Chapter II
Chapter II
Introduction
This chapter reviews the existing literature and studies related to the efficacy of
manual SIP trunk issue detection in modern contact centers and the potential for
Manual detection of SIP trunk issues in contact centers has been the traditional
approach. This method relies heavily on users reporting problems through support
tickets, which are then investigated by technical teams. Ramdas and Manickam (2018)
criticize this reactive approach for the delays it introduces, as technical staff must wait
for users to experience and report issues before beginning the troubleshooting process.
Such delays contribute to increased mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to
resolve (MTTR) issues, thereby causing longer downtime and reduced service quality
Kiser et al. (2020) found that the use of manual methods in SIP trunk monitoring has led
centers. This inefficiency is further highlighted by Wenguang and Song (2021), who
emphasize the need for more automated solutions that can streamline the detection and
solutions. The Automated SIP Trunk Guardian (ASTG) is one such system designed to
automate the detection and visualization of SIP trunk issues. The novelty of this system
lies in its ability to proactively detect anomalies in real time rather than waiting for users
visualization tools such as Looker, ASTG not only detects potential issues but also
provides immediate visual insights into the nature and location of these anomalies
The application of AI and machine learning in SIP trunk monitoring has shown
promising results. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are well-suited for identifying
anomalies because they can capture intricate patterns that may be indicative of issues
such as packet loss, call drops, or network congestion (Ketkar et al., 2021). Additionally,
the AI-driven anomaly detection model relies on outlier detection methods like the
isolating points in the dataset that deviate from the established norm (Delavar &
Nabizadeh, 2021).
Unlike traditional systems that rely heavily on support tickets for problem
detection, ASTG incorporates real-time dashboards that continuously monitor SIP trunk
performance metrics, including call quality, packet loss, and latency. These dashboards
provide technical teams with actionable insights, allowing them to address issues before
they impact users. This innovative use of visualization tools, paired with AI-based
anomaly detection algorithms, sets ASTG apart from existing solutions (Wenguang &
Song, 2021).
Customization of AI Models
While off-the-shelf AI models are widely available, they are often too generalized
to address the specific issues encountered in SIP trunk environments. To address this
gap, researchers have tailored AI techniques such as CNNs and Natural Language
Processing (NLP) to analyze SIP traffic logs and identify deviations from expected
performance patterns. Additionally, outlier detection methods like Isolation Forests have
been integrated to ensure that the system can accurately distinguish between normal
traffic variations and true anomalies, thereby minimizing false positives (Delavar &
Nabizadeh, 2021).
The evolution of technical support has seen a significant shift from reactive,
detect and resolve issues before they impact customers, enhancing service reliability
and customer satisfaction. This section reviews the literature on the transition from
reactive to proactive technical support, with a focus on the benefits of AI-powered tools
report issues through support tickets, and technical teams respond to resolve them.
This approach often leads to delays and increased downtime, as support teams must
wait for issues to be reported before taking action (Coretelligent, 2024). The reactive
model is akin to firefighting, where problems are addressed only after they have caused
issues before they occur. This approach involves continuous monitoring, predictive
analytics, and regular maintenance to identify and address potential problems early
powered tools can analyze vast amounts of data in real-time, identifying patterns and
anomalies that may indicate potential issues. For example, AI algorithms can monitor
network traffic, detect unusual activity, and predict system failures before they impact
connectivity issues would submit support tickets, and ISPs would investigate and
resolve the problem. This process can be time-consuming and frustrating for customers.
However, with AI-powered monitoring tools, ISPs can continuously monitor network
performance, detect connectivity issues, and trace their origins. If the issue is identified
as being on the ISP’s side, it can be resolved proactively, often before the customer
algorithms, the SIP Trunk Guardian can monitor SIP trunk performance in real-time,
detect anomalies, and provide actionable insights to technical teams. This proactive
approach reduces mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to resolve (MTTR)
issues, ensuring smoother and more reliable communication services (Delavar &
Nabizadeh, 2021).
Proactive issue detection offers several benefits over traditional reactive models:
Cost Efficiency: Preventing issues reduces the need for costly emergency
Technology, 2024)
The literature highlights the significant inefficiencies of manual SIP trunk issue
detection and the potential benefits of automated solutions. The Automated SIP Trunk
detection with interactive visualizations, providing a more efficient and reliable method
for identifying and resolving SIP trunk issues. This shift from a reactive to a proactive
to proactive technical support. AI-powered tools like the SIP Trunk Guardian exemplify
how proactive issue detection can enhance service reliability, reduce costs, and improve
The review of literature and studies underscores the need for an automated
solution to improve the efficiency and reliability of SIP trunk issue detection in contact
centers. The proposed Automated SIP Trunk Guardian (ASTG) aims to address these
monitoring and anomaly detection, setting a new standard for operational efficiency in
the industry.
proactive, AI-driven solutions marks a significant advancement in the field. Tools like the
resolution.
References