(IELTS) Learning Notes #5
(IELTS) Learning Notes #5
com/hqo-ytxn-zns
Lesson #41
READING
SAVING THE SOIL
More than a third of the Earth’s top layer is at risk. Is there hope for our
planet’s most precious resource?
A
More than a third of the world’s soil is endangered, according to a
recent UN report. If we don’t slow the decline, all farmable soil could be
gone in 60 years. Since soil grows 95% of our food, and sustains human
life in other more surprising ways, that is a huge problem.
B
Peter Groffman, from the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in New
York, points out that soil scientists have been warning about the
degradation of the world’s soil for decades. At the same time, our
understanding of its importance to humans has grown. A single gram of
healthy soil might contain 100 million bacteria, as well as other
microorganisms such as viruses and fungi, living amid decomposing
plants and various minerals.
That means soils do not just grow our food, but are the source of nearly
all our existing antibiotics, and could be our best hope in the fight
against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Soil is also an ally against climate
change: as microorganisms within soil digest dead animals and plants,
they lock in their carbon content, holding three times the amount of
carbon as does the entire atmosphere. Soils also store water,
preventing flood damage: in the UK, damage to buildings, roads and
bridges from floods caused by soil degradation costs £233 million every
year.
C
If the soil loses its ability to perform these functions, the human race
could be in big trouble. The danger is not that the soil will disappear
completely, but that the microorganisms that give it its special
properties will be lost. And once this has happened, it may take the soil
thousands of years to recover.
Agriculture is by far the biggest problem. In the wild, when plants grow
they remove nutrients from the soil, but then when the plants die and
decay these nutrients are returned directly to the soil. Humans tend not
to return unused parts of harvested crops directly to the soil to enrich
it, meaning that the soil gradually becomes less fertile. In the past we
developed strategies to get around the problem, such as regularly
varying the types of crops grown, or leaving fields uncultivated for a
season.
D
But these practices became inconvenient as populations grew and
agriculture had to be run on more commercial lines. A solution came in
the early 20th century with the Haber-Bosch process for manufacturing
ammonium nitrate. Farmers have been putting this synthetic fertiliser
on their fields ever since.
But over the past few decades, it has become clear this wasn’t such a
bright idea. Chemical fertilisers can release polluting nitrous oxide into
the atmosphere and excess is often washed away with the rain,
releasing nitrogen into rivers. More recently, we have found that
indiscriminate use of fertilisers hurts the soil itself, turning it acidic and
salty, and degrading the soil they are supposed to nourish.
E
One of the people looking for a solution to his problem is Pius Floris,
who started out running a tree-care business in the Netherlands, and
now advises some of the world’s top soil scientists. He came to realise
that the best way to ensure his trees flourished was to take care of the
soil, and has developed a cocktail of beneficial bacteria, fungi and
humus* to do this. Researchers at the University of Valladolid in Spain
recently used this cocktail on soils destroyed by years of fertiliser
overuse. When they applied Floris’s mix to the desert-like test plots, a
good crop of plants emerged that were not just healthy at the surface,
but had roots strong enough to pierce dirt as hard as rock. The few
plants that grew in the control plots, fed with traditional fertilisers, were
small and weak.
F
However, measures like this are not enough to solve the global soil
degradation problem. To assess our options on a global scale we first
need an accurate picture of what types of soil are out there, and the
problems they face. That’s not easy. For one thing, there is no agreed
international system for classifying soil. In an attempt to unify the
different approaches, the UN has created the Global Soil Map project.
Researchers from nine countries are working together to create a map
linked to a database that can be fed measurements from field surveys,
drone surveys, satellite imagery, land analyses and so on to provide
real-time data on the state of the soil. Within the next four years, they
aim to have mapped soils worldwide to a depth of 100 metres, with the
results freely accessible to all.
G
But this is only a first step. We need ways of presenting the problem that
bring it home to governments and the wider public, says Pamela Chasek
at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, in Winnipeg,
Canada. ‘Most scientists don’t speak language that policy-makers can
understand, and vice versa.’ Chasek and her colleagues have proposed
a goal of ‘zero net land degradation’. Like the idea of carbon neutrality,
it is an easily understood target that can help shape expectations and
encourage action.
For soils on the brink, that may be too late. Several researchers are
agitating for the immediate creation of protected zones for
endangered soils. One difficulty here is defining what these areas
should conserve: areas where the greatest soil diversity is present? Or
areas of unspoilt soils that could act as a future benchmark of quality?
Whatever we do, if we want our soils to survive, we need to take action
now.
Questions 14-17
Questions 18-21
Questions 22-26
WRITING
IELTS Writing Task 1: Table (cont.)
Exercise 1: The table below shows the number of temporary migrant
workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these
workers per 1,000 people in these countries in 2006.
SPEAKING
Speaking Part 2
1. Describe an occasion when someone or something was making lots
of noise.
You should say:
- When and where it happened.
- What you were doing.
- What/Who was making the noise.
- How it affected you.
2. Describe a time you made a complaint about something.
You should say:
- When it happened.
- Who you complained to.
- What you complained about.
- How it was solved.
3. Describe a time when you were very busy.
You should say:
- When it was.
- Why you were busy.
- What you did to deal with the situation.
- How you felt about it.
4. Describe a time you had to do something in a hurry.
You should say:
- What you had to do.
- Why you had to do it in a hurry.
- How well you did this.
- How you felt about it.
Lesson #43
READING
Motivational factors and the hospitality industry
Questions 27-31
Questions 32-35
Questions 36-40
WRITING
Writing Task 2: Discuss both views
I. Introduction
- People have different views about…/Individuals have varying opinions
on… Personally/In my view,...
- It is true that [background]. Although it can be argued that…, I believe/I
support…
II. Body 1
- Topic sentence:
+ The argument in favour of A would be that…
+ The advocates of A would argue that…
- Explanation:
+ To be more specific
+ In particular,...
- Example:
+ For example,...
+ To illustrate,...
+ For instance,...
+ To take X as an example,...
- Linking:
+ This means that…
+ As a result,...
+ Consequently,...
III. Body 2
- Topic sentence:
+ However, I would agree with those who believe that/the advocates
of B.
+ Despite the above argument, I would agree with…
+ On the other hand,...
- Explanation.
- Example.
- Linking.
IV. Conclusion
- In conclusion, [background]. There are good reasons why A, but in my
opinion, B.
[Sample essay]
Some people think that all university students should study whatever
they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study
subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to
science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own
opinion.
→ People have different views about how much choice students should have with regard
to what they can study at university. While some argue that it would be better for
students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able
to study the course of their choice.
There are various reasons why people believe that universities should
only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. They may assert that
university courses like medicine, engineering and information
technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees.
From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses
provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and
therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. On the
societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects,
governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the
economy are covered. Finally, a focus on technology in higher
education could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater
future prosperity.
In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students should be
free to choose their preferred areas of study. In my opinion, society will
benefit more if students are passionate about what they are learning.
Besides, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be
most useful to society in the future, and it may be that employers begin
to value creative thinking skills over practical or technical skills. If this
were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history and
philosophy than of science or technology.
In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus
only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system
in which people have the right to study whatever they like.
Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on
each other, while others think that people have become more
independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
SHEEPT
Society
Health/
Economy
E
Politics
Lesson #44
LISTENING
Questions 21 – 26
SPEAKING
Part 1:
● Crowded places.
● Being bored.
Part 2:
1. Describe a useful object that you cannot live without.
You should say:
- What it is.
- How long you have owned it for.
- What you use it for.
- Why you cannot live without it.
2. Describe a good advertisement that you think is useful.
You should say:
- When and where you saw it.
- What it was about.
- What was featured in the advertisement.
- Why you think it is useful.
Part 3:
● Technology & equipment.
● Advertising.
Lesson #45
READING
Alexander Henderson (1831-1913)
Early life
• was born in Scotland in 1831 – father was a 9 …………merchant………………
• trained as an accountant, emigrated to Canada in 1855
Start of a photographic career
• opened up a photographic studio in 1866
• took photos of city life, but preferred landscape photography
• people bought Henderson’s photos because photography took up
considerable time and the 10 ………equipment……………… was heavy
• the photographs Henderson sold were 11 ……………gifts……………… or
souvenirs
Travelling as a professional photographer
• travelled widely in Quebec and Ontario in 1870s and 1880s
• took many trips along eastern rivers in a 12……………canoe……………..
• worked for Canadian railways between 1875 and 1897
• worked for CPR in 1885 and photographed the 13 ……………
mountains……………… and the railway at Rogers Pass
WRITING
Writing Task 2: Opinion essay
Format
[Sample essay]
It is true that some celebrities are known for their glamorous lifestyles
rather than for the work they do. While I agree that these celebrities set
a bad example for children, I believe that other famous people act as
positive role models.
On the one hand, many people do achieve fame without really working
for it. They may have inherited money from parents, married a famous
or wealthy person, or they may have appeared in gossip magazines or
on a reality TV programme. A good example would be Paris Hilton, who
is rich and famous for the wrong reasons. She spends her time
attending parties and nightclubs, and her behaviour promotes the idea
that appearance, glamour and media profile are more important than
hard work and good character. The message to young people is that
success can be achieved easily, and that school work is not necessary.
On the other hand, there are at least as many celebrities whose
accomplishments make them excellent role models for young people.
Actors, musicians and sports stars become famous idols because they
have worked hard and applied themselves to develop real skills and
abilities. They demonstrate great effort, determination and
ambition, which is required for someone who wants to be truly
successful in their chosen field. An example is the actor and martial
artist Jackie Chan, who has become worldwide famous through years of
practice and hard work. This kind of self-made celebrity can inspire
children to develop their talents through application and perseverance.
(Add your own conclusion)
Notes: Pay close attention to every single piece of information in the
prompt.
Lesson #46
LISTENING
Questions 31 – 40
19th century
● For the first time, people’s possessions were used to measure Britain’s
31………wealth …….. .
● Developments in production of goods and in 32……technology…………
greatly changed lives.
Lesson #47
READING
Questions 14-20
Reading Passage 2 has nine paragraphs, A-I
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Write the correct letter, A-I, in boxes 14-20 on your answer sheet.
14 mention of factors driving a renewed interest in natural medicinal
compounds.C D
15 how recent technological advances have made insect research
easier H
16 examples of animals which use medicinal substances from nature A
17 reasons why it is challenging to use insects in drug research F
18 reference to how interest in drug research may benefit wildlife I G
19 a reason why nature-based medicines fell out of favour for a period
B
20 an example of an insect-derived medicine in use at the moment E
Questions 21-22
Choose TWO letters, A-E
Write the correct letters in boxes 21 and 22 on your answer sheet.
Which TWO of the following make insects interesting for drug research?
A the huge number of individual insects in the world
B the variety of substances insects have developed to protect
themselves
C the potential to extract and make use of insects’ genetic codes
D the similarities between different species of insect
E the manageable size of most insects
Questions 23-26
Complete the summary below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 23-26 on your answer sheet.
WRITING
Writing Task 1: Process
A. Layout
I. Introduction
The given chart/diagram (shows/describes/illustrates):
+ How X is made/manufactured/produced.
+ The process of making/manufacturing/producing X.
+ How to make/manufacture/produce X.
+ The manufacture/production of X.
II. Overview
- There are [number] main stages/steps in the process of producing X,
beginning with A and ending with B.
- The production involves [number] main steps, starting with A and
finishing with B.
III. Body 1 & 2
Separate the steps into two body paragraphs.
the first stage starts with gathering olives from trees/from farms
At the first stage, ripe olives are collected from gardens before being
taken to the factory where they are washed with cold water. Then, they
are rinsed and transferred through a conveyor belt to a smashing
machine, which separates the olive paste and stones.
Lesson #48
LISTENING
Questions 1 – 10
SPEAKING
Part 1:
● Geography.
● Gifts.
Part 2:
1. Describe an unusual holiday that you had.
You should say:
- When and where it was.
- What you did.
- Why it was unusual.
- How you felt about it.
2. Describe an important journey that was delayed.
You should say:
- When it was.
- Why it was important.
- How it was delayed.
- How you felt about it.
Part 3:
● Tourism, travelling, holidays.
● Transportation, travelling.
Lesson #49
READING
Chelsea Rochman, an ecologist at the University of California, Davis,
has been trying to answer a dismal question: Is everything terrible, or
are things just very, very bad?
Rochman is a member of the National Center for Ecological Analysis
and Synthesis’s marine-debris working group, a collection of scientists
who study, among other things, the growing problem of marine debris,
also known as ocean trash. Plenty of studies have sounded alarm bells
about the state of marine debris; in a recent paper published in the
journal Ecology, Rochman and her colleagues set out to determine how
many of those perceived risks are real.
Often, Rochman says, scientists will end a paper by speculating about
the broader impacts of what they’ve found. For example, a study could
show that certain seabirds eat plastic bags, and go on to warn that
whole bird populations are at risk of dying out. ‘But the truth was that
nobody had yet tested those perceived threats,’ Rochman says. ‘There
wasn’t a lot of information.’
Rochman and her colleagues examined more than a hundred papers
on the impacts of marine debris that were published through 2013.
Within each paper, they asked what threats scientists had studied – 366
perceived threats in all – and what they’d actually found.
In 83 percent of cases, the perceived dangers of ocean trash were
proven true. In the remaining cases, the working group found the
studies had weaknesses in design and content which affected the
validity of their conclusions – they lacked a control group, for example,
or used faulty statistics.
Strikingly, Rochman says, only one well-designed study failed to find the
effect it was looking for, an investigation of mussels ingesting
microscopic bits. The plastic moved from the mussels’ stomachs to their
bloodstreams, scientists found, and stayed there for weeks – but didn’t
seem to stress out the shellfish.
While mussels may be fine eating trash, though, the analysis also gave a
clearer picture of the many ways that ocean debris is bothersome.
Within the studies they looked at, most of the proven threats came from
plastic debris, rather than other materials like metal or wood. Most of
the dangers also involved large pieces of debris – animals getting
entangled in trash, for example, or eating it and severely injuring
themselves.
But a lot of ocean debris is ‘microplastic’, or pieces smaller than five
millimeters. These may be ingredients used in cosmetics and toiletries,
fibers shed by synthetic clothing in the wash, or eroded remnants of
larger debris. Compared to the number of studies investigating large-
scale debris, Rochman’s group found little research on the effects of
these tiny bits. ‘There are a lot of open questions still for microplastic,’
Rochman says, though she notes that more papers on the subject have
been published since 2013, the cutoff point for the group’s analysis.
There are also, she adds, a lot of open questions about the ways that
ocean debris can lead to sea-creature death. Many studies have looked
at how plastic affects an individual animal, or that animal’s tissues or
cells, rather than whole populations. And in the lab, scientists often use
higher concentrations of plastic than what’s really in the ocean. None of
that tells us how many birds or fish or sea turtles could die from plastic
pollution – or how deaths in one species could affect that animal’s
predators, or the rest of the ecosystem.
‘We need to be asking more ecologically relevant questions,’ Rochman
says. Usually, scientists don’t know exactly how disasters such as a
tanker accidentally spilling its whole cargo of oil and polluting huge
areas of the ocean will affect the environment until after they’ve
happened. ‘We don’t ask the right questions early enough,’ she says. But
if ecologists can understand how the slow-moving effect of ocean trash
is damaging ecosystems, they might be able to prevent things from
getting worse.
Asking the right questions can help policy makers, and the public,
figure out where to focus their attention. The problems that look or
sound most dramatic may not be the best places to start. For example,
the name of the ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ – a collection of marine
debris in the northern Pacific Ocean – might conjure up a vast, floating
trash island. In reality though, much of the debris is tiny or below the
surface; a person could sail through the area without seeing any trash
at all. A Dutch group called ‘The Ocean Cleanup’ is currently working on
plans to put mechanical devices in the Pacific Garbage Patch and
similar areas to suck up plastic. But a recent paper used simulations to
show that strategically positioning the cleanup devices closer to shore
would more effectively reduce pollution over the long term.
‘I think clearing up some of these misperceptions is really important,’
Rochman says. Among scientists as well as in the media, she says, ‘A lot
of the images about strandings and entanglement and all of that cause
the perception that plastic debris is killing everything in the ocean.’
Interrogating the existing scientific literature can help ecologists figure
out which problems really need addressing, and which ones they’d be
better off – like the mussels – absorbing and ignoring.
Questions 27-33
Questions 34-39
Question 40
WRITING
IELTS Writing Task 2: Problems & Solutions
I. Question types & requirements
1. Cause - Solution
E.g. Many people believe that educational standards have declined in
recent times, particularly in the area of literacy & numeracy.
Discuss the causes of this problem and offer some possible solutions to
it.
2. Cause - Effect
E.g. Today, more and more people are leaving rural areas to live in the
city.
Discuss some effects of rural recession (migration from the country to
the city) and the cause of this.
3. Problem- Solution
E.g. Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements
from competing companies.
To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by
advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them?
IV. Practice
1. It is observed that in many countries, not enough students are
choosing to study science as a subject. What are the causes of this?
And what will be the effects on society?
2. Many working people do not have enough free time off work to spend
with their friends and family. Why is this the case? What are the effects
on family life and society as a whole?
It is true that a lot of working people nowadays have little free time off
work to spend with their acquaintances. There are several reasons why
this is the case, And I believe this could cause some negative effects on
family life and society.
Outline:
- Body 1: Cause
+ Reason 1: young people tend to be more ambitious.
+ Reason 2: cost of livings is higher people have to work overtime to
cope with it
- Body 2: Effects
+ Effect 1: Family life: less time spent with family can cause family
members to feel isolated (family bonds are weakened).
● Example: higher divorce rates
+ Effect 2: Society as a whole: population mental health decrease
significantly
Lesson #50
LISTENING
Questions 11 – 15
SPEAKING
Part 1:
● Running
● Films
Part 2:
1. Describe a uniform that you wear.
You should say:
- What it looks like.
- Who purchased it.
- When and where you need to wear it.
- How you feel about it.
2. Describe a rule that you don’t like.
You should say:
- What it is.
- When and where it is applied.
- Why you don’t like it.
- What others feel about it.
- Whether you follow it or not.
Part 3:
● Uniforms
● Rules
HOMEWORK
Speaking part 2
Describe your first day at school.
You should say:
- When it was.
- What the school looked like.
- What you did during that day.
- How you felt about it.