Group Five Construction Pty LTD Business Rescue Plan
Group Five Construction Pty LTD Business Rescue Plan
and
Dave Lake
of
Company
Group Five Construction Proprietary Limited (in business rescue)
2|P ag e
Table of Contents
4|P ag e
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION
1.1. The headings of the paragraphs in this Business Rescue Plan are for the purpose of
convenience and reference only and shall not be used in the interpretation of nor modify
nor amplify the terms of this Business Rescue Plan nor any paragraph hereof.
1.2. In this Business Rescue Plan, unless the context indicates otherwise, the words and
expressions below shall have the following meanings (and cognate expressions shall bear
corresponding meanings):
1.3. the following terms and / or expressions shall have the meanings assigned to them
hereunder and cognate expressions shall have corresponding meanings:
1.3.1. "Adopted" and / or “Adoption” means that a business rescue plan has been
approved in accordance with Section 152(2), read with Section 152(3)(b) and
Section 152(3)(c)(ii)(aa), of the Companies Act;
1.3.2. "Advisors" means the advisors to the BRPs and / or the Company, including but
not limited to those listed on page 2 of this Business Rescue Plan, and the
advisors' respective employees or representatives;
1.3.3. "Affected Person/s" shall bear the meaning ascribed thereto in Section
128(1)(a) of the Companies Act, being the sole shareholder of the Company,
Creditors, employees and Trade Unions;
1.3.4. "Assets Identified for Sale" means the assets and property of the Company
identified for sale as set out in Annexure D;
1.3.5. "BRPs" means the joint business rescue practitioners of the Company appointed
in terms of Section 129(3)(b) of the Companies Act on 11 March 2019, being van
den Steen and Lake;
1.3.6. "Business Day" means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or official public
holiday in South Africa;
5|P ag e
1.3.7. "Business Rescue Proceedings" means the proceedings to facilitate the
rehabilitation of the Company, which is Financially Distressed, as provided for in
Chapter 6 of the Companies Act;
1.3.8. "Business Rescue Costs" means the remuneration and expenses of the BRPs
and other costs of the Business Rescue Proceedings, including but not limited to
legal costs and the costs of the Advisors;
1.3.9. "Business Rescue Plan" means this document together with all of its annexures,
as amended from time to time, prepared in accordance with Section 150 of the
Companies Act;
1.3.11. "CIPC" means the Companies and intellectual Property Commission, established
in terms of Section 185 of the Companies Act;
1.3.12. "Commencement Date" means 11 March 2019, being the date upon which
Business Rescue Proceedings commenced in accordance with Section 129(1) of
the Companies Act;
1.3.14. "Companies Act" means the Companies Act 71 of 2008, as amended, including
the regulations promulgated thereunder;
1.3.15. "Concurrent Creditors" means all persons with unsecured claims, other than
Disputed Creditors, Contingent Creditors, employees, PCF Employees and
unsecured PCF Creditors;
1.3.17. "Contingent Creditors" means potential Creditors whose claims are contingent
upon future events, and are thus not entitled to cast a vote in respect of this
Business Rescue Plan;
1.3.18. "Creditors" means creditors to whom monies are owed by the Company and who
have been accepted as such by the BRPs and are therefore not Disputed
Creditors;
6|P ag e
1.3.19. "Creditors' Committee" means the committee formed in terms of Section
145(3) of the Companies Act and whose representatives are set out in paragraph
6.18;
1.3.20. “Defects Liability Period” means the contractual time period following practical
completion of a Project during which the Company remains liable to remedy any
defects which become apparent at its costs;
1.3.21. “Disputed Claims” means any claim, or part thereof, not recognised in this
Business Rescue Plan;
1.3.22. "Disputed Creditors" means persons who have Disputed Claims or allege that
they are Creditors, but, who dispute the amount for which their Claim is reflected
in Annexure B, who dispute the class in which they are reflected in Annexure B,
and / or who dispute the existence and / or value of their security as reflected in
Annexure B;
1.3.23. "Dispute Resolution Mechanism" means the dispute resolution mechanism set
out in paragraph 10.
1.3.24. "Distribution/s" means any amount payable to Creditors as provided for in this
Business Rescue Plan;
1.3.25. "Employers" means those clients of the Company who are counter parties to
contracts entered into with the Company and / or the Company's agents for
Construction Works in respect of the Projects;
1.3.26. "Expunged" means the full and final extinguishing of claims, or portions of
claims, in terms hereof, and which claims, or portions of claims, are consequently
no longer enforceable and recoverable;
1.3.30. "Group" means the group of companies comprising Group Five Limited, the
Company, and all of their directly and indirectly held subsidiaries;
1.3.31. "Group Five Limited" means Group Five Limited, registration number
1969/000032/06, a company registered and incorporated in accordance with the
laws of South Africa;
7|P ag e
1.3.32. "Group Five Limited Business Rescue Plan" means the business rescue plan
to be published in respect of Group Five Limited, together with all its annexures,
as amended from time to time, and prepared in accordance with Section 150 of
the Companies Act;
1.3.33. "Group Five Power" means Group Five Power International Proprietary Limited,
registration number 2008/007984/07, a company registered and incorporated in
accordance with the laws of South Africa;
1.3.35. “Implementation Phase 1” means the period following the Pre-Plan Period until
approximately the end of the first quarter of 2020, as set out in paragraph 7.3.2;
1.3.39. "Lake" means David Charles Lake (identity number 580704 5324 186), a
business rescue practitioner as contemplated in Regulation 126 of the Companies
Act;
1.3.40. "Lenders" means The Standard Bank of South Africa (acting in various
capacities), Absa Bank Limited, FirstRand Bank Limited, HSBC Bank plc and
Lombard;
1.3.43. "Management" means the management team who had, and continues to have,
the delegated and supervised responsibility of managing the day-to-day
operations of the Company as at the Commencement Date;
1.3.44. "Metis Strategic Advisors" means Metis Strategic Advisors Proprietary Limited,
registration number 2015/220685/07, a company registered and incorporated in
accordance with the laws of South Africa;
8|P ag e
1.3.45. "Other Assets" means all other assets of the Company not included in the Assets
Identified for Sale (as per Annexure D), including, amongst other things, legal
claims, claims against debtors, pension fund surpluses and contractual rights;
1.3.47. "PCF Creditor" means a creditor, including the PCF Lenders who provided PCF
to the Company;
1.3.49. "PCF Lenders" means the Lenders who provided PCF to the Company;
1.3.50. "Preferent Creditors" means Persons who have a preferent unsecured claims
against the Company as envisaged in Chapter 6 of the Companies Act and / or
Insolvency Law 24 of 1936, as the case may be, and as the context determines;
1.3.51. "Pre-Plan Period" means the period from the Commencement Date to the
Publication Date;
1.3.52. "Projects" means those projects in respect of which the Company has
contractually agreed with the relevant Employer to perform Construction Works;
1.3.53. "Proposals" means the proposals made to Affected Persons in terms of this
Business Rescue Plan;
1.3.54. "Publication Date" means the date on which this Business Rescue Plan is
published in accordance with terms of Section 150(5) of the Companies Act, being
30 August 2019;
1.3.56. "Rand" or "R" or "ZAR" means the lawful currency of South Africa;
9|P ag e
1.3.59. "SARS" means the South African Revenue Services;
1.3.60. "Secured Creditor" means a Person who holds security for a claim against the
Company, including PCF Creditors who hold security against the Company;
1.3.63. "Substantial Implementation Date" means the date upon which the BRPs file
a notice with the CIPC pursuant to the events contemplated in paragraph 8.2
having occurred and whereupon the Business Rescue Proceedings will terminate;
1.3.64. "Tax" or "Taxation" means any tax payable to SARS in terms of the laws of
South Africa;
1.3.65. "Trade Unions" includes, but may not be limited to, the Building Construction
and Allied Workers Union; the Bargaining Council for the Civil Engineering
Industry; the Building Industry Bargaining Council; the Building Wood and Allied
Workers Union of South Africa; the Construction and Allied Workers Union (South
Africa); the General Industries Workers Union of South Africa; the Metal and
Engineering Industries Bargaining Council, the National Transport Movement; the
National Union of Civil and Allied Workers, the National Union of Mineworkers;
the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa; the South African Transport
and Allied Workers Union and UASA – The Union, all being trade unions registered
as such in terms of Section 96 of the LRA;
1.3.66. "van den Steen" means Petrus Francois van den Steen (identity number
6811075024087), a business rescue practitioner as contemplated in Regulation
126 of the Companies Act;
1.3.67. "VAT" means the value-added tax levied in terms of the Value-Added Tax Act 89
of 1991, as amended;
1.4. Any reference to any statute, regulation or other legislation in this Business Rescue Plan
shall be a reference to that statute, regulation or other legislation as at the Publication
Date, and as amended or substituted from time to time.
1.5. Any reference in the Business Rescue Plan to any other agreement or document shall be
construed as a reference to such other agreement or document as same may have been,
or may from time to time be, amended, varied, novated or supplemented.
10 | P a g e
1.6. If any provision in a definition in this Business Rescue Plan is a substantive provision
conferring a right or imposing an obligation on any person or entity then, notwithstanding
that it is only in a definition, effect shall be given to that provision as if it were a
substantive provision in the body of this Business Rescue Plan.
1.7. Where any term is defined in this Business Rescue Plan within a paragraph other than
this paragraph 1, that term shall bear the meaning ascribed to it in that paragraph
wherever it is used in this Business Rescue Plan.
1.8. Where any number of days is to be calculated from a particular day, such number shall
be calculated as excluding such particular day and commencing on the next day, if the
last day of such number so calculated falls on a day which is not a Business Day, the last
day shall be deemed to be the next succeeding day which is a Business Day.
1.9. Any reference to days (other than a reference to Business Days), months or years shall
be a reference to calendar days, months or years, as relevant.
1.10. Words or terms that are capitalised and not otherwise defined in the narrative of this
Business Rescue Plan (excluding capitalised words or terms used for the purpose of tables
and / or headings) shall bear the meaning assigned to them in the Companies Act.
1.11. The use of the word "including", "includes" or "include" followed by a specific example/s
shall not be construed as limiting the meaning of the general wording preceding it and
the eiusdem generis rule shall not be applied in the interpretation of such general wording
or such specific example/s.
1.12. To the extent that any provision of this Business Rescue Plan is ambiguous, it is to be
interpreted in a manner that is consistent with the purpose of the business rescue
provisions of Section 7(k) and Chapter 6 of the Companies Act.
1.13. Unless otherwise stated, all references to sections are references to sections in the
Companies Act.
2.1. Each of the Company and Group Five Limited is under its own legally separate business
rescue proceedings in terms of Chapter 6 of the Companies Act. This document reflects
the Business Rescue Plan in respect of the Company only.
2.2. Affected Persons of Group Five Limited should refer to the Group Five Limited Business
Rescue Plan to be published in respect of those proceedings.
2.3. The Affected Persons of the Company and Group Five Limited will meet separately and
vote only in respect of the business rescue plan directly relevant to them.
11 | P a g e
2.4. Affected Persons of Group Five Limited may wish to have regard to this Business Rescue
Plan insofar as Group Five Limited is the sole shareholder of the Company.
2.5. For the purposes of Section 150(2) of the Companies Act, this Business Rescue Plan is
divided into several chapters:
This chapter sets out general information about the Business Rescue Plan,
including the structure of the Business Rescue Plan and with whom Affected
Persons should engage for independent advice, as well as a summary of the
Proposals.
This chapter provides details on the Proposals and is set out in the form required
by the Companies Act.
This part sets out the background to the Company, the circumstances
that resulted in the Company's Financial Distress and an overview of
Business Rescue Proceedings.
This part describes the Proposals, including the effects, benefits and
risks of adopting the Business Rescue Plan.
This part sets out the conditions that need to be fulfilled in order for
the Business Rescue Plan to be implemented and become effective,
the assumptions applied in respect of the Proposal and when the
Business Rescue Proceedings will have been substantially
implemented and the Business Rescue Proceedings terminated.
This chapter sets out certain administrative and general matters pertaining to the
Business Rescue Proceedings and the Business Rescue Plan.
The chapter contains the BRPs' recommendation and the certificate that is
required to accompany each business rescue plan in terms of the Companies Act.
12 | P a g e
2.6. Unless indicated otherwise, all figures represented in this document are as at
28 February 2019, being the closest practical date to the Commencement Date.
3.1. Affected Persons are advised to consult an independent attorney, accountant or other
professional advisor in respect of this Business Rescue Plan, as may be required.
3.2. Nothing contained in the Business Rescue Plan shall constitute tax, accounting or legal
advice to any Affected Person, and the BRPs do not make any representations in respect
thereof, other than as may be expressly stated in this Business Rescue Plan.
3.3. The BRPs shall not be responsible for any acts taken by (or omissions arising from) any
Affected Person’s reliance on this Business Rescue Plan.
4. Notifications
4.1. Insofar as possible, notice has been given to the Affected Persons, in terms of the
Companies Act and the Regulations thereto, that the Company has been placed under
Business Rescue Proceedings and placed under the control and supervision of the BRPs,
in accordance of the Companies Act.
4.2. In terms of Section 150(5) of the Companies Act, the Business Rescue Plan was required
to be published on 16 April 2019. However, the BRPs obtained approval for an extension
for the publication of the Business Rescue Plan to 28 June 2019 at the first statutory
meeting of Creditors. Thereafter, on 27 June 2019, a further extension for the publication
of the Business Rescue Plan to 30 August 2019 was approved. Affected Persons were
duly notified of these approvals. No further extensions have been approved.
4.3. Regular updates relating to the Business Rescue Proceedings have been provided to
Affected Persons in accordance with Section 132(3)(a) of the Companies Act.
4.4. The BRPs have taken all reasonable steps to ensure that all Affected Persons have been
notified that the Business Rescue Plan has been published and is available for
consideration. All notices issued in respect of the publication of the Business Rescue Plan
contained details of the meeting of Affected Persons to consider and vote on the Business
Rescue Plan.
4.5. The abovementioned notifications and other information relating to the Business Rescue
Proceedings can be accessed on the Company’s website, being
http://www.g5.co.za/group_five_limited.php.
13 | P a g e
5. Summary of the Proposals in terms of the Business Rescue Plan
5.1. Consultation
In preparing the Business Rescue Plan, the BRPs have consulted with, and taken into
consideration where relevant, the views expressed by Affected Persons, other
stakeholders and their legal representation.
5.2.1. The high degree of Financial Distress in the Company as at the Commencement
Date was characterised by material levels of unsustainable debt coupled with
significant projected negative forward cash flows from operations.
5.2.2. The Company’s management accounts for the period ending 28 February 2019
show that the Company’s liabilities exceeded its assets by approximately
R1.5 billion.
5.2.3. The majority of the Company’s material assets by value (including the Company’s
interest in companies comprising the manufacturing division and those
comprising the Intertoll Europe businesses) were provided as security to the
Lenders.
5.2.4. This meant that returning the Company to solvency in its current structure would
not have been possible without the injection of a significant sum of new equity
capital. The sole shareholder of the Company (Group Five Limited) was itself in
Financial Distress and unable to provide or raise new capital.
5.2.6. Over and above this, where possible, Subsidiaries or operating divisions of the
Company will be disposed of through controlled sale processes, as businesses
that are intact along with their employees. Such businesses can thus continue on
a solvent basis under their new ownership.
5.3.1. PCF has been secured from the Lenders to provide operational solvency during
the Business Rescue Proceedings and to ensure that value realisations are
optimised and losses from Projects minimised.
14 | P a g e
which are to secure profits from favourable Projects, minimise losses from
unfavourable Projects, minimise claims, and avoid wherever possible the calling
of Financial Guarantees (which would otherwise increase the pool of Creditor
Claims).
5.3.3. Wherever possible, Subsidiaries and operating divisions of the Company have
been (or are being) restructured and / or disposed of to new owners in arms-
length transactions, for fair value, on a solvent basis and as going concerns.
5.3.4. Where this is not possible, the Business Rescue Proceedings contemplate a
controlled wind-down, wind-up and / or deregistration of the relevant Subsidiaries
and operating divisions, including the head office of the Company.
5.3.5. All Other Assets of the Company are being vigorously pursued and / or disposed
of.
5.3.6. Costs are being aggressively managed and reduced in accordance with the
diminishing needs of the Company.
5.3.7. The net effect of the Business Rescue Proceedings will be the realisation of better
Distributions to Creditors than would have been the case if the Company had
instead been immediately liquidated, and the saving (solvency) of several of the
operating businesses / divisions – albeit under new ownership.
5.3.8. Affected Persons are referred to Chapter 2 for a more detailed analysis of the
Proposals in this Business Rescue Plan.
5.4. Timing
5.4.1. In preparing the Business Rescue Plan, the BRPs have considered three distinct
periods for the Company, these being:
5.4.1.1. the period from the Commencement Date to the Publication Date
(“Pre-Plan Period”);
5.4.1.2. the period following the Pre-Plan Period until approximately the end of
the first quarter of 2020 (“Implementation Phase 1”).
5.4.2. With these phases, the BRPs aim to accelerate as far as possible the payment of
early Distributions to Creditors during or at the end of Implementation Phase 1.
15 | P a g e
5.5. Anticipated outcomes
5.5.1. When comparing the estimated dividends payable to Creditors in the event of a
liquidation of the Company against the BRPs’ estimation of Distributions payable
to Creditors in accordance with this Business Rescue Plan, each class of Creditor
will (it is anticipated) receive a significantly greater return in terms of this
Business Rescue Plan than would have been the case if the Company had been
immediately liquidated.
5.5.2. The PwC report seeks to demonstrate to Creditors the returns they can anticipate
in the alternative scenario of an immediate liquidation. When compared to the
PwC report, the shortfall in Business Rescue Proceedings is anticipated to be
R4.8 billion better than that estimated in a liquidation. The relevant table of the
PwC report has been included in paragraph 6.9.3.
5.5.3. Industry experts have indicated to the BRPs that liquidation proceedings would
take approximately five to ten years to complete. The envisaged Business Rescue
Proceedings is expected to be completed in a materially shorter time frame than
this.
5.5.4. The BRPs anticipate that approximately 3 000 to 3 500 jobs in the Group will be
preserved through the restructuring and / or sale of Subsidiaries, operating
businesses, divisions and / or contracts to new owners.
5.6.1.1. The amount and timing of Distributions to Creditors will depend upon
the successful and timeous fulfilment of the terms and conditions
related to the Proposals.
5.6.1.2. The BRPs anticipate that the majority of Distributions due to Creditors
will be made during Implementation Phase 1, which phase it is
anticipated will be completed around the end of the first quarter of
2020.
5.6.1.3. The BRPs anticipate that a first Distribution will be made to Concurrent
Creditors at the end of Implementation Phase 1. In this regard, it is
estimated (but not binding on the BRPs) that this first Distribution to
Concurrent Creditors should be approximately four cents in the Rand
(more than the full liquidation dividend as estimated by PwC).
5.6.1.4. Implementation Phase 2 will deal with all matters which by necessity
will endure beyond the end of Implementation Phase 1. Further
16 | P a g e
Distributions will be made to Creditors as and when funds become
available during this phase.
5.6.1.5. While the table below is no more than a reasonable estimate and is
not binding on the BRPs, the table provides an approximation of the
anticipated aggregate cents in the Rand Distributions payable per
Creditor class during the full Business Rescue Proceedings (including
both Implementation Phase 1 and Implementation Phase 2):
5.6.2.2. The BRPs anticipate that the Business Rescue Proceedings will result
in the preservation of approximately 3 000 to 3 500 jobs in the Group
through the restructuring and / or sale of Subsidiaries, operating
businesses, divisions and / or contracts to new owners.
5.6.2.3. However, whilst the BRPs have tried to limit job losses wherever
possible, the ongoing Retrenchment Processes are required given the
Financial Distress of the Company, and the inevitable winding down of
parts of the Company.
5.6.2.4. Where possible, the BRPs have supported, endorsed and aided those
employees affected by the Retrenchment Processes in their efforts to
secure alternative employment.
17 | P a g e
5.6.2.6. All outstanding retrenchment entitlements owing to PCF Employees
retrenched during the Business Rescue Proceedings will be settled
during or at the end of Implementation Phase 1.
Given the high level of Financial Distress in the Company, regrettably the BRPs
do not anticipate that any residual value will accrue to the sole shareholder of the
Company. This is consistent with the anticipated outcome of liquidation as
calculated by PwC.
The Benefits of the Business Rescue Plan include, amongst other things:
5.7.1. more favourable Distributions to Creditors than would arise under the alternative
scenario of an immediate liquidation of the Company;
5.7.2. the saving of a significant number of jobs and of a number of business units
(albeit under new ownership);
5.7.4. a shorter duration for the completion of the Business Rescue Proceedings of the
Company relative to a liquidation.
Affected Persons are referred to paragraph 7.9 for further details of the benefits to be
enjoyed from the successful implementation of this Business Rescue Plan
5.8.1. The BRPs are of the opinion that a successful rescue of the Company is achievable
within the meaning of the Companies Act, but draw attention to some challenges
5.8.2. The implementation of the Proposals is subject to factors potentially not known
to the BRPs as at the Publication Date, including, amongst other things, required
amendments to the Business Rescue Plan, unforeseen litigation, changes in
regulations and legislation, delays in implementing the Retrenchment Processes,
restricted access to PCF, unforeseen damages claims and / or statutory liability,
crystallisation of Financial Guarantees, and the operational or financial
performance of the Projects.
5.8.3. Whilst the BRPs have tried to determine realistic valuations for the Assets
Identified for Sale, uncertainties remain as to the timing of such sales and the
actual proceeds that will be realised from a disposal or realisation of these assets.
18 | P a g e
The BRPs aim to implement the most appropriate methods of sale in order to
achieve optimal values and timing from the sales process.
5.8.4. Affected Persons are referred to paragraph 7.11 for further details of the risks
related to the Adoption of this Business Rescue Plan.
It is the opinion of the BRPs that there remains a reasonable prospect of a successful
rescue of the Company within the meaning of the Companies Act. The Proposals contained
in this Business Rescue Plan are reasonably anticipated to result in a better return to
Creditors than would have resulted from an immediate liquidation of the Company.
19 | P a g e
CHAPTER 2 – PROPOSALS
6.1.1. Detailed corporate structures of the Group are set out in Annexure A.
6.1.2. At the Commencement Date, the Company held direct and indirect interests
(controlling or otherwise) in approximately 181 companies in 38 different
jurisdictions, excluding branches and unincorporated JVs.
6.1.3. As at the Publication Date, the issued share capital of the Company comprised
1 000 001 ordinary shares, all held by Group Five Limited.
6.1.4. The BRPs are conducting an analysis of the direct and indirect Subsidiaries of the
Company, many of which are dormant and / or have little or no value. The BRPs
will seek the closure (i.e. winding-down, winding-up and / or deregistration) of
such Subsidiaries where no recoverable value for the Company is evident. Where
a Subsidiary has directors who are employees appointed by the Company, the
BRPs will work with those directors to give effect to such closure.
6.2. Directors
As at the Publication Date, the Directors and officers of the Company, according to the
CIPC, were:
20 | P a g e
Sunninghill
South Africa
Gauteng
2157
6.4.1. The Company commenced business in the construction industry in 1974 and has,
since inception, expanded its operations beyond construction by acquiring or
developing operating entities in its “Manufacturing” and “Investments &
Concessions” divisions.
6.4.2. The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Group Five Limited. Group Five
Limited has one direct Subsidiary in addition to the Company, this being Everite
Proprietary Limited.
6.4.3. The Company operates on a principal / agent basis. To this effect, certain
Subsidiaries of the Company have concluded contracts as disclosed agents of the
Company with Employers and third parties. These contracts are binding on the
Company, as the disclosed principal, and the contracting parties, who therefore
qualify as Affected Persons.
6.5.1. The Group (of which the Company is the major part) incurred financial losses of
approximately R800 million (as reflected in the published financial statements)
for the year ended 30 June 2017, and further losses of R1.3 billion in the year to
June 2018.
6.5.2. Market conditions in the construction industry worsened, and certain of the
Company’s Projects were under-priced. As a result, several of the Company’s
construction projects were (and continued to be at the Commencement Date)
loss-making.
6.5.3. Working capital could not support the Group businesses without new funding. In
order to alleviate the cash flow constraints of the Group arising from, amongst
other things, loss-making projects (the Kpone Project in particular) and a
shrinking order book, the Company obtained bridge funding in the amount of
R650 million from the Lenders, which funding was granted to the Company in
April 2018. This facility was in default at the Commencement Date.
6.5.4. In return for the provision of the bridge funding, Group Five Limited and several
other companies within the Group guaranteed to the Lenders the repayment of
the bridge loan as well as other obligations of the Company. As security for the
bridge loan and other obligations of the Group to the Lenders, security was
provided to the Lenders over, amongst other things, the companies comprising
21 | P a g e
the manufacturing division of the Group and the European based Intertoll
businesses. The Lenders further required the subordination of all intragroup
loans.
6.5.5. The Company's financial constraints were exacerbated following the termination
of the Kpone project when payment in the amount of US$106,5 million was
demanded by Cenpower from the guarantee providers under the guarantees that
were issued in respect of the Kpone Project.
6.5.6. As a result, the Company became indebted to such guarantee providers under
counter-indemnity arrangements, which came into force when payment was
made by the providers. Such indebtedness remains outstanding.
6.5.8. Further to the R2.1 billion losses incurred in the 2017 and 2018 financial years,
management accounts for the Group prepared for the 8-month period to
28 February 2019 indicated that a further approximate R2.3 billion of losses were
incurred in that period – primarily from within the Company and its Subsidiaries.
Major losses and material negative cash flows were forecast for the Group for the
balance of the 2019 calendar year.
6.5.9. As a result, in February 2019, Group Five sought additional bridge funding from
the Lenders, but this request was declined.
6.5.10. Group Five Limited approached its major shareholders in, in late 2018 and early
2019, to request support for a material rights offer to recapitalise the Group, but
the shareholders advised that the conditions were not suitable for them to provide
support for the proposed rights offer.
6.5.11. As co-principal obligor with the Company, Group Five Limited was consequently
also Financially Distressed and unable to meet its financial obligations.
6.5.12. The Company was clearly Financially Distressed as it was unable to meet its
current and upcoming financial obligations. In the absence of obtaining further
funding, which Group Five Limited was unable to provide, the commencement of
Business Rescue Proceedings for the Company was inevitable, with the only
alternative being liquidation.
6.5.13. Accordingly, the boards of directors of both the Company and Group Five Limited
passed resolutions voluntarily commencing Business Rescue Proceedings for the
respective companies on 11 March 2019, following which the BRPs were
appointed.
22 | P a g e
6.6. Business rescue
As provided for in the Companies Act, business rescue aims to facilitate the rehabilitation
of a company that is Financially Distressed by providing for, amongst other things:
6.7.2. With this Business Rescue Plan, the BRPs intend to provide a better return to the
Company’s Creditors than would result from the immediate liquidation of the
Company.
6.7.3. In addition to the above, the BRPs would note that, where possible, a Subsidiary
or operating division of the Company will be disposed of (in many instances after
some form of restructuring) through a controlled sales process, as a business that
is intact along with its employees. Such businesses can thus continue on a solvent
basis under new ownership. In cases where this is not feasible, the businesses
will be wound-down in a controlled and cost-effective manner.
6.7.4.2. for those Subsidiaries or operating divisions disposed of, the Business
Rescue Plan will have secured the likelihood of those businesses
continuing in existence on a solvent basis (with its relevant
employees) and under new ownership.
23 | P a g e
6.8. Business rescue events
6.8.1. The table below sets out the salient dates on which certain events have taken
place, and which will take place, during the Business Rescue Proceedings.
6.8.2. All notices that have been circulated to the Affected Persons of the Company and
of Group Five Limited can be obtained from the Company's website, being
http://www.g5.co.za/group_five_limited.php
Event 2019
Board resolution to Commence Business Rescue Proceedings 11 Mar
Board resolution filed with the CIPC 11 Mar
Commencement of Business Rescue Proceedings 11 Mar
Appointment of BRPs 11 Mar
First statutory meeting of creditors 26 Mar
First statutory meeting of employees 26 Mar
Request and approval of extension for publication of Business Rescue Plan to 26 Mar
28 June
Additional Creditors Meeting – Cape Town 4 Apr
Additional employees meeting – Cape Town 4 Apr
Additional Creditors Meeting - Durban 5 Apr
Additional employees meeting – Durban 5 Apr
Meeting to consider the BRPs' Remuneration Agreement 24 Apr
Notice of outcome of vote in respect of the BRPs’ Remuneration Agreement 3 May
First Creditors Committee Meeting 10 May
First claims deadline 15 May
First Employees Committee Meeting 17 May
Second Employees Committee Meeting 30 May
Notice of Business Rescue Proceedings published in the Government Gazette 31 May
Notice of Business Rescue Proceedings published in The Star Newspaper 31 May
Notice of Business Rescue Proceedings published in Die Beeld 31 May
Publication of Business Rescue Proceedings Status Update Report 11 Jun
Third Employees Committee Meeting 21 Jun
Extension Approved for the Publication of the Business Rescue Plan to 27 Jun
30 August
Notice to Subordinated and Non-Independent Creditors 27 Jun
First Extension of Claims Deadline 30 Jun
Second Creditors Committee Meeting 11 Jul
Publication of Business Rescue Proceedings Status Update Report 11 Jul
Fourth Employees Committee Meeting 23 Jul
Notice of Extension of Publication Date of the Business Rescue Plan published in 26 Jul
The Star Newspaper
Notice of Extension of Publication Date of the Business Rescue Plan published in 26 Jul
Die Beeld
24 | P a g e
Notice of Extension of Publication Date of the Business Rescue Plan published in 02 Aug
the Government Gazette
Third Creditors Committee Meeting 5 Aug
Publication of Business Rescue Proceedings Status Report 15 Aug
Fifth Employees Committee Meeting 19 Aug
Fourth Creditors Committee Meeting 19 Aug
Publication of Business Rescue Plan 30 Aug
6.9.1. The BRPs appointed PwC as independent experts to determine an estimate of the
probable recovery for each Creditor if the Company were to have been placed
into liquidation on 28 February 2019.
6.9.2. As the financial information as at the Commencement Date was not available, the
closest practical date to the Commencement Date has been used by PwC, this
being the month end of February 2019.
6.9.3. The following table has been extracted from the report provided to the BRPs by
PwC showing the estimated probable dividends which Creditors would receive if
the Company had been liquidated as at 28 February 2019:
25 | P a g e
Lombard 791 724 738 47 236 775 6.0 (744 487 963)
Nedbank 24 152 825 9 862 236 40.8 (14 290 589)
CGIC 38955 258 1 326 731 3.4 (37 628 527)
Constantia 1 183 598 40 311 3.4 (1 143 287)
Total payment
guarantor 1 758 734 646 169 332 916 (1 589 401 730)
recoveries
Month end sundry
and contractor 991 608 594 33 772 018 3.4 (957 836 576)
accruals
Contract advance
595 063 168 20 266 549 3.4 (574 796 619)
payments and billings
Subcontractor control
accounts and 395 376 165 13 465 647 3.4 (381 910 518)
retentions
Other concurrent
306 270 647 10 430 908 3.4 (295 839 739)
creditors
Total other
concurrent creditor 2 288 318 573 77 935 121 (2 210 383 453)
recoveries¹
Contract damages
1 783 000 000 60 725 076 3.4 (1 722 274 924)
claims (estimate)
Total estimated
additional damages 1 783 000 000 60 725 076 (1 722 274 924)
claims
Total 8 257 721 098 891 639 397 10.8 (7 366 081 701)
Note 1: PwC understand that all intercompany loans are fully subordinated to all creditors.
Accordingly, these have been excluded for the purposes of the illustrative liquidation calculation.
The relevant notes in relation to the table above have been extracted directly from the
PwC report and reproduced below:
• Recoveries as presented have been adjusted to reflect the net present value of
an assumed five year liquidation proceeding (secured recoveries assumed to be
recovered within one year, the balance over five years (“Adjusted”))
2. Asset realisations in the Group are, in the context of the of the illustrative liquidation
calculation, in the main predicated on an ‘ex-situ’ break up or fire sale basis. In
addition to this, given that the trading companies within the Group are inextricably
linked, both operationally and financially, PWC have assumed a concurrent breakup
(or going concern sale) of all subsidiary companies across the Group.
26 | P a g e
3. Recoveries for Creditors as presented above are anticipated principally from key
subsidiaries (directly or indirectly held) and, to a lesser extent, recoveries from the
Company’s own assets (such as debtors and investments not specifically granted to
lenders as security):
• Key asset value within the Group is expected to be realised mainly from the
Company’s European held assets;
• These assets are encumbered to the Lenders in relation to the bridge facility.
Accordingly, realisations from such assets are assumed to flow directly to the
Lenders.
4. Overall recoveries for concurrent creditors (excluding any claims from the Lenders)
are expected to be low (c.3 cents in the Rand). Notwithstanding low asset realisation
levels expected in the break up of the Group in a liquidation scenario (with key value
flowing directly to the relevant secured lenders at subsidiary level), overall creditor
recoveries are expected to reduce due to the dilution resulting from an increase in
concurrent claims which PWC would anticipate being lodged against the Company in
a liquidation, including:
• Claims from the Lenders in relation to the bridge facility (via the security SPV)
and Kpone overdraft guarantees;
6.10.1. A list of the material assets of the Company at book value and the security given
in relation thereto is set out in Annexure C.
6.10.2. The balance sheet of the Company as at 28 February 2019 (see Annexure G)
shows that the Company had total liabilities of approximately R6.0 billion.
6.11.2. Annexure B indicates which Creditors are Secured Creditors, PCF Creditors or
Concurrent Creditors. The list also sets out what is owed to PCF Employees.
6.11.3. A summary of the Creditors’ voting interests has been provided in the table below:
27 | P a g e
Type Category Pre BR Vote % vote
(R’m) (R’m)
Secured Asset Based Finance 35 35 1%
Bridge Loan 681 681 13%
Guarantees crystallised 1 666 1 666 31%
Financial Guarantees 1 807 1 807 34%
Mortgages 307 307 6%
4 496 4 496 85%
Preferred PCF Employees 44 44 1%
44 44 1%
Concurrent Concurrent Creditors 750 730 14%
750 730 14%
Subordinated Inter Company Loans 653 0 0%
653 0 0%
TOTAL 5 943 5 270 100%
6.11.4. As at the Publication Date, the BRPs have received numerous claim forms from
Creditors. A verification process has been undertaken to reconcile the claims of
Creditors as reflected in the records of the Company against the claim forms
received. Further details about Creditors and claims are set out in paragraph 6.24.
In terms of Section 140(1)(a) of the Companies Act, the BRPs took full management
control of the Company and delegated certain functions to Management in terms of
Section 140(1)(b) of the Companies Act.
The BRPs have complied with all statutory obligations under Chapter 6 of the Companies
Act and will continue to render monthly update reports to the CIPC and Affected Persons
as contemplated in Section 132(3) of the Companies Act.
6.14. Investigations
6.14.1. Section 141(1) of the Companies Act requires that “As soon as practicable after
being appointed, a practitioner must investigate the company’s affairs, business,
property, and financial situation, and after having done so, consider whether
there is any reasonable prospect of the company being rescued”.
6.14.2. In the course of their investigations, into whether or not a reasonable prospect
exists for the Company to be rescued, the BRPs have concluded that there is a
reasonable prospect of the Company being rescued.
6.14.4. The BRPs have to date not found, or been presented with, cogent evidence of any
misconduct that would require the BRPs to take the requisite steps as
contemplated in Section 141(2)(c).
6.15.1. In terms of Section 150(5) of the Companies Act, the Business Rescue Plan was
required to be published on 16 April 2019 (i.e. within 25 days from the date of
the appointment of the BRPs).
6.16.1. At the first meeting of employees, the BRPs called for nominations for
representatives to sit on an employees' committee. Details of the members of the
employees' committee as at the Publication Date are set out in the table below:
6.16.2. The BRPs held the first statutory meeting of employees, in terms of Section 148
of the Companies Act, on 26 March 2019, whereby the BRPs explained the
29 | P a g e
Business Rescue Proceedings process. Further meetings of employees were
convened on 4 and 5 April 2019 in Cape Town and Durban respectively for staff
in those areas.
6.16.3. The BRPs have maintained contact with the employees of the Company through
Management and the employees committee, including Trade Unions who were
invited and some of whom attended employees committee meetings.
6.18.1. Section 145(3) of the Companies Act provides that the Creditors of the Company
are entitled to form a Creditors' Committee, and through that committee are
entitled to be consulted by the BRPs during the development of the Business
Rescue Plan.
6.18.2. Consequently, at the first statutory meeting of creditors and at the additional
Creditors' meetings in Cape Town and Durban, the BRPs called for nominations
for representatives to sit on a creditors' committee. Details of the members of
the creditors' committee are set out in the table below:
30 | P a g e
6.18.3. At a meeting of the Creditors Committee held on 10 May 2019, Haroon Laher of
Fasken Attorneys was appointed by the Creditors' Committee, to be its
independent chairman.
6.18.4. The Creditors’ Committee has had further consultations and meetings with the
BRPs on 10 May 2019, 11 July 2019, 5 August 2019 and 19 August 2019 and the
independent chairman of the Creditors Committee has been in constant
communication with the BRPs.
6.19. Moratorium
6.19.1. The moratorium imposed by Section 133 (as read with Section 150(2)(b)(i)) of
the Companies Act prohibits any legal proceedings, including enforcement action,
against the Company, or in relation to any property belonging to the Company or
lawfully in its possession, from being commenced or being proceeded with for the
duration of the Business Rescue Proceedings.
6.19.2. This means, amongst other things, that no Person is entitled to proceed in any
forum against the Company for non-payment of debts during Business Rescue
Proceedings unless the BRPs or the High Court consent thereto.
6.19.3. The intention of a moratorium is to give the Company breathing space and to
provide the Company with the best possible opportunity to develop and
successfully implement the Business Rescue Plan.
6.19.4. The moratorium in relation to the Company took effect on the Commencement
Date and is expected to remain in place until the termination of Business Rescue
Proceedings as defined in paragraph 8.1.
6.20. Ongoing role of the Company and the treatment of existing contracts
Section 136(2)(a) of the Companies Act allows the BRPs to entirely, partially or
conditionally suspend, for the duration of the Business Rescue Proceedings, any
obligation of the Company that arises under an agreement to which the Company
was a party at the Commencement Date and would otherwise become due during
the Business Rescue Proceedings. Accordingly, the BRPs have suspended the
Company's obligations under certain agreements that will become due during
Business Rescue Proceedings and have reserved the right to continue to do so as
necessary.
The BRPs have the right, in terms of Section 136(2)(b) of the Companies Act, to
entirely, partially or conditionally cancel any contract (whether or not they are
31 | P a g e
entitled to do so in terms of the terms of the contract) on application to court.
The BRPs reserve the right to terminate any agreement that they deem
necessary, on application to the High Court, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 136(2)(b) of the Companies Act.
Contracts not specifically dealt with in the above paragraphs are subject to
ongoing evaluation and negotiations by the BRPs in an effort to mitigate risks and
optimise the Distribution.
The BRPs have engaged with the Lenders and have obtained PCF for the general working
capital requirements of the Group and for specific Projects.
6.21.1.2. The PCF facility is to be used by the Company towards general working
capital requirements of the Group and the payment of the centralised
costs of operations of the Company until such time as those centralised
costs are able to be more specifically allocated to designated Projects,
business units or operations of the Group during the Business Rescue
Proceedings.
6.21.1.3. The PCF is critical to the success of the Business Rescue Proceedings
and the Proposals put forward in this Business Rescue Plan. The PCF
assisted with the funding required to effectively deal with the:
• measured sale processes for the sale of assets at fair value (as
opposed to the alternative of fire sales on auction);
32 | P a g e
• optimisation of matters related to Projects (minimising claims,
losses and the crystallisation of Financial Guarantees); and
6.21.1.4. The Company is required to repay the PCF facility on the date falling
not more than 12 months after 17 April 2019, or any other date agreed
to by the Lenders.
In order to secure its obligation to the PCF Lenders under the PCF facility
agreement, the Company concluded a cession agreement with Boundary Terraces
No 014 Proprietary Limited (registration number: K2017/324661/07) on or about
17 April 2019, in terms of which the Company ceded its rights, title and interest
in and to (i) its bank accounts, (ii) its insurance policies and the insurance
proceeds in relation thereto, (iii) its intellectual property rights, (iv) all debts owed
by the Company's debtors and receivables of any nature, (v) all current and future
claims it may have against any company; and (vi) its shares and claims in and
against Group Five Power.
The net amount of bilateral PCF funding secured from Lenders as at 30 June 2019,
net of projects which were cash flow positive, amounted to R32 million. Additional
bilateral PCF has been arranged during July and August 2019 for the Cummins
project (Standard Bank), Willows Primary School (Standard Bank) and Woodlands
Primary School (Rand Merchant Bank).
In order to maintain the solvency of the Company whilst under its Business Rescue
Proceedings, the BRPs continually monitor cash flow and financial projections, perform
daily bank reconciliations, control payments and enforce general controls.
6.23.1. The BRPs notified all Affected Persons that the BRPs were investigating the affairs
of the Company to determine, among other things, which Projects would be
completed.
6.23.2. In order to give effect to this, the BRPs took the following actions:
33 | P a g e
partners for the various Projects, to advise them whether or not the
Company and / or its Subsidiaries (as agents of the Company)
intended to complete a Project;
6.23.2.3. where the BRPs determined that it was not feasible and therefore not
in the interests of the Company to complete a Project, the BRPs either:
6.24.1. The BRPs will accept the Company records as being correct unless the claimant
can prove otherwise.
6.24.2. Claims that do not reflect in Annexure B of this Business Rescue Plan are Disputed
Claims, and will not carry a vote in respect of the Business Rescue Plan and will
be dealt with in accordance with the Dispute Resolution Mechanism contemplated
in 10.
6.24.3. The claims that the BRPs have accepted, in whole or in part, are set out in
Annexure B.
6.24.4. All persons who believe that they have a claim against the Company are referred
to Annexure B and should treat Annexure B as the BRPs notification of the claims
that have been accepted in these Business Rescue Proceedings. If any Person is
in disagreement with the information provided in Annexure B (being a Disputed
Creditor), such Person should utilise the Dispute Resolution Mechanism set out in
paragraph 10.
6.24.5. All persons who are not recognised as Creditors in terms of Annexure B must
follow the Dispute Resolution Mechanism.
34 | P a g e
6.25. Exchange rate
The exchange rate in respect of all claims expressed in a foreign currency will be
converted to Rands by applying the appropriate exchange rate ruling as at the
Commencement Date.
6.26.1. The claims of Creditors, other than the Lenders, shall bear no interest in the Pre-
Plan Period.
6.26.2. Upon Adoption of the Business Rescue Plan, no further interest will accrue on any
claims and is hereby waived, except for interest accruing on any PCF which will
accrue in accordance with the terms of the relevant underlying agreement.
6.27.1. In terms of Section 135 of the Companies Act, to the extent that there are funds
available to pay Creditors, the Distributions to Creditors will be made in the
following order of priority in terms of the Business Rescue Plan and while the
Company is under Business Rescue Proceedings:
6.27.1.3. Unsecured PCF Creditors, who will rank in the order in which such PCF
is provided;
6.27.2. Secured Creditors will be paid the net (after costs) proceeds, up to the value of
their claim, on realisation of the relevant encumbered asset.
6.27.3. To the extent that all or part of the claim of any Secured Creditor is not satisfied
from the net (after costs) proceeds from the disposal of the relevant security
asset(s), the balance of such claim shall be treated as being part of Concurrent
Creditors.
35 | P a g e
6.28. BRPs' remuneration
6.28.1. The regulations to the Companies Act prescribe an hourly tariff (inclusive of VAT)
for the payment of the fees of a business rescue practitioner.
6.28.2. The Company is classified, in terms of regulation 26(2) read with regulation
127(2)(b)(i) of the Companies Act, as a large company in that it has a public
interest score greater than 500 points.
6.28.3. The Company's public interest score at the Commencement Date was 16,326
points.
6.28.5. The Company recognised that the hourly rate prescribed by the tariff in the
regulations is not market related and is outdated as it was determined in or about
2008. Accordingly, the Company concluded the Remuneration Agreement with
the BRPs in terms of which the Company has agreed to:
6.28.5.1. a basic hourly rate of R3650.00 (exclusive of VAT) for each of the BRPs
for the services that each of them have rendered, and will continue to
render, to the Company for the duration of its Business Rescue
Proceedings; and
6.28.6. A separate meeting of the Creditors and of the sole shareholder of the Company
was held on 24 April 2019 for the purpose of procuring a vote on the
Remuneration Agreement.
6.28.7. Votes were cast and 99.09% of those Creditors present in person or by proxy,
voted in favour of the Remuneration Agreement, 0.75% of those Creditors
present in person or by proxy voted against the Remuneration Agreement and
0.16% of those Creditors present in person or by proxy abstained from voting.
As a result, the Remuneration Agreement became final and binding on the
Company.
36 | P a g e
6.29. Voting on the Adoption of the Business Rescue Plan
6.29.1.4. PCF Employees will have a voting interest equal to the value of the
amount owed to that PCF Employee as at the Publication Date.
37 | P a g e
6.30. Proposals made informally by a Creditor
In terms of Section 150(2)(a)(vi) of the Companies Act, no informal proposals have been
made by a Creditor or Creditors of the Company with regard to this Business Rescue Plan.
38 | P a g e
7. Part B – Terms of Proposals
The purpose of the business rescue provisions as set out in Section 7(k) of the Companies
Act is to provide for the efficient rescue and recovery of Financially Distressed companies
in a manner that balances the rights and interests of all relevant stakeholders.
In preparing the Business Rescue Plan, the BRPs have consulted with and taken the views
expressed by Affected Persons and other stakeholders into consideration. The BRPs have
been constrained in their deliberations by the reality of the circumstances facing the
Company, including, amongst other things, the high level of indebtedness, security
arrangements entered into between the Lenders and the Company prior to the Business
Rescue Proceedings, the fact that the liabilities of the Company materially exceed the
value of the assets of the Company, and the significantly loss-making position of the core
construction business.
In preparing the Business Rescue Plan, the BRPs have considered three distinct periods
for the Company with reference to the Business Rescue Proceedings, these being:
7.3.1. the period from the Commencement Date to the Publication Date (“Pre-Plan
Period”);
7.3.2. the period following the Pre-Plan Period until approximately the end of the first
quarter of 2020 (“Implementation Phase 1”). Whilst the date on which
Implementation Phase 1 will be completed is entirely in the discretion of the BRPs,
this, it is anticipated, will allow time for:
7.3.3. the period following Implementation Phase 1 until the termination of the Business
Rescue Proceedings (“Implementation Phase 2”). The date on which
Implementation Phase 2 will be complete will be determined by the matters to be
completed therein, including, amongst other things, litigation matters,
construction Latent Defect periods, business wind-downs, asset realisations and
39 | P a g e
matters carried over from Implementation Phase 1 that may require more time
to be resolved.
7.3.4. The aim of dividing the Business Rescue Plan implementation into phases is to
enable the payment of Distributions as soon as possible.
7.3.5. The BRPs anticipate that the majority of Distributions due to Secured Creditors,
PCF Employees, PCF Creditors, PCF Lenders and Preferent Creditors will be made
during Implementation Phase 1 (i.e. by the end of the first quarter of 2020).
7.3.6. The BRPs anticipate that a Distribution will be made to Concurrent Creditors at
the end of Implementation Phase 1. In this regard, it is estimated (but not binding
on the BRPs) that this first Distribution to Concurrent Creditors should be
approximately four cents in the Rand (equal to more than the full liquidation
dividend as estimated by PwC).
7.3.7. Implementation Phase 2 will deal with all matters which by necessity will endure
beyond Implementation Phase 1. Further Distributions will be made to Creditors
as and when funds become available during this phase.
7.4.1. obtain PCF to fund the Business Rescue Proceedings and enable the Company to
avoid immediate liquidation;
7.4.2. minimise the crystallisation of additional losses and liabilities that would otherwise
have arisen (most certainly in liquidation) through the calling of Project Financial
Guarantees;
7.4.3. minimise further losses and liabilities arising from claims on cancelled and/or
delayed Projects;
7.4.5. stabilise existing business units which are profitable, and realise optimal value
from the sale of such businesses through controlled sale processes;
7.4.6. restructure existing business units where required, and realise optimal value from
the sale of such businesses through controlled sale processes;
7.4.7. save and secure as many jobs as possible through the sale and repositioning of
business units as noted above;
40 | P a g e
7.4.8. realise optimal value from non-operational plant, equipment, financial assets,
claims and other such Company assets through controlled sale processes,
avoiding the value destruction implicit in “fire sales”;
7.4.9. defend the Company’s position, where appropriate, in respect of claims made
against the Company;
7.4.10. defend and / or advance the Company’s position, where appropriate, in respect
of disputes, litigation, arbitration and other such matters involving the Company
7.4.13. settle Secured Creditors from the net proceeds (after costs) of the relevant
encumbered asset disposals in respect of assets secured in favour of Secured
Creditors; and
7.5.1.3. The BRPs are contemplating the prospect of a sale and transfer of a
number of Projects, together with relevant personnel, to an arm’s
length acquiror.
41 | P a g e
7.5.2. Realisation of Assets and Property Identified for Sale
7.5.2.1. The Company’s Assets Identified for Sale are set out in Annexure D.
As may be seen, there are numerous controlled and measured sales
processes underway. The aim of the BRPs is to secure fair value for
assets, rather than to secure quick sales. If required, the BRPs are
prepared to hold assets into Implementation Phase 2 if appropriate
values are not secured from processes currently underway.
7.5.2.2. The assets over which security is held will be disposed of and the
proceeds, less realisation and Business Rescue Costs, will be paid to
Secured Creditors, subject to their input and consent in terms of
Section 134 of the Companies Act.
7.5.2.6. It is noted in this regard that certain of these sales processes include
complex sales of international assets, and/or regulatory procedures
and approvals that are outside the control of the BRPs.
Notwithstanding this, it is envisaged that substantially all sales
processes should be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2020.
7.5.2.9. Affected Persons are referred to paragraph 7.11 for Risks of the
Business Rescue Proceedings, which could affect the realisation of the
Assets Identified for Sale.
42 | P a g e
7.5.2.10. To the extent that any such sales processes have not been completed
by the conclusion of Implementation Phase 1, these will be dealt with
in Implementation Phase 2.
7.5.4. Secure new PCF as may be required to implement the Business Rescue Plan.
7.5.5. Complete the collection of proceeds from Other Assets. To the extent that any
collection processes have not been completed by the conclusion of
Implementation Phase 1, these will be dealt with in Implementation Phase 2.
7.5.6. Wind down the head office operations (and costs) of the Company and the Group
in accordance with the diminishing needs of the Company and the Group as
afforded by the completion of Projects and the sales processes.
7.5.7. Seek the resolution of all disputes involving the Company and / or its Subsidiaries
(refer to Annexure H for a summary of the key legal matters applicable to the
Business Rescue Proceedings). To the extent that any such disputes have, or will,
become the subject of litigation involving the Company, the BRPs will assess the
merits and, provided it has merit, vigorously defend and / or advance the
Company’s interests in such litigation. To the extent that any such dispute or
litigation processes have not been completed by the conclusion of Implementation
Phase 1, these will be dealt with in Implementation Phase 2.
7.5.8. Where the Company is pursuing claims against others, pursue those through the
appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms available to the BRPs.
7.5.9. Settle Secured Creditors with net proceeds (after costs) received from the sale of
assets being the subject of the related security.
7.5.10. Settle secured PCF Lenders with the net proceeds (after costs) from the sales of
assets being the subject of the related security.
7.5.11. Settle all deferred and new retrenchment costs and other amounts owing to
employees.
7.5.13. Design, structure, fund and establish the vehicle for Implementation Phase 2,
being an appropriate vehicle and / or mechanism to deal with the residual matters
which require resolution beyond the end of Implementation Phase 1
(see paragraph 7.6).
43 | P a g e
7.5.14. On completion of the above, the timing of which will be at the BRPs discretion,
the BRPs will reconcile the financial position of the Company and will make a
Distribution to Concurrent Creditors.
7.5.15. The BRPs anticipate that this first Distribution to Concurrent Creditors will be
approximately four cents in the Rand (i.e. more than the full PwC calculated
liquidation dividend). This anticipation is based upon the successful
implementation of the Proposals, and the timing thereof, and should therefore be
treated as a guide and not a firm undertaking.
7.6.1. Implementation Phase 2 will deal with those matters which it is anticipated or
known will take an extended time to resolve. Implementation Phase 2 has been
separated from Implementation Phase 1 in order to accelerate the payment of
part of the Distributions to Creditors before commencing Implementation Phase
2. Implementation Phase 1 is anticipated to be largely completed at the end of
the first quarter of 2020. This is the best estimate regarding timing as at the
Publication Date and remains subject change in the sole discretion of the BRPs.
7.6.2. The design of the vehicle and mechanisms that need to be established in order to
efficiently execute Implementation Phase 2 (including potential unresolved
matters related to Implementation Phase 1, Disputed Creditors and the remainder
of the Distributions) is to take place in parallel with Implementation Phase 1. As
at the Publication Date there is insufficient information available to provide
greater detail on this. However, conceptually it is intended that a specific entity
will be put in place to deal with the execution of all Implementation Phase 2
commitments. The lifespan thereof will stretch to the end of all Defects Liability
Periods, and possibly other longer-term commitments made by the Company in
the past, that cannot be dealt with meaningfully in the Business Rescue Plan at
present.
7.6.3. Upon commencing Implementation Phase 2, the BRPs will issue a notice to
Affected Persons providing details as described broadly in 7.6.2 above. The
44 | P a g e
support of domain expertise and execution capacity to deliver on outstanding
obligations with respect to construction portfolio and related matters has in
principle already been sourced.
7.6.4. Matters to be dealt with in Implementation Phase 2 will include (but are not
limited to):
7.6.5. Net cash available from Implementation Phase 2 will be distributed by the BRPs
during Implementation Phase 2 as and when deemed appropriate by the BRPs,
and at the sole discretion of the BRPs. Such Distributions will be in accordance
with the waterfall referred to in paragraph 6.27.
The table below sets out the BRPs’ current anticipated cash inflows and outflows from the
respective phases of the Business Rescue Proceedings. For the avoidance of doubt, this
is purely an illustrative indication of estimates and is in no way binding on the BRPs.
45 | P a g e
R’m Pre-Plan Implementation Implementation
Period Phase 1 Phase 2
Actual Forecast Forecast
4 months 9 months ended To closure
ended 31 Mar ‘20
30 Jun ‘19
Sources of funds
Cash brought forward 3 47 42
Secured asset realisations 50 1 570 78
Unencumbered asset 84 501 280
realisations
Recovery of business rescue 0 55 15
costs from Secured Creditors
Secured common PCF 153 0 0
Secured bilateral PCF 24 0 0
Total sources of funds 315 2 173 414
Application of funds
Overheads and business rescue (60) (115) (25)
costs
Retrenchment costs (60) (160) (4)
Net Project (outflows) / inflows (68) 16 (44)
Net residual closure costs 0 0 (100)
Total application of funds (188) (260) (174)
Distribution of funds
Payment to Secured Creditors (56) (1 570) (89)
Repayment of common PCF 0 (160) 0
Repayment of bilateral PCF 0 (27) 0
Payment to Concurrent (24) (115) (152)
Creditors
Total distribution of funds (80) (1 872) (241)
Notes
1. The period to end June 2019 has been used as a proxy to represent the Pre-Plan Period as this
provided a useful cut off point in terms of the accounting procedures undertaken by the
Company
2. The table is based on the conservative assumptions used to estimate the lower end of the
estimated Distributions referred to in paragraph 7.8 below
While the table below is no more than a guide and is not binding on the BRPs, the table
provides an estimate of the anticipated aggregate cents in the Rand Distributions payable
46 | P a g e
per Creditor class during the full Business Rescue Proceedings (including both
Implementation Phase 1 and Implementation Phase 2).
Note
1. The low estimate as indicated considers, among other things, all claims to date, including all
known Disputed Claims
The benefits to Affected Persons of adopting the Business Rescue Plan compared to a
liquidation are as follows:
7.9.1. Creditors
7.9.1.3. When compared to the PwC report, the shortfall in Business Rescue
Proceedings is anticipated to be R4.8 billion better than that estimated
in a liquidation.
47 | P a g e
carefully managed sale processes; aggressive cost management
throughout the Business Rescue Proceedings.
7.9.2. Employees
7.9.2.3. If employees are forcibly retrenched, they will be entitled to their full
retrenchment packages.
7.9.2.4. In respect of any employees who are not retrenched, if the Company
goes into liquidation, such employees will be PCF Employees and will
be paid any remuneration, reimbursement for expenses or other
amount of money relating to employment that has become due and
payable during the Company’s Business Rescue Proceedings, from the
available free residue of the Company, after the costs of liquidation
and after the BRPs fees and expenses have been paid, but before any
other Preferent Creditors are paid.
48 | P a g e
7.9.3. Shareholder
7.9.3.1. Regrettably, it is not anticipated at this time that there will be any
return to the Company’s shareholder.
7.9.3.2. This is as a result of Creditors not being settled in full and the security
held over the material assets of the Company by the Lenders and other
secured Creditors being insufficient to settle Secured Creditors in full,
and the effective winding up of the remaining businesses after the sale
of the Assets Identified for Sale.
7.10.1. Once the final Distribution is made to Creditors, all claims against the Company
will be Expunged. It is specifically recorded that, on such final Distribution, all
liabilities, provisions and obligations, of whatsoever nature, howsoever and
whensoever arising, of the Company will be compromised and discharged in full,
in terms of Section 154 read with Section 152(4) of the Companies Act.
7.10.2. Claims that do not reflect in Annexure B of this Business Rescue Plan are Disputed
Claims, and will not carry a vote in respect of the Business Rescue Plan and will
be dealt with in accordance with the Dispute Resolution Mechanism contemplated
in paragraph 10.
7.10.3. Any prospective claim which SARS may have against the Company, under section
22(3) of the Value Added Tax Act No. 89 of 1991 or otherwise, will be Expunged.
For the avoidance of doubt, this means that any claim for VAT from SARS has
been recognised as a Concurrent Claim in the Business Rescue Proceedings and
will be entitled to the same cents in the Rand recovery as all other Concurrent
Claims.
Notwithstanding the Proposals and estimates in this Business Rescue Plan, the following
risks should be borne in mind, as they may adversely impact the ultimate outcome of the
implementation of this Business Rescue Plan:
7.11.1. General:
49 | P a g e
7.11.1.3. Any changes in legislation that impact the Business Rescue
Proceedings.
7.11.1.4. Any challenges to this Business Rescue Plan, the rejection thereof or
any amendments thereto.
7.11.1.7. Any damages or penalties claimed against the Company which cannot
be compromised or were unforeseen.
7.11.1.9. The legal revocation of support from any Affected Persons and/or
service providers.
7.11.1.11. The final verification and agreement of the claims taking longer than
expected.
7.11.1.15. Any events and outcomes that may lead to the discovery of fraud,
misrepresentation, corrupt practices, or other such matters relating to
the Company prior to the implementation of the Business Rescue Plan.
7.11.1.16. The variation in the exchange rates affecting the Business Rescue
Proceedings.
7.11.1.18. Adverse judgements or rulings which may have the effect of reducing
cash flow available for the Distributions, given that the estimated
50 | P a g e
Distributions have been calculated on the basis that the Company’s
legal interests are preserved in terms of Section 134(1)(c) of the
Companies Act.
7.11.2. Projects:
7.11.2.3. The Company's debtors, retention debtors and contract claims not
being realised or partially realised.
7.11.3.3. The asset registers differing materially from the actual assets on hand
thus reducing the proceeds received on the sale of such assets.
7.12.1. Section 152(4) of the Companies Act provides that once a business rescue plan
has been adopted, i.e. approved with the following support:
i. the holders of more than 75% of the creditors’ voting interests that were voted;
and
ii. the votes in support of the business rescue plan having included at least 50% of
the independent creditors' voting interests, if any, that were voted;
iii. the above will constitute an approval on a preliminary basis;
iv. as the plan does not alter the rights of the holders of any class of the Company’s
securities, the approval of the plan on a preliminary basis will also constitute final
adoption of the plan;
51 | P a g e
the business rescue plan is binding on the company, its creditors and every holder
of its securities (the latter in terms of the provisions of Sections 146(d) and
152(3)(c) of the Companies Act), whether or not such a person was:
7.13.1. The obligation of the Company to pay any amounts due to the non-executive
directors has been suspended for the duration of the Business Rescue
Proceedings.
7.13.2. Certain non-executive directors have resigned. Save for these resignations, the
board of the company has remained intact since the Commencement Date, and
the remaining Directors have continued to exercise the functions of director,
subject to the authority of the BRPs.
7.13.3. Management continues to work with the BRPs as set out herein and are receiving
their remuneration in the ordinary course.
7.14.1.2. The BRPs have engaged with the Competition Commission in the hope
of achieving an amicable all-inclusive resolution of the various pending
proceedings, but have had no success in this regard. Based on
independent legal advice regarding the Company’s prospects in the
various proceedings, the BRPs believe that the Company has good
prospects of success on the outcome of the review proceedings.
However, should the review be unsuccessful, the Company will persist
in its defence of the proceedings before the Competition Tribunal,
52 | P a g e
unless suitable settlement terms can be agreed with the Competition
Commission.
7.14.2. VRP
7.14.2.1. On 11 October 2016, the Company and a number of other major South
African construction companies entered into an agreement with the
Government, whereby they undertook, amongst other things, to make
certain payments over a period of twelve years to the benefit of a
nominated trust fund, being the Tirisano Construction Fund. This
obligation was undertaken in purported settlement of anticipated civil
liability for prospective damages claims by public entities arising from
the Competition Commission’s investigation into alleged collusive
practices in the South African construction industry (“the Settlement
Agreement”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company
paid a total amount of ZAR 44,997,098.72 to the benefit of the
Tirisano Construction Fund prior to the Commencement Date.
7.14.2.2. The BRPs have investigated and taken legal advice. The BRPs are
advised that conclusion of the Settlement Agreement, as well as all
subsequent payments made in accordance therewith, are likely
voidable transactions as contemplated in Section 141(2)(c)(i) of the
Companies Act. The BRPs are presently engaging with the Government
and the Tirisano Construction Fund to procure repayment of the
aforementioned amount, or such part thereof as may prove
recoverable, coupled to a suitable release of Group Five Limited and
the Company of any residual obligations under the Settlement
Agreement.
7.14.3.1. The Company has applied for an interim order, pending the finalisation
of its Business Rescue Proceedings, in terms of Section 134(1)(c) of
the Companies Act:
53 | P a g e
interests in and share of assets in the JVs ("the ENM
JVs") in respect of each of the Brits Hospital Staff
Accommodation Project, the Jouberton New Community
Centre Project, the North West Provincial Legislature East
Wing Project, and the New Bophelong Psychiatric Hospital
Staff Accommodation Project (collectively, "the ENM
Projects");
54 | P a g e
8. Part C – Assumptions and conditions of Proposal
The Business Rescue Proceedings will terminate (Section 150 (2) (c) (iii)):
8.1.1. if the Business Rescue Plan is proposed and rejected and no Affected Person/s act
in any manner contemplated by the Companies Act; or
8.1.2. this Business Rescue Plan is Adopted and implemented and the BRPs have filed a
notice of substantial implementation of the Business Rescue Plan with the CIPC;
8.1.3. the BRPs file a notice of termination of the Business Rescue Proceedings with the
CIPC; or
8.1.4. a High Court orders the conversion of the Business Recue into liquidation.
Substantial implementation (Section 150 (2) (c) (i) (bb)) will be deemed to have occurred
upon the BRPs deciding, in their sole discretion, that the following has taken place:
8.2.1. the Projects identified for completion are completed or alternative arrangements
are made for their completion;
8.2.2. the Assets Identified for Sale and Other Assets have been substantially realised
and the proceeds applied in accordance with the terms of this plan, or alternative
arrangements are made for subsequent Distribution(s);
8.2.3. final Distributions have been paid to Creditors and / or a mechanism has been
put in place for the payment of any remaining Distributions to Creditors; and
8.2.4. all Business Rescue Costs and fees relating to the Business Rescue Proceedings
have been paid and settled in full.
For the sake of clarity, it is recorded that, notwithstanding the above, the assessment of
the achievement of substantial implementation of this Business Rescue Plan will remain
within the sole and reasonable discretion of the BRPs.
55 | P a g e
CHAPTER 3 – GENERAL
9. Existing litigation
9.1. Annexure H lists the key legal matters relevant to the Company as at the Publication
Date.
9.2. All parties who have instituted legal proceedings, including any enforcement action, in
respect of any claims against the Company, in any forum, will be subject to the
provisions in this Business Rescue Plan for dealing with the proof of claims.
9.3. The various claims against Group Five Power are being defended and Group Five
Power’s claims against Cenpower and the relevant subcontractors are being pursued.
It is anticipated that further funding will be obtained to support the pursuing of the
various legal proceedings. The proceeds arising from a successful outcome of the
various legal actions will be received by Group Five Power. These proceeds will firstly
be applied to repay the funding obtained to pursue the legal actions, whereafter the
balance will be shared between the funders and the existing creditors of Group Five
Power. These proceeds are not expected to be enough to see funds flowing to Group
Five Construction or the Company. As a result, it is not anticipated that there would
be any direct benefit flowing through to the Company other than a reduction in the
Concurrent Claims against the Company.
10.1. In order to resolve Disputed Claims, and / or any other disputes concerning this
Business Rescue Plan, in an expedited manner and at minimum cost to all parties
concerned, an accelerated and optimised Dispute Resolution Mechanism will be followed
as set out in this Business Rescue Plan.
10.2. Save as provided for in Section 133 of the Companies Act (and without in any way
impacting or depriving the rights of the BRPs), all Disputed Claims that are not already
subject to court proceedings and / or a formal dispute resolution process (to which the
BRPs have agreed to or in respect of which the courts have granted leave) as at the
Publication Date must be resolved in accordance with this Dispute Resolution
Mechanism.
10.3. In terms of this Dispute Resolution Mechanism, all Disputed Creditors must notify the
BRPs in writing within 30 days after the date of Adoption of the Business Rescue Plan
(or in the case of a Contingent Claim, within 30 days after the relevant contingency has
been satisfied) of their intention to resolve the dispute. Similarly, all Contingent
56 | P a g e
Creditors must notify the BRPs in writing within 30 days after the contingency has been
met that they are a Creditor.
10.4. If the Disputed Creditor or Contingent Creditor, as the case may be, does not notify the
BRPs within the time period allowed, or such longer period as the BRPs may in their sole
discretion determine, then such Disputed Creditor or Contingent Creditor shall be
deemed to have abandoned its claim/s. Any claim so abandoned will be deemed to have
been Expunged and not be enforceable in terms of Section 154 of the Companies Act)
at a later date. If a Contingent Creditor’s claim is disputed, then the further provisions
of this clause 10.5 and onwards will apply.
10.5. If, after having availed itself of the opportunity to resolve the dispute in terms of
paragraph 10.4, the dispute is not resolved directly with the BRPs or their
representatives within a 15-day period thereafter, the Disputed Creditor will be afforded
7 days (reckoned from the date of expiry of the 15 days) to nominate a retired judge
or senior counsel (on the basis set out below) as an arbitrator to preside over and to
resolve the dispute. Should the Disputed Creditor not make this nomination and / or
the BRPs not agree to appoint such nominee as arbitrator within the period allowed,
then the BRPs will request the President of the Arbitration Foundation of South Africa
("AFSA") to appoint a retired judge or senior counsel as an arbitrator on behalf of the
Disputed Creditor and the BRPs, and this appointment will be binding on the Disputed
Creditor.
10.6. Thereafter, the retired judge or senior counsel who agrees to accept such appointment
(hereinafter referred to as the "Arbitrator") will endeavour to complete his mandate
within 30 days of his appointment or within such further time period as the BRPs in their
sole discretion may determine. To the extent that the Arbitrator as nominated refuses
to act or is not available to act, the President of AFSA will appoint another retired judge
or senior counsel as Arbitrator.
10.7. The Arbitrator will in his sole and absolute discretion determine:
10.7.2 the rules, regulations and procedures that will govern the determination of
the dispute;
10.7.4 will give his award / determination within five days of the completion of the
process as determined by him; and
10.7.5 will as part of his award / determination determine who is liable for the
costs of the determination, such costs to include his costs, legal costs,
venue costs, recording equipment (if applicable), transcript of evidence (it
applicable) and the like.
57 | P a g e
10.8. The Disputed Creditor/s agree that the determination of the Arbitrator will be final and
binding and will not be subject to any subsequent review or appeal process, unless
reviewed on grounds of negligence, bias or malice.
10.9. All parties agree to use their utmost endeavours to ensure that a dispute is determined
by the Arbitrator within the 30-day period as set out above.
10.10. To the extent necessary, should the BRPs be of the view that certain disputes may be
settled or compromised, the BRPs shall be authorised to settle and/or compromise such
a dispute.
10.11. If the Disputed Creditor does not follow the procedure set out in 10.5, then the Disputed
Creditor shall be deemed to have abandon its claim/s. Any claim so abandoned will be
deemed to have been Expunged and not be enforceable in terms of Section 154 of the
Companies Act) at a later date.
11. Domicilium
11.1. The BRPs choose domicilium citandi et executandi ("Domicilium") for all purposes
relating to the Business Rescue Proceedings up until the Substantial Implementation
Date, including the giving of any notice and the serving of any process, at the physical
and e-mail addresses set out below:
11.2. The BRPs shall be entitled up until the Substantial Implementation Date, by giving written
notice to Affected Persons, to vary their physical Domicilium to any other physical address
(not being a post office box or poste restante) and to vary their e-mail Domicilium to any
other e-mail address.
11.3. Any notice given or process served by any Affected Person to the BRPs, which is delivered
by hand between the hours of 09:00 and 17:00 on any Business Day to the BRP's physical
Domicilium for the time being, shall be deemed (unless the contrary is proved by
the BRPs) to have been received by the BRPs at the time of delivery.
11.4. Any notice given or process served by any Affected Person to the BRPs, which is
transmitted by e-mail to the BRP's e-mail Domicilium for the time being, shall be deemed
(unless the contrary is proved by the BRPs) to have been received by the BRPs on the
Business Day immediately succeeding the date of successful transmission thereof.
11.5. This paragraph 11 shall not operate so as to invalidate the giving, serving or receipt of
any written notice or process which is actually received by the BRPs other than by a
method referred to above.
58 | P a g e
11.6. Any notice or process in terms of, or in connection with, this Business Rescue Plan shall
be valid and effective only if in writing and if received or deemed to have been received
by the BRPs.
12.1. For purposes of this paragraph 12, a “materially prejudicial outcome” is an outcome that
results in the total Distributions received by Concurrent Creditors during the full Business
Rescue Proceedings being less than 2 times the dividend to Concurrent Creditors as
estimated by PwC in the event of an immediate liquidation of the Company. For the
avoidance of doubt, based on the PwC estimate provided in paragraph 6.9, this means
that total Distributions below 6.8 cents in the Rand will be considered a “materially
prejudicial outcome”.
12.2. The BRPs shall have the ability, in their sole and absolute discretion, to amend, modify
or vary any provision of this Business Rescue Plan, provided that (i) any amendment will
not constitute a “materially prejudicial outcome” to any of the Affected Persons; and (ii)
at all times the BRPs act reasonably.
12.3. Any amendment will be deemed to take effect on the date of written notice of the
amendment to all Affected Persons. It is specifically recorded that the provisions of this
section shall, mutatis-mutandis, apply to the extension or reduction of any timeframes
by the BRPs.
12.4. If the Business Rescue Plan requires amendment and the amendment gives rise to a
“materially prejudicial outcome” to certain Creditors but not to others, then the approval
of that amendment must be procured in writing from those that have been so prejudiced.
In this instance, the process to amend the Business Rescue Plan would be as follows:
12.4.1. If possible, obtain the consent from the prejudiced parties without the need for a
formal meeting;
12.4.2. Once obtained, a notice of amendment will be distributed to all Affected Persons;
and
12.4.3. The amended Business Rescue Plan will be placed on the website of the Company.
12.5. All amendments to the Business Rescue Plan (other than as provided for in this
paragraph 12) which require further approvals will be subject to the provisions of the
Companies Act and the same voting thresholds as is required for the Adoption of the
Business Rescue Plan.
59 | P a g e
13. Severability
13.1. Each provision of this Business Rescue Plan is, notwithstanding the grammatical
relationship between that provision and the other provisions of this Business Rescue Plan,
severable from the other provisions of this Business Rescue Plan.
13.2. Any provision of this Business Rescue Plan which is or becomes invalid, unenforceable or
unlawful in any jurisdiction shall, in such jurisdiction only, be treated as pro non scripto
to the extent that it is so invalid, unenforceable or unlawful, without invalidating or
affecting the remaining provisions of this Business Rescue Plan which shall remain of full
force and effect.
13.3. The BRPs declare that it is their intention that this Business Rescue Plan would be
executed without such invalid, unenforceable or unlawful provision if they were aware of
such invalidity, unenforceability or unlawfulness at the time of execution of this Business
Rescue Plan.
14. Disclaimer
14.1. The BRPs in the preparation of this Business Rescue Plan have relied on information
obtained from the books and records of the Company, meetings held with relevant
persons including the Company’s directors, Management, staff, auditors, suppliers,
clients, advisors and other service providers of the Company, and studies and reports
commissioned from various technical and other professional advisors in connection with
the affairs of the Company.
14.2. Whilst the BRPs have made certain efforts to ensure the accuracy of the information
contained herein, it should be noted that the BRP’s investigations have been limited in
nature due to:
14.2.1. the time constraints placed on business rescue practitioners by the Companies
Act;
14.2.3. limited financial resources available to the Company (and in turn the BRPs); and
14.2.4. the quality of certain of the records and state of affairs of the Companies.
14.3. The BRPs have not carried out an audit of the Company’s documents, nor have they had
adequate opportunity to independently verify all information provided to them by the
Company and/or relevant third parties.
14.4. Neither the BRPs nor any person engaged to assist in the Business Rescue Proceedings
or in the production of this Business Rescue Plan undertake any responsibility in any way
60 | P a g e
whatsoever to any Person in respect of any errors in this Business Rescue Plan arising
from incorrect information that may have been provided to them.
61 | P a g e
CHAPTER 4 – CONCLUSION AND BRPS’ CERTIFICATE
15. Conclusion
For the reasons set out above, it is the view of the BRPs that, notwithstanding the inevitable
risks and challenges:
15.1. there is a reasonable prospect that the Company can be rescued within the meaning of
the Companies Act;
15.2. this Business Rescue Plan balances the rights and interests of all relevant stakeholders;
and
15.3. should the Business Rescue Plan not be Adopted, the Business Rescue Proceedings will
have to be converted to liquidation proceedings immediately.
We, the undersigned, hereby confirm that the information contained herein is based on
information provided to us by the Management of the Company, the management of
Subsidiaries of the Company, other relevant parties, and upon which we have relied. While
every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information contained herein,
we can give no warranty in this regard save to confirm, to the best of our knowledge and belief
that:
16.1. any information provided herein appears to be reasonably accurate, complete and up to
date;
16.2. we have relied on financial information including opinions and reports furnished to us by
the board of directors, Management and the Company's auditors;
16.3. any projections provided are estimates made in good faith and based on factual
information and assumptions as set out herein; and
16.4. in preparing the Business Rescue Plan, we have not undertaken an audit of the
information provided to us.
__________________________ __________________________
Petrus Francois van den Steen David Arthur Charles Lake
Date: 30 August 2019 Date: 30 August 2019
62 | P a g e
ANNEXURES
63 | P a g e