Week 5 Reading Questions Homework
Week 5 Reading Questions Homework
Reading Questions:
1) Describe the geographical advantages of Rome.
Rome itself had a few key geographical advantages. Its hills were easily
defensible, making it difficult for invaders to carry out a successful attack. It was at the
intersection of trade routes, thanks in part to its proximity to a natural ford (a shallow
part of a river that can be crossed on foot) in the Tiber River, leading to a prosperous
commercial and mercantile sector that provided the wealth for early expansion. It also
lay on the route between the Greek colonies of southern Italy and various Italian
cultures in the central and northern parts of the peninsula.
2) When and how was Rome founded? Discuss the story of Romulus
and Remus.
The Romans themselves invented their own origins had to do with two brothers:
Romulus and Remus. In the legend of Romulus and Remus, two boys were born to a
Latin king, but then kidnapped and thrown into the Tiber River by the king’s jealous
brother. They were discovered by a female wolf and suckled by her, eventually growing
up and exacting their revenge on their treacherous uncle. They then fought each other,
with Romulus killing Remus and founding the city of Rome. According to the story, the
city of Rome was founded on April 21, 753 BCE. This legend is just that: a legend. Its
importance is that it speaks to how the Romans wanted to see themselves, as the
descendants of a great man who seized his birthright through force and power,
accepting no equals. In a sense, the Romans were proud to believe that their ancient
heritage involved being literally raised by wolves.
3) Who were the Etruscans? How did they influence the Romans?
Etruscans were Rome's neighbor, who lived to the northwest of Rome. The
Etruscans were active trading partners with the Greek poleis of the south, and Rome
became a key link along the Etruscan - Greek trade route. The Etruscans ruled a loose
empire of allied city-states that carried on a brisk trade with the Greeks, trading native
Italian iron for various luxury goods. This mixing of cultures, Etruscan, Greek, and Latin,
included shared mythologies and stories. The Greek gods and myths were shared by
the Romans, with only the names of the gods being changed (e.g. Zeus became
Jupiter, Aphrodite became Venus, Hades became Pluto, etc.). In this way, the Romans
became part of the larger Mediterranean world of which the Greeks were such a
significant part.
The Etruscans ruled the Romans from some time in the eighth century BCE until
509 BCE. During that time, the Etruscans organized them to fight along Greek lines as a
phalanx. There is no actual evidence that the Etruscans ruled Rome, but as with the
legend of Romulus and Remus, the story of early Etruscan rule inspired the Romans to
think of themselves in certain ways - most obviously in utterly rejecting the foreign rule
of any kind and even of foreign cultural influence; Romans were fiercely proud (to the
point of belligerence) of their heritage and identity. The Romans overthrew the last
Etruscan king and established a full Republican form of government, with elected
senators making all of the important political decisions. Roman antipathy to kings was
so great that no Roman leader would ever call himself Rex - king - even after the
Republic was eventually overthrown centuries later.
4) Who were the Celts? What was the Celts relationship with Rome?
The Celts were a warrior society that seemed to have practiced a variation of
what would later be known as feudal law, in which every offense demanded retribution
in the former of either violence or “man gold”: the payment needed to atone for a crime
and thereby prevent the escalation of violence. The Celts were in contact with the
people of the Mediterranean world from as early as 800 BCE, mostly through trade.
They lived in fortified towns and were as quick to raid as to trade with their neighbors.
By about 450 BCE the Celts expanded dramatically across Europe. They seem to have
become more warlike and expansionist and they adopted a number of technologies
already in use further south, including chariot warfare and currency. By 400 BCE groups
of Celts began to raid further into “civilized” lands, sacking Rome itself in 387 BCE and
pushing into the Hellenistic lands of Macedonia, Greece, and Anatolia. Subsequently,
Celtic raiders tended to settle by about 200 BCE, often forming distinct smaller
kingdoms within larger lands, such as the region called Galatia in Anatolia, and serving
as mercenary warriors for the Hellenistic kingdoms.
Eventually, when the Romans began to expand beyond Italy itself, it was the
Celts who were first conquered and then assimilated into the Republic. The Romans
regarded Celts as barbarians, but they were thought to be barbarians who were at least
capable of assimilating and adopting "true" civilization from the Romans. Centuries
later, the descendants of conquered Celts considered themselves fully Roman:
speaking Latin as their native language, wearing togas, drinking wine, and serving in the
Roman armies.
5) What was the Pyrrhic War? What groups were involved? What was
the result?
The Pyrrhic War (280–275 BC) was a complex series of battles and shifting
political alliances among the Greeks (specifically Epirus, Macedonia, and the city-states
of Magna Graecia), Romans, the Italian peoples (primarily the Samnites and the
Etruscans), and the Carthaginians. The Pyrrhic War initially started as a minor conflict
between Rome and the city of Tarentum over a naval treaty violation by one of the
Roman consuls. Tarentum had, however, lent aid to the Greek ruler Pyrrhus of Epirus in
his conflict with Korkyra, and requested military aid from Epirus. Pyrrhus honored his
obligation to Tarentum and joined the complex series of conflicts involving Tarentum
and the Romans, Samnites, Etruscans, and Thurii (as well as other cities of Magna
Graecia). Pyrrhus also involved himself in the internal political conflicts of Sicily, as well
as the Sicilian struggle against Carthaginian dominance. Pyrrhus' involvement in the
regional conflicts of Sicily reduced the Carthaginian influence there drastically. In Italy,
his involvement seems to have been mostly ineffectual but had long-term implications.
The Pyrrhic War proved both that the states of ancient Greece had essentially become
incapable of defending the independent colonies of Magna Graecia and that the Roman
legions were capable of competing with the armies of the Hellenistic kingdoms — the
dominant Mediterranean powers of the time. This opened the way for Roman
dominance over the city-states of Magna Graecia and advanced the Roman
consolidation of power in Italy greatly. Rome's proven record in international military
conflicts would also aid its resolve in its rivalry with Carthage, which was eventually to
culminate in the Punic Wars.
5) Discuss the Punic Wars? What groups were involved? What was
the
final result?
There was a conflict there between Syracuse and Messina, the two most
powerful poleis. The Carthaginians dispatched a fleet to assist the Messinans, but the
Messinans requested assistance from Rome as well (a betrayal of sorts from the
perspective of Carthage). Carthage sided with Syracuse, and Rome saw an opportunity
to expand Roman dominance in Sicily, therefore the fight quickly escalated. The
Centuriate Assembly decided to increase the Roman military commitment because its
members desired the potential wealth that could be gained through war. The First Punic
War erupted, as a result, lasting from 264 to 241 BCE (note: “Punic” refers to the
Roman designation for Carthage and its civilization).
The Romans were defeated multiple times, but they were wealthy and powerful
enough at this point to continue fighting. The fact that the Carthaginians were unaware
that the conflict could expand beyond Sicily aided Rome enormously; even after winning
triumphs there, the Carthaginians never attempted to attack Italy itself (which they could
have done, at least early on).
The Second Punic War (218 BCE - 202 BCE), with 60,000 troops and a few
dozen war elephants, Hannibal crossed the Alps from Spain into Italy (most of the
elephants perished, but the survivors proved very effective, and terrifying, against the
Roman forces). He annihilated every Roman army sent against him for the next two
years, killing tens of thousands of Roman soldiers and marching dangerously close to
Rome. In Italy, Hannibal never lost a single battle, but he also never forced the Romans
to sue for peace.
The third and last Punic War that ensued was utterly one-sided: it began in 149
BCE, and by 146 BCE Carthage was defeated. Not only were thousands of the
Carthaginian people killed or enslaved, but the city itself was brutally sacked
11) What are the three major “Imperial Dynasties” of the pax romana
period?
The period of the Pax Romana included three distinct dynasties:
1. The Julian dynasty: 14 – 68 CE - those emperors related (by blood or adoption) to
Caesar's line.
2. The Flavian dynasty: 69 – 96 CE - a father and his two sons who seized power after
a brief civil war.
3. The “Five Good Emperors”: 96 – 180 CE - a "dynasty" of emperors who chose their
successors, rather than power passing to their family members.
12) Describe how the Romans viewed the societies and peoples living
outside of their borders (i.e., the Germans and the Persians)?
v
14) How did the Roman Army change overtime? In short, compare the
Roman military / army during the Republic vs. the Empire.
v
15) Describe the Roman social hierarchy (i.e., social classes).
v
Big Names:
Describe the following “Big Names”. Who were they why are they
important?
1) Pyrrhus
Pyrrhus was a Hellenistic king who had already wrested control of a good-sized swath
of Greece from the Antigonid dynasty back in Greece. Pyrrhus won two major battles
against the Romans, but in the process, he lost two-thirds of his troops. Following his
wins, he said, "One more such victory will undo me," coining the word "pyrrhic victory,"
which refers to a temporary success that ultimately results in defeat, such as winning a
battle but losing a war. He returned to Greece with his remaining forces. The south was
unable to mount much of a resistance after he withdrew, and by 263 BCE, all of Italy
was under Roman authority.
2) Hannibal
Hannibal the great Carthaginian general (son of the most successful general who
had fought the Romans in the First Punic War). In 218 BCE he launched a surprise
attack in Spain against Roman allies and then against Roman forces themselves. This
led to the Second Punic War (218 BCE - 202 BCE). Hannibal never lost a single battle
in Italy, yet neither did he force the Romans to sue for peace. Hannibal defeated the
Romans repeatedly with clever tactics: he lured them across icy rivers and ambushed
them, he concealed a whole army in the fog one morning and then sprang on a Roman
legion, and he led the Romans into narrow passes and slaughtered them.
3) Scipio
Scipio a brilliant Roman general who defeated the Carthaginian forces back in
Spain in 207 BCE, cutting Hannibal off from both reinforcements and supplies, which
weakened his army significantly. Scipio then attacked Africa itself, forcing Carthage to
recall Hannibal to protect the city. In 202 BCE, he was the first general that defeated
Hannibal. The victorious Scipio, now easily the most powerful man in Rome, became
the first great general to add to his own name the name of the place he conquered: he
became Scipio “Africanus” - conqueror of Africa.
5) Mithridates
Mithridates is the Greek king of Pontus, a small kingdom on the southern shore
of the Black Sea. Mithridates led a large anti-Roman coalition of Hellenistic peoples first
in Anatolia and then in Greece itself starting in 88 BCE. Mithridates was seen by his
followers as a great liberator, given the degree of corruption among many Roman
officials (one Roman governor had molten gold poured down his throat to symbolize the
just punishment of Roman greed). Mithridates fought a total of three wars against Rome
but despite his tenacity, he was finally defeated and killed in 63 BCE.
7) Philip V of Macedon
Philip V the Macedonian King, allied with Carthage against Rome, a reasonable
decision at the time because it seems likely that Rome was going to lose the war.
8) Crassus
Senator Crassus, who was the richest man in Italy, took command of the Roman
army assembled to defeat Spartacus, defeating the slave army and killing Spartacus in
71 BCE (and lining the road to Rome with 6,000 crucified slaves). Crassus wanted to
lead armies against Parthia (i.s. the “new” Persian Empire that had long since
overthrown Seleucid rule in Persia itself)
9) Gaius Marius
General Gaius Marius, who was a contemporary of the Gracchi, took further
steps that eroded the traditional Republican system. Marius combined political savvy
with effective military leadership. Marius was both a consul (elected an unprecedented
seven times) and a general, and he used his power to eliminate the property
requirement for membership in the army. This allowed the poor to join the army in return
for nothing more than an oath of loyalty, one they swore to their general rather than to
the Republic. Marius was popular with Roman commoners because he won consistent
victories against enemies in both Africa and Germany, and he distributed land and
farms to his poor soldiers. This made him a people's hero, and it terrified the nobility in
Rome because he was able to bypass the usual Roman political machine and simply
pay for his wars himself. His decision to eliminate the property requirement meant that
his troops were totally dependent on their general for loot and land distribution after
campaigns, increasing their loyalty to him, but undermining their allegiance to the
Republic. Marius was the first Roman general to draw from the vast pool of poor male
citizens in the city of Rome itself, which by this time had a population of around a million
people. Marius's recruiters offered good pay and equipment to any Roman man willing
to join Marius's army, and as a result, Marius became a popular hero among the poor in
Rome, much to the horror of the Roman elite, who feared the "mob" of poor citizens.
11) Cleopatra
Cleopatra VII the queen of Egypt, the last of the Ptolemaic dynasty
12) Tiberius
Tiberius, Augustus' stepson, in 14 CE, he became emperor Tiberius began his
rule as a cautious leader who put on a show of only reluctantly following in Augustus's
footsteps as emperor. He was a reasonably competent emperor for over a decade,
delegating decisions to the senate and ensuring that the empire remained secure and
financially solvent.
13) Caligula
Caligula was the Tiberius' heir was (r. 37 - 41 CE), also known as "Gaius,"
literally meaning “little boots” but which translates best as "Bootsie." As a boy, Caligula
moved with his father, a famous and well-liked general related by marriage to the
Julians, from army camp to army camp. While he did so he liked to dress up in
miniature legionnaire combat boots; hence, he was affectionately dubbed "Bootsie" by
the troops (one notable translation of the work of Suetonius by Robert Graves translates
Caligula as "Bootikins" instead). Caligula was a disastrous emperor. He liked to appear
in public dressed as various gods or goddesses; one of his high priests was his horse,
Incitatus, whom he supposedly appointed as a Roman consul. He staged an invasion of
northern Gaul of no tactical significance which culminated in a Triumph. he was
unquestionably the enemy of the senate, seeing potential traitors everywhere and
inflicting waves of executions against former supporters. He used trials for treason to
enrich himself after squandering the treasury on buildings and public games. He also
made senators wait on him dressed as slaves, and demanded that he be addressed as
“Dominus et Deus,” meaning" master and god." He was finally murdered by a group of
senators and guardsmen.
14) Claudius
Claudius was the following emperor after Caligula. The one unquestionably
competent emperor of the Julian line after Augustus. Claudius had survived palace
intrigues because he walked with a limp and spoke with a pronounced stutter; he was
widely considered to be a simpleton, whereas he was actually highly intelligent.
Claudius proved himself a competent and refreshingly sane emperor, ending the waves
of terror Caligula had unleashed. He went on to oversee the conquest of England, first
begun by Julius Caesar decades earlier. He was also a scholar, mastering the Etruscan
and Punic languages and writing histories of those two civilizations. He restored the
imperial treasury, depleted by Tiberius and Caligula, and maintained the Roman
borders. He also established a true bureaucracy to manage the vast empire and began
the process of formally distinguishing between the personal wealth of the emperor and
the official budget of the Roman state.
15) Nero
Nero was the son of his wife with another marriage. was another Julian who acquired a
terrible historical reputation; while he was fairly popular during his first few years as
emperor, he eventually succumbed to a Caligula-like tendency of having elite Romans
(including his domineering mother) killed. In 64 CE, a huge fire nearly destroyed the
city, which was largely built out of wood. This led to the legend of Nero "playing his
fiddle while Rome burned" - in fact, in the fire's aftermath Nero had shelters built for the
homeless and set about rebuilding the roughly half of the city that had been destroyed,
using concrete buildings and grid-based streets. Nero took great pride in being an actor
and musician, two professions that were considered by Roman elites to be akin to
prostitution. His artistic indulgences were thus scandalous violations of elite sensibilities.
16) Vespasian
General Vespasian, seized power and founded a fairly short-lived dynasty
consisting of himself and his two sons, known to history as the Flavians. The
importance of Vespasian’s takeover was that it reinforced the idea that real power in
Rome was no longer that of the old power-broking families, but instead the armies;
Vespasian had no legal claim to the throne, but his emperorship was ratified by the
senate nevertheless. The emperor's major concern had to be maintaining the loyalty of
the armies above all else because they could and would openly fight to put their man on
the throne in a time of crisis - this occurred numerous times in the centuries to come.
Vespasian was one of the great emperors of the early empire. He pulled state finances
back from the terrible state they had been left in by Nero and restored the relationship
between the emperor and the Roman elite; it certainly did not hurt his reputation that he
was a successful general, one of the traditional sources of status among Roman
leaders. He was also renowned for his openness and his grounded outlook. Reputably,
he did not keep a guard and let people speak to him directly in public audiences.
17) Trajan
It was under one of these emperors, Trajan, that the empire achieved its greatest
territorial expanse. The borders were maintained (or, as under Trajan, expanded),
public works and infrastructure built, and infighting among elites kept to a minimum.
Trajan’s accomplishments deserve special mention, not only because of his success in
expanding the Empire but in how he governed it. He was a fastidious and
straightforward administrator, focusing his considerable energies on the practical
business of rule. He personally responded to requests and correspondence, he
instituted a program of inexpensive loans to farmers and used the interest to pay for
food for poor children, and he worked closely and successfully with the senate to
maintain stability and imperial solvency.
18) Hadrian
Hadrian spent much of his reign touring the Roman provinces, particularly
Greece. It was clear by his reign that the emperor’s authority was practically limitless,
with both emperors issuing imperial proclamations known as “rescripts” while away from
Rome that carried the force of law.
19) Marcus Aurelius
The emperor Marcus Aurelius, a brilliant leader, and Stoic philosopher (161 –
180 CE) named his arrogant and foolhardy son Commodus. his co-emperor three years
before Aurelius’s death. Storm clouds had already been gathering under Aurelius, who
found himself obliged to lead military campaigns against incursions of Germanic
barbarians in the north despite his own lack of a military background. He had, however,
been a scrupulously efficient and focused political leader. His decision to make
Commodus his heir was due to a simple fact: Aurelius was the first of the Five Good
Emperors to have a natural-born son who survived to adulthood.
20) Commodus
As emperor, Commodus indulged his taste for debauchery and ignored affairs of
state, finally being assassinated after twelve years of incompetence.
Vocabulary Terms:
Provide the definition and know the significance of each term below.
1) Senate
The supreme council of state, the membership and functions of which varied at
different periods.
2) Consuls
Either of the two chief magistrates of the ancient Roman republic.
3) Tribunes
Any of various administrative officers, especially one of 10 officers elected to
protect the interests and rights of the plebeians from the patricians. Or any of the six
officers of a legion who rotated in commanding the legion during the year.
4) Dictator
A person invested with supreme authority during a crisis, the regular magistracy
being subordinated to him until the crisis was met.
5) Equestrians
The wealthiest class consisted of the equestrians, so named because they could
afford horses and thus form the Roman cavalry; the equestrian class would go on to be
a leading power bloc in Roman history well into the Imperial period
6) rhetoric
Roman shores were rhetoric: the mastery of words and language in order to
persuade people and win arguments
8) pax romana
The height of Roman power coincided with the first two hundred years of the
Roman Empire, a period that was remembered as the Pax Romana: the Roman Peace