed 19 November 2016).
19 November 2016).
11. A teacher for every child: projecting global teacher
2. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for needs from 2015 to 2030. UIS Fact Sheet No. 27.
Sustainable Development. United Nations; 2015 Paris: UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2013
[Internet] (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/ (http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/
post2015/transformingourworld, accessed fs27-2013-teachers-projections.pdf, accessed
19 November 2016). 19 November 2016).
3. Recommendation concerning Technical and 12. Global teacher shortage. Paris: UNESCO Institute for
Vocational Education and Training (TVET). Paris: Statistics; 2013 [Internet] (http://www.uis.unesco.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural org/Education/Pages/world-teachers-day-2013.aspx,
Organization; 2015 (http://portal.unesco.org/en/ accessed 19 November 2016).
ev.php-URL_ID=49355&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_
SECTION=201.html, accessed 13. Creating rural indicators for shaping territorial policies.
19 November 2016). Paris: Organization for Economic
Co-operation and Development; 1994.
4. Sustainable Development Goal 3c. Substantially
increase health financing and the recruitment, 14. Naicker S, Plange-Rhule J, Tutt RC, Eastwood
development, training and retention of the health JB. Shortage of healthcare workers in developing
workforce in developing countries, especially countries: Africa. Ethnicity and Disease.
in least developed countries and small island 2009;19(Suppl. 1):60–4. PMID:19484878.
developing States. United Nations [Internet] (https://
sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg3, accessed 15. O’Donnell O. Access to health care in developing
19 November 2016). countries: breaking down demand side barriers.
Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2007;23(12):2820–34.
5. Marope P, Chakroun B, Holmes K. Unleashing the PMID:18157324.
potential: transforming technical and vocational
education and training. Education on the Move series. 16. Nandi A, Ashok A, Kinra S, Behrman J, Laxminarayan
Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and R. Early childhood nutrition is positively associated
Cultural Organization; 2015 (http://unesdoc.unesco. with adolescent educational outcomes: evidence
org/images/0023/002330/233030e.pdf, accessed from the Andhra Pradesh Child and Parents Study
19 November 2016). (APCAPS). Journal of Nutrition. 2016;pii:jn223198.
doi:10.3945/jn.115.223198. PMID:26962175.
6. Dal Poz M, Gupta N, Quain E, Soucat A, editors.
Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human 17. Strasser R, Kam SM, Regalado SM. Rural health
resources for health: with special applications for care access and policy in developing countries.
low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Annual Review of Public Health. 2016;37(1):395–412.
Health Organization; 2009 (http://whqlibdoc.who.int/ doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021507.
publications/2009/9789241547703_eng.pdf, accessed PMID:26735432.
19 November 2016).
18. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N,
7. Health systems: health workforce. Geneva: World Evans T et al. Health professionals for a new
Health Organization; 2016 [Internet] (http://www.who. century: transforming education to strengthen
int/healthsystems/topics/workforce/en/, accessed health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet.
19 November 2016). 2010;376(9756):1923–58. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(10)61854-5. PMID:21112623.
8. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health:
Workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 19. Review of medical education in the Eastern
2016 http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/pub_ Mediterranean Region: challenges, priorities and a
globstrathrh-2030/en/, accessed 9 February 2017). framework for action. World Health Organization
Regional Committee for the Eastern Mediterranean,
9. WHO global strategy on people-centred and 62nd session, September 2015 (EM/RC62/3 Rev.1)
integrated health services: interim report. Geneva: (http://applications.emro.who.int/docs/RC_technical_
World Health Organization; 2015 (http://apps. papers_2015_3_16503_EN.pdf?ua=1 &ua=1,
who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/155002/1/WHO_HIS_ accessed 19 November 2016).
SDS_2015.6_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed
19 November 2016).
22. Working for health equity: the role of health 31. WHO, USAID, World Bank, countries and partners
professionals. London: University College London, align on new way forward to measure impact of
Institute of Health Equity; 2013 (http://www. country health programs. News item, 11 June
instituteofhealthequity.org/projects/working-for-health- 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015
equity-the-role-of-health-professionals, accessed (http://www.who.int/hrh/news/2015/measurement-
19 November 2016). summit2015/en/, accessed 19 November 2016).
23. TVET at the centre stage of the new sustainable 32. From “paramedics” to allied health professionals:
development agenda. In: Shanghai update: follow-up landscaping the journey and way forward. OneWorld
on the UNESCO Third International TVET Congress. South Asia, 21 December 2012 [Internet] (http://
Issue No. 4, November 2015 (http://unesdoc.unesco. southasia.oneworld.net/resources/from-paramedics-
org/images/0023/002353/235362e.pdf, accessed to-allied-health-sciences-landscaping-the-journey-
7 February 2017). and-way-forward#. WDAX-Xd7HdQ, accessed
19 November 2016).
24. Allais, S. The implementation and impact of national
qualifications frameworks : report of a study in 16 33. Uttar Pradesh Skill Development Mission,
countries. Geneva: International Labour Office, Skills Department of Vocational Education and Skill
and Employability Department; 2010 (http://www. Development [Internet] (http://www.upsdm.gov.in,
ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@ifp_skills/ accessed 19 November 2016).
documents/meetingdocument/wcms_126589.pdf,
accessed 17 January 2017). 34. Transforming and scaling up health professional
education and training: policy brief on faculty
25. Resolution WHA66.23. Transforming health workforce development. Geneva: World Health Organization;
education in support of universal health coverage. 2013 (http://whoeducationguidelines.org/sites/
In: Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly, Geneva, 27 default/files/uploads/whoeduguidelines_PolicyBrief_
May 2013. Agenda item 17.3. Geneva: World Health FacultyDevelopment.pdf, accessed
Organization; 2013 (http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/ 19 November 2016).
pdf_files/WHA66/A66_R23-en.pdf, accessed
19 November 2016). 35. Recognition, validation and accreditation of non-formal
and informal learning in UNESCO Member States.
26. Global citizenship education: preparing learners Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and
for the challenges of the 21st century. Paris: Cultural Organization; 2015 (http://unesdoc.unesco.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural org/images/0023/002326/232656e.pdf, accessed
Organization; 2014 (http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ 19 November 2016).
images/0022/002277/227729E.pdf, accessed
19 November 2016). 36. Cobb N. Caring for communities: training clinical
associates in South Africa. Transformative Education
27. Increasing the employability of disadvantaged for Health Professionals, 5 November 2014 [Internet]
youth. Skills for Employment Policy Brief. Geneva: (http://whoeducationguidelines.org/content/caring-
International Labour Office; 2011 (http://www.ilo. communities-training-clinical-associates-south-africa,
org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---ifp_skills/ accessed 19 November 2016).
documents/publication/wcms_167168.pdf, accessed
19 November 2016). 37. Cobb N, Meckel M, Nyoni J, Mulitalo K, Cuadrado
H, Sumitani J et al. Findings from a survey of an
28. Subrahmanyam G. Advancing TVET for youth uncategorized cadre of clinicians in 46 countries:
employability and sustainable development: key findings increasing access to medical care with a focus on
from the global synthesis report. Presentation at the regional needs since the 17th century. World Health
UNESCO-UNEVOC Global Forum on Skills for Work and and Population. 2015;16(1):72–86.
Life Post-2015, Bonn, Germany 14 October 2014 (http://
www.unevoc.unesco.org/SWL2014/presentations/
Plenary%20Session%203%20-%20Gita%20
Subrahmanyan%20.pdf, accessed 19 November 2016).
40. Ross SJ, Preston R, Lindemann I, Matte M, Samson 49. National health workforce accounts: the knowledge-
R, Tandinco F et al. The Training for Health Equity base for health workforce development towards
Network evaluation framework: a pilot study at five universal health coverage. Policy brief. Geneva: World
health professional schools. Education for Health Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/hrh/
(Abingdon). 2014;27(2):116–26. PMID:25420971. documents/15376_WHOBrief_NHWFA_0605.pdf,
accessed 19 November 2016).
41. Recommendations at a glance. Transformative
Education for Health Professionals [Internet]. 50. Data for health and sustainable development.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013 Health Data Collaborative [Internet] (http://
(http://whoeducationguidelines.org/content/ www.healthdatacollaborative.org, accessed
recommendations-glance, accessed 19 November 19 November 2016).
2016).
51. Global High Level Policy Forum, Paris, 9–11 June
42. Hogenbirk J, Timony P, French M, Strasser R, Pong R, 2015: online, open and flexible higher education
Cervin C et al. Milestones on the social accountability for the future we want. Paris: United Nations
journey: family medicine practice locations of Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2015
Northern Ontario School of Medicine graduates. [Internet] (icde.typepad.com/policy_forum/, accessed
Canadian Family Physician. 2016;62:e138–45. 19 November 2016).
PMID:27427565.
52. Qingdao Declaration. International Conference on
43. Larkins S, Michielsen K, Iputo J, Elsanousi S, ICT and Post-2015 Education, 23–25 May 2015,
Mammen M, Graves L et al. Impact of selection Qingdao City, the People’s Republic of China.
strategies on representation of underserved Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and
populations and intention to practise: international Cultural Organization; 2015 (unesdoc.unesco.org/
findings. Medical Education. 2015;49(1):60–72. images/0023/002333/233352E.pdf, accessed
doi:10.1111/medu.12518. PMID:25545574. 19 November 2016).
44. Philippines: Ateneo de Zamboanga University School 53. World development report 2016: digital
of Medicine (ADZU-SOM), Mindanao. THEnet dividends. Washington (DC):World Bank; 2016
[Internet] (http://thenetcommunity.org/thenet-schools/ (http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/
philippines-ateneo/, accessed 19 November 2016). default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2016/0
1/13/090224b08405ea05/2_0/Rendered/PDF/
45. Health Professions Network, Nursing and Midwifery World0developm0000digital0dividends.pdf,
Office, Department of Human Resources for accessed 19 November 2016).
Health. Framework for Action on Interprofessional
Education and Collaborative Practice. Geneva: World 54. TVETipedia glossary: apprenticeship. United
Health Organization; 2010 (http://apps.who.int/iris/ Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
bitstream/10665/70185/1/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng. Organization, International Centre for Technical
pdf, accessed 19 November 2016). and Vocational Education and Training; 2014
[Internet] (http://www.unevoc.unesco.
46. The 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion, org/go.php?q=TVETipedia+Glossary+A-
Helsinki, Finland, 10–14 June 2013: the Helsinki Z&term=Apprenticeship, accessed
Statement on Health in All Policies. Geneva: World 19 November 2016).
Health Organization; 2013 [Internet] (http://www.
who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/8gchp/8gchp_ 55. Rauner F, Smith E, editors. Rediscovering
helsinki_statement.pdf, accessed 19 November apprenticeship: research findings of the International
2016). Network on Innovative Apprenticeship (INAP).
Netherlands: Springer; 2010 (http://www.springer.
com/la/book/9789048131150, accessed 19 November
2016).
Abstract
This chapter presents contemporary evidence on the positive role of socially
accountable education in improving the availability, distribution and impact
of health workers. Evidence is presented from a variety of country contexts,
including Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Cuba, the Philippines, South Africa
and Thailand.
1. Introduction
The health workforce is increasingly being recognized as central to delivering on
the ambition of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (1). Improving
the availability, relevance, distribution and performance of the existing and
future health workforce is critical to making progress towards the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), including poverty elimination (SDG 1), quality
education (SDG 4), gender equality (SDG 5), decent work and economic growth
(SDG 8) and reduced inequalities (SDG 10) (1).
The Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030 highlights the
growing mismatch between health workforce demand and supply and population
needs (3). It speaks not only to increasing investments in the health workforce but
also to the need to optimize the current and future health workforce to better address
the needs of populations, particularly those who are underserved. The less educated
and the poorest members of society, along with migrants, minorities, and those living
in rural and remote areas, are often the most neglected (4).
Most efforts to address health workforce shortages have focused on the planning
and scaling up of production of health workers without taking into account labour
market challenges (9). The effects of institutional and educational strategies on
where graduates choose to work and their career choices have also been largely
ignored. Several long-standing challenges continue to hamper much needed
reforms in health workforce education and regulation. These include education
strategies and programmes designed by particular professions with inadequate
focus on population health needs; a notable lack of learning in the primary care,
community settings where many graduates are expected to work; insufficient
focus on interprofessional learning, collaborative practice and teamwork; student
admission policies that are not optimized for recruitment or retention of graduates
in underserved areas; community-based health workers and unregulated cadres
that are not formally supported or incorporated into the workforce; weak or
absent accreditation and quality assurance systems; and a lack of education
and career pathways that promote recruitment and retention in underserved
areas (5, 8, 10).
While the challenges are complex, evidence is emerging that socially accountable
health workforce education, which aims to ensure that education programmes
are relevant to the local context and that needs are identified in collaboration
with key stakeholders, can strengthen health systems and positively influence
the availability, distribution and performance of health workers (8, 11–17). For
example, an evaluation of schools with a social accountability mandate showed
significantly higher graduate deployment and retention rates in underserved
communities compared to graduates from traditional schools (18). Another
recent study demonstrated that the presence of students and graduates from
socially accountable schools in poor rural communities in the Philippines is
Box 1
The remainder of this chapter considers the existing social accountability education
strategies that are taking place across countries, as well as emerging evidence of their
impacts. Evidence on current reforms at the education institution level is presented
first. This includes a focus on transforming curricula; community engagement to better
address needs; targeting student admissions; and the recruitment, development and
promotion of community-based faculty. The chapter then discusses reforms under
way and needed at government and system levels, including a focus on integrated and
participatory policy development and planning and prioritization of investments in
rural and primary care settings. Evidence is then presented on the reforms required to
ensure a health workforce that is of good quality and accountable to those it serves.
This chapter offers as substantive a literature review as possible within the given
time frame, including published articles, grey literature, and relevant global reports
and guidelines, as required to provide input to the deliberations of the High-Level
Commission on Health Employment and Economic Growth. Available evidence
on the effect of system- and governance-level reforms, often in their early stages, is
scarce. Current research on the impact of education strategies and programmes being
conducted in high-income countries tends to focus on medical (and to a lesser extent
nursing) education, and on the impact on learners rather than on communities or
patient outcomes, thus limiting the available evidence. The evidence presented in the
chapter was reviewed by an interdisciplinary panel of health workforce education
experts. The panel jointly selected the policy options that are being put forward.
Curriculum reform must be viewed in terms of what is being taught, how the
curriculum is developed and implemented, and where the learning takes place.
How needs are defined and curricula are developed is also of importance, and
community engagement is a key approach of social accountability education.
Schools work with community representatives and other stakeholders to design
their curricula in line with the needs of the regions they serve. Communities can
be involved in selecting students, acting as simulated patients, and evaluating
programme impact. Community-engaged education builds social capital1 (24, 25).
Social capital encompasses interdependent and mutually beneficial relationships
between education institutions and the communities they serve. Coupled with
equitable provision of health services, partnerships involving communities,
education institutions, and the health and social service sectors can increase human
security and reduce costs by tapping into social capital, local human resources and
community assets (25).
1 Defined by Robert Putnam as “connections among individuals in social networks and norms of reciprocity and trust-
worthiness that arise from them” (24).
While sceptics have suggested that moving training away from hospital settings
compromises the quality of the education, studies show positive impacts on student
competencies and performance in national licensure exams, with rurally based
students doing as well as, and many doing better than, their urban counterparts
(16, 27, 28).
Moreover, there is evidence that aligning curricula to local needs and training
students in the context in which they are expected to work not only prepares a more
fit-for-purpose workforce but also increases the likelihood that graduates choose to
work in primary care and rural settings (8, 26, 29).
There is convincing evidence that targeted admission criteria – that is, criteria aimed
at selecting students deemed to be most likely to address specific health workforce
needs or increasing the socioeconomic, ethnic and geographical diversity of students
– have positive effects on the distribution and career choices of health workers
(40–43). One study of rehabilitation graduates shows that a graduate is 3.3 times
more likely to choose to work in a rural or remote community if the student was
raised in such a community (44). A study of socially accountable schools identified
four distinct strategies that positively influenced students’ intentions to practise in
underserved areas: quota systems prioritizing rural or underrepresented populations;
community involvement; school marketing strategies; and selection based on
personal attributes (39). All participating schools offered extra academic support
for students from underrepresented groups, and several schools used outreach
Who the graduates are, combined with where and how students learn, is clearly
important both to retain them as practitioners in underserved areas and to prepare
fit-for-practice workers. For example, results for medical graduates from NOSM are
impressive, with 92% of all NOSM students coming from Northern Ontario, and
with substantial inclusion of underrepresented populations in Northern Ontario
indigenous (7%) and francophone (22%) students. In 2015, 62% of NOSM graduates
chose to pursue careers in family practice, and 94% of the doctors who completed
undergraduate and postgraduate education with NOSM are practising in Northern
Ontario (46).
Many schools and regions suffer from a shortage of trained clinical and academic
faculty members, who are essential to the training of a fit-for-purpose workforce.
Several schools are using innovative approaches to recruit, train and reward
community-based clinicians and other health workers to become faculty (12, 41).
Many regions also lack trained clinical preceptors whose expertise is needed to
maximize learning outcomes and assure the consistent quality of patient services in
community and small hospital settings.
Joint and inclusive health and education sector planning can help stakeholders
to identify opportunities for cost savings and efficiencies and to coordinate
education plans for all cadres. Such coordinated planning will also equip the
health workforce with the optimal skills mix in line with local needs and national
development priorities.
Countries such as Brazil, Cuba and Thailand, which have demonstrated sustained
improvement towards achieving universal health coverage, have adopted more
integrated, equitable and primary care-oriented approaches to policy-making and
resource allocation (20, 40). For example, in Brazil, the government works with
partners at all levels to reduce inequity through a series of integrated strategies
(Box 3).
Australia has made strides in addressing shortages in the rural workforce using
collaborative approaches, albeit with most investment in physician education. The
success of the approach has been due to “passionate leadership of rural medical
and community leaders, government seed funding to encourage rural medicine
as an academic discipline, rigorous research and consultation that underpinned
each step of the innovation pathway, and a political campaign to invest in rural
medical education as a form of rural social capital” (55).
In Canada, a study was carried out of the social and economic impact of
NOSM’s rurally based, community-engaged education model aimed at
producing health professionals for Northern Ontario, after only four years of
operation. The direct, indirect and induced economic impact of the operation
of the social accountability school is estimated at Can$ 67 million, excluding
construction and renovation. By 2009, each of the 70 communities where
students had been placed received a return on investment of Can$ 7300 to
Can$ 103 900 per pair of learners per placement. The lower amount reflects
learner spending during short rotation in rural communities, and the
higher amount is spending in larger communities with several programmes
for different cadres and up to 30 week-long comprehensive community
clerkships, requiring substantial school investment. In the same period,
the school generated between 185 and 280 new full-time jobs in the rural
and remote regions of Northern Ontario (14). With respect to community
engagement, according to a 2015 NOSM report, 1300 trained clinicians
served as teachers, preceptors, and members of various committees in over
90 communities (58).
To equip the health workforce in Queensland, Australia, with the skills it needs to
address local challenges and create opportunities to pursue a career track in rural
and remote health, regional authorities work with rural medical schools to create a
rural generalist training pathway for physicians. Early evidence indicates that this
strategy generates high returns on investment and creates a training pipeline for
rural communities. For example, employing rural generalists with advanced skills
in anaesthesiology and obstetrics allowed for a 120% return on the government’s
Box 4
Service leave
Five areas of competency are woven throughout the midwifery, nursing and medicine
curricula, each building on the previous level. The first area stresses the competencies
that students require to become health care providers; the second trains them to
become community mobilizers to improve health-seeking behaviours; the third
focuses on programme management and supervision; the fourth centres on research
skills; and the fifth trains them to become educators.
There is also a need to clearly define the roles of each cadre in the health workforce
and their relationships to each other (3, 67, 68). In many countries, efforts to track
and regulate the AMTC cadre have been slow. For example, Ghana’s physician
assistant-medical cadre, which serves the primary care needs of 70% of the
population living in the most remote parts of the country, was established in 1969, but
registration, standards and regulations did not become official until May 2011, when
they came under the Ghana Medical and Dental Council (68). A lack of regulations
and clearly defined roles and responsibilities can create discord, undermine
implementation of health policies, and compromise the quality of services (69).
However, there are highly divergent approaches to regulation, and cost is certainly a
factor. The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care in the United
Kingdom advocates “right-touch regulation”, an approach that is influencing global
discussions (Box 5).
Right-touch regulation
• Agile: regulation must look forward and be able to adapt to and anticipate
change.
Source: Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care, United Kingdom (70).
rather than the individual, and capture objective data to analyse and improve
processes. Frequently, there is no formal authority that ensures a smooth progression
through the various stages of quality assurance, including accreditation of education
institutions, certification and licensing of health workers, and continuous professional
development and recertification (71). While there is general agreement on the need
to strengthen and link quality assurance efforts in both education and care (5, 8, 47),
there is less agreement on the most efficient ways to do it. Different approaches are
emerging, including multicountry and interprofessional or intercadre oversight, and
The values associated with social accountability – equity, quality, relevance and
cost-effectiveness – and interprofessional practice require strong alignment between
education and health systems. Hence, accreditation and evaluation of programme
outcomes should be interlinked. The results of programme evaluation should
inform the accreditation process and support continuous quality improvement of
the education process. Evaluation should include tracking of graduates’ practice
locations and career choices, along with their continued professional development
and performance. Training and service delivery sites should also be evaluated
and the health, social and economic impact of education programmes should
be regularly assessed to guide policy and strategy development. Such actions are
aligned with global recommendations to strengthen and streamline data collection.
3 Personal communication with David Gordon, President of the World Federation for Medical Education, 19 June
2016.
Figure 1
Based on the review of emerging evidence and promising practice described above, this
chapter advances the specific policy options below.
To ensure that health workforce education strategies address population needs, using
models that embrace interprofessional education and practice and that maximize
recruitment and retention in underserved areas, education providers in collaboration
with all stakeholders should:
• ensure that curricula incorporate local patient and population needs, including the
social determinants of health, and that a significant portion of the curriculum is
delivered in the primary care contexts in which graduates are expected work;
• recruit, train and promote faculty across cadres to build competencies that are
relevant to evolving health care needs;
To ensure that policies are evidence-based, and to maintain high standards for education
and service provision and at clinical training sites, governments and other relevant
independent authorities in collaboration with stakeholders should:
For education providers, changing the way established institutions work, coupled
with changing what, how and where students learn, will be a significant challenge in
a context where small changes in curricular content can be a turf battle. Hence the
processes of education reform need to be participatory and carefully designed and
implemented. Those who deliver education services need to work with a broader range
of stakeholders to ensure programmes are aligned with local contexts and address root
causes, and to create a sense of co-ownership of reforms. Key building blocks to foster
socially accountable health workforce education institutions at macro, meso and micro
levels have been identified (Figure 2) (76).
An explicit policy of
community participation
Responding to and informal linkages with
workforce and a defined community
health needs
The bedrock: Shared values and asirations congruent with social accountability
“Talking the talk and walking the walk”
7. Conclusions
Socially accountable health workforce education can and should be interprofessional
and cross-cadre; incorporated into all levels of the health system; and supported
by enabling policies, strong regulatory frameworks, and robust quality assurance
processes. All of these factors promise to optimize the impact of investment in
education.
A growing body of evidence suggests that such investments will yield returns in
the form of increased availability and distribution of health workers who have the
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of the following reviewers:
Andreia Bruno, David Clarke, Sandra MacDonald-Rencz, and André-Jacques Neusy.
1. High-Level Commission on Health Employment 10. Strasser R, Neusy A-J. Context counts: training health
and Economic Growth: final report of the Expert workers in and for rural and remote areas. Bulletin of
Group. Geneva: World Health Organization; the World Health Organization. 2010;88(10):777–82.
2016 (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstre doi:10.2471/BLT.09.072462.
am/10665/250040/1/9789241511285-eng.pdf?ua=1,
accessed 10 February 2107). 11. Suphanchaimat R, Cetthakrikul N, Dalliston A,
Putthasri W. The impact of rural-exposure strategies
2. Brearley L, Hanna L, Gushulvili D, Glennie J, Wise on the intention of dental students and dental
L, Roche JM et al. A wake-up call: lessons from graduates to practice in rural areas: a systematic
Ebola for the world’s health systems. London, review and meta-analysis. Advances in Medical
United Kingdom: Save the Children; 2015 (https:// Education and Practice. 2016;7:623–33. doi:10.2147/
www.savethechildren.net/sites/default/files/libraries/ AMEP.S116699.
WAKE%20UP%20CALL%20REPORT%20PDF.pdf,
accessed 5 December 2016). 12. Murray RB, Larkins S, Russell H, Ewen S, Prideaux
D. Medical schools as agents of change: socially
3. Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: accountable medical education. Medical Journal
Workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; of Australia. 2012;196(10):1–5. doi:10.5694/
2016 (http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/ mja11.11473.
globstrathrh-2030/en/, accessed 5 December 2016).
13. Reeve C, Woolley T, Ross SJ, Mohammadi
4. Equity: leave no one behind. In: World health statistics L, Halili Jr SB, Cristobal F et al. The impact of
2016: monitoring health for the SDGs. Geneva: World socially-accountable health professional education:
Health Organization; 2016: Chapter 5 (http://www. a systematic review of the literature. Medical
who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2016/ Teacher. October 2016;1–7. doi:10.1080/014215
EN_WHS2016_Chapter5.pdf, accessed 5 December 9X.2016.1231914.
2016).
14. Hogenbirk JC, Robinson DR, Hill ME, Pong RW, Minore
5. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, B, Adams K et al. The economic contribution of the
Evans T et al. Health professionals for a new Northern Ontario School of Medicine to communities
century: transforming education to strengthen participating in distributed medical education.
health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine. 2015;20(1):25–32.
2010;376(9756):1923–58. doi:10.1016/S0140- doi:10.1016/S1203-7796(15)30017-7.
6736(10)61854-5. PMID:21112623.
15. Hoffmann KD. The role of social accountability in
6. Chisholm D, Evans DB. Improving health system improving health outcomes: overview and analysis of
efficiency as a means of moving towards universal selected international NGO experiences to advance
coverage. World health report 2010, Background the field. Washington (DC): CORE Group; 2014 (http://
Paper 28. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010 www.coregroup.org/storage/documents/Resources/
(http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/ Tools/Social_Accountability_Final_online.pdf, accessed
healthreport/28UCefficiency.pdf, accessed 5 December 2016).
5 December 2016).
16. Cristobal F, Worley P. Can medical education in
7. Anderson GF, Reinhardt UE, Hussey PS, Petrosyan poor rural areas be cost-effective and sustainable?
V. It’s the prices, stupid: why The United States is The case of the Ateneo de Zamboanga University
so different from other countries. Health Affairs. School of Medicine. Rural and Remote Health.
2003;22(3):89–105. doi:/10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.89. 2012;12:1835–2012 (http://www.rrh.org.au/
publishedarticles/article_print_1835.pdf, accessed
8. Transforming and scaling up health professionals’ 5 December 2016).
education and training: World Health Organization
guidelines 2013. Geneva: World Health 17. Kerlen A, Forde A, Preston R. Social accountability
Organization; 2013 (http://apps.who.int/iris/ of the physician assistant: a fit-for-purpose
bitstream/10665/93635/1/9789241506502_eng.pdf, health workforce. Journal of Physician Assistant
accessed 5 December 2016). Education. 2016;27(1):43–6. doi:10.1097/
JPA.0000000000000053.
9. McPake B, Maeda A, Araújo EC, Lemiere C, El
Maghraby A, Cometto G. Why do health labour 18. Ross SJ, Preston R, Lindemann IC, Matte MC,
market forces matter? Bulletin of the World Health Samson R, Tandinco FD et al. The Training for Health
Organization. 2013;91(11):841–6. doi:10.2471/ Equity Network evaluation framework: a pilot study at
BLT.13.118794. five health professional schools. Education for Health
(Abingdon). 2014;27(2): 116–26. doi:10.4103/1357-
6283.143727.
40. Evans TG, Chowdhury AM, Evans DB, Fidler AH, 49. Kickbusch I, Behrendt T. Implementing a Health 2020
Lindelow M, Mills A et al. Thailand’s universal vision: governance for health in the 21st century –
coverage scheme: achievements and challenges making it happen. Copenhagen, Denmark: World
– an independent assessment of the first 10 years Health Organization Regional Office for Europe;
(2001–2010). Nonthaburi: Health Insurance System 2013 (http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/
Research Office; 2012 (https://www.hsri.or.th/sites/ pdf_file/0018/215820/Implementing-a-Health-2020-
default/files/THailand%20UCS%20achievement%20 Vision-Governance-for-Health-in-the-21st-Century-Eng.
and%20challenges_0.pdf, accessed 6 December pdf, accessed 6 December 2016).
2016).
50. Incheon Declaration – Education 2030: towards
41. Strasser R. Learning in context: education for inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong
remote rural health care. Rural and Remote learning for all. In: World Education Forum 2015,
Health. 2016;16:4033 (http://www.rrh.org.au/ 19–22 May 2015, Incheon, Republic of Korea. Paris:
publishedarticles/article_print_4033.pdf, accessed 6 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
December 2016). Organization; 2015 (http://en.unesco.org/world-
education-forum-2015/incheon-declaration, accessed
42. Increasing access to health workers in remote 6 December 2016).
and rural areas through improved retention: global
policy recommendations. Geneva: World Health 51. Promoting learning for the world of work: what is
Organization; 2010 (http://www.searo.who.int/nepal/ TVET? [Internet]. Paris: United Nations Educational,
mediacentre/2010_increasing_access_to_health_ Scientific and Cultural Organization, International
workers_in_remote_and_rural_areas.pdf, accessed 6 Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and
December 2016). Training; 2016 (http://www.unevoc.unesco.org/
go.php?q=What+is+TVET, accessed 6 December
43. Grobler L, Marais BJ, Mabunda S. Interventions for 2016).
increasing the proportion of health professionals
practicing in rural and other underserved areas. 52. National health workforce accounts: the knowledge-
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. base for health workforce development towards
2015;6:CD005314. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005314. universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health
pub3. Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/hrh/
documents/15376_WHOBrief_NHWFA_0605.pdf,
44. Winn CS, Chisholm BA, Hummelbrunner JA, accessed 6 December 2016).
Tryssenaar J, Kandler LS. Impact of the Northern
Studies Stream and Rehabilitation Studies programs
on recruitment and retention to rural and remote
practice: 2002–2010. Rural and Remote Health.
2015;15:3126. PMID:26163882.
56. Keck CW, Reed GA. The curious case of Cuba. 66. Ellrich F. The economic effect of a physician
American Journal of Public Health. 2012;102(8):e13– assistant or nurse practitioner in rural America.
22. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300822. Journal of the American Academy of Physician
Assistants. 2016;29(10):44–8. doi:10.1097/01.
57. Greenhill JA, Walker J, Playford D. Outcomes of JAA.0000496956.02958.dd.
Australian rural clinical schools: a decade of success
building the rural medical workforce through the 67. Olapade-Olaopa EO, Sewankambo NK, Iputo
education and training continuum. Rural Remote JE. The challenges of restructuring Africa’s
Health. 2015;15(3):2991. PMID:26377746. physician workforce: going forwards quickly into
the past. International Journal of Health Planning
58. Achievement report 2015: Northern Ontario School and Management. 2016;5(x):1–3. doi:10.15171/
of Medicine. Thunder Bay and Sudbury, Canada: ijhpm.2016.100.
Northern Ontario School of Medicine; 2015 (http://
www.nosm.ca/uploadedFiles/About_Us/Media_ 68. Miniclier N, Antwi J, Adjase ET. Educating for service:
Room_2/NOSM%20Achievement%20Report%20 the medical assistant profession in Ghana. Journal of
2015-web.pdf, accessed 9 December 2016). Physician Assistant Education. 2009;20(3):44–7.
59. Pálsdóttir B, Barry J, Bruno A, Barr H, Clithero A, 69. Moosa S, Gibbs A. A focus group study of primary
Cobb N et al. Training for impact: the socio-economic health care in Johannesburg Health District, South
impact of a fit for purpose health workforce on Africa: “We are just pushing numbers.” South Africa
communities. Human Resources for Health. Family Practice. 2014;56(2):147–52 (www.safpj.
2016;14(1):49. doi:10.1186/s12960-016-0143-6. co.za/index.php/safpj/article/download/3713/4902,
accessed 6 December 2016).
60. The state of the world’s midwifery 2014. A universal
pathway: a woman’s right to health. UNFPA, 70. Right-touch regulation (revised). Professional
International Confederation of Midwives, World Standards Authority for Health and Social Care; 2015
Health Organization; 2014 (http://www.unfpa. (http://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/docs/
org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/EN_SoWMy2014_ default-source/publications/thought-paper/right-
complete.pdf, accessed 6 December 2016). touch-regulation-2015.pdf?sfvrsn=12, accessed 6
November 2016).
61. Bilal K, Herbst C, Zhao F, Soucat A, Lemiere C. Health
extension workers in Ethiopia: improved access 71. Health professions oversight processes: what they do
and coverage for the rural poor. In: Chuhan-Pole P, and do not do, and what they could do. In: Institute of
Angwafo M, editors. Yes Africa can: success stories Medicine (US) Committee on the Health Professions
from a dynamic continent. Washington (DC): World Education Summit; Greiner AC, Knebel E, editors.
Bank; 2011:433–444. Health professions education: a bridge to quality.
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US);
62. Health services development: the WHO Health 2003: Chapter 5 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
Systems Framework [Internet]. Geneva: World Health NBK221526/, accessed 7 December 2016).
Organization (http://www.wpro.who.int/health_
services/health_systems_framework/en/, accessed
6 December 2016).
73. McKimm J, Newton PM, Da Silva A, Campbell J, 76. Preston R, Larkins S, Taylor J, Judd J. Building blocks
Condon R, Kafoa B et al. Regulating on and licensing for social accountability: a conceptual framework
of healthcare professionals: a review of international to guide medical schools. BMC Medical Education.
trends and current approaches in Pacific island 2016;16(1):227. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0741-y.
countries. Sydney, Australia: Human Resources for
Health Knowledge Hub; 2013 (https://sphcm.med.
unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/sphcm/Centres_and_
Units/SI_licensing_Report.pdf, accessed
13 December 2016).
339
CHAPTER 14
Abstract
This chapter identifies the education, training and service delivery reforms
required to transform the health workforce in countries of the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). While results focus on
doctors and nurses, the chapter stresses the need to move beyond traditional
professional boundaries.
The chapter identifies policies that support the creation of a health workforce
with the right skills, in the right mix and in the right numbers. Skills mismatches
waste human capital when health workers are overskilled, and harm quality of
care when they are underskilled. Countries need to adapt health professional
education and training to better match the skills acquired in training with
the skills required at work, and make more effective use of skills through
interprofessional collaboration and engagement with digital technology.
Moreover, to respond to population health needs, countries will need to train
a sufficient number of generalists, prepare non-physician providers to deliver
primary health services and make better use of technology to reach underserved
populations. Finally, the chapter calls for all countries, particularly countries of
the OECD, to educate and train the right number of health workers to respond
to their domestic needs. This requires more robust labour market information
and health workforce planning models, incorporating impacts of changes in
technology and models of care, to guide decision-making.
Health care provision needs to continuously adapt to respond to new needs driven by
demographic changes, the shifting burden of disease, and new opportunities driven
by technological changes.
New technologies – such as telemedicine, mobile health, electronic health records, big
data analytics and wearable diagnostic and therapeutic devices – are transforming, and
often disrupting, health care delivery. Smartphone software applications (apps) are now
being used for the diagnosis of health conditions in a cheaper and timelier way than
the traditional face-to-face consultation. Wearable devices and sensors are enabling the
continuous transmission of a person’s vital signs to his or her primary care practitioner
in real time, permitting more effective and tailored management of health problems.
Telemedicine is also becoming available to an increasing number of patients. Along
with these innovations come heightened expectations from citizens and communities,
who now have greater access to information than ever before.
This chapter addresses these questions, shedding light on current challenges and
needed reforms in education and training programmes and health service delivery to
transform the health workforce. While the chapter focuses on doctors and nurses –
due to their predominant role in health service delivery in OECD countries – it also
stresses the need to move beyond traditional professional boundaries to optimize the
training and scope of practice of different health care providers to better respond to
population health needs.
For both clinical and economic reasons, OECD countries tightly regulate the
acquisition, certification and use of skills of health professionals. Entry into medical,
nursing and other health-related education programmes is often implemented through
numerus clausus policies, which limit access to education to a given number of
students. Certification is usually achieved by issuing licences to practise in regulated
professions, through exams at the end of education or training programmes, and
increasingly also through reregistration procedures throughout the professional’s
life. The use of skills and scope of practice of different health care providers is usually
defined by laws and regulations (1).
Figure 1
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Physicians Nurses Others
Note: “Others” means workers in other technical and professional occupations (ISCO 2 and 3). The figure depicts
percentage responses with the associated 95% confidence interval.
Source: OECD (1).
1 The OECD PIAAC survey is a comprehensive survey of workers in all sectors of the economy that provides information
on the use of workers’ skills and skills mismatch. It includes 23 countries, with responses obtained from 500 doctors
and more than 2000 nurses. The survey questionnaire was designed to be fairly general, so it does not allow identifying
precisely the specific tasks for which the health professionals report being either overskilled or underskilled. Therefore,
self-reports of underskilling do not necessarily mean that health professionals are not able to fulfil their clinical tasks.
Rather, it implies that for some aspects of their work, these health workers think that they could benefit from more
training.
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Physicians Nurses Others
Note: “Others” stands for workers in other technical and professional occupations (ISCO 2 and 3). The figure
depicts percentage responses with the associated 95% confidence interval.
Source: OECD (1).
Addressing skills mismatches in the health sector is crucial to ensure high quality in
health service delivery while promoting greater return on the substantial investment
of time and money in educating and training health professionals. A recent report
by the United Kingdom’s National Audit Office indicates that it takes three years
and costs an estimated £79 0002 to train a new nurse, 10 years and £485 000 to train
a general practitioner (GP), and 14 years and £727 000 to train a senior specialist
doctor (consultant) (2).
Policies to address issues related to overskilling involve, first and foremost, reviewing
the scope of practice of different health care providers to promote a more efficient
use of their skills. Too many high-skilled health professionals are reporting that they
spend a large amount of time doing work that could be delegated to non-physician
providers (in the case of doctors) or health care
To overcome this challenge, OECD countries are introducing or expanding the role
of non-physician providers, including more advanced roles for nurses (for example,
nurse practitioners), pharmacists and other categories of health workers. In
2012/2013, at least one third of OECD countries reported having used this strategy
in the previous five years. In Canada, the Nordic countries and the United States of
America, advanced practice nurses and other non-physician providers have often
been deployed initially to address the needs of populations living in rural or remote
areas that are underserved by doctors (3). They then spread out more widely across
the health system as their role and the quality and safety of their work become
more broadly accepted by physicians and patients.
To ensure health workers are fit for purpose in the 21st century context,
policy-makers ought to conduct an in-depth review of skills indispensable
for the new generation of health workers, and adapt education and training
models accordingly. At the same time, as new technologies start facilitating the
performance of certain tasks, a range of skills become expendable, and should
therefore be discarded from health professionals’ curricula.
Figure 3
Instructional
• Competency-driven GOAL
ENABLING ACTIONS
• Interrofessional and
transprofessional education
• IT-empowered • Mobilise leadership Transformative
• Local-global • Enhance investments and interdependent
• Educational resources • Align accreditation professional
• New professionalism • Strengthen global education for
learning equity in health
Institutional
• Joint planning
• Academic systems
• Global networks
• Culture of critical inquiry Source: Reprinted from Frenk et. al. with permission from Elsevier (4).
Policies and regulations concerning CPD vary greatly across OECD countries.
There are variations regarding whether participation in CPD activities is
mandatory and whether relicensing requirements are in place. Where there are
relicensing requirements in place, there is variation in whether (and how much)
CPD is a mandatory part of the relicensing or reregistration process. In at least a
dozen OECD countries, participation in CPD activities for doctors is combined
with relicensing or reregistration requirements. In the United Kingdom, CPD is
linked to relicensing or reregistration procedures, although CPD provisions for
doctors do not follow a uniform nationwide system (1).
3 For the purpose of this paper, the term “generalists” refers to general practitioners or family doctors.
55
50
45
40
35
30
25 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Note: Generalists include general practitioners (“family doctors”) and other generalists (non-specialists).
Source: OECD (1).
To address this challenge, a few OECD countries have started to train more
generalists or use other health professionals to fill the gaps in primary care.
In Canada, France and the United Kingdom, the number of postgraduate
training places in general medicine has been increased. In Canada, the
proportion of medical students admitted to postgraduate training in general
medicine is 44% of the total entrants, while this proportion is 40% in England
and 48% in France (Figure 5). However, it has not always been easy to attract
a sufficient number of new medical graduates to fill these places. Numerous
factors affect the choice of medical specialization training beyond increasing
the number of posts available. Complementary actions are needed to make
general medicine a more attractive option for new doctors, including
narrowing the remuneration gap with other medical specialties and reducing
time on duty by promoting group practices (1).
da
es
s
nd
an
ai
an
na
at
Sp
gl
rla
St
Fr
Ca
En
he
d
te
et
ni
N
U
Note: In the United States, general medicine includes students admitted to both family medicine and internal
medicine.
Source: OECD (1).
OECD countries are also expanding nurses’ roles as a way to strengthen primary
care services. Evaluations have shown that properly trained advanced practice nurses
working in primary care can improve access to services and deliver the same quality of
care as GPs for various patient groups (for example, those with minor illnesses or those
requiring routine follow-up for chronic conditions). When advanced practice nurses
take on some of the tasks previously performed by doctors, it helps free up the time of
GPs and provides these services at a lower cost (3).
In Canada, the Netherlands and the United States, the number of students admitted
to nurse practitioner (NP) programmes has expanded and increased the supply of
these mid-level providers in primary care and other settings. In the United States, the
While training more generalists or expanding the scope of nurses’ roles requires
substantial resources, digital technology and ICT can offer countries cost-effective
means to expand access to primary care services. For instance, telemedicine or mobile
health (m-health) – both already being used in OECD countries – can be accessed
through smartphone apps, wearable monitors and portable devices.
Figure 6
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Nurse pratitioner (graduates)
The potential of telemedicine – clinical services, mostly medical consultations, that are
provided remotely – is undeniable. Not only can it bring high-quality and specialized
care to underserved populations by connecting patients to providers, it can also
4 For the past 20 years, a master’s degree has been required to become an NP, or any other recognized advanced
practice nurse (APN), in the United States. However, in 2004, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing and the
National Council of State Boards of Nursing proposed that the minimum requirement for advanced practice nursing (to
be imposed from 2015 onwards) be raised to a “Doctor of Nursing Practice” degree. While this change will not have
any consequence on current NPs and other APNs with a master’s degree (they will still be able to practise), this will add
more years of education and training for the new generation of advanced practice nurses and further delay their entry
into practice.
Governments can also strengthen the investment and incentive structure around
the use of mhealth. Giving people more control to manage their own health
decreases the need for medical or nursing consultations. Wearable devices and
sensors can continuously transmit a person’s vital signs to his or her primary care
practitioner in real time, permitting more effective and tailored management of
health problems. According to one estimate, more than 165 000 health apps were
available in 2015, a figure that has doubled since 2013 (8). These apps perform a
wide range of functions, such as medication reminders, tracking movement and
activity, and monitoring progress in pregnancy. For example, diabetes management
apps allow glucometers to be plugged into the smartphone to track insulin levels
and send alerts if necessary.
As health needs continue to change and technologies become a more integral part of
health service delivery, policy-makers will need to carefully consider the number and
types of health workers needed in the system.
In OECD countries, one of the most powerful policy levers governments use to
adjust the supply of doctors, nurses and other health professionals is through
numerus clausus policies,5 which regulate the number of students admitted to
medical and nursing education programmes each year. While limiting student
intakes is clearly a powerful tool, the effects are not felt immediately, as it takes
several years to train new health professionals.
Since 2000, most OECD countries have increased, often quite substantially, the
number of students admitted to medical and nursing education, in response to
concerns about current or future shortages. Increased intakes have led to growing
numbers of medical and nursing graduates entering the labour market, contributing
to the continued rise in the number of doctors and nurses that has been observed in
nearly all OECD countries over the past decade, both in absolute number and on a
per capita basis (9).
5 Ever since numerus clausus policies were introduced to control entry into medical education in the 1970s, both
their legitimacy and management have been questioned. Numerus clausus policies have often been characterized
by increases or decreases in the number of students admitted, as a response to concerns over future shortages or
surpluses of health care providers. Determining what may be the right number of students to admit each year has
proven to be challenging for governments, given the wide range of factors that affect the future demand for and
supply of health workers and political pressures from different interest groups. At least one country, Australia, has
recently decided to abandon numerus clausus policies for most health-related university studies (with the exception
of medical education) in an effort to open up entry into university education.
Non-European countries
Australia Canada Japan United States
250
Index (2000=100)
200
150
100
50
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2013
European countries
France Germany Netherlands United Kingdom
250
Index (2000=100)
200
150
100
50
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2013
Nordic countries
Finland Norway Sweden
250
Index (2000=100)
200
150
100
50
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2013
200
150
100
50
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2013
Figure 8
225 225
200 200
175 175
150 150
125 125
100 100
75 75
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
France Finland
250 250
225 225
200 200
175 175
150 150
125 125
100 100
75 75
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Note: For the United States, the number of graduates is used as a proxy for the number of students admitted
to nursing education. For France, the annual quotas established by the government are used as a proxy for the
number of students admitted to nursing education.
Source: OECD (1).
The above example illustrates the need to conduct regular assessments of labour
market prospects based on more robust health workforce planning models that do
not overreact to cyclical fluctuations, given the time that it takes to train new health
professionals.
Box 1 summarizes some of the main recommendations that arose from a 2013
OECD review of health workforce planning models to improve the management
of numerus clausus policies based on more robust health workforce data and
sophisticated health workforce planning models.
We need to know where we are before we can know where we are heading. The
first step of any good health workforce projection is gathering comprehensive
data about the current situation. One of the main benefits of strengthening health
workforce planning efforts is that it often triggers improvements in this crucial
first step.
5. Conclusions
Ensuring that the health workforce becomes fit for purpose for 21st century health
needs will require that policy-makers, professional associations and educational
institutions support the necessary transformations in education and training
programmes and in health service delivery models. The need to adapt is driven by
So far, OECD countries have focused mainly on ensuring there will be sufficient
health care providers (notably doctors and nurses) to replace those who will be
3. develop more robust health workforce planning models – including the potential
impact of new technologies in changing the roles of and requirement for different
health professionals – to guide the decisions of prospective students and public
investments in education and training programmes;
Acknowledgements
1. Health workforce policies in OECD countries: right 7. NP fact sheet. American Association of Nurse
jobs, right mix, right places. Paris: Organisation for Practitioners; 2016 (https://www.aanp.org/all-about-
Economic Co-operation and Development; 2016. nps/np-fact-sheet, accessed 17 January 2017).
doi:10.1787/9789264239517-en.
8. Terry K. Number of health apps soars, but use
2. Managing the supply of NHS clinical staff in England. does not always follow [online]. New York;
Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Medscape; 2015 (http://www.medscape.com/
National Audit Office; 2016 (https://www.nao.org.uk/ viewarticle/851226).
report/managing-the-supply-of-nhs-clinical-staff-in-
england/, accessed 20 November 2016). 9. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris:
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
3. Delamaire M-L, Lafortune G. Nurses in Development; 2015 (http://www.oecd.org/health/
advanced roles: a description and evaluation of health-systems/health-at-a-glance-19991312.htm,
experiences in 12 developed countries. OECD accessed 17 January 2017).
Health Working Paper No. 54. Paris: Organisation
for Economic Cooperation and Development; 10. Biviano MB, Tise S, Dall TM. What is behind HRSA’s
2010 (http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/ projected U.S. supply, demand, and shortages of
publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DELSA/HEA/ registered nurses? In: Gupta A, Harding A, editors.
WD/HWP(2010)5&doclanguage=en, accessed 20 Modelling our future: population ageing, health
November 2016). and aged care. International Symposia in Economic
Theory and Econometrics, Volume 16. Emerald Group
4. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Publishing Limited; 2007:343–74.
Evans T et al. Health professionals for a new
century: transforming education to strengthen 11. The future of the nursing workforce: national
health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. and state level projections, 2012–2025. Rockville
2010;376(9756):1923–58. doi:10.1016/S0140- (Maryland): U.S. Department of Health and Human
6736(10)61854-5. PMID:21112623. Resources, Health Resources and Services
Administration; 2014 (https://www.nh.gov/nursing/
5. Study concerning the review and mapping of forms/documents/hrsa-report-nursing-projections.pdf,
continuous professional development and lifelong accessed 20 November 2016).
learning for health professionals in the EU. European
Commission, DG Health and Food Safety; 2014 12. Ono T, Lafortune G, Schoenstein M. Health
(http://ec.europa.eu/health/workforce/key_documents/ workforce planning in OECD countries. OECD
continuous_professional_development/index_en.htm, Health Working Papers No. 62. Paris: Organisation
accessed 20 November 2016). for Economic Cooperation and Development;
2013 (http://www.aacp.org/resources/research/
6. OECD reviews of health care quality: Italy 2014 – pharmacyworkforcecenter/Documents/OECD%20
raising standards. Paris: Organisation for Economic paper.pdf, accessed 20 November 2016).
Co-operation and Development; 2014 (http://www.
oecd.org/italy/oecd-reviews-of-health-care-quality-italy-
2014-9789264225428-en.htm, accessed
20 November 2016).
Abstract
This chapter focuses on the importance of decent work in the health sector for
the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals 3, 5 and 8. It considers all
workers in or contributing to the health sector as part of the health workforce,
including a broad range of skill levels and occupational groups. Referencing the
normative work of the International Labour Organization and recent literature,
the chapter summarizes decent work challenges and opportunities, and suggests
strategies to create quality jobs in the health sector.
The chapter emphasizes the need for and value of investment in decent work
in the health sector, as related to attracting and retaining health workers and
enabling the provision of quality health care. Core issues addressed include
secure employment, safe and healthy work environments, fair pay and benefits,
social protection, and education and professional development, with particular
attention paid to the gender dimensions of each issue. The chapter calls for
a rights-based approach to health employment, with collective bargaining,
organizing, and freedom of association rights as fundamental. It additionally
highlights the positive contribution of social dialogue, as an integral part of
decent work, to health sector development and reforms; and consensus-based
responses to health sector challenges, resulting in policies that are more effective
and sustainable.
The health and social work sector2 has remained a relatively stable employment
sector, with annual growth rates even in times of slowing economic growth and
increasing levels of unemployment, particularly for women, who constitute more
than 70% of the workforce (2).
While the care economy has been identified as a source of future job growth due
to ageing populations, many existing needs for care go unmet because of financial
constraints on the individual in need, or because the care needs are met by
underpaid or unpaid carers (6).
The Ebola outbreak in western Africa demonstrated the harsh consequences that
inadequate investments in public health systems and their workforce can have on
societies, economic development and international health security (7). The high
1 SDG 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent
work for all. SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages (target 3.c: Substantially increase
health financing and the recruitment, development, training and retention of the health workforce in developing
countries, especially in least developed countries and small island developing States). SDG 5: Achieve gender equality
and empower all women and girls.
2 The health and social work activities sector is defined according to ISIC Rev.4, section Q: Human health and social
work activities.
This chapter focuses on the importance of decent work in the health sector for the
achievement of SDGs 3, 5 and 8. It considers all workers in or contributing to the
health sector as part of the health workforce, including a broad range of skill levels
and occupational groups. New estimates suggest that a significant number of workers
in non-health occupations4 are contributing to the provision of health care (10 ).
With reference to International Labour Organization (ILO) normative work and
recent literature, the chapter summarizes decent work challenges and opportunities,
and suggests strategies to create quality jobs in the health sector.
3 WHO reported the deaths of 513 Ebola-infected health workers (as of October 2015) in the course of the outbreak in
the three most affected countries – Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone (8).
4 Examples of workers in non-health occupations in the health sector include information technology workers, cleaners,
catering and maintenance personnel, and accountants. For a more detailed definition of workers in health occupations
and workers in non-health occupations in the context of estimating the size of the workforce contributing to the
health economy, see Scheil-Adlung and Nove (10).
Yet, in the face of reforms focused on cost containment, policy-makers face major
and growing challenges in responding to the increasing demand for health care.
While existing workforce shortages already result in overburdened workers, there is
a risk that extending access to health care without expansion of health employment
will lead to further intensification of workloads and deteriorating working conditions
for the workforce.
Working conditions influence the quality of care. Patient outcome indicators such as
morbidity and mortality are closely associated with appropriately determined staffing
levels, staffing stability and the education levels of health workers (18). Research in
some European countries shows that an increase in a hospital nurse’s workload by
one patient increases the risk of inpatient mortality by 7%; while inversely, each 10%
increase in the proportion of nurses with a bachelor’s degree is associated with a 7%
decrease in patient mortality (19).
Thus, decent work in the health sector has a dual critical role: ensuring both the
sustainability of the health workforce and the provision of quality care. Improving
employment and working conditions will attract and retain health workers while also
enabling them to perform more effectively.
All aspects of decent work have a legal dimension: international labour standards
and national labour laws help to clarify what decent work implies in concrete
terms and are preconditions for its achievement (21). Fundamental rights at work
include freedom of association, the right to organize and collective bargaining, equal
remuneration, the elimination of discrimination in employment and occupation,
and provision of safe and secure working environments for all workers, including
migrant workers.
International labour standards provide guidance for decent work policies. The
Nursing Personnel Convention, 1977 (No. 149) and its Recommendation (No. 157)
outline key standards, also relevant for other occupational groups in the sector,
including standards for education and training appropriate to the exercise of
functions; professional regulation; occupational safety and health legislation adapted
to nursing work; hours of work, leave and social security at least equivalent to other
workers; and voice and participation (22). Box 2 presents ILO Conventions and
standards of relevance to the health sector.
5 Notably: Migration for Employment Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 97); Migrant Workers (Supplementary Provi-
sions) Convention, 1975 (No. 143); Nursing Personnel Recommendation, 1977 (no. 157) (all ILO); and International
Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, 1990.
Social dialogue may include all types of negotiation and consultation, ranging
from exchange of information to collective bargaining and mechanisms for dispute
settlement. It operates at various levels, from national institutions, through regional
coverage to individual workplaces. Effective social dialogue requires strong,
representative and independent social partners who recognize the legitimate roles of
each other. Social partners in health services are public authorities as regulators or
as employers, and employers’ and workers’ organizations in the sector. Increasingly,
other stakeholders within and beyond the health sector have been involved in
dialogue on health policy development, while matters concerning negotiating and
collective bargaining remain a prerogative of the social partners (26).
The freedom to participate and to express their concerns are critical for enabling
health workers to actively contribute to enhancing positive work environments
6 In line with the Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (No. 202) and the Social Security (Minimum
Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102) (22).
Health sector reforms, in response to cost and efficiency concerns, have resulted
in growing diversification in forms of employment. The sector increasingly uses
non-standard forms of employment, including fixed-term work, temporary work,
temporary agency work, dependent self-employment and part-time work (31).
In South Africa, the use of agency staff and related different contractual
arrangements within the same institutions has been identified as a growing problem,
7 Such as: Guidelines and good practice examples “ageing workforce healthcare sector” (2013); Framework of action
on recruitment and retention (2010); Multi-sectoral guidelines to tackle third-party violence and harassment related
to work (2010); Framework agreement on the prevention from sharp injuries in the hospital and healthcare sector
(2009); Code of conduct on ethical cross-border recruitment and retention (2008). All documents available from www.
epsu.org and www.hospeem.eu.
8 Zero-hour contracts are employment arrangements without guarantee of a minimum number of work hours.
Figure 1
Cleaning % own
87% 13%
% contracted
Technology
25% 75%
services
0 20 40 60 80 100
The case of the Brazilian Unified Health System – Sistema Único de Saúde
(SUS) – provides an example of how institutional openness to dialogue and
negotiation can create a way to decrease the instability of outsourced work through
Box 3
In the European Union, health workers had the fourth-highest rate of serious work-
related problems across economic sectors. The sector ranked highest with regard
to exposure to biological and chemical hazards and work-related stress, violence
and harassment (38). Of concern to health workers are needlestick and sharps
injuries as sources of infection of hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV (39).9 Violence
and harassment are persistently high in the sector in both developed and developing
countries (40–42). Discrimination against health workers related to their status with
regard to HIV, Ebola or other infections, their gender or other reasons is a concern.
During the Ebola crisis in western Africa, the infection and mortality rates among
the national health and emergency workforces were exacerbated (8) due to lack of
personal protective equipment, supplies for hygiene, infection prevention and control,
and occupational safety and health measures.10 Once those measures were in place, the
infection rate among health workers dropped significantly (9).11
The complexity of ensuring 24-hour services seven days a week, involving shift work,
night work and weekend work, poses enormous challenges for workers’ health and
organizational performance. Excessive workloads, long hours, sleep-disruptive shifts,
night work, overtime, short rest periods and work–life conflicts are associated with
9 In 2003, WHO estimated 3 million needlestick accidental injuries in health workers, leading to 37% of all new
hepatitis B cases in health workers, 39% of new hepatitis C cases and around 5.5% of new HIV cases (39).
10 WHO reported 881 confirmed or probable cases of Ebola-infected health workers, of which 513 had died, as of
October 2015 (8).
11 Health workers’ risk of infection was between 21 and 32 times higher than in the general population at the beginning
of the outbreak (9).
In non-health sectors, the economic return on prevention has been estimated at 2.2,
supporting the business case for investment in occupational safety and health in the
health sector as well (46).
4.3 Remuneration
Over the first decade of this century, the remuneration of salaried health workers
as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) remained nearly unchanged
globally and decreased in terms of total health expenditure (Figure 2). In some
countries, for example Egypt, Myanmar and Sudan, workers in the lowest paid
categories received wages on average 1% above the poverty line (47). To make up for
low wages, health workers often resort to working multiple jobs or increasing shifts
or overtime (30, 48).
12 In line with ILO Convention No. 149 and Recommendation No. 157.
In response to the global economic crisis, some European countries reduced salaries
drastically or froze them, also affecting benefits such as pensions. These measures
contributed to increasing wage disparities, further stimulating health worker
outflows from some countries. Austerity measures induced a radical transformation
in the hierarchy of wage levels between the public and the private sector, resulting in
wage penalties for public service workers in some countries of the region (49–51).
Wage levels across occupations vary widely: among 16 health occupational groups
across 20 countries, medical doctors were paid the highest and personal care workers
the lowest wages, while the nursing and midwifery groups ranked in the middle.
Wage differentials between countries were also significant (52).
While around 70% of the global health workforce is female (Figure 3), paradoxically
women in the health and social sector tend to remain in lower-skilled jobs, with less
pay and at the bottom end of professional hierarchies (53). In the United Kingdom,
female employment in care is mostly related to direct care work, while managerial
jobs tend to be held by men (54). In particular, long-term care is mainly performed
by women (90% in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) countries), often in part-time arrangements, while the training and skills
development of formal long-term care workers is often at very low levels compared
to other health workers (54).
Figure 3
Africa 54.1%
Americas 74.0%
Overall 70.3%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
The number of informal long-term care workers in care of the elderly, often unpaid
female family members, by far exceeds that of formal long-term care workers (55).
Informal carers, including migrant workers, have less favourable working conditions,
lack social security and receive lower wages (38).
Because care work involves tasks that women have traditionally performed without
pay, the skills required for it and care provision in general are undervalued or
The gender pay gap,13 globally estimated at an average of more than 20% in the
overall economy (6), appears even more marked in the human health and social
work sector, where the unadjusted wage gap has been estimated at an average 26% in
high-income countries and 29% in upper middle-income countries.14
13 The gender pay gap refers to differentials in earnings between women and men. While being explained by a number
of factors, such as level of education, hours worked, and type of occupation, these factors are consequences of
broader gender inequalities in labour markets, including occupational segregation, hours spent in unpaid care and
household work, and part-time work due to family responsibilities (56).
14 This refers to an unadjusted gender wage gap, that is, the simple difference in average wages, not taking into
account the different characteristics of male and female employees. The reasons for the unadjusted wage gap need
to be further studied. Data available from 40 countries (27 high-income; eight upper middle-income; four lower mid-
dle-income; one low-income); latest available 2011–2013. Source: ILOSTAT, based on national labour force surveys
and official estimates of each country (http://www.ilo.org/ilostat/).
15 The term “employability” relates to portable competencies and qualifications that enhance an individual’s capacity to
make use of the education and training opportunities available in order to secure and retain decent work, to progress
within the organization and between jobs, and to cope with changing technology and labour market conditions. See ILO
Recommendation concerning Human Resources Development: Education, Training and Lifelong Learning, 2004 (No.
195) (22) .
16 See also ILO Human Resources Development Recommendation, 2004 (No. 195), article 21.
17 See also ILO Nursing Personnel Recommendation, 1977 (No. 157), articles 62–67; ILO Human Resources Develop-
ment Recommendation, 2004 (No. 195), article 21(f); and WHO Global Code of Practice, article 5.3.
5. Policy options
Policy option 1
Invest in decent work in the health sector so as to attract and retain health
workers and enable the provision of quality care
• To attract and retain skilled personnel where they are needed, investment in
health employment must be founded on decent work. Core issues to be addressed
include secure employment, safe and healthy work environments, fair pay and
benefits, social protection, education and professional development, and a voice
for health workers and their organizations.
• It is important to take into account gender dimensions when developing strategies for
health care to address the challenges for women in health work, including measures
reconciling work with family responsibilities, equal opportunities and pay, career
paths for women and the recognition and compensation of unpaid care work.
Policy option 2
Promote a rights-based approach in health employment and social
dialogue in the health sector
Box 5
• generate more and better jobs in the national Unified Health System (SUS);
Monitoring the impact of policies on the health workforce with a view to improving
work quality, access to health care and health outcomes is a next step requiring the
development of assessment tools adapted to the health sector.
References
1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for 7. nited Nations, World Bank, European Union and
Sustainable Development. United Nations General African Development Bank. Recovering from the
Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/L.1. New York: United Ebola crisis: a contribution to the formulation of
Nations; 2015 (http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_ national Ebola recovery strategies in Liberia, Sierra
doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E, accessed 21 Leone and Guinea. New York: United Nations
November 2016). Development Programme; 2015 (http://www.
undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/crisis-
2. World Employment and Social Outlook: trends 2015. Uprevention-and-recovery/recovering-from-the-ebola-
Geneva: International Labour Office; 2015 (http:// crisis---full-report.html, accessed 21 November 2016).
www.ilo.ch/global/research/global-reports/weso/2015/
lang--en/index.htm, accessed 21 November 2016). 8. Ebola situation report, 21 October 2015 [Internet].
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 (http://apps.
3. Scheil-Adlung X, Behrendt T, Wong L. Health sector who.int/ebola/current-situation/ebola-situation-report-
employment: a tracer indicator for universal health 21-october-2015, accessed 21 November 2016).
coverage in national social protection floors. Human
Resources for Health. 2015;13(1):66. doi:10.1186/ 9. Health workers Ebola infections in Guinea, Liberia
s12960-015-0056-9. PMID:26323724. and Sierra Leone: a preliminary report. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2015 (http://www.who.int/csr/
4. Scheil-Adlung X. What are the impacts of health resources/publications/ebola/health-worker-infections/
workforce shortages and employment conditions en/, accessed 21 November 2016).
on the population and economic growth? Policy
Brief No. 10, United Nations Commission on Health 10. Scheil-Adlung X, Nove A. Global estimates of the size
Employment and Economic Growth. Geneva: of the health workforce contributing to the health
International Labour Office; 2016 [unpublished: economy: the potential for creating decent work in
available upon request from the author]. achieving universal health coverage. In: Buchan J,
Dhillon I, Campbell J, editors. Health employment and
5. Scheil-Adlung X. Global evidence on inequities in rural economic growth: an evidence base. Geneva: World
health protection: new data on rural deficits in health Health Organization; 2016 [forthcoming].
coverage for 174 countries. Geneva: International
Labour Office; 2015 (http://www.social-protection. 11. Decent work. Geneva: International Labour Office
org/gimi/gess/ShowRessource.action?ressource. [Internet] http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/decent-
ressourceId=51297, accessed 7 November 2016). work/lang--en/index.htm, accessed 21 November
2016).
6. The future of work centenary initiative. Report of the
Director-General, International Labour Conference, 12. Blaauw D, Ditlopo P, Maseko F, Chirwa M, Mwisongo
104th Session, 2015. Geneva: International A, Bidwell P et al. Comparing the job satisfaction and
Labour Office; 2015 (http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/ intention to leave of different categories of health
groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/ workers in Tanzania, Malawi, and South Africa.
meetingdocument/wcms_369026.pdf, accessed 21 Global Health Action. 2013;6:19287. doi:10.3402/gha.
November 2016). v6i0.19287. PMID:23364090.
14. Wismar M, Maier CB, Glinos I, Dussault G, Figueras 22. NORMLEX: information system on international
J, editors. Health professional mobility and health labour standards. Geneva: International Labour
systems: evidence from 17 European countries. Office [Internet] (www.ilo.org/normlex, accessed 21
Copenhagen: WHO/European Observatory on Health November 2016).
Systems and Policies; 2011 (http://apps.who.int/
iris/bitstream/10665/170421/1/Health-Professional- 23. WHO Global Code of Practice on the International
Mobility-Health-Systems.pdf?ua=1, accessed 18 Recruitment of Health Personnel. WHA 63.16.
January 2017). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010 (http://
www.who.int/hrh/migration/code/code_en.pdf,
15. Humphries N, McAleese S, Matthews A, Brugha accessed 21 November 2016).
R. “Emigration is a matter of self-preservation.
The working conditions … are killing us slowly”: 24. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United
qualitative insights into health professional emigration Nations General Assembly Resolution 217 (III)A.
from Ireland. Human Resources for Health. Paris: United Nations General Assembly; 1948 (http://
2015;13(1):35. doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0022-6. www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/,
PMID:25981629. accessed 21 November 2016).
16. George G, Atujuna M, Gow J. Migration of South 25. Labour protection in a transforming world of work:
African health workers: the extent to which financial a recurrent discussion on the strategic objective of
considerations influence internal flows and external social protection (labour protection). International
movements. BMC Health Services Research. Labour Conference, 104th Session, 2015, Report
2013;13(1):297. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-297. VI: ILC.104/VI. Geneva: International Labour Office;
PMID:23919539. 2015 (http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---
ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/
17. Wiskow C. International migration of health wcms_358295.pdf, accessed 22 November 2016).
personnel: challenges and opportunities for North-
and West- African countries. CARIM Research 26. Joint meeting on social dialogue in the health services:
Reports 2011/02, Robert Schuman Centre for institutions, capacity and effectiveness. Note on the
Advanced Studies, San Domenico di Fiesole proceedings. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2002
(FI). European University Institute; 2011 (http:// (http://staging.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2003/103B09_44_
cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/18954/ engl.pdf, accessed 22 November 2016).
CARIM_RR_2011_02.pdf?sequence=1, accessed
21 November 2016). 27. Social dialogue in the health services: a tool for
practical guidance – the handbook for practitioners.
18. Buchan J. Assessing the impact of policies on the Geneva: International Labour Office; 2005 (http://
health workforce: issues and options. ILO Sectoral www.ilo.org/sector/Resources/training-materials/
Working Paper. Geneva: International Labour Office; WCMS_161166/lang--en/index.htm, accessed 22
[forthcoming]. November 2016).
19. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede 28. R202: Social Protection Floors Recommendation,
K, Griffiths P, Busse R et al.; RN4CAST Consortium. 2012 (No. 202). Geneva: International Labour Office;
Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality 2012 (http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORM
in nine European countries: a retrospective LEXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_
observational study. Lancet. 2014;383(9931):1824– ID:3065524:NO, accessed 22 November 2016).
30. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62631-8.
PMID:24581683. 29. Promoting constructive approaches to labour relations
in the public service: examples from collective
20. ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair agreements. Geneva: International Labour Office;
Globalization. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2015 (http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---
2008 (http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/mission- ed_dialogue/---sector/documents/instructionalmaterial/
and-objectives/WCMS_099766/lang--en/index.htm, wcms_433916.pdf, accessed 22 November 2016).
accessed 21 November 2016).
50. Karanikolos M, Mladovsky P, Cylus J, Thomson S, 58. Toward transformative education: inclusion of
Basu S, Stuckler D et al. Financial crisis, austerity, migration and decent work in the nursing curriculum.
and health in Europe. Lancet. 2013;381(9874):1323– Policy Brief 7. In: Policy briefs for stakeholders: taking
31. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60102-6. off from the ILO Decent Work Across Borders Project
PMID:23541059. on the migration of health professionals. Manila:
International Labour Office; 2014 (http://www.ilo.org/
51. Vaughan-Whitehead D, editor. Public sector shock: manila/publications/WCMS_330265/lang--en/index.
the impact of policy retrenchment in Europe. htm, accessed 18 January 2017).
Geneva: International Labour Office; 2013.
doi:10.4337/9781781955352. 59. Dussault G. Addressing health workforce access
gaps in rural areas: country examples. Geneva:
52. Tijdens K, de Vries DH, Steinmetz S. Health workforce International Labour Office; [forthcoming].
remuneration: comparing wage levels, ranking, and
dispersion of 16 occupational groups in 20 countries. 60. Barriball L, Bremner J, Buchan J, Craveiro I,
Human Resources for Health. 2013;11(1):11. Dielemann M, Dix O et al. Recruitment and retention
doi:10.1186/1478-4491-11-11. PMID:23448429. of the health workforce in Europe: final report.
Brussels: European Union; 2015 (http://ec.europa.
53. Langer A, Meleis A, Knaul FM, Atun R, Aran eu/health/workforce/docs/2015_healthworkforce_
M, Arreola-Ornelas H et al. Women and health: recruitment_retention_frep_en.pdf, accessed 22
the key for sustainable development. Lancet. November 2016).
2015;386(9999):1165–210. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(15)60497-4. PMID:26051370. 61. Sectoral Policies Department: highlights 2014–15.
Geneva: International Labour Office; 2016 (http://
54. Colombo F, Llena-Nozal A, Mercier J, Tjadens F. Help www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/-
wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. --sector/documents/publication/wcms_468059.pdf,
OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: Organisation accessed 22 November 2016).
for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2011
(https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/47836116.
pdf, accessed 22 November 2016).
Abstract
Posting and transfer (P&T) encompasses initial health worker deployment
and subsequent transfers. Irrational P&T refers to deployment and transfer
that is inconsistent with population health needs. This chapter is based on a
comprehensive literature review to uncover the actual practices and informal
regulations characterizing P&T in low- and middle-income countries.
Irrational P&T in the health sector is described in many diverse low- and middle-
income countries. Existing data suggest that irrational P&T affects many cadres
of health care workers and administrators, from specialist doctors to outreach
workers. P&T is intimately related to the distribution of power at multiple levels
of governance. Negotiations often occur in a context of official and informal
regulations and incentives, lack of adequate human resources for health, political
patronage and networks, personal networks and corruption. Irrational P&T can
contribute to maldistribution and absenteeism, undercutting efficiency and health
worker morale. Often, the poorest regions are the most affected.
Despite its relevance to global health goals, P&T remains a largely unnamed
health system governance function. The chapter calls on policy-makers to
improve health worker deployment as a core system function; to introduce
direct accountability to communities around health workforce deployment;
and to improve collaboration between health-specific and broader public
administration actors.
Achieving universal health coverage requires adequate numbers of skilled health care
workers in functioning health facilities. However, in many countries there are too
few skilled personnel in the public sector, and the existing public sector workforce is
inequitably distributed. This maldistribution results in part from poor posting and
transfer (P&T) practice (Box 1).
Box 1
Even when governments have P&T policies that are intended to guide the
distribution and movement of health personnel, these policies are not always
followed. This may be because the policies are unknown to those tasked
with implementing them, because of management and communication
challenges or because their enforcement would interfere with entrenched
informal practices.
2. Findings
HRH-related studies suggest that there may be significant gaps between policy and
practice. Actual P&T of health providers and administrators is shaped by factors at
individual and health system levels. Some of these factors, such as urban preference,
are well explicated in the retention and HRH distribution literature; others are not.
On the individual level, health providers and administrators may have locational
preferences for several reasons, including standard of living, proximity to family,
access to further education, access to promotion opportunities, opportunities to use
one’s skills, opportunities to generate additional licit or illicit income, and access
to development projects or other activities that might entail additional income or
professional support (1–8). Several studies report that providers fear being posted
to a rural area, where they can be “forgotten” and overlooked for transfers or
promotions. Thus, while some of these workers might be willing to spend two years
in a rural area, they may be wary of posts that are theoretically two years, but much
longer in reality (5, 8–10). The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed
global policy recommendations on how to address these challenges by increasing
retention of health providers in rural areas (11). For their part, actual decision-
makers (who may or may not be the persons with decision-making authority as per
official policy) may have preferences about P&T related, for example, to a desire to
punish a particular worker, to make a dysfunctional system function better or to
ensure that an ally is well placed (1, 4, 5, 12).
P&T as it occurs on the ground goes well beyond the negotiation of individual
preferences. Negotiation can occur in a context of official and informal regulations
and incentives, lack of adequate HRH, political patronage and networks, personal
networks and corruption (1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 13). Thus, P&T is related to the
distribution of power at multiple levels of governance. For example, individuals who
hold power in a certain context, for example when their political party is in power,
may be able to draw upon networks as resources, such as when they pay for a post
Irrational P&T in the health sector has been described in many diverse low- and
middle-income countries, including the Dominican Republic (2), Ethiopia (9),
Ghana (6), Guatemala (13), India (2, 4, 10), Indonesia (3), Nepal (5), Niger (13),
Nigeria (12), Sierra Leone (8) and the United Republic of Tanzania (7). National
perception surveys conducted by the World Bank with households, businesses and
public officials revealed that significant percentages of public officials – ranging from
9% in Benin to 50% in Zambia – report that purchasing posts in the health sector
is relatively common (14). The scope and breadth of the challenge is probably large,
with articles from many other countries obliquely referring to irrational P&T.
Within the global health community, P&T is a largely unnamed health system
governance function, though P&T more broadly is frequently discussed within the
public administration world. Given its links to retention, equitable distribution,
public administration reform and corruption, P&T relates to many global and
national strategies and policy-setting priorities. The fact that actual practice is often
tacit, and the fact that irrational P&T is not yet high on policy agendas, means that
P&T is rarely explicitly addressed in these forums. Yet, given the increasing focus on
HRH governance, health systems, universal health coverage and delivery of quality
care in the SDG era, there is ample opportunity to address P&T.
3.1 Challenges
The following subsections outline the challenges faced in addressing the gaps
between P&T policy and practice.
This is not to say that the system is so ossified that there is no subnational variation
or that informal P&T is never positive. There are scattered examples of both,
although the peer-reviewed literature in this area is slim (2, 5). For example, P&T
practice may vary significantly among different states in India, perhaps determined
in part by degree of health worker scarcity, state-level laws and regulations, and the
political party in power (2). Research in some contexts has found that health workers
Individual health workers and administrators have preferences about where they live.
In the context of significant human resource shortages, these preferences frequently
clash with the needs of underserved communities. Health workers who lack power
can end up languishing in posts they do not want, or be arbitrarily transferred,
undermining their morale, professional satisfaction, sense of organizational justice
and, ultimately, their retention in the workforce (13). Though it may make short-term
rural postings more feasible, increasing the absolute number of health workers is
probably insufficient to remedy the clash between individual preferences and
system needs.
Starting in the 1980s, many countries implemented broad public sector reforms
that aimed to promote better public sector governance, administrative devolution,
enhanced management, customer service and efficiency (22). These reforms were
often guided by New Public Management (NPM), a philosophy and set of policies
developed in the 1970s and 1980s in Nordic and Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD) nations. A common theme was the transfer of
responsibility from the core public sector to “agencies”.
3.2.2 Transparency
Given that whole system public sector reform is an ambitious and politically
challenging undertaking, many propose “within-system” solutions. For example,
health care providers and administrators, researchers, and international
agencies, including the World Bank, have advocated transparent recruitment and
deployment (1, 14, 31–33). The WHO Global Strategy on Human Resources for
Health: Workforce 2030 recommends transparent HRH regulatory mechanisms
(34). Indeed, transparency is widely considered to be an integral attribute of
robust health systems governance (15, 35), and essential to development more
broadly (36). Some countries and states, particularly some states in India, have
tried to introduce greater transparency into the process.
First, the techniques need to be fully implemented and integrated into existing
decision-making routines. A systematic review of human resource information
systems found that few countries actively used the information systems for staffing
decisions (51).
Second, existing political support and receptive staff are necessary for reforms to take
root. This can be a challenge in contexts where there is interest among both political
actors and health providers to maintain the status quo of irrational P&T. Unions
may present a formidable obstacle to reform (5). On the other hand, it has been
argued that some human resource reforms (particularly supportive supervision) can
garner effective political support, as politicians can easily understand the impact
of supervision on organizational function (52). Qualitative research in Benin and
Kenya found that weak or non-functioning management structures (particularly
supervision structures) were related to staff motivation and self-efficacy. Thus, if
management reforms respond to the perceived needs of staff on the ground, then
staff may embrace such reforms (33).
Emergency and special hiring procedures address health care worker postings in
rural areas without modifying existing legislation on hiring and transfer. These
temporary programmes have clear policy implications, as they have focused national
attention on professional human resource departments, routine HRH planning
and leadership development (58). Successful elements from the hiring programmes
(recruitment from rural areas, special financial incentives) may be incorporated into
permanent policies.
4. Policy options
The following policy options are suggested to address the challenges surrounding
P&T, particularly irrational P&T.
Policy option 1
Improve health worker deployment as a core system function
Policy option 2
Introduce direct accountability to communities around the deployment
of health workers
Rather than looking at deployment only as a top-down function, this policy option
aims to engage existing decentralized and local governance mechanisms that are
accountable to local communities in the local deployment and, where relevant,
monitoring of health workers. As described, many of the top-down efforts to reform
P&T and the public sector more broadly have faced significant resistance. Bottom-up
community monitoring and accountability approaches address some of the intractable
determinants of irrational P&T. For example, village health committees, facility
committees, locally elected officials and other entities can be engaged in addressing
absenteeism and other P&T-related concerns. Health systems should be accountable to
people for the delivery of responsive, equitable services, and communities should have
a say in who serves them.
Policy option 3
Work with national and provincial/state labour departments, public or civil
service commissions and other related bodies
As noted, policies regarding public sector recruitment and P&T are often made
by labour authorities. In general, however, there is inadequate expertise about
5. Implementation considerations
There are few data about actual P&T practice, and in some cases, little transparency
about formal P&T policies. Effective HRH information systems would be the
most effective way of learning about the actual distribution of the workforce and
informing reforms. In the absence of such systems, national and subnational data
gathering may be advised in certain contexts. Data collection is challenging due
to the hidden nature of prevailing practices. Partly for this reason, bottom-up
approaches may be particularly appropriate.
In some contexts, actual P&T practice may be linked to political factors and not
openly discussed. Any efforts at assessing the situation and proposing reform will
need to navigate these challenges.
HRH-related strategies and programmes are important areas for addressing P&T.
Depending on the context, anticorruption strategies, community participation
strategies, broad public sector reform efforts and other development initiatives may
need to explicitly engage the actual dynamics of P&T practice.
Acknowledgements
1. Schaaf M, Freedman LP. Unmasking the open secret 11. Dolea C. Increasing access to health workers in
of posting and transfer practices in the health sector. remote and rural areas through improved retention.
Health policy and planning. 2015;30(1):121–30. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010 (http://
doi:10.1093/heapol/czt091. www.who.int/entity/hrh/migration/hmr_expert_
meeting_dolea.pdf, accessed 2 December 2016).
2. La Forgia G, Raha S, Maheshwari SK, Ali R. Parallel
systems and human resource management in India’s 12. Abimbola S, Olanipekun T, Schaaf M, Negin J, Jan S,
public health services: a view from the front lines. Martiniuk AL. Where there is no policy: governing the
World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series posting and transfer of primary health care workers
No. 6953. World Bank, South Asia Region, Health, in Nigeria. International Journal of Health Planning
Nutrition and Population Unit; 2014 (https://papers. and Management. 2016. doi:10.1002/hpm.2356.
ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2460116, PMID:27144643.
accessed 28 November 2016).
13. Sheikh K, Freedman L, Ghaffar A, Marchal B, el-Jardali
3. Blunt P, Turner M, Lindroth H. Patronage’s progress F, McCaffery J et al. Posting and transfer: key to
in post-Soeharto Indonesia. Public Administration and fostering trust in government health services. Human
Development. 2012;32:64–81. doi:10.1002/pad.617. Resources for Health. 2015;13(1):1. doi:10.1186/
s12960-015-0080-9.
4. Garimella S, Sheikh K. 013: Workforce governance:
reflections on the role of postings and transfers 14. Lewis M, Pettersson G. Governance in health care
at the primary health care level. BMJ Open. delivery: raising performance. Policy Research
2015;5(Suppl. 1). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015- Working Paper No. 5074. Washington (DC):
forum2015abstracts.13. World Bank; 2009 (http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/
abs/10.1596/1813-9450-5074, accessed
5. Harris D, Wales J, Jones H, Rana T, Chitrakar RL. 28 November 2016).
Human resources for health in Nepal: the politics
of access in remote areas. Overseas Development 15. Wade R. The market for public office: why the
Institute; 2013 (https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/ Indian state is not better at development. World
files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8329.pdf, Development. 1985;13(4):467–97. doi:10.1016/0305-
accessed 28 November 2016). 750X(85)90052-X.
6. Sakyi DE. A retrospective content analysis of studies 16. Mkoka DA, Mahiti GR, Kiwara A, Mwangu M,
on factors constraining the implementation of health Goicolea I, Hurtig AK. “Once the government
sector reform in Ghana. International Journal of employs you, it forgets you”: health workers’ and
Health Planning and Management. 2008;23(3):259– managers’ perspectives on factors influencing
85. doi:10.1002/hpm.947. working conditions for provision of maternal health
care services in a rural district of Tanzania. Human
7. Shemdoe A, Mbaruku G, Dillip A, Bradley S, William Resources for Health. 2015;13(1):77. doi:10.1186/
J, Wason D et al. Explaining retention of healthcare s12960-015-0076-5. PMID:26369663.
workers in Tanzania: moving on, coming to “look,
see and go”, or stay? Human Resources for Health. 17. Rao KD, Ramani S, Murthy S, Hazarika I,
2016;14(1):1. doi:10.1186/s12960-016-0098-7. Khandpur N, Chokshi M et al. Health worker
attitudes toward rural service in India: results
8. Wurie HR, Samai M, Witter S. Retention of health from qualitative research. Health, Nutrition and
workers in rural Sierra Leone: findings from life Population (HNP) Discussion Paper. Washington
histories. Human Resources for Health. 2016;14(3):3. (DC): World Bank; 2010 (http://documents.
doi:10.1186/s12960-016-0099-6. PMID:26833070. worldbank.org/curated/en/211711468044089576/
pdf/580190WP01PUBL1ral0service0in0India.pdf,
9. Lindelow M, Serneels P. The performance of health accessed 28 November 2016).
workers in Ethiopia: results from qualitative research.
Social Science and Medicine. 2006;62(9):2225– 18. Bonenberger M, Aikins M, Akweongo P, Wyss
35. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.015. K. The effects of health worker motivation and
PMID:16309805. job satisfaction on turnover intention in Ghana: a
cross-sectional study. Human Resources for Health.
10. Ramani S, Rao KD, Ryan M, Vujicic M, Berman P. For 2014;12(43):43. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-12-43.
more than love or money: attitudes of student and PMID:25106497.
in-service health workers towards rural service in
India. Human Resources for Health. 2013;11(1):58. 19. Thu NTH, Wilson A, McDonald F. Motivation or
doi:10.1186/1478-4491-11-58. PMID:24261330. demotivation of health workers providing maternal
health services in rural areas in Vietnam: findings
from a mixed-methods study. Human Resources
for Health. 2015;13(1):91. doi:10.1186/s12960-015-
0092-5.
22. McCourt W. Public management in developing 33. Mathauer I, Imhoff I. Health worker motivation in
countries: from downsizing to governance. Africa: the role of non-financial incentives and human
Public Management Review. 2008;10(4):467–79. resource management tools. Human Resources for
doi:10.1080/14719030802263897. Health. 2006;4(1):24. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-4-24.
PMID:16939644.
23. Moynihan DP. Ambiguity in policy lessons: the
agencification experience. Public Administration. 34. Global Strategy on Human Resources for
2006;84(4):1029–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467- Health: Workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health
9299.2006.00625.x. Organization; 2015 (http://who.int/hrh/resources/pub_
globstrathrh-2030/en/, accessed 30 November 2016).
24. Sulle A. The application of new public management
doctrines in the developing world: an exploratory study 35. Siddiqi S, Masud TI, Nishtar S, Peters DH, Sabri B,
of the autonomy and control of executive agencies Bile KM et al. Framework for assessing governance of
in Tanzania. Public Administration and Development. the health system in developing countries: gateway
2010;30(5):345–54. doi:10.1002/pad.580. to good governance. Health Policy. 2009;90(1):13–25.
doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.08.005. PMID:18838188.
25. 2014/2015 Budget Support in Tanzania. Global
Budget Support Group; 2015 (http://www.tzdpg. 36. UNDESA, UNDP, UNESCO. UN System Task Team on
or.tz/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/Budget_ the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Governance and
Support_in_Tanzania_2014-2015.pdf, accessed 28 development: thematic think piece. New York: United
November 2016). Nations; 2012 (http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
pdf/Think%20Pieces/7_governance.pdf, accessed 2
26. 2013 annual review of the general budget support. December 2016).
Dar es Salaam: United Republic of Tanzania
Ministry of Finance; 2013 (http://www.tzdpg.or.tz/ 37. Government told to transfer doctors again.
fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/GBS_Annual_ News18 India, 14 September 2011 (http://www.
Review_2013_Final_Report_-__TROIKA_approval.pdf, news18.com/news/india/government-told-to-transfer-
accessed 28 November 2016). doctors-again-400490.html, accessed
28 November 2016).
27. The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic
of Sri Lanka: revised edition, 2015. Parliament 38. Lodenstein E, Dieleman M, Gerretsen B, Broerse
Secretariat; 2015 (https://www.parliament.lk/files/pdf/ JE. A realist synthesis of the effect of social
constitution.pdf, accessed accountability interventions on health service
28 November 2016). providers’ and policymakers’ responsiveness.
Systematic Reviews. 2013;2(1):98. doi:10.1186/2046-
28. McCourt W. The merit system and integrity in the 4053-2-98. PMID:24199936.
public service. Development Economics and Public
Policy Working Paper Series: Working Paper 20. 39. Banerjee A, Duflo E. Addressing absence. Journal
Manchester: Institute for Policy Development and of Economic Perspectives. 2006;20(1):117–32.
Management; 2007 (http://cedo.ina.pt/docbweb/ doi:10.1257/089533006776526139. PMID:19169425.
MULTIMEDIA/ASSOCIA/INTERNO/ELECTRON/E116.
PDF, accessed 28 November 2016). 40. Banerjee AV, Glennerster R, Duflo E. Putting a band-
aid on a corpse: incentives for nurses in the Indian
29. McCourt W. The human factor in governance: public health care system. Journal of the European
managing public employees in Africa and Asia. Economic Association. 2008;6(2–3):487–500.
Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006. ISBN:978-0- doi:10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.2-3.487. PMID:20182650.
230-20830-8.
41. Bjorkman M, Svensson J. Power to the people:
30. Bana A, McCourt W. Institutions and governance: evidence from a randomized field experiment on
public staff management in Tanzania. Public community-based monitoring in Uganda. Quarterly
Administration and Development. 2006;26:395–407. Journal of Economics. 2009;124(May):735–69.
doi:10.1002/pad.423. doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.735.
45. Brinkerhoff DW. Accountability and health systems: 54. O’Neil M, Jarrah Z, Nkosi L, Collins D, Perry C,
toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Jackson J et al. Evaluation of Malawi’s Emergency
Policy and Planning. 2004;19(6):371–9. doi:10.1093/ Human Resources Programme. Cambridge, MA:
heapol/czh052. PMID:15459162. Department for International Development; 2010
(http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/media/
46. Gilson L. Trust and the development of health news/2010/Malawi_MSH_MSC_EHRP_Final.pdf,
care as a social institution. Social Science and accessed 28 November 2016).
Medicine. 2003;56(7):1453–68. doi:10.1016/S0277-
9536(02)00142-9. PMID:12614697. 55. Zurn P, Codjia L, Sall FL, Braichet J-M. How to recruit
and retain health workers in underserved areas: the
47. McGee R. Government responsiveness: a think Senegalese experience. Bulletin of the World Health
piece for the Making All Voices Count programme. Organization. 2010;88(5):386–9. doi:10.1590/S0042-
Brighton, United Kingdom: Institute of Development 96862010000500017.
Studies; 2014 (https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/
opendocs/bitstream/handle/123456789/11582/ 56. Frelick G, Mameja, J. A health workforce “innovative
Think_Piece_on_Government_Responsiveness. approaches and promising practices” study –
pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y, accessed strategy for the rapid start-up of the HIV/AIDS
28 November 2016). program in Namibia: outsourcing the recruitment and
management of human resources for health. Chapel
48. Waters KP, Zuber A, Willy RM, Kiriinya RN, Waudo Hill, NC: Capacity Project; 2006 (http://pdf.usaid.
AN, Oluoch T et al. Kenya’s health workforce gov/pdf_docs/Pnadi803.pdf, accessed 28 November
information system: a model of impact on 2016).
strategic human resources policy, planning and
management. International Journal of Medical 57. Adano U. The health worker recruitment and
Informatics. 2013;82(9):895–902. doi:10.1016/j. deployment process in Kenya: an emergency hiring
ijmedinf.2013.06.004. PMID:23871121. program. Human Resources for Health. 2008;6(19).
doi:10.1186/1478-4491-6-19.
49. Badr E, Mohamed NA, Afzal MM, Bile KM.
Strengthening human resources for health through 58. Fogarty L, Mungai K, Adano U, Chirchir B. Evaluation
information, coordination and accountability of a rapid workforce expansion strategy: the Kenya
mechanisms: the case of the Sudan. Bulletin of the Emergency Hiring Plan. USAID; 2009 (http://pdf.usaid.
World Health Organization. 2013;91(11):868–73. gov/pdf_docs/Pdacp834.pdf, accessed 28 November
doi:10.2471/BLT.13.118950. PMID:24347712. 2016).
50. Hastings SE, Armitage GD, Mallinson S, Jackson 59. Andrews M, Pritchett L, Woolcock M. Escaping
K, Suter E. Exploring the relationship between capability traps through problem driven iterative
governance mechanisms in healthcare and adaptation (PDIA). World Development. 2013;51:234–
health workforce outcomes: a systematic review. 44. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.05.011.
BMC Health Services Research. 2014;14(1):479.
doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-479. PMID:25280467. 60. Saini NK, Sharma R, Roy R, Verma R. What impedes
working in rural areas? A study of aspiring doctors in
51. Riley PL, Zuber A, Vindigni SM, Gupta N, Verani the National Capital Region, India. Rural and Remote
AR, Sunderland NL et al. Information systems on Health. 2012;12(1967):1–7 (http://www.rrh.org.au/
human resources for health: a global review. Human publishedarticles/article_print_1967.pdf, accessed
Resources for Health. 2012;10(7):7. doi:10.1186/1478- 28 November 2016).
4491-10-7. PMID:22546089.
Abstract
This chapter provides empirical evidence on factors associated with spatial
variations in the supply of and demand for outpatient physicians in Germany.
There are substantial district-level differences in physician–population ratios
within the country, with higher physician densities evident in urban areas
and other favoured locations, for example close to the Alps. Statistical links to
both demand-side factors (population, morbidity and financial incentives) and
supply-side factors (health care system, cultural variety, labour and economy,
attractiveness, and infrastructure) are examined.
The results presented in this chapter could only be achieved due to the
availability and accessibility of a broad range of data in Germany. A further
and essential improvement of evidence is possible if more disaggregated data
on physicians (for example, geographical or demographic data) were made
accessible in the public domain.
• Financial resources are drawn from the financing system by overfulfilled health
care needs in urban areas (supplier-induced demand; oversupply).
• The corresponding shortage of health care professionals may cause health care
needs to be unmet in rural or remote areas (undersupply).
This may also affect the equity principle of many health care systems, if the rural
population contributes the same share of their income as the urban population to the
financing system but has less access to physicians.
From these theoretical findings, two common measures – both adopted in Germany
– are derived that governments or regulatory bodies can take to counteract the
geographical differences in physician–population ratios. One measure is to implement
a regulatory system to control the number of practices, or the establishment of new
practices, in defined locations. If a certain threshold in the physician–population ratio
is reached, no additional practices are allowed in that location. The second measure is
to incentivize physicians to work in areas with low physician–population ratios, either
by reimbursement schemes specific to those areas or by financial support for opening
new offices. (In Germany, these latter measures are not applied nationwide, but are
rather implemented at lower administrative or non-governmental levels.) For both
measures to be properly implemented, it is necessary to know if the extent of spatial
variation in physician numbers corresponds to the variations in population numbers
(“demand-side factors”), and to what extent “supply-side factors” representing
physicians’ geographical preferences shape the spatial distribution of physicians.
Empirical analyses can provide this information, focusing on revealed preferences of
physicians (that is, observing their actual behaviour).
1.2 Methods
The present chapter analyses the association of physician–population ratio with several
factors on both the demand side and the supply side in Germany. The German health
care system is based on the Bismarckian system of compulsory health care insurance.
This statutory insurance covers the health care services of roughly 90% of the German
population. Only persons with higher income, entrepreneurs and federal employees are
allowed to be privately insured. In contrast to most other health care systems, specialized
and general ambulatory health care services in Germany are mainly provided by office-
based physicians. Only emergency and highly specialized ambulatory services (for
In the statistical model, a variety of variables were used to explain the differences
in the geographical distribution of GPs and specialist doctors in 2010. They
were combined with the findings in the literature under the topics “population”,
“morbidity” and “financial incentives” for the demand-side factors; and “health
Since 1993, the permission to open a practice within a certain area has been
regulated by 17 Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (ASHIPs)1
within each of the 16 states of Germany (North Rhine-Westphalia is covered by
two ASHIPs). For each of the country’s 412 districts (which represent the second
smallest administrative level), a physician supply rate is calculated as the current
physician–population ratio in relation to the baseline ratio in 1990 (specialists)
or 1995 (general physicians). A time constant ratio between physicians and
population therefore corresponds to a supply rate of 100%.
The average supply rate in Germany was 126.5% for all groups of
physicians in 2010, with a minimum of 93.0% for general practitioners in
Saxony-Anhalt, and a maximum of 266.2% for surgeons in Mecklenburg,
Western Pomerania (7).
Source: Author presentation based on data from the federal ASHIP, 2010.
2. Findings
2.1.1 Population
The population density (defined as persons per km2) is the most basic proxy for the
demand for health care services in a district, as one can assume an increasing need
for health care services with an increasing number of inhabitants in a district. The
respective densities of GPs and specialists show strong associations with the population
density of a district. While the results from the specialist model suggest a positive
correlation with the population density, GP density seems to be negatively associated
with population density, contradicting the theoretical assumption of higher GP density
in more densely populated areas. In all models, significant interactions are changing
the coefficient of the population density substantially. This means that the association
between physician–population ratio and population density differs according to
whether a city is present in a district or not. Where no cities are present, the GP density
decreases while specialist density increases with increasing population density. Where
cities are present, population density has nearly no effect on the physician–population
ratio. These findings might suggest that specialist density and the specialist–GP ratio
increase and GP density decreases with increasing population density until some level
of urbanization is reached.
Health care institutions play different roles in the possible attractiveness of a district
for physicians. Hospitals often serve as education centres in the last stage of medical
training, which coincides for many physicians with the stage in life in which they
start a family. Medical institutions such as hospitals can also serve as centres for
medical networks and collegial exchange of knowledge. It is not possible to separate
the effects of health care institutions, but the number of hospital beds was found
to be highly associated with the number of outpatient physicians in a district.
University hospitals were not significantly associated with a higher density of GPs
and specialists; nor was the number of nursing home beds.
2.2.2 Culture
Other than the higher population density, urban areas tend to offer a broader
spectrum of cultural facilities and activities that might meet the preferences of
physicians. The analysis included the number of middle-order centres (defined
as cities providing specialist doctors, shopping malls, cinemas, hospitals, public
swimming pools and legal counsellors) and high-order centres (defined as
cities additionally providing special shops, specialist hospitals, and cultural,
educational and administrative institutions) as well as state capitals. The results
show an increasing effect of the cultural variables, with the strongest effect for
state capitals. This result is more clearly defined in the model for specialists.
Although the cultural variables are not defined in terms of population density,
there are some correlations.
2.2.4 Attractiveness
Besides the culture and economy of a district, there might be other factors representing
its attractiveness to physicians. For example, a higher touristic attractiveness, measured
by the number of guest-nights in tourist enterprises per capita, might represent the
recreational value of a district. Building area prices and migration balances capture
other aspects of a district’s attractiveness. However, these factors show only minor
associations with the physician–population ratio, with touristic attractiveness being
positively correlated with GP density, and the migration balance of the past five years
positively associated with specialist density. Building area attractiveness and the
migration balance of the past 10 years show no significant effect.
2.2.5 Infrastructure
The final category of supply-side factors representing physicians’ preference for their
practice location consists of variables depicting the infrastructure. The variables
concerning travel times to the nearest high-speed train station, airport, middle-
order centre and high-order centre indicate how well a district is connected to other
districts offering more of the above described characteristics. The travel time to the
nearest middle-order centre is negatively associated with physician–population ratio
(especially for specialists), indicating that a shorter travel time coincides with more
physicians. The travel time to the nearest airport is only significant for the number of
2.3 Summary
In summary, the findings provide some evidence that a higher density of physicians
per 100 000 population can be found in districts with a higher population density
per km2. As we have controlled for factors associated with physicians’ geographical
preferences, a relevant part of the differences in physician–population ratios can be
solely explained by differences in patient demand. Compared to the density of GPs,
the density of specialists is generally more strongly associated with the population
density and other variables describing an urbanized district. For example, a higher
household income and a higher travel time to the next middle-order centre indicate a
higher density of specialists in comparison to the population parameters alone. These
results support the hypothesis that a higher density of specialists is associated with
urban districts than is the case for the density of GPs. Box 3 summarizes the factors
showing a significant association with physician–population ratio.
There are several limitations that need to be considered when interpreting the results.
Importantly, although the results represent a complete survey of German outpatient
physicians, no causal interpretations can be made, as the analyses were carried out
using cross-sectional data. Not all the data used in the model were available for the
same year. However, the maximum difference is one year, and it is assumed that no
drastic changes of the independent variables occurred within this short period of
time. Finally, districts are politically administered units, and district sizes vary widely
in different states. Therefore, homogeneity of the explaining variables may be smaller
in larger districts, reducing effect sizes and leading to an underestimation of the
coefficient sizes.
Specialists
Strong • Population density (+)
• Number of hospital beds (+)
• State capital (+)
Moderate • Travel time to middle-order centre (–)
• City in district (+)
• Unemployment rate (+)
• Share of privately insured patients (+)
• Rate of highly qualified employment opportunities (+)
Weak • Household income (+)
• Number of middle-order centres (–)
• Migration balance, five years (+)
• Number of high-order centres (+)
Besides the regulatory planning mechanism, there may be other factors limiting
the transferability of the above results to other countries. In Germany, the health
insurance system leaves the possibility for doctors to provide health care for privately
insured persons, which shows a weak to moderate association with physician–
population ratio. In addition, many explanatory variables may be fundamentally
3. Discussion
3.1.1 Education
The primary institutions for the education of physicians in Germany are university
hospitals and cooperating teaching hospitals. Outpatient training lasts four weeks
for specialists and GPs, and further general practitioner training is optional for
older GPs. As university hospitals did not show a significant association with the
number of physicians per 100 000 inhabitants, bringing those major education
centres closer to rural areas might not be an effective measure to decrease
geographical imbalances in Germany. However, the observed moderate to strong
effect of the number of hospital beds on physician–population ratio might also
be due to the number of beds in teaching hospitals (roughly one third of German
hospitals other than university hospitals), indicating some association between
a higher number of physicians in areas where training takes place. In Germany,
a rural background is not a criterion in medical student selection and there are
no mandatory internships in rural areas as part of the curricula. However, there
There is mixed evidence regarding the effect of the German regulatory system and
planning mechanism. Population density, the main parameter in the first phase
of the planning process, shows the expected positive association with specialist
density, but a negative association with GP density. The old-age dependency
ratio, introduced as an additional parameter when the planning mechanism was
reformed, does not show a significant association with GP and specialist density.
These findings might indicate that the effectiveness of regulatory interventions
can only be measured in the long term, as it takes time for the disparities that have
arisen to disappear.
The association between the number of privately insured persons and the respective
GP and specialist densities may be interpreted as the effect of financial incentives
on the decision of practice location. As reimbursement of health services for
privately insured persons is higher than for statutory health insurance, this can be
seen as an example of higher income attracting more physicians. Nevertheless, the
association is moderate and weak, indicating that financial incentives in the form
of additional income may need to be very high to overcome physicians’ preferences
for urban areas and attract them to practise in rural areas. This interpretation is
supported by findings from Günther et al. (2). In their study, physicians were given
the choice between a practice location with a monthly income of US$ 6600, two
on-call duties, on-site career opportunities for the partner as well as child care
and leisure activities, and a practice location in the same area but with 30 minutes
travel time to a location providing those opportunities. The results indicate that
physicians would have to be compensated by an additional US$ 11 938 per month
to opt for the second choice.
The findings of the present analysis indicate that supply-side as well as demand-
side factors are associated with physician–population ratio. The parameters
included in the German planning mechanism for outpatient physicians do not
seem significant. This might be due to the long time it takes newly introduced
regulatory systems to overcome historically derived geographical imbalances,
especially if no relocation of physicians takes place. The findings also indicate that
professional and especially personal support might help to increase the number
of physicians in underserved areas. Education centres such as university hospitals
do not seem to be associated with a higher physician–population ratio, but no
conclusions can be drawn concerning other educational interventions, for example,
choosing a rural background as a selection criterion for medical students, as these
interventions have not been adopted as policies.
The present analysis was only possible due to the availability of a broad range of
data. Federal ASHIPs were able to provide detailed numbers on GPs and specialists,
and the INKAR data set provided measures from a wide field of variables that are
potentially linked with physician–population ratio. However, the evidence could be
improved substantially if more spatial demographic data on physicians were made
accessible to science and the public. In particular, data on the age of physicians
would allow analysis on future shortages caused by retirement, and potential changes
in retirement patterns could be assessed and influenced by targeted support for older,
pre-retirement doctors.
1. Brooks RG, Walsh M, Mardon RE, Lewis M, Clawson 11. Kistemann T, Schröer MA. Kleinräumige kassenärztliche
A. The roles of nature and nurture in the recruitment Versorgung und subjektives Standortwahlverhalten von
and retention of primary care physicians in rural Vertragsärzten in einem überversorgten Planungsgebiet
areas: a review of the literature. Academic Medicine. [Small-scale care by SHI physicians and their subjective
2002;77(8):790–8. PMID:12176692. choice of location within an oversupplied planning
area]. Gesundheitswesen. 2007;69(11):593–600.
2. Günther OH, Kürstein B, Riedel-Heller SG, König HH. PMID:18080930 (in German).
The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the
choice of practice establishment: a stated preference 12. Bevölkerung: Kreise, Stichtag, Geschlecht, Altersgruppen
study of young physicians in Germany. Health Services [Population: areas, date, sex, age groups]. Federal
Research. 2010;45(1):212–29. doi:10.1111/j.1475- Statistical Office; 2013 (https://www.govdata.de/web/
6773.2009.01045.x. PMID:19780851. guest/daten/-/details/destatis-service-12411-0017,
accessed 14 January 2017).
3. Young A. Inequality, the urban-rural gap, and migration.
Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2013;128(4):1727–85. 13. Sundmacher L, Ozegowski S. Regional distribution of
doi:10.1093/qje/qjt025. physicians: the role of comprehensive private health
insurance in Germany. European Journal of Health
4. Sander N. Internal migration in Germany, 1995–2010: Economics. 2016;17(4):443–51. doi:10.1007/s10198-
new insights into east-west migration and re- 015-0691-z.
urbanisation. Comparative Population Studies.
2014:39(2):217–46. doi:10.12765/CPoS-2014-04en. 14. INKAR 2011: Indikatoren und Karten zur Raum- und
Stadtentwicklung Ausgabe 2011 [Indicators and maps
5. Richardson JR, Peacock SJ. Supplier-induced demand: for spatial and urban development]. Bundesinstitut für
reconsidering the theories and new Australian Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR) [CD-ROM].
evidence. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2011 (in German).
2006;5(2):87–98. PMID:16872250.
15. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über
6. van Dijk CE, van den Berg B, Verheij RA, Spreeuwenberg die Bedarfsplanung sowie die Maßstäbe zur Feststellung
P, Groenewegen PP, de Bakker DH. Moral hazard von Überversorgung und Unterversorgung in der
and supplier-induced demand: empirical evidence in vertragsärztlichen Versorgung: Bedarfsplanungs-Richtlinie
general practice. Health Economics. 2013;22(3):340–52. Stand: 16. Juni 2016 [Announcement of the decision
doi:10.1002/hec.2801. PMID:22344712. of the Joint Federal Committee on the revision of the
directive regarding demand planning and measures
7. Klose J, Rehbein I. Ärzteatlas 2011: Daten zur to assess oversupply and undersupply in contract
Versorgungsdichte von Vertragsärzten [Map of medical care: demand planning directive, 16 June 2016]
physicians 2011: data on the density of SHI-doctors]. (https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-1249/BPL-
Berlin: Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK; 2011 (in RL_2016-06-16_iK-2016-09-15.pdf, accessed 19 January
German). 2017) (in German).
8. Roick C, Heider D, Günther OH, Kürstein B, Riedel-Heller 16. Ono T, Schoenstein M, Buchan J. Geographic
SG, König HH. Was ist künftigen Hausärzten bei der imbalances in doctor supply and policy responses. OECD
Niederlassungsentscheidung wichtig? Ergebnisse einer Health Working Papers No. 69. Paris: Organisation
postalischen Befragung junger Ärzte in Deutschland for Economic Co-operation and Development;
[Factors influencing the decision to establish a 2014 (http://www.recruitandretain.eu/uploads123/
primary care practice: results from a postal survey of OECDDoctordistribution_April_2014.pdf, accessed 15
young physicians in Germany]. Gesundheitswesen. January 2017).
2012;74(1):12–20. PMID:21161878 (in German).
17. Paul KI, Moser K. Unemployment impairs mental
9. Kazanjian A, Pagliccia N. Key factors in physicians’ health: meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior.
choice of practice location: findings from a survey 2009;74(3):264–82. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.001.
of practitioners and their spouses. Health and Place.
1996;2(1):27–34. 18. Hergenrather KC, Zeglin R, McGuire-Kuletz M, Rhodes
SD. Employment as a social determinant of health: a
10. Breyer F, Mühlenkamp H, Adam H. Determinants of systematic review of longitudinal studies exploring the
the utilization of physician services in the system of relationship between employment status and physical
statutory health insurance in Germany. In: Graf von health. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education.
der Schulenburg J-M, editor. Essays in social security 2015;29(1):2–26.
economics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1986.
19. Increasing access to health workers in remote and
rural areas through improved retention: global policy
recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2010 (http://www.who.int/hrh/retention/guidelines/en/,
accessed 15 January 2017).
Standard
Metric variables by topic Mean deviation Minimum Maximum
Dependent
Density of GPs (per 10 000 inhabitants) 6.32 0.99 1.52 12.58
Density of specialists
3.14 1.35 0.51 8.99
(per 10 000 inhabitants)
Ratio GPs–specialists 2.30 0.99 0.75 12.80
Demand/need factors
Population
Population density (per km2) 518.68 674.91 37.09 4 355.28
Morbidity
Old-age dependency ratio 32.14 4.22 22.03 45.53
Life expectancy women (from 60 years) 25.08 0.63 23.10 27.10
Life expectancy men (from 60 years) 21.56 0.94 19.40 24.60
Mortality (deaths per 1000 inhabitants) 10.91 1.59 6.90 15.40
Financial incentives
Household income (in £, per month) 1 548.93 199.31 1 157.90 2 585.00
Rate of privately insured persons (%) 13.46 4.32 3.53 27.00
Control factors
Health care system
No. of hospital beds
64.49 38.70 0.00 215.90
(per 10 000 inhabitants)
No. of nursing home beds
108.94 28.83 47.10 256.60
(per 10 000 inhabitants)
Cultural
No. of middle-order centres 2.24 2.16 0.00 11.00
No. of high-order centres 0.39 0.56 0.00 4.00
Standard
Metric variables by topic Mean deviation Minimum Maximum
Labour/economy
Unemployment rate (%) 7.41 3.31 1.90 17.40
Rate of highly qualified workers (%) 8.23 3.80 3.00 26.50
GDP per capita (in 1000£) 27.58 10.24 13.20 83.60
Attractiveness
Touristic attractiveness 5.27 7.56 0.00 90.60
Building area attractiveness 125.47 117.34 0.00 1 031.80
Migration balance (past 10 years) 4.54 46.13 –171.40 100.30
Migration balance (past 5 years) –3.98 21.85 –69.80 61.80
Infrastructure
Travel time to airport 54.41 24.11 7.60 161.50
Travel time to high-speed train station 22.36 14.42 0.00 61.60
Travel time to middle-order centre 8.26 6.40 0.00 36.60
Travel time to high-order centre 26.56 17.83 0.00 76.20
Binary variables Frequency Percentage
Cultural
State capital 16/412 3.88
City > 100 000 inhabitants 68/412 16.50
Health care system
University hospital 33/412 8.01
Infrastructure
District in former East Germany 86/412 20.87
Urban district 206/412 50.00
Ratio
General physicians Specialists GPs–specialists
Coefficients
by topic Estimate p-value Estimate p-value Estimate p-value
Intercept 1.736 0.000*** 1.919 0.000*** –0.178 0.003**
Population
Population density
–0.136 0.005** 0.349 0.000*** –0.453 0.000***
(per km2) (z-score)
Financial incentives
Household income
0.018 0.255 0.093 0.001** –0.088 0.001**
(z-score)
Share of privately
insured persons 0.042 0.008** 0.123 0.000*** –0.063 0.033*
(z-score)
Health care
No. of hospital beds
0.073 0.000*** 0.253 0.000*** –0.206 0.000***
(z-score)
Cultural
No. of middle-order
–0.005 0.703 –0.074 0.004** 0.052 0.038*
centres (z-score)
No. of high-order
0.036 0.003** 0.057 0.022* –0.022 0.336
centres (z-score)
City in district
–0.021 0.476 0.146 0.005** –0.140 0.008**
(binary)
State capital in
0.127 0.000*** 0.278 0.000*** –0.096 0.244
district (binary)
Labour/economy
Rate of highly
qualified workers 0.019 0.264 0.106 0.001** –0.099 0.001**
(z-score)
Unemployment
0.052 0.064 0.139 0.006** –0.073 0.142
rate (z-score)
Attractiveness
Touristic
attractiveness 0.046 0.000*** –0.004 0.861 0.036 0.116
(z-score)
Migration balance
(past 5 years) –0.012 0.478 0.072 0.025* –0.113 0.000***
(z-score)
Ratio
General physicians Specialists GPs–specialists
Coefficients
by topic Estimate p-value Estimate p-value Estimate p-value
Infrastructure
Travel time to the
nearest airport 0.049 0.000*** 0.021 0.420 0.016 0.548
(z-score)
Travel time to
middle-order –0.064 0.007** –0.177 0.000*** 0.115 0.004**
centre (z-score)
Interactions
Population density:
0.099 0.044* –0.422 0.000*** 0.464 0.000***
city in district
GoF measures
Sigma (global
–8.177 0.000*** –3.763 0.000*** –3.892 0.000***
deviance)
BIC-score
3 260 4 125 3 979
first model
BIC-score
3 162 3 828 3 751
final model
An Evidence Base
Health Employment and Economic Growth
Powerful demographic and economic forces are shaping health The 17 chapters
workforce needs and demands worldwide. in this book, are
grouped into
An Evidence Base
Effectively addressing growing population need and economic four parts:
demand for health workers stands as one of our foremost
global challenges. It also represents an opportunity to secure • Health workforce
a future that is healthy, peaceful, and prosperous. dynamics
Edited by
The contents of this book give direction and detail to a richer • Economic value James Buchan
and more holistic understanding of the health workforce and investment
through the presentation of new evidence and solutions- Ibadat S. Dhillon
focused analysis. It sets out, under one cover, a series of • Education and
production
James Campbell
research studies and papers that were commissioned to
provide evidence for the High-Level Commission on Health
Employment and Economic Growth. • Addressing
inefficiencies
“An essential read that rightfully places investments in health workforce at the heart
of the SDG Agenda.”
— Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief
The Lancet
Campbell
Dhillon
Buchan
work in health.”
— H.R.H. Princess Muna al-Hussein,
Princess of Jordan
“An important book for those who would like to understand the role, relevance
and contribution of health workforce in health and development, including faculty
and students in medical and public health schools; and implementers, programme
managers and policy-decision-makers in the national governments and global health”
— Dr Abdul Ghaffar, Executive Director
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO