Crack Jack PRDV 0
Crack Jack PRDV 0
This format represents theory. Consider it as guiding prompts, & the ‘why’ of that section.
This format represents assumptions made.
<TBAL> – To be added later
<TBAL>
Statement: “I am trying to solve for my productivity gaps. Sometimes, I think I end up taking much
more time than what I have allocated to a task. Sometimes, I don’t put in the hours scheduled for
a task. I am not really sure.”
Digging deeper, there are the possible user buckets this user could fall into
Bucket 1 : The Perfectionist
The user is a perfectionist - is not happy with drafts created, & only wants to put out the best.
Here, the solution would be to draft guidelines for the release, & adhere to it – which is totally
different from the current objective, & requires a different solution.
The question is how to identify this?
Bucket 2 : The Miscalculator
Not allocating the right time needed for the task, i.e., a task in reality needs more time than has
been allocated to get the desired result considering the proficiency – basic/inter/pro
Bucket 3 : Non - Committal
Not putting in the time that has been scheduled for the tasks.
This differs from the current objective, & the problem statement would pertain to a concern with
the routine / commitment.
Bucket 4 : Non-Prioritizer
The user puts in the allocated hours, but is not prioritizing the tasks, & hence not meeting deadlines.
Part c. Current status:
s/he uses a combination of white board, pen & paper system
practises Pomodoro –
o has tried a few apps that favour this style of working, such as Focus-To-Do, but drops
off
o prefers using the phone clock to set pomo timers, & create focussed blocks of time
Part d. Limitations.
Having a system of sorts shows the intent & the interest – but, it is not converting into
favourable results
The current pen & paper can't automatically calculate or show progress.
Because of the lack of clear data, user does not know the real cause of the problem.
There is a lack of engaging visuals.
Actually, there are no visuals - there is no color coding to motivate for progress & drive for
consistency
Step 2.Objective
Part a. VOC
Voice of the Customer (VoC) is a research method that's used to collect customer feedback - this'll
help to capture how your users feel about your product giving you insights that’ll help create a
stronger customer experience. It is also considered to be the foundation of product development.
For the sake of progress – let us assume the user research from Step 1.Part b is the VoC
Part b. Solution
Considering we are in the discovery phase of the product, & there is no clear data identifying the P0,
our current solution is three-pronged.
Before we build further, with the help of the user’s current system,
we will attempt to identify the P0/1/2… by calculating the percentages against the problems
identified
to identify the problem -
o have the user consistently log in to the MVP for 20 days
o 10 days into this habit, get the user introduced to a top-ranking desktop productivity
tool, & from the 15th day have him/her use it
attempt to discover if there is any other unidentified problem
Part c. Success Criteria
Qualitative Quantitative
User reports a degree of satisfaction, & is User is able to achieve 70% - 100% of P1, P2 & P3
willing/eager to continue with the system priorities
User is acceptive of incremental changes to o within scheduled times (30%)
system & trying other productivity tools o a few hours more than scheduled times
(30%)
o within deadlines (40%)
User is able to keep the ‘to-do’ backlog clear at
50% - 75% to be able to incorporate incoming
tasks
Step 3.Scope
In Scope
Digitally emulating user’s current system, with minor but effective enhancements
This system is currently optimized for the desktop space
Out of Scope
With the current data in hand, this section is vast , so we focus on staying ‘In Scope’
Step 4.Flowchart
<TBAL>
Step 7.Wireframes
<TBAL>