0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Relations

Uploaded by

monaimmeznaoui
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Relations

Uploaded by

monaimmeznaoui
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

National Higher School of Mathematics

Preparatory Cycle Academic Year : 2023/2024


First Year Course : Algebra 1
Worksheet 3
Binary Relations

Exercise 1.
Let E be a nonempty set, A a subset of E and R a relation defined on P(E) by :

∀X, Y ∈ P(E) : XRY ⇐⇒ X ∩ A = Y ∩ A.

1. Prove that R is an equivalence relation.


2. Determine ∅, E.

Exercise 2.
On R we define the relation R as follows :

∀x, y ∈ R : xRy ⇐⇒ x − y ∈ Z.

1. Verify that R is an equivalence relation.


2. Determine x.
3. Show that R/R = {x | x ∈ [0, 1[}.

Exercise 3 (Construction of Z and Q).


I) We define on N20 the relation R by :

∀(x, y), (x0 , y 0 ) ∈ N20 : (x, y)R(x0 , y 0 ) ⇐⇒ x + y 0 = y + x0 .

1. Show that R is an equivalence relation.


2. Determine the quotient set N20 /R.
II) Define on Z × N the relation R by :

∀(p, q), (s, t) ∈ Z × N : (p, q)R(s, t) ⇐⇒ pt = sq.

1. Show that R is an equivalence relation.


2. Determine the quotient set Z × N/R.

Exercise 4.
Let E and F be two sets, and f : E → F a map. We define on E the relation R as follows :

∀x, y ∈ E : xRy ⇐⇒ f (x) = f (y).

1. Show that R is an equivalence relation. Describe the class x of an element x ∈ E.

1
2. Consider the map :
f : E/R −→ F
x 7−→ f (x).
(a) Show that f is well-defined.
(b) Show that f is injective.
(c) What can you conclude about the quotient set ?

Exercise 5.
We define on R2 the binary relation R by :

(x, y)R(x0 , y 0 ) ⇐⇒ x + y = x0 + y 0 .

1. Show that R is an equivalence relation.


2. Describe the equivalence class of (0, 0), then describe all the equivalence classes.
 
2
3. Consider the map φ : R /R → R defined by φ (x, y) = x + y. Verify that φ is well-defined and
bijective.

Exercise 6.
On the set of complex numbers C, we define the binary relation R by : ∀z, z 0 ∈ C, zRz 0 ⇐⇒ |z| = |z 0 |.
Show that R is an equivalence relation and determine C/R.

Exercise 7 (Real projective line).


Let R be the binary relation on the set R2 \ {(0, 0)} defined as follows :
−−→ −−→
∀M, M 0 ∈ R2 \ {(0, 0)} : M RM 0 ⇐⇒ ∃λ ∈ R∗ , OM = λOM 0 .

1. Show that R is an equivalence relation.


2. Describe the equivalence classes and the quotient set RP 1 = (R2 \ {(0, 0)})/R.
3. Show that there exists a bijection between RP 1 and the circle of center (1, 0) and radius 1.

Exercise 8.
We define on N the relation R by :

∀p, q ∈ N : pRq ⇐⇒ ∃n ∈ N, q = pn .

1. Show that R is an order relation. Is it a total order ?


2. Is the subset {2, 3} upper bounded ?
3. Let A = {2, 4, 16}. Determine the maximal and minimal elements of A.

Exercise 9 (Lexicographical order).


We define on R2 the relation R by :

∀(x, y), (x0 , y 0 ) ∈ R2 : (x, y)R(x0 , y 0 ) ⇐⇒ ((x < x0 ) or (x = x0 and y ≤ y 0 )) .

1. Show that R is an order relation 1 . Is it a total order ?


2. Determine the set of upper bounds and lower bounds of {(a, b)} and represent them in R2 .
1. R is called lexicographical order

2
3. Let X = {(a, b), (c, d)}. Determine sup X and inf X.
4. Define the lexicographical order of R3 , then generalize to Rn .

Exercise 10.
1. Let R be an equivalence relation on a set E and Cx is the equivalence class of x ∈ E. Show that

∀x, y ∈ E, x 6= y =⇒ (Cx = Cy or Cx ∩ Cy = ∅) .

2. Let E be a set. Show that the inclusion ” ⊂ ” is an order relation on the set P(E). Is (P(E), ⊂) a
totally ordered set ?
3. Let E be a totally ordered set. We say that E is well-ordered if ∀A ⊂ E, A 6= ∅, there is m ∈ A,
such that: ∀x ∈ A, m ≤ x.
(a) Show that the set N0 is well-ordered.
(b) Show that the sets Q and R are not well-ordered.

Exercise 11 (Combination of relations).


Let E be a set.
I) Let ≤ be an order relation on E. Let ≺ be the binary relation on P(E) \ {∅} defined as follows :

∀A, B ∈ P(E) \ {∅} : A ≺ B ⇐⇒ ∀x ∈ A, ∀y ∈ B, x ≤ y or A = B.

Show that ≺ is an order relation.


II) Let R1 and R2 be two relations on E. We define two relations S and T on E :

xSy ⇐⇒ xR1 y ∧ xR2 y


xT y ⇐⇒ xR1 y ∨ xR2 y.
S is called the intersection of R1 and R2 . Similarly, T is called the union of R1 and R2 .
1. Show that the intersection of two equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. What can we
say about their union ?
2. Show that the intersection of two partial order relations is a partial order relation. Give an
example where the union of two partial order relations is not a partial order relation.
III) Let R be a reflexive and transitive relation on E. We define the relations S 0 and T 0 as follows :

xS 0 y ⇐⇒ xRy ∧ yRx;
xT 0 y ⇐⇒ xRy ∨ yRx.
1. Show that S 0 is an equivalence relation. Is T 0 also an equivalence relation ?
2. Show that R allows us to define an order on E/S 0 .

Exercise 12 (Trellis).
Let E be a set and ≤ a reflexive and antisymmetric relation over E such that any pair of elements
(a, b) ∈ E 2 has a supremum denoted (a ∧ b) and an infimum denoted by (a ∨ b). A set with such a property
is called trellis, and is denoted by (E, ≤, ∧, ∨).
Show that the following statements are equivalent :
i). (E, ≤, ∧, ∨) is a trellis.
ii). The operations ∧ and ∨ are associative.

3
iii). One of the two operations ∧, ∨ is associative.

Citation tirée du livre ”Géométrie” de Michèle Audin :


”Il faut faire des exercices. Il faut chercher les exercices. Un exercice n’est pas quelque chose dont il faut
connaı̂tre <<la>> solution pour la réciter à un jury. Aucune notion ne peut être comprise ou assimilée
sans un minimum de pratique, de recherche, d’échecs. Un exercice sur lequel on n’a pas <<séché>>
est un exercice inutile.”

You might also like