Reading Into Writing V1 2324 Text 3
Reading Into Writing V1 2324 Text 3
Few social policy ideas are as hot today as universal basic income. Social scientists, technologists,
and politicians from both ends of the political spectrum see it as a potential solution to the
unemployment that automation and artificial intelligence are expected to create.
It has also been floated as a potential solution to the rise of the gig economy, where work is centred
around on-demand tasks and short-term projects as opposed to regular full-time employment. This
is the kind of employment that platforms like Uber and Freelancer are based on.
Automation and the gig economy are actually closely linked. Isolating and codifying a job task in such
a way that it can be outsourced to a gig worker can be the first step towards automating that task.
Once a task has been automated, gig workers are used to train and supervise the algorithm.
Meanwhile, expert online contractors are hired to fine-tune the technology. More often than not, a
finished artificial intelligence system is actually an ensemble of machines and human workers acting
in concert.
Basic income is an interesting solution for the gig economy, because it addresses its problems from a
new angle. One of the most problematic aspects of the gig economy has to do with its negative job
characteristics. Though gig work can provide autonomy and good earnings for some, it also involves
uncertainty and insecurity, and for many can entail working antisocial hours for little pay.
A sort of default policy response therefore tends to be to regulate gig work back into the mould of
standard employment, consisting of things like guaranteed working hours and notice periods. Basic
income takes a different angle. It provides workers with a level of security and predictability over
their income that is independent of work.
Plus, by providing workers with a fallback option, a sufficiently high basic income empowers them to
turn down bad gigs. So, rather than regulating employer-employee relations, basic income allows
them to negotiate terms on a more level playing field. This is why the idea has found favour on both
sides of the left-right divide.
Yet if basic income is intended as a corrective to economic inequality resulting from new
technologies, then the micro-level details of how it is funded are also important. Silicon Valley
technology companies, regardless of all the wonderful services they provide us with, have also been
notoriously good at avoiding paying taxes. Had they paid more taxes, there would probably be less
economic inequality to grapple with now in the first place.
So when some of the same technologists now suggest that states should address mounting
inequality with basic income, it is pertinent to ask who will pay for it. Colleagues and I have
previously looked into novel ways of taxing the data economy, but there are no easy solutions in
sight.
Proponents, however, have faith that most would want to better themselves or help others, even if
they were not explicitly paid to do so. The idea is that a guaranteed income would free people to
pursue societally valuable activities that markets won’t pay them to pursue, and that current test-
based benefits may even hinder them from pursuing.
But all of these activities require not just food and shelter that basic income can buy, but also other
resources, such as skills, knowledge, connections, and self-confidence. The most important means
through which many of these resources are cultivated is education. Deprived of this, people with
nothing but a basic income may well end up sitting at home watching YouTube.
Research that colleagues and I have carried out looking at online gig workers in Southeast Asia and
Sub-Saharan Africa suggests that it is not the most resource-poor who are able to benefit from new
online work opportunities, but more typically those with a good level of education, health, and other
resources.
So universal basic income is a very interesting potential solution to the rise of the gig economy and
more entrepreneurial working lives in general. But whenever basic income is discussed, it is
important to ask who exactly would be paying for it. And it is important to recognise that more than
just money for basic necessities is needed – unless the intention is simply to store away surplus
people in YouTube-enabled homes. Apart from universal basic income, we might therefore want to
talk about universal basic resources, such as education as well.