Argument Map for Allowing AI in the classroom.

Logical fallacy
Using AI in academic sector is seen as a threat to the teachers.
AI tools can explain the things in various However, a teacher cannot always offer differentiate
Hasty Generalization: assuming AI will
way according to the learning styles of the instructions at university level because of the quantity of
students and time limited which has to be complete the enhance academic outcomes for all
students. curriculum. Even through AI cannot be assumed as human students without considering individual
Main Argument Using AI assistants can help the teachers, it cannot be deniable that AI have unlimited capacity differences. Its effectiveness can vary
ar students to get clear understanding for helping students to provide differentiated explanation based on factors like the type of AI tools
without time and place limited. Explanation of AI normally and students' learning styles.
about their classwork and excludes personal feeling, bias toward students and private
unfamiliar topics as well. point of view while the description of human teachers
AI can adapt the presentation style based on normally tends to be influence by their personal issues, their Appeal to authority; assuming that
prior belief and bias based on students’ background. because AI is technologically advanced, it
the students' request and provide unlimited will always make the best educational
time until they get satisfied answer. choices without fail
Conclusion
Analysis
Hasty generalization: The
Premise argument assumes that AI will
always enhance information
AI streamlines information assessment by quickly assessment without acknowledging
AI enhances information scenarios where AI may
analyzing large datasets for credibility and
assessment by swiftly analyzing misinterpret data or rely on biased
AI improves information assessment by analyzing data relevance. This automation improves accuracy,
large datasets, identifying credible algorithms, potentially leading to
to find credible sources, enhancing accuracy for better reduces cognitive bias, and enhances decision-
sources, and reducing human bias making in education and research. By providing inaccurate evaluations.
decisions.
for more accurate evaluations. data-driven insights, AI helps users navigate
complex information landscapes more efficiently
and confidently..

Allowing AI in the Premise

classroom enhances
ar

Conclusion Analysis
academic outcomes for
Cognitive Bias
university students.
essential because it
The argument asserts that AI in the classroom Confirmation Bias: Users might
AI fosters creativity by providing students with
can enhance students’ academic outcomes by favor AI-generated results that
diverse ideas and perspectives on academic topics. confirm their pre-existing beliefs
improving their idea generation. It suggests
Allowing AI in the classroom that AI provides diverse information and or opinions, ignoring contradictory
perspectives, fostering creativity and evidence and thus undermining the
enhances academic outcomes objective assessment of
by supporting idea generation. AI enables students to explore innovative innovation. Thus, the premises indicate that
AI is well-suited to boost academic information.
solutions by quickly synthesizing information
performance through effective ideation.
and presenting unique approaches. Bandwagon Effect: can drive
students to adopt AI tools due to
Analysis
their popularity rather than
Conclusion effectiveness. This uncritical
Premise acceptance may lead to
overreliance on AI in education. As
a result, it can hinder independent
AI has the potential to enhance personalized thinking and creativity.
learning and improve academic performance.
The implementation of AI in AI technologies can enhance personalized learning However, its implementation requires careful
educational settings fosters an in education by analyzing individual student data consideration of biases and logical fallacies to Confirmation Bias: Users might
ensure it serves all students effectively. Ongoing favor AI-generated results that
environment where students to tailor content, pacing, and instructional evaluation and openness to diverse perspectives confirm their pre-existing beliefs or
Main Argument
receive customized support. methods, leading to improved learning outcomes. are essential for maximizing AI's benefits in opinions, ignoring contradictory
ar education evidence and thus undermining the
objective assessment of
information.