AGENCY/OFFICE :

PROJECT :
Total Project Cost :

Score
Results
for an
or
Element and item/question Done? item/
comme
element
* nts

(col.1) (col. 2) (col. 3) (col. 4)

No Partly Yes
(2a) (2b) (2c)
1.0 Involvement of women
and men (max score: 2; 1 for 2
each item)
1.1 Participation of women and
men in beneficiary groups in
problem identification (possible
1
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
1.2 Participation of women and
men in beneficiary groups in project 1
design (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)

2.0 Collection of sex-

disaggregated data and
2
gender-related information
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)

3.0 Conduct of gender

analysis and identification of
2
gender issues (max score: 2;
1 for each item)

3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and

inequalities related to gender roles,
perspectives and needs, or access to 1
and control of resources (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)

3.2 Analysis of constraints and

opportunities related to women and
men’s participation in the project
1
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)

4.0 Gender equality goals,

outcomes, and outputs
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
2
Does the project have clearly stated
gender equality goals, objectives,
outcomes, or outputs?
 5.0 Matching of strategies
with gender issues (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
2
Do the strategies and activities match the
gender issues and gender equality goals
identified?

6.0 Gender analysis of likely

impacts of the project (max
1.33
score: 2; for each item or
question, 0.67)

6.1 Are women and girl children

among the direct or indirect
0.67
beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0,
0.33, 0.67)

6.2 Has the project considered its

long-term impact on women’s
socioeconomic status and 0.33
empowerment? (possible scores: 0,
0.33, 0.67)
6.3 Has the project included
strategies for avoiding or minimizing
negative impact on women’s status 0.33
and welfare? (possible scores: 0,
0.33, 0.67)

7.0 Monitoring targets and

indicators (possible scores: 0,
1.0, 2.0)
2
Does the project include gender equality
targets and indicators to measure gender
equality outputs and outcomes?

8.0 Sex-disaggregated
database requirement
(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) 1
Does the project M&E system require
sex-disaggregated data to be collected?

9.0 Resources (max score: 2;

2
for each question, 1)
9.1 Is the project’s budget
allotment sufficient for gender
equality promotion or integration?
OR, will the project tap counterpart 1
funds from LGUs/partners for its
GAD efforts? (possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0)
 9.2 Does the project have the
expertise in promoting gender
equality and women’s
empowerment? OR, does the project
commit itself to investing project 1
staff time in building capacities
within the project to integrate GAD
or promote gender equality?
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)

10.0 Relationship with the

agency’s GAD efforts (max
0.99
score: 2; for each question
or item, 0.67)

10.1 Will the project build on or

strengthen the agency/ NCRFW/
government’s commitment to the
empowerment of women?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
0.33
IF THE AGENCY HAS NO GAD
PLAN: Will the project help in the
formulation of the implementing
agency’s GAD plan?

10.2 Will the project build on

the initiatives or actions of other
0.33
organizations in the area?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)

10.3 Does the project have an

exit plan that will ensure the
sustainability of GAD efforts and 0.33
benefits? (possible scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)
TOTAL GAD SCORE – PROJECT IDENTIFICATION AND
17.32
DESIGN STAGES

Total Project proposed

11199.99
budget
Percentage of budget that
=(Total GAD
can be attributed, based on score/20)x100
87% score
Total GAD Budget =Total project proposed
budget x (total GAD
Attributable Amount score/20)
9,699.19

DESCRIPTIVE RATINGS SCORE

GAD is invisible in the project
0-3.9
(proposal is returned)
Proposed project has promising GAD
prospects (proposal earns a
"conditional pass", pending
identification of gende rissues and
4.0-7.9
strategies and activities to address
these, and inclusion of the collection of
sex-disaggregated data in the
monitoring and evaluation plan).
Proposed project is gender-sensitive
8.0-14.9
(proposal passes the GAD test).
Proposed project is gender-responsive
15.0-19.9
(proponent is commended).