Scribd
Upload
25 views2 pages

Maurice Dobb's Perspective: Studies in The Development of Capitalism

Uploaded by

khushboosao08
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
25 views2 pages

Maurice Dobb's Perspective: Studies in The Development of Capitalism

Uploaded by

khushboosao08
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Maurice Dobb's Perspective

Maurice Dobb, a Marxist economist and historian, presented his views on the transition from
feudalism to capitalism in his book Studies in the Development of Capitalism (1946). Dobb
argued that the transition was mainly due to internal contradictions within the feudal mode of
production.

 Internal Development and Class Struggle: Dobb emphasized the importance of


internal factors within feudal society, particularly the class struggle between the
feudal lords and the peasantry. He argued that the inherent tensions and conflicts
within the feudal system, such as the lords’ exploitation of the peasants and the
peasants' resistance, led to the breakdown of feudal relations.
 Decline of Feudal Productivity: Dobb highlighted the decline in the productivity of
labor under feudalism as a critical factor. As feudal obligations and exploitation
became more intense, peasants had less incentive to produce surplus, leading to
economic stagnation and decline. This decline in productivity, according to Dobb,
created the conditions for the emergence of more productive capitalist relations.
 Agricultural Innovations and Changes: He also pointed to agricultural innovations,
such as the enclosure movement in England, where common lands were privatized,
and large-scale farming emerged. These changes helped undermine feudal structures
and facilitated the development of capitalist agriculture.

Paul Sweezy's Critique

Paul Sweezy, an American Marxist economist, offered a different interpretation in his


critique of Dobb's work. Sweezy's critique was published in a series of articles in Science &
Society and later included in the book The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism (1954),
which compiled the key texts of the debate.

 Importance of External Factors: Sweezy argued that Dobb placed too much
emphasis on internal factors and neglected the role of external forces, particularly the
expansion of trade and markets. Sweezy believed that the development of capitalism
was significantly influenced by the growth of long-distance trade, which played a
crucial role in dissolving feudal relations.
 The Role of Trade and Urban Centers: According to Sweezy, the expansion of
trade and the rise of towns and urban centers were instrumental in the transition to
capitalism. The growth of commerce created a new class of merchants and traders
who became increasingly powerful and influential. These merchants and the markets
they created helped to undermine the feudal order by fostering economic relations
based on profit and exchange, rather than feudal obligations and subsistence.
 International Trade and Capital Accumulation: Sweezy also emphasized the
importance of international trade and colonial expansion in the early stages of
capitalism. The influx of precious metals from the Americas, the expansion of trade
networks, and the establishment of colonial empires contributed to the accumulation
of capital and the growth of a capitalist economy.

Giuliano Procacci's Survey of the Debate

Giuliano Procacci, an Italian historian, provided an overview and analysis of the debate in his
essay "A Survey of the Debate" included in The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism.
Procacci aimed to summarize and analyze the key arguments put forth by Dobb, Sweezy, and
other contributors to the debate.

 Balancing Internal and External Factors: Procacci noted that while Dobb and
Sweezy represented opposing viewpoints—Dobb emphasizing internal factors and
Sweezy highlighting external influences—the debate also encouraged a more nuanced
understanding of the transition. He suggested that a comprehensive analysis should
consider both internal developments within feudal society and external economic
changes, such as trade expansion and the emergence of markets.
 Further Contributions and Theoretical Implications: Procacci highlighted that
other scholars, such as Rodney Hilton and Christopher Hill, also contributed to the
debate by exploring additional aspects of the transition, such as the role of the state,
ideology, and cultural changes. These contributions helped to broaden the discussion
and integrate more complex social, political, and economic factors into the analysis.
 Marxist Historiography and Historical Materialism: The debate also had broader
implications for Marxist historiography and the application of historical materialism.
It challenged scholars to think critically about the ways in which economic and social
transformations occur and the role of different factors, such as class struggle,
economic relations, and state power, in shaping historical change.

Significance of the Debate

The Dobb-Sweezy debate is significant for several reasons:

1. Theoretical Contributions: The debate enriched Marxist theory by highlighting


different approaches to understanding the transition from one mode of production to
another. It underscored the complexity of historical change and the need for a
multifaceted analysis that takes into account economic, social, and political factors.
2. Historiographical Impact: The debate influenced a generation of historians and
scholars who sought to understand the development of capitalism and the decline of
feudalism. It remains a reference point for discussions on socio-economic transitions
and the development of modern societies.
3. Ongoing Relevance: The questions raised in the Dobb-Sweezy debate continue to be
relevant for contemporary discussions on economic development, social change, and
the dynamics of capitalism. It provides a framework for analyzing historical
transformations and understanding the factors that drive social and economic change.

You might also like