Chapter One
Chapter One
1
c. Rationality of consumers - consumers are assumed to be
rational beings. He/she can reason out as to what is good and
what is bad for him and he prefers more of good to less of it
further more he aims at the maximization of his utility subject to
the constraint imposed by his income .
iii. The Law diminishing marginal utility: - the utility gained from
successive units of a commodity goes on diminishing as the consumer
2
consumes more of it. That is, the additional benefit or marginal utility a
person derives from a given increase of quantity consumed of a
commodity diminishes with every increase in quantity.
The concept of cardinal utility makes it possible to define the total and
marginal utility in quantitative terms.
Total utility (TU):- may be defined as the sum of the utility derived
from all the units consumed of the commodity. if there ‘n’ number of
commodities ; such as X 1 , X 2 , … , X n , total utility is the sum of utility
obtained from each commodity.
MU =ΔTU / ΔQ
. TU
Maximum TU
67
TU
60
50
30
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Quantity
consumed
Fig 2.1A.
Total Utility
MU
30 MU curve
Fig 2.1B. Marginal
Utility
20
10
0 1 2 3 4 5
6 Qx
5
This law states that as the quantity consumed of a commodity increase
over a unit of time, the utility derived by the consumer from successive
units goes on decreasing provided the consumption of all other goods
remain constant. In other words, as a consumer takes more units of a
good the extra utility or satisfaction that he derives from an extra unit
of the good goes on falling.
Law of diminishing marginal utility holds only under certain given
conditions. These conditions are
6
conditions the consumer is in equilibrium when the marginal utility of X
( MU x ¿ is equated to its market price ( P x). Symbolically we have:
a. MU x =P x ,
b. Given the budget constraint is satisfied; M = X P x .
If MU x > Px , the consumer can increase his well fare by purchasing more
units of X.
Similarly if MU x < P x the consumer reduces quantity of good X to
increase total utility and keeping more of his income unspent.
Therefore, he attains the maximization of his utility.
When MU x = P x. When only a single or type of commodity is consumed
MU x MU y
A. ¿
Px Py
Therefore, the optional choice of the consumer is x=30 units ,∧ y=10 units
MU
MUx
0 D Good X
9
Taking points R , A, B, C and D from the above figure with the corresponding
prices and quantities , we derive and draw the demand curve of the product
as follows.
PX The negative section of the MU curve
R does not form part of the demand curve
(Segment beyond point D), since negative
P1 A quantities do not make sense in
economics.
Similar to the MU curve, the DD curve is
P2 B
downward sloping (has -ve slope)
p3 C reflecting inverse relation between
DD
0 X1 X2 X3 D Qx
Fig 2.4 Demand curve derived from MU curve
Critiques of cardinal approach
The following are some basic weaknesses of the cardinal utility theory.
I. The assumption of cardinal approach that utility is cardinally or
objectively measurable is. Utility is a subjective concept, which
cannot be measured objectively.
II. The assumption of constant marginal utility of money is used
because money serves as a measure of utility. However, this
assumption is unrealistic b/c marginal utility of money, like that of
all other goods is subject to change and therefore it cannot serve
as a measure of utility derived from goods and services.
III. The psychological law of diminishing marginal utility has been
established from introspection. The law is accepted as an axiom
without empirical verification.
Unlike the cardinal utility theory, the ordinal utility theory stated that
utility is not measurable. It asserted consumer can only rank or order
the utility he/she derives from different goods. The theory uses
10
indifference curve (IC) in analyzing the consumer behavior, hence
referred as Indifference curve theory/approach.
The OUT rejects the view that utility is measurable objectively because
utility is a subjective concept it can’t be measured objectively or
cannot be expressed numerically. The theory argued utility is an
ordinal magnitude – that is – consumers can only rank or order utility
derived from the consumption of different goods.
Good Y good Y
IC3
IC
IC2
IC 1
good X
good X
Indifference curve , IC Indifference map
Ordinal utility is not quantity or a numerical value. It is only an
expression of ranking or ordering consumer’s preference for one
commodity over another.
The concept of ordinal utility is based on the following axioms (Rule of
principle)
a. It is not possible for a consumer to express his/her utility in
quantitative terms. But it is always possible for him/her to tell which of
any two goods he prefers.
b. In view of this the consumer can order all the commodities he
consumes in the order of their preference.
11
In the opinion of the ordinals, this is sufficient to analyses consumer
behavior, and absolute measurement of utility is nether neither
feasible nor necessary for analyzing consumer behavior.
Assumption of ordinal utility theory - the theory makes the
following assumptions;
1- Rationality:- the consumer is assumed to be rational, he aims at
the maximization of his utility given his income and market prices. It is
assumed he has full knowledge of all relevant information.
2- Utility is ordinal: - utility is ordinal magnitude; it can’t be
measured or expressed numerically. Consumers can rank or order their
preferences from consumption of different baskets of goods according
to the satisfaction of each basket. It is difficult to numerically /objective
measure utility for consumers. They need not know precisely the
amount of satisfaction, it is enough somehow the compare and rank
utility from different goods.
3- Consistency and transitivity of choice:- it is assumed that
consumers are consistent in their choice, that is, if in one period he
chooses bundle A over B he will not choose B over A at another period
if both bundles are available to him. The consistency assumption may
be symbolically written as follows: If A> B , then B< A .
Similarly, it is assumed that consumer’s choice is characterized by
transitivity: if bundle A is preferred to B, and B is preferred to C, then
bundle A, is preferred to C, symbolically we may write the transitivity
assumption as follow; If A> B ,∧B>C then A>C .
4. Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution (Law of
DMRS).
The marginal rate of substation (MRS) is the rate at which a consumer
is willing to substitute one commodity (X) for another (Y) without
changing or affecting total utility. The Rate is given by ∆Y/∆X. the
assumption of DMRS/ diminishing marginal rate of substitution, is that,
∆Y/∆X goes on decreasing, when a consumer continue substitute X for
12
Y. in other words, DMRS refers to the increasingly difficulty one face in
substituting one commodity for another without affecting TU.
The law of DMRS states that the rate at which one commodity is
substitute to another decreases as one keep on increasing
consumption of one commodity while at the same time reducing
quantity consumed of the other commodity.
2.2.1 Nature of Indifference curve (IC)
An Indifference curve is the locus of points, each representing a
different combination of two goods, which yield the same utility or
level of utility. IC is a curve that shows the different combinations of
two goods (say goods X and Y) that give the same level of utility. On IC
An IC contains
consumers can choose between any combinations
infinite no. ofof goods
points without
or combinations
of goods X and Y. such as combinations A, B, C and D.
affecting total utility. Since all points (A, B, C, D , ETC) are on the same IC ,
good Y represent the same amount of utility.
At points A and D we different combinations of X and
100 .A (X= 5, y= 100) Y, but level of utility is same for both.
.B
.C
10 .D( X = 50, Y=10)
IC
0 5 50 good X
Indifference curve, IC (convex in shape)
Indifference curves are also called iso- utility curves [equal utility
curves]. For example: let us suppose that commodity X and Y are
substitute to each other and combinations; A, B, C, D, of the two
commodities, as presented in table 2.2. Since all combinations on an
IC yield the same level of satisfaction, consumer is indifference
between any of the possible combinations.
Table 2.2 Indifference schedules of commodities X and Y.
13
Combination commodity Y commodity X
utility
A 20 5
U
B 15 12
U
C 10 20
U
D 5 30
U
15 D IC
0 5 12 20 30 Commodity X
Indifference curve (convex in shape)
The MRS (marginal rate of substitution) is the rate at which one
commodity can be substituted for another, the level of satisfaction
remaining the same.
The MRS between two commodities, X and Y may also be defined as
the ratio of quantities of X and Y required replacing one for another
under the conditions that total utility remains the same. It implies that
the utility of units of X given up is equal to the utility of additional units
of Y. Suppose moving from point A to B, MRS between X and Y is
computed as
14
MRS x, y = |−∆∆ XY |= |−57| = 5/7 = 0.714
15
Since the total utility remains the same on an IC; ⎹−∆ YMU Y ⎸ must be
equal to ∆ XMU X , i.e.,
−ΔY MUX
=
ΔX MUY
ΔY
Here ΔX , - ratio of quantity changes is simply the slope of
16
Table 2.3 the Diminishing MRS between commodities X and Y (MRS Y,X)
Point on IC Y ∆Y X ∆X MRSY, X
= /- ∆Y/∆X/
A 12 - 1 - -
B 8 -4 2 1 4
C 5 -3 3 1 3
D 3 -2 4 1 2
E 2 -1 5 1 1
Qy
17
utility represented by IC 1 because IC 3 is farther away from the origin
than IC1; and IC3 denoted larger quantities of both goods relative to
IC1.
U (IC 1 )> U (IC 2)>U (IC 3).
Single Indifference curve represent a constant level of utility even if
combinations of the two goods varies along IC, utility don’t change.
Map of Indifference curves contains more than two ICs representing
different level of utility.
Map of ICs used to rank or order level of utility. The far away an
IC from the origin it represents a higher level of utility.
18
consumed. This property is special relevant to indifference map which
used to rank /order utility from different bundles of goods consumed.
The budget constraint of the consumer
The consumer has a given income, which sets limits to his maximizing
behavior. Income acts as a constraint in the attempt for maximizing
utility. The income constraint, in the case of two commodities, may be
written; M = Px Qx + Py Qy
M – Denote the total budget/income, Px, P y are prices while Qy and Qx
denote quantities of the two goods. P x Q x– total expenditure on good X
& Py Qy - expenditure on good Y
We may present the income constraint graphically through the budget
line; whose equation is derived from the above income constraint
equation (by solving for QY);
M Px
Q y= − Q ; Equation of the budget line
Py Py x
If Q x =0, i.e. if the Consumer spends all of her/ his income on Y, she/he
M
can buy Q y = units of Y all the budget being spent on good Y.
Py
Similarly:
M Py
Q x= − Q If the consumer spends all his income on X,
Px Px y
M
i.e., at Q y =0 ; then Q x = : total quantity of X that can be
Px
purchased using all the budget.
QY
A M/PY
Budget Line
Slope = - Px/Py
B
19
0 M/Px QX
Mathematically, the slope of the budget line is the derivative
[ ]
M M
−0
∆ Qy Py Py −Px
= = =
∆ Qx M −M / Px Py
0−
Py
Solutions
Soln B: - equilibrium condition: MUx / MUy=Px/ Py
2
2Y 6
= Px /Py =
4 XY 4
⤇
Y 6
= 4 Y =12 X ; hence, Y =3 X
2X 4
180 = 6X + 4Y ⤇ 180 = 6X + 4(3X)
180 =18X ⤇ X = 180/18 = 10 Units
Since Y = 2X, Y = 3* 10 = 30Units
Thus; the equilibrium quantities are X = 10 & y = 30units
Y
45
IC
30 E
21
0 10 18 X
Graphical presentation of the consumer
equilibrium
22