Unit 1 Soil Investigation
Unit 1 Soil Investigation
ata to be collected
D
Finding profile of soil (No. Of layers and thickness of Layers)
Position of Water table
Collection of soil sample
Finding the Engineering properties in Lab. Or field
Depth of exploration:
➔ Exploration, in general, should be carried out to a depth upto which the increase in
pressure due to structural loading is likely to cause perceptible settlement or shear
failure.
➔ Such a depth, known as the significant depth, depends upon the type of structure, its
weight, size, shape and disposition of the loaded areas, and the soil profile and its
properties.
➔ It is generally safe to assume the significant depth upto a level at which the net
increase in vertical pressure becomes less than 10% of the initial overburden
pressure.
➔ Alternatively, a pressure bulb bounded by an isobar of one-fifth or one-tenth of the
surface loading intensity is sometimes assumed to define the minimum depth of
exploration.
➔ This depth may be assumed to be equal to one-and a half to two times the width
(smaller lateral dimension) of the loaded area.
T ype of sample
Disturbed samples
➔ can be obtained by direct excavations, augers and thick wall samplers.
➔ For sampling saturated cohesionless soils, a trap valve or a spring sample retainer is
inserted in the drive shoe (cutting edge).
➔ Sand pump and shell with a trap valve (flap) are also used.
➔ The disturbed samples may be used for mechanical analysis, water content
determination, index properties tests, compaction and stabilization tests.
➔ The split spoon samplers can be used for approximate determination of unconfined
compressive strength.
➔ The samplers should be so transported and stored that the original composition is
preserved and the water content also does not change, if desired.
Undisturbed samples
➔ may be required for tests on shear, consolidation, and permeability.
➔ They can also be used for other tests like the disturbed samples.
➔ Undisturbed samples are obtained by forcing a thin wall sampler into the soil at the
bottom of the bore hole or in a test pit.
➔ The penetration of the sampler into the soil should be continuous and rapid.
➔ The sampler should never be over driven so as to compress the sample. A piston
sampler may be used with advantage in soft soils, especially below the water table.
➔ Undisturbed samples of cohesionless soils, especially from below the water table are
difficult to obtain.
➔ A compressed air sampler may be used. It enables the sample to be removed from
the ground into an air chamber and then lifted to the ground surface without contact
with water of the drill hole.
➔ A piston sampler with bore holes kept filled with drilling mud can also be used.
➔ Alternative methods may be to impart cohesion to sand by asphaltic emulsions, or to
freeze the sand at the sampling depth or near the lower end of the sampler.
2
Type of sampler
1. Standard split spoon sampler
2. Scraper bucket sampler
3. Piston sampler
1.Open excavations:
➔ Test pits and trenches can be used for all types of soils.
➔ Soils can be inspected in their natural condition and samples, disturbed or
undisturbed can be conveniently taken.
➔ The cost of open excavations, however, increases rapidly with depth.
➔ They are generally considered suitable for shallow depths (say upto 3 m).
➔ For greater depths (over 6 m) and below ground water table, specially in previous
soils, measures for lateral support and groundwater lowering become necessary.
3
oring Methods:
B
The methods of boring or drilling are: auger, auger and shell, wash boring, percussion
boring, and rotary boring.
Type boring
1. Auger Boring
2. Wash boring
3. Rotary boring
uger boring.
A
Augers are used in cohesive and other soft soils above the water table.
Hand augers are used for depths upto about 6 m.
Mechanically operated augers are used for greater depths and they can also be used in
gravelly soils.
Figure 32.1 shows a post hole auger and a helical (spiral) auger.
Samples recovered from the soil brought up by augers are badly disturbed and are useful for
identification purposes only.
Auger boring is fairly satisfactory for highway explorations at shallow depths and for
exploring borrowing pits.
Wash boring.
➔ Wash boring is a fast and simple method for advancing holes in all types of soils.
➔ Boulders and rock cannot be penetrated by this method.
➔ The method consists in first driving a casing through which a hollow drill rod with a
sharp chisel or chopping bit at the lower end is inserted.
➔ Water is forced under pressure through the drill rod which is alternatively raised and
dropped, and also rotated.
➔ The resulting chopping and jetting action of the bit and water disintegrates the soil.
➔ The cuttings are forced up to the ground surface in the form of soil-water slurry
through the annular space between the drill rod and the casing.
➔ The change of soil stratification could be guessed from the rate of progress and the
colour of the wash water.
➔ The samples recovered from the wash water are almost valueless.
➔ For interpreting the correct geotechnical properties of soil.
➔ Figure 32.3 shows a set-up for wash boring.
4
5. Rotary Boring.
➔ Rotary boring or rotary drilling is a very fast method of advancing holes in both rocks
and soils.
➔ A drill bit, fixed to the lower end of drill rods, is rotated by a suitable chuck and is
always kept in firm contact with the bottom of the hole.
➔ A drilling mud, usually a water solution of bentonite, with or without other
admixtures, is continuously forced down the hollow drillrods.
➔ The mud returning upwards brings the cuttings to the surface.
➔ The method is also known as mud rotary drilling and the hole usually requires no
casing.
➔ Rotating core barrels, provided with commercial diamond-studded bits or a steel bit
with shots, are also used for rotary drilling and simultaneously obtaining the rock
cores or samples.
➔ The method is then also known as core boring or core drilling.
➔ Water is circulated down the drill rods during boring.
L oading arrangement: The loading to the test plate may be applied with the help of a
hydraulic jack.
The reaction of the hydraulic jack may be borne by either of the following two methods:
Gravity loading platform method (Fig. 24.22)
In the case of gravity loading method, a platform is constructed over a vertical column
resting on the test plate, and the loading is done with the help of sand bags, stones or
concrete blocks.
The general arrangement of the test set-up for this method is shown in Fig. 24.22.
When load is applied to the plate, it sinks or settles.
The settlement of the plate is measured with the help of sensitive dial gauges.
For square plate, two dial gauges are used.
The dial gauges are mounted on independently supported datum bar: As the plate settles,
the ram of the dial gauge moves down and settlement is recorded.
The load is indicated on the load-gauge of the hydraulic jack.
5
eaction truss method:
R
Figure 24.23 shows the arrangement when the reaction of the jack is borne by a reaction
truss.
The truss is held to the ground through soil anchors.
These anchors are firmly driven in the soil with the help of hammers.
The reaction truss is usually made of mild steel sections.
Guy ropes are used for the lateral stability of the truss.
Indian Standard Code (IS: 1888-1982) recommends that the loading of the plate should
invariably be borne either by gravity loading platform (Fig. 24.22) or by the reaction truss
(Fig. 24.23).
The use of the reaction truss is more popular now-a-days since this is simple, quick and less
clumsy.
No support of the loading platform should be located within a distance of 3.5 times the size
of the test plate from its centre.
.It is essentially a short duration test, and hence the test does not give the ultimate
2
settlement, particularly in the case of cohesive soil.
6
.Another limitation is the effect of the size of foundation.
3
For clayey soils the ultimate pressure for a large foundation is the same as that for the test
plate.
But in dense sandy soils, the bearing capacity increases, with the size the foundation, and
the test on smaller size bearing plates tend to given conservative values.
PENETRATION TESTS
➔ These tests involve the measurement of the resistance to penetration of a sampling
spoon, a cone or other shaped tools under dynamic or static loadings.
➔ The resistance is empirically correlated with some of the engineering properties of
soil such as density index, consistency, bearing capacity, etc.
➔ The values of these tests lie in the amount of experience behind them.
➔ These tests are useful for general exploration of erratic soil profiles, for finding depth
to bed rock or hard stratum, and to have an approximate indication of the strength
and other properties of soils, particularly the cohesionless soils, from which it is
difficult to obtain undisturbed samples.
➔ The two commonly used tests are the standard penetration test and the cone
penetration test.
7
Test procedure:
➔ The split tube sampler, commonly known as split spoon sampler resting on
the bottom of the bore hole is allowed to sink under its own weight.
➔ It is then seated 15 cm with the blows of the hammer falling through a height
of 75 cm.
➔ Thereafter, the split spoon sampler is further driven by 30 cm or 50 blows
(except that driving shall cease before the split spoon sampler is full).
➔ The number of blows required to affect each 15 cm penetration is recorded.
➔ The first 15 cm of drive may be considered to be a seating drive.
➔ The total blows required for the second and third 15 cm of penetration is
termed as the penetration resistance N.
➔ If the split spoon sampler is driven less than 45 cm (total), then the
penetration resistance shall be for the last 30 cm of penetration.
➔ The entire sampler may sometimes sink under its own weight when a very
soft subsoil stratum is encountered. Under such conditions, it may not be
necessary to give any blow to be a sampler and SPT value should be indicated
as zero.
GEOPHYSICAL METHODS
➔ The geophysical methods of exploration were developed in connection with
prospecting for useful minerals and oils.
➔ The major methods are gravitational, magnetic, seismic (refraction and reflection),
and electrical resistivity.
➔ The seismic refraction and electrical resistivity methods are the most commonly used
for civil engineering purposes.
8
Seismic refraction method:
➔ In this method, shock waves are created into the soil at their ground level or certain
depth below it by exploding small charges in the soil or by striking a plate on the soil
with a hammer.
➔ The radiating shock waves are picked up by the vibration detector (also called
geophone, or seismometer), where the time of travel gets recorded.
➔ Either a number of geophones are arranged along a line, or the shock producing
device is moved away from the geophone to produce shock waves at given intervals.
➔ Some of the waves, known as direct or primary waves, travel directly from the shock
point along the ground surface and are picked up first by the geophone.
➔ If the sub-soil comprises two or more distinct layers, some of the primary waves
travel downwards to the lower layer and get refracted at the interface.
➔ If the underlying layer is denser, the refracted waves travel much faster.
➔ They emerge again and reach the geophone.
➔ As the distance between the shock point and the geophone increases, the refracted
waves are able to reach the geophone earlier than the direct waves.
➔ Figure 32.6 shows the diagrammatical travel of the primary and refracted waves.
➔ The results are plotted as a graph (Fig. 32.7) between distance versus time of travel
(ordinate).
➔ The break in the curve represents the point of simultaneous arrival of the primary
and refracted waves, and its distance is known as the critical distance which is a
function of the seismic refraction method is fast and reliable in establishing profiles
of different strata provided the deeper layers have increasingly greater density and
thus higher velocities and also increasingly greater thickness.
➔ If a blind zone i.e., a layer having a velocity lower than that of the upper layer, exists,
it cannot be detected by seisdmic refraction (Goodman and Karol, 1968).
➔ Different kinds of materials, such as gravel, clay, hardpan, or rock have characteristic
seimic velocities and hence they may be identified by the distance-time graphs.
➔ The exact type of material cannot, however, be recognised and explored. Should be
supplemented by boring soundings and sampling.
9
Electrical resistivity method:
➔ The electrical resistivity method is based on the measurement and recording of
changes in the mean resistivity or apparent specific resistance of the various soils.
➔ The resistivity (ohms-cm) is usually defined as the resistance (ohms) between
opposite faces of a unit cube (centimetre cube) of the material.
➔ Each soil has its own resistivity depending upon water content, compaction and
composition; e.g. low for saturated silt and high for loose dry gravel or solid rock.
➔ Battery milliameter the test is conducted by driving four metal spikes to serve as
electrodes (Fig. 32.8) into the ground along a straight line at equal distances.
➔ A direct voltage is imposed between the two outer potentiometer electrodes and the
potential drop is measured between the inner electrodes.
10
➔ To correctly interpret the resistivity data for knowing the nature and distribution of
soil formations, it is necessary to make preliminary trials or calibration tests on
known formations.
➔ The depth of exploration is roughly proportional to the electrode spacing.
➔ For knowing the horizontal changes in the sub-soil, the electrodes, kept at a constant
spacing, are moved as a group along the line of test.
➔ This method is known as resistivity mapping.
➔ For studying the vertical changes, the electrode system is expanded, about a fixed
central point, by increasing the spacing gradually from an initial small value to a
distance roughly equal to the depth of exploration desired.
➔ The method is known as resistivity sounding.
11