TAI SOLARIN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION

IJAGUN, OGUN STATE, NIGERIA

COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE

PRESENTATION TOPIC: FIXED ENVIRONMENT VS

DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT AGENTS

GROUP NUMBER: 4

COURSE CODE: CSC 412

COURSE TITLE: MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS

 LECTURER IN CHARGE: DR ODULAJA
MEMBERS

S/N NAMES MATRIC NUMBERS

1 OLALEKAN IYANUOLUWA AYOMIDE 20210294020

2 ADEGOKE YUSUF OPEYEMI 20210294047

3 LAWAL HABEEB OLADIMEJI 20210294030
4 WAHEED ADEOLA OLAMILEKAN 20210294031
5 BIAYORON AKPEVWEOGHENE MICHAEL 20210294093
6 AYANBAJO FUNSHO ADEDAYO 20210294075
7 ELLIOT SAMUEL OLUWADAMILARE 20210294105
8 OLANIYI AMOS IFEOLUWA 20210294044
9 ACKON STEPHEN KWEKU 20210294006
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1.
INTRODUCTION
i. Definition of agents and environment
ii. Overview of Fixed and Dynamic environments.
iii. Importance of understanding Agent behavior in different environments.

Chapter 2
FIXED ENVIRONMENT AGENTS.
i. Characteristics
ii. Agent design consideration for fixed environment
iii. Examples of fixed environment agents
iv. Challenges and Limitations

Chapter 3
DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT AGENTS
i. Characteristics
ii. Agent design and consideration for dynamic environments
iii. Examples of Dynamic environment agents
iv. Challenges

Chapter 4
COMPARISON OF FIXED ENVIRONMENT AND DYNAMIC
ENVIRONMENT AGENTS
i. Similarities
ii. Differences

REFERENCE
 CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
In artificial intelligence, an agent is a computer program or system that is designed to perceive its
environment, make decisions and take actions to achieve a specific goal or set of goals. The agent operates
autonomously, meaning it is not directly controlled by a human operator.
Agents can be classified into different types based on their characteristics, such as whether they are
reactive or proactive, whether they have a fixed or dynamic environment, and whether they are single or
multi-agent systems.
On the other hand,
The environment is the external setting in which agents interact and operate. It encompasses everything
that influences the agents' perceptions, actions, and outcomes.
OVERVIEW OF FIXD AND DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT

In the context of artificial intelligence (AI) and agent-based systems, the environment in which an AI
system operates can be classified into two main types: static and dynamic environments. The nature of the
environment significantly impacts the design, development, and performance of AI agents.
Understanding the differences between fixed and dynamic environments is crucial for designing and
developing effective AI agents and systems. While fixed environments are relatively simpler and more
predictable, dynamic environments are more complex and challenging due to their changing and
unpredictable nature. By considering the characteristics and challenges of each environment, we can
design and develop AI agents and systems that are capable of operating effectively and efficiently in
various environments and scenarios, achieving the desired goals and objectives.
Fixed Environments
Fixed environments are those where the conditions and factors influencing an agent's behavior remain
relatively constant over time. These environments are often predictable and structured, allowing for more
straightforward agent design and planning.
Examples of fixed environments:

 Factory settings: Industrial robots operating in controlled environments with predictable

tasks.
 Board games: Game AI agents playing in a structured environment with defined rules
and objectives.
 Simulation environments: Virtual worlds created for testing and training agents under
controlled conditions
 Dynamic Environments

Dynamic environments are those where conditions and factors change frequently and
unpredictably. These environments present significant challenges for agents, as they must be able
to adapt and learn to cope with uncertainty and variability.

Examples of dynamic environments:

 Real-world traffic: Self-driving cars navigating roads with varying traffic conditions,
pedestrians, and other obstacles.
 Stock markets: Financial agents making decisions in a rapidly changing market
environment.
 Natural disasters: Search and rescue robots operating in disaster-stricken areas with
unpredictable conditions.

Importance of understanding Agent behavior in different environments.

Understanding agent behavior in different environments is crucial for several reasons:

1. Effective Design: By understanding how agents interact with their environments,

designers can create more effective and efficient agents. For example, in a dynamic
environment, agents may need to be more adaptable and capable of learning from their
experiences.
2. Predictability: Understanding agent behavior can help predict how agents will respond
to different situations, which is essential for tasks such as planning and decision-making.
3. Safety and Security: In safety-critical applications, such as self-driving cars or
autonomous robots, understanding agent behavior is crucial for ensuring that they operate
safely and avoid accidents.
4. Human-Agent Interaction: Understanding agent behavior can help design agents that
can effectively interact with humans. For example, agents may need to be able to
understand human intentions and respond appropriately.
5. Scientific Advancement: Studying agent behavior in different environments can
contribute to our understanding of intelligence, learning, and decision-making.
 CHAPTER TWO

FIXED ENVIRONMENT AGENTS

Characteristics of Fixed Environments

Fixed environments are characterized by:

 Predictability: The conditions and factors influencing an agent's behavior remain relatively
constant over time.
 Stability: There are minimal changes or disruptions to the environment.
 Structure: The environment is often well-defined and organized.
 Limited uncertainty: The agent can typically anticipate and plan for most situations.

Agent Design Considerations for Fixed Environments

When designing agents for fixed environments, the following considerations are important:

 Efficiency: Agents can be optimized for specific tasks and conditions, leading to efficient
performance.
 Determinism: Agents can often rely on deterministic algorithms and rules, as there is less need
for adaptability.
 Simplicity: The agent's design can be relatively straightforward due to the predictable nature of
the environment.
 Goal-oriented: Agents can be designed to focus on achieving specific goals within the fixed
environment.

Examples of Fixed Environment Agents

 Industrial robots: These robots operate in controlled factory settings, performing repetitive tasks
with high precision.
 Game AI: Game characters and opponents often operate in fixed environments with predefined
rules and objectives.
 Traffic control systems: These systems manage traffic flow in controlled environments, such as
highways and intersections.
 Simulation agents: These agents are used to test and train other agents in simulated
environments with fixed conditions.
Challenges and Limitations of Fixed Environment Agents

While fixed environments offer certain advantages, they also present challenges:

 Lack of adaptability: Agents designed for fixed environments may struggle to cope with
unexpected changes or disruptions.
 Limited learning opportunities: The stable nature of fixed environments may limit the
opportunities for agents to learn and improve.
 Overreliance on rules: Agents may become overly reliant on pre-defined rules, limiting their
flexibility and creativity.
 Difficulty with unforeseen circumstances: If the environment deviates significantly from the
expected conditions, the agent may encounter difficulties.
 CHAPTER THREE

DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT

Characteristics of Dynamic Environments

Dynamic environments are characterized by:

 Unpredictability: Conditions and factors can change frequently and unexpectedly.

 Uncertainty: There is a high degree of uncertainty about future states and outcomes.
 Complexity: The environment may be complex and difficult to model.
 Adaptability: Agents must be able to adapt to changing circumstances.

Agent Design Considerations for Dynamic Environments

When designing agents for dynamic environments, the following considerations are important:

 Adaptability: Agents should be able to learn and adapt to changing conditions.

 Flexibility: Agents should be able to respond to a wide range of situations and challenges.
 Resilience: Agents should be able to recover from failures or setbacks.
 Uncertainty handling: Agents should be able to handle uncertainty and make decisions based on
limited information.

Examples of Dynamic Environment Agents

 Self-driving cars: These vehicles operate in complex and dynamic environments, navigating
roads with varying traffic conditions, pedestrians, and other obstacles.
 Autonomous drones: These drones operate in dynamic airspace, avoiding obstacles and adapting
to changing conditions.
 Search and rescue robots: These robots operate in disaster-stricken areas, navigating
challenging terrain and adapting to unpredictable conditions.
 Financial trading agents: These agents operate in rapidly changing financial markets, making
decisions based on limited information and uncertain future outcomes.

Dynamic environment agents often require more sophisticated techniques, such as machine
learning, reinforcement learning, and probabilistic reasoning, to cope with the challenges of
these environments.
CHALLENGES OF DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT AGENTS

Dynamic environment agents face several significant challenges:

1. Uncertainty: Dealing with uncertainty is a fundamental challenge. Agents must be able to make
decisions based on limited or incomplete information, and they may need to adapt to unexpected
changes.
2. Complexity: Dynamic environments can be highly complex, with many interacting factors and
non-linear relationships. This makes it difficult to model and predict the environment's behavior.
3. Adaptability: Agents must be able to adapt to changing conditions quickly and effectively. This
requires the ability to learn from experience and adjust their behavior accordingly.
4. Real-time Decision Making: In many cases, agents must make decisions in real-time, with
limited time to process information and respond.
5. Safety and Ethics: Ensuring the safety and ethical behavior of dynamic environment agents is a
critical concern, especially in applications such as self-driving cars or autonomous weapons.
 CHAPTER FOUR

SIMILARITIES

The Fixed and dynamic environment agents share some common characteristics:

1. Goal-Oriented: Both types of agents are typically designed to achieve specific goals or
objectives.
2. Decision-Making: Both types of agents must make decisions based on their perceptions and
knowledge of the environment.
3. Learning: While fixed environment agents may have limited learning capabilities, both types of
agents can benefit from learning to improve their performance.
4. Interaction: Both types of agents may interact with other agents or the environment to achieve
their goals.
5. Agent Architecture: There can be similarities in the underlying architecture and components of
agents, such as sensors, actuators, and decision-making mechanisms.

DIFFERENCES

FEATURES FIXED ENVIRONMENT DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT

AGENTS AGENTS
PREDICTABILITY High Low

UNCERTAINTY Low High

ADAPTABILITY Limited Extensive

LEARNING Less Necessary Crucial

PLANNING More Straightforward Challenging

DECISION-MAKING Based on Complete Information Based on Limited or Incomplete

Information

REFERENCES
 Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial intelligence, 47(1-3), 139-
159.
Colangelo, C., & Petrone, R. (2016). Industrial robotics: A modern approach. Springer.

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.

Kozłowski, S., & Orłowski, A. (2017). Autonomous robots: A practical guide. Springer.

Nilsson, N. J. (1998). Artificial intelligence: A new synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann.

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice
Hall.

Stone, P., & Veloso, M. (2000). The utility of multiagent systems. Journal of Artificial
Intelligence Research, 12, 423-439.

Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT Press.

Thrun, S., Burgard, W., & Fox, D. (2005). Probabilistic robotics. Springer.

Thrun, S., Montemerlo, M., Dahlkamp, J., & Burgard, W. (2005). Stanley: The robot that won
the DARPA Grand Challenge. Journal of Robotics, 4(1), 1-9.

Urmson, C., Bagnell, D., & Rosen, R. (2009). Perception, planning, and control for autonomous
vehicles. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

Wooldridge, M. J. (2009). Introduction to multiagent systems. John Wiley & Sons.