Complete Part Retrofit
Complete Part Retrofit
16
IS 15988: 2013
deteriorated concrete. Rebound hammer test is equipment can be used to test rock strata and to
used to estimate in-place strength if a correlation provide useful data for geological survey work.
is developed. The method has also been used for testing
The most common use for a rebound hammer is graphite and it is likely that it will
in the process of determining the relative A-5 Explain retrofit strategies suitable for RC
hardness of concrete by using the concept of the
moment resisting frame structures constructed in
rebound. Despite this, scholars have attempted to
use the approach to evaluate a variety of tangible Surkhet
characteristics. The following are examples of Retrofit strategies for reinforced concrete (RC)
applications that are very common: moment resisting frame structures in Surkhet, Nepal,
Determine how consistent the concrete is where would also focus on enhancing the seismic
it is placed. performance of the buildings. Surkhet is located in a
Delimit areas within a structure that are made of seismically active region, and retrofitting existing
concrete that is of low quality or has
structures is crucial to ensure their safety and
deteriorated.
As a technique for estimating the strength of resilience. Here are some retrofit strategies suitable
concrete while it is still in situ for RC moment resisting frame structures in Surkhet
Applications for Pulse Velocity Testing 1. Adding New Shear Wall
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) The UPV 2. Adding Steel Bracing
method is widely used to detect internal defects, 3. Wall Thickening Technique
and estimate crack depth and compressive 4. Base Isolation Technique
strength for concrete structures. 5. Mass Reduction Technique
The velocity of ultrasonic pulses traveling in a 6. Jacketing Method
solid material depends on the density and elastic 7. Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP)
properties of that material. 8. Epoxy Injection Method
The quality of some materials is sometimes
9. External Plate Bonding
related to their elastic stiffness so that
1. Adding New Shear Wall:
measurement of ultrasonic pulse velocity in such
This is a frequently used technique for
materials can often be used to indicate their
quality as well as to determine their elastic retrofitting of a building of non-ductile
properties. reinforced concrete frame buildings.
Materials which can be assessed in this way The elements can be either cast-in-place or pre-
include, in particular, concrete and timber but cast concrete elements. New elements preferably
exclude metals. are placed at the exterior of the building.
When ultrasonic testing is applied to metals its 2. Adding Steel Bracing
object is to detect internal flaws which send Steel bracing is an effective solution in the
echoes back in the direction of the incident beam retrofitting of buildings when large openings are
and these are picked up by a receiving required.
transducer. The measurement of the time taken Potential advantages due to higher strength and
for the pulse to travel from a surface to a flaw stiffness and opening for natural light can be
and back again enables the position of the flaw to provided.
be located.
3. Wall Thickening Technique
Such a technique cannot be applied to
The existing walls of a building are added a
heterogeneous materials like concrete or timber
certain thickness by adding bricks, concrete, and
since echoes are generated at the numerous
boundaries of the different phases within these steel aligned at certain places as reinforcement.
materials resulting in a general scattering of The weight of the wall increases and it can bear
pulse energy in all directions. more vertical and horizontal loads.
The pulse velocity method has been shown to 4. Base Isolation Technique
provide a reliable means of estimating the Isolation of the superstructure from the
strength of timber and has been used to test foundation is known as base isolation. It is the
various kinds of timber products. most powerful method for passive structural
It is in use for the detection of rot in telegraph vibration control techniques.
poles and provides a very economic method of
inspecting these poles while in service. The same
17
IS 15988: 2013
18
IS 15988: 2013
19
IS 15988: 2013
20
IS 15988: 2013
21
IS 15988: 2013
22
IS 15988: 2013
23
IS 15988: 2013
8. Document the observations like area and extent of 9. Discuss the observations and decide the safety
effect, damage pattern, location and size of cracks, level of the building observed.
any other deformations, nonstructural damages, 10.Report outcome to the Incident Commander.
obstacles in circulation areas, spillage of hazardous
materials etc.
ANNEX A
(Foreword)
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee, CED 39
Organization Representative(s)
aterials & Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi DR A. S. ARYA (Chairman)
of Consulting Engineers, Bangalore SHRI UMESH B. RAO
SHRI B. V. RAVINDRA NATH (Alternate)
rgy Regulatory Board, Mumbai DR P. C. BASU
SHRI ROSHAN A. D. (Alternate)
y Electrical Limited, New Delhi SHRI RAVI KUMAR
DR C. KAMESHWARA RAO (Alternate)
aterials & Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi SHRI J. K. PRASAD
SHRI PANKAJ GUPTA (Alternate)
ding Research Institute, Roorkee SHRI NAVJEEN SAXENA
SHRI AJAY CHAURASIA (Alternate)
ic Works Department, New Delhi SHRI BHAGWAN SINGH
SHRI S. P. LOKHANDE (Alternate)
s and Materials Research Station, New Delhi SHRI N. P. HONKANDAVAR
SHRI S. L. GUPTA (Alternate)
er & Power Research Station, Pune SHRI I. D. GUPTA
SHRI S. G. CHAPHALKAR (Alternate)
er Commission, New Delhi DIRECTOR, CMDD (E & NE)
DIRECTOR, EMBANKMENT (Alternate)
ltants Pvt Ltd, New Delhi DR (SHRIMATI) PRATIMA R. BOSE
ge of Engineering, Delhi SHRI ALOK VERMA
of Atomic Energy, Kalpakkam SHRI S. RAMANUJAM
SHRI R. C. JAIN (Alternate)
General of Border Roads, New Delhi SHRI A. K. DIXIT
-Chief’s Branch, New Delhi BRIG B. D. PANDEY
SHRI RAVI SINHA (Alternate)
ndia Limited, New Delhi SHRI VINAY KUMAR
SHRIMATI ILA DASS (Alternate)
dia Limited, Mumbai SHRI V. N. HAGGADE
SHRI J. N. DESAI (Alternate)
Survey of India, Lucknow SHRI HARSH GUPTA
DR KIRAN MAZUMDAR (Alternate)
Urban Development Corporation Ltd, New Delhi SHRIMATI BINDU JESWANI
SHRI SURINDER GERA (Alternate)
rete Institute, Chennai. DR A. R. SANTHAKUMAR
ute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai DR RAVI SINHA
DR ALOK GOYAL (Alternate)
ute of Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad DR C. V. R. MURTY
ute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur DR DURGESH C. RAI
ute of Technology Madras, Chennai DR A. MEHER PRASAD
ute of Technology Roorkee, PROF ASHOK JAIN
24
IS 15988: 2013
Member Secretary
SHRI S. CHATURVEDI
Scientist ‘E’ (Civ Engg), BIS
25
(Continued from second cover)
This standard was originally formulated as part of project entitled ‘Review of Building Codes and Preparation
of Commentary and Handbooks’ awarded to IIT Kanpur by the Gujarat State Disaster Management Agency
(GSDMA) Gandhinagar, through World Bank finances.
The composition of the Committee responsible for the formulation of this standard is given in Annex A.
For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with, the final value,
observed or calculated, expressing the result of a test or analysis, shall be rounded off in accordance with IS 2 :
1960 ‘Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised)’. The number of significant places retained in the
rounded off value should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard.
26
Bureau of Indian Standards
BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote harmonious
development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and attending to
connected matters in the country.
Copyright
BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these publications may be reproduced in any form
without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of
implementing the standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations.
Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publications), BIS.
Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also reviewed
periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that no changes are
needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users of Indian Standards
should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by referring to the latest issue of
‘BIS Catalogue’ and ‘Standards : Monthly Additions’.
This Indian Standard has been developed from Doc No.: CED 39 (7428).
27
Branches: MUMBAI 400093 2832 7891, 2832 7892
AHMEDABAD. BANGALORE. BHOPAL. BHUBANESHWAR. COIMBATORE.
DEHRADUN. FARIDABAD. GHAZIABAD. GUWAHATI. HYDERABAD. JAIPUR.
KANPUR. LUCKNOW. NAGPUR. PARWANOO. PATNA. PUNE. RAJKOT.
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
VISAKHAPATNAM.
28