Chapter 6
Chapter 6
1. Time saved by reducing repetitive manual work (e.g., execute regression tests, re-enter
the same
2. test data, compare expected results vs actual results, and check against coding
standards)
3. Prevention of simple human errors through greater consistency and repeatability (e.g.,
tests are
4. consistently derived from requirements, test data is created in a systematic manner, and
tests are
5. executed by a tool in the same order with the same frequency) More objective
assessment (e.g., coverage) and providing measures that are too complicated for
6. humans to derive
7. Easier access to information about testing to support test management and test
reporting (e.g., statistics, graphs, and aggregated data about test progress, defect rates,
and test execution duration)
8. • Reduced test execution times to provide earlier defect detection, faster feedback and
faster time to market
9. • More time for testers to design new, deeper and more effective tests
Potential risks of using test automation include:
1. Unrealistic expectations about the benefits of a tool (including functionality and ease of
use).
2. Inaccurate estimations of time, costs, effort required to introduce a tool, maintain test
scripts and change the existing manual test process.
3. Using a test tool when manual testing is more appropriate.
4. Relying on a tool too much, e.g., ignoring the need of human critical thinking.
5. The dependency on the tool vendor which may go out of business, retire the tool, sell the
tool to a different vendor or provide poor support (e.g., responses to queries, upgrades,
and defect fixes).
6. Using an open-source software which may be abandoned, meaning that no further
updates are
7. available, or its internal components may require quite frequent updates as a further
development.
8. The automation tool is not compatible with the development platform.
9. Choosing an unsuitable tool that did not comply with the regulatory requirements and/or
safety standards.