0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views

PD Design QA Tool

Professional Development Design Tool

Uploaded by

Imelda Embuestro
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views

PD Design QA Tool

Professional Development Design Tool

Uploaded by

Imelda Embuestro
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

Professional Development (PD) Enhancing Teachers’ Competence th rough In-Service Training


Program Title

☐ INSET
Proposed PD Program
☐ Learning Action Cell

School Division of Las Pinas

Application Receipt

General instructions:
The evaluator shall be guided with the following instructions for determining the compliance of the proposed PD program elements to the quality standards:
a. Put a check mark in the box under the column Not Evident if all the requirements of the quality standards are not exhibited in the PD program element
(relevant section).
b. Put a check mark in the box under column Partially Evident if one or more requirements of the quality standards is/are not exhibited in the PD
program element (relevant section).
c. Put a check mark in the box under column Fully Evident if all the requirements of the quality standards are exhibited in the PD program element
(relevant section).
d. For Partially Evident and Not Evident evaluations, input in the Remarks column your clearly articulated findings/comments/suggestions.
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

Fully Partially Not


PD Program Component and Quality Standards Remarks
Evident Evident Evident

A. Strength of Research Base

1. The proposed PD program is based on the results


of competency-based professional development
needs assessments (i.e., through individual ☐ ☐ ☐
development plans (IDPs), DepEd priorities across
levels, learners’ learning outcomes, etc.)

2. The proposed PD program’s content and


methodologies are justified and supported by
☐ ☐ ☐
research literature or theories and/or legal bases
(DepEd issuances/RA) if any.

B. Alignment to the Professional Standards

1. The proposed PD program responds to at least


one PPST/PPSSH/PPSS domain, strand, and
☐ ☐ ☐
indicator, and/or other emerging needs of the
Department.
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

2. The target PPST/PPSSH/PPSS domain, strand,


☐ ☐ ☐
and indicator in each session is indicated.

C. Target Participants Profile

1. The proposed PD program identifies the career


stage/s and profile (teacher/school
☐ ☐ ☐
head/supervisor, position, subject, and/or
grade/year level taught) of the target participants.

2. The target number of participants is specified. ☐ ☐ ☐

D. Articulation of Learning Objectives

1. The proposed PD program’s workplace


development objectives and session objectives are ☐ ☐ ☐
articulated according to the SMART principles.

2. The proposed PD program’s workplace


development objectives and session objectives are
logically articulated to support the development of ☐ ☐ ☐
the target professional standard (domain, strand,
and indicator).

E. Session Contents

1. Contents are appropriate and adequate to support ☐ ☐ ☐


the attainment of the learning objectives and
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

expected outputs.

2. Contents are accurate and based on credible


☐ ☐ ☐
sources of information.

3. For subject content-based PD programs, contents


☐ ☐ ☐
align with the curriculum standards.

4. Contents are organized according to the most


☐ ☐ ☐
appropriate sequence and structure.

F. Soundness of Methodology

1. The methodologies (e.g., active learning,


experiential learning or collaborative learning,
etc.) employ adult learning principles with ☐ ☐ ☐
opportunities to be active, experiential, social,
self-directed and goal oriented.

2. The methodologies describe in detail or step-by-


step process how the assigned resource speaker ☐ ☐ ☐
will deliver content and engage participants.

3. The methodologies indicate the relevant learning


resources that the resource speaker and
☐ ☐ ☐
participants will use to support the attainment of
the session objectives.
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

4. The methodologies use recognized best learning


practices such as motivational/mood-setting ☐ ☐ ☐
activities, modeling, etc.

G. Assessment Strategies and Tools

1. The formative and summative assessment


strategies are varied and sufficient to assess
☐ ☐ ☐
learner’s progress and proficiency in the target
competencies for development.

2. Appropriate assessment tools are identified and


provided. Rubrics are available for ☐ ☐ ☐
performance/demonstration-based assessment.

H. Expected Outputs

1. The session outputs are concrete, e.g., reflection


journal, TA Plan, lesson exemplar, rubrics, ☐ ☐ ☐
worksheets.

2. The session outputs are relevant to the session


objectives and can be realistically produced by ☐ ☐ ☐
participants within set time.

I. Workplace Application
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

1. The proposed PD program provides opportunities


for development and application of acquired
☐ ☐ ☐
competencies: crafting and implementation of
Learning Action Plan (LAP).

2. The LAP can be realistically completed within an


adequate period (exclusive of school breaks for
☐ ☐ ☐
teachers) using available resources in the
workplace.

J. Time Requirement

1. The indicative dates of implementation of the


proposed PD program do not interfere with the
conduct of school-based instructionally relevant ☐ ☐ ☐
activities, especially the actual classroom teaching
of teachers.

2. Sessions are appropriately sequenced and


☐ ☐ ☐
adequately timed.

K. Credentials/Expertise of Resource Speaker/Subject Matter Expert

1. The Resource Speakers/Subject-Matter Experts'


CVs reflect expertise relevant to the
PPST/PPSSH/PPSS domain/s, strand/s and ☐ ☐ ☐
indicator/s covered in the Speaker's/Subject-
Matter Expert’s session/s.
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

L. Gender Equality, Disability and Social Inclusion

1. Proposed PD program elements (i.e., participants


selection criteria, activities, learning resource
materials, resource speakers, and monitoring and
☐ ☐ ☐
evaluation, etc.) promote maximum engagement
of participants from all backgrounds (disability,
age, gender, religious and ethnic backgrounds).

M. Monitoring and Evaluation

1. The proposed PD Program M&E plan reflects the


four levels of evaluation according to Kirkpatrick’s
☐ ☐ ☐
Model (Level 1: Reaction; Level 2: Learning; Level
3: Behavior; and Level 4: Result).

2. For Level 1, daily evaluation tool to measure how


participants find the PD program favorable,
☐ ☐ ☐
engaging, and relevant to their jobs is indicated
and submitted.

3. For Level 2, formative and summative assessment


tools to measure participants’ acquired
knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and ☐ ☐ ☐
commitment based on their participation in the
PD program are indicated and submitted.

4. For Level 3, the LAP template detailing how ☐ ☐ ☐


Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

participants will apply what they learned from the


PD program when they are back on the job is
indicated and submitted.

N. Budget and Costing

1. Proposed budget per participant is within the


allowable limits according to government
☐ ☐ ☐
budgeting, accounting, and auditing rules and
regulations.

2. The attached itemized expenditure reflects the


cost of the proposed PD program vis-à-vis the ☐ ☐ ☐
allowable expenses.

RECOMMENDATION

Process and issue Quality Assurance


Yes
Certification

Are all Quality Return to PD Program Provider


Standards fully
evident? No
For compliance with the recommendations
For provision of technical assistance
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

Quality Assured by:

Evaluator Type here

Signature Sign here

Date Type here the date of evaluation

This Form is not valid if not signed.

You might also like