Mensima VRS Attorney General Brief - 081232
Mensima VRS Attorney General Brief - 081232
FACTS
In this case, the plaintiff broke away from their old registered co-operative company which
produces akpeteshie and form their own limited liability company producing the same product.
They were harassed by the officers of the co-operative union on the grounds that the plaintiff is
not registered with the co-operative union and for that, does not have any licence to produce the
product as provided by regulation 3(1) of the manufacture and sales regulations. The plaintiff
sued under article 2(1) of the 1992 against the regulation 3(1) as inconsistent with the
constitution(supreme law of the land. Particularly, Article 21(1) of the 1992 constitution which
provides that, “all persons shall have the freedom of joining and exiting an association.
Issue
Whether or not the regulation 3(1) contradicts with the supremacy of the constitution.
Holding
The court held that, the regulation was in contradiction to the supremacy of the constitution.
REASONING
Article 1(2) and 2(1) of the 1992 constitution, establishes the supremacy of the constitution over
all other laws in the country. Therefore, any law or regulation made by an institution or
Ghana’s constitution is classified as void. Article 21(1) of the constitution grants every Ghanaian
the freedom of association without restriction for joining or exiting. Therefore, any regulations
which is inconsistent with this provision deforms the provisions under article 1(2) and 2(1) of the
1992 constitution of Ghana and for this reason become void. Though article 11(5) protects
existing laws from being replaced by the existence of the 4th republican constitution, however
our modern system of government establishes the concept of judicial review which makes it
possible for all other laws apart from our constitutional laws to be reviewed if found inconsistent