0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Oriented Face Centered Cubic To Hexagonal Close Pa

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Oriented Face Centered Cubic To Hexagonal Close Pa

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

RESEARCH AND EDUCATION

Oriented face-centered cubic to hexagonal close-packed


martensitic transition, grain morphology, and mechanical
properties of Co-Cr alloy fabricated by selective laser melting
Xiang Yan, MDS,a Ruodan Jiang, MS,b Wen Li, MS,c and Hong Lin, DDS, PhDd

Removable partial dentures ABSTRACT


(RPDs) have typically been
Statement of problem. Removable partial dentures (RPDs) can be fabricated by selective laser
made from cobalt-chromium melting (SLM) with different build orientations. How microstructures and mechanical properties
(Co-Cr) alloys; however, the of SLM Co-Cr alloy are affected by different build orientations is unclear.
conventional lost-wax casting
Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the phase structures, grain
process for RPD frameworks is
morphology, and mechanical properties of SLM Co-Cr alloy with different build orientations.
complex, and obtaining an
accurately fitting prosthesis Material and methods. SLM Co-Cr tensile specimens were fabricated at orientation angles of 0, 45,
1
challenging. Recently, selec- and 90 degrees between the building and longitudinal direction named the T0, T45, and T90 design
groups (n=14). Mechanical properties were obtained by tensile testing conducted by using a
tive laser melting, a metal-
universal testing machine according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
based 3D printing technique, 22674. The grains along the longitudinal direction of the specimens and phase structures were
has facilitated the production observed before and after tensile testing by electron backscatter diffraction. One-way analysis of
of RPDs with remarkable cost variance followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical
savings.2-5 Co-Cr alloys are analysis (a=.05).
popular SLM dental materials Results. The 0.2% yield strengths in descending order were T90 (870 MPa)>T45 (840 MPa)>T0 (786
because of their good MPa) (P<.05); the elongations were T0 (21.8%)>T45 (15.6%)>T90 (8.7%) (P<.05); the ultimate tensile
biocompatibility, low cost, and strengths were T45 (1226 MPa)>T90 (1200 MPa)>T0 (1149 MPa) (P<.05). The average grain sizes in
straightforward 3D printing.2-6 the T0, T45, and T90 groups were 22 mm, 18 mm, and 14 mm, respectively. After the tensile test, a
Studies have also shown that face-centered cubic (FCC) to hexagonal close-packed (HCP) martensitic transition was found in each
prostheses fabricated with group, and the phase transition area fractions were T0 (38.3%)>T45 (11.4%)>T90 (0.7%).
SLM Co-Cr alloys have better Conclusions. The FCC to HCP martensitic transition, grain morphology, and mechanical properties
corrosion resistance and of SLM Co-Cr alloy depended on the build orientations. The oriented phase transition and grains
higher strength compared with affected the anisotropic mechanical properties of SLM Co-Cr alloy. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;127:282-7)
those fabricated with conven-
tional casting methods.7-9 microstructures of the SLM Co-Cr alloys should be
With the SLM process, the RPD frameworks can be determined as a function of the build orientation. How-
printed on the metal substrate in different build orien- ever, studies on this subject are sparse. Two studies have
tations (Fig. 1), and the mechanical properties and reported that the mechanical properties of the SLM

Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant number 2018YFB1106905).
a
Assistant, Department of Dental Materials Laboratory, Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, PR China.
b
Engineer, Department of Dental Materials Laboratory, Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, PR China.
c
Engineer, Department of Dental Materials Laboratory, Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, PR China.
d
Professor and Director, Department of Dental Materials Laboratory, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials & Dental Medical Devices
Testing Center, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, PR China.

282 THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY


February 2022 283

Clinical Implications
SLM Co-Cr alloys have oriented microstructures and
mechanical properties that indicate SLM RPD
frameworks with a specific build orientation should
satisfy clinical requirements.

Co-Cr alloy depend on the build orientations,10,11 but


specific details were lacking. Figure 1. Removable partial denture frameworks with different build
The strength and ductility of Co-Cr alloys depend on orientations.
the face-centered cubic (FCC) and hexagonal close-
packed (HCP) crystal phases.10,11 The FCC structure
provides ductility because of easier dislocation motion; by
contrast, the HCP phase is more brittle because of its
limited capacity for dislocation motion.12-14 Furthermore,
the strain-induced martensitic transformation (SIMT) of
the FCC phase can occur in Co-based alloys with low
stacking fault energy, which can significantly affect the
mechanical behavior of the alloy.14-16 The SIMT can
induce plasticity, which can increase the strength of al-
loys.15,16 In addition, grain morphology can also have
significant effects on the mechanical properties of
alloys.17,18
The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate
the phase structures, grain morphology, and mechanical
properties of SLM Co-Cr alloy with different build ori-
Figure 2. Island laser scanning strategy.
entations. The null hypotheses were that the FCC to
HCP martensitic transition, grain morphology, and me-
to ISO 22674.19 The 0.2% yield strengths (s0.2) and
chanical properties of the SLM alloy would not depend
ultimate tensile strength (UTS) were obtained from the
on the build orientation.
stress-strain curves of the specimens, and the elonga-
tions were determined with the fractured pieces fitted
MATERIAL AND METHODS
together microscopically, which was in compliance with
The Co-Cr alloy powder (Dental Co-Cr alloy powder; ISO 22674.19
Upcera) with a weight percentage composition of Co Before and after tensile testing, 2 specimens in every
62%, Cr 25%, Mo 6%, W 5%, Si 1%, Mn 1%, Fe<1.0% group were prepared to observe the phase structure and
was used in this study, and the particle sizes of 90% alloy grains by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). In order
powder were within 80 mm. The SLM machine (FS121M- to prepare EBSD test specimens, cylinders with a height
D; Farsoon) was used to prepare the specimens under a of 5 mm were formed by cutting along the middle of the
nitrogen atmosphere; the laser spot diameter was 76 mm; tensile specimen before and after tensile testing. Then 1.0
the laser power was 200 W; the scan speed was 15.2 m/s; mm was wet ground from the side of the cylinders by
and the layer thickness was 0.03 mm. With the SLM using 240-, 400-, 600-, 800-, 1000-, 1200-, and 2000-grit
process, the island laser scanning strategy was used as Al2O3 abrasive paper. Finally, the specimens were pol-
illustrated in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 3, the tensile ished with an electrolyte consisting of glycol and sulfuric
specimens prepared in compliance with the International acid for Co-Cr alloy (megalyt; megadental); the electro-
Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2267419 were lytic voltage was 220 V; the electrolytic current intensity
designated according to the 0-, 45-, and 90-degree build was 16 A; and the electrolytic time was 8 minutes. The
orientations and built up with the longitudinal axes in- EBSD observations were performed in the long axis di-
clined from the build direction by 0-, 45-, and 90- rection (Fig. 4) of the specimens before (near the center)
degrees, namely the T0, T45, and T90 groups. and after the tensile test (near the specimen fracture) at a
Fourteen specimens in each group were used for step size of 1.5 mm by using an SEM (S-3400 N; Hitachi)
uniaxial tensile testing. The tensile testing was conducted equipped with an EBSD system (AZtec EBSD; Oxford
in air at 25  C by using a universal testing machine (3367; Instruments). Based on the EBSD technology, boundary
INSTRON) at a cross-head speed of 2 mm/min according segments with a critical orientation difference angle

Yan et al THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY


284 Volume 127 Issue 2

Figure 4. Electron backscatter diffraction observation position.

Figure 3. Selective laser melted tensile specimens with different build Table 1. Mechanical properties
orientations. A, T0; B, T45; C,T90.
Groups s0.2 (MPa) UTS (MPa) Elongation (%)
T0 786 ±26.2 1149 ±28.1 21.8 ±3.19

higher than 10 degrees were identified and defined as T45 840 ±39.6 1226 ±26.3 15.6 ±2.66
T90 870 ±26.1 1200 ±23.7 8.7 ±1.06
grain boundaries. The EBSD data were collected and
T0 and T45 P<.001 P<.001 P<.001
analyzed by using a software package (HKL Channel 5;
T0 and T90 P<.001 P<.001 P<.001
Oxford Instruments). The experimental data were eval-
T45 and T90 P=.046 P=.035 P<.001
uated with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed
s0.2, 0.2% yield strength; UTS, ultimate tensile strength.
by the Bonferroni post hoc test with a statistical software
program (IBM SPSS Statistics, v24.0; IBM Corp) and the
Kruskal-Wallis test (a=.05).
The EBSD phase map (Fig. 6) indicates that the tested
RESULTS regions of the specimens before the tensile test consisted
of a single FCC phase without an HCP phase. However,
As can be seen from Table 1, the order from the highest
after the tensile test, the HCP phase was found in all of
to lowest s0.2 values of the test specimens was
the specimens, and in the order from the highest to
T90>T45>T0. The variability of s0.2 values among the 3
lowest HCP phase area fractions in tested regions of the
groups was homogeneous (df1=2; df2=39; P=.221). One-
specimens were T0 (38.3%)>T45(11.4%)>T90 (0.7%).
way ANOVA analysis revealed a significant difference in
These indicated that the FCC to HCP martensitic trans-
the s0.2 (df1=2; F=25.823; P<.05), and the Bonferroni post
formation occurred during the tensile test. In addition,
hoc test demonstrated significant differences among the
the HCP phase texture direction of T0 and T45 were
groups (P<.05). The order of the UTS values was
identical to the corresponding build orientation.
T45>T90>T0. As a result of homogeneous variability
(df1=2; df2=39; P=.137), the 1-way ANOVA analysis re-
DISCUSSION
vealed a significant difference in the UTS results in the 3
groups (df1=2; F=31.661; P<.05), and the Bonferroni post The ductility and strength of the SLM Co-Cr alloys tested
hoc test showed significant differences among the groups depended on the build orientation and exceeded the
(P<.05). The elongation values were T0>T45>T90, while requirements of ISO 2267419 for the V type alloy
the variability among the 3 groups was inhomogeneous (s0.2 500 MPa, elongation 2 %) used for thin metal
(df1=2; df2=39; P<.001). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed RPD, frameworks. Furthermore, clear distinctions were
significant differences in the elongation values among found in the grain morphology and FCC to HCP trans-
the groups (P<.05). formation in the T0, T45, and T90 groups. Therefore, the
Figure 5 shows the grain morphologies and low-angle null hypothesis was rejected.
grain boundaries (LAGBs, <15 degrees), where it can be Variations in grain shapes among the 3 groups were
seen that the long axis of the grains and grain boundaries clear in the microscopic observations (Fig. 5). Because of
of T0 and T45 were the same as the corresponding build the directional solidification during the SLM process, the
orientations. In addition, the grain overall morphology of grains of the T0 and T45 groups extended and stacked
T90 was similar for different scanning strategies. The along the build orientations, creating aligned grain
mean values and standard deviations of the grain sizes in structures and larger grain sizes than T90 along the build
the T0, T45, and T90 groups were 22 ±23 mm, 18 ±16 mm, orientations. The tested surface of T90 was perpendicular
and 14 ±12 mm, respectively. Moreover, group T90 to the build direction, and its grain overall morphology
showed that the LAGBs were mainly located in the was similar to islands or a chessboard, reflecting the
crisscrossing regions of the island laser scanning strategy, characteristics of the scanning strategy. When the di-
where the grain sizes were smaller. Compared with T0 rection of shear stress is consistent with or close to the
and T45, the LAGBs of T90 were denser. grain boundary, the probability of dislocation blocking

THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY Yan et al


February 2022 285

orientation and the 3D dimensions of theses grains were


unclear. The LAGBs pose a major obstacle to dislocation
penetration, and the interaction of dislocations with
LAGBs has been shown as a substantial contribution to
the strength of metals.20,21 Therefore, the differences of
LAGBs in the 3 groups should also contribute to the
differences of their yield strengths.
The FCC phase is stable at high temperatures, while
the HCP phase exists as an equilibrium phase at lower
temperatures.13,16,22 The equilibrium phase diagram of
Co-Cr alloys indicates that at >900  C, the expected
structure is the FCC structure and that at <900  C, it is
the HCP structure.23-25 Under the thermodynamic con-
ditions of below or about 900  C, accompanied by the
diffusion of alloy elements, the diffusional FCC to HCP
martensitic transformation occurs slowly in Co-Cr
alloy.23-25 In addition, because of a low stacking fault
energy, the FCC to HCP martensitic transformation
during plastic deformation at room temperature also
occurs because of shear of 1/6 <1210> on {111}fcc planes,
referred to as the SIMT.14-16,26
With the SLM process, rapid cooling of the specimen
suppresses the FCC to HCP transition; consequently, the
FCC structure is dominant in the as-built SLM Co-Cr
alloy.10,11,23,24,27 After the tensile test, the HCP struc-
ture was present, which indicated that the SIMT with
FCC to HCP transformation occurred during the tensile
test. Furthermore, this induced martensitic trans-
formation can also increase plasticity.28 Under tensile
stress, the FCC to HCP transformation causes stress
relaxation in the specimen and gives rise to a uniform
deformation in the SLM Co-Cr alloy instead of necking
behavior, which leads to high UTS and high plasticity.28
In the present study, the FCC to HCP transformation
of the SLM Co-Cr alloy depended on the build orienta-
tion, and the experimental results revealed that the area
percentages of FCC to HCP transformation in the tested
area of T0, T45, and T90 were 38.3%, 11.4%, and 0.7%,
respectively. Therefore, in the order of highest to lowest
ductility, the specimens were T0>T45>T90. Furthermore,
the yield strengths of T45 were lower than those of T90,
but it had higher ultimate tensile strengths, which may
be attributed to this phase transition. During the FCC to
HCP transition, the 2 structures should follow the
orientation relationship of {111}fcc ||{0001}hcp based on
the gliding of the partial dislocation of 1/6 <1210> in
Figure 5. Grain morphologies. A, T0; B,T45; C, T90. Original every second {111}fcc plane.14-16,26 The orientation rela-
magnification ×250. LAGBs, low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs, <15 tionship probably resulted in the phase transformation of
degrees) SLM Co-Cr alloy depending on the build orientation;
however, the mechanism should be further studied.
has been reported to decrease, resulting in lower yield Cast Co-Cr alloy typically exhibits isotropic micro-
strength.17 In the present study, the order of largest to structures and mechanical properties. However, casting
smallest grain size was T0>T45>T90; however, these defects such as pores are unavoidable and reduce the
grains were observed on 2D surfaces of specimens, ductility and strength of dental Co-Cr RPD frameworks.
mainly reflecting the 2D dimensions of grains in the build The present study highlights that the microstructures of

Yan et al THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY


286 Volume 127 Issue 2

Figure 6. Phase structures. A, T0; B, T0 after tensile test.; C, T45; D, T45 after tensile test; E, T90; F, T90 after tensile test. Original magnification ×250. FCC,
face-centered cubic; HCP, hexagonal close-packed.

the Co-Cr alloy fabricated using SLM have unique grain restorations with different build orientations require
morphologies and FCC to HCP phase transformation, increased attention that can lead to further understand-
thereby improving the ductility and strength of the alloy. ing when SLM Co-Cr frameworks are used in clinical
In addition, the differences between the mechanical applications. SLM Co-Cr alloys have oriented micro-
properties and microstructure of SLM Co-Cr alloy structures and mechanical properties indicating that the

THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY Yan et al


February 2022 287

RPD framework with a specific build orientation should 11. Kajima Y, Takaichi A, Nakamoto T, Kimura, Yoqo Y. Fatigue strength of Co-
Cr-Mo alloy clasps prepared by selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed
satisfy clinical requirements. Currently, there is no ISO Mater 2016;59:446-58.
standard for dental metal materials used for 3D printing 12. Allan FC, Asgar K. Reaction of cobalt-chromium casting alloy with invest-
ment. J Dent Res 1966;45:1516-28.
technology and 3D-printed metal prostheses. Therefore, 13. Yamanaka K, Mori M, Chiba A. Nanoarchitectured Co-Cr-Mo orthopedic
the results of this study suggest that the build orientation implant alloys: nitrogen-enhanced nanostructural evolution and its effect on
phase stability. Acta Biomater 2013;9:6259-67.
should be considered when relevant standards are 14. Mittemeijer EJ. Fundamentals of materials science. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer;
drafted. 2010. p. 107-228.
15. Mani A, Rodriguez S, Lopez HF. Deformation induced FCC to HCP
Residual stresses occur in the SLM process, which transformation in a Co-27Cr-5Mo-0.05C alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 2011;528:
may result in the deformation of moldings so that heat 3037-43.
16. Mitsunobu T, Koizumi Y, Lee BS, Yamanaka K, Matsumota H, Li Y, et al.
treatment of the part is necessary to relieve the stress Role of strain-induced martensitic transformation on extrusion and intrusion
after the parts are printed.2,29 Therefore, based on this formation during fatigue deformation of biomedical Co-Cr-Mo-N alloys.
Acta Mater 2014;81:377-85.
study, further work should identify suitable heat treat- 17. Cho KK, Chung YH, Lee CW, Kwun SI, Shin MC. Effects of grain shape and
ments and determine whether heat treatments can texture on the yield strength anisotropy of Al-Li alloy. Scr Mater 1999;40:
651-7.
eliminate the differences of mechanical behavior and 18. Christian JW. The theory of transformations in metals and alloys. 3rd ed. St.
microstructure in the SLM Co-Cr parts with different Louis: Elsevier; 2002. p. 961-1075.
19. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 22674. Dentistry
build orientations. -metallic materials for fixed and removable restorations and appliances.
Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2016. Available at:
https://www.iso.org/standard/59620.html.
CONCLUSIONS 20. Liu B, Raabe D D, Eisenlohr P, Roters F, Arsenlis A, Hommes G. Dislocation
interactions and low-angle grain boundary strengthening. Acta Mater
Based on the findings of this in vitro study, the following 2011;59:7125-34.
21. Liu B, Eisenlohr P, Roters F, Raabe D. Simulation of dislocation pene-
conclusions were drawn: tration through a general low-angle grain boundary. Acta Mater 2012;60:
5380-90.
1. The FCC to HCP martensitic transition, grain 22. Veprek S. The search for novel superhard materials. J Vac Sci Technol A
morphology, and mechanical properties of the SLM 1999;17:2401-20.
23. Li KC, Prior DJ, Waddell JN. Comparison of the microstructure and phase
Co-Cr alloy depended on the build orientation. stability of as-cast, CAD/CAM and powder metallurgy manufactured Co-Cr
2. The oriented FCC to HCP phase transition and dental alloys. Dent Mater 2015;31:e306-15.
24. Li KC, Tran LY, Prior DJ. Porcelain bonding to novel Co-Cr alloys: influence
grain morphology influenced the anisotropic me- of interfacial reactions on phase stability, plasticity and adhesion. Dent Mater
chanical properties of SLM Co-Cr alloy. 2016;32:1504-12.
25. Yan X, Xu YX, Wu Y. Effects of heat treatment on metal-ceramic combination
of selective-laser-melted cobalt-chromium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:
319.e1-6.
REFERENCES 26. Koizumi Y, Suzuki S, Yamanaka K. Strain-induced martensitic trans-
formation near twin boundaries in a biomedical Co-Cr-Mo alloy with
negative stacking fault energy. Acta Mater 2013;61:1648-61.
1. Zhou XS, Tong D. Prosthodontic technology. 1st ed. Beijing: Peking Uni-
27. Zhou YN, Li N, Yan JZ. Comparative analysis of the microstructures and
versity Medical Press; 2014. p. 307.
mechanical properties of Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated by different methods.
2. Yan X, Lin H, Wu Y, Bai W. Effect of two heat treatments on mechanical
J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:617-23.
properties of selective-laser-melted Co-Cr metal-ceramic alloys for applica-
28. Cooman BC. Structure-properties relationship in TRIP steels containing
tion in thin removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:1028.e1-6.
carbide-free bainite. Curr Opin Solid St M 2004;8:285-303.
3. Øilo M, Nesse H, Lundberg OJ. Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium
29. Li C, Liua JF, Fang XF, Guoa YB. Efficient predictive model of part
3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by casting, milling, and additive
distortion and residual stress in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf
manufacturing. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:156.e1-7.
2017;17:157-68.
4. Alifuisegbaya F, Williams JR, George R. Additive manufacturing: a novel
method for fabricating cobalt-chromium removable partial denture frame-
works. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017;25:73-8. Corresponding author:
5. Braian M, Jönsson D, Kevci M, Wennerberg A. Geometrical accuracy of Dr Hong Lin
metallic objects produced with additive or subtractive manufacturing: a 22 Zhongguancun Avenue South
comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2018;34:978-93. Haidian District, Beijing 100081
6. Kim E, Lee D, Kwon S, Kwon T. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of PR CHINA
the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new Email: [email protected]
manufacturing techniques and alloy systems. J Prosthet Dent 2016;117:393-9.
7. Lu Y, Wu S, Gan Y, Li J, Zhao C. Investigation on the microstructure, Acknowledgments
mechanical property and corrosion behavior of the selective laser melted The authors thank Farsoon technologies Co Ltd for the support in specimen
CoCrW alloy for dental application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl fabrication.
2015;49:517-25.
8. Wang WJ, Yung KC, Choy HS, Xiao TY, Cai ZX. Effects of laser polishing on
surface microstructure and corrosion resistance of additive manufactured CRediT authorship contribution statement
CoCr alloys. Appl Surf Sci 2018;443:167-75. Xiang Yan: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis,
Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.
9. Zeng L, Xiang N, Wei B. A comparison of corrosion resistance of cobalt
Ruodan Jiang: Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis. Wen Li: Validation,
chromium molybdenum metal ceramic alloy fabricated with selective laser
Investigation, Data curation. Hong Lin: Conceptualization, Writing - review &
melting and traditional processing. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1217-24.
editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.
10. Takaichi A, Suyalatu, Nakamoto T, Joko N, Nomura N. Microstructures and
mechanical properties of Co-29Cr-6Mo alloy fabricated by selective laser
melting process for dental applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;21: Copyright © 2020 by the Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.036

Yan et al THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY

You might also like