t.

me/alphagodVIP

The Machiavelli
Handbook
49 MENTAL MODELS ON HOW TO SPEED READ,
ANALYZE AND DEAL WITH PEOPLE

WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI,

AUTHOR OF @CORPORATEMACH
CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI
t.me/alphagodVIP
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Special thanks to @CryptoVince369 for helping make this title

possible! Long live Hex!!
t.me/alphagodVIP
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Daily Messages on
Telegram [Free
Resource]

Corporate Machiavelli Telegram Resource Group

https://t.me/machiavellicorporate

Unmodern Men Telegram Resource Group

https://t.me/unmodernmtg

Cory Smith, The Daily Wingman Telegram Resource

Group
https://t.me/wingmandaily

v
t.me/alphagodVIP
t.me/alphagodVIP
t.me/alphagodVIP
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 1

Mental Models #1-14

M
ENTAL MODEL #1: Status is a zero-sum
game in every hierarchy.

W HEN ENGAGED in zero-sum negotiation over price, be

polite. Charm the other party. The more they like you, the
more inclined they will be to give you a better price and
better deal terms, even when doing so goes against their
own best interests. 1
High extroversion helps with charming people; thereby
enhancing performance in !nance, law, and sales (these are
all professions where you need to be good with people; you
can‘t be a socially awkward autistic genius).

MENTAL MODEL #2: Every hierarchy is a pyramid

scheme. Every hierarchy has a pyramid structure.
Refer to every hierarchy as a ‘Power hierarchy’ and the
1
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

world will make more sense. There are many ways to

play, many ways to win.

MENTAL MODEL #3: How you rank in the macro

hierarchy is a matter of life and death. When people are
competing for status and power, understand that what
they are really competing over is "Probability of Survival".
In the game of power the stakes are astronomical. Life
at the top of the hierarchy is not slightly better than life at
the bottom. It is astronomically better. A billionaire does
not have slightly more wealth than a homeless man, he is
astronomically more wealth.

MENTAL MODEL #4: Wealth is Pareto distributed.

Power and status are Pareto distributed. To be average is to
be a loser. There is no real ‘middle‘; only towards the top
and towards the bottom.

Towards the top of the hierarchy2 = top 20%.

Towards the bottom of the hierarchy =
bottom 80%.

MENTAL MODEL #5: Everyone thinks the pinnacle of

hierarchies is a relaxing vacation, and they are wrong.
Hierarchy Apexes are dangerous places. Play your cards
wrong up there, and you might end up like Jeffrey Epstein.
At the bottom of the Marco hierarchy, life is dangerous,
2
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

since resources are scarce (poverty). At the pinnacle of the

macro hierarchy, life is dangerous, since you will be dealing
with intelligent predators (High IQ Psychopaths and
Sociopaths/Narcissists).
If you want to have a life that is as easy and relaxing as
possible, stay in the middle of the hierarchy, or on the
high end but NOT at the pinnacle.
To be clear, I am not at the apex of the American macro
hierarchy and I never have been, but I have met the people
up there, and be assured that THEIR LIVES ARE NOT
SMOOTH AND EASY; THEIR LIVES ARE A RELENTLESS
WAR.

MENTAL MODEL #6: Generally speaking, upward

mobility is a false promise that powerful people offer to
those at the bottom of the hierarchy, in an attempt to
placate them.
Rags to riches stories are sensational precisely because
they are rare. In most societies, the promise of upward
mobility is nothing more than a false promise used to
placate young men at the bottom of the dominance
hierarchy.

MENTAL MODEL #7: Your status in the hierarchy is

directly in!uenced by and corresponds to your ability to
hide secrets.
If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to
fear. That‘s the problem. Everyone has something to hide,
and so everyone has something to fear. Nobody on the
3
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

planet has a reputation that would still be good if all their

secrets were to be revealed.
Authoritarian Regimes and Extortionists know this,
which is why they go out of their way to !nd people‘s
secrets to use them as blackmail. [Again], your status in the
hierarchy is directly in"uenced by and corresponds to your
ability to hide secrets.

MENTAL MODEL #8: If you are going to say politically

incorrect things and you want to transcend the hier‐
archy as high as possible you need to be anonymous.

MENTAL MODEL #9: If you are powerful (top 0.1% of

the macro dominance hierarchy) the only people you
can trust are those who were loyal to you before you
became powerful. Everyone else is loyal to your power, not
you. You must assume that.

MENTAL MODEL #10: The traits needed to transcend

the corporate hierarchy as an employee, and the traits
needed to succeed as an entrepreneur, have a lot of
overlap. If you can‘t get rich from a salary, you won‘t get
rich being an entrepreneur. The traits needed to reach a
high level, high pay position, are the same traits needed to
be your own boss:

High-level competency,
4
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

stress tolerance,
cunning and;
capacity to solve complex problems.

MENTAL MODEL #11: If you are towards the bottom

of a hierarchy, you have little or nothing to lose, execute
high-risk high reward strategies until you end up
towards the top, or dead. Death is nothing. To live and
to be powerless is to die every day. If your status is
currently low (you are low in the macro hierarchy), and you
publicly start executing high-risk high reward strategies,
your status will instantly be raised.

MENTAL MODEL #12: Charming Low-Status People is

incredibly easy; Compliment them. Low-Status People
are very vulnerable to compliments since to them they are
so scarce; many of them have not received a compliment in
years.
Charming people who are Low Status (Poor) is incred‐
ibly easy. Simply treat them with basic human decency, and
they will love you. Low-Status People are so accustomed to
being treated with disdain, that if you show them even the
tiniest amount of respect, they will be overwhelmed with
feelings of gratitude.

MENTAL MODEL #13: Words indicate thinking.

“Words Don‘t Matter. Only Actions Matter.”

WRONG: A person's words matter, because their words
5
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

(speech) are an indication of their thoughts (thinking), and

their thinking...will in!uence their actions.

MENTAL MODEL #14: Women don't care, Men don't

care There is a difference though; most men are *hon‐
est* about the fact that they don't care. Women main‐
tain the pretence they care with super"cial charm
(politeness) and virtue signalling.
If they are publicly talking about how virtuous they are,
the probability they are actually virtuous is very low. This
may sound 'Obvious', yet most people miss this.

1. In negotiations, charming the other party is critical. If they like you,

they will offer you better deal terms simply because they like you.
Never insult the other party. If you must reject an offer they give, do
so gently and politely.
2. As globalization, consolidation, and BIG [corporations] swallow up
the world, hierarchies consolidate too.

6
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 2

Mental Model #15:

How to Impress

E
ditor’s Synopsis of Mental Model #15: To impress
low-status people, be arrogant, boast, have
expensive items (and show them off).

T O I MPRESS Low IQ Poor People:

Have a very expensive car and a big house;

Overtly boast of how rich you are, in public, and
on social media.

To Impress High IQ Rich People:

Offer valuable insights and wisdom, that you

will not !nd in a textbook;
DO NOT EVER "aunt your wealth.

The personas displayed by Andrew Tate and Donald

Trump are designed to appeal to Low IQ Poor People. 1 They
7
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

are narcissistic, loud, boisterous, and endlessly mention

how rich they are. The personas displayed by Elon Musk
and Robert Greene are both designed to appeal to High IQ
Rich People.
They never mention the fact that they are rich (it is
simply quietly obvious that they have more Wealth than
99.9% of Americans). There is not a hint of narcissism or
arrogance in their personality. They never raise their voice
in anger or boast.

1. By "Low IQ”: I mean IQs below 120, and by ‘Poor’: I mean in the
Bottom 90% of income, Bottom 90% Intelligence and Income.

8
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 3

Mental Model #16:

How to Raise Your
Status

E
ditor’s Synopsis of Mental Model #16: When
people ask “What do you do?” they are really
asking “What’s your status within society?”
Wealth and appearances are status-increasing factors.

W HY DO people ask "What do you do for a living?”

It is a very consequential question. They are

asking "Is your status in the macro hierarchy
high enough, are you powerful enough, to
make it worth it for me to spend time talking
to you?"

Gaining Status in Different Cultures

Status can vary from one group or culture to another. In

some cultures, engaging in violence (particularly against
people the group considers to be its enemy) wins one
9
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

status, while in others, engaging in violence causes one to

lose status.

If you are an employee in a corporation,

engaging in violence will cause you to lose
status (almost certainly it will result in you
being !red or ostracized from the
group/organization).
If you are a member of a criminal organization
(say, a gang) and you engage in violence
(particularly against someone the organization
considers to be an enemy, such as a rival gang
member), that will cause you to lose status.

STATUS INCREASING FACTORS

That being said, there are things that will earn a person's
status within virtually any group or culture:

Wealth
Appearances

In any group, being rich (having a lot of wealth)

automatically grants you at least above-average status.
In any group, being good-looking automatically grants you
at least above average status.

10
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 4

Mental Model #17:

Predictors of Life
Success

M
ental Model #17: Life is a lottery. 12The 2 best
predictors of long-term life success are
IQ/Intelligence, and Energy/Industri‐
ousness.

H IGH IQ + H IGH E NERGY /I NDUSTRIOUSNESS = Insurance

Against Poverty. If you are smart and capable of working
hard, the probability you will be poor (towards the bottom
of the macro hierarchy) is practically zero. You will at
minimum be top 20%.

The traits needed to become a Successful Banker,

Lawyer, Salesmen, Businessmen, Criminal, Drug Dealer
are the same:

High IQ;
High Cunning/People Skills;
High Energy/Industriousness;
11
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

High Stress/Risk Tolerance;

High Testosterone;
Low Agreeableness;
High Ruthlessness.

I JUDGE a man by the choices he makes, not his

circumstances, or his status in the macro dominance hier‐
archy. Why? His circumstances and his status are deter‐
mined by a million factors, some in his control, most out of
his control. The only thing in his control is his choices.
People suffering due to factors outside their control
deserve all the compassion and assistance you can give
them. People who manufacture victimhood out of nothing,
for the sake of winning status in a victim hierarchy, deserve
your disdain.

If you are towards the top of the hierarchy, you

have a lot to lose, be risk-averse, maintain your
current position.
If you are High IQ + High Cunning, Charming
Rich People (The Powerful, Top 0.1% of the
Macro Hierarchy) will be easy. They will look at
you, and feel "He is just like me!" Everyone likes
people who are similar to them, and the
Powerful is the epitome of this, not the
exception.
If you have good physical health, wealth, and
high status in the dominance hierarchy you live
in you will be happy by default. If you have bad
physical health and are poor, and low status in

12
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

the dominance hierarchy you live in you will be

miserable by default.

There is a recipe for success. To be clear, ‘Success‘

means:

Getting Rich (High Net Worth/Income)

Attaining High Status In The Macro Dominance
Hierarchy
Seizing Power The recipe is *not* optimistic;

It mostly boils down to being born into the correct

circumstances.

If a man has a net worth of $10 million+ he has

enemies nobody makes it that high in the
hierarchy without prevailing in intense con!ict
against others.
Law 23 Addendum: To get rich, or transcend a
macro dominance hierarchy, you do NOT need a
‘Diverse Skillset‘. You need to be EXTREMELY
GOOD AT 1 THING; THAT IS BEING VALUABLE.

1. IQ = 100% luck;
Energy = Heavily determined by luck.
2. Life success = high income, net worth, wealth, power, status in the
macro dominance hierarchy.

13
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 5

Mental Model #18: The

Psychology of
Charm

M
ental Model #18: Few people want to !nd
the truth. Most people just want their
biases and feelings validated.

M OST PEOPLE ARE NOT interested in real intellectual exchange

or getting a more accurate view of reality. They just want to
**Feel Smart**. As such, let them do most of the talking,
and appear to agree with everything they say, even if you
know it is false.
For the sake of charming people, appear to agree with
their opinions, and do not tell the truth to validate their
biases and their feelings.
To charm people, tell them things that appeal to their
sensibilities, do not tell them the truth if the truth will
offend their sensibilities. As a matter of habit, you should
hide your displeasure and fake your contentment. For the
sake of charming people, this is mandatory. When inter‐
acting with superiors, this is mandatory.
14
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

R ANKING HIGH ON ‘E NTHUSIASM ‘ makes a person good at

charming people; most people !nd an enthusiastic
person to be charming.

When doing logical reasoning, facts and

substance are all that matter, tone and emotion
mean nothing.
When charming and persuading people, facts
and substance often mean very little and tone
and emotion mean everything.

Logic vs Charm: For the sake of charming people you

should appear ‘optimistic‘. People like optimists.

15
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 6

Mental Model #19:

How to Influence
Others

M
ental Model #19: The Machiavellian
perspective asserts that most people are
motivated primarily by self-interest. 1

M ACHIAVELLIANS ARE individuals capable of doing the things

that psychology professors at university wish they could
do: charm people, persuade people, deceive people, and
read body language effectively. Machiavellians are individ‐
uals capable of doing what Psychologists wish they could
do; read people‘s personalities accurately, read social situa‐
tions accurately, read body language and vocal tonality
accurately, regulate their own body language and vocal
tonality, charm people.
Cold reading and Charm are the most important
social competencies in any machiavellian‘s toolbox.

Cold Reading is making accurate deductions

regarding the psychologies of other people.
16
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Charm means getting people to like and trust

you. The seemingly banal encounters of
everyday life should be used to hone these skills.

If you are in an environment where charming people is

critical to your survival, then ranking high on extroversion
(being a highly enthusiastic extrovert) is a good thing.
Being skilled in the manipulation of the psychology and
behavior of others is key to succeeding at almost anything.
"The Machiavellian Perspective," also known as "Reality.”

1. People want hope, not truth. Politicians understand this. —Life‐

MathMoney (not an exact quote)

17
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 7

Mental Model #20: The

Psychopathic Edge

M
ental Model #20: Great !nanciers, lawyers,
salesmen, businessmen, politicians, and
con men are very often psychopathic. 1

“P SYCHOPATHS ARE impulsive and have poor emotional control.”

Wrong. That‘s Narcissists/Sociopaths (particularly the
dumber ones....those with IQs Below 120). Psychopaths,
particularly the Intelligent ones (IQ 120+), tend to be cold
and calculating. They are NOT impulsive.
Dumb Psychopaths impulsively engage in violence and
end up as inmates in prisons. Intelligent Psychopaths Own
and Manage prisons.
There are many types of Monsters in this world. The
most dangerous ones are well dressed, polite, and particu‐
larly pleasant when you have a discussion with them. Intel‐
ligent Psychopaths: Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein, Frank
Underwood (Fictional).

18
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

1. Great scientists and engineers are very often autistic. Great writers
are very often depressed, alcoholics, and suicidal.

19
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 8

Mental Model #21:

Psychopaths in Plain
Sight

M
ental Model #21: Psychopathic men are
usually masters of blending in; they are very
good at concealing their psychopathy. Most
people who know them would report that they are ‘nor‐
mal‘ and ‘likeable‘; nothing particularly unusual about
them.

A UTISTIC MEN STAND OUT . When you interact with an autist,

it‘s obvious within the !rst 60 seconds of interaction that
their personality isn‘t normal; they are clearly an outlier.
Hopelessly socially awkward. Not cunning at all. Autistic
men are easy to detect.
Narcissistic men are easy to detect, but not as much
as autistic men. Psychopathic men are hard to detect; you
usually don‘t notice them until you feel a knife in your back.
Ted Bundy and Jordan Belfort are men who are both
narcissistic and psychopathic. Vladimir Putin is a man who
is psychopathic, but not narcissistic.
20
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

N ARCISSISTIC MEN ARE a paradox in the following sense; they

are volatile, yet also predictable. They can go from enthusi‐
astic to angry, and back again, very quickly. Yet at the same
time, predicting their behavior is simple: simply ask "What
would the stereotypical high school bully do?"

High IQ low narcissism psychopath types like

Vladimir Putin make for good leaders. The
“I‘M AN ALPHA YOU‘RE A BETA
LMAOOOOOOO” crowd do not. —Illimitable
Man
High IQ psychopaths are master tacticians and
strategists Narcissists are not.

Psychopaths (who are not narcissistic), don‘t have this

problem; they will take whatever course of action is most
tactically effective, regardless of whether it strokes or
offends their ego.
To give an example, a high IQ psychopath would have
no problem applying Law 1 when dealing with a superior.
However, a narcissist would have dif"culty applying Law 1;
narcissists instinctively shine as bright as possible, even if it
means outshining their master.
A narcissistic man will escalate the con#ict because his
ego compels him to do so. A rational man (say a psychopath
or an autist) will walk away without hesitation.

For Career:

If you are a high IQ autist, consider going into

Engineering/STEM. You could excel there. If you
21
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

are a high IQ psychopath, consider going into

Finance/Law/Sales. You could excel there.
Men who are high IQ psychopaths tend to excel
in !nance, law, and sales.
Men who are high IQ psychopaths, and also
men who are high IQ narcissists, tend to excel at
sales. Psychopaths and Narcissists are often very
charismatic; good at charming people.

Narcissists are neurotic, psychopaths are calm.

Narcissistic men are far more common than psycho‐

pathic men. You will have more narcissistic men in your
contact list than you have psychopathic men, simply
because they are more common in the general population.
Psychopathic men are very different from narcissistic
men. While narcissists are egotistical (arrogant on the
outside and neurotic on the inside) psychopathic men are
cold and detached. They experience zero compassion, and
zero fear.

22
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 9

Mental Model #22:

Have great targets.

M
ental Model #22: You will encounter people
who are poorer than you, and smarter and
more cunning than you. Do NOT underesti‐
mate them. You will encounter people who are richer
than you, who are also dumber and less cunning than
you. They make great targets.

T HERE I S N OT A 100% Correlation Between Intelligence,

Wisdom, Cunning, and Wealth. This sounds ‘Obvious‘, yet
many Americans I speak with don‘t understand it. They
assume Intelligence = Wealth = Cunning ....Correlation
100%. 1

23
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN LEVELS OF CUNNING

People raised in Low Trust Societies have higher

Cunning levels, on average than people raised in High
Trust Societies. Example: China Is A Very Low Trust
Society Japan Is A High Trust Society Result? The Average
Chinese...!s WAY More Cunning Than The Average Japanese
If you think that The Chinese are trustworthy, you are
naive. Seriously. You are Low Cunning. You need to hire a
Machiavellian Advisor because if left to your own devices,
you will get destroyed.
Most Chinese People In China Or From China Are NOT
Trustworthy. China is a LOW TRUST SOCIETY. One conse‐
quence of this is that virtually everyone raised in that
society is Cunning and Not Trustworthy.
The children of The Chinese Ruling Class are being
trained in the arts of cunning and prepared to take over
the planet. The children of The American Class are
being taught to spend their time worrying about Micro
Aggression and Intersectionality. I wonder who
will win.

1. Yes, Intelligence, Cunning, and Wealth all correlate positively [to

some extent]. Speci"cally, Intelligence and Wealth Correlate, and
also Cunning [but] I consider the correlation to be.....weak.
[Without industriousness, intelligence is wasted].

24
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 10

Mental Model #23:

Cultivate High Stress
Tolerance

M
ental Model #23: You want to the sky-high
stress tolerance of a psychopath.

TRAINING AND DEVELOPING PSYCHOPATHY

If you are a neurotypical man with high testosterone levels

and below-average neurutocism (above average stress
tolerance), you will never have the *in!nite* stress toler‐
ance of a psychopath (psychopaths are incapable of experi‐
encing fear/stress/nerutocisim). However, you can train
yourself to have a very high stress tolerance, so high
that you and a psychopath are almost indistinguishable.
Very, very, very few men get the genetics to be a
psychopath with an in!nite stress tolerance like Vladimir
Putin. However, do what you can to maximize your stress
tolerance (minimize your neuroticism).
The !ctional Thomas Shelby (Peaky Blinders) displays a
stress tolerance that is as high as a man‘s stress tolerance
25
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

can be, without them being psychopathic. (Extremely Low

Neuroticism...Not Zero Like A Psychopath‘s)
No With neurotypical men, if you expose them to
enough violence (or any psychologically traumatizing stim‐
uli), it is inevitable that sooner or later they will develop
PTSD. Psychopaths are immune to this.
Military units in World War 1 that were to exposed to
endless combat (weeks or months of trench warfare
without any breaks) had 98%+ of their soldiers develop
‘Shell Shock‘ (PTSD). 98% was not a typo. The other 2%
were psychopathic.
What does Con"dent (but NOT Narcissistic), cold and
detached, calm, look like? Vladimir Putin, Frank Under‐
wood (Fictional Example).

You do NOT want the Ruthlessness of a Psychopath, but

you do want the Con!dence (Sky High-Stress Toler‐
ance) of a Psychopath.

26
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 11

Mental Model #24: Do

not reveal your
cunning.

M
ental Model #24: Do Not Talk About
Cunning, In Front Of Other People Do Not
Talk About Human Psychology, Social
Dynamics, Strategy, Or Manipulation.
Why?
Most people foolishly con!ate Cunning with Evil, even
though in reality Cunning is a morally neutral tool, that can
be used for good or for evil.
Most people foolishly con!ate Cunning with Evil.
Cunning (euphemistically called “People Skills”) is a
morally neutral tool; like an axe, it can be used for good or
for evil.
Similarly, if you are skilled in Cunning (you are good at
reading people‘s individual psychologies, and manipu‐
lating them). ‘Cunning‘ = Manipulating human psychology
and behavior in a way you see #t. You can use Cunning to
talk depressed teenagers out of suicide, or you can use it to
swindle old people out of their live savings. You can use
Cunning to talk a suicidal person out of killing themselves,
or you can use it to talk old people into handing over their
27
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

life savings in exchange for nothing (as con men do).

Psychiatrists do the former. Con Men do the latter.
Most people don‘t realize this. With most people, if they
realize you are skilled in Cunning (you have a deep under‐
standing of psychology, and you are good at predicting and
manipulating people‘s behaviors), they will assume you are
evil, even if you have no malicious intentions.

Evil = harming others for your own gain

Cunning = People Skills = Social Skills

T HESE 5 PHRASES represent the same thing:

‘Cunning‘
‘Machiavellianism‘
‘Manipulative Ability‘
‘People Skills‘
‘Social Skills‘

The "rst 3 sound evil, the latter 2 sound good. The

difference between them is one of connotation, not actual
substance. I prefer the word ‘Cunning‘.

T RAITS OF ‘H IGH C UNNING ‘ (Good People Skills):

Good At Charming People

Good At Persuasion
Good At Selling Lies Convincingly
Good At Detecting When Someone Else Is Lying
28
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Good At Reading Body Language & Vocal

Tonality
Good At Reading Personalities & Social
Situations

Traits of ‘Low Cunning‘ (Bad People Skills):

Bad At Charming People

Bad At Persuasion
Bad At Selling Lies Convincingly
Bad At Detecting When Someone Else Is Lying
Bad At Reading Body Language & Vocal Tonality
Bad At Reading Personalities & Social Situations

You should master Cunning. You should be good at

reading body language and vocal tonality, reading indi‐
viduals’ psychologies, charming people, persuading
people, selling lies convincingly.
However, nobody should detect how Cunning you are; if
they do, they will think you are Evil, even if you are not.

MY AREA OF EXPERTISE:

Cunning (euphemistically called ‘People Skills)

How To Charm, Persuade, And Sell Lies
Convincingly
How To Read Body Language And Vocal Tonality
Manipulative Strategies And Tactics

29
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

Politics (heavily driven by human psychology)

If you can create writings on Cunning that are valuable

(meaning they can help train a person to manipulate others
in the real world), you are one in a million. Note: ‘Cunning‘
is euphemistically called ‘People Skills‘.

T HE TRAITS NEEDED to become a Successful Banker,

Lawyer, Salesmen, Businessmen, Criminal, Drug Dealer
are the same:

High IQ;
High Cunning/People Skills;
High Energy/Industriousness;
High Stress/Risk Tolerance;
High Testosterone;
Low Agreeableness;
High Ruthlessness.

America needs a leader who is an intelligent

Psychopath with Top 0.1% Manipulative Ability (Cunning)
who understands how all of America‘s Institutions work.
America Needs...Bill Clinton
Dogs are not cunning, and loyal cats are cunning, and
not loyal. Men are like dogs, Women are like cats. There’s a
lesson in there.
Bad Childhood will cause you to be High Cunning. You
need to learn to have at least some minimal level of skill
with Cunning (understanding human psychology and how
to manipulate it in the real world) just to survive.
Luxury Belief: "Cunning, learning how to manipulate
30
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

people in the real world (rather than being a psychologist

who merely reads textbooks) is evil. Only bad people do
that."
Reality: If you live in a harsh environment and do not
have at least some minimal skill with Cunning, you are not
going to be able to survive. Your survival depends on being
able to predict and manipulate the behavior of others.
Chinese Proverb: "Beware the !awless performance."
The only people capable of being incredibly persuasive
are people who are very cunning; this does not automati‐
cally mean they are untrustworthy or evil, but you should
be paranoid in your dealings with them.
Above Average Cunning does not mean you need to be a
Machiavellian mastermind like the "ctional character
Frank Underwood. It means you need to have better ‘People
Skills‘ than the average person.

31
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 12

Mental Model #25 A:

Reciprocity Tripping

M
ental Model #25: People who have the desire
to actually help you are rare. People who
will try to do you tiny, inconsequential
favors so that they can feel useful and feel like you owe
them something in return are common.

32
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 13

Mental Model #25 B:

True Friends

Mental Model #25: “Few Are The Friends Of A Man.

Most Are Merely The Friends Of His Present Circum‐
stances And Power. When His Power Disappears Most
Of His ‘Friends‘ Will Disappear Soon After.”

B
altasar Gracian
—

33
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 14

Mental Model #26:

Ascending
Dominance
Hierarchies

M
ental Model #26: to transcend a macro
dominance hierarchy (aka how to get
rich) be

born into a rich family

high IQ
high cunning
high energy/industriousness
low neuroticism (high stress tolerance)
low agreeableness (high capacity for
ruthlessness)
good looking (halo effect)

T HE MAIN ADVANTAGE a child gets from being born into a

wealthy family is NOT the extra material resources. Rather,
it is easy access to mentors who can explain how The
Game of Power works at the highest levels of the
hierarchy.
34
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

“T HERE ‘ S NOT MUCH difference between being depressed and

existing in the biochemical state that being at the bottom of
the dominance hierarchy would produce; they are the same
thing. Are you depressed...or are you just at the bottom of a
dominance hierarchy?”
—Jordan Peterson

“MY LIFE IS MISERABLE.” ADVICE?

Do you live towards the bottom of the macro dominance

hierarchy? Executive high-risk high reward strategies
until you end up towards the top of the hierarchy...Or
dead either outcome is superior to living powerless.

ELITES

Every society has Elites. Elite = Top 0.1% of the macro domi‐
nance hierarchy, the richest and most powerful, high
status.
Every society in the history of the world has Elites and
in every society in the history of the world Elites harm
others (almost always below them in the hierarchy) for
their own gain within their own society, and often they
harm people in other societies for their own gain.

SELF-ESTEEM

Your status in the macro hierarchy can rise or fall dramati‐

cally in a short period of time, often due to factors entirely
35
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

outside of your own control. Do not allow your emotional

state and sense of self-worth to rise and fall with it.
Do not allow your sense of self worth to be so tied to
your status in the hierarchy, that if your status is false, your
sense of self worth dies with it. Status is !ckle. Your status
can rise, or fall, dramatically, within 24 hours.

36
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 15

Mental Model #27:

Wealth, Status,
Likeability are all
matters of Life And
Death.

M
ental Model #27: Wealth, Status, Likeability
are all matters of Life And Death.

E VER WONDER WHY PEOPLE CARE SO MUCH ABOUT THEIR LEVEL

OF W EALTH AND S TATUS ?
E VER WONDER WHY PEOPLE ENJOY IT WHEN PEOPLE LIKE THEM ,
AND HATE IT WHEN PEOPLE DISLIKE THEM ?

I T IS because in our evolutionary past, and even in our

modern world, these things intensely affect one's odds of
survival. If your level of Wealth, Status, or Likeability is
too low, it can literally get you killed. This was true when
we lived in hunter-gatherer tribes, and in 21st Century
America it is still true.

37
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

WEALTH HAS LIFE AND DEATH CONSEQUENCES.

In our ancestral environment (hunter gatherer

tribes), having a high level of wealth meant
having food and shelter.
Having a low level of wealth meant lacking food
and shelter.

This could easily be the difference between life and death.

In our modern day environment (America, 1990 - 2022),
your level of wealth still has life and death consequences.

#1) Having a high level of wealth (Billionaire),

means having guaranteed access to food and
shelter, as well as **THE BEST MEDICAL CARE
ON THE PLANET**. In the event you get sick,
your odds of survival are great.
#2) Having a moderate level of wealth
(Upper/Middle Class), means having
guaranteed access to food and shelter, as well as
access to medical care. Your medical care will
NOT be the best on the planet. It will be
mediocre. In the event you get sick, your odds of
survival are decent
#3) Having a low level of wealth (Poor), means
having *unreliable* access to food and shelter
(you are always one missed rent payment away
from being homeless), and NO MEDICAL CARE.
As a poor American, in the unlikely event you do
get medical care, accessing it will involve delays,

38
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

and the quality of the medical care will be

shoddy. If you get sick, your odds of survival are
BAD.

YOUR LEVEL OF RELATIVE STATUS HAS LIFE AND

DEATH CONSEQUENCES.

Most people think that only petty egotistical narcissists

care about their relative level of Status, and most people are
Fools.

When people perceive your Status is High, they

become more willing to do you favors, and more
hesitant to harm you.
Conversely, when people perceive your Status is
Low, they become less willing to do you favors,
and less hesitant to harm you.

The reason is simple; people are more willing to do you

favors when your Status is perceived as high, because
having high Status makes them assume you wield the
power to repay a favor in a meaningful way. Similarly,
people are more hesitant to harm you when your Status is
percieved as high, because having high Status makes them
assume you wield the power to retaliate in a meaningful
way.
Conversely, people are less willing to do you favors
when your Status is perceived as low, because having low
Status makes them assume you do NOT wield the power to
repay a favor in a meaningful way (so it is not worth it for
them to spend time and resources helping you). Similarly,
people are less hesitant to harm you when your Status is
percieved as low, because having low Status makes them
39
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

assume you do NOT wield the power to retaliate in a mean‐

ingful way.
In our modern environment (America, 1990 - 2022),
being percieved as high status, and thereby people being
very willing to do you favors and very hesitant to harm you,
still increases your odds of survival....if for no other reason
than because it makes making money easier (as detailed
above, making money being easier makes your odds of
survival better, since more wealth increases your odds of
survival).

LIKEABILITY HAS LIFE AND DEATH

CONSEQUENCES.

Likeability is similar to Status, in that having high

levels of it makes people more willing to do you favors,
and more hesitant to harm you, while having low levels
of it makes people less willing to do you favors, and less
hesitant to harm you.
As with Status, Likeability making people more willing
to do you favors and more hesitant to harm you, improved
your odds of survival in both our ancestral environment
(hunter-gatherer tribes), and our modern environment
(America, 1990 - 2022).

BIOCHEMISTRY AND HIERARCHIES:

Your brain closely tracks what your relative status is in the

hierarchy you live in, and assumes that if you are low status
you are in danger (causing your cortisol levels to rise) and if

40
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

you are high status you are safe (causing your cortisol levels
to fall).
The assumption that life at the top of the hierarchy is
safe and life at the bottom of the hierarchy is dangerous
is an accurate assumption in most hierarchies most of
the time (see the ‘Life and Death Stakes’ section above).
Your brain also regulates the release of serotonin based
on what it detects your relative status to be; when you are
high status, your brain detects this and releases high levels
of serotonin. When you are low status, your brain detects
this and restricts the release of serotonin
The biochemical state that is typical of depression, and
the biochemical state that is caused by having low status in
a hierarchy, are identical; low serotonin. As the 48 Laws
said, “…powerlessness will make you miserable.” Notably,
the part of the brain that tracks your relative status is older
and more deeply engrained than the part of your brain that
tells your lungs to breathe.

SO FAR AS THE HUMAN MIND IS CONCERNED, THE

GAME OF POWER IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN AIR.

There are those who will claim they do not care about their
relative status or relative level of wealth; they care only
about their absolute level of wealth.
Such people are worthy of laughter; they are lying,
mostly to themselves. Whether you care to admit it or not,
the serotonergic system in your brain cares intensely about
your relative status.
High serotonin tends to inhibit emotions, both positive
and negative. The practical consequence is that high status
people with their high serotonin levels !nd it easier to

41
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

restrain both their enthusiasm and their fear; they feel

positive and negative emotions, but mildly enough such
that they can still control themselves.
On the other hand, low status people with their low
serotonin levels !nd it dif!cult to restrain their emotions;
they are more likely to get carried away with enthusiasm
and do something that feels good in the moment but that
they later regret. They are also more likely to become over‐
whelmed with fear.
If you have never lived toward the bottom of a macro
dominance hierarchy, then at least part of your own
psychology is alien to you. You don’t know what you would
be like if you were at the bottom of a hierarchy and low
serotonin; hopefully you will never !nd out.
Some men are calm and con!dent when they are high
status, and humble yet determined when they are low
status. Such men deserve your respect. Sadly, most men are
narcissistic when they are high status and resentful when
they are low status.

42
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 16

Mental Model #28:

What To Look For In
A Wife

M
ental Model #28: Choose a woman who has
a low partner count, is high in agreeable‐
ness, high in conscientiousness, high in
intelligence, and has a good relationship with her
father. 1

I N A MERICA FROM 1970 - 2022, the divorce rate has been

50%. If you get married you are a coin toss away from cata‐
strophe. As such you must be very careful in choosing
which woman to marry. There are few decisions that can
irreversibly change the course of your life; this is one of
them. There is no sure"re way to guarantee the woman you
marry will be a good wife, but there are certain metrics to
screen for that shift the odds in your favor.

43
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

THE KEY METRICS ARE:

-Partner Count
-Male Relative Presence
-Agreeableness
-Conscientiousness
-Intelligence (IQ)

PARTNER COUNT:

If a woman has a high number of previous

sexual partners, the probability of her divorcing
her husband is high.
If a woman has a low number of previous sexual
partners, the probability of her divorcing her
husband is low.

The reason is that as a woman accrues additional part‐

ners, their capacity to pairbond with a current partner
diminishes.
The more men she has been with before you, the less
prone she will be to becoming emotionally attached to you.
To minimize the probability of divorce, marry a woman
who has had as few partners before you as possible; ideally
zero.

MALE RELATIVE PRESENCE:

When selecting a bride, note how she relates to her father

and her brother(s). Women who get a long well with
their father tend to make good wives; women get get
along badly with their father tend to make bad wives. The
44
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

same could be said of how women get along with their

brothers.
Male Relative Presence *correlates negatively* with
Partner Count. Women who are raised with their father
present tend to have fewer sexual partners throughout
their lifetime than women who are raised fatherless. It also
seems to be the case that women raised with at least 1 older
brother present have fewer sexual partners throughout
their lifetime than women who have no brothers (though
the evidence for this is not concrete). There are various
explanations as to why Male Relative Presence correlates
negatively with Partner Count.

One is that in our evolutionary past, women

with no male relatives present were desperate to
!nd a man (sexual partner) since they'd be in
desperate need of a man's resources. A woman
with a father/brother present can get resources
from him, but a woman who is fatherless and
brotherless does not have this option, so she is
desperate to !nd a boyfriend who she can get
resources from.
Another explanation is that when a woman
does have male relatives present, they are likely
to pressure any sexual partner (boyfriend) she
has to marry her, or to at least not outright
abandon her. Over the course of a lifetime, this
would keep her total number of sexual partners
down.

The actionable information is this: if a potential bride

was raised fatherless or has a very bad relationship with
her father, take that as a bad sign. If she was raised with her
45
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

father around and has a relationship with him that is at

least decent, take that as a good sign.

AGREEABLNESS:

A woman who ranks high on Agreeableness is likely to be a

good wife, a woman who ranks low on Agreeableness is
likely to be a bad wife. Highly agreeable people tend
towards submissiveness rather than dominance, which
is what you want in a wife.

CONSCIENTIOUSNESS:

A woman who ranks high on Conscientiousness is likely to

be a good wife, while a woman who ranks low on Conscien‐
tiousness is likely to be a bad wife. Don't marry a lazy
woman; such women make annoying wives and
abysmal mothers.

INTELLIGENCE:

Marry a high IQ woman, not a low IQ woman. Why? This maxi‐

mizes the probability of your children getting the genetics to
have high IQs. IQ is the single best predictor of long term life
success; give your children the best shot at life possible.

TLDR:

Good Woman:

-Low Partner Count

-Yes, Male Relative Presence

46
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

-High Agreeableness
-High Conscientiousness
-High IQ

BAD WOMAN:

-High Partner Count

-No, Male Relative Presence
-Low Agreeableness
-Low Conscientiousness
-Low IQ

Women default to adopting the beliefs and values of the

most powerful men in their lives. A woman's beliefs are
as malleable as water; they take the form of the
container they are in. The container is the most
powerful man in her life, whether her father, husband,
brother, or political leader she worships.

When a woman is with a man who is Muslim,

she will become a Muslim.
When with a man who is Christian, she will
become a Christian.
When with a man who is Communist, she will
become a Communist.

47
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

T HE FIRST PLACE I learned cunning was from my father. He

grew up poor, and managed to go from rags to riches by
starting a business.

T HE MAIN APPLICATIONS of cunning I witnessed him execute?

-Charming Customers, so that they'd buy

product from his business rather than a
competitor’s.
-Persuading Bankers, to lend capital to start and
expand his business.
-Zero Sum Negotiation with Suppliers, getting
multiple suppliers in the same room, and
getting them to compete against one another on
price.
-Law 46: NEVER FLAUNT YOUR WEALTH.

If you are rich, then by all outward appearances

seem to be just one more middle class average Joe. This
will shield you from envy, backstabbing...and
lawsuits. Charm was always his most critical tool Charm
Customers: when they like you, they are more likely to
come to your business rather than a competitor's Charm.

Charm Bankers: when they like you, they are

more likely to lend to you and they are more
inclined to give you low interest rates
Charm Suppliers: when they like you, they are
more inclined to give you discounts (low prices)

Note: Details have been intentionally changed, for the

sake of obscuring his identity.
48
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

He met my mom via cold daygame approach when he

was broke, so you know he's a G. Mom believed in him
when he had nothing and was nothing. Endeavour to
marry a woman who feels the same way about you.

1. Note: This chapter was inspired by LifeMathMoney.

49
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 17

Mental Model #29:

Status’ Function in
Romance

M
ental Model #29: It is a universally biological
fact that men are attracted to youthful
women with physical features that imply
fertility. It is also a well-documented fact that women
are attracted to men high in the male hierarchy of
success who are competent and generous.

TRAITS THAT MAKE A MAN ATTRACTIVE TO

WOMEN:

Good Looking
Tall
Powerful (High Status In The Macro Hierarchy,
Rich)
Low Neuroticism (Con!dent)

50
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Low Agreeableness (There is a limit to this;

don‘t be so disagreeable that you‘re sadistically
abusing her and the children)

In 1970, what does an American Man have to do, to make

women consider him romantically attractive?
Just Be Average If you are of average physical attractive‐
ness, and have an average income (status in the macro hier‐
archy), there are decent women who will consider you
attractive.

In 2022, what does an American Man have to do, to make

women consider him romantically attractive?

Be in the top 10% for physical attractiveness and have a

top 10% income (top 10% status in the macro hierarchy) notice
the word ‘and‘ rather than ‘or‘. With women who are dumb or
of average intelligence, if you are a man who is good-looking
and of high status in the macro hierarchy (rich and powerful),
they will love you. With smart women, physical attractiveness
and status are NOT enough. You need to also be smart.

WOMEN ARE HYPERGAMOUS

They desire to be paired with a man who has a higher

status than they do in the macro hierarchy.

If a woman notices her husband‘s

income/status in the macro hierarchy is *lower*
than hers, she is likely to feel "This man is not
good enough for me; l can do better!" and
divorce him.

51
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

If you are a man and your status in the macro

hierarchy dramatically declines, any woman
you are romantically involved with will leave
you. She will not leave on the day your status
declines but the countdown has begun. 1

PLATONIC RELATIONSHIPS WITH WOMEN

As a man, you need to be good at getting women

to like you; charming them, but NOT seducing
them. There are many situations in which being
‘Friendzoned‘ is a good thing. [Most] Pickup
Artists deny this.
Mancy such instances, for example, at
University, You will have many female
professors. To ensure the grades they give you
are as high as possible, you need to charm
them...platonically.

HOW TO MANIPULATE AN ENDING OF A

RELATIONSHIP

I am endlessly shocked by how easy it is to manipulate a

woman into leaving one man for another, and to make her
perceive that all along it was her own idea.
Had to do this 3 times during my life, because I can't
allow 3 women I care about to destroy their futures by
marrying the wrong man.

52
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Example....

W OMAN IS NAMED Z ELDA . Man who is an unsuitable husband

prospect is named Keith. Man who is a suitable husband
prospect is named David.
Zelda is hopelessly in love with Keith because Keith is a
good looking and cunning bastard; blinded by dopamine
oxytocin, she fails to realize that being with Keith is a waste
of her time and marrying him would wreck her life. Mean‐
while, David tries to get Zelda's attention, but she is unre‐
ceptive to him since her mind is already occupied by Keith.
Suppose Zelda is your sister or your daughter; you want to
save her.

What do you do?

Very little; you don't need to go nuclear, nothing

grandiose. All you have to do is get Keith to change his
behavior, in a manner that she will "nd unattractive. The
alteration in his behavior can be tiny. You just need to get
Keith to exhibit enough bad behavior, such that your little
sister Zelda stops viewing him as 'AMAZING’. For example,
you could put mechanisms to dial Keith's stress levels up to
the max, until he either panics with fear, or explodes in
anger; in either case, Zelda will no longer view him as
perfect.

What mechanisms could you put in place?

Take Keith out for a drive with you, to 'help' you with
some annoying task. Do it on a hot summer day, and tell
53
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

him the air conditioning in the car is broken (literally HEAT

UP his situation). When you return....ask him to help you
with ANOTHER annoying task.
Make both tasks (the one you drive to AND the one you
ask him for when you return) seemingly small; reasonable
requests (so that when Zelda hears about them, she is not
annoyed that you asked Keith for these things).
RIG THE TASKS (the 2 favors you ask Keith for) so that
SOMETHING GOES WRONG WITH THEM. To rig them, you
could make both favors involve Keith asking for some other
person's assistance, and you could GET THAT PERSON TO
AGREE TO *NOT* HELP KEITH, OR TO DO SO WITH
GREAT GRUMBLING, in advance without anyone else's
knowledge. Sooner or later, Keith will hit the limit of his
stress tolerance, and most likely exhibit anger towards you,
or perhaps even towards Zelda. THAT IS ENOUGH.
You don't need to get Zelda to the point where she
*hates* Keith. You just need her to *not perceive he is
perfect; everything she ever dreamed of*. You just need to
break the spell of infatuation Keith has over her. Once the
spell of infatuation is broken, speaking to Zelda and
persuading her that she should leave Keith to be with David
is going to be A LOT EASIER
The dif!culty level will have gone from 'Impossible' to
'Doable with patient and gentle persuasion’. Again, this is
easier than you think, because the bar is set pretty low; you
don't need to get Zelda to outright hate Keith, you just need
to make it such that she no longer perceives "Keith is a
perfect human being; he is everything I ever dreamed of."

NOTE:

The strategy is simple, and practical; get Keith to alter

54
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

his behavior in a way that will cause Zelda to percieve he is

**LESS THAN PERFECT**. You don't need to make him look
terrible; just not quite as good as a God. There is an endless
list of ways you could devise to get Keith to alter his behav‐
ior, even if only for a moment, to make himself look bad.
The example I have detailed above is simply the one I
used. Don't overestimate the 'Keith' in such a situation.
Chances are, he is not a 130 IQ Machiavellian Analyzer
who carefully thinks through ever possible scenario.
Rather, he is just a young, good looking, delinquent...who is
cunning enough to charm your younger sister into
becoming infatuated with him.

1. So women are not only naturally predisposed to feel entitled to the

best for no logical reason whatsoever, irrespective of their own
value and what they bring to the table, but are furthermore suscep‐
tible to even greater delusion when said men give them an oxytocin
induced taste.

55
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 18

Mental Model #30:

Ego versus Outcome

M
ental Model #30: Your ego is irrelevant.
Outcomes are all that matter.

N EVER ENTER into or escalate a con!ict because your ego

tells you to. Only initiate or escalate con!ict IF you calcu‐
late the bene#ts of doing so outweigh the costs. An ego
boost does not count as a bene!t, an insult does not
count as a cost.
This sounds obvious yet most people never #gure it out.
Suppose you are walking down the street, and a man
insults you. The correct response? Do nothing Walk away
without a word. If you must speak with him, remain
perfectly polite; it makes you seem like the sane one, to any
onlookers, and it may help calm him down. If you escalate
the con#ict, insulting him back, and potentially initiate
a !st !ght, you are a fool.
The bene#t of escalating such a con!ict is zero, the cost
could be wasted time, a trip to the hospital, or a trip to
56
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

prison...all for nothing but your ego. Something that Intelli‐

gent Psychopaths (who are NOT narcissistic) and Intelli‐
gent Autists have in common is that they are not egotistical.
They think in terms of costs and bene#ts, their ego being a
factor that is irrelevant.
Your ego is irrelevant. Outcomes are all that matter.
Never refuse to engage in a course of action that would be
strategically bene#cial, because it offends your ego. Never
carry out a course of action that is strategically counterpro‐
ductive, because it boosts your ego.

Y OUR EGO DOES NOT MATTER . Only outcomes do. If there is

a course of action that would be strategically bene!cial,
that offends your ego, *do it*. If there is a course of
action that would stroke your ego, but that is strategi‐
cally counterproductive, *reject it*.

57
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 19

Mental Model #31-33:

Power and Status

M
ental Model #31: In every society, Powerful
People use their power to exploit Powerless
People, for their own gain. This will be true
regardless of whether your society is Capitalist,
Communist, Monarchist, or anything else.

P OWER IS THE DEGREE TO WHICH YOU CAN IMPOSE

YOUR WILL UPON THE WORLD .
S TATUS IS THE DEGREE TO WHICH OTHERS FEEL
RESPECT FOR YOU . P OWER AND STATUS MAY
CORRELATE POSITIVELY , BUT THEY ARE NOT THE SAME .

STEALTH WEALTH

S HOWING off how high your status is in the macro

dominance hierarchy so that you win respect, and perhaps
inspire fear. Men do this more often than women, and
narcissistic men do it far more often than normal men.
58
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Mental Model #32: The people who truly have

power have nothing to gain by becoming known to the
public, and most never do.

"I am a man who is far richer than most people in the society I
am living in. Should I outwardly display my wealth, or hide it
and by all outward appearances be just one more middle class
man?"

If you outwardly display your wealth, you will get the

following bene!ts:

People are more willing to do you favors, since

they assume you wield the power to repay a
favor in a meaningful way
People are more hesitant to harm you, since
they assume you wield the power to
Women are more inclined to sleep with you,
since they consider your high status to be
attractive

The COST of outwardly displaying your wealth, is that

it makes you a target for envy...and backstabbing...and
lawsuits...and kidnapping. Measure The Bene!ts And The
Costs. Then decide whether you prefer to outwardly display
your wealth, or conceal it. Personally, I do everything I can
to conceal any signs of wealth, because I desire to be left
alone.

M ENTAL M ODEL #33: To be powerless is something that

most people can handle. Very few people can handle
being powerful. If you are powerful; high status,
59
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

towards the top of the macro dominance hierar‐

chy....your life will be a relentless war.

60
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 20

Mental Model #34: Do

not fall victim to
Oxytocin

M
ental Model #34: Do not be blinded by
oxytocin.

W OULD you trust the judgement of a man biased by

Alcohol? No, of course not. Why then, would you trust
the judgement of a man biased by Oxytocin?
I am more Intelligent and Cunning than 99% of
people and I do not trust MY OWN judgement, when I
can feel the Oxytocin hitting my bloodstream; I instinc‐
tively become cautious, and seek the counsel of
advisors.
You are in love with a woman who you imagine to be far
superior to who she actually is: this may sound ‘obvious‘
yet otherwise intelligent men biased by oxytocin do not
realize this.
If a man makes zero tactical mistakes when dealing
with women he is romantically involved with that corre‐
lates with psychopathy. Psychopaths, unlike most men,
61
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

never make tactical mistakes when dealing with women,

because unlike most men they don‘t get blinded by
Oxytocin.

Men who lose women because they are too

emotionally attached are common.
Men who lose women because they are too
emotionally distant 1, and do not offer her
enough affection to keep her, are exceptionally
rare (that is psychopaths).

1. The closest thing a psychopath can experience to ‘Love‘, is Respect

for skill.

62
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 21

Mental Model #35-38:

Dark Psychology
and Money

M
ental Model #35: Wages in !nance are high
because the percentage of men who have
both the Intelligence and the Psychopathy
to do the work effectively is very low. Low Supply Of
Labor -> High Wages

M ENTAL M ODEL #36: When dealing with most people,

feelings matter more than facts and tone matters more
than substance. Most people are emotional, not
logical. 1

M ENTAL M ODEL #37: To seduce women, have a deep

voice. To make people perceive you are credible or
authoritative, have a deep voice.
To appear non-threatening, have a high voice. Note:
There are times when it is bene!cial to make people
63
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

perceive you are non-threatening. If a police of!cer pulls

you to the side of the road....make your voice higher, and
appear non-threatening, and he will be inclined to be
lenient with you.

M ENTAL M ODEL #38: Employment is the next step in the

evolution of Slavery.
A signi!cant percentage of Rich people got their money
via illicit means; theft, sometimes legal and sometimes ille‐
gal. The Economy is not about Free Markets. It is about
Hierarchies and Power This is not 'Leftwing Rhetoric'. It is
Reality. Karl Marx will tell you that in Capitalist Societies,
The Rich use their power to exploit The Poor. That is abso‐
lutely 100% true. What Marx fails to realize is that the
problem is not Capitalism; the problem is Human Nature
This is a feature of every society, not just Capitalist
Societies.
In every society, Powerful People use their power to
exploit Powerless People, for their own gain. This will be
true regardless of whether your society is Capitalist,
Communist, Monarchist, or anything else.

1. "She says she loves me, and can't live without me." When she says
this, **she genuinely believes that what she is saying is true**; she
is not intentionally lying. Act like soy for 60 seconds (highly agree‐
able, overly emotionally attached) and she will no longer feel
this way.

64
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 22

Mental Model #39:

Seize Power like
your Life Depends
on It

MENTAL MODEL #39: YOU SHOULD SIEZE POWER

LIKE YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT.

I
t does.
In The Game of Power, the stakes have always
been life and death, and they always will be.
In the old aristocratic court, success in the game meant
getting a bedroom in the palace, and easy access to food.

F AILURE MEANT EXILE OR EXECUTION .

Exile was nothing more than a death sentence in slow
motion; a man without the resources of the kingdom would
surely starve.
In a modern capitalist society (America), success means
holding on to a high paying job or pro!table business, and
being able to buy shelter, food, and medical care.
• • •

65
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

F AILURE MEANS HAVING NO INCOME , becoming homeless, and

starving in the streets.
In every macro dominance hierarchy, one's relative rank
is a matter of life and death.
Keep in mind, 'macro dominance hierarchy' is a
euphemism for 'society'.

IF FOR NO OTHER REASON, THE HIGHER YOUR

RANK IN THE HIERARCHY IS, THE BETTER YOUR
ACCESS TO MEDICAL CARE WILL BE.

If you are ultra high status (billionaire), and you suddenly

get sick, you will be instantly be rushed to the best medical
care on the planet.
Your probability of survival is great.
If you are medium status (say middle class), and you
suddenly get sick, you will get access to medical care, but
you will have to wait for an appointment with a doctor, and
it will NOT be the best medical care on the planet.
Your probability of survival is decent.
If you are low status (say homeless), and you suddenly
get sick, you will get shoddy medical care with delays, or
perhaps no medical care at all.
Your probability of survival is dismal.

66
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 23

Mental Model #40:

Should you trust
your elders?

E
ditor’s Synopsis of Mental Models #40: The
advice of elders is less potent in the 21st century
due to a lack of relevancy.

I F YOU ARE a young person who attempts to sieze power,

and older people feel you are a threat to their position of
power, they will frame your ambition as a bad thing by
calling you 'Entitled'.

“Pay Attention to Your Elders' Advice for most of human

history.” 1

This was a good heuristic for !nding good advice, and

today it is not. For most of human history, a person's being
old implied they had wisdom, but today it does not.
For most of human history, the pace of change was
slow, so the environment you faced would be similar to the
one your grandparents faced; as such, old people would
67
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

have relevant and applicable advice since they‘d be familiar

with the environment you face.
Today, this is no longer the case. For the past 150 years
(1870—2022), the pace of change has been lightning fast.
Indeed, the pace of change has been so fast that every
generation has to face an environment completely unlike
what their parents faced.
For most of human history, there was intense selection
pressure; making it to old age alive was dif!cult, and most
people died young. As such, if a person somehow made it to
old age alive, you could safely assume they are more
competent and wise than average. Today, this is not the
case; almost everyone makes it to old age alive,
including many fools who have zero competence or
wisdom to offer you. 2

1. Academics and university professors are people who think that

using 50,000 words to say what a normal person could say in 50
words makes them intelligent.
2. [Still] there are going to be SOME old Wise People who have valu‐
able insights to offer you who are not rich and who do not have
ultra-high status in the macro dominance hierarchy. This sounds
obvious, yet many rich men are ego invested in not admitting this.

68
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 24

Mental Model #41-43:

The “Value” of
Academics

M
ental Model #41: There are people with
Business Degrees from Harvard who work
as Employees for a Business who hold Zero
Equity in that Business who think that Business will
make them rich. 1

M ENTAL M ODEL #42: You will stop wanting to 'Fit In',

once you realize that most people are fools. 'Fitting In'
with everyone else means being 'Normal'. Being 'Nor‐
mal' means being 'Average'.

Psychologists and Psychiatrists are False

Experts.
Economists are False Experts.
Political Scientists are False Experts.

69
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

F ALSE E XPERT = someone who claims to have expertise that

they do not actually have
Psychologists and Psychiatrists think of themselves
as being capable of understanding and manipulating
human psychology and behavior in the real world, and
sadly for them, they are not. Politicians, Bankers,
Lawyers, Salesmen, Businessmen, and Con Men....can.
Your average Politician, Banker, Lawyer, Salesmen,
Businessman, or Con Man has a better understanding of
human psychology and behavior and how to manipu‐
late it in the real world than 99% of Psychologists and
Psychiatrists.

ECONOMISTS ARE FALSE EXPERTS.

They claim they understand how the economy works. They

do not. In America from 2010 - 2021 MOST ECONOMISTS
have been incapable of !guring out that "Printing Money
Causes In"ation" is a *true* statement.
Your average businessman has a better understanding
of how the economy works than 99% of economists. Why?
A businessman has to deal with economic reality
not....vague abstract economic theories...completely
detached from reality.

POLITICAL SCIENTISTS ARE FALSE EXPERTS.

They claim to understand how the Politics of a country

works. If you want to learn about human psychology and
behavior and how to manipulate it (what I call 'Cunning'
and what Americans euphemistically call 'People Skills'),
DO NOT bother getting psychology degrees from a
university.
70
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

99% of what psychology departments in universities

and psychiatry departments within medical schools
teach is useless information with no real world
application.

W HEN IT COMES to treating people with serious mental

illnesses, the !elds of psychology and psychiatry have made
real contributions. When it comes to manipulating people
(their psychology and their behavior) in the real world, for
purposes other than treating mental illness, most of what
the !elds of psychology and psychiatry have come up with
in the past 100 years is worthless.
M ENTAL M ODEL #43: If you want to learn about
human psychology and behavior, and how to manipu‐
late it in the real world, you will learn more from 8
hours spent reading The 48 Laws of Power and Dark
Psychology and Manipulation: Corporate Machiavelli in
the Modern World, than from 8 years spent getting
psychology degrees at a university.
Things the !eld of psychology has contributed, that is
LEGITIMATE (it is information connected to reality, rather
than abstract theories existing in textbooks that have no
bearing on reality):

IQ/Intelligence Research
The Big 5 Personality Traits

There are psychologists (psychology academics) who

have contributed information that tracks onto reality; it can
be used to understand and manipulate human psychology
and behavior in the real world:

71
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

-Robert Cialdini (In!uence)

-Jordan Peterson (IQ, The Big 5)

Among academics, Cialdini and Peterson are excep‐

tional, they are not the rule. As a rule, most academics
contribute zero information or theories that track onto
reality. Most psychology academics contribute zero infor‐
mation that can be used to manipulate human psychology
and behavior in the real world. Robert Greene, a man with
zero notable academic credentials, contributed more than
them by writing The 48 Laws Of Power

1. We let these Fools vote. Their vote counts just as much as yours.

72
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 25

Mental Model #44:

Appear Happy

M
ental Model #44: It is wise to make people
perceive you are happier than you are. Hide
your displeasure, fake your contentment. At
least hide your displeasure. When people perceive you
are happy they view you as likeable, when people
perceive you are unhappy they view you as dislikable.
If you want to know a person's true emotional state,
look into their eyes. They may lie with their arms and legs,
and perhaps even with their facial express, but almost no
one can lie with their eyes.

73
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 26

Mental Model #45:

How to Learn

M
ental Model #45: There are an infinite
number of sources you could read to learn
about psychology and cunning (machi‐
avellianism, social skills). The problem is that if you
are a man on a quest for power you are going to be
working 60+ hours a week. You do NOT have thou‐
sands of hours to spend on reading and doing deep
analysis of hundreds of sources. As such, sources must
be categorized into the 'Practical' and the
'Intellectual'.

WHAT’S AVAILABLE:

Practical Sources: Will give information

directly applicable to your life and situations
you are likely to face.

74
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Intellectual Sources: Will give information

that is interesting, but unlikely to be directly
applicable to the situations you will face.

WHAT TO READ:

Read 'Practical Sources' immediately so that you

can operate effectively in the world.
Save 'Intellectual Sources' for your retirement;
when you are an old man who has already
conquered the world.

What follows are a list of 'Practical' and 'Intellectual'

sources related to psychology/cunning/social skills. Note: I
have intentionally kept the list of 'Practical' Sources as
short as possible.

PRACTICAL SOURCES (PART 1):

-48 Laws of Power

-33 Strategies of War
-In!uence (Robert Cialdini)
-The De"nitive Book of Body Language (Pease)
-WallStreetPlayboys
-Illimitable Man
- Dark Psychology and Manipulation: Corporate
Machiavelli in the Modern World

INTELLECTUAL SOURCES:

-Baltasar Gracian (Art of Worldly Wisdom)

75
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

-Francesco Guicciardini (Maxims and

Re!ections)
-Machiavelli (The Prince)
-Sun Tzu (The Art of War)
-Dale Carnegie (How to Win Friends and
In!uence People)

ENTREPRENUERSHIP SOURCES:

-Felix Dennis (How to Get Rich, 88 The Narrow

Road)

The work of Dennis is only relevant if you intend to get rich by

becoming an entrepreneur. If you have no intention of becoming
an entrepreneur, give Dennis' writings a skip.

76
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 27

Mental Model #46:

Perception versus
Reality

M
ental Model #46: It should be noted that the
*perceived* balance of power is what deter‐
mines how people behave, not the actual
balance of power.

T HE FOLLOWING IS an excerpt taken from Essay #12 from the

Book “Dark Psychology and Manipulation: Corporate Machi‐
avelli in the Modern World”. It is available on Kindle, Paper‐
back, and Audible. Get it now:
A ‘superior’ is simply someone who wields more power
over you than you do over them, while a ‘subordinate’ is
someone whom you wield more power over than they do
over you.
A power imbalance can be de!ned as the power the
other party wields over you, minus the power you wield
over them. This begs the question what gives one party
power over another?

77
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

MOST FORMS OF POWER BOIL DOWN TO EITHER A

CARROT OR A STICK.

A carrot is a potential reward; do as I say or I will

deny you X.
A stick is a potential harm; do as I say or you will
suffer Y.

A steep power imbalance is one where the gap between the

power of one party and the other is so big that it’s undeni‐
ably. A shallow power imbalance is one where there is a gap
between the power of one party and the other, but the gap
isn’t obvious; it is quite plausible to maintain the pretense
that the power of each party is equal. Zero power imbal‐
ance is a case where the power each party wields over the
other is equal or close to equal.
In modern America, carrot power is far more common
than stick power. An ancient king ruled over peasants by
saying “Do what I say, or you will be killed” (extreme stick
power). A modern capitalist rules over his wage slaves by
saying “Do what I say, or you will be denied your wages,
and starve to death” (extreme carrot power). Thinking of
carrot power as gentle and stick power as harsh is fool‐
ish. Both carrot and stick power can have deadly conse‐
quences.
In any relationship where there is a steep power imbal‐
ance, one party is a master and the other is a slave. If you
are ever in a situation where another person wields the
power to destroy your life, and you wield no signi"cant
power over them, you are a slave to them. In modern
America nobody is ever called a ‘slave’, but there are

78
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

plenty of employees who are slaves in everything but

name.

79
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 28

Mental Model #47:

Rule Breakage

M
ental Model #47: The higher you move up in
any hierarchy, the more rules you can break.
And at the apex, rules aren‘t broken. They
are made.

VIOLENT REVOLUTIONS

If I am in the bottom 80% of the hierarchy and am

convinced upward mobility is impossible under the current
status quo, I want a revolution or civil war tomorrow.
Upward mobility is greatest during and after a violent
collapse. Why?
Violent Collapse is essentially a "Reset" button on
The Game of Power.
The motive for launching a Violent Revolution or Civil
War is simple: doing so eliminates the current power struc‐
ture (the current dominance hierarchy); it eliminates the
current Elites, thereby leaving freshly vacant Elite Posi‐
80
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

tions. Those currently occupying positions towards the top

of the hierarchy are eliminated, and anyone who is intelli‐
gent, cunning, and ambitious can take over one of their
newly vacated positions.
All SUCCESSFUL rebellions follow the same pattern:

1. Weak/lazy ruling class failed to identify and

neutralize ambitious high IQ men a few
rungs below the hierarchy. 1
2. The crimes of the ruling class are broadcast to
the masses give oxygen/manpower to open
insurrection.

“CM, do you think America should have

another Revolution?”

That depends. If I am towards the top of The American

Hierarchy, then NO. If I am towards the bottom, then VIVA
LA REVOLUTION!!!
The reason people at the bottom of hierarchies are
angered by intense inequality is simple; as inequality
rises, opportunities for upward mobility become *rar‐
er*. Rising up a hierarchy becomes less and less likely, as
the hierarchy becomes steeper (more unequal).

Intuitively, this does make sense. In a hierarchy

with gentle inequality, the distance between
one level of the hierarchy and the level above it
is small, so transcending up 1 level is very
achievable.
On the other hand... In a hierarchy with intense
inequality, the distance between one level of
the hierarchy and the level above it is huge, so
81
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

transcending up 1 level is difficult or

impossible.

1. Testosterone drives ambition. Serotonin is how your body tracks

your current rank in the dominance hierarchy you live in. High
testosterone + low serotonin = !lled with ambition, and despair,
because you are at the bottom of the hierarchy.

82
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 29

Mental Model #48:

Human Nature

M
ental Model #48: People are sheep.

M OST PEOPLES DECISIONS , actions, and opinions, are NOT the

result of careful calculation or logical reasoning. Most
people allow themselves to be launched into decisions,
actions, and opinions by their emotions and instincts, with
zero careful calculation.
People who carefully examine all the relevant evidence,
and who thoroughly calculate all the possibilities, before
entering into a decision or action, or formulating their
opinion are rare.
Most people's opinions and decisions have not been
carefully thought through. With most people their opinions
and decisions were formulated impulsively and driven by
instinct and emotion not careful logical reasoning.
If you start from the premise that people have good
reason for holding the opinions they hold and making the

83
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

decisions they make you are starting from the incorrect

premise. Most people do NOT have good reason for holding
the opinions they hold and making the decisions they
make. Most people's political ideology goes something like
this: ”Automatically agree with The Leftwing, no matter
what" OR "Automatically agree with The Rightwing, no
matter what"
Most people are overly judgmental. Most people judge a
person based on the choices they have made. They think a
person‘s choices are a re!ection of their character. Usually,
this is incorrect. Usually, a person‘s choices are less a
re!ection of their character and more a re!ection of the
options they had available at the time. 1

1. Real victims, people suffering due to factors beyond their control,

deserve compassion and assistance. Fake victims, people who
manufacture victimhood out of nothing, for the sake of winning
Status in a victimhood hierarchy, deserve to be laughed at and
dismissed.

84
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 30

Mental Model #49:

Leverage Scarcity

DON’T BE OVERLY ACCESSIBLE. MAKE YOURSELF A

SCARCE RESOURCE.

P
eople perceive a thing as being more valuable if
they perceive that it is scarce lower supply implies
greater value this is the ‘scarcity principle‘ (see
Robert Cialdini’s book ‘In!uence’).

Competence and Charm 1

JOB INTERVIEWS SELECT FOR LIKEABILITY:

Likeability has zero correlation with the ability to perform

well in most jobs. Sales jobs would be a notable exception.
The data on unstructured (job) interviews indicate
quite clearly that they‘re discriminatory. If you‘re tall,
assertive, good-looking, and charming, then you‘re much
more likely to do well in an interview.
This may sound ‘Obvious‘, yet in practice, most fail to
distinguish between these things; most people assume that
85
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

if a person is Super!cially Polite and Charming, they must

be Compassionate and Virtuous. The person who is the
most competent, and the person who is the most likable,
are almost never the same person. Competence and like‐
ability/charm are 2 entirely separate things; I‘d say the
correlation between them is about zero.
When dealing with the Bottom 80% of Men, Women
offer super!cial politeness and charm, not compassion.
Most people are too oblivious to realize this; they con"ate
charm with virtue and politeness with compassion, even
though in reality they are disparate things.

1. Charm Principle: To make people like you, or at least not

actively dislike you, appear to take their concerns and objec‐
tions seriously, even if you consider them to be petty or
irrelevant.

86
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 31

Normal Distribution
versus Pareto
Distribution

THINGS THAT ARE NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED (BELL

CURVE):

Big 5 personality traits 1

IQ/Intelligence
Height,
Physical attractiveness,

THINGS THAT ARE PARETO DISTRIBUTED:

Quality of Life 2
Worldly Wealth: Power, Status, Money
Successful Male Romantic Relationships With
Women

1. Big 5 Personality Traits = Legitimate Myers Briggs = Garbage

87
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

The Big 5 Model can be used to accurately predict outcomes in

THE REAL WORLD (educational attainment, career success,
income/net worth). Myers Briggs...cannot.
2. Quality of Life is Pareto Distributed. Most people have terrible lives.
A tiny minority of people have spectacular lives.

88
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 32

Western Society in a
Nutshell

IF I WANTED TO DESTROY A SOCIETY WITHOUT

WAR (NO BULLETS OR COMBAT) WHAT WOULD
I DO?

I would endlessly Print Money and debase

the society's currency. I would endlessly
Print Money and cause In!ation, making
Wages In Real Terms Go Down; endlessly
make a majority of the population
(Workers/Wage Earners) poorer on an
absolute basis.
I would teach the largest Ethnic/Racial Group in
that society to hate themselves, because of the
Ethnic/Racial group they were born into.
I would teach them to feel guilty about the
crimes of their ancestors (after all, everyone has
ancestors who committed crimes of some sort).

89
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

I would teach Young Women to view

Motherhood as a bad thing; a form of
oppression.
I would teach Young Men to feel guilt about
being sexually attracted to beautiful women;
I would tell them they are guilty of
'Objectifying' women.
I would make Divorce and Single
Motherhood normal and socially acceptable.
I would teach people to feel no shame or
embarrassment about getting a Divorce.
I might even create a Welfare State that actively
subsidizes Single Motherhood.
I would sell The Masses Food that is essentially
Poison. I would call it 'Fast Food' to make it
sound convenient. I would sell them food
containing Carcinogens and !ll the food with
salt and sugar so that it is as addictive as
Opioids. I would allow both Poison Food (Fast
Food) and Healthy Food (Organic Vegetables) to
be legal but I would make Poison Food *Cheap*
and Healthy Food *Expensive* so that most
people most of the time (The Poor Masses) eat
Poison Food while still having the Illusion Of
Choice.
I would !ll the air and water with
Xenoestrogens that cause Men's Testosterone
Levels to drastically decline, from one
generation to the next. Over time, Men would
become less biologically masculine (lower
testosterone), which would make them
lethargic and depressed.

90
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

SOCIETY MATTERS

Most people have a paradoxical ambivalence regarding the

hierarchy they live in; on one hand, they want to advance
their own position within the hierarchy. On the other hand,
they do NOT want to destabilize the hierarchy so much that
it falls apart; if it falls apart everyone loses; we all starve
together. When society collapses, everyone loses. Unfor‐
tunately, the actions which give a man the opportunity to
rise within the hierarchy, are often destabilizing in nature.
Hence, the ambivalence.

AMERICA IS NOT A DEMOCRACY. AMERICA IS A

PLUTOCRACY.

Disclaimer: This topic is complicated. If you are half asleep,

come back to read it later (or listen to it on Audible).

Plutocracy = Oligarchy, where the main requirement to

be one of the Oligarchs is that you have enough money
to be capable of buying Politicians via Campaign
Donations and Lobbyists

'The American People' (Masses) wield power by casting

votes for various politicians. 'The Ruling Class' (Owners Of
The Country) (Billionaires and Large Corporations) wield
power by bribing politicians via 'Campaign Donations' to
do their bidding.
From 1990 - 2020, The Ruling Class has managed to
own almost every politician who makes it to Washington
DC. Most members of Congress are Corporate Democrats
and Corporate Republicans (Democrats and Republicans

91
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

bought by the Owners Of The Country). Corporate

Democrats and Corporate Republicans do whatever it is
that the parties who sign the checks for their Campaign
Donations tell them to do.
The American People (The Masses) are given the *Illu‐
sion of Choice* when they cast their votes; they can vote for
a Democrat, or a Republican. What most members of The
American People fail to notice, is that both of the 2
options on the ballot, have been pre-approved by The
Ruling Class; the 2 options on the ballot are a 'Corpo‐
rate Democrat' or a 'Corporate Republican'. As such, the
elections are rigged so that no matter who wins (Democrat
or Republican), the interests of The Ruling Class (Billion‐
aires and Large Corporations) are secure.

"The table is tilted...the game is rigged...and nobody

seems to notice...nobody seems to care." - George Carlin

On many issues, the will of The American People, and

the will of The Ruling Class, are opposed. On every such
issue, from 1990 - 2020 'The American People' have been
losing and 'The Ruling Class' has been winning.

Examples?

Bank Bailouts (2008)

Boeing Bailout (2020)
Endless Wars (Afghanistan)
Universalized Healthcare (Medicare For All)
Minimum Wage ($15)
Outsourcing
Bank Bailouts (2008)

92
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

T HE WILL of The American People was "No, don't give the

banks a bailout. Let these banks burn; it is their own fault
for creating the !nancial crisis by manufacturing bad
loans." The will of The Ruling Class was "Yes, give these
banks a bailout. Don't let them go down, since we have
money invested in these banks."
What happened? The banks were bailed out. The Ruling
Class Won The American People Lost.

BOEING BAILOUT (2020)

The will of The American People was "No, don't give Boeing
a bailout. This corporation spent the past decade irrespon‐
sibly blowing its cash on buying back its own stock, rather
than keeping cash reserves in case of an emergency." The
will of The Ruling Class was "Yes, give Boeing a bailout. We
have money invested in this corporation; we don't want it
to go down."
What happened? Boeing was bailed out, by The Federal
Reserve. The Ruling Class Won. The American People Lost

ENDLESS WARS (AFGHANISTAN, 2001 - 2020)

The will of The American People is "End the war in

Afghanistan. This con#ict is pointless." The will of The
Ruling Class is "Have the war in Afghanistan continue. We
have our money invested in Defense Stocks (Military
Contractors). We nee the war to continue, so that Military
Contractors can continue to sieze revenue. War is
pro!table."

93
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

What happens? The War in Afghanistan continues. The

American People are losing. The Ruling Class is winning

UNIVERSALIZED HEALTHCARE (MEDICARE

FOR ALL)

The will of The American People is "Yes, we want Universal‐

ized Healthcare of some sort (Medicare for All), so that we
can access medical care without corporations charging us
extortionate prices." The will of The Ruling Class is "No, we
do NOT want Universalized Healthcare. We *like* the fact
that corporations can sell medical care for extortionate
prices; it is immensely pro"table, and we have our money
invested in these corporations."
What happens? Medicare for All (Universalized Health‐
care) is not even on the table, politically. Both Joe Biden and
Donald Trump explicitly oppose 'Medicare for All'. The
American People are losing. The Ruling Class is winning.

MINIMUM WAGE ($15)

The American People want the 'Minimum Wage' to be

raised to $15 per hour. Why? They *want wages to be high*,
because to them wages represent income. The Ruling Class
does *not* want the 'Minimum Wage' to be raised to $15
per hour. Why? The Ruling Class *wants wages to be low*,
since to them (owners) wages represent labor costs. Thus
far, The Minimum Wage has not been raised to $15, and it
seems unlikely that it will be.
The Ruling Class is winning. The American People are
losing.

94
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

OUTSOURCING

The will of The American People is "No, we do NOT want

outsourcing. Outsourcing decreases the demand for our
labor, and thereby decreases our wages and income." The
will of The Ruling Class is "Yes, we want outsourcing; it
decreases our labor costs." Thus far, Outsourcing has been
happening nonstop (1980-2020).
The Ruling Class is winning. The American People are
losing. From 1971 - 2020, America has had !at currency (left
'The Gold Standard'). US Government (Federal Reserve) has
been printing money on a somewhat regular basis. Printing
money inevitably leads to in"ation. Most of the in"ation
has gone into investment assets (Real Estate/Housing,
Equities/Stocks).
This is a GOOD THING for rich people (since they
own assets; they want asset prices to go up). This is a
BAD THING for poor people (since they don't own assets;
asset prices going up means they'll never get the chance to
acquire them at a low price).
Age ties in to Wealth level with this (Old vs Young, ties
in with Rich vs Poor, with this). Old people already own
assets (real estate, equities), young people don't. As such,
the money printing leading to in"ation driving up asset
prices is GOOD for old people (since they own said assets).
It is BAD for young people (since asset prices going high
means they'll never get the chance to acquire said assets at
a low price).
If you are OLD AND RICH, you own lots of assets, so
money printing in"ating asset prices is GOOD for you; it
boosts the value of your portfolio. If you are YOUNG AND
POOR, you own little to no assets, so money printing

95
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

in!ating asset prices is BAD for you; it makes it impossible

for you to acquire assets at a low price.
In 1920s Germany (Weimar Republic), money printing
lead to the currency becoming worthless overnight (hyper‐
in!ation). In modern America (1970 - 2020), money
printing has NOT lead to the currency becoming worthless
(not hyperin!ation). However, money printing has led to
in!ation rates being high, and the in!ation has mostly gone
into Assets (Real Estate/Housing, Equities/Stocks).
For reasons listed previously, this has meant Wealth
Transfer From The Poor To The Rich (Stealing From The
Poor To Give To The Rich) and also Wealth Transfer From
The Young To The Old (Stealing From Millennials/Zoomers
To Give To Baby Boomers)

"If Money Printing is hurting poor people to enrich rich

people, why would the government do such a terrible
thing!!????"

W HO DO you think wields more power over the decisions

the Government (Federal Reserve) makes? Old Rich People,
or Young Poor People?

F OR THE PAST 50 years (1970 - 2020), the American

Government has been lying downwards about what the
true rate of in!ation is.
The Government tracks in!ation based on the CPI
(Consumer Price Index). The CPI includes the price of

96
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

things like Food. The CPI *does not include* the price of
things like Real Estate/Housing or Equities/Stocks.
Food prices have increased very little over the past 50
years. Real Estate and Equities have *skyrocketed* in price,
over the past 50 years. Tracking in!ation based on the CPI,
means consistently underestimating the true rate of
in!ation.

97
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 33

How to Identify
Autists, Psychopaths,
and Narcissists

T
he comments that follow concern *high IQ and
highly functional* autistic, psychopathic, and
narcissistic men. You need not concern yourself
with *low IQ and dysfunctional* autistic, psychopathic,
and narcissistic men; they are not serious contenders in the
game of power.

AUTISTS VERSUS PSYCHOPATHS

If he is cold and detached, and socially

awkward, he is autistic.
If he is cold and detached, yet also good at
charming people, he is psychopathic.

Detecting autistic men is easy; they stand out like a sore

thumb. They are hopelessly socially awkward. Detecting
psychopathic men is dif!cult; they are very good at
concealing themselves.

98
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

HOW TO IDENTIFY A PSYCHOPATH

H ISTORY .

If he has a history of screwing people over, he is dangerous.

Perhaps he is psychopathic.
Perhaps he is narcissistic.
Perhaps he is neurotypical, and simply an
immoral person.

Whatever the case may be, exercise caution in dealing

with him, or avoid him. 1

Psychopaths experience zero compassion, and

zero fear.
They rank extremely low on Agreeableness and
Neuroticism.
They have a capacity for Ruthlessness and Stress
Tolerance of *In!nity*.
The hallmark of psychopathy is this; harming
others, while experiencing zero emotion at all.

Normal people feel guilt after harming someone, and

usually they need to be motivated by anger or hatred (or
desperation) to be willing to harm someone in the !rst
place. Psychopathic men feel *zero* guilt after harming
someone, and they need not feel any anger, or hatred, or
desperation to be suf!ciently motivated to harm someone
in the !rst place. The point: If you see a man in"ict harm
upon others, while exhibiting zero anger, hatred, or fear in

99
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

the moment, and zero guilt or remorse afterwards....he is

probably psychopathic.
For normal people, in!icting harm (or violence) upon
others is a very emotional experience. Their willingness to
in!ict harm is motivated by anger, or by fear. Afterwards
they experience guilt or remorse. For psychopathic men,
in!icting harm (or violence) upon others is an *emotion‐
less* experience.
They need not be motivated by any anger/hatred/fear to
do it, and they will feel zero guilt/remorse afterwards.
Being completely cold and detached when harming others,
and experiencing zero emotion afterwards, is the hallmark
of psychopathy.
Another outward sign of psychopathy?

S KY H IGH S TRESS T OLERANCE .

If you notice that a man experiences little to no

fear, if his body language remains completely
normal (calm) in a situation where everyone
else is visibly panicing, he may be
psychopathic.
Or perhaps he is not psychopathic; he's a
neurotypical man with an unusually high stress
tolerance.

All psychopathic men have a 'Sky High Stress Toler‐

ance', but not every man with a 'Sky High Stress Tolerance'
is psychopathic.

*COLD EYES*

If his eyes have energy, but no soul ("The lights are on

100
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

but nobody is home" type feel...) there is a high chance he is

psychopathic.

N ARCISSISTIC MEN STICK OUT MORE BRAZENLY than psychopathic

men (they are not as good at concealing themselves), but
not as brazenly as autistic men.
Narcissistic men are vain. They are arrogant yet, thin
skinned. An angry silver back gorilla on the outside, and
insecure and ghossipy 13 year old girl on the inside. If he is
arrogant yet also thin skinned, [or] if he explodes in rage
when insulted, he is narcissistic.
If he values worldly wealth (wealth, status, power)
very highly, and goes out of his way to show off that he
is rich/high status, and also that he sleeps with beau‐
tiful women, he is narcissistic.
If his rhetoric sounds something like...

"I am high status. You are low status.

I am a king. You're a peasant.
I drive a Ferrari. You drive a bicycle."

He is narcissistic.
Narcissistic men tend to be *not spiritual*. You are
never going to encounter a narcissistic man who spends his
free time reading philosophy. Narcissists are deeply
super"cial people. They are only concerned with worldly
matters; money, status, power, and sleeping with beautiful
women.

Psychopathic men are cold and detached.

Narcissistic men are egotistical and vain.
101
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

Psychopathic men are thick skinned; if you

throw an insult at them they will have zero
emotional reaction.
Narcissistic men are thin skinned; if you
throw an insult at them they will explode in
rage.

Vladimir Putin is a High IQ Psychopath. Donald Trump

is a High IQ Narcissist. Psychopathy is caused by genetics
(the speci!c mechanism being a dysfunctional or inactive
amygdala).
Narcissism is caused by a bad childhood (abusive/negli‐
gent parents). Your ego does not matter. Only outcomes
do (See Mental Model #30).
As stated in Mental Model #30, if there is a course of
action that would be strategically bene!cial, that offends
your ego, *do it*. If there is a course of action that would
stroke your ego, but that is strategically counterproductive,
*reject it*.

Psychopathic men instinctively prioritize

strategic ef!cacy over their ego.
Narcissistic men are prone to prioritizing their
ego over strategic ef!cacy.

To be clear, 'Psychopathy' and 'Narcissism' are not

mutually exclusive. There are psychopaths who are narcis‐
sistic (Ted Bundy would be an iconic example).

Dealing with a High IQ Psychopath feels like

playing chess against a master.
Dealing with a Narcissistic man feels like
playing checkers with a 7 year old; if you don't
102
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

give him what he wants, he will explode in rage

and impulsively !ip the board.

1. Psychiatrists, social workers, nurses, and psychologists tend to be

highly agreeable (kind, even naive) people. These are precisely the
sort of people who are easy targets for psychopaths; they are not
suf"ciently cynical to handle psychopaths effectively. Expecting a
social worker to effectively deal with a psychopath is like expecting
a 10 year old boy to win a "st"ght against a 25 year old man.

103
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 34

Autists VS
Psychopaths

T
he following are the Similarities and Differences
between Autists and Psychopaths:

The Similarities:

They are cold and detached

They prioritize facts over feelings, with their
thinking. They are logical, not emotional. They
do not shy away from unpleasant truths, for fear
of hurting other people‘s feelings, or their own
feelings.

The Differences:

Autists feel compassion for people who are

suffering, they just don‘t express it, or they
express it awkwardly.
Psychopaths feel no compassion for people
who are suffering, but most are good at

104
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

pretending they do, and appearing as if

they do.
Autists are socially awkward, often hopelessly
so. They are terrible at charming people, or
reading body language.
Psychopaths are socially smooth, cunning. They
are excellent at charming people, persuading
people, and reading body language.

105
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 35

Warning Signs of
Psychopathy

N
ote that real psychopathy, zero fear and zero
compassion/guilt, having a dysfunctional or
inactive amygdala, is extremely rare. We‘re
talking about 1/1000 adult men.
Many men who are simply below average on fear and
compassion (Neuroticism and Agreeableness) will be
labeled as ‘Psychopathic‘ by many psychologists, but they
are not.
The only way you can verify a man is psychopathic with
100% certainty, is if you subject him to Brain Scans, and
they show zero amygdalic function. That aside, there are
some fairly reliable warning signs.

Warning signs of psychopathy ranked most subtle, to

most brazen:

Cold Eyes
Stilted Speech
Subtle Duping Delight, in the laughter
Zero-Fear/Stress Response
106
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Ruthless Indifference. Zero Compassion. Zero

Guilt.
Sadistic Tendencies

Cold Eyes

Psychopaths have cold eyes. It is dif!cult to describe

this in words. If a man‘s eyes shine bright like the sun, yet
they are still cold as ice that is psychopathy. If his eyes have
energy, but no soul that is psychopathy.
Example of Psychopathic Eyes: Jordan Belfort

Stilted Speech

It is when a person pauses in the middle of their

sentences, a lot, more than a normal person would. Autists
often have stilted speech, and so do intelligent psycho‐
pathic men.

CM, you say that psychopathic men have ‘stilted‘ speech;

speci!cally, they pause in the middle of their sentences, more
than a normal person does.
1: What evidence do you have for this?
2: Why do they do this?

1: My evidence is real-world observation. Having dealt

with psychopathic men (mostly in the !nancial industry), I
have noticed that in addition to a sky-high stress tolerance
and cold eyes being outward signs of their psychopa‐
thy....they pause a lot during their sentences.
2: WHY psychopathic men have stilted speech is some‐
what complicated.

107
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

Subtle Duping Delight, in the laughter:

Intelligent Psychopaths often have a very distinct type

of laughter. Their laughter sounds menacing, the way a
cartoon villain‘s laughter is.
Not all psychopaths have laughter which sounds
unusual, but it is a common enough pattern I have
witnessed in intelligent psychopaths such that it is worth
mentioning.

Zero-Fear/Stress Response:

Psychopaths experience zero fear. They have zero stress

response, when they encounter stressful stimuli that would
cause a normal person to experience fear (stress, a cortisol
increase, a heart rate increase) they feel nothing.
If you notice a man exhibits *Zero-Fear* even in situa‐
tions that would make a normal person panic, know this is
a warning sign for psychopathy. To be fair, not everyone
with a high-stress tolerance is psychopathic.

Ruthless Indifference, Zero Compassion, Zero Guilt:

The hallmark of Psychopathy is complete indifference

regarding the suffering of other people, zero compassion for
people who are suffering, and zero guilt about in"icting
harm or suffering upon others.

Sadistic Tendencies:

Many Psychopathy has sadistic tendencies; they enjoy

in"icting harm upon others. Only stupid psychopaths
express their sadistic tendencies publicly; they know they
108
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

have to conceal the fact that they are evil, to NOT get ostra‐
cized. However, even the intelligent psychopaths often get
caught acting on their sadistic tendencies when they are
very young (children, under the age of 16) by hurting
animals, just for fun.
If your son hurts animals just for fun at a very young
age...there is a very high chance he is psychopathic. Each
one of those 6 aforementioned traits is RARE. All 6 of them
being together in 1 man makes the probability they are
psychopathic practically 100%.

109
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 36

Neccesity of
Charming

F
or charming people, 1 vs 1, have calm and
respectable con!dence, not ostentatious and loud
narcissism.
It is a good idea to *appear* to be grateful to people,
even if you are not because you know they helped you
purely to serve their own interests because doing so enables
you to charm them, thus making it easier to get favors from
them again in the future.
When trying to appeal to the masses, whether to charm
them (make them like you), or persuade them, or manipu‐
late them, you need your message to be SIMPLE and
EMOTIONALLY CHARGED. Example: ‘Make America
Great Again‘.
Use charm even on people who hate you and who
are actively harming you. Emanate warmth and polite‐
ness, even when a person harms or insults you. This wins
you respect. It also wins you love. Both of these encourage
them to be helpful to you instead of harmful. If they‘re
leaving you, it makes them more inclined to re—establish a

110
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

connection with you later. Counter their bloodthirst with

your charm.
Law 10 addendum: there are people who are time
bombs. tick tick tick. Don‘t attempt to persuade them, or
charm them, or negotiate with them, or intimidate them.
Run and get as far away from them as you can before they
detonate.

111
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 37

Analyzing
Personality Traits

Some preliminary questions to assess someone’s

personality:

T
est Questions: Questions you can ask a person,
which will elicit an answer that tells you some‐
thing signi"cant about their personality and
thought process. Examples…

Do you think doctor assisted suicide should be legal, for

those who have terminal ilInesses, and who desire it?

If a person‘s answer to this is anything other than an

immediate ‘Yes‘ they are telling you that "I am a person
who is psychologically weak and who will refuse to make
the correct decision when the correct decision is
unpleasant."

What is your opinion on wearing a mask to shield from

Covid?

112
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Their answer on this should reveal if they are a puppet

of political ideologies or think and form their own opinion.
Wearing masks was always a public health issue. The fact
that it became politicized, with Leftwingers wearing masks
everywhere and Rightwingers refusing to wear masks
anywhere is a sign of collective insanity.
Motivated Reasoning = I want a certain conclusion to
be true so I will interpret any set of facts and information in
a way that supports or leads to that conclusion.

Any Psychological Differences between Individuals

(whether in Intelligence or Personality) are the result of
environmental factors, never genetics. It is impossible
that one individual could be more intelligent or competent
than another, because of genetics.

What you perceive is happening and what is

actually happening are often 2 completely
different things. Your perception of reality is
going to very often be very far from reality.
You need to be open to the possibility that you
are living in something that resembles The
Truman Show; your perception of reality is
totally different than...actual reality.

Charity that is done for the purpose of helping Poor People

who are suffering is rare. Charity that is done for the
purpose of Virtue Signaling and laundering the reputations
of Rich People who have done heinous things is common.

If you need to get a confession out of someone, send an Old

Woman to talk to them. A woman who is old enough to
pose as a Mother Figure. The next best thing, is an Old Man;
113
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

a Father Figure. People are more willing to confess to Old

People than Young People.

Heuristic = a thing that is generally true, but not true in

every single case. Example: "Generally speaking, men are
more likely to engage in violence than women" Stereotype
= a heuristic that is accurate, but politically incorrect
(offends people‘s sensibilities)

Stereotypes are almost always ACCURATE. Stereotypes

exist for a reason, almost always for very good reasons.

Psychologists and Psychiatrists know less about how

human psychology and behavior work in the real world
than any other group of people on the planet.

114
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 38

Narcissism

Narcissism is a Mixed Blessing

N
arcissism isn’t always bad. Sadness and
depression are bad for your health. Anger and
narcissism are also bad for your health.
However, sadness and depression will destroy your
performance, and while anger and narcissism are not ideal
for performance they are an immense improvement over
sadness and depression. If your life is terrible, do what you
can to convert your suffering into anger and narcissism.
As much as I !nd narcissism to be distasteful, I must
admit it does seem to enhance performance in many
domains. Narcissistic men often make great salesmen and
politicians; the masses !nd their narcissism to be charis‐
matic. Trump is a contemporary example.
It would be dishonest to say that narcissism is all bad;
grandiose narcissists often make great salesmen, con—
men, and politicians. While wise men !nd narcissists to be
distasteful, fools (the masses) often !nd narcissists to be
charismatic.
115
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

For charming a crowd, ostentatious narcissism may

actually be better than a quiet respectable con!dence. This
is especially true if the crowd is !lled with a bunch of low
IQ extroverts.
Example:

Conor McGregor appealing to a crowd Example:

Donald Trump appealing to a crowd
Donald Trump‘s narcissism is 11/10 He takes
narcissism to an absurd extreme.
Andrew Tate‘s narcissism is 7/10 He is
narcissistic, but still highly functional; his ego
doesn‘t drag him into doing brazenly stupid
things.
Conor McGregor‘s narcissism (or Mike
Cernovich‘s narcissism), is a 5/10 It is there, but
it is very subtle, and very under control.

116
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 39

Narcisstic men and

Neurotypical Women

What follows are traits that narcissistic men and the

worst neurotypical women have in common:

Revels in attention
Gossipy. Speaks negatively of others when they
aren‘t around.
Petty, Vindictive
Manufactures con!ict and drama out of
nothing.
Neurotic. Ranks high on personality trait
neuroticism.
Aesthetically minded. Judges people heavily on
how physically attractive they are.
Thin-Skinned. Vulnerable to provocation (Law
39 offensive application). Will be enraged by
insults, and will interpret neutral comments as
insults.
Cunning, yet easily manipulated. High attack
and low defense. Good at manipulating others,
yet they themselves are easily manipulated.
117
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

Both narcissistic men and neurotypical women

are vulnerable to provocation (Law 39 offensive
application) because they are deeply affected by
insults, and they are also both vulnerable to
charm since they both lap up compliments.
Deeply super!cial. Loves shiny things.
Luxurious jewelry, expensive cars, and beautiful
mansions.

118
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 40

Psychopathic
Manifestations

P
sychopathy is over-diagnosed. If you rank
extremely low on Agreeableness and Neuroticism
(compassion, fear), most academic researchers,
psychologists, and psychiatrists, will consider you ‘Psycho‐
pathic‘ but you are not.
Psychopathy =
—inactive amygdala (show by brain scans)
—ZERO compassion
—ZERO fear
There is a universe of difference between ‘Very Low‘
compassion/fear, and ‘ZERO‘ compassion/fear.
Many academic researches will tell you that the inci‐
dence of psychopathy is 4% of adult men. This is ludicrous.
REAL PSYCHOPATHY, an inactive amygdala with *zero fear
response*, is more like One In A Thousand, or 0.1%
of men.

Psychopaths make good soldiers, traders,

bankers — anyone with a detached modality

119
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

and high stress tolerance. Grandiose narcissists

make good salesmen, high energy, persuasive,
outgoing, they believe in the product Autists
make good engineers due to their intense
systematizing
Psychopaths make good soldiers: The military
does extensive psychometric testing with
special operations units. Psychopathy is
*overrepresented* in these units, NOT
underrepresented.

Strong tell someone is on the sociopathic spectrum:

they are over the top angry about some unimportant shit
from a million years ago and are easily triggered.
Strong tell someone is on the psychopathic spec‐
trum: something serious happened yesterday and they‘ve
already moved on.
To most Americans and most Russians, the idea that
their country is being led and managed by an Intelligent
Psychopath is unthinkable. Reality Is Unthinkable, for most
people.
Psychopaths are neurologically incapable of experi‐
encing fear. They don‘t feel the cortisol. As such, when
psychopaths encounter danger, they experience pleasure
(the dopamine hit). Many psychology academics (people
who have close to zero understanding of how human
psychology and behavior work in the real world) will say
psychopaths exhibit "Thrill Seeking Behavior".
l have cold indifference, regarding the suffering of Poor
People. l do not take pleasure in witnessing their economic
failure. My cold indifference is typical of psychopaths. And
also, most psychologically normal people. Sadism,

120
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

ACTIVELY TAKING PLEASURE in witnessing the economic

failure of Poor People, is a feature of Narcissism, not
psychopathy, or something a psychologically normal
person does.

“Psychopaths —have stress tolerances of in!nity (zero fear, zero

stress response) AND —they are disproportionately likely to
become addicted to drugs. These things are not mutually
exclusive.”

The theory is—— "drugs are used to !ll a void. Not to

deal with stress." First of all, drugs is escapism. You want to
escape when you feel stressed. Also, the feeling of the void
itself is a stressful feeling. If you can‘t tolerate it, then you
don‘t have stress tolerance.
A Psychopath who has some sense of Honor, but who
experiences zero Compassion, is more Trustworthy than
most people are. Few Understand This. 1

The only people on the planet with zero fear

(zero stress response) are psychopathic men.
This outward warning sign of psychopathy is
unmistakable. ‘Cold Eyes‘ is a salient warning
sign, and I can recognize it accurately, but many
others might detect false positives.
Psychopaths have ‘Cold Eyes‘. Their eyes have
Energy, but no Soul. It‘s as if the lights are on,
but no one is home. Jeffrey Epstein‘s eyes
provide an iconic example.
I understand what intelligent psychopathic,
narcissistic/sociopathic, and autistic men are
like, and how to deal with them effectively ...but

121
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

in terms of how to ‘help‘ someone suffering

from a speci!c mental illness, I have no idea.

1. The most dangerous Psychopaths in any prison are the people who
Own and Manage the prison.

122
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 41

Intelligent versus
Dumb psychopaths

Intelligent Psychopaths

I
ntelligent Psychopaths have very distinct speech
patterns, which makes it easy to spot them.
However, even with this being the case, spotting
intelligent psychopaths is still going to be dif!cult or
impossible for most people, because the only way to be able
to recognize these distinct speech patterns, is if you‘ve
spent signi!cant time around Intelligent Psychopaths, and
heard them speak, AND recognized they were psychopathic
due to something which had nothing to do with their
speech patterns.
Intelligent Psychopaths tend to be able to have good
enough impulse control. They do not run around randomly
harming people for no reason, or when doing so is counter‐
productive to their interests.
Intelligent Psychopaths only in#ict harm when it
advances their interests; they get some tangible bene!ts
from doing so (...usually).

123
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

Dumb Psychopaths

Dumb Psychopaths will impulsively engage in violence,

and spend their lives in and out of prison (this is MOST
psychopaths).
Dumb Psychopaths in!ict harm all the time, in a seem‐
ingly random manner, simply because they enjoy it, even
when harming others does not advance their interests or it
is clearly counterproductive to their interests.
Intelligent Psychopaths (a minority of them), are
successful businessmen, politicians, #nanciers, lawyers,
salesmen, etc; they succeed in any profession where being
good at manipulating people (Cunning) is a key skill
Keep in mind, most psychopaths (like most people) are
dumb. Among Psychopaths, Dumb Psychopaths are the
majority, Intelligent Psychopaths are the minority. For
every 1 Psychopath who ends up as a successful banker, 10
end up in prison.

Intelligent Psychopaths rule the world.

124
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 42

Psychopaths aren’t
necessarily evil.

N
ot all psychopaths are bad people. Psychopathy
just means one has an inactive amygdala,
causing them to experience *zero* fear and
compassion. The thing is...just because you don‘t *FEEL*
compassion, does not mean, you cannot *CHOOSE* to do
the morally right thing.
Morally Right Thing = NOT brazenly harm innocent
people for your own gain. Granted, very, very few
psychopaths are going to voluntarily choose to do the
morally right thing, when no feelings of compassion or
guilt are pressuring them to. Those that do are exceptional.
That indifference is what a psychopath experiences,
when a bomb goes off 100 feet away from them...and kills
17 people, who they can see die. Every psychologically
normal person knows what it is like to experience what a
psychopath experiences when it comes to people in a
foreign country they‘ve never met suddenly being killed.
People do not dislike psychopathic behavior, when it is
done for their bene!t. People don‘t mind a sky high stress

125
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

tolerance and willingness to harm others, if it‘s done on

their behalf.

126
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 43

The Power of Words

Y
ou can train yourself to be lower on neuroticism
and agreeableness, to some degree. You can train
cunning to be higher, to some degree.

If you are a person of average intelligence and

average cunning, you are not particularly good
at reading an individual's psychologies and
manipulating language, the probability you can
in!ict unspeakable psychological pain upon
people with your words alone, is zero.
If you are extremely intelligent and cunning,
you are very good at reading an individual's
psychologies and manipulating language, you
can de"nitely in!ict unspeakable psychological
pain upon people with your words alone, with
zero time to prepare in advance. Be careful.

127
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 44

Winning over Elites

THE IMPORTANCE OF DECORUM

W
hen speaking with establishment elites,
understand that they care more about
decorum than anything else. They care more
about the one rule of all conversation (being polite)
than whether the laws they pass and enforce, or choose to
not enforce, make the country better or worse. The reason
that Establishment Elites care so much about maintaining
Decorum, is because decorum shields their Power. It is
virtually impossible to do anything that would meaning‐
fully decrease the Power of Established Elites, without
violating the rules of Decorum or Politeness.
You do not win political con"icts or wars by being
polite and maintaining decorum. Caveat: Unless you are a
member of The Establishment (an Established Elite whose
power is already secure). In that case, decorum helps you
since it shields you; it would be impossible for anyone to

128
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

seize your power from you without doing something that

violates the standards of Decorum.

129
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 45

Hierarchy in
America

I
nstead of the idea of social class, I‘ve repeatedly
argued that what best explains the American hier‐
archy are three types of power:

popularity,
intellectual in"uence, and
money.

Whoever has the highest Z score on a composite of all

three are the "winners" in America. These three types of
capital are not mutually exclusive, and one type can be
exchanged for another type.

Giving billions of dollars to charity, as Bill Gates

did, decreases his economic capital (money) but
increases his political capital (popularity).
Giving speeches to Wall Street, as Hillary did,
cost her political capital, but increased her
wealth.

130
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Jeffrey Epstein personi!es those at the pinnacle of the

American Hierarchy. Motivated purely by a sel!sh desire for
power. No grand vision for America, or Western Civiliza‐
tion. Sel!sh ambition; desire for power and pleasure.
That‘s it.

131
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 46

Insights into
Corporate
Hierarchy

T
op 10% to 0.1% way harder competition is more
competent as you go up the hierarchy. Going from
0th to 90th percentile is easy. Going from 90th
percentile to 99th percentile is hard.
If you go high enough in the corporate hierarchy, it will
get to the point where in order to get promoted higher you
need the person 1 rank above you TO BE ELIMINATED.
When in a top 10% corporate position, people would do
me favors, but I had to put some effort into charming them
to get their cooperation. When in a top 1% corporate posi‐
tion, people would GO OUT OF THEIR WAY to help me, for
fear of the consequences for failing to do so.
Whenever you enter at the bottom of an *already estab‐
lished hierarchy* conformity is likely to get you promoted,
creativity is unlikely to get you promoted.
Hack: If you are in any institutional hierarchy (corpora‐
tion, university, military, government) and you want your
superiors to view you positively so they promote you, BE
GOOD LOOKING. If you are good-looking, transcending

132
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

hierarchies is easier since you bene!t from the halo effect.

If you are born into a rich family, transcending the macro
hierarchy you live in is easy....since you were already born
at the top.

133
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 47

Violence and Crime

in Dominance
Hierarchy

At the Top of Dominance Hierarchy:

T
he Life Expectancy for a person of average wealth
in China is 76. The Life Expectancy for a Billion‐
aire in China is 47.
Why?
Because assassination is an extremely common cause of
death for those at the pinnacle of China‘s Dominance
Hierarchy.
If the crimes and backroom deals of the established
ruling class were fully exposed, ambitious men 2—3 rungs
below the incumbent ruling class would easily be able to
rally the masses to overthrow the existing hierarchy and
install an alternative, namely themselves.

At the Bottom of Dominance Hierarchy:

In America, the most dangerous part of society is the

bottom; the bottom of the macro dominance hierarchy,

134
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

!lled with poor people; poor neighborhoods with high

homicide rates. Life Expectancy Of A Poor American: 60.
At the bottom of the hierarchy, many young men turn to
violence because their lives are so terrible (poverty) that
they feel they have nothing to lose; violence and death in
combat or prison time are not scary when you feel you have
nothing to lose.
Homicide is most common at The Bottom of the Macro
Dominance Hierarchy (Poor Neighborhoods, young men
impulsively engaging in violence, sometimes result in
death) and also at The Top o The Macro Dominance Hier‐
archy (Assassination).

Who is it, that carries out 99.9% of violence?

Young (Age 16 —25)

Male
High Testosterone
Low Status In The Macro Dominance Hierarchy
(Poor)
No Romantic Prospects (No Girlfriend, INCEL)
Childless

Basically, Young men with nothing to lose carry out

99.9% of violence.

It is possible to realize that most young men

who are poor have done nothing wrong and
should be left alone AND when we are looking
for violent criminals, they will almost
exclusively be young men who are poor (low
status in the macro hierarchy).

135
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

Violent Revolution is what happens when

young men towards the bottom of the macro
dominance hierarchy come to the conscious
realization that their lives are so miserable that
they have nothing to lose.

At the Middle of Dominance Hierarchy

In the entire middle section of the hierarchy, there is

little to gain from violence, and in fact, much to lose
(health, freedom, job, reputation, wife/kids, etc.) With a
stable job and family, you‘d be stupid to risk it all, and
probably have no idea how to be violent.

136
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 48

Gini Coefficient and

Wealth Inequality

I
n economics, the Gini coef!cient, also the Gini index
and the Gini ratio, is a measure of statistical disper‐
sion intended to represent the income inequality or
the wealth inequality within a nation or a social group.
The Gini coef!cient was developed by statistician and soci‐
ologist Corrado Gini.

Historically, Intense Wealth Inequality (a gini

coef!cient of 50%+, there being effectively no
Middle Class), precedes Violent Revolution or
Civil War. Elite Overproduction also precedes
Violent Revolution or Civil War 2020 America
has both.
If I am in the top 20% of the hierarchy, I want
my society to be "stable". Prevent violent
revolution or civil war at all costs. If wealth
inequality is severe (Gini Coef!cient 40%+),
raise taxes on the wealthy and use the proceeds
to help the poor masses.

137
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

If you are at the bottom of the society you live in

(the macro dominance hierarchy) then
supporting revolution is natural.
If you are at the top of society (towards the top
of the macro dominance hierarchy), then being
against revolution is rational.

Inequality that is too intense does have negative side

effects. High Gini coef!cients cause higher homicide rates,
suicide rates, and lower social trust — and violent revolu‐
tion. That said, we must all accept some degree of
inequality (inequality of outcomes) if there is ever to be any
economic productivity or growth.
In order for there to be economic productivity, we must
allow for unequal outcomes. Communism doesn‘t work.
We must limit the degree to which outcomes are unequal.
We must ensure the Gini Coef!cient does not go too high.
Intense inequality (Gini Coef!cient 40%+) has negative
societal consequences such as:

increased violence and polarization in politics;

higher homicide rates;
a higher risk of violent revolution or civil
war; and;
lower social trust throughout society.

At this moment America has very intense wealth

inequality (Gini Coef!cient 50%+, No Middle Class) and
millions of people are being evicted to become homeless.
This could spark a Violent Revolution or Civil War.
Many will tell you that from 1970 — 2020, Relative
Inequality in America increased drastically (the Gini Coef!‐
cient went up), but on an Absolute basis, everyone got
138
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

Richer. This is a lie. The Bottom 80% of Americans (The

Masses) got Poorer, on an absolute basis.
In America, from 1980 to 2020, Wealth Inequality has
always been intensifying. Gini Coef!cient always going up.
Top 1% always getting Richer. Bottom 80% always
getting. Poorer and Elite Overproduction is always getting
worse. This makes Violent Revolution or Civil War
inevitable.
Since America‘s Gini Coef!cient is at 50%+, and there is
no ‘Middle Class‘, a tiny minority of people at the top of the
hierarchy have everything, while most people have little or
nothing. Historically, this precedes Violent Revolution /
Civil War. This is French Revolution Level Wealth Inequal‐
ity. l am in favor of ‘Wealth Redistribution‘, because I have
enough money to last literally the rest of my life, and I don‘t
want "the rest of my life" to be interrupted by a Civil War.
For a real-world example In America, inequality is
intense (Gini Coef!cient 50%+) In Denmark, inequality is
gentle (Gini Coef!cient 20%—30%) Upward Mobility
(Rags To Riches Stories Actually Happening) is far more
common in Denmark, than in America (1990 — 2020).
More intense inequality means more violence. Higher
gini coef!cients cause higher homicide rates, America's gini
coef!cient is 50%+ and I fear the wealth inequality in
America has become intense enough to drive enough
violence to rip apart the country.
Any time the Gini Coef!cient of a society goes above
40%, the inequality has become more intense than what is
desirable. Immediately, raise taxes on the rich (top 10% of
the income distribution).

Zero Inequality (a Gini coef!cient of 0%) is

undesirable, since if outcomes are going to be
139
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

perfectly equal....there is zero incentive to work

hard, invent new technologies, or try to excel.
Outcomes must be at least somewhat unequal,
to motivate people to bother worth trying.
VERY INTENSE INEQUALITY (a Gini
coef!cient of 40%+) is also undesirable, since
intense inequality has many negative side
effects for a society, including more violence,
higher homicide rates, more polarized and
extreme politics, greater risk of violent
revolution or civil war.
Intense Wealth Inequality destabilizes a society.
As inequality intensi!es, violence becomes more
common (higher Gini coef!cients cause higher
homicide rates). Intense Inequality polarizes
politics; revolution or civil war becomes more
likely.
As a society becomes more unequal, violence
becomes more common, because people‘s
sensitivity regarding their relative status
becomes more acute.

140
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 49

Wealth
Redistribution In
Society

T
he correct amount of wealth redistribution is
whatever is required at the time to keep the Gini
coef!cient within stable bounds to avoid both
violent revolution on one side, and perverse incentives on
the other.
The correct amount of wealth redistribution is what‐
ever is required at the time to keep the Gini coef!cient
within stable bounds to avoid both violent revolution on
one side, and perverse incentives on the other.
Poverty does NOT drive Crime. Inequality drives Crime

Low Gini Coef!cient = Low Violent Crime Rates

High Gini Coef!cient = High Violent Crime
Rates

Singapore is a notable exception to this rule.

141
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

WHY DO WE NEED WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION?

As a society becomes more unequal, it will

become more violent. Higher Gini Coef!cient
Causes Higher Homicide Rate
In very unequal societies (Gini Coef!cient
50%+), being rich and highly visible makes you
a target for kidnapping and assassination.
As of now, America has a Gini coef!cient of
50%+ The Wealth Inequality is VERY INTENSE
A tiny minority of people at the top (Elites) have
everything, and most people have little or
nothing.

1788 France, right before civil war, Gini Coef!cient: 50%

1963 Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, right before civil war, Gini
Coef!cient: 50%
2020 America: Gini Coef!cient 50%. Nothing to see here.

Rightwingers are emotionally invested in not realizing that

an intense degree of wealth inequality (Gini Coef!cient
40%+) is a problem. They will endlessly be emotionally
invested in this delusion, all the way to the guillotine.
American Elites have an interest in making sure their
society does not collapse. America‘s Wealth Inequality is
intense enough to cause it to collapse (Gini Coef!cient
50%+) Intense Wealth Inequality increases the risk of
violent revolution, civil war, or violent collapse...

142
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

HOW TO REDISTRIBUTE WEALTH

Do Enough Wealth Redistribution (Taxing Rich

People, and providing government services or
free stuff to The Poor Masses) to ensure the
Wealth Inequality does not become so intense
that there is effectively no Middle Class. Keep
the Gini Coef!cient below 40%
Once the Gini Coef!cient goes above 40%
(which is the case in most societies), there is no
real ‘Middle Class‘.
The countries that have a low Gini Coef!cient
(the Wealth Inequality is NOT very intense),
have it because the governments of these
countries place High Taxes on The Rich, and
use that tax money on things that bene!t the
Poor Masses (Wealth Redistribution, Socialist
Government Spending).
It is NOT an accident of chance, that Denmark
has a Middle Class while America does not.
Denmark‘s Gini Coef!cient is 20%—30%; the
inequality is very gentle. America‘s Gini
Coef!cient is now 50%+; incredibly intense
Wealth Inequality.

Intense Wealth Inequality (Gini Coef!cient 40%+) has very

consequential negative effects on society:

Higher Homicide Rates (Intense Inequality

Drives Violence)
Lower Social Trust

143
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

More Polarized Politics

Greater Risk Of Violent Revolution Or Civil War

If the Gini Coef!cient of your society is 40%+, or even

worse 50%+, your society needs more Wealth Redistribu‐
tion (Socialism) Failure to do more Wealth Redistribution,
and keeping the Gini Coef!cient at 40%+, means accepting
a very real risk of Violent Revolution/Civil War.
Gini Coef!cient 30% = Gentle Inequality, there is a
Middle Class. Gini Coef!cient 50% = Intense Inequality,
there is No Middle Class. There is The Rich....and the rest. A
tiny minority of people at the top have everything, and
everyone else has little or nothing.
From 1946 — 1979, America‘s Gini Coef!cient was 30%
—35%. In 2020, America‘s Gini Coef!cient is 50%+ Gini
Coef!cient measures Relative Inequality Higher Gini Coef!‐
cient = More Intense Inequality .
America is on the brink of Violent Revolution because
the Wealth Inequality has become incredibly intense (Gini
Coef!cient 50%+). For the past 40 years, The Rich have
been becoming richer, while The Middle Class has been
eliminated.
Wealth Inequality in America is far more intense than
the wealth inequality in Western European Countries;
while Western European Countries have Gini Coef!cients
in the range of 20%—35% America‘s Gini Coef!cient
is 50%+
More Intense Wealth Inequality means more violence
(higher Gini coef!cients cause higher homicide rates).
Intense Wealth Inequality (Gini Coef!cient 40%+), also
causes a society‘s politics to become more polarized,
increasing the risk of Civil War or Violent Revolution.

144
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

This is insanity, because Wealth Inequality (INTENSE

inequality, Gini Coef!cient 40%+) is a very serious
problem.

Wealth Redistribution de—intensi!es the

inequality and thereby alleviates this risk.
When the Gini Coef!cient of a society is below
20%, giving The Rich a tax cut is perfectly !ne; if
the inequality intensi!es, it‘s okay. It might
even be a good thing.
When the Gini Coef!cient of a society is above
40% or even worse 50%, IMMEDIATELY Raise
Taxes On The Rich. Why? The Wealth Inequality
has become too intense; violent collapse in the
form of revolution or a civil war is a very real
danger.

Once the Gini Coef!cient hits 40%, there is no real

‘Middle Class‘. A Middle Class may exist as an illusion, and
as a !ctional character in the stories told by Politicians and
Media Outlets but not in reality.
Once the Gini Coef!cient hits 40%+ Politics will
become more polarized (extreme) and Violent Revolution
or Civil War is a real risk. Note: 2020 America‘s Gini Coef!‐
cient is 50%+ I suggest you put on a bulletproof vest.
...and it is virtuous to have ZERO CONCERN about
Intense Wealth Inequality (Gini Coef!cients of 40%+, or
50%+"

America is a 3rd World Country:

Infrastructure Failure is now routine

145
 t.me/alphagodVIP
WRITTEN BY CORPORATE MACHIAVELLI, AUTHOR OF @C…

Intense Wealth Inequality, Gini Coef!cient

50%+
No Universalized Healthcare, Medical Care is
privatized and sold at extortionate prices
Homelessness Is Common In Cities

3rd World Traits, America Has:

Intense Wealth Inequality, Gini Coef!cient

50%+
There Is No Middle Class

America‘s Gini Coef!cient is now 50%+ America is a

society where a tiny minority of people have almost all the
Wealth, and most people have little or nothing. This is not
‘Leftwing Rhetoric‘. It is a statement about reality. 1
Intensifying Inequality Path: American Elites can do
nothing, and allow America to continue to go down its
current trajectory of ever rising wealth inequality (the Gini
coef!cient continues to rise).
Some degree of Wealth Redistribution is necessary, to
ensure the wealth inequality in a society does not become
so intense there are high homicide rates and a very real risk
of Violent Revolution or Civil War (Gini Coef!cient 40%+)
America is a society where a tiny minority of people
have everything, and most people have little or nothing.
The Gini Coef!cient is 50%+ Shoot For The Stars Or Drown
Average = Drown Signi!cantly Above Average = Bad Top 1%
= Shooting For The Stars.
Gini Coef!cient = 50%+ A tiny minority of people at the
top have everything, everyone else has little or nothing.
This is not ‘Leftwing Political Rhetoric‘ It is a statement
about reality.
146
 t.me/alphagodVIP
THE MACHIAVELLI HANDBOOK

1. (Wealth Inequality can be measured via the ‘Gini Coef!cient‘ Once

the ‘Gini‘ is 40%+, it is the case that there is no real ‘Middle‘ Class
and inequality is very intense.)

147
 t.me/alphagodVIP

Chapter 50

Where to go from
here?

I
take “The 48 Laws of Power “by Robert Greene
seriously because a multimillionaire investment
banker with extensive experience dealing with people
at the pinnacle of the american macro hierarchy told me
“Read this. It was helpful in my own career, these past
few years.”

148