0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Analysis Grid Test 1 N6 Power Machines

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Analysis Grid Test 1 N6 Power Machines

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

ANALYSIS GRID

This analysis must be done for every test and assignment (excluding orals in EFAL) as well as for the Internal Examination question papers together with the memorandum

SUBJECT & LEVEL :Power machines N6 EXAMINER :Mr B.M MDAKANE


TASK : 1 MODERATOR : Mr. N MBHELE

TOPIC(S) SO’s LO’s Item Format/ Time Mark Allocation and Total
No. Type (Min) Cognitive Level

Response
Short

Response
Medium

Response
Extended

Application
Knowledge

3. Analysis
Problem
Solving

and
2.
1
Nozzle Chapter 5 ALL    20 4 8 12

Applied Thermodynamic Chapter 6 ALL    40 8 15 23

TOTAL 60 12 23 35
Short Response (Multiple Choice, one-word, definitions, bulleted-list etc.) Medium Response (Short explanations / descriptions requiring a couple of sentences)
Extended Response (long explanations / descriptions requiring several or more sentences)

Signature Date
EXAMINER
MODERATOR
PRE-ASSESSMENT MODERATION CHECKLIST

EXAMINER: Mr B.M MDAKANE_____________MODERATOR: MR N MBHELE

SUBJECT: Power Machines N6____________ASSESSMENT TASK: Test 1

THIS CHECKLIST SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY THE LECTURER AND MODERATOR

(Lecturer to forward checklist WITH the assessment task to the moderator)

CRITERION 1: ANALYSIS OF TASK (accompanying assessment task)

CRITERIA Examiner Moderator

Yes:  Yes: 
ANALYSIS GRID
No: x No: x
1.1 Name of subject, task, lecturer and moderator is provided Yes Yes
1.2 Subject aims/learning objectives are listed Yes Yes
1.3 Conceptual level indicated per question/ instruction with mark allocation Yes Yes
1.4 Spread of conceptual weighting indicated for the task as a whole Yes Yes

CRITERION 2: TECHNICAL CRITERIA


CRITERIA Examiner Moderator

Yes:  Yes: 
TASK
No: x No: x
2.1 Cover page: Name of subject, time allocation and mark allocation Yes Yes
2.2 Instructions to students are clearly specified and unambiguous Yes Yes
2.3 Layout is reader friendly Yes Yes
2.4 The questions on the paper/assessment task have correct numbering Yes Yes
2.5 Pages are numbered Yes Yes
2.6 Appropriate fonts are used throughout the paper Yes Yes
2.7 Format is correct (check page breaks, spacing etc.) Yes Yes
2.8 Mark allocations are clearly indicated (Marks per question / instruction, after Yes Yes
each sub section, marks added and totals correct ))correct)
2.9 The paper can be completed in the time allocated Yes Yes
2.10 Formula sheet / Answer sheets / Addenda attached where relevant Yes Yes
2.11 Drawings – Clear and complete (With mark allocation) where relevant Yes Yes
2.12 The quality of illustrations, graphs, tables etc is clear and print ready Yes Yes
2.13 List of materials required to complete the task is provided where relevant Yes Yes
2.14 A clear indication is provided of the evidence that needs to be produced during N/A N/A
and/or on completion of the task (e.g. artefact, computer printout, activity
sheet, written response, etc.).
2.15 The task is cost-effective Yes Yes
CRITERION 3: CONTENT COVERAGE

CRITERIA Yes:  Yes: 

No: x No: x
3.1 The task covers Learning Objectives as prescribed in the policy documents for Yes Yes
the particular subject
3.2 The weighting and spread of content of Learning Objectives covered is Yes Yes
appropriate
3.3 The examples and illustrations are suitable, appropriate, relevant and Yes Yes
academically correct
3.4 The task allows for creative responses from students where relevant N/A N/A
3.5 The content addressed is relevant and up to date with developments in the Yes Yes
subject

CRITERION 4: COGNITIVE SKILLS

Yes:  Yes: 
CRITERIA
No: x No: x

4.1 There is an appropriate distribution in terms of cognitive levels (Bloom’s Yes Yes
taxonomy or any other taxonomy that may have been used).
4.2 Choice questions are of an equal level of difficulty where relevant. Yes Yes

4.3 There is a correct distribution of marks across Learning Objectives Yes Yes
4.4 Sub-questions / sub-tasks range from simple to complex Yes Yes

CRITERION 5: TYPES OF QUESTIONS / TASKS

CRITERIA Yes:  Yes: 

No: x No: x
5.1 There is an appropriate distribution in the types of questions / tasks. Yes Yes
5.2 The task is according to the requirements of the subject syllabus Yes Yes
5.3 The type of task is authentic to the content being assessed Yes Yes
5.4 There is a correlation between mark allocation, level of difficulty and time Yes Yes
allocation

CRITERION 6: LANGUAGE AND BIAS

Yes:  Yes: 
CRITERIA
No: x No: x
6.1 Subject terminology is used correctly. Yes Yes
6.2 The language is appropriate and unambiguous for the level of the candidate. Yes Yes
6.3 The task does not have any evidence of bias in terms of gender issues, race, Yes Yes
cultural issues, and provincial and regional bias.
6.4 Passages / scenarios used in the task are of appropriate length. Yes Yes
CRITERION 7: OVERALL IMPRESSION

Yes:  Yes: 
CRITERIA
No: x No: x
7.1 The task is of the appropriate standard. It compares favourably in relation to Yes Yes
previous tasks.
7.2 There is a balance between the assessment of skills, knowledge and values Yes Yes
where applicable
7.3 The task is in line with the relevant current policy documents. Yes Yes

CRITERION 8: ASSESSMENT TOOL

Yes:  Yes: 
CRITERIA
No: x No: x
8.1 Cover page: Name of subject, time allocation and mark allocation Yes Yes
8.2 The assessment tool is appropriate for the type of assessment task being Yes Yes
assessed.
8.3 Format (Alignment, check page breaks, spacing) is correct Yes Yes
8.4 The assessment tool is laid out clearly and is neatly typed Yes Yes
8.5 Clear mark allocation is provided per question / instruction Yes Yes
8.6 The assessment tool facilitates marking – clear guidance is provided on how Yes Yes
to allocate marks
8.7 Mark allocation corresponds with marks on the assessment task Yes Yes
8.8 The assessment tool makes allowance for alternative responses where Yes Yes
relevant
8.9 Drawings are clear and complete with accompanying mark allocation where Yes Yes
relevant
8.10 The assessment tool is accurate Yes Yes
8.11 Total number of marks is indicated per section and for the task as a whole Yes Yes

8.12 Assessment tool was printed and checked before pre-assessment Yes Yes
moderation

RECOMMENDED CHANGES:

This section should be completed for the task and the assessment tool separately by the
moderator.

TASK
The Task is APPROVED / CONDITIONALLY APPROVED / REJECTED

Item Number Recommended Changes Motivation


ASSESSMENT TOOL
The Assessment Tool is APPROVED / CONDITIONALLY APPROVED / REJECTED

Item Number Recommended Changes Motivation

GENERAL COMMENTS

SIGNATURE DATE

LECTURER

MODERATOR

You might also like