2018 Australian Mathematics Competition AMC Intermediate Years 9 and 10 - Solutions
2018 Australian Mathematics Competition AMC Intermediate Years 9 and 10 - Solutions
Intermediate Solutions
2. (Also J6)
The major markings are 36, 37 and 38, so the minor markings are 0.2 units apart. Then
the arrow is 0.3 to the right of 37, so it is on 37.3,
hence (E).
4. (Also S1)
The three angles at P add to 90◦ , so ∠XP Y = 90◦ − 50◦ = 40◦ ,
hence (D).
5. 350 = 7 × 50 and 50 is a multiple of 2, 5 and 25, so 350 ÷ 2, 350 ÷ 7, 350 ÷ 5 and 350 ÷ 25
are all whole numbers.
350 35 1
However, = = 17 is not a whole number,
20 2 2
hence (E).
6. (Also J12)
Alternative 1
Tabulate the letters needed.
Letter A D E N O R W
Nora 1 - - 1 1 1 -
Anne 1 - 1 2 - - -
Warren 1 - 1 1 - 2 1
Andrew 1 1 1 1 - 1 1
Needed 1 1 1 2 1 2 1
Alternative 2
ANDREW requires letters ADENRW (in alphabetical order).
For WARREN, an additional R is needed: ADENRRW.
For ANNE, an additional N is needed: ADENNRRW.
For NORA, an O is needed: ADENNORRW.
In all, 9 letters are needed,
hence (B).
8. In the straight path, the length is the hypotenuse of right-angled triangle 4ABC. By
Pythagoras’ theorem, AC 2 = 32 + 42 = 25 and the straight path is AC = 5.
In the stepped path, the horizontal segments have total length 4 and the vertical segments
have total length 3. So the total length of the stepped path is 7.
The difference in lengths of the two paths is then 7 − 5 = 2 metres,
hence (B).
9. (Also S5)
Using the distributive law,
hence (A).
2 4 4 8
3 6 6 12
hence (B).
12. December has 31 days, which equals 4 weeks and 3 days. After 28 days, all days will have
appeared 4 times, and the remaining three days will be the 5th appearance of these days.
So these last 3 days can’t include Tuesday or Friday, which also rules out Wednesday and
Thursday. Therefore the 29th, 30th and 31st days of December that year were Saturday,
Sunday and Monday,
hence (A).
3 8 7 4 8 6 8 8 2
10 6 2 8 6 4 0 6 12
5 4 9 6 4 8 10 4 4
hence (D).
t = x + x + 1 + x + 2 + x + 3 = 4x + 6
t − 6 = 4x
t−6
x=
4
hence (E).
140 105 84 70 60
Some of these numbers will be added, and some subtracted, and the result is a positive
integer as close to 0 as possible. So the task is to separate the 5 integers into two sets
(added versus subtracted), where the totals of the two sets are as close together as possible.
To find these sets, we make the total of each set as close as possible to a target of (140 +
105 + 84 + 70 + 60) ÷ 2 = 229.5.
The number 140 will be in one of the sets. The total of the other number(s) in this set
will be close to 229.5 − 140 = 89.5. Clearly 84 is the closest single number. Also the
smallest possible choice of 2 or more numbers is 60 + 70 = 130, which is worse. So this set
is {140, 84}.
Therefore in the best solution, the two sets are {140, 84} and {105, 70, 60} with totals 224
and 235 respectively, giving this solution.
Transforming this solution back to the original fraction problem gives this solution.
1 1 1 1 1 11
− + − + + =
3 4 5 6 7 420
1 1 1
This is approximately , which is between and .
40 50 20
1 21 11 1 1 11 1 11 1
Checking, = > and < < , so that < < ,
20 420 420 50 42 420 50 420 20
hence (C).
Alternative 2
As decimals, the numbers in the answers are 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1 and 1. The shortest
interval has length 0.01, so we try to solve to 3 decimal places.
To 3 decimal places, the fractions are 0.333, 0.25, 0.2, 0.167, and 0.143. These add to
1.093, so we try to split into two subsets, each with target 1.093 ÷ 2 ≈ 0.546.
In the subset with 0.333, the remaining number(s) have target 0.546 − 0.333 = 0.213. The
closest we can get is 0.2. That is, the best total is 0.333 + 0.2 = 0.533 and this leaves
0.25 + 0.167 + 0.143 = 0.56 as the total of the other numbers.
Thus the smallest possible positive answer is (0.25 + 0.167 + 0.143) − (0.333 + 0.2) =
1 1
0.56 − 0.533 = 0.027. This answer is between 0.02 = and 0.05 = ,
50 20
hence (C).
Note: There are approximations in this solution, but they do not affect the answer. Each
fraction is within 0.0005 of the decimal approximation used. Hence the true answer is
within 5 × 0.0005 = 0.0025 of 0.027, and will still be between 0.02 and 0.05.
O 4 O 4 O 5
D C D C D C
3 3 4 4 3 3
To represent a route traversing roads more than once, add extra edges. Then the route is
an Euler path, and the network has at most 2 odd vertices. We aim to do this with as
little √
extra length as possible. The middle diagram is the network for the route of length
5 + 2 2 found above.
If one of the shorter edges is duplicated, such as in the diagram on the right, then the
graph has less overall length. However, it has 4 odd vertices so is not possible.
There are possibilities
√ where two or more√edges are duplicated, but any of these will be
longer than 5 + 2 2. Consequently 5 + 2 2 is the shortest route length,
hence (E).
20. Alternative 1 x 1
Let x and y be the lengths shown. Since the shaded area is 1
half the rectangle’s area, so is the combined area of the two y
white triangles. These have area 2 × 21 xy = xy while the y
rectangle has area (x + 1)(y + 1). Consequently
2xy = (x + 1)(y + 1) 1
1 x
xy − x − y = 1
(x − 1)(y − 1) − 1 = 1
(x − 1)(y − 1) = 2
Since x and y are positive integers, x − 1 and y − 1 are 1 and 2 in some order, so that x
and y are 2 and 3 in some order. Then x + y = 5 and the perimeter of the rectangle is
2x + 2y + 4 = 10 + 4 = 14,
hence (A).
Alternative 2
Slide the triangles together and shade the rest of the rectangle, as 1
shown. Since the original rectangle was half shaded, so is this dia-
gram. One solution that can be observed is a 2 × 3 white rectangle
inside a 3 × 4 rectangle. We claim that this is the only possibility.
1
The white rectangle must be more than 1 high, since otherwise it
fits inside the shaded area. So the original rectangle is more than 2 high. Similarly, the
original rectangle is more than 2 wide.
Slice the shaded and white areas into the rectangles shown on the left. Since A = X, it
follows that B = Y .
X 1 X 1
2
Y A 1 A 1
B Z C D
1 1 1
Now slice areas B and Y into the rectangles shown on the right. Then C = Z, so that
D = 2. Since D has integer sides, it can only be 2 × 1.
Consequently the original rectangle is 4 × 3, with perimeter 2 × 4 + 2 × 3 = 14,
hence (A).
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
sum of digits = 3 × 1 + 3 × 8 + 9 = 36
2 2 2 2 −
1 1 1 0 8 8 8 9
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
sum of digits = 4 × 1 + 4 × 8 + 9 = 45
2 2 2 2 2 −
1 1 1 1 0 8 8 8 8 9
Clearly this pattern continues, and we can generalise. Then the sum of all digits is 49 ×
1 + 0 + 49 × 8 + 9 = 450,
hence (D).
Alternative 2
. . 111} 000
= |111 .{z . . 000} − 111
| .{z | .{z
. . 111}
50 50 50
. . 110} 999
= |111 .{z . . 999} − 111
| .{z | .{z
. . 110}
50 50 50
= |111 .{z
. . 110} 888
| .{z
. . 889}
50 50
In the digit sum of this number, we can pair the 1 + 8 terms, giving 50 × 9 = 450,
hence (D).
Since p2 − q 2 is a perfect square, 11(a + b)(a − b) is a perfect square, and so its prime
factorisation includes 112 . Hence either (a + b) or (a − b) is a multiple of 11.
Since a and b are digits, a − b ≤ 9, and then a − b is not a multiple of 11. Consequently
a + b is a multiple of 11, and since a + b ≤ 18, a + b = 11,
hence (C).
Note: The only solution is p = 65, q = 56.
24. Alternative 1
Let the area of 4QST be x cm2 .
Since P Q k U T , 4SP U and 4QST have the same height and their areas are proportional
120 PS PS
to their bases. So = = .
x SQ UT
Similarly, since SU k QR, 4RU T and 4QST have the same height, so their areas are
270 TR TR
proportional to their bases. So = = .
x QT SU
Due to corresponding angles, ∠QP R = ∠T U R and ∠QRP = ∠SU P , so that 4QP R,
PS SU
4SP U and 4T U R are similar. Hence = .
UT TR
120 PS SU x
Then = = = . Solving, x2 = 120 × 270 = 22 × 302 × 32 and x = 180,
x UT TR 270
hence (D).
Alternative 2
Due to the parallel lines, ∠SP U = ∠T U R and ∠SU P = ∠T RU . Hence 4SP U , 4T U R
and 4QP R are similar.
2
270 9 3 3
Now, 4T U R has = = times the area of 4SP U , so it has sides that are
120 4 2 2
3
times the sides of 4SP U . In particular T R = SU .
2
2
Due to the parallelogram SQT U , QT = SU = T R. Considering 4QT S with base QT
3
and 4T RU with base T R, these two triangles have equal altitude and bases in the ratio
2
2 : 3. Consequently the area of 4QST is × 270 = 180,
3
hence (D).
25. We rule out the possibility that the teacher’s age is a single-digit number, on the grounds
that Ann would be the same age. Hence assume that the teacher’s age is the 2-digit number
10x + y, so that Ann’s age is x + y. If y = 5 or 10x + y > 95, then in 5 years Ann’s age
would be 0, which can’t happen. In five years Ann’s age will be x + y + 5 and the teacher’s
age will be either 10x + (y + 5), if y ≤ 4, or 10(x + 1) + (y − 5), if x < 9 and y ≥ 6. The
product condition for each case gives the following equations:
Since we are looking for single-digit positive integer solutions for x and y, constrained by
the respective inequalities for y, it is clear that Case I has no solution and Case II only has
the solution y = 8 and x = 5. Hence one possible solution is that the teacher is currently
58 and Ann is 5+8 = 13, and in five years the teacher will be 63 and Ann will be 6×3 = 18,
as required.
Finally, we consider the possibility that the teacher’s age is a 3-digit number of the form
100 + 10x + y, on the grounds that even teachers generally do not live into their 200s, and
Ann’s age is 1 + x + y. Using the same reasoning we have the following additional cases:
Since neither of these has single-digit positive integer solutions we can rule out the 3-digit
case,
hence (B).
s 12 15 18 21 24 27
n = s(s + 1) 156 240 342 462 600 756
X × × × × ×
Here s = 15, . . . , 27 all fail since the digit sum of n is not equal to s. The only solution is
n = 156,
hence (156).
29. Since the nth term is the median of the first 2n − 1 terms, it must equal the (2n − 1)th odd
number, which is 2(2n − 1) − 1 = 4n − 3. Hence, to satisfy the median condition for any
odd number of terms, the sequence must be
1, 5, 9, 13, . . .
It can now be verified that the median condition is also satisfied for an even number of
terms: the median of the first 2n terms is the average of the nth and (n + 1)th terms,
namely
(4n − 3) + (4(n + 1) − 3) 8n − 2
= = 2(2n) − 1
2 2
which is the (2n)th odd number as claimed.
Hence the nth term of the sequence equals 4n − 3. Solving for n to find the number of
terms less than 2018, we have
4n − 3 < 2018
4n < 2021
n < 505 14
hence (505).