Adult Learning Theories and Practices
Adult Learning Theories and Practices
Active Learning
Active learning is defined as the use of one or more interactive approaches to education and training for the purpose of engaging students in their work to acquire and understand knowledge. The active learning classroom is one that de-emphasizes lecture and other teacher-centered forms of instruction in favor of engaged class environments that are learner centered. Examples of active learning in the professional training environment are: Adult learning activities such a role plays, scenarios or similar training approaches Inquiry-based dialogue using protocols to surface the thinking of learners
Article adapted from: Kendall Zoller and Bob Harrison, (2007). The Advanced Facilitation Skills Course Student Workbook. CA Commission on POST
530 333-3349
www.sierra-training.com
Experiential learning activities or exercises (note: students dont learn from experience, they learn from reflecting on experiences in an educational setting) Paired or small group work Problem solving exercises Blended learning using appropriate technological resources to support training Case study exercises Problem-based learning exercises Individual, group and class work using visual, auditory or kinesthetic stimuli to prompt discussion, discourse and related class work.
Expanding on his earlier work, Informal Adult Education (1950), Malcolm Knowles published The Modern Practice of Adult Education Andragogy versus Pedagogy (1970) which propelled the movement to distinguish adult learners and their motivations to learn (andragogy) as opposed to children and adolescent learners (pedagogy). Knowles work generated more than 200 professional articles by others in the next decade, and remains a significant foundation for all subsequent theory.
530 333-3349
www.sierra-training.com
students apply classroom skills in a real-world setting. The focus on the learner acquiring knowledge, is a critical step in effective training
530 333-3349
www.sierra-training.com
the research of Rita Dunn. All normally-functioning adults receive stimuli in their surroundings from visual, auditory, tactile-kinesthestic, olfactory and gustatory senses. The visual, auditory (hearing) and tactile-kinesthertic (touch and movement) (VAK) are normally addressed as primary and secondary styles or preferences of acquiring and processing information in learning. Dunns assertion is we each develop a preference for one of the modes of sensory input, and will use it as a primary screen to process meaning. Recognizing the learning styles of trainees may be valuable to the teacher in a variety of ways. Most commonly, those aware of these differences alter the training environment to modulate through the styles on a routine basis to ensure all present are accessing and processing desired skills and concepts. It is important to note the dominant style may not be the same for all tasks, and that learners may tend to revert to the dominant style as stress increases. Some thoughts regarding modifying the learning experience to maximize participation are: Visual learners generally like to learn through reading and writing tasks or through the use of charts, demonstrations, videos and other visual materials. They often easily visualize faces and seldom get lost in new places Auditory learners often talk to themselves; they may also move their lips or read aloud. They may have difficulty with reading or writing tasks, doing better talking to a peer and hearing what was said. Kinesthetic learners do best while touching and moving. They may lose concentration if there is little or no external stimulation or movement. They may want to take notes by drawing pictures, doodling or by making diagrams. When reading, they may want to scan the material first, and then focus on the details
530 333-3349
www.sierra-training.com
Intrapersonal possesses the ability to access ones emotional life to understand oneself and others; self-aware and aware of how self impacts the environment around them; understands need for change in relation to the environment Interpersonal connected to the intricacies and subtleties of the world around them, especially the physical world or environment; understands the relationship between people and their environment or situation
Gardner draws evidence from the fields of biology, anthropology and the creative arts to form conclusions regarding the ways in which MI might be used in learning settings. Most prominent are: Individuals should be encouraged to use their preferred intelligences in learning Instructional activities should be varied to appeal to the different preferences amongst learners in the teaching environment Formative (in the moment) and summative (end of training) assessment should consider the different intelligences and seek to measure them across multiple forms
530 333-3349
www.sierra-training.com
The specific design and delivery methods used will change as learning outcomes change The learning hierarchies (e.g., Blooms Taxonomy) define what skills are to be learned and their sequence in the learning environment
Kolb, David. (1983). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Indianapolis, IN. FT Press
530 333-3349
www.sierra-training.com
The four learning styles emerging from the combination of styles along the learning cycle are: Diverger (CE/RO) feel and watch Assimilator (AC/RO) think and watch Converger (AC/AE) think and do Accomodator (CE/AE) feel and do
Our approach to a task or learning experience, for example, would be split through watching others perform and then reflecting on what happens (reflective observation), or, through jumping in and doing it (active experimentation).
530 333-3349
www.sierra-training.com
At the same time, we choose how to transform that experience (emotionally and intellectually) into our own meaning and usefulness by either gaining new information by thinking, analyzing or planning (abstract conceptualization), or, through the concrete, tangible aspects of the world (concrete experience). The combination of these two choices produces an individuals preferred learning style. In general, the learning styles are: Divergers are able to look at things from differing perspectives; prefer to watch rather than do, gathering information and using imagination to solve problems and learn. They perform better in instances where ideas are generated and multiple perspectives may be considered, such as brainstorming. They may prefer to work in groups, be imaginative, listen with an open mind and be receptive to feedback Assimilators prefer a logical, precise approach to learning, focusing on ideas rather than people. They prefer explanations instead of practice; are attracted to logical theories, and prefer reading, lecture, dialogue and having a chance to think through concepts. Convergers solve problems and then use their learning to resolve practical issues. They may prefer technical tasks and be less concerned with people. This style may be attracted to technology competencies, and to experiment with new ideas, simulations and then to apply what is learned to practical situations. Accomodators are hands-on, relying on intuition rather than logic. They may use the analysis of others to implement a practical approach to problem solving. They will rely on others for knowledge instead of spending time in analysis; they may prefer to work in teams to complete tasks.
For additional information on trainings in adult learning, contact Sierra Training Associates on the web at www.sierra-training.com. You can also contact us to inquire about trainings and workshops centered on adult learning instruction customized to address your specific goals.
530 333-3349
www.sierra-training.com