Emperical Paper
Emperical Paper
net/publication/274348642
CITATION
S READS
32 2,172
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
EXPLORING ROAD TAX IN CUSHIONING THE EFFECTS OF DOWNPLAYING REVENUE GENERATION IN SOUTH WESTERN STATES, NIGERIA View project
APPRAISAL OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT TAX ON INTERNAL SECURITY FINANCING IN NIGERIA View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Adegbite Tajudeen Adejare on 28 August 2018.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Archives of Business Research – Vol.2, No.2 Publication Date: April 08, 2014 DOI:10.14738/abr.22.4
Taiwo, F. H., and Adejare, A. T. (2014). Empirical Analysis of the Effect of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Adoption on Accounting Practices in Nige
ABSTRACT
This study empirically analyses the effect of international financial reporting standards
(IFRS) adoption on accounting practices in Nigeria. The study adopted personal
interview and questionnaire methods as the major techniques for primary data
collection. Data collected were analyzed using both descriptive such as tables,
frequencies and percentages and inferential statistics of ChiZsquare and ANOVA
respectively. The study concluded that that there is a strong positive relationship
between the adoption of IFRS and financial performance due to cost reduction of an
organisation. IFRS adoption improves business efficiency and productivity for effective
business performance. The adoption of IFRS saves Multinational Corporations the
expense of preparing more than one set of accounts for different national jurisdictions.
It is recommended that the financial reporting practice in Nigeria should cut across the
public and private sector to bring uniformity in accounting practice regarding annual
preparation of financial reports to the owner of companies and other interested
parties.
According to Hoti and Nuhiu (2011), The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), the
body that publishes International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), was established in
Accounting Framework has been shaped by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
to provide for recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements relating to
transactions and events that are reflected in the financial statements. IFRS was developed in
the year 2001 by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) in the public interest to
provide a single set of high quality, understandable and uniform accounting standards. Users of
financial statement worldwide require sound understanding of financial statement but this can
only be made possible based on Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP). With
globalization of finance gaining ground, convergence with IFRS will enable the world to
exchange financial information in a meaningful and trustworthy manner (Ikpefan and Akande
2012).
Objectives
The main objective of this paper is to examine the impact of IFRS on accounting practices.
Other specific objectives are:
o To evaluate the impact of adopting IFRS on the published financial statements.
o To investigate the benefits and challenges of implementing IFRS in Nigeria
o To examine the effect of adoption of IFRS on cost management.
Research Hypotheses
These hypotheses are to be tested in this study.
Ho1 ZThere is no significant relationship between adoption of IFRS and financial statement
reporting format.
Ho2 Z There is no significant relationship between adoption of IFRS and cost reduction.
LITERATURE REVIEW
IFRS represent a single set of high quality, globally accepted accounting standards that can
enhance comparability of financial reporting across the globe. This increased comparability of
financial information could result in better investment decisions and ensure a more optimal
URL: 1
Archives of Business Research Vol.2, Issue 2,
allocation of resources across the global economy (Jacob and Madu, 2009). Cai and Wong
(2010) conjectured that having a single set of internationally acceptable financial reporting
standards will eliminate the need for restatement of financial statements, yet ensure
accounting diversity among countries, thus facilitating cross<border movement of capital and
greater integration of the global financial markets. Meeks and Swann (2009) revealed that
firms adopting IFRS exhibited higher accounting quality in the post<adoption period than in
the pre<adoption period. In a study of financial data of firms covering 21 countries, Barth
(2008), confirmed that firms applying IAS/IFRS experienced an improvement in accounting
quality between the pre<adoption and post<adoption periods. Latridis (2010), concluded on
the basis of data collected from firms listed on the London Stock Exchange that IFRS
implementation has favorably affected the financial performance (measured by profitability
and growth potentials).IFRS compliant financial statements has the tendency to make
comparability and company performance assessment across nations easier and result of such
assessment more acceptable by stakeholders and highly reliable.
Marjan Petreski (2006) described the impact of IFRS adoption on the financial statements for
the company and its influence on decision making by the management. This study used
credible and comparable attitude as independent variables. Interview test instrument was
used. The results showed that, information disclosure on financial statements was full and
credible and comparability of financial statements across nations resulted in better decision
making by management. The adoption of IFRS leads to a more restricted set of accounting
measurement methods and, with fewer measurement rules to deal with, analysts can more
easily master the existing set (Ashbaugh and Pincus, 2001). Tan et al. (2011) confirmed this
result and found that mandatory IFRS adoption improves foreign analysts’ attraction and
forecast accuracy, particularly those from countries that are simultaneously adopting IFRS
along with the covered firm’s country, and those with prior IFRS experience. Proponents of
accounting harmonization believe that comparability of financial statements worldwide is
necessary for the globalization of capital markets. They suggest that there are many potential
benefits that may arise from the use of one common set of accounting standards throughout
the world. These include improved transparency, comparability and quality of financial
reporting that lead to lower preparation cost, more efficient investment decisions and lower
cost of capital for companies (Choi & Meek, 2005).
Street and Gray (2001) examined the 1998 financial statements for 279 firms that referred to
use of IFRS in their financial statements. The study revealed that, in many cases, disclosed
accounting policies were inconsistent with IFRS. Schultz and Lopez (2001) suggest that
uniform international accounting standards may not result in de facto uniformity among
nations, particularly when the standards allow for significant discretion (ambiguity). Various
accounting items exhibit high<value relevance in common law countries that have effective
judicial systems, better investor protection, and higher quality of accounting practices
(including more transparent reporting) and auditing systems compared with code law
countries. It is expected that the smaller the deviation of a domestic practice from the IFRS, the
higher the value relevance of that practice. In a study on financial data of public listed
companies in 15 member states of the European Union (EU) before and after full adoption of
IFRS in 2005, Chai at al (2010), found that majority of accounting quality indicators improved
after IFRS adoption in the EU. According to Jones and Ratnatunga (1997), larger firms report to
a greater concentration of external users who can influence the allocation of scarce resources.
Given that financial statements have greater economic consequences for larger firms, larger
firms are expected to be more susceptible to the financial reporting impacts of IFRS.
On Wednesday, 28 July 2010, the Nigerian Federal Executive Council accepted the
recommendation of the Committee on the Roadmap to the Adoption of IFRS in Nigeria, that it
would be in the interest of the Nigerian economy for reporting entities in Nigeria to adopt
globally accepted, high<quality accounting standards by fully adopting the International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in a Phased Transition (FIRS 2013). In December 2010,
following the approval of the Federal Executive Council, the Nigerian Accounting Standards
Board (NASB), (now designated as Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria (FRCN)) issued an
implementation roadmap for Nigerian’s adoption of IFRS which set a January 2012 date for
compliance for publicly quoted companies and banks in Nigeria. According to FIRS (2013), the
Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Securities and Exchange Commission also adopted this
date for compliance and has issued guidance compliance circulars to ensure full
implementation of IFRS in Nigeria. The Council further directed the Nigerian Accounting
URL: 4
Archives of Business Research Vol.2, Issue 2,
Standards Board (NASB), under the supervision of the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Commerce
and Industry, to take necessary actions to give effect to the Council’s approval. Section 55 (1)
of the Companies Income Tax Act, Cap C21, LFN 2004 requires a company filing a return to
submit its audited account to the Federal Internal Revenue Service (FIRS) while Sections 8, 52
and 53 of the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria Act, 2011 gave effect to the adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards. This implies that the audited accounts to be
submitted to the FIRS after the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards shall
be prepared in compliance with Standards issued by IFRS. As part of plans to meet
international standards, the Federal Government has disclosed that new accounting system,
the international financial reporting standard (IFRS) should take off in Nigeria on 1st January,
2012. In Nigeria, the government has taken its stand to involve all stake holders including
institutions before it finally decided to adopt the IFRS on a gradual basis. IFRS for SMEs is to be
mandatorily adopted as at January 1, 2014. This means that all Small and Medium<sized
Entities in Nigeria have been statutorily required to issue IFRS based financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2014. Entities that do not meet the IFRS for SME’s criteria shall
report using Small and Medium<sized Entities Guidelines on Accounting (SMEGA) Level 3
issued by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). The
implementation of IFRS would reduce information irregularity and strengthens the
communication link between all stakeholders (Bushman and Smith, 2001). It also reduces the
cost of preparing different version of financial statements where an organization is a multi<
national (Healy and Palepu, 2001).
Meeks and Swann (2009) revealed that firms adopting IFRS had exhibited higher accounting
quality in the post<adoption period than they did in the pre<adoption period. In a study of
financial data of firms covering 21 countries, Barth (2008), confirmed that firms applying
Training Resources
Training materials on IFRS are not readily available at affordable costs in Nigeria to train such
a large group which poses a great challenge to IFRS adoption.
Tax Reporting
The tax considerations associated with the conversion to IFRS, like other aspects of a
conversion, are complex. IFRS conversion calls for a detailed review of tax laws and tax
administration.
According to Bewaji (2012), the following are the major challenges to implementing IFRS:
URL: 6
Archives of Business Research Vol.2, Issue 2,
o Current systems may not have the functionality to handle IFRS requirements hence,
changes in financial information requirements due to IFRS should be identified and the
impact of these requirements on the existing data models should be assessed.
o Changes in accounting policies and financial reporting processes can also have a
significant impact on a company’s financial systems and reporting infrastructure.
o These changes may require some adjustments to financial reporting systems, existing
interfaces, and underlying databases to incorporate specific data to support IFRS
reporting.
o Executives will need to collaborate with their IT counterparts to review systems
implications of IFRS.
o The conversion to IFRS can also result in changes to the number of consolidated entities,
mapping structures and financial statement reporting formats, all of which will require
adjustments to the consolidation system.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
A combination of descriptive and cross sectional research designs were considered to be the
most appropriate. This enabled the researcher to collect as many options as possible from the
respondents.
Study Population.
The population comprised of 172 professionals in accounting and finance sections across
companies selected and registered as group companies, public limited companies, small and
medium sized companies and non<profit making organizations with identification numbers in
Lagos state. Lagos state was selected being the commercial nerve centre of Nigeria and the
home of headquarters and operational centres of most companies in Nigeria.
Applying the desired error margin of 5% on the population of 171 professionals under study,
120 respondents were selected.
Stratified sampling was used to determine the sample size. Respondents were grouped in
strata. Purposive sampling was used in each stratum to get the information from Group
companies, public limited companies, small and medium sized companies and non<profit
making organizations across the different organizations. Simple random sampling was used to
limit the biasness of purposive sampling.
DATA ANALYSIS
Data collected were analyzed using both the qualitative and quantitative methods. The
analytical tools used in analyzing the data collected for the study include descriptive statistics,
chi< square and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The descriptive statistics used were tables,
percentages. Chi<square and analysis of variance (ANOVA were used to test the hypothesis
formulated through STATA 10 version. The formulae for chi<square used is
k Oiei
X2 =
e
Where i=1, Oi = observed frequency, ei= expected frequency.
The degree of freedom= (r<1) (k<1)
From table 1 above, 8.33% of the respondents strongly agreed that adoption of IFRS brings
along easy preparation of financial statement, 17.50% agreed, 3.33% were indifferent, 29.17%
disagreed, and 50% strongly disagreed. This indicates that adoption of IFRS brings complexity
in financial statements preparation. This is as a result of more disclosures that are required in
financial statements that are IFRS compliant. Furthermore, 16.67% of the respondents strongly
agreed that IFRS leads to improved quality of the financial statement report, 62.50% agreed,
URL: 8
Archives of Business Research Vol.2, Issue 2,
6.67% were indifferent while 10% disagreed and 4.17% strongly disagreed. The implication of
this is that adoption of IFRS improves the quality of financial statement report format.
In addition, 16.67% of the respondents strongly agreed that adoption of IFRS provide easy
access to offshore capital, 50% agreed, 7.50% were indifferent, 20. % disagreed, and 5.83%
strongly disagreed. The implication of this result is that adoption of IFRS provides easy access
to off shore capital due to easy assessment of financial report across borders.
The result showed that 57.50% of the respondents strongly agreed that there is easy
comparability of financial statements between companies worldwide, 26.67% agreed, 5 %
disagreed, and 10.83% strongly disagreed. The implication of this result is that easy
comparability of financial statements of two or more companies across borders is possible
with IFRS adoption Compliance with these standards provide the necessary impetus to compare and
contrast companies in different continents of the world which makes them more valuable for
decision making by management.
The result further showed that 6.67% of the respondents strongly agreed that adoption of IFRS
brings positive effect on Competition in the Accounting Market, 68.33% agreed, 4.17% were
indifferent, 7.50% disagreed and 13.33% strongly disagreed. With this result, IFRS adoption
encourages positive competition in the accounting market.
In addition, 24.17% of the respondents strongly agreed that adoption of IFRS reduces the
administrative cost of accessing the capital markets for companies globally, 50.83% agreed,
11.67% were indifferent, 3.33% disagreed and 10.00% strongly disagreed. This implies that
the respondents were of the opinion that adoption of IFRS has the tendency to reduce
administrative cost of companies’ access to offshore capital.
The result indicated that 43.33% of the respondents strongly agreed that with the adoption of
IFRS, companies trade their shares and securities on stock exchanges worldwide with reduced
cost, 40.83% agreed, 4.17% disagreed and 11.67% strongly disagreed. The implication of this
result is that adoption of IFRS enhances company’s profitability as a result of the reduced cost
of share trading.
From the result in table 1 above, 27.50% of the respondents strongly agreed that adoption of
IFRS minimize reporting costs as a result of common reporting systems and consistency in
statutory reporting, 48.33% agreed, 2.50% were indifferent, 6.67% disagreed, and 15%
strongly disagreed. This indicates that with adoption of IFRS in organisation, reporting costs
are minimized as a result of common reporting systems and consistency in statutory reporting.
Finally, 10.83% of the respondents strongly agreed that adoption of IFRS and strong
enforcement reduce earnings management cost, 60% agreed, 16.67% were indifferent, 8.33%
disagreed, and 4.17% strongly disagreed. The implication of this result is that adoption of IFRS
and its strong enforcement reduces earnings management cost.
Table 2Z Analysis of the significant relationship between adoption of IFRS and financial statement
report format.
S/N Relationship Pearson chiEsquare Pr (value) Remark
1 Q1 vs Q2 174.8517 0.000 Significant
2 Q1 vs Q3 202.0476 0.000 Significant
3 Q1 vs Q4 184.8606 0.000 Significant
4 Q1 vs Q5 292.5371 0.000 Significant
5 Q2 vs Q3 159.7717 0.000 Significant
6 Q2 vs Q4 153.1123 0.000 Significant
7 Q2 vs Q5 196.9316 0.000 Significant
8 Q3 vs Q4 263.0491 0.000 Significant
9 Q3 vs Q5 267.8038 0.000 Significant
10 Q4 vs Q5 264.6257 0.000 Significant
Source: Computations and output of STATA 10 based on author’s field survey (2013).
Decision : From table 2, minimum pearson chi<square calculated(x2 – cal) is 153.1123 and the
maximum pearson chi<square calculated is 292.5371. Chi – square tabulated (x2 – tab) is
37.566 at 0.01 level of significance. Since (x2 – cal) are greater than (x2 – tab) which makes all
the figures to be highly significant with probability of Pr(value) equal to 0.000. collectively, the
null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore the alternative hypothesis is accepted. Hence, there is
significant relationship between adoption of IFRS and financial statement report format.
Table 3ZRelationship between Adoption of IFRS and Financial statement report format by ANOVA
Source SS Df MS F Prob > F
Between groups 153.088333 4 38.2720833 95.88 0.0000
Within groups 45.9033333 115 .39915942
To further confirm the significant relationship between adoption of IFRS and financial
statement report format by the outcome of Chi<square stated above, the analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was also employed. The Table 3 above showed the relationship between adoption of
IFRS and financial statement report format using single factor ANOVA. Analysis of the data
showed that, since calculated F value of (95.88) is greater than critical F value (tabulated
value) which is 4.35, the null hypothesis is rejected while the alternative hypothesis is
accepted, hence there is significant relationship between adoption of IFRS and financial
statement report format.
Hypothesis 2
Decision: From table 4 on next page, minimum pearson chi<square calculated(x 2 – cal) is
156.6509 and the maximum pearson chi<square calculated is 265.9511. Chi – square tabulated
(x2 – tab) is 30.578 at 0.01 level of significance. Since (x 2 – cal) are greater than (x2 – tab) which
makes all the figures to be highly significant with probability of Pr(value) equal to 0.000.
collectively, the null hypothesis is rejected while the alternative hypothesis is accepted.Hence,
there is significant relationship between adoption of IFRS and cost reduction.
URL: 1
Archives of Business Research Vol.2, Issue 2,
To authenticate the relationship between adoption of IFRS and cost reduction by the outcome
of Chi<square stated above, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was also employed. The Table 5
above showed the relationship between adoption of IFRS and cost reduction. For analysis,
single factor ANOVA was used to test the relationship between adoption of IFRS and cost
reduction. Analysis of the data shows that, since calculated F value (112.43) is greater than
critical F value (tabulated value) which is 4.54, the null hypothesis is rejected while alternative
hypothesis is accepted, hence there is significant relationship between adoption of IFRS and
cost reduction.
The empirical findings shows that adoption of IFRS affects performance of business
organisation efficiently and effectively. Findings also showed that there is a strong positive
relationship between the adoption of IFRS and cost reduction. This indicates that the adoption
of IFRS reduce earnings management cost, saves companies the expense of preparing more
than one set of accounts for different national jurisdictions. IFRS also reduces the cost of
preparing different version of financial statements where an organization is a group of
companies or multi<national. According to the study, the big accounting firms also benefit in
their efforts to expand the global market for their services. Application of International
Financial Reporting Standards has helped developing countries like Nigeria gain legitimacy and
acknowledgement. In addition, Adoption of and compliance with these standards provide the
ability to compare and contrast companies on different continents of the world. In conclusion,
adoption of IFRS would enhance financial performance and proper accounting records.
Accounting records keeping increase the chances of the business operating profitably and
provide information for proper assessment of company performance. IFRS also help in
improving business efficiency and productivity. Adoption of IFRS assists in resource allocation
and performance planning in organisation. Resource allocation does not depend only on record
keeping but also involves appraising the viability of the business to be undertaken through
capital rationing to effectively allocate the resources. Firms that adopt IFRS show evidence of
Policy Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are hereby suggested
o International Financial reporting standard practice in both public and private sector in
Nigeria has not been actively implemented, therefore, IFRS practice in Nigeria should cut
across the public and private sector to bring uniformity in accounting practice regarding
annual preparation of financial reports to the owner of companies and other interested
parties.
o For accounting information and policies to be relevant and communication effective, it
must be timely. The need for effective policies is strengthened because a decision’s use of
accounting data may change overtime as a result of his changing perception concerning
the relevance of the data.
o The owners and managers of organisation should be made to embrace the adoption of
IFRS practices in accordance with the roadmap for implementation for effective financial
performance in their business. The financial reporting council, as a main control and
regulatory authority for IFRS compliance in Nigeria should be strengthened and be made
independent. The government should develop an efficient approach to integrate IFRS
considerations into all potential business transformation initiatives in Nigeria.
References
Abdulkadir M. (2012) Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in Developing Countries: The Case
of Nigeria International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 7, No. 3; February 2012 Pp 152<161
Adekoya, O. (2011). Similarities and Differences, IFRS and Nigerian GAAP. Lagos: Pricewater House Cooper
International Limited. (pwCIL).
Asaolu, T.O; Agorzie, C.J and Unan J.M (2012). Materials Management: An Effective Tool For Optimizing
Profitability in the Nigerian Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry’. Journal of Emerging Trends in
Economics and Management Sciences (JETEMS) VOL 3(1) PP 25<31.
Ashbaugh, H. and Pincus, M. (2001). Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the
Predictability of Earnings, Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 3: 417–34.
Barth, M., Landsman, W.R. and Lang, M. (2008).International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal
of Accounting Research, (46), 467< 498.
Barth, M.E. (2007). Research, standard setting, and global financial reporting. Hanover, MA:
New Publishers.
Bewaji O.(2012) International Financial Reporting Standards Implication for the Nigerian Accountants. 49th
induction ceremony for new members Pp 1<24
Bushman, R. and A. Smith (2001), “Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance”, Journal of
Accounting and Economics, 32, pp. 237<334.
Cai, F., and Wong, H. (2010). The Effects of IFRS adoption on global capital market integration. International
Business & Economic Research Journal, 9(10), 25<34.
Chai, H., Tang, Q., Jiang, Y., & Lin, Z. (2010). The Role of International Financial Reporting Standards in Accounting
Quality, Evidence from the European Union. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467<646X.2010.01041.x
URL: 1
Archives of Business Research Vol.2, Issue 2,
Choi, F. D. S. and Meek, G. K. (2005). International accounting (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Committee of Central Balance Sheet Data Office (CBSO) (2005). III working group on IFRS impact and CBSO
database. October 14.
Ejike, S.I. (2012). Adoption of international financial reporting standards to enhance corporate Governance in
Nigeria. Being A seminar/paper presented to the Department of Accountancy, Ebonyi state University, Abakaliki,
8<15
Epstein, B. J. (2009). The economic effects of IFRS adoption. The CPA Journal, 26<31.
Essien<Akpan I. (2011). The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The Role of the Chartered
Secretary and Administrator. A paper presented at the 35th Conference of ICSAN. Lagos Sheraton Hotels and
Towers. October 26th and 27th.
Eva K. J. and Sylwia G.T. (2006). Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EU publicly traded companies Journal
of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 15 (2006) 170–196
Ezeani N. S. and Oladele R. (2012). Adoption of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) to enhance
financial reporting in Nigeria universities. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter)
Vol. 2, No.3
FIRS (2013), Tax Implications of the Adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
Garuba, A. O. and Donwa P. (2011). The challenges of Adopting international financial Reporting system in Nigeria
JORIND I(9); 313<317.
Hoti A. H and Nuhiu A.R. (2011). Early Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the US
capital Markets International Research Journal of Finance and Economics Pp 98<105
Irvine, H. J., & Lucas, N. (2006). The rationale and impact of the adoption of international financial reporting
standards on developing nations: the case of the United Arab Emirates. In Proceedings 18th Asian<Pacific
Conference on International Accounting Issues, pages pp. 1<22, Maui, Hawaii. [Online] Available:
IASB, (2006). “Statement of Best Practice: working relationships between the IASB and other Accounting
Standard<Setters” February.Available online at http://www.iasb.org/uploaded files/documents/8 1500
SOBPFebruary2006final.pdf Accessed on 30th September 2013.
Ikpefan, O.A. and Akande, A.O. ( International financial reporting standard (IFRS): Benefits, Obstacles and
Intrigues for Implementation in Nigeria. Business Intelligence Journal Pp 299<307
Isenmila P.A. and Adeyemo K.A. (2013), Mandatory Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) in Nigeria: The Unresolved Institutional Question. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 (1)
January 2013 pp 175 – 1842
Jacob, R. A. and Madu, C. N. (2009). International Financial Reporting Standards: an indicator of high quality.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26, 712<722.
Jones, S., and J. Ratnatunga, 1997, The decision usefulness of cash flow statements by Australian reporting entities:
some further evidence, The British Accounting Review 29, 67–85.
Kenneth E. O. (2012). Adoption of IFRS and financial statements effects: The Perceived Implications on FDI and
Nigeria Economy Australian Journal of Business and Management Research Vol.2 No.05 [76<83]
Latridis, G. (2010). IFRS adoption and financial statement effects: The UK case. International Research Journal of
Finance and Economics, 38, 165<172.
Meeks, G., and Swann, P. (2009). Accounting Standards and the Economics of Standards. Accounting and Business
Research , 39,(3), 191<210.
Schultz, J., & Lopez, T. (2001). The impact of national influence on accounting estimates: Implications for
International Accounting Standard<Setters. The International Journal of Accounting, 36, 271–290.
Spiceland, J.D., Sepe, J.F. & Tomassini, L.A.(2001). Intermediate Accounting. New York. McGraw< Hill.
Tan, H., S. Wang and M. Welker (2011). Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions.
Journal of Accounting Research, forthcoming.
Umoru, H. and Ismail S. (2010). Nigeria to Adopt International Financial Reporting standards Vanguard 6th
September p.26
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.22.43 14