RFLIB Syllabus (Sales)
RFLIB Syllabus (Sales)
COURSE SYLLABUS
Grading System:
Recitation 25%
Case Digest 10%
Quiz 10%
Attendance 5%
Examinations 50%
References:
A. Civil Code of the Philippines Articles
B. Maceda Law
C. Recto Law
D. Supreme Court Decisions
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
A comprehensive study of the laws on the contracts of sales which examines the
concept, documents, rights and obligations of parties, actions for breach, remedies of
the parties and extinguishment.
COURSE GOALS:
Know and fully understand the laws and their applications, master the provisions,
develop critical and analytical thinking, effective in written and oral communication,
logical reasoning, and sound judgment, exercise of proper professional and ethical
responsibilities
September 7, 2024
Subject Matter- Articles 1306, 1459-1465, NCC
I. Requisites of Valid Subject Matter
a. Spouses Gaspar vs. Disini, G.R. No. 239644, February 3, 2021
b. Naranja vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 160132, April 17, 2009
c. Atilano vs. Atilano, G.R. No. L-22487, May 21, 1969
d. Martinez v. Court of Appeals, 56 SCRA 647, April 29, 1974
e. Melliza v. City of Iloilo, 23 SCRA 477, April 30, 1968
Formation of Sale- Articles 1475-1488, 1325-1326, 1319, 1874, 1581, 1403 NCC
I. Stages
a. Desiderio Dalisay Investments, Inc. vs. Social Security
System, G.R. No. 231053, April 4, 2018
b. Ainza v. Padua, 462 SCRA 614, June 30, 2005
c. Limson vs. CA, 357 SCRA 209;
d. San Miguel Properties vs. Huang, 336 SCRA 2000
e. Atkins, Kroll & Co. vs. Cua Hian Tek, 102 Phil 948
f. Sanchez vs. Rigos, 45 SCRA 368
g. Ang Yu Asuncion vs. CA, December 2, 1994
h. Bible Baptist Church vs. CA, 26 November 2004
i. Osmeña III vs. Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management
Corporation, 771 SCRA 559, G.R. No. 212686 September 28, 2015
j. Repuela vs. Estate of Spouses Larawan and Bacus, G.R. No. 219638,
December 7, 2016
k. Arcaina vs. Ingram, G.R. No. 196444, February 15, 2017
l. Sepe vs. Heirs of Kilang, G.R. no. 199766, April 10, 2019
m. Trotin vs. Bongo, G.R. No. 212840, August 28, 2019
n. Heirs of Alido vs. Campano, G.R. No. 226065, July 29, 2019
o. Racelis vs. Spouses Javier, G.R. No. 189609, January 29, 2018
p. Ayala Land, Inc. vs. ASB Realty Corporation, G.R. No. 210043,
September 26, 2018
II. Policitacion Stage
a. Philippine National Oil Company vs. Keppel Philippines
Holdings, Inc., G.R. No. 202050, July 25, 2016
b. Mañas vs. Nicolasora, G.R. No. 208845, February 3, 2020
III. Perfection Stage
a. De Joya vs. Madlangbayan, G.R. No. 228999, April 28, 2021
b. Heirs of Kim vs. Quicho, G.R. No. 249247, March 15, 2021
c. Cruz v. Fernando, Sr., supra
IV. Form of Sale
a. Madrazo vs. Barredo-Fuentes, G.R. No. 164482,
November 8, 2017
b. Heirs of Alido vs. Campano, G.R. No. 226065, July 29, 2019
c. Rosencor Development Corporation vs. Inquing, G.R. No.
140479, March 8, 2001
V. Contract of Option
a. Sanchez v. Rigos, 145 SCRA 368, June 14, 1972
b. Equatorial Realty Dev’t, Inc. v. Mayfair Theater, Inc., 264 SCRA
483, November 21, 1996
VI. Formalities of Contract of Sale (Statutes of Fraud)
Sec. 22 Act 1147 (Cattle Registration Act)
a. Paredes v. Espino, 22 SCRA 1000, March 13, 1968
b. Inigo v. Maloto, 21 SCRA 246, September 28, 1967
c. Cuyugan v. Santos, 34 Phil 100, March 3, 1916
d. Dalion v. Court of Appeals, 182 SCRA 872, February 28, 1990
e. Yuvienco v. Dacuycuy, 104 SCRA 668, May 27, 1981
f. Vda. De Jomoc v. Court of Appeals, 200 SCRA 74, August 2, 1991
g. Santos v. Manalili, 475 SCRA 679, November 22, 2005
Consummation of Sale
I. Obligations of Seller
a. Cuison v. Remoto, 472 SCRA 274, October 11, 2005
II. Purchase at Merchant’s Store, Market or Fair – Art. 559
a. Sun Bros. v. Velasco, 54 O.G. 5143, August 11, 1958
b. Salonga v. Concepcion, 470 SCRA 291, September 20, 2005
c. Sigaya v. Mayuga, 467 SCRA 341, August 18, 2005
d. Premiere Dev’t Bank v. Court of Appeals, 453 SCRA 630, March
18, 2005 Siy Cong Bieng and Co. v. HSBC, 56 Phil 598 [1932]
e. Masiclat v. Centeno, May 31, 1956
III. Tradition as a Consequence of a Valid Sale
a. Guillermo vs. Orix Metro Leasing and Finance
Corporation, G.R. No. 237661, September 7, 2020
IV. Effect and Completeness of Delivery
V. When/How transfer is effected?
General Rule:
a. Ilao-Quianay v. Mapile, 474 SCRA 246, October 25, 2005
Exceptions:
a. Vallarta v. Court of Appeals, 150 SCRA 336, May 29, 1987
VI. Risk of Loss or Deterioration (Total/Partial)
a. Lawyer’s Cooperative v. Tabora, 13 SCRA 762, April 30, 1965
b. De Lizardi v. Yaptico, 30 Phil 211, March 22, 1915
c. Sun Bros. Appliances v. Perez, 7 SCRA 977, April 30, 1963
VII. Double Sales
a. Agustin vs. De Vera, G.R. No. 233455, April 3, 2019
b. Mantalan vs. Beltran, G.R. No. 222530, October 16, 2019
c. Cuison v. Remoto, supra
d. Ulep v. Court of Appeals, 472 SCRA 274, October 11, 2005 Sigaya
v. Mayuga, supra
e. Bautista v. Sioson, 39 Phil 615, February 11, 1919
f. Lichauco v. Berenguer, 39 Phil 643, February 27, 1919
g. Paylago v. Jarabe, 22 SCRA 1247, March 27, 1968
h. Quimson v. Rosete, 87 Phil 159, August 9, 1950
VIII. Unregistered Lands
a. Carumba v. Court of Appeals, 31 SCRA 558, February 18, 1970
Vda. De Jomoc v. Court of Appeals, supra
b. Hanopol v. Pilapil, 7 SCRA 452, February 28, 1963
IX. To deliver the object and its accessions -
a. Kuenzle & Streiff v. Macke & Chandler, 14 Phil 610, December 16,
1909
b. Addison v. Felix, 38 Phil 404, August 3, 1918
c. Daguilan v. IAC, 168 SCRA 22, November 28, 1988
d. Pasagui v. Villablanca, 68 SCRA 18, November 10, 1975
e. Dy, Jr. v. Court of Appeals, 198 SCRA 826, July 8, 1991
f. Power Commercial and Ind’l Corp. v. CA, 274 SCRA 597, June 20,
1997
g. Florendo v. Foz, 20 Phil 388, October 24, 1911
h. Philippine Suburban Dev’t. Corp. v. The Auditor General, 63
SCRA 397, April 18, 1975 Board of Liquidators v. Floro, 110 Phil
482, December 29, 1960
X. Quality/Quantity
a. Rudolf Lietz, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 478 SCRA 451, December
19, 2005
b. Santa Ana, Jr. v. Hernandez, 18 SCRA 973, December 17, 1966
c. Asiain v. Jalandoni, 45 Phil 296, October 23, 1923
d. Azarraga v. Gay, 52 Phil 599, December 29, 1928
XI. Not bound to deliver when?
a. Visayan Distributors, Inc. v. Flores, 92 Phil 145, October 15, 1952
XII. Place of Delivery – (F.O.B., C.I.F., F.A.S. )
a. Behn, Meyer & Co. v. Yangco, 38 Phil 606, September 18, 1918
b. Bislig Bay Lumber Co. v. CIR, 1 SCRA 156, January 28, 1961
XIII. Time of Delivery
a. Republic v. Litton & Co., 94 Phil 52, November 28, 1953
Issue
- Problem or doctrine being resolved or explained
Ruling
- Must be aligned with the topic of the class
- Must state whether the petition/action is granted or dismissed