Case Study Pack - November 2024 - OneWay LTD - Paul Hoang
Case Study Pack - November 2024 - OneWay LTD - Paul Hoang
How to use the new Paper 1 Case Study Pack, November 2024
This comprehensive Case Study Pack (CSP) has been produced to help colleagues and students in
their preparations for the November 2024 Paper 1 examination (OneWay Ltd).
2. Additional glossary of key terms relevant to the case study and the hotels industry.
See pages 8 – 13
3. Two sets of True or False Quiz activities to help test students’ comprehension and
understanding of the pre-release statement.
See pages 14 – 17
4. Two different complete case studies (for reference and exam practice only).
See pages 18 – 20 and pages 34 – 36
5. Two separate sets of Paper 1 mock exam questions, using the new assessment format.
See pages 21 and 37
Paul Hoang
22nd August 2024
Key terms appear in alphabetical order for ease of reference. Line numbers in the pre-release
statement are shown in brackets.
Employees (4)
In the context of the hotel industry and the case study, employees refer to the individuals who work
for OWL and are essential to the operation and service delivery of its hotels. They have a variety of
roles, ranging from management and administrative positions at the hotels to frontline service roles
and maintenance staff. Key categories of employees in the context of OWL include full-time
employees, part-time employees, temporary employees, and migrant workers (all of which are
defined below). Examples of roles within OWL’s hotel could include:
• Front desk – These employees handle check-ins, check-outs, reservations, and guest inquiries.
• Housekeeping – These employees are responsible for cleaning and maintaining guest rooms
and public areas of the hotel and beach resort.
• Food and beverages – These employees work in the hotel’s restaurants and bars, e.g., chefs,
waiting staff, and bartenders.
Employees (cont’d…)
• Maintenance – Employees who ensure that the hotel’s facilities and equipment are in good
working order, such as lighting and air conditioning.
• Recreation – These employees organize and oversee activities and entertainment for hotel
guests, particularly in resorts.
• Job postings (job adverts) through various channels such as online employment sites, social
media, local newspapers in Xanadu and Utopia, and OWL’s company website.
• Shortlisting by reviewing job applications, i.e., selecting candidates who meet the job
requirements (job specifications).
• Screening processes, which typically include job interviews, background checks (such as
references from previous employers), and skills assessments to determine the suitability of
candidates.
• Job offers and training for new recruits to familiarize them with the OWL’s policies, procedures,
and organizational culture.
Interest rate
The interest rate refers to the cost of borrowing money or the return on savings. In general, higher
interest rates are detrimental to business as they increase the cost of borrowing. Interest rates are
typically expressed as a percentage of the principal loan amount. Changes in interest rates influence
costs, profitability, and investment decisions. Examples include:
• Borrowing costs of loans and mortgages – Hotel operators often take out loans or mortgages to
finance the purchase, construction, or renovation of properties. The interest rate on these loans
affects the overall cost of borrowing and the hotel’s financial performance.
• Working capital – At times, hotel operators might need to borrow funds for day-to-day
operations, especially during off-peak seasons (winter months) or an economic downturn (such
as the one caused by the COVD-19 global pandemic).
• Changes in interest rates also influence the level of consumer spending in the economy,
including travel and tourism. Higher interest rates can lead to reduced discretionary spending,
especially for those with existing borrowing (such as credit card debts, loans, and home
mortgages). Therefore, higher interest rates could adversely impact tourism demand in Xanadu.
Understanding interest rates is essential for OWL’s board of directors when considering major
financial decisions, such as the potential closure of one hotel and the investment in a new theme
park (lines 12 – 13). These decisions would likely involve financing, where interest rates would play
a crucial role in determining the feasibility and cost of such projects.
Loss (9)
In the context of the case study, a “loss” refers to the financial situation where the expenses of
running hotel operations exceed the revenues generated. This results in a negative financial
outcome for the business during a specific trading period. For example, lower occupancy rates, as
seen during the COVID-19 pandemic when tourism decreased, led to fewer room bookings and
therefore significantly reduced OWL’s revenues (when seven of OWL’s eight hotels were temporarily
closed). At the same time, OWL is committed to paying its fixed costs such as salaries to the
management team and full-time employees, insurance premiums, and maintenance costs,
regardless of occupancy levels. This caused OWL to experience financial losses in 2020 and 2021.
Profit (9)
Profit refers to the financial gain that OWL earns after deducting all costs (fixed expenses plus cost
of sales) from its total revenue. Profit is a key indicator of OWL’s commercial health and financial
performance. This directly affects its ability to sustain its hotel operations and to grow or expand as
an organization.
This section of the Paper 1 Case Study Pack introduces additional key terms that may link well with
the pre-release statement. Definitions are provided along with application to OWL and/or the hotel
industry. The additional key terms are presented in alphabetical order for ease of access and
reference. Line numbers are also included for terms that appear in the first three paragraphs of the
Paper 1 case study.
Note: Although some of these terms are from the HL only part of the course (such as recruitment,
migrant workers, and temporary workers), application of any relevant tool, theory, or term from the
syllabus will be awarded accordingly in the exams. There is absolutely no requirement for any
candidate to use HL tools and theories in the Paper 1 examination.
All-inclusive
This refers to a pricing method where a single price covers a comprehensive range of services and
amenities provided by OWL’s hotels. This typically includes room accommodation, meals, drinks
(both alcoholic and non-alcoholic), and access to hotel facilities such as swimming pools, gyms, and
other activities or facilities offered by the hotel. Therefore, OWL’s hotel guests would pay one price
that would cover their entire stay. This pricing method can be particularly attractive to tourists who
want to manage their budgets easily and enjoy a hassle-free vacation without worrying about
additional costs.
Key differences between hotels and B&Bs are outlined in the table below:
Large scale, multiple floors, with Smaller scale, with only a few
Size and
many rooms (each OWL hotel can rooms, and sometimes in family
Structure
accommodate 450 guests) homes
Physical
Standardized for chain hotels Cozy, home-like, unique character
environment
Often rated using star system, from Not typically rated, but reputation is
Star ratings
1 to 5 stars by external body based on customer reviews
The table below outlines the differences between B&B, half-board, full-board, and all-inclusive
accommodation options, including their advantages and disadvantages:
• Higher cost
• No additional cost for
Accommodation that • Can discourage guests
food, drinks, and
includes all meals, from exploring the local
All-inclusive activities
snacks, drinks, and area
• Convenient and
activities • Can lead to wastage or
hassle-free for guests
overconsumption
COVID-19 pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic refers to the global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that
began in late 2019 and had major impacts on practically all businesses in all sectors, including
hospitality and tourism. These impacts included travel restrictions, temporary closures of hotels and
holiday resorts (OWL temporarily closed seven of its eight hotels in April 2020), and financial losses.
Hotels
Hotels are establishments that provide lodging (accommodation), meals, and various other services
for travellers and tourists. Hotels cater to both leisure and business visitors and offer a range of
accommodations and amenities and facilities to meet different needs and preferences. Examples
include: a variety of room types (such as single rooms, twin rooms, double rooms, suites, and family
rooms), TV, telephone, internet access, conference or meeting rooms, swimming pools, fitness
centres, spas, on-site restaurants, bars, and housekeeping services. OWL operates a chain of eight
hotels on the island of Xanadu, with each hotel located in one of the island’s beach resorts. These
hotels offer a combination of accommodation types, including twin and family rooms, catering to a
variety of guests.
Hospitality
In the context of the hotel industry and the given case study, hospitality refers to the range of services
and experiences provided to guests to ensure their comfort, enjoyment, and satisfaction during their
stay or visit. It encompasses the overall management and operation of OWL’s hotels, restaurants,
and other facilities that cater to travellers and tourists on the island of Xanadu. Key elements of
hospitality include well-maintained and equipped accommodation, guest services (front desk
operations and concierge services), room services, food and beverages (on-site dining options),
recreational and leisure facilities, as well as safety and cleanliness.
Hospitality (cont’d…)
OWL’s ability to attract and retain guests relies heavily on its hospitality offerings, which include
comfortable accommodations, dining options, recreational facilities, and personalized service. The
pandemic’s impact on travel and tourism and the subsequent temporary closure of 7 of OWL’s hotels
highlighted the importance of being adaptable and resilient in the hospitality industry.
Phone app
In the context of the hotel industry, a “phone app” refers to a mobile application designed to enhance
guest experiences by providing various services and features related to OWL’s hotel operations.
These apps are increasingly common in the hospitality industry. Key features and functions of a
phone app include allowing guests to make bookings and reservations, check-in and check-out,
ordering room service, booking spa appointments, accessing hotel customer loyalty programmes,
and booking hotel amenities directly from their smartphones. An effective phone app can help to
streamline OWL’s operations, improve communications, and attract tech-savvy travellers looking for
convenience during their stay or visit.
Self-service buffet
A self-service buffet refers to a dining option where OWL’s hotel and resort guests can serve
themselves from a variety of food and beverage selections available at its dining venues, such as its
restaurants. Buffets allow guests to select from multiple dishes, often featuring a range of cuisines
and meal types, and to choose their portion sizes. Buffets typically offer a wide selection of dishes,
including starters (appetizers), main courses, sides, desserts, and beverages, catering to different
tastes and dietary preferences.
Theme park
A theme park (or amusement park) refers to a large venue that is designed around a specific theme
or concept, offering various attractions, rides, entertainment, and activities for visitors. Theme parks
are popular destinations for families and tourists, and they can significantly enhance the
attractiveness of a hotel or resort. In particular, theme parks can serve as major attractions for hotels,
drawing in visitors who are seeking entertainment and activities beyond traditional lodging. Examples
include the Disneyland hotels and resorts across the world, as well as competitors such as Universal
Studios, Legoland, Alton Towers, and PortAventura World.
Tourism (7)
Tourism refers to the activity of travelling to destinations for leisure, recreation, or business purposes.
Tourism is a vital sector for many economies, including Xanadu. It encompasses various activities
and services that cater to the needs of leisure and business travellers. It creates jobs and supports
businesses, including hotels, restaurants, and retailers. OWL relies on the arrival of tourists to its
hotels and beach resorts, making tourism crucial for its revenue and profitability.
Tourists (10)
Tourists are the individual people who travel to the island of Xanadu, primarily for leisure, recreation,
or vacation purposes. These tourists are typically non-residents who visit Xanadu’s beach resorts
and stay at OWL’s hotels. They contribute to the local economy by spending on accommodation,
food, entertainment, and other services provided by OWL and other businesses on the island. There
were 4.2 million tourists who visited Xanadu in 2023. While there is a gradual increase in tourist
numbers on the island, the growth rate is slow, and projections for the next few years indicate only
modest improvements.
To test your comprehension and understanding of the OneWay Ltd (OWL) case study, answer ‘True’
or ‘False’ to each of the statements below.
Answers
True or
Statements
False?
10. OWL’s board of directors is considering closing one of its hotels and
building a theme park.
To test your comprehension and understanding of the OneWay Ltd (OWL) case study, answer ‘True’
or ‘False’ to each of the statements below.
Answers
True or
Statements
False?
2. OWL is located on the island of Xanadu off the coast of Utopia True
4. In 2023, three of OWL’s directors visited theme parks in France and False – UK
Germany as part of the company’s market research. and Spain
False – there
5. Each OWL hotel employs only full-time employees on permanent
are also part-
contracts, but temporary workers during the summer months.
time workers
False – not
6. Tourist numbers in Xanadu are increasing rapidly.
rapidly
10. OWL’s board of directors is considering closing one of its hotels and True
building a theme park.
To test your comprehension and understanding of the OneWay Ltd (OWL) case study, answer ‘True’
or ‘False’ to each of the statements below.
Answers
True or
Statements
False?
1. Each OWL hotel has full-time and part-time employees who are hired on
permanent contracts.
2. OWL hires temporary employees only during the busy winter months.
5. Each OWL hotel has 125 twin rooms and 50 family rooms.
6. In April 2020, OWL temporarily closed all eight hotels due to the COVID-19
pandemic.
8. During the hotel closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all employees
from Utopia were required to stay in Xanadu.
To test your comprehension and understanding of the OneWay Ltd (OWL) case study, answer ‘True’
or ‘False’ to each of the statements below.
Answers
True or
Statements
False?
1. Each OWL hotel has full-time and part-time employees who are hired on
True
permanent contracts.
False –
2. OWL hires temporary employees only during the busy winter months. summer
months
5. Each OWL hotel has 125 twin rooms and 50 family rooms. True
6. In April 2020, OWL temporarily closed all eight hotels due to the COVID-19 False – 7, not
pandemic. 8 hotels
8. During the hotel closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all employees False – most
from Utopia were required to stay in Xanadu. returned home
1 hour 30 minutes
INSTRUCTIONS
• Do not open this examination paper until you have been instructed to do so.
• Read the case study carefully.
• Section A: answer all questions.
• Section B: answer one question from a choice of two.
• You are permitted to use a calculator for this examination paper.
• The maximum marks available for this paper are 30 marks.
• The data and information included in this mock exam are provided for illustrative purposes only,
in order to provide students with practise for the final examinations in November 2024.
-2-
OneWay Ltd (OWL) is a family-owned chain of hotels located on the island of Xanadu off the
coast of Utopia. OWL has a hotel in each of Xanadu’s eight beach resorts. Each OWL hotel has
full-time and part-time employees on permanent contracts. OWL also hires temporary employees
in the busy summer months. The majority of OWL’s employees are migrant workers from Utopia.
5 Each OWL hotel can accommodate 450 guests in its 125 twin rooms and 50 family rooms.
Between 2010 and 2020, OWL faced increased competition, preventing profit growth.
The COVID-19 pandemic reduced tourism significantly. In April 2020, OWL temporarily closed
seven hotels, and most employees from Utopia returned home. The hotels reopened in
January 2022. OWL made a loss in 2020 and 2021 but made a profit in 2022.
10 In 2023, Xanadu attracted 4.2 million tourists. Tourist numbers are increasing, but very slowly.
Anticipated growth for the next few years remains low. OWL’s board of directors are considering
closing one hotel and building a theme park. In 2023, three OWL directors visited Alton Towers in
the United Kingdom and PortAventura World in Spain. Xanadu has no theme park.
15 With Xanadu’s tourism industry slowly recovering, OWL’s board of directors is under pressure to
identify new growth opportunities to pay off its existing loans. The concept of developing a theme
park is part of a broader strategy to diversify the company’s product offerings and reduce
dependency on traditional hotel income. The board of directors believes that a theme park could
attract more families and longer stays, which would boost overall revenue.
20 However, there are significant challenges associated with this strategic shift. Firstly, the
development of a theme park needs substantial capital expenditure. The current interest rate is
relatively high, yet obtaining external finance at favourable rates remains vital to maintain OWL’s
profitability. The directors are considering various financing options, including bank loans, a share
issue, and forming a strategic alliance with several international entertainment companies.
25 In addition to the potential theme park, OWL is also exploring ways to enhance its existing hotel
services to remain competitive. One proposal is to convert some of its hotels to an all-inclusive
model, providing guests with a comprehensive package that includes all meals, drinks, and
entertainment for a fixed price. This model has proven successful in other tourist destinations, as
well as on cruise holidays to Utopia and Xanadu, as it simplifies budgeting for guests.
30 Another area of focus is improving the customer experience through technology. OWL plans to
develop a phone app that allows guests to book hotel rooms, check-in, and access hotel services
from the convenience of their smartphone. The app will also provide updated information on local
attractions and allow guests to make reservations for restaurants and activities within the hotels.
The hospitality industry relies heavily on its workforce, and OWL is no exception. The company’s
35 reliance on migrant workers from Utopia has been both a strength and a challenge. Migrant
workers often bring diverse skills and perspectives but also face issues related to job security and
employee loyalty. OWL is committed to providing training and development programmes to
enhance the skills of all its workers and improve customer service quality. In addition, investing in
skills development is expected to improve job satisfaction and reduce labour turnover, which is
40 particularly important in the hospitality sector.
To differentiate itself from competitors, OWL is also planning to introduce a variety of guest
services. This includes the introduction of self-service buffets as part of its all-inclusive hotel
package, offering a wide range of international cuisine to cater to diverse guest preferences.
OWL also recognizes the importance of family-friendly services. Alongside the potential theme
45 park, OWL plans to enhance its hotel amenities with children-friendly pools, playgrounds, and
entertainment programmes. These additions are designed to create a more enjoyable and
memorable experience for families, encouraging repeat visits and positive word-of-mouth.
Whilst on a business trip to the United Kingdom (UK), two of OWL’s directors stayed at the Z
Hotel in Piccadilly, London. They gain first-hand experience and were impressed with the
50 customer service and customer loyalty scheme. OWL does not currently offer a membership
reward programme for its guests. Members of Z Hotel’s customer loyalty programme, which is
free to join, enjoy the following benefits at any of its hotels in Bristol, Glasgow, Liverpool, or
London in the UK:
60 The two directors are keen to introduce a similar customer loyalty scheme at all OWL hotels.
However, the success of these initiatives depends on effective marketing strategies, including
brand positioning. OWL needs to communicate its new product offerings clearly to potential hotel
guests. This includes highlighting the convenience and value of all-inclusive packages, the
excitement of the theme park, and the quality of its hospitality services.
65 In addition, one of the directors has concerns about the threat of competition from bed and
breakfast (B&B) operators on the island. B&B options attract a different segment of tourists who
prefer more flexible dining options and are more affordable than OWL’s all-inclusive hotels. It is
estimated that there are over 2,000 B&Bs in operation on the island. OWL also faces growing
competition from Airbnb which provides an online platform for short-and-long-term homestays.
70 In particular, the growing popularity of Airbnb for families visiting Xanadu has disrupted the
traditional hospitality market, offering unique and often more personalized experiences at highly
competitive prices. Airbnb’s platform is exceptionally user-friendly, enabling guests to effortlessly
search for, compare, and book accommodations online. The convenience of using a single app or
website to manage the entire booking process, including communication with hosts and accessing
75 reviews from previous guests, significantly enhances its appeal to younger visitors on the island.
Furthermore, B&Bs and Airbnb properties benefit from less stringent regulatory requirements
compared to traditional hotels in Xanadu.
Companies, products, or individuals named in this case study are fictitious and any similarities with
actual entities are purely coincidental.
-4-
SECTION A
Students of Placeholder International School, answer all questions from this section.
3. Describe one fixed and one variable cost of operating OWL’s hotels. [4 marks]
4. Explain one advantage and one disadvantage for OWL operating a family-
owned business (line 1). [4 marks]
5. Calculate the mean value of tourists in Xanadu for the entire period shown
in Table 1 (express answer to 2 decimal places). [2 marks]
SECTION B
7. Discuss whether OWL’s marketing strategy should include the launch of its
own customer loyalty scheme. [10 marks]
8. Discuss the opportunities and threats for OWL of diversifying into the theme
park industry. [10 marks]
TEACHERS’ NOTES
Teachers should use their professional judgement in awarding answers that may not be
included in this mark scheme.
The data and information included are provided for illustrative purposes only to give students
practise for the final examination in November 2024.
While there is no need to include any HL content, students should be awarded accordingly if
the inclusion of such content directly addresses the demands of the question.
SECTION A
Profit refers to the financial gain that a business achieves when its total revenue from business
activities exceeds its total costs for a given time period. This includes costs such as employee
wages, maintenance, utilities, marketing, and other operational.
Award [2 marks] for a clear and accurate definition of profit, similar to the example above.
Capital expenditure refers to the spending on acquiring, upgrading, and maintaining non-
current assets, e.g., buildings, machinery, equipment, and technological infrastructure. It is a
long-term investment and aims to generate future financial benefits by increasing the firm’s
capacity to attract customers and boost revenues.
Award [1 mark] for a definition that shows some understanding of capital expenditure.
Award [2 marks] for a clear and accurate definition of capital expenditure, similar to the
example above.
3. Describe one fixed and one variable cost of operating OWL’s hotels. [4 marks]
Fixed costs of operating OWL’s hotels include a description of any one of the following points:
Employee salaries – OWL incurs fixed salary payments for its full-time employees,
including hotel managers and permanent staff, regardless of hotel occupancy levels.
These costs remain constant and are essential for sustaining OWL’s operations.
As OWL has existing loans (line 16), for capital expenditures, such as renovating its hotels,
the business incurs fixed costs in the form of interest repayments to lenders. These
payments must be paid regardless of the hotel’s occupancy levels or its sales revenue,
thereby contributing to the company's financial obligations each month.
Property leasing – OWL must pay fixed costs associated with leasing the hotel properties
and ongoing maintenance expenses. This includes property taxes to the government,
insurance costs, and regular maintenance of facilities, which do not fluctuate with
occupancy rates at the eight hotels.
Utilities – Typically, the cost of electricity, water, telephone, and internet services, incur a
fixed component that must be paid, regardless of the level of usage. While these utilities
tend to vary with usage, OWL will still incur basic monthly service charges to keep the
hotels operational, regardless of the number of guests.
Provided by pirateIB | Page 23
N24/7/BUSMT/SHP1/ENG/TZ1/MS
Variable costs of operating OWL’s hotels include a description of any one of the following
points:
Food and beverage costs – Costs related to purchasing food and drinks for hotel guests
will vary based on occupancy levels. Higher guest numbers during the summer months
will result in increased food and beverage sales, leading to higher cost of sales.
Housekeeping and cleaning supplies – The costs of cleaning products and labour for
housekeeping (who are paid hourly wages) are variable, as they depend on the number
of rooms occupied at each hotel. More guests during peak periods lead to more rooms
needing cleaning and additional supplies being used.
Utility costs based on usage – Increased guest numbers during the summer months will
lead to higher utility consumption for services like air conditioning, ice making machines,
lighting, heating (of swimming pools) and laundry.
Guest amenities and supplies – The costs associated with providing guest amenities, such
as toiletries, towels, and linens, are variable expenses. These costs increase with higher
occupancy levels, as more guests require additional supplies and amenities during their
stay. This will certainly be the case if OWL implement an all-inclusive package at its hotels
(line 26).
Accept any other fixed or variable cost that is appropriately described in the context of the
case study.
Mark as a 2 + 2
Award [1 mark] for a relevant fixed cost (and variable cost). Award a further [1 mark] for each
description of this, written in the context of case study, up to the maximum of [4 marks].
4. Explain one advantage and one disadvantage for OWL operating a family-owned
business (line 1). [4 marks]
Effective cost control and resource management – Family-owned businesses often have
a more personal stake in the financial health of the organization, leading to more cautious
and careful cost management and resource allocation. OWL’s ability to manage labour
costs effectively by hiring temporary employees during the busy summer months is
crucial. This practice helps OWL to align its workforce with the fluctuating demand,
ensuring that the hotels do not incur unnecessary expenses during the off-season.
Strong degree of commitment and loyalty – Family members tend to have a strong
commitment to the organization’s success, which can translate into higher levels of
motivation and productivity. This intrinsic motivation can enhance OWL’s overall financial
performance. The family-owned nature of OWL likely contributes to a high level of
personal investment in the quality of service and customer satisfaction at its eight hotels,
helping the business to build a loyal customer base despite increased competition from
B&Bs and Airbnb alternatives.
Disadvantages for OWL could include an explanation of any one of the following points:
Limited Resources: Family-run businesses like OWL may face limitations in financial
resources and investment capacity compared to larger multinational corporations. This
can hinder OWL’s expansion opportunities, technology upgrades, and/or marketing
efforts, making it challenging to compete effectively in a highly competitive market.
Mark as a 2 + 2
Award [1 mark] for a relevant advantage (or disadvantage). Award a further [1 mark] for each
explanation, written in the context of case study, up to the maximum of [4 marks].
5. Calculate the mean value of tourists in Xanadu for the entire period shown in Table 1
(express answer to 2 decimal places). [2 marks]
Award [1 mark] for appropriate working and [1 mark] for the correct answer.
6. In the context of the external environment, analyse two potential challenges for OWL.
[6 marks]
In analyzing the external environment, a STEEPLE analysis can be used to explain the
challenges facing OWL. The examples below are for illustrative purposes only rather than as
a prescriptive or definitive list:
Social challenges
Changing consumer preferences – The rise in popularity of Airbnb and B&Bs on the
island of Xanadu suggests a shift in consumer preferences towards more flexible,
personalized, and (usually) more affordable accommodation options. OWL’s traditional
hotel model may therefore struggle to attract this segment of tourists unless it adapts by
offering similar flexibility and personalized experiences rather than an all-inclusive
package (lines 42 – 43). This change is likely to have intensified after the economic
impacts of COVD-19 which caused recessions throughout the world.
Migrant workforce issues – OWL relies heavily on migrant workers from Utopia, which
also brings challenges. While these workers bring diverse skills, they also face issues
related to job security and employee loyalty, potentially impacting service quality and
labour turnover in an adverse way. Ensuring consistent training and maintaining high
employee morale amidst such challenges is crucial for OWL’s operational effectiveness.
Technological challenges
Adoption of digital solutions – OWL plans to develop a phone app to enhance customer
experience by allowing guests to book rooms, check-in, and access hotel services via
their smartphones (lines 31 – 32). However, implementing and maintaining such
technology requires significant investment and expertise. Ensuring the app is user-
friendly, secure, and integrated with existing systems is crucial but challenging,
especially if OWL as a family-owned business lacks the necessary technological
infrastructure and skills.
Competition from digital platforms – OWL faces growing competition from platforms like
Airbnb, which offer a user-friendly experience for booking and managing
accommodations. These platforms are well-established, technologically advanced, and
popular among younger, tech-savvy travellers, making it difficult for traditional hotels like
OWL to compete without significant technological investments and technical support.
Economic challenges
High interest rates – The current high interest rates (lines 21 – 22) pose a significant
economic challenge for OWL, particularly as the company considers substantial capital
expenditure such as developing a theme park. Obtaining external finance at a favourable
interest rate is crucial for maintaining OWL’s profitability, but high borrowing costs could
strain the company’s financial resources and impact the viability of its expansion plans.
Slow recovery – Although tourism in Xanadu is recovering (line 15), the growth is slow.
The forecasted modest increase in tourist numbers (Table 1) could limit OWL’s revenue
growth and affect its ability to pay off existing loans (line 16), especially given the high
degree of competition from B&Bs and Airbnb.
Regulatory requirements – The hotel and hospitality industries are subject to stringent
regulations compared to the relatively relaxed regulatory environment for Airbnb and
B&B operators on the island of Xanadu. This puts OWL at a competitive disadvantage
as it incurs higher compliance costs and operational restrictions, e.g., B&Bs and Airbnb
properties are likely to face less rigorous health and safety standards, particularly if they
offer limited services or are considered as private residences.
Accept any other relevant response using a STEEPLE analysis framework and analysed
in the context of the case study.
Mark as 3 + 3
For each point, award [1 mark] for stating a potential external challenge and, depending on
the depth and clarity of the analysis, an additional [2 – 3 marks], up to the maximum of [6
marks].
Do not award responses that analyse internal factors / challenges for OWL.
SECTION B
7. Discuss whether OWL’s marketing strategy should include the launch of its own
customer loyalty scheme. [10 marks]
Customer loyalty schemes are marketing strategies designed to encourage repeat business
by offering rewards like discounts, exclusive offers, and special privileges. These benefits
incentivize customer loyalty, fostering long-term relationships with the business and its brands.
For OWL, introducing a customer loyalty scheme can be beneficial. These advantages include
but are not limited to:
Competitive advantages – In a highly competitive market with over 2,000 B&Bs and the
rise of Airbnb, a customer loyalty scheme can help differentiate OWL from its rivals.
Unique member offerings such as early check-ins, late check-outs, and exclusive
discounts can make OWL’s proposition more attractive to guest and visitors on the island
of Xanadu. Porter’s generic strategies suggest that differentiation is crucial to achieving
a competitive advantage. OWL can leverage a customer loyalty scheme to create a
distinct value proposition that appeals to its target customers, particularly families and
repeat visitors.
Increased revenue – By encouraging repeat business and higher spending per customer
through exclusive member discounts and perks, OWL can increase its overall revenue.
Loyal customers are also more likely to participate in upselling opportunities, such as
upgraded rooms and additional hotel services at OWL’s resorts. A significant portion of
revenue often comes from a small percentage of loyal customers, including through
positive word of mouth promotion. Implementing a loyalty scheme can help OWL
maximize revenue from its most valuable customers.
Accept any other relevant advantage or reason, discussed in the context of the OWL
case study.
Potential for low participation – There is no guarantee that the loyalty scheme will be
financially successful or perceived as value for money, especially if guests do not
ordinarily visit Xanadu regularly. Furthermore, if competitors offer better rewards
programmes and incentives, customer participation with OWL’s customer loyalty scheme
may be low. This would result in minimal impact on customer retention and sales revenue
despite the cost of investment in the scheme. The expectancy theory of motivation
suggests that the perceived value of rewards influences participation – this applies to
customers as well as employees. OWL must ensure that the loyalty scheme is appealing
and offers attainable benefits to encourage customer engagement and repeat business
at OWL’s hotels.
Accept any other relevant disadvantage or reason, discussed in the context of the OWL
case study.
Overall, introducing a customer loyalty scheme can be a strategic marketing move for OWL. A
customer loyalty scheme would aim to enhance guest retention at OWL’s chain of hotels on
the island of Xanadu. By providing rewards such as discounted room rates, complimentary
services and other exclusive perks, OWL can create a more attractive value proposition for its
guests. This strategy is intended to differentiate OWL from competitors on the island,
encourage repeat visits, increase customer satisfaction, raise market share, and ultimately
drive revenue growth by establishing a loyal customer base.
Candidates can make any recommendation so long as this is substantiated and the line of
argument is based on the evidence presented in the response.
Market research data – Any effective marketing strategy is likely to be based on thorough
market research. The case study does not provide information of detailed market
research on customer preferences and the potential acceptance of a loyalty scheme.
Understanding the target market’s needs and expectations is critical for designing an
effective programme, beyond the two directors’ first-hand experience (line 50). Therefore,
OWL should conduct thorough primary market research to gather insights on what
incentives would most appeal to its own guests in Xanadu and how these compare to
the offerings of rival hotels on the island.
Financial analysis – There is a lack of detailed financial analysis on the expected costs
versus financial benefits of implementing a customer loyalty scheme. An accurate cost-
benefit analysis is essential to make an informed decision about the affordability and
financial gains from such a scheme. Hence, it is recommended that OWL should conduct
a detailed financial analysis and projection to estimate the initial and ongoing costs of
the loyalty scheme, as well as the forecast gain in revenue from customer loyalty.
In conclusion, introducing a customer loyalty scheme could be highly beneficial for OWL,
provided that it is well-designed to meet customer expectations and preferences and that the
financial and operational challenges are carefully managed. In addition, conducting thorough
market research and a detailed financial analysis are crucial prerequisites to ensure that the
customer loyalty scheme delivers the desired outcomes. If executed effectively, the customer
loyalty scheme can help OWL differentiate itself in a competitive market, increase customer
retention, and drive long-term profitability.
Award [1 – 2 marks] for a response that shows little understanding of the demands of the
question. There is minimal use of Business Management tools and theories, which are
irrelevant or used inaccurately. There is little, if any, reference to the stimulus material.
Award [3 – 4 marks] for a response that shows some understanding of the demands of the
question. There is some use of Business Management tools and theories, but these are mostly
lacking in accuracy and relevance. There is superficial use of information from the stimulus
material, often not going beyond the name of the organization. Any arguments made are
largely not substantiated.
Award [5 – 6 marks] for a response that shows an understanding of the demands of the
question, but these demands are only partially addressed. There is some relevant and
accurate use of Business Management tools and theories. There is some relevant use of
information from the stimulus material that goes beyond just the name of the organization but
does not effectively support the argument. Arguments are substantiated but are mostly one-
sided (unbalanced)s.
Award [7 – 8 marks] for a response that mostly addresses the demands of the question. The
response contains mostly relevant and accurate use of Business Management tools and
theories. Information from the stimulus material is generally used to support the argument,
although there is some lack of clarity or relevance in some places. Arguments are
substantiated and the response has some balance.
Award [9 – 10 marks] for a response that shows clear focus on addressing the demands of
the question throughout. There is relevant and accurate use of Business Management tools
and theories. Relevant information from the stimulus material is integrated effectively to
support the argument. Arguments are substantiated and balanced. There is an explanation of
the limitations of the case study or stimulus material.
8. Discuss the opportunities and threats for OWL of diversifying into the theme park
industry. [10 marks]
When considering the closure of one of its hotels in order to diversify and open a theme park,
OWL must evaluate both opportunities and threats to make a balanced and well-informed
decision.
Opportunities of diversifying into the theme park industry include a discussion of the following:
Additional revenue streams – By attracting more visitors, the theme park could draw in
more customers each day, and not only guests who stay at hotels (such as local
residents on the island of Xanadu). In additional, opening the island’s first theme park
could attract more families and encourage some to stay longer, thus increasing
occupancy rates at OWL hotels. This could boost OWL’s overall revenue by catering to
a broader market. This is important for OWL as it strives to “diversify the company’s
product offerings and reduce dependency on traditional hotel income” (lines 17 – 18).
First mover advantage – As no other hotel on Xanadu will have a theme park, this
differentiation strategy gives OWL a competitive advantage by being the first (and
perhaps only) to provide such a facility to hotel guests and tourists to the island. This
provides OWL an opportunity to establish a unique selling proposition (USP) on the
island. This would clearly differentiate OWL from competitors like B&Bs and Airbnb,
which do cannot offer such attractions.
Brand enhancement – Expanding into the theme park industry could enhance OWL’s
brand image as a family-friendly holiday destination as well as possibly attracting a new
customer segment (such as local teenagers living in Xanadu or Utopia). The attraction
could also encourage repeat visits, especially if OWL is able to develop a season ticket
or annual pass for visitors to the theme park.
Threats of diversifying into the theme park industry include a discussion of the following:
High capital expenditure and financial risks – Opening and developing a theme park
requires substantial capital expenditure. Given the high current interest rates (lines 21 –
22), financing this project could strain OWL’s financial resources and potentially affect
its profitability, especially if it needs to use loan capital.
Uncertain demand – Despite the potential financial benefits, there is no guarantee that a
theme park will attract the expected number of visitors (only 3.48% growth from 2024 to
2026 as shown in Table 1). The success of the theme park is closely tied to the broader
tourism market, which remains volatile due to factors like the ongoing recovery from the
COVID-19 pandemic. With slow growth in tourism as well as the competitive threat from
B&Bs and Airbnb, OWL might struggle to achieve the desired return on investment from
closing one of its hotels and investing in a theme park.
Potential competition with established attractions – International theme parks like Alton
Towers and PortAventura World are well-established brands. Although OWL might be
the first on Xanadu, it will need to overcome these strong competitors to attract visitors,
especially if tourists prefer to visit well-known parks abroad.
Operational and strategic challenges – Entering the theme park industry represents a
significant shift from OWL’s core hotel business. Managing both hotels and a theme park
could dilute the focus of OWL’s senior management. Managing a theme park requires
different expertise and resources compared to running hotels. Diversion of focus and
resources potentially compromises the quality of both operations.
Accept any substantiated conclusion based on the line of argument presented in the extended
response. Two examples are provided below for illustrative purposes:
Conclusion 1
Diversifying into the theme park industry presents a unique and promising opportunity for OWL
to expand its revenue streams and establish its position as a leading player in Xanadu's tourism
industry. By leveraging the first-mover advantage and focusing on the importance of family-
friendly services, OWL can differentiate itself from competitors and create a unique selling
point that boosts occupancy rates across its hotels. Despite the substantial investment
required, the long-term benefits, such as increased brand recognition, customer loyalty, and
the spreading of risks, outweigh the potential threats. With careful planning, effective
execution, and strategic partnerships, OWL is well-positioned to succeed in this new venture
and secure its financial future.
Conclusion 2
While the theme park industry offers potential benefits, the significant financial, operational,
and market risks make it a highly uncertain business venture for OWL. The substantial capital
expenditure required, alongside the challenges of securing favourable financing and the
potential for uncertain demand, could strain OWL’s resources and jeopardize its profitability.
Furthermore, the complexities of managing a new and unfamiliar business (theme park) could
lead to operational inefficiencies and divert attention from OWL’s core hotel business. As
diversification is the highest-risk growth strategy (according to the Ansoff matrix), OWL should
approach this growth option with caution. It would be sensible to delay or scale back the project
until thorough market research is completed and affordable financing options are secured.
It is important to recognize the limitations of the case study and stimulus materials. The data
provided is limited in scope, particularly concerning detailed financial projections and market
research on the demand for a theme park. In particular, the case study does not provide
detailed financial projections, cost estimates for the theme park, or the current financial health
of OWL. Accurate financial data, including an assessment of OWL’s final accounts (income
statement and balance sheet) and its financial position (such as its current level of borrowing),
are essential for making an informed decision about whether to close one of the hotels and to
diversify into the theme park industry. These gaps limit the ability to make a comprehensive
and fully informed assessment of the opportunities and threats associated with OWL’s
diversification into the theme park industry. Further research and analysis would be necessary
to provide a more conclusive evaluation.
Award [1 – 2 marks] for a response that shows little understanding of the demands of the
question. There is minimal use of Business Management tools and theories, which are
irrelevant or used inaccurately. There is little, if any, reference to the stimulus material.
Award [3 – 4 marks] for a response that shows some understanding of the demands of the
question. There is some use of Business Management tools and theories, but these are mostly
lacking in accuracy and relevance. There is superficial use of information from the stimulus
material, often not going beyond the name of the organization. Any arguments made are
largely not substantiated.
Award [5 – 6 marks] for a response that shows an understanding of the demands of the
question, but these demands are only partially addressed. There is some relevant and
accurate use of Business Management tools and theories. There is some relevant use of the
information from the stimulus material that goes beyond just the name of the organization but
does not effectively support the line of argument. Arguments are substantiated but are mostly
one-sided (unbalanced).
Award [7 – 8 marks] for a response that mostly addresses the demands of the question. The
response contains mostly relevant and accurate use of Business Management tools and
theories. Information from the stimulus material is generally used to support the argument,
although there is some lack of clarity or relevance in some places. Arguments are
substantiated and the response has some balance.
Award [9 – 10 marks] for a response that shows clear focus on addressing the demands of
the question throughout. There is relevant and accurate use of Business Management tools
and theories. Relevant information from the stimulus material is integrated effectively to
support the argument. Arguments are substantiated and balanced. There is an explanation of
the limitations of the case study or stimulus material.
1 hour 30 minutes
INSTRUCTIONS
Do not open this examination paper until you have been instructed to do so.
Read the case study carefully.
Section A: answer all questions.
Section B: answer one question from a choice of two.
You are permitted to use a calculator for this examination paper.
The maximum marks available for this paper are 30 marks.
The information included in this mock exam has been provided for illustrative purposes only, in
order to provide students with practice for the final examinations in November 2024.
-2-
OneWay Ltd (OWL) is a family-owned chain of hotels located on the island of Xanadu off the
coast of Utopia. OWL has a hotel in each of Xanadu’s eight beach resorts. Each OWL hotel has
full-time and part-time employees on permanent contracts. OWL also hires temporary employees
in the busy summer months. The majority of OWL’s employees are migrant workers from Utopia.
5 Each OWL hotel can accommodate 450 guests in its 125 twin rooms and 50 family rooms.
Between 2010 and 2020, OWL faced increased competition, preventing profit growth.
The COVID-19 pandemic reduced tourism significantly. In April 2020, OWL temporarily closed
seven hotels, and most employees from Utopia returned home. The hotels reopened in
January 2022. OWL made a loss in 2020 and 2021 but made a profit in 2022.
10 In 2023, Xanadu attracted 4.2 million tourists. Tourist numbers are increasing, but very slowly.
Anticipated growth for the next few years remains low. OWL’s board of directors are considering
closing one hotel and building a theme park. In 2023, three OWL directors visited Alton Towers in
the United Kingdom and PortAventura World in Spain. Xanadu has no theme park.
With the slow recovery in tourist numbers, OWL’s board of directors is considering diversifying the
15 company’s portfolio by exploring new business opportunities. The proposal to construct a theme
park on the island aims to attract a broader range of tourists and increase the average length of
stay, thereby boosting OWL’s revenues. The directors believe this diversification strategy is
essential for mitigating the risks associated with dependency on hotel income alone.
The construction of a theme park represents a significant financial investment. OWL needs to
20 evaluate the interest rates and funding options available for such a large-scale project. The finance
director has provided the following information to support the decision-making process:
Table 1 – Selected estimated financial data related to the opening of a theme park in Xanadu:
The board of directors is exploring various financing options, including loan capital (namely
commercial bank loans), government grants, and strategic partnerships with business angels who
30 have experience in theme park investments.
In addition to the theme park, OWL is considering transforming its hotel services to attract more
visitors and guests. One approach is to transition half of its hotels to an all-inclusive model, where
guests pay a single price for their accommodation, meals, drinks, and entertainment. This model
has gained popularity in other hotels on the island and the directors believe this can lead to
35 increased on-site spending and higher guest satisfaction at OWL’s hotels.
A third strategy is the development of a dedicated phone app for OWL’s guests. This app would
facilitate hotel online bookings, check-in, check-out, and access to various hotel services such as
restaurant bookings and spa reservations. However, OWL will need to outsource the development
of the phone app to a specialist provider.
40 OWL is heavily reliant on migrant workers from Utopia for its operations. Migrant workers often
bring a range of skills and experiences but can face challenges related to high labour turnover.
Nevertheless, OWL is committed to offering robust training and development programmes to
enhance employee skills and improve the quality of customer services at its beach resorts. With
the potential shift to all-inclusive packages and increased technological integration, OWL’s
45 employees will need to be trained in new service protocols and digital tools, such as the phone app.
To improve its competitiveness, OWL is planning to introduce a variety of guest services aimed at
enhancing the overall guest experience. This includes the introduction of self-service buffets in four
of its all-inclusive hotels, providing a diverse selection of international cuisines to meet the
preferences of different guests.
50 OWL is also exploring bed and breakfast (B&B) options in the other four hotels to attract a different
segment of guests who prefer more flexible dining arrangements at a more affordable price. B&Bs
offer overnight accommodation and includes breakfast in the room rate, providing a more cost-
effective option for many customers. These additions are designed to create a more enjoyable
experience for hotel guests, thereby encouraging repeat visits and positive word-of-mouth.
55 OWL’s strategy to diversify its offerings through the development of a theme park and the
introduction of all-inclusive hotel packages aims to strengthen its market position. Nevertheless,
the proposals also present their challenges, including financial constraints. OWL’s finance director
has shared the latest income statement for further discussion (see Table 2). OWL top priority is to
navigate the post-pandemic competitive landscape successfully, ensuring long-term growth and
60 sustainability for the business.
Table 2: Statement of profit or loss for OWL, for the year ended 31st March (figures in $m)
Companies, products, or individuals named in this case study are fictitious and any similarities
with actual entities are purely coincidental.
-4-
SECTION A
Students of Placeholder International School, answer all questions from this section.
3. Explain two benefits for OWL investing in its workforce (lines 42 – 43). [4 marks]
4. Explain one advantage and one disadvantage of using loan capital (line 28)
to fund the construction of a theme park. [4 marks]
5. Use Table 2 to calculate the following figures for OWL (there is no need to
show your working out):
SECTION B
8. Recommend whether OWL should close one of its hotels and open a theme
park (lines 11 – 12). [10 marks]
TEACHERS’ NOTES
Teachers should use their professional judgement in awarding answers that may not be
included in this mark scheme.
The data and information included are provided for illustrative purposes only to give students
practise for the final examination in May 2024.
While there is no need to include any HL content, students should be awarded accordingly if
the inclusion of such content directly addresses the demands of the question.
SECTION A
A diversification strategy refers to a growth strategy where a business expands into new
products and/or markets that are different from its current product offerings. This strategy, as
part of Ansoff’s matrix, is often pursued to reduce the risks associated with relying on a single
product or market by creating new revenue streams.
Award [1 mark] for a definition that shows some understanding of diversification strategy.
Award [2 marks] for a clear and accurate definition of diversification strategy, similar to the
example above.
Business angels are individual investors who provide capital to start-ups or small businesses,
often in exchange for equity (ownership). They typically invest their own money and may also
offer their corporate expertise, including industry connections, to help the company grow.
Business angels are often more flexible and willing to take on higher risks compared to
traditional commercial lenders, making them a valuable resource for businesses looking for
early-stage funding.
Award [1 mark] for a definition that shows some understanding of business angels.
Award [2 marks] for a clear and accurate definition of business angels, similar to the example
above.
3. Explain two benefits for OWL investing in its workforce (lines 42 – 43). [4 marks]
Possible answers include an explanation of any two of the following points that align with the
company’s goal of improving its market position post-pandemic (line 56):
Enhanced service quality – By providing training and development programmes (line 42),
OWL can improve the skills and knowledge of its employees, leading to better customer
service at its hotels. Well-trained staff are more capable of meeting customer needs,
which can result in higher guest satisfaction and positive customer reviews. This is
crucial for any business in the hospitality industry, especially as guests and visitors can
easily spread positive or negative word of mouth using social media platforms.
Reduced employee turnover – High labour turnover can be costly due to the expenses
associated with recruiting, hiring, and training new employees. Training and
development can enhance employee morale and motivation. Investing in the workforce
through career development opportunities can increase employee loyalty and job
satisfaction, reducing labour turnover rates, particularly among migrant and temporary
workers who might otherwise leave for better job opportunities.
Provided by pirateIB | Page 39
N24/7/BUSMT/SHP1/ENG/TZ2/MS
Accept any other benefit for OWL investing in its workforce that is clearly explained in
the context of the case study.
Mark as 2 + 2
Award [1 mark] for a relevant advantage, plus a further [1 mark] for an appropriate explanation
written in the context of the case study, up to a total maximum of [4 marks].
4. Explain one advantage and one disadvantage of using loan capital (line 28) to fund the
construction of a theme park. [4 marks]
Retention of ownership and control – By opting for loan capital, OWL may be able to
secure the necessary funds without giving up any equity (shares) in the family-owned
company. This allows OWL to maintain full ownership and control of its operations,
including the management and strategic direction of the new theme park.
Fixed repayment schedule – Loan capital often comes with a fixed repayment schedule,
which provides OWL with a clear understanding of its future financial obligations. This
predictability in cash outflows helps the company plan its finances more effectively,
especially when managing the large-scale investment required for the theme park. This
can make loan capital a cost-effective financing option.
Accept any other advantage for OWL of using loan capital that is clearly explained in the
context of the case study.
Debt repayment obligations – Loan capital requires OWL to make regular interest and
principal repayments (the amount of the initial loan), which can strain the company’s
cash flow, especially during periods of low revenue during off-peak periods or economic
downturns. If the theme park does not generate the expected returns, these fixed
financial obligations could create significant financial pressure on the company.
Risk of overleveraging – Taking on a substantial loan to fund the theme park, even if
OWL is able to sell one of its hotels, increases OWL’s overall debt levels. Higher levels
of borrowing can make the company more vulnerable to financial instability, particularly
if interest rates rise or if there is a downturn in the tourism market. Overleveraging can
also limit OWL’s ability to secure additional funding in the future, as lenders may view
the company as a higher-risk borrower.
Opportunity costs – High debt levels may restrict OWL’s ability to invest in other business
opportunities to expand or respond to unforeseen internal challenges or changes in the
external environment. This is because a loan of this magnitude would require a
significant portion of OWL’s cash flow to be committed to servicing the loan.
Accept any other disadvantage for OWL of using loan capital that is clearly explained in
the context of the case study.
Mark as 2 + 2
Award [1 mark] for a relevant advantage (and disadvantage), plus a further [1 mark] for an
appropriate explanation written in the context of the case study, up to a total maximum of [4
marks].
5. Use Table 2 to calculate the following figures for OWL (there is no need to show your
working out):
Statement of profit or loss for OWL, for the year ended 31st March (figures in $m)
Award [1 mark] for the correct answer. Working out is not required, but included above for
illustrative purposes. Do not accept answers that show $8.2 or 8.2.
Award [1 mark] for the correct answer. Working out is not required, but included above for
illustrative purposes. Accept answers that show profit for period as $350,000. Do not accept
answers that show $0.35 or 0.35.
6. Explain two advantages and one disadvantage of OWL relying on temporary workers
(line 3) and migrant workers from Utopia (line 4). [6 marks]
Flexibility – Temporary workers and migrant workers can be hired on an as-needed basis,
based on the level of demand during different times of the year, such as the busy summer
months. This flexibility enables OWL to adapt quickly to changes in the number of tourists
and guests staying at its hotels, adjusting staffing requirements accordingly without long-
term commitment of hiring full-time employees.
Reduced labour costs – Temporary and migrant workers allow OWL to adjust its labour
force according to seasonal demand, particularly during the busy summer months. This
flexibility helps the company manage labour costs efficiently by increasing staff levels
when needed and reducing them during off-peak periods, thus avoiding the financial
burden of maintaining a large permanent workforce all year round. This enables OWL to
maintain competitive pricing for its services while protecting its profit margins.
Access to a diverse skills set – Temporary and migrant workers often bring a variety of
skills, experiences, and cultural perspectives that can enhance the quality of service at
OWL’s hotels. Their diverse backgrounds can contribute to a more dynamic and
adaptable workforce, capable of meeting the needs of international visitors to Xanadu
(such as language skills). This diversity can also lead to innovative approaches to
customer service and problem-solving within the organization.
Accept any other advantage that is appropriately explained in the context of the case
study.
High labour turnover rates – OWL’s reliance on temporary and migrant workers often
results in high labour turnover since they are employed only for short periods, typically
during the peak summer months. This constant change in staff can lead to instability
within the workforce, disrupting team cohesion and continuity.
Higher costs of recruitment and training – Being reliant on temporary workers and
migrant workers for a seasonal business, the recruitment process can be extremely time
consuming and expensive for OWL. These people also require induction and other forms
of specialized training. This contributes to OWL’s ongoing costs. Hence, the continual
and transient nature of hiring temporary and migrant workers can result in higher costs
for OWL.
Lower level of commitment and motivation – Temporary and migrant workers employed
in a seasonal business might have lower levels of commitment and motivation compared
to permanent staff, as they may not see themselves as long-term members of the
company. This lack of commitment can result in lower productivity, less attention to detail,
and a diminished quality of service at OWL’s hotels. Temporary workers may be less
invested in the company’s success, which could negatively impact customer experience
and overall business performance.
Potential language and cultural barriers – Migrant workers from Utopia might face
language and cultural barriers (the case study lack such information), which can impact
communication with both colleagues and hotel guests. These potential language and
cultural barriers may lead to misunderstandings, reduced service quality, and potential
dissatisfaction among guests and visitors. Furthermore, the need for extra training to
bridge these gaps can add to OWL’s operational costs and complexity.
Accept any other disadvantage that is appropriately explained in the context of the case
study.
For each point, award [1 mark] for each of the two suitable advantages, and one disadvantage,
and a further [1 mark] for each explanation, up to the maximum of [6 marks].
SECTION B
7. Recommend whether OWL should expand by offering bed and breakfast (B&B) and all-
inclusive hotel packages. [10 marks]
In light of the current competitive landscape and OWL’s recent financial recovery, the proposal
to expand its product offerings by introducing bed and breakfast (B&B) and all-inclusive hotel
packages presents both opportunities and challenges.
Increased revenue streams – By offering both B&B and all-inclusive options, OWL can
create multiple revenue streams that reduce its dependency on revenues from traditional
hotel services. This expansion strategy is particularly crucial in the post-pandemic era,
when OWL experienced losses in 2020 and 2021. Increased on-site spending from all-
inclusive guests, combined with the appeal of B&B packages, can help improve OWL’s
overall profitability.
Meeting diverse customer needs – The introduction of B&B options caters to a segment
of tourists who prefer more flexible dining arrangements (to be able to try out the local
cuisine on the island) and those who may be more cost-sensitive. This could attract
budget-conscious travellers and families seeking affordable accommodation while still
enjoying a quality experience. On the other hand, all-inclusive packages can appeal to
guests looking for convenience, as they allow for a single payment that covers meals,
drinks, and entertainment, enhancing the overall guest experience. This can be equally
appealing for families and guests travelling in groups.
Accept any other advantage of expanding by offering B&B and all-inclusive hotel
packages, written in the context of the case study.
Market uncertainties – Although tourist numbers are slowly increasing, OWL faces
uncertainty regarding its future growth. The anticipated rise in tourist numbers (forecast
to rise by 3.48% from 2024 to 2026) may not be sufficient to justify the investments in
expansion. In addition, changing consumer preferences and competitive pressures must
be closely monitored to ensure that the new B&B and all-inclusive offerings align with
market demand.
Dilution of the OWL brand – Offering a wide range of accommodation and packages can
dilute OWL’s brand identity, especially if not carefully managed. Customers might
struggle to understand the core value proposition of the company, potentially leading to
a weaker brand image and customer confusion. This is because the services offered
(B&B, hotels, and all-inclusive packages) are so diverse.
Accept any other challenge of expanding by offering B&B and all-inclusive hotel
packages, written in the context of the case study.
Accept any substantiated conclusion based on the line of argument presented in the extended
response. Two examples are provided below for illustrative purposes:
Conclusion 1
Given the slow recovery of Xanadu’s tourism industry and the increasing competition from
B&Bs and Airbnb, OWL should consider closing one of its hotels and using the proceeds from
the sale, combined with other financing options, to invest in the theme park. The payback
period of 4 years and 8 months is relatively short for such a large-scale project, indicating that
the theme park could become profitable within 5 years – which is a reasonable timeframe given
the profits that OWL will generate thereafter. Furthermore, the relatively low interest rate of
3.25% on a commercial loan is favourable, making borrowing a viable option to cover the
remaining investment cost. With the forecasted growth in tourist numbers, even at a modest
rate of 3.48%, OWL can expect a steady increase in visitors, which would help generate the
revenue needed to pay off the loan and achieve a positive return on investment. By diversifying
into the theme park industry, OWL could enhance its brand, attract new customer segments,
and secure a sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, OWL should proceed with closing
one hotel and opening the theme park.
Conclusion 2
Despite the potentially attractive payback period and favourable interest rate on a commercial
loan, the significant financial investment required to develop a theme park ($423 million) is a
substantial risk for OWL – especially as its retained profits in 2023 were only $2.75 million.
Selling one hotel would only cover a fraction of this cost, leaving OWL heavily reliant on
external financing. This reliance could increase the company’s financial exposure, especially
if there are any delays in construction or if tourist numbers do not grow as expected. The
forecasted growth in tourist numbers, though positive, is relatively modest at 3.48%, which
may not be sufficient to ensure the success of such a large-scale project. In addition, the
hospitality industry’s inherent volatility, coupled with the uncertainty of securing government
grants or strategic partnerships, further complicates the decision. OWL should be cautious
about diverting its focus and resources away from its core business of hotel accommodation
and services. Therefore, OWL should not close one of its hotels in favour of opening a theme
park, as the financial risks outweigh the potential benefits.
It is important to acknowledge that the information provided in the case study has certain
limitations. The financial data, while indicative of recent trends, may not fully capture the
complexities of market dynamics and consumer behaviour in the tourism industry. Internally,
there are no insights into the operational challenges of running a theme park, especially given
that OWL has no prior experience in this industry. This might include consulting with experts
or partnering with a company experienced in theme park management, although this could be
expensive as there are no theme parks currently in Xanadu. In addition, there is limited
information about external factors such as economic conditions in Xanadu and Utopia,
competition on the island, and potential regulatory changes in Xanadu that may impact the
feasibility and success of the proposed diversification strategy. Therefore, OWL should remain
adaptable and ready to reassess its strategy as new information emerges.
Award [1 – 2 marks] for a response that shows little understanding of the demands of the
question. There is minimal use of Business Management tools and theories, which are
irrelevant or used inaccurately. There is little, if any, reference to the stimulus material.
Award [3 – 4 marks] for a response that shows some understanding of the demands of the
question. There is some use of Business Management tools and theories, but these are mostly
lacking in accuracy and relevance. There is superficial use of information from the stimulus
material, often not going beyond the name of the organization. Any arguments made are
largely not substantiated.
Award [5 – 6 marks] for a response that shows an understanding of the demands of the
question, but these demands are only partially addressed. There is some relevant and
accurate use of Business Management tools and theories. There is some relevant use of
information from the stimulus material that goes beyond just the name of the organization but
does not effectively support the argument. Arguments are substantiated but are mostly one-
sided.
Award [7 – 8 marks] for a response that mostly addresses the demands of the question. The
response contains mostly relevant and accurate use of Business Management tools and
theories. Information from the stimulus material is generally used to support the argument,
although there is some lack of clarity or relevance in some places. Arguments are
substantiated and the response has some balance.
Award [9 – 10 marks] for a response that shows clear focus on addressing the demands of
the question throughout. There is relevant and accurate use of Business Management tools
and theories. Relevant information from the stimulus material is integrated effectively to
support the argument. Arguments are substantiated and balanced. There is an explanation of
the limitations of the case study or stimulus material.
8. Recommend whether OWL should close one of its hotels and open a theme park (lines
11 – 12). [10 marks]
When considering the closure of one of its hotels to open a theme park, OWL must consider
both quantitative and qualitative factors as well as internal and external factors to make a
balanced and well-informed decision. These factors include, but are not limited to the following:
Attracting a broader range of guests and visitors – The development of a theme park can
significantly enhance OWL’s appeal to a wider demographic, including families and thrill-
seekers (both domestic and overseas), who may not have previously considered OWL’s
hotels. With Xanadu lacking a theme park, OWL can gain from an untapped market,
potentially increasing overall tourist numbers to the island. This diversification strategy
can lead to higher occupancy rates in the remaining seven hotels as visitors are drawn
to the new entertainment option.
Enhanced brand differentiation – The introduction of a theme park can set OWL apart
from competitors in the hospitality industry. As a family-owned chain, this unique offering
can enhance OWL’s brand identity and foster customer loyalty. With positive experiences
at both the hotel and theme park, guests may be more likely to return and recommend
OWL to others, creating a distinctive competitive advantage.
Quantitative arguments include the sale of one of the hotels at a price of $110 million,
which will help to reduce the estimated cost of investment of $423 million to develop the
theme park. Using internal finance in this way helps to reduce the cost of financing the
diversification plan. With interest on commercial loans at 3.25%, so long as the
forecasted return on investment exceed this, OWL should proceed with the project based
on quantitative grounds.
Whilst the forecast growth in tourist numbers (2024 – 2026) is quite modest at 3.48%,
this does not factor in the potential of higher visitor numbers to the island of Xanadu if
there is a new attraction, i.e., the theme park. OWL is likely to be able to gain from the
steady rise in the number of tourists to the island.
High financial cost – The $423 million investment required for the theme park is a
significant financial commitment, far exceeding the $110 million that could be raised from
selling one of OWL’s hotels. On this this projection, OWL would need to sell five of its
eight hotels to develop the theme park if the business wants to avoid using external
sources of finance. However, this is highly impractical.
Affordability issues – In addition to the high financial costs, OWL only had $2.75 million
as retained profit in 2023. While the interest rate of 3.25% on a commercial loan is
relatively low, OWL must consider its ability to afford this debt alongside its existing
financial commitments. Hence, the large-scale investment could put considerable strain
on OWL’s finances, especially if the projected payback period of 4 years and 8 months
is delayed due to unforeseen challenges.
Loss of existing revenue – Closing one of its hotels means OWL will forfeit the revenue
generated by that property. Given the slow recovery in tourist numbers, the hotel may
still contribute positively to the overall financial performance of the company, without the
huge investment cost of developing a theme park. The decision to close one of the hotel
to raise some capital must be considered against the potential loss of revenue from
running the hotel, which could negatively impact OWL’s financial stability, especially if
the theme park does not generate expected returns.
Significant risks of diversification – The large investment required for theme park
development, estimated at $423 million, poses huge risks for OWL, especially as it has
no experience in this industry. Entering an unfamiliar industry could lead to operational
inefficiencies, potential mismanagement, and higher-than-expected costs, detracting
from OWL’s core competencies in hospitality services. According to the Ansoff matrix,
diversification is the highest risk growth strategy for any organization. This is amplified if
market conditions do not improve as anticipated. Uncertainties regarding tourism growth
rates in the coming years (only 3.48% over the next few years) may impact the theme
park’s success. This slow growth may not generate sufficient demand to ensure the
profitability of a theme park, making the business venture extremely risky, especially in
an uncertain economic environment.
Negative impacts on human resources – The closure of a hotel may lead to job losses
for full-time and part-time employees, including many migrant workers from Utopia. This
could create negative perceptions of the company and impact employee morale at the
remaining hotels. Furthermore, the operational focus will shift significantly towards the
theme park, potentially disrupting the quality of service in OWL’s remaining hotels during
the transition period.
Conclusions may vary depending on the preceding analysis. Two examples are provided
below for reference only.
Conclusion 1
In conclusion, OWL should proceed with the decision to close one of its hotels and invest in
opening a theme park. The potential benefits of attracting a broader range of tourists,
generating new revenue streams, and differentiating the brand in a highly competitive market
outweigh the risks associated with losing one of eight hotels. The theme park can capitalize
on the absence of such attractions on Xanadu, positioning OWL as a key player in the leisure
and tourism sector. While operational and financial challenges exist, careful planning and
market research can mitigate these risks, ultimately enhancing OWL’s long-term expansion
plans. Embracing this strategic shift allows OWL to secure a sustainable competitive
advantage in the evolving hospitality landscape.
Conclusion 2
In conclusion, it may be more prudent for OWL to refrain from closing one of its hotels in favour
of opening a theme park. The diversification strategy potentially causes a loss of existing
revenue from the hotel, combined with the significant risks associated with the $423 million
financial investment in a theme park. Hence, this poses considerable financial risks and
uncertainties for the family-owned business. Instead, OWL should focus on enhancing its
current offerings, such as developing the proposed B&B and all-inclusive packages, which can
attract a broader range of customers without the drastic need of closing a hotel. In addition, by
investing in employee training and improving service quality, OWL can strengthen guest
satisfaction and customer loyalty, fostering a more stable and sustainable financial position.
By prioritizing existing assets and strengths, rather than opting for a highly risky diversification
strategy, OWL can ensure its long-term survival and competitive appeal.
It is important to recognize the limitations of the case study and stimulus materials in informing
this decision. The financial projections (Table 1) and operational impacts are based on
estimates and assumptions that may not fully reflect actual market conditions. Furthermore,
external factors, such as changes in the needs and preferences of tourists, economic
conditions in Xanadu and Utopia, and the competitive landscape, could significantly influence
the success of both the theme park and OWL’s remaining hotels. There is also a lack of
quantitative information, such as the average rate of return (ARR) on the project as well as the
financing needs in order to determine the affordability of the project. Thus, ongoing monitoring
and adaptability will be crucial for OWL as it navigates this diversification strategy.
Award [1 – 2 marks] for a response that shows little understanding of the demands of the
question. There is minimal use of Business Management tools and theories, which are
irrelevant or used inaccurately. There is little, if any, reference to the stimulus material.
Award [3 – 4 marks] for a response that shows some understanding of the demands of the
question. There is some use of Business Management tools and theories, but these are mostly
lacking in accuracy and relevance. There is superficial use of information from the stimulus
material, often not going beyond the name of the organization. Any arguments made are
largely not substantiated.
Award [5 – 6 marks] for a response that shows an understanding of the demands of the
question, but these demands are only partially addressed. There is some relevant and
accurate use of Business Management tools and theories. There is some relevant use of
information from the stimulus material that goes beyond just the name of the organization but
does not effectively support the argument. Arguments are substantiated but are mostly one-
sided.
Award [7 – 8 marks] for a response that mostly addresses the demands of the question. The
response contains mostly relevant and accurate use of Business Management tools and
theories. Information from the stimulus material is generally used to support the argument,
although there is some lack of clarity or relevance in some places. Arguments are
substantiated and the response has some balance.
Award [9 – 10 marks] for a response that shows clear focus on addressing the demands of
the question throughout. There is relevant and accurate use of Business Management tools
and theories. Relevant information from the stimulus material is integrated effectively to
support the argument. Arguments are substantiated and balanced. There is an explanation of
the limitations of the case study or stimulus material.