Does the U.S.A Election Really Matter to the World?

Alright, let’s cut through the noise: the U.S. presidential election is like the
Super Bowl of politics, but with stakes far beyond American borders. It’s
easy to get caught up in the theatrical campaigning, the rallies, and the
debates. But for people outside the U.S., why does it matter who’s sitting in
the Oval Office? Could the decisions of one individual really ripple across
the globe, affecting everyone from shopkeepers in Karachi to
environmental activists in Nairobi?

It turns out that the U.S. election is not just an American matter. The results
dictate policies that influence global economies, environmental health,
diplomatic relationships, and even cultural attitudes. With every new
administration, there are potential shifts that can fundamentally reshape
aspects of our interconnected world. But let’s break down just how that
influence plays out, and why, whether you’re in Bangkok or Beirut, the
American presidential race might mean more to you than you’d think.

The Economic Influence: Dollars and Decisions

One of the most immediate ways the American president impacts the world
is through economic policy. The U.S. is a heavyweight in global finance,
and as one of the largest economies, its trade decisions and market
fluctuations affect a vast network of countries. From tariff impositions to
sanctions, the president’s economic agenda can dictate how other nations
trade, spend, and strategize.

Take for instance the power of the U.S. dollar. It’s the default currency for
most international trade and financial transactions, meaning that any U.S.
policy affecting interest rates, inflation, or the dollar’s value reverberates
worldwide. For countries whose currencies are linked to the dollar or those
that rely heavily on exports to the U.S., this can be huge. Imagine the
shockwaves felt when a new administration enacts restrictive trade policies
or escalates a trade war with major partners like China. It can destabilize
markets, spike prices, and even lead to shortages in countries thousands
of miles away.

In a broader context, economies that are highly export-oriented — like

Japan, Germany, and much of Southeast Asia — are sensitive to U.S.
economic policies. If tariffs rise or trade agreements falter, those industries
are directly impacted, leading to job losses, wage changes, or shifts in
production. And even for non-exporting countries, financial policy in the

@articles_in_english
U.S. can indirectly determine lending rates, stock market health, and
investment confidence worldwide.

Foreign Policy: Alliances and Conflicts

Let’s not forget that the U.S. wields substantial military and diplomatic
power. American foreign policy, largely shaped by the president, dictates
relationships and conflicts across continents. When the U.S. decides to
support—or withdraw support from—a country, it’s like a signal flare to
allies and adversaries alike. This is where the stakes get serious, especially
for countries in regions like the Middle East and Eastern Europe, where
American involvement or withdrawal can tip the balance between peace
and conflict.

Consider the Israel-Palestine issue. The U.S. has historically been one of
Israel's strongest allies, and this alliance impacts diplomacy throughout the
Middle East. The president’s stance on this issue is more than just a policy
position; it has the power to either stabilize or destabilize the region.
Similarly, American attitudes toward NATO or the United Nations can alter
the dynamics of global cooperation or fuel adversarial relations. When a
new president takes office with a markedly different view on international
relations, you can bet world leaders and citizens everywhere pay close
attention.

From an Islamic or ethical perspective, U.S. foreign policy can also raise
moral questions. American military actions, peace treaties, and diplomatic
deals can influence the stability of nations, affecting millions of lives.
Leaders who emphasize peace, justice, and multilateralism—working
collaboratively with other nations—can foster stability and progress.
Conversely, unilateral decisions, such as sudden military actions, can
upend regions and leave lasting impacts on vulnerable populations.

Environmental Policy: Global Climate, Local Impact

The U.S. is a major contributor to global carbon emissions, and the policies
it adopts on climate change and energy reverberate worldwide. A U.S.
president’s approach to environmental policy has the potential to either
accelerate or hinder international climate efforts. Think about it: when the
U.S. withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord, it sent shockwaves through
the global community. For nations struggling to combat rising sea levels,
extreme weather, or droughts, the U.S. government’s commitment to
sustainability isn’t just a talking point—it’s a matter of survival.

@articles_in_english
Climate change isn’t limited by borders; it’s a planetary issue. For
developing nations, many of which are most vulnerable to environmental
degradation, American leadership on climate action is a beacon—or, in its
absence, a major setback. This means that whether the U.S. president
prioritizes renewable energy and emissions cuts or disregards
environmental policies altogether will affect how much funding, technology,
and international cooperation are available to tackle climate change on a
global scale.

Cultural Influence and Soft Power

When we talk about America, we’re also talking about a cultural

powerhouse. Hollywood, Silicon Valley, and the American tech scene
dominate screens, social media, and news outlets across the world. The
president, like it or not, is a prominent face of American culture, and his or
her words, actions, and policies shape perceptions and trends globally.

A president who champions progressive values or social reforms can set

off waves of similar movements in other countries. Conversely, a president
who downplays or dismisses social issues like gender equality, racial
justice, or LGBTQ rights can embolden conservative factions worldwide.
This cultural diplomacy extends to areas like freedom of expression,
press freedom, and digital privacy. By promoting (or undermining) these
values, the U.S. president influences not just governmental policies but the
social and cultural fabric of societies around the globe.

For example, in many Muslim-majority countries, the values promoted by

U.S. presidents can clash with local norms, sparking debates over tradition,
modernity, and cultural autonomy. American leadership on human rights,
social justice, and freedom of speech can inspire reform, but it can also
lead to resistance and backlash as societies grapple with cultural
imperialism and the preservation of traditional values.

Leadership and Moral Precedent

From a moral and ethical standpoint, the character of the U.S. president
matters. In a world where nations are increasingly interconnected, the tone
and character of world leaders have a profound impact on public trust,
diplomacy, and social harmony. This is where the values of a president—
honesty, empathy, respect for human rights—play a role beyond mere
policy. Leaders are role models, and the U.S. president’s approach can set
a moral precedent that influences leadership standards globally.

@articles_in_english
A U.S. president who values truth, cooperation, and empathy can
encourage similar values among allies and inspire leaders in other parts of
the world. Conversely, a president who sows division, relies on falsehoods,
or promotes isolationism can erode the global trust necessary for
international collaboration. This resonates deeply with Islamic values,
which emphasize justice, compassion, and integrity in leadership. Leaders
are seen as guardians of their people, entrusted with their welfare and well-
being. When the U.S. president embodies—or fails to embody—these
values, the world notices.

Why Should the World Care?

So, does the U.S. presidential election really matter to the world? In almost
every way, it does. From economic policies that impact global markets, to
foreign policies that can stabilize or destabilize regions, to environmental
decisions that shape our collective future, the influence of the U.S.
president stretches far and wide. And while it may seem distant for some,
this leadership matters, sometimes in ways we don’t immediately
recognize.

Whether you’re following from a neighboring country or from a distant

continent, the outcome of the American presidential election has a reach
that goes beyond America’s borders. It impacts our economies, our
climates, our cultures, and the moral standards we hold for global leaders.
So, when election season rolls around, don’t dismiss it as a purely
American spectacle—it’s a show with global consequences, and in some
ways, we’re all part of the audience.

Highlighted Terms and Definitions

1. Linchpin – a central or vital element that holds everything together.

Example: The U.S. dollar is the linchpin of the global economy.
2. Adversarial – involving or characterized by conflict or opposition.
Example: An adversarial approach to foreign policy can strain
international relations.
3. Multilateralism – the practice of coordinating policies in groups of
three or more countries. Example: The United Nations promotes
multilateralism in addressing global issues.
4. Cultural diplomacy – the use of culture and communication to
influence international relations. Example: American cultural
diplomacy shapes perceptions of the U.S. around the world.

@articles_in_english
5. Export-oriented – focusing on the production of goods for export
rather than domestic consumption. Example: Many Asian economies
are highly export-oriented.
6. Default currency – a currency that is widely used for international
trade and financial transactions. Example: The U.S. dollar acts as a
default currency in global trade.
7. Planetary – relating to the entire planet. Example: Climate change is
a planetary concern that requires global action.
8. Unilateral – involving only one country or party, often without
consulting others. Example: A unilateral military intervention can
destabilize entire regions.
9. Guardians – individuals or entities responsible for protecting or
guiding others. Example: Leaders are seen as guardians of their
people's welfare in Islamic tradition.

@articles_in_english