Thematic Lesson Plan 1
Thematic Lesson Plan 1
Curriculum Application
Direction: Make a Lesson Plan using Thematic Integration with related discipline.
Use the format template sample provided below.
Components Subject A: Subject B: Subject C:
English for Oral Politics Without
Academic & Communication in Boarders
Professional Context
Purpose
I. Learning At the end of theAt the end of the At the end of the
Outcomes: lesson 80% of thelesson 80% of the lesson 80% of the
learners should be
learners should be learners should be
able to able to able to
Identify identify
and the identify issues
explain the types of speech related to
key according to political
characteristics delivery and engagement and
of academic purpose youth
writing style practice empowerment
Apply the articulation, Identify elements
principles of modulation, of Filipino
academic stage presence, political culture
writing style to facial evaluate an
their own expressions, existing program
writing gestures and that addresses
Evaluate and movements and an issue related
critique rapport with the to political
academic audience; and engagement and
writing deliver a youth
samples: speech in an empowerment
audience
observing the
principles of
effective
speech delivery
learned.
II. Topic/ Academic Writing Principles of Citizenship-in-
Subject Matter Style Speech Practice
Delivery
Values
Integration
III. Materials K to 12 curriculum Oral K to 12 curriculum
and Reference compliant: English Communication compliant: Politics
for Academic & in Context Without Boarders
Professional Quarter 2 – Module Philippine Politics
Purposes 11: and Governance
Principles of
Speech
Delivery
IV. Strategy “Sentence "Speak Like A" “The Good Citizen”
Combining” Game: The The students will
The students will students will be name or list the
take a simple given different qualities and virtues
sentence and scenarios and have that are
expand it into a them practice characteristics of a
complex sentence speaking in various good citizen.
using tones and styles
conjunctions, and (e.g., a news
participial reporter, a
phrases. politician, a friend).
Group 1 represents
the affirmative team
(supporting the
resolution). Group 2
is the opposing team
(opposing the
resolution). The two
teams consist of
three members each.
The rest of the class
make up the judges
of the debate. While
they are not involved
in the formal debate,
they must ask
questions addressed
to the two debating
teams.
Each of the debating
teams must agree on
two significant points
of argument. The
affirmative team
opens the debate
presenting their
arguments, followed
by a member of the
opposing team. This
pattern is repeated
for the second
speaker in each
team until the third
speaker of the
affirmative team
presents his/her
team's arguments
followed by the third
speaker of the
opposing team.
The class will be The students will The class will be
divided into 5 identify the kind of divided into five
groups. Each speech according groups. Each group
group will be to delivery will brainstorm a list
assigned a (Impromptu, of issues related to
different academic Extemporaneous, political engagement
writing sample. Manuscript, and youth
Each group will Memorized) empowerment in the
carefully read and described by the Philippines.
analyze their situations given by Encourage them to
assigned sample, the teacher. The consider:
considering the students will write - Barriers to youth
following aspects: their answers on a participation in
Style: sheet of paper. politics
- Is the tone - Challenges young
formal and people face in
objective? making their voices
- Is the language heard
clear, concise, - Ways to empower
and precise? young people to
- Does the writing become active
use appropriate citizens
vocabulary and 3. Share and
sentence Discuss: Each group
structure? will share their list
Content: with the class,
- Is the main idea explaining their
clearly stated and choices and
supported with engaging in a
evidence? discussion about the
-Are the importance of these
arguments logical issues.
and well-
reasoned?
-Is the information
accurate and
relevant?
- Organization:
- Is the writing
well-structured
with a clear
introduction, body
paragraphs, and
conclusion?
-Are the ideas
presented in a
logical order?
-Are transitions
used effectively to
connect ideas?
Each group will
complete the
critique worksheet
for their assigned
sample, noting the
strengths,
weaknesses, and
suggestions for
improvement.
After they
complete the
critique
worksheet, each
group will share
their critique of
their assigned
sample with the
class.
Thematic Culminating Activity: Speech Activity
Brief Description: The students will present a speech highlighting the National
Youth Commission's programs that encourage and support youth participation in
the Philippines. Each learner will choose one program to focus on and address key
questions about its impact and benefits. Their speech will address the following
key questions:
- Effectiveness: How effective have these programs been in strengthening youth
participation in various aspects of Philippine society?
- Youth Integration: In what ways have the programs successfully integrated youth
agendas and concerns into their design and implementation?
- Challenges and Issues: What are the major challenges and issues that have
affected the implementation of these programs, and how can these be addressed?
Objectives: At the end of this culminating activity, the students, the students should
be able to
Practice and demonstrate effective articulation, modulation, stage presence,
facial expressions, gestures, and rapport with the audience.
Demonstrate an understanding of the key characteristics of academic writing
style by using appropriate language, structure, and citations in their research.
Deliver a well-structured and engaging speech that effectively communicates
their understanding of the chosen program, observing the principles of
effective speech delivery.
Evaluate an existing program (from the National Youth Commission) that
addresses an issue related to political engagement and youth empowerment.
V. Assessment: