Research - Authentic Assessment
Research - Authentic Assessment
AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT
A Research-Report
Submitted to
Ms. Clarizza Juliet V. Limbo, LPT
Batangas State University – The National Engineering University
Lemery Campus
Lemery, Batangas
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Subject
SSED 313 – Integrative Methods in
Teaching Social Science Discipline in Basic Education
Submitted by:
Almazan, Allan
Ansano, Bea Althea D.
Argel, Andrea
Dimaunahan, Mark Angelo D.
Papahan, Eizzamarie
October 2024
II. Introduction
evaluate and understand students’ progress, knowledge, and skills. Traditionally, assessment has
been associated with standardized tests, quizzes, and exams, which are designed to measure
specific aspects of student learning, often focusing on memorization and recall of isolated facts.
These traditional forms of assessment, while valuable for measuring certain types of knowledge,
can be limited in their scope and effectiveness, as they may not capture a student’s deeper
recognition that assessment practices need to evolve to better align with these educational goals.
assessment has emerged as an alternative that offers a more comprehensive and meaningful
emphasizing tasks that require students to apply their knowledge in realistic, complex scenarios.
This approach is grounded in the belief that learning is most meaningful when students are
engaged in activities that reflect the challenges they will face outside the classroom. Unlike
traditional tests, authentic assessments often involve projects, portfolios, presentations, or other
performance-based tasks that allow students to demonstrate their skills, creativity, and
This research explores the concept of authentic assessment, examining its theoretical
underpinnings, practical benefits, and challenges. By reviewing the literature and analyzing case
studies, this study aims to provide a detailed understanding of how authentic assessment can
foster deeper learning and enhance students’ preparedness for real-life situations. Additionally, it
investigates how authentic assessment can increase student engagement, promote critical
thinking, and support the development of transferable skills. Ultimately, this research seeks to
offer insights into how educators can design and implement authentic assessment practices that
not only evaluate students’ knowledge but also empower them to become active, capable learners
who are ready to apply their skills in meaningful ways beyond the classroom.
III. Discussion
learning through both observation and measurement in an attempt to better understand students’
learning in a course. This includes collecting evidence, both graded and non-graded, about a
students’ progression in the course. We use the term “assessment” throughout this resource to
represent both graded and non-graded activities. Some examples of assessments in a course
could include: discussion observations, exams, papers, reflection questions, in-class student
responses, etc.
which students have met the intended learning outcomes for a course or program. Assessment
also directs both the students’ and instructors’ attention to what is important (Boud & Falchikov,
2007). It has also been claimed that it is only when faced with assessments that students truly
engage with the course material (Bloxham & Boyd, 2007). Assessment provides evidence of
what has been learned for instructors as well as for students. In higher education, we assess our
students to integrate them into the learning process and provide evidence of their understanding.
and require students to choose or offer a response. They test the recall and recognition of
knowledge. However, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests that authentic
assessment not only enhances academic integrity, but is a more effective way to assess student
learning. Authentic assessments are typically iterative and ask students to perform a task, calling
Authentic Assessments
authentic assessment does not seek to measure rote learning and then require students to recall
and restate the information. Instead, authentic assessment focuses on students' capacity to
understand, analyze, and integrate instructional materials and apply that knowledge to real-world
examples.
Additionally, authentic assessments typically allow time for students to reflect on their
work, and in some instances, include collaboration with cohorts. Therefore, an immediate answer
to a question is not required as it would be with a timed traditional examination. These types of
tasks encourage students to use higher-ordered critical thinking skills. Authentic assignments can
Stiggins (1987) defined performance assessments as those tasks that require students “to
demonstrate specific skills and competencies, that is, to apply the skills and knowledge they have
mastered” (p. 34). Simply stated, performance assessments emphasize what a student can do.
Therefore, instructors have an opportunity to evaluate what students have learned by evaluating
students’ demonstration of specific skills and abilities. Mueller (2011) stated that authentic
assessment is also known by other names; performance-based assessment, direct assessment and
alternative assessment.
Thus, in Authentic Assessment, assessment drives the curriculum. That is, teachers first
determine the tasks that students will perform to demonstrate their mastery, and then a
curriculum is developed that will enable students to perform those tasks well, which would
include the acquisition of essential knowledge and skills. This has been referred to as ‘planning
Authentic assessment utilizes two instruments to evaluate the teaching- learning process.
These are authentic assessments that measure skills and understanding by directly
measuring student performance in a natural setting (Kauchak and Eggen, 1998). The real-world
emphasis of performance assessments occurs not only in the final assessment – are the skills
being assessed translatable to skills students would need to use in the real world? – but also in
the ongoing instruction that occurs both before and during the performance assessment.
Generally, there are two broad umbrellas that cover performance-based assessments:
performance assessments can end either in some sort of product or some sort of performance.
Product-oriented performance assessment ends with the students producing some sort of
tangible element not only encapsulating the summation of the knowledge they’ve gained
but demonstrating that they’ve learned how to apply gained knowledge. For example, a
student may grow a garden, create a budget, write an argument, or build a model.
interact with an audience to demonstrate their applied knowledge. For example, a student
may participate in a debate, perform a piece of music they composed, engage in a mock
Regardless of which of the two a teacher chooses to end the performance assessment
with, it is important that the final grading of either is process-based. True performance
assessments value the learning process as much as – if not more than – the final result. The
majority of the learning should occur not before the performance assessment begins but along the
way. Additionally, performance assessments highly value processes that move students beyond
acquiring knowledge to thinking critically about what they are learning and how they can best
apply what they are learning. Whether an assessment ends in a product or performance, students
should be able to articulate both how and why they ended their assessment in the way that they
did.
One of performance assessments’ greatest advantages is that they allow students to see
how many different subjects not only overlap but how they are useful and applicable in the real
world. This usually has the effect of motivating students to learn and invest effort as they see
how the assessments – and the learning that comes along with it – will benefit them in the long
run. However, it is important to keep in mind that Performance based assessment is not a one-
size-fits-all solution and should be tailored to the individual needs of each student.
A portfolio is a collection of student's work which gives evidence to show how the
student can meet the specified learning outcomes. A typical portfolio consists of work selected
by the student, reasons for selecting these works and self-reflection on the learning process.
Portfolio is a developmental process, thus it is not only the product that the student or teacher
assess upon but also the learning process in which the student develops during the given period.
Portfolio is an assessment method that monitors the growth and development of student learning.
Unlike most assessments, portfolio assessment can contain many different forms of assessments
assessment.
of student learning during a given period of time. It often contains a range of artifacts
evidences required to prove the learning outcomes in the given time, in addition, it
type of portfolio is typically used for interview. It is more of a summative assessment and
portfolio
samples and reflections. It gives a thorough view of students' learning journeys and encourages
engagement and ownership. Personalized feedback and individualized instruction enhance the
aligning with standardized tests. Time-consuming due to compiling, organizing, and reflecting
1. The portfolio should not be graded or compared in any way with those of other students.
2. Determine what materials should be kept in the portfolio and announce clearly when, how, and
3. Contents of the portfolio should reflect grade level goals, learning standards, and target
objectives.
4. Everything that goes into the portfolios should be dated by the students.
Rating Scales
A rating scale is a measurement tool or a system used to assess and evaluate the
or any other subject of interest. It provides a structured framework for assigning ratings or scores
to different attributes or criteria based on predefined criteria or standards. Rating scales are
commonly used in performance evaluations, customer feedback surveys, research studies, and
various assessment processes. They provide a way to compare and measure different elements
against a common set of criteria, facilitating decision-making, analysis, and evaluation. There are
o Likert Scale- One of the most commonly used rating scales, the Likert scale presents a
series of statements or items and asks respondents to indicate their level of agreement or
strongly disagree).
o Numerical Rating Scale- This type of scale assigns a numeric value to each item or
attribute being assessed. It allows for more precise measurements and calculations, such
o Graphic Rating Scale- Use visual representations, such as line or bar graphs, to capture
ratings. Respondents or evaluators mark a point on the graph that represents their rating.
o Behavioral Rating Scale- This type of scale focuses on assessing specific behaviors or
those behaviors.
o Comparative Rating Scale- In a comparative rating scale, items or individuals are ranked
based on their ratings, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement but may not capture all
relevant dimensions or aspects of the subject being assessed, potentially overlooking important
factors.
IV. Summary
contexts, and portfolio assessments, which collect a student's work over time to showcase
progress and achievement. Unlike traditional assessments, which are often time-bound and
focused on recall, authentic assessments encourage deeper engagement with the material through
tasks that require critical thinking and problem-solving. Portfolios, as a tool of authentic
assessment, allow for ongoing reflection and provide a holistic view of a student's learning
journey. Guidelines for portfolio use include clear criteria for materials to be included, ensuring
they reflect grade-level objectives and are maintained by the student. Rating scales, such as likert
or numerical scales, are used to assess performance-based tasks and portfolios, helping to
measure progress and provide constructive feedback. Authentic assessment not only evaluates
what students can do but also fosters a deeper connection between the learning process and real-
world application.
V. Key Take-aways
Authentic assessment allows for utmost flexibility and variability in knowledge and skills
representation. This assessment is beneficial for both teachers and students. Authentic
assessment helps teachers to provide an accurate measure of students’ understanding and create
instruction that is appropriate to their student’s needs and interests. For students, it helps them to
analyze their learning and see how real-life situations, in all their unpredictability, ambiguity and
It has two main types which are the performance-based assessment and portfolio
provides a collection of student work over time, showcasing their progress and development.
Both types of assessments provide feedback to students and encourage self-reflection and active
participation in learning. By focusing on what students can do rather than just what they know,
authentic assessment allows them to demonstrate their abilities and develop a deeper
VI. Conclusion
Integrating authentic assessment into curriculum design marks a significant shift from
traditional evaluation methods towards a more holistic approach to measuring student learning.
deeper engagement with course material and cultivate critical thinking, problem-solving abilities,
Designing authentic assessment requires careful planning that begins with identifying
desired learning outcomes and culminates in the evaluation of student performance through
various instruments, such as performance-based tests and portfolios. This multifaceted approach
provides a comprehensive view of student progress and feedback and fostering a sense of
ownership over one's learning journey. However, it's crucial to remember that a one-size-fits-all
Various rating scales used to assess and evaluate the performance, behavior, skills, or other
rating scales can provide a holistic view of learning and provide insights for curriculum and
VII. Reflection
When you think of these different types of assessment, you can see that traditional
assessments certainly have their place in the classroom but that using authentic assessment and
performance -based assessment provides greater depth. Authentic assessments simulate real-
world experiences, which both engage students with the content and allow them to show
promote a growth mindset and view of learning as a process and not a one-time snapshot of
performance. While rating scales are generally more straightforward, they offer consistency and
implement, but they are an asset to pull what they learn in the classroom to the real world) allow
students to see the value of what they are learning in a practical sense
VIII. References
What is authentic assessment? Bringing authentic assessment to life. (2023, October 6).
https://www.turnitin.com/blog/what-is-authentic-assessment-bringing-authentic-assessment-to-
life
https://www.butte.edu/departments/slo/authentic-assessment/define_authentic.html
Chris Hull | Otus Co-Founder and Chief Product Officer. (2023, January 3). The ultimate guide
assessments/
(n.d.). https://www.educationalwave.com/pros-and-cons-of-portfolio-assessment/
What is rating scale? | Meaning & definition | Qandle HR. (n.d.). HR Software | HR Software