DRAFT RESOLUTION BY ICNOMOS BLOC:

UNIVERSAL SPACE DEMILITARIZATION

ACCORD (USDA)

Committee: United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs

(UNOOSA)
Agenda: “Discussing the ramifications of the militarization
of space”
Presenters: DPRK, the republic of Poland,
Q&A : DPRK, Russian Federation
Sponsors: Federative Republic of Brazil, United Mexican
States, The Russian Federation,
Signatories: The Kingdom of Netherlands, The Grand
Duchy of Luxembourg, New Zealand, ,Kazakhstan, Syria,
Russian Federation, Taiwan, Malaysia, Germany, Colombia,
Czech Republic, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, United Arab
Emirates, Spain, Bahrain, , The Republic of India,, the
Hellenic Republic (Greece), The Kingdom of Morocco,
Republic of Turkiye, The Republic of Costa Rica, Argentine
Republic, Japan, The Kingdom of Norway, The United
States of America
_____________________________________________________________________________________

{Preambulatory Clauses:}

1) Reaffirming space is a place to explore, utilize and understand peacefully,

2) Noting resolution 2222(XXI), detailing the exploration and use of outer space shall be carried out
for the benefit and in the interests of all countries and shall be the province of all mankind; outer
space shall be free for exploration and use by all States; outer space is not subject to claims of
sovereignty; States shall not place nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in any
manner; the Moon and other celestial bodies shall be used exclusively for peaceful purposes; and
States shall avoid harmful contamination of space and celestial bodies,

3) Recalling resolution 2777 (XXVI) , which elaborates on Article 7 of the Outer Space Treaty
providing that a launching State shall be absolutely liable to pay compensation for damage caused
by its space objects on the surface of the Earth or to aircraft, and liable for damage due to its faults
in space; the Convention also provides for procedures for the settlement of claims for damages,

4) Considering resolution 3235 (XXIX), building upon the desire expressed by States in the Outer
Space Treaty, the Rescue Agreement and the Liability Convention to make provision for a
mechanism that provided States with a means to assist in the identification of space objects; the
Registration Convention expanded the scope of the United Nations Register of Objects Launched
into Outer Space that had been established by resolution 1721B (XVI) of December 1961 and
addressed issues relating to States Parties responsibilities concerning their space objects,

5) Having devoted attention to the International Space Law, which provides about the above topics
and
a) the Moon agreement (formally Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the
Moon and Other Celestial Bodies)
 b) the Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines ( Key aspects including Preventing Breakup,
Post-Mission Disposal, Collision Avoidance, National and International Cooperation),

6) Alarmed by the excessive armaments and weapons in space,

7) Deeply concerned by the testing of dangerous missiles and weapons in space,

8) Deeply distressed by the purposeful launch of ASATs and other weapons, shooting down the
launching State’s own satellites, creating around 1,500 small debris per satellite,

9) Deeply disturbed by unrestricted growth and use of military satellites in space,

10) Noting with deep concern the cyber-attacks on space organizational databases, stealing valuable
information, possibly related to the organization’s space military work,

11) Affirming the need to regulate dual-use technologies since they are equally important for both
civilian and military use,

12) Recognizing the need for clarification over sovereignty, infrastructure development, area under a
State, inconsistencies between UN regulations and other treaties, laws, and regulations,
regulations to be applied to non-state actors, corporations, and NGOs, regulation, placement and
movement of active or inactive armaments in space,

13) Bearing in mind the need for peaceful negotiations and consultative, conclusive, comprehensive
and cooperative discussions to address the ramifications of the militarization of space,

{Operative Clauses:}

1) Acknowledges the use of space for beneficial, non-beneficial purposes or both;

2) Recommends the deactivation of active dangerous, mass destructive or harmless armaments in outer
space;

3) Encourages the collective understanding that no active armaments, that is, should be placed or
maneuvered through outer space, and urging Member States to abstain from actions that may contribute to
the militarization of outer space;

4) Proposes the establishment of a specialized working group under UNOOSA to define armaments in
outer space and develop regulatory rules to prevent their deployment;

5) Urges fellow delegates to restrict the use of satellites for military purposes unless for
a) training purposes
b) defense
c) or switching to only civilian use;

6) Advocating for the creation of a legally binding instrument of international guidelines to regulate
dual-use technologies in outer space, promoting responsible use to prevent unintentional militarization
including;
a) definition of dual-use technologies with regard to space
 I .a weapon in outer space should be defined as any device placed in
outer space, based on any physical principle, which has been specially produced
or converted to destroy, damage or disrupt the normal functioning of objects in
outer space, on the Earth or in the Earth’s atmosphere

b) risk judging and classification

c) strong licensing and authorization
d) penalties and enforcement measures
e) regular review and revision;

7) Strongly encourages the amendment of the Outer Space Treaty and the creation of new legislations
holding non-state actors, corporations and non-governmental organizations reliable for their activities in
space;

8) Considers the creation of a dedicated co-ordinating body, Committee on the Handling of

Inconsistencies of Treaties, Laws and Regulations (CHITELAR), made of legal experts and delegates from
important international space organizations to look into and address wrong inconsistencies;

9) Invites the use of AI or powerful antiviruses to protect the databases of all international organizations
including state actors, non-state actors, corporations and non-governmental organizations;

10) Emphasizes the development of an extremely firewalls on databases and unknown messengers to
prevent blackmailing or any other form of non-physical attack;

11) Suggests the development of an international guidelines that govern activities in space to ensure the
peaceful and cooperative use of space;

12)Stresses the need to protect the space environment from debris and pollution and calls for measures to
mitigate space debris and promote the responsible disposal of defunct satellites and space equipment;

13) Strongly recommends that countries should be assigned specific areas to utilize in any way except for
militarization in or on celestial bodies;

14) Strongly suggests that these countries do not have sovereignty over these lands but merely share
governance with other governments over the area to be able to use it effectively;

15) Decides to remain actively seized on the matter

Crisis:
1. Urges Canada to stop funding the MS-ISIS;

2. Strongly discourages UK’s mission to “colonize space”;

3. Requests the global community to create an anti-hack to hack into the MS-ISIS;

4. Discourages stealing of military plans by Greece;

5. Encourages Turkey to apologize to victims’ relatives and give them a large sum of money to
compensate or help them in any way possible;
6. Strongly supports investigation of the culprit who built the space cannon without permission
from U.S.A. since it was built on American sovereign territory in the past

7. Strongly recommends support for Spain’s and Bolivia’s new space agencies;

8. Supports action to regain control over space objects whose control has been lost to MS-ISIS
from Costa Rica, China, Canada, UAE, USA, Brazil, DPRK, and