11 Hospital Performance Monitoring and Improvement Manual Second
11 Hospital Performance Monitoring and Improvement Manual Second
Second Edition
October, 2017
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Since its launch in the 1990s, the Health Sector Development Program (HSDP) has led to
considerable expansion of the health services through rapid expansion of infrastructure,
increased availability of the health workforce; increased budget allocation and improved
financial management. However, improvement in Quality of health services at every location
is still not perceived, generally.
The Hospital Performance and Monitoring improvement (HPMI) manual was launched in
2011 G.C and revised in 2017 G.C with the aim of providing quality and equitable access to
all segment of Ethiopian population. Hospitals are central to these reform efforts and a
number of recent initiatives have specifically sought to improve hospital performance and
quality of health services. Such initiatives include: Ethiopian Hospital Services
Transformation Guidelines (EHSTG), Health Sector transformation in quality (HSTQ),
Saving Life through Safe Surgery (SaLTS), Clean and Safe Hospitals (CASH) and the revised
Health Management Information System (HMIS) are among others.
HPMI manual has been prepared comprehensively beginning with areas of administrative
concerns and disease of high priority. Twenty-Six (26) Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
described in this manual are organized into 11 categories under hospital management,
outpatient services, emergency services, inpatient services, maternity services, pharmacy
services, laboratory service, productivity, human resources, finance and clinical governance.
In addition, the HPMI manual in accompany with the HSTQ and EHSTG guidelines, are
going to be the main tools to transform the administrative and clinical process of hospital
functions. Using these tools, the ministry of Health has revised the manual and launched it
nationwide which is going to be implemented and catalyzed through the EHIAQ platform.
It is, therefore, hoped that all hospitals will take advantage of these guidelines and quick and
time bound actions as per the road map placed in HPMI guideline.
I must appreciate the efforts of all experts and partners involved in the preparation and
finalization of these manual.
I also deeply appreciate the commitments of all staffs of Health Service Quality Directorate of
the ministry for finalizing this manual after a series of consultative meetings and workshops.
The development of the Manual for the Performance of Monitoring and Improvement (HPMI) in
the Health Sector is a culmination of the efforts of all health sector stakeholders that were
spearheaded by the Health Service Quality Directorate (HSQD) in the Ministry of Health. A
national taskforce was appointed by the director to oversee and coordinate the technical and
consultative processes in the development of the manual through the HPMI technical working
group. The standards and procedures outlined in this document are aimed at operationalizing the
Hospital’s Performance Monitoring framework, as well as setting the minimum threshold for
establishing enduring Monitoring and improvement functions in health institutions at the national
level.
Invaluable efforts and commitments went into this endeavor. I wish to appreciate the constructive
input and oversight exercised by members of the health sector’s HPMI technical working group
(HPMI TWG). Working together with the national taskforce, their incisive contributions, expertise
and direct engagement have shaped this document. My sincere gratitude also goes to the 11
Regional health Bureaus, Hospitals and Harvard PGSSC team who participated in, interrogated
and validated this document.
We would also like to extend our deepest gratitude for the valuable input, contribution and
comments of the following individuals whose active participation and efforts during the final
review and revision process of these documents has been elemental.
Dr. Hassen Mohammed………………………..FMOH/HSQD
Mr. Bedri Ahmed………………………...……FMOH/HSQD
Mr.Kasu Tola…………………………..……...FMOH/HSQD
Mr.Abiy Dawit…………………………..…….FMOH/HSQD
Dr.Ayele Teshome………...…….St.Peter Specialized Hospital
Dr.Hilina Tadesse………………………….……FMOH/HSQD
Mr.Markos Paulos……………………………….FMOH/HSQD
Dr.Samuel Z/Menfeskidus………………………FMOH/HSQD
Dr.Atlibachew Teshome…………………..…….FMOH/HSQD
Dr.Samson Esseye……………….……………..FMOH/Jhpiego
Dr.Eyob Gebrehawariat…………………….…….FMOH/WHO
Sr.Gezashegn Denekew…………………….……FMOH/HSQD
Mr.Molla Godif…………………………………FMOH/HSQD
Sr.Ayinalem Legesse…………………………….FMOH/HSQD
Mr. Andergachew Abebe…………………….….FMOH/HSQD
Mahlet Asayhegn…………………………...……FMOH/HSQD
Mr.Deneke Ayele………………………………..FMOH/HSQD
Mr.Getachew Yimam……………………………FMOH/HSQD
Dr.Yibeltal Mekonin………………….…………….FMOH/CSD
Mr.Naod Wendrad…………….……………………FMOH/CSD
Mr.Semi Daniel…………………….………………..FMOH/CSD
Kidist W/Senbet.…………………………………..FMOH/ECCD
Anbesaw Tekle………………………………..………AACAHB
Dereje Abdissa………………………….………….Oromia RHB
Ayanaw Takele……………………….……………Amhara RHB
Berihun Mesfin ……………………………………..Tigray RHB
Tebeje Mamo………………………………………SNNPR RHB
Biresa Chali………………..………………….Benishangul RHB
Thomas Tut………………………………………Gambella RHB
Shimelis Aweke………………………………………..Afar RHB
Yared Hailu ……………………………………….Diredawa RHB
Contents
ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ........................................................................................... 9
Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11
1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 11
1.2 Rational for Revision of the HPMI Manual .................................................................. 12
1.3 Purpose of this Manual .................................................................................................. 13
1.4 Target Audience for the Manual .................................................................................... 13
Section 2: A Framework for Hospital Performance Monitoring and Improvement ................ 14
Section 3: Hospital Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) ......................................................... 15
3.1: What are Key Performance Indicators? ........................................................................ 15
3.2 KPIs for Ethiopian hospitals ........................................................................................ 15
KPI 4: Outpatients not seen on same day ........................................................................ 16
KPI 5: Emergency room patients triaged within 5 minutes of arrival ............................. 16
KPI 26: Patient satisfaction ............................................................................................ 17
3.3 KPIs Relationship with HMIS ....................................................................................... 17
3.4. Collecting Hospital KPI data ........................................................................................ 17
3.4.1KPI Data Owners .................................................................................................... 18
3.4.2. KPI focal person .................................................................................................... 18
3.5 Analyzing and reporting Hospital KPI data .................................................................. 18
3.5.1 Analysis and reporting at Hospital level................................................................. 18
3.5.2 Analysis and reporting at regional level ................................................................. 19
3.6. How should KPI reports be used? ................................................................................ 20
3.6.1 Use of KPIs by Hospital management and staff ..................................................... 20
3.6.2 Use of KPIs by a Hospital Governing Board ......................................................... 21
3.6.3 Use of KPIs by Regional Health Bureaus .............................................................. 22
3.6.4 Use of KPIs by HSQD ............................................................................................ 22
3.7 KPI Data Elements ........................................................................................................ 23
3.8. Detailed guide to each KPI ........................................................................................... 26
Hospital Management KPIs ............................................................................................. 27
OUTPATIENT SERVICES ............................................................................................ 29
EMERGENCY SERVICES ............................................................................................ 31
List of Tables
List of Figures
Figure 1: Framework for Hospital Performance Monitoring and Improvement……………8
Figure 1: Overview of the supportive supervision site visit process ....................................... 56
HR Human Resources
HSDP Health Sector Development Plan
TB Tuberculosis
Voluntary Counseling and Testing
VCT
1.1 Background
Federal Ministry of Health through the Health Sector Transformation Plan (HSTP-I) envisions
all of its citizens to enjoy quality and equitable access to all types of health services. To
realize this, the FMOH and RHBs are leading a sector wide reform to strengthen and improve
the quality of health services in Ethiopia. Hospitals are central to these reform efforts and a
number of recent initiatives have specifically sought to improve hospital performance and
quality of services. Such initiatives include: Ethiopian Hospital Services Transformation
Guidelines (EHSTG), Health Sector transformation in quality (HSTQ),Saving Life through
Safe Surgery (SaLTS) and Clean and Safe Hospitals (CaSH) and the revised Health
Management Information System (HMIS) and Demographic and health information system
two (DHIS2) are among others.
Since its publication in 2010, Ethiopian Hospital Reform Implementation Guideline (EHRIG)
and Hospital performance monitoring and improvement manual (HPMI) has played a pivotal
role in improving the services provided in Hospitals. The manual provides detailed guidance
to ensure that hospitals collect and analyze accurate KPIs data and provides guidance on
performance improvement methods that will assist hospital management and staff to act upon
the findings of the KPIs. The manual also provides guidance for the Federal Ministry of
Currently, different structures to lead and coordinate hospital performance monitoring and
Quality improvement activities are formed at different levels across the sector. At Federal
Ministry of Health the Health Service Quality Directorate (HSQD) is leading the coordination
and harmonization of all quality improvement efforts within the sector and is being guided
and overseen by the National Health care Quality Steering Committee (NHQSC). On the other
hand Quality Unit (QU) at the Regional Health Bureau is being led by CRCPO and supported
by a Regional Health Care Quality Steering Committee to oversee hospital performance and
quality improvement activities within the region. All Hospitals have established Clinical
Governance and Quality Improvement Unit (CG/QIU) that lead by a full time physician
assigned to work in the unit with regular responsibility of coordinating and mainstreaming
Quality improvement concepts and activities in all departments in the Health facility. The
Quality Unit is being assisted by a Quality committee represented by those heads of both
clinical and selected supportive departments and experts working in the health facility. To
achieve their functions, these stakeholders (Governing Board, SMT, RHB, QU, FMOH and
others) require accurate and timely information about hospital performance to ensure that
expectations are being met and to take timely action to address any problems identified.
The existing HPMI (2011) is revised in 2017 due to a number of driving forces have resulted
in the need for KPI revision. Some of the driving forces for revision include: the need to have
more quality and equity indicators that will provide details required to operationalize the
monitoring and evaluation framework of the HSTP. The commitment to improve the access
and transform the quality of health services provided at hospitals with magnified efficiency,
accountability and ownership at all level. The requirements to integrate the newly introduced
health initiatives and alignment with international indicators are some of the factors that drive
the manual revision.
The purpose of this manual is to standardize the approach in hospital performance monitoring
and improvement process and activities across the sector. It aims to provide hospital senior
management teams (SMTs), Governing Boards (GBs), health service providers and higher
health sector offices with information to assist in measuring and monitoring hospital
performance focusing on a core set of Key Performance Indicators and, conduct site visits and
facilitate review meetings to ensure the effectiveness, efficiency and quality of services
provided. The manual also provides detailed guidance’s which are:
To ensure that hospitals collect and analyze accurate KPI data and enhance continuous use
of information for evidence based decision making.
Provide guidance on how to gather, analyze, interpret and use performance information’s.
Provide a standardized definition of Hospital performance monitoring and Improvement;
To identify areas for further improvements within hospitals where targeted support, by the
Community, Government offices and other partners is deemed necessary.
Provide guidance on planning and implementation of comprehensive hospital Performance
monitoring and improvement activities.
Create a culture of learning based on utilizing M&E information as a basis for decision
making and accountability in management and governance
To identify and disseminate best practice
These manual is intended to assist actors in the health sector to gather, synthesize and analyze
data and use this information to improve hospital performance.
The actors are:
1. National level: MOH agencies and directorates etc
2. Regional level: RHB/Zonal departments etc
3. Facility level: Hospital GB, SMT, Unit heads, service providers etc
4. Community level: community forums, public wing members etc
The principal methods of monitoring hospital performance used nationwide are regulatory
inspection, client satisfaction surveys, supportive supervisions, regular hospital review
meetings and summits, operational research/evaluation, internal assessments and statistical
indicators, most of which have never been tested rigorously.
Current Hospital Performance Monitoring and Improvement has three principal
methods:
Performance
) management
database
Figure 1: Framework for Hospital Performance Monitoring and Improvement (adapted from the Turning
Point National Excellence Collaborative, 2003
Indicators are vital in health interventions because, when collected and used regularly, they
can: provide a reference point for health intervention planning, management, and reporting,
allow managers of health interventions to assess trends and identify problems and act as early
warning signals for corrective action.
Different types of indicators are used for different purposes. For example indicators could be
used to monitor implementation of a specific program, to monitor the financial performance of
a hospital, to monitor the quality of care provided by each clinical team or to monitor hospital
performance against its plan.
Instead of trying to monitor everything, SMT, Governing Board and other stakeholders need a
core set of indicators that provide all the information they need to ensure that hospitals
provide effective, efficient and quality services. These KPIs should describe the minimum
information needed to effectively govern and manage hospital performance. KPs are a set of
core hospital indicators that are used to identify whether Hospital performance is meeting
desired standards and /or requires improvement. A common set of KPIs allow hospital
performance to be tracked over time, and comparisons between hospitals and among regions.
The ZHD/RHB and FMOH should conduct regular review of Hospitals, Zonal and regional
KPI’s performance respectively, and identify areas where additional support is needed and
should give timely feedback.
1
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, 2008
Hospital Management
KPI 1: % of Non-functional model medical equipment
KPI 2: CASH Audit score
Outpatient Services
KPI 3: Outpatient waiting time to Consultation
KPI 4: Outpatients not seen on same day
Emergency Services
KPI 5: Emergency room patients triaged within 5 minutes of arrival
KPI 6: Emergency room attendances with length of stay > 24hours
Inpatient Services
KPI 7: Delay for elective surgical admission
KPI 8: Pressure ulcer incidence
KPI 9: Surgical site infection rate
KPI 10: Completeness of inpatient medical records
KPI 11: Peri-operative Morality rate
KPI 12: Rate of safe surgery checklist utilization
KPI 13: Mean duration of in-hospital pre-elective operative stay
KPI 14: Surgical volume
KPI 15: Anesthetic adverse outcome
Maternity Service
KPI 16: Proportion of women Survived from PPH
KPI 17: Births by surgical, instrumental or assisted vaginal delivery
Pharmacy Services
KPI 18: Percentage of clients with 100% prescribed drugs filled
Laboratory Services
KPI 19: Essential Lab tests availability
KPI 20: Proportion of SLIPTA standard met
KPI 21: Blood unavailability ratio for surgical patients
Productivity
KPI 22: Outpatient clinical care productivity for physicians
KPI 23: Major surgeries per surgeon
Human resources
KPI 24: Staff satisfaction
Finance
KPI 25: Raised revenue spending as a proportion of total operating spending
2
FMOH (2015) HMIS/M&EIndicator Definitions: HMIS / M&E Technical Standards: Area 1.
For example, the Head of Human Resources (HR) department could be the KPI data
owner for KPI24: Staff satisfaction
Collecting KPI data from every KPI data owner at the end of the reporting period
Checking the accuracy of the KPI /EHSTG/HSTQ data, by reviewing data sources and
conducting spot checks for accuracy on the data sources and the KPIs submitted by data
owners
Entering the KPI/EHSTG/HSTQ data into the electronic Hospital KPI Database/DHIS2
Preparing the KPI report (including data elements and KPI results) from the KPI
Database
Submit the KPI report to the hospital Clinical Governance and Quality Management
Unit (CG&QMU) and CEO during the specified reporting period.
Train and support the KPI data owners and other relevant staffs
Ensuring the availability of all required computer hardware and software, stationery and
formats for the collection and submission of KPIs.
An electronic DHIS2 or Hospital KPI Database has been created (in Microsoft Excel
spreadsheet) into which the KPI focal person should enter all KPI data elements. The KPI
After entering and checking the data quality, the KPI focal person should print the KPI report
and submit this to their CG&QMU and the CEO. The hospital CEO should review, check and
sign the KPIs before submitting them to the Governing Board and next levels.
Additionally, KPI data should be submitted to the RHB. Ideally, the KPI focal person should
regularly email the electronic KPI Database to the RHB. If this is not possible, the KPI focal
person should print a copy of the data elements and a copy of the KPI results directly from the
KPI Database and should fax these to the RHB.
Hospitals should also keep track of progress towards attainment of EHSTG standards. To assist
with this, a Hospital EHSTG Database has been created into which the KPI focal person should
enter all EHSTG self-assessment results. The EHSTG Database will automatically generate
tables and charts from the entered data.
The KPI focal person should email an electronic copy of the EHSTG Database to
the RHB every quarter. If this is not possible then a hard copy of the EHSTG self-
assessment tool should be faxed to the RHB.
Primary
ZHD 26th of the month Monthly, Quarterly & Annual
Hospitals
General
RHB 2nd of the month Monthly, Quarterly & Annual
hospitals/ZHD
Each RHB should assign a focal person to receive KPI and EHSTG reports from all hospitals,
and regional data should be aggregated and analyzed using electronic Regional KPI
Database/DHIS2that it will automatically generate results and related tables and charts,
including regional averages. Regional team should review the quality and regional performance
before sending their KPI and EHSTG reports.
Every quarter, the RHB should email electronic copies of the Regional KPI Database and
Regional EHSTG Database to FMOH. If it is not possible to send electronically then hard
- How does this KPI result compare to the last reporting period?
- How does the KPI compare to the target for the reporting period?
- Has the target been reached? If the target has not been reached and why?
- Is further support (e.g. trainings, supervision) required from the RHB or other partners to
support the hospital to make improvements?
The KPI data owner, together with case team and other relevant colleagues should analyze the
performance and develop actions that need to be taken to improve performance. Each hospital
should have a performance review team or Quality Unit and Quality Committee (QC) to
oversee performance monitoring and improvement functions across the hospital. The Quality
committee should be multidisciplinary, with members appointed from different clinical,
administrative and supportive units within the hospital. The chair of the committee or Quality
unit head should be a full time in their role and should be accountable to CEO as a member of
the hospital senior management team and.
Hospital Performance Monitoring and Improvement Manual – October, 2017 20
Roles of the Quality Unit include:
a) To develop hospital performance and/ quality management strategy and present to the
Senior Management Team for approval,
b) To develop an implementation plan for the overall improvement of hospital performance
and monitor its execution,
c) To ensure that performance management activities relate to the vision and mission of the
hospital, and are aligned with the hospital strategic and annual plans,
f) To receive and analyze feedback information from patients, staff and visitors,
g) To receive clinical audit reports and maintain a record of all clinical audit activities,
h) To review selected hospital deaths
i) To monitor KPIs and HMIS indicators
j) To conduct peer review in response to specific quality and safety concerns and to take
appropriate action and follow-up when deficiencies are identified, and
k) To update hospital staff on hospital performance improvement activities and
findings including:
Hospital Performance Reports should be presented to the Governing Board by the hospital
CEO. The report should be circulated at least ones a week in advance of the Governing Board
meeting, together with the agenda and any other discussion papers for the board meeting.
The Governing Board should discuss the report, identifying areas of improvement or weakness
and set direction and specific follow up actions.
For example, if the Patient Satisfaction Score is low or is decreasing, the Governing Board
could ask the CEO to present the full results of the Patient Satisfaction Survey to see if there
are any particular areas of concern, and could also ask to describe actions that the hospital is
going to take to improve patient satisfaction. Or, if inpatient mortality is high or increasing, the
Governing Board could ask the CEO if there are any factors to explain this (perhaps a
communicable disease outbreak) or to provide additional information on the mortality rate for
o If there is improvement, how did this take place? Should special recognition be
given to any staff members or case teams who are responsible for the
improvement?
o How does each KPI compare to the target for the reporting period?
Has the target been reached? If not, why not?
- What action should be taken by the CEO/hospital in response to the KPI results?
- What support (e.g. trainings, supervision) is required from the RHB or other partners to
support the hospital to make improvements?
After receiving hospital KPI and EHSTG reports and entering these into the Regional KPI and
EHSTG/DHIS2 Databases, the RHBs should compare hospitals, monitor changes over time
and calculate regional averages. The RHB should give feedback to each hospital on the KPI
reports, asking for clarification or further information where required. The RHB should also
use the hospital KPI reports to identify areas for action by the RHB. In particular, KPI reports
should be used as input for hospital site visits and regional review meetings. When reviewing
individual hospital KPI reports, the RHB should consider the same questions as outlined above
for Governing Boards. In addition, the RHB should compare performance between hospitals,
in particular:
- Which hospitals are showing the best and/or poor performance?
- What are the particular strengths and/or the weaknesses in the region?
- Which regions are showing the best performance overall? Which are showing poor
performance?
- What are the common strengths in all regions, what are the common weaknesses?
HSQD should give feedback to each RHB on the KPI reports, asking for clarification or
further information where required. HSQD should not contact hospitals directly in response
to the KPI reports, but instead should discuss first with the RHB so that a joint response can
be made to the hospital and any follow up action can be agreed jointly between FMOH and
the RHB.
In particular, KPI reports should be used as input for hospital site visits and regional and
national review meetings.
Q54
Total number of staff satisfaction criteria’s evaluated
Q55 Operating spending retained revenue during reporting period
Health Financing Q56 Total operating expenditures for reporting period, i.e. operating
budget spending from treasury for reporting period
Clinical Governance Q57 Total number of “Neutral” responses
(Please note: The detail about KPIs together with data entry formats for each KPI, are presented in
Appendix 5. To be used and/or shared with the data owner of each KPI to assist with collection of
the data elements and calculation of the KPI by the data owner).
Why is this Hospitals need to know the proportion of Medical Equipment’s that are
important? non-functional at any given time from their Model Medical Equipment List,
MME they prepared. Model Medical Equipment List means, a list of
equipment that describe the ideal types and number of equipment required
by specific hospital that determined by multi-disciplinary team of the
hospital. The indicator measures the effectiveness of services without
interruption for diagnosis, therapeutics, prevention and investigation of the
patient in the hospital due to failure of M/Es. It also helps to plan for
maintenance or procurement of new essential medical equipment.
Why is this The time that a patient waits from arrival to treatment is a measure
important? of access to health care services. Long waiting times indicate that
there is insufficient staff and/or resources to handle the patient load
or the available resources are being used inefficiently.
Frequency of
Quarterly
reporting
Data entry Q5 = Sum total of outpatient waiting time (in minutes) = ___________
Q6 = Number of outpatient waiting time cards completed =_______
Calculation:
Why is this All patients should be seen in the OPD on the same day that they
important? register for treatment. By measuring the number and proportion of
patients that do not receive a same day service, the hospital can
assess if there is a need for extra personnel and/or other resources
in the outpatient department and/or to review patient flow processes
to increase the efficiency of service provision.
Definition The proportion of all outpatients that do not receive treatment on
the same day as the day of registration in the outpatient department
Unit of
%
measurement
Numerator
Number of outpatients not seen on same day as registration in OPD
during the reporting period (Q7)
Why is this Triage is a process of sorting patients into priority groups according
important? to their need and available resources. The aim of triage is to give
priority treatment to those with the most critical conditions, thus
minimizing delay, saving lives, and making the most efficient use
of available resources. The first five minutes of arrival in the
emergency room (ER) is the most critical time to save lives. If
assessment and treatment is not initiated during this time then lives
will be lost unnecessarily.
By monitoring the % of patients triaged within 5 minutes the
hospital can assess whether ER services are sufficient and identify
the need for additional staff and/or resources and/or service
redesign to reduce waiting times in ER.
Definition Proportion of all patients presenting to the emergency room who
were seen by the triage officer within 5 minutes of arrival at the
emergency room
Unit of
%
measurement
Numerator Number of surveyed patients who undergo triage within 5 minutes
of arrival in emergency room (Q9)
Denominator Number of patients included in emergency room during triage time
survey (Q10)
Formula Number of surveyed patients who undergo triage within 5 minutes
of arrival in emergency room (Q9) ÷ Number of patients included
in emergency room triage time survey (Q10) x 100
Data sources Survey – see Appendix 8 : Protocol for survey to measure % of
patients triaged within 5 minutes of arrival in ER .
The survey should be conducted at 3 different time periods on the
first week of the final month of each reporting period as follows:
Monday: 8am to 12 noon
Wednesday: 12 noon to 5pm
Saturday: 5pm to 8am
Frequency Quarterly
Data entry Q9 = Number of surveyed patients who undergo triage within 5
minutes of arrival in emergency room =__________
Q10 = Number of patients included in emergency room during
triage time survey =___________
Calculation:
Why is this important? Hospitals have emergency room beds where patients can
stay for a short period of time to receive emergency
treatment. However, the length of stay in the emergency
room should always be less than 24 hours. If a patient
requires treatment for longer than 24 hours then he/she
should be transferred to a ward. If emergency room beds
are occupied by patients for more than 24 hours then the
emergency room will become congested and there is a
danger that the emergency room will not have the
capacity for any NEW emergency attendances.
Formula
Total number of admissions who remain in emergency
room for more than 24 hrs (Q11) ÷ Total number of
emergency room admissions(Q12) x 100
Data sources
Emergency room registration book
Calculation:
Why is this Delays in surgery for different conditions are associated with a
important? significant increase in morbidity and mortality.
The Government has set a stretch objective that any outpatient who
requires a bed should receive the service within 2 weeks.
By monitoring the waiting time for surgical admission, hospitals can
assess the adequacy of surgical capacity and identify the need for
improved efficiency in systems and processes, and/or the need for
additional surgical staff and/or resources.
Definition The average number of days that patients who underwent elective
surgery during the reporting period waited for admission (i.e. the
average number of days between the date each patient was added to the
waiting list to their date of admission for surgery
Unit of measurement Days
Numerator Sum total of number of days between date added to surgical waiting list
to date of admission for surgery (Q13)
EXCLUDE:
Elective Caesarean Sections
Emergency Surgery
Ophthalmic Surgery
NB: If a cold case patient is admitted on the same day (the same
calendar date) that the decision for surgery is made then their number of
days on the waiting list should be counted as zero.
Denominator Number of patients who were admitted for elective (non-emergency)
surgery during the reporting period (Q14)
Formula Sum total of number of days between date added to surgical waiting list
to date of admission for surgery (Q13) ÷ Number of patients who were
admitted for elective (non-emergency) surgery during the reporting
period (Q14)
Data sources Liaison registration book,
Frequency of reporting Monthly
Data entry Q13 = Sum total of number of days between date added to surgical
waiting list to date of admission for surgery = _____________
Q14 = Number of patients who were admitted for elective (non-
emergency) surgery during the reporting period = ______________
Calculation:
By measuring the pressure ulcer rate hospitals can assess the quality of
nursing care provided and take action to address any problems
identified.
An ulcer that involves the full thickness of the skin and may even
extend into the subcutaneous tissue, cartilage or bone
INCLUDE:
New pressure ulcers that arise during the patients admission, during
the reporting period
EXCLUDE:
Pressure ulcers that were already present at the time of admission
Pressure ulcers that developed in a previous reporting period
Unit of measurement %
Numerator Number of inpatients who develop a new pressure ulcer during the
reporting period (Q15)
Denominator Number of patients discharged alive (including transfers out) (Q16) +
Number of deaths among admitted inpatients (Q17)
Data sources IPD register **
Frequency of reporting Monthly
Frequency of reporting Monthly
Data entry Q17= Total number of patients discharged alive (including transfers out
= ___________
Q16= Total number of patients discharged alive (including transfers out)
= ____________
Q15= Total number of inpatients who develop a new pressure ulcer
during the reporting period = _________
Calculation:
**NB. The PRESUR ULCER data always recorded on IPD registry at the remark part.
Why is this Infection at the site of surgery may be caused by poor infection prevention practices
important? in the operating room or on the ward after completion of surgery. The surgical site
infection rate is an indicator of the quality of medical care received by surgical
patients and an indirect measure of infection prevention practices in the hospital. By
monitoring surgical site infection hospitals can assess the adequacy of infection
prevention practices in the hospital and take action to address any problems
identified.
Definition Proportion of all major surgeries with an infection occurring at the site of the
surgical wound prior to discharge. One or more of the following criteria should be
met:
Purulent drainage from the incision wound
Positive culture from a wound swab or aseptically aspirated fluid or
tissue
Spontaneous wound dehiscence or deliberate wound revision/opening by
the surgeon in the presence of: pyrexia > 38C or localized pain or
tenderness or redness/heat
An abscess or other evidence of infection involving the deep
incision that is found by direct examination during re-operation, or
by histopathological or radiological examination
A major surgical procedure is defined as any procedure conducted in an
OR under general, spinal or major regional anesthesia.
Unit %
Numerator Number of operated inpatient with new surgical site infection arising before
discharge (Record at discharge) (Q18)
INCLUDE:
Patients undergoing surgery in public facility
Private wing surgical cases
Denominator Number of operated inpatients discharged alive (including transfers out) (Q19) +
Number of operated inpatients discharged dead during the reporting period (Q20)
Formula Number of operated inpatient with new surgical site infection arising before
discharge (Record at discharge) (Q18) ÷
[Number of operated inpatients discharged alive (including transfers out) (Q19)
+ Number of operated inpatients discharged dead during the reporting period
(Q20)] x 100.
Data sources IPD registration
Frequency Monthly
Data entry Q18= Total number of inpatients with new surgical site infection arising during the
reporting period = _______
Q19= Total number of major surgeries (both elective & non-elective) performed during
the reporting period on public patients = ___________
Q20= Total number of major surgeries (both elective & non-elective) performed during
the reporting period on private wing patients = _____________
Calculation:
NB: The IPD nurses will record the SSI data on the remark column of the IPD Registry. The ward
physician is responsible for recording absence or presence of SSI on the discharge summary.
Why is this Complete and accurate medical records are essential to maintain the continuity of
important? patient care and ensure that the health provider has full information about the
patient when providing healthcare.
Definition All-cause death rate prior to discharge among patients who underwent a major
surgical procedure in an operating theatre during the reporting period in the
reporting health facility. Stratified by emergent and elective major surgical
procedures.
Exclusion: exclude patients operated in another facility unless re-operated in the
reporting facility.
Unit of Percentage
measurement
Numerator Total number of deaths before discharge within 24 hour after surgery among
patients who underwent a major surgical procedure in an OR(Q23)+ Total number
of deaths before discharge but more than 24 Hours post op among patients who
underwent a major surgical procedure in an OR(Q24)
Denominator Total number of patients who received major surgery(both elective and non
electives) in the reporting period(Q25)
Formula
Total number of deaths before discharge within 24 hour after surgery among
patients who underwent a major surgical procedure in an OR( (Q23 ) )+ Total
number of deaths before discharge but more than 24 Hours post op among patients
who underwent a major surgical procedure in an OR (Q24)/Total number of
patients who received major surgery(both elective and non electives) in the
reporting period(Q25)
Data sources OR Registry and All IPD registers
Frequency of Monthly
reporting
Data entry KPI 11= Q23+ Q24 *100%
Q25
Why is this A long in hospital pre op stay results in unnecessary bed occupancy as
well as increase the risk of colonization by antibiotic resistant hospital
Important? flora. It is indicative of insufficient pre admission preparation or
inefficient OT management resulting in cancellations. These will be
highlighted for intervention by monitoring this indicator
Why is this Safe surgery checklist a safety checks that could be performed in any
important? operating room. It is designed to reinforce accepted safety practices
and foster better communication and teamwork between clinical
disciplines. The Checklist is intended as a tool for use by clinicians
interested in improving the safety of their operations and reducing
unnecessary surgical deaths and complications. This is an important
aid to ensure patient safety.
Definition Proportion of surgical cases where the WHO safe surgery check list was fully
implemented.
Unit of Percentage
measurement
Numerator Number of Major surgical patient charts in which the WHO Surgical Safety
Checklist was completed per chart(Q26)
Denominator Total number of patient charts reviewed (Q27)
50 charts
Formula Number of surgical patient charts in which the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was
completed patient chart (Q26) / Total number of patient charts reviewed (Q27) x
100
Data sources Survey Patient Chart
Frequency of Monthly
reporting
Data entry
KPI 12= Q26 * 100%
Q27
Frequency of Monthly
reporting
Data entry KPI 13= Q28 *100%
Q29
Frequency of Monthly
reporting
Data entry
KPI 14 = Q25
Definition Percentage of surgical patients who developed any one of the following:
1. Cardio respiratory arrest
2. Inability to secure airway
3. High spinal anesthesia
Cardio-respiratory arrest as: cessation of cardiac activity as evidenced by:
▪ Chest compressions being performed
▪ Loss of femoral, carotid and apical pulse with ECG changes
High spinal defined as:
Within 15 minutes of administration of spinal anesthesia:
▪ Patient experiences loss of sensation in the shoulder
AND
▪ Need for positive pressure ventilation after administration of
spinal anesthesia
Includes any administration of spinal anesthesia extending above T4 level.
Inability to secure airway defined as:
Having to awaken patient due to inability to intubate
Cardio-respiratory arrest due to failure to intubate
Unit of Percentage
measurement
Numerator Number of surgical cases with anesthetic adverse outcome (high spinal anesthesia,
failed intubation, cardio-respiratory arrest) during reporting period(Q30)
Denominator Total number of major surgical procedures performed in OR during reporting
period(Q25)
Formula Number of surgical cases with anesthetic adverse outcome (high spinal anesthesia,
failed intubation, cardio-respiratory arrest) during reporting period(Q30)/ Total
number of major surgical procedures performed in OR during reporting period(Q25) x
100
Data sources Anesthesia Registry
Frequency of Monthly
reporting
Data entry
KPI 15= Q30 *100%
Q25
Why is this important? This indicator measures quality of care provided to women in the immediate
post-partum period and an indirect measure of timely response for early
identification and managing the incidence of PPH.
INCLUDE:
All PPH cases diagnosed in the health institution/ on arrival/ referred in
EXCLUDE:
Dead on arrival of PPH cases
Unit of measurement %
Numerator Number of Women who gave birth in the health facility or referred in who
had any bleeding with hypotension or requiring blood transfusion and
survived (Q31)
Denominator Total number of women who gave birth in the health facility or referred in or
on arrival who had any bleeding with hypotension or requiring blood
transfusion or died (Q32) + Number of Women who gave birth in the health
facility or referred in who had any bleeding with hypotension or requiring
blood transfusion and survived (Q31)
Formula Total Number of Women who gave birth in the health facility or referred in
who had any bleeding with hypotension or requiring blood transfusion and
survived (Q31) ÷ Total Number of women who gave birth in the health
facility or referred in who had any bleeding with hypotension or requiring
blood transfusion (survived or died) during the month (Q32)x 100
Data sources Delivery register/ postnatal register/maternity register/ICU register/OR
register
Frequency of reporting Monthly
Data entry Q31= Total Number of Women who gave birth in the health facility or
referred in or on arrival who had any bleeding with hypotension or requiring
blood transfusion and survived during the month) = ___________
Q32= Total Number of women who gave birth in the health facility or
referred in or on arrival who had any bleeding with hypotension or requiring
blood transfusion or died during the month = _______
Calculation:
Why is this In the health care system of Ethiopia, it is expected that hospitals will manage
important? complicated maternity cases and that uncomplicated pregnancies and normal
deliveries should mainly be managed by Primary Health Care Units. By monitoring
the % of attended deliveries that are complicated, the hospital and RHB can assess if
hospital services are being used appropriately.
Definition Number of births by surgical, instrumental or assisted vaginal delivery per 100
deliveries attended in the hospital
Caesarean Section means delivery of the fetus (including live births and stillbirths) by
the abdominal route when the uterus is intact (Q33)
Abdominal Surgical Delivery means removal of the fetus, placenta and/or membranes
by the abdominal route (including live births and stillbirths) where the uterus is not
intact (i.e. ruptured uterus). (Q34)
Instrumental or assisted vaginal delivery (Q35) means any vaginal delivery (including
live births and stillbirths) using an instrument or manual intervention of the health
worker.
INCLUDE:
Forceps delivery
Rotational deliveries, e.g. internal podalic version
Assisted breech delivery
Vacuum extractions
Craniotomy
EXCLUDE: Episiotomy
Vaginal tears
Numerator Number of Caesarean sections (Q33) + Number of abdominal surgical deliveries
(Q34) + Number of instrumental or assisted vaginal deliveries (Q35)
Denominator Total deliveries (Number of live births attended in the hospital (Q36) + Number of
stillbirths attended in the hospital) (Q37)
Unit of measurement %
Formula [Number of Caesarean sections (Q33) + Number of abdominal surgical deliveries
(Q34) + Number of instrumental or assisted vaginal deliveries (Q35)] ÷ Total
deliveries [Number of live births attended in the hospital (Q36) + Number of
stillbirths attended in the hospital (Q37)] x 100
Data sources Delivery registration book
Frequency of Monthly
reporting
Data entry Q36 = Total number of live births attended in the hospital = _____
Q37 = Total number of stillbirths attended in the hospital = ______
Q33 = Number of Caesarean sections = __________________
Q34 = Number of abdominal surgical deliveries = ___________
Q35 = Number of instrumental or assisted vaginal deliveries = ____
KPI 17 =Q33+ Q34 + Q35 x 100 = --------%
Q36 + Q37
PHARMACY SERVICE
KPI 18: Percentage of Clients with 100% prescribed drugs filled
Unit of
%
measurement
Numerator Number of clients who received 100% of prescribed drugs(Q38)
Denominator Total number of clients who received prescriptions(Q39)
Frequency of
Quarterly
reporting
Data entry Q38 = Number of clients who received 100% of prescribed
drugs = ___________
Q39 = Total number of clients who received prescriptions =
LABORATORY SERVICE
Calculation:
Denominator
275 (i.e. total number of SLIPTA audit standards) (Q44)
Formula
Total SLIPTA audit standards scored (Q43) ÷ 275 (i.e. total
number of SLIPTA audit standards) (Q44)
Calculation:
Why is this Timely access to blood is a factor in surgical morbidity and mortality
important? especially in obstetric and trauma care where hemorrhage is a major
cause of mortality.
Definition The ratio of major surgical/obstetric cases which are referred or cancelled
because of unavailability of blood to major surgical procedures in the
reporting period.
Unit of Ratio
measurement
Numerator Total number of major surgical/obstetric procedures cancelled or referred
because of lack of blood for transfusion(Q45)
Denominator Total number of surgical patients for whom cross - match was done (Q46)
Frequency Monthly
PRODUCTIVITY
For teaching hospitals, the estimated allocation of time for clinical care, teaching
learning process and research activities is 40%, 40% and 20% respectively.
Accordingly, interpretation of productivity takes this in to consideration with due
consideration of specific period of the report. For instance, the clinical care
engagement should be adjusted more than 40% if the physicians are not engaged
in research activities in that particular reporting period. The same applies for
teaching learning activities if the actual number of consultants is in excess of the
need to run the regular schedule of academic activities.
Definition Clinical care productivity for physicians is the average number of patients managed by
full time equivalent (FTE) physicians. A FTE physician is the one who worked for at
least 8 hours a day (except Friday in which case it is 7 hours), 5 days a week and 4 weeks
of the reporting period.
If a physician works only part of the reporting period then his/her regular work hours
should be converted to a FTE number by dividing the number of regular working hours
by 39. For instance, if he/she was productive only for 2 weeks, then the FTE will be 0.5
and 0.75 if he/she was productive for 3 weeks.
Unit number
Numerator Total number of outpatients managed in the reporting period during regular working
hours (Q8). INCLUDES: all outpatient clinic visits (new and repeat) in the reporting
period during regular working hours. EXCLUDES: all outpatient clinic visits (new and
repeat) seen in the private wing and all emergency patients
Denominato Total number of FTE physicians assigned in outpatient department during the
r
reporting period(Q47)
Calculation:
Why is this This indicator relates to the productivity of surgeons, and helps the
important? hospital to determine whether surgeons are working productively, or are
overloaded. The indicator is useful for planning future surgical staff
numbers. Definition
Definition The number of major surgical procedures per full time equivalent (FTE)
specialist surgeon.
INCLUDE:
all major surgeries conducted on patients admitted to public facility
all surgeries conducted on private wing patients
HUMAN RESOURCE
KPI 24: Staff satisfaction
Why is this Hospitals should strive to provide a good working environment for employees, with
important? opportunities for training and development and equitable remuneration.
Employees who are satisfied with their working environment are more productive
and provide higher quality care. In contrast when workers are dissatisfied in the
workplace their productivity tends to be low and the attrition rate is high.
The Satisfaction of Employees in Healthcare (SEHC) survey has been developed for
use in Ethiopian health facilities. The survey tool measures staff experience and
perceptions in relation to training and development opportunities, communication
and relationships between staff members, provision of adequate resources to
perform the job, and the overall rating of the hospital as a working environment.
By monitoring staff satisfaction, the hospital can identify areas for improvement
and take action to address problems identified.
Definition Proportion of “neutral and satisfied” staff responses among all staff surveyed in
the specified period.
Unit Percentage
Numerator Total number of “ Neutral” responses (Q51)+ Total number of “ satisfied”
responses (Q52)
Denominator total number of staff Satisfaction surveys completed( Q53) x total number of staff
satisfaction criteria’s evaluated (Q54)
Formula [[Total number of “Neutral” responses(Q51) + Total number of “satisfied”
responses(Q52)] / [total number of staff Satisfaction surveys completed(Q53) x
total number of staff satisfaction criteria’s evaluated (Q54)]] x 100%
The survey should also include interns, residents, other staffs seconded by other
Inclusion cri. organizations.
Exclusion cr. 6 months or less since a staff joined the hospital
Data sources Survey – For the survey tool and protocol – see Appendix 10
Frequency Biannually
Data entry Q51= Total number of “Neutral” responses = ________
Q52= Total number of “satisfied” responses = _________
Q53= Total number of staff Satisfaction surveys completed = _____
HEALTH FINANCEING
KPI 25: Raised revenue as a proportion of total operating spending
Why is this Hospital income is generated from two sources: government
important? budget allocation (treasury) and raised revenue. Through
Healthcare Finance Reform (HCFR) hospitals now have the
autonomy to generate income from user fees, private wing and
other sources. This is known as raised revenue. Hospitals are
expected to generate income that should then be re-invested in the
hospital to improve the quality of services provided.
CLINICAL GOVERNANCE
KPI 26: Patient satisfaction
Why is this
Patient satisfaction with the health care they receive at the hospital is a
important?
measure of the quality of care provided. By monitoring patient satisfaction
hospitals can identify areas for improvement and ensure that hospital care
meets the expectations of the patients served.
Patient satisfaction survey tool have been developed for use in Ethiopian health
facilities. These survey tool measure the patient experience related to service
availability, cleanliness, communication, respect, medication (prescription,
availability and patient information) and cost in OPD, IPD, maternity and
emergency departments.
Definition Proportion of “neutral and satisfied” client responses among all clients
surveyed in the specified period.
Unit of
measuremen Percentage
t
Numerator Total number of “ Neutral” responses (Q57) + Total number of “ satisfied”
responses (Q58)
A minimum of 120 patient (30 from each of departments; OPD, IPD, maternity
and ED).
Data entry and analysis can be undertaken using the electronic Access database
and Excel pre-programmed analytical tool through which summary tables,
charts and the average satisfaction rating can be calculated.
Frequency of
Quarterly
reporting
Data entry Q57= Total number of “Neutral” responses = ________
Q58= Total number of “satisfied” responses = _________
Q59= Total number of Patient Satisfaction surveys completed = _____
Q60= Total number of patient satisfaction criteria’s evaluated] = ______
Supportive supervision is a process that promotes quality at all levels of the health system by
strengthening relationships within the system, focusing on the identification and resolution of
problems, optimizing the allocation of resources, promoting high standards, team work and better
two-way communication (MARQUEZ & KEAN, 2002). Supportive supervision involves
directing and supporting HSPs in order to enhance their skills, knowledge and abilities with the
goal of improving health outcomes for the patients they manage. It is an ongoing relationship
between HSPs and their supervisors.
4.1 Purpose of hospital supportive supervision site visits
The purpose of a hospital supportive supervision site visit is:
To assure the RHB that KPI and any other performance data reported by the
hospital to the RHB is accurate
To identify, recognize and learn from good practice, which can then be shared with
other hospitals
These are common to all site visits conducted by the RHB but there may be additional
reasons for site visits. The purpose of the site visit and specific areas of focus should
always be agreed by the site visit team and should be informed to the hospital in advance
of the visit taking place.
The site visit should be led and coordinated by the RHB in collaboration with other
partners as relevant. Potential participants include FMOH staff, staff from other
hospitals (e.g. a respected hospital CEO), partners and others.
A minimum of three individuals should conduct the site visit. This will allow each
person to carry out specific functions during the site visit and minimize the time
required at the hospital.
A team leader should be assigned by the RHB to oversee the site visit process. The
roles of the team leader include:
To co-ordinate the site visit process, following the steps outlined below
To ensure communication between site visit team members both before and
after the site visit is conducted
To communicate with the hospital CEO both before and after the site visit
To prepare the site visit report and distribute to relevant stakeholders (e.g.
RHB Head, Hospital CEO and GB Chair, site visit team members).
To ensure the hospital provides a written response to the site visit report. To
follow up on any action described in the site visit report or the hospital
response
To ensure the site visit report and the hospital response are maintained on file
by the RHB
To establish the date or timeline within which the next hospital site visit
should be conducted
Firstly, the site visit team leader should collate all available evidence about the
performance of the hospital, in order to identify specific areas that should be
addressed during the site visit. Much of this evidence will already be on record with
the RHB. As a minimum, the following information should be reviewed:
The most recent site visit report and the hospital response & action plant
The hospital KPIs and attainment of EHSTG standard reports should also be
compared with other hospitals in the region to assess how well the hospital is
performing in relation to others.
If any of the above information is not available in the RHB, the team leader should
contact the hospital CEO to request them to submit the missing information.
Evidence that requires validation (e.g. selected KPIs, selected chapters of EHSTG
self-assessments etc)
The team leader should send the draft site visit briefing document together with all the above
evidence (KPI reports, previous site visit report etc) to all site visit team members. Each team
member should review and give comments.
All team members should then meet in person, or communicate by telephone or
email, to agree the areas to be addressed during the site visit.
The team leader should then assign specific tasks and responsibilities to each team
member and should prepare a schedule for the site visit which describes in detail
the role of individual team members. A sample site visit schedule is presented in
Figure 11, below.
The CEO should inform all hospital staff that a site visit is being conducted; giving
a general overview of the purpose of the site visit and priority areas that the site
visit team will review. In particular, the CEO should ensure that the management
and staff of all service areas that will be visited during the site visit are available on
the days of the site visit.
Each team member should prepare detailed notes on their activities during the site
visit, ensuring that the specific questions raised in the site visit briefing document
are addressed.
The report should be reviewed by all site visit team members. When reviewing the
draft report team members should consider:
Does the report present the impression of the hospital that you want it to
convey?
Does the report contain the key messages arising from the site visit?
Does the report describe any follow up action that is expected from the
hospital?
Does the report identify any follow up action or support that is required from
the RHB?
Will the report help to improve hospital services? If not, how can the report
be improved?
After finalizing the report by the site visit team, the report should be sent to the
hospital CEO who should review and prepare a hospital response & action plan that
describes specific actions that the hospital will take in the light of the report. When
reviewing the report the hospital CEO should consider:
What specific actions should the hospital take to address the recommendations
made in the report? In what time frame?
Does the report describe all areas of support that the hospital expects from the
RHB to assist the hospital to act on the recommendations?
Are there any additional comments that the CEO would like to raise with the
RHB about the site visit process itself? Anything that could be improved in the
process?
The CEO should send a copy of the hospital response and action plan to the site visit
team leader.
After finalizing the site visit report and the hospital response, copies of both should
be shared with the RHB Head and all relevant stakeholders. Copies should be kept
on file within the RHB and used as evidence when preparing subsequent site visits
and regional review meetings.
5.1 Purpose
Regular meetings between the RHB and all hospitals in the region provide the
opportunity for communication and experience sharing between the RHB and
hospitals. Specifically review meetings can be used to:
5.4 Participants
a) RHB staff
b) Hospital staff
The FMOH regional focal persons for the region should be invited to
attend since this will maintain strong communication between
FMOH, the RHB and hospitals and will build capacity in FMOH to
support the RHB and hospitals when required.
d) Other
To prepare for each meeting, the RHB should review all hospital KPI reports and
the most recent site visit report and hospital response and action plan. Using these
reports the RHB should identify successes and challenges within individual
hospitals or across the region as a whole.
Based on the findings, the RHB should identify specific hospitals to give
presentations or share experience at the meeting and should inform these hospitals
in advance so that the hospitals can prepare all necessary information.
Specific individuals from within the RHB, FMOH or partners should be assigned to
take minutes of the meeting.
At each meeting the RHB should give a presentation on the KPI and EHSTG
standards assessment reports from each hospital, including regional averages and
recommendations from the RHB in response to the findings. Other agenda items
will vary from meeting to meeting according to need.
6.1 Purpose
Regular meetings between FMOH and all RHBs provide the opportunity for
communication and experience sharing between regions. Specifically FMOH/RHB
meetings can be used to:
6.4 Participants
a) FMOH Staff
b) RHB Staff
c) Hospital staff
d) Other
To prepare for each meeting, FMOH should review all regional KPI reports to
identify successes and challenges within individual regions or across the country as
a whole.
Based on the findings, FMOH should identify specific RHBs to give presentations
or share experience at the meeting and should inform these RHBs in advance so
that the RHB can prepare all necessary information.
At each meeting FMOH should give a presentation on the KPI and EHSTG
standards assessment reports from each region, and recommendations from FMOH
in response to the findings. Other agenda items will vary from meeting to meeting.
Abdominal surgical delivery Removal of the fetus, placenta etc. through a surgical incision in
the belly
Assisted delivery Birth of a baby in which the midwife or surgeon manipulates the
baby as it moves through the birth canal
Day surgery unit Department in the hospital where patients are operated on then go
home the same day
Emergency attendance Occasion when a patient goes to the emergency room for treatment
Emergency room Department in the hospital where emergency patients are treated
Gestational age Age of the baby in the womb during pregnancy, i.e. how far on in
pregnancy
Hemorrhage Bleeding
Infection prevention processes Procedures like regular hand washing and sterilization of
instruments which stop the spread of infections
Intensive care unit Department in the hospital for acutely ill patients with higher
levels of medical and nursing care
Key performance indicator An agreed measure that all facilities collect in the same way
Medical record Papers that document the care and treatment a patient received
Mortality Death
Private wing Part of the hospital where patients pay for all services they receive
Supportive supervision site visit A visit by the RHB and partners to the hospital to review
performance
Surgical site infection Infection at the place on the body where a surgical incision was
made
Uterus Womb
Vacuum delivery Delivery of a baby using a suction instrument to pull the baby out
Wound dehiscence An area of a wound which is not healing and has come apart or
broken down
Date of Assessment
Hospital Name
Region, Zone/Sub city, District/ woreda
CEO Name
phone no
Email
CASH focal person Name
phone no
Email
Number of Staff(Total )
Number of
Environmental health
officers
Number of Staff(Cleaners
)
Number of Staff(Laundry
staffs )
Name of Assessors
Functional
2 Updated TOR for the
/Active committee
CASH/IP Availability of annual
PS CASH specific
coordinati operational plan at focal
ng point, committee and
committee SMT
Conduct regular meeting
at least quarterly and
minutes should be
documented
Conduct progressive
assessment quarterly
&report should be sent to
SMT
All hospital health
professionals, laundry
staffs, kitchen staffs and
housekeeping staffs
should be trained on
CASH/IPPS
Conduct Hospital wide
Campion at least quarterly
2. Facility Management
No Standard Verification criteria Score R
e
* ** * m
* a
* r
k
4 Protective Fence which surrounds all
Surrounding the hospital ground which
fence will not allow the entrance
of pets and other animals
with a functional gate
Safe especially for
psychiatric and pediatric
patients
At least with two gates that
could aid in case of
emergencies.
Hygiene
Purpose of survey:
The average OPD wait time is one of the Key Performance Indicators that should be reported
by hospitals to their Governing Board and to the RHB has a measure of hospital
performance. Period of survey:
The survey should be conducted on Monday and Thursday of the first week of the last month
of each quarter.
The hospital should assign an „owner‟ for the KPI „Outpatient Waiting Time to
consultation”. He/she is responsible to oversee the survey , to select and train surveyors, to
issue „Waiting Time Cards‟ to each surveyor, to receive completed „Waiting Time Cards‟
from the surveyors at the end of the survey period, and to calculate the average wait time at
the end of the survey period.
Additionally, at the start of each survey period the KPI Owner should inform all OPD staff
that the survey is taking place and should instruct OPD Case Teams to complete the relevant
section on the „Waiting Time Card‟ for every patient seen and ensure that all Waiting Time
Cards are returned to the surveyor at the end of the survey day.
The KPI Owner should assign individuals to act as surveyors. The number of surveyors
required will depend on the patient load. However, there should be sufficient surveyors to
ensure that the waiting time of at least100 outpatient is measured during the survey. In those
facilities where the outpatient load is very high (>200), every 3rd patient may be taken to a
total of at least 100 patients. As an approximation, the number of surveyors required will be
approximately the same as the number of individuals conducting patient registration.
Ideally, the surveyors should be individuals who DO NOT WORK regularly in the outpatient
department in order to avoid bias. Surveyors could be volunteers from the community,
students or hospital staff assigned from other departments. If necessary, the hospital should
provide payment to surveyors according to the number of hours worked.
The surveyors should follow the methodology outlined below to conduct the survey and
should submit all completed „Waiting Time Cards‟ to the KPI Owner at the end of the survey
period.
A member of each clinical case team should receive the Waiting Time Card from each and
every patient seen during the survey period. He/she should record on the Card the time at
which the clinical consultation begins, and the name of the case team. Instructions should be
Hospital Performance Monitoring and Improvement Manual – October, 2017 85
given to each case team to provide all completed cards to the surveyor at the end of the
survey day. Case teams should ensure that no Waiting Time Cards are lost or misplaced.
Methodology of Survey:
The Surveyor should keep track of the number of cards issued and the number of
cards completed. To do this he/sh e should keep a tally of the number of Waiting
Time Cards issued and follow up any that are missing at the end of the day.
On arrival in the consultation room, the patient should hand over the Waiting Time
Card to a member of the case team. If the patient does not automatically hand this
over then a member of the team should request the Card from the patient.
The case team member should record on the Card the time at which the consultation
begins. The case team should keep all Cards received from patients.
At the end of the day (or close of clinic) the surveyor(s) should collect all Cards from
each and every Case Team and should compare this with the list of Cards issued. If
any cards are missing the surveyor(s) should follow up with the relevant Case Team
and determine whether the patient was seen that day.
e) Every effort should be made to ensure that no Cards are missing or lost
because this could lead to an inaccurate survey result. Surveyor calculates waiting
time for each patient
After receiving the Waiting Time Cards from each clinical case team, the surveyor
should calculate the wait time for that patient (in minutes) and should enter it onto the
Card.
A t the end of the survey period the KPI owner should collect all Waiting Time Cards
from each surveyor.
After calculating Outpatient Waiting Time the KPI owner should report all data
elements and KPI result to the KPI focal person. The KPI focal person will then
check the calculations and enter them into the KPI report form.
If the average wait time is very long (especially if some patients are not seen on the
same day) then the surveyor may also want to record the range (shortest and longest)
of wait times.
Similarly, the waiting time for each clinical case team could be analyzed separately to
see if there are any differences between clinical teams. This information could help to
assess the efficiency of each case team and/or to determine the need for additional
clinical staff in particular case teams and/or the need for patient numbers assigned to a
specific case team to be decreased or increased.
Purpose of survey:
Through BPR, the Ministry of Health has set a stretch objective that „any patient with the
need for emergency treatment should be provided with the service within 5 minutes of arrival
at the hospital”.
The proportion of emergency patients who undergo triage within 5 minutes is one of the Key
Performance Indicators that should be reported by hospitals to their Governing Board and to
the RHB has a measure of hospital performance.
Period of survey:
The survey should be conducted during the following time periods during the final week of
the reporting period:
The hospital should assign an „owner‟ for the KPI „% of patients triaged within 5 minutes of
arrival in ER”. He/she is responsible to oversee the survey, to select and train surveyors, and
to calculate the proportion seen within 5 minutes at the end of the survey period.
Additionally, at the start of each survey period the KPI Owner should inform all ER staff that
the survey is taking place.
The KPI Owner should assign individuals to act as surveyors. The number of surveyors
required will depend on the patient load. However, there should be sufficient surveyors
to ensure that the waiting time of each and every emergency patient is measured during
the study period.
Ideally, the surveyors should be individuals who DO NOT WORK regularly in the
emergency department in order to avoid bias. Surveyors could be clinical or non clinical staff
from other hospital departments. If necessary, the hospital should provide payment to
surveyors according to the number of hours worked.
The surveyors should follow the methodology outlined below to conduct the survey and
should submit all completed „Triage Data Forms‟ to KPI Owner at the end of the survey
period.
a) Assign surveyor(s)
One or more surveyors should be assigned to the ER Department for each study time
period. The surveyor(s) should be located at the entrance to ER. If the hospital does
not have a separate ER department the surveyors should be located in an area where
they can identify easily identify emergency cases versus outpatient cases.
As soon as a patient arrives at ER the surveyor should enter the time of arrival on the
Triage Data Form. The surveyor should follow the patient until the time of triage (ie
until assessment by a clinical staff member). The surveyor should enter the time of
triage on the Triage Data Form and calculate the wait time in minutes. The surveyor
should then complete the final column on the Triage Data Form to state if the patient
was triaged within 5 minutes of arrival (yes or no).
At the end of the survey period the KPI Owner should collect all Triage Data Forms
from each surveyor. The KPI owner should calculated the % of patients triaged within
5 minutes as follows:
After calculating % of patients triaged within 5 minutes the KPI owner should report
all data elements and KPI result to the KPI focal person. The KPI focal person will
then check the calculations and enter them into the KPI report form.
Frequency of Audit:
The hospital should assign an „owner‟ for this KPI. He/she is responsible to oversee the Medical
Record Audit, to select and train Medical Record staff who will conduct the audit, and to liaise
with the Medical Records Department to select and obtain the Medical Records which are
included in the audit.
The Medical Record Reviewers should be members of the Medical Records Department. Each
should review the assigned Medical Records following the checklist below and submit their
completed Forms to the KPI Owner.
Methodology of Survey:
Identify and list all patients who were discharged from an inpatient ward during the
reporting period. This information can be obtained from the Medical Records Database or
Admission/Discharge Registers.
MR Number:
Ward:
Section Yes No
1. Patient Card (Physician Notes):
- Is this present?
- Are all entries dated and signed?
2. Progress note- documented at least once a day
throughout the hospital stay?
3. Order sheet:
- Is this present and revised daily?
- Are all entries dated and signed?
4. Nursing Care Plan:
- Is this present?
- Revised daily, V/S taken at least QID for all
admitted patient?
- Are all entries dated and signed?
5. Medication Administration Record -
Is this present?
- Are all entries dated and signed?
6. Discharge summary
- Is this present?
- Are all entries dated and signed?
7. clinical pharmacist record
- Is this present?
-Are all entries dated and signed?
______ _______
Total number of “Yes” and “No” Checks
MR Reviewed by:____________________________
This form should be used to report new pressure ulcers arising in patients following admission
to hospital.
Pressure Ulcers arise in areas of unrelieved pressure (commonly sacrum, elbows, knees or ankles).
Ward (ዋርድ):
Name of patient:
Reported by :
This form should be used to report infection occurring at the site of surgery in patients who
undergo major surgical procedures (i.e. any procedure conducted under general, spinal or
major regional anesthesia).
Name of surgeon :
Reported by :
Patient recruitment:
Participation is voluntary and patient anonymity must be maintained. No identifying information
(such as patient’s name) should be collected. All patients must be 18 years old or older. In
addition, for admitted clients, participants must have a hospital stay of 2 days or more.
The survey may be completed by the patient themselves (written) or administered by the surveyor
who will transcribe the patient’s answers (orally). An ID number should be assigned to each
survey sequentially as it is conducted. The ID should be entered on the survey form and in a
logbook.
Written Survey:
Surveyors will provide a blank patient survey to the patient to be completed by him/her. Patient
should complete the survey at the time it is distributed and be notified of a centralized collection
area where they can return their completed survey.
The surveyor should record the Survey No. in logbook and identify it as a “written survey”.
Oral Survey:
If the patient requests that the survey be conducted orally surveyors will read each question on the
survey to the patient, transcribing the responses of the patient on to the survey form (tally their
rating as per the service area). The surveyor should record the Survey No. in a logbook and
identify it is as “oral survey”. Once the survey is completed the surveyor should deliver it to a
centralized collection area for the KPI data owner to collect.
d) KPI owner calculates Patient Satisfaction Indicator and response rate
At the end of the survey period the KPI owner should collect all completed surveys from the
centralized collection area. The KPI owner should calculate Patient Satisfaction score by
calculating the proportion of a clients responded by giving a neutral or satisfied score from the
total number of clients participated in the survey.
e) KPI Owner reports to KPI focal person and Data Entry Person
After calculating Patient Satisfaction the KPI owner should report all data elements and indicator
to the KPI focal person. The KPI focal person will then check the calculations and enter them into
the KPI report form.
Additionally, all surveys should be given to the appropriate data entry person to enter into the
Access Database. See Appendix 8 for guidance.
Adequate water
supply during the
stay
Adequate
information
provided
regarding waste
segregation,
norms of the ward,
infection
prevention
Auditory privacy
was maintained
during times of
hospital stay
All oral
medications were
kept in cabinet and
ሠንጠረዥ-9-በሆስፒታልእናበሪጅናልሊቦራቶሪደረጃየሊብራቶሪየምርመራዝርዝርእስታንዳርድ
ቀድሞየነበረእስታንዳርድ በዚህጥናትበማሻሻያነትየቀረበ አስታየ
ዲፓርትመንት በጀነራልሆስፒታልላብራቶሪደረ ት
ጃ
በሆስፒታልላብራቶሪደረ በሪጅናል
ጃ ላብራቶሪደረ
ጃ
Clinical Blood glucose Blood glucose Blood
glucose
chemistry
Alkaline phosphatase Alkaline Alkaline
phosphatase phosphatas
e
ALT ALT ALT
SGPT SGPT SGPT
SGOT SGOT SGOT
Total bilirubine Total bilirubine Total
bilirubine
Direct bilirubine Direct bilirubine Direct
bilirubine
Total protein Total protein Total
protein
Albumin Albumin Albumin
RF RF
RPR RPR
HIV-test HIV-test
H.Pylori (Ag/Ab) H.Pylori (Ag/Ab)
HBs Ag HBs Ag
HCV HCV
Salmonella Typhi-O Salmonella Typhi-O
Salmonella Typhi-H Salmonella Typhi-H
Proteus-OX19 Proteus-OX19
HCG HCG
Blood Anti-A፣Anti-B፣ Anti- D Anti-A፣Anti-B፣ Anti-
Group & D
Compatibilit Cross match Cross match
To provide a standardized survey tool for hospitals, they can use it to monitor staff satisfaction
in their workplace, and changes in satisfaction over time.
The Key Performance Indicator “staff Satisfaction” will be calculated using the average responses
to questions in the staff satisfaction survey tool.
Period of Survey:
Hospitals should perform satisfaction of at least 50% of their staffs biannually. The surveys
should be done in the first week of the last months of the first and the second half of the budget
year (i.e. first weeks of December and June). As indicated in the survey tool, different categories
of health care providers (physicians, nurses, midwives, laboratory/pharmacy/imaging workers)
and supporting staffs has to be included in the survey.
Role of KPI owner:
The hospital should assign an owner‟ for the KPI staff Satisfaction (HR or Quality unit staff).
He/she is responsible to oversee the survey, to select and train surveyors, to issue surveys to each
surveyor, to receive completed surveys from centralized collection area, calculate staff
satisfaction (KPI …) and response rate, and give all completed surveys to a data entry person who
will enter them into the Access Database.
Selection and role of surveyors:
Each health facility should assign one or more individuals to administer the surveys to staffs. The
individual conducting the survey (also referred to as “surveyor”) should understand the survey
well, including all survey questions and answer choice. A surveyor must have good interpersonal
skills to interact sensitively with staffs and must not lead the staffs to particular responses but
should administer the survey objectively. Each surveyor must be trained to ensure he/she
understands the purpose and process of the surveys. Surveyors are responsible for collecting all
completed surveys and returning them to a centralized collection area determined by the health
facility. Surveys can be completed by the staff themselves (written).
Staff recruitment:
Participation is voluntary and staff anonymity must be maintained. No identifying information
(such as staff’s name) should be collected. Staffs should be selected to reflect a diversity of staffs,
including physicians, nurses, midwives, laboratory/pharmacy/imaging workers and supporting
staffs. The surveyor should not select staffs based on his/her presumptions about whether the
staff appears pleased or not pleased with the working environment.
Additionally, all surveys should be given to the appropriate data entry person to enter into the
Access Database. See Appendix 10 for guidance.
Enter here a summary of the action that the hospital was expected to take following the previous site visit
(based on the most recent hospital response and action plan)
Describe (if known) whether the hospital has undertaken this action and any issues that remain.
Enter here a summary of information gathered from the most recent KPI report and EHSTG report
Enter here areas of performance that appear strong based on KPI/EHSTG reports or information gathered
from other sources
Enter here areas of performance that appear weak based on KPI/EHSTG reports or information gathered from
other sources
Enter here any data that should be checked/validated during the site visit. For example selected KPI data or
selected EHSTG standards
Enter here areas of the hospital that should be investigated during the site visit (based on the information
entered above). This could include follow up on actions that should have been completed following the
previous site visit, or performance issues that have been identified through the KPI or EHSTG reports.
Be sure to include areas that are possible strengths of the hospital so that best practice can also be identified.
Ente
Section 3: Scheduling r
Date of proposed site visit:
here
Date hospital CEO informed of site visit: the
spec
ific service areas of the hospital that should be visited by members of the site visit team. This will be based on
the information entered above. For example, MR Department, Billing Offices/Finance Dept, ER Department,
Inpatient Wards etc
Enter here the staff members who should be available for interview during the site visit. This should be based
on the information entered above. For example, CEO, SMT, Head of MR, Finance Head, ER Case Team Leader,
IP Case Team Leader etc
Enter here any addition information that the CEO should prepare for your visit. If feasible this information
should be sent to the site visit team before the site visit. However if this is not possible then the information
may be presented at the opening meeting of the site visit. For example; patient or staff survey results etc
Enter here any unresolved action from the previous site visit. Include a description of progress made by the
hospital or RHB (if relevant) to resolve the issue.
15 Template for Site Visit Report
The following is a template with guidance for preparing a supportive supervision site visit report. It
should be used after conducting a hospital site visit and reviewed by all team members. Once agreed
the report should be sent to the hospital CEO for comments. Once finalized the report should be
distributed to the RHB and all relevant stakeholders.
Cover Page
Should include region, name of hospital, names of site visit team members, date of site visit and date
of report completion
This section should include background information about the site supervision process, general
hospital information (hospital level, services offered, catchment population, etc.)
This section should provide a summary of the findings of the site supervision team. It informs readers
of:
- Key findings from the site visit
- Strengths and improvements made
- Areas for improvement
- Overall progress in implementing hospital reforms (EHSTG, BPR, BSC, etc.)
Recommendations
This section should describe any follow up actions the hospital should take based on the findings of
the site supervision team.
Hospital response:
Enter here any specific comment you have on the Site Visit Report. State if you accept the findings and
recommendations of the site visit report.
If there are any observations or comments made in the site visit report that you think are inaccurate describe
those here.
Action plan:
- The specific action that the hospital will take to address the recommendations made
in the site visit report
- The responsible person for each action
- The timeline to complete each action
Enter here any support or action that you expect the RHB or other partners to take to assist the hospital to
fulfill its action plan or to respond to recommendations made by the site visit team.
Enter here any suggestions you would like to make to the site visit team for their next visit to the hospital.
This could be areas of the hospital that were not reviewed during the current site visit where you would like
to demonstrate good practice, or areas where you would like the site visit team to have better understanding
of the challenges you face.
Enter here any other comments you have. For example, suggestions on how the site visit process could be
improved.