Scribd
Upload
42 views4 pages

The Pros and Cons of Mandatory Gym Class in Public Schools

Uploaded by

marybeth.westbrook
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
42 views4 pages

The Pros and Cons of Mandatory Gym Class in Public Schools

Uploaded by

marybeth.westbrook
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Enter school name, location or keyword x

LOGINSIGN UP
LOGINSIGN UP
FIND SCHOOLS TOP LISTS PUBLIC SCHOOL GUIDE About Public SchoolsEvaluating Public SchoolsParenting
and Learning IssuesPublic School Policies ABOUT US
Home > Blog > About Public Schools

The Pros and Cons of Mandatory Gym Class in Public


Schools
Updated June 22, 2023
|
by Grace Chen

Leaders debate the pros and cons of mandatory gym classes in public schools. Learn more about the controversy and
whether gym class should be a phenomenon of the past.
Gym class is invariably portrayed on the silver screen as a time of awkwardness and embarrassment when kids have to
climb ropes and do a certain number of push-ups in a minute’s time. However, gym class is much different now, and it is
not surprising that today’s students and parents are questioning why it’s even a mandatory part of the day. After all,
according to an MSNBC investigation, researchers have found that the average high school gym class only keeps
students physically active for an average of 16 minutes! In a class period that is about 45 minutes long, that isn’t a lot of
active time. In today’s educational climate in which standardized test performance in core subjects carries a significant
amount of weight with regard to teacher and school evaluations, “wasting” all that time doing nothing in PE is
something districts cannot afford. As such, PE classes have been cut so students can spend more time in core classes.

Supporters of mandatory gym programs contend that physical education classes have a wide range of benefits.
According to the National Association for Sport and Physical Education, physical education classes help children
develop fine and gross motor skills, learn cooperation and teamwork, reduce stress, and improve self-confidence and
self-esteem. Furthermore, supporters argue that public schools have a responsibility to encourage children to enjoy a
healthy and active lifestyle – especially as a rising number of young Americans are obese. Activities that promote
muscular strength, cardiovascular endurance, and flexibility, they argue, can help reverse the trend of American

children gaining weight.

Subsequently, some school leaders are left without a clear answer in the debate. Should fitness classes be required to
fulfill a school’s curriculum requirements?

This video looks into the question of whether or not physical education should remain in public schools.

Should Physical Education Remain in Schools?


Are Physical Education Programs Really Fit?

Further expounding on the issue, MSNBC also analyzes a major study of physical education programs conducted by
Cornell University. The study, based on information from 37,000 high school students’ responses to surveys from the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, reveals that most students do not believe gym class is effective. This has led
nearly all states to create and pass new bills to reform public schools’ fitness education programs.

Unfortunately, while many states have increased the time students spend in gym class, Cornell's study found that adding
200 more minutes of time to gym class each week did not produce substantial changes. Even by adding 200 more
weekly minutes, the studies showed that boys generally engaged in only 7.5 minutes of more activity per day, while girls
only participated in activity 8 additional minutes each week.

Attempting to explain these disappointing results, Cornell's lead professor of policy analysis and management asserts,
“The rest of the extra gym time is likely spent being sedentary — most likely standing around idly while playing sports
like softball or volleyball that don’t require constant movement.” Cornell’s results hit a familiar nerve, as a study of
fitness classes in Texas elementary schools also found that the majority of students spent the class time inactive;
specifically, the data suggested that students were only engaging in exercise or movement for approximately 3 minutes
during the entire class period.

As reported in USA Today, what would benefit children more is periods of rigorous physical activity that make them
break a sweat. High-energy games like tag and dodgeball are great examples of activities that have little downtime. At a
minimum, elementary-aged children should get 30 minutes of moderate exercise a day. Middle school and high school
students should get 45 minutes of exercise a day. And about half of that time should be spent in activities like those
mentioned above that get the heart racing.

Should Schools Discontinue Gym Classes?

Despite the results, the lead professor of the Cornell study does not necessarily believe that gym classes should be
banned in public schools, arguing, “We’re not saying schools should get rid of (physical education),” but “there has to
be a meaningful change in the curriculum.”

While many of the nation's gym classes may not be performing at peak levels, supporters of fitness education aim to
spotlight the potential of reform, as well as the accomplishments many public schools have achieved.

In examining the changing policies of fitness education, it is important to understand how gym classes in public schools
could be modernized. While running laps and doing jumping jacks used to be a staple of many physical education
classes, many schools have diversified their options to reflect a more modern take on gym class. Schools offer
instruction in traditional team sports and games like flag football and red rover, but also emphasize healthy eating habits,
and the benefits of lifting weights and offer unique experiences from bowling to fly-fishing to kayaking. By offering
more intriguing physical activities for students, many public schools are reporting positive feedback from both their
students and community members.

Many physical education leaders are arguing for a complete paradigm shift in the area of fitness and wellness
instruction. Elizabeth Spletzer, a highly experienced fitness instructor currently coordinating the University of
Minnesota's Physical Education Teacher Licensor program, strives to teach future fitness teachers the diverse learning
benefits that children gain from physical activity. Instead of seeing gym class as only a physical activity, reformists like
Spletzer want others to understand the psychosocial benefits of exercise, including improved self-esteem, better
behavior and decreased instances of depression and stress. There are academic benefits as well. According to a report by
the New York Times, students who are physically active have better attention and focus, improved problem-solving
abilities, better working memory, and a general improvement in both reading and math scores. In fact, the academic
benefits students gain from physical activity during the school day appear to outweigh the benefits of increasing class
time in subjects such as reading and math.

While schools debate the future of physical education, one fact remains certain: gym class will never look the same
again!

Questions? Contact us on Facebook. @publicschoolreview


Additional Resources [+]

You might also like