0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Security-Enhanced Linux

Uploaded by

Hossam Selim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Security-Enhanced Linux

Uploaded by

Hossam Selim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Security-Enhanced Linux

Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) is a Linux


kernel security module that provides a mechanism for
Security-Enhanced Linux
supporting access control security policies, including
mandatory access controls (MAC).

SELinux is a set of kernel modifications and user-space


tools that have been added to various Linux
distributions. Its architecture strives to separate
enforcement of security decisions from the security
policy, and streamlines the amount of software
involved with security policy enforcement.[3][4] The
key concepts underlying SELinux can be traced to
several earlier projects by the United States National
Security Agency (NSA).

Contents
Overview
History
Original and external contributors
Users, policies and security contexts SELinux administrator GUI in Arch Linux
Features Original author(s) NSA and Red Hat
Implementations Developer(s) Red Hat
Use scenarios Initial release December 22, 2000[1]
Examples
Stable release 3.3 / 4 March 2021[2]
Comparison with AppArmor
Repository github.com
Similar systems and enhancements
/SELinuxProject/selinux (ht
See also tps://github.com/SELinuxP
References roject/selinux)
External links Written in C
Operating system Linux

Overview Type Security, Linux Security


Modules (LSM)
The NSA Security-enhanced Linux Team describes License GNU GPL
NSA SELinux as[5] Website selinuxproject.org (https://
selinuxproject.org),
a set of patches to the Linux kernel and https://www.nsa.gov/what-
utilities to provide a strong, flexible, we-do/research/selinux/ (h
mandatory access control (MAC) ttps://web.archive.org/we
architecture into the major subsystems of b/20201022103915/http
the kernel. It provides an enhanced s://www.nsa.gov/what-we-
mechanism to enforce the separation of do/research/selinux/)
information based on confidentiality and
integrity requirements, which allows
threats of tampering, and bypassing of
application security mechanisms, to be
addressed and enables the confinement of
damage that can be caused by malicious or
flawed applications. It includes a set of
sample security policy configuration files
designed to meet common, general-
purpose security goals.

A Linux kernel integrating SELinux enforces mandatory access control policies that confine user programs
and system services, as well as access to files and network resources. Limiting privilege to the minimum
required to work reduces or eliminates the ability of these programs and daemons to cause harm if faulty or
compromised (for example via buffer overflows or misconfigurations). This confinement mechanism
operates independently of the traditional Linux (discretionary) access control mechanisms. It has no concept
of a "root" superuser, and does not share the well-known shortcomings of the traditional Linux security
mechanisms, such as a dependence on setuid/setgid binaries.

The security of an "unmodified" Linux system (a system without SELinux) depends on the correctness of
the kernel, of all the privileged applications, and of each of their configurations. A fault in any one of these
areas may allow the compromise of the entire system. In contrast, the security of a "modified" system
(based on an SELinux kernel) depends primarily on the correctness of the kernel and its security-policy
configuration. While problems with the correctness or configuration of applications may allow the limited
compromise of individual user programs and system daemons, they do not necessarily pose a threat to the
security of other user programs and system daemons or to the security of the system as a whole.

From a purist perspective, SELinux provides a hybrid of concepts and capabilities drawn from mandatory
access controls, mandatory integrity controls, role-based access control (RBAC), and type enforcement
architecture. Third-party tools enable one to build a variety of security policies.

History
The earliest work directed toward standardizing an approach providing mandatory and discretionary access
controls (MAC and DAC) within a UNIX (more precisely, POSIX) computing environment can be
attributed to the National Security Agency's Trusted UNIX (TRUSIX) Working Group, which met from
1987 to 1991 and published one Rainbow Book (#020A), and produced a formal model and associated
evaluation evidence prototype (#020B) that was ultimately unpublished.

SELinux was designed to demonstrate the value of mandatory access controls to the Linux community and
how such controls could be added to Linux. Originally, the patches that make up SELinux had to be
explicitly applied to the Linux kernel source; SELinux was merged into the Linux kernel mainline in the
2.6 series of the Linux kernel.

The NSA, the original primary developer of SELinux, released the first version to the open source
development community under the GNU GPL on December 22, 2000.[6] The software was merged into
the mainline Linux kernel 2.6.0-test3, released on 8 August 2003. Other significant contributors include
Red Hat, Network Associates, Secure Computing Corporation, Tresys Technology, and Trusted Computer
Solutions. Experimental ports of the FLASK/TE implementation have been made available via the
TrustedBSD Project for the FreeBSD and Darwin operating systems.

Security-Enhanced Linux implements the Flux Advanced Security Kernel (FLASK). Such a kernel
contains architectural components prototyped in the Fluke operating system. These provide general support
for enforcing many kinds of mandatory access control policies, including those based on the concepts of
type enforcement, role-based access control, and multilevel security. FLASK, in turn, was based on DTOS,
a Mach-derived Distributed Trusted Operating System, as well as on Trusted Mach, a research project from
Trusted Information Systems that had an influence on the design and implementation of DTOS.

Original and external contributors

A comprehensive list of the original and external contributors to SELinux was hosted at the NSA website
until maintenance ceased, sometime 2009. The following list reproduces the original as preserved (https://w
eb.archive.org/web/20081018034429/http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/info/contrib.cfm) by the Internet Archive
Wayback Machine. The scope of their contributions was listed in the page and has been omitted for brevity,
but it can be accessed through the archived copy.[7]

The National Security Agency (NSA)


Network Associates Laboratories (NAI Labs)
The MITRE Corporation
Secure Computing Corporation (SCC)
Matt Anderson
Ryan Bergauer
Bastian Blank
Thomas Bleher
Joshua Brindle
Russell Coker
John Dennis
Janak Desai
Ulrich Drepper
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
Darrel Goeddel
Carsten Grohmann
Steve Grubb
Ivan Gyurdiev
Serge Hallyn
Chad Hanson
Joerg Hoh
Trent Jaeger
Dustin Kirkland
Kaigai Kohei
Paul Krumviede
Joy Latten
Tom London
Karl MacMillan
Brian May
Frank Mayer
Todd Miller
Roland McGrath
Paul Moore
James Morris
Yuichi Nakamura
Greg Norris
Eric Paris
Chris PeBenito
Red Hat
Petre Rodan
Shaun Savage
Chad Sellers
Rogelio Serrano Jr.
Justin Smith
Manoj Srivastava
Tresys Technology
Michael Thompson
Trusted Computer Solutions
Tom Vogt
Reino Wallin
Dan Walsh
Colin Walters
Mark Westerman
David A. Wheeler
Venkat Yekkirala
Catherine Zhang

Users, policies and security contexts


SELinux users and roles do not have to be related to the actual system users and roles. For every current
user or process, SELinux assigns a three string context consisting of a username, role, and domain (or
type). This system is more flexible than normally required: as a rule, most of the real users share the same
SELinux username, and all access control is managed through the third tag, the domain. The circumstances
under which a process is allowed into a certain domain must be configured in the policies. The command
runcon allows for the launching of a process into an explicitly specified context (user, role, and domain),
but SELinux may deny the transition if it is not approved by the policy.

Files, network ports, and other hardware also have an SELinux context, consisting of a name, role (seldom
used), and type. In the case of file systems, mapping between files and the security contexts is called
labeling. The labeling is defined in policy files but can also be manually adjusted without changing the
policies. Hardware types are quite detailed, for instance, bin_t (all files in the folder /bin) or
postgresql_port_t (PostgreSQL port, 5432). The SELinux context for a remote file system can be
specified explicitly at mount time.
SELinux adds the -Z switch to the shell commands ls, ps, and some others, allowing the security context
of the files or process to be seen.

Typical policy rules consist of explicit permissions, for example, which domains the user must possess to
perform certain actions with the given target (read, execute, or, in case of network port, bind or connect),
and so on. More complex mappings are also possible, involving roles and security levels.

A typical policy consists of a mapping (labeling) file, a rule file, and an interface file, that define the domain
transition. These three files must be compiled together with the SELinux tools to produce a single policy
file. The resulting policy file can be loaded into the kernel to make it active. Loading and unloading policies
does not require a reboot. The policy files are either hand written or can be generated from the more user
friendly SELinux management tool. They are normally tested in permissive mode first, where violations are
logged but allowed. The audit2allow tool can be used later to produce additional rules that extend the
policy to allow all legitimate activities of the application being confined.

Features
SELinux features include:

Clean separation of policy from enforcement


Well-defined policy interfaces
Support for applications querying the policy and enforcing access control (for example,
crond running jobs in the correct context)
Independence of specific policies and policy languages
Independence of specific security-label formats and contents
Individual labels and controls for kernel objects and services
Support for policy changes
Separate measures for protecting system integrity (domain-type) and data confidentiality
(multilevel security)
Flexible policy
Controls over process initialization and inheritance, and program execution
Controls over file systems, directories, files, and open file descriptors
Controls over sockets, messages, and network interfaces
Controls over the use of "capabilities"
Cached information on access-decisions via the Access Vector Cache (AVC)[8]
Default-deny policy (anything not explicitly specified in the policy is disallowed)[9][10][11]

Implementations
SELinux has been implemented in Android since version
4.3.[12]

Among free community-supported Linux distributions,


Fedora was one of the earliest adopters, including support for
it by default since Fedora Core 2. Other distributions include
support for it such as Debian as of version 9 Stretch sestatus showing status of SELinux in a
system
release[13] and Ubuntu as of 8.04 Hardy Heron.[14] As of version 11.1, openSUSE contains SELinux
"basic enablement".[15] SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 features SELinux as a "technology preview".[16]

SELinux is popular in systems based on linux containers, such as CoreOS Container Linux and rkt.[17] It is
useful as an additional security control to help further enforce isolation between deployed containers and
their host.

SELinux is available since 2005 as part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) version 4 and all future
releases. This presence is also reflected in corresponding versions of CentOS and Scientific Linux. The
supported policy in RHEL4 is targeted policy which aims for maximum ease of use and thus is not as
restrictive as it might be. Future versions of RHEL are planned to have more targets in the targeted policy
which will mean more restrictive policies.

Use scenarios
SELinux can potentially control which activities a system allows each user, process, and daemon, with very
precise specifications. It is used to confine daemons such as database engines or web servers that have
clearly defined data access and activity rights. This limits potential harm from a confined daemon that
becomes compromised.

Command-line utilities include:[18] chcon,[19] restorecon,[20] restorecond,[21] runcon,[22]


secon,[23] fixfiles,[24] setfiles,[25] load_policy,[26] booleans,[27] getsebool,[28]
setsebool,[29] togglesebool[30] setenforce, semodule, postfix-nochroot,
check-selinux-installation, semodule_package, checkmodule, selinux-
config-enforcing,[31] selinuxenabled,[32] and selinux-policy-upgrade[33]

Examples

To put SELinux into enforcing mode:

$ sudo setenforce 1

To query the SELinux status:

$ getenforce

Comparison with AppArmor


SELinux represents one of several possible approaches to the problem of restricting the actions that
installed software can take. Another popular alternative is called AppArmor and is available on SUSE
Linux Enterprise Server (SLES), openSUSE, and Debian-based platforms. AppArmor was developed as a
component to the now-defunct Immunix Linux platform. Because AppArmor and SELinux differ radically
from one another, they form distinct alternatives for software control. Whereas SELinux re-invents certain
concepts to provide access to a more expressive set of policy choices, AppArmor was designed to be
simple by extending the same administrative semantics used for DAC up to the mandatory access control
level.

There are several key differences:


One important difference is that AppArmor identifies file system objects by path name
instead of inode. This means that, for example, a file that is inaccessible may become
accessible under AppArmor when a hard link is created to it, while SELinux would deny
access through the newly created hard link.
As a result, AppArmor can be said not to be a type enforcement system, as files are not
assigned a type; instead, they are merely referenced in a configuration file.
SELinux and AppArmor also differ significantly in how they are administered and how they
integrate into the system.[34]
Since it endeavors to recreate traditional DAC controls with MAC-level enforcement,
AppArmor's set of operations is also considerably smaller than those available under most
SELinux implementations. For example, AppArmor's set of operations consist of: read, write,
append, execute, lock, and link.[35] Most SELinux implementations will support numbers of
operations orders of magnitude more than that. For example, SELinux will usually support
those same permissions, but also includes controls for mknod, binding to network sockets,
implicit use of POSIX capabilities, loading and unloading kernel modules, various means of
accessing shared memory, etc.
There are no controls in AppArmor for categorically bounding POSIX capabilities. Since the
current implementation of capabilities contains no notion of a subject for the operation (only
the actor and the operation) it is usually the job of the MAC layer to prevent privileged
operations on files outside the actor's enforced realm of control (i.e. "Sandbox"). AppArmor
can prevent its own policy from being altered, and prevent file systems from being
mounted/unmounted, but does nothing to prevent users from stepping outside their approved
realms of control.
For example, it may be deemed beneficial for help desk employees to change ownership
or permissions on certain files even if they don't own them (for example, on a
departmental file share). The administrator does not want to give the user(s) root access
on the box so they give them CAP_FOWNER or CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE. Under SELinux
the administrator (or platform vendor) can configure SELinux to deny all capabilities to
otherwise unconfined users, then create confined domains for the employee to be able to
transition into after logging in, one that can exercise those capabilities, but only upon
files of the appropriate type.
There is no notion of multilevel security with AppArmor, thus there is no hard BLP or Biba
enforcement available..
AppArmor configuration is done using solely regular flat files. SELinux (by default in most
implementations) uses a combination of flat files (used by administrators and developers to
write human readable policy before it's compiled) and extended attributes.
SELinux supports the concept of a "remote policy server" (configurable via
/etc/selinux/semanage.conf) as an alternative source for policy configuration. Central
management of AppArmor is usually complicated considerably since administrators must
decide between configuration deployment tools being run as root (to allow policy updates) or
configured manually on each server.

Similar systems and enhancements


Isolation of processes can also be accomplished by mechanisms such as virtualization; the OLPC project,
for example, in its first implementation[36] sandboxed individual applications in lightweight Vservers. Also,
the NSA has adopted some of the SELinux concepts in Security-Enhanced Android.[37]

General Dynamics builds and distributes PitBull Trusted Operating System,[38] a multilevel security (MLS)
enhancement for Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Multi-Category Security (MCS) is an enhancement to SELinux for Red Hat Enterprise Linux that allows
users to label files with categories, in order to further restrict access through discretionary access control and
type enforcement. Categories provide additional compartments within sensitivity levels used by multilevel
security (MLS). [39]

See also
Unix security
AppArmor
Rule Set Based Access Control (RSBAC)
Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
Solaris Trusted Extensions
Tomoyo
TrustedBSD
Qubes OS

References
1. "Security-enhanced Linux available at NSA site - MARC" (https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&
m=97749381725894). MARC. Retrieved 24 December 2018.
2. "SELinux userspace release 20210304 / 3.2" (https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/rel
eases/tag/3.2). SELinux Project. 2021-10-21. Retrieved 2021-10-21.
3. "SELinux Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) - NSA/CSS" (https://www.nsa.gov/what-we-do/
research/selinux/faqs.shtml). National Security Agency. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
4. Loscocco, Peter; Smalley, Stephen (February 2001). "Integrating Flexible Support for
Security Policies into the Linux Operating System" (https://www.nsa.gov/resources/everyon
e/digital-media-center/publications/research-papers/assets/files/flexible-support-for-security-
policies-into-linux-feb2001-report.pdf) (PDF).
5. "Security-Enhanced Linux - NSA/CSS" (https://web.archive.org/web/20201022103915/http
s://www.nsa.gov/what-we-do/research/selinux/). National Security Agency. 2009-01-15.
Archived from the original (https://www.nsa.gov/what-we-do/research/selinux/) on 2020-10-
22. Retrieved 2021-04-21.
6. Compare "National Security Agency Shares Security Enhancements to Linux" (https://web.a
rchive.org/web/20180918025937/https://www.nsa.gov/news-features/press-room/press-relea
ses/2001/se-linux.shtml). NSA Press Release. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland: National
Security Agency Central Security Service. 2001-01-02. Archived from the original (https://ww
w.nsa.gov/news-features/press-room/press-releases/2001/se-linux.shtml) on 2018-09-18.
Retrieved 2021-04-21. "The NSA is pleased to announce that it has developed, and is
making available to the public, a prototype version of a security-enhanced Linux operating
system."
7. "Contributors to SELinux" (https://web.archive.org/web/20081018034429/http://www.nsa.go
v/selinux/info/contrib.cfm). Archived from the original (http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/info/contrib.
cfm) on 2008-10-18.
8. Fedora Documentation Project (2010). Fedora 13 Security-Enhanced Linux User Guide (http
s://books.google.com/books?id=feDeO4IglRkC). Fultus Corporation. p. 18. ISBN 978-1-
59682-215-3. Retrieved 2012-02-22. "SELinux decisions, such as allowing or disallowing
access, are cached. This cache is known as the Access Vector Cache (AVC). Caching
decisions decreases how often SELinux rules need to checked, which increases
performance."
9. "SELinux/Quick introduction - Gentoo Wiki" (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/SELinux/Quick_intro
duction#SELinux_policy). wiki.gentoo.org.
10. "Getting Started with SELinux" (https://www.linode.com/docs/security/getting-started-with-sel
inux/). Linode Guides & Tutorials.
11. "NB Overview - SELinux Wiki" (https://selinuxproject.org/page/NB_Overview).
selinuxproject.org.
12. "Security-Enhanced Linux in Android" (https://source.android.com/security/selinux/). Android
Open Source Project. Retrieved 2016-01-31.
13. "SELinux" (https://wiki.debian.org/SELinux). debian.org.
14. "How To Install SELinux on Ubuntu 8.04 "Hardy Heron" " (https://ubuntu-tutorials.com/2008/
03/18/how-to-install-selinux-on-ubuntu-804-hardy-heron/). Ubuntu Tutorials.
15. "openSUSE News" (https://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/20/opensuse-to-add-selinux-basic-
enablement-in-111/).
16. "Release Notes for SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 11" (https://www.novell.com/linux/releas
enotes/x86_64/SUSE-SLED/11/#02). Novell. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
17. "SELinux on CoreOS" (https://coreos.com/os/docs/latest/selinux.html). CoreOS Docs.
18. "SELinux/Commands - FedoraProject" (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/Commands).
Retrieved 2015-11-25.
19. "chcon" (https://web.archive.org/web/20041024211853/http://linuxcommand.org/man_page
s/chcon1.html). Linuxcommand.org. Archived from the original (http://linuxcommand.org/man
_pages/chcon1.html) on 2004-10-24. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
20. "restorecon(8) - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/restorecon). Linux.die.net.
Retrieved 2013-02-06.
21. "restorecond(8) - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/restorecond). Linux.die.net.
Retrieved 2013-02-06.
22. "runcon(1) - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/1/runcon). Linux.die.net. Retrieved
2013-02-06.
23. "secon(1) - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/1/secon). Linux.die.net. Retrieved
2013-02-06.
24. "fixfiles(8): fix file SELinux security contexts - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/fixfi
les). Linux.die.net. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
25. "setfiles(8): set file SELinux security contexts - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/se
tfiles). Linux.die.net. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
26. "load_policy(8) - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/load_policy). Linux.die.net.
Retrieved 2013-02-06.
27. "booleans(8) - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/booleans). Linux.die.net.
Retrieved 2013-02-06.
28. "getsebool(8): SELinux boolean value - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/getsebo
ol). Linux.die.net. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
29. "setsebool(8): set SELinux boolean value - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/setse
bool). Linux.die.net. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
30. "togglesebool(8) - Linux man page" (http://linux.die.net/man/8/togglesebool). Linux.die.net.
Retrieved 2013-02-06.
31. "Ubuntu Manpage: selinux-config-enforcing - change /etc/selinux/config to set enforcing" (htt
ps://web.archive.org/web/20121220020432/http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/natty/m
an8/selinux-config-enforcing.8.html). Canonical Ltd. Archived from the original (http://manpa
ges.ubuntu.com/manpages/natty/man8/selinux-config-enforcing.8.html) on 2012-12-20.
Retrieved 2013-02-06.
32. "Ubuntu Manpage: selinuxenabled - tool to be used within shell scripts to determine if" (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20130209033811/http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/natty/ma
n1/selinuxenabled.1.html). Canonical Ltd. Archived from the original (http://manpages.ubunt
u.com/manpages/natty/man1/selinuxenabled.1.html) on 2013-02-09. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
33. "Ubuntu Manpage: selinux-policy-upgrade - upgrade the modules in the SE Linux policy" (ht
tps://web.archive.org/web/20120404160143/http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/natty/m
an8/selinux-policy-upgrade.8.html). Canonical Ltd. Archived from the original (http://manpag
es.ubuntu.com/manpages/natty/man8/selinux-policy-upgrade.8.html) on 2012-04-04.
Retrieved 2013-02-06.
34. "SELinux backgrounds" (https://www.suse.com/documentation/sles11/book_security/data/se
ct1_chapter_book_security.html). SELinux. Security Guide. SUSE.
35. "apparmor.d - syntax of security profiles for AppArmor" (https://web.archive.org/web/2013101
7094320/http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/hardy/man5/apparmor.d.5.html). Archived
from the original (http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/hardy/man5/apparmor.d.5.html) on
2013-10-17.
36. "Rainbow" (http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Rainbow). laptop.org.
37. "SELinux Related Work" (https://www.nsa.gov/what-we-do/research/selinux/related-work/).
NSA.gov.
38. General Dynamics. "PitBull Trusted Operating System" (https://gdmissionsystems.com/prod
ucts/platform-security/pitbull-trusted-operating-system).
39. Red Hat, Inc. "49.4. Multi-Category Security (MCS)" (https://access.redhat.com/documentatio
n/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/5/html/deployment_guide/sec-mcs-ov).

External links
Official website (https://selinuxproject.org/)
Security-Enhanced Linux (https://web.archive.org/web/20081018040612/https://www.nsa.go
v/selinux/) at the National Security Agency in the Internet Archive
SELinux (https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux) on GitHub
Walsh, Daniel J (13 Nov 2013). "Visual how-to guide for SELinux policy enforcement" (http
s://opensource.com/business/13/11/selinux-policy-guide). Opensource.com.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Security-Enhanced_Linux&oldid=1078027302"

This page was last edited on 19 March 2022, at 13:21 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0; additional terms may apply. By
using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

You might also like